All Episodes
Previous Next
March 19, 2024 - Jim Fetzer
01:11:27
Truth vs. NEW$, Inc Part 2 (18 March 2024) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett, and Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome back, folks.
This is Truth vs. News, Incorporated, and it's quite a way we are here in the middle of March.
The equinox is upon us, and great discussions back and forth, and we're all going to expose the truth here.
It's been covered by lies.
So go ahead, Jim.
Lead on.
So, Scott, your thoughts about Fannie Willis and Judge McAfee?
Fanny Willis.
Well, there is a great song that I think encapsulates Fanny Willis's mind and that is, we've been moving on up to the east side to a big eluxe apartment in the sky.
Beans don't burn on the kitchen!
You know, I won't go down and degrade my singing voice with that culture.
But it certainly resonates accurately for her.
The thing, the hippo butt, as Brian astutely observes, likes to gyrate with a gorilla twerking.
I think it's laughable and it's disgusting and it's shameful and it's absolutely legally destructive to our country that such beasts, and I use that word advisedly, such as Fannie Willis, enter into these courts and make them laughingstocks.
With a challenge of Donald Trump, because what they do to Trump today can be done to them tomorrow.
And if they think that they can win on any kind of a conflict, political persecution, or civil war against the white Anglo-Saxon, Celtic, Scandinavian, Germanic people, that represent the vast majority of this country, they certainly have another thought coming.
And of course, no one wants an overt conflict like this, but when you do such radically insane things as trying to prosecute a president, then you certainly open the door for Bill Clinton to be prosecuted, and George Bush to be prosecuted, and Barack Obama to be prosecuted, and I would say Michelle Obama, a.k.a.
Michael LeVon Robinson, to be prosecuted.
With far more heinous crimes and crimes against humanity than Donald Trump has ever done.
And when you go down the road of removing him from the ballot, you're basically nullifying, you know, the states that try and advance that to, you know, to oblivion.
So for these reasons, I think unless we have a return to sanity, We will have a entrance into fire and conflict and violence that would be very, very short, I believe, like maybe a month.
But you're pushing the American patriot community to the edge of the cliff with these sort of legal bullying, extreme tactics.
And it's not about Trump.
It's about every American living vicariously through Trump.
So what they do to him, they do to everyone in Nebraska, Iowa, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, South Dakota, North Dakota, Texas, Georgia, Alabama.
Louisiana, go on and on.
For the vast majority of the flyover country, which is where a lot of the military people come from, you're now dealing existential blows against them, and I don't think this will end well.
Fannie Willis and her whoring out to her boyfriend and paying him.
She needs to go to jail for that.
And so does the black attorney George Jefferson, her boyfriend, that joined her in this tremendous fraud and corruption.
Jim?
Well, multiple legal experts have assailed McAfee for this decision, including Jonathan Turley, Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Tober.
They've all said this is preposterous, that she should have been fired, that you can't have a Solomonic decision and split the baby in half, that if one goes, they both have to go.
I think it's offensive, and that McAfee is still presiding is outrageous.
Brian?
Okay, so let's just sort of take a big picture overview here.
They couldn't get Trump with one big federal lawsuit, so they took all their DAs that they had paid off, and they paid them off even more to go and find some sort of weird charge that they could put on Trump in each little jurisdiction.
Hoping that it would stick.
Now this is an ex-president so they can throw anything they want at him and show me the man and I'll show you the crime.
The term Banana Republic comes from a book written by a guy by the name of O. Henry in 1904 called Cabbages and Kings.
And basically, in political science, it's talking about a politically and economically unstable country with an economy dependent upon the export of national resources.
It was used to describe Guatemala and Honduras under economic exploitation by U.S.
corporations, which is now Chiquita.
Um, and it's a society of extremely stratified social classes, usually a large impoverished working class and a ruling class, ruling class plutocracy composed of business, political and military.
It's basically It's an economy of state capitalism where the country is operated by a private commercial enterprise for the exclusive profit of the economic classes.
And so they take that term, apply it to the courts.
Now, there used to be a thing here in America called Lady Justice, the scales of justice.
You could take a look at it.
Obviously, she's blind and holding scales.
It's supposed to be right.
And the question that I have in this particular case is, How much cyanide do you need to put in the bread dough before the whole bread dough is corrupt?
And this is the problem.
This is the same thing I was talking about in the first hour with institutional corruption.
Where is the Bar Association?
Crying foul on the whole nature of the game.
Instead, we've got a single umpire out there calling the shots on second, first, third, and fourth.
And there's no other ruling group within the institution that's going to come out and say, hey, this is an unfair application of justice here in the United States.
So we're going to let this guy go his own way because it's in our political best interests to do so, rather than in the issue of the legality and the corruption.
The only thing it does is it gives Trump a better option on appeal, but they're not worried about appeal.
All these lawsuits are being brought against Trump just to simply tarnish the next election.
And once they let loose with the crowd of mongrelized They're gonna try to institute a martial law to shut it down.
They can't let Trump have it.
They've used every legal option they can.
They can't stop it.
all the other ones.
They're going to try to institute a martial law to shut it down.
They can't let Trump have it.
They've used every legal option they can.
They can't stop it.
Every attack that they've done has made him stronger.
I would, look, I remember when we were going into 2017, coming out of 2016, watching Razor Fist, who's a great commentator.
He's You'll find him on YouTube.
And we were going right into election day and he's like, you know what?
Trump's going to get all 50.
All 50 of them.
I'm sorry.
That was going into 2020.
He thought Trump was going to get all 50 of them.
And yet Fox News pulls the election thing and runs it at the middle of the night.
Oh, we've got Georgia going this way and that.
Oh, Trump lost.
We are looking at the same sorts of plays.
Unfortunately, I haven't seen anything truly creative come out of the Democratic Party except for the, you know, the talking points and the lines in terms of creative ways to go about this.
There is no creativity left.
They can't stop him, so they're just going to release the hordes of angry people to try to institute martial law.
Unfortunately, I blame the Bar Association.
Utterly and completely for allowing this travesty with Fannie Willis and Nathan Wade to continue on its course.
It's the Bar Association that's going to end up with the black eye.
Every lawyer in America, every judge in America is going to be now considered to be, oh, is this just another political prosecution?
Is this another?
That's what's going to come out of it.
It's going to be ugly.
Yeah, I think you're right.
Go ahead, Scott.
Dr. Stephen Pidgeon, a constitutional attorney that was back in Washington with me, is a very brilliant guy, has laid out a possible scenario, and that follows the Jefferson, Davis, Abraham, Lincoln model, where in that model, the South picked up its votes and refused to recognize Lincoln and do these other things.
Stephen said the same thing could happen in this case.
Brian observes accurately.
They are doing everything they can in every legal maneuver that they can, but when that becomes exhausted and they're overturned by constitutional reasons, then the only thing they have is totalitarian bullying and
You know, fascism, and he speculates that the Democrat states will simply withhold their votes or will not participate in the election counting or the electoral votes going forward.
So you will have certain states, you know, that are trying to block him from being on the ballot or things like that, not participating, holding back their votes, whether it's because they are going to continue to clamor about him, you know, being a insurrectionist and all this other stuff, and claiming the higher moral high ground,
Whatever the Democrats do, even though it's complete devilish madness, they are going to try and do to stop Trump from any means necessary.
So when they do that, welcome to 1861 all over again.
Welcome to, you know, Donald Trump saying, I'm the President of the United States and I am here to represent the people of the United States.
You either follow me or follow Biden, which is it?
And whatever bloodbath the Democrats try and start, Republican conservative patriots of every tribe and every clan will finish it.
Jim?
That's fascinating, Scott.
Something I have not contemplated.
Thank you very much.
Meanwhile, the classified dock case looks like it's in major trouble, too.
The week of March 11th was extremely consequential in terms of the 2020 election.
And a story that got buried was a hearing that took place in federal court in Florida, where Judge Aileen Cannon, Held a hearing to discuss Trump's motion to dismiss the classified dock case against him on the ground of vagueness of the Espionage Act and its production under the Presidential Records Act.
Hannon denied those motions but signaled very strongly that she could dismiss the entire case based on selective prosecution.
Independent journalist Julie Kelly was inside the courtroom.
Trump also made an appearance in person.
Kelly said the elephant in the room during the hearing was special counsel Robert Heard's testimony before Congress earlier this week.
Heard testified in Congress, buying the stash he stored at closed and stolen documents in seven different unsecured locations.
He lied about a fact he'd shown them to other people, At the end, the entire herd declined to prosecute Biden because he's an incredibly stupid old man with dementia.
Kelly said Judge Kanner repeatedly used the phrase selective enforcement during the hearing.
It's clear she was directly referencing Biden and the fact he was not charged with stealing thousands of classified documents.
Smith's indictment claims that Trump began willfully retaining national security information on January 20, 2021, the day he left office.
Cannon asked for a historical precedent of when a former president has ever been charged with retaining classified docs after he left office.
There is no such precedent.
Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, George W., Barack Obama all took classified docs when they left office, and they kept them.
None of them were ever charged, despite doing the same thing exactly Donald Trump did.
Vice President Pence skated on charges, as did former Vice President Biden this week.
Hillary Clinton deleted 33,000 classified emails from the illegal server she'd set up in her bathroom closet at her home in Chappaquiddick from the time when she was Obama's Secretary of State.
She wasn't even supposed to have those docs.
And by deleting them, she destroyed evidence in a criminal investigation.
That former MPI director in Bumbling sued James Comey.
Now, no reasonable prosecutor would have brought charges against Hillary.
That's why Cannon kept repeatedly bringing up selecting prosecution.
Nobody else even gets indicted for fumbling around with classified docs, except for Donald Trump.
Cannon also called out Jack Smith's team of prosecutors on the fact that the Department of Energy revoked President Trump's use of clarity currents.
That's never happened to a former president before, but it's even worse than it sounds.
It was only after Jack Smith charged Trump with 32 crimes in Florida that the Department of Energy retroactively revoked Trump's clearance.
Smith deemed it no answer as to why the DOE only did that after Trump was indicted.
Julie noted on Twitter.
Given the constellation of what happened before—no criminal prosecution of former President Clinton, Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan, and vice president—can it suggest that Trump could have reasonably expected he was in the clear?
There's still a motion to dismiss that Cannon has yet to rule upon, based on selective and prejudicial prosecution.
Cannon hammered the point over and over again.
No one else has been charged with these crimes, Kelly predicts.
Based on how the hearing worked, Cannon is going to dismiss this bullshit case.
The most ridiculous thing about it all is Trump didn't retain those documents after he left office.
The National Archive dumped an enormous pile of boxes on the White House driveway on January 14, 2021, and told Trump team to come pick them up.
Trump didn't pack those boxes.
He didn't know what was in that gigantic pile, that there'd be a hundred pages of classified docs, far fewer than Joe Biden stole.
The National Archive packed the boxes.
That's not willful retainment of anything.
It's a setup.
We're not speculating about this.
There's plenty of photographic evidence.
Here's an example.
Trump aides were worried about official White House gifts being mixed together with personal belongings in his rushed move out from the White House.
Boxes are stacked on West Executive Avenue before being loaded onto a truck at the White House on January 14.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, the President of the United States is top declassification authority.
Anything that he wants declassified is instantly declassified.
Trump should have, at his phone or his secretary or someone, say, OK, I, Donald Trump, President of the United States, am declassifying all of these documents.
They're thereby declassified, and I'm releasing them to the American public.
That's what Trump should have done all along, and he failed, and he fell down, and he got tangled up in something that he didn't have the education or experience, specifically government.
So he's been playing whack-a-mole to a bunch of ghosts, and they continue to play this game to exhaust him, but ultimately and legally, and I think the Supreme Court, of course, unless they're completely and hopelessly corrupt unless they're completely and hopelessly corrupt or stupid, the Supreme Court has to come down on the authority of the President of the United States to declassify everything and anything at any time.
Uh, is, uh, is clear in the Constitution.
And President Trump declassified these things.
Therefore, they cannot be reclassified.
And once they're declassified, they're up in cyberspace.
They're for anybody and everybody to review.
It's not a part declassification, it's a total declassification.
That means there's no secret, top secret, confidential, nothing.
It's declassified material.
So that's his only defense, is everything's been declassified, which means I can make copies of everything and anything and give them to any American that I want.
And that's what he should have done.
And, you know, hopefully he'll make that case.
But when they're trying to again entangle him in declassification, you know, no one has the authority to do that.
And you can even go back and say the precedence of what Joe Biden has just done as vice president, having classified material and having recordings of Biden admitting that he had classified material in his garage, admitting to a ghostwriter that he found classified material.
He should be arrested for violating the security protocols.
He's not the president, he was the vice president, so he's not protected.
And yes, Hillary Clinton, in her various violations, and James Comey, and these other fools not prosecuting.
This is something that needs to be rectified.
I would be amazed, and I'm still amazed, that the Republicans haven't pulled out all of the tools, such as the woman who was raped by Bill Clinton.
If you're going to prosecute Donald Trump for rape, That raping the ugly old hag that makes, you know, a hyena's ass look appetizing.
Jean Carroll, whatever hell her name is.
If you're going to prosecute Trump with no evidence of any kind for doing something to this old witch, then why isn't Bill Clinton being dragged in front of a court and the various women that he raped and he violated, such as the woman back in Arkansas.
Yeah, Juanita Broderick.
Why not have Juanita Broderick testify that he raped her and he should be arrested and imprisoned for rape?
You know, there's no wiggle room here.
And I've emailed Juanita Broderick, never heard back.
But I think it's shameful that they haven't stood up and done these things.
This is political warfare, not a patty cake game.
And Republicans are always stepping on their private member when it comes to this sort of battle.
And we, you know, are losing and are a laughing stock because we don't know how to knife fight with these Democrats.
Jim?
I think it's obvious this was a setup.
Trump actually had a standing order.
A dock he took home with him was automatically declassified.
They planted those docks.
He didn't even know they were there so they could bring this phony case.
I guarantee you.
Brian, your thoughts?
Yeah, they've been after him every which way from Sunday, and the attitude is, let's just throw every piece of shit that we can against the wall and hope something sticks.
Let me remind you of a guy by the name of Ian Bettridge.
In 2009, he was a guy that specialized in writing about information technology, and he observed something that's been known to be true for a long time, that any headline that ends in the question mark, the answer is probably no.
So if you're going to write a headline, you're supposed to write a headline with the facts as shown, but when you write a headline with a question mark, what you're doing is really saying, hey, I'm going to write an article that tries to support this conclusion, and I'm hoping that nobody will notice the actual contents of the article below, and everybody just hits the headline.
So that's exactly what they're doing with Trump.
They're just hitting headline after headline after headline, hoping something hits.
I believe that they picked Fannie Willis in Georgia because that's where these cases are to be televised.
Now, of course, that's backfiring.
Everybody's watching Fannie Willis and Nathan Wade on the stand, you know, denying their affair.
And it's backfiring.
Well, surprise, surprise, surprise.
Every time you go after Trump, it backfires.
Now, Let me remind you that we in America have never seen a politically fortunate prosecution of somebody who actually committed a crime that was a politician.
We've seen everybody and their brother get off.
Because they're protected by a system and an institution that protects everybody quid pro quo.
So why is it this one time that Biden's off scot-free with his classified docs, but Trump's not?
Oh, well, there are different cases, different elements here and there.
Bunch of gobbledygook.
It's clear to me that this is just simply selective prosecution for the purposes of trying to break them down so that they can justify it when they go to steal the election.
What about all the people in Atlanta and Fulton County that thought Trump was guilty?
Well, look at the comments.
We only see the comments in the section from the people that think he's guilty.
There's no more comments anymore about people who dissent from the vote.
Look, there's a fallacy of the masses.
That just because you're seeing something on Google and more people comment about it doesn't make it true.
Okay?
Sometimes one man is right and 99 men are wrong.
That's why we set up a republic.
That's why we have the American legal system.
We elect representatives.
The problem that we've got is institutionally, our representatives have sold out to the lobbyists, the power structures, the banking cartels, and we can't trust them anymore when they do that.
Excellent.
Excellent.
Yeah, go ahead.
Remember one thing, too.
What is this doing to our reputation in the eyes of the world?
President Putin has already said in various articles, the United States is not a democracy.
The United States is not a democracy.
This is what they're doing to their president?
We're losing all credibility.
We're losing all respect based on this action alone.
These monkeys, and I use that term advisedly, like Fannie Willis and her, you know, blind hatred For everything white people do, perhaps, animating in this hatred of Republican Trump supporters, this is destroying our country's reputation.
And when you make a country a laughingstock, suddenly you don't have any cards in the poker game.
All of your cards are blank.
You don't have any muscle.
You're a dog without teeth.
And that's what America's delving into.
By what we're doing to Trump, we are making China and Russia and every other nation go, they've lost their minds.
The days of America being anything you could respect is over, and the quicker that we establish a multipolar world, I agree completely.
Don, did you want to add?
Yeah, along those lines.
humanity will be.
That's what's going through the political dialogue of other countries as they observe and process and define what we're doing to President Donald Trump.
Oh, I agree completely.
Don, did you want to add?
Yeah, along those lines, America is a land of freedom and other things, and so why is this big story about concealing and these records and all this stuff, why do we even need to do that?
Shouldn't we be open and honest with the people?
Are they hiding something?
How come we're having so much to hide?
It's so big.
And that's not, that's the little quadri I have.
Shouldn't America be what we're supposed to be from the start?
Yep, you got it. - Meanwhile, a judge gets delivered by the massive defeat about the border wall.
This is welcome news.
Federal judge orders Biden to restart border wall construction.
Federal Judge Drew Tipton issued a preliminary injunction stopping President Biden from diverting money away from border wall construction.
Congress appropriated back in 2019.
The government and all its respective officers, agents, service employees, attorneys, other persons who are in active concert or participation with them are hereby enjoined and restrained from implementing the July 2022 amended plan.
Biden halted border wall construction upon taking office in 2021 to signal to illegal aliens that now was the time to come to the United States.
Texas and Missouri sued to stop him from illegally diverting funds appropriated by Congress from their state at Burbus.
Fallout?
Texas Republican Attorney General Ken Baxton praised Judge Hempton for upholding the rule of law and reigning in a rogue executive.
Biden acted completely improperly by refusing to spend the money Congress appropriated for wall construction, even attempting to redirect those funds, a statement from him read.
His action demonstrated his desperation for open borders at any cost, but Texas has prevailed.
A recent Gallup poll found Americans listing immigration as the biggest issue facing a country.
Biden issued over 90 executive orders since taking office that gutted immigration enforcement and opened the border.
The American people are furious with the result being more than 7 million illegal aliens flooded the country and are overrunning cities and communities.
Biden's not even trying to fix a problem.
At every turn, he's fighting in court to prevent border security enforcement.
Not only did he fight the states of Texas and Missouri on border wall construction, but took Texas to court twice to stop the state from carrying out immigration enforcement.
Biden sued Texas to stop them from laying razor wire and placing police on the Rio Grande River to delete illegal aliens from crossing the border.
He also sued Texas to block a state law allowing local police to return anyone to the border caught illegally entering the state.
At every single opportunity.
Biden took the side of the open border crowd, resisted any effort at federal and state level to stop illegals from marching into the United States.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, this is the invasion of the United States.
This is the crumbling of the border.
The answer, of course, is an erection of a military mentality and culture and armed security force.
And there's nothing else that can compare with that.
And the resolve of what we saw in, you know, the days of the Alamo and under Texas needs to be reinvented.
The problem in modern political leaders is that they place far too much emphasis on government actors, police actors, marshals, military, and not enough direct calls to action and You know, responsibility on the American citizens, the American citizenry, the American veteran community.
There is a wealth of natural resources in our citizenry that would participate in defending the Constitution, defending our borders, and would do it for free.
And that's how things were done in the old days.
That's how sheriffs organized, deputized posses, and they got the job done.
And that's the only way to really stop and defend this is by activating citizenry groups, armed citizen groups.
That's the quickening to a revitalized society is when you give people responsibility and autonomy and a stake in their nation's evolution.
When you strip them of that, you turn into a nation of, you know, children that depend on the state to take care of them.
And that's why the Democrats, of course, are Desperate to to quicken the demise of America as soon as they can, among other things, for the purposes of creating a illegal, you know, voting replacement that they think can be used to overwhelm the natural born citizens that are here.
And, you know, unless the Republicans stand up, Again, you're on the verge of civil war because we see what they do when they come to places like New York and elsewhere.
We see the young girls that are killed when they're jogging.
We see the police that are attacked and abused.
There's one way to handle these people.
You put bullets in their head, you kill them, you execute them, and you also, you know, stop any and all fentanyl smuggling.
That's the biggest thing.
They ought to have a policy at the border.
If you're caught bringing fentanyl across the border, there's no trial.
You're simply pulled out of your car and executed, shot, and then hung for all the people to see coming in and going out of the country.
That's how you respond to an invasion and an asymmetric warfare attack upon the United States using fentanyl drugs.
Jim?
You know, a lot of people nationwide believe that Texas is sort of the bastion of conservatism, but let me point something out.
This is LGBT Pride Week for students at Austin ISD, where students are going to be arriving at schools today, Monday, and they're able to go to the principal's office and get LGBT swag, and there's LGBT flags in all the schools and all the classrooms, and we're going to be talking about gay sex, and we're going to be having the Gay Straight Alliance, and to talk to all the students at our Pride Week celebrations.
At the same time, we have a border wall that's wide open.
That's nothing more than a show.
Sometimes on the conservative websites, there's conservative articles.
They'll show a piece of the border that's, you know, being shut down or saying that Eagle Pass is some sort of Texas is defying the federal thing.
But, you know, everything that's right at the end of Eagle Pass on both ends is wide open.
People are slipping through the border Like nothing.
Now there's Haitians being flown up all over the place.
We've got boats coming in being escorted by the Coast Guard to Florida from the islands.
They're flooding us to try to change our demographics, to try to wash out the conservative rural vote that comes from that cellular structure that made Texas such a strong, independent, conservative state.
They're going to wash us out.
They're going to make sure that we don't have the voting power to continue.
There's only one way to fight this battle, and that is by making a public decision that we are going to stand up for what we are and who we are and, frankly, repent and pray for God's favor in the face repent and pray for God's favor in the face of this atrocity that we've allowed to take place.
And it's not just Texas.
But this is all being driven by federal money.
Again, institutional corruption driving itself down through more institutional corruption, driving itself down to the schools, in the counties, more institutional corruption.
It's the institutions that have gone so bad.
We spend, we're going to spend 82, 820, Billion dollars on border security this year with with the Department of Homeland Security.
In 2001, we spent 36 billion for the same package that Homeland Security still.
Meanwhile, game-changing shift!
of services that Homeland Security, now it's 820, it's inflated that far.
This is all about expanding government power, expanding government reach, and allowing the institutions to continue to press themselves in on the cellular structure of patriots that remain in America.
That's powerful.
Terrible.
Meanwhile, game-changing shift.
Democrats bleed support.
John Byrne Murdoch, he's an editor-in-law writer for the Financial Times when analyzing statistics around the 2024 vote, and it's come to some shocking findings.
The tendency of black and Hispanic votes to lean more Republican has been well-established for years.
However, Democrats are in terrible shape, as their percentage of the white vote declines and the GOP's popularity among minorities rises.
Vern Murdoch also notes identity politics is becoming less effective in elections, further undermining and limiting Democrat chances of winning.
From the Financial Times, in a New York Times survey conducted last week, Joe Biden was beating Donald Trump by barely 56 points to 44 among non-white Americans, a demographic who won by over 50 points during their 2020 contest.
With voters of color, the Democrats are currently losing ground more quickly than with any other group.
The final racial realignment in U.S.
history occurred with the 1960 election.
During Reconstruction, blacks had consistently supported Republicans.
Given the Democrats are the Ku Klux Klan party, that's hardly shocking.
However, JFK recognized a political chance when Martin Luther King was imprisoned in October 1960 for aiding a group of young civil rights activists in Georgia.
While Nixon dreaded repercussions, JFK gave Coretta King a call to let her know he was thinking about her and her family and to offer his support.
For the first time, a Democrat received a majority of the black vote because of that small gesture which inspired the black community.
Racial realignment has now dashed Democrat hopes of a long-term Democratic majority in Washington.
Why is this taking place?
Republicans haven't suddenly won over a minority to their cause.
Time, however, is the great equalizer in American politics.
Weakening bonds and fading memories are partly to blame.
The party continues to have strong support for blacks who experience a civil rights period, but newer generations are losing interest.
In U.S.
politics, there's a diminishing relationship between voter choice and income.
Voters of all races, including those from the working and middle classes, are becoming more open to the GOP.
As a party of country club elites, really, it's because Trump overhauled the party after a hostile takeover and turned it into a populist party.
It's no longer a party of the country club elites.
Unbeknownst to many, American non-white voters have historically had far more conservative beliefs This is particularly concerning for Democrats.
The current wave of migration is more likely the result of natural Republicans realizing they've been voting for the wrong party than it is of disillusioned Democrats.
Black and Hispanic voting patterns are somewhat similar to those of immigrants who, by the time they reach the third generation, have completely abandoned their political party.
The touchstone of minority communities' difficult history, or often.
Either long-forgotten memories or experiences that subsequent generations never had.
They have accepted the American ideal to differing degrees.
Increased wealth brings with it realization they should choose leaders who will uphold their accomplishments.
Many minority groups are also heavily reliant on religious beliefs.
Democrats aren't even attempting to acknowledge the existence of these communities anymore.
The realignment seems obvious in retrospect.
Who knows where this goes from here?
Meanwhile, moderate Dems want Kamala Harris replaced by who?
Late last week, HBO real-time presenter Bill Maher recommended that Biden select former U.N.
Ambassador Nikki Haley as his running mate instead of Kamala Harris.
Maher recommended that Haley form a partnership with Biden.
Betty does not think she has a future in the Republican Party.
A unity ticket is my fantasy.
I know it's insane to believe Hillary might run with Biden.
And then he would most likely prevail.
He went on.
And she said some insane stuff, of course.
Not as ridiculous as, we've never been a racist country.
Most politicians have.
That is rather insane, in my opinion, additionally.
Mayor hinted Biden might choose Senator Mitt Romney.
Here's R.G.
Sarge's new Bill Maher.
Suggests President Biden should ditch Kamala Harris and replace her with Nikki Haley.
Doubles chances in 2024.
Haley being on the Democrat pick is actually a perfect fit for her.
Mayor also said it'd be a good fit because she's a woman of who knows what.
In order to avoid living in a society where everyone perceives the other side as an existential threat, Mayor said, there had to be something to reach over.
I think he's lost his credibility as a political analyst.
Scott, your thoughts?
Yeah, it's very quickly going to, I think, degenerate into what we've talked about before, and that is the Democrats realize they can't win any free and fair election.
The American people are done.
The American people are looking to replace Biden and indeed all of these Democrats that will lose by a landslide.
You see this most recently in the George Galloway election where he won a massive landslide.
I think the same applies to Trump.
The Democrats are going to try and trigger martial law, national emergency election suspension, and they will lie through their teeth shamelessly to do so.
And when they do this, no American should be caught off guard and no American should tolerate it.
And really, honestly, Jim, every American citizen, if you're living in an area or a county with Chuck Schumer or any of these Democrats, they should initiate citizens' arrests of these people and prosecute them for sedition and treason against they should initiate citizens' arrests of these people and prosecute them for sedition This is the only way to handle the tyrants.
I'm sorry I got distracted with the client email there.
I don't have any comment on this article.
Oh, it's just about the racial difference that blacks and Latinos are going to the gym.
That's really what it is.
Yeah, listen, here's my comment on it, okay?
When people feel the stress of a bad economy, they want the government to step in and solve their problems.
So everybody who feels victimized and feel like they're not making it, like inflation's out of control, I feel like that.
But it's the natural thing for weak people to say the government needs to step in and solve my problems.
Strong people stand up for themselves, work harder, help their neighbors.
Build their own lives and they don't rely on the government to come in and solve their problem.
The government will come in and solve the problem by growing out of control, which is cost plus plus plus plus plus.
And that's what these people in the government want.
They want a larger, more expansive government.
So as long as more people come along and say, hey, I need the government to solve my problems.
I can't make it.
I'm not making it on my own.
The government gets what they want.
A strong independent spirit and a hardworking attitude is the only way to go.
And that's the American way.
And that's who we ought to be as a nation.
Turn this stuff off.
Again, back to Hitler.
How did he rebuild after the Treaty of Versailles?
Hey, you don't work, you don't eat.
Everybody's got to go to work.
We're all in this together.
You got to work.
And if you work hard, you can get one of these certificates and go cash it in for food.
The certificates ended up having a tremendous amount of value.
That's how he did it.
I hate to say it.
It's Germany.
It's Hitler.
Everybody's got a bad taste in their mouth.
But they did it right at that particular time in history.
And they did it with hard work and a can-do attitude.
These immigrants, they don't want that.
They want more government.
Lots of people from the lower classes.
More government.
Solve my problems.
You're playing right into their hands if you're not working hard and trying to solve your own problems.
I think that blacks are moving toward the Republican Party because they're appalled by the migrant wave that's undercutting their economic security and gains that they earned lawfully.
And the Latinos are appalled by all the transgender, LGBTQ stuff.
They're mostly Catholics, and they have conservative values.
I think those are two major pivot points for those groups and why they're turning toward the Republican Party appropriately under the circumstances.
Meanwhile, media meltdown.
France's first lady exposed.
They have a huge number of stories about this in the French press, where they're going bananas over claims that Bridget McRodd is a man.
Happy Wednesday, everybody.
I decided to start this episode by showing you guys some photos from my childhood.
Take a look.
This is me with my granddad.
How sweet.
Aww.
I was probably just four years old in this picture.
Here's another one.
This is me and my two sisters.
Looks like I'm about nine years old in this picture.
And yes, look at that flannel.
So fly.
Love it.
And then this photo, definitely from middle school.
I don't know what I'm doing there.
You can tell I have braces.
That's why I know it's middle school.
There's randomly snicker bars on the bed.
Definitely like that as a treat.
Now, why am I showing you guys these photos?
Well, it's not because I'm feeling sentimental today.
It's because I wanted to demonstrate how easy it would be for Brigitte Macron to debunk the quote-unquote conspiracy theory that she lived as a man for 30 years.
That's how easy it is, folks.
That's all it is.
We just want to see a photo from your first 30 years.
Can you just show us one or two?
That's what we have for you coming up first.
Later on in the show, we're going to dive back into Rabbi Shmuley.
He's not done threatening me.
This time he says he wants to bankrupt me.
Yeah, that is totally holy behavior.
Not.
All that and more today coming up on Candace Owens.
I'm a big fan of Condis, and I think that she's going to turn her guns from Bridget McGrath to Big Mike.
We have a whole lot of evidence here and a lot of threats.
If Michelle decides to run, that she's going to be subjected to a massive expose.
We have that little ditty, Michelle Obama is a man, oh yeah, oh yeah.
We have the satirist trying to debunk the claim that Michelle Obama is a man and actually proving it.
And it appears there's a film by the name of Big Mike in the works.
It's becoming pretty clear Sleepy Joe is about to get the heave-ho.
He's served out his usefulness.
He's becoming an obvious liability.
There's always so much that can be done to cover up the fact he's not all there.
And that's why they're laying the groundwork for someone new.
Took her blind from the opening of the producer's Broadway show about you-know-who.
Where could that man be?
Oh, where, oh, where is he?
We looked around, and then we found the man for you and me.
Enter Becoming Michelle, the other Obama's interestingly titled autobiography.
Will this person become the one who gets into the WWF ring to smash the Orange Man over the head with a chair?
Will Orange Man recover and put Michelle in the camel clutch and make her or her humble, her the Iron Sheik?
All of that remains unknown.
But what can be foreseen, with an increasing degree of certainty, is that a person, Barack Obama's brother, publicly styles Big Mike, is coming, and probably soon.
Because we're now at the point that Sleepy and Angry Joe might do something irrecoverable in public.
Such as a drop of number two in his pants while standing at the podium, a silly smile spreading across his face as the load wetly and unmistakably migrates down the side of his pants leg.
This happens to 81-year-olds with dementia, Alzheimer's, and Sleepy Joe is on his way to 82.
It's remarkable, isn't it, that the same laugh that makes every excuse imaginable for this derelict is the same laugh that when the country brawled Reagan was too old to run for office back in 1979.
Reagan was in his late 60s at the time.
Of course.
This is another time.
In Haiti, seem to be the new 60.
Orange Man is not far from Haiti and would be as old as Sleepy Joe is today at the end of his next presidency, assuming he is allowed to win the office.
There are multiple ways for the left to prevent that from happening, as occurred last time.
This time, it probably won't be COVID that provides the excuse for the left to turn election day into election month.
Martial law, on account of terrorism, might enable the left, which has deliberately flooded the country with millions of God-knows-who-they-are people from who-knows-where-they-came-from, to dispense with having an election at all.
It may well prove to be exactly why the left has purposely left the border wide open for the past three going on four years now.
It certainly hopes it will alter the course of future elections once the American people have been replaced by these new ones.
It literally can't go on for much longer, because these geriatrics that comprise the American Politburo can't big Mike, on the other hand, is practically nubile at not quite 60.
She represents exactly what the lefties are thinking does, not old, not white, possibly not she, but maybe.
Just the person that entered the WWE offering to smash a chair over the orange man's head.
The crowd will love it, though America may come to regret it.
Regardless, it seems evident a decision has been made to cut Sleepy Joe loose before he becomes too much of a liability.
The latest evidence in support of this assertion being the special counsels just issued a report about the elderly and forgetful.
Those are the words used, man's action.
The man then quipped something about a president of Mexico's role in what's going on in the Middle East because he was allowed to get in front of a hot mic publicly, which means another mic is coming probably very soon.
Scott, your thoughts?
Yeah, I think Candace Owens has opened up the Pandora's box and by showing the absence of Brigitte's, Macron's, transvestite, transgender, whatever, Frankenstein thing, absent of proof of photographs, you know, it's going to be deemed you know, it's going to be deemed he is a man.
And the same methodology will be applied to Michelle Obama, a.k.a. Michael LeVon Robinson.
There is no photographs of Michelle Obama.
Obama is a little girl.
We know that the children of Obama and Michelle Obama, Michael LeVon Robinson, are children of other parents.
I mean, this is just the cycle of lies and deceit and treason against the American public that I think is going to come to quite a climactic end.
And that's why they're probably preparing for internal domestic uprisings to try and escape the accountability and the outrage that the American people will show when they give the benefit of the doubt to these liars and the American people will see just how viciously and horrifically they've been deceived and abused by these predators
Uh, who really deserve nothing short of death.
Jim?
Yeah, sad to say.
Todd?
One real question.
Michelle's daughters, where's their birth certificates?
Yeah.
What did you say?
Oh, the birth certificates for Michelle's kids.
Yeah.
One of the first things they did was shut down birth indexes when Barack Obama became president.
That was something that they were working on for a long time.
So there's no birth indexes that we can get.
They said it was for public safety, you know, how the ID theft that was taking place.
But prior to that I was able to get birth indexes and figure out who was born to whom.
Where and when and how in multiple different ways.
That was all destroyed, shut down, and everybody that was playing in that game off those old birth indexes were basically prosecuted and shut down in the game.
Now the big question is why hire or why install All these morally bankrupt transvestites, it's because they're easy to control.
They don't have any moral compasses anymore.
As a matter of fact, I would say that they hate God because of their problematic identity.
Related to sexuality.
They probably have all sorts of issues that even the greatest psychotherapist wouldn't be able to work themselves through.
It'd be hard for them to be at one or at peace with God under these circumstances.
And that's the last thing that they want.
So let's go ahead and select these people because we know that we can rely on them to be corrupt when we need them to be corrupt.
Plus, it's that carrot and stick concept.
We'll make you rich and then we'll blackmail you if you don't do What we want you to do.
So these are the perfect people to go after.
They're confused.
They're lost.
They've never been able to resolve this identity issue.
They've never been able to get through the sexual confusion that they've been in.
And they're going to spend their entire life in a system of of confusion.
That's the perfect person to install into an office.
And I think that's why these people are being used and placed into these positions, because they're frankly weaker and easier to control.
They haven't been able to overcome their sexual appetites.
That's a tribute to a depraved society, frankly.
And all this LGBTQ stuff, this goes way back in time, way, way back in time, Greeks, before the Greeks, hermaphrodites, you've got old Baals and old Molecs that are all hermaphrodites, are all some sort of weird tranny scenario taking place.
This is old, old religion.
This is nothing new.
Very, very nice, Brian.
Meanwhile, We have a Hitler-quoting candidate who won the North Carolina Republican gubernatorial primary.
This is very interesting.
Mark Robinson, who has a history of making inflammatory comments, will face Democrat Josh Steiner.
What's expected of him?
Notice it's a close race.
In other words, the fact that he's making these inflammatory comments doesn't mean it's going to be a runaway for the opponent.
Mark Robinson, North Carolina's black lieutenant governor, has a history of making inflammatory comments and said he'd abolish abortion rights as one of the state's Republican nomination for governor, a first black lieutenant governor.
We'll face Democrat Josh Stein, the state attorney general, in what's expected to be a close and hotly contested race.
Robinson and Stein are attempting to succeed the current Democrat governor, Roy Cooper.
Because Republicans already control North Carolina's legislature.
A Republican victory, a Robinson victory, would give them a trifecta in unilateral control over policymaking in a critical battleground state.
Issues like the right to abortion would be at stake.
Robinson said last Monday he would absolutely protect life from conception.
We got it down to 12 weeks, he said.
The next is to get it down to six and then keep moving from there.
A former factory worker, Robinson lost his political where the 2018 speech on gun laws to his hometown council went viral.
During the speech, he said he represented average Americans who feel targeted and whose safety feels threatened by attempts to restrict firearm access.
The attention following the speech earned him a spot on a conservative commentary and an NRA Association board member using his new fame to launch his successful bid for lieutenant governor.
He has a history of controversial statements.
He described COVID-19 as a globalist conspiracy to destroy Donald Trump in 2021.
He described efforts to teach LGBTQ plus issues in sex ed, referring to transgender and homosexual people as filth.
He also said those who are gay are equivalent to what the crowds leave behind, as well as maggots and flies.
He implied At a campaign event last month, transgender women should be arrested if they use women's restrooms.
He once described the movie Black Panther as created by an agnostic Jew and put to film by a satanic Marxist.
He then said it was only created to pull the shekels out of your short-sized pockets.
In 2014, he quoted Hitler on Facebook in a statement about racial pride.
He defended the Post in a speech last July, saying quoting the Nazi leader doesn't equate to support him.
Just because you quote Hitler, you don't support Hitler.
I guess every history book in America supports Hitler now.
They all quote him.
If he were to win, he would be North Carolina's first Jewish governor.
Stein, that is, his opponent, Justice Robinson, would be the state's first black.
At a rally last week in endorsing Robinson, Trump praised his rhetorical skills and called him Martin Luther King on steroids.
The race, just one of two gubernatorial contests in swing states this year, will command national attention.
Democrats, likely to paint Robinson as an extremist.
Republicans, tying Stein to Biden and his unpopularity.
While Republicans currently control the state legislature, Democrats have lost only one gubernatorial race in North Carolina since 1992.
The guy is also, by the way, a Holocaust denier.
And I just want to say, as a student of the World War II official narrative, it was all bananas.
It was all nonsense.
It was all bullshit.
Here you see the British soccer team at Auschwitz looking very fit.
Here, you can learn more from the Holocaust Narrative Politics Trump Science, where I was invited by Nick Holstrom to compose the introduction to his brilliant book, Breaking the Spell.
That is the definitive book debunking the Holohoax.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, yeah, you're witnessing all of these hoaxes and innuendos and propaganda beginning to kind of converge into the perfect storm.
So you're seeing truth beginning to become completely watered down.
In a cacophony of emotionalism and half-truths and half-baked ideas, as well as being amplified by aggression and hostility, a sense of entitlement, a sense of being wronged.
I mean, you have no further to go than the American University.
Academia, Jim.
And I know this strikes a particular chord in you because you You know, come from academia, but you have no further to go to see the epitome of madness, stupidity, desperation, gender twisted, warped minds than these colleges and universities where
The absolute dregs of moral society are gathering like flies around feces, and that is largely these American college students going and getting into arguments with Charlie Kirk and others that go there, who I disagree with on the Israeli position.
But on family values, on marriage, on domestic policy, I find agreement with them.
Except when you go, you see these students at universities completely lost their mind.
And that's why, again, I'll reiterate my position is anyone under the age of 30 is absolute roadkill and leprous, and there's really no hope short of A miraculous, godly intervention, and great awakening, and a Saul of Tarsus moment.
Jim?
Brian?
Well, as for the guy that's quoting Hitler, you know, look, get educated.
There's a great film series on Bitchute called Europa, The Last Battle.
That's a very good 10-hour documentary.
I'm frankly about three hours into it and I just keep watching early parts of it over and over to make sure I ingest what's really there because it's so shocking to me because it's an entirely different historical context than what you're taught in the corrupt academic institutions.
And as for the issue of morals, well listen, if there's no standard, for a creator or a designer or an idea then you've got nothing left but the government if that's who you're going to place as the god who created you who controls you and owns you if you think that you're a cosmic accident Sitting on third rock from the sun, floating through outer space endlessly as just another animal who evolved from the primordial ooze, then you've got a problem.
You might want to take a closer inspection of and start asking questions like, did the one who designed the eye, can he see?
Did the one who designed the ear, can he hear?
And I'll tell you, the answer is yes.
There is a God out there.
He did design us.
He did put us here for a reason.
I think, therefore I am.
I doubt, therefore I think.
I know that I exist.
There is something rather than nothing.
Why am I here?
And I think that those are the important questions that people need to inspect.
And once they do that, then they're able to take an inventory of their personality flaws, lay them out where they need to be laid out, and change their mind.
From a mindset like that, you can approach God and you can ask for help, even so far as doing what the lady that started the Underground Railroad did.
She said, Lord, If this man's not going to repent, if this slave owner is not going to repent, then just kill him.
Two days later he was dead.
Not a single law was broken.
Now this lady managed to smuggle hundreds of people out on the Underground Railroad, not one of them being caught.
She had divine protection and divine guidance.
That is a fact about American history that's out there.
We've run into all sorts of situations where American people have done the right thing, chosen to be righteous, and prevailed with the help and the assistance of an all-powerful God.
I think that's where we need to go.
That's how we need to be thinking.
If the cellular structure of America begins to change their mind and go this direction, we can have a great awakening, we can have a great revival, and we can get done what needs to be done.
Because I guarantee you, With God fighting on your side, there's nobody that can be against you.
And all these evil people can be taken out like this.
Their plans can be frustrated.
They'll turn on each other.
There's all sorts of things that can take place that you haven't even dreamed of because you haven't gotten down on your knees, cleaned up your act, and asked God for some assistance.
As a soul agnostic with three Christians, I would sure like to think you got it right, Brian.
I sure would like that.
Meanwhile, we have our final story.
We have a breakthrough with regard to the assassination of JFK.
We all know the official story of three shots fired by a lone gunman from the sixth floor of the Book Depository building.
However, during the NBC News Live coverage, two shots were reported.
One, a small clean puncture wound to the throat.
The other, an entry wound in the right temple that blew his brains out the back of his head.
If you put them together with the three shots that We're reported by the FBI and the Secret Service the evening of the assassination, namely a shot to the back, about five and a half inches below the collar, just to the right of the spinal column, a shot to the back of John Connolly, and then a shot to the back of JFK, killing him.
You had four shots, four hits on JFK.
Meanwhile, the new book, The Final Analysis, The Assassination of John F. Kennedy, Forensic Analysis of the JFK Autopsy X-Rays, and more by David Mantic and Jerome Corsi.
Here's a jacket he was wearing showing the hole five and a half inches below the collar.
The jacket was slightly below substantiated.
It was from above and behind.
Here we have a photograph where in the background you see a figure believed to be Lee Oswald.
But also, let me point out, if you look right here, there's a small white spiral nebula with a dark hole in the center where a bullet entered the windshield and hit JFK in the throat.
Here's Charles Kinshaw drawing these diagrams before and after the tracheostomy incision, which are consistent with Dr. Malcolm Burry's description of it as a wound of entry.
Here's Malcolm Kilduff announcing the death of the President pointing to his right temple as a simple matter of a bullet right through the head.
David Panik has discovered not only were those shots to the back and to the throat, but there was a hit to the back of the head near the external occipital protuberance causing him to slump forward, the hit to the right temple, the forehead, from the triple underpass, and the vent simultaneous with a hit just above the right ear with a frangible bullet from the curbside sewer opening.
Their combined force blew out the harbor fragment and debris galore!
David had done earlier work discovering that the autopsy x-rays had been altered.
He used a technique from physics called optical densitometry to define this area P for patch, which is far too dense to be human bone.
And if you compare his area P with what I discovered in frame 374, you can see the blowout at the back of the head, though hair partially overlaps.
This is a skull flap blown open by that Near simultaneous shot to the side of the head.
So we have a resolution of differences between those who believe the frontal headshot was fired from the above-ground sewer opening at the intersection of the triple underpass and the vacant fence, and that it was fired from the curbside sewer opening.
Both are true.
Here are a couple of shots of the other locations.
...of the other location from which the Wright Temple shot was fired.
There you see the above-ground sewer opening.
Here's a view from inside the curbside from Larry Rivera using a technique known as blender.
Here's what you would see if the limousine were opposite the opening.
And would you believe?
Newsweek back on 22 November 1963.
Move the location where the fatal shot occurred, about 30 feet further down on Elm Street, which coincides with being opposite the sewer opening, which ain't concealed by misreporting its location.
Brilliant stuff.
Scott, your thoughts?
Yeah, I think as we move forward, we're going to have to keep our heads about us as the rest of the country splits between the sheep and the goats.
And I think this is a time for testing.
This is a time for developing the patience of Job, as well as the character resolve of Job, in order to withstand the fiery darts that the Democrats and their devilish masters are going to try and hurl at us.
Jim?
And of course, many are worried that Trump may receive the same treatment as JFK.
Brian?
JFK.
Well, we've never seen justice, have we?
Does that mean that there is no justice?
Does that mean it doesn't happen?
I will guarantee you that there will be justice.
But we're not going to always see it in our life.
Vengeance is mine, saith the Lord.
Sometimes we just have to live by faith and understand our position and our place.
Remember, evil people get a lot out of this world.
They succeed.
They make a lot of money.
Where do they end up?
Think of the story of the rich man and Lazarus.
Justice will be served, but it will be served on God's terms in God's time.
It is not up to us to administer justice.
We're not even told to judge.
We're not even told to judge the intentions or the thoughts of the hearts of the attitudes of men.
We're told to live right, day by day, pray properly, and take the right path.
And if persecution happens or bad things happen to us, so be it.
We can't avoid everything.
We can't control everything.
But I guarantee you that justice will be served on JFK and every other atrocity, and frankly, every other sin that's been committed by mankind, Go read Revelation Chapter 21 and 22.
Devoutly to be wished.
Don, take us out.
Oh boy.
I'll just say, Brian, that people out there should prove you wrong, and if they can't prove you wrong, they should follow what you're saying, because I think it's very close to being what we need in this world to save this world.
You're very strong, and Scott, you're right on today, and Jim, What kind of heavy stories are we putting out here?
Those that are making us uniquely distinguished between the news.
Believe me, I'm getting great comments now that we have our act together.
So I compliment you, sweet gentlemen.
And I thank you so much for watching today on March the 18th, right before Equinox.
Hopefully things will be equal and going forward from here.
So thanks a lot for watching, folks.
Thank you.
Please share.
God bless.
▲
Export Selection