All Episodes
Previous Next
May 28, 2024 - Jim Fetzer
01:03:40
Truth vs. NEW$, Inc Part 1 (27 May 2024) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett, and Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And welcome, folks!
This is Truth vs. News on Monday, May 27, 2024.
This is Memorial Day, and there's so much to remember on Memorial Day, and we've got all kinds of action going on here.
And so, I'll just say that we have the right people to share it all with.
James Spencer, who wrote books like Nobody Died at Sandy Hook.
He's the editor of these books.
And the book on America got nukes and JFK.
These are books that every library in America should have, because they tell something called the truth, and that's what we're about here.
And then we have Scott Bennett.
He's the Military expert who's doing a great ambassadorship around the world and he wrote a book called Skill Game.
And he's got another one on the right foot and that's for you.
And that's going to be a great book too.
Then we have Brian Davidson, who's a rabbi out of Houston, Texas.
And I guess he's had a lot of wind and all kinds of stuff down there, but he's winning and he's got a few points that nobody else has.
So, Jim, I guess we gotta lead on.
We got some heavy news, I guess, starting in Washington, don't we?
Oh, we do, Don.
We do indeed.
We have.
Netanyahu to address Congress, invited by House Speaker Mike Johnson.
Frankly, I am appalled.
This, I would suggest by analogy, is like inviting Hitler to address Congress during World War II.
The man to engage in genocide.
The United States, the last thing it should be doing is celebrating or honoring him.
Speaker Johnson announced Israeli PM Netanyahu will address a joint session.
It's unclear when it will take place.
Working with Netanyahu on a date?
Tonight I'm happy to announce something else to you that we will be hosting Prime Minister Netanyahu at the Capitol for a joint session of Congress.
He said in a speech marking Israel's independence, hosted by the Israeli embassy.
It will be a timely and I think very strong show of support to the Israeli government in their time of greatest needs as they slaughter the Palestinians with a full complicity of the Biden admin in support from Mike Johnson and Donald Trump.
Johnson's office did immediately respond to a request for details.
He said he'd invite to the House regardless of whether Majority Leader Schumer agreed.
Thursday was the first time the plan was formally announced.
They didn't immediately respond Schumer's office, but he has subsequently signed on to it.
Johnson made the announcement in his keynote address for the Israeli embassy taking place at the National Building Museum.
Other lawmakers attended the program, including Democrat Caucus Chair Peter Aguilar.
Thus, despite mounting opposition, the House leader moved to invite Netanyahu to Congress.
Republican Leader of the House said he wants to invite Netanyahu and U.S.
lawmakers, even if the Senate Democrat leader did not join.
House Speaker Johnson said he'd give Majority Leader Schumer until Tuesday to sign a letter inviting him to join.
If not, we're going to proceed and invite him just to the house.
Schumer confirmed he was talking to Johnson.
I discuss it now with the speaker.
Our relationship with Israel is ironclad.
It transcends anyone prime minister or president.
Johnson said that we hadn't spoken directly with Schumer.
Our staffs have communicated, and it looks as though he wants to sign on.
Members of Schumer's Democrat Party, however, are pushed back hard against Netanyahu's speech to both houses, urging the top lawmaker not to sign.
Representative Dan Kildee from Michigan, a senior party member, told Axios, I don't think it's a good time.
It's not complicated, an already complicated situation.
House Intel Committee Ranking Member Jim Hines of Connecticut, Sad Netanyahu should be focused on freeing hostages, not charming legislators.
Speaker Pelosi of California said of the invitation idea, no.
Good for Nancy.
Other Democrats weighed in.
Minnesota Representative Dean Phillips sits on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, panned the invitation as a political gesture.
Netanyahu, he told Axios, is dividing the country in a way he's divided Israel.
I think that's awfully dangerous.
Peter Scott from California said, I think it's a strange time to invite Netanyahu.
It's a really divisive move.
Representative Jeremy Kosky of Florida said the summit should be bipartisan, even if the party has policy disagreements with Netanyahu.
Representative Annie Kuster of New Hampshire pointed out Congress can recognize hesitate without agreeing to everything they say, and inviting Netanyahu could create dialogue between the Prime Minister and some of his critics.
Axios know that many progressive lawmakers told the website they would boycott a Netanyahu speech if it went ahead.
Fox quoted Representative Gregory Meese in New York saying, Republicans are playing politics again with Israel, which is the wrong thing to do.
Two other House Democrats, speaking on condition of anonymity, highlighted the potential political fallout.
One noted a huge issue is concerned that inviting Netanyahu to give a speech in Washington would give legitimacy to the Israeli leader at home and undermine the local opposition, while the other said it's a very politically thorny exercise.
Jared Murkowski said, we got that.
Should we bipartisan?
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, I think this is something that is going to implode Johnson even more.
I mean, he's now siding with the war criminal Netanyahu, who has been cited by the International Criminal Court.
Arrest warrants have been put out for him.
He put out more actually this week because he's just bombed Rafa and I think this is going to generate an enormous amount of outrage, especially given what the International Criminal Court has just declared.
I know there's A story about Macron going apoplectic about this.
So I think Johnson and the Republicans, by aligning with Netanyahu, you know, I don't know who they think they are courting or who is going to embrace them.
I think the vast majority of this country is opposed to what's going on and for the Republicans to do this.
I think is just a terrible political miscalculation, but they don't seem to have any common sense.
So, Jim?
Yeah, I do agree.
Brian?
Well, the Republicans are just doubling down on a failed policy.
Inviting Netanyahu to come speak to Congress is nothing more than a way to keep the money flowing in the right direction.
I would think that the Democrats, who would normally be all for something like this, given that Schumer's been one of the best friends ever to Israel, would be jumping right on board, but they're not.
It seems like everywhere Trump goes, they seem to be going the other direction.
And I think they're trying to show the younger generation that's all up in arms about this whole thing with the Palestinians, that they're capable of maneuvering a different direction.
So they're going to, so the Democrats are making a big thing about, you know, we're not going to support this.
We're not going to support this.
When we know under all other circumstances, they absolutely would.
It's, it's preposterous to think that the Democrats are any different than the Republicans in terms of how they support who they support.
But they're trying to differentiate themselves right now because Trump is in support of the Israel war.
And it seems like most of the Make America Great Again program leaders are pro-Israel on this particular issue.
So I think the Democrats are just doing some political posturing because we know that they don't actually have any spines of their own to deal with.
So, so much for that story.
I don't know how much is really there.
Very good.
Very good.
Meanwhile, Washington attacks key element of Russia's nuclear umbrella, threatening entire global nuclear security architecture.
Profoundly disturbing.
Three different sources all confirm it.
The Biden admin, using it proxy forces in Ukraine, launched an unprecedented attack on a key element of Russia's nuclear umbrella Thursday, effectively blinding the Russian military from detecting incoming nuclear-armed ballistic missiles.
Satellite imagery confirms multiple drones severely damaged a Russian strategic early warning radar site in the southwestern end of the country, leaving Moscow more vulnerable to enemy attack.
The western media has largely blacked out any coverage which should have been presented in headlines across the country.
According to Russian nuclear doctrine, any attack on Russia's essential nuclear first alert system provides a justification for nuclear retaliation.
And they've already done it.
Given the gravity of the situation, we must assume Washington's frustration with Ukraine's performance on the battlefield has precipitated a dramatic change in policy that now includes high-risk provocation aimed at triggering an overreaction to lead directly to NATO intervention.
Clearly, the Biden admin has decided it cannot prevail in Ukraine absent NATO involvement.
To that end, the U.S.
proxies in Ukraine will continue to launch increasingly lethal attacks on Russian territory, forcing Moscow to respond in time here from the war zone.
Satellite imagery confirms a Russian strategic early warning radar site in the southwestern end of the country was substantially damaged In a reported Ukrainian drone attack earlier this week, it looks to be a first-of-its-kind attack on a site linked to Russia's General Strategic Defense.
As such, it points to a new and worrisome dimension to the conflict, especially when it comes to the potential use of nuclear weapons.
Satellite imagery shows severe damage of both structures housing Verazoth-DM at Armavir.
There's also clear evidence of multiple hits of the radar building.
The radar rays are generally very sensitive.
Very sensitive and fragile systems and even relatively limited damage can result in a mission kill, rendering them inoperable for an extended period of time.
Here's another report.
Flash.
Urgent.
Russian early warning nuclear missile radar attack.
One of Russia's absolute key over-the-horizon nuclear safety early warning radars cited to have been hit by a drone attack blinding Russians from missiles launched at them from the Middle East.
818th Separate Radio Technical Unit at Armov's radar station located in Krasnodar, Kairosh is now locked out.
Here are images of the two gigantic radar buildings at the site.
With a damage to the two, there's a gaming hole at Russia's early warning system against nuclear attack.
Russia is now a sitting tuck for a nuclear first strike, not only against their strategic nuclear missile silos, but also against all the major population centers inside Russia.
Submarine-launched nukes from the Far East Mediterranean Sea, land-launched, even air-launched missiles from Turkey, from Israel, sub-launched missiles from the Red Sea, all can no longer be detected by Russia.
The coverage below is highlighted to show the unimaginable scope of the gabling holes.
Normally, the entire Russian early warning radar system provides the coverage seen in the graph below.
Of course.
This is being credited to Ukraine.
But the radar stations that we're in do not cover Ukraine.
Clearly, this hit was concocted by the US, EU, and NATO.
They are the only entities who benefit.
Why would we do this unless we're planning a nuclear strike upon Russia?
Today's attack opens the door to a full, complete, and absolute decapitation attack upon Russia.
We can now hit all their strategic missile sites, take out all their national government.
They wouldn't even know the missiles had been launched until it was too late.
How long will Russia wait with themselves completely vulnerable before they decide to use them or lose them?
We may have just forced the Russians to launch a nuclear first strike.
Also, Russia launches anti-satellite weapon displays.
Intel community believes the Russian government has launched an anti-satellite weapon into space that's currently deployed near American satellites.
U.S.
Ambassador Robert Wood, who serves as the Alternative Representative for Special Political Affairs at the U.N., made the revelation Monday speaking at the U.N.
On May 16, Russia launched a satellite into low-Earth orbit.
U.S.
assesses to be likely a counterspace weapon, presumably capable of attacking other satellites in low-Earth orbit.
Russia deployed this new counter-space weapon in the same orbit as a U.S.
government satellite.
CNN noticed Russia previously launched an anti-satellite weapon into space back in 2022 following its invasion of Ukraine.
The news came after a U.S.
official warned earlier this year they believe Russian President Putin is developing an anti-satellite nuclear weapon.
Scott, These are ominous developments indeed.
Your thoughts?
Well, let's remind people it is Memorial Day, and as I said earlier, I'm wearing my father's fighter pilot jacket in memorial of him, and I think this is a time of reflection, too, upon the Cold War and what we've gone through for 50 years and how Urgent it is not to return to those hostilities.
The only people who do want that hostility, that cold war, that tension between Russia and the United States are the politicians in the United States and their slaves in Europe.
The bureaucrats, the Biden administration, the RINOs, the Democrats, you know, these Johnson types, they need a war to create the tension, to create the excuse to behave like authoritarian fascists and, you know, dominatrixes of control over the American public.
A glimpse of it has been seen in their Homicidal treatment of college students on college campuses that are protesting the Israeli-Palestinian genocide of the Palestinians in Gaza.
So, I think the Biden administration and the RINOs are hell-bent on triggering a war, and I think the Johnson types are also invested in a war, like Mitch McConnell and Romney, because it's the only thing that'll preserve their political power.
In their mind.
They believe, you know, you fire an explosion up into the sky like a firecracker and all of America is going to look up in awe and wonder and they're going to be silenced and they're going to bow down in some fetus position of worship and the politicians are going to be safe.
That's their thinking.
That's why they are trying to provoke Russia into conflict.
But it's not going to happen.
It would only result in the annihilation of the United States and the civil wars that are brewing are immeasurable.
You know, there's commentary constantly about blacks being pushed out of all of these cities.
And they're about to go apoplectic and do a race war against all of these Hispanics that have been brought up here and given $9,000, and these blacks that have nothing are now being pushed out.
This is one of the elements of a civil war, and I think it's going to be, you know, very Very multi-level.
But they are pushing for a conflict to preserve their political power and therefore Russia's strategy is containment, containment, containment.
Russia does not want to invade London or France or Germany.
They're shitholes with all the African migrants and all the garbage people up there, which you can see there's videos, sad videos, of what Paris and London looks like.
And it's a shadow of what I remember when I was there 20 years ago.
But Russia is not going to go in there.
It doesn't want to go in there.
It doesn't want to have anything to do with London or France or Germany.
There's nothing left.
There's nothing there.
There's nothing wholesome.
There's nothing good.
There's nothing faithful.
This is all humanistic, globalistic, shallow, godless, Pro-homosexual, pro-climate change nonsense, delusional narcissism.
That's what is the new darkness that is covering the lands of Europe and the United States, Canada, Australia, Britain.
So Russia doesn't want any part of that, but it has to contain and try and put out these fires and dampen the roof so something doesn't ignite.
That's Russia's strategy.
And the West's strategy is thrashing about, looking for how to provoke some sort of conflict out of Russia.
And I think the next thing they're going to do is blow up the Zaporozhye nuclear plant, try and blame it on Russia, and then try and do a jerk forward into some kind of a draft.
The American military changed the American Army uniform back to a World War II design.
They did that about four years ago, just when Trump was coming into office.
And when I saw that, I knew that they were preparing the psyche for America to look at the future as similar to how Americans looked to World War II and our obligations under World War II.
You know, everyone joined up, everyone went into the draft, everyone fought Japan, everyone fought Germany.
That's what they're trying to do now, resurrect that spirit of World War II, only substitute it for Russia, and maybe China, maybe Iran.
But it's delusional, because no one is going to sign up and participate in that kind of a war.
And, you know, you see that with more and more Americans, like, McGregor and Ritter and Redacted and Tucker Carlson, the smartest people in the conservative philosophical junket, are all on the same sheet of music.
We are not natural enemies of Russia, and anyone that tries to put us as enemies of Russia are actually enemies of the people of the United States and the Constitution.
Jim?
I agree.
The country doesn't want to fight against Russia or for Israel in its slaughter of the Palestinians.
Brian?
Well, Russia's being hit on a lot of different fronts right now.
The European Central Bank basically issued orders to all the banks that are members of their thing that they need to get out of Russia.
Meanwhile, the ruble gets stronger every single day and they said they had to get out of Russia for reputational issues.
Russia is doing a better job producing military equipment and shells.
They're paying four times less than anybody in NATO at their best price to produce them internally.
So, Russia had a meeting or Putin had a meeting with China's president A couple of weeks ago, and then as a result, China's dumping U.S.
treasuries and security bonds.
They've already dumped $53 billion in treasury bonds right now, which is sort of a prelude to a conflict when you start selling off those bonds and cashing in like that.
In the meantime, the same International Criminal Court that everybody's making noise about regarding Netanyahu indicted Putin for stealing 16,000 children from Ukraine, which is an absolute joke of an indictment, but it was sort of a response to the international crimes related to Israel.
And then Poland has moved out, being a Walk in step member of NATO.
They've come out and said that they're going to restrict all the movement of all Russians ambassadors.
And this is a step in that direction.
So it looks like the writing is on the wall.
The West and NATO have decided to provoke a an invasion or some sort of conflict with Russia that's going to scale beyond Ukraine.
Um, and there's, they're beefing up all of the borders and all of the military installations on the borders and applying as much political pressure as they can to try to provoke Russia into an outright war.
It could be very bad.
This could be our last Memorial Day.
If, if Russia decides to go nuclear.
Yeah.
I'd set that nuclear clock at one second to catastrophe.
One second.
We're there.
Meanwhile, Putin is willing to have a Ukraine ceasefire on the current front lines.
Russian sources indicate he is ready to halt the conflict.
He is also ready to take more land and pressure Kiev into talking.
He does not want another national mobilization.
He has no designs on NATO territory.
Russia is concerned about a nuclear escalation.
Moscow, London, But Putin is ready to halt the war in Ukraine with a negotiated ceasefire recognizing the current battlefield lines, four Russian sources told Reuters, saying he is prepared to fight on if Kiev and the West do not respond.
Three of the sources said the veteran Russian leader expressed frustration to a small group of advisers about What he views as Western-backed attempts to stymie negotiations and President Zelensky's decision to rule out talks.
Putin can fight as long as it takes, but Putin's also ready for a ceasefire to freeze the war, a senior Russian source reported, who has worked with Putin and has knowledge of top-level conversation in the Kremlin.
He, like the other side in here, spoke on condition of anonymity.
Russia writers spoke to a total of five persons who work with or have with Putin at a senior level.
They did not comment on freezing the war at the current—the fifth source did not comment on freezing the war at the current front lines.
As about the report at a news conference, Putin said peace talks should restart.
Let them resume, he said.
Negotiation should be based on the realities on the ground.
And a plan agreed during a previous attempt to reach a deal in the first weeks of the war, not on the basis of what one side wants.
Ukrainian Foreign Minister Kaliba said that the Russian leader was trying to derail a Ukrainian-initiated peace summit in Switzerland next month, using his entourage to send out phony signals about his alleged readiness to halt the war.
Putin currently has no desire to end his aggression, calling only the principled and united voice of the global majority, and force him to choose peace over war, which is about as much nonsense as one could imagine.
A Ukrainian presidential admirer, meanwhile, said Putin wanted Western democracies to accept defeat.
The appointment last week of the economist Andrei Milosov, the Russian defense minister, was seen by some Western political military analysts as placing the Russian economy on a permanent war footing.
It follows sustained battlefield pressure and territorial advances by Russia in recent weeks.
The sources said, however, Putin, re-elected in March for a new six-year term, would rather use Russia's current momentum to put the war behind him.
They did not directly comment on the new Defense Minister.
Putin's spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, in response to a request for comment, said the country did not want eternal war.
Based on knowledge of conversations in the Kremlin, two sources said Putin was of the view that gains in the war were enough to sell a victory to the Russian people.
Europe's biggest ground conflict since World War II has cost tens of thousands of lives and led to sweeping Western sanctions on Russia's economy.
Three sources said Putin understood any dramatic new advances would require another nationwide mobilization, which he did not want.
One source, knowing the Russian president's popularity dipped after the first mobilization back in 2022, astonishingly Only two-tenths of a percent of Ukraine's landmass has changed hands in 2023, despite thousands dead and billions spent.
Only two-tenths of a percent of Ukraine's landmass has changed hands, according to an analysis by the New York Times based on data from the Institute for the Study of War.
This puts into stark contrast how little the front line in Ukraine has actually moved, despite the huge resources each side is throwing at the conflict, including soldiers, money, and weaponry.
From January 1st to September 25th, Ukraine recaptured just 143 square miles of territory while Russia took 331, Resulting in a net gain of 188 square miles from Russia.
188 square miles is about the size of Albuquerque, New Mexico's largest city.
Total area of 189.5 square miles.
In contrast, Ukraine has a total landmass of about 233,030 square miles.
The report shows Russia capturing about 100 square miles per month earlier this year, coinciding with its winter offensive campaign to capture the eastern Donbass region.
According to data from the Institute for War Shared with the Insider, Russia expanded its territory in Ukraine by about four hundredths of a percent in February of 2023.
It continued to make advances until June, when Ukraine turned the tide in its favor with the start of its counter-advances.
This culminated in August when territory changed hands, and the analysis comes on the back of lethal and bloody fights on the front line.
Tens of billions met since the beginning, since the start of the war.
There have been about 500,000 military casualties—I'd say that many—on the Ukrainian side alone.
300,000 Russian and 190,000 on Ukraine.
That's bullshit.
The U.S.
has spent more than $75 billion, according to the Keough Institute for the World Economy.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, first of all, the Institute for the Study of War is the group in London that General Keane is on.
He's always on Fox News.
He's the guy with the Chicago accent and the blue eyes, and he's always advocating for war and conflict in this tired old mantra of neocon America.
You know, dominating everybody.
So, you know, these sort of analytics are fundamentally skewered and propagandistic, and it paints an entirely inaccurate description of Russia's motivation and attitude.
Jack Keane and the Institute of War is looking at Ukraine as a sum of all of these square miles and Russia has to take each one.
That's never been part of Russia's plan.
It's never been in their makeup.
Russia's plan was to identify where the militants are in Ukraine.
It doesn't need to go conquer citizens.
It doesn't want to.
It looks at the citizens as cousins of Russians.
They're all Slavic.
They all speak Russian.
Very small amounts of people speak Ukrainian, and Russia has moved in to defend the people, the Russian-speaking people, that were being genocided since 2014.
So Russia went into the Donbass, went into Donetsk and Lugansk and Mariupol and Belgorod and everywhere, and has been slowly pushing them out.
But its entire strategy has been to Destroy the Nazis if they weren't going to come to the table and have some sort of a peace agreement.
They never have because of Boris Johnson, because of Zelensky, because of Biden, because of NATO and all of these, you know, investors in death and war that have lost their investment because now you've got a Ukraine where the people, I saw this earlier today, Ukrainian soldiers are now complaining that the Ukrainian people are turning their backs on them.
So Ukrainian soldiers that are riding in trains or walking on the street, the public are avoiding.
The public are looking at an enemy as a menace.
As a shark swimming in your beach area, you're keeping your eye on them because they go around kidnapping people and throwing them into the military, grabbing them off the streets, throwing them on the front lines without any training, which essentially all of these people being thrown into the front lines are guaranteed to be dead.
Or to be made losing their legs or arms or feet or whatever.
So the Ukrainian population is very, very quickly turning against and we all said this was going to happen.
This is the natural metamorphosis.
But the Ukrainian people are turning their backs and developing a fear or if not a hatred.
For their own military because they are trying to throw everyone they can into the meat grinder to ultimately die.
And everyone knows this is now a completely worthless spent war.
And Zelensky is not the leader of Ukraine.
He is a spent dictator.
His time is up.
He has no authority to make any actions whatsoever.
And yet, you know, the West is trying to keep him in there.
So Ukraine is about to go through a civil war itself.
That's the next shoe to drop are the indigenous people rising up and going to war against Zelensky and their own military for perpetuating this.
So this is opening up a Pandora's box that is going to be ugly on all sorts of levels, Jim.
Brian.
Well, there's a part of me that doesn't really believe that anybody's going to be provoking any war at all, especially based on the article that no land is actually changed hands with all the billions spent.
Think about it from this perspective.
NATO needs Russia as a boogeyman.
Right now they've got Russia.
They're trying to make China into the next boogeyman.
They're trying to make North Korea into the next boogeyman.
The mainstream media is already reporting that North Korea is going to be meddling in the election alongside Russia to get Trump Elected.
So it's the boogeyman theory that has to take place.
And so what's the Western media doing?
They're telling a bunch of horror stories about all the terrible things that Russia is going to do.
None of which has Russia actually done.
They haven't stolen 16,000 children from Ukraine.
Matter of fact, Ukraine just released its first round of prisoners To fight in the military.
I read another story about how a theater in Ukraine, I think it was Kiev, had to close down because they lost all their employees to the draft.
So imagine how serious that's getting when they're running out of human assets to start doing it.
So what are they doing?
Ukraine's running around asking for more money and longer range weapons to try to strike inside Russia.
Nobody will give them those weapons.
Poland came out last week and said that they wanted to start Um, gearing up with nuclear arms to try and longer range missiles to try to strike deeper into the Russia and NATO came along and said, no, we're not going to have any of that.
So it looks to me like it's still a whole lot of false bravado taking place with NATO because NATO wouldn't exist unless they had the Russian boogeyman to blame on all things bad, all things evil.
This is why we must exist.
Very nice.
Very nice.
Meanwhile, coincidences.
out this monstrosity called Russia.
Just think about it from that perspective.
You've got to have an enemy that justifies your existence if you're a large political organization like that.
Very nice.
Very nice.
Meanwhile, coincidences, so many world leaders being killed or attempts made on their lives.
Have you noticed a trend in the past weeks?
Suddenly being a world leader has become very dangerous.
Of course, a job elite in a nation-state has always had a high level of risk, even in normal times.
But the degree of danger has significantly escalated of late, especially if you're from a BRICS nation.
Here's a short summary.
Over the past two weeks, May 7th, assassination attempt against Saudi Crown Prince 13th, 15.
Assassination attempt on Slovak PM Robert Fajko.
16.
Citizen arrested for threatening to assassinate the Serbian president. 19.
Saudi Arabia's King Salman hospitalized for second time in fourth week.
19.
Helicopter crash involving Iranian President Rassi and Foreign Minister Amir Abdullah.
What's going on right now?
Here are more details.
Assassination attempt on Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, May 7th.
An assassination attempt was made on Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.
No further details about the incident are provided.
Assassination attempt on Slovak Prime Minister Robert Pajko, May 15th.
He was shot and critically injured in the central Slovakian town of Handlova in front of its House of Culture after a government meeting.
The suspect, Jiraj Shintulo, was detained by police.
Mike was hospitalized and stabilized.
Fatal helicopter crash involving Iranian President Ebrahim Rassi, May 19.
Iranian President Rossi was involved in a helicopter crash and reported not just seriously injured, he is dead.
Elephant in the room?
This all may be related to BRICS, not just WIC itself, but the BRICS currency that's going to compete against the dollar.
Unless the world leaders have planned or announced they will either stop using the dollar, compete, or move to a gold standard and then were killed or died.
The K included even JFK.
John F. Kennedy in 1963.
President Kennedy issued Executive Order 11110, which authorized the U.S.
Treasury to issue silver certificates, thereby bypassing the Fed.
He was assassinated on November 22nd of that year.
Ibrahim Raisi.
Iranian President killed in a helicopter crash on May 19th after Iran planned to de-dollarize and join a brick currency plans with Zainab Omar Gaddafi.
Killed in 2011.
After he proposed a gold-backed African currency, the dinar, to compete with the U.S.
dollar and the French franc, Saddam Hussein, killed in 2006—actually, he died in 2003—after he announced in 2000 Iraq would no longer use the U.S.
dollar for all oil transactions, including switching to the euro, Hugo Chavez, The Venezuelan president died in 2013 after announcing plans in 2009 to de-dollarize and create a new regional currency, the soccer, to reduce their reliance on the dollar.
No doubt he was also taken out.
Salvador Allende, the Chilean president, killed in a coup in 1973 after he nationalized Chile's commerce industry and planned to use profit to reduce the country's reliance on the U.S.
dollar.
I'd mention every one of these figures was a strong nationalist representing the best interests of their respective nations.
Meanwhile, Netanyahu warns U.S.
leaders could be targeted next.
Israeli PM said Tuesday disagreed with arrest warrants sought against him by the ICC, suggesting U.S.
leaders could be next.
The ICC said it would seek arrest warrants for Netanyahu, Defense Minister Gallant, and Amash leaders, prompting criticism from both Israel and top U.S.
officials, including President Biden.
The ICC claimed the warrants for the Israeli leadership were over the country's conduct in the Israeli-Hamas conflict.
Netanyahu said warrants against himself and Defense Minister Golan over the country's conduct in its fight against Hamas set a dangerous precedent for other democratic countries, including Israel's allies.
Israel is giving a bum rap.
I think it's dangerous.
Basically, it's a first democracy being taken to the dock when it's in doing exactly what a democracy should be doing in an exemplary way.
Yes, slaughtering all your political opponents.
It endangers all other democracies.
Israel is first, but you're next.
Britain is next.
Others are next, too.
During the interview, Netanyahu asserted the ICC claimed her false, dangerous, and outrageous that chief prosecutor Karim Khan is only exacerbating the problem.
It's also false to see Israel and Hamas as equals, he added.
He's equating the democratically elected leaders of Israel with the terrorist tyrants of Iran.
That's like saying, well, I'm issuing arrest warrants for FDR and Churchill, but also for Hitler.
I'm going to issue an arrest warrant for George W. Bush, but also for Osama bin Laden.
That's absurd, he said.
Well, he says a lot of absurd things, but these are toppers.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, I had a laugh when he mentioned George W. Bush and Osama Bin Laden in an arrest warrant because he walked over the landmine that should be picked up and exploited and thrown right back at him.
Yeah, that's a very good statement, Mr. Netanyahu.
George Bush should have a criminal indictment against him and should you And the five dancing Israelis and the other participants in the 9-11 false flag attack that was used to justify this Israeli-Zionist war across the Middle East from Afghanistan, Iraq to Libya, Syria since 2001.
You know, this nonsense, too, that somehow a democratically elected Israel is insular and defended against international criminal court warrants for genocide is laughable.
The entire issue that was You know, learned and basically written in cement in the world after World War II was the perception of genocide being orchestrated on multiple levels, but in particularly against the Jews to the point where they passed a law, passed an international law against genocide.
And this is the one occasion Where Israel is in fact guilty of genocide.
So this is not going to go well for Netanyahu or Israel or his Likud party or its entire government in general, because the Israeli people are, for the most part, in the majority.
For this genocide, the majority of the Israeli people, aside from a few protesters and stragglers you see out there, but Abby Martin has done a good, and she's been over there a few times, a good exhaustive analysis on how only 2% of the Israelis think they've used too much force and are inappropriate to the Palestinians.
So that means 98% of the Israelis are essentially on board with this kind of a brutality and policy.
They deserve to be ostracized from the entire world.
This is the precise moment when nations should expel diplomats, expel, confiscate consulates and embassies.
And like the Nigerians said to the United States, get out.
We don't want you in our country anymore.
And I think that that day is coming very quickly, Jim.
Oh, I agree 100 percent.
Brian.
Real quickly, gentlemen, of those assassinations you listed there, Jim, how many assassins have been brought to justice?
No.
Virtually no.
Virtually none, Don.
How about that?
You have some patsies who've been arrested and prosecuted or died, but not the bona fide shooters, the actual killers.
Brian, Well, the global landscape is changing quickly, against Israel especially.
It was South Africa that filed the complaint with the International Criminal Court.
Now Spain, Ireland, Norway, Slovenia, and Belgium have all come along and said that they want to recognize a Palestinian state and have it ruled and governed by Palestinians.
The question is, and that's just a few European countries, and of course the whole rest of the world has its arms up about the massacre outrage.
Meanwhile, you know, one of Israel's top security deputies said that a fox couldn't have possibly crossed that fence on October 7th without being known.
So either they knew about the attack or that they're not.
But I think what Scott said Really is a huge indicator.
Scott said that only 2% of Israelis deviate from the popular opinion.
Well, what does that tell you about the 98% hive mind that is Israel?
They'll take the propaganda hook, line, and sinker.
They'll never look under the hood.
They're going to continue to take a one-size-fits-all approach to everything.
But the problem is Netanyahu is under so much pressure.
Because the world is outraged about these crimes, and that pressure is also causing his Western allies to begin to falter.
They're not getting all the money and all the arms that they want to have, and it looks now like West is doing what we normally do, which is play the double-cross game, where we come out on one side of the conflict, but as soon as the winds change, we go to the other side of the conflict.
It could be a possibility that Israel will lose a lot of Western support throughout all of this.
It seems strange to me that it's the Republicans that are sticking to the bandwagon so closely while the Democrats are already beginning to jump shit.
Again, that's largely, I believe, that it's sort of an anti-Trump position that, hey, we're the Dune Democrats.
We're against war.
We're against them.
We're against, you know, Israel and genocide and all this because they're the progressives, again, progressing toward what?
You know, nobody can really define that.
So, it doesn't surprise me that the dark agencies related to Mossad or CIA are taking out helicopters.
There's also been another top Russian deputy that had his helicopter had to make an emergency landing just yesterday.
So, there's a lot taking place all over the world right now.
And as for the investigations, no, they'll never get to the bottom of them, just like they never got to the bottom of
um conveniently never got to the bottom of the the pipeline disasters um so don't expect to get anything this is this is all about justifying money going here money going there it's the same thing i've always said about false flags which is we run our false flags to continue to justify the expenses and continue to expand the security state well just look think of all this as the nuclear Very, very nice.
Very nice.
Reality.
Meanwhile, I'm breaking!
state, and they just need that money to keep flowing.
Who cares what really happens?
And they don't care about citizens.
Very, very nice.
Very nice.
Reality.
Meanwhile, breaking.
Unsealed documents repeal the FBI authorized use of deadly force during the Mar-a-Lago raid.
Thanks to USDA District Judge Eileen Cannon unsealing many documents in the case, we just learned that the FBI authorized the use of deadly force during the raid on Mar-a-Lago.
Take a look!
The FBI authorized the use of deadly force during the Mar-a-Lago raid.
Julie Kelly, who's been on top of this.
Tons of new unsealed filings on classified dark case.
I'll try to post as much as I can.
There goes the workout, but this is mind-blowing.
FBI authorized the use of deadly force at Mar-a-Lago for the illegal raid.
According to an operations order produced in Discovery, the FBI believed its objective for the Mar-a-Lago raid was to seize classified information, NDI, and U.S.
government records as described in the search warrant.
The order contained a policy statement regarding use of deadly force, which stated, for example, Law enforcement officers of the Department of Justice may use deadly force when necessary.
The agents planned to bring standard issue weapons, ammo, handcuffs, medium and large side bolt cutters, but they were instructed to wear unmarked polo or collared shirts and keep law enforcement equipment concealed.
Think about that.
In other words, they were to be armed and ready to shoot, but they weren't to identify themselves properly so the Secret Service protecting the President would know who the hell they are.
Julie Kelly.
More about.
More.
Julie Kelly.
They were gonna go door to door to terrorize Mar-a-Lago guests, even pick the locks.
They were prepared to confront Trump and even engage Secret Service if necessary.
FBI had a medic on the scene and identified a local trauma center for anyone injured during the raid.
Here is the use of deadly force instruction attached to the FBI's operational order.
Head of FBI Phil Thomas, when this was executed, Steve D'Antonio.
Recall who authorized the raid?
Merrick Garland.
The FBI risked the lives of Donald Trump, his family, his guests, calling me crazy.
But if I didn't know better, I'd almost think they were hoping for a confrontation.
Looking for what?
Meanwhile, Sundance.
Some people surprised the FBI was ready to use deadly force against Trump security detail during Mar-a-Lago raid to regain deep state FBI DOJ secrets.
some are expressing shock the mp i was prepared to use deadly force against trump and his secret service detail during the doj raid on mar-a-lago julie kelly has the details i am not surprised in the least
Remember, the objective of the FBI raid was to re-secure the physical evidence Trump had showing how the FBI and DOJ action in 2016 was targeting him using the power of their law enforcement and intel agencies.
The origination of all the DOJ, FBI, IC and TEL issues goes back to the 2015-16 FBI exploitation of the NSA database.
This is not a contested discussion issue.
It's just continually forgotten.
The FBI was using its access to the NSA metadata on all Americans to conduct surveillance on political candidates who might threat the power structure, exploiting secrets within the electronic records of all Americans.
The FBI was and is conducting domestic surveillance and tracking, just like the German Stasi or Soviet KGB.
It's still happening, but we're not supposed to remember or something.
The raid on Mar-a-Lago, like the Robert Mueller investigation, was part of a longstanding cover-up.
The FBI was looking for what took rhythm as evidence in a weaponized system targeting him.
The FBI wanted it back.
The FBI was willing to use deadly force to get it back, if that's what it took.
The raid involved 25 Miami agents, four Washington agents, one identified from headquarters, one DOJ attorney, and the assistant U.S.
attorney from the Southern District of Florida.
Yes.
Apparently the FBI was prepared to engage in a gun battle or kill people in Mar-a-Lago in order to retake evidence against them.
I know it sounds scary, but that's the reality of our modern FBI.
These are not good people.
Remember, also, A.G.
McGarland said he authorized every facet of the raid.
I keep trying to drive the point home.
These are not good people.
Yet many refuse to accept, pretend it just can't be that bad, or forget real example proof how bad the FBI is.
The modern FBI is a police agency of a weaponized U.S.
government with a direct and purposeful mandate To keep the American people under control through strict surveillance and a violent police state.
Understand and accept this with great seriousness.
There are no, there are no, Honorable rank and file within the MEI.
Every member is a participant in the weaponization of power and government.
The members are jackboots recorded from ideological college campuses for exactly the purpose of supporting a Stasi-like police state.
Over the past several years, we've discovered how the FBI worked inside Twitter, Facebook, social media to control information, remove content, manipulate opinion on behalf of the U.S.
government—all activity political.
We've also learned that the FBI took active measures to suppress information about a Hunter Biden laptop, to control any negative consequences for the Biden regime—again, political!
These are not disputed realities.
The U.S.
DOJ and FBI are now political institutions abandoning their originating mission in order to become the domestic equivalent of the Soviet-era FSB.
Their joint targeting mechanisms have been redesigned to support the interests of corrupt D.C.
politicians, specifically the interests of Democrats.
It was in June 2022 when Senator Chuck Grassley sent a letter to Attorney General Mary Garland and FBI Director Christopher Wray notifying them of a whistleblower allegation from within the FBI that senior leadership at both Maine Justice and FBI were involved in a coordinated effort to cover up criminal activity related to Hunter Biden.
At this point, I am increasingly convinced by evidence there are elements within the FBI that are enablers involved in sex trafficking, human smuggling, abduction, counterfeiting, and money laundering as part of their operational mission.
The FBI didn't make a mistake or drop the proverbial ball in the Olympic gymnast case.
They intentionally and specifically maintained the sexual exploitation of teenage girls by doing absolutely nothing with the complaints they received.
This is not misconduct.
This is purposeful.
Then, as if to oblige salt to the open wound of severe FBI politicalization, what did the FBI do with the Hunter Biden laptop?
Notice, I've set the issue of the disappearing Huma Abedin Anthony Weiner laptop in the known custody of FBI over there in the corner, next to the missing investigation of the A1 Brothers.
Scott, your thoughts?
Oh, wow.
Yeah, I think that's a powerful revelation about what the nature of the FBI is, and it's far easier as a default position to simply say the FBI is a criminal enterprise, an enemy gang, hostile to the people of the United States, hostile to the Constitution,
And it only uses government, the Constitution, to generate authority for itself to exercise more brutality and control over the American people.
Therefore, they should be labeled.
A domestic enemy of the United States.
There's nothing good about the FBI.
There's no need for the FBI.
States can handle their own prosecutions.
There's no need for a federal agency.
In fact, I'd say it's unconstitutional by its nature.
And this justifying lethal force in Mar-a-Lago, that really was a disaster that was lucky to have been averted, Jim, because If I know Trump and his people and the people who are around Trump, the best and the brightest, Trump will have a small army of the best trained SEALs, Special Forces, Marine Corps, Army guys.
Not Gomer Pyles, not average soldiers, not big army.
He will have special operations people.
And those men are very well trained to kill with their hands, with pens, with chopsticks, with knives, with guns, with teacups, anytime, anywhere.
So the FBI, which is like a Hitler Youth Fascist Boy Scout Club compared to hard grizzled veterans, is really not much of anything at all.
And these guys in charge of Trump security, Would not surrender and they would not back down if it came to a fight.
So the FBI, if it's under the delusion, or like you said, was being set up to do this brutal, monstrous attack and invasion against Trump for the purposes of trying to trigger a firefight, they're very lucky because every FBI agent would have been killed.
And you would have had Trump security people not backing down, and they would have stood their ground and said, no, no one comes in.
They may have relinquished to the Secret Service, but the governor would have been called in.
As the governor should have been.
If DeSantis was any kind of a man, and the sheriff was any kind of a man in the jurisdiction where Mar-a-Lago is, the sheriff would have went in and told the FBI in no uncertain terms, you don't go into Mar-a-Lago without telling me, the sheriff, or I'll deputize every male citizen in our county to form a ring and stop you.
That's what should have happened, but it didn't because we're a country full of beta males who've been castrated in their brains and their balls.
And then their political understanding and agencies like the FBI thrive off of populations like that.
But I think it's very lucky and very indicative of what the future may be with these fascist fools who think because they have a lanyard, because they have a blue jacket that says FBI, that somehow people are going to be intimidated and back down.
Not anymore.
You remember Robert Lavoie Finnicum?
They had a team of military guys go out and engage the FBI face-to-face.
The team of civilians and former veterans went out and knocked on the FBI's door and said, okay, we're here, let's talk.
And the FBI were taken back.
This is what veterans do when they run up against tyrants.
They're polite, but they're also lethal and deadly.
And the FBI backed down from pissing off any veterans in the Robert LaVoy Finnicombe, Oregon standoff.
They had to kill him secretly, you know, on a lone road.
Yeah.
But this thing is only going to amplify, especially if they try and put a gag order on Trump, they try and throw him in jail or do something like this.
I think we're so close to an outbreak of some sort of a conflict, hostility, civil war, whatever you want to call it, flashpoint.
It's going to result with dead cops, not dead civilians, not dead military guys, dead cops.
And then those military guys who are responsible are going to completely go rogue and say, OK, we're checked out.
We're not part of this government anymore.
We are now, you know, a territory.
We're not giving any obedience or authority to the federal government.
This is where we're going is the inevitability of the breakup of the federal union because of the federal fascist authority of agencies like FBI are going to drive the veteran communities out and independent and autonomous.
Jim?
Oh, wow.
Don, let's take us out.
We'll take a break, and Brian will continue with his comments on the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago when we return.
Well, let's take us out.
You all took us out to a land I don't want to be in, and it's called America the way it is right now.
It's just pretty tense everywhere here.
So, this is the first hour of Truth vs. News here on Memorial Day.
What a lot to remember here on this day.
And it's all right here and you want to share it because this is important information that's getting closer to your survival.
So come on back to the second hour here and we'll look forward to hopefully we can get all of our problems resolved next hour, right?
▲
Export Selection