All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 10, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:15:41
Need to Know News (8 November 2023) with Carl Herman & Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Carl Herman, Mission Viejo, Brian Davidson, Houston, Texas.
Need to Know News.
Today is Friday, the 10th of November, 2023, and the news gets ever more important to share with the public to discern the most important facts from the spin that we get from corporate media and the lies of omission and commission.
We get from leaders, quote unquote.
Topics.
One, we got to talk about the war.
We got six of those.
Biden and leadership optics and the question of how low can they go before something has a breakthrough, a breakout, a breakdown.
Back to COVID for the demonic poisonings recognized as genocidal crimes against humanity.
An idea that perhaps there's a lot going on when finance going on in the background and the question whether the U.S.
national debt has been paid.
And then just a point of truth where If you're committed to the truth, you might have to stand alone.
But before we jump in, Brian, is there anything that you would like to say as an opening statement?
Anything for context for the show today?
Opening statement.
Okay.
I just want to give everybody sort of an overview of conspiracy theory.
You know, what starts out as a conspiracy theory is something that sounds Like it might make sense, given that you've got more facts and more proof and more evidence to actually back it up, rather than, you know, it's just a fictional fabrication of ideas that sound like they might make sense.
And so in this game, you know, for years, I guess you could say I've studied conspiracy theory.
And I've gotten to the point where the theory doesn't carry a lot of water.
Anymore, I spend.
When it comes to this audience and this show, I spend most of my time.
Believe it or not, trying to understand history.
Theology.
Symbolism, cults, secret societies, groups.
Understanding how they function and trying to figure out what their goals are.
And who's in the way?
So.
While I see out up there on Twitter and other atmospheres all sorts of conspiracy theory, it doesn't work until I see some evidence that it fits into the mold.
And I'm hoping the mold's not wrong, but I do think that fundamentally there is a secret organization that may or may not be cohesive in nature, but is pulling strings around the world.
For personal profit and gain, and using mass psychology to control us.
Question is, who are they?
What are they?
Where are they?
And how do we stop them?
And I think that the biggest thing about stopping them is shedding a little light on them.
And that's why I'm here.
So, that said, there's an opening statement.
All right, well, I gotta compliment that opening statement.
As a private investigator, and me as a trained historian, we take a look at similar tools in our training and the application of our professional expertise.
And in history, we take a look at categories of evidence, and there is testimony that's the weakest form of evidence, because people can and do say anything.
There's documentary evidence, and that's going to be photographs.
written statements it and that is going to be subject to verification for authenticity and those documents are important to discern who did what when where and what other subjective questions or what rather what other objective data can help an individual analysis for the question of why and then we have physical
Evidence and physical evidence is considered to be the strongest because the rules of physics cannot be bent.
And that is going to be your most reliable evidence to determine what would be likely to have happened and what can be ruled out from having happened.
But the idea of a secret society.
I'm with you.
And I do recommend the resource.
Jim Mars, the late, great, leading contributor, along with Jim Fesser, to be able to explain, document, and prove what happened to JFK.
Jim Mars' books.
He has one that's ruled by secrecy that I do recommend.
And, man, there's another one.
And that was his Supposition as well is that there are secret societies and to be able to rip them open and at the bottom of the secret society It's the alien agenda and that there have been there has been a takeover of this planet by a relative hyper intelligent species and they go ahead and control through intelligence and through actual extra-dimensional powers to make things happen down here and
And that they have these families under their control.
And there's more to that that I've explored, which is the possibility that that's a violation of rules.
They got a penalty for that.
And hence, people like us are here, and we are not subject to the mind control.
And we are pointing out the difference.
Between their tragic comic lies of omission and commission about everything important and that they controlled every agency and our job as messengers is to offer choice to the people and we're powerless to do anything more than that.
The ordinary human beings are so mind controlled and cheap allies.
That's a great opening for the first couple of articles.
Let's take a look at the contents.
And that's all we could do is point to the data and chuckle about it, hopefully chuckle about it, and wait for some sort of a breakthrough that is unimaginable and unpredictable beyond our powers.
That's a great opening for the first couple of articles.
Let's take a look at the contents.
Let's do it.
Okay, so let's go to the war.
And oh, this is a good one.
So the New York Times, CNN, Reuters, and AP had contract reporters embedded with the so-called Hamas, and whether it was Hamas or not, who knows, and they were taking their photographs on that October 7th,
False flag attack on the southern protected border of Israel that according to, I believe we've had four testimonies of retired IDF personnel saying that nobody can approach that border.
They have eyes on, they have motion, they have heat, and that these people would be destroyed before they could pose any threat to the border.
Then there was the seven hour delay.
And then after seven hours, the IDF came in And use their heavy artillery and beyond what the so-called Moss people were using to kill these people.
Brian, anytime that you want to jump in, jump in.
Otherwise, I'll just go through these on 1 subject.
I think let's see.
It was the 1st to the 3rd.
1 was the Jordan news.
Yeah, let's hit the Jordan news 1 and then.
Yeah, so yeah, let's hit the, let's hit the first 3.
Okay.
Talk about it.
All right.
3 sort of grouped into 1.
Yep.
Okay.
So we have the targeting of civilians.
And this is the footage from Israeli helicopters, or at least that is the documentary evidence that we have that on its face.
Would support the destruction evidence that we saw.
With dead Israelis of the blasted buildings that would be consistent with heavy artillery from helicopters and tanks and not possible to have that level of destruction through the handheld arms of the people who came in and in paragliders and motorized bikes and on foot.
All right, Brian, your comments.
Well, Gateway Pundit is a good platform to start out with.
This particular article came out yesterday in the morning about the Reuters AP.
It's obvious that there were contract reporters within the slaughter of the 1,400 Jews at the music festival.
And so without Gateway Pundit, Dealing with the issue, they asked the question, was the presence of the photojournalists ethical or not during the slaughter?
Guys, this is clearly gaslighting, okay?
The question is not, was it ethical to have photographers embedded into the festival to document it?
The question is, was it ethical to roll it out using the mass media as a As a shield to blindfold people.
Now, Jim Hoft knows better over at Gateway Pundit, but even the powers that be have to control him, and he has to frame the article of, is it ethical to have these photojournalists in this place where all these people are being slaughtered?
Give me a break, Jim.
We're not that dumb.
But you know, it's funny that Carl's comment is the sheeple Are dumb enough to actually buy it.
And I can see that, you know, going through the comments, there's a number of people in this article that really are examining the question of whether it's ethical to have photojournalists at places where slaughters are going to take place.
I can tell you, I see this all the time.
And it's ridiculous to me.
That these people, because they have these platforms and they'll be de-Google-ified or de-Facebook-ized or whatever, they have to try to reframe it so they don't have to come out and tell you what's so obvious, which was it was just a big false flag operation very similar to the Las Vegas Massacre.
I knew that within a couple of hours of even studying the event.
It didn't take me long to see something that didn't make any sense at all, which is the first, earliest, and most reliable footage of the event at all that came out of it, where basically at 7 30 a.m.
on a Saturday morning, a lively, fresh crowd enjoying the music, dancing around before these
Strange parachoppers come rolling on in in the background like some sort of army of wasps and there must have been six or seven of them maybe no more maybe no less and this was the whole platform for these guys are going to come rolling on in well now it turns out that uh wow that was actually the israel they had helicopters they had footage they had grass people on the ground they had all these things in place give me a break you don't have to be in
expert in studying basics to figure out what's really going on here they just chose october 7th as the day that they were going to launch their operation against gaza to try to clean the place out so they can steal the uh steal the resources and continue to massacre those people what do you think well
let me let me point out an exceptional uh statement that you made that i hadn't seen reported elsewhere but uh this is important and significant so So you're saying that at Israeli time, 7.30 in the morning, young people were out for a music concert.
No coffee.
Living up to music.
I mean, it looked like it was 2.30 in the afternoon, and it was 7.30 a.m.
Yeah, you know, if we were to do a statistical analysis of similar types of events and how many of them started at 7.30 in the morning with young people like that, I think that might stand alone.
That might be a unique event.
And plus, they needed a full day of daylight in order to photograph the atrocities.
Yeah, yeah, it was a big operation.
I'm sure that they considered the timeline and they were arguing, saying, ah, fuck, should we start it that early?
Is anybody going to notice?
And that's how they go ahead and roll with this.
All right, let's go.
Hi, I'm going to have to call you back.
Let's take a look at okay, so part of the reporting as well as what we're being shown is that the war crimes within the illegal war of aggression includes the bombing of hospitals, churches, refugee camps, and now school.
And this, you know, this is usual, the idea of war crimes and the destruction, the targeting of civilian infrastructure.
The US did it in the war formerly known as on terror through the destruction of water treatment plants, electrical facilities, and it is it is just usual.
The idea that there is some sort of respect for rules of war is ridiculous and the United Nations with this one legal.
Authority to prevent wars of aggression facilitates them.
And this is an interesting article as well, is that we have an Israeli minister saying on Tuesday about nuking Gaza and that that would be legitimate.
And then the Russian Foreign Minister said that that raises a bunch of interesting questions.
The admittance of having nuclear weapons and then, hey, should the IAEA be involved?
And of course, Israel rejects being part of the Non-Proliferation Treaty.
It does not want to conduct itself or submit itself to any type of inspections and tests and admittances of what they may have there.
All right, and I think that is it.
Oh, and one other is that this is kind of a, I mean, I like it because it's creative.
Barcelona dockers refused to handle military material amid the Gaza War, and the article goes through to say that the dock workers in the Union making that commitment and making that contribution is symbolic more than anything else, but
I hope that that is representative of the public's response to Israel's slaughter of 2.2 million people or the relocation, the total displacement of them to steal the land in that Gaza Strip, which again is about 25 miles Well, you know, interesting take on it.
It's great land and about five miles deep, about 140 square miles, 2.2 million people crammed into it, or 2.2 million minus the ones who have been killed by the Israelis.
All right, Brian, your further thoughts on this?
Well, you know, interesting take on it.
I've been taking a look at a lot of history in that particular region and trying to figure out why it is what it is.
And And as far as I can tell, the old banking family, the Rothschilds, set up some sort of purchasing co-op after the Balfour Agreements.
And they went down there and purchased as much of the land as they could using shadow buyers and maybe a little bit of coercion.
But at the time, the war really wasn't, the land really wasn't all that valuable.
It wasn't developed.
I mean, it looked like what you would have seen in a 50s and 60s encyclopedia.
I mean, it was lots of rocks and lots of dirt and not a lot of water and kind of cleaned out, old, run down.
And so, remember that Muhammad's clerics had been running around down there in all of that area for a long time.
Very clannish sort of people.
You can picture camels in deserts.
And there were some settlers in that area, but it appears to me that it's legit that this Rothschilds family, working with other families, purchased a lot of the land that we call Israel today and then continued to purchase it, purchase it, purchase it, and used it to form a nation.
Now, if you will listen to the Israelis on it, they'll say, yeah, well, we purchased it and then we came in and we put a bunch of infrastructure on it and we began to prosper because we figured out how to build up this land and work this land.
And so all these Arabs that were out there running around in the desert all of a sudden started coming around because we were making A mall out of an empty field.
There's no economic advantage to an empty field.
And here we're bringing in water and we're bringing in sewage and we're bringing in establishments.
And so these guys start rolling on into town and get all around it.
And then, of course, as economics begins to play out and they become more profitable and more prosperous, more and more of these sort of Arab tribal sort of people start gathering around.
Because it's now become a big city, and so Israel's now saying, hey, we want this property.
This was ours.
We're Israel.
We've been working on this for a long, long time, and you guys aren't welcome here.
And they're like, well, my family's been here now for three, four generations, and we're largely settled up in the Gaza area that's run down.
And so think about your town.
Think about some of the most crime real estate in your old run-down city, and think about You know, bringing that back around and all of a sudden you start to spend a lot of money and attractive expensive people and expensive guests.
You start getting some nice stores in the area.
But the people that ran it down in the 1st place that couldn't afford to get out continue to hang around.
You drive them back out and so.
You've got, I'm starting to see more of it through that framework of what would happen in what's called the Third Ward or the Fifth Ward here in Houston, which is a terribly crime ridden, rat infested, roach running old neighborhood with bad plumbing and bad sewage and, you know, just a bad environment, bad schools, bad everything.
And then all of a sudden we start building a bunch of nice new houses and you've got sort of a merging of the old with the new.
And so I think that if you can look at it and frame it through just a basic economic principle, you can begin to understand a little bit more of the influences that made that area what it is today.
Yeah, and one of the, you know, as I'm putting on my economics hat, one of the most important distinctions to make of how the world got to be the way that it is with 1% owning more assets than the 99% and the Rothschild family bankers with this scheme, this Rewillian scheme, to call debt owed back to them our money supply.
Access to credit is a big deal.
And if you allow access to credit, human beings are very inventive.
And if you're bright enough to get good people to build infrastructure projects, then you are going to have a thriving economy.
In our world in the present, the lack or the restriction of access to credit and, you know, everything, everything is captured and owned.
With my mentor, Bucky Fuller, beginning in 1980 to 1983, And then my ongoing research and interest working with leaders with results.org, we would find the most key people in the fundamental aspects.
of building up infrastructure in order to end poverty and the elegant simplicity of engineering solutions.
Man, this whole planet can be a paradise if we have the opportunity and the freedom to apply good engineering and access to credit into these areas.
The only real limits are labor and resources.
And if we get a fair chance, this can be a paradise to move it into a Star Trek future, but in the current environment, you're going to have a bunch of people who are going to be poor, and they're just going to be trapped and captured into these suburbs.
The leaders want it that way, and they want it that way because that's what they do.
When there are Alternatives, they rejected.
And that's kind of the world that we live at.
And we're left to scramble and fight each other.
And then the masters will blame one group and have us fight each other as they continue to go ahead and get more and more resources until they achieve the final culling.
Let me give one more quick illustration about what I was trying to say.
You know, when I went to college in Chicago, There was a term this was back in the early 90s called the other side of the tracks and that term referred right to where I lived.
I lived at the corner of Wells and Rush.
And the others, the tracks were called the L train.
Okay.
And what was on one side of the tracks was an L train means elevated train cutting right through the city.
And so on one side of the track was an establishment called Cabrini Green.
And on the other side of the track, not more than a mile down the road, you had the magnificent mile, which was Michigan Avenue.
Maybe a little more than a mile, but basically Lake Shore Drive, Michigan Avenue, you know, like super duper shopping district.
And so you had this massive economic divide cut right there at the L train as the tracks ran through.
Well, there was one type of people on one side of the tracks and another type of people on another side of the tracks and You couldn't really go with your skin color.
Cross the tracks without taking a particular risk.
In other words, if I had gone rolling in there.
I might have very well become a victim of all sorts of things, but it was on the other side of the tracks.
It was very well policed.
I mean very well policed.
And there was sort of an unwritten rule in that area that white people didn't go into Cabrini and the black people that came out.
Didn't really go spend up their time on Michigan Avenue.
Over time, the city and the leaders solved the problem by displacing all those people and rebuilding, upgrading, and basically taking over the land with powerful developers.
Now, it didn't take an Israeli.
There was nothing illegal about it.
It was hardball land development and politics.
Which got the poor people basically driven out and the rich people moved back in as the area got gentrified.
I see a lot of the same influences when I take a look at this.
So it's a little bit less of a theological or historical mystery to me now that I've begun to understand what's taking place.
But it appears that Israel would have never had the political clout to clean out What they considered to be Cabrini Green without an event like this that they could fabricate to use as a launch board and as an excuse to clean it out and expand their space.
So in essence, oh, we got to take down this Cabrini Green development.
Let's stage a fake mass murder across the street and blame it on the bad guys and that'll give us a reason to clean out the rat's nest.
I see that.
Much clearer now after taking a closer look at the history and the economic development of the area.
I like that thinking and I think that that is valid.
There is always a mundane practical aspect to the empire because the bills need to be paid and they do want to develop resources for themselves and that land for Gaza.
I mean.
The psychopaths they really do see us as expendable work animals and if we're cluttered or they do see is just like rats or filth or cockroaches or whatever if we can be put to productive use fine but if not just get the fuck out of their space because everything that.
They see is theirs, and this goes back to these bloodlines and divine right of kings and rulers that would have you be executed if you dare raise your head from the ground to look them in the eyes.
The lack of empathy and the psychopathy is just in another world and ordinary people, unless you start climbing up the top and you meet some of these people, that is a whole different experience.
Then you can see that that for them, they have more of a predator type of a.
beingness, a soul, and ontology, I think would be the most accurate word.
And as predators, they would just as soon kill us as anything else.
They would like to use us as long as we're useful and then throw us away when we're not.
We have no rights to them.
It is just pure power.
Yep.
Yeah, there's a lot to it.
There's a lot to it.
And I see it a lot clearer now.
It's just, it's starting to come together.
Very good.
Very good.
All right, let's go on to our second topic.
And that's the optics.
And I got one, two, three, four, five of these.
Jump in any time.
So this is an excellent report.
I don't like the headline, because you should just say what it is here.
So the House Judiciary Committee released a report saying that the federal government had partnered with, through the Department of Homeland Security's CISA, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, and they worked with universities in order to create this EIP.
And that is, the EIP was the Educational Election Integrity Partnership.
And that's what went through universities, the University of Washington, Stanford, and they did a lot of the censorship.
And the government worked through these agents in order to declare Disinformation and then to get censorship onto public media.
I'll have a, uh, a new report coming out soon with my dances with the advanced placement macroeconomics discussion board and the.
Moderator censored more of my content.
Or that we have testimony from or.
A remark, a tweet, I guess, or whatever this platform was.
It ended up on Gab.
I don't know if Trump is on here.
But this is nice because Trump flipped the script.
So Trump is accused of fraud and the evidence for that Is the false evaluation of Mar-a-Lago worth $18 million on tax records when the actual value is going to be what the real estate market would bear, which is approximately $350 million?
I saw Trump say it's worth more than that.
It probably is, but let's just say, you know, 20 times more than that.
And for Trump to call the judge And the Attorney General, Letitia James, as committing the fraud.
That is how to do it.
To flip the script.
And Gateway Pundit, who breaks a lot of great stories.
And we have here part of the good news and a strike back.
Articles of impeachment have been filed against the Michigan AG.
And this is the same Attorney General who And it's for failing to uphold the election integrity by prosecuting election fraud.
And this is the same woman who wanted to jail up to 71 years in prison for the alternative electors that the Democrats themselves had done going back to JFK.
To appoint alternative electors, not in any sort of insurrection, not in any sort of an action to object or to harm an election, but just as alternatives so that if a challenge was successful, you had your team ready to go and putting that into play.
So that is good news and we'll see where that goes.
The interest on the US national debt has gone to above 1 trillion.
And this is part of the data that I'm discussing among the teachers on the macroeconomics AP board.
We have about 2000 teachers around the world.
I don't know how many of them look at this stuff, but.
I do know that I get censored on a regular basis, and that I'm attempting to make the case that this is unsustainable, and that it's either going to crash in a tragic, comic way, or we're going to be a great reset into the WEF's own nothing, eat bugs, and be happy about that.
And I don't think that there's any way to sugarcoat this or to get out of it other than a tragic comic collapse or a great reset with that.
And finally, I do like this art.
This is in L.A., that's City Hall, and this is a new street artist named Sabo.
And I think that's pretty much what we're looking at.
Brian, your thoughts?
Okay, so let's talk about the first one, which was that article from Conservative News about the House Judiciary Committee's report on basically the government's collusion with several universities to censor conservative speech.
They're taking something called censorship and fundamentally dressing That pig up in nice clothing, colorful clothing, is basically what the article's saying.
So the intent was to help Joe Biden win the election because they wanted to shut down and shut up the conservatives.
And so the government's Homeland Security, Cybersecurity Infrastructure Agency teamed up with Stanford University and other liberal colleges Uh, and formed a partnership called the Election Integrity Partnership.
Basically, it was there to launder the government's censorship activities in hopes of bypassing public scrutiny.
I like that frame, laundering the censorship.
I like that.
Yeah, well, that's what they do.
If you can't get something done straight up with consensus, you set up a committee that you control.
And then take the committee's recommendations and then blend it blend that committee's recommendations up with some other law or some other bill that's going to pass.
And that's how we get these policies in place.
This is exactly what Matt Gates was trying to do is to get each issue to stand alone.
But basically, The campaign was there to label conservatives as misinformation platforms, and it was there to silence conservative voices and conservative content, and that included President Donald Trump.
And so, you know, I want you to understand something.
This is the House Judiciary Committee that releases a report that fundamentally says that The government of the people for the people by the people is dressing up their conservative or dressing up their conservative censorship campaign in academia to try to justify it and put it out there.
But it was the whole purpose of it was to make sure that Joe Biden won and they could continue to get all the money that they want because they're afraid if the House went conservative.
That the conservatives might start cutting off the money, and so that's why the schools and the academic elite got involved with it.
That's my take on it, and I'm glad to see that the Judiciary Committee at least took note and wrote the report, but whether the mainstream media or any of the media outlets will cover it, I doubt, just because it's such a common technique to control the people.
Very good.
Very good.
Anything else on those stories?
Okay, the next one was Trump coming out after Judge Engeron.
Yeah.
There was a lot of people after Engeron, and he even released a shirtless selfie, a pathetic shirtless selfie that the judge took in a gym apparently, and then basically just mocked him for his Sophomoric understanding of real estate transactions.
Fight back.
I'm glad Trump did it.
Obviously, Letitia James and this whole thing is just designed to keep him off the ballot or keep him off the ticket.
Control him.
It doesn't look to me like they they've really got control.
The question is.
Fundamentally, on Trump, the question is, is who is he going to put in control if he gains control?
Will it be more of the same or will it be something different?
So.
You know, I do think that they're going to do everything they can to gaslight us and try to make us believe that Joe Biden.
Just take a look at the polls.
The polls are telling you that it's a dead heat between Trump and Biden.
There ain't no way.
That Joe Biden, I mean.
It's insanity to believe.
That Joe Biden.
is really capturing 49 percent of America's hearts and minds and souls with his blunders.
I mean, and his son and the bribes and the bad policy and the inability to prevent wars.
He might be capturing the heart and mind of the military industrial complex, but he's certainly not winning with the American people.
And Donald Trump You know, he's gained a lot of points with me recently.
I watched an old video shot, an interview that he did with Roger Ailes, the head of Fox News recently.
I know he did that video back in 1995.
And the funny thing is, it's eerie how much he's exactly the same abrasive, straight-talking character today as he was back then in that interview.
He also said that he, you know, the rich people hated him.
But the hard working, you know, union labor sort of guy loved him.
And that was 1995 in New York, where that half hour interview took place.
And I thought it was real interesting, but eerie how much he's exactly the same guy today.
And let's see, what was the last one?
Was that Gateway Pundit article on the Michigan election?
Let me jump in and say something about what you're talking about.
For that judge, and I like how you brought up that point of him being a little bit of an exhibitionist apparently, and for the judge and A.G.
James to claim the value of the property was $18 million, you know, a legal eye for that, for them to go ahead and go with that as professionals, they are asserting that this is fraud.
Okay, so they're either demonstrating themselves as being stupid or knowingly lying.
Now, when you go for this, you go and you do exactly what you do in the court.
Courts bring in expert witnesses.
So, before the AG would file these charges for fraud based upon an $18 million evaluation of Mar-a-Lago, she would have to check that with somebody.
I mean, this is so egregious, nobody would invent in their own mind to look at the tax records.
Because we all get these tax records, and the tax record evaluation is so far lower than what you would sell the property for.
So they're being shown as being either incompetent or criminally fraudulent, and that is a big deal.
And we have talked about some of the poll numbers showing Biden at 9% And I think, and that was a couple of months ago, so I think the actual understanding, the actual response of people to their political leaders, and not just Biden, it's kind of a race to the bottom among Trudeau, Macron, everybody is just crazy bad of what they're being shown, and that has me be optimistic.
Well, I'm optimistic about it too.
The only thing I have is You know, these people that are in charge of making these decisions as to who's going to be primaried and who's not and who's going to be running in what seat and who's going to win which election, you know, they're the same people that are pulling the strings on the guys that run and control these media organizations.
And for those of us that are in the know about who controls the media organizations, it's a it's a pretty big Zionist cabal that's behind it.
And I think these guys have the power to basically handpick who they want to install and who they want to elect and who they want to not elect.
And at this point in time, it seems that they've operated with almost total impunity.
I haven't seen anything significant in terms of a prosecution or anything significant in terms of an honest attempt to to clean up the election integrity systems.
So I think that they're just going to continue to gaslight the American people until we explode into a civil war, which is something that I think that they actually want to see happen.
Again, it will lower the cost of real estate.
If the neighborhoods that are in trouble burn everything to the ground, and then these guys that have a lot of cash under their Under their belts can come rolling on in and purchase up all that cheap property once it's been destroyed and revamp it.
You know, it's less and less sort of a demon under a rock sort of scenario in my mind and more and more of this is just a bunch of banksters trying to get rich using the tools that they have.
So I see a little bit less of the sort of reptilian alien sort of concept and just a lot more of the Capitalistic opportunistic billionaire mindset psychopath mindset that just hasn't just doesn't care just wants to get the rats out of the sewer.
The more I study it and the more I look at it.
I don't necessarily see.
Well, I do still see it.
It's just that I'm beginning to understand that it's both an economic agenda and What I believe to be a satanic, I believe this is the return of the old gods.
Figure out who the old gods were, figure out what they stood for, male and female combined, colors of the rainbow.
I mean, you're talking about some Greek goddesses that have made a return to America and the world.
So transgenderism, homosexuality, abortion, death, child sacrifice, Molech, Those are, that's the old evil.
That evil doesn't care about money.
That evil cares about bloodlust.
Yeah, yeah.
The more you look, the wilder it seems that our actual history.
Is and once we get the breakthrough, maybe we can rip open the Vatican library and be able to get the to the truth.
And yeah, there is the evil incorporated part of it is important.
And most of the people that we interact with are just these low level minions and their administrators.
Heartless, and they have to okay this stuff, and that is the operations of evil, the day-to-day operations.
Did you want to say anything else about that Michigan AG who's getting impeached?
Well, getting impeached doesn't necessarily mean being removed in this scenario.
It'll be interesting to see how it goes.
It's the Attorney General.
I mean, they just tried to do The wrong guy here in Texas when they hit Ken Paxton with an impeachment.
So.
So what?
Donald Trump was impeached twice.
I mean, I don't know what it means until I start to see something that actually changes or transforms the structure of of a governmental organization.
I'd rather see a perp walk.
Yeah.
I mean, seriously, Joe Biden, 20 million dollars, Hunter Biden, the whole Biden.
I mean.
Give me something significant, and these guys aren't even touching this stuff.
I mean, I know the house is saying they're serious about it, but I'll believe it when I see it.
Yep.
A lot of pieces in play, but nothing until we do get some arrests, and I think arrest is the transformative part of it.
All right, we've got four stories on COVID.
And we have here, this is Mike King in the Anti-New York Times, and in 2019, Madonna had this, and Mike is framing this as a pre-pandemic genocide ritual, and you can see the little X on Madonna's eye, and that goes back to the, there's some pre-programming with 9-11, and disease X, and this was, this began
In 2018, and with the World Health Organization, and this was their pre-scandemic kind of preparation to let people know that something is coming.
They're calling it disease X. And from what we've covered over and over and over again, we know that the whole rollout of the so-called COVID was to cover for the death shots and the destruction of rights and There's a nice view of these coffins, the plastic Pima coffins from years back.
And there's more of Madonna with photos from this.
She's actually wearing a Twitter patch.
How much does she get paid for that?
Oh, yeah.
We have the second smartest guy in the world, and we've covered this before, but this is a nice article for it, is that Pfizer's vaccine, one dose, is contaminated with 200 billion pieces of DNA.
And the idea that they are genetically modifying us, either from culling or to create us into a more manipulatable and willing work animal, I think that is totally on their agenda.
We have 80 lawsuits.
So basically, they're saying what they did was they took a bunch of aborted babies and blended them all up in a blender and then stuck it into the vaccines.
I mean, fundamentally, 200 billion pieces of DNA in one dose.
You know, that's a hell of an electron microscope.
I don't know.
I don't know, but that's what it sounds like.
It sounds like some sort of evil injection ritual.
200 billion pieces of DNA.
I mean, what else could it?
I mean, seriously, what else could provide 200 billion pieces of DNA unless it's some sort of DNA blender, you know, and then some sort of, you know, drop it into the mix?
I don't know.
Yeah, seems a little odd.
It does seem a little bit of odd.
It seems like they're actually trying to to contaminate us.
80 lawsuits in the UK, and that's a step in the right direction.
Although I think that you have the right frame is that we'll see how this stuff goes.
I mean, the optics are moving more and more into the right direction, and this is a nice observation that if you compare what Elon Musk and Joe Rogan said versus Fauci, and that Fauci and Rogan are going to win that contest for zero on the mandates, the lockdowns, the masking, The lab leak, mechanical ventilation.
I guess they gave Rogan and Elon a four plus score and Fauci zero on that.
What do you mean?
The National Institutes of Health have all the scientists.
Joe Rogan, give me a break.
There's no scientist.
Elon Musk, he's just an entrepreneur.
No scientists.
Fauci is science.
Well, doesn't that just sort of Laughably tell you what science has become if Fauci is science and Fauci can't get it right more than Joe Rogan and Elon Musk.
Oh, guess what?
Looks like common sense reigns and that all this science is nothing more than a bunch of... Well, most of it is probably corrupted with academia's insight.
So, that's two cents on that story.
Yeah, and I'll provide a link into the show notes as well, an article.
And Marcia Angle, who is a professor emeritus at Harvard's Medical School, and she was the former chief editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, the number one medical journal, she is an honest person and she has been on fire and writes as powerfully as you can imagine.
And she just says her estimation is 50% of the declared research is fraudulent.
So New England Journal of Medicine is trying to rebuild their name, which has been absolutely destroyed recently with all the academic integrity issues that have come up as a result of Stanford and Harvard and all these other academic papers that have now all of a sudden hit scrutiny that were out in their magazine.
I think I read somewhere that over 60% of academic studies When reviewed by people that actually know what they're doing have serious flaws in them.
Again, I believe that you can hire them to give you an academic study that says anything you want.
I mean, I've seen it happen before.
I know that there was a time in my previous career where one of my competitors simply hired an academic institution to create a report that said what they wanted it to say.
And then they use that report to basically go out there and say, well, you don't want to do business with that guy because he's ineffective.
You want to do business with us because look, we hired this company to do this independent study for $150,000.
And turns out he doesn't know what he's talking about.
And we do, our scientists are better.
Well, proof's in the pudding, you know, and that's the thing about academia is I think a lot of the older Americans have begun to Slip in terms of our ability to continue to trust these organizations.
To give what what it is they're asking them to give and you can see why the federal government and the FBI, especially.
Seem to be so closely correlated with academia.
All these grants, all these gifts and all these protection rackets that are in place.
Man, we need we need to take a a.
I'd like Congress to address the issue of how much money we give to academia because it's a hell of a lot more money than we give to Ukraine.
There's no doubt about that.
It's like a Ukraine every month that we're using to subsidize academia.
Yeah, the more you look, the more that you see, and every agency is captured, and everything is just narratives that are pushed in and fortified with false flags and then reported on.
And then they hire these people at the universities in order to construct and to build the narratives, and they push people out who have narratives that are destructive to the direction that the leaders want to go in.
It is crazy.
All right.
Now this, Brian sent me this, and this is consistent with some of the interesting testimony I've seen, and this person has a four-minute video where they go through documents, and the documents seem to be official statements stating that the national debt has already been paid.
Can you imagine showing up at the bank with a check for $21 trillion?
Yeah.
Listen, I sent you this, that little video snippet of those documents in the context of that article that you had put up by Zero Hedge, interest on the U.S.
debt skyrockets above $1 trillion for the first time ever.
That was Zero Hedge, Tyler Durden, put out yesterday, yesterday morning, I believe.
So basically, anybody that's been watching this U.S.
Debt Clock at debtclock.org or worlddebtclock.org, whatever, just realize that our interest on the debt that we've taken as a nation has surpassed a trillion dollars a year, which basically means we've hit what's called a death spiral.
The amount of taxes that we bring in can no longer support the amount of interest that we're paying out.
And we have to declare bankruptcy.
And so, in the context of that, it doesn't seem like, to use the terminology, the shit's hitting the fan or the world is on fire.
You would think that the debt hitting $1 trillion under these circumstances would cause hyperinflation, frankly.
And it hasn't.
I don't know if we're just sort of at the calm before the storm, but something stood out about that tweet where this lady's producing documents that come from, and I didn't check them out.
I didn't have time.
I just sent that little video to Carl a couple hours ago.
We don't know who the lady is that's talking.
There's chatter that the woman that's showing the documents is Marsha Blackburn.
I don't know that that's true.
We don't know if the documents are legit.
But I can tell you, the reason that we bring this craziness up is that right now, we may be seeing a restoration, and I say may, because I don't know, but this could be that whole Q White Hat concept, Nassara Gassara, which has been brought up, sort of the, let's call it the
Jubilee in the Bible, every seven years, the Jubilee would come around and all the debts had to be canceled and all the slaves had to be released.
And that had to happen every seven.
No, maybe it was every forty nine years.
There was different seven, seven, forty nine.
As far as the east is from the West, forgiveness, you know, that's the concept with seven and seven and forty nine, it's sort of the number of perfection in the Bible and the Jubilee, I think it was the forty ninth year where Literally all the debts needed to be erased.
This is an old biblical concept that basically died out with the Roman occupation that started prior to Christ's arrival on scene.
But the question is, does our military have some sort of group of people that are in a position To take down this cabal or expose the cabal or persecute or prosecute the cabal.
And I've, I've heard a lot of people chatter about it.
I've seen a lot of things that I thought were very interesting on the subject.
But how is the question?
How?
How?
And basically what that video was showing is that.
Somebody sent a letter to Donald Trump saying, here's your check for 21 trillion dollars.
We've delivered you from the corporate control of the bankers, and they're saying that those documents existed back in 2017.
I've seen a lot of things that are real creepy that support that, but I haven't certainly seen anything at all except for a slapping of a turd on Q by calling us Qtards and by rolling out false flag actors on January 6th called the QAnon Shaman to embarrass people that were
Taking a look at the conspiracy theories, and I gotta tell you, I'm beginning to believe that there may be and indeed be some sort of group.
I just don't know how powerful they are and what mechanisms they're going to put into place.
Maybe you can enlighten us.
The well, a few things that I can say is that the problems that we're looking at in terms of economics, they exist only on what that video shows on paper and digital.
It is fundamental fraud.
And the again, the only real limitations are.
Now, in terms of the fraud that they commit, I only understand a fraction of it.
We have been controlled, contained, lied to, manipulated.
We've been mind controlled into the economic system of our wannabe master's choice.
Now, in terms of the fraud that they commit, I only understand a fraction of it.
I see it kind of like making sausage.
And once you understand that what they're doing is they're cutting things up and they're just putting them all together, then, okay, you really don't need to know all the parts that are going into it.
Yeah, the basic understanding of what's going on now, in terms of such a remedy that could be into place.
Is that the, and I'll throw in here again the article, is that two tools have been discussed for a long time.
Monetary reform and public banking are the current names, but it goes back to Benjamin Franklin being so excited.
Almost 300 years ago, he wrote a pamphlet saying, hey, Colonial Pennsylvania, we're the bank and we make money from the loans we make.
And then we create a little bit of money to cover the interest rate and we don't have to have any taxes.
That's a breakthrough.
The German government in between World War I and World War II, and there's a lot of history there I don't know and a lot of history to get into that I'm not going to get into, but the idea that they had an economic turnaround is a function of when you have a proper banking system and employing monetary reform, the creation of money to directly pay for goods and services, that is some juice!
Now, if you do too much, you'll pay for it through inflation, but to the extent that what you invest in contributes to economic growth, typically, and typically that's why you do economic investment into infrastructure, because you get triple benefits, you get the improved infrastructure, you get up to full employment, and you get overall falling prices to the extent that infrastructure Contributes to productivity.
So there could be all kinds of nice stuff in the background because we have the technical solutions to move forward.
That said, my own experience working with these 2000 AP Macroeconomics teachers is that they can't hold a conversation with me.
They are either unable or unwilling so far to date.
You know, since 2009, since I've interacted with these experts teaching college-level macroeconomics courses to our brightest high school students, from time to time I'll have somebody who will, you know, jump in and say something recognizing that what I'm pointing to is the data that would make a difference from our exponential debt system into actually honest accounting of what we could have.
Uh, human beings just aren't ready.
I, or at least I can't reach them.
There is no argument.
I've been able to contribute and I'll, uh, I'll update this article and I'll, uh, share it through the BitChute as well.
It won't be for this show.
It'll be in a couple of shows.
I got to run through this conversation with the AP teachers and see where they're at.
But my point is, is that they can't hear data.
And these are people teaching a college level course, and this is moderated by a PhD economics professor, and we have a few other PhDs in economics who are taking a look at that stuff too.
They just can't hear it.
So the idea that there could be solutions in the background.
Could be and as I keep saying, I'm 95% certain that that that is the case.
And as I've always said, is that based upon what we're shown, we do need to act responsibly to what we have and.
Because anything the White Hats could do, the Black Hats could be doing.
I don't think that they're that ambitious or capable.
And I do think that we have had an intervention from White Hats for the sheepilization of human beings.
I think they got called on a foul for that one, and hence we're here.
So we'll see.
I'm with you with what you're saying.
Until we see the arrests, then, you know, the game is still on.
And what are we going to do?
Rest?
Stop?
Not pointing out the lies and the crimes?
Not encouraging our fellow citizens to say something?
To employ what we think and what we say and what we do for justice?
We're going to be in action.
But yeah, yeah, I'm with you.
And I think that that is something happening in the background.
And we'll all discover together what evolves.
Yeah, I just, um, I wish it was more sophisticated than something boiled down to white and black.
Because, to me, that indicates a deception just in and of itself.
It's not always black and white.
There is a whole lot of gray.
And I, I'm a guy who, as a private investigator, believe that I just need to figure out why they did what they did.
In order to get to the bottom of it, and I always find that what's under the hood is more sophisticated than I could have, you know, boiled it down to in terms of motives, previous history, previous experience.
It's always a whole bunch of mitigating factors that got somebody where they did that terrible crime or, you know, whatever they did.
And so when I hear the idea of white hats and black hats, what I see is sort of A comical superhero platform where you've got the good guys and the bad guys.
And I can tell you, in the real world of espionage, if they were doing something as sophisticated as we like to believe they're doing, 4D chess and not, that you're going to see a whole bunch of people that have to play both sides being capable of double-crossing or triple-crossing or being capable of being double-crossed or triple-crossed.
And and I just don't think that you'd ever get to the point where you could label somebody in one box or the other.
Because in order for any of this theory to even possibly play out.
The other side can't know what your strategy is and what you're doing and who's on your team and who's not on your team.
They can't know your motivations.
They have to believe you're on their side when it's just so convoluted and so complex.
It's like making a sale.
If I want to convince somebody to do something, I've got to make them believe that my motives are pure and on the table.
And that's a very difficult thing to do if you're talking about draining the swamp.
How are you going to drain the swamp if you're the guy who comes on in and says, hey, all you swamp preachers, I'm one of you.
I'm just like you.
But hey, let's go ahead and get on out of here.
It's not going to happen.
The only way that swap is going to drain is with an application of an iron fist of power.
It's not going to happen unless we have an application of a gavel in a court.
Or a noose or a judgment of some authority.
I just, I don't believe it's going to happen like that.
And so I tend not to believe in fairies and fairy tales.
Although, I really want to believe in this one.
I really do.
I want to believe that there's some deliverance.
But in the meantime, I can make peace with the idea that things may not go as planned.
And that this thing might continue its downward snowball slide into hell.
I can live with that.
I have character.
I have integrity.
I sleep like a baby.
Yeah, I think you do have to make contingency plans, and the idea of the iron fist of power is going to be the NSA having the data of how these leaders were blackmailed, and then using that as leverage to have the puppets, the leaders, be able to work for the White Hats, but that would take extraordinary power at the top.
And then to protect somebody, you know, just to protect Trump from assassination would be a miracle in and of itself.
So it is fascinating.
It does raise a lot of questions.
And for contingencies.
Yeah.
I mean, you definitely have to dance with the music that you hear, not the music that you hope is coming up on the next song.
that analogy makes any sense And as I've said for myself, Personally, I'm willing to dedicate on the path that I'm on until the 2024 election.
But if something doesn't break by then, then I'll have to look at the playing field.
And between now and then, too.
That's just what I tell myself to comfort myself of how long I'm going to personally endure this shitty clown show.
And I'm telling myself now, just for my own peace, that if we get to the 2024 election and things are not settled, then I'll have to invent some sort of a campaign and I'll do something to get myself in trouble at the level of Socrates, probably.
But I'm going to escalate personally if something isn't cleaned up by the 2024 election and we don't have honesty.
And I'll look between now and then.
It's just, right now, You know, talking to family, friends, just having ended this two-year campaign with Hayward Unified School District and continuing with the macroeconomics teachers, I don't think that there's any avenue, or I can't see any effective avenue for action at this point, other than just doing what we're doing, talking to the patriots, and as I've said a few times, is that I see this as
Consistent with the Committee of Correspondence in AMREV1, where people who have access to the facts are sharing them with each other, and we're building a foundation that would lead to a breakthrough such as an AMREV1.
All right.
We have just one other area that I just wanted to share with you.
You will reach a point on your path where you do not require a single person to understand or relate to you.
And that just resonated with me.
And part of what we go through on the journey, in my observation, Is to overcome the fear of having to stand alone, and that once you feel the importance of the data that we're pointing to, and the cost of the lives of the empire, any person who.
Just as an opportunity to freely consider where you want to stand.
I'd rather stand with the truth and, you know, I can't control other people.
That's I have no power over what they say and what they think and what they do, nor do I want it, but I would choose the truth and be willing to stand alone because in practice.
What patriots discover is that they often do stand alone among family, friends and colleagues.
And that's just a choice that you're going to have to make.
Brian, your thoughts on that?
Yeah, I mean, in that context, I'm envisioning that scene in The Matrix where the the board of directors approaches Morpheus and he says, Damn it, Morpheus, not everybody believes what you believe.
And he sits back like a Smug hero and says, my beliefs do not require them to believe.
I don't know.
That was a bad accent, but.
You know, it's almost like he's like, hey, I'm OK.
I know what I'm talking about.
You don't have to believe me, but I'm taking the Nebuchadnezzar and we're heading on up to Zion or I'm going to let Neo do it.
I just I just don't.
That's fiction.
That's fiction.
Now, I do think there's some things that we can really hang on to.
I really do.
And I am.
I mean, I'm hanging on to him.
And I'm gonna hang on to him.
I'm gonna continue to hang on to him until I die.
Because I do believe that we're put here for a purpose.
And I think I've got a pretty good feel for what that is.
So I am choosing to believe.
And trust me, I get hit with the attacks just like anybody else.
I have to take a look at the other side of the coin all the time.
I find myself Trying to re-evaluate important theological things that I thought were solid, maybe not so solid.
I have to take a look all the time and go back.
And you know, the problem with society today is we like to, you know, we like to have everything given to us as sort of pre-digested headlines.
Tweets, you know, everything's given to us as sort of a, you know, A vomit of basics that sort of make everything black and white and basic.
Again, I can tell you that in the reality of this world, I mean, this is a book that I've been studying.
This is the Dictionary of Symbols.
Look how thick it is.
Guys, I'm telling you that the world is much more complex Then we give it credit for.
And there's a lot going on.
And I don't know where we're at.
But I can tell you this for certain.
I'm pretty certain that I know where it's headed and where I'm going to be one minute after I die.
I'm pretty sure I got that figured out.
Once you get that figured out, the rest is easy.
Excellent.
Well, thank you for your expertise, brother.
And for our audience members, we'll go on to Final thoughts.
We've had kind of a broad-ranging discussion, and I think I've said everything that I reasonably could say.
And just to close it off, it does seem that all of the facts are on our side, and that a
Revelation of those facts would, of course, demonstrate that our opponents have controlled every agency in a criminal organization that, as Brian has talked about and brought into distinction so well, it does have a mundane day-to-day criminal enterprise aspect of it, an evil incorporated type of business to run, and that, you know, part of it is just totally explainable with the acquisition of resources, both natural
And human for the psychopaths to continue to control the top.
And all I can do is to encourage patriots with how I encourage myself, is that it seems that all of the steps our opponents are taking are just making them look worse.
It seems the direction in all of the matrix are both gathering more evidence against our opponents and to have people slowly recognize and withdraw consent and Hopefully, the bonus, the necessary component that we've talked about again and again and again, is that people have to be willing to recognize that these are crimes requiring arrests of the leaders.
So I am optimistic.
And with what Brian was talking about as well, we call it the fog of war, is that very little can be seen with certainty.
And plus, you got to throw in there, our human brains are only so smart.
We can only process so much and the magnitude of the data around us and our ability to discern and pull in and then have something to say about a picture that makes sense relative that whole just be humble and more like a child.
I mean we do have to work and it is fun to try to figure out what's going on and I think that that is part of what we have to do to exercise our intelligence.
Just don't be too certain in an environment of lies and poison and torture and mind control that what you think that you see is what is there.
All right, Brian, your final thoughts, brother?
I'm going to read a passage from Ecclesiastes just to remind you of something.
There's a time for everything.
A season for every activity under the heavens.
A time to be born and a time to die.
A time to plant and a time to uproot.
A time to kill and a time to heal.
A time to tear down and a time to build.
A time to weep and a time to laugh.
A time to mourn and a time to dance.
A time to scatter stones and a time to gather them.
A time to embrace and a time to refrain from embracing.
A time to search and a time to give up.
A time to keep and a time to throw away.
A time to tear and a time to mend.
A time to be silent and a time to speak.
A time to love and a time to hate.
A time for war and a time for peace.
In the place of judgment, wickedness was there, and in the place of justice, wickedness was there.
I said to myself, God will bring into judgment both the righteous and the wicked, for there will be a time for every activity, And a time to judge every deed.
That's my final thought.
Thank you, Brian.
Thank you, audience members.
▲
Export Selection