All Episodes
Previous Next
May 6, 2025 - Jim Fetzer
59:35
Truth vs. NEW$ 2 (5 May 2025)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome back, folks, to Truth vs.
News Incorporated.
This is Cinco de Mayo, May 5th, 2025, a day of partying and all kinds of fun and heavy news to interrupt and make it not so happy today.
So we've got to see that first hour of things to help you survive.
It's a very down-to-earth show today, and there's a lot of happening on the earth.
So, Jim, why don't you carry on?
How about House bills and other things like this?
What do we got now?
The U.S. House set a bill on a bill of fines, prison for boycott of Israel.
This is rock bottom.
This is as bad as it gets.
The U.S. House of Representatives set a vote on a controversial bill that proposes fines or prison terms for Americans participating in boycotts of Israel or Israeli settlements.
Promoted by international governmental organizations such as the UN or EU.
The House is scheduled to vote Monday, that would be today, on the contentious Anti-Boycott Act, which seems to penalize American citizens with fines of up to a million bucks for prison terms as long as 20 years for boycotting the Israeli regime.
That's what they're going to do if you criticize Israel.
A million bucks are 20 years.
Sponsored by pro-Israel congressmen Mike Lawler and Josh Gothheimer, the Bill will broaden U.S. anti-boycott law by targeting voluntary, values-based political actions undertaken by American citizens.
The underlying objective is to shield the Israeli regime from nonviolent international pressure campaigns, Notably, the Boycott, Dilemma, and Sanction movement.
Rights Group warned the legislation will criminalize, constitutionally protected political expression.
The move, according to rights groups, is part of a broader push by the U.S. government to suppress opposition to Israeli genocide, apartheid, and illegal settlement expansion under the guise of fighting anti-Semitism.
Palestinian groups and other regional factions and organizations strongly condemn the Israeli regime.
Resistance group organizations rage against Israeli aggression, targeting Gaza-bound aid flotilla.
The original act was introduced in 2024.
Back then, the Republican-controlled Congress passed a bill with broad bipartisan support, but Senate Democrats blocked it.
Now if Republicans control the Senate as well, there's a significant chance it would pass both Congress, both the House and the Senate.
The American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee, the most powerful Israeli lobbying group in the U.S., said it strongly supports the act.
The Foundation for Defense and Democracy's Action has already supported the legislation in broader congressional campaigns, To push back against anti-Israel boycotts.
The majority aim to force the regime to end its genocidal war in Gaza and have taken the lives of more than 52,500 Palestinians injured, at least 118,000, most of whom children and women.
By my estimate, the numbers are far, far greater.
The Israeli regime has put God on a total blockade for two months.
Barred the entry of all humanitarian aid, including food, which, according to the UN's integrated food security phase classification, has driven the territories 2.3 million toward famine.
Meanwhile, Bill Pult has GOP'd the fans' right to boycott Israel.
An amendment to the Anti-Boycott Act of 2018, HR...
867 was pulled from a Monday scheduled vote in the House.
Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia announced Sunday evening after initial news about the vote group mass opposition across acts over the weekend.
From across a political spectrum, Republican Democrats and Libertarians alike voiced their opposition to the Intergovernmental Organization or IGONI Boycott Act, waging concern That it stands as an affront to the First Amendment by compelling, really restraining speech and business transactions.
On Sunday, Green Post said she'd be voting no.
It's my job to defend Americans' right to buy or boycott whomever they choose without the government harshly fining them or imprisoning them, she added.
But what I don't understand...
It's why are we voting on a bill on behalf of other countries and not the president's executive orders that are for our country?
Later that evening, Green announced the bill had been pulled.
Representative Thomas Massey of Kentucky also commented, Apparently HR 867 has been pulled from the schedule this week.
Thank you for your vocal opposition to the platform he added.
It was a ridiculous bill.
Our leadership should have never scheduled for a vote.
Under the Anti-Boycott Act of 2018, an American individual company organization participating in or supporting a boycott of a U.S. ally imposed by a foreign government can be fined by up to a mill and receive up to 20 years in prison.
If H.R. 867 were to pass, It would expend its penalty to Americans participating in boycotts of U.S. allies promoted or endorsed by intergovernmental organizations such as the United Nations or the European Union.
But as it stands, there are no known instances of Americans boycotting U.S. allies besides Israel.
Moreover, over the weekend, the libertarian platform, the Mises Caucus, wrote, NIPDS laws restricting boycotts of Israel have long been a front to free association and speech.
H.R. 867 is a direct violation of the First Amendment.
This will grow American opposition to Israel faster, leading to more desperate regime crankdown and so on.
BDS, or boycott, divestment, and sanctions, is a nonviolent movement in support of Palestinians.
to promote the aforementioned actions against Israel.
Former outspoken Democrat Ohio State Senator Nina Turner also boasted to X, broad coalition in opposition to H.R. 867, Congress must vote no tomorrow.
The bill was sponsored by Representative Mike Lawler of New York, co-sponsored by 19 Republicans and 5 Democrats.
I think this may be.
The most significant defeat ever confronted by AIPAC.
Joaquin, your thoughts?
Well, the sad part is, you know that Trump is supporting it, 867.
You know, I mean, this is just another giveaway cluing us in.
where our Israel-controlled, Zionist-occupied government is coming from.
This is what they're about.
Yes, thank God there is some resistance and opposition to this that stopped it from being voted on today, Monday.
I guess you're on Sunday time.
But anyway...
Thank God for it being not voted on.
However, it's a clue to all of us.
Where the administration, where the synagogue of Satan regime is going, where our country is going, you know, they are already picking up for the last couple months now legal people that are from foreign countries studying in the United States on foreign student visas, and they're treating them, you know, like criminals and deporting them.
They're in detainment camps.
They have no kind of First Amendment, you know, or even due process rights.
Well, that's where it's headed for all of us, you know?
It's like that Pastor Niemeyer in Germany, you know?
First they came for the communists, the socialists, the trade unions, and then the Jews, and now me.
Yeah, you know?
That's where they're headed.
Anybody that disagrees and goes against what Israel is doing, massacring thousands upon thousands of Palestinians, oh, we're the bad guys now.
So, yeah, let's stand up for what is right.
Let's not let this inverse world totally pervert our perception of what really is going on.
Brian.
Well, I think that we're careening toward a new communist-style superclass, and I think that Trump is doing it.
Now, MAGA as a movement seems to be fueled a lot by...
It's hatred and resentment of the Democrats and the controls that they've had in place in academia, the controls that they've had in government.
But I think it's a misplaced aggression.
We feel displaced by the Democrats more than we feel displaced by the oligarchs and the machinery.
That has done everything it can to suppress and destroy America.
I think MAGA as a movement will continue to fail until it's able to identify the real enemy of the state, which is going to be those superclass communist type parties that Trump has been aligned with for virtually his entire life.
If you remember, he was a New York Democrat.
He's an actor in the WWE program.
He doesn't know which religion he is, at least can't seem to tell what it's all about.
He seems to align himself with the Shabad-Lukovic guys and surround himself with all the cultists that believe in sort of I think that he's been put into place and supported to be into place to divide America.
America is going to continue to divide.
You know, it's not like Trump ever led morally in terms of how he has chosen to set up America.
Sometimes I think JFK may have had more scruples than Donald Trump.
He's twice divorced, three-time married casino owner with, you know, acting headlines all throughout his resume.
He needs to seem to indulge on this enormous gratification of owning people or being biased.
And he seems to be out there sort of helping the MAGA movement seek justice for the wrongs of the Democrat Party.
And while we should, but...
Pam Bondi?
I mean, give me a break.
We haven't seen a single legitimate prosecution yet.
It's been all chatter, all talk, and all deception.
So the MAGA movement, to me, is beginning to feel a lot more like the Tea Party and a lot less like the teethy, strong...
monster bear that was going to clean up the deep state, drain the swamp and rebuild a government for the people by the people here in America.
There's no seems to be no respecting of the constitutional limits of the powers of office.
We seem to be getting these frivolous bills like anti-Semitism acts being driven through on an almost weekly basis to make sure that the Poor weakling Jew doesn't take any guff from Americans who have begun to figure out what they're really all about from a superclass perspective.
And I don't mean your street-grade guys that have no idea what's going on.
I mean the global superpower cartel machine at the very, very top.
That seems to be driving the Zionist and banking cartel agenda.
Meanwhile, credit card debt is at an all-time high.
The economy hasn't gotten any better.
Americans don't know how to control themselves much anymore in terms of their spending, and we seem to be careening toward a security apparatus state where we allow every false flag in town to come through, driving a new law that restricts our freedoms.
I'd say we're in pretty bad shape, but I don't really see this round.
After 110, 120 days of Trumpism changing or replacing anything, it seems to be a lot of cheerleading, but not a whole lot of football.
Very nice.
Very nice.
And I...
How about that?
...quites about Tam Bondi are very telling.
Meanwhile, who rules the West?
The governments or the U.S. Secret Services, meaning CIA?
The claim that non-democratically elected governments are in power in the U.S.-controlled West is not a conspiracy theory, but a fact, as another example demonstrates.
When people like me claim it's not governments that hold power in the West, but rather the structures of U.S. intelligence services and military, the mainstream calls it a conspiracy theory.
However, it ain't a theory, but a long-established fact.
I found a very interesting article which I translated about Five Eyes, the Intel Alliance of U.S., Great Britain, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand.
The article mentioned it passing, backed up with sources that the heads of the governments of Australia and New Zealand weren't even aware for years or decades what their own intel agencies were doing with and for the U.S. intel community.
We'll come to the translation in a moment.
But first, I want you to example to show what the article says.
It's not the exception, but obviously the rule in the West.
Take Gladio, for example.
These were a secret underground army CIA built up in all Western European countries after the end of the war and used, when necessary, for terrorist attacks, then blamed on left-wing extremists.
This became known in Italy in 1990, but there was no scandal, because the media at the time was reoccupied with the collapse of the Eastern Bloc and German reunification.
Thus, the scandal that was organized, in most cases without the knowledge of the respective governments in violation of applicable laws, was easily slapped under the rug.
If you never heard of it, You'll find details here, including sources and tricks used to hide it from the public to this day, because Gladio never ended.
Another example in Germany was the NSU scandal, when a parliamentary investigative committee requested information about the NSU from the federal office for the protection of the Constitution, but the latter refused to release it.
Since the official narrative in Germany is that Parliaments control the Secret Services.
The Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution is Germany's Domestic Intelligence Agency.
Every self-described journalist in the German media at the time would have had to produce bold headlines every day because the supposed parliamentary oversight obviously doesn't work.
But of course the self-appointed journalist didn't ask these uncomfortable questions.
Moving on to the article, I stumbled upon by chance about a possible end of Five Eyes, which is why I found it interesting.
Almost even more so, however, is how the article almost casually mentions who actually makes decisions in the Western Hemisphere, because that's been known for a long time.
Images, highlights from the original.
Translation.
A rest in peace for the spies of the Five Eyes?
Global espionage network in danger.
Kit Klarenberg.
Since Donald Trump returned to the White House, speculation has grown his second term could swell the end of five highs.
The international signals intel network.
In this secret cooperation, Australia, Great Britain, Canada, New Zealand, and the US, the five highs, continuously monitor the public and private communications of the entire world.
While few would...
Remit the end of Five Eyes, fears of disintegration are widespread in certain circles, especially in London.
Last February, Financial Times reported Peter Navarro, one of Trump's top advisors, was pushing to expel Canada from Five Eyes.
The reports say the proposal was being discussed by senior officials in the Trump admin, while Navarro denied the report.
His alleged proposal Sparked fears among Western intel veterans, think-tank experts, and journalists that excluding Canada could have held the network complete collapse.
The following March, the British economists asked, could Donald Trump jeopardize the Five Eyes spy pact?
Finally, in April, Politico posed the question, can Britain survive without U.S. intel?
Political reveal developments such a trump decision in March to halt intel sharing with Ukraine had prompted current and former intel official to consider whether it might be necessary for Britain to plan the previously unthinkable, namely, severing ties between the two countries' intel agencies.
This, despite the fact those ties are so deep, it might be impossible to unravel, or at least impossible for London, To replicate the U.S. contribution.
While the CIA and MI6 have long been known to work in lockstep, Five Eyes is the most intimate expression of this transatlantic camaraderie.
Expulsion from this circle would drastically curtail Britain's already dwindling global influence and prestige.
As Politico noted, membership in Five Eyes Global spy network is significant to Britain's status as a relative heavyweight in the intel community.
The origins of this relationship date back to 1946, where the secret UK-USA agreement was signed, formalizing the intel sharing between London and Washington that began decades earlier.
Since then, participation in the network has given Britain a prominent role.
And influence internationally.
As I revealed in May 2022, a secret collusion among British military and intel vets, including the disgraced former head of MI6, Richard Dierlove, plotted to install Boris Johnson as PM and push through a hard Brexit, telling that EU military and intel integration could undermine Five Eyes.
With Trump's aggressive approach toward long-standing U.S. allies, This nightmare may finally become reality.
As a declassified doc from 1997 makes clear, UKUSL enables unrestricted sharing and collected SIGINT data between NSA and British GCHQ as its general headquarters, except for data from areas exclusively excluded the request of either party, for example.
Info intended for U.S. eyes only.
The alliance also allows NSA to circumvent U.S. laws, preventing it from spying on U.S. citizens, outsourcing it to GC headquarters.
The same applies in reverse.
Both servants exchange their respective intel with each other.
In other words, the British spy on American citizens for CIA, while CIA spies on British citizens for...
GCHQ.
The connection between the two friendly services runs even deeper.
The same doc states, some GCHQ redacted exists solely to carry out NSA functions.
The redacted word may be teams, units, even departments.
The conclusion is reinforced by documents linked by whistleblower Edward Snowden, which revealed USN as a font and UK's GCHQ with at least a hundred million pounds between 2010 and 2013 alone to gain access to and influence its Intel programs.
The document also reveals Britain's lax surveillance laws and regulations are a key selling point for Washington.
London's also aware of the need to achieve a significant return on NSA's investment.
An internal agency memo leaked by Snowden.
States at GCHQ must do its part to be perceived as important by Washington.
An undated declassified NSA report provides a detailed assessment of US-UK relations full of praise for GCHQ's contributions.
UK-USA has been invaluable to NSA and cannot be abandoned.
There's no doubt.
UK-USA has much to offer the NSA.
Such is a unique collection of data from GCHQ's conventional sites.
News have redacted, where the U.S. itself has none, the compatibility U.S. and U.K. SIGINT systems, but particularly skilled crypto analysis workforce, and perhaps most importantly, a track record as an ally in helping U.S. tackle global problems.
Despite these outstanding achievements, however, The report also raises significant concerns about certain aspects of the relationship.
Notably, the section detailing these concerns is heavily redacted.
Nine consecutive pages have been completely blacked out.
However, an unredacted section concerning the exchange of numerous personnel is revealing.
Its content suggests London has frequently sought to cross the red line of the UK-USA agreement.
Infiltrating its cyber-spies, it's a sense that it varies accessible only to U.S. eyes well beyond its purview.
Meanwhile, Trump says, I don't know if he must uphold the Constitution as President.
President Trump said in remarks airing Sunday, he does not know whether he must uphold the U.S. Constitution, the nation's founding legal document.
In a wide-ranging NBC interview, the 78-year-old Republican, also saying he was not seriously considering running for a constitutionally barred third White House term, blamed his presidential predecessor, Biden, for bad parts of the current economy.
Trump has drawn widespread criticism for repeatedly brushing up against constitutional guardrails since returning to the White House in January, Notably over his policy of mass deportation of undocumented migrants, some without benefit of a court hearing.
He insists such rabid expulsions are necessary in the face of what he has declared to be a national emergency, that giving every migrant a court trial would take 300 years.
When NBC meets the press moderator, Kristen Welker, as a people in the U.S., citizen and non-citizen alive, deserve the due process of law as the U.S. Constitution states.
Trump said, I'm not a lawyer.
I don't know.
And he would have said that because it's not clear whether non-citizens are entitled to the same due process as citizens.
Press more generally on whether he believes he needs to uphold the supreme law of the law, and Trump repeated, I don't know.
Meanwhile, the remarks in the interview record Friday, broadcast Sunday.
made waves in Washington, including among Republicans.
The remarks were either a free society governed by the Constitution or we not, said Rand Paul, a self-described constitutional conservative.
No third term.
Trump's suggestion of possibly seeking a third term had been sharply questioned by legal and constitutional scholars.
The 22nd Amendment states No person shall be elected to the office of President more than twice.
But Trump said in March he wasn't joking about seeking a third term, adding their methods that would allow it to happen.
Changing the Constitution to allow a third term would be difficult, requiring a third-thirds majority in both houses for application by at least thirty-eight of the fifty states.
But this is not something I'm looking into.
Even while acknowledging Trump Organization official stores selling red, Trump 2028 hats.
I'm looking to have four great years, turn it over to somebody, ideally a great Republican, to carry it forward.
Ask whom that might be.
You mentioned Vance and Secretary of State Rubio.
We have a lot of good people in this party.
Trump appeared to bristle, however, when asked for his reaction to critics who warned us, Leading the country toward authoritarianism.
Why don't you ask it in a different way?
Many people want to come into our country.
Many people love Trump, he said.
I've won the election.
His first hundred days in office were marked by economic turmoil, primarily over his plans to impose sweeping tariffs on most countries.
But despite the world's largest economy shrinking in the first quarter in 2025, he struck an optimistic and defiant tone in the interview.
Insisting U.S. economics were sound and that tariffs are going to make us rich.
I think the good parts are the Trump economy.
The bad parts are Biden's and Trump.
Love it!
Love it!
So there's the latest controversy, Joaquin, your thoughts.
I think we need to make a correction.
It's not the five eyes.
It's the six eyes.
And that six eye is a trump card over all the rest.
Israel!
Yes, Mossad.
Mossad.
They're behind a lot of stuff, okay?
So, yeah.
We had JFK assassinated by Israel and Mossad because...
He actually wanted to stop the nuclear development of all those warheads going up in Israel.
He wanted to stop the CIA from taking over Vietnam and creating a big war there.
He wanted to shatter them into a thousand pieces.
They got rid of him.
He got rid of the CIA director and immediately it worked against him because...
The CIA director was in on the assassination.
So, yeah, I mean, you know, there was a church committee that basically happened in the 70s.
You know, and that was an investigation of how the Mockingbird Press, the CIA-controlled press, was operating at that time.
And they said, oh, yeah, we got to get rid of it.
Yeah.
And we had George H.W. Bush.
The Mockingbird Press, controlled by much of the CIA, and the, quote, five-eyes, six-eyes, you know, they still have a major impact on everything the mainstream press puts out.
Let's face it, it's completely filtered, censored, and controlled by, quote, the six-eyes.
You know, here we go.
And then as far as Trump actually thinking that, well, I'm not sure if there's a Constitution that applies to me.
You know, this is ridiculous.
But I have to add, the reality is, there isn't a Constitution.
It's not followed.
It's not...
It's not basically upheld.
The Constitution is gone.
The First Amendment rights are gone.
Due process is gone.
You know, so, I mean, I think it's a moot point.
The Constitution is no longer honored by the traitors that are in our Zionist-occupied government.
It doesn't go together.
If you're controlled by another foreign country, you're not going to do things in behalf of the Americans that you supposedly represent.
So, yeah, everything is twisted, upside down, lies.
Brian.
Well, let me remind you that five eyes slash six eyes slash seven eyes, whatever.
has been around in theory for a long time.
George Orwell's book 1984 was actually published in 1949, predicting the surveillance state of the future of 1984 with telescreens and microphones and central surveillance structures,
historical revisionism, propaganda, and recruiting of neighbors to inform or friends to inform on those who were engaging in wrong things.
So it's nothing new under the sun.
The only difference is now in 2025, years later, we have these little things in our pockets called cell phones and we have these computer screens and our...
Our refrigerators are connected networks and so are our microwaves and our cars and everything else.
They have technology that allows us to basically know everything there is to know about us.
I would love to have access to Google's file on me to find out how deep it goes and what sort of psychological programs they've been able to put together to approach after me.
We do have to start separating ourselves from our dependents.
I would like to see that continue to go down.
And what does it really do for us?
It makes us miserable as we get deeper and deeper daily into the tech world and get farther and farther away from our families and the people that we need to surround ourselves with that are more important.
As for Trump following the Constitution, I haven't seen any indication that the Constitution has been seriously followed or adhered to.
In years, it seems to have been manipulated going back even before Kennedy.
To the point where when justice is not enforced, there is no such thing as justice.
You can have all the paper documents in the world, including the Constitution, including any other books and anything else, but without a structure there to enforce those particular rules.
And we know that they're not properly enforced.
They're enforced for the little people, but they're not enforced for the big people.
Take a look at the pedophile networks.
I mean, just this week, one of the articles that kind of hit me upside the head was one of Bellingcat, which is the journalism platform that trains journalists how to do open-source intelligence research.
One of Bellingcat's top guys got picked up for doing pedophile network stuff and sex trafficking stuff on his own.
So here's a guy that's supposed to be researching Pedogate.
That's a pedo himself.
You know, we're seeing some adjustments, but it's not going to be enough until we start to see the big names go down.
Wow.
Very good.
Indeed.
The big names.
How do we get these vicious laws?
NIY thinking goes back longer than you may think, Jared Taylor writes.
Last week, Heather McDonald, one of the best people in mainstream media, wrote this.
Take this biggest step yet toward restoring meritocracy.
The admin's executive order eliminating disparate impact theory restores the 1964 Civil Rights Act to its original meaning.
I do think there's something very telling about this.
He just signed this executive order banning a pernicious legal doctrine called disparate impact.
This terrible anti-white practice goes all the way back to 1971, then before a lot of you were even born.
Here's how it started.
In the 50s, before anti-discrimination laws, the North Carolina-based Duke Power country hired blacks only for low-level jobs.
For better jobs, it weeded out as promising whites by requiring a high school diploma in good scores on the...
Wonderlic IQ test and a mechanical aptitude test.
Here you have the Wonderlic and you see how it all phased out.
Red, scores were not recommended.
Orange, cautionary.
Green, worthy of pursuit.
After the Civil Rights Act, the '64 banned race discrimination due to power.
Opened all job categories to blacks.
If the Blohmann test requirement kept out more blacks than whites, 34% of whites had a high school diploma, but only 12% of blacks.
The test weeded out 42% of whites, but 94% of blacks.
Nobody could argue these requirements were set up to keep out blacks.
Duke Bauer used them to pick the best candidates, and when the law changed, anyone could apply.
However...
Since blacks had a harder time meeting the grade, the requirements were said to have disparate impact upon them.
Yes, they hit blacks harder.
The '64 Civil Rights Act had just bent intentional race discrimination, but the Supreme Court, just five years later, in a case called Griggs v.
Duke Power, said that racially neutral standards with a disparate impact Think about it.
Blacks did less well on these tests than whites.
There was a disparate impact that could be just as illegal as deliberate discrimination.
Basically, discrimination on ability.
Everything I've been talking about, plenty more, comes from ignoring not just common sense but hard science.
People of different races don't have the same average abilities.
This graph reflects one of the oldest, best-established findings in psychological testing.
To wit, the average IQ of blacks is about 85, it's shown here, for whites 100.
The red bars...
Our black distribution in IQ, the blue whites.
The black average is 85. The white, 100.
Everything to the right of 100 means above average.
Look at how whites dominate in that space.
And there are distributions.
The actual number of high IQ blacks will be a fraction of that because there are more whites than blacks.
Talking about this is taboo.
There's never been a disparate impact court case in which a defendant explained your honor.
There is disparate impact because groups aren't the same.
There's no racism here.
We are scrupulously fair in applying our standards to all candidates.
No one dares say that.
Though I add, it's absolutely true.
This pernicious race IQ taboo has got to be smashed.
The executive order banning disparate impact thinking is an important step, but please, Mr. Trump, appoint a blue-ribbit panel to study the facts about race differences and present the findings with as much fanfare and press coverage as possible.
Let me just add, I have a book entitled The Evolution of Intelligence, and it affirms the same conclusions presented here.
From an evolutionary point of view, the races are different.
It was some time ago I realized that Democrats were presuming all the races were innately the same in their ability, and therefore if they were performing less well, it had to be because of discrimination.
They ignored the prospect of inherent genetic differences, race-based differences in ability and intelligence, which is a fact.
Joaquin.
Yeah, they outlawed the capacity to allow blacks and DEI and all the rest to come in.
They've outlawed that, and they've moved legally in a direction of going against the race reverse discrimination against more qualified whites.
So, you know, in theory...
We're moving in the right direction.
Meritocracy is what is proper, you know?
Who's the best candidate?
Who's the most qualified?
Who has the most skill?
Regardless of race, that shouldn't even be a barrier or a factor whatsoever.
So, anyway, I think it's good to move in the direction of meritocracy.
Get a rate from DEI.
And all the affirmative action stuff, it's supposedly been outlawed, but let's face it, it's not.
It's still in practice in a lot of places.
So, you know, that's my view.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, meritocracy is certainly better than...
Diversity, equity, and inclusion just based on the color of your skin.
Of course, there are cultural factors that go into some people ending up appearing to be more intelligent than others.
People that sit in front of the TV and watch cartoons all day or kids that do versus the ones that listen to classical music are obviously going to turn out a little bit more differently.
It really comes down to whether a person wants to wake up and wants to decide to get educated.
I have to spend...
Years in libraries and Barnes& Noble bookstores and others just to be able to collect enough structure to be able to think in a straight line.
I also went to college, but that didn't help a tremendous amount.
All it did was expand the vocabulary and help me understand the logical limitations to what I was capable of.
But I think that the real smart ones aren't necessarily the ones that just simply can pass a test, because we can go to China and get 9 out of 10 of their students to come over and pass a test if that's what you think that intelligence is.
I say it's not.
I say intelligence is the ability to creatively...
Think your way through a situation within society and work your way out of the trouble or the problematic situation that you're in.
And I don't think the test can prepare for that.
But intelligent people are the ones who are resourceful, able to use those things which are available to them to solve problems for the nation.
Now, you can take a kid that...
That might not have any education whatsoever, and with the proper tools, he can become the next Elon Musk.
Good for him, go for it.
I believe we're all equal in that fashion.
I don't care if it's black, white, Japan, Japanese, Chinese, Jewish, or whatever.
I think everybody's got the capability.
It just comes down to the motivation.
Well, let me just show, I've just added the cover of my book here.
Because I'd like to encourage people to take a look.
It's right on this subject.
In fact, it's even, here we go, even broader in its scope.
The evolution of intelligence.
Are humans the only animals with minds?
Published in 2005.
James Fetzer explores the nature of consciousness and cognition in human beings and other animals.
He addresses the inadequacies of the computational conception and expounds an alternative theory based on the study of signs and symbols as elements of communicative behavior.
Fetzer offers a new theory of intelligence by which machines can be intelligent without possessing minds.
Megyn Kelly's hilarious spoof, a blue origin girl ride.
Blonde origin, zero gravity, zero clue.
The Gateway Pundit reported on the plastic surgery-obsessed celebrities and celebrity hangers-on, such as Gayle King, Lauren Sanchez, and Katy Perry, who took a leisurely flight into space.
The female space tourists named themselves the Six...
Taking up space.
The women rang a bell before boarding the capsule because all astronauts throughout history and various programs have their traditions.
Although the space tourist flight by blue origin lasted only 11 minutes, Katy Perry kissed the ground after landing as though she were one of the two astronauts abandoned in space by Biden-Harris Admin who had to be rescued by Elon Musk's SpaceX.
Megan and her team both funded the spoiled celebrities with their spoof, Blonde Origin, Zero Gravity, Zero Clue.
Narrated by Mark Halpern and Link Lauren, Megan and her team spent twice as much time in weightlessness as the gals from Blue Origin.
Watch!
Here we had Katie Perry kissing the ground as astronauts returned from space.
Here, while most of America struggled to care for their families, Gayle King arrogantly lectured critics on the stunt by asking, have you all been to space?
Gayle King just compared herself to Alan Shepard, the first American ever to travel to space.
The ego of these women is stratospheric.
Meanwhile, the world premiere of blonde origin, reaching new heights of inspiring women and girls and everyone in the world, and new heights of trolling, Meghan Carey Dean Maureen and Mark Halperin.
It's Link Horn.
Get Bond Origin.
This was totally fake.
No question about it.
Totally fraudulent.
I guarantee they didn't even go into space.
We know, of course, this reflects on the moon landing.
Therefore, Apollo or other lunar missions will be as successful.
The equipment and...
Crew aboard the Stavecraft would have to be adequately shielded from exposure from the intense radiation surrounding planet Earth, the Van Allen radiation belt, which would have required like five or six feet of lead, making it impossible too massive to get off of Earth.
For those who harbor any lingering doubts over whether we went to the moon, they're decisively settled by the demonstration that, had we arrived on its surface, we could not have returned.
Among the best of all refutations, it was fake.
Look at the amount of the rocket required to get to the moon and the little tiny vessel we had that was supposed to enable us to return.
How bad is that?
And look, the relative mass of Earth is like 55 times that of moon.
If you'd been looking at Earth from moon, it would have looked a lot like that.
But what did we get?
Here's a photograph from NASA.
Claiming to be of Earth from the moon, which is clearly a shot where just the moon from Earth has been recolorized to make it resemble what they thought they might get away with, and they did.
What a fraud.
Joaquin, your thoughts?
Yeah, so much theater.
You know, those women going out in space, yeah.
We knew right from the beginning that that was all just PR bullshit.
And, yeah, I'm totally with you.
I don't believe that the United States or any country ever has gone to the moon yet.
And, you know, I mentioned it before, but I think Stanley Kubrick was actually appointed as a director for the, quote, lunar Apollo mission to the moon in the desert.
And he leaked it out, and he made a film called Eyes Wide Shut, which exposed the occult and sacrifice and all this kind of stuff that's involved with pedophilia, and then he was dead.
He was filming, editing his last film, Eyes Wide Shut, and they killed him.
And I think they killed him because he leaked the truth that we did not go to the moon.
Yeah, it's ridiculous.
He wouldn't actually ever bought it, but it was the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the entire planet Earth.
Brian?
Yeah, space may be the final frontier, but it's made in a Hollywood basement, to quote the Red Hot Chili Peppers on that particular one.
Listen, just like everybody else, we all grew up with the shows that we watched and the movies and the opening credits.
We see the globes in the backgrounds in every movie.
What is the purpose of that deception?
Assuming there is one, which I do think it is, because water is flat as far as you can see, as far as you can go.
The purpose of the deception is to prevent people from believing that there is a central creator that designed and created and maintains life on this planet.
And to keep that away from that, there's all sorts of deceptions that go along with it.
And just like anything else, you can get caught on one side of the road or the other side of the road in any sort of conspiracy.
The trick is to walk right down the path and figure out exactly what the truth is, why space is being faked as much as it is.
This one's so bad, they're almost making fun of us.
It reminds me of Spaceballs, where they had the giant...
Oh, no, that was...
Austin Powers with the giant penis flying through the air and the play on all that.
It's bad what they've been doing to us for years and people just don't question it.
They just take it one way or another.
I'm telling you that this realm, whatever it is, has been designed, structured, balanced, and operates nearly perfectly, if not totally perfectly, in terms of the first and second laws of thermodynamics.
I find it to be More than adequate and beautiful for survivability.
Very, very good.
Meanwhile, as though there were not any greater absurdities, Donald Trump has circulated an AI-generated photograph of himself as Pope.
There's a similar photograph of Elon Musk as Pope, and to tell you the truth, Elon, he looks even more like a Pope than Trump.
But there it is.
There it is.
Let me ask you, gentlemen, before we turn to our final story, what do you make of that, Joaquin?
Well, we've been saying for a long time he's a showman.
Yeah, he's all fake.
He's there basically to polarize, to, you know, be a nuisance to a lot of people.
There's a lot of Trump haters, division, divide and rule.
You know, he's their man.
And, you know, for him to pose as the Pope, yeah.
He's trying to take over Greenland, the Panama Canal, Canada.
He's the conqueror, you know, so why not make him Pope?
Crazy, Brian, hear that.
Well, I don't think Donald Trump is the one that made the photo or distributed the photo.
I think he just simply answered a question about it in a press conference.
But I would not put it beyond Donald Trump to claim divine titles like Our Lord God the Pope, which is the title used for the Pope in...
Extravagantus, Johannes editions of the Bible from 1508 to 1511.
I wouldn't think that Donald Trump would accept Vicar of the Son of God on Earth as a title for himself.
And I don't think that Donald Trump would want to be called Holy Father, even though the Bible clearly says, call no man on earth your father and labels the title.
I think Donald Trump would say that he has the ability to forgive sins like the Pope.
And it was the Pope that granted all priests the ability to forgive sins.
I would consider that Donald Trump would...
Not have a problem proclaiming infallibility as his position in this world.
Don, you were so keen on my including this image.
I want you to comment on your thoughts, Don.
On Trump and being Pope, is that the same guy that I see here?
Yeah, well, he gets around.
He gets around.
This is back in the good old days.
Fun and games.
Yeah, so anyway, yes.
He wants to be a ruler, I guess.
You didn't think popes were virgins, did you?
Sinners and saints.
I guess saints are converted to sinners, so maybe Trump is being converted.
There we have it.
That was a special feature for Don Gron.
There we go.
Final story.
I'm in trouble now.
I and the rest of us, Joaquin, Bryan, have been massively assaulted by this guy who calls himself Victor Hugo Vaca.
I published an open letter to him.
He has besieged us with hundreds, hundreds of videos.
These are the most vicious, malicious, nasty, unfounded, unscrupulous.
Deceitful attacks I've ever encountered.
There are so many and they are so malicious.
I believe this case qualifies as the most egregious example of digital harassment and cyberbullying in the history of the internet.
I'm doing what I can to go with it.
I'm going to take legal measures.
Not only against Victor Hugo Vaca, but against BitChute and Rumble that are tolerating all this complete nonsense.
But I need your help.
I need to put together a couple of grand to make it happen.
I do have a GiveSendGo.com slash FundingVetzer website.
And if anyone out there in the audience...
Believes enough in me, in Joaquin, in Brian, in Carl Herman, in Russ Winter, in Susan Bradford, in Bill Bonitotti to support us, because I'm acting on all of our behalf.
Please consider contributing to GiveSendGo.com slash funding, that's her.
And, in the meanwhile, look.
for this special report from Real Deal Media that gives a summary overview of the entire case.
It is being slightly edited to add slides that prove the points that are being made during this presentation where I explain the history of the case Sandy Hook and what's going on here, which should be up on our BitChute channel.
By tomorrow.
So I want to thank you one and all.
If you believe in what we're doing, if you think this sounds like something you'd like to help deal with, it's a monster.
It's unbelievably bad.
And we would welcome your support.
Joaquin, your thoughts.
Yeah, the guy has been slandering and defaming our character and attempting to ruin our reputations as reputable individuals standing up for the truth.
Very reprehensible.
I agree that we need to move on legally stopping him because he's violating laws, not to mention bit shoot and rumble terms of...
I'm all for it.
We need to stop him.
You can't get away with calling you, Jim, a fraud.
Brian, you a coward.
Me, a pedophile.
You can't get away with that shit.
Unless it's true.
And it ain't true.
So, I'll leave it at that.
Brian?
We've been doing this for our audience for free for years.
It's just the public service to try to help wake people up.
If it's helped you in any way or affected you positively, then show some appreciation.
There's no ad revenue.
None of us get paid.
None of us do anything.
It's a purely voluntary platform, which is why you don't have to watch a bunch of garbage advertisements and commercials.
Now there's a situation that has arisen, and we're putting together a little bank.
Bank book to take care of it.
That's all there is to it.
We hope you'll contribute.
Yes, thank you.
Well said, gentlemen.
Don, your final thoughts and take us out.
Yeah, I will say we have been doing this show, Jim, for, what, 12, 15 years, something like that, and Cruise vs.
News has been standing very tall and very strong.
Headed by a very tall and very strong gentleman, Jim Fetcher, who is just a fantastic mind, and to have him being attacked as he is unrighteously is just outrageous.
And I will say that this is the time to get more truth out there.
To people, so please pass this on as you can, folks.
And thank you for watching for all these years and your devotion to us.
So we'll be back next week, God willing, and hopefully we'll have, well, better news.
We still had some rough stuff today.
So thank you so much for watching, and God bless.
Carry on and share.
▲
Export Selection