All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 21, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
47:03
Need to Know News (21 August 2023) with Carl Herman & Chris Weinert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Carl Herman, Michig-Viejo, California, joined today by Chris Weiner from Fort Myers.
This is the new format for Need to Know.
Jim Fetzer has migrated over to RBN Radio to take over for Mike Rivera of What Really Happened for a Much Broader Audience.
All right, so what we're going to do is we're going to take a look at news stories and just use it as the basis for analysis.
And first, I want to go to Hawaii.
And State of the Nation had a report Calling it Operation Incinerate La Haina, and I think that's closer to how the Hawaiians pronounce it with every one of those vowels pronounced.
But this was a good article.
There's an interview or something with it, but just the different aspects of the attack that we can tell.
And this is going to go back into history, and I'll have several related stories with this.
With the atmospheric aluminum, and that's the chemtrail, the heart, Weaponized smart meters, and EMFs, microwaves, mini EMPs, then we have the DEWS, arsonists disguised as police officers, firefighters, and other first responders, incendiary devices, drone flamethrowers, and overloaded power lines, sabotage, and this has a nice article going through it.
And the photographic evidence is really what's remarkable in that Um, and anytime you want to jump in here, Chris, go ahead.
But otherwise, I'll just go through these different articles and these different points here.
I was going to actually see if you had seen that video with the different color spectrums of material and how like most of the scene has like blue stuff that is untarnished and everything else is just burned to a crisp and dematerialized.
And there's someone that does an experiment with the laser and does this with certain spectrums and it shows the blue stuff doesn't get touched but everything else it burns and goes to flames.
Wow, wow.
I'll send it over to you.
Yeah, I wish I would have done that.
I was a little bit unprepared, but I did catch it earlier today and was just astonished by that.
And it almost looks like what's going on with that scene there with the directed energy weapons or the fires or whatever they're saying.
And I remember seeing similar things in California.
You're a California native.
Do you remember when they were having those fires over the last five years?
Burning people off their lands.
Gold-rich and silver-rich lands that are going to be worth even a higher premium when these assets get restructured.
Amazing stuff, isn't it?
Yeah, I do.
And that was one of the articles I'm showing people here on the show.
And I'll have all these links of the show notes here at BitChute.
And there was an article, or there was an interview, or a few interviews done by a couple of retired fire captains.
John Lord was one of them.
And he
lived in Sonoma in the area of the Paradise Fire and he and his other retired fire captain pal went out and they took a look and they basically said yeah this the damage that they observed and you see a couple of pictures here and what Chris was talking about is that's done by no known fire and these are people who are captains who train firefighters and they said that the characteristics and they documented it with video and photographs the great number of fires starting at the same time
The temperatures of the fires being two to three times of normal, the homes were just obliterated, but leaving the surrounding trees and the plastic untouched and the trees burned at the base only and from the inside out, and then evidence that these smart meters and blew up and these guys We're all over it, and they just flat out said this is a directed energy weapon.
It's directed because it's targeted.
You can see this picture here that it hits the homes, but you have an alleged forest fire not touching the forest.
It selectively picked out some buildings.
It goes right across this playing field here.
So it's directed, it's adding energy, and it's a weapon because it's used for destruction.
A smart fire!
Yeah, a smart fire.
And Lahina is within 40 miles of one of the two big U.S.
facilities from the military.
One of them is on Maui.
So that's just an interesting coinkydink, huh?
And we have the Hawaii governor, Josh Green.
He says that they got a thousand missing.
Take a look at that.
It says a face to trust.
He also said that There's going to be fires month in and month out all across the country, and they've also imposed a media blackout with the governor saying that any social media attempting to report anything about this is just stupid.
I want to point out the history of Hawaii, and this is my documentary series, U.S.
Illegal, about the U.S.
being a rogue state, and that our history books, they tell the story, but they lie in omission.
And the U.S.
violated a clear treaty, and this was admitted to by two U.S.
presidents, and all the documentation is here, and it's pretty straight out that the U.S.
just stole the land in direct violation of a treaty to the Kingdom of Hawaii, and that this isn't… Mysterious, it isn't even controversial.
All these facts are agreed to.
And with the U.S.
admission that they did steal Hawaii, that was President Clinton who did it last, they did everything but the right thing and the right thing would have been, it was just acknowledged that they stole the land and then to give them the opportunity or the choice to have their land back or not.
Jim, on his channel, he has an excellent A documentary video of some of the evidence there.
And finally, I have Jimmy Dore.
I wanted to play a brief clip of the fire captain, or not fire captain, the police captain who came over from Las Vegas, who was there for that shooting, refusing to answer questions.
And I'll have to make sure that I have this so I can place down.
Can you hear that, Chris?
I don't hear any audio yet.
All right, because I think I need to hear the sound.
Small world's in tight circles, isn't it, Carl?
You know, the incident commander in Vegas is this guy now in Hawaii, and they just bring these guys straight in and straight out.
It's like a revolving door of regulation and authority and corruption.
You know, they seem to work hand in hand and beat each other quite complementarily, don't they?
Yeah, yeah.
Just a coincidence, they'll tell us.
All right, let's watch this little clip.
It's about one minute.
Still no audio, Carl.
I'm not hearing anything.
Oh, okay.
Well, then it's not going to work out.
This guy just walks across.
Wow.
No comment.
They're asking questions about him.
And you see the captions there.
And they basically told him.
She says, how come he always want to speak to the people?
He only wants to speak to a camera, meaning at a press conference.
And he goes all the way through.
Biggest massacre.
Isn't that weird?
There you go.
But anyway, that's the look at that.
All right, Chris, what else do you want to say about Hawaii?
Or anything related to that.
Uh, you know, it seems to be going on around the world, not just Hawaii, not just in California, but Canada, uh, in both parts, East and West.
Uh, yeah, this doesn't seem to be accidental or coincidental.
I think that, uh, when you hear these, these guys then trying to foist this off onto the climate change and global warming and things of that absurdity, this is exactly how they work.
This is what they do in major cities when they have these fires and they blame them on something absurd.
And it's really Crassus running the Roman fire department.
And extorting people off their lands and Blackrock coming in with fed money and buying it on the cheap.
So yeah, this is really a land grab.
This is really do alone nothing and like it.
This is Judge Smails running the world, so to speak.
So yeah, in my opinion, this is what's going on and I don't think it can be mistaken.
No, it can't be mistaken by the facts.
You're absolutely right.
And that's part of what we're attempting to contribute as having been around the block a few more times than most people to be able to point to the central data.
And here you got the testimony of two retired fire captains.
And in my field, in the world of teaching law and history, you get these expert witnesses and they're only expert to the extent that they can point to the most important data so that people can see it for themselves.
And what we saw on the ground, In Hawaii is the same thing that you saw in California is that these houses were basically blown up and that the fire captains in their previous interviews, I mean, they're sitting on the ground, they're just chatting with each other right there on the footprint, the slab footprint of what used to be a house.
And they're basically saying, yeah, there's no known fire that can produce this amount of damage.
This is a definitively increased amount of energies.
In order to produce this result, this is not fire damage and end of story.
And it's the same thing that you see on behind us.
So, yeah, there's no mistaking it.
And because there's such a central lie to this, the public, I don't think the public has any chance other than to withdraw consent and.
Uh, successfully somehow orchestrate the people to refuse to obey orders from these psychopaths anymore.
I don't know how we're going to get to that point.
And I just kind of fill in the gap with, uh, that's the breakthrough, which by definition is unpredictable and unimaginable.
Cause after 46 years of, of trying to orchestrate events on the ground, coordinating with human beings, organizing all the way up to two UN summits for heads of state, I just don't see.
anything that we can do on the ground except go through the same motions again.
I was going to say that.
Oh yeah, okay.
Sorry, I thought I was on mute.
The possibility that maybe once there's a critical mass that is awakened and aware of this and stops giving the benefit of the doubt and, you know, putting these people beyond suspicion and starts realizing that these are malevolent forces that are supposedly there to help, and in many cases they're the ones that caused the issue in the first place, and it's to bring in a third you know, Hegelian type of resolution that they've had waiting all along.
And they just needed these incidents and these crises to bring in what they've always wanted to bring in and to fulfill their timeline.
So, yeah, really, you're looking at the most organized terrorist organization that you're going to probably see.
And they have the full weight of the media and the financial institutions behind them in the military, to some extent.
Law enforcement, too, it seems, that are orchestrating these things.
And people can say, oh, it's a conspiracy theory, this, that or whatever.
But I mean, it's a conspiracy fact.
And I think that really, when you look at this data and you start putting these pieces together, any criminal investigator, even an amateur one like myself, I have no pedigree in this.
But I can understand that, you know, these things are an application with a criminal investigation or a scientific method.
You can see, you know, look at the qui bono, look at the benefit of hindsight, look at, you know, the shit they try to sell you right when it goes down, and all the things that crack in the official narratives, because There seems to be a crisis every every single few weeks that's waiting for us and once the last one expires and these people always predict it they always have it waiting and certainly like I say it's to bring something more entirely more duplicitous upon us as a result of mitigating the crisis that being caused in the first place.
Yeah, I'm framing what the political so-called leadership does is all they do is they forward narratives.
They're not there for any policy.
If they get some people who are elected who think that they're still in the Boy Scouts, they'll let them go through and go through the motions if it doesn't make any difference.
But the main policies, they're all scripted out, and then they have the research for the talking points that are most effective, and then they roll them out, and they own the media, and they own the politicians, and then they have the money behind it, and they just Use the false flags to push these narratives forward, and that's what we get.
Carl, to add to your point, I was going to say, and sorry to cut in on you, it's almost like they have these PR firms that are certainly propagandizing the audience, thinking that something benevolent is coming to them from these legislations that are passed.
But in reality, these are malevolent legislations that if they were read and understood by the taxpayer and the legislator, You would see that things like Dodd-Frank actually makes you a secondary creditor to your own funds in the case of force majeure in any bank in America or around the world.
So, you know, think about that.
I mean, each country has their own Dodd-Frank.
Maybe Dodd-Frank doesn't apply to each nation, but you know what I'm saying.
And even like Citizens United, you know, taking the money out of politics, it brought in so much more money, you know, and it's like everything they seem to put out there, you know, the COVID emergency act, you know, all this shit, it's completely inverted.
And I have to say, if you've got to look at the track records and keep this in mind, And just follow the timeline and stuff will make a lot more sense.
I just actually saw someone else finally do a video talking about Goldman Sachs putting out the BRICS initiative in 2001 of June.
So I'm glad to see others finally realizing this and waking up to realize this is like a cold war.
They're playing against us and it's an economic war.
And it's the 1% against the common citizen.
And they're just departmentalizing this through nation states and financial institutions and corporations.
And, you know, they got all these pieces on the board.
But at the end of the day, you got to look at the chess masters and the people that are moving the pieces, not the ones, the pieces themselves, you know.
We get fascinated on the distraction.
I was thinking if they started investigating all the people that are investigating Trump and put them under serious scrutiny, that they would reveal that maybe they were sent out or dispatched by people like George Soros or things of the like.
But you don't even see any intent in terms of law enforcement or investigation for this.
Jim Jordan, he's going through the motions right now, but in reality, this should be A big effing deal, Carl.
And I'm sorry to cut in on you and ramble off like that, but I just wanted to see what your thoughts are on some of these comments I had here.
No, no, that's great.
Yeah, the facts do tell the story.
And our opponents, they're going to live off of these lies of omission.
They're going to push in a narrative, and they're just going to leave any parts that make their narrative uncomfortable.
And if they have to, they'll lie by commission.
And again, these people, they're hyper intelligent, because take a look at the domination that they've achieved over human beings throughout entire recorded history.
And hence, You know, when you ask the question, how far back do these lies go?
I can document a couple hundred years through the U.S., but really it's all throughout recorded history where we get these bloodlines and thinking that they're somehow better just by the sake of their bloodline.
So it is Orwellian.
It is the opposite of reality.
And the foundation for Americans to have a little more confidence to stand up for themselves Is it the purpose of public education was to have everybody be competent as a citizen to be able to vote and to be able to participate as a jury member?
The foundation of a jury member is just an ordinary non expert person who can sit down and then have the facts be presented in front of them.
And then you have oppositional facts.
You have an attorney from both sides, and that the jury members will be able to figure it out.
That's the foundation of being able to move forward for America.
And Thomas Jefferson had a quote as well, talking about, you know, just unleash the people with education, and that'll all work out.
So, until we get this opportunity, for either some sort of a breakthrough to defeat this hyper-intelligent way that these wannabe masters have kept down.
And again, after 46 years.
So Chris, I estimate about 2% of the public can engage in these facts.
So that's like one out of 50.
So what do you think your estimation is of the, how many allies do we got here?
I got it.
I think it used to be for a long time was probably about the numbers you're saying.
And I almost think right now it's got to be almost one in ten.
I think people are waking up to this quickly.
I think that these sleepwalkers have been jolted awake.
And I think that people are thirsty for information.
And I think right now that there's there's a lot of forces that are maybe steering these people into intellectual cul-de-sacs and through the stuff that we had to go through in terms of the gauntlet to get to the truth in the first place.
So and then there's people out there that are just blasting people's It's long overdue and it's a lot coming at you and it's it's a lot of range to cover.
And certainly, you know, if you can avoid getting run around intellectually, you can probably save a lot of time and be a lot more efficient in terms of waking up.
So I think a lot of people are actually doing that.
I think the Internet has been a two sided or a double edged sword.
Where, you know, it cuts both ways, and I think a lot of truth has gotten out, and I think it's really the independent media that is pushing the conversation and really forcing these people to the fire, and it's about damn time, and more people need to step up at doing this.
Yeah, here on BitChute again, I'll provide all the documentation relevant because as a historian, the contribution that I saw that I could make is to concisely and precisely explain, document and prove that the official stories are easily defeated as lies.
And yet, I mean, we can do that, but here we are still talking about this stuff.
Carl, there's another thing like it's a reflex, a cognitive dissonance reflex of cowardice, where people understand that there is something big behind this, and they're just too scared to address it.
They got too much to risk.
They can't afford it.
They don't have time and whatever.
They got their own immediate problems and their feeble mindedness and stuff to worry about.
So, like, they really kind of absolve themselves of any sort of reaction or any sort of I guess retaliation by dismissing the conspiracy theory.
You could give somebody, you know, the words of these people in their own words on a video, you know, them really stating the obvious and they still won't believe it.
The onlooker will remain confused and actually take in an adversarial position with the messenger.
Rather than embracing the message and going after the real enemy.
So that's a kind of a dynamic that has been exploited and certainly been rather disgusting, especially in the COVID lockdowns and the vaxxers and all that stuff too.
So yeah, it's, it's, they're going to try rolling this shit out again too.
And when they do, I think people are going to have to really, really tune up quick to respond to this appropriately.
Yeah, we'll see.
And I'll put in the bit cheat notes is as usual that the 1% own more assets than the 99% combined.
So pretty much they try to buy their way out of anything.
So, Chris, you submitted this thing right here to kind of give the broadest possible picture here.
That's pretty solid, isn't it, though?
I hate to be so blunt, but I mean, really, at the end of the day, you know, if you're dealing with people like that, they probably don't deserve any sort of Oh man, expectations of decency in terms of social contract, anybody that's into that type of thing.
I don't think there's any reason that they can justify it and I think it's such a reprehensible thing that they've proven to be a psychopath and certainly I think should forfeit their right to be in any positions of leadership, especially when it comes to managing what other people's kids are doing.
Yeah, yeah, and I agree.
The more time that has passed, it's become more and more clear to me that these people really are psychopaths, and I call them that, and I'm not insulting them.
I'm just giving the most accurate label that I know of in order to describe their behavior as having a thin veneer of socially acceptive.
Acceptance, covering the most vicious actions that they engage in.
Now, talking about the spirit of revolution coming up, this was just a little poll from Gab.
Will you comply with any new COVID restrictions?
And out of the 1,360 votes, all 100% of them were LOL.
So, but that's on Gab.
So, we shall see, and I think you're right that we are hearing chatter of another version of COVID coming down, and that'll be next month.
Yeah, go ahead.
They're going to try and shame on us and everyone if they let them get away with that shit they got away with last time.
Yeah.
Oh, we'll see.
We'll see.
You know, the longer this has gone on, Chris, the more I see that this is a fair test that human beings have been presented and we get to experience The thrill of victory and the agony of defeat of leadership of we get to go first.
And so we just get to exist in the gap between the facts and the rhetoric for much longer.
Did you hear the speech of the member of the European Parliament, Christine Anderson?
It's three minutes.
No, I haven't.
All right.
Let me try one more time and see if I can get this thing optimized.
Oh, Jimmy Dore was working.
All right.
So let's see if we can get... Okay.
Okay.
See, this is a three minute speech in the European Parliament.
- I had five minutes of play, it was delayed.
- Okay, okay, see, this is a three minute speech in the European Parliament and here we go.
- It's not doing it.
- You're not hearing her?
Okay, well, bummer.
Well, she says don't comply.
It's not going to get any better.
They're just going to destroy you if you don't.
And I see that she's right.
Yeah, without question.
These people, if they can get you to, you know, if they can steal an inch, they'll take a mile inch by inch until you basically put a stop to them.
Think about it like these Olympic-level perverts are also addicts.
And look at how you deal with any sort of addict.
Do you give them a blank check?
Do you give them your ATM card?
Do you let them, you know, put your $32 trillion in debt before you, you know, put them out in the streets or whatever?
This is ridiculous, and I can't believe this type of abusive relationship has gone on and to such a nature in terms of public servants and the public that they supposedly serve.
This, to me, is reprehensible.
It's obvious that people have vested interests and have violated their oaths of office.
You know, I read from the Bradford ruling that they may not have even had taken an oath of office in 2020, and this whole shit show is just going on unconstitutionally, and as far as they can take it, they're going to push it.
I don't know.
You hear anything about that, Carl?
I did.
I did.
And with so many of these areas of facts where they could be shut down just on one legal point alone.
I mean, we'll see how it plays out.
But certainly by their actions, you can say that they do not honor any such oath of office.
They certainly do not.
I want to go to this story here.
Can I share my screen again?
And this is in the Gateway Pundit, which I do recommend as a, this is one of the primary sites which have the hardest hitting news.
And one of the points that I noticed as well with this Georgia case against President Trump is that they're claiming that we have this criminal collusion and this fraud.
But they're not pointing to steal an election, but they're not pointing to any criminal actions.
They're saying that they're attempting to overturn an election.
OK.
Well, all right.
How did that happen?
What were the crimes that were committed?
And then they can't list any particular crime.
So what they're doing is that this is the beauty of this approach of our opponents, is that they want to get to dictatorship, where whatever it is that they say, is going to carry the day until they say something else.
And so they're saying that this was illegal, what Trump was doing.
And it doesn't matter that they can't describe any of the crimes.
They're just going to have a long list and attempt to blow people away with an emotional outburst and just this constant lies of omission and just try to get people into this idiocracy stage of just just running with what they're dictated to.
But this case where they cannot articulate Any particular crime.
I think it's poetically perfect.
And again, a fair test for people to go ahead and stand up and to be able to defeat this dictatorship or that they're just going to have to suffer further.
Hey, Carl, have you heard the charges they've actually levied against him on this fourth indictment from Georgia of all places?
You read a few of them.
You know, in my opinion, if you were to take a serious criminal investigator or any law enforcement agents and actually investigate the accusers of these very same crimes, they would have far more basis in reality and actuality and probably be crimes and these people committing these offenses they're charging Trump with.
So it's kind of the ultimate inversion here, in my opinion.
Yeah, exactly.
And in the state of Georgia, one of the legislators did take some action for the impeachment of this Willis person.
So we'll see.
People do need to step up.
They are going to have to engage.
And with what you're talking about, with whatever it is that you described, the ordinary human beings who are too afraid to stand up.
I think that that financial crash is going to be a key aspect beginning tomorrow.
The BRICS nations are meeting and the difference from.
A market crash in the conditions that we have, where 99.99999% of the trades are flash trades done within a fraction of a second, with co-located computers owned by Goldman Sachs and people like that, who brag about never losing money on days of trading ever, ever, ever, because they know the trades before they're going to happen.
Because they gamble with everything in this derivatives market, it could just be one day's difference Between the situation that we see just day after day of the oligarchs and where they, the next day, they are bankrupt and it's game over.
And I think we're going to need some sort of a shock like that.
Some sort of a shock like the French were presented when President Macron said, Oh yeah, so your retirement age, I'm just going to add another two years and, and we're not going to have a debate on it.
I'm just signing it into law.
They need to have some sort of a shock like that because they're just too complicit here in the Capital District of the Hunger Games.
Yeah Carl, I think we're actually seeing something like that behind the scenes a little bit with a lot of these banks going down and a lot of the credit freezes and the downgrades and even like you say the turmoil in Europe especially in France and many of these places that are defaulting on a lot of stuff too and obviously the BRICS and forcing a lot of nations off the SWIFT system and using the dollar and feeling it's safe to bank with that.
Man, it's something.
Goldman Sachs has got, what, $60 trillion in derivatives right now.
Morgan's right around there, too.
I would not be surprised if we do see something in a few weeks that It would be like you're talking about, a shock to the system where liquidity freezes, credit locks up, everything just comes to a halt.
You know, I heard an interesting thing from Jim Willey talking about the reason the trade from China has slowed down is because they're not accepting U.S.
treasuries in exchange for goods right now.
So that's extraordinary.
And the fact that the media is kind of mum on this, you know, I don't know.
I mean, I wouldn't be surprised if it was true, because usually when something's true, they don't talk.
Yeah, and a shout out to Jim Willey, too.
He's one of my favorite commenters.
I hope you're still there, buddy.
I'm going to take a moment and go to screen share again, just for a bonus story here.
So this is in New York City and New York City has received over, according to this report, 90,000 illegal migrants and that they've run out of resources.
And this is a film clip of showing that these people are not, they came from across the southern border, but they're not from Mexico, mostly male, military age.
And, uh, Who are these people?
And the idea here is that the purpose is, is this is a race to the bottom and you need to destroy the entrepreneurialism of the United States.
And one of the ways of doing that is we have lost Chris Heria again, so let me get him back in here.
There he is.
To turn the US into a third world country.
I just showed a little.
Little tweet.
That the picture of New York City is accepted over 90,000 illegal migrants.
They're complaining they don't have any room.
And the point of it was to turn every, to turn the US into a third world country in this race to the bottom.
And they don't even know who these people are.
They're obviously not from Mexico.
They're mostly from Africa.
So I think that that would be correct.
They're setting the stage for this dystopian, this back to the future like cities.
And then they can go ahead and more easily pit us against each other.
Yeah, I think right now you're seeing a lot of stuff in China in terms of like defaults, liquidity crunches, devaluing currencies, even like them having a lot of industrial real estate type of projects going down.
China's spread really thin right now and it needs a lot of the US dollar to complete a lot of their transactions too.
So it's gonna be an interesting thing.
This is really like, and economic extortion, and it's a banker's war that's going on.
But it's one that these guys have fabricated, designed from the beginning, and have intended to bring into the lives and the minds of everyone around the world.
So, yeah, this will be a polarizing event where people are going to pick sides faster than they do on the R versus D in the American political theater.
Yeah, and overarching, I think that the design of what we're witnessing in our lifetimes is it's a prompt for people to choose a side and to get – I've talked about this several times.
One is that you're standing with the good and that's with us.
And that is you can tell the difference between good and evil.
You can point out the lies and the hypocrisies and the crimes and you've withdrawn consent as a good person and you're demanding arrest, which is what a good person would do.
There's the bad.
Those are the people who know that they're involved with this.
And they're just joining the parasites.
And then there's the vast majority of people still.
And these are the people who are unable and or unwilling to discern good from evil.
And you know, life is doing its best to try to provoke within them the response to take a side.
But yeah, I think that that'll be a lot easier once they're told that all of their retirement funds have been destroyed.
And they'll no longer be able to rely upon that.
Then maybe they may be more motivated to listen to the things that we've been talking about for decades that this is all by design and they crashed it and they knew and they did it anyway.
Yeah, you know, the thing about the BRICS that I will say is they are certainly trying to restructure this new system.
They have some sort of a basis in reality, but also I think they're going to take a lot of these derivatives and use the crypto market and tie it to blockchain and use that as a way to mitigate the debt, to push it on to the common man.
And to really use these corporate cryptocurrencies in the same way they did with private small and large banks.
So I think you're going to see a transition from the normal banking system into this new quantum financial settlement, atomic settlement system that they've had in store for a while.
And I think that this is, like, every turn of the century, they do something like this.
Like, in the 1900s, they had the guaranteed trusts and, you know, seed and company, and then now they've got this whole thing.
And I think they're using a lot of the valuations that they just phantom up from things like the Federal Reserve and from FAANGs and from these central bank policies that can just print money and value out of nothing.
And ascribe it to intangible and tangible things.
Most importantly, what they've done with commodities manipulation and labor manipulation, you figure there would be at least someone around the world advocating for humanity.
You're starting to see a few leaders in South America coming up talking about it.
Trump maybe got into it a little bit, but not as much as I would have liked to see him get into it.
So, yeah, it's going to be interesting to see how the next few years materialize.
I got to think what the analytics that they're examining, that they're going to have to put these competitions out there to at least, you know, provide the rhetoric that's appealing to the people and the sentiment of the people right now.
Something, yeah, yeah.
And that does remind me that RFK2's campaign manager, Dennis Kucinich, he knows all about monetary reform.
His wife, Elizabeth, was on staff at the American Monetary Institute with Stephen Zerlenga and Stephen with the American Monetary Institute.
They had annual conferences and Dennis met Elizabeth via the American Monetary Institute.
Monetary reform is essentially, and that essay will be here at BitChute, that's the main idea against the Federal Reserve model of creating what we use for money as a negative number forever owed back to the parasites.
That has a mathematical model, of course.
It's going to create exponential debt.
Monetary reform is the capacity to create what we use for money as a positive number directly invested into infrastructure.
And one of the tenants of economics is we make economic investments.
So Chris's company, they buy a truck because that truck is expensive, but it actually saves them money.
They're actually able to do a lot more work.
It's a smart thing to invest in a truck.
You're going to do more.
It pays for itself several times over.
OK, well, the same thing in economics for hard and soft infrastructure investment.
We could create the money out of nothing because the only real limit to the economy are the resources and the labor.
And we had the first paper accepted by the Claremont Colleges was a top 10 list of Americans who have argued for this.
And the only reason that our audience and the readers of our economics textbooks, our children, don't get that perspective is because our opponents don't want you to know that there's any alternative to the system that they've set up with this exponential debt scheme.
That's amazing, Carl, to think about that.
$32 trillion in debt, with them not even having to require reserves to make money and print money out of nothing.
It used to be 10%, but as of March of 2021, I think they moved to zero reserve requirements.
So these banks have nothing in terms of collateral on the line.
They can lend money to anybody and mostly insiders.
That's who they lend it to.
And use this type of money in addition to the money that's given to them from the Fed and from Congress and all these other bills.
So, it's amazing to see how these guys are that broke.
They got $60 trillion in derivatives in most major banking houses, you know, JP, Citigroup, and Goldman.
You know, and to have this type of debt that they've accumulated and put onto the public for private extortion and wealth and corruption, in my opinion, should tell you all that you need to know and should, like I say, forfeit any right for these guys to have any say in a new system that will come when this last one crashes down.
Exactly, the total value of the derivatives market, and about 90% of that is owned by the too-big-to-fail banks, is about a quadrillion dollars, which is a thousand trillions.
So yeah, it's tragicomic and, you know, withdraw consent, abandon all hope, ye who enter into this system, because you're not going to find any from these psychopaths, and they're never going to back down.
The only, the only admissions that they give is when they absolutely have to, but then that's going to be a lie to kind of steer it into another direction.
They were trying to, oh yeah, but like part of the lie for the spin of Obama meeting with the actor playing Biden because they're concerned about Trump and his unstable but loyal followers.
So they'll, they'll come up with some excuse to say, That what people can't deny is reality is actually happening, but they're going to frame it in the light that has them remain and have the most amount of power.
Well, Chris Buddy, let's go to final thoughts with what you might want to say as an overarching picture, what you think people should be looking out for that we haven't already talked about or anything else that you'd what you think people should be looking out for that we haven't already talked Thank you.
Assuming I still have Chris, so I'll jump in and there you are for a second.
Oh, no problem.
So, you know, anything else that you want to tell our audience members that you haven't already said that things to keep an eye on or anything that they might want to check out.
What would you like to say in conclusion?
All right.
Wow, you're gonna put me on the spot there, but that's cool.
I think it's interesting.
I've seen some stuff on Twitter.
They're talking about having to have a government-sponsored ID to carry on and maintain an account through there, in addition to taking a selfie.
I think that Twitter and the whole thing, given the free speech and whatever, is all controlled opposition.
It's a bargaining tactic.
It's an analytics metric that they're gaining from the people.
They still shadow ban you.
They don't put your comments through to everybody.
And like I said, Elon Musk is one of these World Economic Forum insiders all along.
I think they're really trying to create like a controlled opposition dialogue and a whole theatric with that.
And I think Elon Musk is going to probably bring people into more of like the world coin and the x coin and xrp type thing uh with a lot of his his things and neural lace neural link Look at all the stuff he's associated with.
He's not just a Tesla and Twitter guy.
He's the guy that brought in eBay and PayPal and all these other things too.
So these things are pretty much the end of economic privacy and full data surveillance.
So make no mistake about who he is or what his function is.
As I mentioned, I think of him as like a Howard Hughes part two or a junior or something.
Yeah, to the extent that he isn't owned as some kind of a brand and an actor.
assuming that you can jump in anytime if you want to continue those thoughts.
I did see a video of a woman in China who was informed by the government that she had been prevented from making any purchases because of a problem.
And she had to go through an exercise to do a facial recognition ID on her phone in order to unlock her capacity to buy anything.
And she was talking about this at a mall, and she was attempting to perform the facial recognition ID on her phone, which included that she had to open up her mouth and she failed.
And so she was locked out of her account.
And she complained at the end that, well, there it is, that she's still not going to be able to buy anything.
And that's the dystopian future in the direction that our opponents want to take.
And for just my final concluding remark is, again, with what we are shown, with what we can see, the show just appears to get darker and darker as they push more and more of these agendas forward.
That is what Chris is talking about, is that I think that's going to be our strength Because the more actions that our opponents take, the more ridiculous it appears to become.
Now, this is going to have to break out somehow beyond what we have today, because what we have today is we still see the advancement of our opponent's agenda, and objectively, I don't see any help yet.
And yet, I still am at 95%, and I'll give the evidence for that.
is that the White Hats are in control, and in the background our military is removing assets and strengths and weapons of our opponents.
And our opponents, they have a completely different psychology from ordinary human beings.
When you are intensely selfish, when you are kind of a predator, And you are just focused in on your service to yourself.
You have no allegiance to the team.
You have no love.
You have nothing that you honor and cherish that you're protecting.
If there's just a better offer on the table, they're going to say, OK, I'm in.
You've purchased my services.
So that also is a place where we can swing these people.
And part of the biggest deal as well is what I've mentioned.
For years, it's the foundational philosophy, psychology, religion, spirituality that is informing one's actions in the present.
And the big question is, what is this place?
What am I doing here?
Who's in control?
And if you don't know, then it's going to be a scary show for you.
And if you do have some sort of a foundation where you are standing, that this is like everything is somehow connected.
And that there is a fractal version of everything, and that you are connected, and it's a part of you that's in charge, then it becomes a completely different experience.
I don't know what the outcome of this is going to be, but then one just becomes committed to the experience and expression of virtues, and then one moves forward with that, with less of an attachment to what's going on in the world.
So I am at 95% with the evidence that I've seen, and I'll share again that the White Hats are in charge.
And a big part of this is going to be the E.T.
angle.
Part of my conclusion for the hyper intelligence of our opponents is that they literally are not human.
They're not human.
They have a lack of empathy.
The idea that you talk about reptilians or predators or these hunters is that, yeah, that's what's going on.
And some version of that with a hyper intelligence got involved with human beings.
And I think that there is a genetic manipulation in order to keep human beings servile and afraid.
And I think that's part of what this 2% of human beings that Kerry Cassidy says that we have the rebel gene in us.
And with the analogy of Star Wars is that we're not affected by the Jedi mind control, or at least we're able to easily grow beyond it, move beyond it.
To the extent that you can dig deep, patriots, brothers and sisters all, who I appreciate for just standing for the truth, and we're trying to give you some comfort to rely upon the facts, is that I will share here on BitChute just the background, and perhaps to the extent that it seems helpful for you to reach back and answer the question for yourself of what is this place, who's really in charge, because if you do conclude that there is some
force that is trying to synergize, trying to grow, not trying to destroy, then it might be that what we witness here is that outside of the programming, something is being built, something is being born.
Back tomorrow, not tomorrow, three days a week.
So the next time I'll be out will be on Wednesday, and that'll be with Joe and with Chris, and then we're shooting out on Friday, and that'll be with Chris and with Brian.
And again, Jim, the link in the show notes here at BitTube, all of that will be on Jim's BitTube channel for what he's doing with RBN.
▲
Export Selection