All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 22, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
58:25
Truth vs. NEW$ Inc. Part 2 (August 2023) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett, and Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is the second hour of Truth Vs. News on 21 August, 2023.
August 2023.
Scott, your comments. - Well, again, I think we're witnessing a major transformation of the United States, both politically, socially, religiously, On one side, you have the demoniac worshiping of the climate state, homosexual, LGBT, new wokeism, transgenderism, the whole transformation of the human body through vaccines, through technology.
And then you have those of us who are old fashioned, rooted in tradition, rooted in the heritage of our fathers and forefathers.
And, you know, the quote comes to mind, that old Roman poetic quote, how can a man die better than facing fearful odds for the ashes of his fathers and the temples of his gods?
We are standing for the traditions and the great heritage of the United States of America and its premier position on the face of the planet is the nation that best embodied, you know, the truth and order and justice and.
And we're I think you're seeing an awakening happening because people are not going to surrender that to to the forces that are trying to break up the United States.
So I think with their as their darkness increases, our light so increases as well.
Jim.
Brian.
1 of the things that makes us unique among the conservative commentators that are out there on the Internet is that we have a particular affinity towards studying and understanding false flag events.
And I want you to mark my words.
These towns where these false flag events take place will be the 1st of the 15 minute cities.
They had to make a lot of promises to be able to get into places like that and convince all those people to go along with the game.
And those promises were richness and protection beyond your wildest dreams.
I believe that the false flag events that we see and that we study are really just simply covers for passing spending bills that are going to build a larger, more profitable security apparatus.
There was an old conspiracy theory related to a 90s event that had a bunch of musicians that got together, black musicians, black artists, and they were approached by some Globalist cartel types.
And they said, hey, y'all, we're going to give you the stocks to buy.
We're going to give you money to do it with.
We're going to give you everything you want if you'll just make the content of the black music and the black culture dark and lawless.
And when it was uncovered, they discovered that the guys that were driving that change in music were the guys that owned and managed the new private prison architectures that were beginning to develop all over the nation.
So basically they were trying to fill up prison cells because they got paid X amount of money per prisoners.
And of course, today we have one of the largest incarcerated populations in the United States.
I believe that the false flag events where you have the A prototypical young man who's disturbed or young woman who's disturbed with the military gear and the military apparatus going in and shooting up innocent kids is to drive spending for a security apparatus that will create a separation between them and us.
At a later point in time, all they do.
That's why you see bomb threats like Orlando.
The guy had a backpack bomb or Charlotte or Nashville.
The lady had bombs go off in her house.
That's why you always see the manifestos so that these lobbyists can go rolling on through Congress and say, look, we need money because of crazies like this.
Look, we need money for that.
Look, we need money for that.
It's everybody thinks it's about gun rights.
No, they're going to let us have the guns.
Because we're going to need to be able to defend ourselves.
I don't think they're going to be able to get our guns with the Second Amendment.
And I think it's just going to be too dangerous for their security apparatus to even try.
But what they need to do is separate themselves from us, especially if we've got guns.
And I think that's what what's going on in Hawaii is going to be.
This is going to be a walled off city of important people that have done favors for these global cartels with their super secure environment that nobody can approach even with a drone.
Yeah, that's what I think they're building.
I think you're right, Brian.
I think you're right on the money, and I'll add this, too.
The awakening you see in people not tolerating violence, criminality, or any of these abuses, you can see that, for example, in the video of the Sikh 7-Eleven shop, where the Sikh guy and his son grab a black shoplifter who was just arrogantly putting all sorts of stuff in his cart.
Those Sikhs grabbed him when he tried to leave, threw him on the ground, and the father or uncle beat him with a rod.
Well, I think both of your comments were sensational.
Just spot on.
uh smashing blows that is going to be happening all over the country people are not going to tolerate any of this and if the cops think that they come in and can arrest a shop owner for doing that those cops won't be living long on this planet i presume and predict jim well i think both your comments were sensational just spot on fascinating
meanwhile weaponizing government to prosecute the american people at first the america first movement and protect corrupt elite in It's now being shown the federal government may be weaponized against the America First Movement.
Massive three-letter government agency attack anyone who disagrees with the radical leftist worldview and will censor, silence, or suppress those that support America First policy.
But it doesn't stop there.
In a calculated one-two punch, the federal government has also been exposed covering up for hiding crimes committed by those they agree with politically.
In fact, government insiders have been shown often to violate internal agency protocols, ignore dissent from within, and break the law to prevent simple questions from being asked or important information from coming to light.
Government should protect the rights granted by the U.S.
Constitution to all Americans and not target dissenters for political, financial, or social destruction, nor should it choose to shield a select few from consequences because of a shared leftist worldview.
This is dangerous and un-American.
It must stop now.
Federal government insiders have been caught using their powerful means, methods, and tools to attack average Americans who hold an opinion differing from theirs.
Average Americans are being targeted by a weaponized federal government.
Three-letter agency goes after groups and individuals based on their political or ideological views.
Individuals within the FBI, the DOJ, and other agencies have been exposed for targeting people with whom they disagree.
Pro-life supporters, conservative charities, anyone with deeply held religious beliefs, parents who question what's being taught their children in school, people who question government vaccine mandates, Americans concerned about child sex trafficking, This poses a dangerous direct threat to our Constitution and our American democracy.
They weaponize the government against our political opponents.
A man in Chicago arrested for praying outside an abortion clinic in Virginia.
Arrested during a school board meeting for protesting the radical transgender policies that led to the rape of his daughter.
The Department of Justice labeled parents domestic terrorists because they didn't want their kids exposed to sexually explicit material in school.
The FBI sought to label traditional Christians and Catholics as potential terrorists and dangerous to our country.
A federal judge ordered the government to stop colluding with Big Tech to violate First Amendment right to free speech.
You are censored, silent, shadow ban or cancel.
If you push actual scientific data that counters junk science on transgender issues, don't ask questions about the efficacy of the vaccine or believe information on the Hunter Biden laptop was real.
Bad actors within the federal government are still targeting a former president who just so happens to be the chief political rival of Biden.
While radical leftists within the federal government attack so many with whom they disagree, they also protect the elites who share their political views.
Hillary Clinton stored classified data on her home server, deleted 33 emails, and destroyed evidence.
She was not charged.
Joe Biden, as Senator and Vice President, stored classified information at multiple locations for many years.
He has not been charged.
Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, George Bush left the White House with classified documents.
They were not charged.
But Donald Trump, who had classified documents at a secure private location with Secret Service protection, he was charged.
Federal prosecutors indicted the former president in a matter of months, but three-letter agencies have known about serious credible criminal allegations involving the state president for years and have done nothing.
Trump was impeached for a call to a Ukraine official about possible corruption involving then-Vice President Joe Biden at the exact same time.
The FBI had whistleblower accounts of a bribery scheme involving a Ukrainian energy company and Joe Biden.
But nothing happened.
Federal investigators have known about the Biden family foreign business dealing for more than seven years.
Almost a decade ago, the Obama admin received warnings about Hunter's business dealings while Joe was vice president.
FBI reports show a $5 million payment to be spread around multiple LLCs in the Biden family.
The Congressional House Oversight has uncovered millions in wire transactions between multiple LLCs and up to nine different Biden family members.
Selective prosecution versus elective protection locally.
Far-left DAs have a warped, radical agenda designed to protect criminals instead of victims.
A New York DA downgraded 52% of felony cases to misdemeanors.
A registered nurse violently hit by a deranged patient.
New York D.A.
gave the attacker a slap on the wrist misdemeanor charge, even though state law says attacks on health care workers are felonies.
A man accused of raping his teenage relative secured a sweetheart plea deal from the Manhattan D.A.
then went on to allegedly sexually terrorize people in the Bronx a month later.
A New York D.A.
got a break for two women caught on video attacking an NYPD cops when he let one of them go and downgraded the charge for the other.
A store owner in New York was being robbed and physically attacked.
He took out a knife to protect himself and stabbed the robber.
But the leftist D.A.
charged the store owner with a crime.
These criminals are often repeat offenders, but they're protected by radical leftist EAs and rarely punished.
Too often, victims of crimes are behind victims of the law.
Nationally.
The New York Post reported the FBI knew Hunter's laptop was real in 2019, but refused to acknowledge it in 2020.
In fact, documents show the FBI colluded with the media to characterize the laptop as Russian disinformation.
Now, SilverCyclopedia reports info from the laptop, witnesses, bank records, and other sources prove millions were being transferred from businesses in China, Ukraine, Russia, and other countries to at least 15 shell companies, and then to at least nine Biden family members, including payments to one of his seven grandchildren.
The Ways and Means Committee stated investigators tipped off Hunter's legal team prior to a search warrant's execution.
The House Oversight Committee reports multiple whistleblowers say prosecutors were denied the ability to charge Hunter with crimes in two locations.
According to the New York Post, Hunter was not charged with crimes related to his unregistered foreign business dealings, but prosecutors did charge a whistleblower about combines for his foreign business dealings just days after the whistleblower made public claims about Biden family alleged illegal activity.
Newsweek reports there could be audio recordings of Vice President Biden and his son Hunter talking directly to Ukrainian officials about payments.
Real Clear Politics show Hunter's attorney said prosecutors never looked at the laptop during their investigation.
This is more than just a protection of the chosen elite and the indictment of a person, people, or group.
It is the latest move by the radical left against the America First movement.
This is about more than a former president.
It's about the American people.
A Louisiana judge just ruled the federal government trampled the First Amendment when it colluded with big tech to censor signs and shadow ban anyone who dared think for themselves.
If you post something on social media, the government didn't like.
They told big tech to take it down.
That's a clear violation of the First Amendment.
People are being put in jail simply for peacefully protesting abortion clinics or staying up for their kids at school board meetings.
This is not about obstructing justice.
It's about equal justice.
Hillary deleted 33,000 emails, which were official government records.
She said she had no mobile devices, but she did and used software and hammers to destroy them and other electronics.
Joe repeatedly said all his mishandled classified docs were turned over, yet more were found in various locations.
No one is above the law, but no one is below it either.
Left is eager to go after those who support the America First policies.
It's taken more than five years to investigate the Biden family, but it still has resulted in no charges, no indictments.
If it weren't for the real investigation by the House Oversight Committee, even this story would have remained buried.
to combat the increased weaponization of government.
The America First Policy Institute is pursuing a comprehensive strategy seeking to hold those in power accountable, outlying key justice and national security policy reforms, and preparing for an America First administration to rectify the two-tiered system that plagues our nation. and preparing for an America First administration to rectify the This America First approach will provide the solution needed to restore justice and the rule of law to America.
Scott, please, your thoughts.
Well, there is a rising up and an independent spirit.
There's a pre-1776 revolutionary spirit, not in a form of anything other than the restoration of our rights and the restoration of our integrity and the overthrowing of tyranny and slavery.
And indeed, the Declaration of Independence says when the government becomes tyrannical and destructive of the people's rights, it is the duty and the right of the people to overthrow such government and reconstitute one that seems fitting unto them.
And that we're at that juncture, I think, is obvious.
And all of the weaponization of government, the weaponization, the laughable, hysterical hypocrisy and arrogance of Merrick Garland appointing Weiss, that Jewish New York attorney that put the sweetheart plea deal for him, and now Merrick Garland is making him the special counsel that's allegedly supposed to look for criminal acts, is laughable.
It's disgusting.
But every act of overt malice And abuse of our system and of our people just totally eliminates any authority or respect people have for people like Merrick Garland or the FBI or the Department of Justice.
So I think federalism and the Federal Republic is completely imploding and the people are distancing and disassociating.
And I think you're going to see a renaissance of states, state power, state rights, local rights, local control.
And you're going to have a restoration of a lot of our constitutional freedoms and liberties and assumptions that have been slowly eroded.
I think people are going to, in many ways, violently reclaim them against anything or anyone or any agent or any police force or any government supervisor that is trying to take them away from us.
And I think it's also going to start with the school boards.
I could see a lot of public hangings Oh, I think you're right, Scott.
of the local school boards and such who are overtly exercising and abusing children with this transgenderism hysteria.
Brian?
So I think all of this is, you know, the shift of the sea is coming upon us fast.
Jim?
Oh, I think you're right, Scott.
Brian?
Every Democrat and Republican think tank is asking one question right now, and they're trying to get the answer.
And the question is, how do we get Trump supporters to turn against Trump?
And they have a problem because none of them can come up with any scenario because what they're saying is that Trump supporters are so tunnel visioned Right now, that we're so upset, that we're so thrilled in, that we'd support Trump even if he walked down 5th Avenue and he shot somebody dead.
Okay?
The Daily Beast came out with an article the other day that said, Trump voters don't believe in polls or the media, only Trump, that we're hopelessly devoted to one idea.
And the question is, why?
Trump stands for good business.
We like good business.
We're tired of bad business.
We're tired of being taxed for driving down the street.
We're tired of being taxed for this and taxed for that.
And we don't have enough money to continue to do things.
Let me tell you, inflation's real.
Inflation's very real.
I had an electric bill this month that was $700 for a house where I was up at the lake the entire time.
I mean, $700.
Inflation is very, very real.
I got three tickets last month representing $950 that needs to be paid to a government entity.
And it wasn't just me.
It was my wife, too.
But when I go to the grocery store, that $300 or $200 doesn't go nearly as far as it used to go.
$200 doesn't go nearly as far as it used to go.
When I go to the gas pump, $65, $75, $85, depending on which vehicle I happen to be driving.
When I pay my registrations, when I pay my dump tax, when I pay everything, and it's out of control.
I feel like I'm just being strangled to death by a government that just doesn't care, and everybody says it's not my fault, it's not my fault, it's not my fault.
Well, you know whose fault it is?
545 people.
They are after, these Republicans and Democrats are after any line of attack that they can go to get people to break from Trump, and it's not working because Trump represents something to us.
He represents justice, and he likes the people.
He likes going out.
I mean, at a Trump rally, I watch him.
The people love him.
He likes them.
Show me, does Joe Biden like people?
No.
Oh my God, that guy is just angry, just an angry old man that just doesn't care anymore.
Man, I want a politician that likes us, that wants us to be successful, that wants us to be prosperous, that wants to put America backwards, fix all the bad deals and get all the good ones, stop with the warmongering, stop with the security apparatus, stop with the mask bullshit.
I want a politician who believes in America.
And I don't see another one besides for Donald Trump.
It certainly ain't Chris Christie.
And it certainly ain't DeSantis.
I mean, look at what DeSantis said about Trump voters the other day.
He said, I forget exactly what he said, but he said that we were like floating around in the ether, like mindlessly supporting Trump like a bunch of zombie drones.
This nation is going to come to a crisis.
And if they try to take Trump off the ticket, which is what these Harvard scholars and all these guys are talking about right now, he's going to have a conviction on his record.
He can't run for president.
If they try to do that, you will see all hell break loose.
And I don't think I'll be the only guy in town that owns the ultimate sniper advanced training manual for military and police snipers.
Amen.
Yeah, I think you guys are nailing it.
Meanwhile, Belief in Conspiracies.
This was reported by Chapman University in 2016.
The government is concealing what they know about the 9-11 attacks.
At that time, 53 percent.
54.
The JFK assassination, around 50.
Alien encounters, 43.
Global warming, 42.
Plans for a one-world government, 33.
Obama's birth certificate, 30.
Origin of AIDS, 30.
Death of Supreme Court Antonin Scalia, 28.
The moon landing, 24.
All those are legitimate concerns, I guarantee, and for those I've investigated, it's staggering.
What matters is not the specifics of who done it, but the situation with regard to conspiracy theories is not at all as popular belief would have it.
Not only are they not unfalsifiable, but the application of scientific reasoning has produced significant results which have led to the identification of probable perps.
Philosophy, through teaching logic, critical thinking, and scientific reasoning has much to contribute to the public good.
There's nothing wrong with the conspiracy theories that warrants their neglect by philosophers.
On the contrary.
Because most students have a keen interest in knowing the truth about JFK 9-11 and some other politically significant but controversial events.
There's a wealth of material to work with if faculty, philosophers especially, would come down from their ivory tower and engage with real-world events.
A striking illustration of the difference it makes for public affairs may be found in the attacks on Marjorie Taylor Greene, whom the Democrats, as a majority party, removed from her committee assignments because she was raising too many issues they did not want to address about Sandy Hook, Parkland, Las Vegas, California wildfires, and more.
Having done research on all of these, I can boast an assessment where it turned out on every one of the issues about which she was being attacked, Marjorie Taylor Greene was either clearly in the right or supported by the weight of the evidence.
Most of her assertions, of course, qualified in the mind of her critics as conspiracy theories.
But if they paused to consider the evidence with regard to each of them, they would have been impressed Provided only they had an open mind, and there's the rub.
As James Files, who may or may not have been behind the picket fence on the grassy knoll, informed me, when the government commits a lie, it's stuck with it.
Which, of course, resonates with the failure of the government to change its position about the 19 Islamic hijackers on 9-11, or Lee Oswald as the lone demented gunman on 22 November 1963, which means, in turn, the government is not operating on the basis of principles of science or of rationality, where the discovery of new evidence
Or alternative hypotheses may require that we reject hypotheses we previously accepted, accept hypotheses we previously rejected, and leave others in suspense.
The government operates as an authoritarian source of politically infallible knowledge, where to admit mistakes would weaken its grip on the body politic that it governs.
End.
Reflecting upon the treatment of Marjorie Taylor Greene, it struck me like a silver bullet.
Conspiracy theorists are investigating crimes.
No wonder they want to silence us.
The government was involved in the assassination of JFK.
The government was involved in 9-11.
The government was involved in Sandy Hook Parkland in Las Vegas, too.
Think of the genius of it all.
The perps themselves are in the position of dictating to the public who is credible and who is not when it comes to investigating crimes in which the government itself is complicit.
It turns out, therefore, the answer to the question we asked, what's wrong with conspiracy theories, could not be more obvious once they are properly understood.
We should all be conspiracy theorists.
They can only benefit from throwing out true conspiracy theories from false.
Top time fears in America in 2022?
It's spooky time.
Christian Gavin compiled the list from the work of Wilkinson College Undergraduate Research, A Study of American Fears.
Here they are, the top ten fears of 2022.
Corrupt government officials, 62%.
People I love becoming seriously ill, 60%.
Russia using nuclear weapons, 60%.
People I love dying, 58%.
U.S.
becoming involved in another war, 56.
Pollution of drinking water, 55.
Not having enough money, 54.
Financial economic collapse, 54.
Pollution of oceans, rivers, and lakes, 53.
Biological warfare, 52.
The top 10 found in the 2022 survey suggest American fears center on five main topics.
Corrupt government officials, number one.
Harm to a loved one, 2 and 4.
War, 3, 5 and 10.
Environmental concerns, 6 and 9.
And economic, 7 and 8.
Harm to loved ones, nuclear attack, environmental concerns, economic concerns.
They're all there in spades.
Ryan, your thoughts?
You know, the funny thing is about people that just sort of indulge in the mainstream media is that sooner or later, they're going to see something that doesn't add up and they're going to have some curiosity about it.
And they're going to go try to.
OK, so we see a fake space video or we see a moon landing video or we see another false flag where a crisis actor comes on the television telling an outrageous story.
That's exactly how it worked for me.
That's exactly what happened.
I was rolling along thinking the Drudge Report was telling me the truth, and thinking that Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity were telling me the truth about life, and that I could rely on Megyn Kelly and Tucker Carlson to tell me the truth about things.
Even today, Tucker says that he wasn't telling us the truth back then.
Bill O'Reilly, I'll never have respect for him.
Again, he's just so intellectually dishonest.
It's shocking to me.
Sean Hannity's words are just like drivel.
They just sort of pour out like somebody reading an old dictionary because nothing Sean Hannity says has any effect on anything anywhere at all anymore.
Now Fox News is turning all of their energy to try to support Vivek Ramaswamy, who I like as a potential candidate, as a potential future politician.
Fox News has gone all full-on pivoting away from Trump and And there's nothing that can stop the Trump train right now.
But what I'm talking about are the people that, like my dad, OK?
I called up my dad.
My dad and I have a good relationship.
And I said, hey, pay attention to this shooting in Las Vegas.
It's fake.
He calls me back two or three days later and he says, I can't believe it.
I can't I can't believe it.
I would have never believed it.
But I've got all my neighbors sitting in my house and I'm telling them that it's fake and we're all watching the TV trying to figure out because it looks like Brian's right.
I mean, they all said I was a crazy conspiracy nut theorist, but they're watching the news coverage develop.
They're not getting their answers.
Nothing makes any sense.
How did he get the guns into the hotel?
The sounds don't sound right.
None of the deaths seem, everything is all wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong.
People are beginning to wake up.
Now, if my dad can bring every one of his neighbors in his expensive condo in Arizona into the house to see it and help him make a decision, now all of his neighbors are conspiracy theorists, too.
And now all of them look at the television like, I think you're feeding me some BS here, and it doesn't seem to make a lot of sense.
So when we see these ridiculous indictments of Donald J. Trump versus I mean, just look at the difference between Hunter Biden coverage and Donald J. Trump on the television.
It'll tell you everything you need to know.
The news is poisoning your mind.
The government is poisoning our justice system.
Our leaders are poisoning our prosperity.
We're being poisoned at every turn, everywhere, all the time.
And people, once they begin to realize it, break loose and start doing the one big thing that they can do to prepare for a different future, and that's learn to be more self-reliable.
Plant a garden, maybe.
Take care of their loved ones, and try to convince other people to wake up, too.
This is a new time and a new age, and I imagine that about 150, 160 million Americans have begun to wake up, just like I did when I saw the Orlando Pulse nightclub shooting on television, and I said, that is a bunch of bullshit.
I'm getting to the bottom of this.
Excellent, Brian.
Just excellent.
Meanwhile... Okay.
Can I make a comment?
Well, sure, Don.
We can't see you, but go right ahead.
I've heard an awful lot of good stuff today.
I mean, I'm glad I'm not on the air because I would be detracting from all the important stuff that's going on today.
This has been a fantastic show.
And are we conspiracy terrorists or are we conspiracy truth seekers?
I think we're truth seekers and we're going after the facts.
And there's no conspiracy when we get to the truth.
It's facts.
And it's standing strong.
You name a conspiracy, and I think you'll see that it's not a conspiracy fabrication.
It's factual.
And I think we're on the right side of truth.
And hopefully I'll get me back next week.
This is outstanding.
Brian and Scott and you, Jim, have put together one heck of a program that needs to be served everywhere.
And I think it's got a real impact.
Way done, you got it right.
We're conspiracy realists.
That's it.
Meanwhile, the New York Times, the anti-New York Times, has tackled the New York Times saying how Trump benefits from an indictment of that.
Trump indicted the reporting in 2020 election interference case in Georgia, offering a vivid reminder of the extraordinary lengths Mr. Trump and his allies went to in the Southern state to reverse the election.
This is the New York Times!
Within an hour of the dramatic announcement in Georgia, criminal indictment number 4 had already trumped feigning the type of martyr's outrage sure to boost his bully numbers and his donations yet again.
Even Salzburger Slimes is openly conceding the reality of the blowback phenomenon now, as we've been saying since the 2017 days of the Mueller investigation.
Every single one of these raids, investigations, civil suits, criminal indictments have been part of a modified Br'er Rabbit operation.
Br'er Rabbit, as fellow boomers will recall from childhood, was a cunning little character who frantically bled with his nemesis Br'er Fox to kill him in any way he saw fit, except for being thrown into the briar patch.
That is, Br'er Rabbit, beg whatever you do, don't throw me into the briar patch.
Assuming that must be the worst fate of all, Br'er Fox flung his hated captive into the briar patch, which is actually what the clever rodent wanted him to do.
After escaping, Br'er Rabbit then taunted Br'er Fox.
I was born and raised in the Briar Patch, Br'er Fox, as he hopped away.
The reason we say that's what we're witnessing is a modified Br'er Rabbit is because, in this case, Br'er Trump is actually in cahoots with Br'er Fox.
The whole affair is one part professional wrestling match, one part drama, suspense movie with many scenes and many actors.
Prosecutor Fox is a white hat.
The show is all for the normies.
Surely, you guys can all see this by now, right?
Here's Brer Trump facing four indictments and nearly 100 felony counts, and he's absolutely loving it.
Donald J. Trump tweets.
I understand, through illegal leaks of the fake news media, that phony Fannie Willis, DA of Fulton County, Georgia, wants desperately to indict me on the ridiculous kind of tampering with the 2020 presidential election.
No, I didn't tamper with the election.
Those who rigged and stole it were the ones doing the tampering.
They are the slime who should be prosecuted.
I made a perfect phone call in protest.
Why was this case brought two and a half years ago?
Election interference.
Rereading the Q Blueprint, composed of about 5,000 posts, which our faithful full-time reporter here has over the course of three plus years, assiduously studied one by one, is a lot like watching Godfather 1 and 2 again, again and again, which I have also done.
This is Mike King writing, of course.
With each repetition, new twists and subtleties reveal themselves.
This is especially true with Q as current events unfold each day.
As Q stated 51 separate times, future improves past, and indeed it has many times.
Here's post 4621 from August 17, 2020.
One of those riddles which has vexed us Otis for a long time.
It was about indictments.
Clearly presented as one of those future will prove past forecasts.
However, it had yet to be cracked over the course of the past three years.
Hat tip to Truth Social poster Kimberly for filling in some blanks on this one.
Below is the original Q Post left and side by side, Kimberly's edition, items two through six in red.
With the most recent indictments in Georgia, the number of criminal indictments, including what is known as a superseding indictment on July 27, perfectly completes a mysterious list set forth by Q almost exactly three years ago.
Nice work, Kimberly.
Not only are all the pieces now in place for Trump's defense to expose all manner and all magnitude of voter fraud, and God only knows what else, but the media buzz is strongly suggesting these spectacles will indeed be televised beginning sometime in January 2024.
The timing, very close to football's annual Super Bowl, may be the answer to yet another future-proof past riddle that has proven vaccine.
This potential decode is my own.
Cue 2843 from February 20, 2019, and mention again in cue 4484 from June 20 of 2020.
Fear.
The fun begins directly after U.S.
4484 from June 20th of 2020.
Fear.
The fun begins directly after U.S. court SDNY, Southern District of New York, will make the Super Bowl look like a poppy show.
And indeed, the anticipated wall-to-wall flood the zone TV trials just might do that.
Stay tuned.
Will the next Super Bowl look like a public show in comparison to the storm coming in the form of rare criminal trials?
Notice how both Q posts mention U.S.
courts, Southern District of New York.
That's where all this started with the Stormy Daniels allegations.
Stormy.
Get it?
Meanwhile, White Hat Award nominees.
Best Actress, Stormy Daniels.
Best Actor, Michael Avenatti.
Best Supporting Actor, Neroi Cohen.
Righteous Jew of the Year Award, Michael Cohen.
Best Director, Donald Trump.
Who does Americanist want?
I read the New York Times today that all of these indictments are pushing Trump poll numbers and donations upward.
Boobus Americanus, too.
I have a feeling this is all going to backfire on the Democrats.
St.
Sugar.
Not just demon rats, Boobus, but the whole stinking ruling class.
Editor.
I predict that Boobus and even the Black Pill cult will all see it by then.
Brian, your thoughts?
I want to believe in Q. I do.
I want to believe that there's some group of military people that actually have power, that actually have knowledge, that actually can help us in this struggle against these 545 people that run our government.
I want to believe it.
that run our government.
I want to believe it.
But I can't believe something just because I want to believe it.
I have to believe it when I see evidence that it's real.
Now, the Q posts are very interesting, and there's lots of compelling connections that are made in them, many of which I find to be strong.
But at this point in time, I also have to believe that our government is truly a government Composed of the Senate and the White House and the House of Representatives and the Supreme Court balancing themselves out and that the true power in America is truly in what happens on Capitol Hill.
I don't believe that our military would allow, and I don't believe that those 545 people, if they had control, would allow a group of rebels to coexist within its ranks.
I just simply don't believe it.
They would find them, they would flush them out, and they would get rid of them.
And if they haven't, I don't know why, I don't know how.
But I certainly want to believe it.
The problem is, I don't feel like I've been presented with compelling evidence that it actually exists.
And maybe that's the way they want it.
Because if they want it that way, hey, look, if everybody says they don't exist, then obviously the enemy is going to say, hey, they must not exist.
But.
I'd like to believe that there's some sort of savior that's coming down the path.
I just think that it's not I can't sit around and wait for that to happen.
I've got to do what I got to do here now and today.
Yeah, the problem I have with the Q story, Brian, similar to yours, is all the damage that's being done to the nation in the meanwhile.
If Trump had the goods at the time, he should have revealed it at the time and not allowed Biden to become entrenched.
Because a flood across the border, the crimes taking place, continuation of the Vax, all the other Bad, bad stuff that's been going on here is something we would not have, should not have had to suffer if it could have been preempted and it ought to have been done then.
Meanwhile, CNN analyst says Trump surrendering a hellhole of a jail could make co-defendants think about making a deal.
CNN analyst John Dean said former President Trump will surrender for rest next week at a hellhole jail, which could make some co-defendants think about making a deal.
Bolton County District Attorney Frannie Willis announced a new indictment at a press conference Monday on 13 counts related to election crimes.
Trump and the 18 co-defendants named have been given until August 25th to surrender for rest and arraignment.
Trump is expected to surrender Thursday.
On Friday night's edition of CNN Tonight, anchor Jim Acosta noted the surrender doesn't figure to be like the others.
Fulton County Sheriff Pat Laboda promised if Trump were arrested, he would be forced to pose for a mugshot, which would be made available to the press.
Dean said that while conditions at the Fulton County Jail might not affect Trump's decision-making, the same may not be true of his larger complices.
A gossip.
And we've seen Trump motorcade in and out of his previous court appearance.
John, I mean, do you think this surrender could hit Trump a little differently than the ones that came before?
And that is, I mean, somebody is kind of a master of the spectacle.
I don't think this is a spectacle he really wants to be seen or be part of.
Dean, no.
The jail is going to surrender as a hellhole.
It's been, it's received a lot of negative national attention.
I think any of the defendants in this newly charged case, who got a whiff of that place, may think twice about whether they want to stand trial or try to work out a deal.
I don't think Trump will do that.
He's always the double down guy.
But, you know, I hope they do treat him like any other person.
Don't give him special treatment.
But he does have a Secret Service detail to protect him.
So that'll take some exception.
Acosta.
Yeah, it's gonna be a wild scene.
Mark and Van, I mean Mark.
Let me go to you.
If 18 people get mugshots and Trump does not, if he somehow manages to not get a mugshot next week—although, I mean, from what the sheriff's indicating, it sounds like this isn't going to happen—but if he doesn't, how is that going to play?
Mark McKinnon, former advisor to W and John McCain, executive producer of The Circus, Well, I think if the other 18 are, then he's likely to.
What you're seeing from this judge increasingly is she doesn't intend to treat him any differently than the rest of the defendants.
The thing that's unprecedented and fascinating about next week On the one hand, we're going to have a national Republican debate where Trump is not on the stage, yet the following day he'll be in a federal courthouse where we may see a mugshot.
So we may see a mugshot of Donald Trump, but we won't see his face on the national stage in the debate, which is an interestingly diametrically opposed visual we're not used to seeing with Donald Trump.
Meanwhile, Democrats want this election truth censored and buried.
Even though a Georgia grand jury arrested former President Trump for trying to change the results of the 2020 election, Democrats have been refusing to accept the results of the elections they lost for decades.
Breitbart said there are more than 150 examples of Democrats denying election results.
These include President Biden, Hillary Clinton, Representative Barbara Lee, Maxine Waters, and Sheila Jackson Lee, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jaffres, and failed gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams.
According to the Republican National Committee, every Democrat president since 1977 has questioned the validity of the U.S.
elections.
Biden said Al Gore won in 2000 in both 2013 and 2016.
In May 2019, Biden said he absolutely agrees Donald Trump is an illegitimate president.
Biden questioned the validity of the midterm elections in 2022.
In 2006, Howard Dean, then the head of the DNC, said he wasn't sure the election in Ohio in 2004 was fair.
Representative Nancy Pelosi said a debate about the 2004 election is appropriate and that there are legitimate concerns about the integrity of U.S.
elections.
In the 2004, then-Representative Bernie Sanders said he was worried some electronic voting machine didn't have a paper record, which made him question their safety.
The 2016 was also questioned by Democrats.
Seven in the House tried to stop the electoral votes for the 2016 election.
After Trump won, 67 Democrats didn't go to his inauguration.
Some of them said Trump's win wasn't real.
Hillary stated in September 2017 she would not rule out calling into question the integrity of the 2016 election.
In October of 2020, she said the 2016 election was not valid, saying, we still do not really know what happened.
Also, Democrat-backed Stacey Abrams, when she said the race was stolen.
Hillary said Stacey would have won if the election were fair, and that Stacey should now be governor, but was deprived of votes.
Are we talking about pots calling kettles black?
Brian, your thoughts?
Oh yeah.
We have one set of laws in this country and they apply to everyone.
Oh, except for you, Hillary.
Except for you, Hunter.
Except for you, Joe.
37 counts for Donald Trump.
It's ridiculous.
And this indictment has nothing to do with the way Trump responded to the fact that the Georgia elections were rigged to high heaven.
It has everything to do with just simply trying to figure out a way to dodge their comeuppance.
And if Donald Trump gets the job, he has been promising, both on Truth Social and in his rallies and his speeches, that he's going to take down the deep state.
Now, whether he's actually capable of it or not, I don't know, but you know what?
I support him in his efforts.
I'll do anything I can to help, including spending $36 to buy the Donald Trump coffee mug mug shop.
I cannot wait to buy the $36 Donald Trump mugshot coffee mug.
And I think that there's probably about 150 million Americans that would like to have one on their desk at work to show their support.
I think it's going to be one of the greatest things if they give him a mugshot, if they take a mugshot.
I don't think the Secret Service will let it happen.
Maybe Donald Trump will make it happen.
But then again, why should Donald Trump be treated any different than all the other criminals that are inside this terrible jail?
Why should he be treated any different?
I hope he goes through the same process that they go through, and I hope he gets to show the American people that he's just like one of them.
Been arrested.
I love it, Brian.
The Donald Trump mugshot coffee mug.
I couldn't wait to buy one myself.
Meanwhile, Target boycott results just came in.
Woke retailers stunned by the latest sales report.
What's happening?
There's still power to the purse of the people.
Companies across the nation should be aware by now that insulting the core group who pay the bills is a bad idea.
People still care about personal and family values, and they don't want any company telling them how to live.
Big box retailer Target is still feeling the pain of the purse after its profit-canceling marketing plan during Pride Month in June.
LGBTQ plus friendly merchandise offended millions of Target customers who show their displeasure by spending their money elsewhere.
The company saw billions in valuation soon after.
from Fox Business.
Target experienced a sales downturn in the second quarter amid ongoing consumer backlash from the retailers Pride and Transgender Merchandise.
Negative reaction to Target's Pride collection and a material impact on sales, Target CEO Brian Cornell said during a call with reporters.
Cordell tried to play off the massive marketing mistake by saying the company has navigated an ever-changing operating and social environment and will attempt to apply what executives learn.
What they should have learned is not to tick off all the conservative mama bears who don't want their children exposed to tuck-friendly swimsuits and similar items.
Target customers took their shopping elsewhere.
Target's market value fell to $57.7 billion from $74 billion since the start of the public backlash in June.
That's a massive financial hit.
And when similar situations where Anheuser-Busch and Kohl's are added in, the market value loss for the three companies combined was $28.7 billion.
That's a lot of pain in those corporate purses.
What's striking about Target, which sells mostly non-essential products such as electronics and home decor, is that it has not backed off its overwhelming support for Pride products.
It just rearranged its place, and much further support for rainbow closets.
The company is reportedly trying to balance its product lines with more daily-use products.
Inflation has caused people to cut back on discretionary items.
And consumers, walking out thanks to Pride products, continue to hit target dead center.
If Target really wants to right this ship, maybe it should take more pride in the majority of customers who spend money in its stores and not openly shun them.
Key takeaways?
Big box retailer continues sharp sales slump over Pride Month stand.
Target loses billions in market value as customers walk away.
The company's CEO says execs have learned from the situation.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, I came across a headline of an absolutely unbelievable conspiracy theory that originated from none other than Ted Cruz.
Has anybody heard this one yet?
Tell us.
I think it's just great.
Okay, so Ted Cruz is using his power to try to get a hold of the emails related to Bud Light and Dylan Mulvaney.
Oh yeah.
And Ted Cruz believes that Bud Light was trying to market their beer to children.
Now remember, Dylan Mulvaney is a 27-year-old man who dresses up like a little girl, and Dylan Mulvaney's Brand market audience is pubescent and prepubescent kids.
And Ted Cruz believes that Dylan Mulvaney was brought in to try to get Bud Light to go after these kids at younger ages than 21.
And I'll tell you, there's an old Harvard Business Review article, I couldn't find it again if I ever, but it talks about how people develop their tastes for what brand they're going to get identified with, usually in their early college years when they first start drinking, and they'll stick with that brand sometimes the rest of their lives.
So if Bud Light could get a head start on branding themselves as the beer for kids and violate, you know, the whole concept behind these marketing and advertisement limitations that we have on them, then they'd be getting this huge head start.
Well, it backfired, didn't it?
Because it sure did.
Billions and billions and billions of dollars lost.
Bud Light stacked up on shelves.
They're losing their prime places in the big supermarkets.
Nobody wants to buy it.
I'm guessing they had to pay Joe Rogan a few million dollars to have a picture taken of him cracking a Bud Light on one of his shows.
They're doing anything to try to recover this brand.
If Ted Cruz is right in his conspiracy theory, whoo, crazy Ted Cruz, then Bud Light's got some explaining to do in terms of trying to market their beer through this nasty character, Dylan Mulvaney, who pretends to be a little girl when he should be at least pretending to be a 27-year-old woman, not a little girl.
What a sicko.
What a catastrophe.
Don, would you like to take us out?
Oh, I'll try.
I'll do it in absentia.
You can't see me, but I will make a comment, too, that this Bud Light thing and the way that it's gone and they've lost so much money shows that somebody's got the power of the purse and the purse strings.
And if we exercise that in the marketplace, that's probably one of the best things we can do to show support for what's right and good and purchase only those things we selected.
And know that things are not right in this world that we've been lied to and lied to for how many decades?
I mean, going back to the Spanish-American War and all kinds of things, there's all kinds of problems.
And you can't believe the news whatsoever.
That's why we have a so-called Truth vs. News Incorporated.
They're in for the money, and we can control the money by what we watch and turn it off and turn it on.
So I think that we can control things, but boy, they really want to have the strings over us and wire us to their degree.
Thank you, John.
That concludes Truth vs. News for 21 August 2023.
▲
Export Selection