All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 4, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:02:17
Need to Know News (4 October 2023) with Carl Herman & Chris Weinert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Carl Herman, Mission Viejo, Chris Weinert, Fort Myer, Florida.
All the news that you need to know.
Wednesday, October 4th, 2023.
And our topics today.
So one is going to be economics.
We either need to have the truth and banks to arrest, or you can kiss your asses goodbye.
We have several topics there, led off by a great, great AOC defended that reasoning, and that's about the peak clown show that I can see.
Yeah.
We're going to quickly show how they retire to earn $25,000 a month in the lobbying business and that they can only do that with corporate media.
And specifically, we're going to take a look at the New York Times covering up any possible crimes and a few battle updates for our World War III.
And Chris, in this first topic for economics, I'll actually let you introduce this Yeah, yeah.
video and that the banks are going to need their $17 trillion behind.
Go ahead and say whatever you want to say and I can play as much of this conversation that you want to.
Yeah, yeah.
I'll just say I'll start up with some comments and then maybe just play like two minutes of it, because that's really the first two minutes he kind of nails it.
So, yeah, I would also like to say there's a new word that I've come up with called philanthropists.
Uh, the psychopaths that use philanthropy as, like, an inversion.
And, you know, like the guys that run children's charities that are selling children's organs and, like, you know, pizza cake stuff or whatever.
So, yeah, it's a whole new word.
Uh, and, you know, I think people really have to start looking at these things, people, the way that they truly are.
Um, because it is an inversion.
If you don't really understand, uh, what's going on, you're going to be horribly mistook.
So, yeah, I think this is a good way to start it out.
And what Manorino talks about, that's the guy whose clip you're playing, Greg Manorino.
He's got it called the 08 thing, too.
He's had a lot of predictions that have seemed to come pretty true.
He's pretty good with money.
And I don't know, I trust what he's saying.
He knows the system and the financial world better than probably most.
And what he's looking into was that the deposits in the banking system are around $17 trillion, $18 trillion, and the FDIC only has roughly $100 to $200 billion allocated for that bailout for insurance.
So in other words, 3%, roughly, or a little bit less than 3% of their total deposits are insured.
Yeah, so if anything ever hits the bank or if there's ever a run or if there's ever an issue, you know, people need to get their money and the Fed needs to start printing.
I don't think it really can do that.
I don't think it can unless it starts going through some sort of a mechanism that has to do with that.
It's something entirely different.
I think you have to give funding and approval and I don't think you can just print money.
But apparently they can't, and apparently they don't really tell us.
And this is the thing, is that the M1, the M2, and M3 supplies have gone dark since like 2019-2020.
Congressional oversight, in terms of funding, has gone dark with FAST-E56.
These operations that are going on, no one knows how much money is getting pumped into this.
No one knows what these things really are.
No one knows when they're happening or what these things are doing really.
And like the philanthropists are doing, philanthropists are doing, they're doing this type of thing too with so-called assistance and aid packages.
And they're funding it all with debt to do it, and they're replacing, you know, good money with toxic liabilities.
And, you know, Manorino also talks about the top three banks having over 150 quadrillion, or I'm sorry, trillion in derivatives, and two to six quadrillion estimated total in derivatives around the world.
So, There's a lot of money on money and, you know, bad money on bad money and packaged into a lot of different things.
And most people don't know what these financial packages are.
And, you know, if you really get into most of these hedge funds, and some of these real estate investment trusts, they have gates on a lot of their, their mechanisms.
So if there ever is like some sort of a run or an issue or a drop or a market problem, You can't pull your money out.
You're locked in.
They only allow a certain percentage of people to get their money out.
People think they are liquid and that they're investing in a lot of these financial instruments.
In my opinion, Gollum Enterprises is much like the COVID was, or much like the climate change is.
These are complete and total fabrications, manifestations of imagination.
At best.
And there's really no physical product behind the actual scripted certificates.
You can say this about commodities.
You can say this about insurance.
You can say this about just about everything in what we know in our world.
And a lot of this is a breach of fiduciary duty and trust.
And I think trust is the pinnacle of any financial system, especially a fiat fractional reserve currency system.
So yeah, I think that really the trust is running thin, not only amongst the citizens and these banking institutions who are obviously seeing it through this, but more importantly, these guys in with each other.
You know, if you look at the way that the tenant, the two-year yields are flipping and the inversion to the yield curves and the overnight rates, these guys don't trust each other any farther than they can throw each other.
And most of them are buying gold and selling off these toxic liabilities.
In terms of what Greg says, he's talking more about the ability for FDIC to pay you out and the amount that they actually owe versus the amount they have on their books.
So, yeah, you can play the clip now or if you want to comment too, Carl, I'm sure you can probably add a lot more to what I'm saying.
I'll add a bunch more about what you're saying.
The only thing that I'll add at the moment is what you said about it being in an inversion, is that pretty much our audience already knows this.
If there is an official talking point, if corporate media and puppetitions are saying something, or financial leaders are saying something, pretty much whatever it is that is the opposite of what they're saying is what's going on.
But yeah, let's go ahead and play this guy for a couple of minutes.
October 2nd, 2023.
I want to thank all of you who step up and support my work on the first of every month.
I really appreciate that.
So with that said, people, we have a lot to talk about.
This is my pre-market report.
You and I have sat here and talked about the issues which are, I mean, honestly, Beyond belief at this time, and it's about to get a little bit worse.
How about a lot bit worse?
And I want to discuss that with you.
You know, let's start off with that just real quick.
You and I, again, have sat here and discussed the issue with the banks for quite a long time.
Now, I'm going to show you a chart.
I'm going to go over some basic, easy-to-understand information to explain how dire the situation is.
The financial system of the world, which is run by central banks.
They run the economy.
They run the financial markets.
They run the financial system.
Stephen K. Bannon here from the War Room.
The American financial system is in total and complete... Stop stuffing sopping wet bags of ice into your cooler.
I've got a brand new fridge on wheels that keeps your...
Link to the public is clearly the commercial banks.
Commercial banks, banks that take deposits from people.
I'm not talking about credit unions which operate in a different way than a commercial bank.
Credit unions operate in a not-for-profit mechanism.
That's not the case here with commercial banks, all the big banks, all the Wall Street banks.
These institutions are in more trouble than you could possibly imagine.
I'm going to show you right now how these banks are going to need at least a $17 trillion bailout.
You heard that right.
A $17 trillion bailout, but that's not even enough to cover what is about to unfold.
Now let's talk about that.
Just to outline this real quick, this is right off of the Federal Reserve's own website.
This shows the current liabilities.
Again, hidden in plain sight.
I always tell you that.
Federal Reserve's own website.
The current liabilities on the books of the commercial banks, collectively, that number, in case you can't read it, is just over $22 trillion.
This is debt liabilities that the commercial banks Oh, we're talking about bonds, corporate debt, and a whole bunch of other things as well.
So keep that number in mind.
Right now, the commercial banks collectively owe over $22 trillion in debt liabilities.
Now, if we were to look at The total assets.
Okay, we have to weigh what these institutions owe against what they're worth, and try to figure out what the net comes out to.
Make sense?
Well, in case you were wondering, just by some coincidence, if you were to take the total assets of these institutions, it pretty much zeroes out.
In other words, debt liabilities, just over $22 trillion, and their total value, which includes their property and everything else, about the same.
However, these institutions also, I guess you could say, owe you, the depositors, Cash which you, you know, so gracefully put into these institutions.
That number, in case you were wondering, comes out to about 17 trillion dollars.
So what does that mean?
It means these institutions are, I mean by their own numbers, just some basic math here, in a hole for 17 trillion dollars.
Or should I say, you, all of us, are in a hole for 17 plus trillion dollars.
Do you understand why I've been explaining to you to get your cash out of these institutions?
They're absolutely insolvent.
They are operating in a vacuum.
I mean, no surprise.
What would you expect in an environment where we don't even have a reserve system anymore?
It's a zero reserve system.
All the cash you think of that is in these institutions that you gracefully give to them to hold for you, it's not there, okay?
So, again, let's just sum this up.
Debt liabilities, collectively, for the commercial banks, over $22 trillion.
Their total assets, about the same.
So right now we're at zero.
Right now they have a zero net worth.
A zero net.
Now, take out deposits, or what they owe you, and there comes another $17 trillion.
Imagine my shock, imagine your shock.
Let me tell you this real quick.
I personally don't think this these numbers are actually correct because I was I was trying to quantify It goes on from there, but yeah, and I like this guy.
This is a great Catch and pass.
And he's right.
The more that people see about this stuff, it is just a Ponzi scheme.
It is tragic comic.
And the people who look at this data, and well, let's just take a look at a little more data, unless there's more that you want to say here.
Yeah, no, that's pretty good.
If I fast forward, It saves a lot of time, but you get the point across a little better, quicker at least.
Yeah, I think he really goes into a lot more stuff about this, but yeah, you want to check him out.
Greg Mattarino on YouTube.
And yeah, I'd recommend checking out his channel.
He's been pretty good.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
The bottom line is that they, okay, let's just, let's just jump into my friend and colleague, Ellen Brown.
And we have worked together for But probably at least 15 years.
And so Ellen's latest article, The Great Taking, How They Can Own It All, just takes a look at the, well, she talks about the derivatives bubble that you mentioned, and that they're just gamblers at the top.
And that what they create, that they call a monetary system, is the Orwellian opposite.
It is a debt system.
They create what is used for money as legally credit.
So they're not lending you somebody else's deposits.
They have the legal right to create what is used for money as debt owed back to them with interest.
Now, the great taking is talking about exactly what?
What Greg was talking about here is that if there is a call and there is a rush and people want to get their money, I'm sorry, it's not your money.
When you deposit them into the bank, that actually becomes the bank's money.
And then you go into the legal aspect of it, and we'll see what actually happens.
If there is a run, and the damage of that is what is called a bail-in.
And if you do have money in those institutions, I do recommend a credit union or not the too-big-to-fail banks.
All right.
Anything on that, Chris, or keep rolling?
Uh, well, yeah, just one thing I'd like to add is it almost reminds me when you go to a hospital and you check in, you have to be discharged or else you can be detained.
Uh, this is, this is kind of the same thing with you giving your money to the banks.
It's kind of like you giving yourself over to these medical institutions with these psycho, uh, philanthropists at the top.
Uh, so yeah, it's a, it's a crazy world that we're going in, uh, into right now, but, uh, I think now more than ever, people need to wake up and we really need to do something about sorting this out.
Yeah.
Yeah, and a little more of the history and then the good news is that we have technical solutions for this and have forever.
If what you're doing for a monetary system is creating what we use for money as a negative number, then stop that.
At least create the capacity to create what is used for money also as a positive number directly.
And so this is the anti-New York Times.
This is Mike King.
And I do recommend his work.
It's really leading, cutting edge.
And he pulls a New York Times article from 100 years ago.
110 years ago.
And he talks about, the article discusses, how the Rothschilds made their money in the banking game, in the banking scam, in the control system of a central bank that has the legal ability to create what we use for money owed back to them.
And then, you know, of course, one of the things that you're going to have to do if you control the banking system and you can create what is used for money directly, there are a couple of tools that you have.
One is go ahead and buy up the media.
And about 10 years ago, I was with Michael Hudson, who is an economist at the University of University of Missouri, I believe.
And, you know, he is an expert with this.
He has best-selling books in here.
And I asked him, just sitting down at dinner, hey, Mike, If these central banks just created what is used for money and just entered into a shell company, Digits, there's no mechanism to catch them.
There's nothing that would prevent them from doing that.
And he looked at me and said, that's right.
Nothing.
Nothing.
So these people can create what is used for money and the history of our system, if you want to have a great documentary, The Money Masters, it is now dated, but that takes a look.
It is the best, it's three and a half hours, but it is the best historical overview of how we got to where we are with this central banking scheme.
And then I put everything... Hey Carl, you ever studied into the 100 Years War?
I'm sorry, what?
I'm sorry, Carl.
I was going to ask you, did you ever study into the 100 Years War and like the tally stick system that they had?
Like when all these dukes ran out of money and they basically had to like start doing tally sticks instead of currency exchange with like farm settlements and like citizen sales and you know all this stuff you know within the realm.
It's almost like company script in like the mining days of the 1890s.
or the early industrial, second industrial era. - If what is used for money is merely a means of exchange and the supply is limited, that is good.
You don't have to have a hard asset to inform the value of paper money.
If you don't trust the system, then yeah, you need to have a hard asset.
But if you're going to attach the value of the money to the value of silver or gold, then it puts the monetary system at risk for some manipulation.
But you know, the manipulators Anyway, so we do have hope in this article here just goes over that the mechanics because of this exponential debt system if you have basically so the two.
The two reforms are monetary reform and public banking.
So monetary reform means is that create what we use for money as a positive number, create it and directly invest it into infrastructure.
The only real limits to the economy are the resources and the labor.
If you have surplus labor and you have the resources, create the money and put these people to work and invest in infrastructure and infrastructure You get triple benefits.
You get the improved infrastructure, you have up to full employment, and you have overall falling prices because one of the key standards in economics is that, and we do this all the time with, you know, our personal lives and businesses, you make investments and that makes you more productive.
Public banking is that's creating in-house net cost credit.
So instead of selling debt securities, you create the credit yourself.
And if If we had a public bank and a state bank had a 5% credit card and a 5% mortgage, that revenue stream alone would pay abundantly for all state taxes without any other need of any revenue stream.
And these benefits of just public banking and monetary reform, they're worth about a million dollars per average.
U.S.
household.
So, and that's for a household making about $60,000 a year.
That's worth a million.
So, if your household earns $120,000 a year, then the value of these two reforms is about $2 million.
So the good news is that we do have solutions, but in our environment where the banksters and the prostitutes are in control, we're never going to get an honest conversation about that.
And they're never going to point out the obvious and the emperor's new clothes condition continues.
Chris, anything that you want to pitch into that?
Oops, frozen up.
Not all system is organized crime at the highest level.
I think what?
Am I in there?
Yeah, I heard you say organized crime at the highest level.
Yes, that is true.
Oh yeah, yep.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
These banking institutions are organized crime at the highest level and they have every bit of commerce and production pretty much departmentalized.
I think it's a similar thing with the guilds in the past centuries.
Now that they have the fiat fractional reserve system, and they're not even on reserve requirements, they can pretty much just print mint and steal whatever they want.
And this is why they're running out of small business at the moment.
Pop Shop is it's it's about power and compliance, you know, like you can go into a small business and they wouldn't say, hey, are you vaccinated?
I'm telling you this from the social experiment we went through in 2020.
This has been my experience with that, and I think that it's always come down to, as far as a corporate policy, You know what I'm saying?
Most of these places have enforced that very, very, very strongly.
So I don't agree with that shit.
I don't think that that's even constitutional.
I think that's absolutely discriminatory if it would happen to any other thing, you know, like for race or for religion or anything like that.
You know, it would be absurd, but the fact that it's about a private medical situation is even crazier, and the fact that everybody's in on this and looking at this and all fever frenzy into this over nothing.
And you see the way that they got turned into maniacs.
I mean, like, they don't even need law enforcement.
They had these little assholes run around, these ruthless little shits out of fear, you know, enforcing this stuff for everyone, you know.
I think there's a scary situation.
It should be a wake-up call for many people.
And I think the banking institution has made money out of money and money for money to put into these things and to study this stuff and to put this on and socially engineer it.
Think of all the content providers that they're monetizing.
Think of all these celebrities.
Think of all the DC competitions.
All these people are, you know, marching in the same direction.
The sports leagues, everything like this.
Music artists.
They're all pretty much going towards this.
These people are all occultists, too.
And I just, you know, how people don't see this and see through this or haven't seen through this is a mystery to me.
But, you know, hey, I guess Everybody will figure this out at their own pace.
Yeah, they do want to crush the mom-and-pop businesses.
That is true.
They want to own everything.
They want to have human beings as some sort of a servile work animal for them and any type of entrepreneurship they need to crush.
And at the heart of it, you're right, it's all irrational.
If you take a look at the reasons, they're specious.
They're They're ridiculously illegal, and yet the level of propaganda takes advantage of an emotional manipulation and these propagandistic talking points that infiltrate the language, and they're tricksters, and one of the reasons that we call them Satanists.
Well said.
We didn't have the zombie apocalypse at 2.20.
You guys alright over there?
Everything is the opposite.
And pretty much whatever it is that they say is they're just going to be projecting onto you what they themselves are doing.
And what they're saying is the opposite of reality.
All right, let's go on to the next.
Well said.
Thank you.
All right.
So, we didn't have the zombie apocalypse at two 20.
Did you guys are right over there?
Do you have the whatever the MP test that everybody's freaking out about?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
And Joe Olson, he said that he wanted to be on the outside and take a look at the possibilities for that.
He wanted to observe that whole thing that's going on today and see what's going on with that.
And I'm sure that if our opponents had the ability, they could apply that technology.
I don't think that they signal that into movies unless that is a script that they're working on, but I just don't think that they had the power to do it.
All right, so let's talk about this guy, Jamal Bowman.
So this member of Congress, a former middle school principal, and I was a middle school teacher for about 15 years of my career.
So he pulls the fire alarm to stop the vote.
He says, I was trying to open the door.
And then he has to backtrack entirely when a member of his office says that the people who are pointing this out, they're Nazis.
And that is exactly What happened here?
And here is the so his office.
So released a memo and the memo from somebody in his office.
I believe Congressman Bowman when he says this was an accident.
Republicans need to instead focus their energy on the Nazi members of their party before anything else.
Now Marjorie Taylor Greene, she had a nice little video of taking a look at the hallway and she walks people through.
Maybe I'll just play this, how easy it is.
And basically she says, you know, you don't pull the fire alarm to open the door.
Nobody does that.
You walk down the hallway that leads to where you need to vote.
And I'll let her.
A member of Congress says that everybody that works here knows that.
But on Saturdays and Sundays, They are locked and only certain doors are open on Saturdays and Sundays.
Now, come on over here.
This right here is a fire alarm.
Nowhere does it say, pull the fire alarm to open the exit door.
I promised that guy as a middle school principal, he had to deal with that, probably.
Ten times a year.
And to, you know, Marjorie Taylor Greene is absolutely right.
And she just walks down the hall and shows you where you gotta go.
There's stairs.
And it's not that hard to go and vote.
So nobody believes this guy.
Because nobody has ever pulled a fire alarm to exit a building, but yet AOC wanted to protect this guy and run cover.
And AOC attempted to say, I mean, listen, I think you actually do see some of the photos of the signs.
I think there's something to set about the government about to shut down.
There's a vote clock that's going down.
The exits that are normally open in that building were suddenly closed.
And then Jake Tapper said, so you pull the fire alarm and then.
AOC had to change the conversation because that was the level of propaganda that defeated, well, she stopped with her propaganda by a simple question, that nobody pulls the fire alarm to open up the door.
Chris, any comments on that story?
Yeah, you know, most of these Democrats do seem to be comedies like that.
Biden, you know, falling up and down every flight of steps you put in front of the guy.
Fetterman coming out, a new man every day, you know, replacing his head almost three, four times a week.
You know, his dress appearance, you know, all this stuff.
AOC and her famous stuff.
Liz Warren and her double speak and financial Dodd-Frankism, whatever you want to call it.
Yeah, all these people are clowns.
All these people are masters of inversion.
John Kerry flying around in his charter jet talking about climate change, you know what I mean?
Like, it's absurd, and anybody that goes better should just laugh these guys out of the fucking room, but there's some people that take them so seriously that they really want to go tooth and nail, and I just don't understand it.
I get how they're manipulated, I understand the propaganda, but I just don't understand how someone could be that hoodwinked.
But, you know, it's the young people, and I hate to say it, I hate to sound that way, but it's really, they get roped into these things, you know, and a lot of women, too, by the emotional appeal.
And it's unfortunate because it's an inversion, a ruse, and it's certainly a Janissary culture where they end up weaponizing you against your own kinfolk and your own best interests.
Yeah.
And, you know, the respect that I have for our opponents to be able to – the hyper-intelligence to manipulate sheeple in that way is just extraordinary.
I can't break through it with my factual presentation, and we've been defeated so far.
And it is fundamentally an emotional type of conditioning, because the facts are just crazy.
And for those of us who are paying attention to this show, again, you don't have to get caught into every crime du jour and every type of drama.
You can just take a step back, and I recommend having three areas where you can point to the wars, the money, wherever, the 2020 election fraud.
And just say, withdraw consent, demand arrest.
This is a clown show.
Don't worry about any, any of the other theatrics.
All right.
So the Supreme Court, they had a ruling on Monday and they dismissed without comment.
One of the lawsuits, the saying that, Oh, Trump can't be president because of the 14th amendment insurrectionist.
And of course that is ridiculous that he has not been charged with that crime.
And he has not been convicted of that crime.
So the opponents are just trying dictatorship and dictate what is said.
And that's all that they do.
And if we're defeated by that level, then we deserve it.
I want to play this clip here, which is.
Luke, I forget Luke's last name, Rukowski or something like that.
But he goes off on it in about a minute with a couple of good points here.
That literally killed American teenagers.
There's politicians that go to Jeffrey Epstein's island and you're telling me we're going after this guy because he overinflated the property value that he had.
What this is after investigating here for so long.
This is what you have on him.
Are you freaking kidding me?
There's politicians that literally killed American teenagers.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah, and, uh...
You know, that is just ridiculous.
This is a civil case and the charges are, is that Trump defrauded the public because of the value that he placed on his property of Mar-a-Lago.
The judge decides all by himself that he's going to be a real estate expert and take the valuation of the property based on tax records when the fair market value of the property, instead of not the 18 million that The judge said it's about $350 million and you can take a look at the value of property to be able to come up to that conclusion and that $18 million.
So the judge has literally declared himself as being stupid.
And that will be reversed, but unless you have people who can see through it, then that level of propaganda is going to defeat us.
And let's see, there's another point that I wanted to make about this guy and valuation of the property.
Civil case brought by the government of New York.
No crime committed.
This was for a loan that was fully paid back, and yet they're going after him over this, as Luke smartly points out.
All right, Chris, any comments about the Trump stuff?
Yeah, Luke Rakowski brings up a very good point.
He's the guy from We Are Change.
He's had some pretty good on-the-spot questions for guys like Kissinger and many of the folk that were doing this shit for a long, long time.
Yeah, as far as journalists go, he's probably been one of the better ones in America, if you really think about it.
What we have in mainstream media has been absurd and, you know, we almost do need to have this.
What we have coming up is an independent media, I think, and that's almost replacing the mainstream media.
And, you know, hopefully the people will be vigilant in sharing the truth and the news with each other so that we can, you know, defend ourselves and each other against this tyranny.
Because these guys have plans for us, I'll just say.
And we don't even have plans or organization or anything really like that at this point.
And I think it's about time that people really start trying to change that.
And here's the thing, if we ever do, and there's ever more than two or three gathered in any name, they're going to send in feds to just, you know, undermine it, subvert it, radicalize it, whatever, you know, and then bust everybody in there that's not a fed.
So, you know, it reminds me of J6 or any of these other things that have gone on, Whitmer kidnapping, many things.
The PAC-CON in the 90s, same damn thing.
So, yeah, this is like history repeating itself.
And it's painful to watch, but at least more people are waking up and you're not being gaslit, everybody you talk to out in the streets these days, by the mainstream narrative and script.
So, you know, people are starting to listen and starting to understand and really starting to think about this stuff.
And the things that, you know, we've been saying all along are making a lot more sense than the official narrative at this point, given it.
You know, what we're seeing, whether it's election fraud, whether it's the COVID facts, whether it's this lawfare thing going on with Trump.
And I think that that's pretty much all it is.
You know, they're certainly trying to destroy popular sovereignty.
And I think that this is going to be a situation where the tighter they squeeze, the more that's going to slip through their fingers.
And with this Trump thing, it's going to lead into something that will make Candler look like a Girl Scout.
This large crush is gonna go crazy.
Yeah, we'll see.
Well, people are waking up, and we'll see if it's sufficient, and hence I keep saying that we need some sort of a breakthrough, which is unpredictable and unimaginable, and something to change the playing field.
And it will occur.
Something will shake down outside of our hands and get tossed into our lap, or else our opponents will take steps forward, and that'll create openings on the playing field.
But yeah, it's a crazy situation.
And part of the necessity of controlling human beings as sheeple, as a slave race, is that you have to have corporate media and public education.
And let's talk about some of those stories here.
Let's go to our hero.
Okay.
So Matt Orfalea, I do recommend his work.
He has been able to document how we're being gaslit.
And here's a good one about our liars, our prostitutes saying that the, well, I'll just play it.
President Putin actually sent a draft treaty that they wanted NATO to sign to promise no more NATO enlargement.
That was what he sent us.
Do you know what large is actually made of?
This food saved America during the Great Depression.
And that was a precondition for not invade Ukraine.
Of course, we didn't sign that.
So he went to war to prevent more NATO close to his borders.
Flashback.
This is fundamentally not about NATO expansion.
It was never about NATO enlargement.
It's not about NATO.
It's not about NATO expanding toward Russia.
This was never about NATO.
Absolutely nothing to do with NATO expansionism.
It has nothing to do with NATO.
This is not about NATO.
It's not about NATO.
It's not really about NATO.
This is not about NATO.
Seriously, it's not about NATO.
This was never about NATO.
It was never about NATO, let's be honest.
This has nothing to do with NATO.
Nothing to do with NATO at all.
Yeah, he's claiming it's like security purposes, but we can see the clear reason.
But NATO is not the reason.
This is not about NATO expansion.
This is about It's a democratic expansion.
Ukraine bans religious organizations.
We are protecting democracy right now.
Ukraine is banning political parties.
Because it's a democracy.
Ukraine restricts books and music.
It's about democracy.
Ukraine won't hold elections.
It's about democracy.
It's not about NATO expansion.
This war in Ukraine is not about NATO.
It's not about NATO.
It's not about NATO.
It has nothing to do with NATO.
Nothing to do with NATO expansion.
It's not about NATO expansion.
Nothing to do with NATO.
It isn't really about NATO.
It's not about NATO.
It's not about NATO enlargement.
In fact, it has nothing to do with NATO.
It's not about NATO encroaching.
It was not about NATO.
NATO is just a fictitious imaginary adversary for Mr. Putin and for Russia.
It was never about NATO.
That's not what it's been about.
It's been about him trying to expand his sphere of influence.
Hang on.
I mean, the two are not mutually exclusive.
Obviously, Russia has wished for a sphere of influence over Ukraine, but if the He wanted us to sign a promise never to enlarge NATO.
I think that there was a chance to avoid this war. - He wanted us to sign a promise never to enlarge NATO.
We rejected that. - The reason why Putin invaded Ukraine is because of his evil.
Evil!
It's about that Putin wants to rebuild Soviet empire of evil, like President Reagan told.
It's about Putin being sick.
I don't know how you negotiate peace with a madman, but... Nobody negotiated with Hitler.
People are comparing him to Hitler.
Hitler.
Remember Hitler?
He's a Hitler.
We're back when the Nazis invaded Poland.
This is exactly the same what Hitler was doing to Jews.
This is crazy inversion.
Putin will not stop.
Putin is reminiscent of Hitler.
Hitler.
This reminds me of Hitler.
Hitler.
Hitler.
He's the new Hitler.
Hitler.
This is about a butcher trying to kill people everywhere in the world, just not Ukraine, Syria, all over the place.
I hear you.
Senator Lindsey Graham, always great to talk to you.
Thanks so much.
Thank you.
All right, straight ahead.
Press them.
That's crazy inversion.
They're the evil ones doing the talking and they're projecting their evil onto others.
And it is.
It's just tragic, comic, cartoonish talking points.
And that's what they do.
And part of the contribution that I make as a historian is to point back in history and say, yeah, yeah, it's about all the sophistication that has ever been.
Chris, anything that you want to say about Matt's excellent video or anything else that sparks your interest?
Yeah, it's not about NATO expansion.
I heard that too.
Yeah, you just keep repeating it.
People will believe it and recite it themselves.
Yeah, yeah.
Because electrolytes, that's what plants need.
Absolutely.
No, it's almost getting there.
It's sad.
Yeah, that's idiocracy that we're quoting.
Yeah, the water cooler at work has got to be a frightening place for a lot of people that really know better and it's got to be a scary world for them.
People that are waking up and then see this and you talk to people they have no idea what you're trying to convey to them.
That's interesting.
Yeah, yeah.
And speaking of the water cooler, the anti-New York Times, take another look at them.
And Mike King closes his articles with boobus Americanas, one and two, having a chat over the water heater.
And again, let's just take a look at the New York Times and part of the crimes and the lies that you need with corporate media.
And this one, Russia may be planning to test a nuclear powered missile.
And what Mike does is just quotes the New York Times.
And So the weasel words here, satellite imagery and aviation data, suggest that Russia may be preparing to test an experimental nuclear-powered cruise missile, or may have recently tested one with a theoretical range of thousands of miles, movements are consistent with, blah blah blah, according to.
So this is the bullshit that they have, according to, it is not clear, according to, experts say, thought to be, theoretically, appears to correspond, difficult to determine, may have been, Could, if put to use, the missile could.
So this is the bullshit that we always have and it's crazy, but yet it works.
And hence, part of the ridiculousness of our situation is that we can point to these facts and yet it just goes on and on and on.
Anything that you want to say on that point or keep rolling, Chris?
Yeah, just they're pretty much using fear like they always do.
That's all.
Yeah, yeah.
Now with the New York Times, I had a run-in with them that I wanted to point to, and this is the Critical Thinking to High School Students lesson that I developed, and if you're homeschooling audience, feel free to take this one.
This is my best work.
To be able to professionally go through critical thinking and to be able to explain, document, prove the lies and crimes.
And one of the things is having participated in the 1990 World Summit for Children, the largest meeting of heads of state in world history for saving a million children's lives every month from preventable poverty, is that the, so this is at the UN and the New York Times, we couldn't Get them to cover the story they did finally at the last day of the summit.
They threw it in the education section and the education section is way underneath.
All these other sections is behind sports, health, opinion, the arts, books, movies, theater, style, dining and wine.
The largest meeting of heads of state in world's history.
They're throwing it behind weddings, celebrations, travel, cartoons, classifieds.
They throw it in there and they.
They obfuscate the title.
They never communicate that this is about saving a million children's lives every month from preventable poverty, and it's already been pre-agreed to by the heads of state.
Instead, they complain about that You know, some people are complaining about how much money this is costing to get all the heads of state into New York, and it's just going to be more money thrown at a problem.
And it causes a lot of traffic for for people in in Manhattan.
That was their coverage and.
It's just evil.
And these people are, and I framed that to the students, so do you think that's some honest mistake?
Or is that like an in-your-face insult that they're in charge of the narrative?
And nobody can come up with a justification, or none of the students could ever come up with a justification for that refusal to coverage.
And just the number of children, just since the Clinton administration, the number of children who have perished from preventable poverty in the most slow motion All right, I can go on for more corporate media propaganda.
which is more than killed in every war, every act of violence, every revolution, every murder, every suicide, every whatever in the entirety of world history, just since the Clinton administration.
So these people are ridiculous monsters.
All right.
I can go on for more corporate media propaganda.
Anything that you want to say at this point, Chris?
Yeah, Carl, I'll answer that.
You might remember that we had those military initiatives with NATO going into Serbia and into Bosnia and that Yugoslavia or that.
Most of the accusations that came out of there were war crimes or war from NATO and like there was a lot of child trafficking and kids going missing and a lot of mysterious murders and just Yeah, so like they pinned it on that Slobodan Milosevic and a couple other people there, but ultimately at the end of the day most of I think the damage that people had said and reported being done was from NATO forces.
So like it was an act of terror with these blue helmets going in and doing what they do.
And they have a long track record of this.
I think that most of these NATO forces are probably protecting this same thing, this child trafficking ring that they have going on.
They're probably like A military force that defends it or something.
I don't know.
It's amazing to see how corrupt this organization is and what this whole thing really is all about.
It's disgusting.
Yeah, it's inverted, as you said.
The UN has one area of legal responsibility to prevent wars of aggression.
And instead they're facilitating wars and child trafficking and well, I want to point out the CBS News article Headline America's poverty rate soared last year children were among the worst hit So I think what this is this is damage control for corporate media to acknowledge something that everybody is recognizing But instead they're gonna find a way to blame it.
They're blaming it on That the federal child tax credit in 2022 was changed to not give the amount of money that Biden had previously given that then there you go it's a big poverty increase and with all of the money that was given.
That has dried up and therefore we have poverty after this, so they're going to have to justify, they're going to have to virtue signal that they care about children.
But at the same time, they're not going to give you the history that the heads of state have promised to end poverty since 1969 and that they have run egged on every promise.
It's all just a virtue signaling and propaganda.
And then one of the things that these congressmen do after they have worked and they've had the they're the political arm.
So in order to run an empire, you have to control the government to get the policies that you like.
You have to control the monetary system because you got a lot of minions to pay and you got to enrich yourself.
And then you got to control the media to communicate to the people that it's all good.
But once that cycle goes through, then these congressmen They retire to spend more time with their families and then they end up getting money and this guy gets paid from Ukraine $25,000 a month as a lobbyist.
thousand dollars a month as a lobbyist.
Okay.
And we have another example of Chris sent this.
And this again is the scripted talking points of the leaders and This is an edited version, and I'll play the first couple of minutes here.
And this again is Matt Orfalea.
And the talking points for this, actually, let's see, we're going on to a different, no, no, no, this is still part here of the corporate media nonsense.
So there are, this is what I wanted to look at here.
So this is an 11 minute video and there are three talking points that he documents that the press and prostitutes and and politicians gave.
Nobody is safe until everyone's safe.
I'll just, we'll play that very first one.
And then there was other ones talking points too.
I must have that on that other document I haven't put in there.
We want to make sure that people can discern the truth from the misinformation.
And we want to make sure that everyone understands that no one's safe till everyone's safe.
No one is safe.
Nobody's safe!
No one is safe.
Nobody is safe.
This is a post 9-11 axiom, safer but not yet safe.
No one is safe.
No one is safe from COVID-19 until everyone is safe.
If the whole world isn't safe, none of us are safe.
No one is safe.
No one is safe.
Nobody is safe.
Until we're all safe.
Health experts have been saying nobody is safe.
Nobody is safe until everybody is safe.
No one is safe.
Science is clear.
None of us are safe.
There is no safety.
No one is safe.
No one is safe until everyone is safe.
No one is safe.
Nobody is safe.
Normalcy only returns when we've largely vaccinated the entire global population, so... Get the fucking vaccine!
You need to get vaccinated, and if you don't, you are going to die.
I know you're vaccinated, you're the smart ones, but you know there's people out there who aren't listening to God and what God wants.
You know who they are.
Unvaccinated people.
My message to unvaccinated Americans is this.
If you are the unvaccinated, you are the problem.
You're the f***ing problem.
Condemn them.
Shame them.
Blame them.
The only people that you can blame are the unvaccinated.
Frankly, we can't trust the unvaccinated.
They should not be part of polite society.
F*** the lunatics who won't take COVID vaccines.
And it just goes on and on and on.
And the additional talking points, I guess you saw when I did this here, is don't do your own research.
That was another talking point that is at 11 minutes.
And that the vaccination stops transmission.
And that this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated.
And to ban the unvaccinated, as they began to hint at here, remove them from polite society.
Screw your freedoms.
And these are all going to be the focus group winning propaganda Yeah, these guys were the ones that we're talking about safe and effective for a long, long time, and the vaccine, vaccine, vaccine, and now it's mostly COVID and, you know, illnesses are people that have had the vaccine.
Sadly, most of the people that are having serious medical issues and fast-moving cancers And it's a war crime.
It really is.
And it's not just them, you know, saying this, but the way they tried to turn everybody in a position of fear against their own family members that were warning them about not to do these things and making them sound like they were insane, crazy, or just, you know what I mean?
It was pretty bad.
Those of us that have had that happen and have, you know, actually had people that kind of push you aside and take the damn thing because all these people are scaring the shit out of them.
Now suffering health issues.
You know, it's hard, man.
I mean, everyone I talk to has a loved one or many loved ones or even people I know that have taken it themselves.
Unbelievable that this thing has gone on like this and they've deceived this many people and now they have the position that this was a voluntary thing, a mandate was optional, until they try to push it again and then it's mandate is mandatory.
You know, these guys are fucking assholes and what they're doing is truly satanic and for that lady to bring God into this and say that that's what God wants you to do, I hope she has her own special place in the future.
Yeah, yeah.
You know what I mean?
Like, our own spot in hell, man.
That's bullshit.
Yeah, I think that, uh, you do earn your place wherever that is.
Okay, a few battle reports.
So, Matt Getz, so McCarthy has been removed as the House Speaker.
Now, whether this is just going to be political theater or not, we shall see.
One of the openings, and this is JSNP, is that what if, and Trump has been invited for the Speaker of the House, and if Then in this Brunson case, or if Kamala becomes, if Biden goes and Kamala goes, then Trump would be president again.
So there's all kinds of interesting speculation of that.
And Trump has been nominated for Speaker of the House.
And I don't know what any of this means, but we're paying attention to it.
So anything that you want to say on this business of McCarthy and Trump, perhaps, being nominated as the Speaker of the House, Chris?
I'll keep moving on.
So Chris is commuting home, and he's got his infant when he arrives home that he needs to give attention to, and that might be what's going on.
So more of the battlefronts.
So J6, that there is a document, the 1776 returns, that has now been admitted that this was a government produced document that was then testified in court as being evidence for a insurrection.
So, but the FBI wrote the document, delivered it to this guy, Enrique Tarrio, and then when that document was confiscated, That was one of the exhibits that they presented in the court case as proof that this was an insurrection.
And this was all supplied, and it was just that this guy happened to have the document on him that he was given, planted for him by the FBI.
And the more that we see about this type of progress, the more likely it is that the public will withdraw consent and demand arrest of the leaders as January 6 was the false flag to cover up the 2020 election fraud.
All right, Chris, anything on that?
Nope.
Okay, we'll keep going here.
Lawsuit filed against Remdesivir and again they claim this was safe and effective when actually the part of the Orwellian opposites is that this was like 80% of the people who were given
This protocol, and they were being paid the federal government paid hospitals to use this treatment that ended up killing 80% of the people who had that type of treatment given to them.
So, crimes against humanity is one way of framing it.
And another way of framing it, of course, is murder.
All right, Chris, anything that you want to say about any of the news items that we've covered before we go to final thoughts?
Yes.
Medical mass murder, no doubt.
This remdesivir thing and the ventilator combo, they know that's a death sentence.
And they actually incentivized it in a pretty protest manner.
And this whole thing should be proven by now.
And the fact that it hasn't even gone to any sort of justice or any sort of a major public outcry, Beyond the confines of social media, I'll say.
It is an outrage, and I think that this is no accident.
I think they're going to try to push this further because they got away with it last time.
These people need to have, you know, some sort of a capital punishment as they go on so that they don't try to shoot anyone.
They got away with it once, and that's it.
Okay, thank you.
All right, we'll go on to final thoughts and mine is that...
From all appearances, every agency has been captured and that the enemy is in charge of everything.
And at the same time, paradoxically, we are in the strongest position because people are discovering that every agency has been captured only through the ridiculous exposure of our enemy being shown as being very poor liars, and that all of this is just scripts and propaganda.
May, quit licking this desk.
And yet, we're here discussing it for another day, and there seems that we don't have any opportunity just with our own resources, and yet the battlefield is changing all the time with the people who are noticing this, who are looking up and seeing for themselves.
I didn't include it this time, maybe I'll put it in for Friday, is that some of the testimony of people, natives of Hawaii, people who live there, residents who are Seeing the truth and getting quite vocal and quite strong and quite sharp in their talking points, but we do need some sort of a breakthrough and once that breakthrough comes, then I have always.
Concluded that the Emperor's New Clothes is the best analogy to what we have.
We have naked empire parading in front of us, and we have enough people speaking and pointing to the truth so that everybody is aware of these alternative factual claims.
They reject them.
And just as in the story of the Emperor's New Clothes, is that the adults could hear the children talking and pointing and giggling.
They heard that.
And they told the children to shut up and not to embarrass them.
And they believed the propaganda.
But then something happened.
In an instant, the story goes, in an instant, the adults were looking with their own eyes.
And the conversations began.
And I think that's what we're going to experience.
At that point, I hope we have friends in high places, because then it could get dicey.
It could get into a civil war.
If we have friends in high places and the White Hat military in control, which I conclude that we do, it could be a little bit easier.
But we shall see.
If we don't get some sort of a breakthrough, then we're going to have to step up.
And for me, as I've been talking about and thinking just to myself, Is that by the 2024 election, if we don't have this shit straightened out by then, if we don't have an accurate election, then I'm going to have to engage as well.
I don't know if it'll do any good.
And at that point, I'm going to have to, uh, we'll see what the battlefield looks like as we go on.
And this breakthrough could happen anytime.
Some people were thinking that it was going to happen.
Something might happen today with that EBS alert.
All right, Chris, final thoughts, brother.
Yeah, I was at that point in 2016, Carl, where I was like, all right, something's got to give.
But yeah, I hear you.
I'd like to think that I've been trying to do as much as I can to try to get my mind out there to other people and start thinking about maybe how we're going to deal with this and what it is maybe that we're actually dealing with.
I think that it's a lot for people to wrap their mind around, I know.
I guess once you finally realize what we're up against, you know, it's going to take all hands on deck.
And I don't think it's going to be one thing that's going to be handed over.
These guys are going to return everything that has been taken or everything that's been used against us.
Think about all these weapons that they're using on us right now.
They're all things that they funded after World War II.
And Paperclip has been like a Rothschild, using all the militaries to develop these type of weapons.
To basically gather them for their own use and for the use against the common citizen.
And more importantly, the people that have funded this stuff, that have probably, you know, died to defend the nations, you know, are completely discarded.
They're absolutely taking our military for granted.
They're absolutely taking our law enforcement, you know, officers for granted.
They're doing some pretty terrible things to a lot of people right now, and they're really playing, you know, demographics against each other, NGOs, and many other nasty things.
So, there's a lot at play right now.
I think we're actually seeing the Phoenix program coming home to America domestically, and actually the assassination parts, too, going on.
I think there's a lot of people that are getting taken out on the left that were involved with a lot of systemic corruption or maybe with some other things.
I don't know, just speculation at this point, but I think there's a lot going on behind the scenes that maybe we don't really know about.
And, you know, I don't know, just pay attention and do the right thing and hopefully we'll Hopefully this will pay off for everybody, I guess.
It's going to take all hands on deck, but like I say, everybody's going to have to put aside the political partisan thing.
And really just think about right and wrong and work from there.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
No, 46 years in the Great Awakening.
I have concluded that I haven't been assassinated.
And among my colleagues, there have been some of my colleagues have been attacked with energy weapons.
They've been targeted individuals, but nothing here.
So I guess my observation is that I've been allowed to talk and The colleagues that I know have been allowed to talk, and we shall see how things evolve.
Thank you for your expertise as a retired math teacher.
One of the things that I look to is to quantify items of interest.
And really, Chris, you have spent well over the Kind of the number that is given the magnitude number of 10,000 hours dedicated to something makes you a relative expert.
And I know that you have committed at least 10,000 hours to the research to be able to figure out what the real history is.
After you've demonstrated that you've been lied to, then we do scramble.
We do try to put things together and we are able to point to compelling documentation.
Again, that is sufficient to withdraw consent and demand arrest.
They've been doing this for a long time to humanity and playing the wheel of time against us.
I think it's about time that we turn the tables on them and stop what they're doing.
This is pretty bad, what they've been doing for a long time.
It has to end with our generation.
Hopefully so.
Alright audience, thanks for doing your part for your intellectual integrity and moral courage for the truth.
▲
Export Selection