Feb. 13, 2025 - Jim Fetzer
22:58
| 
| Time | Text |
|---|---|
| This morning, the jury is in on the cause of the COVID-19 pandemic. | |
| That's thanks to a 520-page report by the House subcommittee that concluded the coronavirus most likely emerged from a laboratory in Wuhan, China. | |
| I'd like to introduce some articles for the record that are exemplary of the select subcommittee's finding that a lab leak is the most likely origin scenario. | |
| And my question is, have you seen anything at this point that gives you a high degree of confidence? | |
| That the Wuhan Institute of Virology was the origin of this virus? | |
| Yes, I know. | |
| Three years ago, I declared that the China virus almost certainly came from the Wuhan lab. | |
| Now the world is finally admitting the truth, and they're saying I was right. | |
| I think when you put together the intelligence information, the epidemiology, all the evidence together, it points towards two leads. | |
| There's a significant amount of facts that would disprove the theory that this was a spillover from nature, something natural. | |
| Coronavirus was created in a laboratory. | |
| Headlines like these spread after the release of the document titled After Action Review of the COVID-19 Pandemic, The Lessons Learned and a Path Forward. | |
| Published by the U.S. Congress's Special Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic on December 4, 2024. At first glance, the document appears sensational. | |
| The US government is allegedly exposing Chinese biolabs responsible for the leak of a highly contagious and dangerous virus. | |
| However, upon closer inspection, it becomes clear that this report is neither a scientific study nor an attempt to establish the truth. | |
| It is a political tool designed to restore public trust in the authorities, which was undermined during the so-called pandemic, while also serving geopolitical goals. | |
| Many already understood that COVID-19 has been an act of | |
| massive manipulation and dissection performed by the government. | |
| This document attempts to lull skeptics by reinforcing their doubts about the official narrative, but it feeds them yet another lie, a story devoid of any evidence. | |
| The report contains no scientific facts or logic, only a desire to distract from real issues. | |
| Before moving on to the critique of the so-called evidence for the lab origin of SARS-CoV-2 virus, it's worth asking the obvious question. | |
| How can one discuss the origin of a virus whose existence has never been proven? | |
| The SARS-CoV-2 virus has never been isolated. | |
| This means the virus has not been found and isolated from a sample of a sick person to study it and prove it causes disease. | |
| Instead, virologists conducted unscientific experiments with cell cultures, killing laboratory cells using toxic antibiotics and then claiming the cells died because of a hypothetical virus. | |
| What is presented as the genome of the virus is merely a computer-generated model. | |
| All hypotheses about its origin, including the laboratory one, are based on the analysis of this digital genetic sequence and are not supported by any real evidence. | |
| The origin of this sequence is neither natural nor laboratory, it is a fiction existing only in computer programs. | |
| Imagine someone describes a mythical creature, like a dragon, that no one has ever seen. | |
| You have no skeleton, no photographs, no traces, but you decide to create its image on a computer, based on others' accounts and your imagination. | |
| You add wings, fire-breathing abilities, and scales because it seems logical. | |
| However, this image remains entirely fictional and has no connection to reality, as no one has found the dragon itself. | |
| Similarly, the genome of the virus is constructed from assumptions, not real data. | |
| For more on this, you can watch my video, the scientific vacuum, the scientific method and its absence in virology, and other materials on my channel. | |
| Now, let's critique the report. | |
| The document entirely overlooks the lack of any real evidence proving the existence of SARS-CoV-2. | |
| Despite it being an obvious and long-exposed truth. | |
| Instead, it discusses a genetic sequence that exists only as a random string of letters in a computer and convinces people it contains atypical features that might indicate a lab origin, such as. | |
| Fear and cleavage site. | |
| Allegedly, this part of the genome makes the virus more contagious for humans. | |
| But since the virus has not been isolated, the furin cleavage site is just a string of letters in a computer. | |
| Code on optimization for humans, the document claims that the genetic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 is too well adapted for infecting humans. | |
| However, without isolating the virus and obtaining its real genome, this claim remains pure fantasy. | |
| Lack of an intermediate animal host, the document emphasizes that no animal host has been found through which the virus could have jumped from bats to humans. | |
| But since the virus has not been isolated, such discussions are meaningless. | |
| As a second argument in favor of the virus's laboratory origin hypothesis, The document cites the case of several employees from the Wuhan Institute of Virology who allegedly fell ill with symptoms identical to COVID-19. | |
| However, this claim, presented as proof, does not withstand any scrutiny. | |
| Symptoms such as fever, cough, loss of taste and smell, shortness of breath, and general weakness are not specific to COVID-19. | |
| They are characteristic of many respiratory illnesses, including influenza, which affects millions of people annually, seasonal respiratory diseases, pneumonia, which is widespread in China, particularly in areas with high air pollution like Wuhan. | |
| Wuhan, like many industrial cities in China, suffers from severe air pollution, a well-known factor contributing to respiratory diseases. | |
| Each year, millions in the region suffer from bronchitis, pneumonia and other respiratory conditions. | |
| Many also have chronic respiratory illnesses due to constant exposure to polluted air. | |
| It is therefore unsurprising that several laboratory employees could fall ill. | |
| This in no way proves the existence or leak of a virus. | |
| The document describes SARS-CoV-2 as a virus modified in a lab to become highly contagious and more dangerous, yet claims that measures taken to combat it, such as lockdowns, did more harm than good. | |
| But if the virus is such a contagious and dangerous chimera, why are lockdowns and masks unnecessary? | |
| If SARS-CoV-2 was truly enhanced in a lab, lockdowns would logically be justified to prevent its spread. | |
| If the measures are unnecessary, as stated in the report, then why scare the public with a lab-created virus? | |
| How could they even conceive of combining criticism of strict measures with a scare story about a highly contagious virus? | |
| These contradictions show that the document is not striving for logic but instead aims to cater to different audiences. | |
| The first group, skeptics of lockdowns and masks. | |
| They rightly believe that the restrictions did more harm than good and that the pandemic was exaggerated. | |
| The document tries to capture their attention by criticizing strict measures and emphasizing their negative consequences. | |
| The second group, those who believe in the possibility of SARS-CoV-2 being lab-created. | |
| The report highlights alleged genetic anomalies of the virus, like the furin site and the lab-leak hypothesis. | |
| The third group, people generally afraid of viruses. | |
| They are willing to believe any explanation that makes viruses even scarier. | |
| The story of a highly contagious lab-created virus reinforces their fear and dependence on government solutions. | |
| The fourth group, those disappointed in the government but seeking explanations. | |
| The report tries to win over people who lost trust and authority during the pandemic by offering them an allegedly truthful version of events. | |
| Another contradiction in the document is the praise of the Operation Warp Speed program and the simultaneous criticism of the vaccines produced by this program. | |
| In 2020, Donald Trump launched the Operation Warp Speed program to accelerate the development and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines. | |
| The report praises this program as a significant success, supposedly saving millions of lives, and calls it a model for future crises. | |
| Yet, in the same document, the vaccines created under Operation Warp Speed are criticized, along with their rollout by Joe Biden's administration, with an emphasis on the serious side effects of these vaccines. | |
| Simply put, the vaccines developed under Trump's program are first presented as the salvation of humanity, but as soon as powers This presents obvious logical contradictions. | |
| The COVID-19 vaccines used in the United States turned out to be among the most toxic vaccines in history, largely due to the accelerated pace of their development and the cutting of clinical trial phases. | |
| But who accelerated their development? | |
| The Trump administration. | |
| The instant the coronavirus invaded our shores, we raced into action to develop a safe and effective vaccine at breakneck speed. | |
| It would normally take five years, six years, seven years, or even more. | |
| We're just days away from authorization from the FDA, and we're pushing them hard, at which point we will immediately begin mass distribution. | |
| Before Operation Warp Speed, the typical time frame for development and approval, as you know, could be infinity. | |
| And we were very, very happy that we were able to get things done at a level that nobody has ever seen before. | |
| The report also fails to mention that it was under Operation Warp Speed that vaccine manufacturers were granted immunity from legal liability for the side effects of their products. | |
| This immunity allowed pharmaceutical companies to speed up development by cutting clinical trial phases. | |
| While simultaneously depriving vaccine-injured people of the right to seek fair compensation through the courts. | |
| Thus, the praise of Operation Warp Speed aimed at restoring trust in the Trump administration directly contradicts the criticism of the vaccines in this document. | |
| It serves as an attempt to appeal to the public's dissatisfaction that built up during Biden's presidency. | |
| This duplicity clearly demonstrates that the report's goal is not to establish the truth but to manipulate public opinion for political purposes. | |
| If the US government is truly pursuing honesty and seeking the truth, why do they avoid the key issue of the lack of evidence for the virus's existence? | |
| Why spend so much time and resources discussing the origin of a hypothetical virus that no one has ever seen? | |
| Preparing official congressional reports like this is no cheap endeavor. | |
| It involves paying Congress members, their staff, analysts, conducting research, and etc. | |
| The costs can amount to hundreds of thousands, if not millions of dollars, funded by American taxpayers. | |
| Unfortunately, instead of uncovering the truth, taxpayers received yet another distraction from real issues. | |
| New pandemics are inevitable, confidently declares Congressman Brad Wenstrup at the beginning of the document. | |
| But if the U.S. government were truly committed to the truth, it wouldn't prepare for non-existent threats. | |
| Instead, it would question the entire concept of virology. | |
| How can we talk about new viral pandemics when virology itself is pseudoscience with no scientific foundation? | |
| A report where a random string of letters on a computer screen is discussed as something real, let alone a dangerous chimera supposedly created in a lab, can hardly help America from a scientific standpoint. | |
| Politically, however, it opens up many possibilities. | |
| Pseudo-pandemics have always been used as justification for actions impossible under normal circumstances. | |
| Remember 2020, the declaration of a pandemic was nothing more than a cover for one of the most devastating financial crises in history. | |
| In 2019, signs of an impending global economic collapse became evident. | |
| The banking system, based on endless debt accumulation and speculative derivatives, was overwhelmed. | |
| Leading global banks help problematic assets worth many times the world's GDP. The financial elite faced a choice, admit the systems collapse and suffer reputational and personal financial losses, or find a way to distract attention and shift the consequences onto society. | |
| In such a situation, the elites face two scenarios to exit the crisis. | |
| A global war, capable of writing off debts through destruction, or inventing a large-scale pandemic, which would become a universal justification for financial manipulations. | |
| It was COVID-19 that became this means. | |
| Lifting restrictions on the uncontrolled issuance of fiat money allowed central banks to hide signs of the impending crisis, mask financial instability, and temporarily delay the banking system's collapse. | |
| Instead of solving systemic problems, they pumped the economy with cheap money, shifting the burden onto taxpayers and the real sector. | |
| Simultaneously, the pandemic provided an opportunity to write off some debts under the guise of economic losses supposedly caused by a global threat. | |
| A crisis that, under normal circumstances, would have led to the loss of power for financial elites and prompted reform of the financial system, was presented as an unforeseen consequence of the pandemic, while society faced hyperinflation, rising unemployment, and increased economic inequality. | |
| Now, the COVID-19 report, released shortly after Donald Trump's victory in the November 2024 elections, can be used for another geopolitical and economic strategy. | |
| Trump has long voiced his plans to weaken China, aiming to surpass it in economic dominance. | |
| And I'm doing the same thing with China. | |
| We're going to tariff the hell out of them. | |
| The COVID-19 pandemic has already been a tool for accusing China of leaking a lab-created virus. | |
| To be specific, COVID-19. | |
| That name gets further and further away from China as opposed to calling it the Chinese virus. | |
| "They intentionally let it spread to their population." Now, using this myth, the Trump administration can psychologically prepare the public and the international community for the next pandemic, again attributing it to China. | |
| A scenario where China is portrayed as the culprit behind global crises could justify sanctions, restrictions, and other measures of pressure. | |
| Such actions would not only undermine China's economic and political power but also create the illusion of protection by the US, strengthening the government's position domestically and internationally. | |
| Thus, the report is less about the past and more about the future. | |
| It psychologically prepares people for a new pseudo-pandemic. | |
| The illusion of viral threats continues to serve as a universal justification for global manipulations, both economic and geopolitical. | |
| Of course, government structures will never admit virology is pseudoscience, as they would lose their age-old tool for controlling public consciousness and justifying their actions. | |
| Without the concept of viruses as an invisible threat, governments and corporations would lose the ability to manipulate masses through fear. | |
| People would start asking uncomfortable questions about the real causes of declining healthcare, economic crises, and political instability. | |
| Moreover, the disappearance of the virological doctrine would undermine the multibillion-dollar pharmaceutical industry, based on the production of vaccines and antiviral drugs. | |
| The strategy of saving lives through vaccination would be exposed as a blatant fraud, potentially leading to a loss of trust in official medicine and authority as a whole. | |
| Thus, acknowledging virology as pseudoscience would deprive elites of their primary tool of control and lead to significant social, economic, and political changes, which they strive to prevent at all costs. | |
| If the authors were genuinely committed to the truth, the report should have highlighted the following key points. | |
| 1. The existence of SARS-CoV-2 has never been proven. | |
| The virus has not been isolated, and the so-called genome is merely a computer-generated sequence of letters unrelated to real biology. | |
| 2. PCR tests are not able to detect any virus. | |
| In the absence of a real virus sample, COVID-19 tests were never calibrated to detect the mythical SARS-CoV-2. | |
| Laboratories inflated amplification thresholds to 40-50 cycles, making nearly all samples positive, even sterile solutions. | |
| This artificially inflated the number of cases and created the illusion of a pandemic. | |
| 3. The seasonal incidence of respiratory symptoms has been labeled a dangerous pandemic. | |
| Ordinary respiratory diseases were presented as a global catastrophe. | |
| PCR tests, which gave positive results even for people without any symptoms, became the main tool for manipulating numbers. | |
| 4. Vaccines were created without a real virus. | |
| Since SARS-CoV-2 was never isolated, vaccine efficacy against it was zero from the start. | |
| However, their toxic composition caused millions of adverse effects, including severe health damage and deaths. | |
| 5. The real solution is to abandon virology and vaccination. | |
| Instead of preparing for new pandemics, the entire approach to medicine must be reconsidered. | |
| Virology, as pseudoscience, should be abolished. | |
| The practice of vaccination against viral diseases must be discontinued. | |
| Resources should be directed towards studying the real causes of diseases related to lifestyle, nutrition, and the environment. | |
| Treatment should be based on the scientific method, not myths about viruses. | |
| To break this cycle of manipulation, we must demand honesty and transparency from science. | |
| It's time to rethink the concept of infectious diseases. | |
| Reject and proven hypotheses and focus on the real causes of illnesses that can be proven and addressed. | |
| Only then can we build a society based not on fear but on knowledge. | |
| In a few months, my new investigative documentary titled "The Truth About Measles" will be released. | |
| The Truth About Measles is the first documentary in the world to present the most detailed, scientifically grounded, and unparalleled refutation of any argument in favor of the necessity of measles vaccination. | |
| The documentary is nearly four hours long and is divided into three episodes. | |
| There is no other material that addresses the topic of measles in such depth. | |
| It covers the history of measles, the creation of its diagnosis, and explains how the medical establishment has historically created the illusion of measles epidemics and convinced the public that vaccination reduces the incidence of measles. | |
| The documentary provides the most detailed analysis of the 2016 German court case regarding the existence of the measles virus, where it was demonstrated that the measles virus does not exist. | |
| This court case is still the subject of heated debates today. | |
| Any attempt by fact-checkers and vaccine advocates to discredit the outcome of this case has been completely refuted in this documentary. | |
| The documentary examines the experiments that have tried to prove the contagiousness of measles to verify the claim that measles is the most contagious disease in the world, as well as the so-called complications of measles and whether measles actually causes them. | |
| You will understand the real causes and purposes of measles symptoms, learn what to do if you or your children contract measles, and free yourself once and for all from the fear of measles. | |
| If you want to silence any doubt about the correctness of your decision not to vaccinate yourself and your children and understand why All of modern virology as we know it today, as well as modern vaccination practices prior to the era of mRNA vaccines, began with measles. | |
| Measles is the largest knot in the entire field of virology, which I have carefully untangled for the understanding of the general public. | |
| To ensure you don't miss the release of the documentary in English and other languages, subscribe to my Telegram channel. |
Export Selection