All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 28, 2025 - Jim Fetzer
58:24
Truth vs. NEW$, Inc Part 1 (27 January 2025) with Don Grahn, Joachim Hagopian, and Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Truth vs.
News on January 27th, 2025. Wow, a month's almost gone here, and it's really been an exciting month.
Lots are happening, and lots of news, and we've got to get the truth out of the news that's happening.
And today it happens to be Holocaust's anniversary, idiot.
And things, and all types of other things are happening in the news that might be really relevant.
And to bring it to you, you know, we've got the best people in the world.
We've got Jim Fetzer who wrote a little book called Nobody Died on Sandy Hook.
And this is the most controversial book, I think, in the world, or in the United States, in a way.
But it shouldn't be controversial because this is the facts and the other stories are all fabricated.
And, of course, nobody died in Boston either.
And other things like we've got JFK and Jim is just a wonder to behold here.
We're so proud to be working with him for the last 15, 20 years.
And then we also have Brian Davidson, a private investigator out of Texas.
He's really sharp on getting the details out on what's really going on.
And from Bali into Indonesia, we have...
Joaquin has come out of the sun to join us and share with you.
In this perspective, he's a fabulous writer.
We've got some heavy stories, Jim.
I guess I'll just let you lead in.
Oh, you got it, Don.
You got it.
Lots of development with the new press and State Department issues and immediate widespread pause on foreign aid.
The stop work order appears.
To apply to U.S. for all countries except Israel and Egypt.
Secretary of State halted spending Friday on most existing foreign aid grants for 90 days.
His guidance issued to all diplomatic and consular posts required department staffers to issue stop work orders on nearly all existing foreign assistance awards.
It appears to go further than President Trump's recent executive order instructing the department.
To pause foreign aid grants for 90 days, pending review by the Secretary.
The new guidance means no further action will be taken to disperse aid funding programs already approved by the U.S. government.
The order shocked some department officials for its sweeping mandate.
Stage us totally when nuclear on foreign assistance, said another official.
Still, a document leaves room for interpretation.
This provides some exceptions.
Specified foreign military financing for Egypt and Israel will continue.
It allows emergency food assistance and illegitimate expenses incurred prior to the date of the guidance under existing awards.
Current state official plus two former Biden admins said the pot appears to stop aid to key allies such as Ukraine, Jordan, and Taiwan.
The guidance could open the U.S. government up to civil liability.
Lawsuits could be filed.
Over unfulfilled contracts, if the terms were deemed to have been violated, the guidance states that the decision whether to continue to modify or terminate will be made following a review.
Meanwhile, Andrew Anglin, the allegedly cutting all funding to the Ukraine, this would end the war.
Count him a skeptic.
We'll have to wait and see if it actually happens.
If it does, it would just end the war.
Without free money from American taxpayers, Ukraine would have to surrender to Russia quickly.
The Wokies in Ukraine fighting for child sodomy against Russian patriots might still have some juice left in them.
SRT reports Secretary of State Marco Rubio has frozen nearly all aid grants to Ukraine for 90 days.
Rubio instructed a diplomatic consular post to issue stop work orders.
On nearly all existing foreign assistance awards, according to Politico, the order has shocked state officials.
It appears to apply to funding for military assistance to Ukraine.
The BBC, which also reviewed the memo, reported it appears to affect everything from development assistance to military aid.
The Pentagon previously told Voice of America it would not affect security assurance to Ukraine.
Rubio's memo reportedly only grants exception for military aid to Israel and Egypt.
This is not officially confirmed.
Foreign aid cuts were supposed to exempt the woke Ukraine Jews along with the woke Israeli child murderers whom they claim are murdering to stop homophobia.
But we shall see.
So, did...
Trump halted aid to Ukraine, Larry Johnson, former CIA, yesterday.
There were a number of headlines in U.S. media claiming all foreign aid was stopped except for Israel and Egypt.
But the Pentagon weighed in today denying that it affects Ukraine.
A Pentagon official confirmed Trump's executive order freezing foreign aid applies only to development programs, not security assistance to Ukraine.
Anyway, we have a headline.
Trump's 90-day foreign aid suspension does not impact weapon deliveries to Ukraine, Pentagon says.
When I, Larry Johnson, spoke with Judge Knapp and Nima today, I had not seen these reports, however.
While Trump's order does not curtail security assistance in weapons, vehicles, and ammo already in the pipeline, it does freeze assistance funds that flow through State Department channels.
An official told the news agency USAID officer responsible for projects in Ukraine were told to stop all work.
The projects that were frozen reportedly include support for schools and health care, including maternal care and vaccination for children.
So part of the Ukrainian grip machine is sat down for the next three months.
Even if U.S. under Trump continues to funnel weapons to Ukraine that does not solve...
Ukraine's fundamental weakness, the lack of trained soldiers.
The Times, probably some bizarre piece of illogical nonsense under the title, Ukraine is losing fewer soldiers than Russia, but still losing the war.
That's simply fetid horse manure.
I'm not going to waste time deconstructing the lies, but deal with facts.
Russia has at least an 8-to-1 advantage in artillery shells in 2022. Russia has air supremacy, able to drop massive glide bombs on Ukrainian positions.
Russia has more drones deployed, drone guided by fiber optic cable and AI. Ukraine knows such capability.
Russia has more tanks and armored personnel carriers.
We also have hard numbers from Ukrainian sources about Ukraine-Russian exchange of dead soldiers.
This is fascinating.
Russia received the bodies of 49 soldiers and, in turn, delivered the reins of 757 Ukrainian troops.
In other words, for every dead Russian, there were 15 dead Ukrainians.
That tells you everything you need to know about the true extent of Ukrainian losses and exposes the prevarications of the New York Times.
They do, however, make a damning admission.
Western intel agencies have been reluctant to disclose their internal calculation of Ukraine casualties for fear of undermining an ally.
American official previously said Kiev withholds this information from even its closest.
Yes, they don't want to admit the truth because it's so damning.
Joaquin, your thoughts?
Yeah, the truth.
Oh, my God.
Everything will end that they want going for themselves if truth gets known.
Therefore, we have truth versus their bullshit news.
Yeah, I think it's winding down very quickly now.
It really even doesn't matter if weapons get through because there's no personnel left in uniform over there to even...
Do any harm to Russia.
So yeah, the Russian forces are dancing like never before.
They pretty much have cleaned out the Donbass, certainly in the southern part.
They're gone now.
In the northern part, I think they're still working on that, but that's going to end within weeks, I think.
And as far as any, you know, whether there is U.S. Military weapons being sent or not, you know, they're putting out mixed news, basically, where one contradicts the other.
But it really doesn't matter in the whole scheme of things.
The war is going to end very soon, I believe.
Brian.
Well, first of all, it's nice to be back.
I had about a week off here.
Didn't do any shows, and it feels nice to be back on the air.
I feel like every day I see about 10 different things I'd like to make comments on, so keeping track of them all getting ready for the shows is no small ordeal when it comes to trying to isolate your thoughts.
First story was, Trump halted all foreign aid except for Israel and Egypt.
Huh.
I wonder why.
Could it be because Donald Trump is trying to cut a deal with Egypt, which they are currently rejecting to take all the Palestinians?
In other words, Donald Trump is trying to fulfill whatever promises he made to Adelson's and the rest of the Zionist synagogue of Satan to try to help them clear out the rest of the Gazans without having to actually kill them all.
Which I guess is his contribution to humanity and world peace.
Anyway, he's been trying to cut a deal with the Egyptians, which is why he allowed the foreign aid to continue to get them to take all the Palestinians, which the Egyptian, the top colonel in Egypt says...
Absolutely not.
Egypt has not bowed to the world globalist agenda and has decided to keep themselves secure, and they don't want the Palestinians inside.
And to be honest with you, the Palestinians are pretty rough too, although I have heard that there is a huge concentration of Christians.
Who knows how many still remain after Israel and all of its war atrocities have taken place.
The next story was about what's going on with Ukraine.
And let me add a little bit of insight into this.
The Trump administration has been lobbying to try to get Ukraine to lower its conscription age to 18 years old because they don't have enough troops to take care of all the money that's been being laundered through that platform.
Meanwhile, everything I'm seeing coming out of RT and everything I'm seeing coming from Putin staff and others is that Russian television right now and other Russian forces are powerfully aligning themselves with sort of the anti-globalist I saw Victor Orban came out the other day and had a nice conversation about how he thought that Trump had defeated the
Soros Open Society Foundation.
They came out and they said that they outright threatened NATO because NATO was trying to operate against Trump in terms of Bringing in, I think it was 11 or 1200 troops in near the Russian border.
North Korea has been playing both sides of the transaction, trying to conscript troops to both Ukraine and...
In other words, North Korea is trying to pick money off of both pockets.
I guess they're trying to play the old Rothschild, let's make money on both sides of the transaction thing.
But I think the biggest indication about what's going on over there right now, oh, and by the way, there's been a lot of new, juicy, graphic, nasty stuff being released about the Zelensky regime.
The other day, there was a raid that took place on a brothel, and they caught one of Zelensky's top colonels in the brothel with a transvestite.
So if that gives you any feel for the quality of people that are remaining in Ukraine fighting this nasty war, I think that would give us some insight into it.
Anyway, it sounds to me like there's...
More plans for more endless wars if they're trying to convince Ukraine to actually lower the conscriptions to 18. We know that those troops that are currently remaining are acting more like a Stasi in terms of going to get the young Germans, bring them into the program and make sure that they're taken away from their families.
I'm surprised there's many left after as much war has been taking place.
And Russia is also continually modifying their nuclear doctrine, which is indicative of a much more sophisticated...
I'm at a friend's house, and so that Alexa thing's on, I guess it's listening to me.
It's indicative that Russia is more than willing to rattle the sabers at this particular point in time.
I think if you see movement happen, it's going to start happening very soon.
Putin's been putting up with Ukraine long enough and hard enough.
And with Western forces using Ukraine as a puppet, I think he's going to try to bring this to an end as fast as possible.
Very good.
Very good.
Excellent.
Meanwhile, Patriot Putin says Wokey stole the 2020 election.
Patriot Trump would have prevented the Ukraine war.
This is Andrew Anglin.
Wow!
These are big statements from the patriot president of Russia about the patriot president of America is looking like patriots are in control.
Russian President Vladimir Putin, RT reports, said the 2020 U.S. presidential election was stolen from Donald Trump and that had the outcome been decided fairly, the Ukraine conflict might have been avoided.
I cannot disagree with him that if he had been president, if his victory hadn't been stolen in 2020, perhaps a crisis in Ukraine that arose in 2022 wouldn't have taken place.
Turns out, by the way, that the Biden admin refused to even communicate with Putin about Ukraine, whereas Trump would have done so.
Putin would never have done it, Trump said, if the election weren't rigged.
Our election, it was rigged and stolen.
If it weren't rigged, if I were president, you'd right now have a billion people alive that are dead.
Trump would have fixed the woke Jewish rats in Kiev.
Using patriotic extermination Methodists against them speculates Anglin, I'm not so sure.
There's no reason for this war other than Joe's woke policies supporting a...
Sickening, woke, kike, and tranny neo-Nazi agenda in Ukraine, which is actually a part of Russia that had gone rogue.
Patriots would have cleansed Ukraine, and now they will.
Meanwhile, Zelensky reports on Deal Decide to Fight Trump explains.
President Trump put blame on Ukrainian President Polinsky for choosing to fight Russia rather than make a deal.
In April of 2022. Zelensky had nearly completed negotiation with Putin when members of NATO, specifically the UK Prime Minister, pushed Kiev to fight rather than sign.
Look!
Zelensky was fighting a much bigger entity, much bigger, much more powerful.
He shouldn't have done that.
We could have made a deal.
Would have been a deal that would have been a nothing deal, he told Hannity.
Trump was referring to negotiations that nearly ended the invasion within the first two months.
Under that deal, Russian forces would have withdrawn from Ukraine, including the Donbass, if Kyiv would not join NATO and committed to some demilitarization.
During the interview, he indicated he would have taken the deal.
I could have made that deal so easily, and Zelensky decided that I want to fight.
He went on to say his predecessor did a horrible job by allowing the war to start.
He placed some blame on Putin, knowing he shouldn't have invaded Ukraine several times, but we know better.
When Zelensky was close to signing the UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson traveled to Kiev, pushing Zelensky to forego diplomacy and attempt to drive the Russians from Ukraine at the same time.
Members of NATO promised Ukraine everything it needed to win the war.
Trump says Zelensky now wants to negotiate an end.
I will say this, he wants to settle now he's had enough.
He shouldn't have allowed this to happen either.
Putin is largely kept his demands consistent throughout the war, including a pledge that Ukraine never joined NATO, limits to what arms are sent to Kiev, and recognition of Ukrainian territory annexed by Moscow.
Which include Crimea, the Donbass, and other old blasts.
Russia does not intend to give those up.
At the start of the conflict, Russia had only annexed Crimea since then.
They've held referenda and seized four additional Ukrainian old blasts.
Trump refused to tell Hannity if he'd spoken with Putin, meaning he has.
He said he wanted to bring the war to an end as quickly as possible, claiming Millions are dying.
It's got a hand.
These are human beings that are being slaughtered.
Meanwhile, Russia reject the idea of NATO peacekeepers and Ukraine warns of uncontrollable escalation.
Russia on Thursday rejected the idea.
Foreign Ministry's Welshwoman Maria Zakharova said it was totally unacceptable to Russia.
At a press briefing, she heard a recent statement by British PM Keir Starmer and German defense minister warned historians about the possibility their countries might contribute troops to a peacekeeping force.
Historians said on January 18, Germany obviously has a role to play.
Starmer said on Jan 16, Britain had been discussing the idea of a peacekeeping force with other allies.
Russia It's open to dialogue with President Trump and said he intends to bring an end to the war.
Grady and President Dolinsky said Tuesday, if we 200,000 European peacekeepers would be needed to prevent a new Russian attack.
Meanwhile, shocking numbers, Russian army gains 450,000 contract soldiers.
More than 1,000 people have joined the Russian forces daily.
Under contract in 2024. A pace the Kremlin, insist, must be sustained into the new year.
Last year, an average of over a thousand people enlisted in military service daily, said Mendevede.
The plan for 2025 has been outlined.
Our task is to maintain the pace.
Mendevede stressed the importance of focusing on supporting those who are actively engaged on the front lines and veterans returning from combat zones.
Which is totally appropriate, which the United States fails to do again and again and again.
This is a shared responsibility of regional leaders, he said.
Attention to this issue cannot waver.
Going to mend if ever on more than 50,000 in 2024 or another 40,000 volunteer to join special military ops.
Report numbers reveal more than just a headline-grabbing recruitment success, but speak volumes.
about Russian border strategy that maneuvers through an extended and costly military campaign in Ukraine.
Maintaining an average enlistment rate of a thousand a day requires not only logistic efficiency, but significant resources for training, equipping, and employing such a force.
Fascinating stuff.
Joaquin, let me say, I was told today NATO is going to send 100,000 peacekeepers to Ukraine, but I do not believe Russia will tolerate your thoughts.
No, they will not settle on any kind of ceasefire or peace agreement with NATO entering the stage in what's left of Ukraine.
That is not going to happen from the very outset.
I mean, we can talk years ago now.
Russia has been demanding That there's neutrality on their border.
They've made that clear for 20-something years now, and the West just will not give it up.
So that obviously is not going to happen.
And because militarily, Russia has all the terms on their side to if there's any negotiation at all, which I don't think there will be.
Obviously, America can never be trusted with any kind of agreement, and neither can Ukraine, you know?
And then we go back.
Yes, the end of March 2022, Zelensky, they had initialed, each side had initialed the agreement on a peace deal in March 2022, what?
Barely a month into this supposed war.
And what happens?
City of London sends over Boris Johnson, the big blowhard ex-Prime Minister, to sabotage that deal.
This tells you that the evil forces of the West, the controllers certainly, the money changers, wanted war.
And they're going to keep the war going at all costs.
What?
Over a million Ukrainians dead?
Seven million or so, maybe more, displaced in other countries.
You know, it's insane.
So, yeah, I mean, and then at the beginning, you were talking about, you know, the broken record with Trump.
Yeah, it would have never happened.
Well, I think I say all the time, well, it doesn't matter, Republican, Democrat, it doesn't matter because the same people are in control.
But in this case, yes, I don't think Putin would have actually probably, they would have worked out something because at least they have some level of communication as opposed to with the Biden camp.
There was none.
So, yeah, it probably would not have happened, sadly.
So there's over a million dead people to answer for, for the ridiculous war that we have here.
Yes, Brian.
This is going to sound a little bit off-kilter, but just bear with me for a second, okay?
I remember when I was younger, I was working in the health insurance brokerage business, and we're sitting here trying to negotiate this big, huge contract between trying to decide what this large Houston employer is going to pay this hospital system.
And so we're sitting in there with our Excel spreadsheets and our pivot tables, and we're trying to figure out how we're going to engineer this and make sure this is where all the money goes.
And this is sort of the face of the battle.
And so we're doing all this advanced rigmarole, and then we find out down the line, because we went higher and higher and higher in the structure until we finally got somebody that can give us an answer.
And they basically said, when we finally got our answer from up top, they said, look, nobody cares about all these details, okay?
This is all about the hospital's top brass, and I mean like above CEO level, playing golf with the employer's representatives and their top brass.
And what they do is they go play nine holes of golf, and then they get to the end, and the hospital says, look, We made $15 million off you guys last year, and we figured that we need to make about $16 or $17 million off you guys next year.
So we really don't care how the puzzle pieces get together.
But if you want to cut a deal, your $15 million needs to become $17 million.
Now, why do I tell that story?
Because here we're down here trying to look at all these different details and trying to figure out how these deals get cut.
Let me cut through it all real fast.
There are negotiations taking place right now that are global negotiations, and they're taking place on golf courses and in CEOs' offices and on the phone between world health leaders, and there is a lot of pieces on the table right now.
So, Donald Trump is probably managing...
Are we going to protect the pedos or are we not going to protect the pedos?
Well, how many of our people will go down and how many of their people will go down?
How are we going to prevent the Israeli Epstein nuclear option where his files get released to the public or do we want that to happen and do we want to actually clean out the deep state or are we just going to...
Sort of roll in a couple of sacrificial lamps.
Oh, well, what are we going to do about the military-industrial complex?
Are we going to continue to fund that?
Are we going to reform that?
Are we going to try to cut that back?
What about all these contractors that are making all this money?
What are we going to do about all these non-governmental organizations that are taking all this money and just making people rich?
Are we going to start sacrificing some of them to the gods of reform?
Or are we going to go ahead and keep funding these people because they put money in the right pots of the right politics?
What are we going to do about AIPAC? Are we going to go ahead and neuter them, or do they still have all the power that they need to control everybody left and right?
Are we going to prosecute the enemies of the state that have done treasonous activities towards us or not?
So all these different negotiation pieces are probably on the deck.
And I just started writing, like, repair and restore the Department of Justice.
What about the Senior Executive Service, the Office of Personnel Management?
Who's going to represent that?
How are we going to do it?
Are we going to go ahead and sacrifice the January 6th Committee and eat them alive?
What about all the criminals on the inside?
Are we going to start sacrificing them?
Are they just going to be gone?
How are we going to disarm the secret government that's taking place in the CIA? Are we going to fix the broken voting system or not?
All these things are just negotiation pieces.
Are we going to disarm the Department of Education and change The future course and rewrite history of American history, whatever.
Are we going to destroy the bad Democrat fundings?
You could go on and on and on and on.
I can guarantee you that if you took all these issues, you could put a number on them.
Well, this is worth, that guy's worth, this issue's worth, that...
And you just break it down to a number and sit down and negotiate.
It's going to end up on the golf course, where one guy says, we'll give you this if you give us that, you give us this.
This is how the pendulum of power swings.
And I think right now, the American people are thinking, oh, we're entering a golden age of restoration of American ideals that goes back to the constitutionality of the United States of America.
And we've got all these high dreams and mighty of being restored to the republic.
Let's be real.
Let's be real.
Some of the issues, because we have strength at this point in time, are going to get dealt with.
Other issues are going to get kicked down the road in a can.
That's the way it's going to be.
And so how is it all going to shake up after what we're...
Seven days into the new administration.
Boy, it's nice to sit there and watch Citizen Free Press all day and look at Twitter and watch all these things float past the screen.
But isn't it really simple?
We just got to come down and see where all these negotiations begin to shake out when it's all said and done.
Who gives up Ukraine?
Who gives up Russia?
Who gives up Israel?
Who gives up Europe?
It's just going to all shake out and it's going to come down to one guy saying, you gave me 15, I'm willing to take 13. No, I want 17. That's what it's really all about, because I don't believe the structure is actually going to change.
Fascinating, fascinating.
Meanwhile, summary of Trump's World Economic Forum speech.
Very impressive.
Robert Malone says Trump knocks it out of the park.
This is the first speech of Trump to a foreign audience.
He outlined...
Far out, Americanism that far surpassed what anyone could have hoped for.
Most important element to fix America to build a huge economic engine that isn't dependent on war or warmongering.
Here's a summary.
He intends to defeat inflation.
He's imposed a federal hiring freeze, a foreign aid freeze, and created the Department of Government Efficiency.
He's ended the Green New Deal, withdrawn from the Paris Accord, ended the electric car mandate.
Declared a national emergency to extract more oil to boost manufacturing.
Plans to make U.S. a world capital of AI and crypto.
He's making deregulation and tax cuts top priorities.
Countries that don't invest in America will pay tariffs.
Large investments by tech companies and other governments are announced.
Lower oil prices will help end the Ukraine war.
Mexican border?
Active U.S. military National Guard now deployed.
Censorship by the government has been stopped, including misinformation and disinformation labels.
Trump has ended the weaponization of law enforcement.
Ended DEI. Once again, only two genders in the U.S. and transgender surgeries will become rare.
NATO to pay 5% of GDP up from two.
Trump claims credit for ceasefire in the Middle East and hostage exchange.
Trump will secure a settlement between Russia and Ukraine.
He plans to take corporate tax rate of 15%, recognizing conservatives are being targeted by banks and that that is wrong.
The Canadian trade deficit he recognized it must be recalibrated.
And other nations he believes are taking advantage of the U.S. He wants to meet with Putin and end the war.
His proposed relationship with China is to close the trade deficit.
He wants to work toward denuclearization with the cooperation of Russia and China.
Plans to make a peace agreement with Russia and Ukraine a priority.
I like it.
Meanwhile, the president of Argentina followed Trump and declared that of the members of the WEF, they are pedophiles.
Argentine President, have you seen here issuing a coup de grace to the WEF following Trump's teleconference deletion of the DEVOS agenda with his vow to unleash the U.S. untapped petroleum reserves along with his complete demolition of DEI policies at home and with the exit from the U.N.-sponsored Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative.
A list of Ursualdivo's Spain says not in attendance spoke volumes.
Completely absent were Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Chinese President Xi Jinping, President Emmanuel Macron, and Italian leader Georgia Maloney, and British Prime Minister Keir Stormer.
Williams succinct and impassioned speech appears to have meted out the final death blow to the WEF. It seems fair at this point to ask whether there will ever be another DeVos meeting.
Fascinating.
Brian, your thoughts?
I understand the WEF has gone downhill about whether they'll be obliterated.
I think they lost their funding and everything.
Well, so Trump is a good negotiator.
Yeah, I love that.
It's exactly what I just said, right?
Let's go ahead and lay out the points that we're going to try to negotiate in this, and we'll decide who to sacrifice in the bigger scheme of things.
I think that everybody right now feels like there's some sort of savior coming in to change everything.
And granted, the winds are beginning to blow in our direction, but I'll guarantee you that the big strokes by the big power players...
Are still going to be adhered to, and they're going to be honored.
How many big power players do you think are going to actually go down over this Trump thing?
I'd like to see maybe 10, but you've got to realize there's 500 of them.
600 of them.
Yeah, we're going to get wind.
We're going to think we have a big victory.
But this whole world, I'm telling you, every one of these issues is just simply a number on a spreadsheet to a guy like Donald Trump.
That's all it is.
Something's really bad, and they were having big sex parties and stuff at that WEF, and it all fell apart, blew apart this time.
He'll use it to decide how to get what he wants for his particular administration and for future administrations.
But are we, look, do you think the Democrats want to see the dominoes start to fall?
Or do you think the Republicans pedos want to see the dominoes start to fall?
This is one of those issues that Trump can and will use to get just about everything else that he wants.
He will protect Diddy.
They will want to protect Diddy, Epstein, Hollywood, the whole shebang.
And they'll give up the rest of the economy to do it.
But they cannot let this information out or that structure goes down because as those dominoes fall, they're going to go right up the mountain and start getting the guys at the very top.
I'd like to see that.
I just simply don't believe that those guys can be taken down.
Joaquin.
Yeah, between, you know, his first day where he's busy signing all those executive orders and, you know, and then the speech he gave to World Economic Forum, it all, at surface appearance, looks real good for the people, you know?
You've got to give them a few bones so they still believe that you're on their side, you know?
And that's the strategy Trump's using, where he's able to be looked upon, as the MAGA crowd always views him, as the savior of America.
But yeah, I'm inclined to go along with Brian's analysis, where...
It's a cover.
It's just a cover to placate the masses into thinking, yeah, we finally got a good guy on our side working on our behalf, you know, where the power structure does not change.
Yeah, they make it look like, yeah, the web's going down now.
You know, they don't have the support of all those big leaders in the world even showing up anymore, you know.
This is all just cosmetic change to get the change of opinions in people to think they've got goodness on their side.
God's on our side now.
You got it.
You got it.
It's all up front.
It's all up front.
The power structure remains the same.
I hate to, you know, because it's kind of negative news for a lot of people, but...
That's the bottom line reality.
The power structure stays the same, and you can do some cosmetic changes that are for the good, because, you know, let's face it, a lot of the, you know, the thing with the gender identity, wokeism, all that, you know, yeah, right, it's good to get rid of it finally, supposedly, anyway.
You know, and it's good to, he signed a...
An executive order actually supposedly ending the World Bank digital currencies even.
You know, that's a big one too.
You know, there's a bunch of them in there.
And if they follow through and the change is made...
Well, I guess I'm wrong in my analysis, but I just hesitate to jump for joy yet because I don't think the power structure behind everything we see in front of us, sleight of hand mostly, is changing at all.
Let me just add one idea to that, okay?
BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard, you get the point?
They own everything.
You go to a retail center in any semi-urban area, just look around.
What you're seeing is a 90% consolidation of the machine.
It's everywhere.
It cannot be defeated.
I heard rumor that a black block is going down.
No, that's just buzz.
They can't take down that mountain.
Don't be naive, but I think things are moving in the right direction.
Meanwhile, how the U.S. Wilkert ceasefire shows U.S. Israel is a pet project, not an ally.
I disagree with that, but it's interesting.
Who books credit for this, Mr. President?
You are Trump.
Is that a joke?
The final words hung in the air as President Biden scoffed, turned his back to the journalists, and walked away.
Drawing his announcement of the ceasefire to a tense and awkward close.
During his address, Kamala stood to Biden's right and stared at the camera without breaking her gaze, as if it really was her Biden and Blinken who stood to the left.
Efforts that brokered the ceasefire, the truth is, we all know it wasn't the case.
Biden's avoidance of ongoing popular unrest and global pressure to take more action disqualified him from running again, as demonstrated in countless polls.
During her campaign, Harris did nothing to challenge her predecessor and instead doubled down, condemning Palestinian protesters at the DNC. This weakness ultimately lost her the election as well, not a chance.
She was a pathetic candidate.
No way the worst candidate the Democrats have ever run could defeat.
Arguably the best candidate the Republicans have ever won.
That means sad.
Did Trump actually do anything?
Yes.
He sent an envoy who aggressively and publicly pushed in a way Biden's team did not.
He made brash declaration Biden was unwilling to make.
In the end.
Biden and many analysts are right.
The terms of the ceasefire are relatively similar to ones rejected by Netanyahu in May.
So who was the successful broker?
Was there one?
Was Israel finally unable to say no?
Despite immediate focus on the battle between the two, the truth is it was the U.S. that was successful in compelling Israel's surrender.
It was not anymore Biden, it was Trump.
It was U.S. exercising its overall imperial control that forced the hand of the Zionist entity.
In the process, the ceasefire negotiation illustrated the reality that perhaps a seemingly more favorable imperial possession, Israel is simply part of a long pattern of U.S. imperial control that selectively promotes funds and bolts that undercuts their hands.
The political buoyancy of countries around the world?
I don't think so.
I think we are more the stooge of Israel than Israel the stooge of the U.S. The analysis of the U.S.-Zionist relationship in the context of Gaza reveals the material condition that defines the U.S. imperial relation, including when the U.S. will sacrifice Zionist interests for its own.
The U.S. has been a champion of Zionism from its onset.
Since the launch of the most recent genocide, there's been widespread discussion of U.S.-Zionist relations to illustrate how crucial U.S. support is to Zionist functionality.
While the circulation of this narrative is essential to expose the depth of U.S.-Zionist collusion, it's also paramount to make it known that the relationship has its limitations.
Though few and far between, and often obscured, There are times the U.S. has been at odds with the Zionist sanity enacted in its own interest.
There is overwhelming documentation of the U.S. longstanding and boundless support for the Zionist sanity since the mid-20th century.
Zionists possess an extensive lobby in the U.S. and have made countless gains for the Zionist government.
Relatedly, Zionist interests are deeply embedded in virtually every sector of U.S. functionality.
Academia, business, pop culture, scientific research, production, environmentalism, medicine, etc., weapon manufacturing, and more.
There's not a single aspect of U.S. infrastructure absolved from upholding Zionism in some shape or form, whether cultural, economic, or political.
None of this is new, nor does it require much digging or citation.
That being said, What is less often discussed is whether or not the Zionist entity's relationship is egalitarian and entirely foolproof.
For the most part, compared to other countries far more clearly subordinate to the U.S., the Zionist entity is often portrayed as a self-assured, assertive, and relatively unfettered body and has the authority to make its own decisions instead of adhering to the U.S. This gap is understandable.
The Zionist entity is the U.S. premier political and military entry point to the region and is unparalleled in the role it has and continues to serve.
When the U.S. became a global superpower after World War II, its choice to back the Zionist cause at the time was an intentional one.
They gave it unbridled access to the region to this day.
Their interests often overlap.
When the Zionist entity profits, so does the U.S. What's arms industry, trade with settlements, government programming, creating government jobs, promoting U.S. supremacy?
There's almost no way the Zionist entity profits without the U.S. also over time.
Because their interests have remained generally aligned with priceless rewards.
The moments where there have been tensions often go under the radar.
For example, in 1956, Eisenhower criticized the Zionist occupation of Gaza, to which the Zionist entity ultimately conceded.
The U.S. opposed it because it feared it would impact their access to Arab oil in both the 20th and 21st centuries.
A slew of Zionists espionage cases have sustained an ongoing sore point.
Between the U.S. and the Zionist entity.
Oh, there are other examples.
The point is tensions between the entity and the U.S. are often omitted, reifying the notion their partnership is impenetrable.
Reality has been on display since October 2023 as well.
The fact of the matter is due to Israel's ongoing genocide in Gaza.
The U.S. has been hemorrhaging unprecedented amounts of hate.
Because of Israel's countless military losses, the U.S. would force us to send more aid than it has ever sent to the Zionist entity in a single year and forcing the U.S. to risk noncompliance with its own trade standards to maintain Israeli bonds.
Similarly, the Zionist economy...
was severely devastated by the genocide, something for which the U.S. also had to account beyond finances.
The U.S. sacrificed significant amounts of political clout on a global scale during 2024, and the Zionist entity lost a slew of relations for their aggressive commitment to maintain the genocide.
Also, Compounding pressure on the U.S. to maintain the entity's financial and political position thus far.
The U.S. willingness to center its own interests in ways that deprioritize the top choice of the Zionist agenda has been okay because the decisions have never been a total detriment to the Zionist entity, while some decisions are not to their liking.
The net gain has been and is always substantial.
This is why on both sides there's less emphasis on tensions that have and still exist.
They pale by comparison to the hordes of wealth that two generate through their partnership.
When we focus on how severe a liability the entity has been for the U.S., it becomes far easier to understand the relationship between the U.S. and the entity are impermanent.
It's also easier to recognize U.S. support, for the Zionist entity is not without calculations of its own.
In the words of Tara Alami, the question of whether the Zionist state is a U.S. proxy is less about the sort of diplomatic pressure that exists, more about whether the relationship between the two meets certain structural, economic, and military criteria.
The genocide of the past year and the current ceasefire agreement.
On a perfect entry point into the distinction she is raising last week, Inamar Ben-Gurv threatened to resign from Netanyahu's cabinet and take his entire party with him if the ceasefire were to go into effect.
The promise may all make good upon sense.
The tension is a climax of what's been an ongoing unraveling of the Zionist military and government in June 2024. Many grants resign from the Zionist war cabinet.
In protest of what he considered an endangering of Zionist stature for Netanyahu's political career.
A slew of military and security officers resigned throughout 2024 in response to intelligence failures and imminent loss.
Settlers have protested in the thousands countless times since the launch of the genocide, increasing internal tensions between the Zionist government and its constituents.
Over the past year, the U.S. condemned the genocide, however, meekly, while continuing to fund it.
This, paired with the repeated insolence of the Zionist entity, often pointed to as an indicator of U.S. unequivocal support for Zionism.
However, though the U.S. allowed for the Zionist entity to continue its efforts, won't pass a timeline in an outline.
It ultimately was the one allowing it.
And it stopped to switch gears when it decided it reached its own breaking point.
It is this subtlety that we must uplift because, however slight, what it reveals is U.S. apparent deference to the Zionist entity is, in fact, its own complex dominance.
The disarray that genocide has spurred reveals to us that Zionist interests greatly vary, sometimes clash.
And are coming to a major conflict in light of the past year, only pointing to more and more political polarization among current leadership.
Given this backdrop, it becomes clear that U.S. calculations deprioritize Zion's political equilibrium for its own gain.
The upheaval of the current government is irrelevant to U.S. interests, because so long as the overall colonial imperial aspects of the project are intact, And what the U.S. requires for its partnership with the Zionist entity is fulfilled.
Fascinating stuff.
Don, have we time for comments, or do we need the break?
No, we've got six and a half minutes.
Okay, excellent.
Joaquin, your thoughts.
Well, we were talking about the power structure not changing, and then we move on to Zionism, and there you go, because the power structure consists largely of Zionism.
We have the money changers of the city of London, the Rothschilds that have created every major conflict and war in the last 200 years, profiting from war.
So the power seat doesn't change.
We have a synagogue of Satan cabinet that Trump has surrounded himself with.
They're all Zionist zealots ready to go to battle for Israel.
You know, things don't change.
They do the cosmetic changes to suck the public into believing change is happening, but the power structure underneath the cosmetics is immovable.
It's not changing.
This whole idea of Zionism, there's a reason why he has a bunch of Zionists in his cabinet.
Because Israel and the city of London control America.
It's not even a question.
Well, Israel controls America.
No, it's the city of London money changers that control pretty much everything.
And we're talking about...
The shareholders of the largest investment firms that remain, you know, discreetly unknown.
But we know who they are.
They're the wealthiest people in the world that have gotten together and decided all of these major wars and presidents come and go and all of this.
The power structure remains the same.
So this whole Zionism is basically coming down to...
They will do a war against Iran.
They have been perceived as the biggest threat in the Middle East by Israel and the United States and the Zionists forever.
And it's going to come down to that.
There's going to be a false flag that will enter World War III Armageddon, predicted over a century and a half ago, by Freemasons, which are part of the deal here between the Zionists as well as the Islamic world.
By the way, Iran is consisting of high-level Freemasons as well.
So, yeah, I think it's going to come down to a war, a Middle East war situation.
Trump is in there for a big part of that reason because he's been totally bought and sold.
I mean...
You know, he ran with Epstein.
They got all the goods on this guy.
He's been a pedophile, so he does what he's told.
You know?
Adelson, Rothschild, they bailed him out several times out of bankruptcy.
The guy's completely owned and controlled by the, quote, Zionist power structure.
So don't get fooled that there's going to be all these major positive changes.
They're only cosmetic, and the bottom line is there's going to be World War III because the power structure is...
They're going to destroy everything and kill a lot of people so that they have ultimate power.
Money is not really even a motive for them.
Global depopulation is their agenda, and they're going to end up doing it.
Brian?
Yeah, there's so much I want to say on this issue, and I appreciate Joaquin's comments because I think he hit it pretty well.
Listen, there was no such thing as a Zionist prior to Napoleon.
Napoleon was a power-hungry young man who needed money to continue fighting his war against Britain.
Where did he get the money?
Oh, he got the money from the Rothschilds.
Where did the Rothschilds get their money?
Oh, they got their money from the Vatican and the Vatican bankers.
Napoleon was in a war.
Who was he in a war with?
He was in a war with England.
Where did they get their money?
Oh, they got their money from the Rothschilds.
Okay.
So the Rothschilds has Napoleon.
Napoleon says, oh, we got to restore the Zionist.
We got to make this thing called a Zionist because I've read this in the Bible.
It looks like it all going to make sense.
And so he begins to bring that up.
The Rothschilds play both sides of it with the money that they've got to invest.
And so they finally end up deciding that Britain's going to win the more.
So they pulled the money out of Napoleon.
Napoleon goes into exile.
But the idea was born and the cover in the front was established.
Zionism will be a new goal.
We'll use it to negotiate with Russia as long as it keeps the highlights off of us and our structure that's in place behind the scenes.
Flash forward, the Americans begin to develop.
Come into our season, we...
We have a civil war.
Both sides of the North wins, but we lost.
We owe a bunch of money.
America gets rebuilt into a different structure.
It's now a corporate structure.
Okay, we're going on.
So now we're on the same strings that they're on.
Okay, oh, now we've got the two evil Western powers, Israel and America, that are struggling in this great struggle that's going to change the world.
And so America should eat the Zionists.
You know what?
In the meantime, the people down at the bottom are starting to get upset because they're feeling like we've got no power whatsoever.
They're watching all of this evil unfold.
Let me ask you a question.
What's worse, the pedophile or the guy who's filming the pedophile that set him up to use it as blackmail to control the rest of his life?
Which one's worse?
It's all rotten as hell.
It's all rotten as hell.
The whole thing is rotten as hell.
And how far down does it go?
How deep does it go?
Where does it go?
What do we tolerate?
What do we not tolerate?
Where does the moral compass say you've gone too far?
Oh, is it killing babies?
Oh, no.
Well, apparently we're willing to put up with that.
Is it killing kids and putting bullets in them in Gaza?
Oh, well, I guess we're willing to put up with that.
We have to realize...
But there is something called a plumbob.
There is a straight line, a straight walk, a straight and narrow.
All of this could be avoided if men would straighten up their lives.
Very good.
Very powerful, gentlemen.
That concludes our first hour.
Don, take us out.
Yeah, what a positive...
What a powerful first hour.
All kinds of things are breaking loose here on the 27th of January, 2025. The second week of Trump's turnaround of this country and things are jumping, I tell you.
And we're trying to keep up with it.
And hopefully you can keep up with us and it.
Watch these shows, fill it widely, because people won't know about it unless you tell them, I guess.
So we post this in a...
▲
Export Selection