All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 6, 2025 - Jim Fetzer
01:06:51
Truth In GAZA, Trump on HB1, Musk - Universal Income, Lucky Larry, BB, Jimmy Carter, What's Her Face
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to episode 109 of Gary King's Inconvenient Truths, where Gary presents video clips and stories I don't know are coming for my spontaneous and unrehearsed response.
Please know I had a bad night, couldn't sleep, recent surgery, so just take that into account.
Gary, what do you got for me today?
Anyway, alright.
We're going to start off with our favorite girl talking about should we trust the science?
People often ask me why I don't trust doctors and scientists.
So allow me to explain.
Reason number one.
Beginning in the 1920s, tobacco companies sought to exploit the public's trust in medical professionals after a huge spike in lung cancer led people to express concerns over the dangers of smoking.
The first cigarette company to use physicians in their ads was American Tobacco, maker of Lucky Strike.
In 1930, it published an ad claiming 20,679 physicians agree- That luckies are less irritating on the throat.
I guess the most important consensus here is the consensus that everybody likes money.
Here's another good one.
Give your throat a vacation.
Smoke a fresh cigarette.
Viceroy's!
Filter the smoke.
As your dentist, I would recommend viceroys.
Or what about this one?
More doctors smoke camels than any other cigarette.
Damn, doctors were really stupid back then.
I wonder what people are gonna say in 50 years about our doctors.
Reason number two.
In 1932, the U.S. Public Health Service and the CDC conducted a study on untreated syphilis in black men.
A highly unethical study that's remembered today simply as...
The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment.
It initially involved 600 black men, 399 with syphilis, 201 without, all of which were not aware of their participation in the study.
Researchers lied to the men and told them they were being treated for bad blood, but in truth, they didn't receive any treatment, not even after penicillin became the drug of choice to treat syphilis in 1947. Although initially projected to last six months, the study went on for 40 years and resulted in over 100 preventable- What's more disturbing is local doctors were recruited and compensated to lie to the men and withhold treatment.
Autopsy and physician assessments were done at local hospitals, and a number of Tuskegee Institute faculty and staff were involved in the scam.
Reason number three.
In the 1960s, an increase in heart disease led people to express concerns over the ill health effects of sugar.
So sugar industries shut down, sugary products were pulled from grocery shelves, and the government informed the public of the danger Big
shocker there.
Reason number four.
In March of 2019, a California man was awarded 80 million dollars in damages after he claimed that glyphosate, the active ingredient found in the herbicide roundup, was the cause of his terminal cancer.
Monsanto was aware of the link between glyphosate and cancer since the early 1980s when a study done by the company found a statistically significant increased risk of cancer in mice who were treated with glyphosate.
The EPA was alarmed by the finding, but Monsanto dismissed the results It wasn't definitive because, get this, a single mouse who was not exposed to glyphosate also developed a tumor.
The agency wanted the study replicated, but Monsanto refused.
So why was Monsanto able to say no to the EPA? The agency responsible for regulating their products?
Well, because pesticide companies quite literally bankroll the EPA's pesticide office.
Not only did Monsanto manipulate scientific data and collude with corrupt regulators, they also manipulated the media to gain favorable public opinion on their products.
They planted helpful articles in traditional news outlets, they discredited and harassed journalists who refused to parrot the company's propaganda, and they secretly funded front In the year 2020, people began questioning the use of masks, lockdowns, and experimental mRNA vaccines as successful mitigation strategies for the spread of a virus.
To counter opposing expert opinions, public health leaders and campaigns strategically recruited people with large social media followings to use their platforms to push the unconstitutional So
what's the moral here?
Scientists and doctors can be bought.
Celebrities, social media influencers, and the media can be bought.
Everyone can be bought, including me.
That's why this video was brought to you by Forbidden Clothes.
Check out their website at ForbiddenClothes.com and click the link in the description to follow them on Instagram.
Use the code "What's Her Face" to get 10% off your fashionable middle finger to the system.
Alright guys, if you like this video, please comment and like and subscribe, and I will see you all next week.
Bye!
okay - She's just wonderful.
I'm ecstatic to see her back.
She went on some sort of hiatus.
We haven't had her for, I don't know, six months, Gary.
This is wonderful.
All the cases she demonstrated are clear cases of the abuse of what's known as applied science, the application of scientific results, in some cases pseudoscientific because they manipulated the data.
For business reasons.
Now, we have a new ruling from a Court of Appeals that COVID is not even a vaccine.
Now, we knew it, but this is the first in what's going to be a long train of legal decisions.
So some hope that that one may wind up in massive settlements, even though Pfizer and Moderna AstraZeneca, they had clauses that made them immune,
you know, because it was an emergency authorization, which is only permissible if there were no viable alternatives that had already been approved when there were HCQ and ivermectin.
So the whole thing was fraudulent from the beginning.
EPA, CDC, Fauci, These people all should be held to account.
I believe it will happen.
If Bobby is confirmed as Secretary of Department of Health and Human Services, for sure.
Now, all our other cases, doctors endorsing cigarettes, I think they made up that number, 26,000, whatever.
Cigarettes cause lung cancer.
Just as alcohol causes cirrhosis of liver, marijuana actually causes neither.
So in my opinion, marijuana is a superior high.
And why should we punish a generation?
Because it prefers to smoke its tie rather than drink it.
Those cigarettes, that's an abomination.
There's a wonderful film about it called Thank You for Smoking.
I encourage everyone to watch.
Tuskegee, inexcusable.
This is violating every basic principle of medicine.
No informed consent.
All wrong.
It's a grotesque case, historic case.
And I think there's a lot of physicians who have learned from it.
The sugar studies has a very interesting case of shifting responsibility from sugar.
I don't doubt her reporting, which seems to me to be of extremely high quality.
So I think there may have been one I'm overlooking here, Gary, but this was just simply superb.
Let me distinguish, by the way, from applied science from pure science.
I'm a philosopher of science.
I am an expert in the area of pure science, in other words, of scientific reasoning.
The objects of scientific reasoning, scientific laws, laws of nature, scientific explanations, what it takes to be properly qualified as a scientist, which means adhering to the rules of science, not just putting out a shingle or calling yourself a scientist.
Think how many put out shingles or call themselves truth-tellers when they're lying through their teeth.
So, pure science, by and large, It has not been affected in the way we're talking about here.
But there are reports.
Whole departments, I think, biochemistry at Harvard was bought up and funded by a big pharmaceutical firm.
So it can happen, too, and can be difficult to sort out.
So this was simply excellent.
She's right across the board.
I endorse it.
Everything she had to say here, Gary, and I'm delighted to have her back.
All right.
Here we go.
Talking about science, Dr. Fetzer.
When I saw this video, I thought about you.
Science versus scientism.
Definition of science.
Science is the pursuit and application of knowledge and understanding of the natural and social world following a systematic methodology based on evidence.
Science is a matter of inquiry, and the knowledge acquired through that inquiry.
The scientific method involves hypothesizing, experimenting, observing, presenting proof, and drawing conclusions.
The basis to the method of science is that no theory is ever considered final.
All theories are subject to scrutiny and re-examination, and it is assumed that all theories will eventually be proven false by a more comprehensive theory.
Definition of Scientism Scientism is the ideology of science.
The term scientism generally points to the cosmetic application of science in unwarranted situations not amenable to application of the scientific method or similar scientific standards.
"The world" Scientism is the belief that the methods of science are superior to any and all other methods of determining the truth.
Science believes things because they have been observed to be true.
Scientism believes things because science says they are true and is therefore merely based on personal belief.
Scientism is a largely unrecognized epistemology the investigation of what distinguishes justified belief from opinion that developed as a result of the successes of science and it is necessary to make a distinction between science and scientism.
Many of us are guilty of scientism in one way or another because often when we hear about something that hasn't been scientifically proven we believe it to be true.
It looks an awful lot like Justin Trudeau to me, Gary.
I mean, it's kind of babble.
Basically, everything he was saying is correct.
Scientism is turning science into a religion, as it were.
But, of course, unlike religions and theological beliefs, science is based on observation, experiment, and measurement.
The stages of scientific method is an area of my expertise.
I break it down into puzzlement.
Something doesn't fit into our background knowledge, so we're motivated to sort it out.
Speculation.
What are the possible alternative explanations that might apply here?
Alex Jones, by the way, is very good at those first two stages.
The third is adaptation.
Which hypothesis, if it were true?
And you can just make it up.
Doesn't have to be inspired by any particular source.
What hypothesis, if it were to, would confer the highest probability upon the available evidence?
I mean, a simple case I've used is finding a body and it has bruises on the neck, but no stab wounds or gunshot holes.
And you ask, well, what's the probability?
This was...
This death was caused by a gunshot when there were gunshot holes about zero, right?
No knife wounds, obviously not caused by knife wound bruises around the neck, potential strangulation.
Now, it's important to get additional confirming evidence.
So we get an autopsy report that says, actually, the victim died from poisoning.
So there you have a nice illustration.
Of a scientific method, you look at the probabilities of relative, obviously strangulation at a higher probability because bruising on the neck than knife or gun, since there were no knife wounds or gunshot residue.
So finally then, as has been emphasized in this little piece, all scientific conclusions, and you're entitled To accept the best-supported hypothesis, the one that converts the highest probability on the available evidence when the evidence has settled down, in the tentative and fallible fashion of science.
Tentative in the sense that when you acquire additional evidence or alternative hypothesis, you may have to reject hypotheses you previously accepted to accept hypotheses.
You previously rejected and leave others in suspense.
Fallible, even the best supported theory in science, classical Newtonian physics, thought to be a veritable certain truth for 200 years, turned out to be a limiting case of a broader theory, Einsteinian relativity, and therefore did not possess the absolute True status that heretofore had been assumed.
So this was a very nice little piece.
I liked it.
And differentiating science from scientism, totally appropriate.
Well done.
All right.
Dr. Fetzer, so if you're not feeling up to do, you can have more brains with one half of your brain tied behind your back after that response.
That was really good.
All right.
On to the next one.
Nations, democracies don't go to war easily.
And they usually debate and argue before they do.
Sometimes they have to be bombed into going to war.
In fact, that's what happened in World War II. All of Europe had been conquered.
You had to...
Americans actually bombed in Pearl Harbor.
And that was a pivotal event that opened the eyes of Americans.
And once their eyes were opened, they gathered the power that is available in this great free nation.
And the result was preordained.
I think in a similar way, the bombing of September 11th opened the eyes of Americans to see the great conflict and the great danger that faces us.
And once opened, then the overpowering will of the majority of people of the United States, of the steamroller, is inexorably moving to decide the battle.
Zarif is lying again.
Iran is the one that openly threatens every day to destroy the State of Israel.
Iran continues to entrench itself militarily in Syria, and today the IAA reports that Iran is accelerating its nuclear program.
Okay, Dr. Fetzer.
Well, you're witnessing one of the slickest liars ever on the face of Earth, Benjamin Netanyahu, who is part of the Brain Trust.
He had an Ehud Ulmer, both of whom served as prime ministers of Israel, decided that 9-11 would be the way to go to induce the United States to come into the Middle East and take out the modern Arab states.
That served as a counterbalance to Israel's domination of the entire region.
We had David Ray Griffin with his wonderful book.
The new Pearl Harbor, talking about 9-11 and the analogies and so forth.
He never got around to the Israeli roots of the offense.
That fell to me and others.
Christopher Bolin has been excellent on the politics of 9-11.
I highly recommend, but not so strong on the physics, the science.
So I encourage everyone to pursue all this.
I have a book.
Entitled, America Nuked on 9-11, because it turns out that the destruction of the Twin Towers was not a matter of collapse, but it was a matter of mini-nukes in this basement.
Now, the building was designed as a tube within a tube, and the destruction went from the bottom up for the inner tube and then blew apart the outer tube from the top down.
Notice, in a collapse, all the floors come down at the same time.
None of the floors at the Twin Towers bodged.
They were all waiting their turn to be, you know, turn to kingdom come, in the memorable phrase of Morgan Reynolds.
The building were converted in millions of cubic yards of very fine dust.
When it was all done, there was no pile of debris.
What you have with the classic controlled demolition, a collapse.
You have a pile of debris equal to 12% of the original height.
That's with building seven.
Wasn't it by any point?
It was brought down by controlled demolition.
And it was 47 floors originally.
Well, 12% of 47 is 5 1⁄2.
And when it was done, it was 5 1⁄2 floors of debris there.
With regard to the 110-story Twin Towers, that would have been...
Thirteen and a half floors at least, but it wasn't there.
Father Frank Morales was on my radio show twice.
We'd been a first responder from St. Mark's Episcopal Church in the vicinity and emphasized both times.
The buildings were destroyed to or even below ground level.
Impossible had they collapsed.
And in fact, if you look at some of the spectacular photographs, you see...
Just blowing apart in every direction.
It's simply overwhelming.
And confirmed by the U.S. Geological Survey that it studies the 35 samples of dust from lower Manhattan found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event, including some that only exist in radioactive form.
So when you see this man...
Make all these statements, just realize he's a humongous liar.
He's a manipulator.
He's treating America as a resource to be utilized for the benefit of Israel, and he doesn't give a damn about any of us.
In fact, in 2020, it was overheard speaking in Hebrew, but it was caught in translated.
St. America is the golden calf.
We're going to suck it dry and chop it into pieces and leave it as the world's largest welfare state because that's what we do with nations we hate.
Now, in that case, he was being sincere and speaking his honest opinion.
He wants us now to go and attack Iran, which is the greatest peace-loving nation in the world today.
Hasn't lost a war of aggression against any other states since 1775. And I tell you, if this happens, it's going to be a calamity of unimaginable proportions.
Russia and China will come to the aid of Iran, which is already a very strong country, very large in the area, I think around 70 times the area of Israel.
And if war breaks out between Israel and Iran, don't expect Israel to turn out as a survivor.
I predict if war breaks out, Israel will be decimated.
And it's fallen into the hands of the wrong leadership.
The question becomes, where does the United States stand?
Have we likewise?
Falling into the hands of the wrong leadership, most certainly.
The guy we got is overwhelmingly better than the nitwit we did not, that we rejected.
I'm very concerned when he's appointed 100% Zionist, 60% Jews, to his principal positions in the new administration.
We shall see.
But we cannot take anything for granted.
I agree with that.
I'm not expecting much.
Alright, this is titled Lucky Larry and there's a few things at the beginning of this clip that I didn't know about.
I've got nothing to do today but smile and all the dark and all the dark and here I am.
Here I am.
I had the pleasure of working pretty much with every Prime Minister of Israel from Yitzhak Shamia forward.
Thank you.
I said to myself, wouldn't it be fantastic if I could hold the train towers?
We got very, very lucky.
The governor.
George Pataki decided one day that maybe it would be good to privatize the ownership of the World Trade Center.
So I got a call from the governor's office and they said, would you ever consider owning the World Trade Center?
Good for the family.
Very good for us.
And we're very, very fortunate.
On the morning of 9-11, I'm getting ready, getting dressed, to go to the dermatologist.
Light colored hair, light skin.
The sun is a disaster for me.
I can't take the sun.
She said, okay, but you're going to the dermatologist, you're going this morning, and you're not going downtown.
We got very, very lucky.
I had an obligation to collect the insurance proceeds from the policies.
A new governor was just elected, Elliot Spitzer, an old friend who I knew well.
I said, Elliot, if you don't help me, I'll never collect from the insurance companies.
And guess what?
He listened and he said, you know what?
You're entitled.
I'm going to get you the money.
And in six months, he got me the four and a half billion dollars.
We got very, very lucky.
The four and a half billion dollars.
We got very, very lucky.
The Zionist Jewish owners of the World Trade Center and their connections to Israel as well and their intimate connections with the upper echelons of the Israeli establishment.
We have Larry Silverstein, who mysteriously just decided to purchase a 99-year lease on the World Trade Center four or five weeks before the attacks, taking out a massive insurance policy.
And wasn't he personal friends with Benjamin Netanyahu?
Yes.
Very, very close, actually.
Benjamin Netanyahu and Larry Silverstein would speak on the phone every Sunday afternoon, regardless of where they were in the world.
Every Sunday afternoon at a certain time, Netanyahu and Silverstein would have a conference on the telephone.
And this was all done.
This was all part of the preplanning, getting the ducks in a row, getting the stage set.
And also, what should be mentioned is that Silverstein allegedly skipped a business meeting, a routine business meeting, on 9-11, and Miraxley survived, and as did his two children, who also worked in the Trade Center.
None of them showed up for work on 9-11.
Quite a coincidence.
So I wrote a book in 1995, and I said that if the West doesn't wake up to the suicidal nature of militant Islam, the next thing you'll see is that the militant Islam is bringing down the World Trade Center.
The next thing you'll see, In his 2000 book, The America We Deserve, Trump wrote...
I really am convinced we're in danger of the sort of terrorist attacks that will make the bombing of the 1993 Trade Center look like little kids playing with firecrackers.
Trump also mentioned the mastermind of the attack, writing, quote, A new enemy and a new crisis.
The alliance between Israel and America has always been extremely strong.
It's about to get even stronger.
President Trump and I see eye to eye on the dangers emanating from the region, but also on the opportunities.
I remember getting a call from the fire department commander telling me that they were not sure they were going to be able to contain the fire.
I said, you know, we've had such terrible loss of life.
Maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.
And they made that decision to pull, and then we watched the building collapse.
I see what's happening down there is a mess, and the developer is actually a friend of mine, but he didn't want to build this building either.
If you look back at the records, I mean, when it was first...
Foisted upon him.
Larry Silverstein is a great guy.
He's a good guy.
He's a friend of mine.
Benjamin Netanyahu has publicly said the September 11th attacks have been good for Israel.
Netanyahu said, quote, "We're benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the twin powers in Pentagon and the American struggle in Iraq." It's just imagination, relax.
Everything's the same back.
In my little town, I don't have...
Okay, Dagny Fentzner.
Yeah, it was Jewish Zionists at World Trade Center who arranged for the World Trade Center to become private property just six weeks before the event.
Silverstein renegotiated the contract insurance policy, fired the security team that had been looking after the center since it opened in 1970. Included a terrorist clause and then claimed double indemnity because of two blades and two attacks.
This whole thing was orchestrated with Bibi Netanyahu and Ehud Ulmert, have no doubt about it.
If you want to see a video where I document the whole thing, go to BitChuteChannel Jim Vetser 9-11 special in...
Memory of Robert David Steele.
Put in something like that.
You'll find it'll pop up.
But this was all orchestrated.
He didn't have a terminological appointment.
He and his daughter always had breakfast at the Windows on the World, a restaurant atop the North Tower, but not on 9-11.
And he made, as the report accurately stated, $4.5 billion in insurance payout on a $114 million investment.
They don't call this guy Lucky Larry for nothing.
I agree.
Okay, now this is what we get with our boy, Phoebe.
I am a nurse, and I belong at the bedside right now, actually.
I'm supposed to be at work.
But here I am for the 27th time to tell you about the honor and privilege as well as the heartbreak of serving as a medical mission nurse in Gaza about 10 months ago.
As a nurse, I took an oath to stand by those in need.
But what I witnessed in Gaza wasn't just a humanitarian crisis, and it wasn't a war.
It was genocide.
I witnessed the repercussions of 85,000 tons of bombs dropped.
On a population of two million people the size of Washington, D.C. I stood among a sea of hundreds of thousands of homeless civilians.
I saw families that were shredded apart and a landscape reduced to rubble.
This is all part of a calculated campaign to erase a people.
Israel has murdered a quarter of a million people within a year.
I do want to say as a witness to Gaza's destruction, the most important voices and testimonies should be from the people of Gaza.
They should be the ones standing here to speak their truth.
But their voices have been silenced through bombs, through blockades, through oppression, through propaganda, through media bans.
So now it's become my moral obligation to speak on their behalf as a witness.
Today, there are zero.
Fully functioning hospitals available in Gaza.
Zero.
Every single hospital has been bombed or cut off from supplies or electricity.
I treated patients who arrived in relentless waves, many too far gone to save.
And it wasn't because we lacked skill or compassion, but it was because of the level of violence combined with Israel's blockade on aid that collapsed the infrastructure of the health care system there.
Doctors and nurses were forced to make difficult decisions, choosing which lives to save and which to let go, not because they lack the will, but because the world allows Israel's inhumane blockade and bombardment to continue.
Hospitals already under siege were running on fumes.
No supplies, no electricity, no medicine, little to no staff, barely even having the space to breathe, let alone bury their dead.
Israel has deliberately killed over a thousand health care workers.
Some were even raped and tortured to death.
This Holocaust is being live-streamed in real-time online, and the Israeli forces have no shame in boasting about it on TikTok.
Yet the world remains silent.
Despite the horror and devastation I've witnessed, I've also witnessed an unbreakable resilience and humanity.
The people of Gaza held on to their humanity with a strength that humbled me.
I worked alongside healthcare heroes who continued to save lives even after losing their own spouses, children, siblings, parents in a single airstrike.
And while grieving their own losses, they continued to show up every day, determined to save one life even if that meant costing them their own.
Exhausted doctors and nurses, also victims of genocide, consistently offered me their last scraps of food in the midst of famine.
I've never met a more selfless and generous group of people.
But let me be clear.
The resilience does not absolve us from taking action.
This is not just about Gaza.
It's also about the silence that threatens all of us.
What is happening in Gaza isn't just a tragedy for Palestinians.
It is a threat and a warning to all of us.
It is a litmus test.
What we allow to happen there gives Israel and any other oppressor encouraged by our silence the green light to carry out similar atrocities elsewhere.
I cannot unsee what I saw.
And you should not unhear what I'm telling you guys.
To my fellow healthcare workers who remain silent in the face of this Holocaust, where's your humanity?
How can you turn away while an entire population is denied the right to life?
You took the same oath that I took to preserve life and to do no harm.
But your silence betrays that oath.
Silence in the face of genocide is complicity.
The world must not look away as Gaza bleeds.
This is not just Gaza spite.
It is the world's spite.
The time to act was a year ago.
The future will judge us by how we respond to this moment.
So be the one to stand up and not stand by.
Demand a ceasefire now.
Demand justice now.
Because if we fail Gaza, we fail humanity.
That was about as fine a statement as I've ever heard.
And she's wonderful.
She's showing great strength, integrity, intelligence, honesty.
She's putting her own life at risk, let me tell you.
The Israelis don't treat their critics kindly.
I'm very, very impressed.
Of course, the International Court of Justice has found that Israel does not have a legal right to exist and that there's overwhelming evidence it's committing genocide.
The International Criminal Court has issued Arrest warrants for Bibi Netanyahu and Gallant, Minister of Defense.
Totally appropriate.
In over a hundred countries, they'll be arrested if they land on their soil.
I think that was just magnificent, Gary.
My heart goes out to her and to every Palestinian I have said before and I say again today.
We are all Palestinians.
Lighten it up a little bit.
Compared to that.
Okay.
There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better.
What to do about mass unemployment?
This is going to be a massive social challenge.
And I think, ultimately, we will have to have some kind of universal basic income.
I don't think we're going to have a choice.
Universal basic income?
Universal basic income.
I think it's going to be necessary.
So it means that unemployed people will be paid across the globe?
Yeah.
Because there is no job?
Machine, robot is taking over?
That's simply the...
And I want to be clear that these are not...
Things that I think that I wish would happen, these are simply things that I think probably will happen.
And if my assessment is correct and they probably will happen, then we need to say, what are we going to do about it?
And I think some kind of a universal basic income is going to be necessary.
Now, the output of goods and services will be extremely high.
So with automation, There will come abundance.
almost everything will get very cheap.
So I think we'll just end up doing a universal basic income that's going to be necessary for the sake of the income.
The harder challenge, much harder challenge, is how do people then have meaning?
Like a lot of people...
They derive their meaning from their employment.
So if you're not needed, if there's not a need for your labor, what's the meaning?
Do you have meaning?
Do you feel useless?
That's a much harder problem to deal with.
Well, I think there are lots of jobs that robots aren't going to be able to do better than human beings.
In education, robotic teachers are an absurdity.
In the law, you can't have the law administered by robots.
What are you going to have, a jury full of robots?
You're going to have a judge who's a robot?
Medicine.
You got to make such subtle judgments in medicine, yes.
There may be some...
Routinized forms of medicine that can be handled by robotic treatment, but I think we're going to need doctors and nurses regardless throughout eternity.
Those are three samples.
But you ought to ask yourself, is efficiency the most important value for humanity?
He's talking about Automating production systems, I grant you that that is something that can happen, has happened, is going to continue to happen.
That's merely producing objects, things like automobiles or tractors or maybe cereals, you know, cans of beets.
I mean, the things that, yeah, can be automated, a lot of them already are, but I do not see that the robotic society is giving meaning to human lives.
So I think he's really talking about an important question here, but I'm not at all sure he's got the right answer.
I mean, universal income, you know, basic income.
There have been others who've advocated that idea, and I'm not sure I oppose that.
But human achievement, competition, excellence, these give meaning to life.
And the future Elon Musk is addressing seems to me to be largely devoid.
Thereof, sad to say.
So I'm not enthralled, but I do think it's appropriate he's talking about these issues.
I don't think he has thought it through, but I think he's initiating a conversation that must be had.
All right, you just mentioned the word excellence, so let's let Candace talk about excellence a little bit.
What is Candace Owen's definition of black excellence?
I think black excellence would just be excellence, period.
Because I always try to say the reason why we should remove ourselves from saying white excellence, black excellence, is because I've realized that there's been a power in people trying to segregate our minds in that way.
You know, excellence to me, I think, is independence.
I think it starts with independence of thought, like actually challenging yourself and challenging your beliefs and constantly reexamining them, not thinking that you have it figured out.
But I think that once we achieve higher education levels, and I'm talking about black people in mathematics, black literacy rate jumping to what it should be, which should be 100%, if we're being honest, if you're sending somebody through the public education system, then we will start to see necessarily.
Black people achieving more in our society.
So I just personally think that we should be focusing on the Black literacy rates, full stop, and also creating our own companies, you know what I mean?
And not having our voices controlled.
I think Candace is one of the most important contributors to contemporary affairs.
And she's absolutely right.
It's not black excellence.
It's excellence.
Cuts across all the races.
You can have excellence in sports, in specific disciplines, excellent in football, basketball, hockey.
The Badgers have the number one women's hockey team right now.
I love it, Gary.
I love to see women excelling in sports, and Trump is going to get men out, which is a very important...
Turn of events, given the Democrat perversion of women's sports for God knows what unholy reasons have driven them.
Candace is wonderful.
I think she's among the most thoughtful and contemporary individuals to address these issues.
I think she got it exactly right.
All right, I think you're a sidekick, Dr. Fetcher.
Elizabeth Gibson, Miss Oklahoma City 2025. Just what did that mean to you?
What was winning like?
And just talk to us a little bit about that.
So winning Miss Oklahoma City was actually a really big deal for me.
I'm a third-generation Miss Oklahoma contestant.
My mom competed, my grandma competed, my aunt competed, and I'm actually the first legacy competitor to win Miss Oklahoma City.
There's never been, in a hundred years, there's never been a mom and daughter duo before.
And I've been in the Miss America organization for the last six years, and I grew up watching it, and getting to win the Miss Oklahoma City title, something that I've worked so hard for, was...
Such a blessing and I have such a great board of people behind me that is supporting me and getting me ready for Miss Oklahoma in June and then hopefully Miss America next year.
Now we've seen throughout the world here we've seen some men beginning to enter into women's pageants.
Just what are your thoughts on that as Miss Oklahoma City 2025 and somebody who's aspiring to be Miss Oklahoma and Miss America?
You know the Miss America organization is such a historic organization.
It's been around for a long time.
And, you know, it's always been about supporting and uplifting women.
And because it provides so many opportunities for women, even past winning whatever title it is from a local state or national level, it opens doors past winning the crown.
And when you have opportunities for people outside of the competition that fit them better, specifically with men, there's no need for them to feel like they need to come in and compete in a competition that's primarily made to uplift women.
And historically, we always had something in our rules that said that you had to be born female to compete.
Until recently, until all of the things that have been happening in our world have changed that.
And I just think that there's other opportunities.
Outside for people and we should leave it how it is.
And one thing I do want to follow up on, I know it's a difficult topic, but...
So we hear so much about transgender men in women's bathrooms.
I wonder if it goes to another level at a beauty pageant or a beauty contest with what goes on behind the scenes.
Well, I've never actually...
I haven't competed against a biological male in a pageant before.
I have, however, competed in figure skating against a transgender athlete.
And I was beat by.025.
And someone that is not a naturally born female that is transitioning and trying to compete against a woman, they're going to have different muscle mass, they're going to have different skills that no matter how hard I try, I can't have.
And it was very evident when I was competing, and especially in those scores, that no matter how hard I was trying, I was trying my very hardest, that we're just different.
It wasn't fair.
And I was just going to ask that.
We're seeing that across, you know, different industries and, you know, whether collegiate swimming, other industries, it's not fair, is it?
Yeah.
Another thing I want to transition to here, Elizabeth, I know you work in film production.
Yeah.
So I want to ask just how important is it to build up a ecosystem outside of mainstream Hollywood to kind of produce things without the traditional gatekeepers that...
Yeah, Dr. Pescher, that's what I wanted you to see on that one.
Yeah, yeah.
Well, she's very intelligent.
She's poised.
She speaks in a very straightforward fashion, and she's got it right.
Men competing in women's sports is not fair.
The biological differences are enormous.
No matter how hard she might try, she would never have the muscle mass or strength or this skating ability of a man.
Because she's a woman.
So I'm hopeful that with the Donald in office, we're going to get rid of all this utter nonsense, which I despise.
I was so thrilled when women's sports attained a status of funding from the government to make an independent amends.
It was wonderful.
I was overjoyed.
And that the Democrats have taken us in this bizarre direction.
If they want to have tranny sports, okay, have a tranny sports competition.
But make it separate and apart from men's competition, men's sports, and women's competition, and girls' sports.
Do your own tranny thing, but keep them the hell out of men and women's sports.
Just a disgrace.
And I blame the Democrats for this nonsense.
It's ridiculous beyond words.
All right.
This has been in the news quite a bit.
The H-1B very well, and it's something that I frankly use and I shouldn't be allowed to use.
We shouldn't have it.
Very, very bad for workers.
And second of all, I think it's very important to say, well, I'm a businessman and I have to do what I have to do.
And it's sitting there waiting for you.
But it's very bad.
It's very bad for business in terms of it's very bad for our workers and it's unfair for our workers.
And we should end it.
OK.
And I'm hoping he will end it.
But Elon Musk is promoting it.
And we'll see what happens in this battle of two titans.
Trump is absolutely right.
It's wrong.
But if it's legal as a businessman, he's going to exploit it because it gives him cheaper, high-quality IT labor.
Musk, I think, just wants to make profits right and left.
Unkind things, inappropriate things about American workers that I think they did not deserve.
And I think Musk standing with the public is going to diminish because of this issue where he, in my opinion, is on the wrong side.
Let's hope Trump carries through.
Get rid of it.
100%.
Go, Donald.
Do it.
But if he doesn't, hold him to account.
Yes, indeed.
All right, I call this one Space Folly.
Take a second to honestly observe the following picture and tell me what this looks like to you.
If you said a bunch of cardboard, construction paper, curtain rods, gold tape, and foil, you would be correct.
If instead you said, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's highest technological achievement, incapable of being reproduced today, the Apollo 11 lunar lander, then you would also be correct.
Most unbiased viewers would assume your average high school art class could construct this contraption without much struggle.
But official NASA spokesman and astronaut Don Pettit Assures us that actually this nineteen sixty nine technology is so advanced that even with their multi-billion dollar yearly budget, they cannot for the life of them recreate it now.
I go back to the moon in a nanosecond, Don informs us, but NASA destroyed that technology and it's a painful process to build it back again.
Firstly, why on Earth would NASA destroy the original Apollo lunar landers?
The historic first crafts that landed men on the moon?
The supposed most incredible achievements of mankind?
And they irreparably destroyed them so that they could not be replicated even after fifty years?
Could it be because they didn't want future generations able to visit museums and see these laughable nineteen sixties attempts at high-tech looking space vehicles?
And what other 1960s technology is so advanced and expensive that it cannot be recreated easily and far better now than way back then?
Let's take a closer look at this 1960s spaceship and see what else we can notice.
For example, look at the paneling here, on the side of the craft.
If someone sheetrocked your house looking like this, you would be entitled to a full refund.
Yet, With supposedly the best engineers and scientists in the world on the job, this is the kind of craftsmanship NASA provides?
Look at the flimsy, haphazard, and careless construction materials and methods used.
Look at the buckling, warping, and indentations showing how thin the paneling is.
What is this thing?
A Twinkie?
No, I'm sure it's some super-important and necessary high-tech device.
Here there are press stubs, and here also has press stubs.
But here, and here, they must have run out so they used gold foil instead.
And then over here they must have run out of gold foil, because they didn't bother with either.
Look over here, at the evenly spaced lines of gold foil going down the legs, until you get to this point, where there is three lines right close together.
It must be important because it's the connection point to the other crossbars, right?
Let's look at another leg.
Oh, no.
On this one, they are all evenly spaced the whole way down.
No three lines near the crossbar.
Apollo 11 mission controller Harold Loden was quoted saying, The skin on the crew cabin was very thin, and that was all done because of weight saving.
If you really took your finger and poked hard at it, you could poke right through the outer skin of the spacecraft.
It was about the thickness of two layers of aluminum foil.
Project Manager Thomas Kelly concurred noting that the skin, the aluminum alloy skin of the crew compartment, was about twelve one-thousandths of an inch thick, equivalent to about three layers of Reynolds wrap that you would use in the kitchen.
Apollo astronaut Jim Lovell said, Whenever I saw a model of the lunar module, it had these rigid sides and looked really strong.
Turns out, That external portions of the lunar module are actually made up of mylar and cellophane, and it's put together with scotch tape and staples.
We had to have pads on the floor, because if you dropped a screwdriver, it would go through the floor.
Apollo astronaut Gus Grissom even famously hung a lemon on the lunar lander just weeks before the mission started.
The dictionary describes lemon being a word used to describe things, especially automobiles, regarded as unsatisfactory, disappointing, or feeble.
The lunar lander was never even once tested on Earth, landing here from any altitude, before supposedly going and successfully landing on the Moon.
There, this pathetic cardboard and tinfoil construction allegedly fell from lunar orbit at four thousand miles per hour, then used retro thrusters to slow it down, and safely landed without a hitch on the lunar surface.
When the astronauts did practice in other training vehicles, three out of five of them crashed, and you can see here how difficult they were to control, even in broad daylight, on Earth, in optimal conditions.
The idea that the actual lunar lander was never once tested on Earth, but then made a perfect landing on the Moon, is one small step for lying Freemasons, and one giant leap for brainwashed mankind.
This is a seven thousand five hundred pound thruster.
Look how powerful this is, how big, how much dust it kicks up, and the light it creates.
The lunar lander's thruster was even bigger.
At 10,000 pounds, and somehow didn't kick up any dust, left no blast crater under the craft, and not a grain of sand on the landing pads, as if it was gently placed down by a crane in a studio.
Here we see the lunar lander redocking with the command module.
This is clearly fake, and made with props, models, and footage similar to the Hollywood creations of the day.
Such as Stanley Kubrick's 2001 Space Odyssey, created in 1968, the year before the first supposed moon landing.
Look at the jerky, unrealistic motions and lack of thrusters being used.
The craft is just being turned like a Rubik's Cube somehow, all of this supposedly happening as they both orbit the moon at 4,000 miles per hour.
Since many people can't believe this is genuine footage, Let me assure you, this is actual, official NASA footage of the Apollo 11 redocking.
And this is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to moon landing hoax evidence.
If you still believe man has actually walked on the moon, and rovers are rolling around on Mars, please do me, yourself, and the rest of humanity a favor, and watch my following presentation, link in the description box, the NASA, Moon, and Mars landing hoaxes.
It's like Santa Claus for adults.
I love that.
Yeah, yeah.
It happened that when Catherine Norton was delayed in joining for the Volkswagen Conspiracies conference, I had a backup, a piece on the moon landing hoax that I plugged in that you can find for the Volkswagen Conspiracies 2024 programs.
They're all on my bitch-you channel, Jim Petzer.
And if you go to my blog at jameshfetzer.org, if you go to jimtheconspiracyguy.com, the 65 shows, I believe the second already is the moon landing hoax, how we know we didn't go.
There's a mountain of proof here.
This was very nice, very well done.
There are simply hundreds of additional points that drive home.
This was...
One of the most elaborate scams in the history of mankind.
The whole world was played.
And it's time to bring the curtain down on this elaborate masquerade.
I agree.
Here's our final clip.
We're going to give you a little something extra because we're just about to hit the hour mark.
Thirty-ninth U.S. President James Jimmy Carter passed away at the age of a hundred in his home in Plains, Georgia, late Sunday.
He was the longest-living president in American history.
The former U.S. leader had fought an aggressive form of melanoma skin cancer and spent the last year and a half at home under hospice care.
Born on October 1, 1924 in Plains, Georgia, Carter graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy, moving from warship duties to later serve as an engineer officer on a submarine.
He was elected governor of Georgia in 1971 and eventually became the American president from 1977 to 1981. During his term, Carter initially sought a policy of detente with the Soviet Union, aiming to break the geopolitical tensions of the Cold War.
In June 1979, he and Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev signed the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks 2 Agreement, which aimed to curtail the arms race between the two superpowers of the world.
The treaty ceremony was cemented by the two leaders' infamous kiss on the cheek.
However, soon after, relations cracked.
The SALT II Treaty faced obstacles in the U.S. Senate and was never ratified, but both nations agreed to respect the terms.
Then tensions started to escalate following the Soviet deployment of troops in Afghanistan at the end of 1979 when Kabul requested military assistance.
Carter saw the Soviets in Afghanistan as a threat to American interests in the region.
This invasion is an extremely serious threat to peace.
Because of the threat of further Soviet expansion into neighboring countries in Southwest Asia, and also because such an aggressive military policy is unsettling to other peoples throughout the world.
If the Soviets are encouraged in this invasion by eventual success, and if they maintain their dominance over Afghanistan, and then extend their control to adjacent countries...
The stable, strategic and peaceful balance of the entire world will be changed.
This would threaten the security of all nations, including, of course, the United States.
Carter authorized the CIA to secretly train and arm the anti-Sylvia Islamist Mujahideen fighters.
The covert aid contributed to the eventual withdrawal of Soviet troops and the rise of the Taliban.
That legacy gave rise to a fractured Afghan state, which years later saw the U.S. invade in 2001 as America launched its self-titled War on Terror, only to withdraw, humiliated two decades later.
His administration imposed sanctions against the USSR and initiated a widely adopted boycott of the 1980 Summer Olympics in Moscow.
Neither I nor the American people would support the sending of an American team to Moscow with Soviet invasion troops in Afghanistan if the Soviets do not withdraw their troops immediately from Afghanistan within a month.
I would not support the sending of an American team to the Olympics.
In the end, the Olympic boycott, which killed the dreams of many athletes across the world, did not achieve any of its goals.
The Soviet Union did not pull its troops out of Afghanistan for another nine years, and despite all the posturing, it made Carter look as a weak president.
The Middle East still sees the effects of his policies.
The former U.S. president brokered the 1978 Camp David Accords between Israel and Egypt, which became the first case of an Arab nation officially recognizing the Jewish state.
It was one of the deals which promoted Israel as America's main ally in the region, essentially giving it carte blanche to act lawlessly with its neighbors, Palestine, Lebanon and Syria.
Jimmy Carter's last year in office was marred by the hostage crisis in Iran, where supporters of the Islamic Revolution held 52 American diplomats, servicemen, CIA operatives and others captive for 444 days.
The hostages were released in January 1981, the same day Ronald Reagan was sworn in as the next U.S. President.
After his term in office, Carter dedicated himself to what he called humanitarian efforts, founding the Carter Center in 1982. Two decades later, he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his humanitarian work.
Carter dedicated a good part of his time post-presidency to helping people with affordable housing.
His project, Habitat for Humanity, is an annual building blitz that over the decades has seen over 100,000 volunteers build homes for thousands across the U.S. and over a dozen nations in the world.
However, his Carter Center is mainly focused on election monitoring and promoting U.S.-style democracy.
But the organization's work didn't always help Washington expand its influence.
Multiple countries around the globe, such as the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Miramar, saw power changes that shifted from the West as they strive for their own independent policies.
Jimmy Carter also stayed involved in domestic policy and supported his Democratic Party.
He criticized President Donald Trump during his first term.
Carter called Trump illegitimate and was sure Russians were involved in the election process, which was later proved to be a hoax perpetrated by the Democrats.
His main contention was that the MAGA leader admitted Washington's mistake of trying to push Western-style democracies around the globe.
The president made this clear in his inaugural address.
I was there when he said that no longer will we try to force American standards on other countries.
And I assume that that meant the standards of peace and human rights and freedom and justice and that sort of thing.
So our standards that we've always claimed to be American standards are really the implementation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Over a century ago he was born, and now Jimmy Carter may rest in peace.
He's left behind a political life, a civilian legacy that now stands in the history books.
Be it good or bad?
Well, that's left to interpretation, depending on how you look at it.
All right, Dr. Fetcher.
Well, he was a better president than Gerald Ford or W. Bush or, God forbid, Joe Biden.
I want Jimmy Carter to rest in peace.
He did his best.
And like the rest of us, he had his own limitations, but I think on the whole...
We made efforts for the good of humanity.
The only fault I find there is not observing that when the Iranians took the American embassy, it was regaining control of the country that had been stolen from them by the CIA during a coup engineered in 1952 when they overthrew the democratically elected government of Iran and installed the Shah, who instituted a reign of terror upon the Iranian people.
Other than that, it was a very accurate and appropriate assessment of what Jimmy Carter contributed to America and to the world.
All right.
Okay, Dr. Fetzer, appreciate you being on the show once again.
And if you were not 100% sharp, I never would have known it.
So, all right.
We'll see you next week.
▲
Export Selection