Celia Farber on the Lembit Öpik Show! - Sept. 05, 2024
|
Time
Text
and strange similarities to how AIDS was also handled.
All of that with me, Lembretropic, on TNT.
See you in a moment.
Today's News Talk Radio.
Come on, let the man talk.
We never censor our hosts.
Good.
Now talk.
Uncensored news.
On today's News Talk.
TNT.
Just a bloke says, Lembret, it's not about the environment.
They don't want us travelling or having independence of any kind.
I think you're right.
It certainly can't be about the environment because it's a scientifically illiterate policy to make more CO2 to make us buy electric cars.
It's just rubbish.
We amazingly have much surveillance track and trace, says Blod as well.
That leads us very comfortably to the next guest, Celia Farber, journalist who chronicled Well, Anthony Fauci and Dark Farmer's War on Science and Biology for various magazines.
She's got a lot of heat on this over the last few decades.
She's written for everyone, really.
Harper's, The Squire, Rolling Stone, Spin, Salon, The Epoch Times, and many more.
And she's won awards for this.
But also, you've had heat for it.
Thanks for joining us, Celia.
You're very qualified to answer this question.
What are the similarities with AIDS and COVID-19 with reference to how the media and how governments have colluded to broadcast the story?
Oh, where do I begin?
Great to be with you.
Thank you for having me, Glen.
Great to have you.
It's such a perfect fit.
It's hard to know where to begin.
But let me try not necessarily I'll get this right in order of importance, the most important thing first, but I'll do my best.
Okay, so the foundation that's laid with AIDS theology, HIV AIDS theology, under Tony Fauci, Robert Gallo, and a long list of dark names, in the early 80s, quintessentially kicks off in 1984.
The foundation that is laid is the sudden, total destruction, annihilation, almost overnight of classical science, that is to say evidence based science, if we're going to assert through mass media, that there's a killer virus, and everybody is at risk, we better have some kind of proof.
It was gone.
And in its place, there's just a press conference.
And if we ever got into the weeds, if we had a lot of time about what What led to the proclamation at the press conference, maybe for now just take my word for it, it was fraud, scientific, outright scientific fraud committed by Robert Gallo.
That is to say he wrote it into being with his own pen in the notes.
The lab notes showed the opposite of what Robert Gallo said.
So they had nothing But they had the mass media, and they had what I would call media sorcery.
And they launched it, and the whole world fell under a dark spell that lasted for decades.
And in some parts of the world, maybe it's still in effect.
And the dark spell said, there's a new virus, came from a very far away place, we are in charge, trust us.
And there was exactly what you talk about so often on your show, you and your guests, That kind of like black seed that leads to a whole industry of catastrophism for decades to come.
Catastrophism, grift, exactly the same with HIV AIDS.
But HIV AIDS was one of the first ones.
So people were not primed yet to think that it could be false.
Now I want to slow down and make sure that I'm, you know, that you're with me so far.
It's exactly like COVID in that it was false.
So what was it fueled by?
What made it fly besides sorcery, mass media?
The point I've stressed over and over is that woke-ism is what made it fly.
It wasn't called woke-ism then.
If it had a name, and it didn't really in 1984, later it came to be called political correctness.
So empty phrases designed to cripple people's minds and guilt trip them hooked in.
And all of this, this goes without saying all of Hollywood, all the media, all the big organizations, all the activist groups, it was just the way to be and the thing to think that there was a deadly virus had come from Africa, anybody could get it spread sexually, heterosexuals were next.
Let me just take a breath and ask you, do you remember I'm 59.
psychological operation.
I'm 59.
I remember from around 83, 84, when I first heard about it, right through the late 80s and early 90s, it was center stage for our medical reporting in the UK, Though I just want to ask you, when you say it was misleading, what specifically, for our viewers, are you saying was not true about the HIV AIDS reportage?
Right, so...
There was never a functional model for it.
There was never an animal model for it.
A set of rules that used to govern classical causation epidemiology, this organism causes this disease, had to follow Four rules called Koch's postulates.
HIV did not fulfill any of them.
That means the organism has to be present in every person who is afflicted with the disease or the syndrome.
It cannot be present in anybody who doesn't have it.
It has to recreate the same disease in an animal model and on and on.
So, it didn't even attempt to fulfill classical virological principles.
When I say it, we have another problem, because a sub-war of the does HIV cause AIDS battle, which I chronicled as a journalist since 1987, when it first broke out, the sub-war was, was HIV as a real biological entity ever isolated and purified?
In other words, does it exist to even cause anything?
So those are two Fiercely oppositional camps, believe it or not.
There's like a civil war inside the bigger war.
You know, it's a, it's a, it's a burden when you kind of have been involved in one single subject for so many years and you want to say the elemental thing first.
So, basically what was not there was the foundation of A kind of a classical scientific method that would prove either to the scientists involved, never mind to the public, we have good reason to think this specimen causes this disease.
Okay.
All they had was a sample that was sent to the United States from France for interpretation, which was found in the cord blood of many sick gay men who had the syndrome.
That what happened next is it really, it doesn't lend itself to it to talk about it here.
But I can say categorically that it was what was coming together that's now upon us all with the COVID, I would call it the COVID Reich, is a fusion of emerging technologies, technocracy itself as a religion.
That means instead of saying, Person A is sick.
What have they been subject to?
What drugs have they taken?
What immune suppressive things might they have done?
Instead, you rely entirely on a newly invented, highly lucrative technology called a test, and you get people running out to get tested.
Identical with COVID, except to our horror, those of us who came to be known as HIV dissidents, or to our enemies, HIV denialists, To our horror, when COVID was launched in 2020, they hinged the whole thing on a PCR test, which they didn't even do with HIV.
They had other tests called ELISA, Western blot, and a PCR test played a role in it.
You could not launch a terror on anything more baseless than a PCR test.
Um, but again, the public didn't know, so they believed the PCR test was a was a was a way to find out if somebody had coven as the.
Inventor of PCR, not the test of PCR technology.
Cary Mullis has said over and over, I knew him well, I interviewed him many times, starting in the early 90s.
He said, PCR is not designed to identify any infectious agent.
It cannot tell you if you're going to get sick, it cannot tell you anything.
It is not designed for that.
So we're in an absolute freefall where nothing needs to be connected to reality, evidence, science, Forget ethics.
It doesn't have to be anymore because they built this machine fueled by woke, fueled by, of course, immense greed.
But more importantly, I think this, this fundamentalist ideology that has gripped the world, which you talk about all the time, we have different names for it, right?
Catastrophism, you know, it's basically a world order crowd.
We didn't understand the New World Order angle to the AIDS thing.
We thought we were tackling horrendously fraudulent science and greed and woke-ism, but we did not understand what the big plan was.
What is the big plan?
I was afraid you could ask me that.
I set myself up.
Well, you did set yourself up for it, but it's a very salient question.
Yeah, if I had to get in a certain boat on that, I would say all arrows point to a long-planned depopulation agenda and a New World Order agenda, which they were clear decades ago, as early as the 60s, we're going to use
novel diseases, we're going to make people afraid of each other, we're going to make doctors kind of the priesthood, so all of these things.
The main themes, I want to say it more simply, that parallel between AIDS and COVID, it's almost like I would call it an occult religion that
that is deeply atheistic and cuts off any recognition of God, the Creator, and displaces it to a kind of negative worship of viral deities, which in most cases do not exist at all.
This is the most frustrating moment to stop the interview only because of lack of time, but occasionally I do have a series on Saturdays when we have a whole hour.
Celia, you've got to come on one of those because that summary you gave at the end is exactly what I think is going on.
A cultist replacement of I'm fascinated by what you say.
moral framework with total relativism and anti-scientific control or non-scientific control.
I'm fascinated by what you say.
No wonder you've been getting heat because you've been calling it out before the rest of us.
I'm not the most popular. .
You are here.
I love free thinkers.
Thank you.
I'm sorry.
It's not because I don't want to talk more about it.
It's just I've got to get one more guest in today.
Celia Farber, we will definitely be in touch.
That sounded like a trailer for a fascinating 90 minute program.
Maybe we'll be in touch.
Maybe there's a show to be made here, actually.
I'd love to come back anytime.
Thank you, Lambert.
Thank you.
That is Celia Farber.
Frustrating, I know, for all of us.
That was fascinating where we left that conversation.
I will find a way to get Celia back quite soon, but I do have to get one more guest in today.
Apologies for that to Celia, but very good news.
We've got Jack Hatfield coming in next, a reporter at Republica.
As we delve into something that's both alarming and deeply concerning, touching on issues of security, justice, and societal integration.
Essentially, a story about migration that no one else dares to talk about.
All of that with me, Lambert Opik, on TNT.
I'll see you in a minute.
Lambert Opik on today's news talk, TNT.
Gregor Barth, I saw your comment about chemotherapy in a question.
Once I got Celia to come on to my Saturday show in some time, hopefully fairly soon, then we'll get into all of that as well.
I found her fascinating.
I'm sure there's a documentary to be made there.
I'm sure there is.
But let's go on to my next guest.
Jack Hadfield joins us now.
So talk about stuff that you don't hear much about on the mainstream media.
A schizophrenic Somalian who beheaded, as in chopped off, his roommate's head, won't be deported from Germany because apparently he'll just come back?
That's the reason.
Then the Germans reportedly covered up, or the police there, the rape of a 12-year-old girl by a Syrian refugee who's allowed to walk free after the arrest.
And then we've got a UK Afghan refugee who's praised as humble and admirable, who's now been charged with gang-raping A woman in York, which is in the north of England.
What's going on?
Well, joining me to discuss all this from Publica, which has been the outlet which has really pretty much lifted the lid on all this, is Jack Hardfield.
Jack, we're discussing cases, not only shocked communities, but also raised significant questions about policy, safety, and the rule of law, and reporting, because you don't see these in the mainstream media.
What did Publica discover?
Yeah, well, as you mentioned, there was three stories that we reported on just within the last couple of weeks or so.
And really, it's frankly insane to see the amount of, sort of, these crime stories.
And now I'm reporting, and I'm just seeing every day, a lot of them are coming from Europe.
Uh, like the ones we mentioned, uh, in, in Germany with the Somalian killer and the, uh, Syrian rapist who raped a 12-year-old girl and the police allowed him to get off, which, you know, we can go into more detail on.
And then, as I said, there was this one in York as well, these, uh, these Afghan, uh, refugees.
You know, it's named, it was named in the paper, That they were, you know, from Afghanistan but not that they were being praised as immigration success stories.
So it's very notable to me that the BBC and a lot of the, you know, mainstream or lefty outlets will refuse to cover these crimes, you know, from very recent immigrants.
Pretty much Every single case that I'm seeing.
I mean, there was just another one I wrote about where there was a woman in Paris who was raped by three African-looking males just at the start of August.
You know, that's another story I can think of off the top of my head.
I see another one of these pretty much every single day.
You know, there's honestly, there's almost too much for The Publica to cover every single one because we put them in the workgroup chat, you know, we're looking for stories to share, you know,
We don't have the time and the resources to cover exactly what's going on, so, I mean, to be honest, if you do want to get a handle on a lot of these, it's worth reading French, German, you know, Spanish, you know, Italian news outlets, because the mainstream ones over there, or at least, you know, the ones that are more, you know, New York Post-y, Sunday Daily Mail style, will at least cover these, but they barely ever hit the British news.
Now, this is the obvious question here.
Are you singling these out disproportionately?
In other words, somebody who would take a different position to you could say, well, Public has just gone out looking for this, and therefore they found a handful of cases, terrible as they may be, but in proportion, they're actually quite small.
Have you done a statistical analysis of it?
Well, I haven't done statistical analysis on the number of news cases, but the fact that I'm seeing one of these pretty much every day or every other day, where I don't see anything near to the same level of, you know, white people committing these levels of basically street rapes, attacks, harassment, murders, Um, these things, you know, that, like, they're not popping up on my radar because they're not, I'm pretty sure they're not happening as much.
And you can look into this based on, uh, you know, crime statistics when you look into, um, you know, for example, you know, Sweden done the sums, you know, classic example of this is that, uh, again, I can't remember the exact statistics off the top of my head, but some massive, massive, disproportional number of rapes and murders in Sweden were committed by recent foreign immigrants.
So we know Do you know the actual crime statistics do match on to being recent arrivals being disreportedly charged and arrested with these crimes compared to the local population?
Now another obvious question then.
I'll look at those statistics.
I'm interested in this very much.
Another point would be made about integration and whether integration works.
Is it your view that we can draw wider strategic lessons about how Britain is managing or simply not addressing migration?
Well, I think we can talk into, you know, two different sections on integration here.
You know, we can have a discussion on whether, you know, first-generation immigrants can ever truly be integrated.
You know, that's a whole other kettle of fish.
But really, the thing here with these crimes is these are recent arrivals.
We're talking not even in the last 20 years or the last, you know, it's more like the last 10 or 5.
Um, so, compared to, certainly, we've definitely seen a rise in crime of recent immigrants compared to immigrants of similar, you know, populations who came over previously, you know, within the last 50, 60, 70 years.
Um, so there's been a massive spike in those who've come recently.
You can say, well, that's because there was zero chance That they would be integrated, you know, when you have mass migration, you know, which kicked off in the last 20 years and really kicked off in the last, I said, 10 or 5.
I mean, you know, me and my friends talk about the Boris wave, you know, which is that, you know, the amount of migrants that came into the UK under Boris Johnson was astronomical, you know, even more than under the Blair government.
And, you know, we're seeing demographic change, you know, at a scale that's been completely off the pace.
And that's why you're seeing, you know, these now, these levels of crime in Europe and in the UK, just because of just how many people have come over in one go.
And as I said, there's zero chance for integration at all.
I'm just wondering then, does constant Reporting on this make a difference.
I mean, if you keep seeing these stories, could you be accused of trying to create a certain mood?
I mean, I would assume that people who just want to sweep all of this under the carpet would throw that right at me, but I would of course say to them, well, this is happening.
It's true, and people have a right to know this.
If, as you said, millions of people are coming in in one go and suddenly the crime rates, the rape rates, the murder rates, the death rates, Everything is going through the roof and the media is telling you, oh no, nothing's, everything's fine actually.
Integrate is all going on.
In fact, you're insane.
You're racist for even thinking, uh, that it's now more dangerous for you to go out at night than it was five years ago.
Well, I believe it's, it's, it's really, it's the duty of the press to report on these crimes and report on exactly what's happening.
And then, you know, the wider society and, you know, politicians can make up their minds as to how to, as to how to, After how to fix the problems.
Jack, once again, tantalizing cliffhanger there.
Both of my phones were clearly stolen by migrants.
It was obvious.
They've been a four-month period in central London.
Is that racist?
No, it's just a fact.
I really appreciate that.
Do you incline me to read Republica?
But we're out of time.
We'll get you back pretty soon, though.
Please do keep your stories coming our way.
Today's News Talk will not censor you in any way, shape or form.
That also goes to my other guests and to you, the viewers.
So thank you, Jack.
Thank you, all my other guests.
Thank you, my team.
But more than anything, as I always say, thank you to you, the viewers, for being awake and challenging the woke.
Coming up next, Rick Munns, locked and loaded, take you through the next couple of hours.