All Episodes
March 15, 2025 - Jim Fetzer
01:04:11
US or Israel?, Dr. Robot, Sh*t Aint True, Naomi Wolf, Labels for all, SNAP, Red Meat?, Oracle
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to episode 118 of Gary King's Inconvenient Truths, where Gary presents videos and stories I don't know are coming for my spontaneous and unrehearsed response.
We're in the semifinals of the Big Ten basketball tournament, and my team, the Wisconsin Badgers, which were seeded number five, were playing.
Number one seed, Michigan State.
But State's only favored by a point and a half.
And when we lost to them by only a handful a couple weeks ago, we were missing one of our starting guards.
So the number of threes we've been dropping has been phenomenal.
So I believe there's a real chance we can knock off the number one seed today.
Noon Central.
All right.
Yeah, we're going to get on it.
I always get nervous when I'm playing the number one seed, no doubt about it.
But, hey, if they're slamming down the threes, then it's going to be A-OK. All right, let me get going here.
All right, I got this one off of your clip, your website.
Here we go.
So I've heard that anti-Semitism is on the rise on X and across various social media platforms as a result of right-wing Internet influencers propagating a conspiracy theory claiming that the American government is occupied and controlled by Israel.
Is it really a conspiracy theory?
My name is Frankie Stocks.
I'm a reporter with the Stu Peters Network.
I would just love to ask you a quick question.
I'm trying to ask every representative I can.
That is, do you care more about the American people or Israel as a member of Congress?
I don't think they're mutually exclusive, Frankie.
Can you elaborate?
They're our best allies.
Are they?
Who do you care about more, the United States or Israel?
United States or Israel, sir?
No answer?
Should we put you down for Israel?
Who do you care about more, the American people or Israel?
It's an easy one.
American people or Israel?
If you don't have to fake a phone call, American people or Israel?
Who do you care about more, the American people or Israel?
The American people or Israel, sir?
Who do you care about more, the American people or Israel?
No answer?
I think that Israel is one of our strongest allies and part of the world.
People are trying to harm us, and I think they need our support.
So should the U.S. continue funding Israel, despite their links to the 9-11 with their attack on the USS Liberty?
Who do you care about more, the United States or Israel?
That's kind of an odd question to ask.
Well, it's a question the American people have been asking a lot because they're starting to wake up to how much AIPAC money is flowing into the coffers of Congress.
Well, if you watch what I've done the years since I've been here, the question about people who need a strong support for these real estate, it would be hard to find somebody who's more positive about it than I have.
I'm amazed sometimes at where the American people are and how they think.
It's like this is so against everything I've heard.
There are people who raised me over with their son of a soul.
Well, I mean, we have American citizens who are about to freeze to death in Western North Carolina and we're sending millions to Israel.
Well, it is a comparison because the money's going out.
It's all coming from the same people.
It's coming from the taxpayers, sir.
Who do you care about more, the American people or Israel?
American people are Israel, sir.
Sir, they're equal.
Are you serving Israel or you're serving America?
I stand with this.
Okay, so can you answer the original question?
Who do you care about more, U.S. or Israel?
There's no variance.
It's like you're asking, you know, do you love your wife more than your daughter?
And you said it was a simple question.
It is.
Do you love your wife more than your daughter?
I love the United States more than I love Israel.
It's a very simple question.
You have great love, and you as a human being, you express that love, and you have core principles that drive you to your love for your wife and your love for your daughter.
It's two different loves, but neither of them is greater than the other.
You understand?
Okay, Dr. Fezzeri, it just keeps on going like that.
I think that's great.
Put him on the spot.
It was Cynthia McKinney who exposed back in 2011 on Press TV, that's Iranian television, about the existence of the pledge, that new members of Congress are asked to sign a pledge to put the interests of Israel even ahead of the interests of the United States.
And those who refuse to sign...
Find their financing dries up.
They're confronted with an alternative candidate who's got lots of money.
Or their district's been redrawn.
Cynthia was able to survive and serve six terms, as I recall.
But Dennis Kucinich, who I regarded as the smartest member of Congress at the time, was not.
They redrew his district and he lost.
Today, only Thomas Massey.
of Kentucky does not have an AIPAC handler.
And you can have no doubt that in terms of their political action, they are following the pledge.
They are putting the interests of Israel ahead of those of the United States.
I'm glad to report, by the way, we're seeing a diminution of enthusiasm for support for Israel.
They still have majority support, but it's dropping.
And I guarantee you, Gary, it's going to drop a whole lot more.
The fact Trump is acting like a thug in foreign policy is very, very bad.
Threatening Putin with more sanctions if he doesn't come to the peace table.
Putin can't be pushed around.
Sending similar to the Ayatollah in Iran.
The Iranian president has said, Do whatever you want to do, Mr. Trump.
We're ready.
And I'm telling you, the whole world is disillusioned with Israel and the United States, which they're perceiving quite clearly as the foremost terrorist states in the world today, Gary.
This is not a good situation.
And if we thought Trump was going to improve it in terms of international relations, it's not happening.
Unlike what he's doing domestically, But what he's doing in terms of the war in Ukraine with Russia and the slaughter of the Palestinians ongoing in Gaza, it ain't cutting it.
Not impressing me or anyone else who looks at this objectively, Gary, and has a modicum of morality about them.
Got it.
Okay, on to the next one.
But now we have...
A bunch of Democratic senators reading from the same script.
When I win, I will immediately bring prices down starting on day one.
That ain't true.
That's what you just heard.
And I put this together because I saw three of them.
And once I saw three of them, I was like, I wonder if there's more.
So I went to go look.
Then I found three more.
I actually found seven of them, but I didn't want to keep smashing them into the thing.
So I was like, okay, this is just going to take all day.
I think six gets the point across.
Then I found out after I put this up that there are actually 22 of them now, at least.
So 22 of our senators were given a script written by someone.
We don't know who that is.
They say the same thing and they do the same action.
They say it, then they sit down.
That's what you just saw.
That's what you just heard.
That's what you just heard.
And that's what you just heard.
Then they put up the same font about shit that ain't true.
And then, all throughout the edit, while they're emotionally delivering this script, has now empowered the richest man in the world to take a chainsaw.
He's allowing Elon Musk to literally take a chainsaw.
Elon Musk take a literal chainsaw.
Literally take a chainsaw.
Elon Musk take a chainsaw.
Elon Musk, an unelected billionaire.
Take a chainsaw.
His buddy Elon Musk.
Elon Musk take a chainsaw.
Elon Musk dancing on stage with a chainsaw.
Prance around with a chainsaw.
Elon Musk take a chainsaw.
Elon Musk bringing a chainsaw and just trying to chop this stuff up.
Elon Musk and his doge boys.
And his little muskrats.
Elon Musk take the chainsaw.
There are the same clips that are being shown.
The exact same clips at the same time.
And it all ends with the same line.
You lose and billionaires win.
And that's the truth.
And that's the truth.
And that is the truth.
And that's the truth.
And that is the truth.
And that is the truth.
And that's the truth.
And that's the truth.
And that is the truth.
And it's all edited in the exact same way.
They say repetition is the simplest form of brainwashing.
Instead, he's pardoned violent criminals who beat police officers on January 6th.
Who attacked our police officers at the Capitol.
Pardoning January 6th protesters.
January 6th.
That's an effing disgrace.
All right.
That's great, Gary.
I love it.
I love it.
They're all reading the same script.
Look, the Democrat Party is...
Dead in the water.
It isn't going anywhere.
It has no prospects.
It's been sold out.
Exposing the auto pen scandal means I expect virtually every, if not all, executive orders that were purportedly signed by Joe Biden are going to be declared null and void by the Supreme Court of the United States.
And perhaps they'll even get so far as to realize That signature isn't the same signature as the real Joe Biden from Delaware, who appears to have died around 2017. It's insulting.
It's disgraceful.
The Democrat Party is a totality, is a messy pile of shit.
To use their word, Gary, sad to say, that's where things stand with the DNC today.
Okay.
All right.
We found out via a tweet yesterday that he had arrested a person named Mahmoud Khalil.
Then the White House blared this out across their social media pages, writing, Shalom.
He had completed work on his master's degree from Columbia University in December, but he is a legal resident of the United States.
He is a green card holder.
That is very different from somebody who was here on a student visa.
So he was arrested and detained by federal agents after his lawyer said that his green card was revoked by the Trump administration, despite the fact that he hadn't been arrested.
For engaging in illegal protests.
I'm looking at the details.
I'm looking for the details.
And I'm happy to correct this report if more comes out.
But don't put that on us.
We can't just be kicking out legal permanent residents because they've spoken in ways that we disagree with.
If he called for death, murder, the slaughter of children, I'm willing to partner with you.
But at this moment, I don't see it.
Well, the fact is he was a leader of protests at Columbia, so they want to make an example out of him.
Would you believe they're having to return or release a whole bunch of illegals that had been rounded up by ICE? They're even having to fly him back from Guantanamo.
I believe it's because they didn't follow the law.
In other words, the Trump administration has discovered it committed a blunder.
In the manner in which it's handled these deportations and such.
And they're having to correct it.
Candace, of course, is a sensational.
She's absolutely wonderful.
She is, in my opinion, a national treasure.
And I love everything she does.
Spectacular.
All right.
Yeah.
Zoom has actually redone its platform, so I'm kind of struggling learning it on the fly, but I think I'm getting it.
The time of robots is over.
We have achieved a new level between people and technology.
People and machines are finally united as one single being.
But what price did we pay for this?
Who really controls our mind and flesh this time?
Yes, friends, it is time for robots to become the doctor.
Here we have it.
HR, that is our House of Representatives, Bill number 238, introduced.
In 2025, to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to clarify that artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies can qualify as a practitioner eligible to prescribe drugs if authorized by the state involved and approved or authorized by the Food and Drug Administration and for other purposes.
How do you like them apples?
We designed them to be trusted with our homes, with our way of life, with our world.
Here is the man who introduced this horrendous bill, David Schweikert from Arizona, and he calls himself a Republican.
Here we have it.
Let's take a look at his issues, shall we?
We're going to click on innovation and AI. Advances in technology for improving adherence motivated by AI. If anyone could explain what that means, please let me know.
He writes, many of you know my fascination with innovation and the further implementation of technology into different facets.
of many industries.
Friends, there are those who want to replace our form of government with technology.
I'll be bringing you more coverage on this.
This is the man who has introduced this legislation which hopefully will go nowhere fast.
I thought it was interesting that he included this on the website.
Currently, the FDA has approved over 882 devices that use AI or machine learning.
I reject that phrase.
Machines cannot learn.
They are programmed by human beings who are not computers or machines.
It says that AI will treat, diagnose, and care for patients.
Let me know.
Okay.
Well, the public needs to understand that AI is simply the adaptation of computer programs to perform tasks that in the past have required human minds.
And because human minds operate in fundamentally different ways than do these inanimate machines, the whole project is ultimately Destined to failure.
Although I found it in an international journal entitled Minds and Machines and solely edited it for 10 years, and although most of the contributors bought into the computational model of the mind, according to which human minds operate on the same principles as do computing machines, that's wrong.
Because all the strings of zero, one, high and low voltage and so forth that run these machines mean nothing to the machines.
They're programmed to be meaningful to the programmers and for them to perform tasks that are desired by those who manage the projects when they're completed successfully.
But none of it means anything to these entities.
They not only have no emotions or empathy or morals, but they don't even have any thoughts.
So I'm sorry to say the nation being sold quite a bill of goods here about AI, there are occasionally examples that demonstrate where a minute difference makes a huge difference.
Alteration to understand what's going on in Total Recall.
For example, Arnold Schwarzenegger has a character being confronted by a scientist who'd implanted his memory chips, just trying to convince him that what he's experiencing is an illusion, that he's still under control of the processes of the machine, where that tiny bead of perspiration shows up.
On his face, you know, realizes this is the reality.
This isn't an illusion.
But would a computing machine be processed to take into account the innumerable different minute changes in a situation that could tell all the difference in the world?
I'm sorry to say no, because you simply cannot anticipate everything that's going to develop.
We're getting a very grossly exaggerated set of performance claims about what's going to happen in the future, and while there are a lot of tasks for which AI can work perfectly, serviceably, and successfully, too many hopes are being introduced, too many expectations, the minimization of humanity in roles where humans are ultimately preferable.
To machines is being ignored, and I'm sorry to say, like lemmings, we're rushing over a technological cliff that I predict is ultimately going to lead to a disaster of monumental proportions.
Okay.
Next we got Naomi Wolf.
So I talked about the kind of corruption of the peer review process.
Also the media in North America and Western Europe was very corrupted.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, of course Bill Gates was a major investor in the mRNA injection.
They were flowing millions of dollars to previously very respected news outlets.
To quote-unquote overcome vaccine hesitancy.
So $55 million to the BBC, for instance.
The New York Times got money.
NPR got money.
The Guardian got money.
And you know if you run a news business, margins are very tight.
So a few million dollars makes a very big difference.
But it means that when problems were being surfaced by real journalists and real doctors, those...
Respected news outlets didn't want to cover them, and they kept reproducing inaccurate claims by the CDC, by Dr. Fauci, and so on, that this was safe and effective.
The other issue is the CARES Act in the United States.
A billion dollars from the government itself to basically pay off quote-unquote trusted influencers, all the way from churches and synagogues and mosques down to tiny dance troops in Queens or, you know, little regional...
Okay.
I like Naomi Wolf, even if she's packed on a few pounds.
You know, Fauci was running a huge scam.
The mRNA was neither safe nor effective.
It was sold to the public on the grounds you had a moral obligation not to contaminate others if you happen to have COVID. He wasn't even tested for inhibiting transmission.
It had no effect on transmission inhibition, and Fauci knew very well that base masks did no good to protect.
It's like trying to...
The size of the virus is so minuscule, and the pores of the masks are so enormous.
It's like trying to block a ping-pong ball with a hula hoop.
He knew from studies of the Spanish flu that most of the deaths that had occurred there were not from the flu itself, but from bacterial pneumonia infections that were promoted by wearing face masks.
So Tony Fauci turns out to be one of the great mass murders of our time, indeed of all time.
And I'm afraid he is not going to benefit from the pardon by the auto pen that took place.
Allegedly in Washington, D.C., when Joe Biden was off in St. Croix, Virgin Islands, on one of his many vacations.
So all that's going to be nullified.
And I hope Fauci is prosecuted to the full extent of the law, in my opinion.
He is fully deserving of the death sentence capital punishment, Gary.
I hope we have a modicum of justice and that becomes his fate.
All right, we're going to back just what you set up with this clip right here.
Do you represent science, Mr. Fauci?
I am a scientist who uses the scientific method to gain information.
Yes or no?
Yes or no?
No, that's not a yes or no answer.
Yes, it's a yes or no.
I don't think it is.
Okay, well, we'll take that as a you don't know what you represent.
But this, as director of the NIH, you did sign off on these so-called scientific experiments.
And as a dog lover, I want to tell you this is disgusting and evil, what you signed off on and these experiments that happened to beagles.
Paid for by the American taxpayer.
And I want you to know Americans don't pay their taxes for animals to be tortured like this.
So the type of science that you are representing, Mr. Fauci, is abhorrent.
You confess that you made up the COVID rules.
Including six feet social distancing and masking of children.
I never said I made anything up.
You admitted that you made it up.
I didn't say I made it up.
So are you saying this is fake news, Mr. Fauci?
I didn't say I made anything up.
What did you say?
I said that it is not based in science and it just appeared.
But this is science.
And making up guidelines like six feet distancing and masking of children.
Do you think that's appropriate?
Do the American people deserve to be abused like that, Mr. Fauci?
Because you're not doctor.
You're Mr. Fauci in my few minutes.
No, I don't need your answer.
That man does not deserve to have a license.
As a matter of fact, it should be revoked, and he belongs in prison.
Here you are, without your mask, where you got to go and enjoy the game and sit right next to people, not following the six feet of distancing, not wearing your mask, and everyone else was forced to stay home and stop enjoying life.
And your science here, your science is displayed perfectly in this picture where children, children in school, were put in plastic bubbles because of your science.
You're repulsive, evil science.
And let's go back to your very own email.
You said earlier you don't use email.
Oh, you do.
Right here.
This is your own email where you said the typical mask you buy in the drugstore is not really effective in keeping out virus.
I do not recommend that you wear a mask.
This is your email.
This is your own words.
But yet, children.
Children all over America were forced to wear masks.
Healthy children forced to wear masks muzzled in their schools.
And then they were forced to learn from home because of your so-called science and your medical suggestions while you and all your cronies get paid from Big Pharma.
You know what this committee should be doing?
We should be recommending...
You to be prosecuted.
We should be writing a criminal referral because you should be prosecuted for crimes against humanity.
You belong in prison, Dr. Fauci.
Okay.
I love Marjorie Taylor Greene.
She was fantastic there.
The Beagle experiments were horrific.
Oh, yeah.
So these beagles who were put in cages where these flesh-eating flies were devouring their eyes, their brains.
They were so whelping, they actually removed their vocal cords so they couldn't hear them.
It was disgusting.
It had no scientific benefit whatsoever.
Marjorie's got it completely right.
And I say, you know...
He deserved to be strung up.
In Iran, you know, in order to set an example, they actually hang malefactors from cranes in a stunning public display.
Fauci deserved to be hung from a crane.
That should be his fate.
Okay.
This is about the wildfires?
And to have a uniform burn, as we've seen, whole neighborhoods completely incinerated, you would need multiple ignition sources.
Even with an 80 mile an hour wind pushing that fire, you would still need multiple ignition sources, which the smart meters would provide them.
But the bottom line is this.
What is setting the template for those fires to burn with such ferocity?
And that is absolutely climate engineering, period.
We can see it on satellite imagery.
Remember the forest fires in Canada?
Yeah.
A couple years ago?
And we had multiple ignition sources at the same time.
Of course, you know, many chemtrails.
Ingredients drop, include barium, strontium, and aluminum particles, which act as incendiaries.
In the case of fire.
So I think a lot of these chemtrails have been set up for potential fires.
They've been especially prominent in the northwest of the United States.
And, you know, everything being done to expose it is to the good.
That was a very short clip.
There's a whole lot more out there about geoengineering, and it's all very well done, by and large, to expose a monster sham in the Air Force.
Every cubic foot of space above the United States is covered by radar.
The Air Force knows every plane that's flying in the air above the United States.
They're fully aware of the planes that are conducting the chemtrails, especially because it appears, from the research I've seen, the Air Force is flying them, Gary.
So, you know...
It's like the DOD being involved in creating the COVID vax.
The Air Force spreading chemtrails.
Our military isn't defending Americans.
It's using taxpayers' dollars to destroy us and our way of life.
So we're in a hell of a predicament.
And I only wish Donald Trump would do more to get things squared away.
But he's botching foreign affairs so badly, I don't know how this is all going to play out.
I'm very, very concerned.
Okay, we're at the halfway point in our show.
Let's keep it rolling.
Okay, this is going back a little bit.
Former U.S. Representative Gabrielle Giffords and her husband, retired astronaut Mark Kelly, campaigned for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton in Iowa.
One of their stops was at a canvassing kickoff event in Des Moines where they talked about reducing gun violence.
The couple have been gun control advocates since Gabrielle Giffords was seriously injured in a mass shooting five years ago at a political gathering in her district near Tucson, Arizona.
This is about 15 minutes.
You know, I was just a guy from New Jersey...
Just a fraud from New Jersey.
Bald guy from New Jersey who flew airplanes...
A fraud bald guy from New Jersey.
...in the Navy.
And then, a little while later, I had the opportunity to serve my country as an astronaut flying to space four times.
That was really exciting.
And I've served in the military for 25 years under both Republicans and Democrats, and I was always really honored to be able to serve my country.
So I wasn't really a political person, and as all of you know, you know, Gabby's political career, you know, was cut short.
But both of us have been, you know, quite honored to have a second opportunity at service, and that's in trying to make some positive steps in how we deal with guns and gun violence in this country.
You know, sign the contracts, sell your souls, and become good little New World Order sellouts and puppets.
That's all you did, Mark, but thanks.
And by the way, just to clarify, because I see people still getting confused, this is Mark Kelly, okay?
His twin brother is Scott Kelly, and he's supposed to be currently in space on the ISS, floating around in space.
As we looked at the records of all of the candidates that are currently running for president...
That there is really just one clear choice in who we need and who Gabby and I know is the right person for this issue and so many other issues, and that's Hillary Clinton.
Now I think about this as a, this whole thing, these few days, as a space shuttle launch.
You know, we spent a lot of time getting a spacecraft ready for launch.
How good of Mark to mix in some good old NASA mind control and propaganda into this charade.
It involves an entire army of people.
You know, it takes months and months, even years of preparation to get to that point where you ignite the solid rocket boosters on that space shuttle and build an incredible amount of momentum to complete this mission.
And I think of...
Iowa and all of you folks here working on this campaign as that rocket launch.
So the rocket is on the...
Right.
Right.
Going in the right direction, Mach 25, on to success to make Hillary our...
Okay.
Of all the clips you've ever shown, this is probably the most meaningless, pointless.
Gabby Gifford was in a small group of people, including a judge.
She was shot.
The judge was killed.
It appears that he was known for maximum sentences.
A drug dealer was going to come before him, didn't want to be sentenced by this guy.
And they tried to turn it into an anti-gun.
Bonanza.
But the fact that the matter is that worldwide, the greater the gun ownership in a population, the lower the homicide rate.
Nice illustration recently in Brazil where a strong gun control guy was replaced by a liberal gun ownership guy, and the homicide rate dropped, and then they got rid of him and brought back the strong gun control guy.
Homicide rate increased again.
They don't want you to know that Americans use guns for defensive purposes to defend themselves against perps who are threatening them millions of times every year, saving an estimated 200,000 lives of American citizens, Gary, by virtue of defensive use of guns, which is staggering.
Because it implies if you took away their ability to use guns to defend themselves, you'd add 200,000 to the total now around 50,000 if you exclude the suicides.
When you put in the suicide, we get about 80,000 gun deaths a year, but the most of them are from gang shootings.
Chicago, New York, you name it.
So, you know, you'd quadruple.
The number of deaths, if you took guns away from me, it's not working.
It's not playing out.
All the phony events.
I mean, this was a real shooting, and it appears she really was shot.
The judge really was killed.
Unlike Sandy Hook, where you didn't lose 20 children and 6 adults, or Parkland, or Orlando, or Las Vegas.
All of which were fraudulent in where anyone who wants to pursue them.
Check out, for example, how to spot a false flag in part one, how to spot a false flag in part two.
You can find it very easily.
Jim Fetzer.
Watch those and you'll understand how the American people have been played.
Why Barack Obama has been the maestro to...
Introduce and promote this program of scams to deceive and manipulate the American people to promote a gun control agenda that's contrary to the interests of the American people.
Won't reduce homicides, but on the contrary would increase some.
Gary, we gotta see through the smoke and mirrors.
Thanks.
Yeah, I was under the impression that this Gabby shooting was a complete fake.
Well, the judge was killed.
See, the judge was killed.
So I think that shooting was actually real.
She got a bullet in the head.
She had loss of cognitive function.
You can see from looking at her there, she wasn't all there.
So, no, I think that shooting actually was real.
But it was of a different character.
She wasn't the target.
It was the judge.
Oh, I'm sorry.
Lateral damage.
I gotcha.
Okay.
What if I told you there's a company that knows more about your life than even Google or Facebook, yet most people have never even heard of it?
A company that started by building databases for the CIA and now controls some of the most sensitive information on the planet.
Its name?
Oracle.
With billions in annual revenue, Oracle powers everything from financial systems and healthcare networks to the apps on your phone.
And at the heart of its empire is data.
Your data.
What you buy, where you go, how you vote.
Oracle doesn't just store this information.
It collects, analyzes, and sells it.
But how did Oracle become so powerful?
And why do so few people know about them?
This isn't just a software company.
Okay.
Well, I would like a whole lot more about Oracle and what's going on there.
I mean, we all know massive data collection is taking place.
They have these supercomputers performing trillions of operations in very brief intervals of time.
That one didn't really give us enough information to go on, Gary, to get deeper into the issue.
But obviously, it's of tremendous importance.
To our privacy, our security.
They use our information to target us with ads designed to appeal to our interest to sell our products and increase our profit margins.
I mean, this is a huge issue, but that wasn't even scratching the surface.
All right, here we go.
I want to do the next one.
Hey.
No!
Oh, I hope it's not the same one.
Thousands of miles coming from Mexico, and we're going to stop it.
Get them out of here.
Get him out of here.
Go home to your mom, darling.
Go home To get them out of here Out. Out. Out. Out. Out. Out. Out. Out. Out. Out.
Thank you.
Was that a man or a woman?
Because he needs a haircut more than I do.
Couldn't tell.
I couldn't tell.
Okay.
Okay.
Well, a little bit of fluff there.
I dare say if you got to protest and raise questions about...
Trump's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, and those are legitimate questions, and Trump has some explaining to do, as they put it.
It was completely successful by the protesters.
Look at all the national attention he got.
It's phenomenal.
Now, Pam Bondi has explained that in terms of releasing the Epstein files, not to mention JFK, MLK, RFK. That they have to remove Israeli national security information.
Think about it.
What is this Israeli national security information about the Jeffrey Epstein pedophile files that needs to be removed?
And of course, it's because, as she is implying, Epstein was Mossad.
He was running a...
Israeli opt to blackmail politicians right here in the US. It was very successful.
Very successful.
I mean, look, drugs, sex, and money are the primary methods that can be used to induce bad behavior.
And Epstein was a master.
I mean, this was one of the most brilliantly...
Conceived and executed blackmail schemes in all of American political history, and we've seen quite a few.
So I like the protester.
He was raising a legit issue.
Trump, in my opinion, has not answered all the questions.
Pam Bondi's actually acknowledging that Jeffrey Epstein was running an Israeli op, an Israeli honeypot.
And, you know, we need a lot of answers.
We're getting more questions, but we need some answers, Gary.
Let's hope it's coming, because he made a lot of promises about transparency and releasing all this controversial stuff, and it hasn't happened yet.
All right.
All right.
My breath.
Okay.
About childhood vaccines, number one.
He talked about electromagnetic radiation, number two.
He talked about pesticides.
He didn't talk about the things that Callie's talking about here, which is things like obesity or over-medicating children or sugar drink.
I'm all for that.
I agree with that.
You can have both.
He gave a powerful speech about these issues.
This is what Bobby Kinney's fighting against, Dr. Offit.
As you know, you were the chair at the Children's Hospital, the Merck chair.
It was like a NASCAR driver wearing their sponsors.
Merck paid your $1.5 million salary.
And this is what Bobby's saying, is that fundamentally...
Pharma can create good innovations, but they're foundationally incentivized for children to be sick.
Pharma doesn't make money when children are healthy.
The hospitals don't make money when the beds are empty.
Chronic disease, just as a demonstrable statement of economic fact, is a great economic invention for the health care industry, which demonstrably makes money when patients are sick.
And that's an incentive Bobby Kennedy is going hard after.
I'm in Florida.
I'm in a state senator's office right now.
I'm actually lobbying for these state SNAP bills, which Bobby is really supporting, to get soda off of SNAP.
I think the problem is that the public health community, the Merck shares of pediatricians, I mean, that is just insane.
Merck does not have children's interests at heart.
Merck itself has settled billions of dollars in criminal penalties for misleading and falsifying.
Well, apparently that was a proposal that you not be able to use food stamps to buy soft drinks and desserts.
I think that's kind of silly myself.
We want to inform people about health benefits.
And negative results from eating different kinds of food.
But people are going to make their own choices, you know.
I think this is one of those cases of much ado about practically nothing.
I mean, I get the motivation.
But, you know, it's being paternalistic.
It's telling people what they can and cannot do to benefit them in the judgment of those who are seeking to control their behavior.
These paternalistic ops generally...
Are unsuccessful.
They fail.
What you gotta do is just inspire somebody to be motivated to improve the quality of their lives by the choices they make, including food, exercise, entertainment, the whole line of things.
So I think this is a bit of a tempest in a teapot, Gary.
Okay.
All right.
Is it not true that right now as we speak in the UK citizens are being imprisoned for exposing horrifying crimes committed by Muslim migrants?
Crimes that the government seeks to conceal?
Or didn't the bureaucrats in Brussels suspend Romania's elections simply because they didn't like the party that had won?
Faced with each of these discussions, wokeism's first strategy is to discredit those of us who challenge these things, first by labeling us and then by silencing us.
If you're white, you must be racist.
If you're a man, you must be a misogynist or part of the patriarchy.
If you're rich, you must be a cruel capitalist.
If you're heterosexual, you must be heteronormative, homophobic or transphobic.
For every challenge, they have a label.
and then they try to suppress you by force or through legal means.
Because beneath the rhetoric of diversity, democracy and tolerance that they so often preach, what truly lies is their blatant desire to eliminate dissent, criticism and ultimately freedom so they can continue to uphold a model in which they are the main beneficiaries.
Okay.
That's wonderful.
President of Argentina is a major truth teller speaking at the World Economic Forum.
I mean, this is really an act of courage and integrity.
I'm very, very impressed.
Everything he was saying was accurate and true.
And, you know, to be expressing it at a forum, which is the tip of the spear for the new world order.
Which it appears is not going to go forward because Ukraine is not going to be available and they can only move forward with Ukraine to create the new world order.
In the words of Klaus Schwab, who's a spokesman for the Rothschild, this guy is a good guy.
He's president of Argentina.
That one's worth watching again.
Very, very good.
Excellent.
Great choice, Gary.
Okay.
All right, yeah, we're clearing out a bunch of clips that didn't make it in all the shows.
They didn't make the cut.
We had a company called Lucifer Publishing to write out the philosophical underpinnings of the United Nations.
She turned it into something called Lucis Trust, which still to this day exists at the United Nations as a meditation room with a big black cube in the middle and a thousand points of light coming through the roof.
And she wrote the ten rules for the one world government which still exists at the United Nations today.
And they are...
Okay?
Take God and prayer out of education.
Number two.
Reduce parental authority over children.
Number three.
Destroy the traditional Christian family structure.
Number four.
If sex is free, make abortion easy and legal.
Five.
Make divorce easy and legal.
Free people of the concept of traditional marriage.
Six, make homosexuality the alternative lifestyle.
Seven, debase art, make it run mad.
Eight, use media to promote and change mindset.
Nine, create an interfaith movement without God.
And ten, get governments to make all these laws and get the churches to endorse them.
Let's just say, the one thing not welcome at the United Nations is God.
Okay.
Well, rather interesting as a sequel because she's talking about principles to foment a cultural Marxist revolution by undermining the authority of parents, traditional marriage, traditional values, promoting pornography, homosexuality, transgenderism, and the like.
So that was a little hard to hear.
I mean, the production qualities weren't very good.
The message was appropriate and worth appreciating because that's how it's done.
And it's one of the reasons I think the United Nations may have outlived its usefulness.
Trump's contemplating pulling out of the UN just as he is pulling out of NATO. I think both at this point in time would be a good thing to do.
Boy, do I agree with that one.
Okay.
Oops, missed the button.
This is about meat.
We get a lot of questions sometimes.
When people buy our meat, they're like, well, I opened it up and it's not red.
Why isn't it red?
And the reason is because the only way to keep it red is they pump gases into the packaging that artificially create a red color.
So the meat, naturally, is never that red.
When you cut it and it's first exposed to oxygen momentarily, it will bloom, it's called.
It'll redden up just a little bit and then it'll instantly start to brown out unless you pump gases into the packaging for about 10 minutes and artificially create this red-pinkish color.
So we get that question a lot.
And it's like, they're like, your meat's not fresh because it's brown.
It's like, well, actually, it's way fresher.
Our meat...
is brown because five minutes later it turns to that brown color and then we flash freeze it so you're like eating meat that's like metabolically five minutes old versus that red fresh meat in the grocery store might be a month old and it sat like that but they're using artificial gases in that packaging to create a color that's completely unnatural.
So how would people know if that's is there anything on a package that someone...
Oh no they don't have to declare it.
If your packaged meat looks bright red...
Then it is filled with artificial gases to create that.
Meat doesn't look like that.
But no one knows that.
Looks bright red and juicy, but this piece of meat is not safe to eat.
Believe it or not, it's been sitting out for 11 days.
So how could it still look so fresh?
It's because it's being packed and gassed in a special process that most people never heard about, using carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen, which keeps the meat looking fresh and bright red.
We left two cuts of lamb out at room temperature.
One was gas-packed, the other, no gas.
After a few days, the untreated meat turns a dark, unappealing color.
But the gas-packed meat stays red, even after being left out for eight days.
The only visible sign of spoilage is the package puffing out and a bad odor when opened.
We had the meat analyzed in a lab, and it's no surprise that both cuts are loaded with bacteria.
The color of the meat doesn't necessarily indicate it's fresh.
Okay.
That's valuable information to know.
I mean, uh...
Every one of us is susceptible to that deception.
We go and we look at the meat and it looks red and we think it's fresh.
So I think that was a very useful contribution to understanding.
How do you work around it?
I can't give you the answer to that.
You're certainly not going to be disposed to buy brown meat when you have red meat as the alternative.
This is a marketing scam that is highly successful for all the obvious reasons.
I say buy fresh meat from Wisconsin.
Buy the quarter cow at the time.
Four toxic items in your kitchen that you need to get rid of and what you should swap them for.
Number one, plastic cutting boards.
These are in every home I've been into, every Airbnb I travel to.
When you cut on a plastic cutting board, you are literally creating thousands of plastic microplastic particles that are going into your food and your body.
The easy swap is for a wood cutting board, which you can clean with vinegar.
Number two, Teflon pans.
Teflon was originally developed as a tank coating and it should have stayed that way.
When you heat a Teflon pan above 500 degrees centigrade, the Teflon particles can aerosolize and you can breathe them, causing lung problems and other issues.
Get Teflon pans out of your life.
Also, when you scratch the pan, you can ingest these particles, which are probably not great for humans.
The easy swap is for a stainless steel pan or cast iron.
Number three, aluminum foil.
When this touches your food, there's clear evidence that the aluminum bleaches into your food.
Excess accumulation of aluminum throughout your body, especially in your brain, has been linked to neurotoxicity, dementia, Alzheimer's.
The easy swap is for a non-bleached parchment paper.
Get aluminum foil out of your kitchen completely.
Number four, seed oils.
Corn, canola, sunflower, safflower, soybean oils, peanut oils.
Get these out of your kitchen.
Get them out of your life completely.
These are refined, bleached, deodorized oils that are harmful for humans.
The easy swap is for tallow.
It's for an animal fat.
And while we're at it, I'll mention I'm not a fan of heating olive oil.
It's not stable enough to be heated.
It's okay for a salad dressing, but if you're gonna heat the oil, use a saturated animal fat like butter or tallow.
Send this to one of your friends who has these items in their kitchen so they can get healthier in 2025.
All right, another public service.
I'm willing to believe he's...
Correct about all four of those items, and I'm also convinced that no one's going to change.
I mean, I'm telling you, this is one of those cases where the convenience in the past habit is going to override the actual health hazards.
I'm sure what he's saying about the risks of each of those is authentic.
But I'm equally sure almost no one is going to change their habits.
I mean, it's just the way we are.
We're willing to go so far and not further, even though it would be in our best interest to do so.
Sad to say there we are.
Yeah, I agree.
Okay.
Now we've got...
Almost done.
Is funding Sesame Street a judicious use of soft power?
Thank you.
Well, Michael, the way you put it is the way I hope folks considering your poll today will think about it.
This isn't just funding a kid's show for children, millions of children, in countries like Iraq.
It's a show that helps teach values, helps teach public health, helps prevent kids from dying from dysentery and disease, and helps push values like collaboration, peacefulness, cooperation in a society where the alternative is ISIS, extremism, and terrorism.
And to your point, it's pennies on the dollar.
The U.S. Department of Defense has an annual budget of about $850 billion.
USAID was spending about $30 billion.
It is a small proportion of our total federal spending, and as Joe Nye would often say, it's not just soft power, it's smart power.
And to your point, it's pennies on the dollar.
You're a fucking idiot.
Putting it kind of crudely, Chris Coons has never impressed me from the day he was inaugurated and Joe Biden was sniffing his daughter's hair in the Oval Office.
It was embarrassing.
USAID has been a gravy train for the Democrats.
It funded all kinds of woke, transgender, other bizarre projects.
One of the best moves that Elon Musk and Doge have made is to curtail USAID. I believe it's been completely dismantled in such few legitimate functions as it has.
I believe Marco Rubio recently said 83% of its projects have been disbanded because they weren't appropriate or useful or beneficial, are being redistributed to the Department of State or elsewhere in the administration.
Koons is just a tool, in my opinion.
I do not hold him in high esteem.
Alright, last clip of the day.
This is a song I'm working on.
I don't have the video, so it'll just be audio now.
But it's a song that I'm doing about Lahaina.
Lahaina.
The winds of change look mighty strange as the elite rage.
Attempting to cage every last soul of this age.
By casting their spell, bombing our land to hell.
Fire from the sky.
Fire from above.
Healing in the name of demon love.
Oh.
As we lose our land.
By the hand of men.
Nothing remains but blackened stains from the fiery rain.
As they use dragon dukes.
Bringing hell into view.
Fire from the sky.
Fire from above.
Killing in the name of demon love.
The cries from the ground.
Don't make a sound.
From the lethal fire.
Burning all around.
Fire from the sky.
Fire from above.
Killing in the name of demon love.
Cries from the ground
Don't make a sound From the lethal fire Burning all around Fire from the sky Fire from above
Killing in the name of demon love guitar
solo All right, video coming soon.
you Well, it's Beatles, Patsy Cline, Karen Carpenter, Linda Ronstadt.
I'll mix it up.
You know, that's not my favorite style.
Would that be called heavy metal, Gary?
Heavy metal as it gets.
Yeah.
I mean, I do think keeping the memory of Lahaina alive is a very appropriate thing, and that's going to appeal to a segment who...
Might otherwise neglect it.
So I say, go for it, Gary.
Go for it.
Yeah, I've had many comments say, don't stop reporting on Lahaina.
So I'm doing what I can do.
All right, Dr. Fetzer, if your basketball team wins today, I'm going to go dance in the street.
So, all right.
Wonderful, Gary.
Thank you.
Yeah, inconvenient truth.
Export Selection