All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 23, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
48:51
Jim Fetzer: The 9/11 Crash Sites - What DIDN'T Happen!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome back to the second day of our False Flag and Conspiracies Conference 2023.
Let me remind you of our sponsors.
We have Revolution Radio, Speak Free Radio, Republic Broadcasting Network, Moonrock Books, Real Deal Media, All things reconsidered.
Plus, thanks to Mike Adams, the program is also being broadcast live over Brideon.com slash channels slash Real Deal Media, hosted by Dean Ryan, a conspiracy realist, as indeed we all should be if we want to understand what's going on in the world today.
Now, my first speaker was to have been Joe Olson, but Joe Olson has a serious cold and can't make it here today, so I'm going to feature Joe on my show when he's feeling better.
What we have instead is the 9-11 crash sites.
All four were fake, but in different ways.
Let me take us back to that tragic and fateful day.
This is from the May Brussels website, but it's going to give you an eerie feeling of having been there.
Deja vu all over again.
No second flight.
It was a bomb.
Bombing of the building, not second plane.
It was a bomb.
We say the second plane.
That's what we're told.
The second plane.
We saw it on television.
Alright.
Thanks a lot.
This is-- - The idea of how much of the plane actually impacted the building.
You know, it might have appeared that way, but from my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon.
The only site is the actual site of the building that's crashed in, and as I said, the only pieces left...
That you can see are small enough that you could pick up in your hand.
There are no large tail sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around, which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse.
Now, even though if you look at the pictures of the Pentagon, you see that the floors have all collapsed, that didn't happen immediately.
It wasn't until almost about 45 minutes later that the structure was weakened enough that all of the floors collapsed.
Jeff, it's a United Airlines plane.
It's believed to be at that site outside Pittsburgh, isn't it?
That's exactly right John with 45 people total on board and one of the more profound things today the imprint of terrorism seared not only on Wall Street but also on Main Street.
Here you have an area 80 miles to the southeast of Pittsburgh in this plane which went down at about 10 o'clock this morning.
We have rescue vehicles that came in earlier in the day and they have turned up nothing.
No one believed to be alive from this crash.
Some of the media just getting back to the scene which is about A quarter of a mile up on a hill back behind me, and so some of the first pictures just starting to come in within the last hour.
I want to get quickly to Chris Konicki.
He's a photographer with the Pittsburgh affiliate of Fox Affiliate.
He was back there just a couple of minutes ago, and Chris, I've seen the pictures.
It looks like there's nothing there except for a hole in the ground.
Basically, that's right.
The only thing you could see from where we were was a big gouge in the earth and some broken trees.
We could see some people working, walking around in the area, but from where we could see, there wasn't much left.
Any large pieces of debris at all?
No, there was nothing, nothing that you could distinguish that a plane had crashed there.
Smoke, fire?
Nothing, it was absolutely quiet.
It was actually very quiet.
Nothing going on down there.
No smoke, no fire.
Just a couple of people walking around.
They look like part of the NTSB crew walking around looking at the pieces.
How big would you say that hole was?
From my estimates, I would guess it was probably about 20 to 15 feet long and probably about 10 feet wide.
What could you see on the ground, if anything, other than dirt and ash?
You couldn't see anything.
You could just see dirt, ash, and people walking around, broken trees.
...says that City Hall in Oakland will remain open.
It will be business as usual.
He is urging people to remain calm, given what is going on.
Remain calm.
Oakland City Hall will remain open.
But in San Francisco, City Hall has been closed.
We're also just getting word here now that a second United Airlines jet, Flight 175 from Boston to Los Angeles, is now missing.
Again, if you're just joining us, there have been four separate plane crashes.
Three of those planes were en route to California.
Two were heading to LAX.
The third was heading to San Francisco International Airport.
That was specifically the one heading to SFO United, flight number 93 from Newark to SFO.
It apparently crashed in Pennsylvania.
Fairly close to the border of Maryland and not too far from Camp David.
Why is that significant?
Because one of the groups possibly claiming responsibility for all these terrorist attacks is the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine.
And it was this week in 1978 that the Camp David Accords were reached.
Is there a connection?
At this point we don't know, but it is important to be aware of that situation.
In Washington, D.C., many congressional leaders have been transferred to a secret location.
Some senators have described this as a second Pearl Harbor.
And President Bush was in Florida this morning, but he made a brief announcement when the first attacks were clear on the World Trade Center, and he was heading back to Washington, D.C.
At this point, we don't know exactly where he is.
They're not really broadcasting that information, but we are told that the president is safe right now.
Well, what you had there was a classic Mossad operation, you know, faking a call, saying it was a...
Popular front for the liberation of Palestine.
They even had vintage footage showing Palestinians rejoicing at Trump's previous religious or political event because, in fact, they were just as slap-jawed and stupefied as the rest of the world.
Meanwhile, there were the four different flights where the security in all four were run by ICTS, which just happens to be an Israeli firm.
And here, of course, are the Patsies.
These are the 19 alleged terrorists, along with Osama bin Laden, that were supposed to have been responsible for this.
Osama, in fact, was our man in Afghanistan.
He was instrumental in getting Stinger missiles into the Mujahideen they used to shoot down Soviet helicopters and planes and drive them out of that godforsaken region.
He was actually an officer of the CIA, Colonel Tim Osman.
He was visited by an official from the agency at a hospital in Dubai shortly before his death from his medical maladies on 15 December 2001.
It's tough to get dialysis machines in and out of those caves in Afghanistan.
He was buried in an unmarked grave in accordance with Muslim tradition.
By the 26th, both Fox and CNN had caught up and were reporting that Osama bin Laden was dead.
But it turned out to be politically expedient for Barack Obama to resurrect him and have him die again a decade later in a staged raid on a compound so he could present himself for a triumphal re-election as the man who got the most minored man in the world, but it was all fake.
Here you have that hole.
Remember, it's maybe 10 feet wide, maybe 15, 20 feet?
Well, the plane has a wingspan of 125 feet.
It has a tail that stands 44 feet above the ground.
So where in the world is the plane?
Here you had that interview with Chris Konicki, who, like the other reporter, said the eerie aspect of the crash site was there was no indication that any plane had crashed there.
So where the hell did it go?
And you can see the difference lower right in Shanksville.
And I even believe that smoke has been added, because remember, when he was being interviewed, he said there wasn't even any smoke.
But look at real crash sites, whether it's in Missouri or Amsterdam or Russia.
There's a whole lot of debris, not in Shanksville.
Some have suggested, by way of apology, that this was an area where mining had taken place and the ground was soft, even suggesting it disappeared into an abandoned mine shaft, as portrayed here, in the attempt to commandeer, according to the official narrative, had it such that the plane entered upside down.
Well, we know what to do with miners who are trapped in mine shafts.
We bring out bright lights and heavy equipment and dig 24-7 in an effort to recover them.
By some miracle, they might have survived.
Well, with Flight 93, even though there were 45 souls aboard, they didn't make any effort.
No bright lights, no attempt to dig.
And of course, the reason is obvious, because there was nothing there.
Meanwhile, a woman named McClatchy claimed to have a photograph on the left of the plane having crashed there, but there are a couple of problems with her photograph.
First, the smoke looks much more like that from an explosive in the middle than it does from an actual crash—the dark black smoke on the right.
Plus, geographically, if you locate the origin of that smoke in the image on the left, it's over a pond.
Not where the plane crashed.
Here's what you ought to have had there.
Notice how stunningly different it is from what we had in Shanksville, which tells us no plane crashed there.
It's even better than that.
Pilots for 9-11 Truth were able to track Flight 93 and they discovered that it was still airborne.
Actually, Flight 93 was over Champaign-Urbana, Illinois after it had officially crashed in Shanksville.
Meanwhile, what about the Panacon?
Well, they only released actually five frames, most of which are the growing fireball.
And frankly, I think all that is Photoshop.
It's got the wrong date and time.
In the upper left, you do have a slide, a frame, conveniently labeled plane.
And if you look up at that gate mechanism just above, there's something with a white funnel behind it.
I asked Jack White, legendary, ...Collaborator from JFK Research, if he could introduce the image of a Boeing 757, because in both Shanksville and Pentagon they were 757s, though in New York they would be both 767s, to the scale of the tail.
And when he did, you can see obviously if it had been a 757, it would have been twice as large as what we have there.
Not a Boeing 757.
Pilots and aeronautical engineers have explained that a white plume, moreover, cannot be the exhaust from a jet, but could be from firing a missile into the building.
And indeed, there is now footage where you can see the missile being fired into the building.
Brilliant work has been done on this issue by Dennis Camino, who concluded it was a Unmanned aerial vehicle, a global hawk firing the missile into the building.
Now here's the hit point.
There's some chain-lit fence, there are a couple of big spools of cable you can't quite see off to the right, two cars burning, unbroken windows.
What do you not see?
A massive pile of aluminum debris from a hundred-ton airliner.
No bodies, no seats, no luggage, no wings, no tail.
I mean, my goodness, look at that!
Even have unbroken windows there, as Jamie McIntyre was explaining.
The collapse would only occur about 45 minutes later.
It did not occur at the time.
I frankly believe they thought the damage didn't look significant enough, so they had an additional segment of the building brought down.
That would be the handiwork of Donald Rumsfeld.
And I suggest that the fireball might have been added because when they did an excavation, I see no signs here of an intense fire.
Look at the third floor on the left.
There's what appears to be the wooden stand for an Oxford-Underbridge dictionary.
It's not even singed.
So I think they added the fireball.
That probably explains the wrong date and the wrong time.
This was not from 9-11.
They claim the plane had come in at over 400 miles an hour, barely skimming the ground.
But if that had actually happened, it would have torn up the Pentagon lawn.
It would have massively destroyed the lawn.
And yet we see no indications of any damage to the lawn.
This is from the civilian lime green fire trucks that happened to be in the vicinity, who came to extinguish the very modest fires at the crash site.
But notice the clean, clear Pentagon lawn.
We actually have lots of images like this, including from a BBC special.
No plain debris whatsoever.
Here's another.
Even after that segment of the building had crashed, there is no debris.
The brie only began showing up later, and by far the most interesting part was this segment of fuselage, which did come from a Boeing 757.
There's several interesting aspects of this.
Notice, right off the bat, it doesn't appear to have been exposed to an intense fire.
Number two, it isn't all crumpled up like it went from a violent crash.
Number three, there's a very interesting feature here, a segment of vine not indigenous to the Arlington, Virginia area.
Well, a very diligent retired attorney from Columbus, Ohio, by name of James Hansen, tracked it down to a flight, a crash near Cali, Columbia in 1996, American Flight 965, where the American Flight 965, where the pilots lost track and crashed through jungle where these vines are indigenous.
Surprise, surprise, it was an Israeli firm that had the salvage operation, and it would appear, save that segment of the crash, to put on the Pentagon lawn on 9-11.
The BBC came and interviewed me for eight hours, and I gave them hundreds of arguments about 9-11—the only one they chose to include, however.
When they would broadcast, it was my suggestion that that debris must have been dropped from a C-130 that was circling the building.
So they had the pilot interview the pilot, and they asked him whether he had dropped debris onto the Pentagon lawn.
He said that was absurd.
He didn't actually say no, he said it was absurd, but I don't see how else it could have been done.
According to the official trajectory, the plane hit a series of lampposts.
You can see one, two, three, four, five, as many as six, en route to its target destination now.
We know that a plane traveling over 400 miles an hour hitting stationary lampposts would have the same effect as if the plane had been stationary and hit by lampposts traveling over 400 miles an hour.
They would have ripped open the wings, which are loaded with fuel, which would have mixed with oxygen.
There would have been a massive explosion and we would have airplane debris all over the Pentagon lawn.
But as you can see, as we have already seen, There was no such debris on the Pentagon lawn, therefore it did not hit this series of lampposts.
Moreover, Citizens' investigative team discovered that there were witnesses at a CITGO station right in here who claimed to have seen a plane approach, but it was not on the official trajectory shown in green, but they gave various accounts shown in gold.
Norman Mineta, when he testified before the 9-11 Commission, explained he was in an underground bunker with Dick Cheney, when an aide to Cheney came up and said, sir, it's 50 miles out.
Sir, it's 40 miles out.
Sir, it's 30 miles out.
Do the orders still stand?
And Cheney whipped around and said, of course the orders still stand.
Have you heard anything to the contrary now?
He was talking about an aircraft that was approaching a building that was witnessed by the Sitco customers.
Now, the obvious thing to do, of course, would have been to shoot down the plane.
In that case, you lose a plane and the passenger, but since they're being used as weapons, and since this was on a trajectory toward the Pentagon, While you would lose a plane in the past, you would not also lose a personnel in the property of the destination.
In fact, when this plane approached the Pentagon, it swerved over it.
It flew over it.
I have a dear friend in JFK research, Roy Schaefer, who had a friend, Dave Ball, who was a trucker and was in front of the Pentagon at the time this happened.
He witnessed the plane approach and fly over the Pentagon.
And I told Roy, I said, well, let's get Dave on the air with me to make this report because he'll be much safer when he's made the report.
And Roy came back and said, well, he was reluctant.
And I said, look, be emphatic.
But by that time, Dave's body had been found dead in an abandoned building.
Now, in the Sebring, You have this hole that's led some people to think that the plane traveled or parts trapped the engine all the way through the C-ring, and it was approaching at an angle.
If this hole had been caused by a part from a plane, it would have been asymmetrical, not virtually perfectly symmetrical.
And in the Red Sickle, which you can't quite read, it says, punch out, punch out.
And others reported the smell of cordite, which is a common military explosive.
So this was done.
This was blown out to create the impression that a plane had penetrated all the way to the Sea Ring, when no such thing had happened.
No plane actually crashed there.
It was a missile fired by Global Hawk.
And we already heard Jamie McIntyre make exactly that point from his close-up inspection.
There's no sign of any plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon.
Jamie got it right.
Now, he was pressured to take it back.
And he did so by saying only a fool would deny that a plane had hit the Pentagon, meaning he himself had been a fool to believe that CNN, for whom he was the best reporter, wanted him to report the truth rather than to support propaganda and subsequently retired, even though he was the best in the game.
Here's April Gallup.
This was a civilian who came in with her infant son and said it was just when she touched her computer that there was a massive explosion in front of the Pentagon, that she walked out through the hole in the Pentagon, that there were no plane parts, but she had the smell of Kordite once again.
Here's General Steubenbein, just a wonderful man, giving an interview in Germany as to how he knew that no plane had hit the Pentagon because there was no imprint of the plane on the Pentagon.
The façade, which is limestone, a very soft stone, I actually did a four-part, rather analogous to what I'm presenting here with you, and General Stubbleby not only agreed that no planes had crashed at any of the four crash sites, but gave me additional reasons why I was right.
A good man.
Later, when the rumor was circulated that Flight 93 was actually headed for the Capitol, members of the House and Senate went out on the Capitol steps and looked across the Potomac, and they saw all this billowing black smoke.
But it wasn't from the very modest pyres, which had already been extinguished.
It was from a series of domsters.
So this is a Hollywood-style special technique.
You can thank Donald Rumsfeld, who, by the way, had announced the day before $2.3 trillion missing from the Pentagon budget, which is remarkable for an experienced politician because a big story like that early in the week is going to grow legs.
Meaning become bigger and bigger, as though he knew something were going to intervene, and he'd be able to waltz into the halls of Congress the following day, ask for hundreds of millions more in defense spending, which exactly what he got.
But once again, get this, Edward Hendry, brilliant guy, captured this page from the Bureau Department of Transportation Statistics, which records every flight, every commercial flight in the United States, From, you know, all kinds of important data about its departure time, wheels up, wheels down, the whole bit, and guess what?
There was no American Airlines Flight 77 scheduled to depart Washington Dulles on 9-11-2001.
The plane was not even in the air.
If we turn to New York, of course we had to hit on the North Tower.
A brilliant Scottish investigator has calculated that for the Naudé team—this is supposed to be a French film team—on DuWayne Street to have captured this required the satisfaction of 100 improbable circumstances.
And remember, the plane is flying faster than the speed of sound, so by the time the cameraman heard the sound, the plane was far distant and about at the building, and yet he swung his camera up and captured the hit.
By the way, Nadei The name is an anagram for Duane Street.
They rearranged the letters just to tell you how much they rub our face in it.
Here's what a 767 would have looked like as it approached the North Tower.
What we actually got is something like this, with Rosalie Grable, known as the webfairy, described as a series of flying pigs.
Very, very odd.
Here was a first-hit flash frame.
Oddly enough, initially it looked as though it had created an elongated Z impression, but later it became an expansive V. Not only that, but they touched it up.
They expanded the impact of the wing, which by the way is so fragile.
The wing, like the plane itself, could not possibly have entered the North Tower.
I mentioned this yesterday in relation to Ace Baker's brilliant work about the 9-11 Psy-Opera, and I'll return to that subsequently.
It appears that behind all the smoke, which was, as far as I have been able to ascertain, pre-position, they had explosives, just as the guy said it was bombs, not a plane.
And here the reporter's saying, well, we saw it on television once again.
Scene is not believing.
It appears they set off the explosive to create the cutout behind all the smoke and debris from the initial contact.
And here's what you had at the North Tower.
It intersected with seven different floors.
The buildings were so robust it could not possibly have actually entered.
It would have crumpled external to the building.
Well, guess what?
Again, Edward Henry captured neurotransmutation statistics.
No American Airlines flight 11 scheduled to depart Boston-Logan on 9-11.
Both of those flights were fabricated and faked.
77 Pentagon, 11 North Tower.
Now, the far more interesting quite 175.
This is relatively new footage but fascinating on any number accounts, including the crowd there watching as the plane approaches the building. including the crowd there watching as the plane approaches the No, she won't.
Wow.
This is the first time I was going to be able to get a new one.
I was going to be able to get a new one.
My Lord!
Oh my God!
Did you see that?
Did you see that?
My Lord!
My Lord!
What's most important, did you see that?
There you have a whole group who were seeing the plane approach the building before it hit.
That turns out to be very important in terms of the alternative theories of how this was done.
Here's another.
This is from the Hezirkhani video—I'm not showing here now—of a plane approaching the South Tower.
Turns out pilots for 9-11 Truth have analyzed the speed of the plane as it's approaching the South Tower, and it was too fast, too fast to be authentic.
In other words, the plane would have literally come apart in the air had it been traveling this fast, where the NTSB concluded it was traveling 510 knots and 430 for United 175 South Tower.
and American 11, Northau, respectively.
A benchmark established by the October 1999 crash of Egypt Air 990 of a 767 which exceeded its maximum operating limits, causing in-flight structural failure, is illustrated here by the pilots in their documentary, 9-11 Intercepted.
Now, these are guys who know their business, and they made major contributions to understanding the fraud that was involved in faking the various websites.
Here you have the plane just melting into the cell tower.
What's crucial is there are no collision effects.
It just disappears right into the South Tower, leading to sometimes be called the Ghost Plane or the Tower to be called a Butter Tower because it melts in as though it were made of butter.
In this case, it's actually intersecting with eight different floors.
Now, each of those floors is a steel truss connected at one end to the massive core columns, at the other to the external steel support columns, which were themselves very formidable.
Built each steel truss with four to eight inches of concrete.
The variance being because there were v-shaped grooves in the flooring that were four inches deep.
So some places the concrete would be four other eight inches deep because the towers were 208 feet on a side.
That means each floor represented an acre of concrete on a steel truss.
This plane was intersecting with eight.
Here you see—this is from the Evan Fairbanks looking directly up—Jack White.
Put this together for me.
Here you see a jetliner melting through a steel wall.
Now, We have done a frame count for both the Hazard County and for the Evans Fairbanks, and the plane disappears its entire length into a massive 500,000 ton steel and concrete building in the same number of frames.
It passes through its own length in air.
Which is physically absurd, unless a massive 500,000 ton steel and concrete building provides no more resistance to the trajectory of an aircraft in flight than air.
Not only that, but some of you may recall what's captured here at the bottom, the nose-out phenomenon.
Now you must understand, the nose of a commercial carrier is laded with electronics, radar, all that kind of stuff.
It's the most fragile part of the aircraft.
So the very idea you could have the nose of the plane pop out after traversing this 500,000 ton steel and concrete building is absurd.
And If you were watching on 9-11, and I venture a whole lot of you here today were, they did an immediate fade to black.
In other words, here they are recording what may be, with the possible exception of the assassination of JFK, certainly the most historic event in American history, the attack of 9-11, and they fade to black.
That's because they were showing something they did not want the public to know.
This is from Mace Baker's brilliant piece, how the plane ought to have crumpled external to the building.
Bodies, seats, luggage, tail, wing, fallen to the ground, while the engine might well have traversed the building because they're virtually indestructible.
Much of the plane would have fallen to the ground, but even though we have this spectacular fireball, once again, even involving napalm, when we looked at the ground beneath on both facades, both the North and the South Tower, there's no pile of debris, no bodies, no seats, no luggies, no wings, no tail.
In other words, no planes actually hit either of those buildings.
Not only that, but as I said, well, an engine might have entered.
It turned out an engine was found at Church and Murray.
Very odd.
It was just sitting on the sidewalk there.
It's underneath the steel scaffolding and a canopy, which are undamaged.
Jack White found Fox News footage where there was a van with multiple Agents wearing FBI vests unloading something heavy.
But they committed a blunder.
This engine, it turns out, and there are parts here that are distinctive, wasn't even in service on the aircraft that were involved in the crash.
It was planted.
Obviously, if the crash had been real, they wouldn't have had any reason to plant a phony engine.
They planted a phony engine.
Therefore, the crash was not real.
Again, we have the holes in the north and the south tower.
And look at it.
I mean, there's something very funny.
When I did the Vancouver hearings in June of 2012, one student did a whole thing on these holes and how they appear to have been bent in the wrong way.
It should be inward from the explosive, but they don't correspond to what would have occurred had it been real.
So there's a whole lot going on here, and we've done a lot of study to figure out what happened.
If a bird doesn't vaporize in the process of slicing a wing, then a plane shouldn't vaporize during the process of slicing steel and concrete.
Where is the evidence that a plane actually created the holes?
And by the way, while some have argued We didn't have the remnants of the plane because it vaporized.
Using a study of a fighter jet filled with water on a railroad truss will run into a nuclear resistant barrier, which just blew into a million pieces.
How could we have the nose-out phenomenon if the plane had blown into a million pieces?
And the fact of the matter is, the damage that is done by a mere bird weighing a couple ounces is so great that it brings planes down to the land, but less a steel scaffolding which was so substantial, so serious.
Here you have that Bunker Buster crash.
But that plane was made of a synthetic material.
It was propelled by a rocket, and it blew apart.
It did not penetrate the barrier.
On the other hand, you see the plane passing right through the plane with no collision effects.
This is completely absurd.
A plane should be busting up on the outside.
Instead, it's disappearing.
It's just like in the case of the Flight 77 at Pentagon hitting the lamppost.
The effect of the plane traveling over 400 miles hitting the lamppost, which are stationary, would be the same as if the plane had been stationary hit by the lamppost traveling over 500, 400 miles an hour.
Similarly, The plane hitting the stationary 500,000-ton building would have had the same effects as if the plane had been stationary and was hit by the 500,000-ton building.
I mean, what we see is absurd.
There have been multiple different theories about it.
WebFerry suggested it had been done with CGI.
Ace Baker suggests it was done with video compositing.
There's like a 17-second delay between time video is recorded and it's broadcast, and during that 17-second delay, images of planes could have been added.
The reason that those theories appear to be untenable is that we had hundreds of witnesses reporting seeing the plane approach the building before it hit.
If it had been a matter of CGI or video compositing, the planes would have only been visible in the broadcast footage.
But as you saw from that newly discovered video, there you have witnesses seeing it in real time, what they took to be a real plane, but what we have established on the basis of the laws of physics could not have been a real plane.
So we had three hypotheses—CGI, video compositing, and the use of a sophisticated hologram.
Sounds implausible initially, perhaps, but remember, it cannot have been CGI.
It cannot have been video compositing.
Remember, as Sherlock Holmes observed, when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.
So we have a man from the UK, quite a brilliant guy, with his Blight 175 radar study.
In the 175 radar study, he claimed to have looked at all the videos There's some 52 videos of the plane approaching the building.
About 27 or 28 are sufficiently precise that you could create a plot of the location of the plane at the time.
Well, he compared that plot with what the NTSB presented and found a similar plot, which the NTSB claimed had been based on radar.
Well, he took a look and the radar looked fishy to him.
He didn't believe it.
But he discovered there actually was radar, a military radar path, that differed from the official flight.
It was like 1,200 feet to the right of the approaching plane, as you see here, leading him to infer That what happened was a plane 1,200 feet to the side was projecting the image of a 767.
In order to retain the integrity of the holographic image, it had to fly faster than was physically possible for a Boeing 767.
That the sound of the plane they heard, and many reported hearing the sound, was from the plane projecting the image Which explains, too, the impossible impact physics with no collision, the impossible speed, and why the radar, the military radar, which was legit, didn't pick up the plane that was plotted based upon the videos because it wasn't a real object.
It was just a holographic image, and therefore it did not Respond to it, not bounce off radio wave images that create the radar impact.
Thus you have here his 9-11 Flight 175 Radar Study.
You can find it online.
Check it out.
Completely brilliant work.
And if I understand, this is Richard D. Hall.
Richard D. Hall did crack the case about how it was done, and while I have a report that Richard D. Hall has now abandoned his theory for reasons I know not, then we can designate it the James H. Fetzer theory, because I endorse that it's absolutely correct.
I have been received now through the internet in a mail sent to me, a page from an Australian military manual for an airborne holographic projector, which displays a three-dimensional visual image in a desired location, removed from the display generator.
The project can be used for psychological operations and strategic perception management, It's also useful for optical deception and cloaking, providing a momentary distraction when engaging an unsophisticated adversary.
Well, the American people are very unsophisticated, and the idea of putting together what they thought they saw with their own eyes.
Just as a reporter said when he was told it was a bomb, not a plane, we saw it on television.
They believe what they see on television.
Even though you can also see on television Spider-Man spinning his web, Superman flying, the American suspension of disbelief appears to have carried over to 9-11.
Meanwhile, get this.
Meanwhile, get this, flight 175.
It turns out flight 175 didn't crash into the South Tower, but was over Harrisburg and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania after it had officially crashed into the South Tower.
Again, I compliment pilots for 9-11, too.
They have done completely brilliant work on this.
Meanwhile, I reached out to the FAA, and I obtained the registration data for the two aircraft that were used for those flights—175, the South Tower, 93, Shanksville, Pennsylvania.
And I discovered that The physical planes used for those two flights were—remember, the same physical plane can be used for different flights on different occasions—today from Tampa to Chicago, tomorrow New York to San Francisco—were not even formally deregistered or taken out of service until 28 September 2005.
Raising obvious questions about how can planes that weren't even in the air have crashed on 9-11 and how can planes that crashed on 9-11 have still been in the air four years later?
The fraud is enormous.
Let me accent.
Donald Trump was the first personality in the world to contest the official version of the attacks of 9-11 on television that very day.
After having noted that the engineers who built the Twin Towers were now working for him, he declared on New York's Channel 9 that it was impossible that Boeing's going to burst through the steel structures of the tower.
He continued by saying it was also impossible that Boeing's going to cause the towers to collapse.
He concluded by affirming there had to be other factors of which we were, as yet unaware, actually using the word bombs.
And remember, that's what the spectator president at the time said.
It wasn't a plane, it was bombs.
But a reporter emphasized that, no, we saw it on television.
Well, what we saw on television was an elaborate production We got Hollywood in collusion with the Department of Defense and the Mossad.
Thus, while I'm not addressing it here and now, and we're our
...speaker, unable to join Joe Olson as an expert, who has published multiple articles about the use of small nukes in the sub-basement of the North and the South Tower, such that the destruction occurred by blowing the inner tube surrounding the 47 core columns from the bottom to the top, and then the outer tube blowing apart in every direction from the top down.
All the floors remaining stationary, awaiting their turn in the memorable phrase of Morgan Reynolds, to be blown to kingdom come, being converted into millions of cubic yards of very fine dust.
And when it was over, there was no debris.
We know from controlled demolition The classic result is a pile of debris equal to 12% of the original height.
We had that with Building 7.
Notice all the floors are coming down at the same time, unlike the North and the South Tower.
All the floors are coming down, not blowing apart in every direction, not being converted into millions of cubic yards of very fine dust.
And when it was over, There was a pile of debris of five and a half floors, or 12% of the original 47 floors.
But in the case of Tower 1 and 2, the North and South Tower, they were destroyed too, or even below ground level.
It was Father Frank Morales, who came on to my radio shows on two different occasions, who was a first responder from St.
Mark's Episcopal Church, reported twice.
Which tells us they were destroyed, but they did not collapse.
So we had a controlled demolition of the North and the South Tower, but was very different than what happened with Building 7.
So any who want to go further, here's one source I can recommend, America Nuked on 9-11, Compliments of the CIA, the Neocons, and the DoD, and the Mossad, which is, unlike six of my other books, available at Moonrock Books.
So, I'm just delighted, although Jill can't be here, to have had this opportunity to fill in.
Just on the contingency we might lose one of our speakers, I was prepared to do that, as you can now tell.
And after we take a brief break here, I'll introduce our next speaker.
I'm delighted.
Who is here?
Carl Herman.
So we'll take a short break, and then we'll continue with our next speaker.
Thanks for getting up and being here this morning.
I'm delighted you have joined.
▲
Export Selection