Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 28, 2024 - Jim Fetzer

01:56:37

The Raw Deal (28 June 2024) with co-host John Carman

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Not just anybody.
	You know I need someone.
	When I was young, so much younger than today.
	I never needed anybody's help in any way.
	But now these days are gone and I'm not so self-assured.
	Now I find I've changed my mind.
	I don't better lock the doors.
	Help me if you can, I'm feeling down.
	And I do appreciate you being round.
	Help me get my feet back on the ground.
	Won't you please help me?
	Well, this is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Raw Deal right here on Revolution Radio this 28th day of June 2024.
	I anticipate being joined by co-host Joan John Carman and my special guest, Archie the Armenian from South Dakota, whom I'd invited to join today.
	Archie has a very different take on many of the issues than do I.
	And I thought it would be of special interest to one and all for us to share that conversation together.
	John is just joining me here, and now I'm delighted to say, let me begin.
	John, you might mute.
	Yeah, you got a little static there.
	You might mute till I bring you in here.
	We got the debate last night.
	I watched it in real time and did a commentary.
	Stunning outcome.
	Here's what I put up on Twitter.
	Only around 300,000 viewers on CNN suggesting it might not have been the best choice, but the Dems probably wanted to minimize the damage if Biden fell flat.
	Overall impression?
	An alpha male at the top of his game versus an incompetent wimp.
	A vote shown here.
	This was now of CNN viewers.
	They showed it on the screen.
	I've captured the image.
	95% of 5.
	That's absolutely devastating.
	And it was on that order.
	Meanwhile, there's an effort being made to spin it Biden's way.
	Thus, get this, Associated Press.
	Debate takeaways.
	Trump confident, even when wrong.
	Biden halting, even with facts on his side.
	But virtually nothing Biden said was true, and virtually everything Trump had to say was correct.
	So I say, what's going on with the AB here?
	Pretty disgusting.
	Here's what they write.
	The presidential debate was a rerun that featured two candidates with a combined age of 159.
	But it went especially poorly for one of them, President Joe Biden.
	Already fighting voter concerns about his aid, Biden 81, was halting and seemed to lose his train of thought Thursday night, sparking quick concerns among Democrats about the men they hope will keep former President Donald Trump from returning to office.
	For his part, Trump made repeated false statements By the way, I disagree with that.
	And provocative remarks, but Trump seems smoother and more vigorous than Biden, who is only three years older than the Republican ex-president.
	The debate covered a wide range of topics and included a former President Trump not backing down from his vows to prosecute members of Congress and even the man he was debating.
	But the overall arching thing was the difference between the candidates were four months.
	John, did you have a chance to watch the debate?
	And if so, what were your remarks?
	I have several other stories about it, but go ahead.
	I've evaluated both of them separately before the debate.
	I did not get it because of an important phone call.
	I only got bits and pieces.
	But what you just said is accurate, you know, and I go with that, too, because It's like a waste of time.
	I can't even believe they wasted their time.
	Or Trump wasted his time even going on.
	But it was to prove a point.
	Put them side by side.
	Let them talk.
	Which one's better?
	It's real easy.
	The guy on the left.
	Real easy.
	You know.
	But you know what?
	You know what I know.
	I mean, we talk and we evaluate the same stuff on these guys.
	And I'm a behavioral analysis expert for many years at the border.
	And I look at these things for many years.
	It's obvious what's going on.
	But you know, I don't even know why they waste the time.
	Ben Carson came on later, I think, afterwards making comments saying medically and how the guy was all out of whack and all these other comments.
	I said, well, yeah, what do you expect?
	I can't believe even Biden even went and did it anyway.
	So there you go, folks.
	You know, you roll the dice, you throw it out there, and there's still what, 5% that don't know?
	Yeah, there's a story I may get to that says they wanted to have this debate early enough so they could dump Biden and bring in somebody else.
	Here's what the second smartest guy in the world writes.
	Trump versus Biden, the obliteration of a demanded pop-up.
	It's difficult to write about last night's presidential debate, given that what transpired was tragically depressing and ultimately reinforced a disastrous state America now finds itself in.
	The end of empire is now a descent into the empire of lies, as mumbled by a lifelong grifter and diaper-soiling, ice-cream-licking pedo-criminal poppet, hopped up on a cocktail of dementia meds and methamphetamines.
	CIA News Network, CNN, hosting a presidential debate can only be described as an unmitigated disaster for their candidate.
	Biden shuffled out onto the stage with a glitching thousand-yard stare.
	His slits for eyes were all completely dilated pupils.
	His speech pattern modulating from incoherent dementia drivel to a poor recall of lies disguised as facts and data.
	Last year was a modified Shite show!
	Joe Biden is finished!
	The Democrat Party was further exposed as a deranged neo-Marxist syndicate operating within the Uniparty Kabuki Theater political show.
	All Trump had to do was show up without dementia, stick to the basic facts, and let Biden defeat himself.
	And that is exactly what happened, John, your thought.
	This guy is good!
	Yeah.
	No, I'm reflecting back on other comments.
	It was a good example to see a debate between somebody with some intelligence and background.
	And unfortunately, Biden is fading.
	He's getting old.
	He's been fading for years.
	One important point a lot of people might not remember, and I protected Ford.
	President Ford made a comment that they would never get a female into the White House as president, let alone vice president.
	But they will bring a guy in.
	This is exactly the exact same scenario.
	He talked about this for many years ago, and I happened to catch it on a YouTube.
	You might be able to run it.
	People can run it on YouTube.
	Gerald Ford, an interview of Gerald Ford comment.
	They'll get a male president like Biden in, like Biden.
	Some sort of problem would happen to him with a vice president, and then that's John, did I lose you?
	Hey, hey, hey, you're making great points here.
	I want to hear more, John.
	Yeah, it's the same scenario that happened when Kennedy was in office in 63.
	They had another guy who was a bad guy.
	LBJ should have never been where he was at.
	So that's what they typically do is they put the worst case scenario under the president because you don't want anything to happen to him because if you don't, you're going to get the other person, male or female.
	And then if that happens, something happens to that person, you go third in line, Speaker of the House.
	Speaker of the House is an idiot.
	That guy says he can't do anything about the election or something, you know.
	Yeah, I'm very distressed over Mike Johnson.
	Now, LBJ forced himself onto the ticket with Jack in 1960 in L.A.
	in order to take him out and ascend to the presidency.
	In fact, he sent his chief administrative assistant, Cliff Carter, down to Dallas to make sure all the arrangements were in place for the assassination.
	I've done so much on JFK over like 60 years.
	It's just staggering.
	Staggering, John.
	I actually talked to Jim Garrison.
	Good.
	Yeah.
	Good.
	When Jim Garrison was alive and he was in a hospital, this is before, I think he died in 91, 92, but I was still reaching out to certain people during the timeframe.
	And he said basically this, he says, you have to stay alive as long as possible.
	I don't smoke or drink.
	He suggested the same thing because in the 75 years from 63, we would know the truth.
	This is where Trump had a chance to release the information about the JFK assassination and all the other peripheral information connected to it.
	And he pulled it back for 90 days, three months, because Bush was dying.
	He didn't release it.
	So a lot of people don't know that.
	Oh, you think that's because GHW, who was on the scene there, he was a supervisor of the shooters in Dealey Plaza, not to embarrass him on his deathbed?
	Yes.
	Yes.
	Fascinating, John.
	That's really good.
	Yeah.
	And then the fact that he's handing out these notes at the funeral.
	Remember the note?
	Signed by Poppy Bush.
	I'm sorry they know everything.
	Yeah.
	That kind of comment.
	And I go, yeah, they all got one.
	Carter didn't get it, and I protected Carter and Rosalind.
	They were there.
	They didn't get that because they're innocent of all that stuff.
	See what I mean?
	Yeah.
	So he knows, but he's playing a weird kind of an angle of attack or different strategy that I would have outed that stuff as soon as I got into office.
	But yet he wasn't prepared to do it, and then he's out.
	So now he's going to come back in unless he starts arresting massive numbers of these traders in this country.
	I just talked to somebody a while ago on the phone call just before I came on the air and they're inviting people from people like from the Ukraine to get jobs as pilots to get the shipping sea containers into the United States.
	It's a job upwards of $150,000.
	And those usually under visa programs where they bring them under a special worker's visa.
	Maybe you have a special skill on a computer that we don't have in the United States.
	They'll bring you in on a visa program to get you here.
	So we're being invaded indirectly right now.
	Still, even though there are restrictions on people coming through the border, they're still being offered stuff from people from the Ukraine.
	So there's a massive exodus out of the Ukrainians who speak Ukrainian, Russian, They're going to put them in school.
	They're going to pay for their college and all these things.
	I'm going to be homeless in 90 days.
	Where's the, where's my, where's my gift?
	Where's my payment?
	Where's my subsidy?
	Where's my help?
	Maybe I'll leave the country and come in as an illegal John.
	Pretend you get all those benefits.
	Yeah.
	I've heard that before too.
	And they had Ukrainians at the border, uh, at the largest border of San Diego, Tijuana area.
	And even Marjorie Taylor Greene came down there.
	They let Ukrainians come in, but if you were Russian-Russian, they would refuse you, just like that.
	And we got Haitians in the building right now.
	I'm kind of whispering.
	We got Haitians in the building.
	They speak Spanish.
	They go to Mexico for two years, two to four years.
	They speak Spanish.
	They come across on the special, they use a special phone and they have a QR code And they get it, scan it, right across the special deal over there.
	And then they get in, and I know an Uber driver who drives these people to other locations.
	One guy's in Chinese.
	He can't speak a word of English.
	He whips out his phone.
	Another guy's telling him where to go.
	Another guy comes from the Middle East.
	Same thing.
	Doesn't speak any English.
	Flips out his phone after he's been released to come into the United States.
	Where do you want to go?
	And he's talking to the driver back and forth through an interpreter.
	This thing is a big operation of invasion.
	It's the Trojan horse thing, and people just don't get it.
	You know, what are the White Hats doing this week, Joe?
	Yeah, here's a report from Al Jazeera.
	Six takeaways from the Biden-Trump presidential debate.
	Who won the debate?
	From Trump's overstatement of Biden's faltering speech, here are the highlights.
	American voters watched the two main presidential contenders for the November 5th election brawl it out on Thursday night on the first public debate before the contest.
	Former U.S.
	President Donald Trump, 78, hurled hyperbole at President Joe Biden, 81, who seemed to lose his train of thought during the debate at the CNN headquarters in Atlanta.
	The two oldest presidential hopefuls in U.S.
	history clashed over immigration, abortion, and even golf.
	Here are six key takeaways from the first U.S.
	presidential debate.
	Let me just emphasize that we're talking about immigration.
	Trump hit him again and again and again, John.
	It was powerful.
	And I'm telling you, I think for every American, that is the most important issue.
	Number one is immigration.
	Number two, inflation, the economy.
	Three, foreign affairs.
	You know, all these wars.
	Number four, crime and lawlessness.
	Every one of which.
	Perhaps if we could argue about wars abroad works to Trump's advantage.
	I mean, overwhelmingly.
	Your thoughts?
	Well, it's exactly what you're saying.
	And since I worked at the border 15 years in Secret Service and all these other federal jobs, I'm very familiar with what goes through the border.
	People don't understand the profiling and all the stuff that comes in.
	What you just said, I just translated in my head, is a massive invasion.
	If you can't beat them legally, this is a Democrat profile now, the Democrats are saying if you can't beat them legally in an election, you import your voters.
	That's what they're doing.
	They're importing their voters.
	They're giving them money and jobs and rent, free rent and apartments and jobs and cars, everything.
	They're not doing anything for me.
	I'm a perfect example.
	I will be out on the street in 90 days because I don't have any money.
	No social security, no retirement because I'm a whistleblower.
	That's how bad it is.
	But they'll pay foreigners all this money, and I serve the country protecting presidents of the United States and the border.
	That's just a couple of agencies.
	I was in 20 plus years.
	John, in 49 of the states, they're giving them instructions about how to register to vote.
	How disgusting is that?
	How disgusting is that?
	Well, they're even getting cops that are foreign nationals, too.
	Yeah, Seattle and California.
	How ridiculous is that?
	Do we have a country left and we got illegals who are our police force?
	John, what the hell sense does that make?
	It doesn't.
	It's a total invasion.
	And yet people aren't doing anything.
	I'm sorry.
	What was that person used to be a head of the RNC, the Republican National Convention, Ronnie, what's her name?
	They finally got rid of that person.
	They don't do anything.
	I'm a perfect example of sourcing, trying to reach out for help to these various agencies and people in the Republican parties and vice versa.
	All these people, they don't care.
	Please donate.
	You'll even see recently the commercials on my laptop on the internet.
	They'll pop up if you go to the news or something.
	Kamala Harris will get up there and ask for donations.
	Biden will get up there.
	Oh, cut the malarkey quote.
	You know, hyperbole.
	He's Mr. Hyperbole all the time.
	He's always joking around.
	He's a puppet.
	I'm surprised you didn't notice he had an earpiece probably in his left or right ear because he's getting instructions from somebody else.
	That would have been a violation of the debate rules, but I don't doubt CNN would accommodate that.
	Actually, I was surprised that The two hosts, where Jake Tapper has been very critical of Trump, I thought he was a ridiculous choice, were on good behavior.
	From what we saw, they operated objectively.
	I thought they were fair in their handling.
	Trump showed remarkable self-discipline in not getting pissed off, because Biden was seeking to provoke him time and time again.
	It was really...
	Did Biden do a water test?
	No, I believe he was on amphetamines.
	Yeah.
	Let me talk about these half a dozen.
	Biden put on a muted performance.
	Biden, who already faces criticism over his age, was able to match the energy of Trump, who's only three years his junior.
	The incumbent president resorted to raspy rambling and appeared to struggle with articulating his words.
	At one point, he referred to billionaires as trillionaires.
	Before going back to correct himself, how do you know he had to go back to correct himself if he wasn't getting feed from the earpiece?
	Biden made some robust criticism of Trump's leadership during COVID and its impact on the economy and mocked some of Trump's responses to COVID safeguards at the time.
	Just inject a little bleach into your arm and you'll be all right, which of course was false, ridiculous.
	However, his tone felt flat against the more bombastic opponent, especially during the early stages of the debate.
	Later on, Biden somewhat picked up the pace to push back against Trump's slew.
	They're saying it's all factually incorrect.
	I listened to everything.
	I didn't hear Trump saying things that were factually incorrect.
	I heard Biden, however, make many Assertions about immigration and abortion.
	I don't buy that at all.
	In fact, Trump said he would not ban the abortion pill.
	I thought he had been very, very responsible in seeking to diffuse an issue that I think is one of the Democrats' greatest advantages in this contest with Trump.
	Comments on any of those remarks, John?
	Yeah, I'm evaluating because I've been monitoring the news carefully as well.
	What's interesting is when they don't want to tell you about what's going on, they don't want to tell you about the destruction, the derailments, the crashes, the shootings, murders.
	Continually.
	It's continual.
	And it can get to a person if they don't know how to handle this stuff.
	But then they'll throw up the thing about Roe vs. Wade.
	Roe vs. Wade.
	Oh, it's LGBTQ month.
	Roe vs. Wade.
	LGBTQ.
	If you look at all the continual, continual barrage of programs and all these things that they're hitting people up with continually, people will turn off the phone, the cell phones, the radios, the TVs or whatever, because it's constant.
	That's a tactic.
	It's psyops.
	But to continually hit people up with these things, I think even Bannon supposedly got a request before the Supreme Court Which is unusual, and the Supreme Court's been making some decisions.
	I understood that Putin was also going to cut the supply chain to the adrenochromes.
	Oh my God, the people, the Democrats, the high-ups that are doing the adrenochrome stuff, they're going to really get worried now, see?
	But they don't want to talk about these things.
	They're putting fluff stories and distractionary stories out there.
	They're going to suddenly age dramatically, John, if they're cut off from their blood supply.
	How God-awful is that?
	Meanwhile, presidential hopefuls came to blows over golf.
	That was kind of a lighter moment.
	Why did Trump went back and forth over which of them is physically and cognitively stronger?
	There's no question about it.
	Trump boasted about his strength, claiming, I'm in as good shape as I was 25, 30 years ago, to moderator Jake Tapper and Dana Bash.
	In response, a snickering Biden.
	Implied his opponent was lying about both his height and weight.
	It was just ridiculous!
	Trump said he had won two championships on his golf course while Biden can't hit the ball 50 yards.
	This prompted Biden to challenge Trump to a golf match.
	Only if Trump was carrying his own bag.
	Let's not act like children, Trump said.
	You are a child, responded Biden.
	That was a low point for Biden.
	Trump called Biden a bad Palestinian.
	This was interesting.
	Of course, I completely disagree with Trump's attitude toward Israel.
	That's bothered me tremendously.
	We are the biggest producer of support for Israel of anyone in the world.
	Biden said we're ready and US support for Israel's war on Gaza, a genocide against the Palestinians.
	Why anyone would boast of that, John, is disgusting.
	In which more than 37,718 Palestinians have been killed since October of last year.
	Biden added his admin is continuing to send experts and intel to inter-Palestinian group Hamas in the war.
	See, he's actually adding, he's saying, actionable intel.
	For fighting on the ground.
	I mean, that means the U.S.
	is, you know, not only complicit by virtue of saying all the weapons being used to slaughter the Palestinians were given the data they needed in order to carry it out.
	This is just repulsive.
	Trump snapped back, saying it's Israel that wants to continue the war and you should let them go and let them finish the job.
	I agree, disagree completely.
	Joe Biden doesn't want to do it.
	He's become like a Palestinian, but they don't like him because he's a very bad Palestinian.
	He's a weak one.
	You know, the Palestinians have shown themselves to be fierce fighters.
	I mean, basically Hamas has defeated the IDF.
	And if they now go after Hezbollah in Lebanon as they're threatening to do, I think it's going to be a catastrophe for Israel.
	But the U.S.
	is sending a battle carrier group out there.
	I think, John, the prospect of that carrier group being sunk every single one of those ships is extremely high if this goes live.
	Oh, I think the USS Gerald Ford was sent out there a long time ago as well.
	So they're sitting there.
	They've got their support ships.
	In fact, I think I sent you a picture, a screenshot, where all the ships were maybe a couple of months ago.
	And the point is, they've already had their people out there.
	They're already doing flights, overflights, intel gathering, just like all the EC-121s are monitoring all the electronics all along the border in the air.
	And, you know, you were talking about, I was just imagining, since I have a judo background, you know, black belt martial arts stuff.
	How about, how about a judo match between Putin and any of the candidates?
	Putin, Putin, he would drop him.
	I'm telling you.
	Yeah, yeah.
	He's good.
	He's physically fit, mentally alert, morally straight.
	I'm a huge fan of Vladimir Putin.
	Here's another.
	Biden accuses Trump of lying about abortion.
	Trump invoked anti-abortion sentiment by accusing Biden and his party of allowing late-term abortions.
	There's no question about it.
	And he cited that Governor of Virginia was advocating infanticide, killing babies after they're born.
	And that's the point at which I'm properly described as babies in the first place.
	During the debate, Trump claimed Biden and Democrats would be willing to, as we say, rip the baby Out of the womb in the ninth month.
	You're lying.
	That's simply not true.
	Biden refuted.
	He rebutted.
	To be a refutation, it's got to be true.
	But he was making a false claim.
	We are not for late term abortion, period, period.
	That's ridiculous.
	The Democrats are all for late term abortion.
	John, I mean, how bad is that?
	And Trump, as I mentioned, said he wouldn't ban the abortion pill, which I think is going to be very beneficial to him.
	Your thoughts?
	Yeah, that's that's a mixed case right there.
	I mean, I know I know about this stuff.
	I was EMT trained and all that.
	Hang on.
	Hang on.
	Hang on, John.
	We'll be right back after this break.
	And I'll give Archie a call and see if I can get him to join.
	Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
	We'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support.
	This has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
	Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
	We need the support of the people.
	It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
	Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
	With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
	Revolution Radio.
	FreedomSubs.com.
	The number one listener supported radio station on the planet.
	Revolution Radio.
	Hey everyone!
	It's Barbara Jean Lindsay, The Cosmic Oracle.
	If you have questions about your past lives or future plans, need answers from the cosmos about your love life or career, or just want to keep your finger on the pulse of the planet, check out my show, The Cosmic Oracle, here on Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
	Thank you.
	Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday, 8 p.m. Eastern. 8 p.m. Eastern.
	Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at FreedomSix.com, the people station.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
	This abortion thing was extremely telling, John.
	You know, I mean, I'm a proponent of Roe v. Wade.
	I think it is among the wisest decisions the court ever handled down.
	Turning it over to the state so there's a patchwork quilt around the country for abortion rights is, in my opinion, an absurdity, an insult to women.
	But look what Trump did.
	He made the Democrats, I mean, this has got to be like their strongest issue.
	He made the Democrats look like extremists because there are Democrats like that former governor of Virginia who favor even infanticide, so that Biden looked like a big liar when he denied it.
	And then by saying he would not oppose, you know, the abortion pill, he relieved women all over the country that he's not going to do that.
	You know, he came out looking like a moderate.
	Your thoughts?
	Yeah, I mean, that's a touchy subject, but that's the whole point.
	Even back on the actual case of Roe versus Wade was based on allegedly a case where somebody was raped, correct?
	And because of that, they were supposed to be able to get an abortion and all these other things.
	Well, it was based on a lie, but who cares?
	It's all based on, do you have choice to govern over the properties of your body?
	Women need to have control over their bodies, whether they want one baby or not.
	They have to do it in the first trimester, then they would start putting restrictions on the first, second, and then up to the last trimester, up to the ninth month.
	Well, you might as well deliver the baby and give it up for adoption or something, you know, full term.
	But yet, we want to go through these.
	No restrictions on abortion in the first trimester.
	And the developing entity doesn't even look like a person for most of that period.
	It looks more like a shrimp or a seahorse or something like that.
	I mean, it's right to claim, you know, from an evolutionary point of view, that the developing fetus from, you know, zygote and so forth is proceeding through the stages of evolution of human beings for each individual organism.
	And I think there's much plausibility to that.
	Then during the second trimester, the state would regulate how abortions are done.
	During the third, however, abortions are only permissible to save the life or health of the mother, and any other abortion is qualified as murder.
	Which means that the Supreme Court in essence determined that personhood, the special social moral legal status entailing rights under the law, occurs at the end of the second trimester, which is when viability, the ability of the entity, To survive outside of the uterine environment comes into play, and it's not a function of heart or brain development, it's a function of lung development, being able to breathe and so forth.
	So John, I mean, I think in a way Trump was masterful on this, which I regard as the trickiest issue he had to deal with.
	Yeah, you made some excellent points there, and that's why I started mentioning the word trimester, because A lot of people don't use those in the terminology, which shows your background and training, and you're very articulate about that.
	So, a lot of people don't get it.
	But I was also thinking on a third level, which is about the pituitary gland, because that's where they're after the adrenochromes and so forth.
	You know, at a certain point, they want to get that body at a certain condition to a certain maturity level, so they can extract that stuff Even from an aborted baby or fetal tissue.
	That's just something for people to think about.
	Yes, yes, yes.
	Here's another point in this Al Jazeera piece.
	Immigration dog the debate.
	Throughout the debate, Trump turned the topic to immigration, accusing Biden of opening up a safehouse border in the world to terrorist prisoners.
	He accused Biden of being the one who killed people with a bad border and flooding hundreds of thousands of people, dying, killing our citizens when they come in.
	Biden, on the other hand, recounted the work his administration has done to manage and hit blocks of illegal immigrants, including tightening border security, working on the bipartisan national security agreement.
	That's just rubbish.
	Biden has opened a flood.
	He's given all kinds of inducement, bringing in millions.
	John, I read a study here, a guy who appeared with Joe Rogan, some comedian, CK something or other, was saying Many people think it's unfair that the United States have a higher standard of living than other countries, and they want to level the playing field by bringing in millions of low IQ, untrained, unskilled workers and criminals to even it out, and that they're doing it deliberately.
	That's the policy of these extreme radical Actually, this total equity thing, that's a communist idea.
	So what they're doing is implementing cultural Marxism to try to destroy America, I have no doubt.
	And he was implying it was a deliberate policy of the left.
	I agree.
	If you think about the people that come in, their cultures are so different.
	They don't have the same background as Americans do.
	They don't have the same schooling backgrounds.
	In spite of what religious you believe or not, but once they get here, they experience the freedom.
	They can work.
	They can pay taxes and contribute to the country.
	But a lot of these other cultures, they're not doing that.
	Once they get in, they could still work.
	They could still believe what they want to believe.
	They could still respectfully worship whatever religion they can.
	But yet, are they contributing to the culture of the United States?
	Where it's a multi-type belief system where we have all people coming together but still having a common goal.
	United States of America.
	But everybody looks at it that way, you know.
	They all want to come to America.
	If you don't even speak the same language, how can you communicate to achieve common goals?
	Creating a Tower of Babel, as Paul Craig Roberts has put it.
	I have observed before, Mexico has two policies for migration of Mexico.
	Number one, You must be able to show you have something to contribute to the good of Mexico, plumber, carpenter, doctor, lawyer, that you can make Mexico better.
	Number two, you must show you have the financial resources to support you and your family, whoever is coming with you, that you not become a burden on the state.
	If the U.S.
	just adopted those two principles, we'd be done with 98% of our immigration problems right there in a single stroke.
	John?
	Yeah, that's called solvency at the border.
	When we do the same thing in reverse, people who come from Mexico or through Mexico, as an example, they could be coming from Canada.
	Solvency is the question.
	Do you have a job in your other country?
	Can you pay your bills?
	If you're coming here to immigrate, if they immigrate them, They still have to be able to support themselves, have a job, pay taxes, obey the laws, and all those things.
	We have almost the same basic standards as the Mexican immigration.
	Same.
	You just put it in reverse.
	It's almost the same.
	But yet, we're not enforcing it.
	So, it's the same.
	But yet, we're going through the expense of, yeah, we let people in, they blend into the system, they disappear.
	Well, they're getting out of Mexico.
	John, you're telling me we actually have similar conditions for immigration into the United States?
	We're simply not enforcing them?
	Yes.
	Oh, God.
	Yes.
	That is so awful.
	It is.
	In fact, other countries, if you're down to pass Mexico into Guatemala, Honduras, their immigration laws are so vicious that if you try to cross the border, they'll shoot at you, you know.
	But if you get up to Mexico, You pay off the polleros, the coyotes, the smugglers, then you get into their system.
	That's why, you know, allegedly Soros.
	I mean, you know, you know where you get all these Intel people and say, oh, Soros is paying for all these people.
	But I just gave an example.
	Haitians come here, Middle Eastern people, the Chinese.
	Now, as far as blending in, they all want to get the Chinese all want to go to San Francisco because there's a lot of Chinese up there.
	You think they learned English when they got here?
	No, they're still speaking Chinese.
	Maybe they won't even go to college.
	Some of them will, but others won't.
	They still say in their own community, and after a while it'll become their own little China.
	You know, kind of like some of the movies, you know, Big Trouble Little China.
	Joke.
	And then you've got Ukrainian, and then you've got Russian, then you've got Hispanic, then you've got Middle Eastern.
	We have places in Michigan, Michigan is second only to another place in the United States that has a lot of Middle Eastern Muslim type religious belief systems of people from other countries.
	San Diego is second to Michigan.
	So we have a lot of people from certain areas that have established in a community not more than five miles, six, seven miles from here, and you can't even read the signs unless you speak and read Arabic.
	Think about that.
	You talk about Tower of Babel, there it is.
	Here's another important issue.
	The moderator's trying to bait Trump into saying he'd honor the outcome of the election.
	I mean, that's ridiculous.
	He was stolen.
	2020, he won, by my estimate.
	Trump got over 100 million votes, Biden about 37.
	They stole it from him before, so they're supposed to get him to say, yeah, if you steal it from me again, of course I'll go along with it.
	I thought that was insulting.
	Trump did not directly answer whether he would honor the result of the election.
	He said he would only accept the result if the election is free and fair.
	Reiterating false claims that the 2020 presidential election, which he lost to Biden, was rigged against him.
	That's not a false claim!
	I can't believe how many different ways it's provable.
	This is just insulting.
	The fraud and everything else was ridiculous, he said.
	That's exactly right.
	John, your thoughts?
	Yeah, I keep thinking about Dominion servers and what Mike Johnson said about they can't do anything because it was over four years ago.
	Mike Johnson should be removed as Speaker of the House because he doesn't know anything about the laws that those people pass.
	They don't know anything about enforcing the laws, because if you commit a felony, it's still a felony.
	It doesn't matter if it's expired, because there is no expiration for a lot of certain felonies, especially voter fraud.
	I just quoted a case where this black woman Voted for Obama ten times.
	Oh, I get it.
	If you're a Democrat, you can vote ten times.
	But if you're a Republican, you can only put one vote.
	And yet, they didn't do anything.
	And Obama actually brought her before one of the State of the Union speeches to brag about her.
	Because she so loved Obama, she voted for him ten times.
	Well, wow, I really understand that one.
	He voted for him ten times, yeah.
	Yeah.
	That's voter fraud.
	Here's another Yahoo News reporting about it.
	U.S.
	President Joe Biden struggled badly in the first television debate of the 2024 presidential election cycle against Donald Trump on Thursday night as Democrats looked on in horror.
	Horson asked me, Biden appeared low in energy during the CNN showdown in Atlanta, Georgia, with the White House later saying he had a cold.
	Looking his age and out of sorts, Biden mistakenly declared one thing, we finally beat Medicare, and another, his Republican opponent was left to respond, I really don't know what he said.
	The president did later rally to rebuke Trump over his sordid personal history and alleged suckers and losers remark about the military, which was a fabrication.
	The businessman, meanwhile, spread lies and falsehoods throughout, I deny that, often failing to answer a question and having to be pressed three times on whether he would accept November's results.
	In most debate analysis, pundits discuss the possibility of Biden stepping down as a Democratic candidate, with party members saying to be privately lobbying for the likes of Vice President Kamala Harris, State Governors Gavin Newsom and Gretchen Whitmer to take over.
	But CNN reported Friday Biden is not planning to drop out, intending to take part in a second debate in September.
	Key points?
	Biden rejects calls to dropout, commits a second debate in September.
	Trump pulls no punches as President struggles in CNN debate.
	Republican candidate claims U.S.
	was respected all over the world on January 6th.
	Morals of an alley cat!
	Biden lays into Trump over sexual abuse and porn star affair claims, which were all manufactured phony cases with no basis in fact or law.
	Snap poll who won the debate was, I said, they even had a poll of CNN viewers and it was 95% of five, John.
	I mean, that's as devastating as it gets.
	I've never seen such a stunning result.
	And they put it up on CNN as the debate was in its final stages.
	Your thoughts?
	No, I'm listening to what you're saying, but I keep, I'm being bothered by this one decision.
	Didn't Biden just overturn all of these alleged military exclusions where they got rid of a lot of the military that refused to take the shot or the jab and they were removed and either there was a case that was going on and he may have reversed it or something.
	I wasn't sure about that part, but if he did, it's still back to the same Democratic agenda is to tear it down, build it back better.
	Tear it down, build it back better.
	But they're tearing it down is the problem.
	They're trying to make it like, oh, yeah, this is an accident or this happened some other way so they can get credit for fixing it.
	That's just outrageous.
	They don't need to be in this country.
	They need to go to a communist country and do that.
	And in that way, we don't have to worry about going to war.
	You know, just send them over there.
	Yes.
	Yes. - Yes, absolutely.
	And, of course, the situation in Ukraine is deteriorating.
	I mean, it's getting worse and worse and worse.
	I'm astonished.
	It's just that the Russian banking empire isn't willing to give it up.
	Even though Russia is clearly dominated, the Ukrainians are being wiped.
	Here's a question about it.
	Is Ukraine using an elastic defense or just losing the war?
	There's no question.
	Ukraine is losing the war.
	Fact check.
	North Korea has not announced plans to send troops to Ukraine yet.
	United States and Ukraine have a math problem.
	Countries that sent tanks to Ukraine.
	Larry Johnson reveals U.S.
	fires 15,000 missiles to defeat Russia.
	Putin's move causing NATO panic.
	Let me play a little bit of this.
	I'm real happy with, uh, Larry Johnson's quite good, but let's make up a bit of this.
	It was involved in trying to defeat all of those.
	We're talking almost 15,000 missiles, which basically would represent the entire, almost the entire inventory of what the United States has in place.
	But judge, this is not just isolated to patriots.
	It's the problem with the 155 millimeter shells.
	It's a problem with the artillery barrels that go with the M777 howitzers.
	And it's with the attack of missiles.
	The United States no longer is we spend billions of dollars Hundreds of billions of dollars on this defense technology, but it's not actually being used to produce amounts and quantities that are replaceable if they're used in war.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	That's the, that's really the primary reason those are showing up over there.
	Uh, not that the ISIS said, Oh, we're going to teach those Russians, man.
	We're going to use some cluster bombs on it.
	It's like, this is all, this is all we got.
	So, you know, let's give that to them.
	I mean, it really is.
	the discrepancy between, as you talked about in your show last week, where the United States has just approved like an $880 billion defense budget, and yet we can't build more than 200 or 550 cruise missile, and yet we can't build more than 200 or 550 cruise missile, attack Patriot missiles in America's got the most expensive military in the world, but this is certainly not the best.
	Whether you're talking Anthony Blinken, Jake Sullivan, Joe Biden, that whole crowd, you know, they're the type of people that would look at some foreigner that they were asking to fight a war, and they'd ask that foreigner to put on a 100-pound backpack and walk 10 miles in and out.
	And they would think nothing of it.
	Why?
	Because they've never done that.
	They would be asking people to do something that they themselves are incapable of doing and have never experienced.
	So here they are moving these chess pieces about on the board without a clue.
	About the logistics that's involved with making the, if you want to, if you want to do something like, okay, yeah, we're going to provide air defense to Ukraine.
	We used to then start counting up.
	Well, you know, how many missiles a month are the Russians firing?
	Oh, they're firing about 500.
	Okay.
	That means we're going to need at least a thousand Patriot missiles to try to take those out.
	And yet we're only producing 550 a year.
	So we've either got to figure out How to do, you know, 12 years of production in one year or, you know, we actually, our solution is not going to work.
	Yeah, no, this is now incredibly dangerous.
	Let's be clear that this is not the first time that Ukraine has fired off Western supplied armaments, rockets, missiles, mortars, artillery rounds that have killed civilians in Russia.
	In Belgorod, those attacks have been going on for over a year.
	But over the last three weeks, the West became more open about, OK, yeah, we're going to give Ukraine permission because Ukrainians were demanding it to fire deeper inside of Russia and made it very, very clear that the United States was going to be enabling attacks against Russia on behalf of Ukraine.
	And the Russians, in response, made it very clear Vladimir Putin, Foreign Minister Lavrov, Deputy Foreign Minister Rubkov, others within the defense industry, that if the United States did this, they'd be crossing a red line and that they would be opening themselves up to retaliation.
	They made that very clear, explicitly so.
	So this attack yesterday in Sevastopol consisted of at least four attack of missiles.
	And one of those detonated over, at least three of them were shot down, but one of them detonated over this beach.
	Now, there is a military base that is nearby, but this thing detonated over the beach.
	I mean, there's no doubt that the U.S.
	was involved with providing intelligence that was used to program that missile so they could hit in that vicinity.
	The United States is culpable.
	And the Russians very quickly were out acknowledging and stating that it was the United States and that the United States will pay a price.
	They were unambiguous with respect to that.
	And, you know, it wasn't just here.
	You had another, this other terrorist attack in Dagestan, where the synagogue was attacked, a priest and an Orthodox church was attacked and murdered.
	I think that was simply excellent.
	And those who will think that these were isolated, separate incidents are kidding themselves.
	This was a coordinated, in my view, Western-backed terrorist attack against Russia, whose purpose, goal, is to try to create division inside of Russia and hoping that that will get rid of Putin.
	I think that was simply excellent.
	Your thoughts, John?
	Yeah. - You're muted.
	Yeah.
	Go ahead.
	Please, please.
	Yeah, John, go ahead.
	I was listening carefully and I've heard this before.
	The only difference I had was the fact that I think that they're manufacturing much more than what they're putting out, because that's what the secrecy thing is about.
	You never give away your information to your enemy.
	So if you're putting out a million widgets, then you tell them 500,000 widgets.
	That's it.
	You don't tell them the actual amount because that would be giving away how much you're able to do.
	And that comment about taking a 10 pound backpack and taking it 10 miles in one hour, that's ludicrous.
	I used to run.
	You can run certain distance, maybe six miles if you ran, but carrying a 10 pound package walking, no way.
	So a lot of people don't understand the logistics of just playing stuff like that, because they've never done it.
	It was very good information.
	Yeah, yeah.
	I think Larry Johnson is doing the suburban.
	If we look down at Israel, they are planning now to attack Hezbollah and Lebanon.
	Iran has warned that they should not do this.
	The Houthis have been very successful in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden, even though the US and the UK have expended a billion dollars in munition to try to destroy them.
	They have failed.
	I think if this battle carrier group being brought in to support Israel in the attack on Lebanon, Shows up.
	They're going to be taken out, John.
	Hezbollah is more than 10 times more powerful than Hamas, and Israel can't even handle Hamas.
	Hezbollah has defeated the Israeli army in the past.
	I mean, this is just outrageous what's going on here.
	It's all about the terrorist tactics because the Hamas or the Hezbollah or whatever group it is, They know how to to plan around and use defensive tactics in a way that they're using innocent people, women and children, putting their rocket launches over at schools and hospitals, underground tunnels and hospitals.
	IDF, BB Netanyahu and all the people in the Mossad know about all this stuff.
	But what bothers me is they let it go so far.
	Knowing that they were constantly moving ammunitions, weapons, rockets in these tunnels all around Israel.
	Israel is full of tunnels.
	Every country has tunnels.
	They just don't talk about it because of all the stuff that they're using.
	You think you see stuff above ground, even the United States has tunnels with high rapid transit type devices where they could transmit Vehicles like the monorail at Disneyland.
	Same difference.
	Same difference.
	They can go from the East Coast to the West Coast in like an hour.
	So, it's crazy.
	But yeah, all the tunnels are going on.
	They're all after Israel.
	They want to go after the Holy City of Jerusalem.
	What's going on with that?
	Afghanistan was another location.
	Poppies everywhere and we're protecting the poppy fields and the heroin production in the United States in Afghanistan.
	And then we pulled out.
	So, you think we pulled out?
	No, we're still there.
	We're still there, we're just doing it under a different name.
	Kind of like when Nixon used to talk about going to Vietnam and we did not have any armed military people there in Laos or Cambodia, but they weren't military, they were CIA.
	It's kind of like saying we don't have military boots on the ground.
	Well, yeah they do.
	John, stand by, we'll be right back, and I'll make another effort to see if I can track down Archie to join us.
	We'll be right back.
	Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	Was it a conspiracy?
	Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting This is a Drill, This is a Drill on bullhorns during the marathon?
	That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
	And that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
	Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
	But there was no blood.
	The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
	They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	If you think for one second that the Capitol will ever treat us fairly, you are lying to yourself. - Oh!
	Because we know who they are and what they do.
	This is what they do and we must fight back.
	You can torture us and bomb us.
	Fire is catching.
	And if we burn, you burn with us!
	Good evening.
	Are you awake yet?
	I hope.
	We've tried and we've tried for years and years to use passive resistance and loud voices to make a change.
	The time is over.
	Your governments around the world have no other goal than to decimate your entire existence at the hands of the bankers and the elites.
	The war is coming and it's your choice to decide if you want to be a warrior or a victim.
	Denial is not a choice anymore.
	Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
	Not giving up.
	Revolution Radio.
	Radio Radio.
	Radio Radio.
	It is no secret that the so-called mainstream media is best described as controlled propaganda.
	Countless news stories are either totally ignored or spun with half-truths, and because of this, essential facts and vital information are often compromised.
	Join Dr. Ot every Friday night on Studio B at 10 p.m.
	Eastern, and learn why The Story Behind The Story was nominated for a Peabody Award in its second year of producing unparalleled broadcasting excellence in 1997.
	That is, if you really care about learning the truth.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
	Well, John, there have been several developments related to Julian Assange, of course.
	Let me just read a couple of headlines.
	The Julian Assange saga is finally over.
	Assange implies murdered DNC staffer was WikiLeaks source.
	DNC mails scrub from WikiLeaks as Julian Assange returns home.
	I'm very troubled by that.
	You know, there was a condition of his release that they scrubbed 20,000 emails that had come from the DNC that Seth Rich had given his life to expose to the public.
	And, John, I'm looking at this guy who's supposed to be Julian Assange and ain't the real guy.
	They showed him walking out and getting on a plane and he just zip, zip, zip up the stairs like he was fitted as a fiddle.
	This guy's been 62 months in basically solitary confinement.
	The facial features are different and the physical fitness and muscle tone completely inappropriate to someone who's endured that degree of incarceration.
	Your thoughts?
	That's a good point.
	I didn't get to see close, but the video that I saw looked like him.
	He did have a little bit of a gut.
	And if you're going to be in like that, and I've experienced it personally, you have to have martial arts training, meditational skills, knowing how to exercise, getting proper food and exercise and sunlight.
	Even in the prison system in the United States, you're allowed one hour of sunlight every day.
	You have to have it to survive.
	Otherwise, you will get sick and die.
	But I was bothered by the whole thing.
	They pressured him.
	They called it time served.
	And that's what the U.S. government does.
	We're a communist country, just like a bunch of other ones.
	And if you give in to it, and he did a really good job.
	I mean, my hat's off to him.
	Five years or more, and the fact that he got out, but only because he took a deal that says, okay, you plead guilty.
	We'll call it time served.
	That's the lowest they'll go.
	He was willing to be, no, I'm sorry.
	Ed Snudd was willing to be extradited.
	Then you got the Chelsea Manning connection.
	Is it not correct that Trump gave Chelsea Manning a pardon?
	Right?
	That means that whole thing is out.
	They should have never been gone after.
	Um, Wikileaks and Julian Assange, because it was part of a release under, uh, First Amendment protection rights.
	And yet I even heard rumors and information that even Pence and somebody else was going to have him offed because of the stuff that they were releasing.
	Well, that was being released through Assange, through, um, or from, from Chelsea Manning, Assange, and then indirectly was also Ed Snowden.
	So it's kind of a weird, uh, three way thing that was going on there on the information.
	But he suffered the most so far.
	And if they could have, they would have killed him.
	You know, the day is young, as they say.
	But when they get to the point of charging a foreign national who's Australian under the Espionage Act, well, that's kind of crazy.
	He wasn't here in the United States.
	So it's indirect.
	So it'll be a first test case.
	That's what they're doing.
	It's all test case.
	And if it's under this administration, Democrats will do anything Yeah, very, very troubling.
	Very, very troubling.
	We have lots also going on.
	I think that the Democrats are panic-stricken.
	He doesn't care about whatever.
	He just wants to get his name in history books.
	That's all.
	But yeah, that's an interesting case.
	Yeah, very, very troubling.
	Very, very troubling.
	We have lots also going on.
	I think that the Democrats are panic-stricken.
	I have heard multiple rumors about what they might do.
	They've got, of course, their convention is going to be in Chicago.
	That's going to be a shite show for a certainty.
	But, you know, what are they going to do about Biden?
	I mean, 95 to 5, I mean, a guy, there's no way they can steal the election and have the American people believe it.
	They've got, they've got to have a plausible deniability where they steal election with Biden.
	They don't have it, John.
	So I believe, I believe they were going to bring in Gavin Newsom and Michelle.
	There've been horror stories of trying to resurrect Hillary.
	My goodness, what, what an awful development that would be.
	I'm sure she'd love to do it.
	And would you believe Hillary?
	His body doubles during her debates with Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump way back when.
	They brought in a younger, thinner, far more healthy and attractive version of Hillary, and they've got this voice box that they can replicate Hillary's voice.
	So it's Hillary's voice, but it wasn't Hillary's body, because it wasn't Hillary.
	And if she'd done that before, maybe she'll try to do it again.
	I mean, it is really, truly outrageous.
	Your thoughts?
	You know, that's an interesting point, because I've done some debunking over the years.
	Like, people would claim Elvis Presley called him up at three in the morning.
	You know, Gail Brewer DeGiorgio sold a book based on that stuff and a tape.
	Some other lady, I won't even give her any credit, claims Elvis called him.
	I said, OK, let's prove a point.
	Give me the copies of the actual voices on their tapes that they had and the book.
	Send it off with an actual copy through a production company locally in San Diego through an actual source of mine who used to work as a producer, executive producer and investigative reporter.
	And we sent it off to a guy named Curtis Crow over in Pennsylvania who does all this analytical stuff digitally on a computer.
	The voices that they claim was Elvis was an impersonator.
	I even picked up a few glitches.
	It sounded like a black guy talking, you know, the infamous, thank you very much type of slam.
	And the fact that I just said that term, you compare it to somebody else, it won't match up.
	It won't match up with Elvis.
	The amount of percentages that came up on the machine was 55%.
	And if it was the real Elvis, it would have been 99%.
	0.9% or better even if he had problems with the voice and you just made an interesting point because they can duplicate under AI just like Val Kilmer who lost his voice because of trachea cancer and so forth they went back on previous movies captured all the stuff digitally that he used in his voices they can now use through an automated intelligence artificial intelligence through a computer a full sentence
	Or regular terminology.
	They could type in whatever they want him to say.
	It'll come out with his voice.
	Just like that.
	They've played it on other shows.
	They've played it for fun.
	Yeah, you know what I mean?
	Yes.
	They could take the infamous Jim Fetzer's voice and put it in a computer and have him say something else, right?
	I think you're absolutely correct.
	That's what's scary, because if they use it in court, they have to differentiate and analyze it to make sure it's not the AI.
	Yeah, I agree completely.
	I think it's part of how they manage to control members of Congress.
	They have them blackmailed, and I believe very often based upon these Fabricated, you know, evidence that impugns their integrity, demeans their character, leaves them utterly controllable.
	Well, I did research on Howard Hughes and back in the day, remember the McCarthyism?
	Have you now or have you ever been a member of the Communist Party?
	That was the bottom line.
	You could always extort people by threatening them.
	And he used to buy off people left and right.
	Whatever campaign this guy was in that he didn't like, he'd pay to the other guy to make sure he won.
	Whatever it took.
	Millions.
	Literally.
	So that's how that works.
	But wow.
	If you think about the ability and the tool that they use in these things, it's the same thing.
	It's just a different time frame.
	Yes.
	Yes.
	I just can't believe our Congress has become so corrupt, John!
	I mean, look, they're inviting this Phoebe the Butcher to address the Congress.
	I would liken this to inviting Adolf Hitler to come and address the Congress, except it's unflattering to Hitler, because Hitler was less abusive to the Jews in Germany than the Israelis are to the Palestinians in Gaza.
	I mean, it is startling.
	Yeah, it's pretty vicious.
	They just showed Bibi was shaking hands with somebody the other day.
	And I go, yeah, the guy was shaking hands, but he was trying to like pull away from it because it wasn't like a friendly shake.
	He was just doing it for political purposes, that kind of thing.
	But yeah, I thought they were inviting him to Congress, just like they do.
	Vladimir Zelinsky has an open microphone over to Congress so he can beg for money.
	It's a constant thing.
	And they'll run it into the ground.
	The Democrats will run it in.
	All the way to the ground so they can get their money to lie to the American public.
	Look, we're paying for this.
	We're saving these lives.
	We're doing all these things.
	I just told you this morning, over an hour ago, they're already being offered to export Ukrainians on special programs to get them into the United States.
	So we're going to save that whole country at taxpayers' expense.
	And Congress is corrupt.
	I can't even get help from my own congressman.
	In the San Diego County District.
	Nor Marjorie Taylor Greene, Ted Cruz, Matt Goetz, any of these guys.
	They won't talk to you unless you live in their zip code.
	So our country is already divided by zip codes.
	If you're not in their district, rather.
	So if you're not in their district, they don't talk to you.
	So we're a multi-faceted country divided by districts of Congress.
	That's it.
	It's back to the feudal system.
	If they're the warlord and you're the peasant, they're not going to talk to you if you're next door.
	They don't care.
	They don't get it.
	National security is being violated all the time.
	Suitcase nukes?
	Yes.
	Everywhere.
	And nobody gets that.
	John, I think I'm going to open the lines early for callers.
	The number is 608-608-957-8727.
	608-957-8727.
	If you're watching a debate, call in and give us your opinion.
	Tell us what you think about everything going on here.
	We're eager to hear from you.
	So don't be shy.
	Stand by.
	and give us your opinion.
	Tell us what you think about everything going on here.
	We're eager to hear from you.
	So don't be shy.
	Stand by.
	Let us hear from you.
	John, meanwhile, are there other issues you would like to raise today while we're on the air together?
	I sort of touched on it.
	That debate is a no brainer.
	So there's no way Trump's going to lose.
	So there's no way they can come up and say all of a sudden Biden won on the Dominion servers thing.
	So what's Trump prepared to do then at that point in time?
	You see what I mean?
	Americans have to stand up and it can get bloody.
	You know, just like 1775, 1776 stuff.
	If they're not prepared to do that, to support and defend their country, it's lost.
	And I get tired of hearing these political types, these political cronies in Congress and political action committees and Republican versus Democrat.
	Yeah, we're fighting for you.
	We're fighting.
	Show me, show me your injuries.
	Where'd you get hit?
	Show me your injuries.
	Nothing.
	They're not fighting.
	They're lying.
	So it's constant.
	But I just said something really important.
	I could stand to lose my apartment and get evicted because I'm not getting support.
	I don't get retirement.
	People assume it all the time.
	But John, you've got your retirement.
	No, I don't.
	But John, you've got your Social Security.
	No, I do not.
	They wiped out 15 years from U.S.
	Customs, the agency I worked at, and reported for human trafficking and illegal activity.
	And that means I don't have but 15 credits.
	You need 40 to get retirement.
	And I'm handicapped.
	I'm handicapped.
	So that means, you know, some girl hit me and I had bad back and all that stuff.
	Yeah, yeah, I get that.
	But I'm not getting paid Social Security and I qualify for it.
	That's what they do to whistleblowers, Jim.
	And it's outrageous.
	Plus the death threats.
	Oh yeah, I get all that stuff.
	They demote you, transfer you, force you out.
	And there's nothing left for a whistleblower.
	Remember Gary Webb, San Jose Mercury News, and then Mike Rupert, former LAPD, both gone because they didn't get proper support.
	I see we have a caller.
	Yeah, here we have, I think it's Brian.
	Join the conversation, 816.
	Yeah.
	The presidential debate, I can't watch it.
	To me, it's an insult to all-star wrestling.
	You know, that's all it is.
	You did not watch it, Brian.
	No, I, I, you know, to me, they probably had Biden there at the beginning, his, his deep state controllers.
	And they said, well, we're going to make it bad for you.
	We need to replace you.
	They they've got everything controlled behind the scenes.
	There's, there's really nothing for us.
	It's just all control.
	That's how I look at it.
	And I think Paul would agree with me.
	It's all a show.
	So how do you think it's going to play out from here?
	It's the same thing.
	It's all a show.
	Yeah, it's just a show.
	You know, keep us enslaved.
	They don't want anyone waking up, so they play this game.
	So how do you think it's going to play out from here?
	Assume what I told you is right, since it's a fact.
	CNN showed their voter poll on the screen while the debate was concluding 95 to 5.
	What are the Democrats going to do under these circumstances, Brian?
	Well, it doesn't matter.
	They've got it all controlled.
	They may allow Trump to win, but then you have to wonder, is that the real Trump?
	You know, if they can put rubber masks on Fauci and Biden and everybody else, what's to stop them from doing that with Can I talk about Ukraine a little bit?
	him play to their tune.
	You know, I mean, it's nothing.
	They're never going to allow anything to go our way.
	It just won't happen.
	It's just how they are.
	So anyway, that's my take on it all for what it's worth.
	Can I talk about Ukraine a little bit?
	Sure, please do.
	I was listening to one of these Ukrainian officers or whatever, and they asked him what he thought of the war.
	And he said, well, we're outmanned, we're outgunned, and we're outranged.
	I thought that was funny.
	And the outranged thing, I really get that.
	They really learned from the Gulf War, because you remember in the Gulf War, Our M1 Abrams were finding the Iraqi T-72 tanks before the T-72s could see them.
	Our rounds had better range, and we were knocking them out left and right.
	Well, that was an export version of the T-72, their fire control.
	Well, the Russians observe all this, so their new T-72 They have an anti-tank missile on it that has a range of five kilometers, and their fire control is more advanced than ours now.
	And that second M1 Abrams tank that they took out, the Russians, and killed the entire four-man crew, that was at a range of 4.8 kilometers, and the M1 didn't see them.
	And so it's kind of like them learning, okay?
	And think of how many T-72s they have in stock.
	They're leftovers from the old Soviet Union.
	They just upgrade their fire control, and our $10 million Abrams cannot compete with it.
	And it's the same with their Zukhoi Su-57.
	I agree with all that.
	Sukhoi, Su-30, 34, they all outrange us now with missiles and their fire control.
	They can see us before we see them.
	So if we get into any kind of a fight with the Russians, we're done.
	But I like that guy's comment.
	It was just so true.
	So that's what I have to say.
	I agree with all that.
	The Russians are far superior military equipment, military equipment, Missiles.
	They've got the best in the world.
	We don't.
	Our whole method of.
	Supporting the nation.
	Through private contractors who are driven by a profit motive.
	Leads them to produce inferior equipment so I can get maintenance contracts that will double their profits.
	And in the quality of the equipment.
	These Abrams tanks are very limited.
	They are huge gas guzzlers.
	They got very limited range.
	They require more maintenance for every hour they spend in the field.
	They require like four hours of maintenance out of service, so it's really absurd.
	We got another caller here.
	Let's see.
	Hello.
	850.
	Yeah, go ahead.
	Join the conversation.
	Hi, this is Michael in North Carolina.
	Very good, Michael.
	Specifically, I wanted to just give my take on the debate situation.
	Yeah, did you see it?
	I could stand to watch about the first 45 minutes of it before I turned it off.
	Okay.
	As soon as I heard Dana Bash say last year was the hottest year on record, that flipped me out.
	They say that every year, of course.
	Am I on the radio right now?
	Yes, you are.
	Yes, you are.
	Of course, we're live on the air.
	Go right ahead.
	Hi, John.
	OK.
	I was in a conversation about that with my brainy friend in Texas, and I said, after thinking about it this morning, I think the whole debate was a deception.
	The professional actor playing Joe Biden was instructed To act like that.
	They've set, you know, Biden's side, I should say, is the one who suggested the debate in the first place.
	And Trump accepted.
	They set up this situation to have a good reason to replace Biden.
	So she answered.
	And said, yep, the New York Times is right on the script today.
	So it's a done deal.
	Tell me more.
	Tell me more.
	I'm eager to hear.
	New York Times is calling for Biden to be replaced?
	Evidently, that's what she says.
	And by whom?
	Who in the New York Times said that?
	Oh, replaced by who?
	I don't know that.
	Are they suggesting replace Biden?
	I don't know.
	I don't know that.
	Let me finish reading what she said.
	Yeah, go ahead.
	I was actually surprised at how instantaneously the CNN commentators threw Joe under the bus.
	It was definitely rehearsed.
	I did hear a suggestion that the Democrats might choose an all-female ticket like Big Mike and Hillary, but I don't think they'll risk There are four different pieces in the New York Times about the debate.
	One says Biden's shaky debate performance has Democrats panicking.
	Opinion.
	President Biden, I've seen enough.
	- I think on the whole thing. - There are four different pieces in the New York Times about the debate.
	One says Biden's shaking, debate performance says Democrats panicking.
	Opinion, President Biden, I've seen enough.
	Another opinion, after that debate, the risk of Biden is clear.
	Another opinion.
	I'm hearing high anxiety from Democrats over Biden's debate.
	Very interesting.
	Very interesting.
	See, when the New York Times voted him under the bus, and so did the CNN commentators right after the debate itself, I think the whole thing was a setup.
	Yeah, but I'm keen with I've been predicting he was going to be replaced for two years now, so that's not a surprise.
	The question is, who, with whom, are they going to replace him?
	I don't know.
	They don't invite me to those meetings.
	Here's Thomas Friedman.
	He's a really well-known Times columnist.
	It's written of his friendship with Biden that he writes, I cannot remember a more heartbreaking moment in American presidential campaign politics in my lifetime.
	He wrote, St.
	Biden, a Biden, a good man and a good president, but has no business running for reelection.
	If Biden were to drop out, he'd be remembered as among the better presidencies in our history.
	I hardly think so.
	But, you know, getting rid of him, I think, is the best possible thing that could happen, just depending on who they replace him with.
	Yeah.
	See how the biggest voices fell right in line?
	You mean about getting rid of Biden?
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	That was a setup.
	The whole thing was staged, I think.
	Or, I don't know if Trump was staged, but the Democrat side of it was.
	Yeah, I want to see who they're going to suggest to be the alternative.
	That's that's what I think is crucial.
	Of course, I've been saying.
	Go ahead, I think they're going to draft Bibi Netanyahu.
	Yeah, because he's actually running their country already anyway.
	You got that right?
	Yeah, and.
	And you know, you know how the Congress loves him from head to toe.
	So that's who they'll get.
	Very, very interesting.
	Very, very interesting.
	John, your thoughts?
	No, no, I was just thinking about the comment I made earlier, but Gerald Ford was claiming if they get a male president in there, it's not so desirable and put a female as vice president.
	We're in that situation right now.
	Anything could happen to Biden.
	He could resign, just like Nixon.
	He could resign, that automatically would put Kamala Harris in to take over the slot.
	Just like that.
	She's not qualified, and she's not a natural born citizen.
	Let's all take a deep breath.
	We'll be right back and we'll field your calls.
	Stand by, the number is 608-957-8727.
	- Jim?
	- Jim?
	Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	We'll be right back.
	Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
	We need the support of the people.
	It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
	Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
	With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
	Revolution Radio.
	FreedomSubs.com.
	The number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
	Revolution.
	Radio, radio, radio, radio.
	Thank you.
	Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday, 8 p.m. Eastern.
	Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at FreedomStitch.com.
	The People Station.
	Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
	But did you know that it was an inside job?
	That Osama had nothing to do with it?
	That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes?
	That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building?
	Barry Jennings was there.
	He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
	The U.S.
	Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
	Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
	9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons in the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Read America Nuked on 9-11.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners, or chatters, are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
	Go right ahead, John.
	Give us further thoughts.
	Oh, I got almost got distracted there.
	Yeah, the thing about the debates and all that it was a waste of time and I was specifically reminded of a rabbi in California.
	They call him the surfing rabbi.
	By the way, he ran for office and didn't make it.
	But the point I'm making is he debate with a Palestinian in Israel because he went back to visit him.
	And I'm not saying this is a joke.
	It's a real deal.
	But trying to argue or debate with this other guy did not work in the least.
	It's like talking or arguing with Iraq.
	I almost felt like that was the same thing in the debate.
	It's almost like Trump lowered himself, but to prove a point he showed up.
	He was disciplined about it.
	He did the debate with Biden.
	I only caught like so many minutes of it, and I caught recaps on the news, so I know I can at least say that much.
	It was like a waste of time.
	You know, so it's like, well, hey, why don't we just do the election right now and get it over with?
	Why wait?
	What says we have to wait?
	People are already doing primaries right now.
	We could get the results in the same night within hours.
	Yes.
	The same election.
	Why not do it now?
	Have a special election.
	Get it done.
	Get it over with.
	And just do it now.
	See, that would be a bloodless coup right there.
	Yes.
	Comments, Jim?
	Yes.
	Brian, go ahead.
	Yeah.
	Well, when you mentioned Kamala Harris, what I think about is there was a rabbi, Alan Anava, who you can get his little speech on the Internet, along with ones who you can get his little speech on the Internet, along with ones like
	And he said that she's in charge of the Tukan Alam, which is one of your callers the other day mentioned it.
	It's no redemption for us Jews unless all the Gentiles are annihilated.
	And she's supposed to be in charge of that.
	So, you know, when you talk about her taking over, then I would go, well, it looks like the Shabbat Ludovitches have gotten their way.
	So, just really bad stuff.
	And that Alan Inaba in his speech said that Jesus Christ, Hitler was a lifetime of Jesus Christ.
	And I found that really interesting.
	So anyway.
	If she gets in there, we know she's the Toucan Alam, and it's not going to be good for us.
	John?
	I'm listening very carefully.
	When I hear those kind of things, they're twisting everything so bad.
	Even in the last week, I've heard stuff where people are praying to Yeshua and all these other things, but at the same time, people are trying to lie, saying, Oh, Yeshua is Baphomet.
	It's Baal.
	It's Astaroth and all these other ancient names and so forth.
	And of course, you've got the Islamic version where Allah has 99 names, you know, like that, like that beer song, 99 cans of beer and all that.
	I'm joking about that part.
	But the point was, is that you can't even find a Muslim that can quote all 99 names that I'm aware of.
	But still, they always try to twist it, reverse it around.
	And I've had Jewish rabbis in Eastern religions training when I was up in Ridgecrest, China Lake.
	So I have some of the best background and training when I was studying the Eastern religions, you know, all of them.
	So it's like, well, yeah, I have a very good basis and it was a really good teacher.
	But we're still not being told the truth and it can get vicious.
	I don't want to go Bible thumping stories or nothing, but it's like the Abraham and the story where he was going to sacrifice his son.
	Somebody said it recently and said, oh, he was Persian.
	Oh my God, I thought he was Hebrew.
	They said, no, he was Persian.
	So if the Persians were doing that, they had Persians, Jews, Persian, Muslims, et cetera.
	So it's kind of an interesting take because what are we fighting against is Persia, is Iran.
	And they won't, they don't do it.
	They go by proxy attacks, proxy wars back and forth.
	If the guy isn't, I think we have Paul here joining the conversation.
	You don't go with a neighbor, that sort of thing.
	But that's very curious stuff.
	Hey, Brian, we'll have to talk off the air.
	I've got your number.
	I'll have to call you.
	Yeah, please do.
	You'll find it enlightening.
	There's a lot that I get that I don't talk about.
	I get it.
	I hear it.
	I hear it.
	I think we have Paul here joining the conversation.
	Paul, go for it.
	Well, I don't know how anybody could think that wasn't disgraceful.
	Naturally, of course, I did not watch it, but I just went on to YouTube and watched the summaries, the experts.
	I watched a couple of the talking heads afterwards, and they showed obviously the most provocative and salacious exchanges between the two.
	You know, Brian's exactly correct.
	Thanks for mentioning my opinion on it, which is absolutely true.
	Again, it's not interesting at all.
	I mean, if they were to actually physically get in the ring like big time wrestling, you know, maybe more people would think it's serious.
	But Jim, I mean, as a grown man, forget about all your degrees and your education and your ability to do a political analysis.
	Just as a grown, decent man in America, I mean, that's it.
	What else could you say?
	Russ Winters said it best, and I've been saying it for a long time.
	It was just a Jewish humiliation ritual, okay?
	I mean, exchanges such as, oh, well, you're the only person that's a felon.
	Oh, well, your son is a felon, and he might be, you know, convicted of another felony.
	Oh, you had sex with a porn star while your wife was pregnant.
	You got the morals of an alley cat.
	I mean, seriously, these are the two men that they give us a choice between.
	You already know.
	I mean, you're already red-pilled on Trump, okay?
	So you know it's not going to be any different.
	And I don't think—I mean, obviously, you know, there's plenty of time ahead on the calendar for us all, but you don't really need to do any more shows after what Victor Hugo said on your show, right?
	All you have to do is just take the excerpts of what he said, and that's it.
	We don't have to have any other viewpoints.
	He's a terrific guy, isn't he?
	I'm really happy with him!
	Related discovery that he's out there and speaking so clearly and with conviction and articulation.
	Paul, yeah, no, I like him a lot.
	A bill bill Bonatati seems so disillusioned with any discussion that talks about the Kabuki theater that he's he's inclined to withdraw from discussion altogether.
	Now I think that's a big mistake because.
	Well, I'm inclined to believe he's right and you're right about the deep politics of the situation Americans are dealing with the more superficial theatrical level.
	We got to analyze that and help them to think it through.
	And I don't think just telling them that nothing can be done that's going to make any good or difference is the right way to go.
	That's me.
	To my opinion, that's just.
	Forfeiting the opportunity to do whatever you can to make things better.
	And I suspect, Paul, you're more on Bill's side than you would be on mine.
	But, I mean, that's just how I see it.
	Well, again, I've made this comment before.
	The way that this is being done, and probably the way it's been done in other places, it's all incremental.
	It never winds up at your front door until it does.
	You know what I'm saying?
	In other words, you know, again, I mean, it probably happened the same way in the Bolshevik Revolution, I would imagine, right?
	Nothing all at once, over years, okay?
	They didn't kill a bunch of people overnight, you know, and they, I mean, we've all read the accounts, heard the radio shows where they talk, you know, I've watched the videos on what occurred and, you know, again, I'm not sure if we, you know, know all the truth and all the figures are accurate, but Victor is exactly right.
	I mean, he's not alone, obviously, but I just thought he put it so clearly and so succinctly.
	And that's why I've been telling you for years, there's only one way to look at this, and it's a racial war.
	And, you know, that's why we have to forget about politics, because there's no political solution to this.
	I think you know that.
	I mean, they're incomplete in total power.
	The elections are fake.
	The president himself is fake, right?
	I mean, it just goes on and on and on.
	So what do we do, Paul?
	Just stop talking about it and stock up on ammo weapons, do our training and get ready for combat?
	Is that your thought?
	Well, of course.
	I mean, asymmetrically, you know, get together with whatever, you know, groups, crews.
	I mean, if there's I'm not sure there's ever going to be an organization for all of us.
	And, you know, there's always infighting.
	There's infighting in every group.
	But what's sad is whites seem to engage in it.
	Uh, so much when their collective lives are on the line.
	The civilization that we built is being dismantled and destroyed.
	And Trump ain't going to do a damn thing about it.
	And you know it.
	So what's, what's the point?
	I mean, he's going along with them.
	He's cooperating with them.
	Sure.
	He throws us the bone, the fake news and, and all of that.
	But I mean, in the end, I mean, you've heard, you've heard enough clips about Israel, right?
	You've heard enough quips about the vaccines of him.
	And of course, there's tons of other clips where he, you know, backtracked and double talked.
	And I mean, it just couldn't be more clear.
	And it's exactly like I've been saying and exactly how Victor Hugo put it.
	That's my two cents.
	Oh, but should we be talking about it?
	I mean, I don't get it.
	I mean, is this supposed to be because we have seen the promised land we just shut up and then stock up on ammo and weapons?
	I don't get it, Paul.
	The public needs to be informed.
	The purpose of these shows is to inform the public and they need to be exposed to multiple point of views to help them think things through.
	That's what we're all about.
	And the idea of having reached a conclusion and just saying that's it is, to my mind, ridiculous!
	There are a lot of people who need to be educated, and it takes a long time before they get the big picture, especially when it's so complicated and messy and full of propaganda, deceit, and deception.
	Yours?
	That's a slow death, Jim.
	In other words, we can't wait to wake other people up when I think across the country There's enough people already awake.
	It's just we have to get, uh, get down to business, the task at hand.
	I mean, I'm not telling you not to do shows or talk about it, but let's face it.
	We can talk about it till the cows come home.
	Nothing's going to change.
	Right?
	I mean, they got it.
	In other words, we can only win.
	All right.
	Right now we're losing.
	And a lot of people say, well, it's lost.
	It's just a matter of time.
	Then we're going to be 40% of the population.
	Then we're going to be 35% of the population.
	Then we're going to be 30 when I'm going to be 25% of the population.
	It's all going to be incremental.
	People are going to bitch about it all the way down.
	And then who knows when they feel the time is right.
	They might do all the stuff that you've already talked about in terms of, you know, giving them directives or orders, you know, releasing weapons, caches.
	I don't know.
	But there's nobody that can seriously argue that I'm not correct and that Victor Hugo is not correct.
	And if you were to argue that, I would just question your sanity.
	Let's start with Brian.
	Brian, what are your thoughts about Paul's remarks?
	Brian?
	Did we lose you?
	I'm sorry, I was on mute.
	No, I'm not as concerned simply because I know we're getting to a point where they're just going to start dropping.
	They're going to die, okay?
	I know that sounds crazy.
	You know that, what was her name in Russia?
	The young girl, Dugin, what was her name?
	Anyway, she was, the Ukrainians put a car bomb in her car and killed her.
	Okay, anyway.
	Yeah, that's it.
	Yeah, it was interesting reading her philosophy because it was exactly mine.
	She talked about the end of the age of the Kali Yuga and how we're in the new age.
	And it happens every 26,000 years.
	You guys can research it and find out it's the truth.
	And these are just the growing pains getting into that new age.
	And in the end, they're going to be defeated.
	We got another caller here, 870.
	Please join the conversation.
	Join the conversation.
	Good afternoon.
	This is Gary in Arkansas.
	I've been listening to talk radio for decades, and I've never heard anybody talk about the legal remedy to this problem.
	And the Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land, and it very clearly defines the legal remedy.
	It's in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 15.
	It says that the people are responsible for the execution of laws of the Union, suppression of insurrections, and repelling invasions.
	In this case, people means the able-bodied men between the ages of 18 and 45 with their rifle and their bayonet.
	So the American men decide to perform their constitutional duties Nothing's going to change.
	That's a good one, Gary.
	Hey, Gary, good to hear from you, man.
	Hey, Tom.
	Yeah, good to hear from you.
	Let me share with you a story by Tom Selgass.
	I met Tom Selgass back in 2010.
	He claims that he is a graduate of the Harvard Law School, and he claims that he argued the Heller case before the Supreme Court.
	He told me how law enforcement and the justice system worked in the United States in 1830.
	There is a situation where a judge knowingly allowed false evidence to be admitted into a murder trial.
	Then he sentenced the convicted person to death.
	And the it turns out that the.
	The convicted person was a political opponent of the judge.
	So what happened in 1830 is that the militia was mustered.
	They took the judge to the nearest busy street where at noon hang by the neck until dead for treason.
	Right so the in the 1830s is when the public schools was introduced in the United States and And by 1860, when the Republicans used election fraud to put in the first communist president of the United States, what did the able-bodied men age 18 to 45 do?
	Nothing!
	They accepted that.
	And when the most destructive thing that the American people have ever done was they allowed the Federal Reserve Act to stand in 1913, What did the American men 18 to 45 do?
	They did nothing.
	They pretended that was lost.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Here we are 100 years later, and the economy has been destroyed, and society has been degenerated to the point that they can't even maintain a lawful society.
	God bless America!
	And so just precisely, this is it, Jim.
	If you don't understand what he's saying, and I'm sure you do, What they count on, and by the way, they've been working on taking away our masculinity, right?
	Our very maleness with the attack of the food and the water and, you know, the chemtrails and everything.
	That's all part of the equation.
	But all Gary is saying is the absolute truth is that what they count on is we will not do anything physically to them.
	Okay?
	So they're going to win.
	All we have is our physicality and our willingness to assert our will against these people who would rule us and destroy us and kill us, just like Victor Hugo said.
	So for some reason, we've lost our way.
	We have to find that again.
	And all he's saying is the exact precise truth is whatever we stand for and excuse me, whatever we allow, okay, and whatever we Well, it's a powerful argument.
	I'm fascinated to hear it articulated with such clarity.
	Gary, give us more.
	Let me give you another idea.
	You've talked about the Smith-Mudd Act for a long time.
	Let me tell you what I think about that.
	The Supreme Law of the United States is documented in three places.
	The Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the United States, and the Federalist Papers.
	The Declaration of Independence says that the only legitimate government is government that derives its authority from the consent of the government.
	So if the people who created the United States—I mean, it says, we the people of the United States created the Constitution, right?
	In order for the people to consent, they have to know what government has done.
	So if a government official maintains secrets from the American people, or they make false statements to the American people, they have violated the most fundamental principles of the self-government of the United States, right?
	They have deprived the people of the ability to consent.
	And what do you do with people that violate the most fundamental principles of the government?
	What do you do with those people?
	Hang them.
	Treason.
	That's what article, the U.S.
	Code, Title 18, which is criminal, what Tom Selgas said was that The original code, before it was modified recently, said that the posse shall take the accused to the nearest busy street where at noon, hanged by the neck until dead, the body to remain in state until dusk for all to see that might contemplate a similar crime.
	And by the way, I quote this 18 U.S.C.
	code all the time.
	18 U.S.C. 2381 Write that down folks, because that's high treason.
	That's it.
	18 U.S.C.
	2381.
	But it's important to remember that we don't need permission from any law written down anywhere to fight for our survival and to punish our wrongdoers.
	So even though I agree obviously with everything Gary has said, and we've talked about this sort of thing on the phone before, The bottom line is it doesn't matter who's saying it, okay?
	It's truth in and of itself, right?
	Intrinsically, we all know it's the truth.
	We have an enemy.
	The enemy is occupying our government.
	The enemy is exercising unwarranted and unlawful authority over us, so we don't need any damn law to deal with them.
	And it's worth pointing out, you know, as we in the white nationalist movement talk about the Leo Frank treatment, okay?
	And I'm sure, Jim, you're familiar with what happened to Leo Frank.
	But it's worth noting that these people that got him, right, dragged him out of the jail, then they drove over dirt roads during the night so they could hang him at dawn in the Capitol so that the government and the governor could see that they were aware of.
	In other words, they just didn't get him on the spot.
	They dragged him out of jail and then they drove on country roads so they could make the statement at dawn in the state Capitol.
	So those were men.
	Well, I don't think you've ever made your case more eloquently than today, Paul, and I'm very glad Gary called in, and I look forward to future calls from him as well, because this is as serious as it gets.
	I mean, once we pick up arms against the government, We're in a status where we're subject to execution.
	I mean, it's an ultimate commitment.
	And therefore, you know, I believe it needs to be thoroughly vetted, well reasoned, thought through by those who are willing to do what the Declaration of Independence declares is our right to do when subjected to a tyrannical government by force of arms.
	Defeat it.
	So, you know, I'm not opposed in principle, but we're talking about people putting their lives in jeopardy for the sake of their nation.
	I'm all for that.
	I've done it myself as a Marine Corps officer and in principle, I endorse the idea.
	I just think we want to have this thoroughly explored in the process of reaching the point of making an irrevocable, irreversible commitment.
	Yeah.
	But Jim, here's my quick response to that.
	When you talk about thoroughly, you know, explored and all that, we have hundreds of years of thorough exploration of this.
	OK, we don't need any.
	Look, it's not going to be, I don't know how you envision it, and I'm not sure if the way I envision it is correct.
	We'll see.
	But it's going to be, you know, incidental here and there.
	It's going to be asymmetrical.
	But there's probably people out there that are bound and determined.
	I don't know.
	You and I are getting up there in years, you know, and it's probably not going to end up in the long run being our fight.
	But here's the thing.
	There has to be people willing to do what's necessary.
	Otherwise, we're finished.
	It's just that simple.
	So, you know, if you're not willing to at least speak about it and consider it, I mean, Forget about all these ideas.
	I mean, I know it's a very sobering thought.
	It's an unpleasant thought, right?
	And, you know, but in the end, there's really nothing else to consider.
	And my quick pushback to you about this is it's already been thoroughly considered for hundreds of years.
	It's written down in the law, as Gary said, in the Constitution, the Declaration, and it's written in history.
	Very, very, very good.
	Very appropriate rebuttal, Paul.
	Gary, would you like to add a final thought before we have to conclude today's conversation, Gary?
	Well, sir, I've been thinking about this since I learned in 1974 from studying economics that the U.S.
	is headed for destruction because of the use of bills of credit as money.
	That's the most serious mistake that the Americans made, was allow the Federal Reserve Act to stand.
	And unless they can find some way to overcome, they're going to perish.
	Brian, a final thought?
	Brian?
	Well, to me, all this just shows more light coming in here, like I've said, and it's just going to keep growing.
	And in the long run, I'm not as concerned.
	I know that it's going to go our way.
	In the end, we're going to win.
	And all I can say is, Those bayonets they pass out, he mentioned, to the militia.
	I can think of a few people I'd like to use that bayonet on.
	John, John, your thoughts about all of this?
	Yeah, all good points.
	And what Gary was bringing up, it brings up the real serious stuff as well as the rest of these guys.
	And they're really important points.
	People aren't willing to sacrifice.
	I'm not 45 anymore, but I can still do the job.
	You know what I mean?
	And somebody's got to do something.

▲