Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 4, 2025 - Jim Fetzer

01:56:51

The Raw Deal (3 February 2025) with Danny Cirrus

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Not just anybody, you know, I need someone.
	Younger than today, I never need anybody's help in any way.
	Out and down, these days have gone out, not so self-assured.
	I'll find the gentleman I know I'll drop the door.
	Tell me if you can, I'm feeling that.
	Well, this is Jim Petzer, this is Jim Petzer, your host on The Raw Deal.
	This third day of February, 2025, I have as my special featured The Blackhawk American air crash at Reagan Airport.
	Before we get there, I want to share some recent news where my co-host Keith may be joining us.
	We have Russia may expand its nuclear...
	This is coming from the Truth Seeker.
	Russia may expand and upgrade its nuclear arsenal if the United States continue to push ahead with the development of a missile defense system, a top Russian diplomat said in an interview published Thursday.
	Grigory Mashkov, the Russian Foreign Ministry Special Ambassador, made the comments.
	To Russian Journal of International Affairs, according to Reuters, Newsweek reached out to the Russian Foreign Ministry and the U.S. Department of Defense via email for a comment.
	Since Russian President Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine in February 2022, that, of course, was a special military operation to forestall a Ukrainian Tensions have been high between Russia and
	Kyiv's Western allies, including, of course, the United States.
	Putin and various Russian officials have frequently raised the specter of nuclear escalation.
	The Russian leader also Suspended his country's participation in the New START nuclear arms reduction agreement two years ago, which was the last remaining treaty between Moscow and Washington that limited nuclear weapons.
	Of course, we're all not happy about that.
	Meanwhile, we have leading war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu to visit Donald Trump.
	Phil Garaldi on the UNS review.
	President Donald Trump has invited Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to meet with him in the White House on Tuesday, February 4th.
	That would be tomorrow.
	Netanyahu will be the first foreign head of state to visit America's new president at the White House, and the message being sent by virtue of that pact would seem inescapable, namely...
	That Israel is in the mind of the country's power brokers and media, indeed, America's best friend and close ally.
	Or is it?
	Is it possible, though admittedly less likely, that Trump, he of the enormous ego, might well take the opportunity to suppress any thoughts that the Israeli leader is basically dictating the course of U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East?
	Trump?
	Just might want to make it clear in the face-to-face that he is the one who is in charge.
	I find this fascinating.
	I must admit, when the story broke, my first thought was that I might possibly discover he had been lured to Washington.
	Blaine lands at Dulles or Andrews.
	I even hoped there'd be an international police contingent waiting for him to show him the ICC warrant for his arrest, read him his right, shackle him, and send him off to The Hague to be tried for his numerous war crimes and involvement in genocide.
	Hopefully, Joe Biden and Tony Blinken would be treated similarly and sent off on the same plane.
	But my dream outcome for the visit faded as reality set in.
	And I came to accept that Bibi will be more likely fed at his royalty by the neocons and other not-quite-human trash that now invests the U.S. government.
	What a wonderful statement Phil Giraldi makes.
	Here's another from Information Liberation.
	Netanyahu thanked Trump for executive order on fighting anti-Semitism.
	Which has caused many of us great distress.
	Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu formally thanked President Trump Thursday for signing an Israel First America last executive order calling on the Department of Justice to prosecute Americans for so-called anti-Semitism.
	On behalf of Israel and the Jewish people, I thank President real Donald Trump for his executive order.
	To fight anti-Semitism in support for terrorism on American campuses, Netanyahu said on X. Thank you, POTUS, for standing up for truth and justice.
	Trump's executive order encouraged the Attorney General, that would be Pam Bondi, assuming her confirmation, which is a virtual certainty, to aggressively prosecute Americans using Civil rights enforcement authorities, such as 18 U.S.C. 241, Conspiracy Against Rights, combat anti-Semitism.
	It shall be the policy of the United States to combat anti-Semitism vigorously, using all available and appropriate legal tools that prosecute, remove, or otherwise hold to account the perpetrators of unlawful anti-Semitism harassment and violence.
	The order also encourages federal officials to press colleges to monitor students who are critical of Israel for unlawful activity so they can be investigated and deported.
	Danny, I gotta tell you, this is such a disgrace.
	I mean, Trump appears to me to be talking out of both sides of his mouth, because on the one hand, he's saying he's gonna be a champion for freedom of speech, and on the other, he's Unleashing the powers of the government against students who are being described as anti-Semitic for protesting genocide.
	What can be more reasonably a subject of protest than genocide for crying out loud?
	And of course, they're using the expanded International Holocaust Memorial definition, which expands the concept of anti-Semitism.
	Any criticism of any action by the government of Israel as anti-Semitic, up to and including genocide.
	Your thoughts?
	Well, sir, I'm no fan of Netanyahu.
	I mean, that's no secret.
	If you remember back, when this whole thing got started in Gaza, we did an in-depth, I think more than one, maybe two shows, on the video.
	That they showed us.
	And we definitely showed that there was some CGI video and a lot of fakery going on, fake explosions, you know, video that was injected from other scenes at other times.
	So definitely there were some very strange things going on to get this thing started in the beginning, you know, which created a lot of suspicion.
	Anytime somebody has to put out fake video.
	Of scenes that didn't really happen to try and make the public think a certain way.
	It cast doubt on the whole situation.
	And that was Israel that put that video out.
	So I don't trust Israel.
	As far as Trump's strategy on this, I was hoping that Trump was going to meet him and put this whole thing to an end somehow with some sort of a strategy.
	We'll have to see what happens.
	But I'm definitely no fan of what's going on.
	I don't like Yahoo at all, anything he's done.
	And I think he is guilty of war crimes, no doubt.
	And I would love to see him arrested and shackled.
	We'll just have to see exactly what the result is after Trump meets with him.
	Yes, yes, yes.
	War crimes indeed.
	I mean, all kinds of slaughter.
	There's just no question about it.
	Free speech on X, claiming censoring a Trump Chabot connection.
	There are some, including Henry Macau, who believe that Trump is not merely a Jew.
	We have had reports that he converted, but that he's a Chad Lubavitcher, which is like the most extreme variety.
	I have not seen it yet, except in, of course, His seeming enthusiasm for ethnic cleansing where he's reposed at the Palestinians be evacuated from the lands of their birthright to Lebanon, Jordan, or even extraordinarily to Indonesia.
	All those countries, by the way, and Egypt too, have refused the honor.
	Here's what we have about from Henry Macow.
	Trump's background in corrupt Shabbat.
	Here we have a photograph of Primo Don and scandalous Fred C. and his father with a masonic brotherhood of death hand over hand, skull and bones, X-signal.
	The sign or letter X has a long history of use in ancient mystery religions.
	I was very troubled, puzzled, really, why Elon Musk, when he bought Twitter, would change the name.
	I mean, the concept of Twitter, tweets, a little bird symbol and all that are so world famous.
	Why would he want to change?
	I'm sorry to say it.
	Look, there's no reason is the role of X in the history of These ancient mystery religions.
	The Illuminati use it to this day to symbolize key phenomena and mark significant events.
	Here we have Henry reporting.
	Trump belongs to Shabbat, a Jewish supremacist cult that advocates the extermination of Christians.
	Wonder why Kamala neglected to mention this?
	Very, very curious.
	It is the case that the extreme forms of Talmudic Judaism do call for the extermination of all Christians.
	When Rabbi Schneerson, for example, was proposed to be the Meshiach, the Jewish reincarnation of the Jewish God, he said, no, no, he can't be the Meshiach because there are still Christians alive on the face of Earth.
	Danny, this is appalling.
	I mean, I would have a very hard time believing that Trump has such a disposition.
	I just find that incredible.
	Your thoughts?
	Well, same here, sir.
	You know, Trump kind of has a way about him about keeping his enemies close.
	So again, I'm not going to speculate too much.
	On what his strategy is.
	I've been very impressed with a lot of the things that he's done so far in his first week of being president.
	And as far as what his strategy is going to be, he said he was going to put an end to the war.
	So we're going to have to see exactly what he ends up doing.
	Does he continue it in some way?
	Or does he negotiate with Netanyahu and get him to shut down the war?
	So I'm willing right now to give him the benefit of the doubt.
	To see the outcome of the meeting and actually the results and what happens after the meeting.
	And right now I'm kind of leaning to, I think Trump wants to keep his legacy going of no wars and maybe put it to an end.
	So that's kind of where I'm at.
	And I'm sort of reserving right now until I see what happens.
	Danny, that's exactly where I am today.
	Meanwhile, we have a leading economist saying Trump's aggressive tariffs are pure genius.
	And are set to trigger an explosive American renaissance.
	Let's pick up on a bit of this from Infoborst.
	In this absolute must-watch interview, economist Dr. Kirk Elliott explains how President Trump's 25% F on Mexico alone will trigger, he's saying, an explosion in the price of silver.
	Now, I don't know why that would in particular be a good thing or not.
	What is this going to mean to the economy and to the markets, right?
	Because we've got so much to go over, but really, tariffs is going to actually make an impact on the rest of the world in quite a negative way, right?
	If we don't buy their goods, I mean, here's the angle, and it's brilliant.
	It's absolutely brilliant.
	It's like, all right, China and other countries and other companies from other countries, if you want to access...
	Wealthy America and our huge buying base, you're gonna have to pay to come here, right?
	And that's what the tariff is all about.
	That's all it is.
	It's like a pay to play.
	You're going to fund our expenditures, everything that we have as a country.
	And if you don't want to, if you're not gonna, well, then you don't get access to the American consumer.
	And the globalists set up deindustrialization here to control us in their own admissions.
	Now he's using their setup against us that now all these other countries are totally dependent on the manufacturing, that they'll basically have to capitulate.
	And then in the medium term, it will then bring back the industrial strategic base.
	Silver refineries in the US are now backed up more than three months because demand is increasing so much.
	Why would demand be increasing?
	Well, a couple of reasons, right?
	So number one, Like you talked about, it's needed in all of this stuff.
	But really, whether it's military, industrial complex, nuclear power, solar power, batteries, electric vehicles, all that stuff that we've talked about numerous times.
	But really, in all the circuit boards of these AI chips, right, it's needed.
	So it would be needed for cryptocurrency mining.
	It's needed for this artificial intelligence, which are obviously moving in that direction.
	So the demand for silver, I don't know why that should necessarily be a good thing.
	On the other hand, we have U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.
	Identity months dead at DOD. Would you believe that he even had the idea of identity after multiple U.S. federal government agencies required employees to remove Gender-identifying pronouns from email signatures on Friday evening.
	And I applaud that.
	The defense department issued a memo titled, Identity Months Dead at DOD. The move is, bar Trump's admin, broader effort to remove toxic cultural Marxists from managerial roles across the federal government and military like this.
	Libs of TikTok.
	Trans army major discloses.
	LGBTQ pride and diversity in the military.
	This was posted to the IG account of the U.S. Army Sustainment Command.
	The world is laughing at us.
	Here we have it.
	I'm Major Rachel Jones, and what pride means to me is celebrating that diversity is our strength as a nation and as an army.
	Pride means something very special to me as a LGBTQ individual, and it's a chance to show everyone what we have to offer in terms of the diverse skill sets that we bring and the diverse ways of thinking we bring into the team to make everything work better.
	I mean, it's just ludicrous.
	It's not even true, actually, in fact.
	And why would a...
	A man who poses as a woman or a woman posing a man have any more ability than they had originally when they were a man posing as a man or a woman posing as a woman?
	Ridiculous!
	But Danny, here's a big tell.
	I like this.
	USAID headquarters in Washington has been closed.
	Perhaps the real USAID was a terrorism and...
	We financed along the way, one leadoff staffer was heard saying, I repeat that.
	Trump has closed USAID. Perhaps the real USAID was a terrorism and we financed along the way.
	One leadoff staffer was heard saying, now I like that, Danny.
	It's long been known USAID was funding terrorism.
	Around the world, like ISIS, Al-Qaeda, you know, the HTS, all this other stuff.
	That's a good sign that suggests maybe Trump really is serious about getting, ending wars and getting the U.S. out of the terrorism business.
	Your thoughts?
	Well, sir, there were three questions in there.
	And I want to go back just for a second to the Kurt Elliott and the silver thing, if I may, because you were asking me about that.
	And then we moved on to the next subject.
	So, you know, I've watched him speak many times.
	I do believe in gold and silver, a percentage of it, even though the price is extremely high right now.
	But as far as I know, a lot of people really can't afford to buy.
	You know, silver is obviously much more affordable than gold is.
	But Kurt Elliott, the only thing that bothers me, to be honest about him, is that he's constantly saying that because he, if you even notice when he's speaking on Alex's show, he has a phone number there and he sells gold and silver.
	That's what he does.
	He has a large crew.
	They sell gold and silver.
	He's constantly pushing to flip your 401k or your retirement over to gold and silver, of which he makes a large commission for doing that.
	I don't really believe in what he said too much about it's going to drive the price up of gold or silver or whatever.
	With the thing with Mexico and Trump, I don't believe that at all.
	The thing that Trump did was he signed those executive orders and put those tariffs on.
	Because he clearly explained we have to do something.
	There's a massive amount of fentanyl, drugs that are coming over the border into the United States, and it's literally killing hundreds of thousands of people.
	And what I'd like people to think about is it's really no different because it's coming out of China, and it's really no different than if China were dropping bombs on us and killing people.
	People are dying as a result of their action.
	Well, their action is bringing the fentanyl into Mexico, and then the cartel sneaks it over the border, and then it gets into America, and it kills a lot of people.
	And fentanyl, a lot of people don't know about just how nasty fentanyl is, because they don't see it, they haven't come across it.
	But you know what?
	Just one little grain of fentanyl can kill somebody.
	And quite often, police officers will make a traffic stop, and they'll run across somebody trafficking fentanyl.
	They'll go to check the drugs, and simply when they open the bag, there's several videos online, where you can see officers actually passing out on the ground and going into heart failure or all kinds of conditions.
	And they actually carry drugs now in the car with a syringe, an emergency syringe, in case this happens.
	That's how bad it is.
	So people are overdosing on fentanyl, and they're lacing it in all kinds of other drugs now to mask it, and people are dying from this.
	No one seems to want to talk about it, and I notice the mainstream media does not want to talk about it.
	They never talk about this problem, even though this is the number one problem, I believe, coming over the border right now.
	And this is the cartels and the China sneaking it in.
	So Kurt Elliott worried about the price of silver and these tariffs.
	Trump simply did this.
	To stop the flow of the drugs coming over.
	That's his first step.
	There's going to be more and he's going to ratchet it up, I believe, if Mexico doesn't get a handle on stopping this going on.
	But, you know, I don't understand the media not covering how many people are dying with this drug and some of the problems.
	So, you know, he's going to start off with tariffs and he's probably going to ratchet it up to something else.
	You know, I think it's a pretty good step.
	I like the tariffs in Mexico.
	You know, it's better than him just starting to drop bombs or send special forces over there.
	But I think it's at the point pretty soon that if the tariffs don't work, he is going to have to send special forces over there to deal with these cartels and new drugs.
	We have to, have to, have to stop that flow of fentanyl.
	It's no different than them dropping bombs on us.
	It's deadly poison, sir, and it's killing Americans.
	They say it's killing over 200,000 Americans a year and zero in the media.
	And it's almost like they don't want us to know about it.
	It's like a stealth kill.
	They're sneaking this stuff over the border and we never hear anything about it.
	Well, I hear a lot about it and I see a lot about it.
	So Trump's strategy there to me is okay, 100%.
	And then the next step.
	I forgot.
	What was the next subject that you covered, sir?
	Yeah, I'm glad to see that that's happening, for sure.
	There's no doubt about it.
	To me, that was a good move.
	I like all of his moves so far.
	They've all been positive for the United States.
	But when I see him taking these actions like this thing in Mexico to stop the flow of fentanyl...
	I agree with it 100%.
	And I'll just wait to see what happens.
	I'll defer to Trump.
	That's just his first step to stop what I think is one of the biggest problems in the United States.
	And that's the deadly fentanyl that's flowing over the border, coming out of China, coming into the United States, sir.
	And USAID headquarters being closed.
	I think that is sensational, Danny.
	Yeah, I agree.
	I agree, sir.
	We don't need to be putting money into that at all.
	That's a nasty organization.
	And I was glad to see that Trump pulled the money.
	Just like, you know, jumping ahead, I loved that he pulled the money from the World Health Organization as well.
	You know, he's made a lot of really good moves.
	You know, Trump is doing exactly what he says.
	You know, and he did say that he was going to end all these wars.
	We haven't seen the end of the...
	The war in Russia yet in Ukraine, but I'm sure he's working on it.
	I saw a video with Putin come out saying he's willing to work with Trump in ways to shut that down.
	That was a very positive video to see Putin come out with that.
	And I have no doubt I believe that he's going to do something.
	I haven't seen it yet, but he's going to do something to shut down this war in Gaza between the...
	Netanyahu, and that's why he's inviting them in.
	So again, I'm going to wait to see what the results of the meeting are and see what happens afterward.
	But I think it's positive, sir.
	Here's another.
	Kevin MacDonald writes, Tulsi Gabbard on the Israeli lobby's role in fabricating the weapon of mass destruction hoax that led to the war in Iraq.
	He writes, I've been keeping fairly close track on the confirmation hearings, but never came across any mention of these exchanges.
	The New York Times, for example.
	We'll be right back.
	This is a very important story.
	will continue right after this break.
	Music
	Music Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com We'll be right back after this message.
	Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support as has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech.
	in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
	Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
	We need the support of the people.
	It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
	Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
	With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
	Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
	Revolution Radio, Radio, Radio, Radio.
	The End
	The End
	Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at FreedomSteps.com The People Station The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
	Kevin MacDonald on Tulsi's testimony not being reported by the mainstream.
	The New York Times, for example, has nothing to say about them in its article, Four Takeaways from Tulsi Gabbard's Confirmation Hearing.
	Nor is there any mention of these exchanges in a Second Times article on her career leading up to the hearings.
	Demming the Iraq war is based on lies from neocons like Douglas Fyde, Paul Wolfowitz, and Abram Shelsky's office of special plans would be front page news.
	As Gabbard noted, it was a complete fabrication of intelligence.
	This was not a mistake.
	It was a deliberate deception.
	Or have you ever seen a U.S. politician make a statement challenging the very basis of U.S. foreign policy in its complete deference to the interests of Israel?
	Deference that resulted in 4,431 American deaths, including both killed in action and non-hostile, and 31,994 wounded in action, and cost the U.S. approximately.
	1.1 trillion!
	Slanting the news in favor of promoting and protecting the Israeli lobby is nothing new for the Times.
	As I noted in my 2004 paper on neoconservatism as a Jewish movement, prior to the invasion of Iraq, the New York Times would deeply involve in spraying deception about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction that ties to terrorist organization.
	Judith Miller's front-page articles were based on information from Iraqi defectors known to be untrustworthy because of their own interest in toppling Saddam.
	Many of these sources, including Ahmed Chalabi, were also touted by the Office of Special Plans at the Department of Defense, associated with many of the most prominent Bush administration neocons.
	He's got it right!
	Well, what else he has to say here?
	This is a fairly long article.
	I encourage everyone to read.
	So let's hope Gabbard gets confirmed.
	A truly American first foreign policy is at stake.
	As Jonas Alexis, who's senior editor in Veterans Today, writes, Gabbard is not perfect.
	She has made political compromise, but she is the closest thing to an actual dissident.
	The intelligence community have ever seen inside its ranks.
	And that's why the Senate hearings have turned into an all-out war to discredit her.
	Because the real criminals, the ones who lied America into war, are still in power, as Jonas Alexis writes.
	At the U.S. hold confirmation hearing for Tulsi Gabbard Trump's nominee for director of national intelligence, the gloves have come off.
	In a brutal confrontation between Gabbard and the very intelligence establishment that lied America into war.
	During the hearing, Democrat war hawks aggressively questioned her foreign policy position, particularly her outspoken opposition to regime change wars in Iraq, Libya, and Syria.
	Senators attacked her for supporting Assad and supporting Gaddafi.
	Her response?
	A direct, brutal takedown of U.S. intel community's legacy of lies.
	I have no love for Assad or Gaddafi.
	I simply hate al-Qaeda.
	U.S. government has repeatedly allied itself with terrorists, people who killed Americans on 9-11, and who are responsible for the death of our soldiers.
	Our policy failures have put them in power, and I refuse to be part of that lie.
	Oh, I love this.
	More.
	Iraq.
	Now this is Scott Ritter.
	Iraq had no weapons.
	This is confirming Tulsi's view.
	Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction.
	The intelligence was cooked, deliberately falsified to justify the illegal war.
	The real architects, the neoconservatives inside the Bush administration backed by the Israeli lobby.
	So, why Tulsi's nomination terrifies the establishment?
	Gabbard's willingness to cause these intelligence failures and the role of the Israeli lobby in grafting U.S. war policy has put her in the crosshairs of Washington's most powerful interest groups.
	She refuses to push regime-change wars.
	She opposes military alliance with terrorist groups like al-Qaeda.
	She has repeatedly denounced the influence of foreign lobbies on U.S. policy.
	Her stance on Edward Snowden is equally revealing.
	In the past, she has said Snowden was being persecuted for exposing government crimes, a position that enrages the intelligence community.
	And what Snowden was revealing was U.S. government was spying on the American people.
	He was a whistleblower.
	Now, under Senate pressure, she's toned down her support, but the underlying truths remain.
	The U.S. intelligence apparatus is not about national security.
	It's about controlling the narrative, manufacturing consent for war and covering up its own crimes.
	The real fight?
	Gabbard versus the war machine.
	Gabbard's nomination is more than a political appointment.
	It's a direct challenge to the entire foundation of U.S. intelligence, a system built on lies, foreign influence, and perpetual war.
	Danny, Trump nominated Tulsi.
	He knew perfectly well her position's here.
	I am a huge fan.
	She may be the most important appointment he's nominated.
	Your thoughts?
	I love it, sir.
	I think I was just going to reiterate what you said.
	I mean, Trump nominated her for a reason.
	He knows this.
	That's why he nominated her.
	I like a lot of his picks, and this one is a good one.
	She's not going to put up with it.
	She knows what's going on.
	She knows all the BS that's been going on for a long time, and Trump put her in there to disrupt it, and I really, really like it.
	I think it's a good pick.
	I think she's not going to...
	You know, they're pushing back because they're afraid she might expose it or put all their bullshit to bed.
	And I really, really like it.
	I think it's a great move, sir.
	Yeah, I do too.
	I do too, Danny.
	I think it's a great move and I hope she succeeds.
	Can I add one more point, sir, if you don't mind?
	Absolutely, Danny.
	Go right ahead.
	Right before the break, you did three things, and I forgot to comment on the second thing you did with Pete Hagseth getting rid of the DEI in the military.
	You played that video of that woman pretending to be a man.
	I've got to talk about that for a minute because we're going to talk about the airplane crashes and the DEI. To me, DEI is really no more than a retake from Obama.
	On affirmative action that was pretty much killed by the Supreme Court.
	And that's where they had these quotas where they had to bring in a certain amount of minorities or gay people or whatever.
	And I experienced affirmative action very, very heavy and saw the discrimination many years ago when I first got started.
	It was really, really bad.
	They would pass over a hundred people.
	That were qualified at the top of the list to go down and try to find somebody that was underqualified in a police safety or fire job.
	So it really has been a major, major problem.
	They've even had candidates where they had to run them through the police academy and the fire academy two or three times, costing extreme expense to try and get some of these people hired on that just weren't qualified.
	And Pete Hagsaf has had enough.
	I've listened to many of his interviews several months ago about how there's no room for any of this in the military, and he's just basically putting an end to it and getting rid of all this DEI, and he said they're all getting out of the service.
	And we don't have room for that, sir.
	That stuff is all nonsense.
	I'd like to talk about how...
	You know, several years ago now, you know, all this LBGQ, PES, whatever BS, I call it, you know, it was all diagnosed as a mental illness, sir.
	We had several clinics around the United States that would advertise.
	They'd had almost like an infomercial advertising for people to come to the clinic, like somebody would go to a drug or an alcohol clinic to come and get treated.
	And I had seen several interviews where people would go to these things and get cured.
	They had a very high cure rate, and they would come out of that.
	And go back to normal and then end up with a spouse and having children and being normal.
	And the number one thing that they all said is they found out that they had things wrong in their life that made them do that and that they had a mental illness.
	And you know what?
	Especially this transsexual thing.
	That has always been diagnosed as a mental illness.
	I mean, if you think about it logically, sir, who would want to do something like that?
	It's absolutely ridiculous.
	You know what?
	God gave us what he gave us.
	We were born a certain way.
	There's only two genders, either a man or a woman, and that's the way it is.
	That's the way it's always going to be.
	And this whole thing with the pronouns that people had, you know, making it popular, it's like they were putting a king or queen hat on people for saying they were transsexual, like they were somehow special.
	than a regular person that just went to school and achieved and did greatness in this life.
	But all of a sudden they were putting this prowess on everybody that they were special and that you should be like them too.
	To me, sir, this is all part of the depopulation movement.
	It's just, you know what?
	They're messing with us.
	They're messing with the children.
	They're getting younger and younger every year.
	They're getting them to cut their genitals off.
	So they can never have kids when they get older.
	They can't ever go back in the surgery.
	And many of them that have had any of these altering surgeries are coming out.
	And you can see them on YouTube.
	And you can see some censoring of some of them on YouTube when they come out and they say it was the worst thing they've ever done because they have so many health challenges now and they cut their life short by doing any of this stuff.
	But yet they keep moving it, sir.
	And the reason why they're doing this and they're going younger and younger is because they know that the children's minds is not developed.
	So there's no way that they can possibly make these decisions like this at that young age, especially under 18 years old.
	They cannot do it.
	It's just a fad.
	To a lot of them.
	And they go along with it.
	But they're not mature enough to do this.
	And the elites know this.
	So they're getting these kids to make these decisions that basically alter the rest of their life.
	They can never have children.
	And that is the goal of the elite.
	They're depopulating, sir.
	Like it or not, they are depopulating.
	And they want to get to these kids so they can never change their minds in life and go back.
	And also it's shortening their life.
	So, you know, no one ever seems to want to talk about that.
	So I talk about it.
	I am disgusted with this whole thing.
	I'm not an LBGQ person or whatever.
	I don't believe in it.
	I believe in what we've had for 100 years, that all of this is a mental illness.
	And it's been always diagnosed by multiple doctors, including, I'll say it again, we had clinics all around the country to treat people and get them back to normal.
	Who were getting results.
	And they took all that stuff down off the internet.
	We can't see those doctors anymore.
	Why are they taking that all down?
	Because they want to push this, sir, and push it.
	And it's just creating a massive problem inside our government, inside our country, and our culture.
	But it really has destroyed anything with safety.
	Police, fire, first responders.
	You know, in the medical group, I've seen it.
	And especially it has no place, sir, like Pete Hegsseff said, in the military.
	It all needs to go.
	You know, and I am so glad, sir, that he got confirmed and he's in there and he's slashing it, getting rid of all that stuff.
	There's no room in the military, sir, for any of this transsexual stuff.
	It just degrades the military.
	It makes us the laughingstock around the world that knows its mental illness.
	And they see this nonsense coming out of the U.S. And I'm so glad that Trump just said enough is enough.
	And it was gone.
	And he got rid of it.
	And like Pete Hegssef said in his interview the other day, he said DEI is dead.
	There's nothing to talk about.
	It's already gone.
	And it's just an amazing time for him to do that.
	And I'm just so ecstatic that he did that, sir.
	And that's my comment on that.
	Danny, that was just sensational.
	That was a completely brilliant dissection of what's wrong about it.
	As a former Marine Corps officer, Danny, I could not agree with you more.
	I was at one point a series commander with 15 DIs and three of the recruits under my command going through the training cycle where we produced a...
	8,000 Marines in 11 weeks.
	And then they moved me up to regimental headquarters to transform the program so we could produce 11,000 in eight weeks.
	It was, you know, mixed bag for me because I viewed the Vietnam War as war we should not fight.
	But that was my experience, and I guarantee you, the idea...
	Even of women.
	Women have no role in combat.
	The idea of putting a woman on a submarine is so lunatic, Danny.
	The sailors have to be focusing on their jobs to keep them alive deep underwater.
	And if there's a woman aboard, they're thinking about nookie.
	They're thinking about sex.
	I mean, it's just crazy.
	I cannot believe the stupidity behind the Obama-Biden move to promote this DEI thing in the military.
	It's a catastrophe.
	I totally agree, sir.
	You know, your service is highly commended, and I know what you did was very, very important.
	You know, in law enforcement, sir, I'm going to say a little bit about this DEI and affirmative action, and I still see it today.
	You know, we have women that's in the fire service, and we have women that are police and sheriff deputies or whatever.
	But I can tell you, sir, from my experience, I've seen so many dangerous and deadly calls with females involved in different kinds of emergency scenes, especially when it comes to firearms or stress, where they completely break down.
	Sir, and they cannot do the job.
	An example would be, I've seen a female firefighter one time at a fire scene, and she got injured on the equipment.
	And she was so dangerous and caused so much distraction for everybody on the team at a fire that eventually the captain just put her on the engine, wouldn't let her into the fire scene because he had to worry about her and she was too dangerous.
	And she would do the job.
	She wouldn't do the really dangerous jobs, yet she got the same exact pay.
	You know, they would have loved to fire her, but again, because of affirmative action, she was in there.
	She had no business in there.
	Brought down the morale of that team.
	And I used to hear about it all the time, and I saw her in action, and it was just terrible.
	She had no business being in there whatsoever.
	It's just, it's uncomprehensible that she was even there in certain scenes now.
	I will say on some calls, I'm told that she did a very good job with medical stuff where she reversed the role to paramedic and, you know, where there wasn't a fire and she wasn't using the equipment, didn't have to drag a body or any of that.
	She did fine on the medical stuff, but that's not the job all the time.
	Sometimes the job switches.
	So she was good at that.
	But to be a fireman is very difficult, sir.
	You have to have a lot of different qualifications.
	You have to be able to do a lot of different things.
	And you have to do the entire job, not just one segment of the job, the entire job.
	And it's completely ruined fire service.
	As far as police work goes, I've seen so many times, to me, guys get nervous when women are around in the scene because women often lose their gun.
	They lose their gun to the criminal and now we have to fight the suspect who's armed with the female's gun.
	It happens time and time and time again, sir.
	Whenever there's any kind of a violent stress that comes on.
	You know, making a traffic stop and writing a citation for running a red light.
	That's a calm situation.
	It's not that difficult.
	You know what I mean?
	Anybody can do that.
	But when you get into those times when there's violence and you have to get busy, and I mean, you're going to be rolling around on the ground.
	You're going to be fighting for your life.
	You're trying to affect the rest of someone that just robbed a bank or some violent gangbanger that would just as soon kill you or stab you and go back to jail.
	When you get into that situation, sir, females cannot handle that situation.
	You can't always just pull out your gun and shoot somebody.
	You cannot do that these days.
	That's the last ditch tool that is to be used.
	And a lot of times you've got to get in there and get dirty.
	You've got to wrestle on the ground.
	You've got to do all kinds of stuff.
	I saw a female the other day.
	That showed up to a scene.
	I want to describe it.
	It was a traffic stop of a man in Florida, and he had a firearm on him.
	Now, that alone is not illegal, but for officer safety, they wanted to get him out of the car because he had a bunch of violations with the car.
	Why he was stopped and he admitted he was carrying a gun.
	So they said, we're going to get you out of the car and we're going to take the gun off of you for our safety.
	And then we'll, you know, after we iron out what we need to do here, we'll give you the gun back.
	So the man actually cooperated.
	He got out of the car.
	It was a black man.
	He got out of the car and the officer was starting to pat him down.
	And here comes another car, a backup.
	And it's a female and another man.
	And the female walks up to help out.
	And she goes to lift his shirt, and there's the gun in a holster, okay?
	And it's kind of locked down.
	It's inside his waistband in a holster, right?
	And it's safe the way he's carrying it.
	He's totally cooperating, okay?
	He's not a felon or anything.
	They just want to calmly take the gun off of him.
	She reaches in his waistband to take the gun out.
	And as she pulls the gun, instead of pulling the holster out, she pulls the gun out.
	Okay, and I guess that's okay.
	That's another method for doing it.
	And she's supposed to secure it.
	As she pulls the gun out, in slow motion, you can see she actually takes her finger, puts it in the trigger guard, in the trigger guard, on the trigger, and pulls the trigger.
	Almost like a child to test the gun.
	And she pulls the trigger, and the gun goes off.
	And it scares all the officers jump.
	You can see him jump out of their skin, and she fires a bullet from the guy's gun right down his leg, right there on the scene when she's supposed to be safely removing the firearm.
	She pulls the trigger and shoots the guy in the leg, and they can't believe it.
	And the guy falls down.
	Blood is going all over the place.
	And one of the officers, her partner, looks over and says, just put the gun on the ground.
	Put it on the ground now.
	And like a child, she lays it on the ground.
	He says, walk away.
	And she walks away.
	She was completely worthless and completely caused that scene.
	So now they get him over on the sidewalk and they got to put a tourniquet on him.
	The guy's starting to pass out because this female doesn't know how to handle a firearm.
	It was the most gross, disgusting thing I'd ever seen, sir.
	All she had to do is take the gun off of him.
	Keep it in the holster and go secure it in the car.
	Or take the magazine out, rack the slide, take the round out, secure the weapon, okay?
	And do what you're supposed to do.
	I want to remind you, she's carrying a gun.
	She should know how to handle a gun.
	She went to the police academy.
	Right?
	She's got some time on her gun, but she didn't do that.
	She pulls the gun out, puts her finger in the trigger guard on purpose, and pulls the trigger.
	Now, ultimately, they fired the woman.
	Thank God they fired her, and she got fired.
	I mean, can you imagine, sir?
	She could have shot one of the officers.
	I mean, it's horrible.
	It's one of the worst ones I had ever seen, but she did get fired, and of course, the guy that got shot, he did nothing wrong.
	He got a traffic ticket for some minor infraction, right?
	No big deal.
	But he ended up getting an attorney and suing the city.
	And I don't blame him.
	And I don't know how much money he got, but I'm sure it was a pretty big chunk of change.
	But sir, I brought that up just as an example, that there are certain jobs that women do well.
	There's no doubt about it.
	They are amazing in the medical field.
	They're amazing in the emergency room.
	I've seen some women nurses during gunshots and stuff that just do some amazing stuff to save people's lives.
	There's no doubt about it when it comes to medical.
	But when it comes to violent stuff going on or really high stress in a fire scene where you've got to get up on the roof and ventilate a roof with an axe or you have to do something really, really hard or you're involved with a shootout.
	And there's guns out, and you've got to do some fighting or some wrestling with the suspect.
	It's a no-go for women, sir.
	Actually, they become a detriment to the scene, and they become dangerous to fellow officers around them.
	And I've seen this time and time and time again.
	And I have one more that I want to cite, sir, if you don't mind, just to drive it home.
	I got a friend of mine that was a training officer, and he was down in this particular area handling a call.
	It was a domestic call.
	So he shows up with this female, okay?
	He's training her, shows up with this female, and he tells her to go around the back because they hear a woman in the house screaming.
	Okay.
	And they were waiting for backup.
	But when he heard, his name was Greg.
	So when Greg heard the screaming, he told the female to go around the back door.
	He was going to go in the front.
	They weren't going to wait because of the woman screaming.
	Okay.
	So Greg makes his way in the front door.
	This is him telling me this.
	And when he said when he went in the front door.
	A guy comes right around a hallway corner with a shotgun and he's got the shotgun pinned right on him.
	So Greg is dead to rights.
	There's nothing he can do.
	He can't draw his firearm.
	He walked right into it.
	And the guy had the woman down next to him on the floor.
	So the guy with the shotgun is telling him he's going to shoot him.
	He's going to kill my friend Greg.
	He's going to kill him.
	And then he's going to kill the girl.
	And then he's going to kill himself.
	Well, Greg...
	By the grace of God, was able to use his skills and ended up talking the man into putting the shotgun down.
	Okay?
	He said it was the most scared he's ever been in his life.
	He's never been in that quite of a situation.
	But here's what happened, sir.
	Through the back door, the female got into the house, the female officer.
	Got into the house and she came in and he had a sigh of relief because he saw the female peek around the corner and she was going to be able to come up behind the suspect.
	So he had this fleeting moment of relief that his partner was going to come in and do the right thing and eliminate the threat, right?
	Well, guess what?
	When the female saw the shotgun and saw the guy holding the shotgun, the female went back out the back door and left the house and left the scene.
	So my friend Greg, sir, I'm not joking.
	This is a real life story.
	My friend Greg ended up talking the guy into putting the shotgun down and got out of that situation with his wife.
	And when it was over, do you know where the woman was?
	The woman was sitting on the curb by the police car, sir, and she was crying.
	And she told him, I could never shoot anybody.
	That's why I left.
	Because her job was to come up behind that guy and shoot him and drop him.
	That was her job.
	Nobody wants to talk about that, but that's what you do in that situation.
	You cannot deal with that.
	She should have taken action, walked up, and just shot him because there was no other...
	He was only standing a few feet from my friend Greg, maybe five, six feet away with a shotgun on him.
	He was being unreasonable.
	She should have walked up right behind him and popped him right in the head and ended the threat.
	But yet they find her out on the curb crying, sir, and saying she could never shoot anybody.
	Greg tried to flunk her in the field training program, and guess what?
	Because of affirmative action, sir, they brought her back in, and she was still there.
	She's probably retired now, but she was able to stay on the police department after that.
	And that's how nasty DUI and affirmative action is, sir.
	Danny, we got another break, and then we'll turn to the Black Island.
	All right, let's let's go.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	Was it a conspiracy?
	Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting, this is a drill, this is a drill, on bull hoards during the marathon?
	That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities, and that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
	Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
	But there was no blood.
	The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
	They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	If you think for one second that the Capitol will ever treat us fairly, you are lying to yourself.
	Because we know who they are and what they do.
	This is what they do.
	And we must fight back!
	You can torture us and bomb us.
	Fire is catching.
	And if we burn, you burn with us!
	Are you awake yet?
	We've tried and we've tried for years and years to use passive resistance and loud voices to make a change.
	But time is over.
	Your governments around the world have no other goal than to decimate your entire existence at the hands of the bankers and the elites.
	It's coming.
	And it's your choice to decide if you want to be a warrior or a victim.
	Denial is not a choice anymore.
	RevolutionRadioFreedomSlips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
	Not giving up.
	Revolution Radio.
	Revolution Radio.
	Countless news stories are either totally ignored or spun with half-truths.
	And because of this, essential facts and vital information are often compromised.
	Join Dr. Ott every Friday night on Studio B at 10 p.m. Eastern and learn why the story behind the story was nominated for a Peabody Award in its second year of producing Unparalleled Broadcasting Excellence in 1997.
	That is, if you really care about learning the truth.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
	I want to begin with more or less mainstream reports about the event and then move forward with Danny's thoughts and critique.
	Update.
	Female Blackhawk in D.C. collision identified as Biden White House aide.
	This is stunning.
	The female pilot aboard the Blackhawk chopper that collided with a passenger jet in Washington has been identified as former Biden White House aide Rebecca Loback.
	The U.S. Army made the announcement Saturday after initially refusing to release the pilot's identity at the request of her family.
	That's ridiculous!
	Here we have Daily Mail.
	Captain Rebecca Loback identified his third Black Hawk pilot who died in collision with American Airlines flight in D.C. From the Daily Mail.
	Captain Rebecca Loback, 28, from Durham, North Carolina.
	Was one of three soldiers aboard the chopper that crashed into the jet as it was coming into land.
	The Army initially refused to identify Lubeck at the request of her family, but the decision to release her name came at the request of and in coordination with the family, according to a statement released by the Army.
	We are devastated by the loss of our beloved Rebecca.
	She was a bright star in all our lives, her family said.
	Rebecca was a warrior and would not hesitate to defend her country in battle.
	Lubeck had worked as a White House aide during the Biden admin and had served as an aviation officer in the Army from July 2019 until January 2025. Original story?
	Army refuses to identify female Black Hawk pilot killed in D.C. at collision.
	The U.S. Army is refusing to name the female pilot Gildemort.
	The military helicopter collided with a commercial jet landing at Reagan Washington Airport on Wednesday.
	In announcement Friday, the Army, which disclosed the name of the other two soldiers on the chopper who died, said the woman's family requested her identity be withheld from the public.
	Here's Joel Gilbert tweeting the female Black Hawk helicopter.
	Pilot Captain Rebecca Loback was not named until today.
	Was it so they could scrub her social media?
	Her first Facebook page has been wiped.
	However, her Google Plus image is below.
	If it turns out Loback was a lesbian DEI pilot, I wouldn't be surprised.
	Here's truth details from Donald Trump.
	The Black Hawk helicopters flying too high by a lot.
	It was far above 200-foot limit.
	That's not really too complicated to understand, is it?
	It does indeed appear that, for reasons that are now obvious, a designated route for rotorcraft traveling that section of Potomac imposed a 200-foot ceiling.
	Tracking data reported by FlightRadar24 and FlightAware indicates the incident.
	CRJ-700 was descending through 375 feet when it stopped transmitting.
	If all the above is confirmed, it raises the question, why did the Blackhawk pilot exceed the altitude limit by almost twice?
	According to ABC News report, the pilot and crew were very experienced.
	It was a very experienced group, said Jonathan Kozol.
	A retired Army Chief Warrant Officer with more than 30 years' experience in flying Army choppers.
	Kozol had been attached to the unified command post graded at Reagan to coordinate efforts following the deadly collision.
	Kozol confirmed a report on a conference call.
	A male instructor pilot had more than 1,000 hours of flight time, the female pilot commanding at the time more than 500, and the crew chief was also said to have hundreds of hours of flight time.
	All this experience sounds great.
	Makes one wonder all the more why the helicopter grossly exceeded a critical altitude limit for helicopters crossing Potomac on final approach to Washington.
	The setting and timing of the disaster in Washington, D.C., a few days after big headsets were sworn into Secretary of Defense, strikes me as intriguing.
	I wonder if the Army can be trusted to conduct and disclose the results of a full and transparent investigation instead of stonewalling, like it did when it came to investigating why its Patriot missile battery shot down an AVF-18 Hornet on April 2, 2003. From my years of reading military history, I know there was, until very recently, a widely held firm conviction.
	That mixing young males and females on board military vessels often results in a breakdown of discipline and attentiveness to duty.
	Did a male instructor have a romantic relationship with a female student?
	Perhaps one that had become volatile?
	Note, I'm not claiming this was the case.
	I'm really wondering if I were Secretary Heggs that I'd inquire about the possibility.
	I also wonder about possible mental health deterioration in the military in recent years.
	The Biden admin's fetish for COVID vaccine, transgender weirdness, and DEI. Finally, even before this incident, I wondered if the Trump admin will have to contend with crises arising from deliberate acts of sabotage.
	If I were an investigator, I would at least consider the possibility that the altimeter or other critical equipment on board the Blackhawk Have been tampered with by a saboteur.
	Here I would like to be very clear.
	I'm not presenting conspiracy theories.
	I'm merely stating the theoretical possibilities I were examined if I were investigating the accident.
	Meanwhile, air traffic control equals both Obama and Biden to blame for deadly DC crash.
	More than 60 innocent lives were taken after a Black Hawk collided with a passenger jet landing at Reagan National, and former President Barack Obama and Joe Biden might be to blame.
	A former air traffic controller came forward to reveal how the Obama admin waged war against the aviation industry, firing thousands of qualified people for being too white.
	A preliminary investigation conducted by FAA revealed.
	Staffing at the Reagan Airport was insufficient for the time of day and traffic volume when the collision occurred.
	But a former air traffic controller, Michael Pearson, revealed to Fox this short testing was nothing new that was attributable to the Obama administration.
	The system has been under attack to the DEI and FAA bowing to weakness in 2010, since the Obama administration, Pearson said.
	Lack of staffing is directly attributed to Obama admin terminating lists of eligible, well-trained air traffic controller statements in 36 universities across the country in 2013 because they were too white.
	He added the Obama FAA also rolled out an immunity program which prevented people from being held accountable for their mistakes so as not to hurt their feelings.
	The FAA also at the same time implemented an immunity program.
	So you think you're seeing legitimate statistics?
	You're not.
	In the old days, before 2010, the immunity program, if an air traffic controller got two planes too close too many times, it would be decertified and retrained.
	Now they're not.
	All they have to do within 48 hours is to be noticed or investigated for a potential separation error.
	They're called operational errors in the FAA, simply have to avail themselves of the program that gives them immunity.
	In other words, this insane Democrat-created immunity program prevents the FAA from being able to retain people who commit potentially fatal errors, even if they do so repeatedly.
	The FAA cannot retain these people.
	If somebody has a repetitive instance of malfeasance or lack of competency, the FAA, because of this immunity program, cannot rectify the situation.
	They have to basically allow the person to remain in the same job.
	The union and FAA work together and have used this program to gerrymander the statistics of near-matter collisions.
	I'm fairly stunned, Danny.
	Your comments, preliminarily.
	Sir, we could probably do a five-hour show on this.
	You touched on so many things.
	Let's start from the top.
	You know, I have a couple of close friends that were air traffic controllers.
	I'd like to point out that you have to, this is just one segment of what you talked about, you have to take a psychological...
	And it's a certain kind of person that can multitask at that high of a level.
	You have to be in a high IQ person, okay?
	And you have to be able to do many things well to be an air traffic controller.
	There are so many lives there at your fingertips when you sit at that scope and you're sitting there at that job talking to so many different airliners in the air and different aircraft around.
	It's a very difficult job to get, sir.
	It used to be extremely hard to get that job.
	The testing was difficult.
	Again, you had to pass the psychological.
	It had to be a certain person that got in there, and only the best of the best got in there through the testing.
	It's just the way it was.
	I'd also like to point out that the job paid extremely well.
	It paid into the six-figure range even a long time ago.
	With, you know, of course, great benefits and retirement and all that sort of thing.
	So, of course, it's a desirable job.
	But there's very few people, sir, that are actually qualified to do that job.
	When I was learning how to fly, I went and visited a couple of centers and I got to see how they sit in front of those screens all day long in a dark room.
	Usually there's no windows and they had to do that job.
	And I thought to myself, man, I would never want to sit there all day and do that kind of thing.
	And again, through a friend of mine told me about how it worked.
	And they had this thing where if they get too many planes too close within a certain safety range with a safety factor they had laid out, they called it a near miss.
	And if you had any of those near misses, they tossed you.
	They would pull you.
	A lot of times if somebody got in a fight with their wife or they had some kind of psychological thing, a mother die or...
	Their father died or was ill in the hospital.
	They would pull him, sir, because your mind had to be absolutely clear to do that job.
	You had to be razor sharp at all times, and you were supposed to notify your supervisor that something happened in your life or whatever that could affect your mental status for the day, and they would pull you off and put you onto something else and not put you in that position.
	But yet Obama came along and was so, Hell-bent on destroying the FEA by clearly coming out and saying it was too wide in there.
	And only the best people got that job, sir.
	It's a test, a battery of tests.
	You simply come up with a score, including a psychological, and then there's a ranking.
	Somebody scored the highest, somebody scored the worst, right?
	So, you know, unfortunately or fortunately, certain people got in for that job, and it was only the best.
	Most highest qualified people got in for that very important job.
	And Obama didn't like that.
	He said it was too white in there.
	Well, you know what?
	The way it works is white people were really the smartest, and they were passing the test and getting the highest scores, and they've always dominated that job.
	And it's based on merit, and it's been based on testing.
	And he didn't like that.
	He wanted black people and all kinds of others to get in there no matter what, even though they weren't qualified, even though they couldn't pass the test or they were extremely low scoring on the test.
	He wanted them placed in this very important job above other people that proven to me much better for this job in the testing.
	And that created a massive safety problem in our FAA and many other jobs.
	A really big problem.
	So we got a bunch of air traffic controllers that started having an issue.
	Now, you covered or you just read out about the near misses.
	He even created a program that when they had a near miss, instead of pulling them off and firing them or retraining them because they almost killed an airliner with a bunch of people on it, they would cover it up, sir, for minorities and put them back in there.
	Okay?
	Can you imagine that?
	Can you imagine?
	Can you imagine that story I told you where the female shot that man with his own gun in the leg and then she did it the next week and the week after that and then they covered it up and then they did it again and they said, well, you know, that's a female.
	She's allowed to do that.
	You know, if any man that was white was in that job, sir, and caused a near miss that put lives in danger, they fire you.
	They pull you out of that job, sir.
	That's the end of your career.
	It's over.
	Okay?
	I mean, I can't tell you how strict it was in there.
	And for Obama to cover up these near misses, people have no idea what's going on.
	They're sitting in a passenger plane trusting that the FAA is taking care of them and doing this very complicated job.
	And yet in this situation, we find out there's nothing but cover up after cover up after cover up.
	They didn't want to disclose that there was a female helicopter pilot.
	Why is that?
	They didn't want to disclose that she worked for Biden.
	Why did they take four days to tell us that she was a National Guard part-time pilot but worked in the Biden White House for a long time?
	Why did they take four days?
	Why did they scrub her social media?
	Did she have a bunch of anti-Trump stuff on there?
	Were there pictures on there showing that she was a lesbian with her girlfriends?
	What was going on?
	Then we see an interview with a girlfriend of hers.
	So now we think that that was her girlfriend.
	Was that her girlfriend or not?
	We don't know what's going on.
	Was she one of those DEI hires that we thought, hey, we'll make her a helicopter pilot?
	Was she really qualified?
	She only had 500 hours, sir.
	She was flying in a very dangerous area.
	And you know what?
	When air traffic controller gives you an altitude to stay at, a restricted altitude, you stay at that.
	And when you test for your license, if you come off of that altitude more than 25 feet, they flunk you.
	You've got to stay on that altitude because there's planes above you, planes below you.
	That is a very deadly, serious rule.
	That's not something that's open for negotiation.
	If you bust an altitude...
	As a pilot, you're going to get a call from air traffic control, guaranteed, or you're going to get a visit from an agent from the FAA. You do that too many times.
	For safety violations, you're going to get suspended.
	But yet, she's supposed to stay under a hard deck of 200 feet.
	It's on the map, and she's ascending up almost to 400 feet.
	She's in an ascension.
	She's in a very slow climb, beelining.
	Straight towards that airliner.
	What is she doing up at 375 feet when the jet is on approach path?
	He's on a set approach path.
	Plane after plane after plane comes in that same way.
	And she flies right into the approach path and right into the side of that jet plane.
	So it's a massive air.
	They don't want to talk about who the pilot is.
	They don't want to give the background that she was a DEI hire, that she worked for Biden.
	They wanted four days to try and cover all that stuff up.
	Well, you know what, sir?
	It's always the cover-up that gets you.
	And you know what?
	We can clearly see it was a DEI hire.
	And then next, I'm sure we're going to move into the air traffic controller.
	They still have not released.
	Anything about the air traffic controller.
	They won't give the name.
	They won't give the photograph.
	They won't give anything.
	It's almost like they're safeguarding and protecting whoever was on duty that night with the air traffic controller.
	Why can't we see what's going on?
	Why can't we hear from the person?
	You know what I mean?
	We're getting nothing.
	There's a big shield around that.
	And I got a high suspicion, sir, that it's one of those Obama DEI hires that was in there.
	And I can't wait to see who that person is.
	I can't wait to see their background.
	I can't wait to see how many near misses they've had, how many times they've covered up, how many times they've screwed up.
	And it's about time the public find out about this, sir.
	This is one of our most important infrastructures in our country, is the safety of these passengers flying around in the skies.
	And when people find out how compromised it is, and the kind of quality of employees that were let in there simply because their skin color, it's grotesque, sir.
	Absolutely grotesque that they would put diversity.
	Diversity, sir, is not our strength.
	Diversity is our weakness.
	Like Pete Hegseth says, unity is our strength.
	Diversity will kill us.
	And it's a nasty thing.
	They use that phrase over and over to try and compromise it.
	And I think, sir, they've purposely been trying to weaken our infrastructure for some reason by putting these people that are not qualified into these jobs.
	I'm tired of it.
	People that work in that industry are tired of it.
	It's creating all kinds of safety hazards and all kinds of issues.
	DEI does not work in police, fire, in aviation.
	It just does not work.
	There are certain people, sir, that are just not cut out for certain jobs in professional sports.
	If you're not good enough, you're not getting in the NBA. They don't care.
	There's no DEI. You know what I mean?
	You're not going to play along, Steph Curry.
	And the Warriors, if you can't play basketball just because you've got a certain skin color, they're not letting you in.
	They're only the best of the best of the best.
	Get in there.
	It's the same with football.
	If you're not Tom Brady and you can't do what Tom Brady is, you're not getting into the NFL. You've got to be good at your position.
	If you're not, they will cut you.
	Nobody ever says anything about that in sports.
	But for some reason, in these high-performance jobs...
	That require a certain psychological profile and an extreme IQ that's developed through testing is how we get these individuals.
	But yet now we're throwing all that testing and all that ability out the window because all of a sudden we have to have a black person because black people deserve to have this high-paying job.
	There's no such thing as you deserve it, sir.
	You earn it through merit and through testing.
	And if you don't have it...
	You don't get it.
	And that is the way it needs to be.
	You get guys like Al Sharpton on there calling all of us racist because we won't let people in there that deserve that job.
	That's ridiculous.
	Ridiculous.
	I wrote a paper on it in college.
	And I'll tell you what.
	Only the best of the best need to be in those jobs.
	They test.
	There's a test for a reason.
	And the people deserve to have the absolute best persons in there for those jobs.
	And they're not getting that right now.
	They're getting these DEI people that are underqualified because they're a transsexual or because they're gay or because they're black or because, you know, a multiple of other DEI reasons.
	And it's creating a huge safety problem.
	And you know what, sir?
	On this particular night, it came to a head, and 67 or 68 people lost their lives.
	And Trump has had enough.
	And he signed an executive order and said, no more.
	And when he signed it at the end, he said, everybody can understand this.
	And then he said, right to the camera, he said, even Obama.
	And that was a dig at Obama, because Obama started this nightmare.
	And he's putting an end to it, sir.
	Here's some confirmation.
	Female pilot Rebecca Lubeck's entire social media scrubbed before Army released her name, so what are they hiding?
	My suspicion, given she was a Biden aide, she might have had a lot of anti-Trump vitriol on her social media.
	On Saturday, the Army released the name of the pilot of the Black Hawk chopper that flew into a passenger jet landing at Reagan.
	The crash was Wednesday.
	The third pilot's name, Rebecca Luback, was finally released Saturday, three days later.
	All 64 in the jet were killed.
	The three pilots in a blackout also died in the explosive crash.
	Kristen Taylor at Gateway Pundit reported, after withholding at the request of the family, and I think that's a phony story, the name of the female pilot killed in the mid-air collision Wednesday night Pass your plane on final approach at Reagan.
	The Army issued a statement Saturday from her family, identifying the pilot as 28-year-old Captain Rebecca Loback from Durham, North Carolina.
	The other two killed in a crash.
	Previously identified by the Army are Staff Sergeant Ryan Austin O'Hara, 28, of Libburn, Georgia, and Chief Warrant Officer Sacken.
	Andrew Lloyd Eves, 39, at Great Mills, Maryland.
	Lobach was part of a three-man crew flying a training mission for a continuity government down at Potomac when the collision occurred, killing the three members and all 60 passengers and four crew on the flight out of Wichita, Kansas.
	Here's a photograph of them.
	Meanwhile, John Miller tweets, She escorted Ralph Lauren through the White House.
	The pilot of the crash shopper was Captain Rebecca Lobeck, who served as a White House social aide during the Biden admin.
	Here's a photograph of her right in the company of Joe Biden.
	It's actually the fake guy because the real guy died back in 2017. But meanwhile, Dr. Katherine Hortness articulated her thoughts about this.
	And written them to Donald Trump.
	Dear President Trump, the intel agencies orchestrated the crash.
	Their coded signatures are all over the crash, just like it was all over the assassination attempts.
	Plane was approaching runway 33, a Masonic crown reference.
	Mainstream draws emphatic attention to runway number.
	Crash chopper's call sign blue streak, Democrat reference.
	Next chopper in line told to return to base its skull sign Blackjack 3. Illuminati card game, gambling reference.
	When intel agencies orchestrate car crashes, there's always a monitoring team.
	I wager Blackjack 3 was carrying such an insider monitoring team for the intel agencies.
	Crash helicopter on continuity government mission?
	Continuity of deep state government?
	No one flies a helicopter into an airport's busy approach lane, just like the Secret Service doesn't leave the largest and most accessible roof area unsecured at a presidential rally, unless a disaster is orchestrated.
	When it's orchestrated, the incident is always littered with insider code symbols.
	Your thoughts, Danny?
	Stand by.
	We'll be right back with Danny Siris talking about the Chopra airline crash on Wednesday.
	We'll be right back with Danny Siris talking about the Chopra airline crash on Wednesday.
	We'll be right back with Danny Siris talking about the Chopra airline crash on Wednesday.
	We'll be right back after this lesson.
	Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support.
	This has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
	Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
	We need the support of the people.
	It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
	Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
	With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
	Revolution Radio, freedomsubstance.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
	Revolution Radio, Radio, Radio, Radio.
	The End
	Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday at 8 p.m.
	Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at FreedomStitch.com, the People Station.
	Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
	But did you know that it was an inside job?
	That Osama had nothing to do with it.
	That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes.
	That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building.
	Barry Jennings was there.
	He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
	The U.S. Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
	Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
	9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons in the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Read American Nuked on 9-11.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio.
	And now we return you to your host.
	Sir, I think we're back on the radio. I think we're back on the radio.
	Are you there?
	Well, I'll tell you what.
	I'm going to go ahead and expand until you get back about what I was saying about the DEI hires inside of the FAA. You know, they don't seem to be bringing out the controllers and showing us who the controllers are.
	And that is really, really starting to bother me that we're not allowed to see who the air traffic controllers are.
	And now we're starting to hear, sir, that that particular day, that one of the persons that was in charge of that route got sent home early and that one of the controllers actually was working two jobs.
	He was actually or whoever, she or he was actually working with the helicopter and also working another route because they were shorthanded.
	So who is this person?
	What's going on?
	Who is the supervisor that was on duty?
	I think Trump probably knows.
	He was probably briefed, but they're not putting that information out to the public yet because they don't want us to know.
	It's a bad situation.
	There's no doubt.
	I see you're back there, sir.
	Yeah, Danny, good work.
	Good work.
	We have, meanwhile, a video report about it that looks to me to be quite good.
	Listen up.
	That's...
	I got to try again.
	Danny, you know, I'm increasingly thinking that Catherine's speculations I'm increasingly thinking that Catherine's speculations may be well-founded
	I mean, it's very troubling to imagine a situation could be on that nature, but honestly, I'm beginning to suspect what's going on.
	I totally agree with that, sir.
	There's so many anomalies now that are popping up with this crash.
	I mean, I can go on and on and on.
	I hope we can get to some of them.
	But there's things, sir, that, you know, from my flying experience, I'm not current right now, but I am a pilot.
	And there's just things that happened.
	During this that make absolutely no sense when it comes to the helicopter pilot and also when it comes to the air traffic control.
	It just doesn't work that way, sir.
	Air traffic control is on you constantly and there was a lack of air traffic control speaking to them and they could have easily prevented this, sir.
	That controller can see they were coming together.
	He can see the altitude.
	He sees everything.
	And for him not to call out and tell the helicopter who could turn on a dime, go up or down, and quickly get out of the path of the helicopter, but let it continue and continue and continue, and yet said nothing to them other than...
	You know, duck behind the jet after it passes by is ridiculous.
	It should have told him to turn the path.
	There's a million things that could have happened, sir, and yet nothing happened.
	And it does look almost like the helicopter on purpose flew right into this jet.
	It's just something else.
	I know, I know.
	I'm trying to find those reports.
	Let me see if I can pull it up now.
	Sure.
	While you're working on that, sir, I'd like to point out that, you know, Obama's and Biden's recent FAA head that they put through, I don't know if you saw the video or not, but you can see him being questioned by Congress.
	And when they started questioning about his qualifications for the FAA, Ted Cruz says, have you ever flown a plane?
	He said, no, I never have.
	Have you ever worked in an airport?
	No, no, I've never done that.
	Have you ever sold a plane?
	No, I couldn't do that.
	Then another congressman asked him, You know, a bunch of technical questions about airplanes and rules and stuff.
	And he basically, he admitted, sir, that he had no knowledge of airplanes or aviation whatsoever.
	And at the end, Ted Cruz said, I'm not sure what we're doing here.
	You have absolutely no qualifications whatsoever to be in this industry.
	And he says, take myself, for instance.
	I'm an attorney.
	I'm the last guy, the last guy that you would want.
	To work at the FAA. I have absolutely zero, zero knowledge.
	And I'm not qualified for that job.
	And like most of the people here are not qualified.
	And you haven't given us one thing to show us why you're qualified for this job.
	And thank God the guy bailed out and stepped down.
	But they were trying to put this guy in to the FAA head.
	It's just unbelievable.
	That was a Biden ad in Danny?
	Yes, he was a Biden pick.
	His last name was Washington.
	He's on one of the videos.
	I think I sent you a photo of him.
	But Ted Cruz, he kind of turns his head and says, have you ever sold a plane?
	Have you ever worked in an airport?
	Have you ever had anything to do with airplanes?
	Do you know how to, are you a pilot?
	He's, no, no, sir, I haven't done that.
	No, no, no.
	And then when they asked him some questions about procedures of aircraft, basic questions, sir, that you learn on the first or second day in flight school, he's like, I'm sorry, I don't know how to answer that question.
	I don't know.
	And finally, Ted Cruz just said, Do you have any aviation experience with airplanes or anything at all?
	And the guy said, no, I've never worked around aviation or airplanes in my life.
	He basically said he knows nothing.
	So they just took this DEI hire off the street and tried to jam him through Congress and put him in charge of the FAA because he was black.
	And here's a video about the altitude issue.
	If I can get it.
	Here we go.
	The right diaper for your wild child is the one that can't take off.
	Pampers Cruisers 360 is a stretchy waistband, so tiny hands can't take it off.
	For up to 100% leak-proof fit, Pampers Cruisers 360, the baby-proof diaper.
	As we await the National Transportation Safety Bowl holding a news conference later on this afternoon, there are concerns that the helicopter was too high and out of the zone that it was supposed to be in as it was coming toward DCA Airport.
	Mike Cofield was a commercial airline pilot for 30 years.
	He also led the congressional investigation into the crash of TWA Flight 800, and he joins me now.
	Mike, thanks so much for being with us.
	Here's what the president put out on Truth Social earlier today about the helicopter.
	He said the Black Hawk helicopter was flying too high by a lot.
	It was far above the 200-foot limit.
	That's not really too complicated to understand, is it?
	We have this map that we've got here.
	This is from the ASDB Exchange website.
	uh this is not official data a lot of this is input by users but what it shows is as that helicopter was coming down what's called corridor a and then corridor corridor one and corridor four and the uh aircraft was headed for runway 33 you can see that the height here is 200 feet that's exactly where the helicopter was supposed to be 200 feet it takes a weird jog to the right and then back to the left here but still at 200 i got a better video now here lined up daniela
	Let me pull it out.
	Which includes showing the...
	It includes showing the fact that the...
	That the chopper was flying directly into...
	Directly into the...
	The plane, I mean, it's just stunning to me, Danny, how this is happening.
	Here we go.
	Let me play this.
	This is a good one.
	Tonight, the NTSB providing new details about their investigation into Wednesday's deadly crash over Washington, D.C.
	There were five people in the tower at the time of the accident.
	At this time, we have interviewed the local controller, the ground controller...
	and the local assist controller.
	The NTSB is saying there is much more data analysis to do, but preliminary data suggests the helicopter was flying at 300 feet or more when it crashed into the plane.
	FAA restrictions say it should have been below 200 feet.
	I can tell you at one point very close to the impact, there was a slight change in pitch, an increase in pitch.
	That is something that we will get you more detail on.
	And late tonight, the Army identifying the third soldier on board the Blackhawk was Captain Rebecca Lobach of Durham, North Carolina.
	Large ships along the Potomac River prepping to lift the aircraft out of the water.
	As the investigation continues, new videos first aired on CNN are giving us a clearer picture of the moments an Army Blackhawk helicopter and an American Airlines regional plane collided Wednesday night.
	Jeff Gazzetti is an NBC News aviation analyst.
	So, Jeff, walk us through what you're seeing in that video.
	Well, in the first video, you can see that the helicopter, even though it's approaching the right wing, it actually, in my view, strikes the left wing.
	And then you can see the right wing, still intact, begin to roll.
	And you can see the airplane roll.
	And you also see the body of the helicopter continue through.
	In the second video, it shows that the helicopter is flying level.
	While the airliner is descending slightly, after the collision again you see the airplane roll almost more than 360 degrees before impacting the water.
	Meanwhile, the U.S. Coast Guard playing a key support role along the river, with about 200 people helping divers, securing the search perimeter, and protecting private boats from debris.
	We have NTSB, Army Corps Engineer, Navy Supervisory or Salvage.
	All those entities, we're just trying to make sure they're protected while they're doing what they need to do, as well as protecting other responders.
	Aaron, when do we expect the aircraft to be lifted out of the river?
	Well, Jose, officials tell us they were expecting two barges as well as some other heavy equipment on site here today.
	They could start lifting the two aircraft out of the water as soon as tomorrow, which would help them recover the 25 victims who are still in the water.
	Jose?
	Thanks for watching.
	Stay updated about breaking news and top stories on the NBC News app or follow us on social media.
	Well, Danny, let me say.
	The latest report I have is they're not releasing the passenger list that they released half of it.
	Russia confirmed that a pair of world champion ice skaters, I mean an older couple that had won their world championship a decade or more ago, died on the crash.
	There were a lot of other skaters.
	Apparently there was an event going on in Kansas and the flight was out of Wichita.
	But they're not releasing the names of the others aboard.
	Now, this suggests to me it could have been targeted to take them out.
	We know that.
	Agencies like the CIA are willing to take out whole plane loads in order to get one person, take 007, you know, over the Korean Peninsula.
	That was orchestrated to get one congressman that the agency didn't like.
	And I'm just terribly worried that we may have had a hit going on here, that Catherine may have it exactly right.
	Your thoughts?
	Well, sir, you know, the overview of this, I agree with that.
	There's something way wrong with this, and I piece it together daily as more information comes in.
	But the fact that they're hiding...
	Danny, did I lose you?
	Danny!
	Yeah, I'm here, sir.
	Can you hear me?
	He must have muted me.
	Can you hear me, sir?
	You seem to have lost Danny.
	Not good, because he's wonderful at all of this.
	I'm just...
	Sir, can you hear me?
	Can you hear me?
	Yeah, now I can hear you.
	Go ahead, Danny.
	Go ahead.
	I turned the mute off.
	I don't know what happened when you were on the break.
	So you can hear me okay now?
	I can hear you now.
	Okay, so, you know, there's so much convolution going on with this from the fact that they tried to hide the helicopter pilot.
	That they're trying to hide some of the passengers on the jet.
	And now they're not letting us know who the air traffic controllers are.
	And that really, really bothers me, sir.
	You know, I want to make reference to the helicopter pilot.
	It's very clear on the map that she was to fly at 200 feet or below coming along that river, and you're supposed to be on one side of the river.
	She's going down the middle.
	But that in itself is not the problem.
	If you stay at 200 feet in that area or lower...
	You're not going to have a problem with incoming planes.
	That's obvious if you think about it when they're on the landing pattern.
	So the jet is on its perfect approach path coming into the airport.
	Hundreds of planes land a day on that same path over and over again.
	If you're at 200 feet or below, you're not going to have a problem.
	All of a sudden, if you look at the flight track and you look at the altitude of the helicopter, the helicopter goes from 200 feet to 220 to 230 to 240 to 250 to 275 up into 300 and keeps going 325, 350, 375, and then the crash.
	Why was the helicopter at an upward trajectory perfectly, perfectly pointed at the jet at the point of impact?
	The pilot would know, sir, that they're climbing.
	They have the altitude indicator right in front of them, the altitude indicator.
	They can see that they're in a climb.
	On a helicopter, your hand is on a lever called the collective.
	It's the throttle.
	It looks like a parking brake.
	And when you lift up on it slightly, the helicopter goes up.
	When you lower it down, the helicopter goes down.
	And when you twist it, that's the throttle, kind of like on a motorcycle.
	Tonight, the NTSB providing new details about their...
	Talking, but Eddie, I'm going back to...
	When you look at the video...
	The chopper is perfectly level and flying right into the plane.
	I don't see the altitude increases you're describing, though they may have occurred earlier.
	What happened, sir, is that the altitude adjustment is very slight.
	So even if you're seeing the helicopter flying, because she wasn't at a steep climb, sure, it's a very shallow, slow climb.
	So I'm telling you, this is what the flight track...
	It's showing for FAA, the actual, on the scope that they were looking at, is the altitude.
	So she was at a very slight climb all the way to the point of impact.
	And as soon as she got over 200 feet, she should know right away.
	And her instructor pilot that was supposedly with her, with all these hours, would have told her, hey, watch your outfit.
	There it is, there it is.
	Just flying right into the plane.
	You're climbing over the flight deck here.
	We're supposed to be at 200 feet.
	Now, I can tell you, sir, from my experience of flying through what's called Class B busy airspace, as soon as you come in, you have to ask for permission.
	They give you an altitude, and you have to stay at that altitude, sir, within 25 feet.
	And if you climb in either direction, ATC is in your ear constantly telling you, go down, go up.
	They're telling you where to go and what to do.
	But in this case, sir, We hear nothing from ATC. Why wasn't there a warning from ATC saying, hey, what are you doing up at that altitude?
	You need to descend.
	We didn't hear anything.
	It's almost like ATC went blank, sir.
	I've never heard that before.
	Never heard that.
	The ATC operator was talking to the helicopter on one hand, because they're on a different frequency, and talking to the jet, who's on another frequency.
	So they were in the ear of both pilots.
	And they're watching both of them on the scope.
	They can see the altitude.
	They can see the path.
	They can see the speed.
	They see everything.
	And at any time, that air traffic controller could have told the helicopter, you know what?
	Turn left, 180. Now, expedite.
	You know what I mean?
	And boom, she would have been off the path.
	You know what I mean?
	Or watch your altitude.
	Descend right now, 50 feet.
	You know, boom.
	It happens instantly when your hand's on those controls of the helicopter.
	But if you look at that, a lot of time went by, and there's no...
	Communication from the air traffic controller whatsoever.
	None, sir.
	None.
	There's a major, major problem with that air traffic control that night and a major problem with that helicopter pilot.
	And I sent you one of the top airline investigators who's an ATP pilot.
	He actually has a petition now.
	He wants to be the FAA director.
	He said it's going to be...
	Be bloody if Trump puts him in there because he's going to make major changes to get rid of the DEI inside of the FAA. He's going to fire all these incompetent controllers that have no sense being in there or ever being in there, ever.
	And they were only put in there because they're a minority or something like that, some DEI-er.
	And he says it's created an extreme dangerous situation in the FAA with near misses all around the country that are being covered up.
	And he's very interesting in his report, and he puts the sole blame on the air traffic controller, even though the helicopter wasn't...
	So, Danny, Danny, Danny, there we have two dramatically contrasting views.
	I mean, she's a woman, I take it, she is a lesbian.
	She's a Biden supporter.
	She's furious with Trump.
	He's getting...
	Trannies and gays out of the military is getting away with DEI. Could she have deliberately targeted the plane to create chaos and a problem for Trump?
	Now, that is to be contrasted with, it was inexperienced ATC, and the pilot wasn't that experienced, and of course she was at the wrong altitude.
	But Catherine's points about the...
	Masonic symbolism.
	I mean, that it was, what, blue streak, Democrat, Marty 33, you know, the runway and all that.
	There's something to that.
	So I just want to ask, what is your considered judgment as to what actually happened here, your best guess at this point in time?
	Granted, we're going to get more information.
	And what I like about this event is it's a relatively small event, but it's very controversial.
	I think huge numbers of Americans are going to be investigating.
	I mean, it's a perfect kind to grab you by the stacking swivel to take a closer look.
	Danny?
	Well, sir, I'd like to point out that also this event changed the subject for many other things that are going on in the public.
	You know, there was a lot of Democrats getting thrown under the bus for the fires in California and all the other nonsense that was going on.
	If you notice, when this happened, it completely changed the channel, and now the whole world is focused on this, and all of a sudden we're not thinking about the fires and all the other nasty things.
	Or the testimony of Tulsi Gabbard and Kash Patel and RFK Jr. Exactly.
	They were really mopping up the Congress there and exposing a lot of hypocrisy.
	Warren Pocahontas, Bernie Sanders, they were getting a new one ripped for them by RFK Jr. And Tulsi calling out the deep state for their deliberate deception to get America into war.
	I mean, that's something that a lot of powerful forces in America would not want the American people to focus on.
	I totally agree, sir.
	There were things being disclosed.
	We'll put it at that.
	That they don't want talked about.
	And you know what?
	This event, I'm just trying to say, it changed the channel and it seemed to put a mute button over a lot of people that were talking about a lot of subjects and exposing a lot of subjects that they didn't want to be talked about.
	And to me, this looks like a deliberate act in some way.
	It looks like the controller purposely stepped down or bailed out to let this happen.
	You know, the helicopter path.
	I want to point out the video of the crash, sir.
	If you look at several of the videos, it says provided by CNN. Anytime I see videos supplied by CNN, it makes me think of the 9-11 footage.
	And we know a lot of that was doctored now.
	And I'm highly suspicious.
	I'm highly suspicious of the track of the helicopter, sir.
	And did it really happen the way that they're showing us?
	Is the video even real?
	There's a lot of people that say they wonder if it was a remote.
	Flown helicopter that slammed into the jet and maybe they're just using this girl as a puppet and maybe there was nobody on the aircraft.
	You know what I mean at all?
	We don't know.
	We can't go out.
	Maybe they were already dead.
	We can't go out in a boat or out on the river, me and you, and go look for the bodies.
	I'd like to see the bodies come out of the helicopter because obviously they're still strapped in their seats.
	And we're not going to see any of that stuff.
	So have they ever pulled this kind of trickery before, sir?
	Well, hell yes, they have.
	They've done it a bunch of times.
	I would think nothing of them flying some kind of a drone into a plane and then telling us a made-up story of a lesbian helicopter pilot that just happened to get off of her path.
	Anything is possible, sir.
	We don't have enough information.
	All we have...
	We're trying to dissect what the news is providing us with the footage and what the FAA is giving us right now.
	And we can also see they're withholding a lot of the details.
	All the information with ATC is being obstructed from us.
	They're trying to keep that from us, keep the control.
	They tried to hide the helicopter pilot.
	That's somebody trying to create deception, sir.
	Anytime you see deception, you know you're on the right path.
	As a police detective, when you see deception somewhere, you know that's the path you need to go on.
	And we're seeing deception in many different areas.
	And I think she is on.
	Something about the 33 and all that stuff.
	But we do need more information.
	We do know it's very strange that a low-time helicopter pilot like her, a DE pilot, was at 200 feet and then...
	Got up into almost 400 feet of the crash.
	That does not happen.
	Helicopter pilots are very disciplined.
	They hold altitude when they climb through certain space.
	They're very good at it, sir, and they don't even get their license unless they're good at it.
	So the point where she was at and then all of a sudden this night she couldn't hold altitude and she's at a vertical or a slight vertical all the way to the plane makes no sense.
	It makes no sense, sir, that no air traffic controller in the world would not see them coming together on a collision path and would call out on the radio, turn left, turn right now to try and get them to avoid the accident.
	But yet there was no call out whatsoever.
	No call out from ATC at all.
	That just does not happen, sir, in air traffic control.
	I fly.
	I'm a pilot.
	And I'm telling you, they're in your ear constantly when you're in a busy airspace.
	They tell you.
	To come up 500 feet, come down 500 feet so they can send a jet under you, another plane.
	You know, they're constantly on you, you know, when you're in a busy airspace like that.
	And if you make a mistake and you pull up above your prescribed altitude, man, I'm telling you, they're on the phone.
	They're calling you.
	You're going to get a disciplinary action.
	You're going to get a call from FAA. Why did you do that?
	I mean, they're very strict, sir.
	Very strict with this stuff.
	And the fact that this just happened out of the blue with all these professionals and they all dropped the ball, I think that investigator, Dan Griner, who wants to be FAA director, is right.
	What happened to ATC? He said, I'd have all those controllers in my office Monday morning and they'd all be fired because they created those deaths.
	There's no reason.
	I want to see their near misses.
	I want to see their records.
	I want to see why they were hired, how many mistakes they made.
	They probably shouldn't have been in there.
	He said it was one of the most egregious.
	ATC airs and the most preventable that he's ever seen in all of his aviation career, sir.
	And I totally 100% agree with that.
	Benny, you've been absolutely sensational today.
	When we get more information, I'd very much like you to make a return engagement.
	My apologies to those who might have wanted to call in.
	We simply didn't have enough time to cover all the material Danny was here to present.
	We'll make it up.
	Meanwhile...
	Spend as much time as you can with your family, your friends, and people you love and care about, because we do not know how much time we have left, although Donald Trump appears to have given us a bit more.
	And support Revolution Radio.

▲