All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 20, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:00:33
Truth vs. NEW$ 2 (19 November 2023) with Don Grahn & Chris Weinert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hey, and welcome back!
This is November 19th, 2023, and we're having a hot discussion about what's happening over there in that Middle East area, the hotbed, and Jim just gave a good representation of things that Chris is going to make some hay with here.
You got some good comments, I understand, Chris, coming up.
Go ahead, Chris.
Yeah, okay.
Well, I guess that remains to be seen.
I was actually trying to think of, in the previous segment, the lady's name that had that protest for the David Hogg Right for Our Lives thing.
It was Rita Katz, who was a producer of Dancing with the Stars, Chris, so you're right, yeah.
She was all in with Debbie Wasserman Shultz and setting up Parkland as a phony school shooting, yeah.
It was real.
All in Halbig's backyard too, wasn't it?
Wolfgang Halbig lives down there too, so it was like a thumb in his eye too.
And I remember she had to apply for the permit for that thing like six months before the actual parade or whatever.
And that took it to before the actual shooting.
And so here they are planning a parade in remembrance of a shooting before the shooting.
So amazing stuff.
And then of course all the shit show that went on with that.
David Hogg riding his bike into there and pretending like he was there the whole time.
You know, they almost have like a Screen Actors Guild of these crisis actors, and this is the shit that I'm talking about with, uh, you know, them being, uh, micro grants, uh, or whatever they're calling these things.
Reminds me of the 2016 Democratic, uh, uh, convention, where they basically had all the, the real delegates walk out and had them expelled, and then these puppets come in and, and vote in the favor of Hillary Clinton.
Amazing stuff.
Just getting triggered a little bit about some of this stuff, and just think it's important to put it out there and remember this stuff, because ultimately this stuff all ties together, and if you forget about these things, you know, you can maybe lose sight of what's being done to you right now.
Chris, you're absolutely right.
Now, you may have thought 250 bucks, those are little bribes.
Well, there's some big bribes going on as well.
Check this out from Jimmy Dore.
Hey, you want to know why the governments aren't calling for a ceasefire?
The UK and the United States governments aren't calling for a ceasefire in Gaza?
Because we've got to destroy Hamas right now, and we have to... So the guy who's the... The Rishi Sudak.
What are they called?
The Prime Minister?
Yeah.
The Prime Minister of... Oh, I've got to call my friend John McGuire.
Rishi, the prime minister, his father signed a 1.5 billion dollar deal with British Petroleum who have been awarded a license from Israel to exploit Palestinian gas resources.
Good for him.
It sounds like the family's doing very well.
Right.
He's a Prime Minister.
His dad's got this deal.
That is a good family.
Can you ever imagine believing what you hear on the news?
Can you ever imagine that?
Not now.
There was a time.
So his name is Sunak and his family signed a $1.5 billion deal with BP before oil and gas license announcement.
What?
Richie Sunak's family firm Infosys.
Signed a 1.5 billion dollar deal with British Petroleum just two months before Rishi Sunak opened hundreds of new licenses for oil and gas.
What's the opposite of a conflict of interest?
A confluence of interest?
Look at that.
So if you google it, Israel hands out gas concessions to British Petroleum, E&I, as Gaza War.
These companies will explore...
Israel's Leviathan Field.
I love the names of things.
Yeah, me too.
The country's largest and one of the world's biggest deep water gas... Israel Awards Gas Exploration License.
There it is.
E-I-B-I.
Israel's upstream despite war and gas.
So despite the war, they're still making money because that's what this is all about.
BP still pushing forward with Israel gas.
This is un-fricking-believable!
Oh, I give credit to Thunberg on the case to expose this.
Infosys is involved in a $172 million worth of contracts with the UK government, or pound, I guess.
What is Infosys?
Do we want to find out?
Infosys, do we need to know?
It's an IT company that specializes in consulting and IT services.
Their website claims the company is a global leader in consulting, outsourcing, and next-generation services, enabling clients to create and execute digital transformation, and it was named as one of the top 150 IT companies in the world last year.
Who owns it?
Well, under information released publicly by the firm, their latest annual report showed that the company was founded by Rishi Sunak's father-in-law!
Rishi's wife, Ashada Murthy, is reported on one of the findings as having a 0.93% interest in the business, amounting to 38.9 million shares, which is estimated to be worth around £89 million. which is estimated to be worth around £89 million.
The report shows that dividends paid to her amount to around 12 million pounds each year but until recently she was not liable for UK tax on account of her non Domestic status!
What is the government's link to Infosys?
Well, it has this week come to light from Contracts Finder that the government's own database of public sector tenders and contracts that the business has been involved in public sector contracts worth 172 million pounds.
Information published on the fact-giving site states that the IT company has signed contracts with the UK government to provide a range of services to a number of guys.
Like what?
This is unbelievable!
So let's look at this.
Map 1, location of the three assessment units in the Levant Basin province in the Eastern Mediterranean.
So, you know, doesn't matter.
We know what this is.
So this is what this is, Kurt.
What do you think, baby?
I think it's, uh, the whole world is a stage and all your politicians are actors.
And, uh, if you believe in any of it, you are the biggest chump in the world.
You are the biggest chump in the world.
It's like you have a face mask over your goddamn brain.
Of course!
People, you know, every day after the show, I go back and I'm like, this is great to know.
And meanwhile, most people I know are like, Trump!
That's all they know.
That's all they know is Trump.
That is it.
Trump, we've got to save democracy.
Trump.
The MCU is not doing well.
That's, that's, there you go.
It's something with sports.
So, by fighting the massiveness of the bribes being given to the leaders, you think that would follow the people's will?
Not a chance.
Here are one of the largest protests of all time in London.
Check it out.
Anyway, here is some pro-Hamas protests in London, because this is the big Saturday thing they're doing in London now. - Wow. because this is the big Saturday thing they're doing in All right, you get it.
It's a lot of river to the sea.
It's end the 75-year occupation, which is ironic because they're in London.
And of course, if we were to end the 75-year occupation, we would have to bring back the British Empire.
I don't know that any of them want that.
I don't know that the average Brit wants it, much less the terrorist sympathizers that are out there doing that.
But how long can a society Hold something like this.
Like I can show you there were plenty of calls for they were talking about how the Nazis should finish the job.
Like trust me, we went through 50 videos of like the actual firing of fireworks at police officers and all that stuff.
But you guys get it.
The reason I wanted to show you that one is how long can a society hold this position that on every weekend, let's say, or twice a week There will be mass protests calling for a genocide of people halfway across the world, plus a certain amount of your own citizens, using all of the freedoms of your nation so that you can basically grow, home grow your own society within a society.
Like, how long does that work?
If you were, say, a Jewish person living in London, would you want one of those people to be your dentist?
Would you want one of them to be your Uber driver?
Do you see how this might start actually, like, singeing all of the little pieces that give us connectivity in a society?
And again, it's not just about the Jews.
If you're just an average British citizen who is proud of their country, who knows what their history was.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, I'm sure that guy's an Irishman.
No, you can tell the way he really slants the conversation that he is a pro-propaganda Israelist.
Yes.
I bet he's probably Jewish, too.
I don't know, but... That's my thought, too.
I agree completely.
Right?
I mean, those are the first two things I thought about.
I mean, now that once you see it, you cannot see it.
And once you see the formula, it just sticks out like a sore thumb.
So, yeah, I think he was really pointed in terms of some of the adjectives he found for those people.
Pro-Hamas, you know, not anti-Israel.
You know, I mean, These guys really abuse binary psychology in many ways and propaganda and the sort and gaslighting, of course, too.
So, yeah, I think that's becoming more and more evident the more that we see this thing go on.
Chris, I couldn't agree more.
I mean, the people are so far ahead of the leaders, but then the leaders are all Biden-Bottom paid for.
It's like, as Cynthia McKinney explained back in 2011 on Iranian television, new members of Congress are asked to sign a pledge to put the interests of Israel even ahead of the interests of the United States, and they all sign the pledge!
I had a friend 10 years ago asking me, did I know how many of the then current Congress had refused to sign the pledge?
And I said, I did not.
He held up one finger of one hand.
Only one member of Congress can refuse to sign a pledge.
Our Congress is Israeli occupied territory.
Chris, would you agree?
Oh, they're doing it now.
I didn't want to interrupt you, but I'm going to say, look at what they're doing now.
I mean, you got Americans with a lot of problems.
We're borrowing money to send it to help Israel right now and Ukraine too.
Yep, yep.
Oh, absolutely.
Staggering, staggering.
You are correct.
Meanwhile, Iowa crowd cheers nearly non-stop as Trump seeks to wrap up the GOP primary.
But the important burst in the nation caucus is less than two months away.
Republican candidates have wrapped up their presence in the Hawkeye State.
Fort Dodge, Iowa.
Hours before former President Trump took the stage here, his campaign sent out a text message declaring his intent.
I'm in Iowa today to wrap up the primary.
Speaking to a full house of about 3,000 at the Fort Dodge Senior High School Gymnasium on October 18.
That would be yesterday.
The former president reminded folks the Hawkeye State First in the Nation caucuses are just 58 days away.
All over the world, they're going to be watching this, he said.
We want to make sure we have a big victory.
A man who's attended 33 Trump rallies nationwide, Charles Hibbs, 68th of South Dakota, said this Iowa crowd was among the most enthusiastic he has witnessed.
After welcoming him with a thunderous, USA!
USA!
standing ovation, most of the crowd remained standing for about 20 more minutes as the former president spoke.
Random cries and chants of we love you punctured Trump's 80-minute speech.
As he was winding down, he told the crowd Iowa is special to him.
Then he did something unusual.
Instead of exiting swiftly, he spent the next 20 minutes signing dozens of autographs for fans who jammed the road blind.
Iowa loves Trump.
Trump loves Iowa.
It's as simple as that.
Mr. Hibb told the Atlantic Times in a just-released Iowa state civics poll.
President Trump was leading with 54 percent of Iowa Republicans supporting his candidacy.
Florida Governor DeSantis was drawing 18 percent, followed by former South Carolina Governor Haley at 12.
The rest of the field was polling in single digits.
I think the reason we're doing so well in the polls is that the people see it.
They see it as a persecution of a political candidate, Trump told the audience, referring to the 91 criminal charges he faces.
They see it as a continuation of the greatest witch hunt of all time.
It's over or not.
Despite trailing far beyond President Trump in the polls, Mr. DeSantis, Ms.
Haley, and Ohio interpreter Vivek Ramaswamy have been intensifying their campaigns in Iowa.
It's all for naught.
Because it's the first U.S.
state to hold a Republican primary, Iowa could play a key role in building momentum for a candidate.
All three challengers to President Trump have made multiple recent campaign stops in Iowa, and Mr. DeSantis opened a campaign headquarters in the state capital, Des Moines, with a blessing of the state governor, Kim Reynolds.
During his speech, a former president sharpened his attacks against President Biden, calling him very corrupt and controlled.
Days ago, Biden met in San Francisco with China's leader, Xi Jinping.
The American leader, often a bit confused, made a poor showing next to Mr. Xi, who is strong like granite and a fierce person, Trump observed.
Every voter needs to ask who they want sitting across the table from Mr. Xi or Russian President Vladimir Putin, he said.
There may be some who don't like my attitude, but my attitude is what gets us there, he added.
He criticized President Biden's action vis-a-vis China.
He canceled my program to root out Chinese spies.
He weakened my China tariffs, Trump said.
Under Biden's watch, China has opened military bases in Cuba, posing a threat to the U.S.
because it's only 90 minutes miles away from the U.S.
shore, Trump said.
Meanwhile, I did an interesting show with Giuseppe Vavangula and Russ Winter on his The Hervé Triangle, which you'll find posted on my BitChute channel, Jim Fetzer, and also on Twitter, at Jim Fetzer, where Beverly observed when we had discussion of the prospect of Tucker as a VP choice for Trump.
That ticket would be an intention grabber, but Trump needs a meatier addition to the ticket, Jim Jordan.
Rand Paul or Ron Johnson are better and wiser choices.
They have the political background, better able to sway independents and Democrats also.
One would hope their DC experience can help Trump better navigate the swamp.
Very nice point.
Tucker is coming around to questioning the official narrative on things, but is not a good choice for VP.
We have the celebrity angle with Trump.
We need more substance that comes with the above-mentioned three.
Tucker would be a great choice if they had the FCC a top-notch press secretary or chief of staff.
But Tucker would better serve the nation by doing what he does now, reporting more truth and providing a forum for truth-tellers who are shut out by the mainstream media.
Chris, let me invite your comments on those stories.
Yours.
Yeah.
You know, I've kind of been watching a guy named Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai talk about all the potential candidates on both sides being puppets of Israel, and I have to say he makes a very strong point in pointing this out.
I think if Trump wants to have any sort of redemption with the American people, he has to become America first, and he's going to have to get rid of them small hats.
Some way, some shape or form.
He can't let these guys come in and be the swamp.
He can't, you know, have the same cabinet he took.
He can't have the Iran-Contra, you know, usual suspects running his administration.
You know, he's going to really have to do something entirely different.
I think he was robbed in the 2020 election, and I think that it would have definitely been better to have seen Trump instead of Biden.
But I think playing this game is really just an Israeli in a theater of London parlor trick.
And I almost have to say I like the Sheba guy.
And I think people should start looking into maybe what he's saying and, you know, building something from the people on the ground up.
And, you know, I think Trump's got to come a ways back to the people and certainly has some redemption to do in terms of warp speed and some of his locker up stuff.
I agree with that, but he does seem to be getting a very enthusiastic response in Iowa.
Oh, sure.
Way back when they wanted to promote Biden, by the way, Tulsi Gabbard, I believe, actually took the Democrat caucus.
There was a lot going on in Washington.
Other candidates went there.
They got to know Tulsi.
I think she won.
And that's why they delayed the report Until after the New Hampshire primary and change the outcome.
That's why the DNC was doing dirty work.
I think Dulcey would have been a super candidate for them, but they already had their predetermined outcome with Biden.
Shocking stuff.
I do believe Iowa is going to vote overwhelmingly for Trump.
Zaya maneuvers Biden in San Francisco.
On one side of the table, a global south leader at the top of his game.
On the other side, a mummy selling the illusion that he's the leader of the free world.
That was bound for a cliffhanger before, during, or after the crucial bilateral involving the world's top two powers.
Already during the introductory remarks, U.S.
Secretary of State Stoney Blinken, sitting on the right side of the mummy, was as terrified as James Stewart of rate-of-the-heights in the Hitchcock's Vertigo, sensing doom would dawn at any second.
Then it did!
At a final presser, Joe Biden, the actor playing the mummy, following a proverbial smirk, said Chinese President Xi Jinping is a dictator because he is the leader of the communist country.
All those previous elaborate plans unraveled in a flash.
A tentatively rosy scenario turned into a film noir.
The Chinese Foreign Ministry's response was as sharp as a dachshund hammock one-liner in contextualized.
This was not only extremely wrong, but an irresponsible political manipulation.
All the above, of course, assume the mummy knew where he was and what he was saying off the cuff, not dictated by his ubiquitous earpiece.
The White House readout, as bland as it might seem, actually gives away the key part of the plot.
Biden Actually, a zero piece.
Underscored.
Support for a free and open Indo-Pacific.
The defense of our Indo-Pacific allies.
A commitment of freedom of navigation and overflight.
Adherence to international law.
Maintaining peace and stability in the South China Sea and East China Sea, support to Ukraine's defense against Russian aggression, and support for Israel's right to defend itself against terrorism.
Beijing, understand in detail the context and the geopolitical overtones of each of these pledges.
What the readout does not say is that Biden's handlers also try to convince the Chinese to stop buying oil from their strategic partner Iran.
That's not going to happen.
China imports an average of 1.05 million barrels of oil a day from Iran over the first 10 months of 2023 and rising.
A Sino-American reporter after the introductory remarks asked in Mandarin if he trusted Biden.
The Chinese president perfectly understood the question, looked at her, and did not answer.
That's a key plot twist.
After all, Xi knew from the beginning he was talking to the handlers controlling an earpiece.
Moreover, he was fully aware of Biden, actually his handlers, qualifying Beijing as a threat to the rules-based international order, not to mention relentless accusations of Xinjiang genocide plus the containment tsunami.
Not by accident last March.
It is speaking to Congress party notables.
As I explicitly stated, the U.S.
is engaged in comprehensive containment, encirclement, and suppression against us.
Shanghai-based scholar Chen Dongzhao suggested China and the U.S.
should engage in ambitious pragmatism.
It happened to be exactly the toe-to-side key takeaway in San Francisco.
There are two options for China and the U.S.
in the era of global transformation unseen in this century.
One is to enhance solidarity and cooperation and join hands to meet global challenges and promote global security and prosperity.
The other is to cling to the zero-sum mentality, provoke rivalry and confrontation, and drive the world toward turmoil and division.
These two choices point in two different directions that will decide the future of humanity and planet Earth.
That is as serious as it gets.
I added context.
China is not engaged in colonial plunder, is not interested in ideological confrontation, does not export ideology, and has no plans to suppress or replace the U.S.
The U.S.
should not attempt to suppress or contain China.
Biden's handlers may have told Xi that Washington still follows the one-China policy, even as it continues to weaponize Tehran under the twisted logic that Beijing might invade.
Xi, once again, provided the concise clincher.
China will inevitably, eventually be reunified with Taiwan.
I think P.P.
Escobar has it right, Chris, that Xi outmaneuvered Biden, but what else would we expect?
You got a very formidable, intellectually competent leader of one nation and a completely mummified, incompetent stooge on the other.
Your thoughts?
The compulsive pederast, might I add, too.
So he's got his share of dementia and distraction to deal with.
And, you know, most American people are just crossing their fingers that he makes it up the stairs and across the stage without falling off the thing or doing something terrible.
And actually, Xi is a competent personnel.
So, yeah, we're dealing with entirely different scenarios here.
It's hard to really Related to its apples and rotten oranges or whatever you call it, but yeah, it's it's uh, it's like checkers to chess almost, you know as far as having some sort of a real asset value and valuation something that has proven value versus something that is completely a fabrication and manipulation and There's two different types of economies moving forward.
One is dealing in parlor tricks and economic sorcery and supply-side economics.
The other seems to be more capitalistic than the supposed capitalists.
Yeah, I think that really the United States can learn a thing or two from China and certainly Russia in terms of international diplomacy and in terms of financial direction.
Look how much gold that China has bought, and they don't even talk about it in the media.
China is just running circles around D.C.
right now, and when this whole thing unravels and you see these things reset in terms of valuation, I think you're going to see the United States in a very, very rough predicament.
Oh, Chris, I think you got it 100% right.
Absolutely right.
Meanwhile, a top Trump official dropped a fact about San Francisco that left Nancy Pelosi fuming.
America's major cities are in a shocking state of decline.
The pandemic decimated major cities across the country after Democrat-controlled governments instituted crippling lockdowns and other restrictions.
Residents began pouring out of places like New York City and San Francisco in search of a better life elsewhere.
A University of Toronto study found that many major Democrat-controlled cities still have not recovered from the pandemic.
The study revealed foot traffic is still below pre-pandemic levels from 2019 in several big cities with Democrat mayors.
The data shows cities with Democrat mayors, including Portland, Oregon, Seattle, Washington, Chicago, Illinois, and San Francisco, California, all rank toward the bottom of 66 cities that have the least foot traffic recovers in 2019.
Economist Stephen Moore, who worked on former President Donald Trump's 2016 campaign, said the lack of recovery in Democrat-controlled cities was distressing during an interview on Fox Business.
It's almost all of these big blue cities.
It's San Francisco, it's Oakland, it's Minneapolis, it's my home city of Chicago, he said.
These numbers are really distressing.
San Francisco, represented in Congress by former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, has only recovered 66% of its foot traffic.
St.
Louis, Missouri, has the worst recovery at 53%.
Lack of foot traffic is leading to a decline in economic activity with fewer people in the area.
More said the data shows there's about one-third less economic activity in the downtown area of these cities, which were hit with a double whammy in 2020.
A both a pandemic and a crime wave that broke out after many of them got on board with a disastrous defund the police movement.
The Economist said the surge in crime was keeping people from returning to these cities post-pandemic.
Why is that?
I think it's because of the fact that the carjacking's a crime.
The fact you have high taxes in these areas.
By the way, when you have fewer people going into the cities, think about the impact that has on the stores, the restaurants, and so on.
Meanwhile, Governor Newsom assures the homeless they can resume pooping on the sidewalks once his boss leaves.
California governor defines timing a San Francisco cleanup.
San Francisco, California.
California Governor Gavin Newsom initiated a last-minute cleanup of San Francisco ahead of a visit from China's communist dictator, President Xi.
He assured all unhoused persons in the area they may resume their normal practice of sidewalk defecation as soon as his boss has left town.
Please!
We need to try and keep the place clean for just a few days while my boss is here to set newsome during a press conference surrounded by a horde of angry homeless people.
Please don't mess it up for me and President Tsai.
I really want to impress him.
Please hold it in for a couple of days.
Just quench or something.
After that, you may poop to your heart's content.
Thank you.
Please, he added, if I play my cards right, Tsai may even let me become president.
This is huge for me.
Sources say locals were shocked to wake up Monday and find their streets temporarily clean, safe, and free of mountains of human fecal matter.
What happened?
said one local to the report.
Where am I?
Where did all the poop go?
Did I die and go to heaven?
To keep the streets pristine to the planned Wednesday visit, Newsom also authorized the temporary relocating of all homeless to a Chinese-style labor camp.
Chris, I think the Babylon Bee and its satire got it exactly right.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, most of these democratic cities are looking like some sort of an opium den or a fentanyl zone.
Man, these people walking around are just abject poverty and misery.
The homeless rate is through the roofs, the crime rate.
It's unbelievable to see this happening in America in such a way that it is.
Most of the people that put the outsourcing of American labor into China are the same guys now.
They have to bow before the Chinese government every time they come in and kowtow to them.
So, really interesting to see how they've created their own Their own bosses, I guess, so to speak, and to see what's going on with the American empire and transitioning over to China.
This is a Rothschild shifting over the wealth to these places because they have more docile and more compliant citizens, I think.
And this is an authoritarian government that's taken over where a capitalist democratic one used to exist.
This is their transition to the next age, and this is what they're trying to do.
I think in America we have to really fight for our neighborhoods and fight for our cities and fight for our people, and I think there's just too much political confusion going on by the people that have subverted this government and have looted the people.
I think you're right on all counts in that Trump is the major obstacle they fear the most, so they're doing their very best to sideline him.
Don, your thoughts?
I was going to say one thing about the in China there, they say most people are compliant and things.
Is that a willing compliance or is that a forced compliance as the people are under there in China?
I think that they're pretty well beaten down.
Oh yeah, very good point.
Thanks Don for that addition.
Meanwhile, New January 6 footage shows that Capitol Police may have incited the riot by firing munitions into a peaceful crowd from Zero Hedge.
House Speaker Mike Johnson has released over 40,000 hours of J6 footage, including a Capitol Police body cam to the public in the interest of transparency, an action that should have been taken years ago.
Each new piece of footage only confirms what many Americans already understood.
That few minutes of available video recycled by the media paint a false picture of what really happened.
Many would argue That J6 was nothing more than a protest that was turned into a riot by police incitement and establishment spin.
Even worse, there are many now languishing in prison because of that spin.
The latest footage shows Capitol Police inviting protesters into the building as they peacefully assembled in the corridors.
The same people would later be prosecuted and labeled insurrectionists.
Get this.
Tragic.
Newly released footage of Matthew Perna, seen in a red sweatshirt, shows Matthew walking calmly in the Capitol shooting video.
Matthew pled guilty to initial charges, believing he might face 6 to 12 months in prison, only after pleading guilty.
Did the DOJ inform him they would seek a terrorism enhancement to his sentencing that would raise his sentence to a potential nine years in federal prison?
Four days after receiving news that DOJ would push for this sentencing enhancement, Matthew went into his garage, put a rope around his neck, and hung himself.
Did he deserve that?
Check out that video.
You'll see him walking calmly through the Capitol.
In the red sweater there.
There he is.
This is a guy who was played by the DOJ.
Played by the DOJ.
Did he deserve a threat nine years in prison?
No doubt.
They explained to him he'd be punked out.
Yet he'd be coming Boy toy for serious prisoners.
It's disgusting what's happened with our law enforcement, our Department of Justice.
Simply outrageous.
But just look at this footage.
Look how calm everyone is.
And remember, they were allowed in by the Capitol Police.
This is all part of a staged setup to trash Trump supporters relentlessly.
There he is once again.
Hey Fetz, did you see that Da Pape was one of the recorders of the J6 footage?
I've heard that and seen that meme online.
Yeah, that wouldn't surprise me at all.
Meanwhile, what about what happened before the riot started?
Did they happen spontaneously or were they incited?
New video clips seem to show Capitol Police firing rubber bullets, tear gas grenades, and stun grenades into crowds of peaceful protesters on January 6th before anyone tried to enter the Capitol building, possibly triggering the violence that would follow and creating the footage that was laid ad nauseum on major news networks as a proof of insurrection.
Here's Investigate J6.
Ask Gregory why he doesn't want the truth of January 6th and murdered Trump protesters to get out your block.
Meanwhile, look at all this early J6 footage that Tucker Carlson would show the world but won't introduce, sir.
Yes.
We broke out there.
team at Fox were given all this last year.
J-6 protests were fired upon with no warning.
U.S. Capitol Police Chief Waldo lied, saying he gave warnings, but he never did.
Here's some of that footage.
Yeah.
Pretty dark out there.
Yeah, maybe it's not going to play.
Sorry about that.
Meanwhile, evil beyond repair.
Get these people out of office and prosecute them to the lowest extent of the law.
January 6th was a sad hot.
destroyed exculpatory evidence, inserted fictitious audio into Jasek's video, avoided key witnesses like the chief of the Campbell police, removed Republicans from the committee, televised hearing on primetime to influence the public.
The select committee was the cover-up.
Meanwhile, while not a single BLM protester is in jail It's disgusting.
If you fail to hold these people accountable, then you can shut up about January 6th.
Meanwhile, they installed Biden to make the controlled demolition of America be as incompetent.
You know that, right?
Chris, your thoughts, all of the above.
It appears to be, yeah.
That seems to be his fallback defense.
He's just a senile old man.
But yeah, this is a carefully plotted, controlled demolition of America.
Think about how the political landscape has fallen apart just with dealing with Russia and how taking them off the SWIFT system and sanctioning them and stealing their money has ultimately led them to form what becomes a BRICS alternative.
And just how this plan that was a Goldman Sachs and a Jewish mafia type of agenda somehow comes into actuality as a manifestation from Biden's supposed abhorrent foreign policy.
I don't think this level of stupidity has this mark of consistency without it being planned and part of an agenda.
So yeah, I think what he's doing is very much intentional and very much part of this.
I think this has been a plan for America for a long time.
And the Judeo-Masonic people that have infiltrated our country have dedicated themselves to destroying it.
And it's up to the people to really decide which side of this you want to be on, you know, because they're putting deception in your face on every turn.
And, you know, those of us that can see through this really have to help those that can't, because a lot of people are going to be misled and probably steered into doing some dirty work for the wrong side.
Of course, bear in mind that Biden is just a mob, but the real job here is to have died in 2017.
It's an actor wearing a mask.
Don, your thoughts?
You just said what I was going to say.
That's good.
Okay.
Okay, Don.
Good point.
Good point.
There we go.
Excellent.
Meanwhile, just last night, I was on TNT Radio's Sky Dragon Slaying Show on the JFK assassination.
Had quite a large audience to our program.
Live, Saturday, 18 November.
Did Lee Harvey Oswald really act alone in assassinating President Kennedy?
Or were there dark forces at work?
We have a two-hour special where Jim Fetzer, a leading critic, ruthlessly dissects the official narrative.
This will be a hard-hitting episode.
Don't miss it!
James Fetzer is a professor emeritus of the philosophy of science at the University of Minnesota Duluth and a prominent and respected analyst in the conspiracy theory community.
In this two-hour special, he intends to unpick the misunderstanding and errors he perceives are in Fred Litwin's book, Oliver Stone's Slim Slam, The Demagogue of Dealey Plaza.
Fred Litwin appeared on our Star Dragon Slaying Show on Saturday the 14th of October to explain his book's arguments as to why it is credible that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in assassinating JFK.
Listen to that live recording at TNT Radio.
Litwin argues the major claims that conspiracy theorists have set out in the famous film by Oliver Stone are mistaken, exaggerated, misquoted, misunderstood, misrepresented.
During that episode, Litwin declined our invitation for a live head-to-head debate with Professor Fetzer on the ground that Fetzer is a scandalous figure.
As Rolling Stone reported, a Wisconsin jury has ruled that James Fetzer, a retired professor from the University of Minnesota Duluth, must pay Posner $450,000 for accusing him of forging his son Noah's death certificate.
That's his co-author of Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, which alleged that Posner faked his son's birth certificate and that the Obama administration staged a shooting in an effort to pass legislation on gun control.
However, a defiant Vetser has steadfastly maintained his original position because there are five different versions of a death certificate of one person, which could conceivably lead a reasonable person to doubt the legitimacy of any one or more of them.
Replying to me after posting this promotional article, Jim Vetser added, Since he's attacking me on Sandy Hook, and would no doubt also assail me over 9-11, Please share this with your list, this Fetzer trilogy of three interviews I've done with Jeremy Neal of South Africa, among the best of my career, to present the other side.
James Fetzer on the JFK assassination cover-up.
James Fetzer on the 9-11 cover-up.
James Fetzer on the Sandy Hook cover-up.
The man is an advertising guy who specializes in propaganda, and his attacks on Oliver Stone and me are nothing but.
Looking forward to dispatching the last desperate effort to conceal the truth by those who want to suppress it.
This is TNT Radio at its finest, bringing you truly no-holds-barred revelations that the mainstream media would never permit.
More at jameshfetzer.org or My whip chute channel, Jim Fetzer.
Meanwhile, on Twitter, I recently did an interview with a Barnes Review interviewed by John Grant.
Jim Fetzer on JFK Assassination, Barnes Review.
An 88-minute Specific and detailed review of what happened on Elm Street in Dallas on 22 November 1963.
Here are the answers to the who, the how, and the why of JFK.
Chris, your thoughts.
Well, yeah, this guy's basically saying that Oswald acted alone, and that's what he's suggesting.
What an idiot!
What an idiot!
No, no, no.
That's cool.
I mean, I guess, you know, everybody's got to have their perspective and, you know, whatever.
But, yeah, I mean, how much research have people done talking about, like, David Atlee Phillips or some of these other conspirators involved with this?
Sturgis or Hunt or any of these guys.
On and on and on, man.
There was absolutely a conspiracy there, and if not a conspiracy to make it look like a conspiracy, there was absolutely conspirators in multiple shots, if you do follow the records.
And Fetch, you've done probably some of the more diligent work on this, and for him to really just relegate that to a single gunman and three bullets is kind of a disgrace to what really happened there, and the amount of effort that people have put into really tracking this down.
Among the points I made, During that Sky Dragon interview, where the two shots were widely reported the day of the assassination on, for example, NBC's See It Now.
One was a small, clean puncture wound to the throat by a shot that, it turned out, had passed through the windshield en route to its target, making the sound of a firecracker as it passed through the windshield.
This was observed by Malcolm Perry, M.D., who described this small clean puncture wound as a wound of entry three different times during the Parkland Press Conference that was held with reporters after Acting Press Secretary Malcolm Kilduff announced that the president was dead.
Plus, a second shot, which was described by Keldove as a simple matter of a bullet right through the head, well pointing to his right temple, which blew his brains out the back of his head, attributed to Admiral George Berkeley, the present personal physician.
These two shots, both of which were fired from in front, were widely reported in detail on radio and television the day of the assassination, such that, when later in the evening, story came to come out that the FBI and the Secret Service had concluded there had been one shooter Above and behind, who had fired three shots.
Frank McGee, who is nobody's fool, says, this is incongruous.
How can the man have been shot from in front, from behind?
I also pointed out that Oliver Stone provided a magisterial film with JFK, which is the most accurate, complete, and comprehensive presentation of what actually happened in D. Lee Plaza on 22 November 1963, ever presented to the American public through the mass media.
But that was flawed in three specific respects.
Number one, Oliver did not know that, in fact, Lee Oswald was standing in the doorway of the book depository at the time the JFK motorcade passed by, which meant that not only could he not have been the lone demented gunman, but he couldn't have been one of what turned out to be eight different assassin positioned in Dealey Plaza that day.
Second of all, He did not know that the Zapruder film had been subjected to massive editing and that it removed a limousine stop, which the driver Greer took, which just pulled everyone abruptly forward.
Because while Jack had been hit twice, once in the back, five and a half inches down below the collar, just to the right of the spinal column, by a bullet that worked its way out, and, of course, that shot to the throat, he was still alive.
So the Umbrella Man was bumping his umbrella signal to all the shooters that the target was still alive, keep shooting.
And during the limo stop, he was hit in the back of the head.
He slumped forward.
That was fired by An anti-Castro Cuban in the Daltex, and I identify seven of the eight assassins, name, rank, serial number, the shots they took, and the effects they had.
Jack eased him back up when he was hit in the right temple by the mafia shooter who was at the intersection of the triple underpass and the grassy fence, who may have been the best marksman in the world at the time that blew his brains out back of his head, and where?
David Maddock, the leading expert on the medical evidence, believes that he was also hit near simultaneous in the side of the head, a third shot to the head.
But where the mortician who prepared the body for a funeral observed, that was no discoloration to the face, which indicates that he died instantly.
I believe he was dead already in Dealey Plaza.
And while all of us don't posit three hit teams when there were actually eight, He was absolutely on the right track, and I regard what he did as a marvelous, awesome achievement that deserves the Academy Award.
Not for the fact that Lyndon Johnson's key ally, Jack Belanti, was a czar of Hollywood at the time and took an active role in working against him, such that it was Give it instead to Silence of the Lambs about a cannibalistic criminal, which is absurd when you have an historic film that really brings so much truth to the American people, I would add.
He was affected in all this by his advisor, Robert Groton, who had served a role for the House Select Committee when it reinvestigated the case in 1977-78, where Groton was asked to ascertain whether or not rumors that Lee had been in the doorway were or were not true.
Groten not only investigated, but he fabricated evidence, putting Billy Lovelady in a black and white checkered shirt to create the impression he'd been a party who was in the doorway, but who Billy Lovelady doesn't resemble at all from his profile.
I call him the Gorilla Man.
But he was most certainly not wearing that shirt that day.
In fact, the FBI had called him in.
On the 29th of February, wearing the clothing he wore at the time, which was a short-sleeved red and white vertically striped shirt that bore no resemblance whatsoever,
To the man in the doorway who was wearing a long sleeve, rather tattered and worn shirt, richly textured that he'd brought back from Russia, over a t-shirt that he pulled at the neck, which was his habit, where Ralph Zinkai has aided us in identifying that he had the same height, the same weight, the same build, the same shirt, the same over shirt as Lee Oswald when he was arrested.
Where Robert Hooke began studying the similarities, beginning with six or seven, but winding up with a hundred.
And where Larry Rivera has done brilliant work superimposing images of the facial features of Lee Oswald and a Billy Love Lady on the man in the doorway.
This image was captured in this famous photograph by AP photographer James Ike Algens, Where, in fact, Harold Weissberg, long ago in the second of his Whitewash series, known as Photographic Whitewash, published in 1966, observed the Warren Commission establish having a terrible time concealing the fact that Oswald had been in the doorway.
And where Jim Garrison, who's the focus of Oliver Stone's film himself, had also concluded Lee was in the doorway.
Where Larry Rivera has confirmed it.
He's also done expert research on the poor motorcycle Escort officers, each of whom confirmed the limo stop and the activities that took place thereafter, where I had suspected it was only six or eight seconds long, but where the series of activities that took place then indicate it was on the order of 20 seconds long.
For Bobby Hargis, the officer in the left rear, who was hit with debris so hard when Jack's brains were blown out, he thought he himself had been shot.
Got off his bike, ran between the vehicles, impossible if they were in motion, up to the grassy knoll, from which he believed a shot had been fired.
Officer Douglas Jackson, on the other side, motorcycled up the grassy knoll until his bike fell over and he proceeded on foot.
Meanwhile, five agents dismounted from the Secret Service Cadillac, surrounded the presidential limousine, one took a chunk of a skull from a little boy and threw it back into the limousine, Before it drove off at high speed.
When you combine that with the excising of the turn from Houston onto Elm, where William Greer swung out too widely, mistaking the frontage road in front of the Book Depository for Elm Street, nearly hit a concrete abutment.
Had to pause and then get back into line, which they concluded with a shaken confidence in the Secret Service, and they excised some 100 frames.
We have 400 more.
You know, more frames have been removed altogether from the film than remain in the 487-frame version.
That was produced by the CIA at its secret photo lab, Hawkeye Works.
Adjacent to Rochester headquarters.
So I invite anyone who wants to catch up with JFK, the latest, where I'm providing a distillation of research by the best expert to study the case.
And finally, as Don is showing here, in 2017, published JFK, the who, the how, and the why, to bring up to date the state of our research.
Chris, I welcome you for Final Thoughts for today's show.
Thank you.
Another thing that I believe happened initially, right at the get-go, was they were saying that one of the throat injuries was potentially from a medical treatment where they were trying to get an air tube through there, supposedly, and they said it wasn't an actual bullet hole.
I don't remember exactly.
I wasn't around when JFK was shot, but can you maybe shed a little more insight on that?
And also, Fetz, I want to clarify, are you saying that they parked that motorcade For a matter of 10 plus seconds before they resume it and they cut it out of the... Okay, 20.
Wow.
And they cut it out as a pruder film.
That's right.
And Malcolm Perry, who gave that talk about describing the wound as a wound of entrance three times, had performed a simple tracheostomy incision, just a straight line incision.
So he had a round bullet hole with a straight line incision.
Charles Crenshaw was in trauma room number one when the body was brought in.
For my first book, Assassination Science 1998, a collection of essays by experts on the case provided diagrams of the puncture wound before and after the tracheostomy.
Just a straight line, it was still very clean.
What happened is that Bob Livingston, who was a world authority on the human brain and at the time the scientific director of two of the National Institutes of Health for Neurological Diseases and for Blindness, heard reports about the description of this wound to the throat.
And because he was an expert on wound ballistics, having supervised an emergency medical hospital for injured Okinawans and Japanese prisoners of war during the Battle of Okinawa,
He recognized it had to be an entry wound, so he called over to Bethesda Hospital, because his office at the National Institute of Health was across the street in Bethesda, Maryland, and spoke to Commander Humes, who was going to do the autopsy, and who said he'd not been listening to any of the news reports, so we could approach it objectively.
Bob explained that because it was a small puncture wound, a shot from in front, The neck needed to be dissected very carefully because, and this is so ironic and retrospect, if there were any evidence of shot from behind, then it was shot from at least two directions and therefore a conspiracy.
Later in the evening, Humes would call back to Bob Livingston and ask what it would have looked like had it been an exit instead of an entry, which Bob Livingston described.
And Humes, using that information, Chris, altered the wound to make it look more like an exit than an entry at Bethesda Naval Hospital.
He also altered the fist-sized blowout at the back of the head by removing a huge amount of the back of the head to make it look more like something that could have been the effect of a rifle had JFK been leaning far forward, ironically.
When the HSCA reinvestigated and issued its final report, it not only did it not acknowledge a fist-sized wound, not only did it not acknowledge the huge missing back of his head, which is described with mathematical precision in the autopsy report, it simply reconstituted the back of the head.
As though none of it were missing.
Move the shot to the head to the top, which isn't even consistent with that chunk of skull that was taken from the little boy and thrown back in the car.
A Harper fragment, a big triangular chunk of skull at the back of the head.
In other words, it was cover up from beginning to end.
So if anyone out there wants to understand, there's some places you can go if you want to grasp the reality of what happened on 22 November 1963.
Don, take us out.
Oh, wow.
You took us out, man.
Took us back to...
Long time ago on this week here.
So anyway, this is Truth Vs. News, and boy, we've got a lot of truth, and of course it's Truth Vs. News, and there is a big gap there, and we're trying to close that and give you the real truth here.
So thank you so much for watching, folks.
It's up to you to share this, and I really appreciate the great comments we're getting about the panel and about the work we're doing here.
I'm glad you really appreciate it, and I know that we'll get A job done on getting the truth out, so thank you so much.
God bless.
▲
Export Selection