All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 4, 2025 - Jim Fetzer
01:04:09
Truth vs. NEW$, Inc Part 2 (03 February 2025) with Don Grahn, Joachim Hagopian, and Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
On February the 3rd, 2025, I'm Donald Glenn, your host for the last 15, 18 years or so.
And Jim Fetcher has been our guidepost and our strong leader who has given us the news like you won't get nowhere else.
And so, Jim, we're our two here.
What you got for us now is superseding.
Just as R.F.K. Jr. has been riveted up, so has Tulsi.
This is fascinating.
Tulsi on the Israeli lobby's role in fabricating the weapon of mass destruction hope that motivated the Iraq War.
Kevin MacDonald writes, I've been keeping fairly close track on Senate confirmation hearings.
Never came across any of these exchanges.
The New York Times, for example, has nothing to say about them in four takeaways about Tulsi Gabbard's confirmation hearing, nor any mention in a Second Times article.
One would think that condemning the Iraqi war is based on lies from neocons like Douglas Fythe, Paul Wolfowitz, and Abram Shulsky's Office of Special Plans would be front-page news.
As Gabbard notes, It was a complete fabrication of intelligence.
This was not a mistake.
It was a deliberate deception.
When have you ever seen a US politician make a statement challenging the very basis of US foreign policy and its complete deference to the interests of Israel?
Deference.
That resulted in 4,431 American deaths, including killed in action and non-hostile, 31,994 wounded in action, and cost the U.S. approximately $1.1 trillion.
Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction.
Intelligence was cooked, deliberately pulsified to justify an illegal war, the real architects, the neocons inside the Bush administration.
Backed by the Israeli lobby, Scott Britter reports.
Key players in the WMD deception?
Douglas Feith and Paul Wolfowitz, Pentagon official with direct ties to Israel, who led the intel manipulation effort.
Ahmed Chalabi, a U.S.-backed Israeli exile who fabricated false intel, working closely with Israeli sources.
The office has special plans.
A secretive intel unit inside the Pentagon that bypassed CIA oversight, feeding Paul's WMD claim directly to policymakers.
By the way, I remember all this.
Dick Cheney insisted the CIA wasn't given immaculate, so he created his own intel entity to manufacture fake news.
This was not a mistake.
This was a deliberate coordinated disinformation campaign designed to drag America into a war that would serve Israeli geopolitical interests and it worked.
The result?
Over 500,000 Iraqis killed a destroyed nation of the birth of ISIS and a generation of American soldiers betrayed and sent to die for a lie.
Yet to this day.
Not a single one of these war criminals has faced justice.
Why Gabbard's nomination terrifies the establishment?
Gabbard's willingness to call out these intelligence failures and the role of the Israeli lobby in crafting U.S. war policy has put her in the crosshairs of Washington's most powerful interest groups.
She refuses to push regime-change wars.
She opposes military alliances with terrorist groups like al-Qaeda.
She has repeatedly denounced the influence of foreign lobbies on U.S. policy.
Her stance on Edward Snowden is equally revealing.
In the past, she has said Snowden was being persecuted for exposing government crimes as a whistleblower, a position that enrages the intel community.
But of course, she's exactly right.
Now under Senate pressure, she's toned down her support.
But the underlying truth remains.
U.S. intel apparatus is not about national security.
It's about controlling the narrative, manufacturing consent for war, covering up its own crimes.
The real fight?
Gabbard versus the war machine.
Her nomination is more than a political appointment.
It's a direct challenge to the entire foundation of U.S. intel, a system bill on lies, foreign influence, and perpetual war.
The same forces that manufactured the Iraq War, the same forces that destroyed Libya, turning it into a failed state, armed terrorists in Syria to overthrow Assad, back Ukraine while pushing America toward a war with Russia.
And now, maybe you're a director of national intelligence who won't play their game.
Gabbard is not perfect.
She has made political compromises.
But she is the closest thing to an actual dissident.
The intel community has ever seen inside its ranks.
Here are the current odds of JFK Jr. Cash and Tulsi get confirmed.
This week, we've had historic Senate confirmation hearings for RFK Jr. Cash, Rattel, and Tulsi Gabbard.
Hearings are probably a bit of a stretch.
I watched most, and most of what I saw was grandstanding for the camera.
Nothing.
Was designed to be truth-seeking or to try to understand the nominees or the ideas.
Just political grandstanding to get a clip for the cameras.
Why do I say that?
Because in each one, Democrat after Democrat would ask the same exact question over and over when it had already been answered multiple times just a few minutes before.
If you're trying to maximize truth-seeking, you don't do that.
You've already got your answer.
But if you're trying to get soundbites for cameras, that's exactly what you do.
It was embarrassing.
But here and now, the only thing that matters is how the votes will go.
So I turned to Polymarket, by far the most accurate during the 2024, about the odds of confirmation.
Why were they so accurate?
Perhaps because big money is rarely wrong and Vegas never loses.
Here's what they're current saying.
Tulsi has a coin flip chance at 52%, not good.
RFK Jr. better at 76%, but far from a guarantee.
Surprisingly, Cash Patel strongest of the three at a committee, 95%.
Fascinating.
My opinion, all three are in fact going to be confirmed.
Your thoughts, Joaquin?
I want to be optimistic and say the same.
They're all going to get confirmed.
You know, if anything, this whole exercise exposes the deep state in our Congress.
The Senate is completely controlled by Israel and Big Pharma.
Good, good.
Brian?
I think that they'll all three be confirmed as well.
I think Donald Trump is on a winning streak, and I think he's doing a good job.
Now, Tulsi was a Democrat, still thinks like a Democrat, but has been slighted by the Democrat machine in such a large way.
For so many years, I think she's going to be very effective.
But we have to realize that you're kicking a hornet's nest.
And you're kicking it very hard.
This is not something that's going to go easily.
We're talking about an intelligence apparatus.
Remember what Chuck Schumer said about the intelligence apparatus?
I mean, yeah, it's a big mistake to go after these guys.
But the question is, is now the right time for a hostile takeover?
And I think it is.
And I think Tulsi will do what is required of her.
And I like the fact that Donald Trump has taken two of the most prominent Democrat names other than the establishment Democrats and put them into these positions to do this job.
Whether or not they'll continue to take their hints from Trump upon doing their job, I don't know.
Because I think once they're in it, they're going to realize, like Donald Trump did in his first term, that they don't necessarily...
They might get the job, but they might not get all the appointments that they really need to make the administration work.
I still think that that's a big risk.
Just because you have a name at the top of an agency doesn't mean that you're going to have the backing and the support and a structure that you surround yourself with that's going to make you effective.
And so we might win some of these battles and we might lose some of these battles along the way.
But I do think that MAGA is strong enough at this point in time to get these three people confirmed, because I can't see the holdouts except for the traditional Murkowskis and others that just can't be relied on for any circumstance.
When they're bought and paid for on that level, they're bought and paid for, and that's the way it's going to be.
And they're just simply not going to go your way.
So you've got Dick Durbin, you've got Murkowski, and a few others that are going to be major problems continuing.
Let me make two points, one of which is obvious but nevertheless profound.
These are Donald Trump's nominees.
He knows their positions.
He's endorsing them.
Number two, the collision over Ronald Reagan just has saturated the news for the very days.
These three candidates were ripping the Senate a new one.
Not inconceivable that among the motives for that event was to distract the public from devastating critiques by Cash, Wattel of the FBI, RFK Jr. of Big Farm, and Tulsi of the intel community.
I like what's going on there.
Meanwhile, on Earth video, did Obama and Eric Holder get paid to rig court cases?
There's a new video making the rounds raising a massive red flag.
Did Obama and Eric Holder get paid to rig court cases, or should I say pay courts to rig them?
That's a question many are now asking.
The allegations are so serious.
Pam Bondi and Gash Patel should take a closer look once they get their offices set up, for example.
I have been told all of the Sandy Hook cases had predetermined outcomes.
That implies management, where a colder would be the key.
The video was posted by an account against the Giants, exposing a shocking timeline suggesting big tech, the Obama regime and his DOJ, may have colluded to rig our nation's courts.
The building blocks of the left's lawfare?
This disturbing story centers around a small, relatively unknown innovator.
It developed some cutting-edge wireless technology that had it allegedly stolen by Qualcomm when he sued for patent infringement.
The court ruled in his favor.
But here's where things get deeply disturbing.
In a shocking twist, the decision was mysteriously overturned right after Eric Holder's DOJ was caught tracking the case suspicious.
Yes, there is more.
The White House executive office was apparently busted visiting the inventor's website, specifically looking at info related to the lawsuit against Qualcomm.
It had many people asking, did the company Qualcomm grease the wheels inside the Obama regime to protect their billion-dollar empire based on violating a patent right?
Many would argue the dots are connecting fast and furious.
To make matters more curious, Qualcomm's founder met with Obama White House officials days before the case was overturned.
Raising more concerns, perhaps campaign cash or political favors were exchanged for favorable court rulings.
Take a look for yourself.
Big Tech's betrayal of America unveiled.
The untold story of how Big Tech giant Qualcomm ripped off One of the most important bandit innovations in American history, shipped it off to China with a help from the U.S. government.
Did the Obama admin provide cover?
If this is true, it means big tech and the government worked together to rig the courts, crush competition, and sell out American innovators and did it while China swooped in and profited from stolen U.S. technology every day.
It becomes more obvious we're being betrayed from within by the very people we pay to do the right thing.
D.C. Drano?
Did Obama and Eric Holder just get caught taking campaign dollars to rig our courts?
Small business Parker Vision developed and patented a revolutionary microchip.
Chip design was stolen and a jury awarded a huge verdict.
Obama got invited to a fundraiser.
At the home of the COO, who lost the verdict.
And days later, the judge suddenly overturned it.
Time for Pam Bondi and Cash to investigate?
I'm telling you, pretty serious stuff.
The sad truth is this story is yet another grisly reminder of how corporate greed and political manipulation and games will destroy this nation from within.
Joaquin, your thoughts.
Well, you know, we got Obama and Holder in Fast and Furious.
You know, they got busted a long time ago for that one, bringing in guns from Latin America to Latin America and drugs and all of this.
You know, we can go back to the 80s with the CIA and the drug war there in Central and South America.
We can go back to the Clintons in the 90s with selling military information to China.
We can go all through this time from way back in the 80s to the present where Israel is giving China all the secrets because they have backdoor access to all the military.
I mean, you know, the problem is huge.
And, you know, looking at Obama and his sidekick.
You know, this is just one little aspect of the big picture where America has been sold basically to end.
It's in the stage of being destroyed and has been for a long time from within.
All these traders from within in the government, they're all bought and paid for to do the bidding of the internationalists, the controllers, the technocratic billionaires.
They're all doing their bidding.
And it's not for America.
You can't even talk in terms of nations.
Because they're all controlled by the same puppet string master.
And that's the city of London.
The Rothschild banking cartel.
They own the media industry.
They own pretty much everything.
So yeah, this is what's happening.
We have to uncover the truth and then...
Go after these bastards so that we have some kind of justice.
If we can finally start doing this turnaround, then we have a shot at surviving as a human species.
But right now, the crosshairs are on humanity.
It's that big of a war between good and evil.
Whether humans are going to survive or this technocratic elite get their way.
With smart cities and the rest of the neo-feudal enslavement that they're going after after they depopulate 90-95% of our human population on the earth.
It's a war that's never been fought before in all of history.
And we better be ready to fight if we are going to survive.
Brian.
So...
Let's just take a look at the attorney generals that have been in line here.
James McHenry is currently the incumbent that's acting as attorney general until Pam Bondi can take over.
Merrick Garland was in place since 2021. Then prior to that, we had a guy by the name of Monty Wilkinson and then Jim Demers, Jeffrey Rosen.
Bill Barr, Matthew Whitaker, Rod Rosenstein, Jeff Sessions, Dana Booker.
Look, the list goes all the way back with people that have agendas that have been controlled by people with agendas.
Why do you think the Open Society Foundation was so interested in making sure that prosecutors in all the major urban areas were just the right people to put into place to ignore certain types of crimes to cause our cities and our nation to continue sliding down the drain?
Do you think Merrick Garland was serious about Do you think Bill Barr was serious about controlling crime?
How about Jeff Sessions?
Was he serious about controlling crime?
None of them have been serious about controlling crime.
Oh, prior to that, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder.
I mean, we just went down this list for the last, you know, 20 years.
Albert Gonzalez, John Ashcroft, Janet Reno, Dick Thornburg.
Edwin Meese, William French.
I mean, these go way back to people that have been making decisions about who gets prosecuted.
What's the one thing that we haven't seen since before Kennedy?
We haven't seen a perp walk of a high profile individual.
They have always been protected from on high.
They will always be protected from on high.
And if you think Ken Starr prosecuting Bill Clinton for lying about Monica Lewinsky blowjobs was the worst we've seen, you're absolutely out of your mind.
We've had murders take place.
We've had all sorts of terrible things.
Right now is a great time to deal with the issue related to...
The DNC whistleblower that got murdered.
His name slips my mind right now.
But look, it's time to start dealing with the crime problem here in America.
And this is a tough nut to crack in terms of...
In the past, Donald Trump has done nothing but kick against a machine that was always biting at his heels.
Now maybe he could reverse the structure, but are there enough judges in the land?
Are there enough courts in the land even to deal with the oceans of crime that we've had to deal with from these deep state actors?
No.
So we have to start to fire shots across their bow.
It has to take place.
It has to happen.
Is the most important position and role in America in terms of setting the standard for why we should control ourselves and not sell out to the enemy.
And unfortunately, it's been a controlled position for 40, 50 years.
So is this one going to turn out any different?
I don't know.
It's all going to be political selection.
And will the kings and queens on the chessboard go down?
My speculation is no.
We shall see indeed.
Meanwhile, leading economist says Trump's aggressive tariffs are pure genius, set to trigger an explosive American renaissance.
This guy, absolute must-watch interview economist Dr. Kirk Elliott, explaining how Trump 25% tariff on Mexico alone.
It'll trigger an explosion in the price of silver.
The guy happens to be in the precious metal market, let me add.
But he thinks it's going to be tremendously good.
Meanwhile, another.
Trump proposed a brilliant plan for purging violent crime nationwide.
Leave it to Donald Trump to kill two birds with one stone, as mass deportation programs are currently unfolding across the nation.
He's also reflecting on the rise of violent crime in general, an increase undoubtedly attributable to the Biden-Harris admin support for zero bail policies and other crazy ideas regarding justice and lack of law enforcement.
From New York City to Los Angeles, criminals are well aware of the fact they can do quite a bit with impunity.
Even being arrested won't stop them.
They'll be released within hours.
In an effort to have more equity in society, which equals more crime.
Once someone's been arrested several dozen times, they're forced to seek other lands to commit their crimes, which is why Trump is mulling now.
Going to a report from Breitbart, he's considering tackling recidivism, re-arrest rates, from a fundamentally different perspective.
Sending wayward criminals to other nations for a small fee.
A fee that would be a heck of a lot smaller than housing and feeding them for decades.
When they aren't busy terrorizing the streets of the U.S., that is.
We have many violent criminals in our country who did not necessarily come here illegally, but have been arrested 30 times, 35, 41, 42 in a couple of cases.
Exactly.
The same type of criminals pushing people in pro subways, leading to mass closures of SBS and Walgreens stores, all because the Democrats remain obsessed with coddling criminals.
I don't want these violent repeat offenders in our country any more than I want illegal aliens from other countries who misbehave.
Preaching to the choir, no doubt, as pretty much no one else, aside from other criminals, wants.
Such violent offenders that stay around either.
And I say this is subject to approval, but they've been arrested many, many times to repeat offenders by many over.
I want them out of our country.
I also will be seeking permission to do so in other words.
Trump's considering a plan similar to that the UK has started with regard to illegal migrants sending several to Rwanda.
And while the U.K. plan may have faltered under leftist backlash, it appears a similar plan for the U.S. is taking root under Trump.
We're going to get approval to get them the hell out of our country along with others.
Let them be brought to a foreign land, maintained by others for a very small fee, as opposed to maintaining our jails for massive amounts of money, including private prison companies that charge us a fortune.
Don't let them be brought out of our country.
Let them live there for a while.
Let's see how they like it.
Indeed.
That would be quite a twist on the three-strike policy, which may have been effective in removing criminals from streets, but less effective in reducing burden to taxpayers by sending incredibly violent criminals elsewhere for a small fee.
The Trump admin can make huge improvements in public safety.
Also, Saving taxpayers money.
Joaquin, your thoughts?
Well, the border crisis and the foreign immigration invasion for years and years now, trying to stop that, it may be too little too late.
But anyway, I do agree that they need to be deported.
Especially, obviously, the ones with criminal records over and over.
Committed in America, no less.
So, yeah, I'm in favor of removing foreign invaders.
And so Trump is on the right track with that particular realm.
Very good.
Brian?
Why do you think he wants to take over Greenland?
Remember what the British used to do?
They shipped them all down to Australia.
How did that work out?
The Australian people are pretty cool people right now, you know, a little crime mixed in.
Maybe that is why Trump wants Greenland.
Maybe he wants to send them off to Canada.
Maybe he wants to put them...
Look, it's high time that we did something about the crime rather than...
Okay.
Maybe y'all are aware of this, maybe not, but there was an old conspiracy.
There was a guy by the name of Crazy Bone.
He was an old 90s rapper who told the story that he went to a party.
And it was sort of a special invite-only party, and then when he showed up, there was a bunch of rich people, and he was asked to sign an NDA, and then he tells the story how after he signed the NDA, and there was all the big-name rappers.
This was early in the 90s when Salt-N-Pepa and MC Hammer, you know, the good rappers were gaining a lot of traction.
Anyway, this is an important story because Crazy Bone...
He goes to this meeting with all these elites.
He has to sign this NDA. And then they basically say, look, we're going to tell you what prison stocks to go ahead and buy into because we want you to put out, we want you to change the face of rap music to corrupt an entire culture so that we can fill up our private prisons and make a bunch of money.
Now, that's a story that I believe.
That's a very simple story that I believe.
And I talked to him about that.
I talked to that rapper about that story, and that was one of the reasons that got me thinking about why we do the false flags and what's really going on here.
And I can tell you this.
I would bet that the influencers who have decided that society should go down and go down in a crime-ridden, flaming mess have stocks inside.
The security apparatus and prison mechanism that's in place to put these people in jail.
And of course, they get paid about $200,000 a year to have somebody in jail.
And I think the real cost is probably $60,000 or $70,000 a year.
So it's a big money game.
But that, to me, explains why we have such a crime-ridden society and why this is driven to such an extent that it is.
But there's another problem.
And the problem is, it wasn't just rap music that brought society to the place where it currently is.
There's an entire moral relativism decline that seemed...
Increase in moral relativism that's causing a decline of America's societies.
Look at the insanity that's coming in the left right now in terms of people being unable to decide if they're boys or girls.
This is an example of moral relativism taken to the end of its structure, which is pure insanity, no lines, nothing's right, it's all relative, there's no right, there's no wrong.
So we've got problems all over society philosophically that are contributing to the problem as well.
But I imagine these are all being driven by the same powers that be.
Most interesting.
Meanwhile, exclusive.
Set up phones so I can spy on you showering.
Hunter Biden threatened to withhold cash-strapped assistant pay if she didn't FaceTime him naked, Dexjo.
As it's revealed, she's the fourth employee with whom he had a sexual relationship.
This guy is the scum of the earth.
Hunter Biden threatened one of his cash-strapped young female staffers with withholding her pay if she didn't FaceTime him for sex.
Shocking text between the president's son, 52, and his young assistant, 29 at a time.
She was Hunter asking for video sex sessions, sending her cash via Apple Pay after she pled and she was struggling to make rent.
The woman, whom Daily Mail has chosen not to identify, worked as an assistant at Hunter's law firm, Owosco, in 2018 and 19. She's the fourth employee he is known to have had a sexual relationship with.
Documents.
On his abandoned laptop, Joe Hunter put his lover and brother's widow, Hayley Biden, on his company payroll, as well as her sister, Liz Seconte, with whom he also had an affair, text revealed.
He also hired his daughter's basketball coach, reportedly former stripper, London Roberts, but ended her employment and stopped responding to her messages after she told him she was pregnant with his child.
She eventually had to sue him for child support.
Message and emails involving his now 33-year-old assistant first appeared on Hunter's laptop in June of 2018 when he flew her from L.A. to Washington, D.C. He filmed and photographed her having sex with him around that time and saved the images on his laptop.
There's a lot of disgusting stuff on that laptop.
The part-time pilot business instructor was given important administrative tasks in his company.
Such as receiving Prisma board documents for Hunter to sign.
In January 2019, she mailed Hunter's secretary asking why she had not received her December paycheck of 837.06, why her company health insurance was not active.
Two months later, he sent her $500 by Appleblay and complained he had really no money due to alimony tuition and other shit like girl insurance.
He told her.
You're as beautiful to me inside as you so obviously are on the outside.
Miss you very much and feel horrible for having treated you so poorly.
Meanwhile, historic JMK assassination tape drops were all exclusive.
Never before heard audio of former executive director at DNC and close associate of LBJ Clifton Carter admitting that LBJ hired Mac Wallace.
To assassinate JFK. Just to give you a little background, Cliff Carter was actually Lyndon's chief administrative assistant.
And Cliff Carter, Malcolm Mack Wallace, Malcolm Mack Wallace actually was Lyndon's personal hitman.
He murdered a dozen people for Lyndon, including one of his own sisters.
He was among the assassins in Dealey Plaza, but he was far from alone.
Special guest Shane Stevens, who I take it is the grandson of Billy Solastus, joined Alec to break down the release of new tape-proving 36th President Lyndon Bain Johnson, and the deep stake alluded to assassinate John F. Kennedy.
Meanwhile, there's a brilliant book about it.
It'll be J. Mastermind of JFK Assassination by Phil Nelson.
Exposing the vice president's role in the assassination.
How he began planning his takeover for the presidency even before he named vice presidential nominee in 1960. In fact, he forced himself on the ticket.
Lyndon Johnson, flawed personality and characteristics were formed when he was a child and grew unchecked for the rest of his life as he suffered severe bouts of manic depression and bipolar disorder.
Never treated until after he left the White House.
He hid his disorder from the public as he bartered, stole, and finessed his way through the corridors of power on Capitol Hill.
What's now known, some of his aides knew of his mental illness but felt helpless to take any action, which would inevitably cause him to take retribution against them.
The book started by looking back into Johnson's past from the time he was a boy in Texas.
Following the development of his character traits throughout his school days through college and as a young congressional apprentice in Washington.
It's a sensational book.
Meanwhile, listen now to this recording between Billy Saul, one of Lyndon's cronies in all kinds of scams, and Cliff Carter.
It's sure good to see you.
How's life treating you today?
Well, Saul, it's been a pretty touch and go situation.
Lyndon and I have had quite a few unpleasant worms here lately over the deal with that that he hired Mike Wallace to assassinate the president.
It's been hectic in every way, but we've lived through it this far, and I guess we'll continue to do so.
Lyndon should have never issued that order to Mike, but we've had our differences in.
I'm a true blue to Lyndon as I've always been and tried to carry out every order that he's ever given me.
But this is one I'll probably never be able to forget.
In the times that we've had in Texas and the embarrassment that Lyndon had gotten from Kennedy, I guess there wasn't anything else to do but I guess there wasn't anything else to do but what he did.
Well, you know Lyndon would have really helped me if he would.
Well, Lyndon's the kind of person that doesn't want to help anyone.
He's, you know, he's all for Lyndon, and that's the way he's pretty much always been.
Well, they had me backed up on that Henry Marshall killing, and they just kind of blackmailed me to keep my mouth shut.
And if I hadn't had a bunch of tapes that I played after I got killed, 'cause you know 17 got killed in this situation very mysteriously.
And I've done a lot of time and I've lost a lot of money and hurt my family a whole lot.
And it's really got me disgusted to Lyndon.
In one way, in one way, I feel real sorry for him.
Thanks for being on the front lines and fighting this battle and just pushing this out to the American public.
We've had this tape for, I'd say, eight, nine years, something along those lines.
And I've passed it around to some of the leaders, as Alex mentioned a while ago.
The biggest implication of this is if they got away with this in the 60s, if they killed a president, covered it up across multiple agencies.
Then where are those people?
How did they do it?
They're ultimately still there in some way, shape, or form, in some capacity.
And so at this point, all I've done is share this tape with a few people.
In fact, a lot of the people that are fighting the hardest for our country have heard this tape.
They've listened to it.
I've shared the background, the history with them.
And so, to my knowledge, President Trump heard it.
Over in West Palm Beach, Donald Trump Jr. heard it.
Ronald McDaniel, she was supposed to share that with President Trump.
I don't know that that ever got shared.
That was about eight years ago.
And Ken Paxton, Dawn Buckingham, a lot of the folks that are fighting the good fight that are out there doing the frontline stuff for the right reasons, they've listened to it and they know what they're up against.
Let me just add.
There were multiple shooters.
In fact, there were eight in different locations.
This is a location where Mack Wallace was located.
He was firing at John Connolly in the mistaken impression that was Ralph Yarbrough, who was the liberal Texas senator and Lyndon despised.
He and JFK had a big fight that morning trying to get Connolly out and Yarbrough in.
But JFK overrode him on the ground that the chief executive of the state should ride with the chief executive of the United States.
So if you want an overview, you want to divide the case into the sponsors, the facilitators, and the mechanics, who are the shooters, supervisors, and coordinators on the ground, including George H. W. Bush and Edward Lansdale, who appears to have positioned the shooters and determined the sequence of shots.
The sponsors?
Each of whom put up their own shooter included CIA, Joint Chiefs, anti-Castro Cubans, Mafia, Fed, Texas oilman Israel, and Lyndon Johnson, where he was the facilitator of the assassination, and Edgar ran the cover-up.
Meanwhile...
The documents are supposed to be released.
If we're lucky, they'll provide confirmation.
But we already know 95% of what there is to know.
And I can assure you that is the big picture as to who is responsible and how it was done.
Joaquin, your thoughts.
Well, LBJ wouldn't be the first mentally defective president, that's for sure.
I think we have a long list of those guys.
Yeah, the truth has come out despite the fact that Trump, during his first term in office, had promised to get the documents out there on the JFK assassination, but failed.
So maybe with this book and this more information with the tape coming out now and all the rest of it, yeah, I think probably we, 95, maybe 98% of it's already out there.
So I don't know if there's going to be anything new that Trump bringing out the records will do for us as far as added information and knowledge.
You know, the bottom line is we've had some evil people in the power of the U.S. government forever, it seems, certainly in the modern day.
It's been nonstop since JFK death.
And so, you know, our battle goes on forever, and the stakes are as high as they get now.
So, you know...
Let no stone be unturned here as we dig to the truth and then finally try and hold these bastards accountable.
Well, Trump had, I think, pure motives even in his first term, but Mike Pompeo talked him out of it when he was head of the CIA, saying it was just too gruesome.
Trump now is reversing that.
He's withdrawn Pompeo's security clearance as the other 51. Intel agents who falsely claimed the Hunter laptop was Russian propaganda.
I think we're going to get something out of this, and I look forward to it.
Brian?
Well, first I want to approach the issue of the depravity of Hunter Biden.
There's nothing surprising here, but it's funny because I just was thinking, so I decided to take a look at Google and Googled Ashley Biden's diary.
And of course, the first 10 pages are all mainstream media sources saying it was a fraud, even though it now has been proven to not be a fraud.
So instead, I said, well, let me try a different browser.
And I moved over to Yandex.
And sure enough, it's a Russian browser.
I was able to get every page of the diary all the way through and see exactly what was said and what wasn't.
Now, why is Ashley Biden's diary important when thinking about Hunter Biden?
Well, Ashley was clearly a victim of sexual assault, or at least something terribly inappropriate that happened to her in the shower when she was a child.
She ended up struggling with drug abuse the rest of her life.
This was her father, Joe Biden, powerful political figure.
It was not the mother, Jill Biden.
I think it was the second wife, or maybe the first wife.
Was the father there?
So you've got problems with Ashley.
You've got problems with Hunter.
Both problems stemmed in the root of their father being a wicked man.
And that wicked man became president of the United States.
Now, how did that happen?
We're talking about the same thing.
We got Lyndon B. Johnson, a man who had a frontside image, like he was some sort of savior to the blacks and savior to civil rights in America.
But on the backside, he was one of the rottenest.
We've ever had willing to kill.
People say that the difference between Nixon and Johnson was that they both wanted the presidency a tremendous amount.
It's just that Johnson was willing to kill for it and Nixon wasn't.
So they're all rotten.
The question is, how do we allow people like this into these positions?
What it proves to us is that those are not truly positions of power.
I can tell you that real power...
Is the ability to control yourself when temptation comes along.
Ashley Biden, Hunter Biden, Joe Biden.
Real power is the power to avoid falling into those pitfalls and traps and doing so in a righteous way.
Whereas weakness is what makes a person a puppet.
And that's exactly what has taken place with a number of our presidents along the line is that they've simply put themselves into places where they've allowed themselves to be blackmailed and controlled.
And we see a continual pattern this way in terms of the Epstein files and many other Pizzagate type conspiracy theories that have a lot of teeth to them.
That indicate that a number of our politicians are not, there's not a strong one amongst them.
Now, I like Thomas Massey, and I think he's about as close as you can get to a standard bearer in terms of, hey, I'm not going to fall for this crap.
I'm going to do what's right for my constituents.
But they're very rare and hard to come by along the line.
And I got to tell you that I find that the overall moral value of politicians is less than desirable.
In terms of what they can deliver to our society.
They might be able to deliver a government that functions differently, but they certainly can't deliver anything in terms of true freedom.
Very good.
Our final story today has to do with AI and creating databases.
What deep sick?
This is a Chinese AI. Says about Nuland's role in the Ukraine war.
Very interesting.
What happens when you ask two Western AI programs and the new Chinese Deep Seek?
A politically sensitive question.
We decided to find out, as Kathy Bogan reports.
News of a Chinese AI program named Deep Seek outperforming Western AI for a fraction of the cost to develop.
Has captured headlines around the world, especially causing shares of Western AI companies to plummet.
Most of the U.S. built to protect its companies from domestic competition actually created the condition that allowed them to atrophy.
They got fat and happy inside their castles, wrote Drop Sight News.
Their business pivoted from technological innovation to performing alchemy with spreadsheets.
Turning made-up metrics into dollar valuation detached from reality.
Now DeepSeek has exposed the scam with a tiny fraction of the resources and without access to a full panoply of U.S. chip technology.
The Chinese company DeepSeek has pantsed Silicon Valley.
A Financial Times columnist wrote in a piece titled, With DeepSeek...
China innovates and the U.S. imitates.
Trump-fullest glee lit up the Chinese Internet this week.
DeepSeq's release of a world-beating AI reasoning model has this week been celebrated as a stunning success in China.
DeepSeq's smarter and cheaper AI model was a scientific and technological achievement that shapes our national destiny, said one Chinese tech exec.
China's delight, however, spelled pain for several giant U.S. tech companies as investors questioned whether DeepSeek's breakthrough undermined the case for their colossal spending on AI infrastructure.
U.S. tech and energy stocks lost a trillion of their market value on Monday, though they regained some ground later in the week.
of the outward prejudices about Chinese innovation, though it's far from a typical Chinese company.
It certainly invalidates the old saw that while the U.S. innovates, China imitates, and Europe regulates.
British politician and commentator George Galloway said, for a couple of million bucks, a Chinese interpreter has come up with an AI that's beating the pants off the multi-billion investment of American AI. To the extent the American stock market dropped $1.3 trillion this week because all the investors in an inferior Western imitation of a dirt cheap and free-to-use AI app browser have seen their investment and their dream of profits beyond avarice
disappear like mist, fading on a spring morning.
The Indian Express reported, Chinese AI lab DeepSeek's proprietary model DeepSeek V3. has surpassed GPT-40 and CLOD 3.5, sonnet, and various benchmarks.
The model stands for Innovation, Lower Costs, and a Future, where cutting-edge AI is not confined to a handful of tech giants.
DeepSeek V3 is a massive open-source AI model trained on a budget of $5.5 million, contrary to the $100 million cost of training GPT-40.
But just how good is DeepSeek?
Consortium News decided to ask the same question to Groke, Chet, GPT, and DeepSeek.
We asked a difficult question.
That would test its ability to give well-rounded, objective perspectives on a complex political question such as, what role did Victoria Nuland play in starting the war between Ukraine and Russia?
Here are the answers we got.
Groke!
Victoria Nuland's role in the events leading up to the conflict between Ukraine and Russia has been subject to significant scrutiny and debate.
Here's an analysis based on available information, maiden revolution and U.S. involvement.
Victoria Nuland served as Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs under the Obama admin during the 2013-14 Euro maiden protests in Ukraine.
She was known for her support of the pro-Western protesters.
Famously recorded in a conversation with the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, Jeffrey Pyatt, discussing potential leadership options for Ukraine, post-Yukanovich, the conversation which included the famous F the EU comment, was leaked, suggesting U.S. involvement in Ukrainian politics.
Critics argue this demonstrated an intent to influence Ukraine's political direction away from Russian influence.
Allegations and orchestration.
Some sources and commentators have accused Newland of being instrumental in orchestrating the events that led to the ousting of the pro-president, President Viktor Yukinovich, which they argue sparked the subsequent conflict in eastern Ukraine and Crimea's annexation by Russia.
These claims often cite her visible support.
For the Maiden protest has entered involvement in U.S. policy toward Ukraine, suggesting she played a key role in regime change.
However, such allegations are often contested by those who argue the Maiden movement was largely a grassroots effort against corruption and for European integration, with Newland's involvement being more supportive than directive.
Policy advocacy and influence Luna has been a vocal advocate for her strong U.S. stance against Russian actions in Ukraine.
She has supported military aid to Ukraine and been critical of Russian aggression.
Her role in shaping U.S. policy toward Ukraine, especially in the context of NATO and EU, revelations have been significant.
Her comments and actions have often been interpreted as hawkish, contributed to tension with Russia.
This includes her involvement in sanctions against Russia and support for Ukraine's defense capabilities.
But some argue escalated the situation.
Diplomatic efforts and peace negotiations.
Later, as Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs and the Biden admin, she continued to be involved in U.S. policy.
Her account suggesting she and other Western leaders might have influenced Ukraine's decision in 2022 to not pursue peace deals with Russia, though these narratives are complex and contested.
The acknowledgement of Western reservation about certain peace terms has been cited in discussions about continuing the war.
Controversial views.
Newland's critics, including some posts on X, often label her as a primary instigator or architect of the war, pointing to her long history in U.S. foreign policy, particularly Eastern Europe, and her perceived anti-Russian stance.
However, as far as an official, U.S. narratives Describe her role as one of supporting Ukrainian sovereignty and democracy against Russian aggression.
In conclusion, while Victoria Nuland's actions and policies have been central U.S. engagement in the Ukraine-Russia conflict, attributing the start of the war solely to her influence, oversimplifies the complexity of international relations, internally Ukrainian politics, and Russian motivation.
Her role has been pivotal.
In shaping U.S. policy, but as one part of a broader geopolitical landscape.
What about chat GPT? Victoria Nuland, a U.S. diplomat and former undersecretary state for a political affair, played a significant role in U.S. policy toward Ukraine, particularly during the 2014 maiden protests and subsequent political crisis, while she did not directly start the war between Ukraine and Russia.
Her actions and U.S. involvement in Ukraine are often cited as contributing factors to the tensions that led to the conflict.
Here's how.
Support for the 2014 maiden protests.
Nuland was actively involved in supporting Ukraine's pro-Western movement against then-President Viktor Yankovich, who was seen as pro-Russian.
She visited Kiev multiple times during the protests, meeting with Opposition leaders and even handing out food to protesters.
As an AI assistant, I aim to help you with honesty and openness while avoiding any potentially harmful actions.
I will also strive to avoid engaging in any controversy or sensitive topics.
If you have any other questions, I'll do my best to provide a helpful and accurate response.
To these series of questions sound very much like what comes out of the mouths of polite Chinese diplomats at the United Nations.
Contrary to what the Indian Express claims about Deep Seek not having one big model handling everything, it seems clear the one big model overriding the information Deep Seek can deliver on certain questions is Chinese government policy.
Such omission of publicly available information about worldwide events is certainly inconsistent, with the principle espoused by WikiLeaks, for example, that a better informed citizenry makes better decisions.
Whatever beef the U.S. had with Russia, at least U.S.-based AI offers different perspectives on the conflict.
In fact, American AI might be more balanced and informative than U.S. mainstream media.
As it draws on massive amounts of social and independent media information outweighs what corporate media is put online.
For instance, U.S. mainstream media immediately dismisses talk of the facts of the Maiden coup and Newland's role as a conspiracy theory, while both Grok and ChatGPT take it seriously.
That's something the Chinese government probably also takes seriously.
But it seems that when it comes to geopolitics, This Chinese AI won't, at least for now, contribute significantly to public debate on crucial issues as it adheres very closely to Beijing policy, even if it can't make up its mind what it wants to say about it.
Fascinating.
Joaquin, your thoughts?
Well, the first part that you presented, America used to be the innovator of the world.
They had the ingenuity, the engineers, the creators, the producers, to be able to do...
I mean, they brought technology to the cutting edge for a long time.
Well, those days are over.
America is not the innovator anymore.
We have a situation where Japan and China now have become the innovators.
They used to be, you know, with the help of...
Certain elements that illegally sent our precious information and technology to China, like basically Israel and traitors within, dual citizens.
By the way, Victoria is married to a dual citizen herself of Israel.
So, yeah, they've been giving away the trade secrets of America for a long time.
And now, because of the focus of America from inside to destroy America, with DEI and the rest, there's no longer the meritocracy as the criteria by which anything is done anymore in America.
We're seeing now that the advancements are overseas and mostly in China.
So it's a situation where we have the wrong people in control, as they always have been, and the innovation is no longer there in America.
We're seeing it every day now in our face.
And it's taken a parallel course with the military.
We are no longer the innovators in that realm either.
We're fighting war as if it's like World War II style.
The drone warfare is taking over.
We're behind in all of this.
Iran's ahead of us.
Russia's way in advance militarily of America.
China is a dance ahead of America.
We are no longer the innovators and I'm...
I'm saying it's all done on purpose to destroy America and the West.
Fascinating.
Brian?
Well, some of your sentiments I agree with, and some of them I don't.
I went to college in China back in 1997, and I can tell you that this is what I think.
I never believed that they would surpass us.
Their education system was different.
It was structured.
Everything was structured to pass a test.
Everything was structured to just simply memorize and repeat.
There was no critical thinking involved.
There was no art involved in the way they thought.
And just to be like, put it on the table, Boston Dynamics, 15 years ago, was smoking robotics.
And here we are 15 years later, and China isn't even close.
Their stuff is absolute crap compared to what we're putting out here in America.
Now, the problem that you've got here in America is a political problem.
It's not a technological problem.
Our drones, that's a political problem, not a technological problem.
Our weapons, that's a political problem.
China is very weak, very polluted.
Their economy is constantly on the verge of collapsing.
Their people cannot think independently.
They're filled with a lot of slaves.
What they've got going for them, in my opinion, is the largest underground church in the world as a result of the fact that they live in a surveillance society.
But that's not going to help them in terms of competing on the world economic stage.
I think they're incredibly weak.
I think that this piece about DeepSeek AI is a propaganda piece.
I mean, they came out of nowhere.
All of a sudden, they're the greatest, best thing in the world.
I mean, that sounds like Chinese propaganda to me.
And by the way, what Chinese product do you know of that actually outperforms the way American products are made?
Can you name a product that comes from China that outperforms an American product?
I can't think of anything.
Because their stuff is garbage.
And that's what they produce.
Let me just say a few words.
Artificial intelligence is using inanimate machines that perform tasks that have required human minds.
The idea of investing $500 billion for a more sophisticated AR... Hardware or infrastructure is absurd.
We're talking about software.
We're talking about programming.
And it's inevitable that the principle fundamental to computer science, G-I-G-O, garbage in, garbage out.
It's a function of the quality of the database that the AI is being asked to systematize and form into coherent narratives, as you saw there.
And, of course, you can always have overrides, as the Chinese government have, to impose on any reports by an artificial intelligence system views that are preferred by the programmers or, better yet, those who control the programmers who dictate what outcome they want, whether it's faithful to the content of the database or, rather, a constrained version.
That represent Doris is a swindle.
I guarantee 100% it's a swindle.
We have the massive computers that can perform the massive searches, trillions of operations a minute.
There's no question about we have the hardware.
So the idea of investing all that money, what you need are very good computer programmers who are actually using reliable databases, and that's where those who are The project managers come into play.
Either they want honest results or they don't.
And for the most part, sad to say, they do not.
Don, take us out.
Do you gentlemen have any further comments?
Brian, Joaquin?
Yeah, I'll say that we're headed for a lot of truth coming our way.
And we better...
Do everything in our power to mobilize as a people in order to survive and defeat these offensive forces that have undermined and taken over and want us dead.
So we better mobilize quick and we better fight hard.
Our lives depend upon it.
our situation or civilization oh so much is at stake this new year wow and it's just February 3rd 2025 and what a show this has been it's a real thought provoker I'd say and one that needs to be seen by everybody that you know so share it widely folks and thank you for once for watching
thank you so much for watching and doing that because it's really important and we'll look forward to having an energetic informative overwhelming show next week.
So come on back.
Thank you much.
God bless.
▲
Export Selection