All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 26, 2024 - Jim Fetzer
01:11:51
Truth vs. NEW$, Inc Part 2 (25 February 2024) with Don Grahn, Brian Davidson, and Chris Weinert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And welcome back, folks, to Truth vs. News here on February the 25th, 2024.
And we had a heavy, heavy first hour because things are really getting tough out here and strifeful.
And I guess Chris Leonard has more to say.
Go for it, Chris.
Well, that's the first time ever that I've had more to say.
I'm just kidding.
Think about since the end of World War II and how the Rockefellers through Nelson and David put up the CFR on the conservative side and then the Trilateral Committee on the liberal democratic side and how through both of these ran the direction of the political party system and even the foreign domestic policy through other things like National Security Advisors and Security Council and many of these committee groups and NGOs.
So, there's a lot of ways that these guys have set up these third-party proxies to make it look, to lend the impression of democracy, or of the public will, or something of the sort.
But in reality, it seems to be the inversion of such.
You were talking in the last segment, Fetz, about the term unprecedented.
And yeah, I think it's the first time we can ever use a new word called unprecedented.
You think about what has happened with the Dominion machines, flipping votes, the people that have stepped forward and been, you know, pretty much strong-armed back down.
The George Soros 50-state solution with DAs and AGs and NGOs and, you know, things like the Clinton Foundation and many other things that you mentioned in the other group.
Think about how they did that.
Think about how they disenfranchised an entire demographic and gaslit that entire political target demographic while they are running an asset stripping operation on them and targeting them in every possible manner through things like the ADL, through the media, through property loss, through wage loss, through job loss, through infringing on rights, religion, politics, the BLM Antifa stuff, the woke thing, the COVID thing.
These are like strong-arm bargaining tactics, guised, like I say, is really guising an asset stripping operation or a series of them being run by a group.
And it seems to be going after the largest property holders in America and rendering them homeless as some sort of a larger plan to...
Departmentalized under the World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab famous saying, you'll own nothing and like it.
So there's something going on here with this.
And there's also a thing I'd like to say about the, to me seems to be a deep fake Turing test with Joe Biden.
And there's so many things that you can just point out.
I'm sure Fetzer more than I could, as far as with some of the things that don't have about this guy looking like he's wearing a mask or just even, here I am rambling on a tangent like this and saying the same about Joe Biden.
But ultimately, you know, he's he's suffering from a series of issues.
It seems like dementia being one.
I don't know.
This is a long term plausible deniability scapegoat that he's putting on for himself or what it might be.
But it's certainly an interesting situation.
He's almost not competent enough to stand trial, but competent enough to still remain president.
So interesting stuff.
Yes, indeed.
Fascinating.
Meanwhile… All corrupt judges in Trump cases except Florida are radical leftists.
No good American has a chance in their courts.
Thus we had liberal judges clockwise left Chet Kan, Ergonon, Merchant, McAfee, and Kaplan.
McAfee may turn out to be okay.
The liberal judges in the case against Trump are the most corrupt group of misfits in U.S.
judicial history.
The radical leftists who should never be in a courtroom running any case.
They are not just.
They are the most crooked in their courtrooms.
We did report a previously corrupt Obama judge, Chutkan, runs a corrupt case against Trump in Washington, D.C.
It's an outrage.
If Chutkan's action against innocent Americans who legally protested the 2020 election on January 6th are any indication, Trump doesn't have a prayer.
The judge in E. Jean Carroll's case was a corrupt Clinton judge who allowed the case to move forward where it would never have happened in any other court in the nation.
Judge Kaplan has serious problems and serious conflicts.
The judge in the sort of back Letitia James case against Trump where no crime or wrongdoing was ever done like in the other cases is a Democrat lunatic who hates Trump and justice.
The judge of the Manhattan case against Trump, Juan Manuel Murcha, where he's accused of making accounting entries years ago, is corrupt as well.
The case is total bull and no man of integrity would allow it to ever move forward.
Soros-Back be a brag.
Should never be in a courtroom in any city in America.
Judge Merchant should not either.
Today it was reported that Judge in the Soros-Back corrupt Fannie Willis case against Trump donated to her campaign.
This I did not know.
Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee overseeing the case against former President Trump.
Made a modest donation of 150 bucks to Fulton County D.A.
Fannie Willis campaign prior to his appointment.
McAfee.
Who was born on February 1st of 2023 after being appointed by Republican Georgia Governor Brian Kemp, made his donation in June of 2020, while still working as an assistant U.S.
attorney for the DOJ.
These liberal judges should never have been assigned to a courtroom.
They are corrupt, conflicted to the point where justice doesn't matter.
The most crooked individuals in any of their courts.
And here we see some comment about it.
Congratulations.
Are you happy with the investment?
They're all gone.
New York, mega loser state.
Thank God for truckers.
You're going to see businesses fleeing New York.
Right.
New York has become a legal banana republic.
Well, some of President Trump's supporters are pushing back against what they see as an unfair justice system, threatening a boycott that could have a major impact on the country's largest city.
Heard that there were going to be 700,000 truck drivers protesting.
They work hard.
They work long.
Nobody works harder, actually.
I know a lot about trucking.
I know a lot about truckers.
And I know plenty of truckers.
They're great people.
Ridiculous claims, and ultimately the judgment is untethered to any number.
There was no victim, no bank lost any money, no insurance company was out, anything.
And so, you know, this judge just picked a number out of the air, hoping to punish Trump, the Trump organizations, the Trump children, and others in the Trump organization.
And I think it just is, you know, it's disappointing.
Other thing that's going to happen here, Rachel, is you're going to see businesses fleeing New York.
Right.
Just like Elon Musk left Delaware, you're going to see these businesses leave.
Well, the truckers in New York, where he was sued this time, have decided, well, we're with Trump, so we're not bringing any goods to New York anymore.
Stuff you guys.
Why should I do business here when there are so many more business-friendly states that I could do business?
In Florida.
In Texas, for example.
We've seen Elon Musk make that historic move.
So, I think people are looking at New York and saying, unless you do something to change the vibe here, to turn this environment around, not for me.
Why would we go to New York?
Why take the risk?
My only point is, did we just diminish the great state of New York and the great people of New York?
And shouldn't they ask for better management so they don't become a flyover state?
Remember, New York has the highest taxes in the country, the worst regulatory environment, and it's incredibly mismanaged.
And I'm pointing out now, on top of that, You get this insanity.
A victimless crime, and forget about Trump.
It's not about Trump.
I don't care about Trump in this.
I care about America, and I care about entrepreneurship, and I care about democracy, and the fairness.
The judicial system is now being criticized.
People are asking themselves, the bar of New York.
Is this judge rational to charge $355 million in a case where no one lost any money?
Is that good for the people of New York?
Should the people of New York wake up to this and say, what's happening to us?
Why is this becoming so I think that's right.
The number one loser state in America.
Catastrophic.
It has nothing to do with Trump.
I'm not supporting Trump.
I'm supporting American entrepreneurship.
And New York is slowly becoming the number one loser state in America.
I'm-- Congratulations.
I think that's right.
The number one loser state in America.
Catastrophic.
Brian, your thoughts.
Well, I think of that old classic '80s Kurt Russell film, Escape from New York, and looking through the corridors of time.
I can see that coming and hopefully it does come.
However, there's a big problem.
New York has the financial sector.
New York has a lot of other sectors that are very important for the rest of the American economy.
I think if the.
Armageddon type of destroyers that are out there that want to destroy America and turn it into what Germany became post-World War I. I think if they're out there functioning right now, that they believe that if they can take down New York, then they can institute the CBDCs, the world will cry out for more government to come in and save them.
This is not the solution to the problem.
Let's analyze the problem really quick, okay?
We dealt with Engron, we dealt with these judges.
Where is the Bar Association?
The Bar Association as an entity has obviously lost its mind and become corrupt.
And I would say this about any other institution here in America right now.
Our federal government is acting as the federal head for America right now.
They've sold out their interest to corporations.
They're easily, obviously, easily controlled by simply controlling the power structure at the top.
Start going down your list of institutions, state-run governments, county-run governments.
When you can control the top of an institution that has rules that work vertically downhill, then you can control the entire institution.
There isn't an answer to this.
There's a way to fight back.
It's called a cellular structure based on leadership.
People need to stop with joining the institution.
Stop with respecting the licensing.
Stop with respecting the idea that an institution can control me and can do what's right and start thinking for themselves.
Look at what happened with COVID.
It was a top-down approach to driving the world's largest Propaganda campaign since 2011.
Everything right now is being corrupted at the top with money, with blackmail, with carrot and stick techniques, and it's all floating downhill so that we at the bottom feel like we can't control our structures.
Folks, we have to break loose from this.
We have to start thinking independently and start working cellularly to change our government around.
It's going to start with local community organizations, local organizations that can develop and grow where right And when those people sell themselves out for the sake of their nation, you're going to find that those power structures begin to crumble and that the footing that they're on begins to break apart and come apart at the seams.
We do not have justice anymore in America.
Look at these judges, a power structure controlled at the top, working its way down in the bar associations, both on the federal level, the American level, down to the state levels.
Why are the lawyers not speaking out?
Why are the lawyers not taking care of their own business?
It's because they're a part of a structure that controls their licensing and controls their ability to operate within those licenses.
The entire structure is broken.
It needs to be rethought and rebuilt.
Think of the 209 founding fathers that signed the Declaration of Independence.
They did so at their own peril.
There was great risk to do so.
We need to start thinking in terms of what it takes to break loose from a corrupt structure here in America.
Very nice, Chris.
Yeah, I think a lot of people are arriving at that same conclusion, and I think that with Dragnet surveillance over all our digital devices and AI analysis of analytics, you could probably ascertain the sentiment of the population.
You know, you got your finger on the pulses, you're choking them to death.
Well, ultimately, they realize that we have the multitudes, and I think that they will ultimately fear that, and I think they do, and I think that's why they are really Trying to put maybe some of the Judas goats out there that they're trying to put out there to steer this this outrage, this righteous outrage, into a cul-de-sac or back into the control mechanism that has always been run by this this group of robber barons.
Probably most of them Freemasons and part of the Agents of the Crown.
I think the original 13th Amendment was something in 1812 that was passed through and ratified in like 11 or 12 states out of 13.
And almost put into law.
And it was stating that the Articles of Nobility, i.e.
the British Accreditation Registry System lawyers, bar lawyers, would not be able to hold political office, public service office, because of these conflicts.
And I thought that's a hell of an idea.
And I don't know why they haven't ever gone to that.
But I think that's probably had something to do with the War of 1812, amongst many other things, of course.
And renewing of the Second National Bank is another.
We'll get into that.
It's a whole other video or segment.
I would like to say that many of these legal operatives that have been involved in these anti-Trump lawfare campaigns, and I'm certainly not a pro-Trump guy, if you know me, I really call it his faults and his criticism, but fair being fair, I'll say that these people are also in charge of upholding the supposed fair elections in their jurisdictions.
as well as upholding COVID lockdown laws and Vax passport stuff that they try to put on the 2020 election.
And of course, the amount of money that's been put forward or taken out.
I think they gave around one point two trillion dollars to the citizens in total, if you count all the COVID relief.
And they gave about ten trillion dollars to themselves and their sponsors.
So part of the own nothing and like it type of mantra, I think it's because most of our ownings are already, I think, leveraged in collateral for derivatives in many ways.
And I think that we probably don't even own our own property as we think we do, whether it's in our stocks, whether it's in our homes, whether it's in our cars, whether it's in our money in the bank.
Much of the laws that have been put in place, if you carefully read them, like the Dodd-Frank law, you're a secondary creditor to your own deposits in these institutions if they say shit hits the fan.
So you're literally put into this extortion racket just by the full control mechanism.
Not to mention supply-side economics and controlling the food supply with that as well.
So, I think also you want to point out that maybe most of these places that I mentioned and these people that I'm talking about, in their cities, you see BLM and Antifa showing up all over the place.
The George Soros DAs and AGs all over these places, right?
Where higher wages were brought into quote-unquote law, now of course they have this unrest.
Minneapolis, San Francisco, the West Coast, New York.
So, I think it's kind of like a robber baron tactic they use with the Freemasons and the immigrant mafias in the 30s, breaking the unions and corrupting those with strike breakers and the sword.
So, I think most of these places are also keystone locations for mass population control.
So, we really got a control problem that we got to look at and go back to Agenda 21 and see what that was all about.
And all the stuff that we talked about since the 90s and have been, you know, targeted by the ADL and PatCon.
Very nice.
Very nice.
and whatnot and are still being targeted.
You know, this is about our own self-defense, and apparently that is unconstitutional or deemed illegal or a terrorist activity now, I guess, or something of the sort.
So we really have a serious issue as far as with the rule of law and the social contract, and I think it's been broken and betrayed, and we do need to come up with an alternative.
Very nice.
Very nice.
Heavy.
Meanwhile, Trump easily defeats Haley in South Carolina, her home state.
He won by like 60 percent to 40, not quite, but it was an open primary where Democrats were flooding to support Nikki Haley, so I think legitimately he would have won like 70-30 on that order.
Trump glides to victory.
Former President Trump once again racked up a decisive victory over challenger Nikki Haley, this time running a victory lap around the former South Carolina governor in her home state.
The AP called the election shortly after the polls closed.
I think five minutes after the polls had closed, the outcome was called.
She becomes the first majority party candidate to lose her home state in the modern primary era.
Representative Norman says people spoke for Trump.
Mr. Norman, who campaigned for Ms.
Haley across the state, stressed that both Trump and Haley love America.
What she will have to do is make a decision.
What she'll do is count up the delegates.
Asked about possible moves after Super Tuesday, March 5th, when a large number of delegate-heavy Republican contests will be decided, I mention Fifteen contests, eleven of which are open primaries, where Democrats could attempt to stack the deck.
At the end of the day, everybody will come together.
What's for Nikki Haley or Donald Trump?
Meanwhile, after losing the primary, Haley took the stage in a half-empty ballroom to congratulate Trump on winning.
The move garnered a few boos and no cheers, as expected.
She did not drop out.
Signals she'll stay at least through Super Tuesday.
We need to meet Joe Biden in November.
I don't believe Donald Trump can't beat Joe Biden.
An absurd claim.
We're headed for Michigan tomorrow.
Headed for the Super Tuesday state throughout all of next week.
America deserves multiple candidates, not a Soviet-style election.
Y'all are a rowdy bunch, but I love that about you.
She consistently reiterated she felt blessed throughout the process of running.
We are very grateful for the good people of South Carolina.
She also thanked Representative Paul Norman among the few South Carolina lawmakers who supported her over President Trump.
Today we're getting around 40% of the vote.
That's about what we got in New Hampshire, too, which was also an open primary.
I'm an accountant.
I know 40% is not 50%, but I also know 40% is not some tiny group.
I'm not giving up this fight when the majority of Americans don't support President Trump or Biden, she said.
Meanwhile, we've had hack taking place here.
They had a vote about who would be a good running mate for Trump, which I shall share momentarily.
Meanwhile, red alert.
This was early on.
South Carolina ballot being put into a bin.
Machines not working.
Internet down.
Daily Noah tweeted, red alert.
They're placing ballots in a bin due to machine not working because the internet is down.
I thought the machine were not connected to the internet.
Isn't that what they said over and over again after they stole a 2020 election?
What a nice point.
Warning!
South Carolina is an open primary state.
Here's what that means.
Democrats in South Carolina can vote in the Republican presidential primary.
Regardless of party affiliation, they can vote.
The system allows for greater flexibility and participation.
However, it's important to note, once a voter has chosen a party's primary, they cannot switch back to the other party's primary in the same cycle.
So if you're a South Carolina voter, you can choose to participate in either the Republican or the Democrat but not vote.
And it's happening.
Just as we saw in New Hampshire, Democrats are flipping parties to vote against Trump.
Here we have South Carolina primary Michelle Bacchus tweeting, a few women leaving the polls tell me they voted anyone but Donald Trump.
Here's another.
As a South Carolina, even prominent anti-Trumper, Bill Kristol, proudly declared he switched parties to vote against Trump.
Here's Kristol, as a South Carolina Democrat.
I'd rather solve it by saying I never voted for Nikki Haley before.
These are not normal times.
And her opponent, former President Trump, is no ordinary politician.
In South Carolina's open primary, Haley has my vote.
I don't know what happened to the guy.
He used to be hilarious.
Remember City Sticker?
Such a great movie.
Now he's intolerable anyway.
Get out and vote if you live in South Carolina.
Laura Loomer tweeted, today's the day.
Get out and vote for Trump.
Polls open at 7 a.m., close at 7 p.m.
Don't take it for granted because South Carolina is an open primary state.
Here's the New York Post about changing times in South Carolina voting.
Democrat Saturday officially approved a revamped 2024 presidential primary schedule to make South Carolina First State a vote in the nominating process.
Endorsement by the DNC of the radical Shea Cop comes two months after the organization's rulemaking arm voted to yank Iowa off the leadoff state, a position itself in 1972.
Under the new configuration, South Carolina will hold its primary on February 3rd, New Hampshire, Nevada, three days later.
Georgia will vote on February 13th, followed by Michigan, February 27th, and Super Tuesday in early March.
The move was proposed to increase diversity in the presidential nominating contest, and has been championed by Brett Biden, who is expected to officially announce his run for re-election.
The Democrat Party looks like America, and so does this proposal, said DNC Chair Jamie Harrison, a South Carolinian.
The change continues to make us stronger.
The new lineup comes after a dreadful 2020 Iowa caucus, with a glitch in the new app developed to help the vote count instead cause chaos and uncertainty for days.
I believe, actually, because Tulsi Gabbard won the vote.
They needed a story to conceal it and not to allow it to emerge with momentum.
In addition, South Carolina gave Biden a much-needed boost at a time when it appeared his bid was going nowhere.
Not every politician was upbeat about the revision, some decrying the move as tanking Democrat chances in the upcoming presidential contest.
Iowa Democrat Party Chair Rita Hart claimed Republicans in her state were being Democrats as having turned their back on Iowa and on rural America.
New Hampshire polls previously wrote a letter to the White House, worrying the schedule change would harm Democrat chances in the Granite State.
Here we have Democrats can vote in the GOP primary, as advertised.
Brian, I don't think, in fact, that changes schedule.
I mean, it didn't actually occur this year.
I'm not quite sure if it could in the future.
Your thoughts?
Well, I'm not so sure about all the detailed rules related to the primaries.
I can tell you this, it's obvious that the rest of the nation wants Donald Trump.
But the important question to ask about Nikki Haley's involvement in this particular machine is, why hasn't she dropped out if Trump's support is so much?
Let's think through that for a second.
Candidates generally drop out when they run out of money.
Nikki Haley is backed by the military-industrial complex.
They have an endless supply of cash with which to control her.
Secondarily, the cover story for the normies is that Trump might end up in jail.
So we need to have a second GOP candidate.
Trump might only be removed from the campaign by assassination, and that's Simply not out of the question, given the character of the people involved here.
The regime needs to keep the focus off of Biden as long as possible and keep Haley in running.
And Trump, or Haley, expends ammunition that would have been set up for Biden in the RNC.
And they want to devote as much resources away or as much GOP cash away from Trump as possible, and Nikki Haley is the perfect person for the fit.
So if they can get Trump out, they can replace her with Haley, in which case there's a military-industrial complex vendor on both ends of the ticket.
So Haley is in there simply as a machine waiting in the wings in case something happens to Trump and being supported by the military-industrial complex. - Yes.
And I don't believe that she's running because she loves America whatsoever.
At all.
And that's why I can't think of any other reason why she would still be running through this unless this was the case that they're waiting and hoping to install her on the RNC ticket after they can get rid of Trump.
Well, it's a fascinating speculation.
She's a low-life, insignificant bird-brain, as Trump has called her, prince.
Wow, yeah, a lot to think about there.
It is some nasty business that these people are playing.
They seem to be all in and waist-deep in the blood of the innocent, so they might as well go all the way with this rather than facing any sort of legal repercussions for what they've done in the past, you know, four years or whatnot.
I will say that there's something to be said about these inquisition tactics and these overreaches and these breaches of law and the social contract, as I mentioned before.
It creates a martyr effect or something based upon the public's sentiment or support, which it musters in the face of these inquisitor follies, we'll just say.
These witch hunts, you know, many times the word on the street becomes louder than the rumor and echo and innocence spreads to sainthood and things of the sort.
urban myth unto legend and whispers will turn to shouts, I guess.
So I think something like that's probably going to be brought on and controlled.
And I think, like I say, this is a Freemasonic trick they've done a lot of times in history.
You know, it's a Putin effect, really.
Think about how reasonable Putin has been in the face of much of this.
And people can say what they want about Donald Trump, but he's been pretty reasonable about much of what he did when he was president, in comparison to what we've seen from other presidents, we'll just say.
So I think that that sets home with a lot of people and it has a psychological impact on them.
And they understand the psychologies of crowds, I must say, through millennia of data gathered during said inquisitions, as I mentioned, even wars and peace times as well.
So I almost think the best way to lead an opposition is to control it.
And I think that that's something these guys don't leave the chance.
And I think it's similar to like the Guelph and Ghibellines.
You know, it's these families on each side of these wars lending fighting-edge males into their own destruction.
And it's very similar to the COVID thing.
People self-electedly choosing their own self-destruction in the case of this panic.
This unreasonable, exaggerated panic that is being manufactured and turned loose on the streets in the face of despair.
So there's some shit going on here, Fats, and people can't forget about that.
And I think ultimately at the end of the day, until somebody really pays the price for this, and it's not just one person, there's a lot of people that really could get to the bottom of this.
It's not like, you know, you're talking about the election, right?
Think about how many people are just Zionist stooges waiting in the seniority wing to take the next step up as the next guy takes their shit in public and falls out of their career or whatever.
Right.
These guys are scapegoats and fall guys and proxies.
That's all they really are.
And ultimately, at the end of the day, they have bosses.
And we need to identify who these people are and follow the strings, follow the money.
Because, like I said, this is a big, big robbery that is being manifested on everybody.
And all of our assets and ownings are going to be at stake when these guys are gambling with it.
And you don't even realize what they're doing with their assets.
No, I think you got that right.
Meanwhile, Donald Trump gives a short list of V.I.P.
candidates.
We fact check it.
Here's the truth.
Did Trump just give a short list of V.P.
candidates as every news outlet is reporting?
Uh, not exactly.
Allow me to explain.
The clip going viral on Twitter, everyone claiming Trump given his short list.
I'll just post a bit longer, take a look.
I spare it.
Here are some of those who appear to be under consideration, whom you will recognize.
Trump is playing coy.
The decision was made long ago.
The short was in political theater.
Listen to Trump's comment.
He said it surprises him how historically the VP choices have no impact on who wins a general.
But later, After Laura's done interrupting him for a mildly witty joke, he says that he would like to pick someone who could help from the voter standpoint.
Sounds like Trump wants to buck the trend, instead of picking non-impactful VBs, perhaps go a different route that actually secures more voters.
If this is truly the case, there's only one Mercy could be talking about—RFK Jr., currently polling at 12% by Rasmussen, of the general election vote polls slightly more votes from Trump than he does from Biden.
If Trump is actually serious about securing more votes in the election, He'll pick R.F.K.
Jr.
Otherwise, we risk winning the vote and losing to the deep state candidate, which would quite literally lead to World War III.
I know many of you don't like this idea.
Many Trump supporters don't like R.F.K.
Jr.
policies.
Many R.F.K.
supporters don't like Trump's.
But from a pure numerical strategic standpoint, RFK Jr.
is still the obvious choice.
Hmm.
Former Representative Tulsi Gabbard, mentioned as a possible Trump VP pick, will headline a fundraiser at Mar-a-Lago next month.
Earlier this week, Trump sat for an interview with Laura Ingraham.
During the interview, she asked him about possible Trump running mates.
Vivek Ramaswamy, Rhonda Sanders, Byron Donalds, Tim Scott, Christine Ullman, Tulsi Gabbard were named she-mansion.
President Trump talks Tulsi Gabbard and Vivek Ramaswamy as potential running mate.
He also says people who say he's never going to leave office are crazy.
Obviously, this generates a lot of speculation.
It should be noted that Laura brought the names up, not Trump.
Sean Hannity actually quizzed Tulsi in 2023 about her vice presidential aspirations, so this is interesting.
Tulsi is going to headline a fundraiser at Mar-a-Lago next month.
The Hill.
Former Hawaiian Representative Tulsi Gabbard is slated to appear at former Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort next month.
According to an indication shared exclusively with The Hill, Gabbard is to be the keynote speaker at the 917 Society's annual fundraiser on March 7 for a night in Palm Beach celebrating the Constitution.
The event comes after Trump, the current frontrunner, acknowledged Gabbard is under consideration to be his VP choice, among several others.
Dinner for the event costs $1,250, according to the invite.
Gabbard retired from Congress in 2021 after representing the Hawaii's second congressional.
She spent much of her time in office as part of the progressive coalition, pushing further to the left of many of her liberal counterparts in the House.
Get this.
CPAC attendees vote for Donald Trump's running mate in the straw poll with a first-place tie.
Christine Ohm, the Vek Ramaswamy tie for Trump VP pick in the straw poll.
She, South Dakota governor, and biotech interpreter were tied for first place with 15%.
But look who's in third.
Gabbard with nine.
Then Stefanik eight, Scott eight, Donald seven, Lake six.
Carson 5, DeSantis 5, Sarah Huckabee, to my surprise, Tucker Carlson only 4, RFK Jr.
even lower 3, and Vance 2, and Haley picking up the rear.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, I don't trust any of them.
I mean, the vice presidents Do I trust her?
She only became a Republican in 2022.
Yeah, she's a pretty lady.
Tells a good story.
Raises a lot of money.
Can she be trusted?
I don't know.
Could Mike Pence be trusted?
her?
She only became a Republican in 2022.
Yeah, she's a pretty lady, tells a good story, raises a lot of money.
Can she be trusted?
I don't know.
Could Mike Pence be trusted?
Absolutely not.
Kamala Harris, clearly just a puppet presiding over the Senate government.
Give me a break.
Can you see Kamala Harris in there trying to tell Chuck Schumer what to do?
I don't know what to think about the vice presidential role.
I think I, in a sense, I trust Trump to pick who he wants.
If it was me, I'd pick Byron Donalds.
But I don't know exactly how it's going to play.
Trump, look, It doesn't really matter who Trump picks for his VP.
And why does he pick a VP anyway?
Trump is going to bring them in.
Their job is to follow up if Trump is assassinated, taken out of office, for whatever reason, they're going to become the president.
So hopefully we'll have someone that's presidential.
I, for one, don't believe that a woman is the right type of person to lead America.
I'm concerned about the entire scenario.
Trump should pick a righteous person, and in my opinion, a righteous man.
I don't like Ramana Swami.
I don't trust him.
I don't trust any of them.
But I do like what I get from Byron Donalds, and I do think that he's got the experience to do the job.
But as for that, I'm voting for Trump.
as an alternative to voting for obviously Democrats or even RFK and, you know, possibly splitting the ticket.
And whoever Trump brings along with him, he's going to have his own reasons.
I really can't speculate as to what they would be.
Chris?
I don't know.
Maybe I'm a tough grader, but I think the standard is kind of low as far as the expectation from the people and from their government.
And I don't think really any of those people on that ticket are people that I would trust in any way.
I think they've proven their track record over their years of public service.
And Rana Swani, of course, has WEF background as well.
I don't trust any of these guys, to be honest with you.
I think it's going to have to come from the people and really following the law of the Constitution and in some way taking back not only democracy, but their government.
And I think at the end of the day, maybe even considering the possibility of lowering the overreach of the federal government and certainly the private sector, Uh, in terms of violating, uh, every amendment in the Constitution at some point.
So, uh, yeah, I think that, that really there's a lot to be unpacked there.
And, uh, you know, as far as the conversation goes, I don't think any of these people are pushing that dialogue, so to speak.
Maybe Ramaswamy a little bit, but, uh, yeah, there's, there's a lot to be said and a lot that's being ignored.
And, um, I dunno, I guess people like us are going to have to be the ones to point it out and push the envelope maybe.
Yeah, I've been picking Trump and Tulsi for two years.
I mean, you know, it seemed to me that they were a great fit.
I actually like Ramaswamy during the debates.
He showed me a lot.
He's so intelligent, so articulate, fearless.
I understand why there are reservations about him, given his background.
I just like the guy tremendously.
That doesn't mean I think he'd be the right person.
I would perhaps be less upset than either of you if he were to be with Trump.
I'm not at all sure about RFK Jr., honest to God, I'm just not.
And that's too bad, because he would ordinarily be someone I would think was worthy.
Chris, I'd like your thoughts about RFK Jr.
Yeah, yeah, I want to get in.
You know, I almost feel that there's like a reverse Serrano de Bergerac effect going on with like this asymmetrical surveillance and analytics and how it's being applied to the political spectrum, you know, not only popularity of candidates, but even the conversations and the dialogue that we mentioned.
As far as you were asking me about who was it again?
Ramaswamy.
Oh, yeah.
R.K. Jr.
Yeah.
I think all these guys are strongly Zionist, and they're from the Masonic background, so I don't like them.
I don't like any of these people.
I think they have to go come clean and clean slate and sort this thing out in terms of justice and legal responsibilities.
And unfortunately, most of the legal responsibility has been tiptoed around by high-priced lawyers who have gotten away with war crimes and beyond.
And certainly not only did I say have they betrayed the social contract, but they've broken the rule of law.
And that pretty much is the full faith and credit that most of economic fiat currency is based on.
And I think you're gonna see maybe a shift in those type of things.
You're already seeing it at the higher levels, but I think maybe you'll start seeing that more out in the streets. - Very good, very good.
Brian, did you want to add more about JFK Jr.?
I'm especially intrigued by the idea.
Your thoughts?
Oh, I like what he could do in terms of reforming the medical system, but I'd prefer him as Surgeon General than I would as a politician.
I just simply don't like the idea of sort of a one-trick pony.
Being put in a position where they could end up having to lead the United States.
I don't know if RFK Jr.
has the balanced perspective that I need.
I certainly don't trust him when it comes to Second Amendment rights.
And I don't trust him not to be a Democrat.
And right now, I gotta tell you, I have a very toxic flavor in my mouth about how easily corrupted the Democratic Party is.
Can you think of one Democrat, one that has enough integrity to do what's right and stand up to the Democrat machine?
Even one of them?
I mean, Tulsi played the game.
I used to think Joe Manchin was a good guy, but he was on last night just blasting Trump.
I mean, it was just ridiculous, stupid nonsense he was issuing.
I was embarrassed by it, frankly.
Every one of them are bought.
They're bought.
It's just a question of which lobbyist's interests do we find to be the most acceptable among the candidates that go out there.
I'm tired of these politicians.
I want to see the entire structures torn down.
And unfortunately, they're corrupt.
They're gone.
And the only way that's going to happen is if we have an absolute collapse That has to result in an absolute rebuild.
And then we have to work through the same reissuance of currency that Germany had to go through post World War One, where we issued our own currency, started our own initiatives, broke loose from the banksters and the cartels, and reset up a new government that could end up trading with other nations on the new currency.
I see destruction as the only possibility.
Or we're going to have to continue to suffer under the yoke of these globalists who have decided that we're paddling.
Wasn't that your first story of the first hour here today about the financial collapse?
Aren't we facing that right now?
Yes, yes, yes.
Yes, that the G7 would be moving to freeze Russian assets, which would lead to A lack of confidence in the Western monetary supply and the dollar lead to the collapse of the dollar and of the American economy.
Yes, Don, you're right.
Remember, post-World War I, the Treaty of Versailles meant Germany owed three times the value of all the property in Germany.
That's how bad the collapse was.
That's how bad it could be here.
We are trillions and trillions and trillions of dollars into debt.
It would be easy for China or any other nation to go nuclear on U.S.
Treasury bonds, cash it in, clean us out.
All of a sudden, we've printed another $100 trillion worth of currency.
The dollar becomes valueless.
It could happen in an instant.
Yes, it could.
When that day comes, we better be ready.
Yes, it could happen tomorrow.
You're absolutely right.
Meanwhile, we've had a murder by a Venezuelan thug right here in Georgia.
Promising 22-year-old Georgia nursing student murdered by illegal, let in under Biden, a guy who'd previously been arrested for harming a child.
As a post report, 22-year-old vacant Hope Riley Found not breathing with visible injuries in a forested area near Lake Herrick located on the University of Georgia.
She was a student before transferring to the nursing program at Augusta University's Athens campus after the spring semester.
The UGA police arrested and identified Jose Antonio Ibarra as the individual responsible for the slaying.
During a press conference, he announced he'd been charged with malice, murder, felony murder, aggravated battery, aggravated assault, false imprisonment, kidnapping, hindering a 9-11 call, and concealing the death of another.
Bart went on to say he believed the attack was a crime of opportunity, that the suspect had no known connection with the victim, not a United States citizen, could not say whether it was in the U.S.
illegally, he has been confirmed to be an illegal from Venezuela.
Ali Brady of NewsNation revealed discovered custom employment protection Jodi Cross in El Paso in September 2022 and released due to lack of detention.
Here is her report about it.
Also, that he was arrested five months ago in New York, detained on 9-14-23 in Queens for injury to a child less than 17 and no license.
An illegal alien harming a child was allowed to walk free.
No surprise there.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, I'm very sorry to the family of the slain girl.
This is what happens when our government ceases to perform its basic functions.
Remember why the 209 Founding Fathers, after 150 years of basically being under the yoke of the king, decided to break free?
Because the government no longer functioned to do its job.
There is a time and a place to break free from a tyrannical government that no longer functions in its role as a servant of the people.
And that time is coming quickly.
There's going to have to be a group of people that form that are willing to sign and put their lives on the line for a new declaration of independence from this superstructure that has decided that it has the right to control us and tell us what our rights are.
Our government no longer functions.
It cannot protect our borders.
All the trillions of dollars of money that are spent no longer functions.
Justice no longer takes place in our society.
We're worse than the Romans.
We're coming apart at the seams, worse than Caligula, worse than all of the other countries in the world.
How long will it be before we crash and collapse?
And what will that day look like?
I'm telling you, You need to start thinking differently.
We're talking politics.
It's going to change.
You're going to have to start talking righteousness very soon.
Break loose.
Remember, the law is for moral people.
The law is for the people that are immoral.
Moral people, I'm sorry, moral people shouldn't have to worry about.
There's going to be a time where we do what's right instead of doing what the law says we can because the law has been corrupted.
Venezuela is among the countries that have taken this opportunity to empty their prisons and their insane asylums and send them to New York.
We had a Venezuelan gang in New York beating up cops.
The Soros DA just turned them out.
They came out giving the finger to the newspaper.
They are very tough.
They are very relentless.
They should not be here.
Biden has welcomed them.
I watched That Escape from New York movie last night, Brian, by Shira's Coincidence, and that is a harbinger of the future.
And it's going to be here before you know it.
Grits.
Yeah, probably brought to every 15-minute city near you.
Yeah, I'm sure.
This is really crazy.
They've had a plan for this.
Sanctuary cities, whatever you want to call this stuff.
You know, you can go back to the 90s when they started putting this out, and this is when they were, the Patriots were going nuts back in the day, as we really should have been, but they were going after Patriots with the ADL, the FBI, calling the PACON operations, similar to like the COINTELPRO in the 70s and 60s.
They were going after people that were pointing this stuff out.
They were against NAFTA, permanent normalization of trade with China.
They were trying to prosecute ChinaGate and Whitewater and many of the other things going on.
This is while the people that were supposedly going to be prosecuted by these things were pushing things on the blue-collar crime, the tough-on crime, the war on drugs, the for-profit prisons with quota, occupation quotas and things of the sort, the private group, CCA, Geo Group, Aramark, on and on.
They start putting these things in cities and this becomes like the source of revenue for the locals that are law abiding which of course the law goes a little bit crazy in the next 20-30 years as we can tell with the benefit of hindsight, right?
But thinking about this stuff and how it was set up at the time, In control of, like, the media, deregulating that, deregulating the financial sector in the 90s, you know, the Glass-Steagall, all this stuff.
You know, they put these measures in place, and it's not an accident, and it's no accident that they're now using your pensions, as we mentioned before, as Brian said, you know, to use Vanguard, BlackRock, and many of these other things to control your own self-destruction, and these things like the COVID operation, and many other things, too.
Owning one in five single-family homes, things of the sort.
So there is a war that's been waged on the white middle class.
And of course, in its self-defense, it is called white privilege and racism and anti-Semitism and anything it can be gaslit with.
But in reality, you know, people got to start shaking from that that reflex of self-censoring programming and really start standing up for the rights for their children.
At some point in time, I almost think this is a Rorschach test of people in their own sanity to some extent, too, of what's going on and what we've allowed them to get away with without anything really going on.
And I mentioned in one of our shows with Carl last week that the fluoride is obviously working, given that people are so docile in the face of these really serious overreaches and breaches of the social contract and the Constitution.
So, yeah, people are going to have to really start taking this seriously because our freedom is not going to be just handed over to us.
just like our wealth.
We're gonna have to protect it with our lives too because it's being taken from us Systematically by design as Brian mentioned in this protocols and many other things.
Yep I think Soros, in his enthusiasm to destroy America before he dies, had an ingenious plan.
He did a thorough diagnosis of our society, the fault lines, how he could most effectively spend his money, get maximal destruction for the least expense, opening the borders and weakening the law enforcement system, promoting defunding of police, all elements of it.
And of course all this racism and transgender absurdities, part and parcel of the overall plan.
Hey, Fetz, think about how many color revolutions that Soros has been behind across the country in the past 30 years.
Think about how many currencies he's shorted and just impoverished half the country with.
He's done some serious undermining of economic subterfuge, and he's never been held to account.
Massive weapons of economic mass destruction, that's all I'll say.
Yeah, very good, very good, yeah.
Soros should have been arrested and indicted.
Here's a story I missed about her.
Riley was a stellar scholar, previously made the Dean's List, active in a church along with her sorority, a dedicated athlete, having run the Athens-Georgia half marathon in October.
Very, very sad.
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court refuses to enforce its own ruling.
This is having ruled against affirmative action.
They're not seeking to enforce it.
The Supreme Court ruled against affirmative action in student for fair admission versus Harvard.
In practice, it was like Stephen Perrin predicted, a catastrophe.
In essence, the court told lawyers, colleges, and other institutions that want to racially discriminate against whites and Asians, they simply need to disguise their intentions a bit more.
It did nothing to challenge the idea that diversity is a compelling state interest that justifies abolishing the equal protection of the laws.
Of course, asking diversity, equity, and inclusion bureaucrats for subtlety is probably still too much.
The Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology in Fairfax, Virginia, once a prestigious magnet school for the gifted, however, High standards for academic institution are now de facto illegal in America.
They will necessarily cause a disparate impact because not enough blacks and Hispanics will be able to gain admission.
In 2012, a very civil right group filed a lawsuit against a school alleging discrimination.
Coverage from The Post, The Huffington Post, CNN, federal government, civil right, dutifully opened an investigation.
By 2020, the school changed its admission policy, including scrapping standardized tests.
Not surprisingly, the school admitted fewer Asians.
In 2022, a Pacific Legal Foundation coalition sued on behalf of Asians.
Conservatives opened new front in elite school admission war was the way the New York Times framed it.
A judge initially sided with the plaintiffs, but an appellate court threw out the decision.
We are satisfied that the challenge admission policy does not disparately impact Asian American students and the coalition cannot establish that the board adopted its race-neutral policy with any discriminatory intent.
This is the main reason the appeals court approved the new admission policy.
It also said this school of policy didn't have the disparate impact because most of the students were still Asian, though significantly fewer were admitted than in the past.
The assumption that policy is legal if it doesn't have discriminatory intent does not apply in most other contexts, which is why the mere finding that an objective test leads to disparate impact results in an institution being liable, if not in a Blacks or Hispanics benefit.
Indeed, Gregg vs. Duke Power explicitly found that a disparate impact makes something illegal even if there is no intent to discriminate.
Chief Justice Earl Warren Burger wrote, We do not suggest either the District Court or the Court of Appeals err in examining the employer's intent, But good intent or absence of discriminatory intent does not redeem employment procedures or testing mechanisms that operate as built-in headwinds for minority groups that are unrelated to measuring job capability.
The company's lack of discriminatory intent is suggested by special efforts to help the undereducated through company financing up two-thirds the cost of tuition for high school training.
But Congress directed the thrust of the act to the consequences of employment practices, not simply motivation.
More than that, Congress has placed on the employer the burden of showing any given requirement must have a manifest relationship to the employment in question.
The facts of this case demonstrate the inadequacy of broad and general testing devices, as well as the infirmity of using diplomas or degrees in fixed measures of capability.
History is filled with examples of men and women who rendered highly effective performance without the conversational badges of accomplishment in terms of certificates, diplomas, or degrees.
Not surprisingly, The appellate court didn't reference that decision.
Perhaps the judges don't know about it.
More likely, they just don't care.
The truth is, applying disparate impact doctrine in this case would benefit the wrong group.
Therefore, it was not applied.
If the court really wanted to enforce its own decision in Students vs. Harvard, it would take up the appeal of the Thomas Jefferson High School.
However, It refused to do so without explanation.
The court also refused to stop West Point from discriminating based on race in its own admission policy.
The Post quoted an expert who said, the court is where the American people is because the people don't want racial preferences but want diversity.
The solution to this quandary is what the court has done.
Allow racial preferences to achieve diversity, but don't admit it.
It's unclear that people truly want diversity, but many in our political, social, and media elite would not have careers without set-asides and diversity programs.
Therefore, they will remain.
Too many powerful people have too much to lose, regardless of the law.
Justice Samuel Alito wrote a dissent across the decision to refuse to hear the case.
Justice Clarence Thomas joined.
What a Fourth Circuit majority held in essence is that intentional racial discrimination is unconstitutional.
So long as it is constitutional, as long as it is not too severe, Alito said, this reasoning is indefensible, and it cries out for correction.
However, Since the court won't do it, from whence will it come?
Perhaps it's no coincidence, Justice Thomas, it's currently under media attack, notably by late night host John Oliver, who offered to pay the justice to resign his seat.
This is actually a crime, especially because Oliver said, I'm not joking.
That we simply take for granted.
The law does not apply to him.
Comedy didn't apply when it came to the case of Douglas Mackey, a.k.a.
Ricky Vaughn, on Twitter.
However, Justice Alito warned, in addition, the Fourth Circuit's reasoning is a virus that may spread if not promptly eliminated.
Indeed, The First Circuit has already favorably cited the Fourth Circuit's analysis to disparage the use of a before and after comparison in a similar equal protection challenge to a facially neutral admission policy.
Yet this is precisely the point.
The court's willingness to swallow the American decision is hard to understand, said Alito.
It is not.
It is precisely because it allows a way for institutions to keep using affirmative action without making it too blatant that the other justices do not want to confront it.
It's precisely because it will spread that it was permitted to stand.
If the Supreme Court told institutions they could not racially discriminate to achieve diversity, many powerful interests would challenge the legitimacy of the Court itself.
Therefore, the Court is not picking this fight.
Law has little power in itself.
Political will matters more.
Racial consciousness is the most powerful political force in the world today.
Therefore, the side with greater racial consciousness wins, regardless of whether conservatives or liberals have a theoretical majority on the Supreme Court.
Brian.
That's a perfect example of the corruption of an institution, the Supreme Court being one of them.
I mean, we've got Justice Kagan on there now as a result of Joe Biden being installed in this last election.
Give me a break.
The woman's not smart enough to be on the Supreme Court.
She's no bore.
She doesn't even belong.
The Supreme Court's there for one purpose, and it's to protect our inalienable rights.
Okay, and if you don't know what your inalienable rights are, then what's the point of having them?
If you don't know how to enforce them, what's the point of having them?
We're going to descend into madness here in this culture.
It's only a matter of time.
Let's just go over the list of inalienable rights headed into the next... Actually, I'm going to wait on this one.
That's all I'm going to say on it.
I'm going to wait until the next one, and I'm going to read you your inalienable rights.
Chris, your thoughts.
Yeah, I almost think it would be a good idea to take an entire show and go down the Constitution and just go amendment by amendment and how we've been completely violated by not only our own government, but the private sector that seems to bribe them heavily.
Nice, nice.
Meanwhile, we have two final stories.
Excited Netflix writer turned to Google Gemini for new show ideas.
Los Gatos, California.
Creative professionals all know what it's like to get writers blocked, none more so than networked writers who have to come up with all kinds of new show ideas constantly.
So studios and writers were excited, absolutely jazzed, to learn about Google Gemini, the search and tech giant's new AI system generating images of historical figures with a diverse twist.
Okay, folks.
We need to come up with a new show about George Washington and said head writer, Garth Oldham.
I just don't know where to go with that, though.
He's so boring and white!
One intern, Chandra Patelvin, spoke up, suggesting they ask Google Gemini to generate some images of George Washington to stimulate their creativity.
What came back bored every writer in the room.
It's George Washington, all right.
But there's something different about him.
Hey, wait a minute.
He's black!
The writers excitedly typed up their pension show outline for the new Netflix biopic about Washington.
Let's try another one.
Jonah Vaughn said Alba.
The island produced a picture of an androgynous Native American.
Brilliant!
With her newfound digital views, the Netflix Writer's Room was able to come up with over 30 new show ideas, including one centered around Adolf Hitler as a black woman, Rasputin as a transgender Indian homeless person in a wheelchair, and Winston Churchill as a Mexican midget.
Well, our work here is done, said Alba.
Now we got plenty of time for rooftop cornhole and mimosas at lunch.
Come on, gang!
Here's another.
Get a load of these insane Christian nationalists who believe rights come from God and not the government.
You're not going to believe this.
Check out this list of radical Christian nationalists who believe inalienable human rights are endowed on them by some sort of higher power creator or something like that, and not by the federal government.
This idiot named John Locke.
This loser thought liberty came from the laws of nature and wasn't subject to the legislative authority of man, whatever that means.
Rights come from the government.
Everyone knows that.
Total loser, Thomas Jefferson.
Just look at the unhinged insanity in the eyes of this deranged radical.
Three, this stupid thing called the Declaration of Independence.
We hold the truth to be self-evident that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights.
Ugh, who wrote this crap?
Some dummy named Thomas Paine.
Paine claimed that every child born into the world must be considered as deriving its existence from God.
Uh, okay, yeah, weirdo.
Moron and inventor of lighting, Benjamin Franklin.
This creep said that liberty is derived from the laws of God.
Put this one on an FBI watch list.
He's about to storm the Capitol.
These guys are all dummies.
Do human rights come from God?
Never!
Rights come from the government are disseminated to the population through the mainstream media.
We need to stamp out this ridiculous scourge of Christian nationalism.
Wherever we see it, before we lose our democracy.
They got it right.
Brian, yours.
Well, I love that Babylon Bee article, especially the last one.
So, that said, let's talk about our original, permanent, unalienable rights of every man, woman, and child here in America.
We have the right to life, freedom, Health and the pursuit of happiness.
We have the right to contract or not to contract, which is unlimited.
We have the right to earn a living income by being compensated with wages or a salary in a fair exchange for one's work.
We have the right to travel in the ordinary course of one's life and business.
We have the right to privacy and confidentiality free from unwarranted invasion.
We have the right to own and hold property.
Lawfully, without trespass.
We have the right to self-defense when threatened with harm, loss, or deceit.
We have the right to due process of law without notice, with notice and opportunity to defend ourselves.
We have the right to be presumed innocent, suffering no detention or arrest, no search or seizure without reasonable cause.
We have the right to remain silent when accused and to avoid self-incrimination.
We have the right to equality in the eyes of the law and equal representation.
We have the right to a trial by jury being an impartial panel of one's peers.
We have the right to appeal in law and against conviction of sentence or both.
We have the right to knowledge necessary for one's rights and freedoms.
We have the right to peaceful association, assembly, expression, and protest.
We have the right to practice a religion, to have beliefs of one's own choosing.
We have the right to love and to consensual marriage with children as a family.
We have the right to security from abuse, persecution, tyranny.
And war.
We have the right to refuse to kill under command by reason of conscience, and we have the right to live in peace and be left alone when we're law abiding.
Amen.
I like him.
Where do we find him?
Chris, Chris, your thoughts?
Sorry, you guys caught me eating.
Anyways, yeah, I think, like I said, go down the whole entire Constitution, the whole Bill of Rights, the whole amendments, 1 through 27 or whatever, for however many there are, and I think you can really have a strong argument that many, if not all of them, are being consistently violated by our so-called public servants.
These people know everything about us, we know nothing about them.
These guys are insider Putting debts on our tabs using this lucrative banking system to basically invest their pet projects and to basically render the debt as a millstone on the taxpayer and certainly putting us into some very precarious situations in terms of diplomacy.
Arguably one could say that we've been doing the bidding of Israel since the end of World War II.
And what exactly is Israel but a cash cow where basically American wealth is being re-delivered to and held without extradition laws.
And basically without any other sort of rule of law in terms of international courts.
So yeah, I think really you can see what these guys are doing with the legal system and doing with the monetary system and the resources.
And it's up to us to determine if we want to live as technocratic feudal slaves or as free humans, if we want to have a free market or if we want to have whatever illusion they're putting out.
So, yeah, this is a big deal and a big point in time.
And I think a lot of these cycles, whether they're political, economic, social, whatever, are all coming and hitting at the same time.
So this is going to be a pretty big year.
I'm reminded of when Mahatma Gandhi was asked what he thought of Western civilization.
He said he thought it was a good idea.
Brian reminds us what we might think about having constitutional rights.
I have to say, I agree with Gandhi.
It's a good idea.
Sure would be nice to see it implemented someplace like right here in the United States of America.
Don, take us out.
Oh boy, folks.
Can I say, can I ask you here, if you think that this is the best show we've done in a couple of years, I think this is the most profound show that really deserves to be viewed by as many people as you can show it with.
This is on February the 28th, 2024.
What a show.
Things are very tense, folks.
Things could be downhill in a hurry.
We better be prepared, and I think this show will at least wake you up.
So wake up the world, and we thank you so much for watching.
Hopefully we'll be back next week.
▲
Export Selection