All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 18, 2025 - Jim Fetzer
01:01:44
Truth vs. NEW$, Inc Part 1 (17 February 2025) with Don Grahn, Joachim Hagopian, and Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
News Incorporated, and essentially this is a special day today, February the 17th.
That happens to be President's Day, so I'm proudly displaying my colors here.
I'm thinking it's worthwhile.
And so we have a show that I've seen the guide on, and this is one heck of a show that's coming up today.
Very patriotic and things you're going to want to know about.
And, of course, we have the best person in the world to show with her.
We have Jim Petter, who's an absolute treasurer, writing fantastic books that you need to know about for American history.
And these are just outstanding.
I've got some 40 more, and he's been our star.
And, of course, we have Brian Davidson, the all-star of Private Eye.
Houston, who really investigates everything and gets into the depths where nobody else goes to tread.
And we have Joakim from all over yonder in Indonesia and Bali, who has written many books.
He's been a West Point graduate and very informed and has a cutting edge on what's going on.
So, Jim, what is going on with this president and everything on this President's Day?
Well, Don, thank you for asking.
The title is, in my opinion, misleading.
Putin bends knee to Trump after he pulls ultimate power move.
Trump delivers on his promised peace talks begin immediately.
Trump's wasting no time with his biggest campaign promise to end the war in Ukraine.
Wednesday, he announced he'd had a lengthy and productive talk with Putin that they agreed to stop.
This marks an historic moment when Biden-NATO and the entire globalist establishment failed to achieve in two years.
Trump's team is moving quickly to ask Secretary of State Marco Rubio, C.I. Director John Radcliffe, National Security Advisor Michael Walsh and Special Envoy Steve Witkoff with leading the peace talks.
The first is set Friday in Munich, led by Vice President Vance and Secretary of State Rubio.
In a move that could be straight out of a geopolitical soap opera, former President Trump would not plan to meet with President Putin in Saudi Arabia.
The meeting could be part of an ambitious agenda to put an end to the Ukraine conflict, which many agree has turned into a bloody, drawn-out disaster for all involved.
who seems to rally the role of diplomat-in-chief indicated this could be the moment to shake things up.
In it, the Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman might play gracious host for this high-stakes showdown.
After all, if there's a place that could use a little diplomatic tension reduction in the desert kingdom with its oil reserve and penchant for extravagant gatherings.
The two leaders meeting in Saudi Arabia raises eyebrows, not to mention the question of why they didn't think of this sooner.
Mike Bradley, before Russia decided to roll tanks into Ukraine.
Meanwhile, wonderful!
What a difference it is having Trump as president.
In Trump we trust.
Trump says he and Putin have stride dogs to end the war in Ukraine.
Tweets, I'm a rock.
Timing remains as elusive.
As Biden's long-term strategic vision was roughly promising it's going to happen in the not-too-distant future, which could mean anything from next week to never, but it certainly sounds nice.
He suggested this initial rendezvous would kick off a series of talks, plans for him to gallivant over to Moscow while Putin stopped by Washington like he's visiting a friend's housewarming party.
Dramatic as ever, Trump's efforts could signal a thawing relationship between U.S. and Russia, something that has been as frosty as a Siberian winner since Biden last met with Putin in June of 2021. Since then, tensions escalate faster than a political ad in election year, especially after Biden's infamous declaration.
The Russian leader could not remain in power.
Since that bold proclamation, opportunities for dialogue have been few and far between.
Under Biden, the strategy seemed to favor heavy sanctions in an isolationist stance.
Trump, however, appears to open the door for meaningful conversations.
Trump seems optimistic about a prospect for peace, stating both Putin and Zelensky are eager to put an end to the conflict.
A refreshing change from previous admin approach.
While some may question whether progress could be made with convoluted territorial disputes, Trump gave a nod to pragmatism, suggesting Zelensky might just have to do what's necessary.
Perhaps he should keep this advice handy when it comes to dealing with self-proclaimed adversary that Russian relations have become.
It's not all talk of peace and diplomatic dreams.
Be Vice President Vance and Secretary of State Rubio, or is that to engage Zelensky in Munich, just ensuring that the U.S. maintains its standing as a significant player in the ongoing dialogue surrounding Ukraine?
In a nature, strong defenses are essential.
Having leaders attuned to both diplomacy and action is paramount.
If Trump's meetings yield any sort of tangible result, then hey!
Miracles do happen.
A constructive resolution could beat anything Biden's achieved in taking office.
For now, the world watches and wait popcorn in hand to see if the former president can deliver a real ceasefire where others have failed.
Meanwhile, in the past 24 hours, the Russian army has achieved another significant success on the battlefield.
This time to the west of the recently liberated city of Yalyaka and Novoselka in Kurokovo, directly at the front.
Moreover, on February 16th, the commander of the Spitsnaz Aksmat, General Obdi Alodanov, along with Russian presidential spokesman Dmitry Beskov, made harsh statements that shocked Western leaders and the head of the Kiev.
Regime, Voldemort, Zelensky.
You'll accept all of our terms without exception.
Here we have Trump being a real businessman, not an adventurer.
He won't invest money unless he's sure that the investment is going to return and he sees that Ukraine is a losing proposition.
They believe Russia will not stop, but will take control of the interior territory of Ukraine, including its western part.
If this is not resolved on terms that Russia finds acceptable, where we know the Russian terms include continued possession over the territory they've taken, including Crimea, no entry to NATO ever for Ukraine, and demilitarization and denazification.
Joaquin, your thoughts?
They laid it out from the very beginning, even prior to entering Ukraine, a long time ago now, before February 2022. They basically said, we want to be able to have a neutral neighbor, just like Kennedy back in the early 60s with the Cuban Missile Crisis and the Russian Missile.
And he said, get them out, and they went away.
So, but America this time, they didn't listen.
And they had to go in there.
They'd already invested millions of dollars training Ukraine to be the strongest army in Europe.
And they failed because the Ukraine army has lost this war.
There's so many desertions.
They're, you know, giving up territory galore now.
So finally, it's coming to an end, and it's going to be all on Russia's terms.
Even the United States knows there is no stake that they can hold against the negotiation with Russia, because Russia's going to have its way.
If America and Ukraine do not cooperate...
Russia will have to go all the way to the Polish border.
I hope that doesn't happen.
I hope there's a little bit of a rump left of Ukraine that will be neutral.
And certainly Zelenskyy cannot be in power at that time.
I think his days are very numbered right now.
The guy's already saying, well, if there's some kind of agreement made in Saudi Arabia between Russia...
And U.S., hey, I'm not even recognizing it.
So he's already trying to sabotage.
He also bombs the oil field of Russia right at this delicate time.
So it's like he's trying to sabotage everything just to hang on to power.
It's sickening to me.
I've long believed Russia was going to have to take all of Ukraine to resolve this matter.
Brian, yours.
Yeah, I agree.
This thing's pretty much over for Zelensky.
I mean, everybody's trying to give him some lip service as if the global money that was spent over there wasn't sent to total waste.
What have we achieved?
Okay, Ukraine is still not a part of NATO. They're devastated.
They've been deserted by, I think, 6.1 million Ukrainian refugees have been registered in Europe since mid-2024.
The Ukrainian economy is on its last legs.
They've received over $30 billion in US budget aid just to pay for the salaries of their state employees.
Vanguard, BlackRock have already swept in to profit from the crisis, buying up the assets in Ukraine at bedrock prices, which I think was part of the plan.
All along, and much of their agricultural land is now Ukrainian only in name only.
Their most valuable assets, their natural resource deposits and independent facilities, are going to choose to join Russia rather than submit to the remaining neo-Nazis in Kiev.
They've been saddled with a huge amount of external debt that they can't take care of, and the credit is running out.
They face the prospect of losing about half their natural resources to the U.S. as repayment for financing that turned out to be a loan.
Bio-warfare experts are beginning to treat Ukraine as their own playground where they can't conduct any more research without the risk of containment or breach.
And the U.S. and British intelligence agencies have basically...
Taking charge of it ever since this thing started back in 2014. And make no mistake about it, it didn't start in 2022. It started in 2014. It's been said in many of the media that it reaches back to the fake Minsk agreements that were put into place.
And this thing's been around for a long time.
What I'm surprised at is how patients...
Russia has proven to be, given the intolerable encroachment of the Ukrainians on their own land, and that the Ukrainian people haven't overthrown Zelensky completely, being that he basically made them cannon fodder throughout the practice.
Zelensky's got no defenses remaining anymore if the United States doesn't continue to protect them.
And right now, Musk is talking about Very
nice.
Both of your comments.
Excellent.
Meanwhile, Zelensky, this is now virtually out of date, proposed a land swap deal with Russia to end the war.
Ukrainian president proposed a land swap with Russia in potential negotiation for a deal to end the three-year war.
A land swap?
We'll swap one territory for another, he said in an interview with The Guardian.
Ukraine has been occupying parts of...
Russia's Kursk Oblast.
After capturing it in a surprise incursion in August, Zelensky said he's unsure what Russian-occupied region he would demand in return.
Russia currently occupies about 20% of Ukraine, while Ukraine occupies 500 square kilometers of Russia.
I don't know.
We will see.
When all our territories are important, there is no priority.
VP Vance in Europe with other administration to meet with allies and Ukrainian officials.
He's scheduled to meet Zelensky at the Munich Security Conference over the weekend.
Trump said he may soon meet with Zelensky.
Putin has made several demands for ending the war, including Ukraine abandoning aspiration to join NATO. In allowing Russia to have control over four Ukrainian territories, Donetsk, Luhansk, Kyrsten, and Zabrizaya.
During the Guardian interview, Zloysky expressed concern over losing American support.
Our voice is saying that Europe could offer security guarantees without the Americans, and I always say no.
Security guarantees without America are not real security guarantees.
To keep U.S. support, Zelenskyy reportedly offered American companies lucrative reconstruction comments in investment concession.
Meanwhile, he's also calling for the creation of European armed forces.
That's going to go very big with the EU. Zelenskyy is calling for creation of a European armed force as the U.S. encourages Europe to take up more responsibility for its own defense.
Speaking at the Munich Security Conference on February 15th, Zelensky said establishing a European military is necessary to ensure the future peace of the region.
I really believe the time has come, Zelensky said, as though anyone ought to take him seriously about European security.
The armed forces of Europe must be created.
The old days are over.
When America supported Europe just because it always had.
He claimed Ukraine's three-year fight against the Russian invasion, which was really a defensive operation to protect the people of the Donbass, demonstrates a foundation exists for the creation of a pan-European military.
It's unclear, however, how deep support goes and whether ongoing diplomatic struggles between the EU and the US might push Europe to create a regional military.
Or a European NATO alternative?
I'll tell you, neither is going to happen.
The EU has been one of Kiev's strongest backers.
European nations together have matched the US in aid.
Spending to Ukraine, though Europe's combined gross domestic product is smaller than that of the US. Turning that shared mission into a workable international military force is another matter altogether.
Political disagreement throughout the EU Concerning its sent toward Moscow, endemic economic problems, and burdensome defense spending could all torpedo such an effort.
Toward that end, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen approved the relaxation of fiscal rules earlier to allow EU countries to spend more on defense.
Meanwhile, and I find this very surprising, no reason for new nukes.
Trump floats disarmament talks with China and Russia.
Trump loaded a joint meeting with President Xi Jinping of China and Vladimir Putin of Russia, claiming he wants all countries to move toward denuclearization.
He told reporters he planned to advance denuclearization talks once we straighten out the Middle East and Ukraine.
Comets that come as U.S., Russia, and Ukraine are actively pursuing negotiations to end the conflict there.
There's no reason for us to be building brand new nukes.
We already have so many.
You could destroy the world 50 times, 100 times over.
And here we are building new nukes, and they're building new nukes while spending a lot of money.
We could be spending other things that are actually hopefully much more productive.
And that's, I think, a nice reflection of his businessman's attitude toward these matters, which is wholly beneficial to all parties.
The U.S. has projected to spend $756 billion on news between 2023 and 2032, prior to the Congressional Budget Office.
Additionally, Trump said he was aiming to schedule a meeting with Xi and Putin early on his second term.
Request that countries cut their military budgets in half.
Wednesday believed we can't do that, meaning the United States itself remaining indifferent about whether they travel to Zia or Putin or they wish to visit the White House.
The U.S. has 3,748 nukes.
As of September 23, a drop from the stockpile of 22,217 in 1989, according to DOE. The agency reported U.S. owned a max of 31,255 back in 1966. In comparison,
Russia has an estimated stockpile of roughly 4,380, which have vastly superior delivery systems than anything possessed by the West, while China boasts an arsenal of roughly 600, according to the Federation of American Scientists.
Trump and Mark built on previous statements in July at the Devos Economic Forum in Switzerland, where he signaled interest in talks on denuclearization.
Tremendous amounts of money have been spent on nuclear.
The destructive capability is something we don't even want to talk about today because we don't want to hear it.
Previous talks between U.S., Russia, and China fell through in 2020 during its first admin.
After he refused to sign an extension of the 2010 new strategic arm reduction tree with Russia to impose limits on each country's nuclear arsenal.
He must have given this more thought.
The treaty ultimately was renewed under Biden, but now expires in 2026. But Russia has, meanwhile, suspended its participation.
Thursday, Trump.
Accused of negotiating and falling apart due to what he called the rigged election of 2020. And I think he has a point.
Joaquin, your thoughts?
Well, the first point on Zelensky and his fantasies, I thought they already had an army called NATO. I mean, it's such a joke.
And then he's talking about...
You know, swapping the land that Ukraine controls of Russia with the Ukraine land.
What a joke that is.
I mean, he's got a couple of buildings in Kursk that are manned by Russians.
That's it, you know?
It's over as far as that Kursk invasion.
So yeah, he's got no leverage whatsoever.
And as far as the other point about...
You know, lowering the nuclear arsenal around the world with the biggest guns.
Who could argue that?
I mean, this is common sense.
We don't want to blow ourselves up and end up no longer a human species living on the earth, much less any other life form.
So, yeah, I mean, this is a big step in the right direction by Trump.
And I think that he's going to be greeted with cooperation.
By Xi and Putin.
So I'm very much in favor of this.
It's fascinating.
No one has said, what do you think is NATO, you idiot?
Brian?
Well, think about it.
Doesn't the whole nuke program feel like one of the largest military expenditure psyops that we've ever seen?
I mean, we were told that we were the ones that took the big bombs and dropped them on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
As part of Oppenheimer's projects to rule the world, we were told that the nuclear arm race was breaking loose all around the world, which created the Cold War spending machine.
We had propaganda all over the United States, all the way up to the Red Dawn movies.
We had kids being trained to jump under their desks inside of their things.
We had the Terminator flicks.
You know, telling us that nuclear war was going to annihilate the entire world all the time.
The military industrial complex in Hollywood were working overtime to think about coming up with the next big PSYOP. So the globalists got involved and they decided it was going to be global thermonuclear war and global warming that was going to be the next.
Big, major problem.
So it was the climate.
Now we have to spend all this money on the environment all the way around the world to solve our climate crisis.
It doesn't seem that anyone's actually thinking straight.
And at the same time, all the propaganda is being driven out through the global academic institutions to the point that all the kids are brainwashed and they don't know what to believe.
Then they come out of school and the cognitive dissonance begins to set in as they're like, hey, This isn't important.
This isn't what this is all about.
And I'll tell you, I saw a television show the other day.
My wife, my neighbor told me to watch it.
It was called Landman.
And I saw one of the greatest monologues I've ever seen between Billy Bob Thornton and the lawyer, where he's talking about the electrical grid and how the windmills were all being put up there.
There was a tremendous amount of diesel resources that went into creating them.
And all they were there to do was to power the pumps, to pump the oil.
And I thought, well, what a refreshing perspective.
It really was nothing more than the Earth's natural oil and gas the entire time that was funding the way the world works.
Get back to basics.
And I'm glad to see Trump's doing it.
I think that America and the whole rest of the world needs a refresher on...
What's important?
And it's the fundamental components of the economy, not all this foo-foo, academic, moral relativism and save the world, save the planet from the big, bad oil and gas industry.
It's just getting old.
Very good.
Very nice.
Meanwhile, must see, Munich Security Conference chairman goes on stage and cries like a baby.
After J.D. Vance rocks his world.
B.B. Vance delivered a fiery speech, taking direct aim at European elites for their war on free speech and authoritarian censorship tactics.
I wonder if he's going to think about them right here at home.
In an old-holds-barred address, Vance exposed the hypocrisy of European leaders who claimed to champion democracy.
While silencing dissent and weaponizing so-called misinformation laws to crush political opposition.
Sounds like anti-Semitism laws here.
Vice President Vance warned Europe, the greatest danger the continent faces is from within, that censorship of free speech and silencing their political opponents.
He accused European leaders of fear of their own people.
One of them the real threat against their democracy was their own assault on individual rights.
The EU elite did not take it well.
They're hoping for another empty famine speech filled with exaggerated praise from the Trump regime.
Boy, were they wrong!
Following V.P. Vance's speech, Christopher Huskan, chairman of the Munich Security Council, took the stage and started to cry.
There's nothing that brings terror to the evil global forces that a grown man climbed, crying after J.D. Vance rocked his world.
Of course.
The crowd gave Chairman Huskin rousing applause.
Meanwhile, Margot Rubio fired back at the European League for throwing a temper tantrum after Vance's historic speech.
Fake news hack.
Margaret Brennan shamelessly blames.
Holocaust.
On free speech!
CBS's Margaret Brennan implied free speech was somehow linked to the Holocaust, a claim Rubio vehemently refuted.
U.S. Secretary of State Rubio fired back at European backlash against VP Vance's recent speech where Vance warned, Europe's greatest danger stems from within its own borders.
Due to the erosion of free speech and the silencing of political dissent, his remarks hit a nerve among European elite who quickly erupted in outrage.
British Lord Jonathan Sumpton, an establishment lackey and mouthpiece for leftist media, dismissed Vance's address as silly and immature.
Democracy and free speech are certainly under challenge in many European countries.
But it's not coming from governments.
His criticisms are pretty rich.
Coming from a president who is quite uniquely authoritarian.
Democracy and free speech are under challenge in a much bigger way than the United States and his boss Donald Trump is the man mainly responsible for that.
Germany's defense minister Boris Pistorius went further throwing a full-blown diplomatic tantrum, huffing.
That's a dare to question European democracy.
This democracy was just called into question by the U.S. Vice President, not just a German democracy, but that of Europe as a whole, Bastorius Whine, during his address.
If I understand him correctly, he compares the condition of Europe with what prevails in some authoritarian regimes.
This is not acceptable.
This is not acceptable.
The Europe where I live.
Meanwhile, French President Emmanuel Macron called for an emergency summit in Paris.
Fearing tremors sent through the old continent by a few honest words from an American leader who refused to bow to political correctness.
But it wasn't just European politicians melting down back home.
The corrupt media was in full damage control.
CBS's Margaret Brennan, a known propagandist for the global elite, is gracefully suggested free speech was responsible for the Holocaust in Nazi Germany during exchange with Marco Rubio.
Brennan tried to twist history.
Rubio leaped into the fray, defending Benson's assertion with a vigorous advocacy for free speech's Marco Rubio.
I think if anyone's angry about his word...
They don't have to agree with him.
But to be angry about it, I think, actually makes his point.
I thought it was a pretty historic speech, whether you agree with him or not.
I think the valid point he'd make into Europe is we are concerned the true values we share, the values that bind us together with Europe, are things like free speech and democracy and our shared history and winning two world wars, defeating Soviet communism and the like.
These are the values we share in common.
In that war, Cold War, we fought against things like censorship and oppression and so forth.
When you see backsliding and you raise it, that's a very valid concern.
We can't tell him how to run their countries.
He simply expressed in his speech his view of it, which a lot of people frankly share.
I thought he said a lot of things in that speech that needed to be said.
And honestly, I don't know why anyone would be upset about it.
You don't have to agree with somebody's speech.
I assure you, the U.S. has come under withering criticism on many occasions from many leaders in Europe, and we don't go around throwing temper tantrums over it.
Margaret Brannock, well, he was staying in a country for free speech that was weaponized to conduct a genocide.
He met with the head of a political party with far-right views and some historic ties to extreme groups.
The context of that was changing the tone of it.
You know that censorship was specifically about the right.
Rubio, no!
I have to disagree with you.
Free speech was not used to conduct a genocide.
The genocide was conducted by an authoritarian Nazi regime.
It happened to be genocidal because they hated Jews.
They hated minorities.
They hated those.
They had a list of people they hated, but primarily Jews.
There was no free speech in Nazi Germany.
There was none.
There was also no opposition.
They were a sole and only country that governed their country.
The party, that means.
So it's not an accurate reflection of history.
I also think it's wrong.
Again, I go back to the point of his speech, which was basically, there's been an erosion in free speech and tolerance for opposing points of view in your arm.
That's of concern because it is eroding.
That's not erosion of your military capabilities.
That's not erosion of your economic standing.
Joaquin, your thoughts.
Are we talking about a Tempest and a T-Bot?
Well, I think...
J.D. Vance made very good points, obviously.
However, I have to say, I think he's a hypocrite because the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act is basically conflating any kind of criticism toward genocide against Palestinians with anti-Semitism, which is totally off base.
And the threats that Trump had been making as far as You know, we're going to get rid of these people.
You know, it's against the law.
They make it criminalized if you criticize Israel.
Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
So, you know, I mean, okay.
If you're going to say, you know, free speech is not being upheld in Europe, you also have to say free speech is not really being upheld in America either.
So, you know, that was an important point.
Vance conveniently overlooked.
And then the Brennan person, they're all Marxists, all of the mainstream media.
They're still on this high horse.
But the bottom line is, who gave rise to Hitler?
Well, the city of London Rothschild founders.
David Balfour, 1970 Declaration, committing the basically Middle East to Israel.
And back in 1917, you know, and then we had two world wars going on.
The first one and now the second one later, it was all financed by the City of London.
J.P. Morgan, all the central bankers did this.
They did both wars.
They put Hitler in power, you know, so, you know, it's hardly free speech, you know, when they create the wars.
And they've been doing it for several hundred years now.
Excellent points.
Joaquin, was Balfour a Rothschild agent?
That would be my suspicion.
Oh, he sure was, and so has been the British government.
You know, they've had Zionists as prime minister, Disraeli, you know?
Yeah, I mean, they've all along been totally—well, so has America, really.
They're the most controlled, Zionist-controlled countries in the world outside of perhaps Israel.
Brian.
Well, I think it's an interesting time to point out how our times are different than the eruption of the Nazis in World War II. That was a time when the media was completely controlled and the people were being led along on strings by the writers who were being controlled and who were pressing a particular angle.
Now, don't get me wrong.
People had been observing the problems for a long time in their society.
And when there was a run on the bank, everybody got hit so hard in the gut that they did want to respond.
And they wanted to go after the real source of the problem as they saw it.
But the media didn't help with the situation.
The difference with today is that the Internet is such a wild new beast.
I mean, look at how it's changed the world in the last...
Three weeks alone.
I have to go through probably two or three hundred headlines just to prep for a show, just to be able to figure out how to isolate all the issues that are taking place right now.
And I'll tell you, I think because a lot of this segment was about European leaders reacting to J.D. Vance and Marco Rubio and how Margaret Brennan reacted by saying the problem was free speech.
Of course, CNN doesn't.
Of course, CNN thinks the problem is free speech.
They're the controlled media, and right now, free speech is beginning to outrun everybody, everywhere, all around the world, with the exception of Brazil, where the Internet is so highly controlled.
But even then, the people have an appetite to get to it.
But just so you can understand how the Internet has affected things today, I'm going to point out an important Zero Hedge article as That was tracking all the Google trends coming around Virginia and the District of Columbia, and it showed the entire deep state in absolute panic mode.
D.C. Internet searches for criminal defense lawyer and RICO law erupt as Doge drain swamp.
RICO law up 700 percent.
RICO charge up 300 percent.
RICO statute 250 percent.
What is RICO law?
Up 100 percent.
DC searches soar for Swiss bank, yellow, offshore bank, green, wire money.
This is all in the images that they put out of the eruption in Google searches since Trump took office.
DC searches soar for wipe and erase, according to Google Trends data.
They're running scared right now.
Bleach bit is up.
Oh, it's up.
96% over time.
And these are trends that are being tracked right now.
And imagine if that's America right now with people that have figured out how to use the artificial intelligence and the tools that are out there.
Artificial intelligence right now is also being used by Musk Team to break out Doge, to figure out what the corporate networks look like and the world structures are beginning to emerge.
From the new trends and people learning to use advanced searches on the internet.
And all of this is being exposed very, very quickly.
I think it's growing beyond their control.
But at the same time, I have to ask serious questions about why the structure that Donald Trump has put into place hasn't begun making a move.
I want you to just consider what I just said about how the information is making everything so transparent.
On the one hand, but then on the other hand, why guys like Comey, McCabe, and Strzok are still running free?
So what's going on?
Are the power structures scared?
It looks from the internet searches like they are, but how come the Department of Justice, how come the powers that be are not taking the criminals off the street?
Is it possible that all of this swinging of the pendulum is simply designed to take the power away from the high-level elite Democrat and place it in the hands of the high-level elite Trump MAGA crowd?
And if the Trump MAGA crowd gets a hold of that level of power, will they use it efficiently, effectively?
Wisely, and more importantly, will they relinquish the power back to the people of America once this power has blossomed?
Well said.
I think you meant McCabe, Comey, and Fauci.
You said Trump mistakenly.
Well, McCabe, Comey, McCabe, and Strzok have not been pardoned.
Okay, why aren't they arrested?
Oh yeah, I thought you meant, I thought you had said Trump.
I get it.
You got it.
Oh yeah, I didn't mean to.
You're right.
Very good.
Very good.
Meanwhile, visiting Netanyahu, Rubio says Abbas must be eradicated.
That was not the thing to say.
Speaking of reporters alongside Israeli PM Netanyahu in Jerusalem Sunday, Secretary of State Rubio said Abbas must be eradicated, a goal requiring Israel to restart a genocidal war.
Hamas cannot continue as a military or government force and frankly as long as it stands as a force that can govern or as a force that can administer or as a force that can threaten the use of violence.
Peace becomes impossible, Rubio said.
They must be eliminated.
It must be eradicated.
Completely disgraceful to say that!
In his remarks, Netanyahu said the U.S. and Israel shared a common strategy, namely eradicating, killing all the Palestinians, including when the gates of hell will open, if all Israeli hostages aren't released by Hamas, for being a threat from President Trump.
I want to assure everyone listening now, President Trump and I are working in full cooperation and coordination between us.
We have a common strategy.
And we can't always share the details with the public, including when the gates of hell would be open, as they surely will, if our hostages are not released until the last one Netanyahu added.
Israeli leader also mentioned Trump's bold vision for Gaza, talking about the Riviera of the Mediterranean, referring for his calls to the U.S. to take over the Strip, which would involve an ethnic cleansing campaign.
He said he and Rubio discussed how we can work together to ensure that future becomes a reality.
Discussing Iran.
Now, he said Israel had dealt a mighty blow to Iran's terror axis, meaning no doubt the defeat of Syria, and that with U.S. support, Israel could finish the job.
Frankly, I think Iran can finish the job by decimating Israel.
When push comes to shove.
While Rubio was visiting, the Israeli Defense Ministry announced it had just received a shipment of MK-84, 2,000-pound bombs from the U.S. How thoughtful, how generous, a gift.
The shipment had been paused by Biden but released by Trump.
Rubio's meeting came a day after Hamas released three Israeli hostages.
In exchange for 369 Palestinians.
Trump had previously said, all hostages should be released Saturday, or Israel would open the gates of hell on Gaza, signaling the U.S. is ready to back Israel if it restrains its bombing campaign in siege Saturday.
Trump said it'd be up to Israel to what to do in Gaza, said the U.S. would back the decision they make.
Well, a ceasefire is very fragile.
Trump Middle East Envoy Steve Witkoff insists that Sunday, the second phase of Israel will absolutely begin, but so far, Israel has not sent negotiators to discuss the second phase.
Netanyahu's office said Sunday, Israel is sending a negotiating team to Cairo to discuss the continued implementation of phase one.
The statement also said the Israeli security cabinet would meet Monday to give instructions to the negotiating team on phase two.
Under the deal, talks on phase two were supposed to start on the 16th day of the ceasefire, which began on January 19. So Moss releases three hostages as fragile ceasefire holds now.
Previous reporting said they looked gaunt, they looked haggard, as though they'd just come out of a labor camp like Auschwitz.
But look there.
The guy looks perfectly healthy, looks very happy.
Just as the four women who'd previously been released were very grateful and expressed appreciation to Hamas for taking such care of them.
Meanwhile, using...
Predatory language, Hamas is described as a terrorist organization, has released three more hostages in exchange for hundreds of Palestinians.
The Feb 15 swap was conducted as a ceasefire broken by U.S. and Arabs that continue to hold but under strain.
Hamas paraded the three through a large crowd before releasing them in a show of force likely designed to underscore the fact that The terrorist group, as they're being called wrongly, is still operating despite Israel's war in Gaza.
The hostages, all dual citizens, were transported to Israel to be reunited with their families and received medical evaluations.
They included Argentinian Israeli citizen Eyerhorn, American Israeli citizen Shagui Shen, and Russian Israeli citizen Alexander Trufanov.
All three were abducted from the kibbutz near Hamas on October 7th.
The men were pale and disheveled, see, but they actually don't look pale or disheveled, paraded through the street but appear to be in better health than the hostages released last week, whose emaciated condition outraged Israelis and threatened to bring the current ceasefire to an end.
There's another.
He doesn't look emaciated.
He looks pretty damn healthy to me.
The three returned home to an Israel different from the one they were taken from, reuniting with families that have seen much suffering in the 16 months that the war began.
In exchange for the three, Israel released 369. Four were taken for medical treatment.
Among those released were 36 criminals serving life sentences.
For involvement in deadly attacks against Israelis, two-thirds of the men will now go abroad.
The remaining dozen returning to the West Bank.
The other 333 were returned to Gaza.
Of the 251 adopted during the October 7, 2023 attacks, 73 remaining Gaza, about half of whom are believed to be dead.
Concerns?
Are now high about the remaining hostages' condition, whether they will survive long enough to be released, but the fact is they're being well cared for by Hamas.
Several disputes have erupted recently, threatening to collapse a tenuous ceasefire and bludge Israel and Hamas back into war.
A key issue has been President Trump's sudden announcement.
The U.S. could take over the Gaza Strip, permanently relocating the roughly two million Palestinians who live there.
The suggestion has been rebuked by Arab leaders.
Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, the Palestinian Authority and the Arab League all issued a joint statement, dismissing the very idea.
Saudi Arabia is now spearheading efforts.
to develop an alternative to Trump's plan to discuss with its partners the possibility of establishing a Gulf-led reconstruction fund and a deal to sideline Hamas later in the month.
It's unclear how Trump would pursue the takeover and how the current population in Gaza would be moved.
Hamas has also threatened to delay hostage releases claiming Israel will not uphold is not upholding its commitment to allow more shelters, medical supplies, fuel, and equipment into Gaza.
Meanwhile, Michael J. Springman appeared with Kevin Barrett never again.
Will a holo-hoax trigger a real genocide?
So here we have VP J.D. Vance laying a wreath into Cal concentration camp in Germany on February 13th out of the Munich Security Conference.
These flowers smell nice.
But the Holocaust official story, Briggs, attributed to him, here I have a bit about it.
Holocaust narrative politics, Trump science, here's a nice picture of the British football team at Auschwitz.
What?
You didn't know there was a British soccer team at Auschwitz looking very fit, by the way.
Holocaust myth and reality.
The situation is completely absurd.
No subject generates responses as extreme and is rational as what has become to be known as the Holocaust.
Unlike any other event in human history, including even the most sacred religious beliefs, for anyone who questioned his future denies, the occurrence qualifies as a hate crime.
Holocaust denial is even a prosecutable offense in certain jurisdictions.
Unlike any other, this crime involves the expression of forbidden thoughts.
About a subject that has become taboo.
There were, by the way, 236 references to 6 million Jews in dire straits or fear of loss of their life prior to the Nuremberg trial.
The underlying desideratum is whether history is supposed to be accurate and true or, as Voltaire has put it, merely a pack of lies living play upon the dead.
Just so we know what we're talking about in its broadest outlines, The Holocaust can be defined by meaning of its three primary elements, which I shall designate here as hypotheses one, two, and three.
Hypothesis one, that Hitler was attempting to exterminate the Jews and succeeded by putting around six million to death.
Hypothesis two, that many of those deaths were brought about by the use of cyanide gas in chambers for that purpose.
and hypothesis three, that the chemical agent that brought about those deaths was Zyklon B, to which the victims were so objective.
The science of the Holocaust doesn't leave any room for doubt about H2 or H3, insofar as the laws of biochemistry and of material science, laws which cannot be violated and cannot be changed, entail that the bodies of those put to death using cyanide and turned pink, entail that the bodies of those put to death using cyanide and turned pink, while the walls of Chambers used for that None of the bodies from those camps have been reported to have been pink,
An empirical examination of the gas chambers has determined that, unlike the walls of the delousing chambers, none of them turn blue, which means that H2 and H3 are not simply false, but have been scientifically refuted.
To the extent to which the number of Jews who died in the camps can be objectively determined, the most reliable numbers appear to come from the records of the International Committee of the Red Cross.
Which visit the camps and get ridiculous records of the identities of those who died and their cause of death, their age, their sex, their ethnicity, their religion.
Not one is reported to have been put to death in gas chambers and a total reported in 1993 from all the camps was 296,081 combined, even rounding up to an even 600,000 victims.
Gypsies, Jews, the mentally and physically and from the empirical evidence contradicts a contention that six million Jews were put to death and thereby falsifies hypothesis H1 as well.
Joaquin, your thoughts?
Yeah, all this brings up the point that I drive home every time when I talk about Trump.
Yeah, it's good he's talking about nuclear arms treaties with the other big boys.
Yeah, it's good that he has Musk out there exposing all the corruption and the Marxism that's been in control of the government secretly.
Yeah, it's good that he's trying to make peace in Ukraine.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Good, good, good, good, good.
But the bottom line...
It's his stand with Israel.
That undoes everything else in my book.
You can't have a genocide and justify it.
And we're all supposed to kind of look the other way, like, oh, he's only being loyal to Israel.
Shut up.
This is evil.
And you look further with his little cronies in the...
Silicon Valley, you know, the Larry Ellisons of the world that comes out and says, yeah, I got all these data centers in Texas that are going to punch out the diagnosis within 48 hours and send the mRNA vaccine to you!
Come on!
These are, I mean, we're talking about genocide?
Well, these points are big-time genocide for all of us who disagree with this.
So everything is undone.
All the good that Trump talks about is undone with the bottom line reality that he's really controlled by very evil people that want us dead.
And he's determined to carry it out.
That's the bottom line.
I wish I could disagree with you, but it's clear this new project for tailor-made vaccines is to send you exactly...
What is required to kill you, specifically?
It's stunning!
Brian, your thoughts?
The anti-Semitism platform that's being rolled out by Richard Murdoch and all of the other owners of the large mainstream media networks is a carefully constructed psychological operation designed to drive The political infrastructures of the nations where it's being driven into passing laws that restrict freedom of speech and restrict
the ability to point out false flags related to the Jews.
The Daily Telegraph, which was owned by Rupert Murdoch, got caught trying to orchestrate A mass media psyop to inflame public hysteria and anti-Semitism in Australia.
And the project was called Undercover Jew.
It was designed to show what it's like being a Jew in Sydney, where a man wearing a Star of David hat and video glasses went around targeting Muslim and Arab businesses, trying to instigate hostility from staff members trailed by a video producer and a telegraph reporter.
The obvious implication was he was walking around trying to instigate something that could be framed as an anti-Semitic incident to provoke a national outcry that would draw unusually fiery demonstrations loaded up with paid protesters that would then be sent in to influence Australian politicians and officials.
To drive the incident up through the roof.
Now, I've been worried about this issue on our channel for a while.
I didn't want to be the guy that was used as an example when something stupid happened.
I wanted us to continue to be balanced, continue to use the right historical resources to point out.
What the facts of history really are and not cross that gray line into driving people who are not very bright into doing something stupid, which I felt like was something that was beginning to grow within the channel.
It was basically a mob of anti-Semite Zionists that were beginning to develop in the comments and among some of the other things.
And I said, well, this is...
This has got to stop.
We've got to get away from this because this is going to be used to destroy a platform that does 99% good and makes 1% mistakes here and there.
And if it was one of our listeners who was up to frame us and goes and does something stupid in a mosque or in a synagogue or something like that and then says it was us that did it, that would...
And so I did what I felt like I needed to do to prevent that from taking place.
But in Australia, as a result of the flushing out of the anti-Semitism platform, Australia's Prime Minister came out and said it outright that paid actors were behind the anti-Semitic attacks.
And that most of the incidents that he reviewed that developed within the police reports indicated that it was a paid propaganda campaign designed to do it.
Now, what's interesting here in America at this point in time is that Elon Musk's Doge program seems to be finding the funding related to the NGOs who are pushing the programs.
And thus, sort of cutting the head off the snake.
And so it looks like the problem is beginning to be addressed, although it wouldn't look like that on the surface.
It would more look like that as something that's happening underneath the surface.
So basically what I'm saying is, the more we continue to find out where these funds related to USAID and other programs go, the more we begin to see that these programs that are designed to drive this particular narrative Are going to fall apart.
That's all extremely well said, Brian.
And of course, we had a participant with us whom, in my judgment, turns out to be a provocateur, if not a PSYOP agent, from whom we have separated ourselves.
I think your diagnosis of the problem was completely accurate.
And I'm glad we've taken measures.
Set the ship back on course.
However awkward it may or may not have been in the process and where we continue to endure vicious unjustified attacks from that very party who appears to be some kind of satirist, whatever one could say.
He has a very mixed history and I'm glad.
He's no longer a part of any of our shows.
Don, take us out.
Oh, boy.
This is one heck of a first hour here on Presidents Day.
And there was something else here.
We can celebrate with a lot of presidents.
And what's really happening these days, I tell you.
And we mentioned a guy named Elon.
And here in Seattle, there's quite some feelings about Elon.
And I don't know if you can read this, but essentially it says, F, Elon, and Thelon.
So I don't know if you agree or disagree with this, but essentially there was a lot of action on both sides and what's really happening, good, bad, ugly, and it's all happening right now.
And also between us and Canada right now, you see that hockey game last night?
Where they booed our national anthem and they had fights within nine seconds and everything.
It looks like it's rough and tumble time in America and in sports and all kinds of ways.
So we're in the middle of the fight here, folks, on Truth vs.
News Incorporated.
And believe me, the incorporation is having all kinds of fights and disagreements and things.
But we're here to straighten it all out.
And we'll ask you for a vote on it.
I'm just at the end of the show.
Let's see here.
Come on back for that second hour here on President's Day.
Thank you so much for watching this bar and for sharing this.
Sharing is what's important because nobody else is going to see this unless you show it.
▲
Export Selection