All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 17, 2024 - Jim Fetzer
01:22:27
Truth vs. NEW$, Inc Part 2 (16 Sept 2024) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett, and Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is a show called Truth vs. News.
And believe me, the truth is standing tall, but there's an awful lot of news that covers the truth with all kinds of lies and things.
And we've had this little incident with Trump yesterday.
And so, Scott, I think you want to make a comment on this gentleman?
Oh, let me get it going, Don.
Here we are.
Here we are, our speaker.
Let's hear what he's got to say, just as a refresher.
I'm from North Carolina, originally.
I still live in Hawaii now, so flew all the way from Hawaii here.
So, the question as far as why I'm here, to me, you know, a lot of the other conflicts are gray, but this conflict is definitely black and white.
This is about good versus evil.
This is a storybook.
You know, any movie we've ever watched, this is definitely evil against good.
I mean, we're battling a situation here where, you know, the Ukrainians and the rest of the world are caring and kind and generous and unselfish and take care of one another.
And it's just a matter of, you know, we need to stand up for that.
That is the Most important thing in the world is just to show human beings that we're kind and we're caring and that we take care of one another and that the world is united.
And of course that Russia is evil, Scott.
No doubt about it.
He made it crystal clear.
Well, let me just address him personally as if I was debating.
First of all, there is no evil or good in this scenario.
And this is a very stupid comment, a very naive and ignorant comment.
And I understand he may be a CIA asset.
I understand he may be schizophrenic and on drugs.
I understand he may have suffered all sorts of trauma as a result of the Democrat policies, which break up families, tell people they can cut off their penises and pretend they're a different sexual identity, and on and on and on.
But the fact of the matter is, I've been to Russia, I've been in Donbass, I've been in Belgorod, I've been Cherobinka, I've been in Gorlovka, I've been in Soledad.
And I know more than he'll ever know.
And the fact of the matter is Russia entered in to protect the people of Donbass because they were being genocided after a United States coup d'etat that Victoria Nuland, John Kerry, Barack Obama, Joe Biden orchestrated with a variety of other traitors and scandals and racketeering operation globalists.
In 2014, they overthrew the government of Yanukovych.
They instituted snipers from Georgia.
They went in and set up biochemical labs in Ukraine, 44 of them, under the Lugar-Barack Obama Institute.
They engineered the COVID-19 scandemic.
They also engineered the vaccine behind it.
So this started in 2014.
It did not start in 2022.
Only an idiot, a moron, or a lobotomized Cruella de Vil with a similar ugly haircut would say something like that.
So the fact of the matter is, the government of Ukraine under Yanukovych was overthrown by the United States in 2014.
$5 billion were used by Victoria Nuland to do that.
And then Poroshenko, who steps in, and mind you, they did some horrific tortures and killings of people, burned people alive in Maidan.
Had a bunch of, and it seems like he's naive about this, neo-Nazis, and I've interviewed them, I've videotaped them, I was on a documentary with RT, and I was into the prisons, and I met some of these ass-off battalions who were covered with Nazi tattoos.
They're broken men now.
They're shattered and traumatized.
Some of them don't have bones in their hands anymore.
They're just like rubber hands you get from a Halloween gift shop.
That's how broken these men are.
But the fact of the matter is, the Nazi battalions covered in Bandera tattoos and Hitlerian tattoos and swastikas and all sorts of other pagan symbolism is not what the people of the United States support, nor is it what the Constitution of the United States supports.
It's nothing.
So, when you start flatulently barking all this nonsense about how Ukraine is good and Russia is evil, he's a fool!
And this similar silliness about we take care of each other, we have to feed each other, that is always the claptrap for retard socialists that don't have a girlfriend, never had one, have been on too many drugs, have been in jail, and this guy's been in jail multiple times.
He's also schizophrenic enough to have pulled weapons in Florida.
I won't go through his whole criminal history, but the fact is Russia Through extraordinary patience, after 2014, tried everything they could to appeal to NATO, appeal to the United States, appeal to France and Germany and Britain to say, this is a line that we can't tolerate.
We can't tolerate NATO armies and NATO nuclear weapons on our back door, just like you couldn't stand it in Cuba, nor will you stand it in Mexico.
We can't stand it in Ukraine.
And the people of Donbass that I've interviewed, and I've been back there, have described, and you can see it, the entire cities are shelled.
The entire cities of Donetsk are crumbling ruins, and old people walking around with little plastic bags, trying to, you know, make a meager living.
These people are bombed and killed by random drones and missiles that are paid for by the United States.
This is not a war.
This is a genocide.
That's what Ukraine was doing.
So if you're going to call evil good and good evil, start with getting the terms right.
Ukraine under Poroshenko said, we're going to put their children in basements while ours go to school.
And that's one of the points I have a very strong disagreement with Trump, is he was stupid enough to listen to these morons guiding him, John Bolton, Mike Pompeo, Nikki Haley, and the rest of these traitors that ought to be executed for treason, giving weapons to Poroshenko that started all of this.
It was when the United States under Donald Trump gave Poroshenko weapons that they started bombing Donbass and Donetsk, who declared themselves independent republics because they weren't going to go along with the coup d'etat and the overthrown government.
They did the same thing the United States did in 1776, mind you, but they declared themselves independent republics and they started being bombed and genocided as a result.
And Russia stepped in eventually, quite late, To recognize these independent republics and protect them.
And that's all Russia has done.
It hasn't went into Kiev.
It hasn't went into Odessa.
It hasn't waged war.
It went in a special military operation.
Just like we did, as we were talking before, about Grenada.
We didn't wage war on Grenada.
We did some military operation.
We didn't wage war on Panama.
We did some special military operation, albeit for nefarious purposes.
But Russia's special military operation was designed to protect Russian-speaking people and women and children and civilians.
And it's been doing that ever since.
The war did not start in 2022.
It was in 2014.
In 2022, Russia went into Ukraine, went into the Donbass, and then immediately tried to get a peace deal.
And Turkey tried to put it together.
And they had something.
They had it signed.
And of course, Boris Johnson and Joe Biden and the rest of these castrated eunuchs went in and said no.
You won't make a deal with Russia, and as a result of that you've had 800,000 Ukrainians dead, and now you've got the gall to try and continue the war by going into Kursk and other regions of Russia?
It is astounding to me that this fool is so naive and ignorant.
But then again, they're all Democrats.
They're all leftists.
They're all idiots.
They deserve to get their asses kicked, and that's the problem.
They never have.
They've gotten away with this insanity, and now they're in this numb fuzzy zone of craziness.
I've had enough of crazy.
I've had enough of this country being crazy, and it's time for every American Who wants to protect his women and children and family to have a gun on his hip?
Just like you did in the old west when society was polite.
Have guns on your hip and start walking around like you own this country and you're not walking on eggshells as a renter of this country paying homage to the police or anyone else.
This is the time for people to start rising up.
That's how you control lunatics like this who hide in golf courses like a bad episode of Caddyshack trying to take out President Trump.
There are more of them And they have been trained and reared by CIA and by Mossad.
And we'll see if anybody in Congress has the balls to speak as I've spoken.
We'll see if anybody in Trump's team has the balls to speak as I've spoken.
Because it's very telling that this piece of shit was hiding in the golf course and knew exactly when Trump was coming around the golf course.
Who gave him?
Who told him?
Where's the radio communications?
Where's the telephonic signatures?
Let's do a little tracking.
But number one, the guy's crazy.
He's wrong on everything about Ukraine.
NATO and the United States is wrong about everything with regards to Ukraine.
And the world has come on the side of Russia.
We've lost Ukraine militarily and ideologically.
And the biggest losers are the Ukrainians.
But now you see them trying to unfold this Ukrainian narrative into, you better support Ukraine, Mr. Trump, or we'll assassinate you.
And I think they're going to have more of that to come.
And you're next going to see Ukrainians being recruited as mercenaries, troublemakers, Charlie Hebdo bombers, all sorts of, you know, assassins.
And as we've seen them in January 6th, Ukrainians were used.
I think we'll see more of them used in the future.
But this guy and everything he said is just a confirmation of the schizophrenia that the CIA and Mossad uses as their agents.
Jim?
Yes, I mean, if he's sincere, he's got everything backwards.
Rather astonishing.
Brian, your thoughts?
Yeah, okay, so I guess this is the way I'd like to frame this, and I wish everybody would think through this.
Take a look at this guy.
He is a Democrat, okay?
Now, the Democrats that come out of college They want to fit in with all their friends.
They don't want to go against the tides.
And so they tune in to the same stations and talk about the same CNN articles and try to keep themselves as much in that bubble as possible so that they'll be accepted by their friends.
But inevitably what happens is that the reason that the walkaway campaign is growing, Is that people are getting confronted with certain truths that they can't defend against in the Democrat party.
And so there's a lot of people out there that are now willing to break the tie is with those people that they considered influencers.
When they're confronted with new information, and then they have the intellectual strength to actually take a look at that.
A lot of Democrats are very smart people.
They're just caught up in the wrong.
Microcosm.
Think about all the Democrats that run major companies.
Very smart from a business perspective, but no intelligence whatsoever from a historically accurate perspective.
They've allowed the brainwashing to step in and play.
Well, it's people that get confronted with those realities that change their minds.
This guy is a perfect example of somebody who was probably faced with the psychological pressure To change his mind and decided that he was too smart to do that and decided to kick against the goads because nothing makes sense.
Trump's talking about bringing peace to Ukraine and Russia.
Everywhere Trump has gone and negotiated, it's brought peace.
If you cared about it, why wouldn't you want Trump in office or at least be open to it?
Because it's Biden and Harris, of which he has a sticker on the back of his construction truck saying, but it's them that have been the warmongers.
Them that have gone wherever they've been told in terms of starting wars.
So was this guy a true mental liberal?
No.
He was a uniparty follower.
And obviously NGOs had a lot to do with it.
I can tell you this guy has a criminal history.
Which makes him easier to compromise, or at least helps us identify who's easier to compromise.
He was largely broke.
It appears that the only time he had made any money was when he teamed up with these NGOs to be capable of traveling for the things that he loved to do, which was be an activist on behalf of the military industrial complex, Uniparty.
Now, the problem that we've got right now is that as the American apparatus and the global apparatus is making these Orwellian attacks on RT, let me tell you something.
RT runs off a 300 million dollar budget.
American media complexes each have budgets in the billions and billions of dollars, yet RT is growing by leaps and bounds above them.
Why is that?
Because the truth is stable and people are gravitating towards the truth.
Now the problem with RT and the reason that this desperate attempt to save the currently crumbling unipolar world order are getting traction is that RT is being seen in Ukraine!
Yes, that's right!
Ukrainian citizens are beginning to turn to RT to get their news.
Hey, this is a very bad situation for the global media industrial complex because these people are starting to say, what do you mean Zelensky just bought a 400 million bazillion dollar What do you mean he's selling us out?
What do you mean he's been a Western power puppet and a warmonger sacrificing our children at the mercy of a hungry apparatus that just needs to be fed more money all day long?
The Ukrainian people are singing.
This guy here is an example of somebody who didn't have the intellectual integrity to inspect the facts.
Because you can tell he really believes the bullshit that he's putting out.
And nobody has bothered to confront this guy and stick with it long enough, probably because he's crazy as hell, but nobody's bothered to confront this guy and help him break out of that bubble.
Folks, that's what we're here to do.
Like, share, and subscribe.
You know, I'm not even a YouTuber.
Like, share, and subscribe because The goal here is to wake people up before they do stupid shit like this, if this is indeed what took place.
I mean, but right now, I'm just taking it off face value, but... We're told this guy shows up at 2 a.m., dark golf course with an AK-47, camps out waiting for Trump to play golf later on in the day?
Come on.
Come on.
That's not adding up.
Love it.
Great, great recounting.
Meanwhile, here's why the Secret Service wasn't protecting the golf course from Riveter.
According to the Secret Service, the course wasn't secured because Trump isn't a sitting president.
Here's former President Obama's golf course in Martha's Vineyard.
Secret Service inspects every vehicle that even drives near the course.
Palm Beach Sheriff.
This is what we know about the investigation.
Called in by Secret Service, because we're in constant contact with them.
We were notified.
Our units immediately sealed off the area.
Fortunately, we were able to locate a witness.
Hey, I saw the guy running out of the bushes.
He jumped into a black Nissan.
I took a picture of the vehicle in the tag, which was very helpful with that information.
A real-time crime center set out an alert to the license plate readers.
We were able to get a hit on the vehicle at 995 heading to Martin County.
We contacted the Morton County Sheriff's Office, alerted them, they swatted the vehicle, pulled it over, and detained the suspect afterward.
We flew the witness to the location.
He identified the suspect as a person he saw running out of the bushes and jumping into the car.
In the bushes where the suspect was hiding, we found an AK-47 style rifle with a scope, two backpacks hanging on the fence containing ceramic tiles, and a GoPro, which the suspect intended to use for taking pictures.
Those items are currently being processed.
The Secret Service agent on the course did a fantastic job.
They have an agent who stayed one hole ahead of where the protectee was.
He's able to spot the rifle barrel sticking out of the fence and immediately engage the suspect at which point the individual planned.
So that's what we know about the investigation.
Here we have a report about it from a figure you'll be able to identify.
Who's that?
Who could that be?
All right, let's cross live now to Scott Bennett, former U.S.
Reserve officer.
Scott, local law enforcement complimented the work of the Secret Service during the briefing.
So this reaction differs quite a bit from the response after the Secret Service failed to protect Trump in July when he, during that assassination attempt, where he was nearly shot in the head.
What are your thoughts?
Did the Secret Service do its job today?
Well, first of all, Rachel, it is an honor to be with you as an American commentator on RT, the only network that seems to be telling the truth on this and so many other subjects.
So I just wanted to applaud RT in standing for truth around the world when so many others are desperate in propaganda.
And this seems to be moving in a direction of either you have the lunatic left Democrat Pro-Ukraine warmongers who are desperate to remove Donald Trump because he's against all of that.
Or you have a concerted, planned conspiracy within the highest levels, even the mid-levels of the Secret Service, as you intimated, that are purposefully organizing themselves in a way that is very deficient in the protection that they provide to President Donald Trump.
And I think it is a very real indicator that President Donald Trump needs to immediately compliment a security force with former military retirees, Delta Force, Special Forces, Marine Recon, because he obviously cannot rely on the Secret Service.
And I wouldn't trust any of their back-slapping, flatulent, self-aggrandizing compliments to each other.
They know what they're doing, and they know that they are purposefully and intentionally taking orders from the Biden administration to lessen President Trump's security detail.
They never provided any security to Robert Kennedy Jr., who has had family members killed.
So I think we're entering a time where presidential assassinations are going to be a card that is played, and the purpose of these cards is to disrupt the election In November, I would not doubt that the election is suspended over some sort of an assassination that occurs, whether it's against Kamala Harris and blaming it on a Trump supporter or another attack upon President Trump.
Scott, there have been some reports that I've seen that the alleged suspect had made several anti-Trump posts on social media, and he was also reportedly involved in Raising funds for Ukraine and had even traveled to the country.
I've seen some of these posts by the alleged shooter who did seem to be quite passionate about his beliefs.
I don't want to speculate, but what are your thoughts on on that?
Well, as a former psychological operations officer, I'd say this is this is enfolding a larger narrative, which makes me very suspicious about the broader operation.
This is now trying to enfold that Ukraine is of vital interest, and if President Trump doesn't support Ukraine, he may die.
Now, as someone who's been to Russia and Donbass and seen the firsthand events of this Ukrainian conflict, I can tell you the Ukrainians are on the wrong side of the American public, and they are on the wrong side of the Constitution, and that Russia is fighting to preserve and protect its and that Russia is fighting to preserve and protect its natural-speaking people in the Donbass.
So, President Trump, who I've advised in unofficial ways, and knowing a lot of people close to him, he is aware of the real situation.
He has to be cautious in how he talks about it politically, The President knows that President Trump knows he was duped and lied to by so many people, and he knows the reality that this Ukraine racketeering, criminal syndicate, money laundering, organ harvesting group of Zelensky thugs is not something that the American people want to continue to support.
So if there's any Ukrainian ties associated with this assassin, I think it demonstrates a clumsy attempt to fold the Ukrainian narrative into a threat against President Trump that will only result in his strengthening of his resolve to stand against it.
And we've also seen recently with a Polish foreign minister being caught by the pranksters in trying to admit that President Trump's people would continue to support Ukraine and elevate the situation to force Putin into an agreement.
I think that's a lie.
I think President Trump recognizes the only way to solve this and win this is for President Putin and the Russian people and the Russian government and the Russian interests to be satisfied that they're not going to experience perpetual war against NATO.
And Donald Trump has a great agreement with that.
Scott, the initial reports of this shooting outside the golf course in Florida was that it was just two people shooting at each other, coincidentally near where the former president was golfing.
And I know in the early, you know, reports, you don't want to rush to judgment.
But I'm just wondering, is it common for someone to be walking around with an AK-47?
That, to me, sounds unusual.
I don't know many big horned deer that you could shoot from a golf course in Florida from behind a blind of bushes, poking the barrel of the gun through the fence line with two backpacks, numerous magazines and scopes.
No, this is a ridiculous narrative.
This was an assassination attempt, if it wasn't an operation that was put together by some other government forces, as we've seen suspiciously in the first assassination attempt.
This was in no way, shape, or form a couple of guys playing tag with bullets or blanks.
This was obviously something that was designed to kill the president or to intimidate him.
I don't put past the possibility that they have found a patsy, that they have found some sort of borderline drugged-up lunatic to perform this act.
But I think it shows us, Rachel, honestly, That they are planning assassination games in the future to disrupt the American election.
They may assassinate Kamala Harris and blame it on a Trump supporter.
And this could be the kindling for that fire that they're going to ignite.
And they may replace Kamala Harris with Gavin Newsom or Megan Whitmer or Murphy or an assortment of other handpicks and pull in an October surprise.
So don't be surprised if they coordinate an assassination with President Trump or Kamala Harris with other operations that they're going to be conducting and attacking Russia.
I wouldn't put them past them to attack Russia during the BRICS meeting with missiles and drones from Finland, Sweden, and against Vermont or elsewhere.
We're witnessing the meltdown in the deep state, the meltdown of the dollar, and because of that, they're going to be amplifying their attacks against Russia, and this seems to be a tactic in a broader operation.
Well, it is going to be a bumpy ride for sure as we get closer to the election.
Scott Bennett, former U.S.
Reserve officer.
Scott, thank you.
Thank you, Rachel.
Well done, of course.
Let's go to Bryant.
Bryant, your thoughts.
Okay, so it's a little early to analyze this properly, so we can just sort of take a look at some of the possibilities.
Number one, it was a real assassination scare perpetrated by the U.S.
intelligence communities for the liberal side of the New World Order globalist cabal, and it was a warning to Trump to drop out of the race or die.
OK, that's that one's obvious.
Number two, it was another hoax by the conservative side of the New World Order globalist cult that was executed similarly to the first assassination hoax in Butler in order to draw undecided voters to Trump.
And number three is very real, but that it was a very real but incredibly inept assassination attempt, unless it too was simply just a warning.
This would have been done by the neocons who started the Russian-Ukraine war and who want to continue until Russia is either completely conquered or everybody's fat, hungry bellies are filled with money.
And that makes Trump the neocons' archenemy and his sworn commitment.
Now, I'm telling you that I couldn't conduct.
I'm a licensed private investigator.
Do you think that I could get that close to Trump?
Conduct a surveillance activity that lasts over 12 hours, unnoticed, without the police coming in on a suspicious vehicle?
No, I've been a private investigator for a long time.
People call the police when there's a manned suspicious vehicle sitting on their street conducting some sort of surveillance operation.
Now, I haven't looked at the exact layout.
I don't know everything about the fifth hole at this particular golf course, but Something's not adding up to me because we're told this guy was out at 2 a.m.
scoping the place out.
You know, just what?
You're just gonna sit there and wait for the next fourth one to come through and hope that it's got Donald Trump with them?
According to Trump, he didn't even know if he was playing.
Now, who knows what's real and what's not, but this guy is the perfect shape.
Now, the only thing, there's two things about it that kind of stick in my mind.
Number one, It was an AK-47, not an AR-15.
Okay, they've been pounding away at the AR-15, but if they're wanting the assault weapons ban to cover everything, then you might as well go with an AK-47 and sort of expand the reach from the AR-15.
Number two, unlike all other false flags, or almost all other false flags that I've observed, they always come out within two or three hours and say it appears the shooter acted alone.
Well, guess what?
They haven't.
And they've got a local sheriff that picked him off, not the feds.
Now, how he got away under those circumstances, who knows?
There could be all sorts of things related to it, but nothing smells right to me about this guy or this story.
And I don't think this guy would have had the guts to frankly show up.
A liberal from Hawaii is going to show up with an AK-47?
Come on.
Somebody's pulling this guy's strings.
Let me just add to that.
He flew apparently from Hawaii to this golf course, but he doesn't have any money.
That means somebody had to provide it.
He knew where Trump would be on the golf course and what time he would be there.
How in the world did he get that information?
My best guess is alternative three.
He wasn't trying to kill him, but he's trying to send a warning that if you do not get on board regarding Ukraine, your fate may be sealed.
And I come back to Scott for final thoughts.
Your Scott.
Well, track the gun, track the scopes, track the mags, track, you know, his purchases.
You only buy, you can buy guns like that At gun shows and stores, they're traceable, trackable.
Every purchase of a gun has to go through an ATF inspection.
Brian knows this well, too.
I did it all the time when I purchased in Virginia and various places.
It always goes through a mandatory background check, even when I use private vendors.
So, unless you're buying some black market gun, but you're not going to bring it in from Ukraine, it's impossible to get that kind of a gun, an AK-47 with a scope.
uh without it being traceable and the serial numbers are traceable and uh you know it's that's what it's going to come down to i agree there's something very wrong with this guy because he doesn't have a military bearing he doesn't have any character for this kind of an operation and it tells me he's just a guide on he's just a flag holder uh for someone else to use he's a patsy and snowden said this too he came out with a comment saying this smells like uh oswald And I think that's what it is.
It's a broader operation to use this psychotic socialist as a patsy.
Someone gave him the gun.
Someone told him to be here.
Probably said, you know, you're going to be part of an operation.
And, you know, either they'll kill him or he's a whistleblower.
Or they said, yeah, I don't know.
They just cut him loose.
But I think he's not.
He's certainly not working alone, Jim.
Yeah, good.
All good, you guys.
Both.
Excellent.
Meanwhile... Megan Kelly explained why Kamala looked like she had a perfectly prepared answer to every question at Tuesday night's debate.
The ABC hosted the debate.
It was glorified a media hit job on Trump, and there's a pretty disturbing reason for that.
Political commentator Megyn Kelly revealed there's a bit of an incestuous relationship between the Harris camp and ABC News.
The top exec at Disney, who owns ABC News, just happens to be a close personal friend of Kamala Harris.
The Disney executive, Dana Walton, who literally oversees the ABC News division, and according to Kelly, is so close with Kamala, she actually introduced Harris to her husband, Doug Hamhoff.
I'm ashamed of those moderators at ABC News.
They did exactly what their bosses wanted them to do.
The person who runs ABC News is a close personal friend of Kamala, who's responsible for Kamala and her husband meeting, Kelly said.
They did Dana Walden bidding tonight.
It was three against one on the stage.
During the debate, the moderators fact-checked Trump at least seven times, but let Kamala blatantly lie at least 21.
Not exactly a fair or unbiased exchange.
Walden is not just a close friend.
She has donated to the Democrat politician numerous times throughout her career.
Just last year, she donated $20,000 to support Biden and the Democrat Party.
The debate was never going to be fair.
That was never the plan.
As Kelly points out, the media is trying to steal the election for Kamala Harris.
Meanwhile, tech CEO issued chilling verdict on comrade Kamala's earrings.
Well, that escalated quickly.
Shortly after the debate, the internet was flooded with a flurry of suspicion over Kamala's performance.
Naturally, she had no substance to offer, but she did manage to put together a few sentences coherently by simultaneously vacillating through a bizarre array of expressions.
Which is precisely why many began to theorize Kamala's earrings were, in fact, Bluetooth microphones, specifically the Nova H1 audio earrings, which also feature a pearl.
And while the media was quick to dismiss speculation as false or disinformation, a tech CEO has upended the media's endless defense of the indefensible, as reported by the Daily Mail.
The Nova H1 audio earring may be defined as two tiny high-end microphones integrated into each earring, providing the user with crystal clear phone calls and wind noise cancellation, quite clearly similar to Kamala's earrings.
However, the more troubling verdict is one reached directly by Malte Iversen, who serves as managing director of the Nova Manufacturing Ice Bath Sound.
Rather hilariously, he remarked he can neither confirm nor deny if the effectively communist presidential candidate were wearing the audio earrings, which actually do exist.
I've seen, by the way, the promos for them.
They perform magnificently.
We do not know whether Ms.
Harris wore one of our products.
The resemblance is striking.
And while our product was not specifically developed for use at presidential debates, it's nonetheless suited for it.
Well, no kidding.
Especially for a candidate whose brain is even emptier than her manly pantsuit.
To ensure a level playing field for both candidates, We are currently developing a male version, and we'll soon be able to offer it to the Trump campaign.
Right.
Except, unlike Comrade Kamala Trump, doesn't need weeks of rap-nor-fact-tape spyware implanted in his ear.
Whether or not she was using external assistance during the debate itself, and I guarantee you 100%, she was.
It's quite clear she was given endless passes by the supposed moderators.
Little may wonder, Trump looked rather resigned.
The way else it came across is vastly more presidential than Kamala, needless to say.
I find it interesting how much improvement from her CNN interview to last night.
She stumbled through a taped interview where she answered questions for 16 minutes.
She's suddenly able to make it through two hours?
Doesn't add up for me, one commentator remarked.
Doesn't add up for anyone with any sense.
So Paris Harris is not going to be asked by the media what her plans for the economy or foreign policies are going to be, or plans for the nation or anything else of importance.
Just going to be one joyful surprise for everyone if she gets elected.
A rather scary yet accurate assessment of the situation.
And again, the media loves to misrepresent reality.
Thus its portrayal of everyone adoring Kamala may well be even phonier than its claim regarding the optimal Well, health of Biden, which were blown out of the window after his disastrous debate with Trump, frankly.
Even if Harris herself admitted to using spyware during the debate, the media wouldn't cover it.
In fact, they would censor it, just like they attempted to do with Hunter's home videos.
Scott, your thoughts.
Yeah, we're having a massive information blackout, Jim, on all these levels and all these subjects, and from the assassination attempt of Trump, you know, labeling it as a crazy lone gunman, but with suspicious connections to obvious people close to Trump, providing him with the intel, to now wrapping this with Ukraine.
You know, why isn't anyone else in Congress or anyone else really in the media other than Napolitano and Larry Johnson and McGregor and Ritter and some of these other guys talking like we are?
Why isn't anyone in Congress standing up and using the platform to expose this?
It is a remarkable display of cowardice or treason as far as I'm concerned.
But I think, again, You know, it's funny, I just chatted with one of the RT producers who was the one in Florida who had the FBI come to her house, kick open the door and interrogate her.
And she just wrote me and said, Scott, I don't know if you know, but I had to leave.
I'm in Russia now because the FBI came to my house.
Right?
I use an accent because I like doing it.
But the FBI...
The FBI came to her house, kicked open the door, asked her all sorts of questions about who is, you know, Simone Yan, the gal who runs RT.
You know, has she ever met Putin?
Well, you know, trying to get all this information.
And this little gal lived in Florida and she's an RT producer.
And then immediately when the FBI came into her house, the next day she got out.
She left.
She's back in Russia because They are going full-bore information, Nazi brown shirt, scooping up everybody and anyone they can to shut down the information systems.
In war, you take out the satellites, the radio stations, and the television stations, and the newspapers.
That's how you blind, deaf, and dumb the population.
That's what they're trying to do to America.
It is unconstitutional.
It's a violation of our rights.
It is an act of war, you could say even, for Blinken and these people to do this.
It's denying the American public essential information That if they knew, it would drastically alter their impression of the Ukraine war and steer them towards a, oh, hell no, we're done with all of that.
If they knew a fraction about the Ukraine-Russian war and the conflict and the stories and the oligarchs and all of this evil, every American with a brain would say, no, we're done with all of that.
But the fact that they're trying to cover up and stop that information by Threatening people like Lauren Chen and her media company that got money from RT through a third party.
Not to speak the narrative of Russia or Putin or anything else, but to speak conservatively.
Lauren Chen is a conservative podcaster.
I think she's a lovely Chinese Canadian girl.
And she's a feminine, conservative girl.
They're not broadcasting Russian talking points.
Yet, the Department of Justice came in and shut down their whole media company.
They went to Scott Ritter and shut him down.
And I think he foolishly talked to them for five hours, but they went on and said, you know, interrogated him.
And he was hoping, hey, this is a big misunderstanding and spoke to them.
No, they then said, you're going to shut down all of your operations with RT.
And he was writing articles about his opinions, not their opinions, his opinions.
So once again, they're trying to develop this endless war against Russia just before the election, because I know if Donald Trump gets in and there's a free and clear and quiet election and he wins, they're going to try and continue this deep state, will impeach Trump if he doesn't go to war against Russia.
Or they're just using that as background noise while they do their coup d'etat and all sorts of terrorist activities within the US, which I think the latter is going to happen.
I think we're going to see all sorts of explosions and violence and terrorism in the United States that they try and blame on Russia, Trump supporters, in order to suspend the election.
Jim?
Brian?
Okay, so I guess my point on this particular article is that people need to start thinking for themselves.
And I hate to say something that sounds so sophomoric, but it's true.
I just took the time because I was thinking, you know, I want to contrast the CNN interview where Kamala Harris clumsily had to have Tim Waltz prop her up and there was 43 minutes of shooting and they cut it down to 22 minutes in order to make it presentable.
And then, you know, she was apparently stumbling all over the interview.
And then she comes up to the debate and all of a sudden it's Johnny on the spot.
She's got her comebacks.
She's prepared.
Obviously, she knows all the questions in advance.
Now, I expect that kind of chicanery from the mainstream media on all levels.
I expect the pure fact-checking of Donald Trump.
I expect that.
There's no surprise to us.
But here's the problem, okay?
When I was thinking about the contrast, I thought, you know, I wonder if anybody else has said anything about this particular contrast that I just recognized.
So what did I do?
I googled it.
Compare and contrast, you know, Kamala's CNN performance versus Kamala's debate performance.
I was on page six of the Google results and I realized something.
They've cut out all the conservative viewpoints.
It's a pure propaganda machine that drives The liberal media talking points that Kamala Harris, you know, smoked the debate across the board.
And here's the problem.
A large portion of the American people are incapable of thinking for themselves.
I think a lot of people have to turn 35, 45, 55 before they even, you know, can really get the ball rolling in terms of thinking.
So what do they do?
They look for the group thing.
Well, I want to believe what the masses believe.
It's called the fallacy of the mass is also known as group thing.
I want to know what everybody else is thinking.
So I'm going to go to Google.
Because I'm going to be able to see what everybody else is thinking.
And it's a major problem right now.
If I've got to go six pages, and I still haven't seen of Google results, and I still haven't seen a singular article that gives me the answer to my question.
It's all just gaslighting and puffery.
Then we've got a major problem.
So I suspect that the Google breakup needs to be something that we need to cover in a little more detail moving on.
That's good.
That's a good point, too.
That's exactly what Trump needs to do is, and he should have done this first time, but file antitrust legal action against Google.
Break those fuckers up like you're breaking up a dirt clod.
Anti-trust legal action.
Get a real man to be the attorney general.
Get General Maximus in there.
Zara calls for an investigation of ABC and suits against it.
Here, look at this.
Aberdeen, but before ABC rigged the debate.
This was a whistleblower reporting how they were rigging the debate before it took place.
An employee of ABC blew the whistle on the debate being rigged.
He's been Killed in a car accident near Bethesda, Maryland?
I have the sworn affidavit provided before the debate, which outlines the rigging before it took place.
The sworn affidavit, which appears below, from a longtime ABC News employee, proves ABC News conspired with the Harris campaign to rig the presidential debate between Harris and Trump.
The affidavit.
was sent a full day before the debate to speaker johnson at the house of representatives and by certified mail and fedex so that to prove the date of its filing the harris campaign demanded trump be fact-checked to interrupt his answers during the debate and that a whole series of questions could not be asked of kamala the dirt on harris is real
The whistleblower who filed this affidavit was killed in a car accident near Bethesda Friday night.
The multi-part sworn affidavit appears below.
Meanwhile—oh, that's just a note about special.
Meanwhile, affidavit drops, and yes, it really is a bombshell of truth.
Documents are being provided by prominent ex-users of the whistleblower affidavit.
If they're real and the information is accurate, it's a legitimate bombshell to be widely ignored by all the corporate media.
The skeptic in me, writes J.D.
Rocker, wants to hear from official sources, including Speaker of the House Johnson, who allegedly was in contact with him, but everything about the document seemed to jive with not only what's rumored, but what we saw during the presidential debate.
Here are the first six pages Bob Podduly swore to make.
My name resides in New York, worked for ABC for 10 years in various technical and admin positions.
Since the acquisition of ABC News in 1996, I've observed significant transformations in the nature of news reporting at the organization.
Suggesting a shift from unbiased reporting to a model influenced by external factors.
For the record, I do not endorse Donald Trump in his capacity as a candidate for president.
The intent of this affidavit is to address concerns regarding perceived biases within news reporting within my employer's debate that will be hosted on September 10th.
Observations.
Since the debate has been announced, various members, staff, and express hope of a debate where issues that were important to everyday Americans would be discussed, and there had been promises made, the candidate would be held to firm discussion regarding their proposed policy stances, and the debate would not deteriorate into an ad campaign where both candidates would simply make a blanket statement without specific policy or explanation as to their meaning.
Many employees of ABC were looking for a fair and honest debate, questioning the clear bias that is well known throughout the company.
It's common knowledge that debate moderators, as well as CEOs of my employer, are well known not to support Donald Trump, which led to several employees speaking up in regard to how fair the debate was going to be.
We were given assurances the debate would be fair and that neither the Harris nor Trump campaign would have an unfair advantage.
It is my belief that contemporary news organizations, including ABC, no longer adhere to impartiality.
The influence of commercial interests and substantial donors appears to affect news presentation, resulting in selective reporting and biased narratives.
I have personally witnessed news stories being cut from programming and not reported at all due to the influence of certain corporations linked to our parent company.
I have noted specific instances related to the debate between Trump and Harris that raise concern about procedural fairness.
The specific instances of perceived bias are as follows.
Harris' campaign received accommodation, including not limited to the providing of a podium significantly smaller than that used by Donald Trump, and assurance regarding split-screen television views that would favorably impact Harris' appearance.
Relative to Trump.
It was agreed that Trump would be subject to fact-checking during the debate while Harris would not face comparable scrutiny.
This was widely known throughout the company.
Donald Trump would be fact-checked.
Various people who were assigned to fact-checking observations was perceived candidate Trump would make during the debate.
In fact, Harris campaign required assurances that Trump would be fact-checked.
It was done via multiple communication with the Harris campaign, where the Trump campaign was not included in the negotiations.
To my understanding, any rule negotiation or conversation pertaining to the debate should have been both Trump and Harris campaign involved, but the Harris campaign had numerous more calls regarding the rules without the Trump campaign Being aware or on the call.
The Harris campaign was provided with sample questions that, while not the exact questions, covered similar topics that would appear during the debate.
Furthermore, the Harris campaign imposed restrictions on the scope of questioning included no question regarding the perceived health of President Joe Biden, no inquiries related to her tenure as Attorney General in San Francisco, It was actually District Attorney and then Attorney General for California.
No questions concerning her brother-in-law, Tony West, who faces allegations of embezzling billions in taxpayer funds and who may have been involved in her administration if elected.
That's a doozy.
I didn't know that one myself.
I have observed a pronounced bias against Trump within expressing favorable views toward him, experienced significant concern about potential retribution.
This affidavit is executed to document and provide transparency regarding the issue of earnest and impartiality in the debate process.
This affidavit has been signed and notarized on September 9, 2024, to ensure the allegations set forth are formally documented prior to the debate.
In addition to notarizing, I sent a certified letter to myself postmarked September 9th, which will remain unopened for future investigation.
I've dispatched a FedEx package with the affidavit on September 9th, delivered to my residence September 10th.
I sent a certified letter to Speaker Mike Johnson dated September 9th to establish a record about a correspondence set before the debate commenced for further investigation I've secretly recorded.
Several conversations that would prove the Harris campaign insisted upon not only the fact-checking of Donald Trump, but what questions were not to be asked under any circumstances or the Harris campaign would decline to participate in the debate.
I make these statements under penalty of perjury without coercion of any kind, verification being sworn, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Wow.
Here's some of the key points.
ABC was coordinating with Harris' campaign far more than Trotsch.
They agreed not to ask questions on subjects that would have been detrimental to Harris.
The same considerations were not offered to Trump Absolutely!
Nor did his campaign ask for them.
Sample questions were provided to the Harris campaign, but not to Trump.
Fact-checks on Trump were required by the Harris campaign, but she was not based comparable fact-checking.
Split-screen views were required to favor Harris.
It's noteworthy the affidavit was signed, notarized, and mailed out before the debate.
The fact that everything the whistleblower detailed appears to have happened makes this exceedingly damning.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, I question everything and anybody.
I don't believe anything.
So I would want to validate this person existed, validate that if there was a notary, that the notary be examined, because I know how notaries work.
So, it can be verified and it needs to be verified.
Who he is, who the notary is, when was this done, was there any attorneys?
Because, you know, if it is real, it should be turned into a major lawsuit, a major congressional investigation against ABC and, you know, this whole operation.
But, you know, it's par for the course.
They're contributing to a manipulation and a dishonest one, too, if Kamala Harris has earbuds in.
And that should be, of course, a rule.
You don't have earbuds.
You don't have earrings.
The purpose is not for Barack Obama to whisper into your ear, Kamala Harris, and give you the answers.
But I would just say it needs to be verified.
Jim, go ahead.
Well, I can't imagine what other steps he could have taken.
He's got that verified, then there's the outline there, and now the guy is dead.
Well, no, I mean verify him, that he existed, that the notary existed, because it's very easy for counterintelligence to put together an affidavit and say those very things.
I don't believe anybody.
I don't believe anybody until I verify, and Brian knows this very well, too.
Look, I appreciate all that.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, Joe Biden got 81 million votes, so there's no gaslighting taking place in any of this at all.
Surprise, surprise, the lefty media is willing to rig a debate to get it going.
Look, but we all know that the lefty media, all the media, big apparatus media, is nothing more than a propaganda machine.
So what do you expect from a propaganda machine except for propaganda?
And that's what this debate was.
What do you think the CNN interview was?
I mean, it's propaganda.
The woman is obviously a puppet.
She doesn't have a brain cell in her head.
She's not intelligent enough to be president.
And Trump sat down without all those advantages and, in my opinion, smoked her.
But what is the mainstream media doing?
They're gaslighting all around the world that Harris beat Trump in the debate because she kept her feminine strength in place and told the orange man bad to go.
There's no surprise here for any of our listeners.
The fact that somebody did an affidavit and was willing to risk this level of scrutiny and danger in their lives just shows that they've had some sort of come-to-Jesus meeting that's also part of what appears to be some sort of walk-away mentality where they've said, hey, I've had enough of this.
This isn't making any intellectual sense.
So to me, great news.
That somebody woke up because I think that's half the battle and maybe he'll bring along with him some other soldiers that might be willing to stand up and tell the truth from the mainstream media.
And I'm done with Megyn Kelly and Tucker Carlson and these guys aren't telling the truth.
They're big names on the conservative side and they put on a good show.
They ain't telling the truth.
Give me a break.
Okay, thanks.
Thanks very much.
Meanwhile, Cruz claimed Biden-Harris weaponized government for four years.
We have no doubt they did.
Texas Senator Cruz has a history of calling out the Biden admin for abusing its power.
He doubled down on that message now.
The Lone Star Lawmaker made the remarks Monday on the September 9th edition of the Chris Saucedo Show addressing Trump's business lawsuit in New York, how it was recently described by Big Apple's top federal prosecutor as a travesty of justice.
Cruz said that the case involving hush money payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels said to have been done under false presence to sway the 2016 election is utterly corrupt.
The former president was found guilty of all 34 counts against him, but is yet to be sentenced.
Cruz spoke primarily about the trial as an example of how Biden had been weaponizing the federal government.
He said there's been a pattern presenting itself the past four years when Biden and Harris have been using federal agencies to go after their enemies.
He named the DOJ and the Federal Bureau of Investigation as key agencies, first and foremost targeting Trump, indicted by Democrats in four separate cases, and as Cruz noted, has never before occurred in the United States.
He further argued Democrats targeting Trump are doing so as an act of psychological projection, meaning they're claiming the former president done wrongs that they themselves are engaging in.
He described the targeting of the GOP nominee as an attack on democracy resulting from the left-wing party being terrified Americans will vote for Trump.
Additionally, express support for a continuing resolution linked to a bill related to election integrity.
It's being spearheaded by Speaker Johnson, working around the clock to ensure the federal government can have approved funding before the start of the fiscal year on October 1st.
Cruz said this proposal, especially the part about election integrity, is the right thing to do.
He pointed out it would reveal an enormous amount of insight regarding Democrat lawmakers and leaders if they're willing to force the government to undergo a partial shutdown instead of strengthening voter verification in the upcoming election.
But Johnson's plan is not one to support every Republican in Congress.
Despite being backed by some lawmakers like Cruz, a handful of others are determined to vote against it, even though it's also supported by Trump.
Five Republicans have already declared dissent, one more than Johnson can afford to have against him.
The CR would give six additional months to allow updated federal funding to be approved without the imminent threat of shot down.
The legislation paired with it, called the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility or SAVE Act, would require in-person citizenship verification for everyone registering to vote.
Meanwhile, Alan Dershowitz, prominent attorney and lifelong Democrat, leaves the party.
Renowned attorney and Harvard Law professor Dershowitz has announced his departure from the Democrat Party.
Derek Dershowitz has been a prominent figure in the legal and political circle for decades, side growing to satisfaction with the party's direction as a key region for his decision.
He's been increasingly critical of what he perceives as a shift toward the far left, particularly in regard to free, sweet due process and issues surrounding Israel.
He says the party's current trajectory no longer aligns with his values and principles.
This decision marks a significant political shift for Dershowitz, who has historically supported and defended many Democrat leaders.
Brian, your thoughts?
I am very glad to see Dershowitz come around on this.
I see a lot of people that are beginning to make the move, going the other direction.
I think it's a step in the right direction, but I don't think that winning the war is switching from Democrat to Republican at all.
I think it's exiting both structures and taking a look at Independence and independent thought as more of a leader.
The problem that we've got in the Republican Party, as that article about Ted Cruz comes out and clearly says, is that we have too much of a uniparty in place, and we know that there are foreign influences masquerading as United States AIPAC members that are simply controlling the mechanism.
Thomas Massey called them babysitters.
That work on behalf of all of these house reps and all of these senators.
Now, I was thinking about this and, you know, my first initial knee-jerk reaction to a Ted Cruz save act was, oh, I'll take 20 Thomas Masseys over one Ted Cruz.
But then I started thinking about it and going, you know, it's not like he's playing for the other team.
He's just trying to be a politician and survive in D.C., which is such a swamp.
And he's doing the best he can under the circumstances that he's working with, and at least he's on our side of the war.
So I'm not going to go ahead and throw shade at Ted Cruz.
I like Ted Cruz.
I think he's done some good things here for America.
You can't win all the battles all the time.
And I'll take a Ted Cruz, and I'll take a Thomas Massey, and I'll take a Carrie Lake.
And I'll take a number of different guys, especially some of the guys from Texas that I consider to be good guys.
I like to see that Dershowitz is coming over to the Republican side, but I would have much rather seen Dershowitz say, I'm going independent and I'm going with the truthers.
That's what real change is all about.
It's not about switching parties from one corrupt structure to the next.
It's about breaking loose and saying, you know what?
I'm going to start influencing some people for the truth.
I like that, Brian.
That's a very interesting suggestion.
Meanwhile, lawfare collapsing among Harris's vow to prosecute Trump.
Largely shedding Biden's canard that Trump must be defeated to save democracy, Harris has conceded she prosecutes criminals and Donald Trump is one.
I know Donald Trump's type.
She sneers.
The San Francisco D.A.
and then-California A.G.
Harris supported jailing parents of truants, suppressing evidence, keeping an innocent man on death row, repeatedly covering up misconduct, leading to dismissal of more than 600 cases, incarcerating prisoners beyond their sentences, violate a federal law that protects donor privacy, fail to disclose conflicts of interest arising from her personal relationships.
The record of abusing prosecutorial power fits perfectly with Democrat lawfare against Trump and his advisors.
Now, following setbacks for prosecutors, Trump will have a reprieve in further substantive proceedings until after the election.
Colorado, Maine, and Illinois determined Trump an insurrectionist ineligible for the presidency.
In Trump v. Anderson, however, the U.S.
Supreme Court unanimously rejected this travesty.
Among other failings, the state violated a requirement that Congress determine the process.
Trump has never been indicted for, let alone convicted of, insurrection.
Left's least favorite judge, U.S.
District Judge Eileen Cannon, dismissed the Mar-a-Lago Classified Record case.
Pauline Smith's appointment as special prosecutor violated the Appointment Clause of the Constitution, and his use of a permanent indefinite appropriation violated the Appropriations Clause.
The government refused a compromise that might have saved the case and is appealing.
In Trump v. United States, Sector 3 held the President is immune for official acts, meaning actions he's taken in the performance of his official duties.
His motives cannot be questioned.
His official acts may not be used as evidence in prosecution of his private acts.
Smith filed a superseding indictment that suffers many of the same defects as the initial, including as to immunity, novel legal theories, and the First Amendment right to free speech and petition.
Despite Judge Tanya Chutkan's best effort to move the case forward, she has bowed to reality, delaying the next hearing until after the election.
In Fisher v.
U.S., Supreme Court threw out federal prosecutors' list of 18 U.S.C.
1512c2 to prosecute January 6th defendants for interfering in congressional proceedings, calling the statute as limited to tampering with or destroying official records.
That ruling will also narrow Trump's election fraud case.
A Georgia appeal court agreed to hear a challenge of Fannie Willis' right to remain a prosecutor, scheduling an argument too late for a trial this year.
Even if Willis prevails, the immunity decision versus amendment misapplication of Georgia RICO statute likely will doom her case.
The Nevada court dismissed an indictment against six Republicans accused of submitting certificates to Congress falsely declaring Trump the winner of the state 2020 presidential election.
No doubt they were not false.
New York cases are more problematic, abused by prosecutors around platforms of getting Trump.
There are at least a dozen reasons Trump's conviction in Alvin Bragg's business record case should be reversed.
Trial judge Juan Merchant delayed sentencing until November 26, when he first must rule on whether to vacate the verdict because he allowed testimony by federal officials, homelooks, and Trump's assistant about Trump's official acts as president, now prohibited by the Supreme Court's immunity decision.
More damaging!
In Erlinger v. United States, the court held that a unanimous jury verdict is required for any factual finding that increases a potential sentence.
Merchant did not require unanimity to identify the so-called other crime used to convert an expired business record misdemeanor into 34 felonies.
Judge Arthur Ingram found Trump liable in New York Attorney General Letitia James' so-called civil fraud case for misstating asset value and loan applications.
Though the bank testified they did not rely on the statements, lost no money, and would continue to do business with Trump.
Erdogan ordered Trump to pay $455 million and forfeit his New York businesses.
The appeals court, however, stated most of his ruling allowed Trump to boast a reduced bond of $175 for his appeal.
The fine of liability may survive, but the penalty should be vacated as excessive under the Eighth Amendment and Article I, Section 5 of the New York Constitution, among other flaws.
If Trump is elected, he can order the federal prosecution against him and or pardon himself, and the state cases likely will be delayed until he leaves office.
If Harris wins, the Democrats can be expected to press forward.
Though the Trump legal team has carved back most of the cases and will continue to do so, a conviction could still mean jail time.
Democrats are doing better in their lawfare against Trump advisers who have limited immunity defenses.
Several are defendants in Georgia, Arizona, Michigan.
Giuliani and Eastman are being disbarred.
At least eight other Trump lawyers faced disciplinary proceedings.
Pierre Navarro and Steve Bannon were jailed for refusing to testify to the January 6th committee.
The last time a resuscitant congressional witness was jailed appears to be in 1948.
But for Trump's wealth and perseverance, however, he might now be in jail.
Democrats financially destroyed or jailed his closest political advisors and are broadly threatening Republican Party lawyers.
Usually.
Harris talks about the criminal justice system from the far left.
But, like other progressives, when she's in the pursuit mode, the Constitution, equal justice, and fundamental principles are mere affect.
They don't matter.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, it's funny that... You know the symbol that looks like a number symbol?
It's also used at the end of chess matches as... Hashtag, yeah.
Hashtag, yeah.
It's also used as checkmate.
It's standard notification notation in chess.
And Trump, even given the whole Mass of all that information still tweets out checkmate.
Now I do believe that he has people that are running some sort of operation, and I believe that the reason Kennedy's on the ticket is to help clean out the swamp.
Now, but does it make sense?
I mean, Donald Trump had Mike Pompeo and Gina Haspel as CIA, you know, leads under him.
How serious are you about cleaning out the swamp if you've got Gina Haspel on your basically payroll working for you?
So there's a lot aligned against Trump.
Obviously, there are a lot of far left leaning forces that have been controlling academia that think that they're smarter and more powerful than the MAGA crowd.
But they're finding themselves now in a very weak position where they're being torn apart, chewed up and spit out, and people are leaving their party by the droves.
And it's probably because they overplayed their hand with the LGBTQ trans abortion agenda and all the other crazy lefty liberal agendas that people are now beginning to see as absolutely ridiculous and intellectually indefensible.
So, and as for the attacks, okay, does it surprise you that both Kamala Harris and Big Fanny Willis went to Howard University?
They were both in the same sorority.
Does it surprise you that the lady that did the debate was also in that same sorority, although at a different college?
Does it surprise you that these lefties are aligning themselves and taking whatever financial Veins they possibly can, given the circumstances.
No, it's not going to surprise you at all.
The only journalist jobs out there right now that pay any money are working for the big media industrial apparatus.
And they, of course, make the rules.
If you're going to work for them, you're not going to write about this or you're going to write about that poorly.
So we're seeing all sorts of attacks.
Now, who do I really blame under on all this lawfare?
Bar associations, the bar associations.
President of every bar association that's been involved with any of this in any states.
And by the way, Georgia is so rottenly corrupt, Georgia is so rottenly corrupt, that the Georgia presidential candidates are going to have five, the Georgia ballots are going to have five names, including Cornel West, Claudia Dela Cruz,
Uh, and, uh, and Jill Stein, Chase Oliver, Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, six names actually, but whose name is not going to be on it.
RFK is junior because he's, he's been disqualified because he supported Trump.
So, I mean, the system is obviously rigged.
And remember last time Trump only lost Georgia by quote unquote, 12,000 votes.
Which means they had to erase, flip, or set up enough ballots.
They couldn't do it.
There's only 12,000 votes.
Great points.
Great points, Ryan.
Meanwhile...
Emails expose how Biden, Harris, FDA, and IHL knew COVID vaccines were killing people but promoted them anyway.
Back in 2022, Biden and Harris were insisting people needed to trust the science and get their experimental COVID vaccine if they wanted to live.
The regime was wishing the narrative anyone who refused would almost certainly die due to the virus.
Remember their infamous winter of death comments?
But despite what they were saying in public, Maya and Harris and their top health officials knew the truth about the vax, which is not only that they worked only marginally for a brief period of time, but in many cases they were even more dangerous than the virus itself.
According to newly released documents, back in 2022, top officials at the FDA and NIH were growing increasingly concerned about adverse reactions to the vaccine.
Children's health events obtained a document via Freedom of Information Act request, but not without the government fighting to keep them hidden from the public.
The reason?
The docs contained records of private emails exchanged between FDA and NIH discussing the growing rate of adverse effects associated with the vacs they were shoving down our throats.
In January 2022, top FDA officials admitted There's scientific data regarding adverse effects.
Then an email entitled Impromptu Meetup was sent, and an individual's name was redacted in an attempt to set up a seemingly urgent meeting to review the data.
A high-ranking FDA official said the FDA was not having in-person meetings, but agreed to schedule a discussion to have the right people attend.
Fauci did not clarify who the right people were.
It's safe to assume they were all powerful individuals who, for whatever reason, had a vested interest in covering up the deadly truth about the facts.
Month before, in September 2021, a top NIH official acknowledged the potential dangers associated with the boosters.
NIH scientist Baroness Savvy wrote in an email to a VAX-injured individual, we do not have any data to suggest for or against Wooster shots, but the consensus among our team is not to take if patient develops significant neurological complication post-vaccine.
And all of this was just the start.
Many vaccine-injured vics would go on to reach out to NIH in desperation, and while some got responses at first, the vast majority were flat-out ignored.
What happened was NIH was overwhelmed by the sheer number of VAX-injured people who are contacting them.
As for the FDA, several top officials reportedly scheduled meetings with the VAX-injured and then never showed up.
Emails showed not long after the COVID VAX were first rolled out, government officials became aware of just how dangerous they actually were and chose to do absolutely nothing.
And both Biden and Harris are complicit in all of this, because NIH and FDA were delivering briefings to the White House, where likely they would have shared the never-ending reports of adverse reactions to the vax.
Our government was straight up ignoring people who were getting sick and dying from a vax they told us was not just safe, but life-saving.
How disgusting is that?
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, it's the degradation of science by the academic institutions in exchange for the continued grants that drives all of this behavior.
The NIH is not doing any of the research themselves.
They're just simply allocating the money and doling it out.
And of course, there's so much Incentive to fix the results of your scientific studies to continue to get the grant money or to look like a hero and get even more grant money.
That's what's driving the corruption in this.
The Hippocratic Oath is dead.
Science is dead in terms of modern medicine and vaccines.
I just got a call from my sister the other day who believes that she's going to reach her demise much earlier than she would have.
Because she believes that the treatment that she got for her breast cancer was actually more deadly than the breast cancer itself.
So she believes now that the radiation has burnt her all over inside and she's facing Deadly serious consequences as a result of this.
Now, we still know that the childhood injection schedule being presented by the WHO includes 72 vaccines, and I am proud as hell of RFK Jr.
for joining Crump At least making the statements at this point in time that he's going to try to clean up this mess somewhere along the way.
Right now is the time for people to go out there and begin taking a look at alternative medicines and theories and natural approaches towards different diseases and looking at outside-the-box theories rather than going into the hospitals, which I believe will kill you After they've sucked your estate absolutely dry, even with insurance.
Brian, you're actually very nice, very nice.
Your comments and Scott's throughout have been simply splendid.
Don, take us out.
Oh, wow.
My show.
Remember my vaccine here.
Excuse me.
When you can't trust the medicine and doctors, well, who could you trust?
And it's just that way, and I'm really sorry about that.
We're having a real struggle here, from all sides, a battle in America for control, and it's really more for control.
It should be for freedom and justice and things like this, but it seems like there's power struggles that are going on that are just outrageous, unfair, and dishonest, and that's life in America.
So here we are, for truth versus the news.
And I will say that this truth is going to stand, and news can do all kinds of stuff, but the truth will eventually stand, and will stand forever.
And we may not, but the truth will stand in the end.
So we're here till the end, and this is the end of our show for today, and I hope you come back next week.
I understand that the money is supposed to be gone next week, and it's going to say September 23rd, and you might not be able to exchange those nice little greenbacks.
We'll see.
So if you want to come back for the next week's show, and God bless, see you then.
▲
Export Selection