All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 23, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
54:19
Need to Know News (22 September 2023) with Carl Herman & Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Carl Herman, Mission Viejo, California.
Brian Davidson, Houston, Texas.
This is all the news that you need to know on Friday, September 22nd, 2023.
22nd, 2023.
First up, actually, I'll give you the overview of the topics and the stories.
So we got COVID narratives being recognized as crimes against humanity, or at least that's the frame that I'm putting it into.
The remembrance of the 2020 election.
How many cases?
92 cases were challenging the 2020 election.
Election, we'll go over those results.
The status of the deep state New York governor admitting illegal migration defeat and a few stories with that.
State of the Nation of Hawaii, Governor Gangrene and the evil doers getting lit up.
And finally, some several battle reports.
Here we go, first up.
So we have 46 pages of FOIA emails between the CDC leaders, Dr. Fauci, Dr. Collins, White House, NIH, and HHS, and they knew about myocarditis.
And these are 80% redacted.
So that means that they're hiding information.
Remember, The government is supposed to work for us.
And outside of any narrow national security interest, we need to see everything.
And there is no articulable reason to exclude the American public from that information.
And here's one from Celia Farber.
And they knew.
They knew.
Here's another good article about it.
And this was in May 2021.
And that meant that they colluded to lie to the American People.
And then we have, uh, taking a look at 17 nations in the Southern Hemisphere.
They're estimating 17 million deaths following the COVID injections.
And that was about one death per 800 doses.
And that data is here, very well represented.
17 million.
So that's going to be almost at the level of World War I.
Or total death.
Then we find out the South Carolina professor finds 200 billion pieces of DNA contaminating a single dose of Pfizer's COVID product.
Now what that means, and I like the quotes that the article put in here, is that basically that's going to mess up your DNA or has the potential to adjust your DNA.
And that's a big deal.
And then we have an unprecedented move.
So the woke sports of the United States, we have referee Ken Maurer, and I've seen this guy in a lot of games.
And he rejected the shot, the vax, and he got fired.
And now the league is attempting to freeze his pension.
So that means that Maurer is just going to have to sue him like everybody else, and this is lawfare, and the woke, deep pockets are going to try to intimidate people to not pursue them in court.
We have more masquerades, and this is a compilation Of studies and the understanding of the studies that there is no demonstration that the masks are effective and plenty of demonstrations of research that they are not effective.
So, in gearing up for the possibility of covert 2.0, which I think they're gonna have to do in some respect.
I don't think that they're going to win this one.
And then here is the CDC's own data.
And what this graph is showing you is it's comparing the provisional COVID-19 deaths.
So initially when they say, okay, this is a COVID-19 death, that is the huge report of deaths that we got in the big alleged spike that people say, oh, it was a pandemic because so many people, all right, they didn't die of COVID-19.
They died with a positive test and the actual percentage of deaths due to COVID which has been consistent over the years.
We're looking here.
This is the weekly percentage deaths.
It's about 3%.
So that's flu-like symptoms.
And finally, if you need a one-stop shopping article to be able to back your claims to the facts regarding COVID and why you've withdrawn consent and why you're not going to participate in COVID 2.0 and why you're demanding arrest of the leaders, this is one possible resource for you.
All right, Brian, what do you want to say about COVID, brother?
Well, the very fact that these FOIA requests are redacted to the point that 80% of the actual content is in them shows, without a doubt, that there's something that they want to hide from the public.
The only reason to put these redactions in place would be to protect particular individuals from information that's related to a sensitive nature.
And for the government to take the liberty of choosing to redact everything, it looks very similar to the redactions that I see on documents whenever false flags take place, where they do everything that they possibly can to redact and hide the very fact of the nature of the matter from the American public.
The redactions obviously went into place so that nobody could write a well-written article naming names and pointing fingers related to what the White House knew about these particular health issues and what they didn't know about these particular health issues.
Now, what I have to say about that is that this is no longer a government that works for the American people.
It's no longer a government that respects Journalism independent journalism or strong journalism in any sense.
They know that they have control of the mainstream media sources.
They know they have control of the general newspapers and the general.
Television telecasts, but they do not have control of the actual individuals that take the time to sit down and choose to write an article, and this is a big problem for them.
One of the biggest problems for them is the fact that the internet and independent journalists have gotten so far in terms of exposing what a hoax this really is, and for them to take the time to redact all of these emails that showed who knew what, where, when, why, and how, Just goes to show a guilty conscience about what it is that they're trying to protect.
Again, it's not a government that works for us.
They're obviously hiding something related to COVID.
We've known this for a long, long time.
And the one question that nobody has answered yet is why we're all stuck in a nature of speculation.
But why make sure all these people have these ridiculous jabs?
Why make sure people have to wear these masks and shut up like a bunch of slaves?
Why drive this pandemic concept?
You know, when the economy was doing rather well under Trump, it's not like they had to inject this pandemic into it to to fix the broken economy at the time.
But it's my opinion that They drive these propaganda machines in order to steer policy related to their friends, related to people that pay them money, and related to people that they can help get rich in certain circumstances because they can trust them to share in the riches with them.
So the whole thing stinks of nepotism.
Internal double dealing and, you know, just absolute corruption in terms of specific people or specific groups or specific entities getting rich over the particular issue.
I'm sick that they would do this to the American people.
I'm sick that they'd do this to the entire world.
And I'm even sicker that they would take the time to redact all of these documents to make sure that they can cover up for their crimes.
Yeah, it seems every move is just making it look worse and worse for our opponents, putting on my retired AP U.S.
government hat.
So, in explaining why you have a judicial system, a judicial system is to settle a legal argument.
Now, sometimes it's an interpretation of the law, but mostly it is just an argument of, we have contrasting Answers to questions of what happened in a particular circumstance.
Now, in this case, the litigants, the plaintiffs, are going to be alleging that, oh, well, see, this evidence, like I put in my essay, demonstrates that the government knew that this was not a safe product.
It wasn't tested to be safe.
It violated the protocols for all of the laws.
You just lay them out.
And then you go to this point of the evidence, and the government is claiming that this redacted content of 80% in emails discussing myocarditis is somehow a national security risk.
And then a judge would be able to, if in a fair court of law, where the name of the game Is to present the facts on a table of evidence for public consideration, the judge would have to ask the government to explain the purpose of the redaction.
And I can't imagine.
Any answer that would sound cogent, given the weight of the evidence, and when you bring a case to trial, and I talk about this a lot, the legal term of prima facie applies, and that means on its face.
If you have a prima facie case, unless that is refuted, then that is considered to be legally sufficient for a verdict.
We already have enough evidence, but given that background of evidence, the government would have to respond for some legitimate purpose to redact that content.
And I don't think they would be able to make that argument.
I would like to see them try.
In a fair court of law, but then that goes to the point of how come our opponents will never debate us.
They will never debate RFK on faxes.
They won't debate MIT and former chief economist of the IMF, Simon Johnson.
In the banking system, they just won't because they can't all they have are lobbyists and money and their purchased corporate media.
So, with whatever I don't.
I don't know if you follow judicial watch very much, but they're really some of the leaders in terms of exposing freedom of information act requests and.
The general policy with these guys is every time they ask for something, the government kicks and drags their feet, hoping that Judicial Watch will take them to court and actually argue it out.
Now, most people that put out FOIA requests don't have the wherewithal to schedule and get in front of the courts and make their arguments and hire lawyers to get it all open.
So, just expect that this government That is our government that is supposed to be working for us, which obviously it's not, is going to do everything that possibly can to make it as hard as possible for somebody to get to the truth about what the government knows or doesn't know.
Yep, and as little as it is, just the conclusion of being able to point to three areas of facts and to be able to explain and document.
This is why I've withdrawn consent from this government.
And there's not much more that we can do with that.
The resources of our opponents are tremendous.
And speaking of resources, let's go to the 2020 presidential election related lawsuits.
And this is a great list that Brian shared with us.
So what we got here is we have 92 cases.
And in these cases, 30 were decided on the merits and the GOP plaintiff or Trump prevailed in 22 out of 30 of those cases.
And that means that 62 of those were rejected.
And part of this, as part of the lawfare, is that if you own the judicial branch, then you can reject cases for whatever bullshit reason that you want to try.
Related This is the Washington Post.
So they're making an article having Americans be afraid of secession and another civil war, and this is just corporate media spin, but I want to point out that given the.
You're supposed to be able to use the judicial system to be able to have a fair court of play, to be able to have a public consideration of evidence.
And if the courts reject cases based upon specious bullshit reasons, rejecting a case when it is this important?
Leaders take cases.
They want to be able to have something to say when there is controversy.
But the alternative would be for people to consider other things to do.
And secession is one of the things that our opponents are going to make us afraid of all those outcomes.
They're going to paint it all as irrational election deniers and domestic violent extremist Wannabes, they're going to make people ask for the government to suppress such talk because it makes them afraid.
Brian, your thoughts on this 2020 general topic?
Well, let's just take a look at some of the headlines.
Here's two of them out of Georgia.
I've got more all over the place, but thousands of people vote, fraudulently use illegal addresses.
And this is known by social workers.
That's a lawsuit out of Georgia.
4,700 of Georgia's absentee votes were tied to non-residential addresses.
4,700 people didn't use a residential address.
Here's out of Pennsylvania, 170,830 vote discrepancy between ballots cast and voter records.
That's Pennsylvania, again, the home of Fetterman.
Here in Michigan, you have 174,384 ballots that were counted by their vote counting machines that don't link back to anybody's official voter registration number.
In Pennsylvania, 15,000.
15,000 ballots were legally marked returned between November 7th and November 16.
We have 65,000 ballots were marked as returned after November 3rd.
Despite Kathy Brockvar reporting 10,000, that was out of Pennsylvania.
Another one out of Pennsylvania, 112,516 ballots given new return dates.
And finally, out of Pennsylvania, 151,000 mail-in ballot records were changed on November 23rd.
Out of Michigan, here's another lawsuit.
200,000 more ballots counted than ballots returned in a single county.
Georgia, 143,835 votes in Georgia were in violation of the state law.
That was according to the post-millennial lawsuit.
Nevada, 42,248 voters voted twice.
Nevada, again, 8,000 ballots cast with addresses that are physically non-existent.
Nevada, 1,500 voters were listed as deceased by the Social Security Administration.
Nevada, 6,000 voters had postal service flags or vacant addresses.
Wisconsin, 3,000 fraudulent addresses used in Georgia and Pennsylvania.
Wisconsin, 1,093% more infidelity confined granted than 2016.
I'm not sure exactly what that means.
Nationwide, there's three more of them.
Then you've got other ones, Illinois, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Colorado.
Nationwide, Texas, Michigan, I'm going down this list that's at herestheevidence.com and that doesn't even count right there.
You've got literally millions of votes that have been argued in court as illegal.
Then you go to the next area.
Here's the evidence.
You'll find polling place irregularities.
Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, Nevada, Georgia, Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Georgia, Pennsylvania, just down the line.
Literally hundreds of them.
Voting machine irregularities.
Let's see, that's number 167 through 196.
167 through 196.
So you've got 30 voting machine irregularity lawsuits.
And then the general irregularities, you got another 15 or 16 of them, Arizona, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Arizona, New York, Michigan, Wisconsin, nationwide.
And then you've got unverified new submissions, thousands of those that have taken place, like literally 500, 600, 700, 800.
These are all different suits that have been identified.
700, 800.
These are all different suits that have been identified.
Yeah, 1200, 1300, 1500.
It just keeps going and going and going and going and going.
So go to here'stheevidence.com to figure out where are your problem areas and where are your problem states.
And you know what?
Once you start adding up all these anomalies, you'll see that there are particular places that they've bought and rigged the election so bad that that's casting the large majority of a large group of electoral votes, which is why the election was so screwed up.
People want documentaries for that 2000 mules and selection code make enough of the case and in classrooms.
I had videos just YouTube videos from professors.
Princeton and Stanford were the 2 leading universities to be able to demonstrate these machines and they would explain.
All right.
that the purpose of this machine is to steal an election.
It is making it very difficult to verify any election is honest with these machines.
It's black box voting is really the best conclusion.
All right.
Next.
This is the deep state governor of New York, and she is admitting defeat in that just having open migration does not work.
I'll play this in just a minute, and we'll hear the comparison between December 2021 and just a few days ago.
As you know, the Statue of Liberty is inscribed.
It says, Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled young masses yearning to be free, the wretched refuse to a teeming shore.
And that statement It encapsulates our values.
We want people to come here, despite where they came from or despite the circumstances that drove them to this country and to this state.
We say you are welcome here.
You're welcome with open arms and we'll work to keep you safe.
We'll not only house you, but we'll protect you.
So our message to the world is, send us your people.
Send us those who need the cloak of comfort that we can demonstrate as New Yorkers with big hearts.
We have to let the word out that when you come to New York, we're not going to have more hotel rooms.
We don't have capacity.
So we have to also message properly that we're at our limit.
If you're going to leave your country, go somewhere else.
But the smarter thing is to apply for asylum before you leave your country.
So that's funny just making the admission that there is actually a limit and part of the scheme with that is, Brian shared this, is that NBC is reporting that the people who are on the inside are making bank and that might be a conflict of interest with the government for having these people and how to get these people to support This policy.
And then we have more.
Chicago, 29.3 million contract to build winterized base camps for migrants.
And I wonder how much of that is going to be graft and corruption.
And then we have propaganda Pierre.
And I'll play this.
This is 37 seconds of what she had to say regarding the flood of illegal immigrants.
close to 8 million.
What do you call it here at the White House when 10,000 people illegally cross the border in a single day?
So what do you call it, Peter, when GOP puts forth a... Wait, no.
No, no, no, no, no, no.
No, you can't... I'm answering... Okay, we're gonna move on.
No, no, no, no.
No, no, no.
We're moving on.
In the back.
No, no.
I tried to answer... Peter, I tried to answer the question.
You stopped me.
Let's go.
Answer my question!
The question, jerk!
So, Propaganda Pierre's title as a job is Press Secretary.
She's supposed to serve the press, and the press are supposed to serve us, and you get this Orwellian standing where she just has grinning with duping delight, and what she's going to do is she's just going to message.
Now, that's happened for a long time out of press secretaries, and now I think that The Americans hopefully have a fair chance to be able to see that's what they've always done and that they've always been just pumping out these narratives and then creating these false flags and these talking points to be able to push agendas forward that have nothing to do with a representation of the American public.
It is a representation of the oligarchs behind the puppetitions to be able to drive this dictatorial culling agenda forth.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, I don't think Corrine Jean-Pierre, however you pronounce it, is doing duping delight.
I think what she's doing is she's doing everything she can to mask the fact that she's so thoroughly unhappy that she throws on a fake-ass smile or something.
Remember, the difference between a real smile and a fake smile is one that uses the eyes.
A real smile, you'll see that the eyes perk up.
With her, it's always pulling back on the side of the mouth.
That's a whole lot different than duping delight.
Duping delight happens when people are trying to Believe that when they're they believe that their lies are convincing people that they're telling the truth.
Corrine Jean-Pierre is just putting on what is considered a fake smile because she's so uncomfortable with Peter Doocy and she's been that way for a long, long time.
It's always been adversarial because her job as a propaganda puppet clown And that's exactly what Raggedy Ann looks like, is a propaganda puppet.
Her job is to get up there and push the party line and sell it like a dirty little Bugs Bunny type salesman, no matter what the truth really is.
And Doocy's always pressing her buttons, as are a number of other ones, but we see a lot of Doocy And her back and forth and she said, I tried to answer your question, but she didn't.
She just asked the question, trying to turn it around on the GOP as if it's as if the border problem is a problem with the Republican Party.
Now, I'm actually going to agree with her.
The border problem is a problem with the Republican Party.
And if anybody bothered tuning into Marjorie Taylor Greene, who broadcast on Twitter earlier from home, Can you keep them down and broadcast on Twitter from home earlier?
She's talking about how she just left because there was nothing she could do.
She really did a tell all about what's been happening in Congress.
And she's mentioning that the border problem is just as much a Republican problem as it is a Democrat problem now.
My point in going over and putting in the articles about the money related to the migrant camps, the money related to housing these people.
Okay, remember that there's an age-old conspiracy out there that goes back to the 90s.
It used to be that prisons were run by Public institutions.
Our government ran the prisons.
And then there was laws passed where they allowed it to be privatized.
Well, so all these investors get together and they privatize and finance all of these institutions.
And now they've got to make sure that they're all filled up.
So they push draconian legislation related to drugs and other issues that literally they're running housing camps for profit.
Well, what do you think's happening at the border?
There's somebody, and I can tell you a lot of who they are down here in Texas, that are profiting big, big, big time off of Government contracts related to servicing all of these unhoused illegals and moving them and transporting them around and putting them from here to there.
There is an absolute fortune being made in the business of the border from government contracts that are just housing and feeding and putting these people around.
There's no legal, there's no justice system separate from the real justice system, which is Which is obviously corrupted.
There's no special provisions in place.
This is just about being able for these government contractors to say, we house X amount of workers or X amount of migrants, X amount of these, and therefore we deserve reimbursements of Y, Z, and, you know, all these other amounts.
And that's why I covered Chicago's homelessness or Chicago's My migrant homeless camp.
That's why I covered all the money that's being made at hundreds and hundreds of dollars an hour related to taking care of all these migrants.
It's all about money.
That's that's what the entire machine is.
Drain it until it's dry until it crashes.
Those people will get rich and I hope their souls end up paying the penalty.
Yeah, great data points.
Alright, next.
Let's go back to the state of Hawaii.
And this, I just want to share documentation.
We have discussed this nearly daily about the ability to be able to point to the facts in such a way that the official story of a fire, especially climate change fire, is refuted.
And that basically the name of the game is to be able to show the strongest evidence, which is going to be physical.
That the physical damage means that that is not a fire.
Common Sense Show, this guy is great.
I don't remember his name, I just came across this guy.
But I like him.
And he lays out and documents the lies, and especially for Governor Green, Saying it's climate change and changing a story.
Ah, it's climate change.
Oh no, it was the electric company.
And then all of the, they turned off the water.
They turned off the water.
They put people in circles to stay in the kill zone.
And here's expert testimony, and I've shared this one again of being able to take a look at the physical evidence and this guy was one of two retired fire captain captains who went to Northern California.
And when this was just about 50 miles north of where I lived, and they go over the data that again, that this is not.
This is not possible by any fire that they have ever worked with.
The temperatures got far too hot.
And regarding Hawaii, that this is a slam dunk case, and the people of Hawaii know this, that their country was violated and taken from them, a crystal clear contract, a treaty to recognize the state of Hawaii, and this was dull, and the U.S.
Marines Just took the land, and it was financially driven, and it was admitted to by President Cleveland.
They didn't do anything about it.
The next President McKinley just annexed them, and then a hundred years later, you got Clinton admitting and signing off that, oh yeah, we took your land, but not giving the proper remedy, which would be for the Hawaiian people to be able to freely consider and to freely choose if they would want to have their independence, and that would be a Good conversation for the Hawaiian people to have.
All right, Brian, Hawaii.
Well, I like Sherry Zaslowski, who wrote this Firebombing of Maui Part 1, and I appreciate that, uh, her perspective.
She basically says that it's, it's similar to The fire bombing of Dresden during World War 2, and of course she questions whether the fire in La Hena was an act of war caused by the people controlling directed energy weapons.
She points out several anomalies and coincidences surrounding the fire, such as the fact that only certain areas were affected and Oprah's estate remained untouched.
She promises to keep going with the articles and continue with that.
And now Dave Hodges, he's been around for a long time.
He runs his show on a YouTube channel.
He has a lot of advertisements and he was he started really getting a lot of traction back around the time that Trump was running the first time around with what he called the common sense show.
But he he went real down a lot of rabbit holes too far too fast and then just became difficult to follow after he started running.
I think it was running close to 25 or 30% of his content was all commercials, which reminds me, you know, we don't do any commercials.
We're not doing any of this for money, but this is how Dave Hodges has to make his living.
So he's going to but he basically does what we do.
He takes certain articles.
He digests them and he regurgitates them along with a little piece of his opinion as to what the articles actually mean.
And he's covered a lot of very important events for a long time.
I appreciate that he's out there doing it.
I just, I just can't, can't deal with the advertisements that are so loaded into his shows all the time.
But yeah, I believe, I believe that the Hawaii was a massacre designed, massacre and a land grab based on all the anomalies I've seen.
And there's been thousands that have been mentioned, documented and exposed on all the different alternative media channels out there.
But this will get swept under the rug, just like the train crash in Ohio.
Just like every other major event, they're just going to cover it up with something else and try to grab your attention with some other BS sooner or later and hope it all just dies out.
But I want you to remember, In my opinion, this one was a whole lot worse than any Las Vegas fake shooting or anything else.
In my opinion, a lot of good people got caught up in a real nightmare of a death, and I wish there was going to be some justice, but I doubt that you're ever going to see it because there is no justice on this side of life.
We have to wait for the next side of life to get justice.
That has definitely been the history.
And hence, I keep saying that we need some kind of a breakthrough, and a breakthrough in a technical sense is going to be something unimaginable, unanticipated, and because just our being able to talk about the facts has not been enough.
All right, I got several stories here to be able to kind of give you a state of the battlefield, and part of the battlefield is the propaganda.
Joe Olson shared Parody Whitney, and I'll just play a little bit of this.
I hope I don't get a commercial first.
I know because I've tried all these online shirt brands.
Let me save you some time and money.
Thank you.
If you want more, there you go.
I like what she does.
Yeah, Parody Whitney's been real cute.
I've watched her on YouTube for a long time.
Well, I don't know how long she's been out there.
She's got about 45,000 subscribers and I've seen a lot of her stuff.
She maybe puts out a video every week.
It's all conservative nature.
It all is a lot of parody making fun of Current events and putting it to remixes of old songs.
She's really fun to watch.
She's a lovely lady, a great singer, and I love her conservative attitude and I hope she's a happy girl.
Yep, yep.
As you know, I grew up in Southern California and I do appreciate the arts.
And it has a tremendous contribution.
There is something about good art that will just have you be in a different space.
And technically, you can talk about it with the side of the brain, the hemisphere of the brain responding and making connections with with art.
All right.
So DHS Secretary Mayorkas, so he's going to They're always going to pretend that they're the experts and not the propagandists.
But they're coming up with a group of people who were exactly the same people who put out that letter before the 2020 election to be able to say that Hunter's laptop was Russian disinformation.
So they just recycle the same people.
Merrick Garland said that he didn't know, that he had no idea if there were FBI informants in the crowd.
And if so, how many?
And he had been asked this question for a while, and he's just pretending that it isn't of his interest or capacity to get that information if the FBI was involved with the false flag of January the 6th.
So just playing stupid.
I like this one.
Yeah, this article is... let's watch that one there.
That one came out by the Conservative Treehouse, and basically he's establishing the Homeland Intelligence Experts Group.
Mayorkas ought to have been strung up by now, but this is ridiculous.
Anyway, the Homeland Intelligence Expert Group by the Department of Homeland Security It will be comprised of private sector experts who will provide their unique perspectives on the federal government's intelligence enterprise to the Office of the Counterterrorism Coordinator.
But the article, of course, from the conservative treehouse takes note of some very important facts.
Number one, most of the members of the group were primary background operatives who pushed the Trump-Russia collusion conspiracy and 2016 17 2018 and 2019 and of course, then the article just goes ahead and does the analysis and raises the obvious concern about the potential for the group to define what constitutes dangerous information.
Given that DHS will be launching a new online enhanced artificial intelligence system to assist the government in combating information they deem dangerous to national security.
So now they're going to unleash the robots and the propaganda agents on the American people all as part of an official public safety type plan.
Boy, what a what an absolute waste of taxpayer money.
What an absolute waste of our government that they would establish these departments, staff them with these people.
You're talking James Clapper, John Brennan, Paul Coby, Benjamin Witts.
I mean, the names go on and on and on.
You got John Bellinger, John Brennan, Thomas Galati.
Just name after name after name of lefty nut jobs that were a part of the establishment narrative that goes against...
And then these guys are going to put together a special artificial intelligence program that's going to assist the government in combating people like you and I. It's it's just it's just sick.
It's just sick.
And of course, none of the Republicans in Congress are going to do anything about it.
Except for Marjorie Taylor Greene, Matt Gaetz, James Comer and Grassley and Some of the others, but they don't have enough votes to overcome the rhinos.
The rhinos got to go to me.
They're the worst threat against America that there that there has ever been.
And I want to point out to our audience that it is as bad as Brian is talking about.
We have apparently every agency captured, corporate media is captured, public education is captured, higher education is captured, and that there is seems to be no action for the American people, but every action seems to be to repress and to shift the power.
And again, we've talked about the economics at 1% on more assets than the 99%, but that isn't going to be enough for them.
They want us.
Cold and into a permanent slave race and it seems that the power of our ability to to work with the facts and for our audience members in your attempts to work with the facts and I don't know how it's been for our audience members I know how it's been for me that I'm the only one in my family and Pretty much it's that 2%, so 1 out of 50, seem to be able to hang with conversations like this and 49 out of 50 are sheepalized and are unable.
Therefore, it might be that all we're able to do is to be powerless messengers with no power to affect policy, only the power of the truth of our message for the point of choosing a side.
Maybe that's all we're able to do is to help people for themselves choose a side into three basic positions.
One is the good.
That's us, of course.
You can discern good from evil.
You have some capacity to recognize objective data from propaganda, from political spin.
There's the bad.
The bad, those are the people who are choosing to manipulate.
They're choosing to be with the parasites.
And they can be earning their living with the parasites, they can know that they're bad, and maybe they say, I don't like this, but they accept the money and that's who they're working for, what you work for, that's what you're going to earn, pal.
And the third category are the sheeple, is that they are either unwilling and or unable to discern good from evil.
And hence again, I think that we need a breakthrough for anything to to fall our way.
All right.
And Brian, that's exactly that's perfect.
Any of these that you want to jump in on, just jump on in.
Garland playing stupid.
And one of the one of the key lines that we're always told is, oh, mistakes were made.
But not to assign any responsibility or culpability, as a matter of fact, the insiders who facilitate these false flags, they get promoted.
Now, I like the 6 million here and how he frames it.
People 33 trillion in debt that lose state-of-the-art warplanes, arm their enemies, talking about Afghanistan, and refuse to guard the border want you to know you're not responsible enough Don't.
Rifle.
And as always, to just flip the scripts.
Oh, this is just something that I'm looking at.
Tartaria.
Just to flip the script.
Let's see.
This is the one that I wanted.
All right.
Brian shared this story.
I didn't know there was a transgender cheerleader.
Justine Linsday?
State of North Carolina is banning trans women from competing in sports.
Good for them.
And, uh, is that?
That's it.
That's it, man.
Wow.
That's it.
Huh?
That's it, man.
That is unbelievable.
The guy definitely looks like he has a background in dance.
I mean, in Southern California, I do know a lot of waiters and waitresses.
I mean, actors and actresses, and a lot of them do do dancing, and he looks like a dancer.
All right, well.
And then this, from Julie Kelly.
So, Jack Smith is attempting to, our opponents, they want just to have their dictatorship.
And dictatorship, dictate, is just whatever is said for as long as it's said, for whatever it's said.
And in the cases against Trump, is just to have Trump not be able to comment, to shut him up, to take away any freedom of speech, so that there's only one side of the story going out, and that's the side from corporate media.
And this is part of lawfare And then finally, is that, you know, I've seen this, this guy pretending to be female, speaking for Ukraine, and I forget what threat he issued, something that everybody has to sign up and join the military or else, I forget what it was.
But that's one of the guys that our government used to infiltrate the Proud Boys as a progressive activist.
As a religious fellow myself, I am absolutely sickened by the corruption of the identity of mankind.
I find man and woman to be one of the most beautiful balancing acts that nature has ever displayed.
I find man and woman to be so clearly different in terms of our roles in society and the family and in the nature of how things are supposed to be.
And I know that all of the ancient religions, the old rituals, the old abuse functions, even many of the old Solomonic rituals and biblical Rituals included sort of the man woman concept and if you look at the old Hindu gods you'll find a lot of them that are old as above so below.
You'll find a lot of symbolism related to sort of the yin and the yang and this blended balancing act but nature very clearly shows that there are two opposite not opposite but two forces that work together to make a family.
And it is not to men, and it is not to women, and it is not men pretending to be women.
Those are designed, in my opinion, to insult the Creator's great design, that they're functions of a darker doctrine that chooses to compete with the God of this world.
And I am just absolutely sickened by these clowns that think that they're helping to move society forward in a stronger way.
Again, conservative is to conserve the traditions of our fathers and our forefathers, and progressive is to throw all that crap out and try something new, whether it works or whether it doesn't.
Well, I'll tell you something.
Trans doesn't work, and homosexuality doesn't work.
Um, they don't work to create families.
They don't work to create children.
They don't work to create proper basis for cultural.
Survivability, and that's one of the reasons why I think they're being pushed, but I'm sick about it.
But I learned a long time ago not to take it personally that these people exist, but instead to try to have some breed of compassion.
But my breed of compassion is I will not turn on a Carolina Panthers game under any circumstances ever.
Yeah, we'll go on to our final thoughts here.
So human beings have been tortured, poisoned, Mind-controlled.
And that has played into a confusion on many, many areas.
And their sexual identity and their sexual expression is certainly going to be part of it.
They are confused and they are chemically poisoned.
And the idea of the balance and that the mirroring There are real things to work with, and that our opponents want to make it be as confusing as possible, and then for us to surrender to whatever it is that they dictate.
This has been, whatever has happened on Earth, whatever was unleashed on human beings, Is in my view, as a public school teacher, seeing human beings, human children for 38 years, I think that they could really be great if they were given a free environment to be able to explore and experiment.
All human beings have tremendous potential and all human beings recognize that we have experienced and expressed greatness from time to time.
All right.
Well, in a free environment, then we could identify what is it that makes being human an enjoyable experience and pursue and research and practice.
But in our environment, we've been totally owned, totally captured.
They have all the agencies and there are just a few of us.
Let's just say it's 2% who are able to see that we're being tortured and poisoned and mind controlled.
And, uh.
There seems to be nothing that we can do about it and not taking it personally is something that is important, but.
It does, and we've talked about this before, and for our audience members, it does raise the question, who is in charge here?
Who are you really?
And what is this about?
And if, for me, I align myself with the, whatever created this place, and there's a certain surrender with that.
Now, my experience is that there is at least a choice and a pathway for virtue and goodness.
Now, I think that this place, Earth, is meant to be an environment for good to be able to thrive and to flourish.
It cannot in this environment.
Maybe as a limited individual, you can have some chance, but it is in a poisoned environment.
And if our opponents win, there is no place to hide from the capture of everything that they will do.
And as a historian, it is my professional working conclusion that humanity has been reset a few times, at least three, and they're going for another one.
And if they're able to do that, to cull everybody with COVID, then they'll just go ahead and write another narrative and go on to the next part of their slavery game.
Now, all that said, that might sound pretty depressing.
And from what we've seen, oh, it is.
And it's even worse.
We could talk about even darker topics about how bad it is.
But I think that the reason that we're here is to be able to provide choice, and that our Creator has somehow set it up so that there will be some breakthrough through the good.
Now, it might be... it won't happen in this lifetime, in this existence.
And I was talking about on, I guess, on Wednesday.
That personally now, I'm looking at if this shit isn't resolved by the 2024 election, if we don't have justice by then, then I will engage in some other campaign and invite people with me and I would be happy to volunteer for some potential martyr mission.
Because I would take it up with the Creator at that point, I am no longer willing to participate in this type of environment where the truth is not enough.
Brian, your final thoughts?
Well, just an update.
I mean, if you guys haven't been paying attention to what Marjorie Taylor Greene's been doing to squeeze McCarthy on this defense appropriations bill, McCarthy is pretending to back down to Marjorie Taylor Greene.
She said that voting for the Ukraine war for more spending needed to be separated out from other spending bills that she would absolutely vote no, no matter what, unless it was separated out.
She said, everybody's welcome to go do that.
Now, remember, I've been reporting that we've spent nearly $90 billion in Ukraine.
Well, that number is now up to $113 billion that we've directed toward Ukraine.
And the White House has requested an additional $24 billion.
So McCarthy comes out and says, I'm going to meet you in the middle, Marjorie, since you're making such a fuss about all this money.
And he says, let's just go ahead and strip out 300 million.
Will that make you happy?
So they, I am so tired of the Republicans.
I'm so tired of what's happening in DC.
It's difficult to even fathom the depth of rottenness that's taking place.
And I really do want to see a government shutdown.
I want to see the whole thing shut down.
I'd like to see somebody take a sledgehammer to it, frankly.
All of it.
Wages.
All of them.
And I mean, postal workers.
I mean, Feds.
FBI.
I mean, all these government agencies.
I'd love to see every single one of y'all bastards unemployed.
That's how I feel about you.
You're a part of the government.
You're a part of the problem.
And I'm looking forward to the comments that come along my way inside the section.
But I gotta tell you, if you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem.
And if you're sucking off my taxes for your own living, shame on you.
Go learn to make your own living.
Yep, yep.
And just because it came to me now.
So we seem to be facing, about the comments here at Bitu, two types of quote-unquote attack against our new show.
One is the low production value, which, of course, I agree with.
I can't even get my microphone to work.
At least I got one.
And so people are pretending that the low production value somehow means that they should go to another news show.
So they're encouraging that the purpose of the propaganda in the comments is to discourage and disperse patriots trying to arm themselves with information.
And the other line, All right, Patriots, hang in there!
My dog is at the back door asking to go out, so this will be a good time to end.
▲
Export Selection