All Episodes
Previous Next
April 7, 2025 - Jim Fetzer
01:04:12
Truth vs. NEW$, Inc Part 1 (06 April 2025) with Don Grahn and Joachim Hagopian
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And welcome, folks, to a show we call Truth vs.
News Incorporated.
And it's a lot of news out there, and it's really attacking the truth.
I'm here to stand tall for what's really happening and what you need to know.
And it's being attacked, but I've got Truth vs.
News. I'm Donald Brown, your host, and very proud to be working with the most...
The best people in the world here.
I have James Fetcher, Dr. James Fetcher out of Wisconsin.
And he's written books on all kinds of topics that you need to know.
Sandy Hook and JFK and 9-11.
And he's just outstanding.
And he's been hosting the show for...
At least 15 years.
And then we have Joachim Hagopian, who's all the way over there in Bali.
And he's in a place where he's nice and secure and can look at the whole world and make critique of it, and people can't find him to do him in.
But anyway, we have an important article that Joachim has written, and I think it would be good to read that first paragraph to start to set the theme of the show for today on March, on April 6th.
Yeah. Okay.
Let's see.
Let's connect it.
Okay. It's called Chronicling the Occupational Hazards of Exposing Incessant Lies in a Dishonest, Lawless World.
everything we see taking place in real time on our planet today is through the shady, deceptive lens of a biased mass media spewing out false propaganda lies rather than actual truth.
This includes both the legacy media claiming to depict legitimate real world events organically unfolding as today's news, as well as generated online output from smaller independent citizen journalism.
Mostly all of what the corporate media portrays is fiction.
Much of the alternative media is also slanted to a large extent fabricated as well.
Thus,
Sadly and pathetically, it is my contention that artificial This presentation examines the flood of lies and inherent risk of exposing the truth that past others have been cruelly subjected to,
even sacrificing their lives for the truth.
And I go on to cite specific cases of mostly journalists, but people in the entertainment industry as well, that spoke too much truth for the system not to do them in.
At least it points in that direction.
It could even be subtitled Truth vs.
News. Oh boy, I hope not.
I'm going to continue on here.
I don't want to shoot on your trademark.
And the news right now is pretty awful here.
How about Russia and America and war and all kinds of things are right on the top here.
You got it, Don.
Trump is about to bomb Iran.
Top Israeli sources reveal planned attack on nuclear sites and deliver chilly war is coming warning.
Dan Hodges reports.
Trump's about to bomb Iran.
Top Israeli sources reveal planned attack on nuclear sites.
This morning, the world's focus is on Donald Trump's decision to launch a global trade war.
But in a few weeks' time, the man who last month pledged to deliver peace through strength is planning to embark on a real war.
I'm currently in Tel Aviv, and according to several senior political, military, and diplomatic sources, The United States and Israel are preparing to launch a strike on Iran that will finally eradicate the threat posed by the country's nuclear weapons program, except, of course, the country doesn't have a nuclear weapons program to threaten anyone.
So the whole thing is premised on a falsehood, an illusion, a lie that's been promoted by Bibi Nanya for around three decades now.
A week ago, the U.S. deployed a trio of B-2 Spirit bombers accompanied by long-range fueling assets to its Chagos Island base on Diego Garcia, bringing the total strength of the bomber force there to seven.
This was significant because it's rare to see such a major concentration of these sophisticated assets.
There's still the possibility Iran could back down in the face of Trump's ultimatum.
But a senior British diplomatic source I spoke with expressed pessimism.
Even if the Iranians were to grant significant concession, there's no guarantee it would stay Israel's hand.
Instead of forcing Israel to stop the onslaught on Gaza, for example, the Israelis are forcing Trump to bomb Iran.
The base at Diego Garcia is in the Indian Ocean.
The aircraft Especially these stealth bombers are now in range for both Yemen and Iran.
History records when NATO attacked Yugoslavia in March of 1999, the U.S. sent three stealth bombers during the 78 days of bombing that ultimately crushed that country and broke it apart.
Three for Yugoslavia, seven for Yemen and Iran.
Meanwhile, here's Tulsi confirming.
Iran not believed to be building a nuclear weapon.
The U.S. intel community has assessed that Iran is not currently building a nuclear weapon, according to Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.
Speaking before the Senate Intel Committee, Gabbard stated the Intelligence Committee continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, and Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei Has not authorized the nuclear weapon program he suspended in 2003.
Newsweek. Newsweek has reached out to Gabbard and Iran's foreign ministry for comment.
Why it matters.
Iran's nuclear program has long been a focal point of U.S. foreign policy with concerns over regional security and global non-proliferation.
Gabbard's statement Comes amid heightened tensions in the Middle East, ongoing U.S. sanctions, and recent military confrontations involving Israel.
President Trump has also instituted a maximum pressure campaign against Iran over its nuclear program.
But the U.S. hasn't ruled out military action.
So look at the absurdity of this situation.
According to the U.S.
own intel, Iran does not have any nukes and isn't developing nukes, and yet we're going to attack Iran in order to stop their nuclear weapon program.
Iran's nuclear program, in fact, has been under scrutiny since the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, a deal signed by world powers to limit Tehran's nuclear activities in exchange for sanctions relief.
The U.S. withdrew from the agreement in 2018 under Trump.
...reimposing sanctions that led to increased tensions in Iran exceeding the uranium enrichment limits.
While former President Biden sought to revive the deal, negotiations stalled and Trump's second-term policies have further tightened sanctions.
Meanwhile, Hal Turner.
Russia warns of catastrophic consequences after Trump threatens to bomb Iran.
Moscow has condemned Trump's warning to bomb Iran if it refused as a new nuclear deal, calling it an unacceptable ultimatum.
Iran is now considering a preemptive strike at Diego Garcia.
And by the way, under international law, if a nation confronts an imminent threat, it is entitled to a preemptive strike to take it out.
I have...
On one occasion or another, endorse the idea of a preemptive strike.
But I believe because of the long flight time, given it's 3,000 miles, the risk of missiles en route to the target would be taken out is sufficiently great that Iran has now rejected and declared it will not undertake a preemptive strike.
Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Rabakov said U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear infrastructure would destabilize the entire region and urge Washington to de-escalate.
Trump's message was clear.
No deal.
It means unprecedented bombing and renewed sanctions.
Tehran renewed talks, prompting Trump to say it will be bombing the likes of which they have never seen.
This is a hell of a way to conduct diplomacy.
Senior Iranian military officials are reportedly advocating a preemptive strike on the base at Diego Garcia, citing concerns it may soon be used as a launch pad for operation against Iran.
Indeed. Russia and China are allies of Iran.
An attack on Iran is an attack on those two countries prepared for World War III.
Iran revealed plasma weapons.
Iran today released Information about what it claims are new plasma weapons, not laser-based.
Right now, Iran only has perfected the technology.
Could this be a game-changer?
Immediate effects.
Hot war with Iran could trigger inflation apocalypse.
Retaliation by Iran could choke off key oil routes, such as at Strait of Hormuz and Bab al-Mandeb in the Red Sea.
Crippling the world's oil supply, global energy experts say.
This would immediately impact 20 million barrels of oil a day, 77 million tons of Qatari liquid natural gas passing through the Strait of Hormuz.
Brent crude oil price would initially surge to 110-115 a barrel.
The same would apply to liquid natural gas, with Europe hit the hardest.
Global economy Cut by 2-3% if the disruption lasts 2-3 months, which I do not expect.
I think this would be over in days.
A conflict with Iran amid a tariff war that the U.S. is waging could be set off an inflation spiral that would impact every American household.
Why? Because the U.S. is highly dependent on imports.
$4 trillion worth of goods in 2024 alone.
U.S. manufacturing has been shrinking for years, hitting 10% of GDP in 2024, compared to 30% for China.
The Fed upwardly revised its target for inflation in 2025 from 2.5 to 2.7.
It's already reduced its target for U.S. growth in 2025 from 2.1 to 1.7, blaming the revisions on Trump's tariffs.
Update. The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs has issued travel warnings for all Israelis traveling abroad.
In addition, the Israeli Air Force has announced exit restrictions from all air bases in the country.
No personnel allowed to leave.
This morning, Chief of U.S. Sent Kerman met with Israeli military leaders at the underground fortress in Jerusalem used to control all Israeli military ops.
Joaquin, your thoughts?
Well, he's a battering ram, and that's why he has been installed as the U.S. president.
Stir things up, polarize, and bring a lot of conflict to the world.
That's why, I mean, that's one of the reasons why the Rothschilds invested to Haul him out of bankruptcy a couple of times through their agent, Wilbur Ross.
The guy's owned by Israel.
The guy is owned by the Rothschild founders of Israel.
He does what he's told.
Oh yeah, he talks tough like he's in control.
He's not.
He is a robot for the whole thing about Israel.
This is all about Israel.
It has nothing almost to do with the lives and the welfare of Americans.
It only puts Americans in severe jeopardy.
I mean, the prices are going to go up through the roof.
People are not going to be able to afford even to travel with the gasoline oil price hikes that are going to take place, the inflation that's going to kick in.
And then his tariff program.
Where he's raising all this?
You know, we're not going to be able to get anything from overseas and yet we're so dependent on it because we don't have a manufacturing sector left.
It's just total disaster for everybody on this earth as I see it.
There's nothing positive other than those that want to depopulate the earth.
They might be happy about this whole situation but the rest of us, you know, The billions that are on this earth can only lose from Trump's move here.
It's disgraceful.
What's your assessment of the prospect?
Is Trump, in fact, going to attack Iran, do you believe?
It could be just, you know, they love to keep...
The world on edge and in fear.
And it could possibly, I pray actually, that it's only bullshit and a lot of hot air.
But you can't keep on this whole expansionist, war-demanding diatribe.
Very long before something gives.
Something has to give here.
Because obviously if he just keeps it up and then there's no action, everybody's going to perceive him as just a bunch of bullshit hot air.
And he's got such a huge ego that he's not going to want to be seen as a bullshitter.
He means business!
I don't know.
I hope it's just hot air, but I don't know.
This guy's kind of a madman.
Yes, yes, yes.
I think we're all disturbed.
Meanwhile, New York Times blockbuster article prepares Americans for defeat in Ukraine.
A March 29 article on involvement in Ukraine in the Times by Adam Entos.
Reveals America was woven into the war far more intimately and broadly than previously understood.
Understood is euphemism.
It means the American and global public were lied to.
The article reveals the war in Ukraine truly was, as former British PM Boris Johnson and Secretary of State Marco Rubio have said, a proxy war against Russia.
U.S. military and intel were involved at every stage.
Including supplying the weapons, the training, the planning, the war gaming, the intel, and the targeting.
They were involved in everything, from the big picture to the minute detail.
A vast American intel collection effort, both guided big picture battle strategy and funneled precise targeting info down to Ukrainian soldiers in the field.
Which, by the way, of course, explains one of the reasons why it's taken longer than anticipated.
American military and intel.
Provided intel about Russian battlefield position movement and intention.
Every morning, officers recalled, the Ukrainians and Americans gathered to survey Russian weapons systems and ground forces to determine the ripest, highest value targets.
When a European intel chief discovered how deeply enmeshed NATO was in battlefield adopts, he marveled.
They are part of the kill chain now.
But none of this is really new.
For those of us paying attention rather than propaganda and repeated assurance and talking points, it was already available.
Even the New York Times had already reported much of this.
The piece adds many names and significant details, but it's not a revelation.
The U.S. was not supplying the Ukrainians weapons, but that was feeding them the intel.
But beneath the supposed time shell, the important targets are exposed deserving more attention again, though not entirely new.
It opens with a revelation intended as dramatic narrative rather than investigative journalism, that from early on, NATO troops were on the ground in Ukraine.
In the dramatic description of a clandestine convoy smuggling two Ukrainian generals across a Polish border to meet with American intel to forward what would become one of the most closely guarded secrets of the war of Ukraine, the Times reveals the convoy was manned by British commandos out of uniform but heavily armed.
That's not entirely news.
Nor is it entirely news that American military were dispatched to Kiev.
It may be news that the Biden admin sent a small team, about a dozen officers to Kiev, easing the prohibition on American boots on Ukrainian ground.
And then, to build confidence and coordination, the admin more than tripled the number of officers in Kiev to about three dozen.
They could now plainly be called advisors, though they would still be confined to the Kiev area.
But it is significant that CIA was also authorized to send officers to the Kharkov region to assess their Ukrainian counterparts with operations inside the box.
That phrase means inside Russia.
The unthinkable had become real.
The U.S. was now woven into the killing of Russian soldiers on sovereign Russian soil.
Soon, military advisers would be dispatched to command posts closer to the fighting.
The creeping closer to the front of military advisers' U.S. hints at how far the U.S. stretched its restrictions and became involved in strikes inside Russia.
It began with Crimea, regarded by Russians as their own.
American intel and targeting allowed the killing of Russian generals, with leeway to act within Crimea itself.
The CIA supported a massive attack by maritime drones on the Russian Black Sea fleet in the Crimean port of Sevastopol.
Later, the U.S. military and CIA would help plan and support a campaign of Ukrainian strikes in Russian-annexed Crimea.
In an operation codenamed Lunar Hail, the Biden admin authorized Ukraine to attack Crimea with long-range missiles and drones with the aim of forcing Russia to pull their military infrastructure out of Crimea.
The U.S. would select the targets, oversee virtually every aspect of each strike, from determining the coordinates to calculating the missile flight path.
But Biden had been even authorized the military and CIA to secretly work with the Ukrainians and the British on a blueprint to attack the Kerr Strait Bridge.
By the end, the military and then CIA received the green light to enable pinpoint strikes deep inside Russia itself.
Since CIA was not allowed to provide targeting inside Russian territory in an act of sophistry, The admin would let the CIA request variances, carve-outs, authorize a spy agency to support strikes inside Russia to achieve specific objectives.
The CIA provide details on Russian vulnerabilities as well as on Russian defense systems.
They calculate how many drones the op would require, charted their circuitous flight paths, The Times revealed, perhaps in clearer detail than before, how these escalations recklessly led the Biden admin to repeatedly cross red lines, creating consequences that had them genuinely concerned about World War III, even nuclear.
When the US provided long-range HIMARS rocket system, which rely on US satellite for their flight path, a US official reflected, The movement spent standing on that line wondering, if you take a step forward, is World War III going to break out?
In their calculations, the U.S. new Russian nuclear doctrine allows for the use of nukes if the very existence of the state is threatened.
They knew, too, Russia considered Crimea to be part of the Russian state.
U.S. intel had overheard Russia's Ukraine commander, General Sergei, Servikon talking about using tactical nukes to prevent Ukrainians from crossing the Dnepro and making a beeline to Crimea.
Estimate would raise the chance of Russia using nukes to 50%.
The Biden-authorized Operation Lunar Hail anyway.
They would repeat that risk with the introduction of longer-range ATACMs, knowing that Russia's military chief, General Gerasimov, had indirectly referred to them the previous May when he mourned General Milley that anything with a longer range would breach a red line.
A final red line would be crossed when CIA was authorized to support long-range missile and drone strikes into Russia.
In addition to the reckless flirtation with World War III, And a nuclear war for which history should hold a Biden admin accountable, the time reveals another cynical nugget not previously sufficiently reported.
The war against Russia was also a grand experiment in war fighting, one that would not help Ukraine but reward Americans with lessons for future war.
In an episode...
For his poignant drama than investigative journalism, he misses the significance of his own reporting.
As Lieutenant General Christopher Donahue, head of the Coalition Supporting Ukraine, ended his deployment and prepared to leave, he presented Ukrainian General Sabrodowsky a gift and said thanks.
When the Ukrainian general asked him, why are you thanking me?
I should be thanking you.
Explained the Ukrainians were the ones fighting and dying, testing American equipment and tactics, and sharing lessons learned.
Thanks to you, we built all these things that we never could have.
Missing from the stories the Russian Armed Forces also met and adapted to the most advanced American systems.
Learned how to defend against and eliminate many of them.
The Times article is characterized by other oddities.
As Geoffrey Roberts, Professor Emeritus of History at University College, Cork, pointed out in this account, the Russian Armed Forces play no role in a peculiar narrative that is as significantly for more authoritative ones like that told in the relative chapters of the Routledge Handbook of Soviet and Russian Military Studies, edited by Alexander Hill, the incompetent Russian Armed Forces.
Early ever reactive.
They are missing from the story.
The Russians have no battlefield successes, only passive responses to Ukrainian failures.
In a war that has swung decisively in Russia's favor, the American-Ukrainian partnership is portrayed as yielding triumph upon triumph, even most of Ukraine's catastrophic failures.
are presented as yielding some success.
In the face of partnership victories, Russian forces' morale plummeted, and with it their will to fight.
In odd account of a war, Russia is winning.
Perhaps most importantly, the article reads like a history intended to prepare the American public for defeat in Ukraine.
Every victory is credited to America.
Every defeat blamed on Ukraine.
To read the article is to learn Ukraine would have won the war had they only listened to the Americans.
The Times is flipping the script.
Ukraine has blamed the U.S. for its failure, pointing failure to keep its promise to whatever they need for as long as they need it.
President Zelensky may have meant his Ukraine victory plan to allow him to claim that he has begged the U.S. to keep its promise to no avail.
They had broken their promise and abandoned him, leaving no choice but to concede defeat and turn to negotiations.
The time flipped the script.
The U.S. did everything they could, but the Ukrainians wouldn't listen.
That's why the war was lost, and now we have no choice but to force negotiations.
There are too many examples of U.S. receiving credit for easy victory and Ukraine receiving blame for every failure.
To quote them all.
The Americans, we're told, sometimes couldn't understand why the Ukrainian didn't simply accept good advice.
An American general told a Ukrainian, I love your country, but if you don't do this, you're going to lose the war.
The humble general replied, he gets it, but he's not the Supreme Commander.
I'm not the President of Ukraine.
On another occasion, the same American told the Ukrainians.
You can slobber Ukraine all you want with other people.
I don't care how brave you are, look at the numbers, before walking them through a plan to win a battlefield advantage.
When the Ukrainian armed forces had an important early victory against Russians, attempting to build a bridge they could cross over a river, it was spoken that the Americans had supplied the points of interest targets that helped to thwart the Russian assault.
Time and again, when battles failed, it was because the Americans were informed the order of battle had changed, Ukrainian generals had other plans, or Americans were not told the meeting's outcome.
That's not the plan!
The exasperated American generals would cry.
We all kept thinking.
Was. This is not great.
The Americans meticulously laid out each op.
Each time they failed, it was because...
The Ukrainians wavered or their generals wouldn't budge.
Or when the U.S. generals were begging the Ukrainian generals to move his brigades forward, the Ukrainian commander hesitated.
The crucial counteroffensive failed because the key was beginning the counteroffensive on schedule.
But the drop-dead date came and went because the Ukrainians wouldn't commit.
A frustrated senior U.S. official said, We should have walked away.
Later, mission would fail because out of caution and deficit of trust, Ukraine commanders would now first use drones to confirm the U.S. intel, costing precious time in the end.
Ukraine fell short because they weren't willing to do what was necessary to help themselves prevail by drafting people as young as 18, despite all the legitimate reason for not doing so.
The Americans were deaf, too, because they prioritized their goals in the proxy war over Ukraine's concerns.
Later, mission would fail because they had a caution and a deficit of trust.
The New York Times article reveals many gems, sometimes not the ones it set out to.
Its catalog of just how much the U.S. was woven into the war should also, as Anatoly even, Director of the Eurasian Program at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft suggests that me remind the Europeans with their ambitious ideas of continuing to support the war without the Americans how crucial was USA.
But the most important revelation is that it is the first significant public attempt to prepare Americans for defeat in a war that has cost them billions of dollars and Ukrainians Hundreds of thousands of casualties and lives.
Meanwhile, Zelensky, no troop cuts, no recognition of occupied territories.
Ukraine will not agree to reduce its army or recognize Russian occupied land in future peace plans.
Our priority is a strong military.
No reductions, only modernization.
Hal Turner remarks, "He again seals the fate of the entire country.
It seemed to me personally that unless he agrees to Russia's terms, it's clear to some old people that Russia will simply continue to smash Ukraine until it either surrenders or no longer exists.
I think this man is either detached from reality or not." Maybe both.
Joaquin, your thoughts.
Well, I think what we're seeing is when the losers in the war are about to lose, they blame each other.
This happens in every war.
Nobody can fess up and admit mistakes.
I mean, this is the stubborn, delusional kind of thinking that all players, certainly in the West, US, as well as Ukraine, have.
But, you know, a little history is important here, too.
You know, the whole thing, divide and rule, that's how the Rothschilds and the globalists that have been in control of geopolitics on this earth for a long time have played it since World War II.
The Cold War, you know, divide and rule, Soviet Union versus the United States.
And ever since the NATO began in the late 40s, they've been expanding.
And since the 1991 statement by Secretary of State James Baker under Reagan, saying that there would be not one inch eastward will NATO go, there's been 16 countries added to NATO just in the interim time.
Including in 2008, the audacity to invite Putin to a NATO summit and tell him that Ukraine and Georgia, the Soviet Republic X, are the next NATO acquisitions, right there in front of Putin.
They insult him with this information.
So they've been at it a long time.
This is a major investment of the United States puppet government answering to the globalist city of London to try and get one more country on Russia's border to weaken Russia.
That's their whole foreign policy is based on provocation to weaken Russia.
The West Point guy that I supervised, Lloyd Austin, as Secretary of Defense, said, yes, our aim is to weaken Russia.
And so, yeah, everything's about weakening Russia to play the globalist game of West versus East, which is still going on and headed towards World War III.
It's always been this way since World War II ended.
All this detail now about blaming and these revelations that are coming up, nothing is new here.
It's all rehashed, same old policy of provocation to try and create more conflict with Russia, and it always failed.
They have not beaten Russia in anything.
And certainly in the big one that's coming with Iraq and Russia saying, hey, you know, this is going to be devastating consequences for you, the United States, if you bomb Iran.
So here we go.
I mean, it just never ends.
Conflict. That's what the controllers of the Earth want.
Conflict, conflict, conflict.
And what it means, of course, it was always NATO versus Russia from the beginning.
No difference.
NATO couldn't have fared any better because NATO was already there and NATO lost.
Really stunning.
Yes. Not good.
Meanwhile, did the West's paranoia of Russia destroy the world?
Paul Craig Roberts.
Do you remember that James Bond film that was a deranged Soviet general wanted to launch a nuclear war?
Or Dr. Strangelove?
An American deranged general wanted to do the same?
Well, Strangelove wasn't a deranged general.
Strangelove was the advisor.
Brilliant film.
I consider it the most important movie ever made.
Dr. Strangelove is still with it, but he's no longer considered insane.
In today's Pentagon, spending nuclear weapons among allies who lack them in order to conduct an even larger nuclear war is just good war planning.
On April 1st, unfortunately no joke, the nominee chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Dan Crane, said the U.S. was ready to consider entering into nuclear sharing with more of the country's NATO allies.
From a military perspective, explaining NATO ally participation in the nuclear deterrence mission in some capacity would enhance flexibility, survivability, and military capability.
Stunning! If confirmed, I will work to evaluate the cost-benefit of such a decision.
The nominee said another benefit of providing nukes to NATO members who don't have them is to prevent nuclear proliferation, resolving from acquiring them on their own.
If too many of our allies have the weapons, the U.S. would not be able to manage the escalation risk.
What Keynes said made sense.
We do not want Belgium, the Netherlands, Italy, Germany, or Poland launching a nuclear war.
But what this common sense hides is the absurdity of managing nuclear war.
There is a consensus or close to one.
Nuclear war would be lethal life on the planet.
It calls to mind the novel or canticle for Leibowitz.
With a spaceship loading with humans, animals, and plant life for a distant planet in a short period of time remaining prior to nuclear armageddon on Earth, rather a space Noah's Ark, it is, of course, the Pentagon's job to be prepared for war.
But as...
The war the Pentagon had prepared for is unwinnable.
Why not attempt to prepare for peace?
What cause is worth fighting for if it results in the death of planet Earth?
These thoughts entered the mind of President John F. Kennedy, who had campaigned as a Cold Warrior, proclaiming a missile gap.
Somehow Eisenhower, World War II advice our general, and let the Soviets get ahead of us.
Kennedy was rescued from the delusion by the Cuban Missile Crisis and BMX.
He refused the request to allow the Air Force to support the CIA's Cuban refugee army's invasion of Cuba.
He refused the Joint Chief of Staff Northward's project, which called for the U.S. Air Force to shoot down U.S. passenger airlines, stamp out of refugees from Cuba to Flora, And kill Americans on streets of Miami and Washington, D.C. and Blaine Castro as the justification for a U.S. invasion.
He rejected the Joint Chief of Staff plan for nuclear attack on the Soviet Union.
All this information is publicly available, but few are aware of it.
Kennedy worked behind the scene with Khrushchev to defuse the dangerous situation.
Instead of recognizing his leadership, The U.S. military security complex saw Kennedy as soft on communism, a traitor in the making to America who had to be removed from office.
As Kennedy was popular, assassination was a solution.
I agree with James Douglas, Oliver Stone, and the rest that Kennedy was murdered by the U.S. security state.
Why depart is whether it should have been revealed or covered up.
Here are facts.
Here are facts are not the issue, just judgment.
And judgment is not infallible.
I do not believe that anyone on the Warren Commission believed the report.
The entire purpose was to protect the American people from losing confidence in their own government in the midst of a dangerous Cold War with a nuclear-armed opponent in the aftermath of the missile crisis in Bay of Pigs with a balance of power at stake.
The US would have been harmed by official admission that security agencies of the government had assassinated its own president.
I agree that today, six decades after JFK's assassination, the truth, long proven by independent investigators, could be officially recognized, and perhaps it will be.
What I will address instead is how the truth could have been presented in 1963 if only the American government were up to the task.
What's sworn in?
Lyndon Johnson could have said something along the following lines.
Dear fellow Americans, our inordinate paranoia, our fear of the Soviet Union, has resulted in our president's death at the hands of the CIA, Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Secret Service.
Because President Kennedy's efforts to reduce tension between the U.S. and the Soviet Union that very recently brought the world close to a nuclear war were misperceived by our protective agencies as a sign of dangerous and warranted trust in our enemy that left us exposed to a nuclear attack.
President Kennedy was seen as soft on communism and possibly a traitor.
The fault is not in the CIA and the Joint Chiefs.
The fault is in the Cold War and the deployment of immensely destructive nuclear weapons.
The threat is real and it must be eliminated.
Our most urgent task is not to prosecute our protective agencies for their misjudgment but to terminate the Cold War and ban the existence of nuclear weapons.
Our challenge is to learn how to get along not how to kill one another.
The tragedy And our grief over our president's assassination is the fruit of our own paranoia.
Our job is to substitute mutual understanding and trust for fear and mistrust.
If not sooner or later, the disastrous weapons will be used.
Nothing like this could happen because too many people in interest have taken an ongoing conflict.
The assassination of JFK Put Johnson in the presidency.
It benefited the power and budget of the military security complex by blaming the assassination on Oswald, portrayed as a Soviet agent.
For the Joint Chiefs and CIA, that was a wonderful outcome.
What did they have to gain from Johnson telling the truth and continuing Kennedy's effort to reduce hysteria and threats when vision was needed?
It wasn't there.
Most disasters in history result from people being incapable of making the right decisions.
Today it's Trump and Putin who are being tested.
How much confidence can we have in either?
Meanwhile, Klaus Schwab is stepping down as World Economic Forum chair after investigation collapse of the globalist dream.
The WF is undergoing a great reset.
Just not of the kind the Devos founder envisioned.
Klaus Schwab's day as chairman or number at the World Economic Forum, the technocratic globalist organization he founded in 1971, and hosts an annual conference that's supposed to lead in Devos with Sir Lund.
Schwab told the W.F. Board of Trustees and staff in a letter Tuesday, seen by the Financial Time, he was beginning a year-long process of stabbing down Having already stepped down as Organization Executive Chairman last May,
the shake-up in devos comes between the American-led unrealization of Swan's proposed great reset of capitalism and in the wake of a probe into allegations of discrimination at the WEF.
Toxic workplace.
Days after his previous title drop, the Wall Street Journal published a damning report claiming On the basis of internal complaints, email exchange, and interview with current and past WEF employees, that under Schwab decades-long oversight, the forum had allowed to fester an atmosphere hostile to women and blacks in its own workplace.
The report noted at least six female employees were pushed out or otherwise saw their careers suffer when pregnant or coming back from maternity leave.
Other women claimed senior managers had sexually harassed them.
That was the most disappointing thing.
It was distressing to witness colleagues visibly withdraw from themselves with the onslaught of harassment at the hand of high-level staff, going from social and cheerful to self-isolating, avoiding eye contact, sharing nightmares for years after, said Vera had been a former media exec.
Worked at the W.F. before resigning in 2019.
Former staffers who worked closely with Schwab told the Journal the problem went all the way to the top, alleging that the founder made suggestive comments that made them uncomfortable.
The Journal also indicated black employees complained about managers using racial slurs and being passed over for promotion.
One employee filed a lawsuit in New York claiming WEF was hostile to women and blacks.
The WEF settled on undisclosed terms.
Cheryl Martin, head of the Center for Global Industries.
That was the most disappointing thing.
To see the distance between what the forum aspires and what actually happens behind the scene.
The WEF, which routinely lectures the world about racism.
The supposed gender gap, sexism, climate change, and other perceived moral failings characterize the general report as inaccurate, claiming we are an organization that upholds the highest standards of governance while working to address the most pressing challenges of our time, with our high-performing teams, our diverse and global outlook, and an environment that values innovation, inclusion, and well-being.
By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy in terms of use and agree to receive content that may sometimes include advertisement.
Tom Blair, legal touts of the W.F. suggested the report, painting the W.F. as a degenerate organization led by hypocrites, was both defamatory and illustrative of the journal's steady decline.
Toothless investigation.
In the wake of the Journal's indication those keen to control the world were unable to control themselves, W.F. had the law firm Covington& Burling, whose members recently had their security clearance suspended by President Trump, investigate the claims of workplace discrimination and harassment.
The American firm, which conducted the review in conjunction with the Swiss firm Hornberger, indicated in a summary of its assessment that it did not find The forum had committed any legal violations and did not substantiate the misconduct allegations against Schwab.
Now, after the turmoil of the last month, our purpose is to recover our sense of mission.
While the external investigation were unable or unwilling to find proof of guilt, Roger Brande, president and CEO of the WF, indicated there was nevertheless an internal desire to make some minor Changes.
Brendy reportedly noted in an email the board overseeing the law firm investigation identified leadership and management issues that do not meet our established standards, in addition to affirming the organization alleged commitment to a workplace where all employees feel valued and respected.
Great reset.
Schwab is apparently convinced The WF has yet to recover its sense of mission, saying as much in his April 1st letter to the trustees, including Salesforce CEO Mark Benioff, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink,
International Monetary Fund Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva, failed U.S. presidential candidate Al Gore, and Saman Guttaranam, President of Singapore.
I am deeply convinced that in today's special context, the forum is more important and relevant than ever before, wrote Schwab.
It's also financially very well equipped, thanks to successful financial management since its beginning.
What is essential now, after the turmoil of the last month, is to recover our sense of mission.
The W.F. of the Financial Times, Schwab's departure, Should be complete by January 2027.
Schwab reportedly suggests it was personally significant he made his announcement on April 1st as it marked the 55th anniversary of the day he began working on the concept of a global village, a term coined several years earlier by Canadian intellectual Marshall McLuhan.
Joaquin, this is all, you know.
Mixed message.
I mean, I'd say I wish the WF should fail.
Not leaving until January 2027.
What the hell does that mean?
Your comments on all the above.
I think WEF is in total turmoil because they have recognized that quite a large percent of people now are onto WEF.
They're on to them as this globalist organization that is bringing total tyranny to the world.
I think a lot of people are understanding that they, the WEF members, do not represent humanity.
As a matter of fact, they represent the death of humanity.
Latch on to all these kind of concepts, globalist concepts, where depopulation is a big priority for this group.
And so, you know, and then, you know, the fact that Klaus Schwab is supposedly leaving.
You know, last year he was stepping down a little bit.
Now they're, till 2027, that hardly says he's gone.
I think he's going to die prior to the end.
But sadly, I think a lot probably of the people on this earth are going to die before him, unfortunately.
I think it's all basically, they're in fear mode right now because they're becoming less important.
Less powerful?
Yeah, they do represent the Rothschilds and the biggest globalist bloodline families that have been controlling the earth for a couple of centuries.
But I think their clout is drying up.
It's fizzling.
And they are in total disarray as a result.
and unwilling, of course, to admit weakness and non-relevance.
But that's the truth.
They are becoming more non-relevant.
And that's also a reason why I think they're stepping up World War II Yeah, I think those are great comments.
Very, very troubling.
Any way you cut it.
Meanwhile, Trump's three greatest betrayals so far.
Writing for Natural News, Lance Johnson wrote an accurate, concise summary of President Trump's greatest betrayals so far.
There are three in number.
Betrayal number one.
From Gaza to Yemen.
Trump's expanding Middle East slaughter.
Trump betrayal is most evident in his military escalation.
After cynically criticizing Biden's bombing, Trump has launched devastating strikes on Yemen, killing civilians under the pretense of protecting Red Sea shipping, a crisis manufactured by Israel's blockade of Gaza.
Dr. Ron Pollock contends the hypocrisy.
Was Yemen in the process of attacking the United States?
No. Did the president seek a declaration of war?
No. Instead, Trump's bombs rained down on women and children while his administration threatened Iran, a deliberate provocation toward World War III.
Max Blumenthal summarized Trump's role succinctly.
Trump owns the Gaza slaughter.
The same man who promised peace now fuels a regional inferno with Israel's interest dictating every move.
Yes. Indeed.
Here's Chuck Baldwin, who's sponsoring this site.
Well, now we know that the double standard of the law also exists for the Republican hierarchy.
So the real double standard falls on voters of this country who are only willing to apply the rule of law to the opposing political party.
They are completely fine if their party violates the law or the Constitution itself for that matter.
Legal scholar Judge Andrew Napolitano opines Hegseth violated the Federal Espionage Act.
In my view, Hegseth's crime makes Hillary's look like a parking ticket by comparison.
In the very least, he could be fired, perhaps even criminally prosecuted.
Others in government are currently serving 20-year prison sentences for far lesser crimes than the nature of Hegseth.
He showed the world, friends and enemies, Trump's cabinet picks are a bunch of buffoons.
Reading the chat, one would think they were listening to the chatter of high school kids, incredible incompetence.
Then, of course, Donald Trump resupplied Israel with bombs and missiles with which a continuous genocide and ethnic cleansing of Palestinian people in Gaza.
Then, greenlit, It was the slaughter of the civilian population, which continues unabated to now.
So a genocide in Gaza is now Trump's genocide.
The war in Yemen is now Trump's war.
Betrayal number two.
The puppet and the puppeteer.
Trump's subservience to Netanyahu.
Trump's fealty to Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu is not just political, it's pathological.
As Colonel McGregor bluntly observed, Netanyahu is practicing American foreign policy through ventriloquy.
He's simply moving Trump's mouth.
George Galloway highlighted Trump's humiliating subservience, recalling footage of the president bowing down to Netanyahu's chair like a servant.
This is the President of the United States practically waiting at table on a visiting politician, Galloway remark, emphasizing the grotesque power imbalance.
Netanyahu does not merely lead Israel.
He commands.
Jewish international power and capital, as McGregor noted, Trump, indebted to this influence for his election, now repays the favor with bombs.
By now, only those who are willingly ignorant Do not know that our politicians in both parties in Washington, D.C., including President Trump, are bought and paid for by the Israeli lobby.
I've read estimates suggesting a combined contribution to the Trump political campaign last year by Zionist donors totaled over a billion dollars.
Mossad asset Miriam Adelson alone donated more than $100 billion to Trump.
The truth is...
U.S. military is little more than a mercenary army for Israel.
This began in earnest during the first presidential admin of George H.W. Bush.
For one quarter of a century now, the foreign policies of American presidential admins, regardless of party, have been nothing more than puppets for Israel.
As I noted in this column last week, Listen to what this very influential Jewish rabbi recently said.
It really doesn't matter if Donald Trump or Donald Duck wins the U.S. election.
It really doesn't matter if Kamala Harris or Kermit the Frog wins.
What comes to international affairs, anything that impages on the future of the world, Donald Trump, Kamala Harris have no freedom of choice.
They become like puppets.
And it moves the strings of the puppets we do.
The Jewish people.
American foreign policy is not made by our President and Secretary of State.
It's made by Benjamin Netanyahu and the Zionists in Israel.
Betrayal number three.
Trump's war on free speech.
Silencing critics of Israel.
Trump's admin has weaponized federal power to crush the Sanagans' Israel brutal occupation of Palestine.
Judge Napolitano and Professor John Mearsheimer recently exposed the chilling reality.
The single greatest threat to freedom of speech in the United States at this point in time is Israel and its supporters here in the United States, Mearsheimer stated.
Despite that hollow claim, I have stopped all government censorship and brought back free speech in America.
His regime has intensified crackdowns on pro-Palestinian voices.
Protesters face deportation, university-centered criticism of Israel, and any challenge to Zionist narratives is met with state-sanctioned retaliation.
Professor Mearsheimer is 100% correct.
The single greatest threat to freedom of speech in the United States at this point in time is Israel and its supporters here in the United States.
Published on VaccineImport.com is a report by Brian Shellaby entitled RFK Jr.'s Anti-Semitism Task Force, operating as new secret police, stalking and terrorizing legal U.S. residents.
Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has continued to attack those who protest against the genocide happening in Gaza by having his Anti-Semitism Task Force stalk and terrorize legal U.S. residents, including permanent residents here with green cards.
Here's a surveillance video showing how the new secret police force operates in the U.S., operating similarly to the German Gestapo and the Russian KGB in World War II, where dissidents were abducted and shipped off to concentration camps.
Journalists... Glenn Greenwald, himself an ethnic Jew, is the latest to criticize Kennedy for running the anti-Semitism task force.
He supported Kennedy and Make America Healthy Again movement, but now can hardly believe Kennedy is joining the Zionists and restricting free speech.
Many of the students who are being stalked, seen without warrant, and whizzed away to ICE detention centers in Louisiana, run by private contractors in deplorable conditions, with no charges against them, are not here on student visas, but are permanent residents holding green cards, being immigrationists, or I interview them and gram them, permanent residents in the United States.
Is this new secret police force Mark this down.
The same...
Judaistic evangelicals are cheering for the unconstitutional persecution of college students who voice their displeasure of Israel's genocide in Gaza will cheer for the unconstitutional persecution of you and me who say the Israel of God is not the Zionist state born in 1948.
Don, take us out.
Oh. Jim, you've taken us out of our comfort zone, that's for sure.
This has been a heavy, heavy program here on April the 6th, 2025.
Oh boy, we are heading right towards hell.
I don't think it's going to be heaven here while it's really going on.
But hear this, folks.
I mean...
A lot of people probably can't handle this show but try to toughen up and watch it and realize what really is happening to your world and I guess get prepared for the worst.
And I guess we're going to have some more of this show coming on in a little bit so come on back if you dare.
And I thank you so much for watching and for selling because the world needs to know this and if you don't tell them, who will?
So let's just carry on and pray for the best and work for peace if possible.
▲
Export Selection