Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 15, 2023 - Jim Fetzer

01:36:07

Need to Know News (15 December 2023) with Carl Herman & Brian Davidson

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Carl Herman, Mission Viejo, California.
	Brian Davidson, Houston, Texas.
	Need to Know News.
	This is Friday, the 15th of December, 2023.
	And I conclude that we're very close to a breakthrough, but I haven't been right yet.
	Let's take a look at the topics, then we'll have an opening statement, and then away we go.
	We'll talk more about the False Flags and Conspiracies Conference 2024, the fourth annual, and that'll be this weekend.
	I want to take a look at some context from a retired Marine Sergeant.
	We'll take a look at the fundamental choice that we have.
	We're going to go to the war, we're going to go to COVID, we're going to go to optics.
	All right.
	Let's take a look at the conference first, then opening statements.
	So this information is from Jim's site.
	The link is at bitchute.
	If you want to pop in, there are 500 free spaces on Zoom, and we do suggest a donation just to help out, but it's a great lineup.
	And again, we had more speakers than spaces available.
	And we went over in the last show examples of Of the presentations.
	And if you really want to be able to get into the mindset of being quicker at identifying the lies and knowing the tools that Brian Davidson, a professional PI and people like me, a professional historian and anybody who really engages it like anything else you discover.
	Well, I'm really excited about the False Flags and Conspiracies Conference.
	the most, just like, you know, Brian and I were talking about his overalls being the most practical work outfit with all of its pockets.
	You learn these things and then you apply them and the stuff that works, you keep it and the stuff that doesn't, you don't.
	Brian, any opening statement you'd like to make, brother?
	Well, I'm really excited about the False Flags and Conspiracies Conference.
	I've done this for the last four years, and it seems to be sort of my brush up opportunity to go back over and learn lots of new things.
	Of course, there's a whole bunch of different topics that are covered.
	I like being given the early slots because it seems like the later in the day that the slots start to shrink.
	You know, you've got all these great speakers that each one of them could talk for two or three hours about whatever subject they happen to be assigned, but they've got to condense it into like a 45-minute, 50-minute session.
	By the end of the day, the nights just seem to be going on and on and on.
	They get deeper and deeper, sometimes 11, 12, 1 a.m.
	before they're over.
	But I'm given...
	Given two slots originally, and it's been moved to one, so I've got to take two presentations.
	And condense them into 1, the 1st presentation I was supposed to do was basically.
	Techniques open sourced intelligence techniques and computer techniques for how to.
	Basically, create a when you see a suspected false flag, how to download the earliest and most reliable evidence.
	The value of the earliest and most reliable evidence and parsing the earliest and most reliable evidence.
	Very important to create a file and what I've done is looped into Oleg Damogard to create a structure that allows us to collaborate and save files into Dropbox.
	We're using a massive directory on Dropbox of which I keep a local copy here on my Four terabyte Crucial Drive.
	And that allows me to go back through and basically keep an index of all the early videos that come up whenever I see a false flag.
	Again, I don't wait.
	We'll deal with this more in the thing, but I don't wait any information that comes out significantly after the event.
	I don't give it any credibility whatsoever.
	I rely almost exclusively on the first two, three, four hours of coverage to create all of my analysis.
	Whenever I do a false flag break, and usually I have plenty of fireworks and firepower within those first couple of hours to prove that the event is indeed fake.
	So we'll be going over some of those techniques.
	I'll be showing you how to use either a Windows computer or a Linux computer.
	And then, of course, the second presentation was on.
	How they drive spending and I think that if you're there for that portion of the presentation, I've basically parsed FEMA's, not just FEMA, but Department of Homeland Security's entire budget for the past 30 years.
	Well, it's only been around since 2003, but that's 20 years.
	But I looked at the budgets for all the same groups prior to it being called FEMA.
	And I've determined that something significant is seriously taking place.
	It's almost like they're creating a prison system, which I'm going to talk about in the United States.
	I'll talk about that during the second half of my speech, Saturday morning at 10 a.m.
	Very good, very good.
	So, as a professional historian, we're also trying to take a look at the earliest evidence, and then the later the evidence comes, that becomes useful as well to demonstrate the revision on the creation.
	And the implementation, the pushing of the false narrative, because they selectively, and I frame it as they lie by omission, that there's a lot of stuff that they leave out, and then there are going to be lies of commission where they commit lies as well.
	And that is, you know, the false flags and conspiracies where, you know, you can hear the confidence in our professional voices here, is because we really can demonstrate and Once we've demonstrated, then it's a public presentation and public consideration.
	And if anybody had been able to refute us over the decades, then we would be able to make a correction.
	But when nobody is able to refute us, and we're not allowed for any type of official debate, because they can't, they won't, because they can't, because all the facts are on our side, we become pretty confident.
	And yet, I'll just jump in because part of my opening statement is that we need this breakthrough, which by definition is going to be something that is unpredictable and unimaginable.
	I mean, if we fucking knew what to do to cause this Emperor's New Clothes moment, we would have done it.
	But we've acted in good faith professionalism, taking the steps along the way and discovering the tricks and the lies and the cognitive dissonance and the mind control and whatever it is that is still keeping the narratives in place.
	It's gonna blow.
	It's gonna blow.
	Okay, so let's go ahead and go in here.
	I want to start out with a retired Marine Sergeant, and he's just going to give a take that is my favorite of who's in charge of the U.S.
	government, and it's we the people.
	And I'll let Sarge go ahead and take it from here.
	And he also gives a nice analysis of Dr. Jan Harper Hayes as well.
	And if you want to go back and listen to her, what she talks about is that, you know, if the military wanted to take action, they're in position to do so.
	All right, let's listen to Sarge here.
	Ms.
	Harper-Hayes.
	Dr. Harper-Hayes, I love her.
	And she's bringing much awareness to the unlawful act of 1871.
	But she's skipping over the most important aspect of that act.
	And this is just like two minutes.
	And that is the fact that we the people of America back then and today are the sovereign authority over our country and over our government.
	We the people created a contract called our Constitution that gave our employees in our government limited powers.
	That is the republic that we live in.
	Nowhere in that contract did it give our employees, whether it be Congress, the President, the courts, any power to grant or create a separate government for the District of Columbia.
	It's not in the original contract.
	And if it's not in the original contract, then they had no right and no power to do it.
	That doesn't exist as one of their lawful powers.
	If Ms.
	Harper-Hayes or anyone can show me where they got that power from or the permission to create a separate government outside of the original government created by the people for the people, I will concede this argument.
	The District of Columbia was a charter under our original Constitution.
	And it was controlled by we, the people.
	That happened in 1791, I think, when that charter came.
	So why would we, the people, allow some international court controlled by people that are not the sovereigns of America and not the owners of America, determine our country, especially our complete sovereign power over our government.
	And he goes on and I like that point that, you know, it's our country.
	And what we have for the government is so Orwellian.
	It is so unreasonable.
	There is no rational argument, and we talked about that, is that if somebody could talk us down, they would have talked us down, but they can't talk us down.
	And that's because, as this article talks about, is that the globalists are on a mission.
	Turn Americans against each other before a foreign power is called in to finish the job.
	And a foreign power would be somebody acting just outside the limits of government.
	And you all remember this from school.
	And the big deal of the concept of limited government is that the government is limited within the Outlined powers on the page.
	It's like a sport You know there are rules and you got to play inside the rules and the rules are supposed to be understood by all now One of the things that this article takes a look at to divide Americans into a civil war is that we had this documentary
	I guess it's talking about that here, of Leave the World Behind, and you got the 666 and the symbology, you have the t-shirt with Obey, and then Never a Straight Answer and Not a Space Agency for NASA, and Julia Roberts, who probably is a dude, or started out as a dude, and you got Ball right here, and then you have the the new one as a
	Promoting civil war and that's the only hope that our opponents have is to create such a field of chaos that people will beg for a military order and will turn to the government, the psychopaths, the public serpents, the parasites for a solution to the problem that they created.
	If the truth is going to win, then we're going to see as quoting Justin Turtow is that Those oligarchs are a small fringe minority holding unacceptable views, and we'll see things for what they are.
	The emperor will have no clothes, they'll be arrested, removed from power, technology will be released, and it'll be a happy ending.
	Brian, your thoughts, brother?
	Well, first of all, I want to take a quick poke at Dr. Jan Harper Hayes and the Q movement.
	And it's not a poke.
	It's just that I've always asked the question.
	While it, you know, while it's very nice to believe in the idea that there are a group of some sort of specially powered people who are going to prosecute crimes in the military, I, for one, know that our president is the commander in chief of the military.
	And that I don't see a lot of support in the Supreme Court for the idea that there's going to be some military action against the people or for the people.
	I guess it would be considered by one side against the people of the United States and by the other for the people of the United States.
	And so I've had to reinterpret my view of the Q movement.
	Again, I feel like it's been a good thing.
	I don't think it's a PSYOP like Operation Truth was.
	I think it's a different type of operation, an operation of people becoming motivated to expose the crimes of the deep state and people doing their own research, breaking loose from the mainstream media and stepping into alternative research.
	And I think for that reason, it's been very good for America, because I think there's a large Larger selection of us.
	There's basically a critical mass of people that are beginning to realize that the mainstream media are lying to them in mass.
	And I think this was largely developed as a result of Trump's run starting back in 2015 and into 2016 through 2020.
	The biggest thing he did for America was begin to open people's eyes.
	And even if he was unable to drain the deep state, which now we're seeing with the Resignation of Miss Wolf from the Department of Justice that happened in just a couple of days.
	We're starting to finally see some some movement in the right direction and you know, it's funny.
	I was talking to my mother-in-law the other day who's going to be staying with us for an extended period of time and I was pretty serious because we were talking about the the Kennedy assassination.
	I said, you know, That's on your generation.
	She's 80 years old.
	And I said, that's on you guys.
	You guys were unable to get through any sort of prosecution.
	Granted, they murdered a lot of people.
	Granted, they took down a lot of witnesses.
	Granted, they applied a lot of pressure.
	But that's on you guys because you just couldn't break through this system.
	You didn't have what it took to get any sort of justice whatsoever.
	And now for 45 years, we've been sitting around waiting for something for 40 years, 63 to 03.
	60 years.
	We've been waiting for something to happen and it hasn't.
	We haven't seen justice and we're not going to see justice on the scale that we need to see it until the Department of Justice goes down and gets rebuilt from the bottom to the top.
	As for the second article related to this new movie that apparently is on Netflix that's indicating sort of it's a premonition of what's going to go down is my understanding of it in terms of in terms of what's going to happen Uh, when society finally collapses.
	There's always symbolism in all the movies.
	The word bail being basically brought out.
	The Leave the World Behind movie and the title trailer plus the 666 stuff.
	This is all stuff that's very important.
	And again, Carl mentioned the Not a Space Agency NASA shirt that one of the girls in the images is wearing.
	And I think that this is a very important issue.
	I'm going to cover it slightly this way.
	Everybody knows that NASA's faking videos.
	Everybody knows they're using green screen technology.
	Everybody knows that this space station thing is filmed inside of a swimming pool.
	The question is why?
	And what is it that they're hiding if there is some great conspiracy?
	Of course, right now the conspiracy seems to be leaning towards is the Earth really what they say it is with the growth of the Flat Earth Movement?
	And of course, I'm an old Bible guy, an old Bible scholar, and I believe in the Bible top to bottom.
	The very first pages of the Bible, the very first words indicate that there is a firmament and that God separated the waters and basically stamped out the dry land, created the boundaries for the waters.
	And while I understand that things have changed between the Antediluvian period and The post-Diluvian period that we're currently in, I do have always recognized that the biggest and most important thing is that if we are indeed created by a great designer, a great intellect, a great all-powerful being that has designed and created this world, then we answer to him.
	If, however, we're broken loose from that paradigm and put into sort of third rock from the sun floating through outer space, Aimlessly with no purpose, we're just a human animal that developed out of the primordial ooze with sort of no meaning to life, then the government becomes our new god.
	And I think fundamentally that's what's at the bottom of that rabbit hole when you continue to dig, dig, dig, dig, dig, is who is in charge?
	Is it the quote-unquote religion of science that tells us that the earth is changing and warming and going to die as a result of Humanity's impractical movements, breathing, and cow farts, and global warming of all that stuff.
	Do we have to leave that up to our governments to solve that problem?
	And as good citizens, do we obey our government?
	Or is this world simply created with a beautiful balance, we're put in the middle of it, we're given our lives, and we're expected to be responsible to our Creator?
	And I'm going to lean toward The biblical view on that particular policy every day, every time, everywhere I look.
	That's just sort of my take on the big picture of those first couple of articles.
	Awesome!
	All right, I'm going to try to help my dog out to get into a position.
	She's excited.
	Our daughter is home from college.
	She doesn't know exactly where she wants to be.
	So for Q, I read all the source material and my experience with the source material is that it was some of the hardest hitting, exposing, deep state, punching articles that I see.
	And you know, we look for those because we share those, the hardest articles.
	And that's what I got in Q. And my experience with the voice of Q is that this was a serious Voice, it has the gravitas of somebody who has battled for decades, and as somebody who has battled for decades, if you read my writing, it has a similar tone.
	So I resonated with the material.
	Now, as to what it means, that is something else.
	The limitations of the facts make you be serious, and as a historian who is attempting to provide the best analysis of tools, the application of tools, of who did what, when, where, and then to provide The other relevant comprehensive facts were the subjective question of why, and we're really trying to find this out.
	And so what this means is that, you know, I don't see enough data to be able to prove anything.
	Now, that said, I'll put it in the show notes as usual about why I'm at 95% certainty that the Q movement is essentially, that Q is essentially true.
	And that is based upon the optics of the Trump Tour of 2017.
	And plus, you know, after 46 years, I have an intuitive feel that I have to honor and that something is going to break, especially as having published economics research.
	Man, I don't know what's holding that Orwellian debt-based system up, but it is still up.
	And if that falls, If the demand for U.S.
	debt falls, then baby, it is a whole other game and the credibility of the government will go down to zero.
	And the public disgust.
	We shared a video, I think on Wednesday, Brian, of that.
	20-year Democrat that Jimmy Dore played that clip of, of the Democrats' message was basically, fuck you to the Democrat leadership for reneging on all of the ideals of progressivism to help take care of people.
	Because when people can't afford a house, then those Democratic ideals, they're pretty much gone if you're struggling to earn a living.
	And I do conclude with Q after Working our way up to two UN Summits for Heads of State for Ending Poverty through Results.org, and I'll put the link to that history there.
	Q's conclusion that military is the only way is that I'm with it.
	You know, I had a two-year battle with our school district, the courts aren't providing any relief, and this is either gonna go to civil war or the military is gonna step out and say, surprise bitches, we've been here the whole time.
	But again, the professional military, They don't want you to see them until the flashbang and then they'll say, ta-da, here we are.
	And it would be like, wow, you guys are good.
	And I think that's where we're going to be going.
	For the flat earth, I'm credentialed.
	As a mathematician.
	And regarding flat Earth, with the distances that you can see an object, so there's a math formula for the size of the sphere that we're given, and I believe that it is 8 inches per mile squared.
	Perfect, yes.
	And it's, it's pretty, I mean you just can't work your way around it.
	It's eight inches per mile squared.
	If the Earth is a 25,000 mile sphere, you just can't.
	Yeah, it is what it is.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
	And you can verify this for yourself by taking a look at pictures over the horizon.
	And one of the most famous ones, and you can just look this up, I won't provide a link, but If you take a look at the skyline of Chicago across Lake Michigan, 60 miles, the entire skyline is visible.
	And all of the skyline should be obscured from, I don't have enough fingers, but you can't see around the curve.
	And then there was the reflection of the sun on the water, demonstrating a flat surface.
	Then there are pictures of clouds in front of and behind the sun.
	And then now the Flat Earthers are going to argue that that means a localized sun and a localized moon, which would also explain all the angles on the sun rays rather than just one angle from a sun that's a bazillion miles away.
	There's a lot of good arguments on the side of... I don't like to call it the Flat Earth Movement because I just... Unfortunately, there's so many weirdos that Get tied to that?
	I'm a, I'm a, I'm what's called a biblical cosmologist.
	Meaning I'm going to take a look at what the Bible says and see if it jives with, with reality.
	And I can tell you eight inches per mile squared don't work.
	The longest infrared photo is over 800 miles.
	It just doesn't work.
	Yeah, it doesn't work.
	It's refuted.
	So as a professional scholar, the importance of this one proof is that, how we talk about it, is that that one proof refutes the theory of a sphere.
	And then the ball gets kicked into the other court with those who want to demonstrate that it is a sphere, saying, okay, well, then how do you explain the data being able to see the entire Uh, Chicago skyline.
	And the only attempt that I've seen is that it is a mirage reflection, which would invert the image, but they don't demonstrate how that works anyplace else.
	So it's bullshit.
	And then you ask the appropriate question of why, why do they do this?
	Well, I think that they exactly, as you said, they want to make the argument that we're just an animal on an animal eat animal planet, and they want to Usurp the role of human beings as given dominion and caretakers of the earth.
	They want us as just a sophisticated animal scared into scarcity and therefore become a demon who is serving yourself and taking over the place of God, that you are your own God somehow.
	Let's see, what else?
	Oh yeah and then I think that we're also being recruited to terraform the planet for a better environment for whatever the species is that I conclude took over this place or was allowed to be able to take it over at least for a period of time to offer choice and my working conclusion is that that would be those long-headed guys that were in Egypt and South America
	And they would have come from a planet that got blown up, Malduk or whatever it is, that is now the asteroid belt outside of Mars.
	The evidence of an explosion is the smattering and the blown away atmosphere of Mars.
	The southern half just shows an explosion.
	And one of the reasons I think that Star Wars resonates with us is that this was some sort of evil.
	That engaged in some sort of a war, and this was about 500,000 years ago, as far as we can tell.
	But I'll provide the link to that if you want to dive down that rabbit hole.
	Go ahead.
	All right.
	Anything else, brother, or go on?
	Oh, yeah, let's keep going.
	Got lots of good stuff here.
	Oh, lots of good stuff, lots of good stuff.
	All right, let's go to the war.
	We got five of these updates.
	And this is absolutely legally correct.
	No, Israel does not have the right to defend itself against the population it occupies.
	And okay, I'll go ahead and throw in here the show notes to my article on the history of Israel and the occupation, the military blockade that restricts Supplies going into the country.
	That's an act of war.
	So when Israel is already been engaging in war on Gaza, then they have no right to claim that they they have to defend themselves that and I'll put in here as well.
	The basic article that explains war law and that if there is a dispute, you were supposed to take it to the U.N.
	Security Council, but they have no right to engage in a war of aggression.
	And then the U.N., which only has one job, is to prevent wars of aggression.
	They're silent on this.
	There's a U.N.
	genocide office and they're silent about that.
	Of course, they have to be silent because the U.N.
	facilitates wars of aggression.
	It doesn't stop them.
	Israel claims it's rounding up Hamas fighters, but the photos seem so they're stripping these civilians because they want to have you be confused.
	I guess they took their uniforms off.
	No, they're not dressed in civilian.
	They're dressed in civvies.
	That's why probably some of them dressed in overalls like like we would.
	Historical voices Malcolm X, Albert Einstein, Nelson Mandela, Mahatma Gandhi talking about the same thing as to Free up the Palestinians from the Orwellian stealing of land by Israel.
	And then, just quickly, going to Ukraine with the official narrative of Janet Yellen, who is in charge of the Fed, or at least that's what we're shown, says that the U.S.
	could be held responsible for Ukraine's defeat unless Congress approves a new aid package, which is just funny.
	What are your thoughts?
	Well Janet Yellen saying that is almost as funny as Chuck Schumer standing in front of, let's see, he's the Senate Majority Leader, and he stood up there the other day and said that Ukraine will certainly lose the war if we don't give them 60 billion more dollars.
	And they will certainly win the war if we do give them 60 billion more dollars, as if that's not the most myopic, idiotic thing I've ever heard in my life.
	That, oh, it's win versus lose at this point in time.
	It's either 60 billion or nothing.
	And then, of course, Janet Yellen here.
	She's another one of the supervillains from the Deep State coming along saying that, hey, Unless we help Israel, they're certainly not going to be able to beat these Palestinians.
	And again, it's my opinion that Hamas is nothing more than an Israeli creation in order to control the opposition.
	But over the years they've allowed people that are truly misguided people that are truly anti-Israel to Enter into their ranks.
	I'm seeing more connections to I was going through an important article back from 2018 that it was a Millennium Report article released in June of 2016 called the Kazarian Mafia.
	You don't know what you don't know.
	And I've been rather impressed with this particular writer from the Millennium Report, dealing with the hidden history of the incredibly evil Khazarian Mafia.
	And this was put together by a couple of our authors by the name of Preston James and Mike Harris, who both have done extensive work with veterans today.
	And of course, they make an argument, and this was from 2018.
	It's not even like in vogue to make the argument today.
	But they make the argument that we're not dealing with what ought to be the original Israel at all at this point in time.
	We're dealing with a new breed that broke loose post 70 AD from the Pharisees and from the sort of elitist quote-unquote you party that has begun to develop themselves from
	You know, I would call it the same old ancient cult that did Moloch and Baal worship that also had the old Solomon intrigue related to David and his illegitimate stolen wives murdered with the murdered husbands, David and Bathsheba.
	They put together This young guy by the name of Solomon, who supposedly, biblically, was given special gifts.
	But one of the most important things on the Israel front that I want to remind you guys of, and this just came up in my mind as I was, you know, I got my mother-in-law here.
	She's almost 80, so I'm trying to tap her for as much wisdom as I can possibly pull in terms of what happened historically.
	So one of the things that we did the other night is we sat down together and we watched the old Nixon tapes.
	I remember Nixon, about 68 or 69, I believe he installed recorders in the White House, and it recorded everything that he said, and there was only three or four people that really knew what was going on.
	And Nixon knew that this stuff was being recorded and didn't have any problem with it.
	And I gotta tell you, the more I've studied Nixon, the more I've been rather impressed with his direct link on life.
	But let me, let me point out What those tapes said, because Nixon said it, and he said it knowing that it was being recorded.
	From 1971, this is the summer of 1971, and remember Nixon was elected by the people to get us out of Vietnam.
	Vietnam was a war machine, but he was stuck into a deep state position where the entire military-industrial complex wanted that war to continue.
	These are the same people that were willing to get rid of Kennedy to get that war into place, and they wanted to see that war continue to no end.
	So he was stuck in a tough spot.
	So let's take a look at some of those Nixon tapes real quick.
	Let me quote him.
	President Richard M. Nixon lashed out repeatedly at the Jews he saw at the root of his problems.
	The Jews are all over the government, Nixon complained to his chief of staff.
	HR Bob Halderman in an Oval Office meeting recorded on one set of the White House tapes released yesterday by the National Archives.
	This again was released in 1999.
	Nixon said the Jews need to be brought under control by putting somebody in charge who's not Jewish in key agencies.
	Let me go on.
	Washington is full of Jews, the president asserted.
	Most Jews are disloyal, he said.
	He made exceptions for some of his top aides, such as National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger.
	His White House counsel, Leonard Garment, and one of his speechwriters, William Sapphire, and then he added, But Bob, generally speaking, you can't trust the bastards.
	They turn on you.
	Am I wrong or am I right?
	Alderman, the Jew, agreed wholeheartedly.
	Their whole orientation is against you, and this administration anyway.
	And they're smart.
	They have the ability to do what they want to do, which is to hurt us.
	Elsewhere in the tapes, Nixon denies being anti-Semitic, but his attitude towards Jews was starkly displayed in the approximately 45, 445 hours of White House recordings made between February and July of 1971 and finally released in 1971.
	So we were, my mother-in-law and I were watching these tapes and I was shocked.
	Now, Nixon, he would go after the blacks, he would go after the Hispanics, he'd go, he'd call them the Spics, he'd go after the Jews and call them kikes, he'd go, he was an equal opportunity pisser-offer.
	There's no doubt about it.
	But he knew that those tapes were running.
	He and three other guys knew that those tapes were running.
	And he was just a very transparent type of leader who would say whatever he felt he needed to say.
	And this wasn't the first precedent that I'd heard.
	I'd heard some things from Kennedy that were similar along those lines regarding the Catholics and different religions and regarding other things.
	I gotta tell you, I'm more and more convinced that even back in 1971, before I was even born, I'm only 50, Nixon was already beginning to recognize what was at the root of the problem.
	Fascinating.
	Great, great points.
	So, touching on the points, yeah, we are digital warriors with a How you started out with talking about the veterans today and we have sufficient documentation and part of the, you know, my concern after 46 years of it and phases and taking a look and observations of people and you only need to be able to demonstrate sufficient prima facie evidence to withdraw consent from the official story.
	If you can refute the official story, then You can actually demand the arrest of the people who are engaging in official lies because they're not supposed to.
	That's not the contract.
	That's not what they're hired to do.
	And in order to get to the truth, we're going to have to have this Emperor's New Clothes moments and the liars are going to have to be removed from power and from corporate media.
	And then we'll have a chance to be able to discover what the truth is.
	And with the.
	The possibility, if you take into the Bible, with the historical span of life of the ancient kings, is that my working conclusion is that human beings have been GMO'd as a slave race to these long-headed people who came here after they blew their own
	Planet up and that our limited lifespan is so that you know you only start figuring things out once you're at the end of your life and we have been dominated and I think in Star Wars the analogy would be with the the clone wars with those clones and they say there that these were all bred and created And that they are just order followers.
	And they're order followers as warriors, but they're not capable of the critical thinking to see that they're being used as tools for evil.
	And that the chosen people may have been the chosen people where the master said, all right, so we got to create a management class to the slaves.
	And so we'll give these people a little more intelligence and We'll splice in some more of our genetic component, because whoever is in charge of this place, just from the idea that they maintain the wars, they maintain poverty, a million kids are dying from...
	Preventable poverty every month and slow motion agony.
	So that is what these people want because that's what they do.
	And the solutions are easy in the two UN summits for heads of state, blah, blah, blah.
	So they are some sort of predator, some sort of empathy-less beings at the top.
	So you need to create a management class for that, and it might be that a group that were their chosen people to manage are at the core of the Heartless Ones, and you would have to sprinkle them in and put them into positions of power.
	And with Nixon and with Haldeman as the chief of staff in those recordings, One of the admissions that was fascinating regarding the Kennedy assassination is that they were talking about stopping the information about Hunt being busted.
	Hunt wanted out of prison and Hunt told the press saying, look, I was involved in the Kennedy assassination and I could tell you a lot of things.
	And then he used that as leverage.
	But Nixon was talking about that if hunt is allowed to talk if that truth comes out, then it'll open up the whole quote.
	The Bay of Pigs thing, unquote, that Haldeman put into his own book is that that was the Kennedy assassination.
	And then with all of the evidence for the Kennedy assassination, again, you know, there's sufficient evidence to withdraw consent and demand arrest.
	And then we'll have a chance to get to the truth because digital warriors have so much fascinating documentation.
	And I've been doing good faith effort for 46 years to to get to the best of it.
	You know, and that's nice and everything, but the world is still the way that the world looks, and we're still a breakthrough away from anything changing, or at least of what we can see.
	Alright, let's go back to the news.
	We went to the war.
	Let's go to COVID.
	Canada, so a 300 increase in unspecified causes of death, causing calls for investigation.
	I do recommend, this is Bobby Kennedy's Children Health Defense site, and the data, we've been covering it for years.
	So that's an important data point.
	Steve Kirsch, the New Zealand data is crystal clear evidence that the COVID vaccine is deadly, a simple, stunning example, and all he's doing is taking a look at the death rate.
	And if the vaccine saved lives, then This would be in the opposite direction.
	It isn't showing that more people died.
	Yeah.
	That was the big takeaway from that particular article, is that, look, everything's opposite of what it ought to be if this vaccine has any effectiveness whatsoever.
	But we saw an absolute opposite effect, and Kurtz did a very detailed job of laying that out.
	He's very good at putting together his pivot tables and his graphs and showing what happened, where, when, why, and how.
	And he's right.
	There is simply no explanation other than it was the jab, because it wasn't COVID.
	Because they got rid of the flu.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	And then the, uh, we've repeated this, but I like bringing this article for the bigger picture so that you can see, um, the best evidence that we have is 17 million deaths from the, uh, the death shot.
	And that's taken a look at 17 South American countries and extrapolating from their And again, how academics work is that you do a study, you make it, throw it out there for public consideration, and if nobody can refute it, then the ordinary public's response, or at least what we're trained in in academics, which makes sense to me, is that, okay.
	So it looks like 17 million were killed, unless somebody can talk us down, and when the officials don't address the data, then that's a liable mission.
	Dr. Pierre Corey, so the official response is that the CDC isn't gonna track data on excess deaths anymore, and the obvious question is- What's the point?
	What's the point of having a federal agency that does this if they're not gonna track what people are dying from?
	Why are we spending the money?
	Exactly.
	It's almost as stupid as FEMA and it's almost as stupid as all these other agencies that we've got that have absolutely no purpose.
	I mean, we've got agencies to study biological terror weapons and, you know, different ways to destroy entire populations.
	We've got agencies to study this and agencies to study that.
	But, oh, let's go ahead and stop tracking COVID death or vaccine-related death.
	We don't need that information anymore.
	It just goes to show how Absolutely controlled these people are and it goes to show most importantly how the money rules the mission.
	I can't tell you how much as I've looked into this FEMA money and this Department of Homeland Security budget over the last 25 years as I've studied.
	That budget I cannot tell you how every single component of the government just has an appetite to to to grow at 10% plus per year per capita and just to give you a little highlights of what you'll see from me on Saturday.
	When this data first was being tracked, related to what Homeland Security, and Homeland Security didn't come up until 2003 really, but I found the same agencies in 1995 and tracked them.
	I'm just going to give you a little highlight, okay?
	In 1995, for the same services that Homeland Security is offering, we had an average expenditure Per citizen of $34.
	of $34, $34.
	In 2024, with the budget for Homeland Security, for the same services that we were providing in 1995, for $34 per citizen, it is now going to be $302 per citizen for the same exact service it is now going to be $302 per citizen for the same exact service that we were It's got more frills, and it's got more complexity, and it's got more federal agencies, and it's got more this and got more that, but it's basically the same thing.
	FEMA, Customs and Border, Post Guard, TSA, Immigration, Citizens, Citizenship, management, Secret Service, and cyber security is all grouped into that Homeland Security umbrella.
	And I gotta tell you that the entire structure is so hopelessly corrupt.
	What I'm going to show you on Saturday is how they're using the money to create a prison inside the borders of America.
	$798 per household is what they spend to imprison you.
	I think you're going to be shocked if you come to the False Flags and Conspiracies Conference.
	Yes, yes.
	And that, you know, people can say what they want about the Bible, but the essential observation that evil has somehow been given rule is that I don't see any way to argue that that isn't the case.
	And the agencies, as I keep saying, all the agencies are captured.
	And you can see that the work of the agencies is the Orwellian opposite, the inversion of their stated purpose.
	The UN is facilitating wars, the CDC is facilitating disease, and the Department of Defense is the Department of War.
	So it is Orwellian opposite crazy.
	And, oh yeah, and for the money.
	Yeah, yeah, it's an evil incorporated.
	For sure.
	And they're serious about that.
	I like the movie's Robocop to kind of show how the money operates.
	And there's a bunch of funny lines with that, with the CEO of the Dynacor, or whatever it is that operates those robots, being concerned about the ones who lived through the slaughter by their robot.
	Suing them.
	And the CEO says, the dead ones don't sue, but it's the ones that stay alive and their families that, that's the problem.
	And they really do look at this.
	And from the feeling that I've had interacting with political leadership, that's the feeling that you get too, is that these people, and I don't even think that they're bad.
	And this goes back to one of the first observations that I had for my mentor, Bucky Fuller.
	He said that there are no right and wrong people.
	There are no good And bad people.
	God made all people.
	It's not that you have a right foot and a wrong foot.
	You have a right foot and a left foot.
	And you use forces.
	And these types of people are just more predatorial.
	They're like a red team.
	They have a selfish interest.
	And, okay.
	They want to live that way, they can.
	And our job, if you want to have a connected life, if you don't want to have a dog-eat-dog type of mentality, if you want to embrace the mantle that we're here as custodians of the earth, and we're servants of the power that created this place, and you choose to co-create with the connection to the creator, that's going to be quite a significant different lifestyle.
	Well, I think that what's fundamentally at the bottom of that morals issue is do you fear God or do you not fear God?
	And some people have convinced themselves that there is no God.
	That we are just the human animal.
	That we are just people floating through space with a given lifespan and that we don't have to worry about Whether or not there's going to be any divine retribution or any ultimate justice that takes place, I can assure you there is going to be justice.
	As a matter of fact, that's the greatest argument for the existence of God, or at least in my opinion, the most elegant argument for the existence of God, is Immanuel Kant's philosophical argument.
	It's called the moral argument for the existence of God.
	He says mankind has a compass built into them, an antenna for what's right and what's moral and correct.
	And yet we look around in this world and we see no justice.
	We see evil people get away with all sorts of things, and we see good people end up with cancer and die, and their children die in terrible accidents and of sicknesses.
	This world has no justice.
	Well, if indeed we are created, then absolutely there must be a God to bring justice around to this world.
	The problem with these immoral people that want to enslave and control and that don't want to love their neighbor as themselves, is that they think that all they're going to get out of this world is what they can get in this life.
	I can assure you that we come into this world naked and we go out absolutely naked.
	And what we earn and what we build during our time here in terms of structures or in terms of finances means absolutely nothing compared to what's coming in the afterlife.
	Very, very good.
	Part of what I resonate with in support of your argument is that as messengers, it appears that we have no power and we don't have any power.
	And that some other force, the evil force, the selfish force, has been given authority over here.
	And yet, here we are.
	And as near as I can tell, through 46 years experience, about 2% can engage in the type of conversations in one way or another that we're talking about.
	So let's say roughly that's about 200 million across the globe.
	We don't have power to affect policy, but we have power to initiate a choice.
	And it seems as if the choosing is into three fundamental groups.
	There's the good, that's us.
	We can tell the difference between good and evil.
	The good brings people together and it's the solutions and the moral solutions or the economic solutions.
	Like you don't have the war.
	That's really destructive and a waste of money.
	You wouldn't want to do that.
	And yet, the wars go on.
	So, the good people choose the good, the connection.
	The bad people choose the evil.
	And these are the people who are in the position of being minions, and these are the ones who, like at Hayward Unified School District, when I challenged our district's so-called health, so-called orders, those are the ones who, in conversations and in reading, they choose to lie.
	They know they're lying.
	They choose to lie.
	That's what they want.
	And then there's a third group who are so mind-controlled, and we see that in our family, neighbors, and colleagues, who are defeated by the propaganda.
	And I think that that is going to be a special category.
	And with whatever happened here on Earth, now in my estimation, the amount of evil, like baby torturing, eating monsters, That's a hefty dose of evil.
	I don't know if that was in the design.
	I don't know if we're that badass.
	I don't know what happened.
	Was that an experimental error?
	Did somebody make a mistake?
	Or is that just how we roll?
	Is this just a usual school to discern good from evil?
	I don't know.
	That's a lot of evil for me.
	And it looks like our friends and family have been defeated and can't confront that level of evil, and that might be a special category that the creator is going to say something like, all right, all right, that was too much for you guys.
	We'll give you another chance.
	Here's another planet.
	You can be born onto a neutral planet, and then that'll be a better environment for you to choose so that you're not so freaked out.
	I don't know, but you have to make the conclusion, I think, That the evil is there, 98% of the people seem to be defeated from the propaganda, and that we're just poised here and still just chatting about it, and my dog still doesn't know where she wants to go.
	Well, ever since mankind thought that they could gain favor with the gods by offering up some living sacrifice, there's been a problem.
	Although it's been that way since the very, very beginning, Unfortunately, many people have quisted up what sacrifice meant.
	They thought that they needed the sacrifice to the gods in order to have prosperity.
	Nothing could have been further from the truth.
	The only sacrifice that was ever officially authorized was a sacrifice for sin or for redemption or for having done something terrible so you could see the actual burden of your bad acts.
	Unfortunately, the fertility cults and those particular influences that were behind those ancient cults started to take it to the nth degree where you'd have to sacrifice a child on your altar to Baal in order to gain favor with the gods so you could have prosperity.
	They took it, twisted it, and made it very, very evil.
	There was a purpose for the original sacrifice.
	There was a model in the original sacrifice.
	And that ended up displaying itself for all of history at history's turning point, which was on the cross.
	Very good.
	All right, next.
	Here we are.
	Oh, I didn't even finish the... We got more COVID stories.
	Oh, they're not going to track it.
	We talked about that.
	Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Now, the second smartest guy in the world, I found it interesting that he put Biden into quotes, is that he may recognize that this is an actor playing Biden, but his response with the optics is that we're investing in three new COVID vaccines.
	Great, great, great.
	Dr. Meryl Nass, who's one of the presenters at the conference, she...
	She was, she's been, she challenged the health orders and she had her license suspended and the medical board said, all right, bitch, tell you what, you have to, let's see, what did they tell her that she has to do is right here.
	You're going to have a $10,000 fine, two-year probationary period during which you're going to be required to finance the costs of oversight of your work.
	You're going to have to take courses in ethics and medical record-keeping and undergo a competency evaluation, among other things.
	And NASA... Comply or face total brokenness and devastation.
	Boy, isn't that like the government?
	Yeah, yeah.
	Comply or die.
	And she's going to sue instead, take him to court.
	You have Dr. Naomi Wolf writing another book, and I like her voice.
	And she wrote the 2007, The End of America, a letter of warning to a young patriot that I thought hit a lot of the most fundamental points.
	And Facing the Beast is the newest one, courage, faith, and resistance in a new dark age.
	And the dark age she's defining as the people who have gone They just obey.
	They obey the official story.
	And the dark ages is that they are either unable or unwilling to consider the factual data.
	And again, with the Orwellian nature that we're in, it turns out that Ivermectin may be just, might be able to do a lot.
	And when we do win, if we win, I don't know what this place is, if it's a permanent school or what, I have no idea.
	But I do know the suppressed technologies will have human beings just flourish and thrive.
	And 100 years from now, this place will be unrecognizable.
	But we'll see, we're still engaged.
	Anything else on COVID or do you want to jump on to the next topic?
	No, but as long as psychopaths have power and control to invest and control, then They'll always be a division of classes.
	I don't care what technology that you give unto mankind, somebody will figure out how to capitalize on it.
	Because some people are just inherently that way, and other people are not.
	It seems to be a little bit more prevalent in the Jewish race that they're like that.
	But hey, there were Black people all over the South that capitalized on slavery.
	There were Black people in Africa that capitalized on slavery.
	There were white people that capitalized on white slavery.
	There's always going to be the rich and the poor.
	It's the way the world has always been.
	It's the way the world always will be.
	And there's nothing new under the sun.
	To quote Solomon.
	Ecclesiastes.
	And part of the argument about why I think that human beings were GMOed is that if a human being I don't like any science fiction.
	I won't watch science.
	Did you see the series Westworld, the new one with Anthony Hopkins?
	No.
	I don't like any science fiction.
	I won't watch science.
	If I think it's propaganda or science fiction, I won't do it, although I have become a real big fan of The Terminator and The Matrix, which seem to work together.
	Hold another discussion.
	Yeah, yeah, I like, you know, I grew up in Southern California and I know a lot of waiters and waitresses, I mean actors and actresses, and I think that we get a lot of good analogies that get put in there.
	In Westworld, you have this robot species and the robots are programmed That if they encounter data that challenges their programming and would have them act outside of the acceptable programming because their purpose in existence is to serve the elite who come to the park and they're basically toys to do with what they will for sexual pleasure, violent pleasure, whatever you want.
	But if the robots start encountering data that has questioned their existence, then they're programmed to say, I don't see anything.
	And my response of the GMO'd humans who can't engage with data that should have any rational person withdraw consent from these psychopaths, that makes me wonder about that.
	Well, I'm not going to...
	Look, like I said before, I'm a biblical cosmologist in terms of my outlook on it.
	I tend to think that what was created originally was pretty similar to what was created today.
	Now granted, that was an antediluvian period.
	The atmosphere may have been very different, maybe has been more of a hyperbaric chamber.
	Those people lived six, seven hundred years, even after sin and death entered the world with the very first human beings.
	I, what was interesting about that pre-Diluvian households is that, hey, we can, you know, we have babies every nine months.
	I don't think that's ever changed.
	Those people live six and seven hundred years.
	They could have populated the world based off that.
	And then you have Shemham and Japheth.
	After the flood, which is post-flood, which again, the DNA pool could have been plenty big to populate the world from those groups of people, even from Noah's descendants, but there was absolutely a pre-Diluvian civilization that was
	In my opinion, much more advanced than anything that we see today, but maybe you can chalk that up to the fact that those guys lived six or seven hundred years, and the second law of thermodynamics, sin and death, the idea of order to disorder, hadn't kicked in.
	They were able to use more of their minds than we're able to use today.
	They were able to bypass things and observe things for longer periods, test more things, and they came up with different solutions.
	That would have been more obvious.
	Plus, some of those people would have been communicating with the theoretical angels that were booted from heaven.
	And remember, those angels, there's no salvation for those Those angels, they were not given a Jesus to die on the cross for their salvation.
	They have no hope of a redemptive life toward God.
	As a matter of fact, their judgments already been passed.
	So why wouldn't they continue to go absolutely crazy because they have nothing to gain by being good whatsoever.
	Therefore, they can clearly influence humanity.
	The evil things that they do.
	We like to chalk up to the demons and the cults or whatever, but hey, out of the hearts of men, they're desperately wicked and deceitful above all things.
	I don't put it beyond man to do this baby sacrifice stuff that's beyond that.
	I've seen men do terrible things, and I believe men are capable of doing it.
	We don't need demonic influence to get us to do absolute evil.
	We can do it on our own.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	It seems pretty extreme sport that we're set up in, and people can take extremely evil actions and extremely good actions.
	Another story that I like as well is the Lord of the Rings.
	I think that that also is a... That's really interesting that you say that, because a lot of that lore comes from a book that was originally attributed to Solomon, King Solomon.
	And I forget the name of it, and maybe somebody can hit it in the comments, but literally when I went over the contents of that book, I found the outline for Lord of the Rings, with the Ring of Power and the goblins and noblins and, you know, the elves and this.
	There was a whole lore created by that book.
	I think it was called The Secret of Solomon or something like that.
	Very interesting, very interesting, and it may indeed go all the way back to King Solomon, if the lore is correct.
	I tend to think it was more of a Knights Templar thing coming later among the Order of Solomon, but very, very interesting that you bring up the Lord of the Rings.
	Yeah, it would be.
	Because the whole Middle Earth, the whole three rings to rule them all or rings to rule them all concept, it's very interesting.
	Yeah, yeah, the temptations.
	You know, it'll be interesting 100 years from now when our great grandkids view these videos and they'll be like, Oh, look at great-grandpa.
	Look at what he was asking, what he was wondering about.
	We were so confused, and we are totally in the dark.
	And we're like the sharpest ones, poking our heads up, saying, okay, so we know what we're shown and told isn't true, but what is true?
	And we're looking around in good faith effort.
	We're making progress.
	And if we can get the victory, we'll get the full story, which I'm looking forward to if we don't, we'll just be crushed again.
	And maybe they'll be.
	I think they buried that library.
	I think they took that library that of that old ancient stuff.
	And I think they buried down in the bottom of Vatican or the back room of the Smithsonian or something.
	Either that or they just burned it.
	Just burned it.
	Had a good old fashioned book burning to protect their power structure.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	That Indiana Jones.
	Room at the end where they put the Ark of the Covenant, where it's just endless material that we'll never see the light of day.
	All right, let's go to optics.
	We got a bunch of these, eight of these, and this also encourages me because it's just more and more.
	Now, first I got Propaganda Pierre completely dodging a question about Joe's lies interacting with Hunter's business partners.
	And I want to play this just to show because it's just a brilliant example of obfuscation.
	So this is probably the weirdest thing you've ever seen come out of a Christmas stocking.
	But there's a reason thousands of men across the...
	I had an ad blocker, but YouTube shut me down on it. - Um, for a lot of people at home who only view this in very broad strokes, um, could you explain to people why the president interacted with so many of his relatives who are his associates, and why he continues to deny any interaction?
	How should people think about this?
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	He's definitely tossing a softball up there, and he's a believer in the system, but you're going to forget the question.
	So remember, Biden, the actor playing Biden, said that he never talked about his son regarding business now.
	Disregard for a moment the bullshit that a dad is gonna say to his only living son He's never gonna say so how's work son?
	That but that's the claim.
	That's the claim and he's asking, you know propaganda Pierre How should people think about that when you know for sure he's interacted with hunters business partners We got the emails.
	We got the photographs.
	We have bank receipts and and And this is what Well, let's be very clear here.
	And I talked about this yesterday, and I'll talk about it a little bit more.
	And the President put out a statement yesterday that was very clear.
	It's, you know, what we're seeing from House Republicans is a waste of time, and it is certainly baseless political stunt.
	That's what we're seeing.
	And they're leaving, House Republicans are leaving this week to go, you know, enjoy a nice holiday, right, as most Americans should.
	But what happened to the funding to Ukraine?
	Just ask me about Ukraine.
	They haven't been able to get that done.
	They haven't been able to help us fix what's going on at the border.
	They haven't been able to get that done.
	They haven't been able to start a conversation on how we're going to avert a shutdown in January.
	They haven't been able to do that.
	And so, look, there's been zero evidence.
	Zero evidence.
	You can ask me about engagement and what the President has done with his family in conversation, but there's no evidence.
	Wait, wait, but there's no evidence.
	There is no evidence that the President has done wrongdoing.
	There's none.
	Absolutely none.
	None.
	And that is just a fact.
	You've heard it from Republicans themselves.
	So they're wasting their time instead of doing the work on behalf of the American people.
	So what she's doing is she's distracting and she's moved the goalposts back and she's failing to acknowledge that, okay, you're right.
	They go after the president's family.
	did at first say that he had no interactions, but now they're saying, oh yeah, well, there were interactions, but they weren't illegal.
	That's where they're drawing the new line and they'll-- - They go after the president's family.
	But that's a waste of time. - Is there an easy way to counter the central message though that the president interacted with associates and has been lying about it since? - The president is not lying about anything as it relates Okay, so now she said very slickly that, oh, he's not lying about what the House Republicans are saying.
	Instead of the question like, okay, so Biden lied about not having any interactions with Hunter's business associates.
	So she just lies.
	And this is just typical.
	I'll let her go on for more.
	This is just too good.
	It is baseless.
	It is a political stunt.
	And he has it has not proven that the president has done anything wrong, anything wrong.
	And so they are wasting their time.
	They're wasting And her job, by the way, is called a press secretary.
	And what they should be doing is the things that I just listed.
	They're going to go home, but they haven't taken care of what we need to make sure that we are helping Ukraine.
	There's going to be potentially a shutdown next month.
	They have done nothing, nothing to avert that shutdown.
	Go ahead.
	Ben, that's that.
	And her job, by the way, is called a press secretary.
	She's supposed to be serving the press as a secretary.
	She's so predictable with the gaslighting.
	This is an important historical marker.
	- Yeah, CNN. - Let me deal with that one real fast.
	Okay.
	She's so boring.
	She's so boring.
	She's so predictable with the gaslighting.
	This is an important historical marker.
	We are getting closer than we have ever gotten to a prosecution of a high level criminal since Kennedy was assassinated.
	We are getting closer.
	And I gotta tell you what, credit not to Donald Trump.
	Nope.
	Credit to the House.
	To Jim Jordan, James Comer, Matt Gaetz, even Mike Johnson.
	Credit to the guys that are voting to go this direction.
	Now, whether they'll go all the way, I don't know.
	But we haven't been this close to the truth since Nixon stepped down in 1973, I think that was.
	We're getting very, very close to showing something that's incredibly wicked.
	In our administration, and yet we've got the gaslighting from Black Raggedy Ann, the carpet muncher, who does nothing but boringly gaslight all day, every day.
	It's so boring.
	Next story.
	It is all day, every day.
	And part of it, I like David Icke's frame of it, is that, you know, and he just shakes his head and says, you know, part of Ike says this is the flavor of it.
	Part of me is just I have pity on these people.
	What a limited worldview of trying to crush down the truth like that.
	All right, so I don't want to play any of this, but if you want to watch of Probably most people have seen the Vivek snippets.
	If you haven't, go to YouTube and watch some Vivek and what he did at the last debates.
	I mean, the guy was absolutely off the chain in terms of throwing around truth bombs.
	And I gotta hand it to the guy.
	Look, that's what the American people want to hear right now.
	We want to hear that there's another iconoclast other than Donald Trump who's willing to tell the American people what they've been wanting so desperately to hear.
	For 60 years, which is that this government is absolutely unequivocally corrupt, that there are people within the government that are corrupt, that there is a structure and a machine that pulls the strings on the puppets at the top of all of our organizations, and that there is a wicked group of people who are influencing this machine.
	Psychopaths, indeed.
	And I don't care if it's Vivek that says it, or Mitt Romney, or anybody else.
	I don't care whose mouth it comes from.
	If it's said, it's the truth.
	And it is the truth, for those of us that have studied Pizzagate, those of us that have studied these influence rackets.
	It is the truth.
	And I don't care whose mouth it comes out of, whether the guy's controlled or not, whether he's deep state or not.
	I can tell you one thing, he'll never get any RNC money.
	Donald Trump showed up that we didn't need it.
	And with Trump, too.
	This is similar, Syops, and I don't know if this is part of the obviousness that I don't see just being a scholar, but I do know how political campaigns work, and I do know the talking points that are constructed for politicians, so I'm pretty confident in my conclusion that Trump and this Ramaswamy guy
	That they are deliberately pulling their punches, because if you wanted to go in for the kill, you would take three points, and you would demand answers to pointed questions.
	Now, these people are lawyers, and that's how lawyers kill you, is that they'll ask a question that is obvious.
	And what you're saying, Brian, is what the American public would snap their heads and turn attention and say, yeah, well, what's the answer to that?
	But they don't do that.
	So this is just teasing and hinting and it's bringing topics forward for public consideration or, you know, their staff sucks, but I don't think that's going to be the case.
	But it's fascinating that these are coming out.
	And again, just like Q, they're raising awareness, just like all the conspiracy, just like Elon Musk, just like all the conspiracy theories, Alex Jones, all of it, Jim Fetzer, us.
	We're raising awareness, and once that awareness hits the proper level, we might be able to... Look, Leslie Wolf just went down in the Department of Justice.
	She just went down.
	She was the big protector.
	She's down.
	Now, whoever they're going to put in there is going to be a lame duck until Donald Trump gets in.
	Let's hope he appoints a real justice guy if he gets in, if they allow the elections to take place.
	But until we have a Department of Justice that's willing to perform the will of the American people when it comes to righteousness and judgment, We don't have any hope.
	However, the simple fact that the awareness is growing on such a massive level right now gives me hope that sooner or later the American people will be ready for somebody who will come along and construct the gallows on the front steps of D.C.
	Yeah, yeah.
	And I'm hopeful too.
	I'm hopeful too.
	It is poised.
	It is set up.
	And what Q demonstrated is the drip, drip flood.
	And that is consistent with my personal experience with family members, colleagues, that we need some sort of a breakthrough.
	And it seems as if our entire job has been to make people aware of the possibility so that when something goes down, The 200 million of us or so that are spread around this realm will be able to be anchors so that when our family members freak out and say, no, it couldn't be that.
	It couldn't be that.
	It will be right there to say, yeah, that's exactly what I told you for four years.
	Yeah, they just slide.
	They're just they're just evil.
	I mean, it's no different.
	They were trying to steal.
	They were running an empire.
	They got greedy.
	You know how it is.
	And we'll be able to sue them over.
	But we'll see.
	We'll see.
	When they say adrenochrome was an urban legend.
	We thought that was just the boogeyman that the Russian mafia had made up to scare the American people.
	No, no, no.
	Adrenochrome is very real.
	There are missing kids all over the place who are being tortured, probably, to have their adrenaline sucked out of their bodies and fed to these Hollywood elite terribles.
	And people, you know, I have a working answer because people are going to say, why?
	How could they be that?
	I'd say, look, you know, I don't know.
	I'm just guessing.
	But if you are totally evil and you wanted to take over the role of God, at least on a domain to control this place, then why don't you take life and try to rip it apart to see what gives the power God gave to life?
	So, one of the ways that you would do that is you would rip apart a human being and you would see what gives you access to power.
	And if you find out that torturing kids and the adrenaline pump allows you to give some sort of a product of adrenochrome and like I don't know but they say that gives some insight into this dark selfish path and then if you wanted to employ AI to what you should do and then if they get addicted to this stuff I don't know.
	I'm just guessing, but yeah.
	Look for the symbols.
	You want to know where it's at?
	Look for the symbols.
	Okay, say more.
	So what about it?
	Symbols everywhere.
	If you look at all these elite people that have sold their souls, symbols everywhere.
	You'll always see symbols.
	Look for the hexagram.
	Look for the compass and scale.
	Look for the symbols.
	Once you begin to see and understand the symbols, you'll begin to understand Where these groups coordinate from and to.
	Take a look at the Masonic organizations.
	Take a look at the architecture.
	Take a look at the symbols on their books.
	Take a look at their literature.
	Take a look at the things that are hidden.
	You'll see why they use symbolism.
	They use symbolism because it's a hidden language that they use to communicate with one another.
	Whereas we, on the other hand, we're just willing to come out and say what we want, what we think, what we know.
	We're truth tellers.
	There's a big difference between people who speak directly to the people and people who speak in code using symbols.
	And it is like a military organization with the signal intelligence.
	And it is kind of an insider club.
	And it is kind of a club where they want to be with the cool kids.
	And part of what I think was the manipulation of human beings, or it may have been Uh, part of the design from the beginning is to be more of a herd animal rather than these solitary predators who seem to have no moral, uh, halt to just picking us off and and consuming us.
	When you start to see the correlations between the old, old religions and Masonry or the Talmud or the New Breed of Jews, the hexagram, you begin to understand how these people cross the boundaries of organizations and how they move around within these circles.
	It's very much an eyes wide shut world where it's there for anybody who has the eyes to see it, can see it.
	But if you're uneducated and you sit on the couch and you let your television do the programming, you'll never see it.
	And that's how they've kept so many people silent and quiet and obedient.
	I no longer wish to be obedient.
	I want to speak out about it.
	Yeah.
	All right.
	The Boston mayor invites only, quote, electeds of color to a holiday party, and then they claim that that was a mistake sent out to all.
	But man, talk about divide to conquer is that this is what they're Trying to do this business as usual.
	What the heck is Trantifa?
	Trans rights or else with this t-shirt and the stories of the acts of violence from this gang of penised so-called women.
	On Trantifa, you need to look up Jonathan Cahn's book, The Return of the Gods.
	I think he gets to it around Chapter 18 or 19.
	Jonathan Cahn, C-A-H-N, Return of the Gods.
	And he focuses on what started happening in New York when they brought in the bull.
	Uh, as the symbol for Wall Street, when they brought in the, uh, the old arches, um, as symbols, and what happened in the lesbian community, and how that exploded, and how the pride flag grew out of that, and, and how that lesbian tran, uh, group began to gain power, and there's a lot of old witnesses who said there was something truly evil lurking in that district when it all broke loose, so I highly suggest
	Jonathan Cahn's Return of the Gods.
	Very good.
	And then just taking a look at a historical context, I like this, this meme of Hillary's emails, Wiener's laptop, the Epstein tapes, and client list, Hunter's hard drive, and the FBI was, what are they doing if they're, and again that's part of the Orwellian inversion is that they're facilitating this stuff, they're not This is a book from 2019, How the New FBI Damages Democracy, Disrupt, Discredit, and Divide.
	Great book showing what's at the root of the FBI's poor behavior in terms of protecting the American people.
	Again, I highly suggest that 2019 book, Disrupt, Discredit, and Divide.
	Very good.
	That is part of what the documentation shows is what they do is that they are against the truth.
	They commit crimes and then they cover it up.
	And we got the King of England.
	Or at least that's what we're shown.
	And just a reminder of Jimmy Seville.
	And his relationship with that.
	And this I like, Rolling Stone trying to cover that Elon Musk drove a 9,500% surge in Pizzagate content.
	And the Rolling Stone, they try to cover by saying researchers chart the reckless impact of the Twitter owner's revival of the dormant conspiracy theory And that's all that they're going to get is just this bullshit.
	Now, I'm particularly interested in your take on this one, brother, because I did see this like a long time ago, but this just popped up on on Facebook, where the Paramount Pictures logo with Mount Hermon and the stars and the possibility of the fallen angels
	And that this was all a symbolism to show that that they're in charge of the communication and that they've weaseled their way up to this level of control.
	And that's the people who are in charge in the background.
	What do you got to say, brother?
	Well.
	I wouldn't want to.
	Here's the problem of.
	Okay, for those of us that actually have a basis in biblical studies, we believe in something called exegesis, and we believe in something called textual criticism, and we believe in looking at the text for what's actually there, not what's speculated to be there.
	And that's because there's a near view in prophecy as well as a far view.
	There is very little information with which to build a doctrine about the fallen angels.
	There's enough there that you can build a sort of soft image of what really happened, but there's not enough there to really build a really well-developed doctrine.
	You want to take a look at a well-developed doctrine, take a look at The doctrine about Jesus Christ and his heritage, his mother and his father.
	Take a look at his sinless nature.
	Take a look at the doctrines where there's lots of different passages all throughout the Scriptures that weave a tapestry that tell a story.
	A lot of people try to build around the idea of Nephilim or build around the idea of A particular verse here, a particular verse there, but you've got to interpret the smaller verses in context with the larger verses and let the larger verses sort of guide you through what it ought to be without putting too much focus and energy on a particular verse to build a doctrine off of.
	Doctrines are built based on the overall whole and majority of the Scriptures.
	Themselves, which again 66 books written over a period of 6000 years by 42 different authors from all different cultural and backgrounds and language backgrounds, yet they weave together this beautiful perfect tapestry of a, of a, of a suffering save Savior.
	who would die on the cross for the people.
	Everything from Isaiah 53, an incredible chapter, all the way through the rest of the Bible, indicates that all of history revolves around this character that was sent by God to show people how God really acts and who God really is, versus those people that build their indicates that all of history revolves around this character that was sent by God to show people how God really acts and who God really is, versus Very good.
	All right, we'll jump to final thoughts and I'll start out.
	So again, we're showing you that there is sufficient evidence to withdraw consent and that there is an abundance of proof for anybody who would want to look at it.
	And let's say that there are about a hundred general areas of important magnitude and wanttoknow.info, and I'll put that link in the show notes as well, from my friend and colleague Fred Burks, former State Department translator who refused his oath of secrecy after 9-11, they told Fred, they said, okay, so you're no longer allowed to say anything about anything you have ever done,
	anything you are doing, or anything that you will be doing anything you are doing, or anything that you will be doing to anybody And Fred said, I'm out.
	And he created that website with everything that he discovered that the federal government had been withholding from the American public that would give a very different view and of what we're pointing to with facts. - Yes.
	And with the False Flags and Conspiracies Conference, if you want more, there's always more that you can go into to equip yourself.
	But for me, tying everything together with what we're talking about, the story of the Bible, for me, it comes down to, you got a choice.
	And if you want to accept Jesus into your heart as a brother, A connection.
	If you say, yes, I'll be on that team.
	Okay.
	It's a good choice.
	You'll have that future.
	If you want to reject it and say, no, we're separate.
	And then what kind of a life are you going to live from there?
	It's going to be in the predator land for you, and that's up to the individuals.
	The big picture as well is it seems that what those who are listening to the show now, those who have had some interest in the truth, is that we have the capacity to demonstrate that we live in some sort of an environment of official lives.
	Okay, so you can demonstrate that.
	And it seems like the minimum steps that you would take is to, if you want to be honest, if you don't want to be a liar, then you withdraw consent to obey such a system of lies and demonstrable harm, as I keep saying.
	They annually kill millions, harm billions, and loot trillions.
	So you withdraw consent.
	And then furthermore, if you want to actually be an American and a patriot, And me, under oath to support and defend the U.S.
	Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, I like that because I like the U.S.
	Constitution as a promise of limited government within the limits of the Constitution and then the spirit of the Declaration of Independence that we uphold and honor inalienable rights as creatures, children of a divine creator I like that too.
	So, you know, we can at least take those steps.
	And again, after 46 years, it seems that, you know, my perspective has evolved to being on fire to literally save the children with work for ending poverty, because it is the children and the elderly who are most vulnerable to the most gruesome suffering from dying from poverty.
	You know, be with that for a while and step into that experience.
	But to save the children to engage in that and then This is kind of a long concluding statement, but everything is paradoxical, except sometimes.
	And that we are on fire for this mission.
	And at the same time, after so many years of engagement, you just have to step back and say, it seems like all we can do is facilitate the choice and that our power on our own
	Has been so far insufficient to cause this breakthrough and therefore for myself just kind of explaining a lot and a lot of what I'll be talking about on Sunday in the false flags and conspiracies conference is that we can be absolutely professionally confident in the information and facts that we lay forward at least in so much that nobody has refuted it yet.
	In the good faith public presentations that we have made available and then to withdraw consent demand arrests and to find some creative outlet for ourselves and not to be consumed working living in hell only kind of working with the hellish conditions that we have again with the important context of saving the children is the easiest one that is accurate and an appropriate type of frame for it.
	But to know that we have limited power, whatever God has placed us here has given us power in the message, but no power apparently to affect policy.
	Therefore, my rather technical definition that we need to break through that this is something that if we would have done, we would have done it.
	So we need some help here somehow.
	And it is also my working conclusion.
	Based upon both the intuitive response, the factual response, and the whatever-it-is-that-I-receive-a-value-through-prayer, is that we're right there, baby.
	And for patriots to hang in there, that something is going to break soon, and then whatever comes our way.
	That will be a new playing field and that there will be openings and hopefully that the work that God has needed to do, God slash life slash evolution slash white hats slash whatever the fuck you want to call it, it hasn't been ready up to now, but that the timer will ding and that we'll have a new day and all the work that we put in here will pay off, but we shall see.
	Brian, your final thoughts, brother.
	If I was to sum up the Bible, I'd say that a large part of it is the law.
	Thank you.
	And the law is the thing that you break, that we do wrong, the thing that separates us from God.
	And remember, heaven wouldn't be heaven if it had a bunch of rotten sinners inside of it.
	But of course, we all are.
	We all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.
	We all have the opportunity to get a new beginning.
	That's the beauty of the Bible is there's new beginnings all over the place.
	There's bad things that happened and people that repented.
	What is repentance?
	I think it's a very simple thing.
	You sit down and write down all the things you've done to other people that you're ashamed of.
	Write down all the things that I've been done to you that you're ashamed of.
	All the dark things that happened in your heart that you think and that you do.
	All the little dirty closets that you think you can hide from the world.
	Write them down.
	Then open up your Bible, read a gospel, figure out what the cross is all about, lay those things down at the foot of the cross, and get your new beginning.
	It's that simple.
	It sums up in that.
	And once that journey begins, you'll be amazed at where it takes you.
	You'll be shocked at how freeing it is to find yourself clean with a fresh start.
	And then you'll get dirty again, and then you'll have to do it again.
	That's the nature of the beast.
	But you don't need a priest or a fancy church or anything like that to do this.
	It's between you and God.
	Look, the Bible is like the ocean.
	You can jump in and go 10,000 feet deep or you can get your ankles in and start to feel it.
	You can go as deep as you want to go.
	You don't have to be all lifetime deep in every aspect of what it says to be able to read the signs of the times.
	But you do need to know some basics, which is in order to be saved, you've got to believe in Christ and you've got to repent.
	If you believe in Christ, you will repent, and that's what repentance is.
	I just laid it out for you.
	It's beautiful, brother.
	I had just written in the comments at BitChute for one of our recent shows, and I came to the same conclusion.
	Trying to offer choice to this individual is that it's either the repent or the serpent.
	And that's a good one.
	Yeah, that is a good one.
	That is a good one.
	And it's just the acknowledgement that we've been, and you're right, when you actually choose to be good and you take some good faith actions to correct the lies and the harm and the damages,
	Miracles happen, doors open, and part of what has my faith so strong is that I've always, with my good faith effort, I've always been given hope and a pathway, a doorway, an avenue to explore that would make me more of a virtuous person.
	And all the time, you know, my... Is she under here now?
	Yeah, with my dog, May, I take her out all the time, and I enjoy the walks and being with nature.
	And I really just look and be and have little chats with whatever it is, my higher self, my soul with the Creator.
	And I discover all these areas of lies that, and it's not really, they are lies.
	There are lies with how I see and talk and view things.
	But so much of it is just being born into hell, being born into this condition of being poisoned, tortured and mind controlled and not having anything to say.
	And then having something that is so tortured and poisoned as some way that I relate to myself and others.
	And you're absolutely right, is that it's an ongoing process to make yourself as clean as possible.
	And and part of what the Patriots who were with the show have discovered is that once you once you've gone down that path, there's no going back.
	You can't go back to the ignorance and the allowance of of this evil to continue to crush the world.
	All right.
	And Jesus said, Come unto me, all you who are weary and heavy burdened, and I will give you rest.
	Take my yoke upon you.
	It's light.
	It's not too heavy.
	You can do it.
	And I agree.
	And the truth shall set you free.
	All right.
	That's true.
	Patriots, we will see you more on Monday for more of the news that you need to show or more of the news that you need.
	I was trying to think two things at once with the False Flags and Conspiracies Conference.
	If you want to join us.
	Starts tomorrow.
	Starts tomorrow at 9 a.m.
	Go ahead and log on in if you want.

▲