All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 12, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:02:55
Need to Know News (11 August 2023) with Carl Herman and Chris Weinert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Carl Herman in Mission Viejo, California, and by Chris Weinert on his way to Fort Myers, Florida.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
Niger faces a threat of military intervention.
This is a serious development in Africa on which we have not previously reported.
The week after Nigerian President Mohamed Bouazoum was removed by the military, the threat of Western-backed intervention began to rise.
The military takeover on June 27 was supported by many there who staged anti-French protests in the Nigerian capital of Nami in other parts of the country.
It was, however, not welcomed by the West's remaining ally in West Africa.
On July 30, 2015, the Asian Economic Community of West African states imposed sanctions on Niger and threatened divorce if Niger's military leaders failed to reinstate the Austin president.
This Economic Community of Western Africa, ECOWAS, and the eight-member West African Economic and Monetary Union said that with immediate effect, borders with Niger would be closed, commercial flights banned, financial transactions halted, national assets frozen, and aid ended.
Wow!
Military officials involved in the so-called coup would be banned from travel and have their assets frozen.
The sanctions were welcomed by the U.S.
and France, which of course engage in exploitative colonialism worldwide, and where the French are especially unhappy at the prospect of losing rich, fertile assets here, especially as a source of uranium, and by the rest of the European Union, who felt threatened by the military takeover and anti-imperialist sentiment.
The U.S., France, Italy, Germany have troops on military training mission to fight Islamist insurgents in Niger, which is the world's seventh largest producer of uranium.
The radioactive metal, by the way, is mainly exported to the West.
On August 3rd, West Africa's defense chiefs met in Nigeria's capital, Abuja, and discussed the possibility of a military intervention in Niger if Everett failed to reinstate the ousted president.
An intervention in Niger Would rely heavy on Nigeria, which has 223 personnel and modern jet fighters and armed helicopters.
Senegal's foreign minister also said her country would participate in a military intervention if ECOWAS were to decide to act.
However, Other ECOWAS members have stated they would not support the use of force in Niger, including Mauritania, Algeria, Mali, and Burkina Faso.
It's worth noting both Mali and Burkina Faso announced in a joint statement that any military intervention against Niger's military leaders would be considered a declaration of war against them as well.
A military intervention would be backed by the West, almost certainly, which fears a military takeover could facilitate the expansion of Russian influence in West Africa.
Pro-military protesters have already called for boosting relations with Moscow in cooperation with the Russian military.
Any intervention would escalate into a Western-African conflict, considering the split within the Okhobos bloc.
The West, namely the U.S.
and France, is apparently planning to start a war in the region, using its allies there as proxies.
Meanwhile, secret Pakistani cable documents U.S.
pressure to remove Imran Khan as the PM of Pakistan.
This is outrageous.
It deserves to be understood worldwide.
The U.S.
State Department encouraged the Pakistan government in March 7th of 2022 to remove Imran Khan as prime minister over his neutrality on the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
Think about it.
He doesn't want to get involved.
What the hell stake does Pakistan have?
But the U.S.
wanted to oppose him because he's not supporting them, even though we are on the wrong side and Russia on the right.
The meeting between the Pakistani ambassador and two State Department officials has been subject of intense scrutiny, speculation over the past year and a half, as Saburza Khan and his military and civilian opponents jockeyed for power.
The political struggle escalated August 5th, when Con was sentenced to three years in prison.
See how they do it even better in Pakistan?
They've already got him in prison.
They haven't managed to get Trump in prison yet, but by God, they're following the Banana Republic model.
On corruption charges and taken into custody for the second time since his ouster.
Khan's defenders dismiss the charges as baseless, as it's obvious on his face they are.
The sentence also blocks Khan, Pakistan's most popular politician, think of the parallels with Donald Trump, from contesting elections expected in Pakistan later this year.
One month after the meeting with U.S.
officials, A no confidence vote was held in Parliament, leading to Khan's removal from power.
No doubt the U.S.
was bribing all the members of Parliament.
The vote is believed to have been organized with the backing of Pakistan's powerful military since that time.
Khan and his supporters have been engaged in a struggle with the military and its civilian allies, whom Khan claims engineers his removal at the request of the U.S.
No doubt.
The text of the cable produced from the meeting has not been previously published.
Known internally as a cipher, it reveals both the carrots and the sticks.
State Department deployed in its push against Khan, promising warmer relations if Khan were removed in isolation, if he were not.
Just outrageous.
Carl, your thoughts?
Wow, more pieces in play.
So I'll put in the notes here a bit sheet, an article that I've shared with students in government class for 20 years, and that was the documentation that the number two, three, and four oil-producing countries in Africa all had dictators that were puppets to the U.S., and their records on human rights were atrocious, but it didn't matter.
They just kept selling the oil at cheap prices to the U.S.
The U.S.
and France to support sanctions, that's a big giveaway that whatever it is they're supporting, you should be on the other side.
And ongoingly, what, so what it appeared happened in Niger is that a puppet got removed.
And the question always is, is that can the former colonies stand?
Can they demonstrate that the former colonial powers are neo-colonial Resource rapists, and they rape resources both natural and human.
And we live in this, John, and I'll put a little two minute video, I think it's a one minute video, of a summary of John Perkins, the bestselling author of Economic Hitman, which is just a quick briefing about how this hidden empire works.
And you subvert the political process, you control the elections, you have a political puppet, and then that political puppet facilitates the use of the companies, and they're all paid for by bribes and those bribes come in through the IMF through loans.
And if that game is successful, then that situation where you have a puppet that funnels the profits of the resources to the neocolonial masters that stays in place.
But apparently there's been a problem there.
So we'll see for Pakistan.
Same deal.
Can the people there demonstrate that the proper response to anything that the U.S.
does, anything France, the U.K., Germany, Italy say, to be able to point back that these are neocolonial monsters and you should not consider their testimony and their demands as anything other than more manipulation.
By the way, I'm also told that if this were push order to come to shove, that Algeria would be siding with Niger, which is very significant.
Chris?
Yeah, as I mentioned in many other previous segments in these videos, talk about the independence illusion model.
And this was granted after World War II to many nations like Pakistan, India, China, and many other ones, these former British colonies after World War II that supposedly are given this independence.
But in reality, I think it's all an illusion because they really, the central bankers control the finances.
And then by this carrots and sticks mechanism where they can just print money out of nothing, And a fraction reserve basis and even then some Really and then sanction and do whatever else they're doing on top of that with trade and with resource controls and price fixing These mechanisms are absolutely colonialist blueprint type of control mechanisms and certainly are being used accordingly for this this cabal that is controlling the entire world and
and departmentalizing us by nation states.
So yeah, I think it's becoming more and more evident that this is an instrument of colonialism and certainly maybe that's another push for the bricks in the gold back currency because if there's actually something behind this, Those are great points.
out of nothing and say it exists.
They have to actually account for its actual, you know, physical ledger type of transaction.
So it would probably reduce a lot of these senseless wars that are blank checks.
And certainly a lot of the corruption that goes along with it as well.
If they actually had to come out of an account and deliver a physical specie gold instead of just digits on a screen, crypto, or this fresh and reserved fiat usury. - Those are great points.
I do think in retrospect, the U.S.
and NATO getting involved in Ukraine was a colossal blunder that the sanctions on Russia have totally backfired.
The economic and other repercussions, including the demise of the dollar, are going to have staggering effects.
But we were dealing with idiots who were promoting all of this at the behest of Israel, so it should not be surprising it's coming to a bad end.
Meanwhile, the Gateway Pundit publishes Massive 2020 voter fraud uncovered in Michigan.
Police find tens of thousands of fake registration bags of prepaid gift cards, guns with silencers, burner phones, a Democrat-funded organization with multiple temporary facilities in multiple states.
On July 8, 2020, just a month before the 2020 general election, Muskegon, Michigan City Clerk Anne Meisch noticed a black female whose name was redacted from the police report, dropping off—get this—between 8,000 and 10,000 completed voter registration applications at the City Clerk's office.
Gee!
You didn't think it was common for one person to come in with 8,000 to 10,000 voter registrations?
The Muskegon police were contacted and asked to investigate.
On 10-21-20, First Lieutenant Mike Anderson was contacted by Tom Fabus, Chief of Investigation for the Muskegon Attorney General Dana Nessel's office.
According to the Michigan State Police report, Mr. Fabus asked for Michigan State Police assistance with a joint investigation of alleged voter fraud being conducted by the Muskegon Police Department and the AG.
The investigative task force was formed and an investigation initiated.
Here's following from the report.
On 10-16-20, Muskegon City Clerk Anne Meisch and Deputy Clerk Kimberly Young contacted the Muskegon Police Department after noticing irregularities in voter registration application received both in person and by mail.
The Muskegon City Clerk became suspicious when the female, whose name is initially redacted but later unredacted, hand-delivered thousands of voter registrations to her office, many in the same handwriting.
On 10-2020, deadline day for in-person voter registration applications, the suspect returned to the Muskegon City Clerk's office to deliver additional registration forms in person.
Bench estimated the suspect brought an additional 2,500 forms.
She contacted the Muskegon Police and Detective Logan, and Captain Sean Bryde conducted a non-custodial interview with the suspect.
They stated, in her opinion, a quantity of the voter registration form were highly suspicious and possibly fraudulent.
Actually, written in the same hand and all that, not merely possibly, but probably indeed on their face, certainly fraudulent.
Much of the opinion was based on the fact numerous forms appeared to have been completed by the same writer, and upon initial examination, addresses on multiple forms were invalid or non-existent.
Miche investigated and found phone numbers on multiple forms were erroneous.
Signatures didn't appear to match signatures on file.
Those addresses did not exist in the Muskegon City Housing Number System.
Moreover, another form listed at ADW Southern Avenue, the address for the Muskegon High School, which is clearly not a resident.
Later in the report, the name of the female was unredacted.
The Michigan State Police assigned her the case, spoke to the female, explained she was being paid $1,150 a week—that's about or close to $5,000 a month—to find unregistered voters and provide them with a form so they could be registered to vote or obtain their absentee ballots.
The only problem being, the handwriting on the voter registration was the same on several, and many of the addresses were nonexistent or fake.
Clearly a fraud.
Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, and you gotta get a fix on this woman.
Who is currently attempting to prosecute 15 senior citizens and the former Michigan GOP co-chair for casting an alternate set of electoral votes in the 2020 election as the Michigan State Police that joined the Muskegon Police in AG's investigation of the potentially massive multi-city voter fraud operation.
Two members of the AG Dana Nessel's Criminal Investigation Division were assigned.
Yet, curiously, the Attorney General failed to mention the investigation to the public.
To this day, Dana Nessel is still claiming there was no evidence of white threat voter fraud in Michigan.
Despite the fact she knew her office and that of her friend, Michigan's crooked Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, were involved with the Michigan State Police in a large-scale investigation that took place across the state before it was taken over by the FBI.
Well, now we can relax.
Taken over by the FBI, we know it's in good hands.
Corey Ames, the Michigan Secretary of State analyst, confirmed a quantity of the forms they found are clearly fraudulent.
Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson also claimed there was no widespread voter fraud in Michigan and also neglected to mention the investigation to the public.
Today, the Gateway public and our close friends in Michigan are exposing this damning report.
The evidence exposes criminal election fraud involving thousands of fraudulent ballots in Michigan by an organization set up temporary offices in several swing states prior to the 2020 election.
An explosive investigation that has been covered up and buried from the public until today.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yes, a great story, important story and more evidence, along with the documentaries 2000 Mules and Selection Code and the post 3 a.m.
impossible, mathematically impossible odds of the vote swings for the actor playing Biden.
So this woman was being paid to find Unregistered voters, that would be an interesting follow up question to say, tell tell us more.
How exactly did you find this?
And on its face again, the evidence is just so clear.
But.
Officially, it's going to be blocked.
And again, we're at the place where we see this drip, drip, drip of evidence and so much, and all of it is good, and all of it has to be waking people up, and all of it has to be facilitating a choice for the people involved in these episodes.
And that said, I still see that we need some sort of an event, some sort of a breakthrough before we can get any outcome other than Continuously just being gaslit by officials saying, oh yeah, no, that was the cleanest election, the most secure election ever, and we see no evidence that we had that Babylon B article that had the headline something like, we don't care what the evidence is.
So we need something to break.
Eyewitnesses, audio report, video reports, confessions—none of it affects us.
We need to be convinced, and we aren't.
I mean, stunning.
Yes, you got it exactly right, Carl.
Meanwhile—and this is highly intriguing, and I want more confirmation.
Trump knew if he presented any of the goods early on, we'd have a civil war.
That may have been a blunder on his part.
2020 election fraud.
Trump knew if he presented any of the goods early on, we'd have a civil war.
That may have been a blunder on his part.
I think presenting early on would have been the thing to do.
In recent posts on his social media platform, former President Trump praised the analysis and comments made by Dr. Jan Halper Hayes during a recent interview.
A former Global Vice President of Republicans Overseas UK, Halper Hayes made headlines with statements during her appearance with a British morning news show, Breakfast with Stephen and Ellie.
Helper Hayes pushed back against the widely held belief Trump's case is based solely on political conspiracy theories, arguing there are significant questions about election integrity that require attention.
She further contended the current indictment has inadvertently given Trump a platform to present his case and expose possible election irregularities.
During the interview, Albert Hayes claimed to be part of a DOD task force asserting Space Force had evidence proving the fraudulent nature of the 2020 election.
Of course, the Gateway Pundit, alas, can neither confirm nor deny at this point in time.
According to Albert Hayes, Trump chose not to disclose the evidence to prevent civil unrest, believing it could even lead to civil war.
I sit on a task force at the DoD, and the thing is, they've got the goods.
They've got the goods.
And Trump knew that.
If he presented any of the goods early on, we'd have a civil war.
And he really felt the people needed to see how bad it could get.
Mistake.
My opinion, mistake.
See, the thing is, think about Edward Snowden and all the information he had.
Think about the fact that our military, our Department of Defense Space Force, if you think they don't have the actual real results from the election, then you're fooling yourself.
The U.S.
Space Force is a branch of the military established by the Trump admin.
Its creation was initially exacting by signing the NDAA for 2020 on December 20, 2019.
Its mission is to organize, train, and equip Space Force in order to protect the U.S. and and allied interests in space and provide space capabilities to the Joint Force.
Now, let me say something about this 2020 election.
Order 13848 enacted by Trump on December 12, 2018, arguing it was designed to combat foreign interference in U.S. elections with a focus on the 2020.
Now, let me say something about this 2020 election.
Biden is the legitimate president, she says, which seems to me to contradict everything else she's reporting here, but he's a legitimate president of what is now the bankrupt U.S.
corporation based on a treaty of 1871.
The Treaty of 1871, also known as the Treaty of Washington, was an agreement between U.S.
and U.K.
to settle disputes lingering since the Civil War.
On September 12, 2018, Trump created an executive order outlined in future elections any kind of foreign or domestic interference, specifically for the 2020.
How did he know some of these things were going to happen?
Election integrity on both sides is tough.
It's really tough.
But what this has done is opened the door for Trump to present his case, and I believe now she's alluding to the indictment over January 6.
Alpernay has also suggested Trump signals his intent to dissolve the U.S.
corporation and return the country to its original state as a republic during a meeting with the Queen of England.
She claimed, or haze, his move led to a substantial transfer of gold from the Vatican Bank.
There's more to that, Carl.
I find it rather fascinating, but I'm left in limbo as to how much I can believe your thoughts.
Yeah, yeah.
What to believe?
It is fascinating testimony in great political theater.
And Dr. John, again, Halpern Hayes appearing on that Stephan and Ellie BBC Prestitute Show.
Again, those people, this is the same as American corporate media.
They're either prostitutes or useful idiot stupid.
And again, all people have to do is pay attention and say, is there any evidence of election fraud?
And then you, you know, you get the documentaries, 2000, you will selection code and the mathematically impossible vote counts to conclude.
Yeah, it would seem that way.
Plus.
OK, so Trump gets in in 2016.
All right.
So he knows and his team knows and they know about election fraud.
It's been going on forever.
So it would make sense that 2020 would be a set up.
And now it's 2023.
And all of us can appreciate in the three years of time that has gone by with COVID, with The war in Ukraine with what we can see for progress for people understanding of election fraud and considering the amount of time that it would take to remove an entrenched enemy.
from hundreds of years.
You know, I could totally accept that it's taken until now to move forward, but you know, this is now 2023, and I'm ready for this breakthrough, but that's just me.
Apparently the breakthrough isn't ready to happen, otherwise it would happen, but I am fascinated in this woman's testimony and hope she has more to say.
Yeah, and it was supposed to be hundreds of blind loads of gold that was returned from the Vatican to the United States, Carl.
I mean, it's quite a sensational story, if it is true.
Meanwhile, Dershowitz drops shock Trump prediction.
This is what the Supreme Court will do.
Once again, Democrats within the government have indicted Donald Trump.
In New York State, they've indicted him over supposed business accusations.
Biden's DOJ already indicted him over documents he kept at his home, but this is the big one.
Biden's DOJ is now indicting him over claims he tried to overturn the 2020 election.
Democrats have been accusing Trump of this since 2021, but they've apparently failed to convince Americans.
Now they're taking the case to what will most likely be a biased jury in Washington, D.C.
Legal expert Alan Dershowitz is weighing in.
He has a big prediction on a post-millennial.
I think he may lose in the Court of Appeals for the D.C.
Circuit, again, because of political bias, but he will probably win in the United States Supreme Court.
When you have the President of the United States and his people going after his opponent in a political election, it has to be beyond reproach.
It has to be without any problem.
It has to be the strongest case in history.
This case does not meet that standard.
Constitutional expert Nershewitz discussed the latest attempt to control our elections—I mean, the latest indictment of Donald Trump.
Dershowitz explained the left's case hinges on claims Trump believed he lost, but went about trying to change the outcome.
Dershowitz says there's no smoking gun.
There does not appear to be evidence Trump ever said he lost the election.
Even to this day, he maintains he won.
Democrats will have to prove somehow Trump believed he lost.
Dershowitz also explained Trump's lawyers will try to move the case out of D.C.
since he's unlikely to get a fair trial there.
Regardless of where it's held, Dershowitz believes Trump will lose in the initial ruling.
Well, we'll be able to appeal, taking it all the way to the Supreme Court, and Biden and the DOJ will have to prove to the highest court that they went to such great lengths to attack their biggest political rival.
Unless the evidence is beyond reproach, the court will rule against the Democrats.
Meanwhile, Though our nation and entire electoral system will be dragged through an endless, miserable battle.
We'll have to put up with liberals feeling more hate toward a man loved by millions of Americans.
By the time the dust has settled, which could be years from now, who knows how much damage this trial will do to our country.
Also, Joe Biden can win another term.
Takeaways?
Constitutional expert Alan Dershowitz claims Trump will lose his latest indictment.
He doesn't believe he got a fair trial.
He, however, claims the case will be taken to the Supreme Court, where it will be overturned.
Meanwhile, Trump gaining ground in national polls.
Will you vote for him in 2024?
A poll of close to 36,000, 96% said yes, only 4% said no.
of close to 36,000, 96% said yes, only 4%, no.
Carl, your thoughts. - Dershowitz is pulling his punches He's lying by omission.
He needs to declare that this is the lawfare that it is, and to take the golden opportunity, like Jonathan Turley does, and that this latest case is a claim that Trump defrauded.
The American public, and by fraud, you have to know something is false, but you're going to lie about it for your own benefit.
For Dershowitz to be such, again, he's either just complicit, or he's useful, idiot, stupid, to not embrace the evidence of 2000 Mule's election code.
And for those impossible mathematical vote counts.
And for him to say something that doesn't meet the standard.
That's kind of understated there, pal.
No smoking gun.
So this is just, he's displaying tremendous ignorance about the impossibility to demonstrate fraud.
You're going to have to say, all right, so this evidence that Trump is presenting is obviously false.
You can't do that.
There is no way of being able to go through that evidence and say that it's false.
That would be like going through the evidence of the World Trade Center towers and saying all of that is false and only reinforces that the planes did that.
There's no way they can get around that lie.
So we'll see what happens.
And again, I just keep repeating the point because this is what I see.
We need some sort of a breakthrough to snap people out of it.
Otherwise that type of bullshit is just going to continue to be pushed.
Oh, you're right.
I like all your comments.
Not only that, but Jonathan Turley has pointed out that in U.S.
v. Alvarez, the Supreme Court declared that even lies are constitutionally supported speech.
So you cannot accuse him of having committed a crime because he lied about the election, and it's obvious he sincerely believes it, so he wasn't lying after all.
And as you observed, the mass of evidence overwhelming, including Our first story today confirms it.
So, very nice.
Second story, actually.
Meanwhile, get this.
How is Jill spending her cobia-free time?
Welcome to Manny's.
Manny's is unapologetically queer and unapologetically political.
This photo says it all.
San Francisco Queens meet the First Lady of the United States of America in a civic meeting space in the Mission District of my fair city of San Francisco.
There it is, Jill, looking real happy with her friends in the queer community.
Meanwhile, 104 U.S.
colleges have not revealed the COVID vaccine band-aid.
No college mandates as a group of parents, doctors, nurses, professors, students working to end COVID vaccine mandates.
Many believe they have ended, especially after the overwhelming evidence of the inefficiency of the vaccine, that it's in fact neither safe nor effective.
Yet 104 colleges in the U.S.
continue to demand students provide proof of vaccination to attend.
Some of these colleges have even exempt faculty from receiving the jab.
Rules for thee, not for me.
Teens are willing to take the jab because they want to go to their desired college.
Many are forced to go to in-state schools for financial reasons, and their option may be limited.
For example, Rutgers has a student immunization portal for everyone's required to upload their vax records.
Those who fail to do so are listed as non-compliant and cannot attend in-person classes.
There are few exemptions available.
One student at Earlham had a religious exemption revoked.
That's right, a religious school—this was the Earlham School of Religion—denied a religious exemption.
When they re-implemented the exemption, she faced increased animosity among classmates and alumni.
Two students yelled at spit on her and her mother.
Remember, The mass media and politicians told us it was a pandemic of the unvaccinated, as Joe says in a video he did.
This poor girl did not feel safe enough to attend her own graduation, and the school removed her alumni email.
She is now suing the school, and I think she's got a hell of a case.
Carl, I know you've a lot to say about this one.
Yeah, yeah.
First, I can't let those mannies say the fair city of San Francisco anymore.
I mean, certainly the buildings are still there and they're still beautiful, but man, anybody who's been to San Francisco lately on Market Street, you will see not dozens, not hundreds, but thousands.
of homeless and all that they bring to that fair city.
So the whole logical fallacy, if somebody takes a medical product that's supposed to protect them from infection, then why do they care if other people take it or not?
And then you go to the data that the people who avoid vaccines are going to be healthier And then you go specifically to COVID.
And here at BitTube, I'll provide my documentation, which is sufficient for anybody to withdraw consent and demand arrest of the leaders for that.
And again, you have Title 21.
Title 21, that's federal law under Article 6 of the Constitution.
That's going to be supreme over anything that a college says or a state says.
And Title 21 comes historically from the Nuremberg Trial and the Nuremberg Code, and that was humanity rejecting forever, ever, ever in language that is crystal clear in letter and intent.
Human beings are not to be medical experiments.
They are free to decline any experimental medical product just freely and no coercion, no negative consequences.
So it's all Orwellian, Ed, but until we get this game changer, they're just going to attempt to push this as they always have.
Oh, you got it exactly right.
Exactly right.
Meanwhile, Democrat calls for reprimand of Marjorie Taylor Greene over Hunter Biden picks.
House Oversight Committee Ranking Democrat Jamie Raskin is demanding Chairman James Comer publicly reprimand committee member Marjorie Taylor Greene for displaying sexually explicit photos of Hunter during a recent hearing.
During the oversight hearing featuring testimony from two IRS whistleblowers, Marjorie used her time to display graphic sexual photos taken from Hunter's abandoned laptop while alleging the younger Biden used his company to write off payments to prostitutes.
In a letter to Chairman Comer, Raskin said Greene's display violated House rules on decorum.
He argued the images were irrelevant to the mutative subject of the hearing and did not advance its stated purpose, but they certainly captured the attention of the public.
Rankin argued Green displayed the pictures for purely voyeuristic, sensationalistic, and sadistic purposes and accused the chairman of allowing the Oversight Committee to be reduced to a 1970s-era dime-store peep show.
The ranking Democrat blasted Comer for failing to stop her from displaying pornographic photography, saying it undermined the integrity of both the committee and the House.
Rankin reminded Comer that as committee chair, he's obligated to enforce the rules of decorum fairly and equitably.
He said it was up to Comer to make clear screens display of pornographic images violated House rules while ensuring such incidents are not repeated in the future.
Calling for Comer to publicly reprimand He urged the chairman to issue a statement condemning her actions as an affront to the dignity, propriety, and decorum of the committee.
In his statement in response, Chairman Comer said it speaks to the ranking Democrat priorities that he's more concerned about Hunter's embarrassment than he is about the young women involved in his illegal activities.
Here's Ceaseman tweeting, Parental discretion be advised.
Represent Marjorie Taylor Greene asks an IRS witness about Hunter Biden's alleged activity with prostitutes, which he claims is a violation of the Mann Act.
The clip contains graphic images of sexual acts, including this.
Marjorie Taylor Greene holds up a censored photo of Hunter Biden and a prostitute.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, typical.
Attack the messenger, that's all that they're going to do.
And they're not going to attack Hunter's crimes that, in that documentation, what was it, like 300, 400, 500 crimes that were pulled out of Hunter's laptop.
And as often is the case, one of the moves that we could have going after Raskin is just to flip the script and just say, Congressperson Raskin, you do stand for the arrest of Hunter Biden and Joe Biden for the documentation on the FBI's own file or at least for the criminal investigation for them for pay to play and just continue to flip the script and embarrass them.
But, you know, this is what we're going to get.
And so there's a good news, bad news thing.
The good news is, is that everything that contributes to this is helpful and it helps polarize the choice.
And the bad news is, is that we've been reporting on this for years and decades, and we're not there yet.
Yes, yes, indeed.
I mean, Hunter's laptop has been around for quite a while.
Meanwhile, FBI lies about the Hunter laptop.
Surprise, surprise.
House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan Accused the FBI lying about a meeting with Facebook employees regarding Hunter Biden laptop before the 2020 election.
The FBI lied about meeting with Big Tech regarding New York Post Hunter Biden laptop story.
He wrote on X.
Formerly known as Twitter.
Frankly, I think changing the name was a blunder.
On November 29, 2022, Special Agent Elvis Chan was deposed as part of the State of Missouri-Schmidt et al.
versus Biden et al.
lawsuit.
As revealed in Elvis Chan's deposition, The FBI played a major role in working with big tech companies to censor speech.
Actions ranged from weekly meetings with social media companies to demanding takedowns of specific accounts and facilitating suppression of certain stories.
Chan observed the platforms became far more aggressive in removing misinformation during the 2020 election cycle than in previous election styles, and they have remained so.
The Ohio Republican said internal Facebook docs indicate Chen made false statements in his testimony regarding the FBI's role in the suppression of the story.
Chen and the Foreign Influence Task Force Section Chief Laura Demlau met with a representative from Facebook on October 14, 2020, the same day the New York Post published its bombshell story on the Hunter laptop.
Demlo and other members of the FBI Task Force spoke with Twitter employees by phone the same day.
When asked during that call whether the laptop was authentic, according to Demlo's deposition, one of the FBI folks on the call did confirm that, yes, it was, before another participant jumped in and said, no further comment.
After that, the FBI was careful to say no comment when asked if it were authentic, even though the Bureau had processed the laptop in 2019 and knew it was authentic.
They refused to admit it wasn't Russian disinfo, so the story would be suppressed.
Parting the truth from voters noted Rep.
Ben Klein, Republican of Virginia, The FBI had for months been warning social media behind the scene of a possible Russian hack and dump operation involving Hunter, although, according to them all, it was fairly common knowledge within the FBI that the laptop was real.
During his deposition, Jan was asked if he'd take part in another meeting with Facebook other than the October 14th.
And his body was confident he had not been a party to other meetings with social media regarding the laptop.
Here's Jim Jordan.
Chandler testified about the October 14th Facebook FITF meeting where Demlo said no comment when Facebook asked if the laptop were real.
Chan, when asked if the FBI had any meetings with companies other than Facebook about the Hunter Biden story, Chan replied he was confident he was not part of any other meetings.
When asked again whether he were aware of any other communication between anyone at Facebook and at the FBI related to the Hunter laptop, Chan replied, no.
Completely false, Jordan wrote on Twitter.
The chairman shared a recently obtained internal Facebook document showing Chen took part in a follow-up call on October 15, 2020, the very next day.
Chen said during the call there wasn't currently evidence proving a foreign connection or direction to the laptop leak.
Of course, the FBI knew there was no foreign connection, Russian or otherwise, to the laptop.
The committee has recently obtained an internal Facebook document proving Agent Chan had a secret follow-up call with Facebook about the Hunter laptop story on October 15, just one day after the New York Post story and the first Facebook meeting.
Jordan said Chen made another inconsistent statement when he claimed that he had no internal knowledge of the FBI's investigation when, according to a Facebook employee, the agent had indicated he was up to speed on the current state of the matter within the FBI.
Is there any wonder why the Biden DOJ has so far stonewalled the committee's effort to interview Agent Chan?
Our investigation remains ongoing.
We will continue to update the public with our findings as we prepare and consider legislation to fight the censorship industrial complex and protect the First Amendment.
Carl, your thoughts?
Again, great!
Keep it coming?
That's wonderful news.
That's great.
So FBI agent Elvis Chan lied, his bigger and first and primary lie, is to his oath of office to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic.
He's ignoring that First Amendment, that the government doesn't get involved with the speech of the people, and to egregiously lie to Facebook for the Prima facie benefit of censorship that again, this just points to we have two types of governments and two types of FBI agents, the one that they put on the politically sensitive cases, those that are the operatives, those are the literal traitors working for the deep state.
And the reason that they're literal traitors is that this is involved with the overthrow of the government, the destruction of the electoral process and the placing in of political hacks.
And I can also say that it's treason as well for the lies that support these ongoing false flag and lie started were really an illegal wars of aggression that lie our military in order to get them killed.
So that's an attack on our own military.
And the other part of the FBI or ordinary FBI agents, they'll just send that out to, you know, if the sheeple are involved in something like smuggling cigarettes or something, you send those people out.
And it's the same thing with teachers and doctors and nurses.
Most of them are just unaware, useful idiots.
But to the extent that you need people on the ground, Chris, I'm delighted we got reconnected.
This is a story about Jim Jordan attacking the FBI, especially in Agent Chan, for inconsistent statements about the FBI's role in covering up the Hunter Biden laptop story, especially in response to the New York Post publication.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, the FBI seems to have been behind a lot of these crucial investigations and the blundering of them, where they investigate what went on and certainly spin out a counter-narrative that is pretty far from the truth, and it's definitely propagandized and it's fulfilling an agenda.
Now, the question that I gotta ask is, who are these people working for?
If they're violating their oaths of duty, if they're violating their whole job purpose and everything like that, and they're not serving their country, who exactly are they serving?
And I think maybe when we get to the bottom of some of these questions, maybe a whole new parallel infrastructure will open up as far as what's being purchased with the Federal Reserve power and certainly with deep state black ops money.
So, yeah, these these FBI agents come out of the woodwork and they really seem to botch up just about every major case of significance regarding national security and certainly supporting an official narrative, we'll say.
So, yeah, I think at some point in time these fixtures are going to have to be dealt with because they've obviously been politicized and given an agenda that's certainly not serving the people and the common will of our country.
So, yeah, hopefully this will get sorted out.
These SES guys and everything like that, these perfect fixtures.
They certainly seem to change with administration, but serve the same purpose.
So, hopefully we'll get to the bottom of this.
And good on Jim Jordan for calling him out.
There's no doubt, in my opinion, that the DOJ and the FBI are operating as an extension of the Biden crime family, where Merrick Garland is their conciliary, just as Tom Hagen was for Don Corleone in The Godfather.
I think the parallel is fairly exact.
Meanwhile, Democrats demand a thousand percent tax on assault weapons, which they define as any semi-automatic gun with 10 rounds or more.
That's ridiculous, of course, as a definition.
Democrats are pressuring Speaker McCarthy to hold a vote on legislation that would place an excise tag on what they consider, wrongly, to be assault weapons and increase gun prices by a thousand percent.
More than two dozen Dems, including Representative Don Beyer of Virginia, penned a letter to the House Speaker to bring the legislation to the floor as soon as possible.
The members of the Gun Violence Prevention Task Force put forward the same suggestions that were proposed in 2022, when 38 Democrats wanted the incredible tax increase.
An excise tax, which places a duty on a product at the moment of manufacturing, would increase the price of a $1,000 firearm to $10,000 before it even gets to a retailer, as there was no published version.
It's unclear whether the legislation differs from the 2022 tax, which also came from Bayer.
In the previous iteration, the tax was imposed on any magazine or related device that can accept more than 10 rounds of ammo.
The provided definition for a semi-automatic assault weapon was a semi-automatic rifle or pistol with a fixed magazine of 10 rounds or more and has other various features.
Any gun fitting the definition would have the excise hack and apply.
We are disappointed that Republican leadership canceled votes in July with so many pressing issues facing our country.
Foremost among them is a gun violence crisis that's a leading cause of death for children in America.
Frankly, I doubt that 100%.
As members of the Gun Violence Prevention Task Force, we call on you to schedule votes on gun violence prevention as soon as possible.
We also have a new standing request that should the vote schedule fall apart again, you'd fill that time to vote on life-saving gun violence prevention legislation instead of canceling votes altogether.
The group provided statistics, including that 1,686 kids were killed and another 4,485 injured by gun violence in 2022.
It called the violence preventable carnage and said the Republican-controlled House had yet to vote on even one gun violence prevention bill.
According to Breitbart, however, California has had an assault weapon ban while having the most firearm-related homicides in a single state in 2021.
The outlet also claimed 17% of annual firearm murders in the country were in California that year.
We know the murder rate is high in the areas controlled by the Democrats.
Look at the superimposition of the 2014 murder distribution on the 2016 Electoral College map.
Chicago is a perfect illustration.
If gun control worked, then Chicago would be the safest city in America, if not in the United States or even the world.
But they don't.
And what the gun grabbers consistently deny acknowledging is that Americans use guns for defensive purposes to protect themselves from criminals millions of times every year, saving an estimated 200,000 lives per annum.
Since the annual estimate of deaths from gun violence is in the 70,000 range, over half of which are from suicide, that would multiply by many times the number of deaths if Americans did not have guns to protect themselves.
The Democrats have their heads where the sun does not shine.
This is disgusting and repulsive.
Carl, And yet, it's good, just go ahead and bring it, talk more about it.
The Second Amendment says that the right for the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
All right, so these Democratic leaders are saying that it's not an infringement.
To raise the prices 1000% that's not in it.
So what what our opponents always try to do is they attempt to impose dictatorship and dictator dictate.
So it's whatever you say for as long as you say it and that's all that we're ever going to get.
And hence, withdraw consent, demand arrest, a constitutional republic means is that we're going to have rules that are crystal clear in letter and intent.
And this is a game that is meant to be fair for everyone.
If you can think about any sports rule, just pick your favorite sport.
I'll take baseball since it's in season.
The purpose of those rules is for a fair game.
And of course, the rules are reconsidered, I mean, every year to make for a better and better Game!
And for almost all actions, it's very clear what has happened in the application of the rule.
You have vampires, in case you get confused, and to keep the whole system fair.
But that is not what we have in the United States.
who has any knowledge of the Second Amendment and what a constitutional republic is supposed to be, the idea of the government raising the prices by a thousand percent.
That's going to be an infringement, they're going to say.
They're going to say, "Oh no, that's like the opposite of the Second Amendment." And it's really that clear and ridiculous.
But here we are still talking about it until we have the breakthrough.
Chris?
Chris, we got you.
Go ahead.
You got a weak connection at the moment.
Go ahead.
Well, with us, Chris, we'll get him back, I'm sure, and he can complete his thoughts.
Well, with us, Chris, we'll get him back, I'm sure, and he can complete his thoughts.
Meanwhile, suspect accused of stomping, severely beating a 71-year-old woman.
Cops say the victim had shoe tread prints on her face, was unable to speak.
There he is, right there.
A suspect was arrested after being accused of stomping and severely beating a 71-year-old woman in Tulsa, Oklahoma.
What's more, the victim was found with shoe tread prints on her face and unable to speak.
Officer responded to multiple calls about an elderly woman being attacked near the intersection of East 21st Street and South Sheridan around 5.45 p.m.
Around the same time, a lieutenant in the area was flagged down, found the victim with severe facial, head, and body injuries, adding she had shoe tread prints on her face and unable to speak.
Several witnesses were attempting to render aid, adding the witnesses said they saw a male punching, kicking, and stomping on the woman.
Officer searched the area and got the suspect a few blocks west of the intersection.
The suspect, later identified as Donovan Anderson, said he beat the woman because she said something wrong to him that he did not like.
We believe the victim had just got off the bus, walking to her home when the attack happened.
The victim was taken to hospital, expected to be okay.
I find that dubious.
Anderson was arrested on charges of aggravated assault and battery on an elderly person.
How are folks reacting?
Commentators.
He will bond out and do it again.
If this had happened in New York, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg would have charged her with damaging his shoes.
What did she say that was wrong that he didn't like?
No, you can't have my purse!
When did we become people with so little self-control?
When did we decide it was okay to attack someone for something they say?
You could just say, well, that's your opinion and walk away.
This lady is most likely going to suffer for the rest of her life.
And her attacker will be in jail for hopefully several decades for assault and elder abuse.
Does no one consider consequences?
Or do they just figure they can ignore them?
Carl, your thoughts?
Especially at this time, given it's World War Three and AMRAF 2.0 and everything, some people are going to snap, and a very small percentage of people are going to be violent.
And I speak from having volunteered at the so-called hard-to-staff schools in central Los Angeles, where we averaged at Jefferson High School, which is a little bit to the southeast, of USD at 41st and Compton, we averaged about a homicide a week within a mile of the school.
And yet, You know, just be polite to people.
Don't don't aggravate them because some people will become violent.
There are not very many of them.
So that grandma, I hope that she upgrades her purse contents with at least pepper spray and maybe with a gun.
And that, again, shows the purpose of the Second Amendment for self-defense.
And I don't remember the exact Outline of the story.
But there is that quote of Jesus saying to sell your cloak and buy a sword.
So do not underestimate people.
Do not underestimate the danger of the times.
Yes.
Yes.
I couldn't agree more.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Holy FJB and FHB, will this actually happen?
Am I dreaming?
Is it Reaper madness, or is this actually possible?
Anyone mind if I don't hold my breath for too long?
BAM!
Biden and Hunter to get a subpoena by Oversight Committee.
Representative James Comer says Joe and Hunter Biden will be subpoenaed to come before his committee.
This is always going to end with the Bidens coming in front of the committee.
We're going to subpoena the family.
This investigation is well done by Comer.
There's no escape.
The storm has arrived.
Godspeed, Mr. Comer.
Sick him.
Meanwhile, final thoughts.
Carl, yours.
Yeah, again, and this whole show today has emphasized, for me, the importance of just having people choose a side, and all the facts are on our side, the good side.
And if people want to go ahead and remain lukewarm, like Dershowitz, then they can do that.
But we're really pushing for people's intellectual integrity and moral courage, or at least I am.
And until that somehow breaks, and when it does, then all of these people, or most of the people who have supported evil, they're just going to slime their way over to the good side, and they're going to try to avoid detection.
So one of the good things of All these operations that we see with all these central players is that if and when we win all of these people are going to be there known they have.
Spoken.
They have demonstrated their allegiance.
But until we get the breakthrough, we're going to be talking about it, and all I can do is encourage and appreciate.
Thank you, thank you, thank you for our audience for your intellectual integrity and moral courage to speak the truth.
If we don't win, then that great reset and eating the bugs and owning nothing and being chipped and culled, that's what we're looking at if we don't win.
Well said, Carl.
Thank you for the excellent commentary today, Chris.
Also, though, we would have liked to have had more.
It may have been Thomas Jefferson who observed the United States would never be defeated by foreign powers, but only could succumb to traitors within.
It astonished me, having voted Democrat most of my life, to find that the Democrat Party itself represents that traitorous column within the United States.
It is destroying our law and our constitution and our form of government.
With profound adverse effects for the quality of life of every American.
It is a disgrace.
The fact that we have a crime family in place.
The fact they're utilizing the FBI and the DOJ as merely extensions.
The fact that Merrick Garland actually is functioning as though he were the conciliatory power.
Don Biden is outrageous, disgusting, a disgrace.
I cannot believe these people can actually sleep well at night, given the extent to which they are betraying the American people and the Constitution that our Founding Fathers so well designed.
Civilization lives in a very fragile state.
It requires cooperation by persons of good faith and well-meaning and dedication to the Constitution to make it function.
The Democrats are destroying that on every side, through law enforcement, through the judicial system, through the open borders, and much, much more.
It's a tragedy to watch.
And if we can't bring it to a halt, the nation is done.
Meanwhile, this weekend, spend as much time with friends, family, people you love and care about, because we still do not know how much time we have left.
Enjoy!
▲
Export Selection