Truth vs. NEW$, Inc Part 2 (10 June 2025) with Don Grahn, Joachim Hagopian, and Brian Davidson
|
Time
Text
And welcome back, folks, to Truth vs.
News Incorporated.
And by golly, I'm June 10th here, 2025.
The news and the truth can't be further than that.
It's definitely more agitated.
It's really getting heavy out there.
So this is part two.
And, Jim, I think we've got a lot of stuff going on.
We got a planter exec saying pro-Palestine protesters are a domestic terrorist movement.
In other words, if you're opposed to genocide, if you're pro-Palestine, if you support Hamas, you're a domestic terrorist.
Unbelievable.
In an interview with Fox Monday, planter exec Mike Gallagher.
Suggested pro-Palestinian protesters are a domestic terrorist movement, which the state must use all legal mechanisms to shut down.
Under the Constitution, of course, there aren't any whining about pro-Palestinian protesters interrupting a planter event at the SCSPAI Expo in D.C. when he was on stage.
Gallagher said, They are not interested in free speech or freedom of exchange.
They were intending to disrupt a free exchange of ideas, meaning his propaganda.
These people are both incredibly uninformed.
They're brainwashed.
But now they become something much more, which is a dangerous movement, a domestic terrorist movement.
Couldn't be said more clearly by a Zionist fanatic.
We must use all legal mechanisms at our disposal to prevent people from being harmed.
And I think politicians on left and right, everywhere in between, can come together around that basic, very fundamental American fact, namely that they're terrorists.
Chris Minahan, Planner Exec Mike Allaher, suggests pro-Palestinian protesters are a domestic terrorist movement where the state must use all legal mechanisms to shut down.
If you're wondering what Planner intends to do with our data, the answer is to create a domestic Stasi.
Yes, remember, this is the guy Trump has given all our data to.
If you had any question about Planner, it tends to do.
Vincent James, Planner's only client up until 2008, was a CIA.
Think about that.
Planner got funding from In-Q-Tel, the CIA's venture capital firm.
Planner's Gotham and Tiberia software was used to collect health data for vaccine companies.
Planner went public in 2020.
Fluentes update.
Planner was created so the government could legally violate our constitutional rights.
When I say Planner was created by CIA, that's not a figure of speech.
Vincent James.
This is the same guy.
Who told the New York Times, most of the decision he makes at Planner are driven by his experience as a Jew and his fear of the right wing.
He was also once quoted as saying, our software single-handedly stopped a farm right in Europe.
Meanwhile, Deliah Curz, American millionaire CEO of the Planner Tech, Alec Karp, is If your argument was so strong, why won't you let me talk, useful idiot?
A naive or credulous person who can be manipulated or exploited to advance a cause.
Planner's CEO gets called out for enabling G-side.
People get wealthy.
Galler's a former GOP representative from Wisconsin.
He resigned after getting backlash for casting a decisive vote against impeaching DHSS Alejandro Mayorkas in Feb 2024.
Wow!
Quite a credential.
Despite announcing he resigned on April 19, 2024, he later moved his resignation to April 20, 2024, so he could vote in favor of aid to Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan, as Wiki notes.
He was hired by Plantar.
Right after, plantar genocide is not innovation.
During his time in Congress, he also pushed a TikTok ban explicitly to silent critics of Israel.
As the New York Times, New York Post reported, October 30, 2023, Representative Mike Gallagher, a Republican of Wisconsin, who serves as chair of the House Select Committee on China, told the post at TikTok,
have become ground zero for disinformation and pro-Hamas propaganda, and warned TikTok parent bike dance ties to Beijing have made it difficult to separate organic viral trends from China-backed bots or influence campaigns.
We have zero visibility into whether the viral nature of the content is a result of user engagement bot campaigns or the CCP's covert influence.
Gallagher said in a statement, all this illustrates a fundamental problem with TikTok.
It's an avenue for the CCP to covertly inject any message it wants, particularly during a crisis, into the American bloodstream.
We must act now to ban it.
Open borders, mass surveillance, Israel First, and new domestic war on terror are planters' values.
The anti-Semitic virus has escaped.
College camp months, shocking, stunning, bad stuff.
Joaquin, your thoughts?
Yeah, this guy Gallagher, he's basically an enemy of basically democracy, freedom, all the liberties, the constitutional republic, the rights that we have had that are being stripped away on a daily basis now.
And Trump is all in with all the technocratic, the social credits, all of it.
And the old talk here is...
That's where it's all headed, very rapidly, with Palantir becoming the merging of the government with Palantir.
It's a fascist kind of merger here taking place.
They, for a long time, yes, they made their money back in 2008.
Their soul wasn't.
The sole income probably was CIA, FBI, law enforcement, all the controllers out there for a police state.
They've been there from the very beginning.
They started in 2003, and they just expanded.
Like I say, Trump's all in.
He's all in for data harvesting on every level so they know, they analyze, and they pigeonhole everybody into you're either with us or against us.
And if you speak your mind, you're against them.
And therefore, they're going to come after you.
It's a police state, and it's only becoming more robotic 1984 Orwellian state.
And we have to fight.
And resist, because they're moving on it very quickly, and Trump is at the source of it, with Peter Thiel and Palantir.
This is another example of using a private company to perform actions that Constitution forbids the government.
It's just like using Amazon.com to ban books.
That's what they do.
They banned six of mine.
And it wasn't because there was anything wrong with the books.
It was a suppression op.
And this is even more, in fact, magnitudes more serious.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, Palantir stock has notably skyrocketed since this big, new, beautiful bill seems to be laying the groundwork for what's probably going to become an interconnected and Unified surveillance apparatus, and Palantir is the perfect company to do it.
Like Joaquin said, it was founded in 2003 by a CIA agent, and the head of Palantir was Alex Karp.
His company was single-handedly stopped, was accredited, was single-handedly stopping the far right in Europe, Karp.
Trump's ally, Peter Thiel, which is where Vance came from, helped put the company together, along with Alex Karp, and they specialize in finding patterns of data and streamlining it into easily presentable formats, and Thiel is theoretically a conservative, and Karp is definitely a left-hand loony.
Lefty, he's a self-described socialist who voted for Hillary Clinton and bragged about using Palantir to stop the far right in Europe.
It was put together with funding from the CIA's In-Q-Tel program.
And their only client was the CIA up until 2008.
So it appears that Palantir is going to be the sort of new platform that was used against us.
It has been said that Palantir has been used to identify and find the Ukrainian patriots who were then stripped, destroyed, and removed from the government so that Zelensky could have full reign.
It is said that Palantir was used to identify the people that were upset about Zelensky suspending elections.
For Russia.
And it has been said that Palantir has been used all over the world to help achieve political objectives by using its surveillance technology to identify whatever they consider the bad guys to be that particular day.
So think of it like an artificial intelligence RoboCop machine that's able to find the free thinkers, that's able to find the people speaking out against what the...
And, you know, Trump might be able to turn it around and deploy it in a proper format, but, hey, the technology's there.
It's not going to get destroyed.
And Palantir's stock appears to be going through the roof.
So they're claiming that they're going to use the technology to track the migrants.
I don't know that they're using the technology for anything more than to activate the migrants that they brought in.
And I don't know how much Trump is on one side or the other, being that it was his buddies that put it together.
They're using it to track you and you and you.
And me.
I mean, that's what it's all about, Brian.
Have no illusions.
The enemies.
The enemies.
It has to do with us.
100%.
Meanwhile, congressional Republicans veer between Musk and Trump over budget bill.
President Trump and billionaire Musk are locked in an ugly breakup.
Republicans are having a hard time choosing sides.
Since leaving the Trump admin in late May, Musk has gone rogue, openly attacking the House U.S. U.S.' one big, beautiful bill act for its deficit-busting tax cuts.
He called the legislation, which cuts Medicaid and food stamps, but would still add trillions to the deficit, thanks to tax cuts, which overwhelmingly benefit the rich.
A disgusting abomination.
Ouch.
That has angered Trump.
Who told the report Thursday his friendship with Musk may be over and that Musk is against the legislation only because it ends vehicle, electric vehicle subsidies.
Some Republicans, like out Speaker Mike Johnson, are taking Trump's side, saying Musk is wrong and Republicans need to pass the legislation.
I think he's flat wrong, and I've told him as much, Johnson told reporters, insisting he's not worried the legislation will negatively impact Republicans in a 2026 midterm election or add staggering amounts to the national debt.
Why, House Republicans may still tank Trump's big, beautiful bill, as I hope occurs.
As the Republican-controlled Senate moves changes to Trump's one big, beautiful bill, one-house Republicans warning Senate counterparts against tweaking one particular section.
During a Sunday interview with CNN Congressional correspondent Manu Raju, representing Mike Lawler of New York, Costing Senate Republicans against making any changes to the state and local tax deduction, the and others negotiated with House Republican leadership.
The SALT deduction cap is currently at $10,000, but House Speaker Mike Johnson agrees to raise the cap to $40,000 in order to convince House SALT caucuses to support the legislation.
This is an issue that not just impacts blue states.
It impacts nearly every state in the country, Lawler said.
29 states blew through the 10,000 cap over the last seven years.
So listing the cap on salt is critically important.
It provides middle-class tax relief.
And that's exactly what we did here.
I've been very clear with leadership over this past week that if the Senate changes the salt deduction in any way, I will be a no.
And I'm not going to buckle on that.
And I've spoken with my other colleagues.
They will be no as well.
Waller's remarks on the Senate Republicans have spoken openly about slashing the SALT deduction, which they say is overwhelmingly beneficial to Americans in blue states, which typically have higher state and local tax rates.
Mike Cabrow of Idaho, The Senate Finance Committee said last week, senators are likely to nix the SALT deal in the package they intend to send back to the House.
There's not a single Republican senator from New York, New Jersey, or California.
There's not a strong mood in the Senate Republican caucus right now to do $353 billion for states that basically the other states subsidize.
The House only narrowly passed a massive 1,037-page budget bill by 215 to 14 margin in May and did so only with the help of the SALT Caucus, including representatives like Andrew Garbarino of New York, Young Kim California, Nick Lollota of New York, as well as Lawler.
Should they withhold their support from the final bill that calls the SALT deduction, the legislation would likely fail to pass.
I hope.
Big Warren signed the GOP senators as they pushed a pairback salt deal.
Lawler warns could jeopardize key support in the House.
Inside politics?
No.
I'm not going to buckle on that.
Represent Mike Lawler.
Tells Mac Brague he and other colleagues will vote no on Trump's domestic policy bill if the Senate changes the salt deduction in any way.
"Explosive truth behind Trump and Muslim abusive romance "collapse, which a billionaire, where the billionaire "was secretly the clingy one." I don't happen to believe that.
The abrupt breakup between Trump and his first buddy played out spectacular public fashion this week.
The bromance began almost immediately after a bullet grazed President Trump's ear at a campaign rally last fall in Pennsylvania.
When images of the then-candidate being supported off the stage with a fist pumped in the air, mouthing fight went viral, Musk weighed in.
I fully endorse President Trump, hope for his speedy recovery.
That was the first of many expressions of public support that relationship experts say hit some dynamics, more typically reserved for romantic partnerships.
Dr. Isabel Morley.
A clinical psychologist specializing in combo therapy said, I would best describe it, their falling out, as a perfect example of the idealization devaluation cycle that we typically associate with narcissists in abusive relationships.
There's this initial obsession that can include love bombing, this over-the-top flattery, this sort of perfect image of the other person being anything and everything wonderful.
And there's always a devaluation phase when a person gets ripped off the pedestal, typically because, especially with those who have narcissism, the other person disappointed them, made them feel bad, disagreed with them, made them look bad, which is unforgivable to a narcissist because their self-esteem is so low.
Here you have a photograph.
Call out.
A classic case of narcissistic idealization and devaluation, a pattern seen in toxic relationships.
The moment Donald Trump says his bromance with Elon Musk is over.
Musk has been a fixture by Trump's side since he made an energetic rally debut exactly a month before the election, popping around on stage with his arms aloft.
The two tests of someone's character is how they behave under fire.
And we had one president who couldn't climb a flight of stairs, and another was fist-bombing after getting shot, Musk told the crowd.
But the honeymoon phase of the bromance came to a screeching halt in May on the heels of a less-than-stellar Tesla earning call, which has been down more than 40 percent over the years so far.
Musk publicly criticized Trump's Marquis Big Beautiful Bill saying it undercuts the government slashing work Dodge is carried out.
Then Trump returned to office.
Indeed, it doesn't include a single Dodge cut.
Musk didn't stop there.
He doubled down.
Indeed, he interviews in online barbs, ensuring Trump would see them.
What ensued was an ego-fueled Hindenburg-style disaster.
Playing out on smartphones worldwide.
Mental health and couple therapy experts insist this was not unexpected.
Dr. Holly Schiff, a licensed clinical psychologist told Daily Mail, I definitely have seen some elements of idealization in the relationship, which can be an early sign of love bombing.
We overwhelm someone with brazen attention in order to foster loyalty or dependence.
However, when we see admiration so publicly inflated, it's usually quite brittle.
Thus you got Donald Trump tweeting, I was always surprised Biden didn't do it again.
Elon was wearing thin.
I asked him to leave.
I took away his EV mandate, forcing everyone to buy electric cars that no one else wanted.
They knew for months I was going to do, and he just went crazy.
If the relationship doesn't provide ongoing affirmation or mutual gain, then a dynamic can flip into devaluation just as quickly.
She said Musk emerged as a clingy partner in mind-drop performatively and publicly to secure his status as first body.
Elon was often seeking approval from Trump, was more eager for validation.
Trump asserted more dominance in their interactions.
His position at the right hand of the President for his Musk insurance, his company's lucrative contracts in dealing with the federal government.
SpaceX's $14 billion in federal contracts.
Tesla's EV tax credits would continue bolstering his status as the world's richest man.
Musk would also hate to see his legacy as chief chainsaw wielder at Dodge by adding to the federal debt rather than reducing it.
Dr. Morley added, the Musk-Trump situation are particularly interesting because it's a rare case of mutual ego combustion.
Both men, because of the bending relationship to their will, lavish praise on allies, whenever valuable, and then discard them the moment the balance of power shifts.
Here you have, more likely than not, Trump ditched Musk first, and now Musk firing back with his own platform and influence.
Musk was not the only one with a partnership who issued a fusing place early on.
There is an inauguration speech.
Trump lavished praise on his top campaign donors, saying, we have a new star, a store is born, Elon.
Trump then embraced Musk to head up the new Department of Government Efficiency, which put tens of thousands of federal employees out of work.
Since his inauguration, Trump's ex-account and that of the White House have been peppered with dozens of hosts praising Musk and his dodge cuts, which he prayed Musk repeatedly on camera.
On March 11th, Trump said on social MeTruthSocial that Elon Musk is putting it on the line in order to help our nation, and he's doing a fantastic job.
A few days later, he wrote, "Thank you, Elon.
Mega!" Around the same time, Musk said, "President Trump has put together the best cabinet ever." And I do not give false praise.
That is an incredible group of people.
I don't think such a talented team has ever been assembled.
The very public declarations Of admiration.
Signal a kind of exaggerated closeness, Dr. Schiff said.
These behaviors usually serve a strategic purpose, especially in a power alliance.
Build someone up publicly so they're harder to criticize later.
It creates a debt of loyalty.
The two turned the White House into a pop-up Tesla showroom in March.
When dropped out at his advisor's electric vehicles, number one, it's a great product, as good as it gets, and number two, because Elon has devoted his energy and life to doing this, I think it has been treated very unfairly.
Musk, whose company at the time was seeing precipitous drops in share prices and acts of vandalism, basked in his buddy's praise, As a function of the great policies of President Trump and his admin in his act of faith in America, Tesla is going to double vehicle output at the United States within the next two years.
Around that time, Dr. Schiff said, eagle-eyed politicos caught subtle behavioral clues in Musk that hinted at simmering tensions beneath the surface.
Standing next to Trump at the Resolute Desk on more than one press occasion, Musk has stood with his arms crossed, staring up at the ceiling and rolling his eyes back and forth.
While public and some health expert chalked this up to evidence that it's rumored to have a use of ketamine and other psychedelics, Dr. Schiff suggested these are micro-expressions of distancing.
She said, in public moments, there appeared to be a growing incongruence between most body language and a performative alliance.
More sublacues usually precede more overture.
The splinter in the relationship deepened the more Musk woke up about the big, beautiful bill, which the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated led $2.4 trillion to the deficit and leave around 11 million Americans without health insurance.
Trump seemed willing to discard Trump.
Mosk, telling the world a billionaire was wearing thin, threatening to cancel the EPA tailpipe emission rules, which effectively required over a third of new cars to be sold, be either electric or hybrid, by 2023, cars Trump has said nobody else wanted.
Joaquin, fascinating.
With your clinical background, I have no doubt you'll have lots to say.
Yeah, we have here...
And they're narcissists as well.
So the bromance was, you know, as long as they were on the same page, it was all lovey-dovey, you know, I got your back all the way, and all this kind of bullshit.
And, you know, flattery, all the rest.
But it's disingenuous because when it comes to the bottom line, and the bottom line is they did kind of go opposite way.
Yeah, he didn't get his mandate.
You know, electric cars are not the future like they've been touted for quite a few years by basically.
You know, it's ironic because the left immediately embraced it, you know, part of the green energy and all this kind of crap.
And then they're scratching all the cars and the lots.
They go from there to there.
But yeah, this is an interesting little psychology analysis.
But at the same time, it's like more soap opera.
More diversionary, wag the dog.
Oh, let's focus on this.
You know, while Rome's burning.
In other words, the world war is approaching like never before.
You know, so it's like a big sideshow.
That's kind of the way I look at it.
I don't pay that much attention to it.
There were a couple of points, you know.
That Elon Musk actually made that were actually correct in that the big beautiful bill, you know, trillions more down the drain.
Just keep printing that fiat money, you know.
Well, it's crashing, you know.
It's also part of this.
The controllers of this world, you know, the money changers, they know it's not been sustainable system, the usury system, debtor.
You know, nations, debtor consumers, debtor Americans, you know?
I mean, you know, they're in debt more than ever in the past.
So it's unsustainable.
And the big beautiful is just getting bigger and bigger for the big explosion.
So on that part, Ilan's right.
And also, he had other parts that were...
He's been actually...
He has a number of companies, the satellites, you know, the things they stick in you, you know, to control your mind, all of this.
He's been behind all of that.
But the part that he didn't like in the big bill was that, Ten years!
This is a federal law that states cannot at all alter for their residents in each state.
A.I. has taken over.
And nobody can touch it for 10 years.
That's another one in that big, beautiful bill that's not so beautiful.
It's moving us straight, with Palantir, straight toward total surveillance system, lockdown, and, you know, getting rid of all dissidents.
So that's moving in that direction.
So yeah, it's soap opera drama.
That's how I see it, primarily.
And of course, you know, I guess we have to talk about maybe coming up.
I wrote quite a bit, mostly in the past, the books.
But anyway, yeah, then he got really nasty with, well, you know, I'm going to do the bomb here, dropping the bomb, you know, with Epstein files.
They never are coming because Trump is in the Epstein file, you know, so maybe we'll talk about that some too.
Baby.
Brian.
You know, you've got to remember your history when it comes to Musk and Trump.
When Trump was running this time around, he got, I think, about $230 million from Adelson's.
But he had another pact called the Save America pact that was given $75 million.
From Elon Musk.
And that was part of his war chest.
Now, Musk is supposedly worth $247 billion, so I'm sure it was no big deal.
But you've got to understand that Musk expected to get something for his money, just like the Jews expected to get something for their money.
Other filings indicated that Palantir Technologies was a big donator to the PAC.
It was their co-founder, the other co-founder, Joe Lonsdale from Lonsdale Enterprises that put a lot of money into that.
Palantir is sort of the artificial intelligence, super crime fighting machine that we spoke about earlier in the show.
Now, what's really interesting about Musk, I think,
This is back in the 30s when it was sort of in fashion to continue to sort of talk about Aryan heritage as well as, you know, Darker influences on society.
There was a lot of influence that sounded like it was coming out of sort of World War I Germany that was influencing these tracks that this guy wrote.
But one of the more important things, the aspects of it, one of the interesting ties.
Now, I'm not saying this guy had a bunch of influence on Musk himself because the guy died when Musk was only three years old, but his tracks.
Remained on, and he wrote a whole bunch of them about, you know, the Jews and the banksters and the cartels and the global conspiracies.
And he actually assembled an organization that was a protesting organization, and their purpose was to establish a technocracy, believe it or not.
Now, what is a technocracy?
This guy believed that computers, artificial intelligence, So it's just a very interesting twist on it.
But, you know, Musk paid for his access to the presidency, $75 million as part of the PAC.
And, you know, it wouldn't surprise me a bit if that relationship continues to break down.
Very good.
Very good.
Fascinating stuff.
Yeah, heavy.
Meanwhile, Trump viewed explodes with claimed president and is in Epstein files.
A war between Elon Musk and President Trump erupted into a low meltdown Thursday with Musk slamming Trump for ingratitude over the 2024 election, agreeing with a call for his impeachment, knocking the president's signature legislation.
And even claiming Trump is in the Epstein files.
Trump, speaking on television from the Oval Office, say he was disappointed in Musk, find his criticism Tuesday of the big, beautiful mega bill to fund his agenda, then engage in a mutual barrage of social media posts at one point, saying Musk had gone crazy.
As he exchanged his group progressively personal, Musk posted, Without providing evidence about Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, accused of sex trafficking of minors in 2019.
Time to drop the really big bomb.
Real Donald Trump is in the Epstein files.
That's the real reason they've not been made public.
Have a nice day, DJT.
Between Musk and Trump began in earnest with Musk's rampage against the present domestic mega bill.
Musk takes issue with the bill's price tag and its estimated impact on the national debt.
Speaking of reports of the White House earlier Thursday, Trump pushed back on Musk in extensive report.
Look, Elon and I had a great relationship.
I don't know if we will anymore, he said.
Musk responded in real time.
To drop personal comments on X, swiping at the legislation and at Trump directly.
At one point, Musk responded to a user, Without me, Trump would have lost the election.
Dems would control the House and Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.
Such ingratitude, Musk added.
He spent more than 270 mil to back Trump in other Republicans during the 2024 cycle.
Later, he reboosted a comment calling for Trump's impeachment to be replaced by Vice President Vance.
Yes!
Musk wrote in response to the idea.
Elon Musk.
Without me, Trump would have lost the election.
If he would control the House, the Republican would be 51-49 in the Senate.
Such ingratitude.
Trump countered on his own social media platform.
Elon was wearing thin.
I asked him to leave.
I took away his EV mandate, forcing everyone to buy electric cars that nobody else wanted.
And he knew for months I was going to do, and he just went crazy.
Trump said the easiest way to save money would be to terminate Elon's It always surprised me Biden didn't do it.
Musk went on to criticize not only Trump's bill, but also his tariff policy, a cornerstone of the president's economic agenda and a decade-long political goal.
He claimed on X tariffs would cause a recession in the second half of the year.
Musk and Trump had not spoken as of Thursday morning, according to two sources familiar with the president's conversation.
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act passed the House by a single vote.
The measure would extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts, boost spending for the military and border security while making some cuts to Medicaid, SNAP, and other assistant programs.
Now faces headwinds in the Senate, specifically among a small group of Republican fiscal hawks.
I'm hoping it will not pass.
Joaquin, your thoughts.
I'm almost certain it will not pass.
They don't have the votes.
So that's a real positive that it won't pass.
And then they have to go back to the drawing board again in the house.
Yeah, I'm actually over already with the feuding going on.
It's like, okay, this is sideshow bullshit.
More wag the dog.
And then they shift to all the riots.
One thing after the next.
It's a steady stream of bullshit.
All the news is staged nowadays.
There's nothing of any real substance.
The bottom line is, war is coming, and we better pay attention to that.
Also, if you have a mind and you speak it, they're going to take you away.
I think we should pay attention to that.
The most important things about survival are at stake.
And yet, all this sideshow activity, you know?
And it's done for a purpose.
Because the attention span of Americans is very short.
So they keep pumping, wag the dog, misdirection all the time.
And that's what all this is.
Brian, Brian, your thoughts?
I just had a thought.
I just lost it.
I got so much going through my head.
Listen, I hate to simplify things to this level on this show, but it's all about money.
The riots and the mobs are being activated.
Why?
Because so that power and money can swing from point A to point B. All of these engineered events in the media that are Played up or played down are all about somebody getting rich someplace somewhere else.
There's an appetite out there in America that you must be rich and you must be powerful in order to be successful.
And that's just completely the wrong way to go about living life.
But for the psychopath, that's what they want to do.
And of course, this bag of tricks that's sort of the Zionist playlist or Freemason playlist or whatever you want to call it, this old learned elders of Zion sort of code that includes...
I'm sure artificial intelligence is going to come up with even more tools that are going to continue to mesmerize and expound.
The real life is not being rich and having a go fast boat and a, Real life is being able to sleep like a baby, taking care of your family, and living a humble, peaceful life that doesn't find itself out of whack in excess on a whole bunch of different levels.
We're watching every one of these clowns.
Every one of these clowns in the government, every one of these clowns in the media, and we're thinking, this is the standard?
Wrong.
We are the standard.
We're the ones that live balanced lifestyles, that love our families, that do right all day and every day.
And we're just calling out the ones that we see it, and we're calling it like we see it.
So they're losers.
They're a bunch of rotten sons of bitches that will sell anybody's soul for a little bit more money.
They're part of the Epstein machine.
They're part of the Pizzagate machine.
They could probably go back to the Franklin affair.
And that's what we're dealing with here.
I'm not necessarily saying Musk.
And Trump are this, but I'm saying everything that hits our eyes, hits our media, hits our computers and our televisions is all part of the same apparatus, which has a bigger, deeper appetite for the world.
Between the planter and the restraint on no AI opposition for 10 years, I see the total imposition of a surveillance state and the exclusion, the elimination of protesters.
Who oppose the Zionist agenda.
I think this is the most sinister combination I've ever encountered in legislation before the Congress.
Politeer has consistently denied that they're keeping a surveillance master list.
They're just catching the bad guys.
But of course they are.
Of course they are.
Yeah.
Here we go.
My game is...
There's now three parts to this series.
Joaquin, how about I start, and we alternate pages.
Joaquin, Agobian, Trump, and the Epstein Plows, Part 1. With Elon Musk last Thursday, June 5th, dropping a really big bomb, reopening Donald Trump's can of Epstein worms, I'm reminded of two chapters included in my Pedophilic Empire Book 4, exposing the Israeli Mossad.
Child sex blackmail operation run by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
I named Trump Trump's really big bomb a whopping 215 times in chapters 7 and 8. And since my five-book volume series drops a penetruth bomb like no other books ever written on the child-raving high rollers running our world, I figure it's important to repost them now.
Joaquin.
I am trying to cue it here on my screen.
Okay.
You go ahead and continue.
Right.
Despite Trump and Attorney General Bambani's repeated empty promises to release the Epstein files, they haven't and won't, because they incriminate our current president.
The reason why Israel is still allowed to drop all those U.S.-made bombs on innocent children and their families in Gaza has everything to do with Israel owning Trump and the U.S. Zog-owned Congress through bribery, blackmail, and extortion.
And that's why the Epstein files may never see the light of day.
But for the sake of truth and justice, For all underage child victims of the world whose lives have been forever maligned and too often destroyed, it's time to repost the incriminating truth exposing Donald Trump.
Because Musk quickly learned that waging his ongoing public war with a sitting U.S. president could become costly to no end, Musk decided to retreat from his earlier pedo-bomb dropping on Trump with a June 7th Daily Mail headline announcing, Elon Musk makes stunning Epstein U-turn in War on Trump that cost him $27 billion.
The first chapter exposing the Epstein-Trump-Header saga comprised in part one below with Trump's name mentioned 127 times.
Part two will follow with Trump's name mentioned another 88. Sadly, these are about as close as we'll ever get to the Epstein files.
The Jeffrey Epstein Scandal, Anatomy of the Zionist Illuminati Sexual Blackmail System, Part 1. Go ahead, Joaquin.
Well, I'm just going to talk off the cup.
Okay, that's fine.
Yeah, obviously, Trump...
I think it goes back to probably the late 1980s.
And all the way through, up until 2004, they were the best buddies.
Kind of like Elon Musk and Donald Trump.
Hmm, yeah.
And they engaged in some serious stuff together.
Both of them had a thing for young girls.
We know all about Epstein's, but it's all been kind of brushed under the rug when it comes to Donald Trump.
The reality is, yeah, he's a pedophile.
He's had many cases.
Many people have emerged as adults talking about the abuse that he put on them.
When he ran with Jeffrey Epstein, they had mansions in Manhattan together.
They had their mansions in Palm Beach together.
And boy, did they party.
And so, the system is such that they will take people that are already tainted, already messed up.
Already having a lot to hide and then they will groom them for positions of power.
This is the way our system works because that way they have complete control over them.
If Trump steps out of line, then he has to worry about, yeah, the things that he did with children.
He paid them off.
That's what happened.
And then, really?
Right up until 2016, when he ran for president, there was a Katie Johnson who actually filed a lawsuit in New York, and she was like 13 when Trump raped her.
And then, you know, this is how it was when they were buddies.
Epstein got pissed off because Trump got to her first.
And so then he raped the girl.
And, you know, it was a little bit of a competition, you know.
And then Trump went all in on those beauty pageants, you know.
He's Mr. Beauty Pageant.
And, yeah, he's been involved from the get-go for a long time, like I say.
In the late 80s up until 2004.
In 2004, there was an incident where they were going for, there's two versions of the story of how they had their falling out.
One of them, and I'm not quite so big on this one, but they apparently, first of all, they lived very close to each other in Palm Beach.
And supposedly, there was a property that went up for the market on an auction, and Trump won that auction, did, and apparently acquired that property, and that was supposed to incense Epstein.
I don't go for it.
You know, it came out in the book in 2020, the Drifters book.
But anyway, And I have a real question about the veracity of this one, too.
But supposedly, first of all, Trump has Mar-a-Lago, the club, you know, it's a club for all kinds of betting and all this kind of stuff.
And basically there were girls.
Virginia Roberts Guthrie actually started out as a sex slave because that's where Ghislaine Maxwell recruited her at Mar-a-Lago.
But there was another girl who apparently, and there's various stories around this too.
There's a whole bunch.
But one of them is that a girl whose father was a member was at the Mar-a-Lago club.
And Epstein hit on her sexually.
There's another story going on that Epstein actually, you know, sexually attacked the girl.
So this caused some waves and caused some legal actions.
Eventually, Trump realized, you know, he's being groomed, set up for president, and he's Mr. Wheeler dealer on the TV.
And so he realized finally that Epstein, especially once they started doing the investigation of Epstein, the Palm Beach police in 2005, he finally realized that my own liability to be associated with this guy, I need to distance myself quickly from him.
So supposedly, their falling out occurred around the time that...
And supposedly...
One of the mothers of the abused daughter, teenage daughter, went to the police.
And that's what started.
Less than two weeks after this supposed real estate bust where Trump got the deal.
And Epstein didn't.
It's all very questionable.
But anyway, so the bottom line is, yes, Trump is just another president.
We've had a whole string of them.
Obama's a pedophile.
Bush Jr. also has had liaisons.
I'm not so certain about how much, like his father, but H.W. It was part of the whole Franklin scandal.
He ran that scandal because he ran the whole pedophilia operation in the United States, trafficking operation, for many years.
You know, the Iran-Contra, the whole bit, you know, it's all tied in together.
And, of course, we know about Clinton and both of them, you know?
They're into that whole thing, too.
So all the modern presidents, Obama, $65,000 worth of hot dogs, you know?
I mean, that's code word for little boys, you know?
So all of them, they're not picked by the people, And this is the bottom line to the modern U.S. history and probably, I would say, Western history, probably in Eastern Asian countries also.
But this is the way it is.
This is the world we're living in.
That's what we have here.
So we have to clean it up and protect our children because we haven't done a good job.
I can't thank you enough for that.
Brian, your thoughts?
I know Trump has probably been involved in some of this chicanery.
I have no doubt.
But I will say this about him.
When the Podesta emails came out, Trump was begging the media to pay closer attention to the WikiLeaks information.
He was telling them, he was telling people, he was telling the media, he tweeted it, that it was, that those were the key, basically, to how the structure and the system works.
You'd be in jail.
There was all sorts of things that were taking place.
I think that Donald Trump was either, at that point in time, naively not understanding what would happen.
With the role of the presidency, but he was definitely trying to highlight it and even had correspondence back and forth with WikiLeaks about the Podesta emails, which was later published by WikiLeaks.
And he was trying to get publicity to it to show people how it works.
So we get a lot of mixed signals.
And I think that it is possible for a human being with as much history as he's had to have done things in your past that you have regretted.
And I can tell you that in the halls of power at the country clubs, amongst the millionaires and billionaire classes, you will find a lot of very low-life scum people.
That will do anything for money and choose to surround themselves with other people who will do anything for money.
The highest caliber, quote unquote, of people that I've ever seen, the richest people that I've ever hung out with, were absolute, well, sleazebags in a lot of sense.
I had a client once that sent me to his penthouse at an undisclosed Location to load it up with hidden cameras.
I had to enter the building, rest all in black, and spend two days loading the place up with hidden cameras.
And I said, well, what do you want to do with the feeds?
And he's like, can you save them on your servers?
And at the point at that time, you know, he told me that the cover story was that it was that he was concerned that building management was letting somebody use his penthouse and he wanted to know if that.
But it turns out that that's not what the purpose of the hidden cameras was for.
And as soon as I saw the first footage come back from one of his parties, I knew what it was really all about.
And I told him I wouldn't have anything else to do with it.
Now I lost probably $50,000 to $100,000 in future revenue with the guy because I'm like, I don't want to have this stuff on my computer.
It's not going to happen.
I don't care what country it takes place in.
It's not going to happen.
Because I thought some of it could get me into some trouble.
So that was the end of that.
But I'll tell you, that's par for the course among some of these superclass type guys.
They just think it's okay to treat whatever as just a tool.
Whatever young lady is just a tool.
And that's sort of a culture that needs to be addressed.
And nobody's doing it.
Gentlemen, this has just been superb.
In every way, I want to thank you both for your high-quality commentary, which happens again and again, week after week.
Don, take us out.
Mm-hmm.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Time is up here.
And, wow, you took us out.
I don't know.
I'm an American, but I don't owe my pride of being American.
Has been bolstered by this show and has been destroyed by the people that are supposed to be our fearless leaders and the best, but how they can be the scum and be the best at the same time is an American miracle, I guess.
So thank you for watching here on June the 10th, the start of the summer here in Seattle and around the world, and hopefully things are going to be better.
With the riots and stuff, it's going to be held under your hats and give it up for a rough time here.
Life goes on.
We'll be back next week, God willing.
So this is Truth vs.
News Incorporated June 10th.
God bless.
Share this widely.
Share this freely where you can.
The comments by Joaquin and Brian and Jim are just outstanding.