All Episodes
Previous Next
June 21, 2025 - Jim Fetzer
01:01:10
Iran, Israel, B.B. & Trump, Ted Cruz & AIPAC, AI & War, Weapons of Mass Deception, #33 is everywhere
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to episode 132 of Gary King's Inconvenient Truths, where Gary presents video clips and stories I don't know are coming for my spontaneous and unrehearsed response.
Gary, what do you got for me today?
I'm going to be honest, we might be a little Iran heavy today.
We're going to try to make it a little entertaining, of course.
So we'll start off with this one here.
Breaking news.
It turns out that the people carpet bombing the innocent are actually the good guys.
Just kidding.
That would be retarded.
Let's go live to Steinberg.
So you're saying they have weapons of mass destruction again?
Exactly.
It's the same excuse we've used since the towers fell.
Not much has changed.
Here's what we're going to do.
We're going to get PTSD from hurting the innocent.
Then we die for the chosen people.
Let's go.
We shouldn't be here.
This non-chosen sand person lost his home and family just hours ago.
But Israeli military officials say this is God's plan and questioning it is antiseptic.
Please stop!
I hear they're building a new restaurant in Tel Aviv.
The chef prepares an amazing foreskin salad.
This is where I will cook my foreskins.
Imported directly from the adrenochrome factory.
I've never tried the foreskin salad.
Sounds satanic.
Right.
Probably part of their Talmudic beliefs.
Right.
Shapiro Stein.
I missed 2001, back when we all blamed the same people.
Today, everybody notices.
This is why we do false flags.
We go live to the dancing Israelis.
These people really know how to dance, but the real dancers are on the roof.
We're following these guys up to the top floor, no clue what's going on, but they're moving fast.
Yo, check this out.
We are God's chosen people.
Breaking news out of Times Square.
Officials say they found a Muslim passport in the debris.
Sir, are you okay?
I'm sending my son off to Iran tonight.
You saw it from your apartment?
Yeah, right over there.
They were just dancing.
It didn't look right.
Wow.
We better go fund that.
Right?
It feels good to personally fund the most grotesque acts of violence.
Back to you, Dennis.
Anyways, follow my boy, JakeGTV, if you're not retarded.
I think we need satire.
I think we need parody.
I think this is important, and the situation is so manifestly absurd.
That it deserves to be lampooned.
And this is the first of its kind I've seen.
I mean, Kevin Barrett write brilliant satirical articles, but this is the first video I've seen carrying the ball forward.
I like it, Gary.
I think it's got the right theme.
I think it may be capable of penetrating consciousness of those who kind of have bought into the I think it's very effective and humorous, but with a very serious message, Gary.
I like it.
Yeah.
Well, we're going to keep it going.
Now, look, if you see me jump real quick, there's a wasp flying around my head right now, so I'm kind of worried.
Okay.
So, here we go.
Move away, everyone.
I'm fleeing from a war zone.
I'm Israeli.
I need entry right now.
Oh, no.
Oh, no.
I'm so sad about it.
Passport!
What brings you to Romania?
There are bombs everywhere!
Iran hit Tel Aviv!
Pray for us!
Pray for us!
Of course!
Ladies and gentlemen, attention.
Let's pray on Israel.
For Israel.
Dear God, may you bless them all.
Bless!
My English is not very good, actually, but it's okay.
Everyone now, kneel.
Before the passport of divine entitlement.
I want to talk with your boss.
I want to talk with a higher up right now.
Of course, let me call God.
I hear he's the real estate agent who gave you the deed to someone else's house.
Hello, God.
Is Nadia here?
I'm having here one of your chosen tenants.
Yeah, it's having a mental breakdown at the immigration.
He wants a global do-over if it's possible.
I'm being persecuted right now.
Persecuted?
My dear, you're just standing in line for passport control, not Nuremberg.
Welcome to democracy.
I had to leave everything behind.
Except your entitlement.
That made it through customs just fine.
We want safety.
So did the children in Gaza, but they did not get a window seat out.
This is absurd!
You bombed so many countries at the same time and now you need Romania to feel safe.
What happened with the God-choosen people?
God does not agree with this anymore or how does it work?
This is a humanitarian crisis!
Wow, you learned a new word.
It's funny how you start using it when the bombs came your way.
You thought it's only one way?
Wow.
Okay, so entry granted.
Let me put the stamp.
years ago with no proof next oh brother why there are so many Divine candidates of the earth throwing theological tantrums.
We don't like you here.
We don't like you anywhere.
But you know, democracy and everything.
Hold on.
Doggone it.
Sorry about that.
Someone's calling me right when the thing goes off.
Okay.
Not a problem, Kerry.
More subtle, more restrained.
I like the earlier better, but this conveys a lot of points about the chosen people believing they're entitled to bomb and slaughter anyone who is non-Jewish.
I do not like that.
The world doesn't like it.
And while we all have friends who are Jewish, the actions of the Jewish state are Unacceptable to the world and have turned Israel into a pariah among nations.
I will not be surprised if Israel is actually given the boot from the United Nations and frankly the United States because it's all in on the genocide.
Trump is now sending a fleet of B2 bombers to drop nukes on Iran.
I'm afraid World War III is in the offing.
By the time anyone sees this, we may already be engulfed in a nuclear holocaust, Gary.
No one's happy about this, with the sole exception, perhaps, of Bibi Netanyahu who has promoted these wars in order to save himself politically from criminal prosecution and to remain in power in Israel.
It's a tragic story.
I think if the Israeli people were to rise up and depose him, that would be a good thing.
It might go a long way to setting things right, but I'm afraid our own president has betrayed us.
The man who campaigned on any of these stupid wars is now initiating a third and even bigger than before, Gary.
Not a good situation at all, and the world is going to pay a heavy price.
All right, well, tell me if you think BB looks a little pale and nervous here.
Talk about the nuclear threat, and I want to talk about President Trump.
You just said Iran tried to assassinate President Trump twice.
Do you have intel that the assassination attempts on President Trump were directly from Iran?
Through proxies, yes.
Through their intel, yes, they want to kill him.
Look, he's enemy number one.
He's a decisive leader.
He never...
He took up this fake agreement and basically tore it up.
He killed Qasem Soleimani.
He said, made it very clear, including now, you cannot have a nuclear weapon, which means you cannot enrich.
He's been very forceful.
So for them, he's...
Look, they also tried to kill me, but I'm his junior partner.
They understand that President Trump is a great threat to Iran's plans to weaponize nuclear weapons and use them.
When did you tell President Trump you were going to launch these strikes?
Look, I've been in constant contact with President Trump.
We've known each other for many years.
And obviously, we informed our American friends and President Trump, our great friend, ahead of time.
He knew about it, of course.
I mean, there were reports that President Trump kind of helped you achieve your strategic surprise by publicly urging you not to attack when he already knew you had decided to do it.
So you were closely coordinating with the U.S. throughout this process.
Look, we're fully coordinated, but understand that America, under President Trump, will make the decisions that are best for America.
And that's the way it is.
He understands that I, as the Prime Minister of Israel, the one and only Jewish state.
Must make the decisions that are important for the survival of my country.
Okay.
That's a body double.
That's not me beating that now.
The voice is the right.
They got that.
We had Hillary using a body double during her debates with Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump back in 2016.
They sound right, but they don't look right.
I do not believe you have the real.
Bebe there.
My understanding is actually pled to Greece.
And of course the things he's saying, there's been no attempt by Iran to assassinate Donald Trump.
There may very well have been fake attempts, you know, that Mossad may or may not have inspired.
If Mossad, of course, wanted to take out Trump, Trump would be taken out.
But Iran has no interest in killing Donald Trump.
They have believed that he was going to be the peace candidate.
The fact that he pulled us out of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action had to be at Beebe's urging because it took away his argument, the premise of this whole affair.
To wit, Iran's seeking to develop nuclear weapons.
Have you got inspectors in place?
And they're verifying Wren is not pursuing nuclear weapons, not enriching to levels that could possibly produce atomic bombs.
The argument falls flat.
So he had Trump pull out in 2018 so he can now in 2025, seven years later, resurrect the argument.
And even though Tulsi Gabbard has, in my opinion, courageously, heroically Declared to Congress and the world that the American intelligence community concurs that Iran is not developing nuclear weapons, has no desire to acquire them, doesn't want them.
Trump is now saying he could care less what Tulsi Gabbard has to say.
Well, this is a man whose mind is made up, who doesn't want to be bothered with facts.
And frankly, I think the mega movement has now been shattered.
As strongly as I've supported Donald Trump, voting for him three times, offering explanation and excuses for seemingly wayward behavior, I can no longer endorse him as president.
Indeed, what he's doing is contrary to his oath of office to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.
The president is not allowed to take America to war without an act of Congress.
This is an impeachable offense, frankly.
I now support impeaching Donald Trump.
It's just flabbergasting.
It boggles the mind.
The transition from the peace candidate who declared he was going to end these stupid wars, and the guy who's now sending a fleet of B-2s said nuclear bomb Iran.
Grotesque, Gary.
Grotesque.
I don't like it.
And we may all.
Be incinerated as a consequence.
Mark my words.
This is the greatest act of travesty, treachery, treason, by an American president in the history of the nation, by the guy who claimed to make America great again.
He's doing anything but, Gary.
He's simply betraying every one of us who have supported him and the nation.
Pretends to represent.
I support impeachment, too, and just tell me where the anti-war protest is, and I'll be there.
Okay, this has been making a round.
I've never taken money from the Israel lobby.
Have you?
Taking money from the Israel...
So AIPAC raises a lot of money for me, but it's actually a misnomer because the people who raise money are individuals.
So it's not the PAC itself, but they're individual members who believe in the American-Israeli...
Is APAC a foreign lobby?
No, it's an American lobby.
APAC stands for the America-Israeli Political Action Committee.
What is it lobby for?
So, to be honest, not a whole lot effectively.
Listen, I came into Congress 13 years ago with the stated intention of being the leading defender of Israel in the United States Senate.
I've worked every day to do that.
AIPAC, a lot of times...
AIPAC, I wish, were much more effective.
Like, there are folks online who are in the fever swamp of terrified of AIPAC, and AIPAC...
You're the one who seems a little uncomfortable when I'm asking this.
No, not uncomfortable at all.
I'm just asking what AIPAC does.
My understanding, having known a lot about AIPAC, is that it lobbies on behalf of the Israeli government.
Oh, okay.
When was the last time AIPAC took a position that deviated from...
All the time.
Okay.
Let me go back and give a little history.
Do you want to do a deep dive on AIPAC?
I don't.
I want to do a shallow dive.
I want to get to the core question.
AIPAC is lobbying for a foreign government.
False.
It's not.
It's lobbying for the United States?
It is lobbying for a strong U.S.-Israeli relationship.
Okay.
So it has nothing to do with the foreign government.
It wants America and Israel to be closely allied.
Okay, but it's lobbying on behalf of the interests of another country.
So that's not true at all.
It's not true.
How much contact do you think AIPAC leaders have for the government of Israel?
No idea.
I imagine some.
I think the government of Israel is often frustrated with AIPAC because AIPAC is not nearly strong enough.
Do you think there's any coordination between the government of Israel and AIPAC?
Do they talk?
Sure, if you're lobbying...
Sure.
I'm not mad about that.
There are a million countries that lobby Washington.
I like a lot of those countries, including Israel.
But APEC or Americans?
They're not Israelis.
Hold on.
There are tons of Americans who lobby on behalf of foreign governments.
I know them.
I'm related to some of them.
I know how it works.
I'm from here.
So my question is not, is it outrageous that foreign governments lobby the United States?
They all do, including Israel.
My only question is why don't we admit that is what's happening?
You're denying it, but it's true.
Because what you're saying is false.
Why aren't they registered as a foreign lobby?
Because they're not.
Okay.
Well, Ted Cruz, I think anyone's going to believe these humongous lies.
I mean, he's grossly misrepresenting the rule of AIPAC.
We all know Congress is Israeli-occupied territory.
Every member of Congress.
With perhaps one exception, Thomas Massey, representative from Kentucky, has an APAC handler.
If her crews would sit there and be so disingenuous, deflecting Tucker's very appropriate questions about what APAC is all about, obviously he was squirming and uncomfortable, obviously he didn't like being put on the hot seat, but then he claimed he came into Congress to be the foremost representative of Israel.
In the Senate?
Well, that's outrageous.
My very first political speech back in 2008 at a Ron Paul Freedom Rally on Tax Day, April 15, 2008, on the grass outside the Capitol in Washington, D.C.,
I gave a talk later published under the title 9 /11 and the Neocon Agenda when I explained that no dual citizen should ever be placed in a decision-making or policy-shaping position because you cannot know that their loyalty to the other state doesn't outweigh their loyalty to the United States.
And indeed, Cynthia McKinney in 2011 revealed the pledge that new members of Congress are asked to sign a pledge to put the interests of Israel ahead of even those of the United States.
So how can Ted Cruz sit there and, with a straight face, try to tell us this bullshit line about Israel not trying to control the American government, where he appears to be, by self-proclamation, the tip of the spear?
I mean, this is disgusting.
I think if Ted Cruz has ever done anything that is self-discrediting, there it is, right there with Tucker, that very clip we just watched, Gary.
Good one.
Yes, indeed.
All right, we're rolling on.
Now, regarding the ongoing situation in Iran, I know there has been a lot of speculation amongst all of you in the media regarding the president's decision-making and whether or not the United States will be directly involved.
In light of that news, I have a message directly from the president, and I quote: Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks.
That's a quote directly from the President for all of you today.
Well, it's just bullshit.
He's made up his mind.
He's going to attack Iran.
But the fact these B2s are in flight confirms it.
It's very expensive to put these planes out there.
We only have a small number, but they're the only planes we have that can drop these massive bombs.
And I believe, actually, Trump has decided he's going to use nukes on Iran.
And God only knows what's going to happen as a consequence.
I think he's opening not just Pandora's box.
But the path to a nuclear holocaust where you and I may not have another conversation next week, Gary, is a consequence because we may have interned into little pieces of charcoal.
America doesn't understand.
We got a guy who's completely subservient to Israel calling the shots.
He's not making America great again.
He's defending Israel.
And he's going about it using every weapon in the American arsenal.
Against the most peace-dedicated nation in the world, believe me when I say, and I've repeated this many times, Iran has not launched a war of aggression against any other states in 1775.
Remember, the Constitution was only ratified in 1787.
George Washington elected our first president in 1789.
So for longer than the United States has existed as a constitutional republic, Iran has not launched a war of aggression against any other state.
They have denied the desire to have nuclear weapons.
They don't want them.
They're not pursuing them.
Even the head of the Atomic Energy Agency, International, has acknowledged there's no proof that Iran is pursuing nukes, and yet we've been issuing this humongous lie.
For more than 30 years, it actually goes back to 1984.
How appropriate is that?
Just as Orwell's book, 1984.
Iran pursuing nuclear weapons are about to develop.
Now we have the latest.
Within 15 days, Iran's going to have nukes.
Well, given they're pulling out of the nonproliferation treaty because Israel is threatening to attack them with nukes.
I won't be surprised that within 15 days Iran does have nukes supplied by North Korea, Pakistan, Turkey, Russia, China.
I think this is a losing campaign for Israel.
Scott Ritter's latest report says that Israel had not anticipated, even its defense ministers acknowledged, the Iranian ballistic missile capabilities.
Iran planned this for the long term.
Iran's taking Israel out.
I'd say half of Israel may be destroyed already, the other half on the verge.
The Iranian missiles they use are older, cheaper.
Missiles are beginning to expand the Israeli interceptors.
And now Israel is virtually bereft of interceptors.
And absent U.S. intervention is going down big time.
Which is why I think Trump under duress.
I believe they have all kinds of blackmail on Trump.
All kinds of blackmail on Trump.
In my opinion, up to and even including his having sex with his own daughter, Ivanka.
That's long been rumored.
It's taken me a good while to think there was anything to it.
But today, I believe it may very well be true.
So to spare himself personal embarrassment and humiliation, he's willing to nuke the most peaceful nation in the world and run the risk of a nuclear holocaust.
That's what we got there in Donald J. Trump, sad to say.
That's where things stand today.
Yeah, things have never been like this.
All right.
Now, this is when you actually had sort of like have to go to Congress for war.
Back when the Tony Blair government asked the British House of Commons to endorse the George W. Bush-inspired invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, the late, great Anthony Wedgwood Ben, a fierce fighter against war, gave a remarkable speech on the floor of the House of Commons.
I finish just by saying this.
War is an easy thing to talk about.
There are not many people of the generation that remember it.
The right honourable gentleman served with the six in the last war.
I never killed anyone but I wore uniform.
But I was in London in the Blitz in 1940, living in the Millbank Tower where I was born.
Some different ideas have come in since.
And every night I went down to the shelter in Thames House, every morning I saw the It was terrifying.
Aren't Arabs terrified?
Aren't Iraqis terrified?
Don't Arab and Iraqi women weep when their children die?
Doesn't bombing strengthen their determination?
What fools we are to live in a generation for which war is a computer game for our children and just an interesting little Channel 4 news item.
Every Member of Parliament tonight who votes for the Government motion Now, that's for their decision to take.
But this is a quite unique debate in my parliamentary experience where we ask to share responsibility for a decision we won't really be taking with consequences for people who have no part to play.
In the brutality of the regime which we are dealing with.
And I finish with this.
On October 24, 1945, and the former Prime Minister from Bexley and Old Circuit will remember it, the United Nations Charter was passed.
And the words of that charter etched into my mind and moved me even as I think of them.
We, the peoples of the United Nations, determined to save future generations.
Succeeding generations from the scourge of war which twice in our lifetime has caused untold suffering to mankind.
That was the pledge of that generation to this generation and it would be the greatest betrayal of all if we voted to abandon the charter and take unilateral action and pretend we were doing it in the name of the international community and I shall vote against the motion for the reasons that I've given them.
There is no great debate in the House of Representatives or the Senate of the United States of America on this.
For all of the wrongful decisions that were made by the House of Commons, at least they had a debate.
At least there was an Anthony Wedgwood.
There's nothing here.
It's a decision of one man made in a subterranean room surrounded by people telling him what he wants to hear.
Well, Napolitano's got it exactly right.
In just contrast, that member of the British Parliament with Ted Cruz, a member of the American Senate.
Cruz worms, prevaricates, evades.
Here's a guy in the British Parliament who is forthrightly addressing the real issues of war and peace.
Cruz gets a staggering amount of money from APAC, as do so many other members of the House and the Senate.
It's disgusting.
They've abdicated their obligation to represent the people of their states and of their districts for money, completely crass, for financing, to be elected again to continue to represent foreign interests rather than the American people.
It's a travesty, Gary.
A complete travesty.
And I welcome a reminder here of how things have been in the past when men of integrity stood up to argue seriously about issues of war and peace.
You won't find that in America today.
Sad to say.
All right.
Sadly, a lot of people believe this is hardcore Israel propaganda.
Iran, heat a hospital in Israel.
A ballistic missile, direct hit, Sorokko Medical Center, packed with patients, babies, cancer wards, is now rubble.
Let me say it straight: Iran didn't hit a base.
They targeted the sick, the weak, the dying.
Israel treats Jews, Muslims, Christians, even Gazans in this hospital.
That's who Iran tried to kill today.
While they bomb hospitals, we target terror bunkers.
They aim for babies.
We aim for missiles.
Israel is under attack.
Not just our land, but our humanity.
We defend life.
They destroy it.
And today, Iran crossed the red line.
They bombed the place we go to to save lives.
Never again means never again.
Standing with Israel is standing with humanity.
What absurdity.
I mean...
Israel has made it commonplace virtually on a daily basis to attack schools, mosques, hospitals in Gaza.
Any center whatsoever where Palestinians gather is a fair game for them.
They're slaughtering by the tens of thousands.
And if there was an Israeli command center under hospitals, and this is a massive case of rejection, Israel makes this a common practice.
To my understanding, to put their military under civilian structures so they can make arguments just like this, if Iran goes after them, they constantly say legitimate targets are legitimate targets, but that's true for Iran as much as it is for Israel.
And if there was an Israeli command and control center, say there, then it was legitimate for Iran to go after him.
This is rare.
This is happening one time in a hundred for Israel, 99 times out of a hundred.
So, you know, it's just gross propaganda.
Well illustrating the adage that the first casualty of war is truth.
We're getting nothing but propaganda from the Israeli side.
Now, if the Iranians Had a miscalculation and hit the wrong target.
I would be willing to bet they would own up to it.
But I suspect, in fact, almost it is the case.
And that Israel actually had a military target concealed by civilian structure.
And indeed, it appears this is a common practice by the Jewish state.
There you go, Gary.
But that's as clear-cut a piece of propaganda as we're going to get in this whole encounter and exchange.
I agree.
Okay, let's shift gears completely.
Here's your girlfriend, Dr. Fetzer.
Look at this.
This is a document published in 2017 called The Sparse Pandemic 2025-2028: A Futuristic Scenario for Public Health Risk Communicators.
It's a quote-unquote hypothetical scenario designed to illustrate the public health risk communication challenges that could potentially emerge during an infectious disease outbreak.
It begins with the disclaimer that the infectious pathogen, medical countermeasures, characters, news media excerpts, social media posts, Government agency responses described within are entirely fictional.
But in the year 2021, the contents of this 86-page document look more like a gruesome snapshot of our current reality than any hypothetical fictional scenario.
This document predicts that at first we will be eased into the pandemic with very simple mitigation strategies, like washing your hands and practicing good hygiene.
But that over the course of three years, those simple mitigation strategies will slowly escalate To get this: a mass experimental vaccination program.
And the purpose of this document is to mull over effective communication strategies for dealing with the public when they become aware that this vaccine has no long-term safety data and that, and this is in their own words, It might potentially be causing more harm than good.
This is straight out of the document.
What are the potential consequences of health officials over reassuring the public about the potential risks of a novel spars vaccine when long-term effects are not yet known?
Long-term effects that are not yet known.
That's weird.
I heard from a professional student that long-term side effects don't exist for vaccines.
Hang tight because it gets even more infuriating.
Communities around the country went through what some felt was a harrowing public health emergency only Only later to confront the possibility, however slim, that the medicine we promised would help them may, in fact, be hurting them.
Summary reports indicated that a significant number of helpline users said that their principal worry was associated with the sparse pandemic and, more recently, uncertainty about the potential long-term side effects of Corovax.
Considering this new knowledge, Dr. Flynn countered the earlier claim that the public simply needed to wait until the science was clear.
I urge you to take a look at this document for yourself.
You might be pretty shocked by the parallels.
It focuses on details such as how to deal with the public when they viewed graphic images of children being harmed by their medical concoctions.
It covers the neurological side effects that will be caused by the vaccine.
It even covers very specific details such as the black community's hesitance To take the hypothetical vaccine, and more specifically, how to win back the Black community's trust in the CDC.
Even though the CDC funded the Tuskegee syphilis experiment.
Here's a little hypothetical tweet they've included of a rapper pandering to the black community.
Sound familiar?
The vaccine, you got the vaccine They got the vaccine, we got the vaccine We can get back to normal, let me inform you Now, believe it or not, the end of this document is even more shocking than the casual minimization of 40-plus years of human suffering.
It ends by mulling over whether the hypothetical president of the hypothetical pandemic world should address the millions of people who sacrificed themselves to this experimental vaccination.
Or to console them in their grief over that sacrifice.
That's right, my friends.
Back in 2017, your trusted health experts predicted that there would be a pandemic, that that pandemic would result in the rollout of a mass inoculation program, and that that inoculation program would inevitably lead to the death and injury of millions of people.
What do you think will happen to people like us who didn't get the jab?
When those people start finding out they may be sterile due to the vaccines.
I don't know, man.
Maybe we will be like Handmaid's Tale people.
I fully believe that any man with unvaccinated sperm, I think that shit will be worth more than gold.
I believe men with unvaccinated sperm are either going to have a lot of fun or not so much fun because they're going to be like fucking milked like a cum cow or something.
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry.
It's so bad.
Okay.
She sure has a way with words, Gary.
I love her.
She's wonderful.
And she packs a punch.
They call her What's Her Face?
I say she's spectacular.
And she's warning us of the next fake pandemic to come and how they're going to try to shoot us all over again with a new jab that will no doubt be even more toxic, more lethal.
And the COVID jab.
Beware.
Foreknowledge.
Forearmed.
Be on your guard and for God's sake, don't take the facts.
Thanks for that, Gary.
Good one.
All right.
Yep.
All right.
Now, this one is titled, What are the odds?
And I'm asking you, what are the odds?
We have 33 confirmed positive tests.
Yesterday we had 22 cases, today we have 33 cases, so it's gone up by 11. That brings, those are 11 new cases, 22 goes to 33. As we sort through this here in Arkansas, today we have 33 confirmed positive cases in Arkansas.
As of today, we have 33 confirmed cases with Boston residents.
We expect those numbers to climb.
As of this afternoon, we have 33 Pennsylvanians who have tested positive for COVID-19.
So as of this morning, there are Good evening to you.
Lots to get to tonight.
I'm Leon Hendricks.
We want to start with new information into our newsroom.
Within the past couple of hours, there are now 33 confirmed cases of the coronavirus in Michigan.
Good evening, everyone.
Thanks for joining us for the News at 6. I'm Richard Gerhardt.
Karina Corral has the night off.
More cases of the coronavirus were confirmed today in San Luis Obispo County, bringing the total number now to 33. Right now, Georgia is reporting a total of 99 cases in 19 counties.
That is 33 new cases from just yesterday.
Good afternoon.
I'm Karen Swenson.
More cases and more events affected.
Here is the latest coronavirus news.
There are now 33 cases in Louisiana.
That was a local broadcast there.
I mean, they're telling you this is all bullshit.
This is orchestrated.
This is a phony event, but it has a malevolent purpose.
So beware.
Just listen.
You got the number 33. That's a red flag.
something very dirty and untoward is taking place.
And it's a signal, you know, that...
I mean, they're virtually unending, Gary.
So those who, you know, conspiracy theorists, that's because conspiracy theorists are investigating crimes that more often than not lead back to the government, which they don't want to be revealed.
Hence, They're attempting to cut off research at a grass level.
They've had some success, but not complete.
Shows like ours, but so many others.
Stu Peters, for example, comes to mind or exposing the shenanigans government has perpetrated.
Tucker's doing a worthy job.
Tucker, whom I admire beyond words.
I mean, these are good people standing up for exposing the truth.
To the American people, truths that their own government will not share with them.
Whether it's JFK, 9-11, Sandy Hook, Boston Bombing, Coronavirus, Moon Landing, you name it.
They're lying to us, Gary.
They're lying again and again and again.
Absolutely.
All right, here's a...
Today, we have Liam Crosgrove, the White House correspondent for Zero Hedge.
With that, Liam, please kick us off.
Thank you, Caroline.
So, my first question is on foreign policy.
Sure.
The president has made several moves towards peace in multiple fronts.
India, Pakistan, with the Houthis, talking with Iran, talking with Putin.
Biden didn't even talk to Putin for the entire span of the war, which is crazy, considering two nuclear powers were engaged in a proxy war.
So I do admire these moves by the current president, I'll be honest.
However, as of today, we are still funding both Israel's and Ukraine's wars.
So can Americans expect to finally be done financing foreign wars at some point?
Do you consider that one of the president's goals?
Well, I think I can.
Summarize the president's foreign policy agenda with two words: America first.
And that means putting the American people and the American taxpayer first.
And that's why the president is moving as quickly as he possibly can and working overtime to end these conflicts in both Israel and in Gaza and also the Russia-Ukraine war.
As you all know, the president will be speaking with Putin at 10 o 'clock.
He plans to call President Zelensky when that call concludes.
I spoke to the president about that call at 10 o 'clock.
I don't want to get ahead of those.
Very important conversations, but of course you will hear directly from the President or me after those calls conclude today.
So you can expect that.
As for Israel and Gaza, the President continues to not only himself, but his national security team engage in talks on both sides of this conflict.
The President made it very clear to Hamas that he wanted to see all hostages released.
And last week, when we were flying out of town, there was great news on that front with the return of Eden Alexander, who was the last.
Remaining hostage in Gaza.
So to answer your question, the president is always thinking about the American people, the American taxpayer first.
He wants these conflicts to end, not just to save money, but most importantly, to save lives.
Thank you.
And my only other question for you is, so over the weekend, President Trump posted on Truth Social a video highlighting what most people call the Clinton body count, which is the strange number of suicides that seem to happen in Clinton circles.
I have a headline here from the Washington Post that said, Trump peddles false conspiracy theories tying the Clintons to several deaths.
So I just wanted to highlight, real quick, this wasn't in Trump's video, but this is from the Arkansas Times.
And it's the death of Mark Middleton, who was a former Clinton White House aide who was found dead on a Clinton Foundation property.
And I'll just quote from the Arkansas Times: "Middleton apparently shot himself in the chest with a shotgun and also hung himself from a tree with an extension cord." I have no idea how somebody commits suicide that way, but if the Washington Post is here, maybe you can enlighten us as to how that was actually a suicide.
So anyways, that's just a lead-in to my question about the most famous Clinton-related suicide, which is that of Jeffrey Epstein.
There's still a lot of questions around that case.
You've released Phase 1 of the Epstein files.
What was missing from that is any connection to his ties to intelligence agencies, and that's really the whole story, that not just trafficking young girls, but doing it on behalf of intelligence agencies.
And even potentially as part of a blackmail ring with potential ties to the Israeli government.
So for phase two, when can we expect it?
Will it have information pertaining to those aspects of the Epstein case?
I know the Attorney General has committed to releasing those files.
I would defer you to the Department of Justice on her timeline.
But when she has made a promise in the past, she has kept it.
And I'm certain that she will in this case as well.
Okay.
Well, there's so many anomalies here.
I mean, the Attorney General said there are tens of thousands of videos involving children, so they got to go through and, you know, somehow redact the images.
On the other hand, Kash Patel, head of the FBI, says there are no videos.
Who do you think's telling the truth?
It ain't the director of the FBI for sure.
And how typical of a It also hung himself by an extension cord.
I mean, these absurdities grow and grow and grow and grow.
I doubt very much they're going to release the Epstein files, but I'll tell you this, Virginia Roberts Guthrie, anticipating she was going to be taken out, created files.
Recordings document what she learned in her role as a sex slave under the Epstein-Maxwell regime with a dead man's switch.
It appears to be working.
Most of these fail.
They claim to have set up for public release when it never happens.
In this case, it appears to be happening.
And in her very first release, she explained that while Trump was there in the background, She was even solicited by Gaslane when she was working at Mar-a-Lago when her father was tending to the tennis courts.
She said the big biggies, the worst of the worst, were Barack Obama and his buddies George Clooney and Tom Hanks and Bill Gates, who wasn't just having sex with these girls who were strapped down or wired to the ground.
But actually conducting experiments, injecting them with who knows what.
It's ghastly.
But it's only the beginning, Gary.
This is just a Timothy Eisberg, and we have much to thank.
Virginia, who always seemed to me to be very spunky, to be resilient for bringing us more truth than we're going to get from our own government.
Once again, we're never going to see the Epstein files.
The idea they're going to be released is a joke.
They're just temporizing to pacify those who care, and the false belief that they're going to be released when they have no intention of doing that.
And by the way, I have a friend who has seen the list, and there are like 948 names on the list of the Epstein files, some of whom are quite shocking, prominent religious and sports figures.
Whose followers and admirers will be devastated, should they ever learn the truth, Gary.
It's a tragic state of affairs.
She also affirms, and I have no doubt Jeffrey Epstein is alive and well, sipping my ties.
I don't know if it's in Tahiti or Little St. Jane, but I guarantee you.
He may even have returned to Israel, but given the bombardment taking place there, he might just as well wish he were back in the Caribbean.
In any case, he is safe and sound a precious asset of Mossad.
And I've got to tell you, that Israeli intel agency is superb.
I think the KGB and Mossad are the two best intel agencies in the world.
And while they have different objectives and work for different governments, they both exhibit a high degree of professionalism and get the job done.
Whether you approve or disapprove of their ultimate objective, you have to admire their competence and professionalism.
What a world we're in today, Gary.
What a world.
Yeah, I say he's sipping Mai Tais in Tel Aviv.
Okay, this is a little quick history lesson on the White House Press Corps.
One of the reasons the American political establishment really hates it when Trump is president is that his administration has a tendency to bring out and exaggerate dynamics at play in DC that the establishment would prefer to keep hidden.
One such example is the weaponization of media access.
Right at the beginning of this term, Trump's team shook things up by announcing that going forward, they would control which journalists were allowed into White House press briefings and would determine where each would sit.
Establishment journalists did little to hide their displeasure as the administration brought right-wing news sites, podcasters, and influencers to briefings that had always been reserved for respectable outlets.
They characterized it as Trump shattering a decades-long tradition of media independence to prop up media figures loyal to him.
The anger with Trump's shakeup came to a head when the administration banned the Associated Press from White House briefings after the newswire service refused to call the Gulf of Mexico by its new official name.
As a result of that ban, which has mostly held up in court, many are trying to portray the president's approach to the press pool as a brand new form of authoritarianism that Trump has only recently introduced to Washington.
But that isn't true.
Granting, controlling, and revoking access to official briefings, restricted government facilities, and the sites of government activities has been one of the political establishment's favorite tools of media control for over a century.
An urban legend says that the White House press pool was formed one night in 1900 when President Theodore Roosevelt noticed a group of reporters struggling to find sources outside in the rain and invited them into the White House.
The story is likely not true, but still, the imagery of a president inviting struggling journalists in from a cold rainy night and giving them access to the White House is perfect symbolism for the government's approach to the press.
It appears benevolent.
And on the surface, seems to embody the democratic principle of transparency.
But by bringing certain journalists in, excluding others, and retaining the power to revoke access, the government gained leverage and control over much of the press.
Not all presidents shared Roosevelt's approach to media control.
Woodrow Wilson, for instance, was famously unwilling to engage directly with reporters.
And when his administration needed to crack down on antiwar rhetoric to ensure enough of the public would accept the American entrance into World War I, Wilson used strong-arm tactics like intimidation, suppression, and even imprisonment against journalists and media figures who continued to oppose the war.
But as the years went on and Americans grew increasingly horrified by the naked authoritarianism overtaking Europe, a new appreciation for Roosevelt's approach took root.
Unlike the regimes in Berlin and Moscow, the American political class came to understand that the key to good media censorship does not lie in muzzling the media watchdogs, but in transforming them into lapdogs.
So, in the 1950s, President Eisenhower formally established the White House press pool as it's known today.
Because of limited space, an independent organization called the White House Correspondents Association was tapped to formally choose the rotating roster of outlets and journalists that would get access to the briefings.
But the independence of this process was an illusion, because the White House had complete control over which outlets were eligible to be chosen by the WHCA in the first place.
And they would charge participating media organizations hefty fees when traveling with the president on government aircraft.
This is presented as a way to protect the taxpayer, but it just so happens to ensure that only a few very wealthy corporate media outlets have been able to accompany the president on trips.
Together with the government's seizure of the airwaves, the selective access the White House granted through the press pool gave the federal government considerable control over which newspapers and broadcasters gained prominence in the American media landscape.
Okay.
Well, that's pretty fascinating.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
I mean, T.R. was among the greatest of all American presidents.
Seen to me consistent with what I understand to have been his character, to have facilitated interaction between journalists and the White House, which I applaud.
But of course he's making key points about how, nevertheless, behind the scenes the White House can manipulate who actually is covering the news.
I think today with the Internet they have far less success.
And controlling the flow of information because there's so many alternative sources today.
And they do their best to manage Google searches.
I know shows of mine have been taken off a YouTube.
Others have had the numbers suppressed.
Others aren't even allowed to be shared.
If you go to Yandex, which is a Russian search engine, Y-A-N-D-E-X, you're going to get far more comprehensive access to news sources worldwide.
But when you throw in Al Jazeera, Press TV, Sputnik, RT, highly reliable news sources from the Middle East and Russia, You're going to find that you can pretty much identify what's really going on, but it requires time and effort.
Most Americans aren't willing to expand or don't have the ability to pursue, so they're basically victimized by soundbites you hear on mainstream television networks, not just ABC, NBC, and CBS, but the cable, Fox.
CNN and MSNBC, to which my wife is addicted, and you find even Fox, for example, has gone full propaganda.
Very disappointing.
Once they gave Tucker the boot, it's been all downhill for Fox.
And, you know, I'm happy.
When I see something approximating the truth.
But if you want to find out what's going on today, especially regarding the wars, look for interviews.
Judge Napolitano is sensational.
Daniel Davis is sensational.
With Colonel McGregor, Scott Ritter, Larry Johnson, Colonel Wilkerson.
Jim Petcher.
Bible sources about the news today, Gary.
There it is.
Yeah, don't forget to put Jim Fetzer in there and Inconvenient Truth.
All right, this is the last clip of the day, and I'm going to tell you something about what the singer of my band said about you.
She watched Inconvenient Truth for the very first time last week.
In 2024, Palantir made a deal with Israel to harness Palantir's advanced technology in support of war-related missions.
We see part of that technology today as the Lavender AI system, which assigns Palestinians a numerical score of 1 to 100 based on how likely they are of being an enemy.
It has a 10% error rate, which has been acceptable for Israel and Palantir.
We're getting wealthy off of killing Palestinians.
Palantir kills Palestinians with their AI and technology.
Oh.
Yeah.
Well, if you do you want to hear my answer to the primary source of of death in Palestine is the fact that Hamas has realized that there are millions and millions of useful idiots that will mostly terrorists.
So what do you think about the use of artificial intelligence or lavender by the IDF in identifying Hamas targets?
Look, I'm not, you know, without going into all the details, you know, I'm not, I'm I'm not on top of all the details of what's going on in Israel because my bias is to defer to Israel.
It's not for us to...
And I believe that broadly the IDF gets to decide what it wants to do and that they're broadly in the right.
And along with the Lavender system, there is the Habsora AI system, which means the gospel, which is an AI tool created to address the human issue of running out of targets.
Habsora generates up to 100 targets per day.
Both these AI systems use Palantir's advanced surveillance technology to track every person's phone records, social media, and movement patterns.
Palantir's tech is used by the US military and local police departments.
It is the premier tool for mass surveillance.
When running for his first term, Trump was saying he would implement a biometric tracking system.
We will finally complete!
The biometric entry exit visa tracking system, which we need desperately.
We will ensure that this system is in place.
And I will tell you, it will be on land.
It will be on sea.
It will be in air.
We will have a proper tracking system.
Palantir co-founder Peter Thiel donated $1.25 million to that campaign.
And he donated $15 million to J.D. Vance's 2022 Ohio Senate campaign.
Palantir has significant ties to the CIA, starting in 2004, when the CIA's venture capital arm, In-Q-Tel, gave Palantir $2 million.
Palantir's Gotham platform was developed by and for the CIA.
Initially, the CIA was Palantir's sole customer for several years.
Palantir is the CIA's surveillance tool.
And now, Palantir is to create a system for the federal government that will monitor every American under an AI system, linking Social Security, the IRS, and immigration into one centralized system.
It will be using its Gotham software, developed by the CIA, to track and condition human behavior.
Most of yesterday's alternative media support this.
For those who can still think clearly, this is as dystopian as it gets.
But there are many fools who are content that the fascist society being put into place will not be woke.
But don't be surprised if it comes with a carbon tax and an American version of a social credit system.
Greg Reese reporting.
Okay, Dr. Fessler, let's close it out.
Well Greg Rees is a brilliant guy and he chooses important subjects and does cutting edge reporting about them.
Palantir is going to be used for mass surveillance on the American people and if they're using it to target high value Palestinian targets they're going to use it to target high value American targets, people who are dissenters, who speak out, who...
And, Gary, that's going to include all the above.
Colonel McGregor, Scott Ritter, Larry Johnson, Daniel Davis, and who knows, maybe you and me, Greg Reese, is going to be right there with us, Gary.
Stand by, America.
Freedom is on the verge of termination because of a new technology being deployed against us.
By a president we all thought was going to make America great again, but he's doing so in a very different fashion than any of us contemplated, and I guarantee we're not going to be happy with the outcome.
All right.
The girl singer in my band, she finally saw Inconvenient Truth last week, and she said, boy!
Dr. Fesher's one brilliant.
He's just a masterful mind.
He's got to have a super high IQ.
I said, hey, you know, who do you think I hang with?
▲
Export Selection