All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 17, 2024 - Jim Fetzer
59:33
JAMES FETZER, PhD - A Global Jewish Conspiracy: Racism or Reality? The Case of Rabbi Schneerson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome back to False Flags and Conspiracies Conference 2024. Our next speaker is Jim Fetzer, and I don't even know what to say to introduce Jim.
I've known him since ConspiracyCon days back, and I think I met him in 2009 or 2010, so it's been a little while we've known each other, and We've been through a lot of things together.
I've produced conferences for him.
I've recorded him in hotel rooms with other people for my radio show at the Conspiracy Con.
Gosh, we've done JFK together in San Francisco too, haven't we, Jim?
Santa Barbara, I think, actually.
No, actually, 2012, the 49th, we were in San Francisco.
You invited me to come down there and do radio.
With St. John Hunt, for example.
And Judith Ferry Baker and Chris Milligan from Trine Day Books.
Yeah, it was quite extraordinary.
And you played...
You know, I got to tell you guys a quick story.
Jim invites me to come do this, and I'm like his last choice on the list, of course.
And I'm not doing anything on Thanksgiving.
And so I show up in San Francisco, and they're playing the JFK movie.
And I thought to myself, no one's going to show up.
What did you have?
Over 150 people there?
I was shocked.
Yeah, yeah.
Well, it was a great occasion because I was given a critique of what Oliver Stone got right and got wrong.
Yes!
Yeah, it was fascinating.
It was a lovely event and I'm so happy to have, you know, kept knowing you over these years.
And every year Jim calls me and has me do something for him, you guys.
So here we are again for False Flags and Conspiracy Con 2024. So Jim, you take it away.
Thank you, Lorien, and it's always been a joy to have your assistance.
I couldn't do it without you, girl.
That's how I would put it today.
Thank you.
Virtually everybody knows I've been a very big fan of Donald Trump, virtually from the beginning when he came down the escalator at Trump Hotel.
But I've been, you know, especially in relation to running against This woman who's completely unqualified and utter nitwit and her buddy who is so woke.
I mean, it was really no contest because you had one of the most charismatic, capable campaigners of all time against A nonentity who has no qualification, never even received a single vote for president.
So, in my opinion, I was all in for Trump.
Now that he's there, and this was something I was always concerned about, We have to look at, just as Stephanie was emphasizing, his enthusiasm for Israel.
How serious is it and why does it matter?
That's basically what I'm going to address here and now.
Why does it matter?
You have a title, A Global Jewish Conspiracy?
Racism or Reality?
The Case of Rabbi Schneerson.
I was contacted by a fan of the show who went after me for not talking about Rabbi Schneerson very much as Morgan Reynolds and Judy Woods had gone after me when I founded Scholars for 9-11 Truth because they hadn't looked at the planes, the question about the planes.
And when I finally got around to looking at the planes, I was dumbfounded because they were performing aeronautically and physically impossible feats.
And that led to the undertaking rather extensive of the flimflammery regarding the planes, two of which were not even in the air that day, the other two of which were still in the air four years later.
That's a story for another day, but you can find it on my Bits U channel by my 9-11 special.
Which was dedicated to Robert David Steele.
Here today, I want to look at this question of the Zionist aspect.
I begin with a very significant piece by Chuck Baldwin.
Trump picks a war cabinet.
The Trump toadies are convinced that Donald Trump is going to drain the swamp and make America great again during his upcoming second term as president are delusional.
He did neither during his first term and he will do neither during his second.
One will only look at Trump's appointments at the senior executive leadership level, who will direct his administration to know that Trump is nothing more than more of the same, especially in matters relating to foreign policy, which is one specific area where a president can single-handedly do the most damage.
I've already warned readers about Trump's appointments of the uber-Zionist warmongers, Marco Rubio, Secretary of State Kristi Noem, Homeland Security Mike Walsh, National Security Advisor Pete Hegseth, Department of Defense Elise Stefanik, Ambassador to UN, uber-Christian Zionist Mike Huckabee, Ambassador to Israel.
We can now add Uber Zionist Sebastian Gorka and Pam Bondi to this ignoble list.
Judge Andrew Napolitano said that, to a man, Trump's senior executive leadership picks are 60% Jewish and 100% Zionist.
Trump is being true to his campaign promise to make Israel great again.
The Bondi appointment as America's attorney general is especially noteworthy.
Trump's first selection was Florida Congressman Matt Gaetz.
But after being announced as the next attorney general, the Zionist media and political lobbyist pounced into action.
You see, Gaetz is one of the very few members of Congress not on the Israeli lobby payroll.
The result?
It took only a matter of days for Gate to be forced to withdraw his name.
Enter Pam Bondi.
Bondi is a rabid pro-zina zealot.
She's also a radical anti-bill of rights zealot.
Especially the First Amendment.
She, along with Kristi Noem, has every intention of stopping out freedom of speech in the United States, especially that which denounces the ongoing genocide against the Palestinians in Gaza, the West Bank, and Lebanon, and which supports Palestinian statehood.
In his interview with Max Bumenthal, Judge Knapp and Max had this exchange regarding Bondi.
Napolitano!
Ermattei and I have discussed at length the assaults on free speech by the Biden admin by members of Congress, Michaelis Stefanik, as an example, who's slated to become ambassador to the UN. I think you'll agree this is about to get worse.
Here is Pam Bondi, designated AG, suggesting that demonstrators on college campuses should be deported at worst or interrogated by FBI agents at best.
And what I think we're going to happen, and this is now Max talking, and this is an agenda spelled out in the Heritage Foundation Project Esther, which was actually largely written by Christian right activists, Christian Zionists, to seek terrorism designations.
For groups like Students for Justice in Palestine, American Muslim for Palestine, the groups leading demonstrations in the street, then they began actually prosecuting them and debanking their activists going to places like PayPal, Venmo, ordering them basically to block transactions of anyone who's leading Palestinian solidarity activity.
So if you protest against genocide in Gaza, you're to be designated a terrorist in the new America.
I mean, this is all spelled out.
And Bondi seemed the perfect person to advance this authoritarian anti-freedom on American agenda on behalf of Netanyahu and the Israeli apartheid regime.
Napolitano?
Is there anybody in Trump's cabinet who's not in Arden's Highness?
Bloom at the Hymen, yeah, it's mega!
Let's make Israel great again!
And I'd like to ask, Miss Bondi, what exactly is truly, truly heartbreaking, what's happening to all of our Jewish friends in this country, as she has said?
Are Jews in America being starved to death with blockades that deny them food and medicine?
Are Jewish hospital schools and synagogues in America being bombed to smithereens by the nation's military?
Are Jewish children in America being shot dead in the head by army snipers?
Are Jewish homes in America being bulldozed to the ground?
Are tens of thousands of innocent Jewish men, women, children, and babies being slaughtered like animals because of their race?
Give it up, Ms. Bondy.
You are nothing but a Zionist hack, bought and paid for by the Israeli lobby.
There's no other word I could use to describe you and the rest of the bought and paid for toadies of the Israeli lobby.
But you, Zionists, psychopaths, and D.C. are worse than those whom the word I could use describes, so I won't use it.
Let me remind readers, too, that during Trump's first war year, he appointed more C.F.R. Bilderberger than Barack Obama during his eighth.
Now the question becomes, what's wrong with this?
We tend to take for granted the difference between right and wrong, where some acts like murder, robbery, kidnapping, and rape are clearly wrong, while others like truthfulness, honesty, kindness, and candor are right.
But we seldom stop to ask ourselves, what is it about actions of the one kind that makes them wrong, or actions of the other that makes them right?
Having offered courses in ethics and society, I've considered whether there may be an objective foundation for drawing these distinctions.
Preliminarily, the concept of morality must be distinguished from those of legality and of propriety.
Actions are moral when they are right in accordance with the most defensible theory of morality.
They are legal when they accord with the statutes of a given jurisdiction.
The morality of actions does not vary over time.
Actions that are legal in conformity with established law, however, can be legal at one time and illegal at another, as in the case of slavery, which is immoral if any actions are immoral, and of consuming alcohol as a beverage, again, sometimes legal but other times not.
Propriety is a function of manners.
Which fork you use to eat your salad, a man walking on the outside of the street, for example, can likewise change from time to time.
My thoughts have extended at theories about morality, which are, after all, theories.
That might be of value by criteria parallel to those used to evaluate scientific theories, including even theories about conspiracies.
Entity, the classic criteria of antiquists initially advanced by the American philosopher of science Carl G. Hamill, for whom I wrote my undergraduate thesis at Princeton in 1962, turned out to be as applicable to conspiracy theories as much as they are to standard scientific.
The clarity and precision of language in which alternative theories are expressed, their scope of application for the purpose of explanation and prediction, their respective degrees of empirical support on the available evidence, their economy, elegance, or simplicity in satisfying C A 1 C A 3. Their applicability of theories of morality is not as straightforward as their applicability of conspiracy theories,
especially because of what ought to qualify as empirical support in the case of theories of morality.
My solution is to adopt traditional cultural practices as appropriate for cases that historically have been regarded as morally wrong, such as murder, robbery, kidnapping, rape on the one hand, or alternatively as morally right, such as truthfulness, honesty, kindness, candor on the other, which provide empirical data.
In other words, if a theory qualifies traditionally regarded actions as right, as right under the theory, and traditionally regarded actions as wrong, as wrong under the theory, that counts in its favor.
The contrary, however, occurs in most cases of alternative theory.
Symbols, subjectivism, it's actions right if you think it's right.
Obviously, you could think murder, robbery, rape were right.
Family values similarly remember Texas Chainsaw Massacre, a family that butchered and cooked up his barbecue.
Religious-based ethics, there's so many religions, and what we have here in the Middle East between Christianity and Judaism, or really Zionism, raises profound concerns.
Cultural relativism, that is just right if it was acceptable in the culture, which could include, for example, cannibalism.
Or, you know, pedophilia.
Philosophical theories fare somewhat better.
Ethical egoism.
Here you make a calculation of which action among the alternatives would produce the most happiness for you.
But then you look at a John Gacy or a Jeffrey Dahmer and you realize, my goodness, if they got more happiness from raping and murdering young men, that clearly violates the standard.
Now limited utilitarianism and classic I'm going to talk about more as well as deontological moral theory.
Limited utilitarianism.
And action A is right when it produces at least as much happiness for the Group G as any alternative.
Think of the Third Reich, the Mafia, or even General Motors.
When it puts a profit line ahead of safety for the American people, its own customer.
A nice example is the Corvair, which Ralph Nader publicized in his book, Unsafe at Any Speed.
I regard T6 Limited utilitarianism as the most pernicious of all moral theories, because it emboldens groups to undertake collective actions in order to enrich themselves or otherwise control the course of events exemplified by the consortium of powerful interests that take out JFK and replace him with LBJ. Israel and its allies in the CIA and DOD to attack the United States on 9-11.
And the Obama admin to manipulate public opinion by taking the Sandy Hook Elementary School shoot, which was a FEMA drill, presented as mass murder to promote gun control.
Contrast limited with classic utilitarianism.
Inaction is right when it produces at least as much happiness for everyone as any alternative.
Some actions, of course, could produce more happiness for some members of the community than for others.
So it becomes a matter of happiness, net happiness, which equals gross happiness minus gross unhappiness.
So the difference is, in the case of limited, you're only concerned with happiness for the group.
You can exclude Others not part of the group.
With classic, you've got to consider everyone.
But some may be made happier than others, and it will then mean you have to make a decision based upon net happiness.
The lynch mob, for example, may derive more happiness from lynching their targets than any alternative act, but would obviously not induce happiness for those who are stringing up.
The government takes action that affects almost everyone in the United States.
For example, some Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and employment insurance, workmen compensation, that seem to serve the public well.
Those theories are moral as long as they produce more happiness than any alternative.
Now, the defect of classical utilitarianism, it does not stand up for individual rights.
In other words, it's exemplified as though the whole community were a lynch mob.
Okay?
In some particular segment, we're going to be annihilated.
Thus, and I've gone through this in a piece on my blog at jameshfetcher.org entitled Evaluating Moral Theories, only the deontological moral theory that entails treating every person with respect Never treating anyone merely as a means can accommodate the nature of morality properly understood.
Think of murder, robbery, kidnapping, rape.
Those are all cases of using other people merely as means to achieve other goals, and it can happen on a large-scale basis.
In fact, what I'm going to suggest is, from the perspective of deontological moral theory, we can understand what's going on In Gaza and Ukraine and why it is wrong.
Thus, the Jerusalem Post published the president of the Reb, another word for leader, a continuing relationship from beyond the grave.
Since the Reb's passage, these presidential interactions have continued via the annual proclamation.
This is a leader.
Of the Shabab Ludovitchers within the Jewish community.
I mean, Mike Sparks was absolutely correct.
Not all Jews are at fault for any of these actions.
I mentioned the hundreds who occupied Grand Central Station protesting genocide.
But they are not running the Israeli government.
They are not behind the actions that are taking place as slaughtering the Palestinian men, women, and children now.
Just as Morgan Reynolds and Judy Wood were after me about the planes in New York, our surreal world, as he has designated himself, has been after me about exposing what's going on here.
His letter to me was so good and so well documented, I want to share it.
Now I'm open, of course, as always, to criticism and critique, but I want to share with you what appears to me the situation.
We will return this territory and build the Great Kazariah, the Jewish state, on these fertile lands the same way as 50 years ago we created Israel.
Menachem Mendel Schneerson, also known as the Mashiach, called 1998 talking about Ukraine.
Reb, a living messiach of the Chabad Mafia, was the leader of the Jewish people from 1951 to 1994, considered to be the most influential Jewish figure in the past century.
Schneerson considered more than Jerusalem and Greater Israel his ancestral homeland.
Reb had a strong affinity with his Ashkenazi roots as he was born in Ukraine in 1902. He wished to return to this promised land to act as a global capital for the Kingdom of Jews.
In a 1994 address featured in the Volda-based publication, Slavania, Menachem Mendel Schneerson detailed his intention to obliterate both Ukraine and Russia.
Slavs, and among them Russians, are the most unbending people in the world.
Slavs are unbending as a result of their psychological and intellectual abilities, created by many generations of ancestors.
It is impossible to alter these genes.
Slav-Russian can be destroyed but never conquered.
That's why this seed is subject to liquidation and at first a sharp reduction in numbers.
First of all, we will divide the Slavic nations into smaller countries with weak and severed connection for this.
We will use our old method, divide and conquer.
We will try to pit these countries against each other and suck them into civil wars for the sake of mutual destruction.
The Ukrainians would think they were fighting against the expansionist Russia and still struggling for their independence.
They'll think they have finally gained their freedom.
While they become fully subdued by us, Jews.
The same will be thought by Russians, as though they defend their national interest to return their lands illegally taken from them and so on.
Looking back in history, it must be admitted that these lands are the ancient ancestral lands of the Jewish Gazaria, that is Israel, captured by Kiev's Rus, The ancient state of Russia with its capital in Kiev in the 10th century.
The Slavs are temporary guests on these lands that are subject to invention.
We will return this territory and build the great Khazariah, the Jewish state, on these fertile lands the same way as 50 years ago we created Israel, squeezing the Palestinians out.
Israelis will partially relocate here and we will drive Slavic cattle out far to the north beyond Moscow.
There will be a small northern territory, a reservation with a compact population, a reservation like Indian reservations in America.
Circa October 7, 2024, Trump prayed at the tomb of Rabbi Menasch and Mendel Schneerson at the Shavad Lubavitch Center in Queens, New York.
It was a little taste.
It was a little taste.
Trump commemorating.
The rabbi, whom many Jews took to be the Messiah before he died, did not think of non-Jews as human.
This is whose tomb Trump is going to pray at.
This is prima facie evidence.
A speech essay by Reby Schneerson was real and was attempted to be memory hold.
The prima facie evidence is a court case in the Russian Federation that ruled Reby Schneerson did compose the essay speech and his written words were published and published accurately.
The official publication of the text in the newspaper, Slaviana, in 2001, after publication in Provocia, Jews filed an application to the Ministry of Internal Affairs and tried to convict the editor of the newspaper, Via Popov, for anti-Semitism, under article 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.
The court considered her witnesses as specialists, Russian scientists, academicians, UK, Burdov, and doctor of law, OG. Korolev spoke.
The court denied the accusation, and the text of Schneerson's speech was recognized as true.
Remember, that's a defense against defamation, for example, that what you claim to be the case was true.
Schneerson publicly announced plans for the Jews against the Slavs and the Russians.
The entire publication can be found there.
However, there's also a less attractive underside, often at odds with such public perceptions, some of the more extreme parts of Jenerson's teaching, such that Jews are a completely different species than non-Jews, and that non-Jews exist only to serve Jews, have been largely hidden, it appears, even from many who consider themselves his followers.
As we will see, such views profoundly impact the lives of Palestinians living and dying under Israeli occupation and military invasion.
For example, the quotes above were translated by authors from a book of Schneerson's recorded messages to followers that was published in Israel in 1965. Despite Schneerson's global importance and the fact that his world headquarters is in the United States, there's never been an English translation of this volume.
Meanwhile, Ukrainian general reveals that Zionist control of Ukraine circa March 7, 2014, during the Maiden revolution carried out by members of the American government.
For those who are watching, who will watch this information.
Mr. Turcinov, Mr. Yatsenyuk, Mr. Teghnebok, And I know that this is an agent of the United States of the United States.
Mr. Yatsenyuk is the first president of the masons of Ukraine.
Mr. Yatsenyuk is the president of the masons of Ukraine.
and took the Kuchмы.
All these mistakes, which were made, all the command.
The Kuchмы was just a maryanet.
They were in the hands of Kuchмы.
They were also sold.
They gave the command to "Push Berkut", "Push Berkut", They suscribon, and they Dortmund better who banned others.
Then people would relax to take weapons takes care of their" hey businessmen been bazied In the first of all, it was the case of Mr. Khrushchev and Mr. Khrushchev.
This is their case.
Because it is known that Mr. Khrushchev after the so-called victory of the revolution, they were thrown thanks to Mr. Khrushchev.
American people gave him money.
They took the arrest of his own and he was able to take it.
After that, when they were to the man who was given to him, I don't say that he was a good guy.
I'm not a good guy.
He's not a good guy.
He's not a good guy.
I love him or love him.
But he was not right.
Although he's a legitimate president.
Do we want it?
It's hard to listen and listen to a person.
But first of all, we need to figure out what caused it.
What caused it?
What was the most part of the problem of Mr. Ahmetov, Mr. Leonid, Mr. Kolomoyev, Mr. Kovacov, Mr. Firtash, Mr. Yishez Nimi.
All these oligarchs.
In the beginning it looked like two clans were in the Kermush, as it was in 2005.
Now it's just a direct occupation of the United States and Ukraine through the border.
Yes.
I'm not afraid of this.
I'm not afraid of anything.
Thank you.
It's enough for me to stand up for me.
I'm not afraid of it.
But that's a surprise.
This is what this entity wrote and spoke about nonchosenites.
The difference between a Jewish and a non-Jewish person stems from the common expression, let us differentiate.
Thus we do not have a case of profound change in which a person is merely on a superior level.
Rather, we have a case of let us differentiate between totally different species.
This is what needs to be said about the body.
The body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of members of all nations of the world, literally translated to goyim.
The difference in the inner quality between Jews and non-Jews is so great.
That the body should be considered as a completely different species.
And even greater difference exists in regard to the soul.
Two contrary types of soul exist.
A non-Jewish soul comes from three satanic spheres, while the Jewish soul stems from holiness.
As has been explained, an embryo is called a human being because it has both body and soul.
Thus, the difference between a Jewish and a non-Jewish embryo can be understood.
The general difference between Jews and non-Jews?
A Jew is not created as a means for some other purpose.
He himself is the purpose, since the substance of all divine emanation was created only to serve the Jews.
The important things are the Jews because they do not exist for any other aim.
They themselves are the divine aim.
The entire creation of a non-Jew exists only for the sake of the Jews, Rabbi.
Machem Mendel Schneersam.
This isn't a video in question proving that Netanyahu and Ribi Schneerson were directly involved in attempting to provoke full world war circa 1990 to bring the messiah by destroying this world and recreating the old and now destroyed world in the Chosen's image.
This is the result of Schneerson's grand vision, circa November 20, 2024. Zaluni in Britain advised Ukrainian soldiers not to fear death, and stated they have virtually no chance of survival, reports the Times.
We have only one Ukraine.
No one will defend it except us.
Remember that the war is coming more brutal every day.
It leaves almost no chance for survival.
Learn not to fear death, not to fear looking the enemy in the eye.
You will need to kill without hesitation.
When you see the enemy kill him before he tries to kill you or your comrade, please learn this here.
Love each other and remember Ukraine.
Said the former commander-in-chief, now an ambassador, while standing over the trenches of a training base in East Anglia.
This is connected information 100% verifiable.
We Jews, we the destroyers, will remain the destroyers forever.
Nothing that you will do will meet our needs in advance.
We will destroy because we need a world of our own.
You Gentiles.
Page 155. Maurice Samuel.
Circa 1990 C-SPAN program book notes.
Features a group discussion about Israel, an intelligence operations service that revealed in no uncertain terms that ISIS has been how Mossad, which simply means Institute in Hebrew, or Israel intelligence in general was referred to for decades in Inner Circle's Diplomacy Actions Intelligence.
Basically, it's a slap in the face to the literally ignorant mass of humanity and a flawed soul brazen.
It's an open admission of guilt to the point that it screams, what are you going to do about it?
A 1996 fan interview hosted by Brian Land with Dan Revy and Yossi Millman about the book, A Complete History of Israel's Intelligence Community.
ISIS stands for Israeli Secret Intelligence Service.
Spirit the penniless population against the frontier by denying unemployment.
Oh, the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly.
Theodore Herzl, founder of the World Zionist Organization.
Speaking of the Arabs of Palestine, Complete Diaries, June 12, 1895, entry.
One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.
Rabbi Yechel Perret, February 27, 1994 in the New York Times.
Netanyahu, under where a camera says, America can easily be moved.
- What's happening?
- No, no, no.
- He wants to know.
- He wants to know.
- I'm going to show you.
- But then, I'm going to show you.
- I'm going to show you.
America is not supposed to be able to do it.
This is a good thing.
I'm sure there's a place in our house, but...
No, we don't have to do it.
We're doing something.
There's a place where we're going.
We're going to go.
We're going to go.
It's absurd.
We're going to go.
The government is going to go.
The government is going to go.
I was scared to get rid of it.
It's a good thing.
Value for the price.
Circa October 13, 2024, I am personally proud of the Holocaust of Gaza, and that 80 years from now, they will tell their grandchildren what the Jews did, the Israeli Minister of Social Equality.
Here's President Obama admitting to training ISIS ISIL on video at the podium.
The only reason the Jews are in pornography is we think that Christ sucks.
Catholicism sucks.
We don't believe in authoritarianism.
Pornography thus comes a way of defiling Christian culture and, as it penetrates to the very heart of the American mainstream and is no doubt consumed by these very same wasps, its subversive character becomes more charged.
Al Golnstein, infamous pornography king.
Judicial Watch proved that under a Freedom of Information Act request, Judicial Watch was able to obtain a heavily redacted copy of the Defense Intelligence Agency directive that initiated the creation of ISIS in 2012. The DIA report states, meanwhile...
You tell the story about how you tried to find out what the...
What they call the Mossad when they deal with, uh, publicly?
I thought it was a reasonable question, but the trouble is, uh, you can't pick up the phone book.
There's no, uh, Langley in, uh, in Israel that you can look up, you know, CIA, or in our case, the Mossad.
We thought we should ask, what shall we call it in English?
You can translate the Hebrew words, as I said, Mossad's institute.
But when they write a letter to their friends in the CIA or the British intelligence, what do they call themselves?
It took a while.
It was a matter of asking the Prime Minister's spokesman.
The best you could do, because officially, the Mossad is under the Prime Minister's office.
And I think he sort of wondered why you want to know and all that, so we explained.
And he came up with the Israeli Secret Intelligence Service.
If it were to have initials, it would be ISIS. Just simple words like that.
Interestingly enough, kind of a British model.
Yes, indeed.
Meanwhile, the West Gulf countries, Turkey, who support the Syrian opposition, supports establishing a declared or undeclared Salaf's principality in eastern Syria in order to isolate the Syrian regime.
The chemical attacks on Syrian citizens on 21 August 2013 was meant to justify lobbing cruise missiles into Syria.
It was all staged.
Obama was ready, but Americans were not.
And when the ploy was debunked by a 50-page dossier the Russians provided to the UN, they resorted to Plan B, which was a creation of ISIS by the DIA. Actually, the DIA opposed it.
That was Michael Flynn.
He didn't think it was the right thing.
But John Brennan, then Director of CIA, Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State, and Barack Obama wanted it.
and branded because flint and bros had suggested to obama fire flint which he dutifully did.
The future will be about finding a way to reduce the population, Jacques Attali, councillor to French president, Mitterrand.
The future will be about finding a way to reduce the population.
We start with the old, because as soon as they exceed 60, 65 years, people live longer than they produce, and that costs society dearly, then the weak, then the useless, who do not help society, because there will always be more of them, and above all, ultimately, the stupid.
It doesn't matter.
The weak will succumb to it.
The fearful and stupid will believe in it and seek treatment.
We have made sure treatment is in place.
Treatment will be the solution.
The selection of idiots then takes care of itself.
You go to the slaughter by yourself.
Jacques Attali, 1981. With his twin brother Bernard Attali and a Jewish family.
Circa May 28, 2024. The NICC prosecutor Fatou Ben Sota had opened a formal inquiry in 2021 to examine years of allegations of human rights abuse and war crimes against Palestinians committed by Israel's military.
The joint investigation found that then-Mossad director Yossi Cohen used tactics to monitor her that amounted to stalking.
Circa November 16, 2024. Leaked piles show top UK military figures conspire to carry out the Kershbridge bombing, covertly train Gladio-style stay beyond forces in Ukraine and groom the British public for a drop in living standards caused by the proxy war against Russia.
Emails and internal documents reviewed by the gray zone reveal details of a cabal of British military and intel veterans plotting to escalate and prolong the Ukraine proxy war at all costs.
Convened under the direction of the British Ministry of Defense in the immediate aftermath of Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the CELL referred to itself as Project Alchemy.
As British leadership sabotaged peace talks between Kyiv and Moscow, the CELL put forward an array of plans to keep Ukraine fighting by imposing strategic dilemmas, costs, and frictions upon Russia, circa September 11, 2024. Exiled Russian journalist Mikhail Zyger recently sat down for a new interview, published to YouTube earlier this month.
Most interesting part was when he pressed Nuland, who'd been behind the coup in Ukraine, on widespread reports saying that British Prime Minister Boris Johnson actively encouraged President Zelensky to back out of a potential peace deal with Moscow after the February 2022 Russian invasion.
There was a possible chance to end the war and perhaps involve hundreds of thousands of deaths.
But the West apparently convinced Zelensky to fight it out.
But a deal was on the table.
Russia was demanding a full commitment to Ukrainian neutrality regarding NATO. Nuland laid out that it was relatively late in the game when Kiev started seeking guidance on the peace deal from Washington and its allies.
Zygar said there were statements from foreign leader Quiffy to the negotiations saying both sides were really close to achieving a deal.
Ukrainians began asking for advice on where this thing was going.
It became clear to us and to the Brits that Putin's main condition was buried in an annex to the document they were working on.
It included limits on the precise kinds of weapons systems Ukraine could have after the deal, Nulon introduced in response.
She went on to describe Washington and didn't like the end result of the deal would leave Ukraine neutered as a military force.
But at the same time, the same limits weren't imposed upon the Russians.
People inside Ukraine and people outside started asking questions about whether this was a good deal.
And it was at that point it fell apart.
Newland admitted it.
Professor, he's directing that to me, in case you're not aware, do you remember that 40-kilometer-long Russian convoy parked out at Kiev, awaiting orders for weeks, and for no reason it all turned around and returned to the Russian Federation?
That convoy was prepared to fully occupy Kiev, ordered it turned back as a goodwill gesture, and proved the Russian Federation was parlaying in good faith and had every intention of brokering peace.
Instead of a broker peace deal, the Russian Federation has been ridiculed this time as weak and allowing its convoys to run out of supplies.
Instead of being known as honest, magnanimous, and honorable in the face of absolute mendacity and malevolence, what amounts to literal genocide against laws.
Incidentally, I wrote this a while ago, appropriate to know now.
The complement and implementation of cancel culture is much older than almost everyone thinks.
In The Conquest of the World by Jews by Major Omen Bay, written in 1873, he observed, Jewish solidarity is so great.
If you attack one Jew in any place in the world, all the Jews of the five continents arise as one man.
The popes expel their enemies from the church.
The Jews expel their enemies from the stock exchange and from social connections and finally condemn us to starve without a roof to cover us.
Almost everyone thinks, believes that cancel culture is new, but it's actually quite old, with the same people driving it.
You haven't heard much about it until recently because nobody noticed.
Because those who did were canceled.
They can't hide the facts of our collective reality any longer.
Want to know why the Israelis and Zionists control the media and public discourse in almost all Western countries and most platforms on social media?
In 2009, a manual written by a man named Frank Luntz, Republican political strategist, considered a top source for CBS and Fox News, the well-known poller, his specialty by his own words, testing language and finding words that'll help clients sell a product or turn public opinion on an issue or a candidate.
The 2009 manual he wrote is literally the go-to for Israeli propagandists.
Every one of the hundred and twelve pages of the booklet is marked not for distribution or publication, and it's easy to see why.
The Luntz Report, officially entitled, The Israeli Project 2009 Global Language Dictionary, was leaked almost immediately to Newsweek Online.
But its true importance has seldom been appreciated.
It should be required reading for everybody, especially journalists interested in any aspect of Israeli policy because of its do's and don'ts for Israeli spokesmen.
Please, professor!
See to it a fact about Schneerson and a dream of the new capital if the Jews are exposed to the world.
Get these facts to the officials and others you are able.
If you have any contact within government, please do see to it these people are aware of these facts.
So there's a chance that literal global war can be averted.
If you're able to contact Candace Owens, Judd Napolitano, Dr. Scott Bruder, and all, then please do so.
And make them aware of the truth.
It is provable.
In a court of law level, probable.
What is and has been happening, and we collectively are only facing these crises, catastrophes, because common humanity knows next to nothing about any of these facts.
Thank you.
Nope.
Well, I waited as long as I could for someone else, anyone else, anywhere, to present the macrocosmic truth about the Ukraine situation, and no one again, I reiterate, anywhere has done it so.
Here I am breaking my silence.
Meanwhile, Phil Giroldi asks very reasonably,"'Who the hell is in charge here?' A photo popped up on the internet was a bit surprising even for those of us who've been overly obsessed with a seemingly aimless and highly dangerous comedy routine that describes itself as the United States of America's foreign policy.
The U.S. has confronted no real security threats since the Cold War ended, but it has done so many things that were against its own interests it now finds itself seconds away from nuclear emulation and is registered on the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists Doomsday Clock.
Recently, there's been much discussion of what Trump will do read the wars he's inherited from Biden in Ukraine and the Middle East.
Bear in mind that Donald thinks he's a tough guy and believes by throwing around threats he'll inevitably get his way.
Concerning Ukraine, he's repeatedly promised to end the war in one day.
No, he has not exactly provided details on how he expects to accomplish that.
Sebastian Gorka, the new deputy assistant to President and Senior Director for Counterterrorism, has explained that Trump will use the threat of increasing military aid to Ukraine as a tactic to bring Russia to the negotiating table.
Gorka called Putin, a murderous former KGB colonel, and said Putin must negotiate now, or the aid we've given to Ukraine thus far will look like peanuts.
The comment is so preposterous, those monitoring the situation are waiting to hear something from President Trump to provide clarity.
Trump's connection with Israel suggests that he, like Biden, will do whatever Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu wants.
On the campaign trail, he has openly and ostentatiously bonded closely with Israel and its Jewish and Christian Zionist supporters, describing himself as the Jewish state's best friend.
Nevertheless, on at least one occasion, he rebuffed Netanyahu and following the 2020 election, the soon-to-be ex-president lashed out at the prime minister, being in his words the first to congratulate Biden.
The internet photo that appeared last week showed a festive gathering at Mar-a-Lago featuring a beaming Donald Trump seat of his Senator Lindsey Graham standing behind him with a big smile on his face.
Sitting next to Trump or two grinning apparent guests that Trump's faces would not be familiar to most Americans.
The woman was Sarah.
The wife of Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu seated next to her was his son here, who reportedly has been living in Miami.
The president of the prime minister's wife and son at Mar-a-Lago Friday signaled a clearer desire by the Israelis to maintain the much-needed warmth in the personal relationship with the American president.
The backstory of how Serenyar, a wife at Mar-a-Lago, is a bit murky.
But it appears that Graham, a passionate and outspoken advocate for all things Israeli, was on one of his frequent trips to that country a few days before the dinner, may have brought Sarah back with him to meet personally with the president-elect and suggest in incoming administration the ties that bind the Netanyahu's and the Trump transcend politics.
In that light, it's perhaps no coincidence that so soon after the arrival of Serenahu, President-elect Donald Trump issued a grave warning to Hamas, which is still holding in Gaza something like a hundred Israeli hostages, violently and humanely and against the will of the entire world, contradicted, by the way, by the testimony of those who were released by Hamas, who said they were treated very kindly, gently, and humanely.
In a Social Truth Post Monday afternoon, Trump said if the hostages are not released by his inauguration, January 20, 2025, there'll be all hell to pay in the Middle East for those in charge who perpetrated these atrocities against humanity.
Trump concluded those responsible will be hit harder than anybody has been hit in the long and storied history of the United States of America.
Release the hostages now, bear in mind.
In the long and storied history of the United States, we bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki with nukes.
Meanwhile, Hamas responded to Trump's threat that it should be directed at Netanyahu.
And a Moss official responded to President-elect Trump's warning that he'd be held at bay if Israeli hostages were released by his inauguration on January 20, 2025. Trump did not mention a Moss by name in his warning, but appeared to threaten U.S. strikes on a Palestinian group saying those responsible will be hit harder than anybody has been hit in the long and storied history of the United States of America.
A senior member of Hamas's political bureau said Trump's threat should be directed at Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu Sainzah efforts to sabotage a hostage and ceasefire deal.
Israeli officials and media reports have also blamed Netanyahu for the lack.
Hamas understand that Trump messages, in fact, directed primarily at Netanyahu and his government, he said, according to the Palestinian Chronicle.
He added that Netanyahu government had been using negotiations as a cover to advance its own agenda.
Netanyahu's government was to put an end to this deceptive charade.
Former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, recently fired by Netanyahu, said the PM sabotaged a chance of a deal by demanding Israel maintain control of the Philadelphia corridor on the Gaza-Ajip border.
I can tell you there was not security consideration.
IDF and I said there were no conservative reasons for remaining in the Philadelphia corridor.
Gallant told hostage families on November 7th.
Netanyahu said it was a diplomatic consideration.
I'm telling you, there was no diplomatic consideration.
There were believed to be ninety-seven hostages remaining in Gaza.
Israeli media reported back in September, Netanyahu told the Knesset Committee only half the hostages were believed to be alive.
The Israeli newspaper from Ratz reported in October the Israeli government was done with ceasefire talks and focused on annexing portions of the Gaza Strip.
There have been recent efforts by mediators to restart talks, but there's no sign the effort is going anywhere, and there's no end in sight for the daily slaughter in Gaza.
I gotta conclude observing.
Have you understand the moral defect of what's taking place here?
Understand that Israel is acting as a limited utilitarian entity, taking actions that benefits its members regardless of the consequences for others.
They're not only a lawless state, ignoring international law, the Geneva Conventions, the UN Charter, the Hague Convention.
They've not only been found to have committed genocide by the International Criminal Court, but the International Court of Justice even discovered there's not even a legal warrant for the creation of the Israeli state.
And given Trump's enthusiasm for all things Israeli, And what may well be true, as Stephanie implied, that he may have actually become a chap Lubavitcher himself.
I'm sorry to say that I'm not at all optimistic about the prospects for peace in the short term to come, nor even the long.
Thank you.
Wow.
I don't even know what to say, Jim.
That was fantastic.
Thank you so much.
I'm going to see if anybody's got some quick questions for you because we only have a couple minutes left since we went long with William and Catherine.
Anybody got questions for Jim?
If you do, type them up in the chat in capital letters, please.
And I guess my question to you is...
Because of Trump's interactions with the Israeli government and moving the, what was it, the embassy to help me.
I got no sleep.
And declaring the Golan Heights to be a part of Israel.
Yeah.
Adelson had given him 100 mil.
Well, Marian's given him 250 mil.
Exactly.
So do you think that is...
He wants him to part the annexation of the West Bank.
I mean, this is just Israel stealing everything from the Palestinians.
And of course, as many have observed, DNA studies have shown these occupants of present-day Israel are not descendants of the tribe of Judah.
They have, as it might be said, no Hebrew blood.
They're actually not even Semites.
But while a Palestinian czar, it turns out, ironically, that Israel is the greatest practitioner of anti-Semitism in the world today.
Yeah, that's absolutely true.
We got a question.
Noahide laws, do you know about these, Jim?
They are to do with the Schneerson.
Yeah, I know they have some peculiar aspects, and they're very severe, especially about religious transgressions, but I'm no expert on it.
And when I want to offer a more definitive report, I'll just say everything I understand about them is bad news.
We do not want to give up our Constitution.
We do not want to give up the rule of law.
We simply need to adhere to the Constitution and uphold the rule of law.
Yeah, absolutely.
Yes, and oh wow, we're getting a bunch of questions here.
It was, oh, they're saying that, okay, let me see if I get this right.
Should Trump articulate his position on Noahide laws in American life?
We've already addressed that.
It was signed into public law by every president since Carter.
Is that true?
Not to my knowledge.
Oh, okay.
Yeah.
Oh, okay.
How do we know this?
Abathai is 731?
Okay, let's see.
I sent a number of comments and questions to Jim in the Q&A section.
Do they not go through?
Yes, they are there.
Let me go over and check them.
Okay.
Okay, here's what 731 says.
Schmierson is the reason every president since Carter have signed into public law the Noahide Law under the pretense of Education Day celebrating the birthday of Schmierson.
Smearson.
So, do you know about this, Jim?
I do not.
It's something I cannot address.
Okay.
Okay.
That's fine.
I'm just trying to get in here to see if there's any real questions about what you just talked about.
Oh, she's going to send links to you, Jim, so you can, I guess, investigate it.
Okay, here is a question from Monique.
What is the excuse for the others who are not Jewish who produce pornography?
As far as I'm aware, there are other backgrounds also infested in pornography.
Italian, American, Armenian, American, and German come to mind.
No harm intended to any of these communities.
What do you think?
To my astonishment, I have been told that half of Computer usage is devoted to watching pornography.
Half.
That's astonishing.
I know.
There's no room for doubt that the ultimate goal is to degrade the quality of our culture and that it has Jewish roots, I have no doubt.
Yeah, yeah.
There we go.
Okay, we've got to end this one, folks.
So, Jim, thank you for that presentation.
It was amazing.
▲
Export Selection