All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 27, 2024 - Jim Fetzer
01:20:10
My simulation as US Secretary of Education: 80 minute interview by The Matrixist
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is the Matricist Warrior Chronicles where we search for the one.
Today we have Carl B. Herman of Blogspot and Bitchute's Need to Know News.
Carl, let's play make-believe.
With the hope the following fantasy scenario magically comes to pass, or think of this as a simulation, a dress rehearsal for an eventual future we can make.
Here's the situation.
There's a new president of the United States and starting immediately they've appointed you Secretary of Education and you must serve or else You've been given carte blanche to do whatever you want during your term.
Only get one term and have an unlimited budget and staff to do as you please with all law enforcement prosecutorial power required to make your good will happen.
What would you do in the first seven minutes, seven hours, days, weeks to bring a wrecking ball to the status quo and remake it so it perfectly reflects what we, the people, truly want as best you understand it.
Be emotional as you want, using curse words you deem respectable or appropriate as you like, and assume you somehow know that when your term ends, that's the end of your life.
So this is your last chance to do some good to write Starship Earth so humanity finally fulfills its potentials.
So, please, now, make your ultimate definitive statement, telling us what you'd do, the order you'd do it, precisely why, showing and citing the best evidence you could gather so far, with a limit of 3 hours and 33 minutes segments.
Now, make this powerful because the whole world eventually will hear it.
Your turn, your thoughts, with absolutely no interruptions of any kind.
Go.
As a recently retired public school teacher of 38 years, National Board Certified Credential in Social Studies and Mathematics, I have thought about this question and I do have a response to that question for public consideration and I have, screen share here, considered applying.
And volunteering to take over the Department of Education.
Alrighty, so these are the bullet points, and I'll go through these as you can see my screen.
First is to destroy the typical Fed control to offer money if and only if states and counties follow local Fed guidelines, and I'll talk to you about that for a moment.
The amount of money is about 10% of the budgets, but the Fed will stipulate control over policy with a major recent example being the so-called COVID funding.
So that would be the initial first thing for the Department of Education is to get rid of that control.
Now, if I'm going to be the Secretary of Education, that is going to be that we've won for the disclosure of the truth and the disclosure for public education would be it's been bullshit to train, stupefied, work, Animals.
I've written about a thousand public essays since 2009 to about 50 million plus page views.
I've been in over 300 podcasts, videos, television, radio interviews, and I wrote a 12 part series as a USC Berkeley and Harvard educated teacher.
U.S.
public education bullshit to train stupefied work animals.
And this is an academic definition of the term bullshit.
Harry Frankfort, the most eminent living philosopher in the U.S., professor emeritus from Princeton, had an academic definition of bullshit that you can read what he says here.
I'm going to give you my analysis, which is to herd sheeple.
And it is prevalent In politics and for this documentary series on US publication US public education as I'm making my case that I should have something to say.
All we need to do is go through the textbooks and we can find the examples.
I'm going to tell you just one of examples, but I have I took a top 10 of this US history.
And this is just one of the examples I'm going to show you.
I do recommend going back to this article series and taking a look at this two-minute video, U.S.
Imperialism 1800-1900.
You would be amazed at all the wars that were engaged in under our flag and with our taxes that you didn't know ever existed.
On each of these sections, because I'm an educator, I ask some questions for you to ponder.
I'll read this one for you just to give you an example, and there are just three.
What does it mean that claimed expert historians present such lies of the comprehensive facts?
It's gotta mean something.
It's not a mistake.
That means it's not a mistake.
They did it intentionally.
They're lying and they know they're lying.
Because, second question, because these lies are in such Orwellian contradiction to any reasonable factual account, do these examples document our children are learning bullshit history?
It's kind of a rhetorical question.
And third, because history is our best tool to understand the present, is the purpose of bullshit history?
To stupefy our children to similar acts of ongoing empire?
I think I nailed it there.
Otherwise, I wouldn't have framed the question that way.
And I have a whole documentary series of these top 10, but I'm going to just show you one here.
And I contrast what the textbook says.
So this is Prentice Hall's 2008 United States History, Modern America.
And this goes to, in California, high school juniors.
So these are going to be 16, 17 years old.
And take a look at the passive language here.
I'm just going to read this one.
This is just one example, but it's important.
Let me talk to you for a moment.
If I'm saying that this is bullshit, I need to show you one example.
I got a bunch, but I need to show you one.
So let me show you this one.
Alright, so conflict erupts with Mexico?
Not like somebody did something, it just randomly erupted like a volcano?
Westward expansion?
Who the fuck is expanding?
It brought brought the United States into conflict.
So the expansion brought into no human.
So it's just bullshit language.
And in this case, I'm taking a look at the War of 1848 where the United States stole half of Mexico and the textbook, you know, says that it was a boundary border dispute is border dispute.
Border dispute.
But actually, they have this settled by treaty.
It's one of the most important questions to answer for a country.
And I'm showing you this one example.
It's the Adams-Onís Treaty.
And this is signed in 1819 and then formally transferred to Mexico in 1832.
My dog is winning out.
So I'm going to have to pause for two seconds.
Go ahead.
And you can see the borderline here.
And under Article 6 of the United States Constitution, if a president signs off and the U.S.
Senate has two-thirds of the vote, that is U.S.
Supreme Law.
I'm not telling you if it's right or wrong.
I'm telling you, those are the rules.
Here's another map representation, all of the brown area.
And the language of the treaty is crystal clear in letter and intent.
In a good legal treaty, this is what it would look like more from Mexico's point of view.
You have it in the positive and you state it in the negative.
From the positive, it said, OK, all this orange stuff here, everything to the north and the east of this borderline is forever the United States and never Mexico.
Everything to the south and to the west is forever Mexico and never the United... So that was the supreme law.
Here's another view of what it looked like.
And so for President Polk to claim to, first of all, take Texas as a state, for the U.S.
to take Texas as a state, was a violation of the treaty.
And then for President Polk to claim that here, way down in the southern part of Texas, 400 miles inside the promised forever border, to claim that American blood was shed on Americans.
It's all bullshit.
The details are in there.
It makes a great story.
All right, so I need to give you a few more examples that government, as promised design structure, blinded destruction of all constitutional rights.
You will be amazed.
This is a colleague of mine who is an attorney who laid out the rights that are destroyed.
The First Amendment, the Fourth Amendment, you know about the Second Amendment, the Fifth Amendment.
It just goes on and on.
And again, this is my top 10 for examples that you already know of history of treaty violating lie started wars of aggression.
It's pretty much all of them.
If you wanted to know our government is false, and you want to just know war law, I have published research via the Claremont Colleges.
This one article is kind of the best academic voice that I have.
And then this is a 40 page white paper that Congressman Dennis Kucinich leveraged with his attempt to impeach.
W. Bush and Cheney for the lie-started Orwellian Illegal War, formerly known as On Terror, and I'm making the case that you've been bullshitted about public education and we need to be clear that the education... I'll be able to talk to you for another moment here.
We need to be clear that the education most essential has to be measured in lives, quality and quantity of life, and money.
The fucking parasites, the puppetitions, the public serpents.
They engage in ongoing, constant, lie-started, illegal wars of aggression.
We can quantify that the US has killed More than 30 million and over 200 armed conflicts just since World War II.
The rest of the world isn't fooled.
They view the U.S.
as the most dangerous nation in the world.
U.S.A.
U.S.A.
It's a rogue state empire.
And we need to be clear about that in the documentation to our students while paradoxically and get used to paradoxes at the same time.
The breakthrough of the United States on paper.
Through the ideals of the Enlightenment and the scientific revolution of limited government.
Under a constitution.
Defending inalienable rights.
That's sweet.
That's worth fighting for.
I can't like, you know, talk about the devolution of the United States without also being clear that the breakthrough of the promise and where we can stand on the documents to be able to demonstrate that we've been totally hosed.
All right, and as well as the empire, we got to know that corporate media, the people who print the textbooks for our students, the lies start in corporate media, and that's concentrated in just a few corporations, like five of them.
And this is again, it's my published research from Claremont Colleges.
Another area to be able to demonstrate that we've been totally lied to and centered in education.
This is my essay to about a hundred teacher colleagues for Red Pill Scholarship to explain, document, improve, evil, totalitarian, global, scandemic.
And if I make it the case for a second, I need to tell my story.
So, national board certified teacher recognized by two Los Angeles mayors as among the top few best teachers in the city of Los Angeles.
Degrees from Berkeley and Harvard.
Credential to Mathematics and Social Studies.
In 2020, I challenged Hayward Unified School District's so-called health, so-called orders.
And I wrote a documentary series about that.
59 episodes.
And basically, I demonstrated that the so-called health, so-called orders were not based in law.
They were making it up.
They were imposing dictatorship.
For two years, I documented that.
And I worked closely with the pro bono attorneys working with RFK2's Children's Health Defense.
And although those attorneys said, ooh, Carl, we love the evidence.
We would love to work with you.
We would love to get you on the witness stand in terms of the triage response to help the greatest number of students.
They took lawsuits and won.
In Los, including, these are just the ones I can remember, Los Angeles Unified, San Diego Unified, and Piedmont Unified, which is close to Hayward Unified School District.
Eventually, when I wrote that essay, and I began to inform students on how to file official complaints, and the documentation of their responses to my complaints and grievances are tragic, comic, and totally documented.
And when they ran out of of ways to stop me from just pointing to the data and inviting colleagues and students to do what I was doing is withdrawing consent unless they can demonstrate the legality of the orders.
That's when the district Matt Wayne, superintendent, who got a promotion to San Francisco Unified.
Good job, Matt.
I hope you like there.
Put me on paid administrative leave in order to investigate how and why I was asking questions not to answer them.
So, uh, I did see a lot.
And part of the bad news is that every agency apparently has been controlled.
Let me go back on to the briefing and just to point out that the amount of a breakthrough that we're going to need for me to be in such a position in order to do this.
Another thing important to understand is the number of deaths that we can quantify in the system that we have that we need to educate about and then to exit from has tremendous soul crushing quantities of deaths of mostly children from preventable poverty.
The number of human beings is about 400 million since just the Clintons were in office and that quantity is greater than all of the deaths from all the wars in all of human history.
You know, I'm making the case as the Sec Ed and we got to be able to understand that economics has been only limited and flawed models while ignoring criminal looting fraud called debt as money and good.
And ignoring game-changing reforms.
This is published research via the Claremont Colleges.
The good news is that we have all the solutions ready to go.
And just as another example to demonstrate, because where we're leaning to is the Star Trek-like future.
So let me give you one case of good news.
Being right on the money.
So almost 300 years ago, Benjamin Franklin wrote a pamphlet because he was so excited.
Colonial Pennsylvania didn't need to charge taxes if they were the bank.
It's called public banking.
Over half of the states now have passed that legislation.
But getting past the too big to fail banksters for that to become policy is a whole different ballgame.
But we can demonstrate And I'll just show you the paper.
I've talked to you enough with this.
And if you're interested in reforms that are literally worth, on average, for the average U.S.
household, $1 million per household, then read this.
Otherwise, you can kiss your assets goodbye if we don't accomplish that.
Back to Sec Ed.
Hey, you know the mathematics so-called real-world problems that you read as a kid and maybe read as a parent that they're bullshit?
Yes, they are.
They're condescending and assaulting to working adults.
They pretend to count things that real adults don't care about.
And I'm really proud of this academic work in this series.
It's a small book to be able to demonstrate that public education is bullshit.
And in there, of course, are examples of the word problems that they call as real.
It's Orwellian.
If you want to be able to know that I'm up to date on what's going on in the world, we have a twice, usually three times a week news show.
For the last three years, and the documentation on these articles alone are enough to do what I recommend that you do, withdraw consent, demand legal arrest, if you want to know what I really think, this would be the briefing that I would give to kids and adults.
You know, if we talk about education being kind of like a briefing, and I do, Oh, I gotta give you another example.
So for my credentials as Sec Ed about teaching mathematics.
But that last essay, if education is about getting people up to speed with what they need to know to be successful and happy, we're in AMREV 2 and World War 3.
And it's good versus evil.
And as I begin to wrap up this pitch, Because I do believe in saying what needs to be said and then returning the time back to the student.
And we're all students about what's most important in life.
And I'm just a relative expert here in the topic of education.
But let me go back and tell you a story.
And I do tell the story in the... Let me go back and show you this one more time to emphasize because there's one thing if you want to check out for what I found useful in my 47 years of full attention.
What's most important?
It's a presentation to Professor Emeritus Jim Fetzer's False Flags and Conspiracies Conference 2023.
And this is this is pretty much all the documentation that I find useful to share.
But back to the last story.
So in teaching mathematics at Hayward Unified School District, my students had the environment.
Hayward High School.
Hayward Unified School District.
Each, and I checked with this data, each and every other Algebra 1 class is failing on average 50% of the students except mine.
That average is about 5%.
We can quantify how much better that is.
And I say that with a little edge to my voice because I inquired.
And I gotta say this too.
Okay, so as Sec Ed, anybody of course who would stand up for the truth We get his ass fired.
And I did.
Four times.
Hayward Unified, I was only there the last seven years of my career before they put me on the paid administrative leave and then my wife talked me into a year early retirement.
Uh, but I the Hayward attempted to fire me five times.
So that happens if you stand for the truth, the agent Smith's will find you.
But anyway, back to teaching mathematics as credentials for this position for a sec of Ed.
So 50% failure rate except in my classes and I pitch to the leadership of the school, the department, the district.
Hey, You know, this is an ongoing emergency.
Half the students failing a required class to graduate.
You can't imagine what that does for their morale.
And here are my talking points.
If you want to leverage me, I'd happy to help and to have a conversation for possibility.
They ignored all the invitations.
Of course, the principal got the farthest by saying, all right, Herman, tell me your talking points.
So one, Is that we take this seriously because I frame it.
You need a high class work permit to work in the empire.
And that that was something that for the students, I think, had a listening for them in order to go through the hell.
Algebra and the second part is that algebra is actually easy It's a symbolic language as easy as reading or music and all you do is you follow operations add subtract multiply and divide so you know what is being asked to do in this little puzzle you can do it and the third talking point is that yes as I Demonstrated you're all being lied to with what's important the real-world problems or bullshit.
They make them up and And in the chapters the students part of their tests would be they would have I would pick out one of these So-called real-world problems and the students wouldn't need to solve it, but they would need to articulate three reasons Why or why not?
It was a real-world problem And of course, upon inspection, that bullshit is as easy to see through as the lie-starter-illegal-wars-of-aggression-all-in-all, the official lies that were told.
And I think that the students, by the end of the year, they write their opinions and a lot of them say that they're just training us to believe lies or to tune out when they tell us lies.
Sharp kids.
Sharp kids.
Alright, and finally, I do want to say that there is the possibility for a Star Trek-like future.
And wanttoknow.info, that's my friend and colleague Fred Burks, former State Department Translator, working with the heads of state.
And we have new energy, for example, or free energy.
And there are all kinds of demonstrations in order to show that we do have the possibility for a Star Trek-like future.
And let me go back.
Here, that was just my second bullet point.
I was about ready to wrap this up.
All right, so this is just the Department of Education for the federal level, and the feds just unleash it back to the states.
The states run it, but get the feds out of it.
And what the feds... Here, I'll talk to you again about this.
Maybe I am.
No, I wasn't screen sharing there.
I was just going back to my screen and talking to you.
Let the feds be removed.
The states will take over.
They're going to experiment.
They're going to have a problem, because if I'm the Sec Ed, we've had this breakthrough for truth and stuff like that is going to be wanted.
And the whole idea is, all right, do we even keep the system at all, given it was designed for these work animals?
Well, okay.
That's what we have.
What do you want to do about it, bitches?
I wouldn't say bitches to the state secretaries of education, but maybe I would if I got to be closer to them.
I don't know.
Probably wouldn't.
They probably wouldn't be professional.
But that's really going to be it.
It's going to be up to their experimentation, and I wish them well with that.
What the federal government could do is could be a portal for other states and anybody to see what other states are doing as ideas and inspiration.
And the main thing that we could do at the federal level for education is rip open the Smithsonian And whatever we can get for the actual truth of our history, so we can actually know what happened.
And man, I mean, I know some of the lies, but I don't think I know very much to tell you the truth.
And the access to the truth is going to be important.
Let me take a look at whatever the other talking points are, but this time I'm going to share them with you so you can see with me.
All right.
So the possibility for a Star Trek future suppressed science and technology like free energy.
And this is just what we can see right now.
I think that actually that this is going to have a literal E.T.
component to it.
And this will be my closing point.
The late, great Jim Mars, M-A-R-R-S, and If you read the presentation or take a look at the presentation, because it's also a big video of my 57-minute presentation to the False Flags Conference, is that the ET component is vital, and the like-rate author, best-selling author, both For the JFK assassination and for UFOs.
Jim Mars, he wrote several bestsellers on this topic and said, if you don't know the ET component, you're just not going to have a good grasp of the history.
And I agree.
And as a professional scholar, I have professionally addressed how far back in history the lies and crimes go and what seems to be a cogent explanation for human origins.
Now, What we find out with a breakthrough is going to be game-changing for human beings.
And again, going back to the fundamental question of education kind of being the adults and the parents considering, okay, what do we want to brief these kids on?
We get the breakthrough angle of the ETs.
And even better, I think and conclude And have it be my working conclusion that there is a federation of planets, a Star Trek-like federation, who are upholding the Prime Directive because, as we observe, the human sheeple were outmatched by the propaganda.
And even today, as I have said for decades, it seems like in my personal experience of 47 years engagement on these most important issues, beginning with working to end poverty that led to two UN summits for heads of state with results.org,
My conclusion is about 2% of human beings are able to hear and engage seriously on these important factual conditions that would have people conclude, like if you really understood that the wars were lie-started and illegal, your thought processes would include like, whoa, they're war criminals.
They shouldn't be president and prime minister.
They're war, that's right.
That's right.
There were criminals.
That's a big jump for people.
So only about 1 in 50 can actually make that leap at this time.
So we are going to need some sort of a breakthrough.
But once we get that breakthrough, the people paying attention to this type of video right now, you're going to be in leadership positions.
So, the Star Trek-like future, the Q information of the best is yet to come, and I am at about 95% certainty that the information on Q is going to be fractally connected to all of this, and that's part of the argument that I lay out in my articles, if you're interested in going down that rabbit hole.
All right, Matricest, that is my full... let me check.
There wasn't an additional talking point.
I want to make sure before I wrap this up.
Okay, so yeah, as the Secretary of Education, the biggest picture is that human beings have been poisoned, tortured, and mind-controlled.
And just to kind of, as gracefully as possible, move them into this amazing future.
And I do want to say this, in Paradox, I don't have to do much.
All I need to do is point out you've been lied to, you're free now, There are a lot of resources and and the economic pressures that had been put on people were literally the 1% in the system that we have right now.
They have more assets than the 99%.
While they're still arguing that we're going to own nothing and be happy and eat bugs and live in 15 minute cities while we get injected with medical experiments based on whatever pandemic that they false flag and create and then lie about.
So we need that breakthrough to end that system.
And then once we get the truth, we're going to have an explosion of creativity.
And the world that we have today is going to be soon unrecognizable to the beauty, the unique and powerful beauty in our near future.
All right, Matrixist, that is my response to your question.
Are you sure you've gone over all the talking points?
Yeah, yeah, let me I'll give you one more so the documentation that I provided and I have been speaking rather quick because anybody who's listening to this right now you got to be curious enough and you're talking to Secretary of Education and then what we do is exactly what I have done I'm gonna make factual claims and what I've done is I've made factual claims and then I provided the documentation I am personally and professionally confident or is absolutely objective and independently verifiably
True.
Questions?
You recognize that many or most are damaged to the point that they may never read a thing that you post on the web.
If we take that position and they'll only listen to you, are you open to reading all your content into your articles or get someone else to do it?
Will you make that so?
Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.
If anybody else, including you, wanted to do it, of course.
I mean, individuals should take on the projects that they feel.
At this point, I think in all of the articles, I have enough videos.
And if they just want to hear me talk, again, the one presentation that I have is the 57-minute presentation where I walk through the data.
And See, you only need to establish the credibility of an expert witness for you once, if you want, and I did that once through the example of the map with Mexico.
So there's enough visuals, if people are interested, that I'm not going to lose very many of them.
I think I have enough visuals and video evidence to supplement everything.
But yeah, whatever in addition to that that people want to do by reading it, sure.
Do you have an intention to read all of your Blogspot essays into a link through the Blogspot essays or to set up a Substack or other site where all of your material is read by you?
Nothing better than you reading it.
I do not.
I have a thousand articles, and what I do find helpful to talk about, and I have to interest myself, and really, I have not written much in the last, like, three or four years, and I do have, um, wow.
What if you found with a larger audience, perhaps people responding to an online essay, or rather a questionnaire that you post, Uh, what number of individuals?
A hundred?
A thousand?
Twenty?
If they were to say, we want to hear you read your blog spots rather than listen to you do the need-to-know news.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, this is a hypothetical, and hypotheticals I don't do very well.
At this point, the answer would be no, but you know, as data emerge, you always reconsider.
You use a lot of abbreviations, and again, assuming no one ever reads a word that you've written.
Can you clarify, what is AMREV?
2.0, what is Sec Ed?
Oh, AMREF 2.0, American Revolution 2.0, and then Sec Ed is the Secretary of Education.
And someone has never been exposed to Star Trek, doesn't have a clue at all what it's referring to.
Clarify that in the fewest words possible.
Oh yeah, yeah.
Star Trekian future, what does that mean?
We're not alone, is that there are other species, humanoid and otherwise looking, and The Star Trek Federation is a federation of species who are interplanetary, who are cooperating together for exploration.
And my working hypothesis is that, um, this is a good question because this goes into part of the history and this goes back into the Sec Ed credentials.
So as a professional historian, which I am, one of the major questions is how far back does this evil go?
And I'm going back to about 500,000 years where the asteroid belt used to be a planet got blown up evidence for which is all on the southern half of Mars just being smattered and then survivors and there weren't many those long-headed guys whose skeletal remains are still in Peru and in Egypt but there's evidence all over the world these big brainers
GM owed human beings and in the Old Testament of the Bible This is the Elohim to create out of their image but with the design intention to not know the difference between good and evil because human beings were meant to be a slave race and there was a problem in the Masters gardens and has been kind of chaos ever since So I think this history does go back a long long way
And that we were dominated by, in essence, an invading, relatively hyper-intelligent species that broke the Prime Directive to not interfere.
In a species development and the situation that I affirm with my own eyes and experience and lifetime is that human beings and this goes back to the only 2% can engage in these conversations for important truth is that these human beings have been so dominated, tortured, poisoned and mind controlled.
They are no longer able to have an authentic life.
And that the prime directive is therefore violated.
And therefore, There has been adjudication, and we have friends in high places who have intervened, and most likely the people paying attention to this before the breakthrough, before the victory of AMREV 2, are on a type of Starseed Federation mission where an aspect of our existence incarnated at this time in order to assist only with choice.
We're not here to win.
Our numbers are too few, but we're going to point and we're going to be able to make cases so that when some breakthrough happens, and I say breakthrough as a scholar, as a technician, as an academic, in order to have some sort of unimaginable and unpredictable action.
So it's not going to be trying another court case or doing another event or another documentary or it's going to be something outside of our control.
But when that happens, the people who are paying attention to this now, who are being ignored, will then be there for those 49 out of 50 to guide them through into this future without freaking out too much.
Because they've already heard.
They've already heard.
But our choice right now isn't to win.
It's merely to point out that people have a choice.
And there are three general categories.
The good, that's us.
We know the difference between good and evil when we've chosen good and we want that cooperative competition that people thrive under.
And then there are the bad.
And the bad, they have chosen evil and lies and manipulation and they want to be the chosen people lording over work animals.
Okay?
Far from us to tell people what they want to do.
I would admonish people on the law of karma and of What I can tell for reincarnation, but that's up to them.
And then the third group are the sheeple who can't tell the difference, and that's OK.
If it's too much for them, I mean, after 47 years of this Matrixist, I've gotten used to people thinking that I'm crazy, a conspiracy theorist.
Unhinged, unable to discern reality.
I've gotten used to this and all I can do is say, all right, If you want to talk the factual content of what I've just alleged, I can.
But, you know, if you want to tell a story about me, OK, you can.
But good luck.
And that's that's it.
And I'll pause there to open the door for my dog again.
But I think that's all that I need to say.
Are you open to follow up interviews?
Of course.
Are you open to adversarial Follow-up interviews in which I interrupt often with questions like, on what evidence?
How does that constitute evidence?
Is that not an opinion?
Oh, brother!
Bring it!
Bring it!
I'll tell another quick story.
So those of us who are working for the light, the right, especially us scholars, but I imagine anybody who's done the research, is that we would love to debate the experts.
Oh, bring it!
And one of the papers that I wrote on The money is MIT economist Simon Johnson, who is the former chief economist of the IMF, and he was interviewed by – I forget the guy's name.
He was LBJ's press secretary.
He had like 30-plus Emmys, and he said that the thing is is that we can't get any of our opponents to debate, and they won't debate because they can't debate.
All the facts are on our side, not on our opponents' side.
So yeah, adversarial, anything in good faith effort in order to contribute to the public, the facts, and again, back to this application for the Sec Ed, is that what my vision of education and how I would present it to students is that we have an allegorical table of facts in front of us.
Anybody can contribute claimed facts that are relevant to the situation.
And then people take a look around the table from different points of view and point because people can see another side to the fact that you can't from the other side of the table.
Any effort and good faith effort for the public embrace of the data is great.
And then people can have any opinion that they want about the state of the facts on the table, whatever you want to say, say it.
And then there's going to be a policy choice, which is what we're going to do about it, which includes nothing.
So yeah, any type of good faith conversation to sort that out so that people can see things for themselves and have something to say about it.
All that's good.
You said you've done some 300 podcasts.
This would be the latest.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
I mean, yeah.
The 300, what percentage were others approaching you like us?
Oh, it was just you doing?
Probably 50, 50 where I've been invited to speak on shows and television and radio and podcasts.
Of those 50, what percentage were adversarial?
Challenging.
Just a couple of them, I think.
That was only semi-adversarial.
So the closest you ever came online to this sort of thing has been very few, and it's been only online?
Anyone challenge you offline in the public?
Oh, nothing authentic.
Nothing authentic, but I'll tell you another story.
So with Economics published research, That this exponential debt curve of $35 trillion is unsustainable and it's looting and it's Orwellian.
Since 2009, I've worked with about 2000 advanced placement macroeconomics teachers on the college board's discussion board.
And I've presented this research and challenged my colleagues.
And in all that time, nobody has been able to refute the factual claims.
And they get adversarial.
But then, Matricist, it is tragic, comically, childish, cartoonish, so-called arguments that, as a professional, I can easily demonstrate that the components of their argument are denial, an ad hominem, an unexamined belief in leaders that they quote without understanding the content.
So it's easy to refute any of the so-called adversary, but, you know, they try and there's nothing that they can really do because propaganda is all that they've got.
And that's how come Simon Johnson is saying that we can't get anybody to debate us because all they have is just paper-thin propaganda.
Do you believe the deepest truths can be found in Smithsonian or Library of Congress or Vatican or deep underground military bases or off-world, ether connection through channeling or some such esoteric things?
Where's the deepest, deepest rabbit hole in your view?
All of that, and my real view is that I don't know.
We need to be able to win, and we need to be able to have access to wherever the truth is stored, and I really don't know that.
I just imagine it, and we'll see.
We'll see.
If the Federation part of this is true, then we'll have a vantage point to a deeper history and the location of data, and we might get a lot of help.
We'll see.
We'll see, but we got to win first.
You spoke of a prime directive.
Do you believe but cannot prove there is a United Federation of Planets?
I can't.
I can't prove it.
I can't prove it.
But I have had enough.
You can only characterize them as spiritual type experiences that are just really weird.
And if that should happen to any member paying attention to this conversation, it would have you stop and think and ponder and consider that that.
There is a broader aspect of justice and that a violation of the prime directive and a federation helping us out and the idea that we might be a forward team of skirmishers preparing and setting up an energetic network grid would begin to make sense.
But I don't have anything that would construct as proof.
And at the same time, I don't think it's important to prove anything for it.
This is just my opinion and speculation.
Well, I ask because this Secretary of Education position that you currently hold, I would argue, metaphorically, symbolically speaking, if not an actual fact yet, how would a Department of Education manifest in a Star Trekian future?
Or would it not exist at all?
Well, it would be experimental and I'm just giving my ideas of if I was in charge, what I would recommend to move forward.
The secretary of education serves underneath the chief executive, the president, and it would be my recommendation to remove all federal controls that are currently in place.
I don't think that there's going to be a counter argument to continue to.
Attempt to control the states and the counties and the local school districts and then just to acknowledge the bullshit lies I don't think there's gonna be any any opposition to that and then to be able to point to the future I think that's gonna be good and if we think that What we have is really the Orwellian opposite of where we should be the Department of Education should
Be a portal also to research of what is going on in the world.
And if it's a federation of planet and an open access to all of that technology and all of our neighbors, then the Department of Education could just be, hey, kids.
You have no idea the world around you.
But this is what we're learning.
And then just open it up to them, and then the kids would be able to see, wow, so there are different species.
Wow, I want to learn about some of them.
I would actually like to meet some of them.
And then start up ambassador programs.
And then part of public education would be okay kids.
We have a lot of neighbors.
Um, if you would like to be in a program to introduce yourself to these neighbors, so there would be cooperations with anything that is emerging.
And, you know, if we have free energy devices, then part of what.
would emerge naturally is a way okay so how can we get our kids to see this and to try stuff out and that is going to be it's just going to be synergetic and unpredictable once we get into an aspect of synergy then it's going to take in a direction that we don't even have to pretend to imagine just unleash things and then it'll have a life of its own um the state controlled education departments
if you were to remove the federal restrictions wouldn't the state also end up becoming another bureaucratic incompetent partly diabolical obstacle to an unstructured learning environment which you seem to be advocating Yeah, yeah, yeah.
So this is a point that we have to go after.
None of this is possible until the truth is told and the leaders are arrested.
That includes the state department leaders in education, just among all of them.
All the people who are running departments are Orwellian at the state level, probably a percentage, but a percentage of them are going to be at the county level.
A percentage of them are going to be in local levels, like in local school boards.
For example, all the ones who voted for those so-called COVID, so-called health, so-called orders.
So.
We really need some sort of a cleaning out and arrest and full truth.
And without that, nothing is going to be possible.
So if you talk about the Sec Ed for the federal level, we may as well have that be similar to the state level.
Where, for example, at the state level, the governor, let's take the state of California because it does me good to talk about it.
So if Gavin Newsom was acknowledged, To be a communist who rigged the recall election so that he got literally where we were shown that Newsom got 666 of the recall vote, 66.6% of the, so they rigged the election.
So if Newsom was arrested and removed from power and a new governor was put into place and it would be the same mirror conversation at the state level, the state would have to remove their funding control.
And then be a similar fractal version to to the extent the districts want to need to work with counties or to have a union of school districts or however they want to go ahead and move forward.
Because yes, you are right.
And that is a great question.
And I'm glad that you brought it up is that the control system at the state level would have to be recognized and removed from power also.
The problem is being that all of this is based upon the goodwill and high degree of intelligence of school teachers and administrators, if that cannot be found or there's no way to neutralize it, isn't the only solution homeschooling and no other form of schooling.
And in other words, to make public an option, but a voluntary, no alleged juvenile delinquents, no declaration of crime of parents or students for failing to go to the public school.
Yeah, exactly.
And that already is burgeoning.
And I wrote an essay that is about a conversation similar to what we're having a hundred years ago and pointing out that the design of our wannabe masters would be a legal requirement that the state educate the kids.
And then now we have colleges where the state wants four more years in order to apply for the highest quality work permits in the empire.
You need to have that college education, which has become more and more propaganda.
So there's going to be all sorts of responses, and homeschooling would be totally legit.
The data demonstrate that if you want your kid to do better, then homeschool them.
So you would add support, so-called public schooling being purely voluntary.
Oh, yeah.
And would you further support that it only be paid by voluntary contributions rather than mandatory taxes, however extracted?
Well, right now the states states have systems and that's going to I'm the second of the federal government.
You're saying and I'm going to be dismantling everything that that serves no purpose other than control at the federal level.
And then hopefully that it would it would receive the approval of the president and the funding of Congress.
In order to have a portal of information so people can see what's going on at the states and some sort of an access information to what the Smithsonian has, and that would be available to any homeschooling kids and what we're getting from E.T.
species.
So I think that there's going to be some sort of a portal of information.
Now, if we want to call that a Department of Education, then we can, but.
That is way over the head of the practical application.
So let's say we win tomorrow.
All right.
So we still have these millions of kids enrolled into a public school.
And it's not my role to tell other people what to do.
The states are going to have to experiment and figure out and make transitions based upon their conversations.
And exactly as you said, matrices that they're going to have to chat about it among themselves, among those good faith Educators and teachers and parents about what they want to do moving forward.
And we're going to have a whole bunch of good faith experimentation, including with all the people who have already moved to homeschool.
What I'm saying is the state is just another alter ego.
The same problems on the federal level would be mirrored exactly on the state level.
So in order to have the unlimited power and control and prosecutorial activities,
Vested within you or someone like you that would require by default Dismantling the state levels so the individuals on the state local county levels must Be Acting within accord of the individual wish of the parents for their particular children, so they're never any mandatory Curricula that the individual parents don't want for their individual children
And this would be important for me to say, too, is that this 59 part series of challenging my school district's health orders is that when the school district refused to answer basic questions of their ordering authority and the superintendent said, hey, Herman, you think I got it wrong?
Why don't you ask the governor's office?
I responded back, OK, Superintendent Wayne, that's your job to explain the authority to me.
But if you don't want to do your job, I'll do it for you.
And over the next six weeks, I contacted the 14 leading governmental agencies in California that would be connected to that, including the governor's office and wrote a 35 page documented report.
And the bottom line was is that all 14 agencies refused to answer basic and required questions of their ordering authority.
So I want to communicate that.
I have experienced the extent that pretty much every agency is captured or had been captured.
By the baddies and that that is going to be a problem and that Is is probably going to be messy going forward because if.
If we have access to NSA data consistent with what Q is hinting at, then we would have the communications of, for example, if Superintendent Matt Wayne in consideration of what to do about me.
Pointing out to his apparent lack of authority for health orders and thereby illegally forcing children and adults to take experimental medical products with resultant risks, including death.
And if those communications showed foreknowledge, then these people are Criminals Against Humanity.
And that is going to be a lot more than we recognize.
So I'm just saying, I don't know, but to be prepared for Americans to find out that, huh, so our whole school board was captured and here's the evidence of their emails to each other talking about culling our children.
Huh?
That's going to be difficult and it might be messy so I'm just saying is that part of what we need to anticipate and I don't know and also in consideration of me as a leader is to know that it's going to get messy and to again to be comforting to people that okay we got to get to the truth and every agency was captured and it was unimaginable evil and I'm not even going to start talking about the adrenochrome so it's going to be shocking for people
And they're going to have to work their way through it and we who are listening to this now and considering these ideas now are going to be in position to do that.
So you would agree the state level corruption is as bad as the federal therefore the only way to bring a complete wrecking ball to the system would be to have 50 individual leaders on all the state levels cooperating with
It's going to take a life of its own, but basically you're pointing in the right direction and it's not going to be so much as czars, but exactly what you said at the beginning of unleashing them and letting the truth move forward and it's going to go through in synergy.
The criminals have to be removed.
And in law, as a retired AP U.S.
government teacher, the prima facie evidence is that these people who were in charge of the school districts have committed crimes.
And if that is where the evidence leads, then they need to be removed from power and then It's going to be a local conversation that is going to have a life of its own of how people are going to respond and that is going to be consistent with whatever the community invents.
So what I'm really for is is assisting people to see the facts and then empowering them for what they want to do.
Next and hopefully it'll be very inspirational because there will be breakthroughs like free energy to encourage people and even the promise of partnership and membership in an ET Federation and really technologies that will make life unrecognizably beautiful and having that best is yet to come.
In Star Trek, the rule is first contact is only initiated when the species is able to engage in interstellar travel.
To our knowledge, we cannot.
So that may be the only thing holding back a benevolent federation.
Oh, yeah, yeah.
I'm sure we can believe our government that they haven't developed that yet.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
But maybe they're lying about that.
Maybe we have.
And maybe events are moved forward a lot further than people imagine.
And that's part of what we're going to have to find out that we don't know upon victory.
But without this breakthrough and victory, again, we're speculating.
What I'm suggesting is that the problem can only be solved Possibly from the bottom up, rather than waiting for the ETs to wait for us to break some cosmic rule.
What is your best guess that must occur on our level that would encourage a benevolent ET Federation to finally make full disclosure first contact?
What do you think has to happen here?
What would the breakthrough look like, hypothetically?
Oh, I don't know.
I'm not in direct contact with anyone, but I can guess is that we need to be able to recognize that we have been a controlled species.
And I think that we're on the verge of this.
I think that there has to be a significant breakthrough where before the people who are shocked into remember my view, my conclusion, my working conclusion is 98% of the people are sheeple.
So they need to take this thing that They've been in an empire first, and they have to be able to embrace that.
Okay, lie started illegal wars of aggression, bankster looting, COVID crimes against humanity.
We were debt slaves.
Huh, okay.
So that needs to happen first, and then they're going to be curious, and they're going to ask the same questions that we ask, like, how long has this been going on?
And then they'll be ready.
Okay, it's been going on a long time and the genesis of the evil, we can talk about and then go into the history of it.
And then after going through the history of it, people will say, well, then that means that there are good people and bad ones and they're here now.
And you say, yes, yes, yes.
And we're going to introduce them to you.
So I'm sure that there's a natural progression, not to shock people, but given our experience working with ordinary people who have difficulty embracing these facts, we can understand, and I'm totally fine surrendering to a natural progression of events.
What I'm suggesting is that there may be no benevolent ET Federation out there waiting for us to clean up our act.
And if that's the case, I mean, for example, let's say the checklist is achieved.
The adrenochrome situation, to the extent it exists, is cleaned up.
The Bankster cartel is broken up.
The Department of Education on federal and state level is functioning properly.
Assuming all those things are happening, what more would need to be happening for you to say, why aren't the ETs making contact?
Hypolitical question, don't know.
I have taken a look enough of the history that I do conclude that we already have craft that use unconventional Ways of levitation and of movement.
I'll tell you another story.
So in 2005 and 2006, we were, I was teaching in Phoenix at Phoenix Unified School District at Central High School.
And as a part of what I would teach as U.S.
history is that I would ask the students, and again, So the average GPA that I would hit with students was 3.0 along with
Anonymous semester ending survey that where my target would be an average level of satisfaction of 3.5 or better and that's on a 4.0 kind of grade point scale the average scale that I would get for students with their overall level of satisfaction of what they learned in the class was rating my teaching as an A plus and part of what I would do is address what they really wanted to learn and
And history, history is the discipline of who did what, when, where, and what other objective facts can help with the subjective question of why.
And I'd ask the students in a U.S.
history class, which are juniors, and I'd say, hey, you know, if we get a little bit ahead, And you're demonstrating that you have the history here.
We can apply these tools of history to answer any other question that you want.
So let's take your top three list and I'll let you think about it.
That if you could know anything of what happened in history, what would you want to know?
And I'd put the ideas on the board.
And we'd take like three days.
And historically, the list went down to three topics of what high school students, given the chance to reflect and to think and to vote, most wanted to know.
You want to guess what they most wanted to know?
I recall you telling the story several times in Need to Know News.
And vaguely, I believe one was What Really Happened in 9-11, Who Is This Jesus Character?
And the third one doesn't come to me.
Thank you.
Yeah yeah that was it that was it so back forward history of who assassinated JFK and that was replaced by What happened on 9-11 was 9-11 an inside job and the other one was for Jesus for real and the leading one was are ETS real?
Are ETS real?
Yeah, and the evidence that I encountered as a professional scholar and again go to the bestsellers of Jim Mars as well Is that there is an impressive and extensive?
historical record that would have the average person conclude that That Earth has at least seen advanced technological civilization demonstrated by metalithic architecture of stones in the several thousand ton range as building blocks and that something happened to those previous civilizations.
So I think we can already demonstrate that contact has already happened.
And then there's a lot of compelling testimony and testimony among historians is the weakest form of evidence that we do have contact now.
So I think if we win and rip open the truth, we'll have a lot more to base our conclusion about.
So I don't mind people having the opinion that, oh, you know, we're going to have to build it up from the bottom as we go.
Or people who have the opinion that, hey, they're already here and they're going to disclose themselves or anything in between.
All of that is speculation.
And any speculative point of view is fine.
It really doesn't matter.
It's just say, what do you think?
I don't know.
This is what I see.
We would have to, and we'll listen very carefully to this discussion as it's being recorded in order to glean from it deeper, more profound potential questions.
Having said that, the thing that comes to mind immediately, would you agree that the majority out there would label you as radical, revolutionary, and if so, to what degree were your students aware that you were
Radical revolutionary, did you withhold this side of yourself and only put this out on the internet for them to discover on their own if they searched your name, for example?
No, no, no, no.
That was part of how come they had a A plus average rating for my overall teaching, because what I shared with this audience on the share screen is exactly what I would show to students and would share with colleagues.
I paid a price.
Fired four times, all without cause.
Technically non-reelected.
And then finally, Because the rules are in the state of California, within the first two years of teaching, the district can just say, Mr. Herman, you're just not a good fit for us.
And it doesn't matter what the data say.
I was quiet, relatively, for two years at Hayward Unified School District.
And then I just, you know, began saying everything.
And they tried to fire me five times in that district.
But the union appointed attorney said that it wouldn't serve them well.
I don't think I came, no, I didn't finish this data.
So at Hayward Unified School District, half of the students are failing Algebra I, and that is also true across the country, most associated with parents who are lower educated and lower income earning, so it's a national emergency.
And here, my students are 5% are failing at an average GPA of 3.0, So we can quantify and do some quantitative analysis of a 3.0 GPA compared to every other class having an average 1.0 GPA.
And it turns out that my average student is learning at the 99.99th percentile of expected learning results for the district.
And another way of saying that is that my average student is performing somewhere above 4 standard deviations above the mean, which means that my district appointed attorney.
No, no, no.
My union appointed attorney to defend me from the district's attempts to fire me said.
I think that they haven't done it because.
It would go to a neutral body, and we would present this evidence that they're claiming the overall effect of you on students is harmful, and this semester data of average of A+, the learning at the 99.99th percentile, the testimony of the counselors saying that you are the most in-demand math teacher, your degrees from Berkeley and Harvard?
Your national board certification?
Your experience briefing members of Congress 300 times?
Your participation in two UN summits for heads of state?
I don't think they want to bring that to a neutral.
So the idea that I'm viewed as radical, again, I would frame it that if somebody was serious about having that conversation, then I would use the skill of an educator to say, tell me why.
What do you mean?
Define that term.
And it would just turn out that it is unusual ideas.
And I would say, Oh, absolutely.
Absolutely.
And as Sec Ed, I may as well lay more cards on the table.
Is that my function as a messenger?
I am given a message.
The wars are illegal.
The bankster system is looting.
We have a Star Trek like future.
Poverty is murdering.
In slow motion agony about a million children every month, the total of which, since the Clintons were in office, 400 million, is more than all wars in all of world history?
And we have a choice?
That's an unusual message.
I'll grant you that.
But radical or whatever?
I mean, if people want to devolve into that type of name-calling, yeah, go ahead.
I say it's leadership.
And leaders go first.
And for people who don't have the vocabulary to express themselves very well, they may initially say it was radical, but then they're gonna say, oh yeah, ending poverty, ending the lie starter wars, admitting that public education is bullshit, yeah, yeah, that all is...
true.
So in that type of a conversation, I would gently try to disabuse people from their labels.
And if they want their labels, they can have them, of course.
But I don't think that I'm pointing to anything that people would argue shouldn't be done if they give consideration to the actual data.
By radical revolutionary, we mean only wanting profound fundamental change.
Oh, yeah, for sure.
I think that having the leadership be criminally arrested, that would be a profound change.
If a pie chart represents the current educational system, to what degree, if you had your way, would a sector be left that you would approve of?
Only one percent?
You want a 99% change?
50%?
Wreck it all so nothing is left and start fresh?
Well, for me, all I can say is that where we're going to go Is going to be unimaginable from the present.
The present is a system of top down control.
That's going to be removed and then the states are going to have the opportunity to reinvent.
So they're going to start out with their is if you use the pie chart analogy pie chart is going to start out completely full.
And then it is going to gradually decrease into something else with what used to be is going to be replaced by upgrades.
Now as to what that's going to look like, that's going to be part of the synergy and unimaginable and unpredictable.
It's going to be miraculous though.
But you want top-down control removed from the state level as well because you ran into that on the state level.
Well, yeah, sure.
I did contact the State Department of Education.
What was it that they told me?
I asked them.
I asked them to explain.
The health ordering authority and they said that I can't remember what it is all documented, but yeah, it actually so back to the paradox.
If I was the Secretary of Education at the federal level, then all I have Is the Department of Education as the administrative head for the federal level Department of Education without any authority over the states.
So paradoxically, I wouldn't have the authority nor would I want it.
So all I can do is point to the option and once we get the truth.
Matricist.
The leaders at the state level, the governors, the secretaries of education, they're going to be exposed as looters and criminals and liars.
So there will be a revolution fractally similar at all the levels of government.
And also, as I said, many of the people at the county level, they're going to be exposed as criminals.
And many of the school board members are going to be exposed as criminals.
What we are suggesting here at Matrixist Warrior Chronicles is the only solution is homeschooling.
Nothing else.
And for those parents who cannot do that because they have a job, they have no other partner to school the kids, those individuals would have to team up with local parents.
So there would, for example, be one schoolhouse for every neighborhood.
That would be taught by the parents that can be stay-at-home parents.
And if any county, state, so-called public school exists at all, the only way to make it pure, absolutely pure, would be for those parents who want to voluntarily contribute in one form or another, either labor or other form of consideration,
They would have to get together and discuss what the curriculum will be, and what the prohibitions are, insofar as we don't want such and such.
There needs to be a list.
We don't want these things taught, but we do want these things taught.
This is the only way to make it as pure as possible, to have it reflecting the voice of We the People, at the lowest lowest level, which is the family level.
Yes?
Yeah, there's going to be a lot of those conversations and people will come up with things and try it out and it'll be good faith experimentation and they'll get data from those good faith experiments and they'll revisit the data and tweak things and change things and and that'll be great.
And of course the homeschooling parents could turn to individuals such as yourself for the type of curricula that already does exist so they can learn as fast as possible such as the Uh, there's a series of books called Cultural Literacy that I recall coming across.
They say these are the things that should be known on the kindergarten level, the first grade level, and you're familiar with that series?
I've heard of it, but I'm not familiar with the contents.
But yeah, there'll be, it'll be an organic explosion of ideas.
And the author was named Ed Hirsch or something.
Okay.
In any case, um, what is the meme that you are original to, I believe?
If someone searches your name and they combine the words harmed millions, looted trillions, or... I can't remember.
What is the meme?
Can you repeat it, please?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
So we can quantify that the damages of the empire is that they annually kill millions, harm billions, and loot trillions.
And that's your original handiwork, that phrase, isn't it?
I've never heard anyone...
That one is, yeah.
Yeah, I steal some.
Like public serpents, that's Peggy Hall.
Do you have a list by any chance of the ones that you created yourself, as far as you're aware?
Asset holes.
I think I had that one.
Asset holes.
Hey, better learn monetary reform, public banking, or you can kiss your assets goodbye.
I guess your assets can buy.
Lying sacks of spin.
Let's go with the idea that for the reasons, I believe his name is pronounced Salas or Salas behind exo-politics today.
Dr. Michael Salas, yes.
Yeah.
Assuming his guests' worst predictions come to pass, where the corporate Our government, etc., will never disclose, and therefore this forces the ETs to make themselves known.
So they finally appear on the 6 o'clock news, their ship lands on the White House lawn, and so forth, and so on.
If we go with the idea that they will never disclose, the ETs and those who have the secrets will never disclose.
What would be your top three or seven or ten things that you would tell COTUS, which stands for President of the United States, you need to do these three things, these ten things within your four-year term.
And if you make them happen, I will be absolutely incredulous that the ETs have not Finally disclose themselves because we've done the best we can.
What is your wish list that POTUS would do?
Oh, this is good.
This is a good one to end on because I have to go and set up articles for my new show next.
But yes, this is a great place to end.
I think that we actually have to in order to win AMREF 2 in World War 3 is we need to correct the conditions of the war, given that we have been under attack forever.
And some of the key areas that are just obvious off the top of my head is that you would want to end the poverty You would want to have everyone have the economic needs met where people are going to be.
They would have a shelter, food, water, access to basic education, access to basic health care.
And initially, so I.
began 47 years ago at an age of 17 with my mentor Bucky Fuller at the initial Los Angeles inaugural event of the Hunger Project that was led by Warner Earhart who created the S-Training and the Landmark Education today which they do their seminars which I recommend and enjoyed and where I was empowered by.
I became a volunteer with results.org for U.S.
domestic and foreign policy to end poverty.
That was 18 years of work, briefing members of Congress 300 plus times, two UN summits for heads of state.
And so you'd have to end poverty.
And we can do that.
Pardon?
That's one.
Number two.
All right.
So number two is that the wars would have to end.
Three.
3.
We would have to have the banking and financial system be honest and transparent. 4.
See we would have to clean up all of the if we have the truth for all the poisons so that we're no longer Poisoning and being poisoned as the mind control is done that we have full truth Then I think that would be the breakthrough point where it would have a life of its own of synergy And we wouldn't have to worry about it anymore
And then if we wouldn't need anybody visiting us this would be a paradise on earth and we would develop the capacity to travel out and see what's there.
I will do my part to study this recorded discussion carefully to extract potential deeper superior questions for a follow-up if you're willing.
I will send a link once this is online to Potential POTUS that are working on seizing the position from the current Planet of Apes that are running things.
And we'll see.
Having said that, hypothetically, would you accept the position of Secretary of Education if a POTUS said it's yours?
Yeah, yeah.
I mean, I would be smart about it.
I would say with all respect, sir, and I'd show this is my list.
This would be what you would be hiring.
And if POTUS said, yeah, well, whatever you want, I'm hiring you because you're the expert.
You should be able to make these recommendations.
And I would share these publicly and Get a good team of people, and I would think that that would be obvious, and we would begin just to create, and that process of creation and synergy would take place at all levels.
Okay, then thank you for your participation, and we look forward to discussing things with you further.
▲
Export Selection