All Episodes
Previous Next
June 4, 2024 - Jim Fetzer
58:54
Truth vs. News, Inc Part 1 (3 June 2024) with Don Grahn, Brian Davidson, and Chris Weinert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21.
And welcome, folks.
It's June already.
June is busting out all over.
June 3rd here.
And we're at Truth vs. News Incorporated.
And believe me, the truth is being sheltered in a hell of a lot of news out here.
It's quite alarming right now.
Last week was something else, and this is a heck of a week.
And we've got the best people here to share it with you.
Come on.
Anyway, we've got Janine Spetscher.
He's a dynamo, and he's an editor of many books, including JFK, and Who, How, and Why, and America, New York's on 9-11, and of course, Nobody Died, that Sandy Hook has been assaulted, and essentially he's got a revised edition out now, it's perfect, and he's just a dynamo, the leader of our show for some 15 years or more, and we also have Brian Davidson,
Sure, I'll call you soon.
And Brian is the great private investigator of Houston, Texas, where he's had all kinds of fun with the weather and everything there, plus all the stuff that goes on.
And we're having back, we're having, excuse me, uh-oh, and it is, where did he go?
And here we have, come on!
Chris Wainert, of course.
Yeah, I know.
I gotta get his picture.
Okay.
Anyway.
No, anyway, I can't get him a picture.
We can see him.
There you go.
There you go.
And we have Chris Wainert, who's driving people crazy.
He's doing a heck of a lot of good work investigating.
You won't find anywhere else.
Well, with that, I would say that this gets his show on the road here, and we're gonna First story is going to be really hot, and I think it's going to get even hotter from there.
We have Washington attacks a key element of Russia's nuclear armament and threatening the entire global nuclear security economy architecturally.
Anyway, this is pretty heavy, and so we want to go over from this.
Go ahead, Jim.
Well, it turns out Biden, using its proxies in Ukraine, has launched an unprecedented attack on not just one, but several of its advanced nuclear radar warning systems.
That really puts Russia in jeopardy by missiles launched from the South, for example, even the Mediterranean Sea.
The Western media has largely blacked out coverage, but according to Russian nuclear doctrine, Any attack on Russia's nuclear burst alert system provides a justification for nuclear retaliation.
Clearly, the Biden admin has decided it cannot prevail in Ukraine absent NATO involvement.
Toward that end, the U.S.
will continue to launch increasingly lethal attacks on Russian territory, forcing Moscow to respond in kind.
Here we have a report on a second and an attempt to hit a third.
Ukraine has hit a radar of Russia's nuclear early warning system for the second time and attempted to hit a third.
Moscow is expecting a fourth to be targeted yet.
The attack on the second over-the-horizon radar inside Russia is an extremely worrisome development.
It's not being done for Ukraine defense.
But as NATO destabilization, one suspects for a nuclear first strike by NATO on Russia.
The second advanced over-the-horizon system is in the Orsk region of Orenburg, 1,800 kilometers from the Ukrainian border.
Unlike the first attack, the second, which had imagery from the ground available immediately, not from the second.
Here's Hal Turner's take, and this is a very smart guy.
When I reported the attack on the first over-the-horizon radar, I pointed out it was not providing coverage for Ukraine.
There was no military advantage in relation to Ukraine to have attacked this station.
I pointed out the only reason a station like this would be attacked would be to set the stage for a NATO nuclear first strike.
Bolstering my belief that it's NATO is revealed over the Memorial Day weekend.
One of the drones shot down during the first attack was a TechEver AR-3 made by Portugal, a NATO member country.
With a second having now been hit and an attempt on a third, it seems clear NATO is setting the stage for a decapitation nuclear attack against Russia to solve the Russia problem in one fell swoop.
I, Turner writes, may be wrong about this, but I'm not wrong about the vulnerability created for Russia by these attacks.
At some point, Russia will be in a position where they have a single choice, use them or lose them.
I'm of the belief Russia will use them, because failing to do so would leave Russia at the mercy of NATO and thereby become a conquered nation.
I don't see the Russians putting up with that.
The Slavic mentality, which I admire, it is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees.
In sum, we in the West are constantly upping the ante in the Russian-Ukraine conflict, and now we're upping it to an actual nuclear war.
This is not the treaty role of NATO.
I know of no American or even European who has authorized or asked for a nuclear World War III.
And in their response, Russia has moved 11 nuclear subs into the Atlantic.
Russia deployed 11 nuclear subs into the Atlantic, each carrying from 6 to 16, in some cases up to 32 missiles, each of which may hold from 6 to 10 independently targetable nuclear warheads.
This deployment means, by a cautious estimate, there are now around a thousand warheads on Russian SOBs that could be headed toward the U.S.
East Coast or to Europe, the Gulf of Mexico, Deployment just days after Ukraine—really, as a subterfuge for NATO—attacked and destroyed two Samara Russian over-the-horizon warning sites in southern Russia.
When they were hit, a lack of coverage put a hole in Russia's nuclear protection.
When they were operational, Russia had between 14 and 16 minutes advance warning.
Nukes were on the way.
Now they're destroyed.
A sub-launch missile fired from the eastern Mediterranean or anywhere in the Red Sea or in the Gulf of Arabia The southern part of Somalia or the African continent would leave Russia with only 10 to 12 minutes warning.
So from 14 to 16 down to 10 to 12.
In southern Russia, the destruction of the two stations means Russia can only detect inbound missiles when they're past the horizon.
Given the speed at which they travel, that amount of warning is, frankly, too little, too late.
The compressed time frame no longer allows Russia to figure out what might be happening before they have to launch a return strike.
Perhaps it's time to think things through.
Might cause the Russians to launch their nukes in response to something coming at them, which might later turn out to have been benign.
Ukraine denies any military benefit, and they have none to derive.
Clearly, Russia believes this blinding of over-the-horizon radar stations is a prelude to a U.S.-NATO first strike.
They seem to be sending out their nuclear sobs in order to be in a position to hit the U.S.
and NATO back right away.
Now, here's Hal Turner's analysis.
I warned when the first Russian station was destroyed it would be interpreted by Russia as opening a hole for a NATO first strike.
I reiterated this past Monday after news broke of a second Russian station hit, widening the hole in radar protection.
I know my radio audience, this new hole in radar coverage would allow sub-launched Lukes to penetrate deep into Russia, hitting Moscow, as well as Russian nuclear silos, before Russia had time to defend itself.
Apparently, the Russians see this as well.
So now, you and me, we've got real trouble.
There's a reason Russia is sending 11 new subs into the Atlantic.
That's because they'll have to hit the United States.
That's what the nitwits in the House of Representatives and Senate, the illegitimate President Joe Biden, have done for us.
The decision to meddle in the Russian-Ukraine conflict, their constant upping the ante with Russia, have now resulted in today's deployment of subs from Russia into the Atlantic, heading, almost certainly, to U.S.
firing positions.
You folks who voted for Biden because Orange Man Bad deserve exactly what may be coming.
It's right and proper that you and your family be vaporized by the choice you made, because your choice was reckless and stupid, frankly.
I think Biden voters are too stupid to be called citizens.
Personally, I view such people as useful idiots, where in my judgment he's not giving enough credit for the theft of the election by the Democrats.
It had very little to do with the voters.
Indeed, I think only around 37 million Americans voted for Biden, while over 100 million voted for Trump.
So it's not really where their stupidity has got us.
It's where the manipulation of the American elections has brought us.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, it seems that The people in control of the politicians in Washington, as well as in NATO, the ones who have installed Macron and the Biden regime and the rest, have their mind set on a massive, possibly nuclear, catastrophe.
They're going to continue to push this.
They're going to continue to blame Putin as if he's the aggressor, even though he's been almost like a dead cat in terms of how he's chosen to fight this.
They're going to push this.
It's the start of the new world order.
It's inevitable.
They're going to use the platform to set up a new society where all their contractors get rich and all their friends benefit, get benefits out of it.
I believe that this is the beginning of the end in terms of how they're talking and how they're setting this up.
It doesn't appear that there's any sort of diplomacy taking place at all.
There's no red line that's been drawn by Russia in terms of do not go here or we will strike.
There's no media talking about How to resolve this without this being a bigger conflict, and I believe that this is the stage where they're getting ready to implement their new world order.
They're going to use a major militaristic catastrophe to try to stage it all up.
So I think it's inevitable that what's going to take place here is going to be an attack of some sort, whether it's electromagnetic pulse or nuclear.
Or something else.
They're going to use it as a platform to set a military-style intervention and impose a new world order and a digital dollar.
You got that right, Brian.
Chris?
Yeah, I agree.
I think the whole plan is for them to take over the world with this technocratic feudalism and the way they departmentalize it through nations and through corporations and even like certain agendas, AI, automation, the CBDC, cryptocurrency, surveillance capital, on and on and on.
All of this has been justified by a theatric that has been created by the state in the first place.
And therefore brings you to the justification of the retaliation or reaction.
Patriot Act, nuclear retaliation, whatever.
By the way, if that happens, I would think AI would have both sides lit up and destroyed within 30 minutes, you know, if they detected a launch from us or we from them.
It wouldn't even be a decision.
It would be an autopilot reaction within a matter of seven minutes or less.
So, you know, this whole thing, in my opinion, is just theater that is being used to justify mass carnage.
And I don't see it as any other way.
I think these Zionist masons are running the whole show.
They're running both sides of the spectrum.
Oh, your bandwidth is low.
Okay.
Where are we at?
Chris?
I don't know where I bailed out at there, but I got tossed out.
But I was saying that the Zionists are running both sides of this thing and it's all part of the show.
Yes, yes, yes.
And I think you're right.
The response would be so prompt that it would all be over in about 30 minutes, or the time it takes for all those missiles to hit their targets.
Very disturbing.
Meanwhile, Biden secretly gave Ukraine permission to strike inside Russia with U.S.
weapons, an incredibly bad idea if you don't want to risk World War III.
Ukraine asked the U.S.
to make the policy change only after Russia's offensive in Kharkov began last month.
While we've already pardoned 40,000 to 45,000 Ukrainian soldiers, Ukrainians cannot replace or appear to have been taken by the Russians.
All those interviewed were granted anonymity to discuss decisions that haven't been announced in the last few days.
The U.S.
decided to allow Ukraine flexibility to defend itself from attacks on the border near Kharkov.
In effect, Ukraine can use Russian-provided weapons now—rockets, rocket launchers, To shoot down Russian missiles headed toward Kharkov, troop massing just over the Russian border near the city, or Russian bombers launching bombs toward Ukrainian territory.
The official said Ukraine cannot use those weapons in civilian infrastructure or launch long-range missiles, such as the Army Tactical Missile System, to help military targets deep inside Russia, but have no doubt they will not be restrained.
They will use them for those purposes.
It's a stunning shift by an admin that initially said it would not escalate the war by more directly involving the U.S.
in the fight, but worsening conditions for Ukraine on the battlefield.
Russia's advances and improved position in Kharkov led to the change of policy.
Meanwhile, just to confirm, U.S.
missiles strike deep inside Russia.
Update!
U.S.
missiles hit an oil facility deep inside Russia using cruise missiles and ATACMS.
This all appears to be mapped out by the American CIA.
The U.S.
allows Ukraine to use weapons that strike inside Russia, but It's unlikely to be a game-changer unless, of course, it really pisses off the Russians.
The story of the past 27 months has been one of crumbling taboos.
After repelling Russia's initial march on Kiev, Ukraine asked its Western allies for greater and greater support.
First ammunition, then tanks, then cluster munitions, then fighter jets.
Each time, The West agonized over whether to grant a request during escalation or a potential Russian response each time the taboo was broken and nothing happened.
What seemed beyond a pale one week had become banal the next.
More.
U.S.
officials planned their first attacks on Russian soil using U.S.
and NATO weapons launched from Ukraine.
It has begun.
Russia, meanwhile, has launched an anti-satellite weapon into space.
The U.S.
intel community believes the Russian government has launched an anti-satellite weapon that's currently deployed near American satellites.
U.S.
Ambassador Robert Wood, serving as U.S.
alternate representative at the United Nations, made the revelation while speaking at the U.N.
on May 16.
Russia launches satellite into low-Earth orbit.
The USSS is likely to be a counterspace weapon, presumably capable of attacking other satellites in low-Earth orbit.
Russia deployed this new counterspace weapon in the same orbit as a U.S.
government satellite.
He doesn't identify which it is, but I'm quite sure it's extraordinarily important In relation to military affairs, CNN noted Russia previously launched an anti-satellite weapon back in 2022 following its special military operation in Ukraine.
The news comes after a U.S.
official warned they believe Russian President Putin is developing anti-satellite nukes.
Meanwhile, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg Friday shrugged off warnings from Russian President Putin against NATO countries allowing Ukraine to strike Russian territory with Western weapons.
This is nothing new.
It's been the case for a long time.
Every time NATO allies are providing support to Ukraine, Putin is trying to threaten us not to do it.
He told reporters during a NATO minister meeting in Prague.
In an escalation well, Russia escalated by invading another country.
Stoltenberg's comments came after the U.S.
and other NATO countries gave Ukraine the green light to hit Russian territory near Kharkov.
That marked a significant escalation in the proxy war, could provoke a major response from Russia, but now they're striking deep inside Russia.
Putin warned there'd be serious consequences for NATO countries that lift the restriction on Ukraine's use of their weapons.
Moscow warned the UK it would respond to Ukraine using British weapons on Russian territory with strikes on UK military sites in Ukraine and beyond.
Russia already significantly escalated its operation in Ukraine after attacks on its territory did not begin major strikes, for example, on Ukrainian infrastructure Until after the first bombing of the Crimean Bridge in October of 2022.
Putin also said Russia's new offense in Kharkov is a response to Ukraine's attack on Russia's Belgorod oil blast, which borders Kharkov.
He said the purpose was to create a buffer zone to prevent attacks on Belgorod.
Over the weekend, Russia launched a major barrage against Ukrainian infrastructure, which could be related to the latest escalation by NATO.
Due to the bombing, Ukraine imposed emergency power shutdowns almost across the whole country.
Here you have Leon Panetta endorsing the idea.
Just absurd.
...weapons inside Russia.
How do you feel about that?
I think that's the right decision.
I think Ukraine needs to get whatever help it can get in defending itself.
And I think NATO has urged that we allow those strikes.
France, Germany, Great Britain, Canada, Finland, most of our allies have urged that.
I think it is important for the United States to provide a unified approach that allows the Ukrainians to strike at those targets.
Really, really bad.
There you have former Secretary of Defense, former head of CIA Leon Panetta, endorsing it.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, all indicators are that they're pushing and knocking on Putin's door harder than ever before.
There's nobody talking peace again, which I think is the big problem.
While the Bilderberg Group has their major summit that Kamala Harris and other About 95 other major world leaders are at right now where they're discussing how they're going to set up the new world.
We've always known that Russia was the big holdout in terms of chess pieces on the global board that were preventing the new world order from really taking shape.
Putin had some black box ideas that he could have released related to a number of different things that would have changed the way the world viewed Western powers and Putin never played along.
He's praised Israel on a lot of different levels and continues to seem to be playing the game.
I've seen pictures of him in his Masonic garb along with other world leaders including Bush and others.
So I think he's one of the players in it.
Now, I don't think the people have been able to get through to him in terms of what's really at risk here.
And so I see him being another player in this New World Order game on a certain level.
I don't see him as being the big resistance.
I think he knows it's coming, which is why he's trying to create alliances with the BRICS set up.
And while China right now is also hitting the war drums related to Taiwan, Harder than they have in a long, long time.
That one's going to put the West in a very bad situation, and the only thing that's going to be able to bail us out from the financial catastrophe that we've already been able to do is a reissuance of a new global digital dollar after the fallout takes place.
So, meanwhile, Tedros and the World Health Organization are also out there pushing another world health pandemic Population depopulation machine.
So, you might have a massive nuclear war or an EMP strike.
Our food facilities are being hit.
Just today, there was a 5-star fire at the nation's largest free-range chicken food producer in Illinois.
And we continue to see all the pieces fall into place in terms of starve them out and make them submit.
And I think that's where we're going with all this on a global level.
I don't see any reason to believe that the Zionist-controlled global bankster cartel and power machine isn't planning this and choosing to play it out regardless of what the consequences are.
Again, they're psychopaths.
They have control of All sorts of resources that we don't know anything about.
They're setting up special properties and fallout bunkers for themselves while they're leaving us all out in the cold.
And I think they're beginning to really threaten us in terms of how we're going to comply.
There's not going to be a choice.
You're either going to comply or die in this new world order.
I think you got it right.
Chris, your thoughts?
I think Brian's pretty much spot on with what he has said there.
I would almost think that they have to depopulate a significant amount of people before they can have the ability to put this New World Order on militarily.
They would also have to have AI and automation, robotics, you know, stuff like that set up too.
I think they're still a few years away and I think that's why you're seeing them throw all hands on deck and all these things at us.
A crisis a month in the way that they do, just for that reason.
They're buying time.
They're biting time.
No pun intended.
But yeah, this is what I think is going on here and I think we need to do something before it gets to that point or before they're allowed to continue at the rate which they are depopulating us already.
It's provable that COVID and the Vax were Hegelian stagecraft.
It's provable 9-11, you know, and for the Patriot Act, the FISA and all this other stuff.
You know, all these things, Like I say, are manufactured by the state for the empowerment of the state.
So yeah, I think people are pretty much sick of fighting in the Zionist Crusades.
And I think at this point in time, they're going to have a real hard time selling people on the illusion.
So now the velvet gloves are off and it's going to be Iron Fist.
And I think they're going to squeeze too hard and like they always do, overstep and end up in a bad spot.
Unfortunately, since the prospects are very grim.
what I think is going on here.
And I think this Masonic order has been, been running empires for a long, long time.
And I don't want to sound like a pullstring doll, but yeah, I think Brian got it pretty much a spot on there with what he said.
Unfortunately, since the prospects are very grim.
Meanwhile, Brent, President Macron is to announce Europe is at war with Russia on June 6th.
Just a few days hence this coming Thursday, a landmark day for the whole of Europe.
Marking Sending military personnel from a European NATO state to Ukrainian territory has been taking place covertly, but now it will be formal public policy.
Ukrainian President Zelensky, whose term expired May 21, is to attend the 80th anniversary of the Allied landing in Normandy on June 6.
Macron confirmed Zelensky's visit to France.
I will have the opportunity, when President Zelensky comes to France next week for Normandy Landing Day, to welcome him and discuss very clearly what we are going to do to support Ukraine.
According to international media, Macron will choose—not by chance—June 6 to announce in front of other Western leaders a mission of French soldiers to Ukraine, who will shoulder the responsibility of training Kiev.
Right.
This is the first such announcement by a leader of a Western country.
Another sign of escalation.
Will it be trainers only?
Of course not.
It's only the first step on the road to open Europe-Russia war.
The French Brigade in Odessa will follow, then NATO forces in Western Ukraine, then more.
Meanwhile, cyber attack now grounds for Article 5 collective self-defense.
Halt-slag their own countries?
Blame it on Russia?
Then join the war against Russia?
Of course!
The head of NATO's military committee, Admiral Rob Bauer, has said NATO can now declare war over a cyber-attack.
So, not only a real attack, but even a cyber-attack can be a reason for a NATO member to declare Article 5.
It's important to find out who organized the attack, regardless of the route the servers and their locations, and whether the countries in which the servers are located were aware of the attack.
The main thing is to identify the organizer.
If the attacker is unknown, you don't have enough data to declare war on anybody, unless you're a manufacturer yourself.
Here's Hal Turner again.
For over two years, NATO has goaded Russia, trying to get Russia to attack over the ongoing interference in Ukraine.
Russia won't take the bait.
Instead, Russia is steadily destroying all the weapons and manpower Ukraine and NATO is throwing at them.
NATO is hamstrung.
They can't do any more for Ukraine, and Ukraine is now losing badly.
So they seem to have come up with a nifty alternative, cyber attack.
They can attack their own countries in a massive and destructive cyber attack, blame it on Russia, and then invoke Article 5 to enter the Ukraine war, as they have desperately sought to do for the past two years.
A completely, totally false flag cyber attack as their basis to blame Russia and enter World War III.
These people, I think, are snakes.
There's apparently no low they will not stoop to to cause another world war.
Meanwhile, the intel drop had a whole series of photographs and videos showing what appears to be The United States Navy's largest warship, the Dwight D. Eisenhower, hit with hypersonic missiles, burning planes, explosion as Russian retaliation for hitting their radar.
Here you have an image of the ship.
and take a look at the video
it looks real but my colleague carl herman very astutely located photographs of the eisenhower and it has three decks here three decks stacked with this communication antennae unlike the ship shown in the videos This appears to be sending a message that this is what the United States can anticipate if it continues to bomb the Houthis
Iran has published an article verbatim with the intel drop, leading to suspicion that it's Iranian propaganda intended to send a message as to what you will expect if you do not change your conduct.
And I guarantee the morons running our government aren't going to change.
Brian?
Well, I wouldn't be surprised at all if it's Iranian propaganda.
The Iranians are a very important piece on this global strategy in terms of will they comply with the New World Order or will they not comply.
They took out their president.
Understand what happened in Mexico the other day is that they elected a female member of this New World Order, a Jewish woman.
As the new president of Mexico, so you can see that Mexico's gone down.
I don't see a lot of holdouts left.
I see India still holding out, Pakistan holding out quite a bit.
Of course, China's marching to the beat of its own drummer with Taiwan and others.
From a worldwide perspective, it appears that they've captured most of the important company.
countries that they need to capture in order to implement a global agenda.
Just because the World Health Organization pandemic treaty failed doesn't mean that they can't go about it 150 different ways, including with false flags or including with nuclear weapons or a digital attack of some sort.
But make no doubt, make no qualms about it.
What's going to have to happen is that we're going to have to go into an information blackout for a time or a season or a period.
In order for them to implement this new plan and this new martial law and then install their new leadership, come back in and tell people how it's going to be in terms of what you're going to need to do to get food, fuel, water, whatever, after the events begin to take place.
The Club of Rome has been majorly active in terms of its players lately making statements.
And also, with this Bilderberg meeting going on, I imagine that they're really just ironing out the details.
I don't know exactly how it's going to look.
It doesn't really matter to me.
I didn't know.
I didn't foresee COVID getting rolled out the way it did.
As well, I knew immediately that it was a PSYOP, but I didn't understand that that's part of their depopulation agenda.
I want to remind you of what happened early in the morning on, I think it was the 5th of July last summer, when the guidestones were mysteriously destroyed and then demolished and removed a couple days later.
That was all about depopulation.
Nuclear war would be a great way to go about depopulation, as would starving us out, as would simply turning off the electricity.
It wouldn't be long before we didn't have food and water and fuel.
The pantries begin to run empty and the people start getting crazy and the guns start going nuts.
So, to me, it feels like we're closer to that sort of Day one of the new beginning than ever before, and it seems like there's no diplomacy taking place.
If you were to scrape RT or you were to scrape any of the major mainstream media outlets all around the world, one of the only players out there is global research that's putting out a lot of information that's unique about Um, what's going on in this new world order implementation?
Other than that, I see nothing but everybody falling in line and playing along in terms of the mainstream media with this is this is the new look.
I think Donald Trump wouldn't have gone along with it.
They're going to be hesitant to install him, although at this point in time, it looks like the Zionists may be positioning themselves with him, simply because Biden's not giving Israel all the weapons they want to clean out the Gaza Strip.
But I'm not exactly sure about all of it.
I'm just sort of speculating, but I think there's something big coming, and it's coming very soon.
Hopefully, the puppet masters that run America will protect us.
Although I don't have such hopes for the rest of the world.
I don't know how it's going to go.
That's what I think is going to happen though.
I think we're on our own, man.
I don't think these guys are going to protect us.
I think they've failed in any sort of fiduciary or duty of authority or oath that they have.
I don't think it's failure.
I think it's betrayal.
The COVID thing, in my opinion, the collaboration with that and the commitment to these insane policies during COVID, whether it's the lockdowns, the social distancing, the contact tracing, the forced vaccination, the mandate, whatever.
I think this was a loyalty test and even an IQ test for the people, but a loyalty test for the authoritarian people, the operatives that are in position.
And if you see, we saw it in the coup of 2020 in America here, that they had the people in all positions of authority that were there to, in a position to regulate, let's say, the election fraud of 2020, or even to go after the COVID thing for what it was.
And even now putting Fauci in jail and those guys, I mean, it's a dog and pony show.
If you listen to that, it's complete bullshit.
They're not going to do a damn thing to that guy.
And they're going to, They're gonna just let him get away with mass murder.
And as Brian said, I'm a little more certain about this being a depopulation event.
I was calling this out two years before it fucking happened.
And been censored and thrown off of YouTube and banned from Google.
I still can't use my features on Google from that shit.
So like, I'm just saying guys, this is an effort.
A collaborated force, an agenda, people at the highest positions of authority that have infiltrated our government and delivered this to us.
This is not an accident.
This is not a foreign enemy.
This is an enemy from within that swears a dual allegiancy, mostly to Israel it seems, the UN agenda.
So, yeah.
Also, as far as the failed diplomacy with Russia, I don't think there is any.
I think there's been provocation non-stop by the U.S.
since the fall of the Berlin Wall.
And I mean, if you look at like, say, from Obama's administration with the Magnitsky or the Browder Affairs or the Liffin-Yanko thing, the Maidan rent-a-crowd coup, you know, these guys also use the Olympics and FIFA World Cup as coups in the last 20 years, like to bring in cover fire for these coups.
And they bring in these perception management firms and media, CrowdStrike.
These coups happen across the world.
They even happen within the own Democratic Party in Philly 2016 at the convention.
So, yeah, if you think about like Pussy Riot being brought in and shipped into Russian courtrooms and churches, you know, I mean, who's paying for this shit and who's doing this?
You know, when you follow the money and you follow who's behind this stuff, the Griner thing or the McCain-Daripaska thing, they're not such a mystery.
There's a group of people playing both sides of this.
Goldman Sachs created the BRICS initiative.
Jared Bernstein's creating his thesis about destabilizing the dollar as the primary reserve currency.
This is the controlled demolition of this country.
Jerome Powell's involved with that, too.
Again, not on the board of directors of Carlyle like he was in 9-11, but this time he's on the Fed and doing what he's doing economically.
So, follow the debt market, follow the bond market, and that's what this shit really comes down to.
And that's what I think these wars are really all about.
You know, everything else is just Hegelian stagecraft to justify depopulation and more control.
Wow.
I think the two of you are starting out extremely well.
Now, here's a report that may simply be propaganda, proposing that Turkey, outraged with NATO failing to take steps against Israel regarding Rafah, have pulled out of NATO.
This, however, appears to be speculation about what could happen, rather than a report on what has actually happened.
NATO has done nothing in response to Israel's latest attacks on Rafah, prompting Turkey to make the unprecedented decision to leave the alliance.
This drastic move has sent shockwaves through the international community, signaling a significant shift in the geopolitical landscape.
Turkey, a NATO member since 1952, has long been a pivotal player within the alliance, straddling the line between the West and the Middle East.
However, the latest developments have pushed Ankara to take a stand.
Reflecting growing frustrations and a sense of betrayal among its leadership and populace.
Before we start, please don't forget to like and subscribe to our channel for more updates.
The attacks on Rafah, a border city in the southern Gaza Strip, have been particularly devastating.
Israel's military actions have led to widespread destruction and significant civilian casualties, drawing global condemnation and calls for immediate intervention.
Despite these calls, NATO has remained conspicuously silent, opting for a stance of non-interference.
This passivity has been perceived by many, especially within Turkey, as tacit approval of the actions taken by Israel.
The lack of response from NATO has been a tipping point for Turkey, leading to its decision to exit the alliance in protest.
Turkey's departure from NATO marks a historic turning point.
For decades, Turkey has been a cornerstone of NATO's strategic framework, providing a critical link between Europe and Asia.
Its military capabilities and geographical positioning have been integral to NATO's operations and strategic planning.
By leaving the alliance, Turkey is not only reshaping its own foreign policy, but also challenging the very foundations of NATO's purpose and efficacy.
If it's in fact true, I think it's devoutly to be wished, but I've been unable to find confirmation.
We've had resistance since I reported this development earlier in the day.
I think it's devoutly to be wished, but I've been unable to find confirmation.
We've had resistance since I reported this development earlier in the day.
Brian, your thoughts? - They'll be positioning all over the place in terms of nations standing up and saying that we're gonna go this way or we're gonna go that way.
The question is, are they willing to?
Accept the sanctions that the puppet masters are going to put on them and accept the new borrowing rates and the new dollars that are going to come in that are designed to control them.
I believe that these mechanisms have been engineered for over a hundred years in terms of how the cartel is going to run and make sure that these countries stay in line.
So I don't think you're going to have many holdouts out there, maybe a few nations here and there, but they'll quickly be overrun.
With the propaganda and the mind control games and the installation of the proper puppeteers from the World Health Organization, the New World Order.
So I don't know if there's actually going to, it seems to me just like a lot of talk that Turkey's going to leave NATO.
I don't think anybody's really going to have the power to do anything.
Even Trump couldn't get us out of NATO.
So I don't know that it's real.
I just don't know what to think about it.
except it's somebody positioning for more authority under the new regime. - Chris.
Yeah, I agree.
I think that, you know, this is longer than the last hundred years as far as studying the human condition and being in this position clandestinely working within empires to aggrandize themselves and wealth and control throughout empires.
You're talking two, three thousand years of collective wealth and theft and plunder from the human species at the behest of the people running this gambit right now.
And they seek to really put this into a next level in terms of technocratic feudalism.
The surveillance capital that they have in mind for us and the draconian measures of surveillance that they have included with the, I guess, alchemical sorcery of debt that they have created for us, too, leads to really no other conclusion, in my opinion.
These guys are trying to take all the resources and put us all in good, honest men in debt.
So I see what they're doing with this.
I see how they're running this.
They've always sought to do this in just about every empire that they've used, but now they have this type of technocratic power in addition to AI and automation and all these things with social media and control like this.
Once these guys get that CBDC in, that's it for humanity.
You're going to see the Doomsday Book 2.0, the Venetian and Genoese bond markets really drive in this technocratic feudalism unlike anything in human history.
So this is a whole new level of duplicity coming from the guys that have put this on us for the last thousand years or more.
So, yeah, I see this really going one way.
Either humanity stands up and fights, or it just gets ruled for the rest of its existence, until it doesn't even recognize itself.
Wow.
Heavy.
Well, let me say one more thing, too.
You know, China was a good model of massive societal controls and surveillance structure, and it wouldn't be difficult to solve the problems
That of the remaining people using free speech, basically they could just use that city as an example in the protests and shut them down or flood them or use their global weapons against this particular city as an example to anybody that's holding out.
But basically, shut off the truck lines, shut off the gas station, shut off the power, and you'll see a people that complies very, very quick.
I think that we'll go out with a whimper because our freedom of speech will be so deeply threatened that we'll do the best we can under the circumstances.
But sooner or later, we got to worry about our families.
We're going to be put in a bad spot in terms of people that are that are holding out, and we're going to With the artificial intelligence the way it is, social media is going to be absolutely under control and the remaining voices that continue to stick out will just simply have their digital passports revoked.
No more travel, no more going to the grocery store to get food, no more buying anything.
So it's going to be a very small population that remains, and it's going to be a very compliant population.
There might be some resistance that rises up generations from now, but I don't see it in the short term.
Our people right now are too weak and too brainwashed to really put up a resistance under these circumstances.
Hey, can I jump in as well and say that, uh, for the last century, uh, this Zionist group through the, uh, East India company and, and several other, uh, things, the Kohang system as well, uh, really tried to, uh, purge most of the Chinese, uh, from, from the world, with the exception of the Han Chinese, from, from the world, with the exception of the Han Chinese, which is now 85% of their population in And they, they did that because the Han were notorious collaborators, uh,
So these are the guys they left around where they pretty much just hunted down each tribal sect one by one for two, three hundred years and put in what we now see there a hundred years later.
So yeah, this is something else.
This goes back to the 1800s and beyond.
This has been going on for a long, long time.
And I think I have a little bit more faith in humanity than maybe Brian does.
I think that a lot of people see this, they're pissed off, and I don't think they're going to take it.
So, I'm betting on the other side.
I'm betting on humanity.
Good.
All in.
It just breaks my heart here in the projections.
Meanwhile, how bad is this?
Net yahoo to address Congress, according to House Speaker Mike Johnson.
In my opinion, given Netanyahu is promoting the genocide of Gaza, this is analogous to inviting Adolf Hitler to address Congress during World War II.
In fact, some would say it's being uncharitable to Hitler.
It's unclear when the address will take place.
Tonight I'm happy to announce we will soon be hosting Prime Minister Netanyahu at the Gab Hall for a full session of Congress, as though that were a good idea.
This will be a timely and very strong show of support to the Israeli government in their time of greatest need.
What?
When they are completing their slaughter of the Palestinians?
Despite mounting opposition, he's moving forward.
The Republican leader of the House said Tuesday he's inviting Netanyahu, even if the Senate Democrat leader doesn't go along.
That would be Majority Leader Chuck Schumer.
If not, if he doesn't agree, we're going to proceed and invite Netanyahu just to the house.
Schumer confirmed he was talking to Johnson.
I'm discussing this, and I've always said our relationship with Israel is ironclad.
It transcends any one prime minister or president.
Members of Schumer's party, however, have reportedly pushed back hard against Netanyahu's speech at both houses, urging the top lawmaker not to sign the letter of invitation.
Dan Kildee of Michigan, a senior party member, told Axios, I don't think it's a good time.
It's not complicated or a complicated situation.
House Indel Committee Ranking Member Jim Himes said, yeah, we should be focused On freeing hostages, not on charming legislators.
Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said of the invitation idea, no.
With which, in this particular instance, I agree with Nancy Pelosi 100%.
Other Democrats weighed in.
Gene Phillips of Minnesota panned the invitation as a political gesture.
Netanyahu, he told the Axios, is dividing the country in a way similar to how he's divided Israel.
I think it's awfully dangerous.
Scott Peters at California agreed.
I think it's a strange time to invite Netanyahu.
It's a really divisive move.
Jared Moskovitz of Florida, Said, the summit should be bipartisan, even if the party has political or policy disagreements.
Ann Kuster of New Hampshire pointed out, Congress can recognize heads of state without agreeing with everything they say, and inviting it could create dialogue between the prime minister and his critics.
As he has noted, progressive lawmakers told the website that they would boycott that Yahoo speech if it were to proceed.
Gregory Meeks of New York said, Republicans are playing politics again with Israel, which is the wrong thing to do.
Two other House Dems, speaking on the condition of anonymity, highlighted the potential fallout Well noted.
A huge issue for Democrats is concern that inviting Netanyahu to speak in Washington would give legitimacy to the Israeli leader at home and undermine the local opposition.
The others said it's a very politically thorny exercise.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, on the same lines as Mike Johnson inviting Netanyahu, Putin, the other day, came out and offered high praise for the Jews in terms of he wished them all the best as they celebrate their day of salvation and liberation, a holiday dedicated to the defeat of Nazi Germany in World War II.
So, this still confuses me.
It's my understanding that there were somewhere around something like 40 million people killed during World War II.
If you include the Bolshevik Revolution as a part of it, you had a massive swath of Russian Jews that were also killed, as well as regular Russians that were killed.
Why kowtow to the Zionists?
Why get nice with them and say nice things about them?
It's been a pretty Rough run globally for a lot of different races and the Jews are nothing special except that they have managed to take control of this banking cartel.
And Zionism, obviously the protocols of the learned elders of Zion go back to 1896 and lay out this plan.
We're seeing many of the components right now control the politicians, control the media, buy up the billionaire class, Uh, corrupt, coordinate, destroy the goy.
All of these components have been in place for a long, long time, and we're seeing one thing that needs to change the path.
is a prosecution a serious prosecution of the pedophiles if we could if we could get in on that level we could probably root out most of this the real problem inside the structure whether you're going to just call it a you're just going to lazily call it the jews or call it the zionists or whatever the truth is the club of rome vatican all sorts of different secret agencies and secret uh Fascinating.
systems control this and contribute to the problem.
What's at the heart, what's at the root of the problem really is the pedophilia, because I believe this is where they get the stick in the carrot and stick.
And this is how they make sure that they can control people so that they can trust them when they install them into their positions globally.
So a massive crackdown on pedophilia might be the right response under the situation given to us.
Fascinating.
Chris?
Yeah, I think that's another telltale sign of the name changers working from within empires.
They bring that forth, the debasement of currency, the debauchery of the children, of them weaponizing the Janissary youth in the way that they do against the wisdom of the elders.
Yeah, this is the whole liberal-conservative struggle that they have really ascribed political absurdities to and polarized with AIPAC and many other instruments like CFR.
Yeah, you know, to lazily call them the Jews, that's pretty much what you would sum it up as, but there is a group, a secret society, that has used this formula for thousands of years throughout empires, through Greece, Rome, and on to what we're seeing in America.
So yeah, this is a A big thing.
This is really happening.
This is the London Theatre Company and its departmentalization through Hollywood and through the political spectrum.
This is really a big thing and it has to stop with our generation.
And I think that it probably will go if we see this through.
If we just step back and let controlled opposition take charge, we're going to be head for certain doom.
But if we keep seeing the turnout and the amount of awakening that we've seen, I think these guys are going to have a serious problem with the multitudes.
That's just my opinion.
Boy, I hope you're right about that, Chris.
Don, take us out.
Oh, wow.
What an hour.
We're on June 3rd.
June is busting out all over the world.
And it looks like trouble is ahead of us.
And are we going to be able to survive?
Which looks like it's going to be a rough second half of this year.
So this is Truth vs. News, Incorporated.
And believe me, the news out there is heavy and distorted, and we're here striving to bring you the truth.
I don't think you're going to find it anywhere else, so you should listen to it and respect our great speakers and challenge to get this message out, because nobody else will.
So I really thank you so much for watching.
Come back for another jam-packed hour, if you can handle it.
And we thank you so much for watching, and we appreciate your responses.
▲
Export Selection