All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 20, 2024 - Jim Fetzer
01:07:48
Sasha Latypova: COVID was a Dept of Defense Operation - There was NO PANDEMIC
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thank you for inviting me and sorry I have a, you know, I have a back end here.
Hi.
And it's great to see Mike and thank you for your presentation.
um i have a uh some slides that i wanted to because i um yes so i'm gonna make you the co-host and then you're going to be able to um to to uh to show them just one second um okay go ahead uh
Okay, so I can share screen.
Okay, so the topic I wanted to cover today, I'm gonna try to make it more or less brief.
I just have a few slides.
I just feel that it's easier for people to digest this information when I have pictures accompanying my words.
About my background, some of you probably know me and some of you may be following me on Substack and this is the best place to find my information and details about everything that I'm going to talk about is on Substack.
My background is in pharmaceutical R&D.
I spent 25 years working in pharma clinical trials.
I was involved in contract research, so I had several contract research organizations that I owned, co-owned and managed.
And if you, you know, people like Dr. Ye, then you can think of them as an architect of a house.
Or a big, like something more complex than a house, a palace, a conference center.
And people like me, we're the contractors who are building it.
So we're doing the actual work.
And so the designer designs and we're implementing the design and following the regulations and understanding all the details and making sure everything is done, you know, to code.
Right, so correctly and with safety.
And so that's my experience.
And I worked in this capacity for over 60 pharmaceutical companies as clients.
Pfizer was one of the major clients, also was my co-investor twice and research and development partner.
So I know very well how Pfizer operates, or used to in any case, and what is supposed to happen and what processes exist to monitor safety.
So when I started looking into this COVID situation, immediately a lot of red flags came up for me because I knew that things were being done wrong, opposite to what safety is, very dangerously, very recklessly.
And that's what started my journey and trying to understand the data.
And the first place I looked, I'm going to skip over a bunch of information, but the first place I looked was VAERS, Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.
And I was one of the first people who started speaking about the variability of batches, basically noticing the fact that some of the batches of this so-called vaccine product were extremely toxic and some others appeared to be much less so.
And as many already discussed here, you know, it was a strategy to hide the real toxicity and real danger of this product so that some people would get no side effects at all and become the recruiters.
Um, so, uh, I was, uh, involved in, um, uh, collaborated with Craig Parody Cooper setting up the how bad, uh, how bad is your batch website?
Maybe some of you know about this.
It's a place to go check the batch ID number or lot number and see what, how many adverse events and deaths happened.
At that time, we talked to this person, Max, Max, uh, Schmeling.
He's a statistician, economist, and a scientist in Denmark.
We talked about this information and he eventually was able to obtain data from Denmark.
So here I'm showing data from Denmark that he published in the peer-reviewed journal, confirming everything that we have been saying using, you know, data from Bayer's in the U.S.
and showing that there were at least three different toxicity profiles in Denmark.
This is for all of Denmark.
Pfizer batches on the horizontal axis is the Size of the batch in doses and on the vertical is how many adverse events the Danish government recorded for this for this batch.
As you can see, there was a group of batches that were smaller in size, but extremely toxic.
And then there was the batches with sort of medium toxicity ranged in all kinds of sizes, smaller to large.
And you can see those green dots and then the yellow dots.
They have very low toxicity or low apparent toxicity.
A lot of people, unfortunately, took this and started running around with the headline that these were placebos.
They were not placebos.
I actually have the data set.
I looked into it.
These batches have severe adverse events and they have deaths recorded and even worse For children, a lot of these yellow batches are deaths and adverse events for children.
And the only reason that these are appearing as low toxicity ones is because Denmark was one of the countries that stopped injecting children fairly early on.
So these yellow ones are underused.
They're bullets sitting on the shelf and they can't hurt anyone.
Okay, so that's that's just that's just that.
But essentially, there were three toxicity profiles identified in this data set.
And very clearly, this is, first of all, huge variability that shouldn't exist for any pharmaceutical product.
They're all supposed to look the same, regardless, actually, of the size of the batch.
And second, this variability, while, you know, having huge variability is bad enough and reckless, this kind of clustering shows intent, because we have very clearly three different groups and nothing in between.
So this is how you would design something.
It doesn't happen like this by chance.
Okay, so this is intent, intent to harm.
From then on, when we when I realized that this was intentional, I've seen and we've seen all kinds of different clustering and just showing you one, we've seen different clustering by geography, but a lot of even by the label by the letter that that's used in the alphanumeric code of these batches.
So That became clear to me that this was intentional.
And I started looking into other evidence, corroborating evidence.
At the same time, as you know, a lot of people were testing the product directly, even though it's prohibited by all the contracts and by every government.
And in fact, in the US, it's considered, you know, federal theft of federal property to test these vials.
Nevertheless, numerous people have done so.
Nobody has gotten prosecuted because this is You know it's it's it's as if you you know it's it's criminals making weapons and you know they don't want to even admit that that these things belong to them uh but anyway so a lot of people were testing product directly they found huge numbers of Well, you can call them contaminants, but I'm pretty sure this is intentional contamination.
RNA was not conforming to label.
In fact, none of it, almost nothing what's found in the field actually conforms to what the label says.
So RNA is not conforming to the label.
DNA and protein impurities, I'll talk about that.
The toxic metals I found the most consistent finding is toxic metals, a variety of toxic metals, even very exotic ones, there's no idea why, why they would be there where they're coming from.
And, you know, so I'm listing them here.
The substrate is hydrogel, that's also not declared on any labels, but you can see in the images here, these are from my friend, David Nixon in Australia.
He does a lot of microscopy of these things.
So you can see this little sparkling appearance, and that's hydrogel and hydrogel in injectables.
The purpose of it is to delay the release or preserve something that is being delivered.
used in a variety of medical applications.
The fact that this was not declared and not explained to anybody is very, very suspicious.
And there are different like macro structures, you know, he's showing them here.
These are not salt crystals.
Some people were trying to dismiss this as salt crystals.
These are definitely not salt.
And not cholesterol.
So these structures are still unexplained.
Their purpose is unexplained.
They're very, very large.
And so just having something large floating in the vial is already dangerous for an injectable product and shouldn't be there.
Also, there are processes that can be described as self-assembly, very well documented, recorded in numerous videos and presentations.
And they happen continuously, so that's again very strange, never been explained, and very dangerous.
Now talking about the contamination with nucleic acid materials, such as DNA and RNA.
Well, here I'm going to discuss the DNA contamination.
Also, many of you may have seen this so-called plasmid gate, where Kevin McKernan, a researcher and geneticist from Boston, got hold of several Pfizer and Moderna bivalent and monovalent vials.
And tested them extensively and sequenced DNA because his lab is set up to do that.
So he sequenced them and what he found is that, first of all, these vials were hugely contaminated with what's called plasmid DNA, which is not supposed to be there at all.
In fact, there are very strict limits as to, it's considered a process-related impurity, very strict limits as to how much of it can be there.
I think, actually, even Small amount of it is very problematic and dangerous and should not be there at all.
But he found that up to 30% of the vial contained plasmid DNA.
The problem with that is that this is a transfection method.
So the so plasmid DNA comes from the first step of manufacturing.
It's kind of like a photo negative for your future print.
So from from that DNA first needs to DNA needs to be coded.
Here on the right hand side it shows this circular code.
So DNA needs to be coded to specification of what you want to make in the future in the RNA.
synthesis.
And then it's grown in E. coli cells in vats.
And because E. coli cells have a tendency to pick up these plasmids circular code, and then replicate quickly.
And that's that way they grow DNA in the vat.
And then the next step is the these E. coli need to be killed with antibiotic, and then cleared out.
And then the DNA needs to be purified And then from DNA with the chemical reaction, they make RNA.
So this plasmid DNA stuff needs to be completely removed and cleared from when they make the DNA, but obviously they don't do it.
They either don't care, there's no liability, or it's done intentionally.
And what he found in this plasmid DNA is code for antibiotic resistance.
Also SV40 promoter, which is a known cancer promoter gene, And that wasn't described at all in regulatory documents.
And also that SV40 cancer promoter gene, its purpose is to deliver this cargo, not just into the cell, but also into the cell nucleus, which means it will break the genetic code of that cell and it will injure the cell.
And depending on where the product goes, it will start cancer, it will start all kinds of problems.
Sterility if it gets into the ovaries.
So that's a huge problem.
And an additional huge problem is dysbiosis.
This contamination causes dysbiosis because these plasmids, if they are present in the injection, they will end up in your gut.
Your gut contains E. coli.
So E. coli in your gut will pick them up and start replicating them.
And that's how people start producing this aberrant RNA, different DNA aberrations.
Spike protein, they become spike protein factories, then they shed it to their family members.
In the office, into the environment.
And by the way, the exact same mechanism will be used in animals.
So when they inject animals with this type of stuff, same thing.
E. coli in the gut start reproducing, start shedding, destroying the microbiome of the animal, destroying the animal's health.
Animals will be dying and processed into food that ruins our food supply.
So the whole thing is related.
When they vaccinate your pets with this, same thing will happen.
Your pet will be shedding you with spike proteins and destroying your microbiome that way.
So that's multiple attacks, how they try to destroy our entire environment, our food supply, everything that we interact with.
It's by this mechanism.
And this mechanism is just basically transfection with these contaminants and nucleic acids and destroying the microbiome of all of us.
So this is probably the most dangerous thing that has been found so far in the vials is this contamination with plasmid DNA and SV40 promoter.
So what I just described, all those so-called contaminants, which I think are intentional.
This is exactly how the biological weapons are described in all sorts of public documents.
This is one of them.
I have many public documents about biological weapons, starting from, you know, late 90s here.
So this is a Next Generation Bioweapons U.S.
Air Force report.
And they're mentioning this fact that the 97 this Jason group which is basically advisory group to the US presidents met in and categorized different types of potential biological weapons into six categories of which gene therapy was one.
Okay, so when they're telling you that, oh, you know, this is a medicine, no, it's not the medicine, it's a, it's a dual use product that is easily weaponizable.
And the way to weaponize it is exactly what I have just described is basically introducing all sort of so called contaminants or stealth genes.
Or in the case of these metals, they're also like stealth cargo, because in the nanoparticulate form, these metals Can be incorporated into the lipid nanoparticles they will just, you know, create lipid nanoparticle around the metal around plasma DNA everything that gets in there.
And then that lipid nanoparticle is a vehicle to to transfect human cells.
And so that's the mechanism of weaponization that was known since the late 90s.
Yet, they all went ahead and decided that, you know, all these vaccines were going to be based on these gene therapy platforms, and everybody designed them exactly the same way as Mike just described.
So, if anybody tells you we didn't know, not true.
They knew it all very well since the late 90s.
Um, the, the regulators, you know, what's interesting is that some of the regulators had no clue about what they're supposed to be regulating.
And this, this pertains to smaller regulators like TGA here, I'm showing it's Australian pharmaceutical regulator, they did no checking, they had no information about, you know, people were filing For us to ask them questions about, did you know about this, you know, genetic component of this and that and how the micro RNAs work?
And the answer was, well, we don't know anything about this.
So how are they supposed to regulate?
Well, they didn't regulate, they just flagged them through.
They were told to release them on the market.
Larger regulators, such as European Medicines Agency, And also this includes FDA, it's the same set of documents.
So they knew about these issues pertaining to genetic therapies and how they're supposed to be regulated.
So, and the reason I know that they knew is because these documents were leaked from the European Medicines Agency at the end of 2020.
And the one particular document I read, it's like a regulatory summary that they write up before, you know, to discuss with the manufacturer before approval and or during the approval process.
And as of November 30th, 2020, EMA wrote up a huge document for Pfizer saying, first of all, Pfizer is not Good manufacturing practice compliant at any of their regulatory sites that they are not able to produce consistent product that the process is not validated in many, many key areas.
It's a complete black box proprietary and not disclosed to anyone.
And so regulators cannot make any judgment about that.
And there was no plan as to a deadline as to when they're going to be in compliance.
So this is just an obscene violation of any regulatory process.
And then in addition to that, they wrote up 117 major objections and concerns.
Relating to all sorts of manufacturing issues, problems, lack of validation, lack of proof that they can produce consistent product.
And this was all prepared.
And on 30 pages of document, it goes through all kinds of objections that they have.
And this was two weeks before this product was released on the market.
And from my experience working with pharma companies, even having a couple of objections like this would stop the entire program until they were resolved fully.
And so the FDA telling us that they are regulating this is a complete BS.
It's a lie.
They are not regulating this.
They wrote they wrote up all these objections.
Yet two weeks later, the product appears on the market all over the world and is forced on every man, woman and child in the world.
So that's that's just evidence that regulators were not regulating anything.
And so the regulatory approval was a sham.
Neither the regulators, nor the vaccinators, nor pharmas themselves, they have evidence of that, or as far as the employees of pharmas know what's in the vials.
And they were just following orders.
But the question is, whose orders?
Who was giving them the orders to do this?
Well, it turns out that if the government is allowed to violate the Constitution in an emergency, they will create the permanent state of emergency.
And that's what we all need to realize.
That's what they did.
I'm just going to explain to you how exactly they did that.
So currently, the U.S.
Constitution is not in force.
It has been suspended since 2020.
The first step of suspending the U.S.
Constitution is to announce a public health emergency.
For this, we have this Title 42 Public Health Service Act.
And National Hazards Preparedness for Public Health Emergency Acts.
These were put in place starting in the 80s and updated in early 2000s.
So that's, you know, your evidence of pre-planning because all of this had to pass through Congress and through legislation.
So, public health emergency, that idea was introduced under Reagan in the 80s.
Prior to that, there was no anticipation in the U.S.
Constitution of such a thing as public health emergency, national public health emergency.
And this particular idea was put into law.
And what this means is when this public health emergency state is announced, we have the legal equivalent of announcement of war on U.S.
soil.
And that act suspends the Constitution.
And step two is deploy countermeasures.
So all these products, all these medical, so-called medical products or vaccines, it's not just the vaccines, but also therapeutics like remdesivir.
Although it's not a therapeutic, it's a poison.
It's actually a pro.
Pro drug of cyanide.
That's why it causes kidney failure.
But so all of these things and diagnostic tests, which are fake and masks and swabs contaminated.
All of it is falls under this category of countermeasures.
They get deployed.
There is another piece of legislation.
It's very critical.
Is this prep act, which you may have heard of it completely absolves not just the pharma companies, but anyone involved in In the deployment of countermeasures of any liability.
PrEP Act declarations were made in 2020 for COVID and Marburg, and since then they have been updated 11 times or so, maybe even more, and now include flu, RSV, anything potential.
Or any virus or pathogen of pandemic potential, which is also total nonsense.
There are no pandemics.
And Mike explained it actually very well.
So these announcements, these PrEP Act announcements, are equivalent of announcement of using a specific type of weapon.
Because just like military service members, if they're in combat, They don't have any liability if they kill enemy combatants.
Well, legally, this PREP Act announcement gives the same type of protection, liability protection, to everyone who is deploying these things, which for the most part involves healthcare system, doctors, nurses, pharmacists.
They're absolved of any liability, regardless of how many people they kill and injure.
As long as they follow the orders.
So the same way the military says, if you follow the orders and you kill enemy combatants, you don't have any liability.
Same way for the health care personnel who are deploying these weapons on Americans.
And so by doing this, Congress ultimately transferred, and this was done over a long period of time, you know, starting in the 80s.
The Congress transferred to HHS Secretary unilateral, unreviewable power to declare this public health emergency status and then deploy countermeasures, which are basically weapons camouflaged as vaccination programs and medicines.
And another thing that should unite us all, Republicans, Democrats, no matter who we are, what face we have, this is done under both Republican and Democrat administrations completely the same way, following the same procedures, following the same goals, which is destruction of us as people.
And by the way, Trump announced public health emergencies.
He was the one who pulled the trigger.
He's fully knowledgeable about what he's done with the separation warp speed, and Biden continued exactly the same strategy.
So let's not be fooled.
And I think the title of this whole meeting is very good.
Let's stop trusting them.
They're out to kill us and to injure us and to sterilize our children.
And we should not let this happen.
So I'm just explaining to you how this was all organized and pulled together.
Now, important part about countermeasures.
These are so-called medicines without any regulatory safeguards, which by definition makes them poison, because pharmaceutical industry and medical, you know, in general medicines are poisons, which we develop very carefully to transfer, to make sure that they have the therapeutic effects, but don't have the undesired poisonous effects.
If you don't have any of the regulation, They by definition are poison.
And as poison, they're used as weapon.
So here's the specific piece of US law that's cited in all FDA documents, pharma documents, other legal documents pertaining to these COVID shots.
is this 21 U.S.C.
360 BBB, which says that use of EUA-covered medical countermeasures is not a clinical investigation, which means, by definition, it's not possible to run a clinical trial for these vaccines, so-called vaccines, or remdesivir therapeutics.
It's not possible to have clinical investigational subjects or investigators And so, therefore, these, these products for them, they reside in this extrajudicial gray area where federal government makes them, federal government distributes them, converts all the pharmaceutical regulations, And doing it, you know, completely absolving everyone from liability of killing and injuring people as long as they follow the orders.
I mean, Sasha, I'm gonna stop you.
I'm gonna I'm going to mute everyone because someone got unmuted and there's background noise.
So just just unmute yourself after after I mute everyone.
Because I don't know who it is that is that's that's making the noise.
So I just have to mute everyone.
Okay, just unmute yourself now.
Okay.
All right.
So, let's talk about Operation Warp Speed.
So, Operation Warp Speed is a military program.
I was just talking to you about, you know, they announced public health emergency, that's declaration of war, suspend the Constitution.
They do PrEP Act announcements, which Announcements of certain weapons.
So when they declared COVID weapon, what they did is that then they set up this Operation Warp Speed, which is a military program to deliver this weapon so that the healthcare can deploy it.
And as you remember, they were advertising it as a collaboration between HHS and the Department of Defense and saying that the Department of Defense is going to do logistical function only.
But it turns out, based on their own organizational structure, which was obtained from documents that became available for it, We can see that the head of this operation, a chief operating officer, is the Department of Defense.
So this is entirely military-led campaign and military product.
The HHS is only chief science advisor.
All this layer, top executive layer of this organization is entirely U.S.
government and two-thirds of it is military.
And most of them did not have any healthcare experience.
So this is military running this campaign and making this product.
Only third level down is pharma.
Pharma are suppliers of these poisons.
I broadly call them biochemical poisons, because largely it's chemistry, but there's just nucleic acid use, so it's biochemical poisons.
And pharma is following orders, have CREP Act liability protection.
And are not subject to any pharmaceutical regulation, but they get huge amounts of money, so they shut up and they're happy.
So that's how this whole organization is set up.
It's not, you know, some people go, you know, make a mistake and say, oh, it's pharma, pharma, because they're greedy, they want all this money, and they bought all the politicians, and therefore they're doing it themselves.
Yes, pharma is extremely bad and they should be prosecuted.
But let's figure out the exact organizational structure.
And here is very clear that pharma is only third level down their suppliers.
They're suppliers of poisons and weapons.
But the ordering organization is the U.S.
Department of Defense.
And that's, by the way, how all the money has flown through the Department of Defense to the pharmaceutical companies.
So it's not a medical product, it's a military campaign.
Also from the same set of slides, this is the Operation Warp Speed and BARDA bragging about their so-called vaccine portfolio.
All the manufacturers of the vaccines, the real manufacturers of the vaccines, are these what they what they call vaccine supporting efforts and those are long established military contractors uh you know going back decades uh manufacturing weapons uh and manufacturing so-called medical products under these weapons contracts from the department of defense so these are all established they have been preset for years to manufacture this then in 2020
They went and created this show hiring these big pharma companies to put their names on those vials.
And those are the ones that got paraded and advertised everywhere in the TV and media, Pfizer, Moderna, Novavax, Johnson & Johnson.
But as you can see, these guys are very careful about their own PowerPoint presentations and very carefully using the words because they know that this is going to get foiled eventually, lawsuits are going to start and they will have to defend themselves in court.
So what they do, they put very carefully on these vaccine brand names, they put Award Demo Demonstration.
And manufacturing happens here on the right-hand side.
So what does this demo mean?
Well, the demo means it's how the contracts were written.
In fact, I'm going to go to this page first.
The contracts for all of these countermeasures, including vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics, and everything else, were written by the US government, by the Department of Defense.
As you can see, Department of Defense is a contracting entity, and that's where the money is coming from.
This is from the contracted Pfizer.
Pfizer brought it up as their defense in Brooke Jackson's whistleblower lawsuit.
Where Brooke Jackson was alluding, you know, Pfizer committed fraud in clinical trials.
And Pfizer's own legal defense was that we were not hired to do a proper clinical trial, we were hired to do a demonstration only.
So we did not commit the fraud, we delivered the fraud that the government ordered.
And here's how it's stated.
Pfizer's scope of work is a large-scale vaccine manufacturing demonstration.
That's what demo means.
Demonstration is fake, by definition.
It's not the real thing.
Also, further in the contract, there are specific clauses.
I've done very extensive reviews of these contracts and published on my Substack if anybody is interested.
But in the scope of work, it's also very explicit that clinical trials, manufacturing regulations, Preclinical regulations, all of that was out of scope of the contract explicitly.
So Pfizer was not obligated to do any of that.
And in fact by law, it's not even possible for countermeasures.
So, in summary, all this vaccine development and approval was a theater.
It was a theater to deceive the public, to let everyone to believe that these were really pharmaceuticals, and that, you know, injecting themselves with these products, so it's just basically to fool the public that this was FDA-regulated, proper pharmaceutical product.
It wasn't.
The word demonstration is used throughout in all of these documents.
Clinical trials were not ordered by the DOD or HHS and it's not possible legally to have clinical trial for countermeasure.
CG&P compliance also wasn't ordered and it's not possible.
And there are no legally clinical trial subjects or investigators and therefore informed consent is not possible at all.
So what FDA leadership has done, Peter Marks and Janet Woodcock, is they've gone on TV and media and lied to people impersonating regulators.
They have no actually legal authority over these products and no mandate to regulate countermeasures.
In fact, that function resides with BARDA, but BARDA has no congressionally mandated regulatory authority over any medical products.
And so finally, you know, this is what my friend Catherine Watt, you know, the Substack writer, calls the kill box.
What these people have done, they build a kill box.
And we've discussed, and Mike and John also covered this very extensively, that it all starts with propaganda, With fear of of these, you know, cataclysmic things like global pandemics, which don't exist.
It's a hoax.
They cannot they cannot happen.
And they have never happened in human history.
Now, you know, if they run out of that script, they will bring in climate change.
If they'll run out of climate change, they'll bring in aliens from space.
They'll come up with some other fake scenario to fear monger the public.
Then they implement all these intentional bad policies in lockstep, weaponize health care, as I've described, use medical, so-called medical products as weapons and poisons.
And then they gaslight the injured and bereaved and continue the same cycle over and over and over until we stop compliance.
So we have to withdraw our trust completely.
So, Stop complying.
Say no to all of this nonsense.
And that actually is very, very effective because they cannot implement their policies if people do not comply with them.
So that their power only resides on the fact that we give them that power.
We have to withdraw it.
Finally, many people ask me, well, why, and who, and who is behind it?
Why would our government do it?
Well, our government actually is not ours.
It belongs to the mafia.
The mafia is these billionaires.
This is just one of the articles from 2009, but you can find numerous articles discussing the same exact thing.
So these billionaires get together, organizing their clubs, the WEF, the VOS, whatever those clubs are.
And then they discuss how to shrink the world's population because they think that the planet needs saving from us.
And, you know, that's, that's the basic plan.
And so, you know, they're billionaires, they're psychopaths.
And by the way, here's the quote from that article saying that they actually, you know, in 2009, these exact people, Warren Buffett, Bill Gates, and a bunch of others, Soros, Oprah, Rockefellers got together and, you know, they didn't quite vote on reducing the world population, but they said that, you know, population growth should be tackled as a potentially disastrous environmental, social, and industrial threat.
So, you know, if anybody has any questions about it, just look at these publications, look at those newspapers.
And these stories that they tell you themselves, that they think of us as a threat.
They think of us as an enemy, enemy combatant.
And that's how they've set up all these laws to trigger this event.
And that's what they have been doing since 2020.
So at this point, I can take questions.
I'm going to stop sharing here.
Thank you so much, Sasha.
I feel like saying Dr. Latepova because you're so brilliant.
I'm not a doctor.
I know, but you totally seem like it.
I can play one on TV, yeah.
Sasha, are you able to share your slides?
Would you send me the slides so that I could send them to whoever wants them?
Yeah.
Okay, thank you so much.
So let me take questions.
I don't know whether You know what, whoever has questions first for Sasha.
If Dr. Eden is still on, then maybe people have a chance, if he is able to stay, to take the questions afterwards that he couldn't take before, because I know Sasha has to go very soon.
I'll start with Joeyo.
I don't know if I'm pronouncing your name right.
I know you had your hand raised before when Mike was speaking.
Go ahead, you can unmute.
Thank you for all your incredible work, Sasha.
It's just so important.
Do you think that the ruling class spread the virus manually?
Yeah, and it's not, you know, people confuse, you know, what virus is.
First of all, they fear monger as if it's some kind of a self-spreading, you know, disease agent, stuff like that.
And that's what makes people fearful.
But rest assured, nobody can make viruses in the lab.
It's not possible.
They cannot make any live organisms in the lab.
They don't know how.
Only God can make live things.
Again, so people cannot make it in the lab so that when they start fear mongering about all these rogue scientists or our enemies are going to set up these labs.
And make, you know, some pathogens that are self-spreading and hugely deadly, like, you know, flying Ebola.
That's all BS.
It's just a fear narrative, okay?
What they have spread, likely, is some sort of poison.
And, you know, poisons can be synthesized.
No question.
You can create poison People can be poisoned, but it's not self-spreading, and it's largely not dangerous to large groups of people.
I mean, you can poison individuals or small groups of people in one location, but it doesn't spread.
So they probably have done some aerosol spraying on subway in New York, for example.
That's a known mechanism.
And some other, you know, highly populated areas like London or, you know, other key cities that they needed to, to start this propaganda campaign.
And then, and that would, you know, those poisons, I mean, again, they're not hugely dangerous until you, unless you get some very, very large exposure, but they can precipitate things like, you know, flu-like symptoms, for example.
And, you know, simultaneously.
And so they probably have done something like that.
And then from there on, it's largely propaganda, fear narratives, fake movies, fake, all of these like fake videos from China where people dropping dead.
And then the deaths were generated by the hospital murder protocol.
So you scare people to run to the hospital and then you capture them in the hospital and kill them with the murder protocol.
That's how they did it.
Thank you so much.
Do you think that the U.S.
intelligence community is attempting to pass the blame onto China, or are they both involved?
Yeah, yeah, they are.
Absolutely.
And so that's one of the kind of like diversion tactics.
Point finger at China.
Seriously, this is done by the U.S., by the Pentagon, 100%.
Now, China was a collaborator and a contractor and a co-investor in these pharma companies.
They've invested in them.
They're a financial beneficiary, but they're not the mastermind behind this.
It's the U.S.
government, Department of Defense, the Pentagon.
Thank you.
If you'd like to be a guest on our local conservative radio show, I'll send you my email.
Okay.
Thank you.
People are asking me about getting the recording.
So maybe someone can write it for me in the chat box.
Just go to my Substack and subscribe.
It's free.
Truth613.substack.com.
Maybe someone could just put that in the chat box for me.
And then, because if I try to type, then I cover the face of whoever is talking at the moment.
And the recording will be available, God willing.
Let me, let's have, Glenn, I think you had your hand raised also from the last talk.
You can unmute.
You're having trouble unmuting?
No, I'm fine.
Am I asking a question to Sasha or to Mike?
Maybe first to Sasha because I know she has to go soon.
Sure.
So Sasha, the discussion with Kevin McKernan, And the connection of that to the E. coli, I hadn't heard that recently.
Does that sort of complete the cycle?
I mean, there's always been this discussion of a lower gut had some impact, but it wasn't necessarily clear.
We believe that's the primary path of action, that there's interaction with the E. coli in the gut, and that once you can correct that, Uh, that you lessen the amount of, of, uh, damage.
I mean, certainly it's a huge, it's a huge driver of damage that is the induction of dysbiosis.
And by the way, the induction of dysbiosis is also another category of the whole category of weapons that's discussed in, in bioweapons textbooks.
Uh, so, and, and, and they also discussed the fact that you can do it through animal, uh, chain.
And pets, you know, so like they discuss all that.
So, and yes, for people who are vaccine injured, you should look into the gut health and try to check for especially bifida bacteria levels because that's what gets affected.
And in fact, there's also like the COVID itself, you know, whatever poison they were using to induce COVID symptoms.
The explanation for why children are not affected is they have high Bifidobacteria levels versus adults and older people.
And that protects them.
And also in the same house, like there are numerous examples where in the same household, you know, two people would get sick with COVID symptoms and, you know, three people are not, and they're living in the same household.
The same thing, those people who are not affected by this COVID poison, are the ones who have high bifida bacteria levels.
So to protect yourselves, to try to heal injury, is a gut microbiome is a very, very important driver.
So try to make sure that whatever you're doing is improving your own gut bacteria. - Thank you. - Well, that's really important.
Sasha, should I, do you have time for me to let him ask Mike his question also?
Because I don't know how much longer Mike will be on and Mike just sent me a message.
Sure, yeah.
I can do another like 5-10 minutes.
Yes, that's fine.
Okay.
What was the gentleman's name that was just asking a question?
If you want to raise your hand again, you can ask your question for Mikey then.
If you're still there.
I'm so sorry.
I forgot your name momentarily.
Glenn.
Glenn.
Glenn, do you want to raise your hand again so I can find you?
Okay, I'll just, I'll take the next question and, Glenn, raise your hand again.
After that, I'll try to come back to you.
Your name is Huser.
It's a gentleman on the screen.
You can unmute.
Thank you.
Can you hear me, Sasha?
Yes.
Great.
So I follow you quite closely, and I'm somebody who likes to understand the whole picture and why.
So you've presented a compelling case that the DoD and the Pentagon are behind this.
And if somebody that they were willing to answer were to put this before them, obviously they wouldn't admit that they're killing the population.
So what do you think they were trying justify and normalize their role in this?
If you presented all the evidence, what do you think they try to say?
Well, they'll say that you're a conspiracy theorist.
That they, you know, that they would, you know, they would not, they would deny, they would say, you know, it's a medicine, FDA approved it.
And that's, in fact, what they're doing.
So Department of Justice is defending FDA and they would the same way defend DOD if anybody brought them to court.
And the Department of Justice is putting forth these arguments that, you know, the informed consent is not necessary, that FDA approved everything, that these are, you know, regular contracts, regular pharmaceuticals, and, you know, and the judges are very careful not to review the facts about the vaccine itself.
They're very careful about dismissing the cases or, you know, on various grounds.
Dismissing the cases from the court that have any potential to bring discovery into how dangerous this product really is.
Okay, thank you.
Thank you.
Okay, it was Glenn who had been raising his hand.
Let me just get him and unmute him.
Just a second.
Oh, just a reminder to everyone that that maybe some people weren't here when I mentioned before.
We have rabbis either watching now or that will be watching.
So just anyone who wants to ask a question or who even has a photo like on their screen, even if their camera's off, just please try to be dressed modestly.
There shouldn't be anything immodest showing because then it's uncomfortable for me to release the video and send it to rabbis and very important people who really need to see it.
So just cover up so I should be able to call on you or just make sure there's no picture that's immodest that's showing.
I'm sorry.
Thank you.
Glenn, go ahead.
Hi, so, Dr. Uden, you've identified a wide range of different topics and elements, some of them that are certainly within your specialty and others that you've uncovered and learned, and that it does take a large part of the public to be involved.
I was wondering if you would be Would you consider joining a broader team of truth-tellers?
I believe all four of them that we have here today are really core to that, and there's a variety of other players like Dr. James Thorpe, Dr. Andrew Wakefield, Ed Dowd, that if we get the right kind of concentration of truth-tellers and put that out in a consistent and targeted way, I think we can make an enormous amount of forward action and progress.
Oh, Dr. Yehden might be muted.
Just a sec.
Let me unmute him.
Sorry.
Yes.
Yes.
Simple answer is yes.
I've no problem at all working with those people.
I know of those people and some of them I know.
I'm just a bit disconsolate about How can we create, as it were, the false multiplication that you rightly identify we need?
I don't know how to do it.
So far, I'm finding that censorship is so powerful that, you know, just to be objective, although it's a bit depressing, I've lived in and around Canterbury for something like 28 years.
I am probably one of the most notorious truth tellers, certainly in my own country.
I can walk up and down the high street and I'm never recognized.
Depressing.
That means, I think, less than 1% of people have noticed me, or I would bump into someone who would go, you might need... So that's quite depressing.
So I don't underestimate the difficulty, but if you can pull people together and there's a way to reach other people that isn't subject to the relations of these censors, then let's give it a go.
I think we can.
I think this group that's been formed today is a great one as a starting point.
There's a variety of things I've done.
I've been working with Dr. James Thorpe and Dr. Angie Ferrella, she being a Texas pediatrician.
As well as Dr. Peter McCuller and a variety of lawyers.
So I think we're, we are, and I've, you know, Sasha has been on shows that I've sponsored also, as well as John and Looney.
So there's a lot of connections that have been established.
It's just not finalized and fortified.
My own opinion, and it ties with what John and Looney said, I've interacted with 20 or 30 members of Parliament in Britain.
It's a. I have no idea how to make them move from that, they're more frightened, they're more frightened of the puppet masters than they are of you and me.
I get that, and I don't think that's the target.
I think the target, as many people have said, is with the people, and get them involved.
Absolutely.
And many of the fundamentals in the evangelical, both Christians and Jews, are the place to start, because they have a foundation of written Scripture through the Bible, and they will move as a group if they're well motivated.
I absolutely agree.
The people, and inside of God, Great statement for a scientist, but you are right.
Yeah, I'm with you.
Great.
Thank you.
Pleasure.
Thank you.
Thank you so much.
I'm glad that you got to ask your question, Glenn, because of Dr. Yadin, because that was so important.
Let me see.
Sasha, how much longer do you have?
I'll take one more question and then I'm sorry, I'll have to... Okay.
Okay, let me see who else has been raising their hand.
I'm sorry, I have to...
You have to get to it.
Okay, Shelly.
Shelly, you can unmute.
Can you hear me?
Yes.
Okay, first of all, I just want to say, To be able to ask you guys this question is like, uh, one of the biggest deals in my life.
Um, and I'm driving with the sweater thrown over me, so hope that's okay.
Um, I saw this pop up on my phone.
I forgot about this thing today.
Uh, I am, I've been following me, you, Mike, um, Sasha, I've seen you on Telegram, et cetera, for a long time.
And Mike, I've been following you forever from the beginning.
So I've been in this space for a long time.
Um, And hours a day.
I've just done this rabbit hole.
Here's my question.
Sasha and Mike.
Sasha, I have not put my mother's death on on.
Oh, hold on a second.
I'm just getting rid of this call.
Can you still hear me?
Yeah.
Oops.
Almost.
Shelly, did you get... Just a second.
Okay.
I have to go to a different view and... Oh, no.
Sorry.
I have to go here.
Shelly, I'm going to try to find you if you're on a different device.
Just a second.
No?
Too bad.
I wanted so badly to ask her a question.
Okay.
Let me try one more time.
I still feel bad.
Okay, maybe she's going to come on again momentarily.
Sasha, do you have another moment?
Sure, yeah.
Okay, there is Rabbi Yunon Abraham in Britain.
He is on by phone and he very much wants to thank Dr. Yadin.
I'm going to unmute him, just a second.
Rabbi Abraham, go ahead.
Yes, hello.
Yeah.
First of all, I just want to explain what I mean when we say that Dr. Mike Heaton and John Maloney saved, well, the Orthodox Jewish community in Britain.
And I want to explain that.
It sounds a bit... If anybody's living in Britain or anybody's listening to it from Britain, they will not understand how.
One and a half years ago, you gave me the phone number of Dr. Mike Heaton.
I had a 45 minute conversation with him and I typed out the entire thing.
Basically everything he said was typed out.
There was one little point which maybe I'll mention now that wasn't mentioned and that is children do not even transmit the virus.
The jab does not stop transmission.
So there's absolutely no point in vaccinating children.
That's one point which wasn't mentioned, but other than that, I think everything he said, not everything, but give or take a few things, it's a very nice summary.
I actually sent you the letter which I typed out after he'd spoken to me.
He spoke to me for 45 minutes, I typed out everything he said, and then I emailed it back to Dr. Mike Heaton and he did me the favour of going through it all and adjusting it and making it right.
And then I sent it to a few Robonom around England.
Also, John Looney did me a big favor.
Rabbi Abraham, there's a wide audience here, so you have to just make sure you say everything in English.
So, you mean you sent it to different rabbis?
Okay, I'll try my best.
There's a few rabbis, quite a lot of rabbis.
And also, John Looney did me the big favor of transcribing his experiences, and even leaving his phone number, which was an amazing thing, and I emailed it around to a lot of contacts I had.
All over the world, and it actually got into a newspaper called Larvin.
It's a certain newspaper.
I think you've got, I've sent it through to you, so you could maybe show it.
Now, one of the things that happened was, in London, they tried a tactic which they use all over.
And what they do is, they try to get, they try to use this domino effect.
And it's well worth us knowing what system they use.
They go to religious, they went to the most ultra-orthodox community in London.
The biggest group of ultra-orthodox rabbis in London.
And they try to get them to push their members to take the vaccine, that even teenage girls, which is absolutely totally unjustified, should take this vaccine.
They went as far, I've never heard them do this, but somebody from the A&E in London went down to the Rabbis, one of the big Rabbis in London, and he explained to him that they only have people in the A&E who have been vaccinated.
That means they do not get unvaccinated.
That means that anybody who's had a vaccine doesn't end up in the A&E, which we all know is absolute nonsense.
So they said the only people they have in the A&E are the unvaccinated.
That's what they told them.
That's the lie they told them.
So basically, they were holding by literally signing that document.
Had they signed that document, it would have been a domino effect.
It literally would have gone London because it was such a very, very prestigious, ultra-orthodox institution.
Many of the other ones would have followed suit.
That means they would have moved on to Manchester and then to Gateshead as well.
And basically many of the main mainstream ultra-Orthodox would have literally given, even enforced, giving this vaccine because they would have said it was Jewish law that you would have to give.
And at that time it wasn't very clear.
The letter which Dr. Mike Heaton and Dr. John Looney, and sorry, Mr. John Looney, put out stopped this whole thing in its tracks.
So there's no question about what they did.
The sad thing is they don't realize how much they did.
I mean, regardless of the people who can see how Mike Eden looks and how John Looney looks, they've done such a lot.
If you think about how many tens of thousands of people that is, it's phenomenal, a phenomenal amount of people.
Yeah, and that's basically, I want to thank him on behalf of all of those people.
It's unbelievable.
Apart from all the other communities, he's helped out.
And I wanted to add on, you know, the people mentioned the Christian community and the Jewish community.
I would add on to that the Muslim community.
The Muslim community are very, very, very, very upset what's going on, and especially when it comes to transgender particular things, and I think we could work together, and this is very easy to do.
I wouldn't say the community, I wouldn't go, I would go down to the regular people.
A lot of the people who are, like you pointed out, anybody who's in a position of power today is under restraint.
That means that he's targeted and he can't, a lot of them can't say what they want to say because they're targeted.
They're told to keep their mouth shut.
Whereas the regular, regular people are not.
And I think, I think we should be targeting the broader, the broader audiences.
And to be surprised, we could get amongst the Muslim and Christian and the ultra Orthodox, we could get a tremendous amount of a following.
It's quite a, quite a large following which we can get.
Thank you so much, Abraham.
Thank you.
It's so encouraging, and if Dr. Yadim and John succeeded in saving that population that you know about, we can only imagine all the other people around the globe that they've saved that they don't even know about.
Absolutely.
Absolutely.
They've got no idea.
Yes, yes, yes.
For sure.
Thank you.
Thank you so much for sharing that.
Let me see if Shelly is back on.
Just a second.
Yes, go ahead, Shelly, please unmute.
Okay, sorry about that.
Okay, so my mother took the vaccine, the first two vaccines in February of 21.
She immediately started having nosebleeds that went on for weeks and weeks.
Then she got shingles.
I was alarmed, but of course there was nothing I could do.
But it's settled down.
Then my sister signed her up for the booster.
And within a couple days of having the booster, she started having severe nosebleeds to the point they had to take her to the ambulance to the emergency room.
When that happened, I turned to somebody and said, my mother's going to be dead in two weeks.
And she was dead two weeks in one day.
She was literally walking to lunch and face planted.
She rallied for like an hour and was embarrassed.
But then she went downhill very, very fast.
They got her to the hospital.
They said she had a total heart block.
She also had severe tachycardia.
And she died before I even got to the hospital.
And I did the how bad is my batch?
I don't know what's taking me so long.
I have not put her on bears.
Her batches were pretty bad from what I could see.
Not just the first two, but also the booster.
So everybody says, shut up.
Your mother is old.
She just died.
And I know my mother, again, I have a picture of us taken before, like a week before the booster.
She has so much energy and light coming from her face.
I know that this killed her.
And I'm just asking you guys, Am I probably right?
Oh, Mike got muted just a second.
Go ahead.
Go ahead.
Yes, so Shelly, I'm sorry to hear about your mom.
It's tragic and I think you were clearly close.
Obviously, it's impossible to be certain, but my instincts support your own personal remarks.
What happened to her is, Quite common, given the nature of these toxins.
So, yeah, I would say it should go as a suspected SAR, as they say.
And I think upon review, people would say, yeah, that probably is it.
I even called her cardiologist.
I had been, she had gone to a cardiologist at one point and I went with her before she went into the care home and he said, because she did have some dementia, he goes, too bad, because he goes, too bad, said to me, too bad about the dementia because she has the body of a 60 year old.
And I called him and I said, what happened?
And he just hemmed it hot.
And he said, I don't know.
I don't know.
I have my 23-year-old son lost three friends in the beginning of 2022.
One had a seizure.
One died at graduation.
I was there, college graduation.
The other one, as my son called me and said, he woke up dead.
He died in his sleep.
I know so many people.
Today I heard That an ex-boyfriend just had a blood clot and died, and the girl who called to tell me said that two weeks ago she had severe tachycardia and now she has AFib.
The amount of people I know that have had strokes, heart attacks, and suddenly have health conditions is more than anybody I know.
And my son losing three friends the beginning of 2022 right after that booster rolled out.
I don't know what to do with this information.
When I tell people, they look at me like I am crazy.
Like, I don't know where to put all these deaths and how to make sense of it.
Should I just shut up?
Should I just not talk about it?
No, I personally think they've all been murdered.
These are intentionally, carefully designed With the aim of injuring, maiming and killing.
Sorry, I'm as direct as I can possibly be.
Mistakes were not made.
I understand.
I understand.
I have three children.
I kept two from getting the vaccine by bribing, not bribing them, by taking away everything that they had and said if they get the vaccine, they don't get it back.
They don't get their cars.
They don't get the money.
They don't get their college educations.
One, I was too old and I couldn't do that.
I've done everything I can to keep my children.
I've succeeded two out of three.
I feel terrible about everything.
I have to go on to the next person because I don't know if Sasha has any time left.
Before I go, one thing I wanted to say, which has been successful so far, and this is for the US.
But this is based on what Rabbi said earlier.
There is a doctrine of lesser magistrate.
Okay, so when the federal government is captured and acting like this and trying to intentionally kill and injure people, and most of the state governments are also likewise captured, We have to go to whatever is the lesser magistrate, and that is a constitutional concept, and you have to go and petition that authority.
And the authority could be religious leadership or it could be a local county.
So I have been testifying with a number of colleagues, including Peter McCullough and some others, specifically in Idaho, because we have an organizer in Idaho.
And we went to several counties, and some were hostile to us and some were friendly.
Succeeded in them signing letters declaring that these products are biological weapons and that they should be stopped and that their county should not have them.
They don't have legislative power, but they do have it's a symbolic.
It's a symbolic letter that they can all sign and it can be in local papers.
It can be discussed locally.
It also then creates a legislative process.
That the state has to take up.
So that's what we're working on.
And that has been successful.
And I encourage everyone, you can go meet with your county commissioner.
You can go meet with your sheriff.
You can meet with your religious leaders and discuss this and bring this evidence.
Call on us.
You know, we publish our information.
You can find my all my sub stack.
It's free.
You get all the all the new publications for free.
I only charge for archive.
And, you know, so that's how you can use this information to share with your community and to appeal to whatever authority, even your, you know, employer.
I know a lot of employers that were very bad about this, but still, it's worthwhile bringing this information and sharing it in your community and trying to get people to acknowledge it.
So thank you, and I have to leave, but thank you very much.
You're a very great audience, and thank you for your questions.
Thank you so much.
Sasha, can you just state your substack over again?
Because someone was just asking.
Yeah, I'll put it in the chat.
It's my name, SashaLatypova.substack.com.
Thank you so much, Sasha.
And I would love to have you again.
You're such a fountain of knowledge and brilliance.
I really appreciate it.
It's such a pleasure and honor to have you with us.
Thank you so, so much.
And I'm sorry that it was running late and you had to abbreviate, but I would love to share your slides with anyone who wants.
Yeah, I'll send you.
▲
Export Selection