Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 9, 2024 - Jim Fetzer

01:19:57

Need to Know News (9 February 2024) with Carl Herman & Brian Davidson

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Carl Herman, Mission Viejo, Brian Davidson, Houston, Texas, Need to Know News.
	This is Friday, the 9th of February, 2024.
	Let's take a look at our topics.
	Opening statements.
	Alright, we're going to the war.
	The Putin-Carlson interview.
	Very interesting.
	Big move on the game board.
	And the WEF and the WHO and their control for totalitarian politics on We the People, or their attempt to trump Biden optics, and then megalithic architecture.
	Just, uh, what is this place?
	What is our history?
	All right, brother.
	Opening statement.
	Well, opening statement.
	I guess I've been pretty deep into the state and the nature of the Church lately.
	I've spent a lot of time on the Founding Fathers and what happened during that 150 years prior to the Revolution, from when we landed on Plymouth Rock to when we had the Revolution.
	Trying to figure out how, uh, how the founding fathers saw, uh, the emergence of our government, trying to understand how they thought and what was influencing them.
	Um, but also, you know, carefully rereading the Bible again, and I'm, you know, making a lot of progress.
	I'm probably doing anywhere from six to 10 or 11 chapters a day, uh, just to make sure I understand it.
	And I always keep a, A single-volume commentary nearby, just in case I want to cross-reference anything I don't understand.
	And I gotta tell ya, the more I go through it, the more I find these nuggets of truth that are just, like, loaded with truth.
	Loaded, loaded, loaded.
	You know, there's a verse in, I think it's Hebrews 4.12, that says, The Word of God is living and active sharper than any double-edged sword.
	It penetrates to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow.
	Wow.
	And I can tell you something, even just with a couple of months of reading, I'm changing the way I'm living just because I can see so clearly what's right and what's wrong, what's wicked and what's true.
	And I'm able to find all sorts of historical illustrations or events, people, lessons.
	Um, you know, if you're one of those people that are out there that says, I don't know, read the Bible, don't listen to the Bible, I can tell you, brother, you probably wrong.
	You just haven't given it a shot.
	I mean, I'm telling you this special, special book with a lot of lessons.
	So that's it.
	That's my opening statement.
	Very good.
	Thank you.
	As a teacher of U.S.
	government and U.S.
	history and grappling with the source material and trying to come up with myself, how am I going to give the context with the promise of the United States and the breakthrough of it to the students, I basically would just say, so scientific revolution and the Enlightenment Gave principles and ideals that didn't exist in any government and the government of England.
	They literally had so many stories of the divine rights of Kings and that bloodline who I think that is the bloodline of the enemy.
	And that the breakthrough of the United States was just for a person, and that we all are brothers and sisters.
	And that gets into the battle of, what are we going to do about owning other human beings?
	But really, my current position is that I don't hold any of the history as reliable anymore.
	I'm more on the Tartarius side, that there was a huge wipeout event.
	And whatever we had in history was collapsed and we, I am, the only thing that I'm certain of is that we're being lied to and that we're not going to get the truth so until we win and have arrests and then I'll be very interested in what true history is and equally interested in the possibility of a Star Trek like future if we can unleash technology
	This place will be unrecognizable at when we have for your grandchildren and our grandchildren.
	Oh, it would be nice to unleash technology, but I'm good.
	I'm going to make one other one follow-up point to that, you know.
	I've been very careful about making sure I understand what's legit and what's not legit when it comes to anything called the scripture.
	I want to know and I'm always asking the question.
	Where are the earliest and most reliable manuscripts?
	Where were they found?
	When were they found?
	On what were they written?
	Was it a first generation copy, a second generation copy, a third generation copy?
	Was it a piece of a copy of this or a copy of that?
	Where did it come from?
	And that's why I like studying out of what's called the New English Translation, the Net Bible.
	It was some of my Greek and Hebrew instructors in college because they literally document and you can figure out why they translated everything exactly the way they translated it and which scripts, which earliest and most reliable manuscripts they went with.
	You know, People will say, oh, it's perfect.
	Well, it's perfect and it's an original intent and it's the original meeting.
	Nobody's saying that it's perfect letter for letter, word for word.
	We're saying that the concept and the overriding thought is perfect and correct in terms of what was meaning to be conveyed.
	We're not saying that the translators don't have flaws just like anybody else, but what we're saying is that the original word As breathed to the original authors was recognized early and widespread as being the Bible and it was circulated amongst many different churches.
	It was recognized as as being something that was holy and copied very very carefully over the years from one generation to the next and so when you get a late generation manuscript and compare it with an early generation manuscript You're going to see, OK, well, this word spelling was changed or this was adjusted or that, you know, this word was missing or this sentence was missing.
	That's fine.
	But what you try to do is get back to what you think is the earliest and most reliable meaning of the of the text.
	And I think it's a it's a strong it's a much stronger science and art than people give it credit for, which is why I trust it.
	I think it's right.
	It is.
	You're really talking about the discipline of history and the good people who have gone in there and the good people who follow up.
	We know that the point of it is just to come down to our best information of who did what, when, where.
	And what other objective facts are there for the subjective question for everyone to make their own analysis of why?
	And it is.
	It is totally legit.
	We practice and exercise it every day going into the to the Super Bowl.
	I mean, all the preparation or most of the preparation is with history.
	And if you understand the history and then you go into the art of war, you understand your opponent.
	You have to do that.
	And that's what history means.
	Yep.
	All right.
	All right.
	So, to the war.
	Got four of those.
	And then I suspect that for many of us, the experience of watching a genocide unfurl in real time on our phones all day long for months, then watching people in power dismiss what we can see, has broken a lot of the social contract for us.
	No more business as usual.
	No going back.
	And I think that's true.
	And then we got Caitlin Johnstone.
	The U.S.
	keeps bombing people while saying it doesn't want to fight.
	That's what we always do.
	It's always, we are a peaceful nation.
	And I always recommend Caitlin's work.
	Go ahead and take a look at some of the examples to inform yourself.
	And then this is a good question.
	Why does the US have troops in Syria and Iraq?
	Well, they're not supposed to be there.
	Invited by those nations in fact those nations want them out and that goes to the last part to remind you for my 11 part series US illegal and that is a professional the best way I can describe our own government is a lying, looting, Orwellian, illegal, rogue state empire.
	It is not limited government under the Constitution defending inalienable rights.
	And as always, as little as we can do, one can withdraw consent and demand arrest of the leaders.
	Brian, your thoughts, brother?
	Well, I really like Caitlin Johnson's article about basically the passive-aggressive position of the United States, that we have our appointed press secretaries and speakers getting up there saying, we don't want this, while swinging away in a fight.
	I can tell you that that sort of passive aggressive gaslighting is a sign of a very weak policy and a very weak mind.
	It's not projecting any strength whatsoever that we would just simply try to put out propaganda.
	To cover up the downside of what's taking place in terms of these wars.
	The propaganda is not working on the American people anymore.
	One of the many things that we have to thank Trump for was degrading people's faith in the media.
	And I think that what we're beginning to see here, especially with Tucker Carlson's interview, which we're going to talk about in more detail later, is the difference between a professional and a gaslighting sellout Simonist.
	Um, you know, it's very, very clear to me that that's what's taking place right here is that there are people behind the scenes.
	There are ulterior motives that are driving behavior.
	And then what they're doing is they're forcing different people to have to go in and explain that behavior.
	And it's just lies.
	And it's the most despicable behavior to just say, instead of saying, look, I don't understand this.
	I don't know why exactly this is all taking place.
	They're just feeding us whatever will get them through the day.
	Well, the problem is when they practice to deceive on that level, that stuff comes back to haunt them.
	but they just say, forget about that.
	We're going to create another false flag.
	We're going to have another diversion, whatever it happens to be that comes up.
	As for the question of why do we have troops in Iraq and Syria?
	Well, we're not supposed to be there, sure, but I'm sure somebody somewhere cut a deal to make sure that that was available so that we can keep our intelligence apparatuses up and running, or at least the Jews could keep their intelligence apparatuses up and running in those areas.
	Whether or not they're causing any trouble, I doubt at this point in time that they are, but it does sort of paint a target on their back similar to what happened in Benghazi.
	Not that I even am claiming to understand exactly what happened in Benghazi and how it happened in Benghazi, but I can tell you this, it feels to me like those people were basically, a target was painted on their back As a result of their presence and as a result of some of the things that they were involved with, most likely Hillary Clinton's arms deals with that ambassador that was working at the time.
	But I don't understand everything with Benghazi.
	It's been a while since I brushed up on that stuff.
	Yeah, that's a big part of the bullshit that people need to be able to recognize is that there is an authenticity of being.
	And you do max out people's knowledge.
	And then if they're honest, they're going to be, I don't know, let's look together.
	By the way that I painted this challenge and the responsible position to students is that imagine there's a table in front of us of an allegorical table of evidence and anybody for any topic that we're talking about, you place the evidence on the table for public consideration and people are all around the table.
	And if you have the ability, you can move around and take a look at different perspectives.
	But somebody on the other side of the table, if they're honest, they're going to say, OK, looking from here, this is what I see.
	Ethical people help each other to be able to grasp the data because the data doesn't change.
	It is there whether you look at it or not.
	And then once people chat about it, then the question comes up for policy.
	What are we going to do about this, including the option of doing nothing?
	And then you have a free conversation of what do you think that we should do?
	And the liars, they're going to be pushing for their preferred policy preference, which is going to be Orwellian, is going to be illegal.
	And that, to try to cover that up with bullshit when it exposes them as psychopathic murderers.
	It is literally an attempt to be a A protected class and we hear about the two tier social justice or justice system and social system.
	Yeah, yeah, it's two tiers.
	It is two tiers.
	I mean, they tell us about a rules based order while they go ahead and violate every rule and then some.
	Well, it's clear to me that the liars are just simply captured individuals who have sold out their rights and responsibilities.
	And therefore, they're put into a very awkward position of, hey, I took the money.
	Now I've got to, now I've got to try to keep the damage under control.
	I got to sell this shit.
	It gets like that.
	But look, the beauty of truth is once you establish it, or once you think it rings true, or once you're satisfied that you understand the truth, you can put that back to bed, archive it and index it as something that is historically relevant, and then move on to the next issue that that's confronting you.
	The problem with lies is that it takes up so much of our time and energy to go and dig through them all and figure out what's real and what's not, and then by the time we can get to the bottom of it, we're on to the next issue.
	It's really just a very dark thing.
	That's why I do promote the idea of writing books.
	I haven't written one yet.
	I've thought about a whole bunch of them, but to just be able to stay focused on one issue and get to the bottom of it, Very important thing.
	And, you know, I'd like to write a book.
	I actually have a lot of ideas.
	Wolfgang Halbig and Dr. Fetzer and some others have asked me to write on certain subjects, but I just don't, you know, with my business the way it is, I just don't know how I'm going to find the time to sit down and research something on that level.
	And then what topic is that relevant?
	Yes, it is.
	would want to write a book about it on you know with that type of research some people have the mind for that others i just like to move on to the next issue try to stay current try to stay up with it and then uh and then try to figure out what's really going on by looking at the big picture very very difficult thing to do especially if you're going to write a book about it yes it is all righty
	so the putin carlson interview one two three four five six seven of these Alright, so here's the transcript.
	And this is a nice contrast.
	So Fox averages 1.85 million viewers per night, MSNBC 1.2, CNN a half million viewers, and first five hours 50 million views.
	And that has expanded out to this morning a lot.
	I was looking at 120 million views.
	So it just dominates.
	I want to I do want to point something out with CNN.
	So if we only assume that these are domestic American viewers, there are over 100 million households.
	So they're hitting up about one half.
	Of one percent.
	Those are the people who go to CNN for news.
	So it's not much of these people who are getting their news there, and this data of a hundred times more just within the first five hours, that could be indicative of a change of the landscape.
	And then we have here, Wendy to Broadbent or Broadrick, a kill list for Tucker.
	Now, I just want to be clear that This was from the summer, not from now, and people from that list have disappeared.
	And of course, Hillary, if you want to listen to her with her propaganda on that, she has to demonize Carlson and any independent reporting because our opponents want to dictate and not have oppositional views.
	So yeah, Tucker Carlson has to be a useful idiot.
	She has to say, look at this guy, how many times he's been fired.
	Wouldn't be surprised if he ends up working for the Russians.
	And I do want to point this out.
	The presidential adviser who introduced Epstein to Clinton found dead by hanging with a gunshot wound to the chest, ruled a suicide.
	That's how she rolls.
	And then even if Tucker is prohibited from returning, he could just walk across the border.
	And then to point out Glenn Greenwald, the attorney, who were the American journalists who conducted even minimally adversarial interviews with Zelensky.
	And then Elon just gives a low blow in response.
	But it is true.
	And that is it for... I hadn't seen that tweet before.
	Yeah, yeah.
	OK, so let's let's talk about the the Carlson-Putin interview.
	You know, I do follow our own channel on BitChute and I saw that Scott Bennett and Jim Fetzer had decided to cover a transcript that obviously is not the real transcript that they had gotten from prior to Tucker releasing the interview.
	They had covered it in a show and it While I really liked their version of the interview, the transcript was just simply not even close to what really happened during that interview.
	So I think they took that video down.
	But just a reminder, don't believe anything on the website before it's news.
	I can't tell you how many times I've wanted to believe something that was there.
	It was such clickbait, and then it just simply doesn't come to fruition.
	So I'm just real careful about my sources when it comes to this stuff.
	As for the Putin interview, I mean, I thought Tucker Carlson could have done a much better job at getting to the issues.
	He really did allow Putin to wax on with lots of historical color that brought in to the issues.
	And I think what it did was it showed the stark contrast between the president of the United States of America and Vladimir Putin in terms of who's got their head screwed on straight.
	I think it showed Putin to be a peaceful individual generally who has an understandable beef, but You know, the big problem that they really brought out in my mind, and I only got through about...
	Maybe two-thirds of it before I paused it off and said, I'll go watch the rest of it later.
	So I missed the last third of it.
	But what was the most important thing to me was the focus on the failure during the Minsk agreements.
	You know, that's a big deal.
	What is the point of trying to do diplomacy if you can't trust the guy that you're working with?
	And you can't trust that they're going to stick to the agreement that you make.
	So, when you sit down at the table and hammer out a deal with plenty of witnesses in the room, and then that deal is just ignored because the powers that be have decided that you're going to get double-crossed, of course that makes future diplomacy very, very difficult.
	And one of the big things that came out of the interview was the fact that Putin hadn't talked to Biden Hadn't talked to really anybody.
	He had people that talk to people that talk to people that talk to people, but nobody is really got to.
	Are we seriously over there spending $150 billion?
	Helping kill all these people, providing all these arms, doing all this stuff, and there's no talk of diplomacy?
	It just goes to show what terrible psychopaths the war machine really is.
	That they're willing to sacrifice these lives without even talking through it.
	But of course, from Putin's perspective, it's like, hey, what's the point?
	What's the point?
	If you're not going to adhere, To anything that you've already promised, what makes me think I'm going to believe you in the future?
	And that really is the foundation of this war.
	If you take a look at all these wars that are happening all over the world, you'll find that there is a flaw in leadership that makes it impossible to sit down and trust Western societies, especially the ones that seem to be controlled and modified by the Jew machine.
	Why would they trust us?
	How can they trust us?
	I mean, look, Mossad's...
	Their motto is, like, victory through deception.
	By deception, we will do war.
	Yeah, by deception, we will do war.
	So why are you going to trust guys like this, you know?
	I'm real careful about who I do business with in terms of, can I trust this guy to pay me?
	Can I trust this guy not to blow my cover?
	Can I trust this guy, my client, with this information?
	My client's asking me about somebody else and they want a social security number.
	So I can't trust that guy.
	So I'm not going to do it.
	When it comes to all these international relations right now, it seems like the war machine and the money machine are overruling all sense of morality and all sense of diplomacy.
	And it just makes me sick to think that we've allowed ourselves, we've sold ourselves so deep into this machine that we can't get out and we can't rid ourselves of this plague.
	I looked a little bit at the interview.
	I read all of the transcript.
	And the United States and the UK and NATO, they virtue signal.
	They'll go through all of the steps to appear sincere.
	And then they even admitted that the Minsk Accord was just a buy time.
	And that is who they are.
	It is a lying, looting, or willing and illegal rogue state empire.
	And I believe that Putin He's a brand, and I am not convinced at all that what we're seeing now, the more softer, angelic face, very well spoken, that was the energy coming off that guy strong.
	Strong.
	And especially compared to the actor playing Biden.
	But anyway, whether Putin is legit or an actor or a brand, I do think that this has cast the official propaganda of the US and UK and NATO into the air.
	And I think that the damage done with that, with As of early this morning, 120 million views that that is going to have people rise up and be more willing to challenge the official narrative.
	And yeah, yeah, and bring it up that point of the UK PM Boris Johnson.
	Being really at the source or the person who they're pointing their fingers to because it's really all of the US, the UK and NATO.
	It's all of the psychopathic puppet titions getting their strings pulled from up top that are ordering more war, more war, more war.
	And again, for all of this, I think that people are being driven into the right place to take a stand and to shake these psychopaths off.
	And, you know, as always, I am from the perspective that we're watching at least part of a movie.
	Now, I don't know what I'm looking at.
	I don't.
	But After 47 years experience of paying full attention to the political sphere, my god, how bad does the US and the UK and NATO look?
	It's like it's their worst script and it just keeps getting worse.
	Something is going to break.
	Now, I do not want to pretend that my interpretation is correct.
	What we see is an emergency.
	It's an emergency in Gaza.
	It's an emergency for people all over the world in poverty.
	It's an emergency for us.
	It is an emergency, and so we should take actions consistent with that emergency.
	But great interview, I think, for the truth.
	That it was a huge step forward for people to consider the conclusions that are more in line with seeing that the criminals are the ones in the West, not the ones in the East.
	Or at least, we have criminals in the West.
	You know, one other thing I want to point out is that Putin handed Tucker Carlson a dossier full of documents.
	Maybe it wasn't a dossier, but it was a Like a gray thick folder.
	Almost silver colored.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	And, uh, you know, I'd like to speculate as to what's inside that folder.
	And I, but I would, I would probably believe that Tucker Carlson could not have traveled very far with that folder.
	Um, based on whatever might have been in it.
	I hope there was enough there.
	I hope he got it home safely that he can he can protect its contents and analyze it because it was a pretty thick folder.
	Uh, that may very well be.
	And if Tucker can be relied upon, and he's not just another Freemason playing the game, if, you know, he did apply for the CIA, and that was brought out in the interview, Putin confronted him with it right there in the transcript.
	But if he can really be trusted, you know, look, I never trusted Tucker when he was on Fox News.
	Because I knew he wouldn't tell the truth.
	It was just like Bill O'Reilly about the false flags and about 9-11.
	Yeah, they're on Fox News and they make a lot of great conservative points that I'd like to agree with and it sounds real good and it all looks good, but if you're not gonna ask that fundamental question of was this event even real about Las Vegas, the Pulse nightclub, Sandy Hook, and all these other 9-11 and all these other shootings, if you don't even have a litmus test that even allows you to step into that realm and ask that question.
	You know, one time I saw Judge Napolitano Go on about the Pulse nightclub.
	And he said, if this is true, if this FBI timeline is true, then that means that nobody was killed until after the police entered the building.
	Boy, they shut him up in a big hurry, gave him a two-week leave, turned him off because it was impossible.
	It was impossible.
	And so I know that these guys are controlled on some level just to be able to have that visibility on network television.
	Hopefully Tucker's able to break loose from that with this Tucker Carlson network, but I think we're going to have to continue doing our own analysis.
	I don't trust him.
	Yeah, no, no, for sure, for sure.
	Corporate media is all propaganda.
	And I did notice that silver-colored folder and Putin talking about the percentage of currency going away from the petrodollar.
	And that is huge.
	I don't think, even on its own, that the economic system dominated by the US petro and debt can continue.
	I think it has to collapse.
	And I don't know what has really been holding it up.
	But if that baby was to go, and Americans are told, bail in, you're going to take a haircut for trusting us.
	But we're still chatting.
	We're still chatting.
	I can imagine.
	I hope it does go.
	I hope it does go.
	I spent a lot of time this week taking a look at how Germany post-World War I tried to rebuild their currency.
	And I got to tell you, there is a way out.
	When the Jewish controlled banking cartel currencies are removed, there is a way for a nation to escape.
	And post-World War I, Germany did it.
	And they did it without the help of the cartel bankers.
	And they did it with promissory notes and fieldwork basically assigned to the citizens.
	They built the Audubon, they built a number of different infrastructure projects by issuing Sort of their own currency that was based on work.
	You know, if you've done this much work, you get this chunk of currency and they rebuilt it.
	They got their way out pretty soon.
	They were trading internationally.
	Uh, pretty soon they were able to back it by using because that currency gained value.
	They were able to back it with silver and gold.
	And of course that, uh, really did piss off the banking cartel because they had no more control over the Germans at the time.
	And, uh, that banking cartel was on the outs and then the rest of the world was starting to say, Hey, we don't want to be a part of this debt-based banking cartel.
	We're going to break loose from it.
	So knowing that it, it did happen successfully under those circumstances makes me think that there is hope when our $33 trillion in debt crashes and hyperinflation does kick back in, there will be an upside.
	If we, if we can model it after what Germany did post-World War I.
	My friend and colleague Ellen Brown has researched and written about that.
	And the hyperinflation that destroyed that currency was based on currency speculation and shorting it.
	So you have to be able to be independent from the international rigged casino.
	But yes, you're absolutely right.
	And I'll put into the show notes here at BitChute My One article of monetary reform and public banking, which are the main levers of power.
	And the application in the interwar Germany wasn't even complete.
	They were taking just primary steps forward.
	And it is a neutral tool of power.
	So if it is guided correctly, then you'll have great public benefits.
	But we're in a system where we are so obfuscated from the basic facts of an economy that we're just used as work animals.
	And that's the way that these pathetic minions want it, is they want us dupefied and...
	That's the system that we have.
	Anything else, brother, or move on?
	No, I'm just going to go through this list real quick for anybody that's interested.
	OK, because I took some notes when I was studying all this stuff and I didn't finish everything up.
	But let me just lay it out so that we understand that there is a solution.
	OK, so the first thing that happened was Germany.
	Germany made a move to break free of the bankers that had them basically by the balls prior to the Great Depression.
	They broke off.
	The Treaty of Versailles was passed after World War One.
	Was it after World War One or was it prior to World War One?
	But the Treaty of Versailles went through and basically hyperinflation kicked in.
	Their debt with the Treaty of Versailles, they were supposed to pay back all of the war debt related to it.
	It was three times the value of all the property in Germany whatsoever, so they had no choice.
	So they broke loose from the private currency speculators, which caused the German Deutschmark to Fail driving hyperinflation.
	Everything died.
	There were starving Germans all over the place.
	The Great Depression hit.
	It was global.
	1929 to 1933 they started out borrowing from Jewish bankers.
	It was sort of a socialism.
	But then they just said forget it.
	They issued their own money.
	They seized the assets of the people that were remaining.
	International Jewry responded with boycott the Reich, with a boycott on the Reich, and they wanted a bunch of other nations that they thought that they controlled to get in on with it.
	1939, Hitler builds the infrastructure on credit from internal money or hard work, not Jewish bankers.
	The German government then issued labor treasury certificates.
	The socialists put people to work And had them and then paid them with the treasury certificates.
	The government paid the certificates which were spent rebuilding the economy.
	German people climbed out of debt from the bankers.
	Unemployment was solved within two years.
	Two years.
	No debt to inflation.
	They built the autobahn.
	They went in five years from being the poorest, starving, broke nation to one of the richest nations in the earth.
	And they restored their foreign trade as a result of the rebuilding of that currency.
	They created a barter system with other nations to keep the bankers out.
	And they basically rescued themselves from English economic theory.
	And the main reason why the bankers arranged a world war against Germany was that Hitler sidestepped the bankers by creating his own money, freeing the German people.
	The freedom and prosperity threatened to spread to other nations.
	Hitler had to be stopped.
	We must start a war.
	That's the way I'm reading it right now.
	And I hope those in the comments can straighten me out if I got some of it wrong, because I haven't double-checked everything.
	I think the... you've seen Europa?
	Oh my God, really big, wide open.
	I mean, really, really intense film.
	Great film.
	It's on bit shoot.
	Yeah, intense, very intense.
	Yeah, yeah, I, you know, as a historian, I kind of avoided World War Two, the big one.
	But my working conclusion now is that the setup that you gave is about right, and Germany had to be taken down, unless it was orchestrated all from the inside to give people a sense of false hope and a genuine enthusiasm, and I don't know.
	But the tools are there for an economic turnaround, for sure.
	And these two concepts monetary reform is basically what you described is that the government can create what is used for money and invest directly into infrastructure and the only real limits to the economy are the resources and the labor so you can have up to full employment.
	When you invest in the economy, like imagine the contribution that the Audubon made to economic productivity, and typically this is a consistent research topic in economics, if you invest in infrastructure, both hard and soft, hard there's going to be the things like the Audubon and the soft, those are going to be like doctors and nurses, teachers, you are going to improve
	Your economic output therefore the investment monetary reform has the possibility in the data from Germany in that large experiment seems consistent with what anybody could do.
	You could have up to full employment.
	You'd have the improved upgraded infrastructure and you would have overall falling prices because the economy is more productive for everyone.
	That should be the name of the game.
	And that had to be stopped and crushed.
	And then the whole subject needs to be demonized.
	And then you can't bring it up again.
	You can't say anything good about Hitler or the Nazis.
	Otherwise, you would go into prison.
	So they do want to control the narrative, and it is through total censorship.
	But you know, the only reason that it worked was because there was an appetite to do the labor.
	Now think about that in terms of what has just happened with our borders.
	We know that it's Jewish controlled money, non-governmental organizations that are transporting these people up and in and through.
	If we've got that much free labor or cheap labor here in America, it's going to be very difficult to put everybody to work.
	You see what I'm saying?
	How are you going to do that?
	When you have an extra, you know, it just makes it just makes it exponentially difficult, more difficult when you have this super cheap sub subterranean sort of workforce coming through the border.
	So I guess if I was just thinking through it, I'd say it's possible that maybe there were some people here in America that were setting up a break, a breaking from the Fed.
	And then the counter measure was to open up the border and make sure that that could never happen because people wouldn't be able to earn enough from the labor that they do.
	Just the thought.
	Yeah, it is a war.
	Yep.
	Okay, let's take a look at some articles of the WEF and WHO.
	Epstein's clients aren't in jail.
	They're busy creating a social credit system for you.
	You know that, right?
	And I want to point out, this is going to be on the leadership of who our opponents really are.
	And here's another one.
	The most powerful governments in the world can't solve homelessness, but they can change the Earth's temperature if you pay more taxes.
	Psychopaths.
	Parasites.
	Puppetitions.
	Public serpents.
	Control the food and you control the world.
	Now, I like this article for the history and the context for this and that our opponents, they really do want to starve us out and that is what we're being shown in Gaza and they will do it again and again and again and Bill Gates and We need to put vaccines in the food and all the farmland he's buying.
	And the leadership here for the WEF and the WHO for this positive correlation between the increase of how many injections our children get and the development of autism, I think that they may even want an autistic workforce.
	And then for these people, this is the shit that we're shown.
	This is the health leaders of America, Belgium, Canada, and Britain.
	It is just Orwellian, and they will order us to death, if we allow it.
	Brian, your thoughts, brother?
	Well, I think the pictures of those overweight people is a perfect illustration of academia.
	You know, here you've got people that are willing to write books and teach classes and do things, but those who teach can't do sort of mentality related to it.
	As for the food, yes, it's a big problem.
	I can tell you right now that, you know, I've worked in the food bank down at the local church.
	Most of the people that come in are not, in my opinion, Hungry people.
	I think it's just simply abused by a lot of people.
	I'll see them, they've got their keys, they've got their fitness connection thing on the keys, or they've got their $600 hair, their $200 fingernails or whatever, and they'll come through that food bank and pull out $200, $250 worth of groceries.
	And I find that to be less than honest.
	I don't say anything to them, but it's certainly something that I think about.
	I spent all day yesterday on my garden, which I don't know, people don't know, but I have the space for 468 tomato plants and over a thousand other types of plants.
	It's a lot of work keeping that up every year, but my wife and I do it together, and we produce a tremendous amount of food that we share and give away at the local community and allow people to come through the garden to work.
	But it's getting to be that time.
	It's coming up pretty quickly.
	For those that are interested, I use the Mittleider method for farming, and it works very, very well for me.
	As a matter of fact, I've had gardeners with 30 years of experience in that outlying county where it's at.
	Um, say that it was, it was the most, it was one of the most productive gardens that they ever seen in their lives using that particular planting method, the Mittleider style.
	It works really, really well.
	Thank you for that leadership, brother.
	And if we can unleash what is possible for the optimization of anything that we want, instead of the parasites stopping us, this place can be a paradise.
	I'll tell you a JFK story.
	I don't know if it's true anymore, but from what I understood is JFK, rich family, father was one of the people who capitalized on insider knowledge for the 29 stock market crash.
	JFK's dad bought up part of the ownership of Hollywood and part of what sexualized his sons was the sexualization of Kennedy Sr., Joe, in the casting couch.
	But on the campaign trail, Kennedy began talking about poverty because he was seeing it and he asked a important question.
	Okay, if we were to have everybody in the United States have enough food so that they aren't hungry and they don't die, what would be the best way of doing it?
	And the proposal he got back was it would be the cheapest and most effective way was every supermarket in the United States would be given away and the federal government would pay for it.
	Rice, beans, dried milk.
	And people wouldn't have to pay for that.
	Just take what you need and go.
	And the cost of that would be one-sixth of food stamps.
	And food stamps only solve about half of the problem.
	So for a sixth of the cost, you could solve the problem for everyone.
	So great.
	It was proposed, I believe, Hubert Humphrey.
	Was the main backer than the main spokesperson for it, but it didn't have the votes, surprisingly enough.
	So we do have all kinds of solutions.
	And if we can be unleashed, then it will be inspirational.
	And if we if people were unleashed and wow, I think that people might even enjoy watching the news again to be able to be inspired by all of the breakthroughs that would be occurring.
	But we'll see.
	Okay.
	Trump and Biden optics.
	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of those.
	So Nikki Haley became the first politician in American history who is running a race against nobody and still lost by 30 points.
	And that gives me hope people are seeing, or I hope.
	And then we have here, we have congressional candidate Derek Evans releases exclusive footage of an infiltrator shooting a gun on January 6th.
	And we're just finding out about this now, so this guy was probably a fed.
	You're seeing this gentleman here shooting a gun up into the air twice.
	And then, according to this story, is that shortly thereafter, like within a minute, that is when the feds began using pepper spray onto the crowd.
	So, that would seem... Go back to that picture again of that guy and just ask yourself, have you ever seen a MAGA supporter that looked like this?
	That is a good point.
	I mean, this guy came loaded for war.
	He brought a gun.
	He has military-style knee pads.
	What's he gonna do?
	What's he gonna do?
	He's gonna go shoot up the place?
	That's what they want you to believe that MAGA is?
	That's what they want you to believe that we are?
	Yeah, you know what?
	I remember when we used to have the tea party Literally, MAGA would clean up after themselves.
	They'd literally, the last people out would make sure that the place was spotless before they left the park.
	That's MAGA.
	Yes.
	That's supposed to be us?
	Yeah, yeah.
	It is Orwellian and we will see.
	I think that we've already won and what we're doing is we're being orchestrated into an endgame where It's an Emperor's New Clothes type of conclusion.
	But we shall see.
	Alright, a few more.
	So this case of Colorado, of the state of Colorado attempting to remove Trump from the ballot because they're going to dictate Insurrectionist.
	A couple of legal arguments here is that Clarence Thomas usually doesn't say anything at all in these, but he spoke up and he challenged the lawyer.
	Let's talk to you for a moment here.
	So he challenged the lawyer and said, OK, so you're making the argument that the legislative intent and the scope allows a state to remove a candidate from federal office, then the The attorney said, oh yeah, yeah, for sure, for sure.
	And Thomas said, do you have any examples of that ever happening?
	Even once.
	And the attorney had to try to lie three times before giving up and then just resting on some of those scholarly things that people who don't do anything write trying to justify it.
	And Roberts, now I'm not Endorsing the Supreme Court at all there is captured as any others and we're in some kind of a theater, but The questions are basic and part of why I'm so optimistic as well Is that anybody who is in the legal profession sees this shit?
	And sees how illegal it is, how Orwellian it is.
	And I think that the majority of Americans now are just going, uh-huh, uh-huh, uh-huh, uh-huh.
	And something is going to snap.
	And then everybody who is going, uh-huh, is going to go, yeah.
	In a way that I hope is elegant.
	But Roberts, he had another argument.
	He said, you know, if you're concerned about him being an insurrectionist, You should pursue charges.
	Because as it stands right now, there haven't been any charges.
	He's not an insurrectionist under the law.
	And that goes to the part, nobody spoke it as cleanly as I think that I did, that this is dictatorship, that the state is attempting just to dictate and say you're an insurrectionist.
	Anything else just to that point?
	Saying somebody is an insurrectionist, that's a legal conclusion.
	Yes.
	So, unless you're, I mean, I might call somebody a bitch.
	That's not a legal conclusion.
	You know, that's just that's exactly what it is.
	It's just a word.
	There's no legal conclusion behind it whatsoever.
	On this issue, though, you know, they're doing everything they can to keep Trump out.
	It appears at this point in time like they're going to run with Biden, although Vivek Ramaswamy says they're not.
	If they run with Biden, we're going to run into a very serious situation where everybody's going to know that they're cheating when they try to steal it, because they're not going to give up power.
	I don't think they can control Trump like they want to be able to control Trump.
	They're not going to give up power.
	They've tried everything under the book, and he just gets stronger.
	Every time they attack him, he just gets stronger and stronger and stronger.
	I think what they're going to do is run the same tired play that they ran before.
	They're going to cheat through the election.
	They're going to gaslight us to make us believe it was real.
	They're going to engineer another false flag, probably MAGA supporters attacking Mexicans or attacking DC or something like that.
	They're going to use that as an excuse to declare martial law and activate their Activate their Black Lives Matter, you know, border army that just came through the border and then they're going to turn out the lights and do the military, do the military capture thing.
	I just don't see these people giving up power because the problem is the moment that they relinquish power after all their crimes, that's going to open them up to all sorts of prosecutions.
	And I think that there's been enough hemorrhaging of data out there in terms of evidence that these people are corrupt criminals and sellouts that if they give up power, they know that they're They're now potentially going to be prosecuted, if not hanged.
	Yeah, they cannot.
	Got a doorbell I need to let my dog have.
	Go on.
	These guys can never back down.
	They can't give up because exactly as you're saying, they're going to be caught.
	And then we can quantify that they have killed hundreds of millions.
	Maybe even billions, and they've looted hundreds of trillions.
	So, uh, the DOJ, we're not covering this today, but on Monday I got the stories of the DOJ proclaiming, oh yeah, so Biden did take those, a lot of documents that he wasn't supposed to have, but we interviewed him.
	He's sincere.
	He forgot.
	That might open up the door for the 25th Amendment and to go ahead and for the Dems to put in somebody else.
	Big Mike or Barry.
	I can't do Barry, but Big Mike or somebody else.
	And as you're saying, the scenarios, if the Blackhats are in control, then it's going to be torturous and bad.
	It's going to be, ooh, it's going to be crushing, maybe the same crushing way that humanity has been Great reset before.
	And you know, I can imagine all kinds of false flags that they could do to attempt to regain the narrative.
	And the biggest one that I think that could happen is they could stage a false flag assassination of the actor playing Biden and blame it on MAGA.
	And then they could go ahead and try to clamp down on martial law and then invite civil war.
	So it just depends on who's in charge and it can get as crazy as you can imagine.
	And then some, but not any more crazy than the reality that that we live in with.
	Child-sacrificing pedivores.
	And I'll put into the show notes here at BitChute the article that in my AMREF 2 World War 3 article series that directly addresses the case and the evidence that Pizzagate and pedivoria, they're real.
	Oh yeah.
	Oh yeah.
	I'm sure they are.
	I'm sure they are.
	That's how they roll.
	Alright, this is a couple more here with these optics.
	So, my Orcus!
	Mayorkas did not have the votes for being impeached, but they're going to bring the issue back.
	They're going to reintroduce it, and we'll see.
	And that's for the open border of Mayorkas's.
	The Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, who is responsible for the border and more of the optics with Biden and Trump.
	The Biden regime told Amazon to suppress the truth about toxic MRNA jabs, and they did.
	And the evidence is in the emails.
	And then I like this title and frame while Biden claimed GOP were banning books.
	He was banning books.
	So all of the books from experts, medical experts talking about options other than the.
	Getting shot.
	They were silenced.
	And again, it's all Orwellian.
	And as you're saying, Brian, the more that time goes on, the more moves we see on the game board, the worse the position is for the deep state.
	And I can't remember who it's from, but it's like a meme that I saw of a chessboard where you have the king and queen in a corner.
	And then you have literally like 100 pawns surrounding it and moving in, and that might be the endgame that we're looking at here.
	Brian, your thoughts, brother?
	Well, I hope it's true.
	I just can't remember the last time anybody of any consequence has actually been prosecuted by this corrupt Department of Justice.
	I mean, unless something's happening behind the scenes and I hear, you know, I've dabbled in The idea of the military tribunals, I just don't see where they have the authority to do it unless there's some executive orders that I'm missing here.
	I see the tweets about the activation of the National Guards.
	I see the the mystics talking about, you know, Q and the White Hats.
	And I, you know, I see a lot of activity on that.
	But look, I thought they would strike before Biden could steal the election.
	They simply didn't.
	And it made me it made it very difficult for me to understand how they could allow this total puppet fraud Joe Biden to be.
	And my understanding is he was inaugurated.
	Now, I know that there wasn't less than 100 people at that inauguration, whereas with Obama and Trump, it was like.
	A lot of people, but.
	And then why did they have to shoot all those videos from that fake studio?
	I don't know.
	There's there's just a lot.
	There's a lot that I've seen that makes me really want to believe it, but there's just not enough.
	It's just not a strong enough thread in terms of all the different Evidence of corruption that's floating around.
	There's just not a strong enough thread that shows that these people are even even minimally scared of consequences.
	They're not even they're not even hesitating.
	They don't even slow down.
	It's like if somebody had been actually picked up or arrested or prosecuted or successfully taken out.
	These people wouldn't be operating with such a such a absolutely robust level of impunity and they are.
	Yeah.
	So they don't seem scared.
	So I don't know who knows something that I don't know or what, but I just can't see this sort of mystical shadowy white hat organization.
	I just don't see it anymore.
	Maybe I'm just missing something.
	I know if I wanted to look at that evidence and look at it over and over and over all day long, I might see it, but that's only because I'm now missing all the rest of the puzzle pieces that are floating around in society.
	Yeah, it is fascinating political theater.
	And for me, what I see is consistent with the possibility of, and I got to point out that this is a paradox, and it's going to be hard to hold these two apparently contradictory ideas at the same time, but I'll try to show what I see.
	Nobody is being prosecuted.
	That we see.
	True.
	The empire rolls on in utter arrogance.
	And, uh, you know, as, as Jim would say, Jim Fetzer would say, you know, why not elect a potato or Biden?
	It doesn't matter that these people are politicians.
	They're just script readers and liars.
	So the empire rolls on and we don't see anything.
	And at the same time, if you take a look at the facts regarding that inauguration, we did have an article of Mike King pointing out all of the anomalies of the so-called Biden inauguration and the So the theory is, is that this planet has been captured forever, basically, all recorded history.
	We can say that safely.
	And the deep underground military bases would have to be cleaned out.
	Now, if the White Hats did take control over NSA and then make kind of white male deals with the world leader saying you're either working for us or we're going to expose you through blackmail.
	And then you have actors and and The evil minion puppetition leaders who are really the most pathetic lie contest winners.
	They're so psychopathic, they would have no problem saying, all right, I'm on the other team now, because they're not working for love.
	And all these people are just brought up in the most sick, twisted way that they're just pathetic shells of human beings anyway.
	So all of this is a show to alert And then awaken and then have the masses erupt at this shitty clown show.
	Now that is, but it hasn't broken yet.
	It hasn't broken yet.
	So at the same time, the paradox is, is that patriots have to be looking at what we can see on the field and making plans for it and reacting to and be prepared with what, you know, if the White Hat military is in charge, all military does is contingency planning or a big part of what they do.
	So we have to do the same thing.
	That if something doesn't break, then it's us.
	And I'm ready for that.
	And I would thank God for that opportunity if it comes, and as I keep on talking about, is my deadline, personal deadline, how I feel about it, is if this isn't settled by the November election, then we're going to have to get out onto the game board and be a little creative and see what we can do.
	Well, I guess I just have one question for you, Carl.
	Where do I apply to get into the White Hat Army?
	Am I in it?
	Yeah.
	I would have to say that it's not a very powerful force.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Do I need to go put an application with Space Force?
	How do I?
	I think some of the mystics or whatever you call it with Q will say, you already did.
	That's why you incarnated at this time.
	And there is a mystical side to it, which, you know, again, I don't know.
	I do know that what we know as human beings, wow, if you had to give a percentage of what percentage of the truth that we have, that if you contrast
	Loving parents with what you would brief your kids on the reality of living compared to the shit that we got you know and our parents did or my parents for sure did as best they could in this lie-filled system but you have to say that we are so corrupted and lied to and poisoned and tortured that it is just uh indistinguishable and There may be a much bigger space opera type component to it.
	And as you and I have talked about before, you know, the more that I go along, I just, I just pray.
	And it's kind of like, could I go on one of those nice timelines?
	I would prefer it in that the truth comes out and like, it could be a paradise.
	Well, I don't have any trouble with any of, and I'm not going to say any of them, I'm going to say I don't have trouble with this idea that there's been other civilizations that are not preserved historically.
	And I think there's a lot of, you know, there was a lot of talk about the Library of Alexandria being burnt down and all these very powerful, important global libraries being burnt down.
	And there's been a lot of talk about the Smithsonian, you know, taking all these important documents and all these important skeletons.
	And a lot of talk about sort of this overall grand plan.
	But I can tell you that the plan is big enough, whatever it is, that it starts programming us pretty close to birth.
	I think about the first time we turn on a television screen is when it begins.
	And you'll see it in the cartoons, you'll see it all over.
	And then, of course, the academic institutions and the public school system makes for the Makes for the little mothers and the little fathers that don't know any better.
	So they teach it to their kids and it's just a, it's just a cycle of, of, of ignorance that continues.
	And I think it's probably continued for a long, long time.
	Um, you know, we came over here to America and theoretically there wasn't a whole bunch of history over here.
	I mean, according to the historians, there was no history over here, but I can tell you that ain't adding up.
	That don't hold water anymore.
	That doesn't hold water.
	There's too much archaeological evidence to show that there were people here.
	Now, whether they were... Now, I have the worldview of the flood, you know, the anti-Diluvian period, then the post-Diluvian period.
	Whether or not that was part of the anti-Diluvian period or not, I don't know.
	I don't know.
	I don't know.
	But I don't think I have to know.
	I don't think I have to know everything.
	I think I'm pretty satisfied with where I'm at.
	Not that I'm not always looking for another way out or not unsatisfied, but there are some things that just don't change the way I live.
	Even if I were to know them, I'm pretty certain that I wouldn't make those serious adjustments.
	Like, for instance, okay, so now we've got new technology.
	Tesla coils or ether.
	Adapters that are able to harness the power of the ether and and and levitate rocks or whatever.
	Great.
	Yeah, I'd like to capitalize on that.
	I don't think I'll have the money to do it.
	Or at least be first to the game.
	I sure would like to though.
	But I don't know if that changes the way I'm going to have to live my life day in and day out.
	Not yet.
	radically unless unless there's some sort of massive disclosure.
	And I don't think that's going to happen.
	They don't want us to live long enough for disclosure to disclosure happened.
	We'd know the cure to cancer.
	We don't.
	Not yet.
	Not officially.
	Not officially yet.
	All right, I'll share in the notes here at BitChute.
	I'll tell one quick story just with that, just to give people, the audience, hope.
	So, the documentary Cancer, The Forbidden Cures.
	I watched that back-to-back when I first saw that.
	Did you see that movie?
	That documentary, Brian?
	I haven't seen that one.
	I haven't seen that one.
	Okay, so it goes through like 10 different historical cures of cancer and how all of them were shut down and I have a colleague who is at the medical school at Stanford, a professor there, and I asked her, I says, hey, so have you, do you know about this documentary?
	Because she does cancer research.
	And her response was, I show it to my medical students.
	Really?
	Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
	And she said, she said, moreover, She says everyone who is doing cancer research on the inside knows that cannabis destroys cancer cells.
	And that is why the federal government is stopping that research or doing everything that they can to stop it.
	And the administration at Stanford will be severely restricted for what we can do.
	It's too cheap.
	It's too cheap.
	You can't cure cancer for a $10 hot bag.
	It's too cheap.
	It's just like the hydroxychloroquine.
	It was a 30-cent pill.
	Yeah, they can't have that.
	No, no.
	The economy would crash.
	Yeah, so if we can win, it'll be unrecognizable and it would be fun for People in the future to be able to come back in this time and be able to hang out and visit and talk to people like us and see the ridiculous and the contrast between what is possible and the torture and poison in mind control that we have is stunning.
	Alright, so let's take a look at this megalithic architecture and just some of the questions about where we are really.
	And this is in South America.
	This is in Peru.
	I forget the name of the side of this and just They had some sort of technology, and this both looks like you need anti-gravitational tech, and this looks like some sort of a polymer, geopolymer material that they may have just poured this in.
	I do not know, but it is certainly some sort of architecture.
	And technology that we don't have, and you can see the foundational stuff on the bottom is more impressive than the stuff that they threw out on top.
	Benjamin Fulford, this is his website and his regular commentary, and he's added in a different commenter to be able to give a once a week.
	Contextualization of what we're seeing in Project Bluebeam or just with UFOs and ET sightings.
	There have been a bunch of films going on that are showing these things.
	And, you know, that's very interesting and everything.
	I'll just briefly go through here.
	And that's very interesting.
	I don't know what those things are, but that's very interesting to see.
	I don't know what that is if it's real or we're not.
	Oh my god! Oh my god!
	Oh my god!
	I don't know what that is, if it's real or not.
	But we do have, in art history, a whole bunch of interesting images that would have you think that something is going on with extraterrestrials.
	and might even go back to the Elohim.
	And this is some of the architectural... Turn that off.
	And what are these things?
	And the potential of what we're told are stargates that may be different types of technology.
	And we don't know where these things came from.
	But you have to wonder if human beings were motivated enough to build them, why would they do so?
	Is it just art?
	Did they just have all of this spare time to do it?
	And that is fascinating and it just Well, as for flying things, um, you know, they are in the Bible, believe it or not.
	Uh, Ezekiel chapter one, this is a very long chapter.
	of programming of the Simpsons as well.
	So who knows what is really going on.
	Ryan, anything that you'd like to comment upon about that?
	Well, as for flying things, you know, they're in the Bible, believe it or not.
	Ezekiel chapter one.
	It's a very long chapter.
	You got to read all the details.
	But there you've got sort of an author's rendering.
	I don't know if we can even see that.
	It probably just looks white, but it's an author's rendering of a UFO flying vehicle.
	And angels on the corners and sort of concentric circle, geo things and clouds and thrones.
	And so, look, okay.
	So I guess my grandmother and Ezekiel had something in common because my grandmother, when I was a kid, told me a story about how back in the fifties, she's one of them landed out in the field behind her house.
	She wasn't a woman that was prone to embellishment.
	I don't think she ever told a lie at all, frankly.
	And she said that when she was a little girl, she was out there and Her and one of the neighbor girls went out.
	And then the next day, they found the burn marks in the field.
	The police came out and inspected it and photographed it and all that.
	But they they claim to have actually seen a man get out.
	And it was a man.
	Get out of this disc shaped saucer that was hot enough to burn the the grass in the field.
	And so I think it's been around for a long time.
	I don't have a problem with with The fact that we've figured out how to levitate items, including You know, ourselves.
	I mean, you've got ancient Arabic stories of magic carpets and things like that.
	I don't think that it's beyond the realm of possibility that this stuff is out there.
	I think it's, it's impractical when it comes to the commercial side of it.
	Just like they shut Tesla down because they couldn't harness this free energy machine and create revenue out of it.
	I think a lot of it's been the same way.
	Heck, we're still, we're still on oil and gas for the most part.
	I mean, and even in electricity, there's money to be made in terms of wires and work that needs to be done and cars that need to be built and lithium that needs to be mined.
	So I think it's just a, it's just a part of the global bankster cartels.
	When we take them out, you know, maybe we'll have a small capital S savior that gives us some disclosure.
	I can tell you it ain't gonna come from the Freemasons.
	And it ain't gonna come from the Zionists.
	Where's it gonna come from?
	It's gonna come from somebody that's got a really big heart.
	Yes, yes.
	Alright, we'll go on to final thoughts.
	So the that we do need somebody with a big heart, we do need friends in high places somehow.
	And the main question for me is always who's in control.
	And now if this is just a contest and the contest is where it's at, then I'll, as I said, I'll expand my role if things aren't settled by the November 2024 elections.
	But whatever.
	Part of the contribution that I am as a scholar is to be able to give a broad
	History to be able to see the present clearly and again paradoxically at the same time I don't know anything really of I don't know much I can point out a few lies I can imagine the possibility I can look at potential tech and what we could do with it in order to have a Basis where all of human needs to live are at least met in
	And we can unleash creativity and we can get rid of these parasites who, again, the 1% own more than the 99%.
	And we can definitively explain, document, and prove these crimes centered in war, the Orwellian opposite of what is used for money, which is debt owed back to them and their constant lies.
	So we can shake them off.
	We can throw them off.
	Hang in there, Patriots, until we have that breakthrough and the ratcheting up of tensions.
	I mean, I hope.
	Tell you what, in the comments here at Bitchute, if somebody feels otherwise and says, ah, nah, Herman, everything is fine, you know.
	If you want to make that argument, go ahead, but I don't think so.
	I think all of us are feeling that we keep saying the same thing, but every week it's more and more true we're closer and closer to something breaking.
	Brother.
	Final thoughts?
	I think we just need to have a little bit more faith that things are going to work out.
	I really do believe they are going to work out.
	I'm not afraid of any of the skies falling garbage that's going around out there.
	And even if we did have to suffer another failed weakling presidency, that's not the end of the road.
	We've had that before.
	We'll deal with that again.
	I'd just rather see people that are going to be honest with us.
	And I'm tired of people selling out their responsibility, especially politicians.
	They sell out their responsibility to uphold their oath to the public that gives them their governing authority.
	They sell it out for money.
	And I'm tired of that.
	That's called simony.
	That's from the Bible.
	I think it's Acts chapter 10 or 11.
	There's a story about a magician I forget where he was from, but it's in between the story of the stoning of Stephen the Martyr and the conversion of Paul.
	There's this totally out of place story about a magician named Simon that ran into a couple of Christians and he was like, wow, these guys are healing people and saving them and they're doing it for free.
	And boy, I'm fascinated because this is magic that I don't understand.
	These guys are healing the poor and they've got these huge crowds of people following around saying, what is this all about?
	What is this all about?
	And he was jealous.
	And so he went to the apostles and he says, hey man, I'd like to buy this gift.
	In other words, he thought that the free gift of grace and the free gift of God could be purchased with money so that he could capitalize on this this spectacle.
	I think Peter was that in front of him said because you've done this you and your money are going to die.
	You thought the free gift of God that the Holy Spirit could be bought like this and then You know, just to show that he was not even close to being the real deal.
	He says to Peter, this is again, Peter, the Rock, the Pope.
	Peter, he says, Oh, well, would you pray for me that this wouldn't happen?
	Which just goes to show he wanted to have a mediator because he didn't have any relationship with God whatsoever.
	And Peter said, No.
	No, I'm not going to be your mediator if you're really repentant and you really want to have this conversation.
	You better have this conversation with God.
	And what it does is it shows this huge problem with the Catholic Church that they've got this hierarchy and it's free.
	Grace, forgiveness, everything's free.
	And yet they've turned it into a den of robbers.
	They've sold it.
	And I'd say the same thing about our politicians.
	It's simony.
	They've sold their responsibility for money.
	And I don't like it.
	Thanks.
	Yeah, well, may this transformation occur from what we see and discussed to the... I actually think there's going to be a mathematical equation that for the depth that we have gone down would be the height that is possible.
	So, Patriots, at least you can take some comfort in, if this resonates with you, that the depths that you have seen will also mirror the heights that are possible.
	Anything else, brother?
	No, nope, that's it.
	Good video on a Rumble channel called Don't Obey on blood libel and Jewish ritual murder.
	Much more prevalent than I ever dreamed and it is really like almost as dark as that movie Halamador that you were talking about or that documentary Halamador.
	Just sick.
	Just sick.
	The crimes that have been uncovered in the history when it comes to this old Baal and Molech worship that exists in these dark places, in these dark tunnels.
	This is bad.
	This is bad.
	And it's been around for a long, long time.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Whoever our creator is has a great capacity to allow for the playing out of evil on the stage.
	It is remarkable, and that is part of what all Patriots have to go through.
	And if we do get this breakthrough for the victory, then The Patriots listening to this show and to similar shows will be in position to guide people through and to let them know that there is a place on the other side and hopefully if we do get this breakthrough some of the unleashed technology will also give them hope and just just the truth.
	Just finally people telling the truth.
	Hopefully that'll resonate and center.

▲