Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 8, 2023 - Jim Fetzer

01:15:24

Need to Know News (7 August 2023) with Carl Herman and Chris Weinert

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Here we go.
	This is Jim Fetzer, Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Carl Herman at Mission Viejo, California, and Chris Weinert in Fort Myers, Florida.
	We're here to give you all the news you need to know.
	Ukraine has discovered a widespread draft-dodging conspiracy.
	Surprise, surprise!
	Prosecutors claim officials in Regional Recruitment Center teamed up with members of Military Medical Commission to create a scheme for issuing certificates to claim men unfit for military service due to their health and have them removed from the draft register.
	They were charging an average of $6,000 for the service, after which their clients did not even present for medical exams.
	The recipients then used these fraudulent medical exemptions to flee Ukraine.
	During searches of doctors' offices, recruitment centers, and residences of suspected draft dodgers, oblicee medical records, logs of registration of medical findings, patient certificates, and other medical and accounting documents, the entire conspiracy was allegedly mediated by third parties who remained unnamed.
	The government in Kiev has ordered several waves of conscription since the hostilities began in February 2022.
	They've been sending individual summons, but rather blanket notification, all men of military age, and of course they're forcing them to serve.
	It's really quite outrageous.
	Ukraine doesn't publish official casualty figures, but during the month of July alone, Ukrainian military lost almost 21,000 soldiers, 2,227 units of military equipment, 10 German-supplied Leopard tanks, 11 Bradley fighting infantry vehicles, 50 self-propelled guns.
	Meanwhile, Brazil's Lula said neither Putin or Zelensky are ready for peace yet.
	Brazil's role is to try to arrive at a peace proposal when others, both countries, want it.
	The U.N.
	Security Council has to work.
	The U.S.
	invaded Iraq.
	France and England invaded Libya.
	Now Russia.
	Everyone has veto power, meaning the U.N.
	Security Council has failed.
	Brazil has been working with other neutral countries to push for peace.
	Ukraine, however, is demanding full Russian withdrawal, which is a non-starter for negotiations.
	Russia says any future deal must recognize a tariated annex in Ukraine as Russian, and that includes a Donbass in Crimea.
	They will never give them up.
	Brazil was invited to talk this weekend in Saudi Arabia, where Ukraine and the U.S.
	planned to pressure non-allied countries to adopt Ukrainian demands for peace, but obviously that's not going to work.
	That's a failure from the scratch.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	Well, for the first story is, people don't want to serve in that war in Ukraine.
	Duh.
	I wonder and I don't know the answer to the question of what the Ukrainians are doing on the ground to be able to organize and to be able to have something to say and to demonstrate regarding the illegal imposition of the penis piano playing Zelensky, the actor that they have as their leadership.
	It's illegal to protest in Ukraine, it's a tough position, and I support the people on the ground with trying to get to the truth to stop the war from the public side.
	For the second story, yeah, Lula, huh?
	Yeah, Lula won in Brazil, the same as Biden won the political leadership in the U.S., and Lula is just a war criminal complicit liar, saying, fuck you!
	The terms for peace have always been independence for the Donbass, independence for Crimea, which is what the West always talk about, democracy, so let them exercise their democracy, and no NATO for Ukraine.
	For Lula to say that both sides aren't ready for peace without I think you got that right, Carl.
	that have already been put onto the table, that is called a lie of omission.
	And that is, I would say, prima facie evidence of complicity for being a war criminal.
	I think you got that right, Carl.
	Chris?
	Yeah, you know, the whole Brazil BRICS thing that I've been talking about for a while, and if you look at it with the benefit of hindsight, it'll make a lot of sense.
	It was a Goldman Sachs initiative from June of 2001.
	9-11 happens, the War of Terror happens, the whole surveillance data grab happens, the Patriot Act, the NDAAs, all this stuff, right?
	And then on two, you know, the economic emergencies of 08, 09, the bailouts, the TARPs, the Q and 3s.
	Now the megaliths pretty much take over every mom and pop shop and every form of communication online and whatever.
	And basically they corner the marketplace, let's just say, with the parallel infrastructure of the oligarchy and the data grab and the surveillance and all this.
	And they put in these leaders that are in one way or another polar opposite opposed in terms of political origins.
	But they are all working for the same group, the same central bankers, the World Economic Forum.
	They all go to Davos.
	They all pretty much are on the blackmail list.
	And they're all positioned in these places for good reason.
	I have to say Lula is the so-called selected president now of Brazil.
	Rousseff, the former president, is now the head of their finance ministry for BRICS, I think the representative of Brazil.
	So this is, you know, the same players, just on a different stage and a different brand product.
	But it's, I think, a controlled opposition the whole way through like they did with the Cold War.
	You know, the few oligarchs are going to run both sides of that gambit and then basically use the whole spy and surveillance and the whole nationalist red scare type stuff as a loyalty test for their buzz cuts and everything.
	and their hoodlums and their ghouls.
	So, yeah, I don't know.
	As far as I see it, I see the same thing playing out.
	History repeating itself just by more complicated and more technical mechanisms than maybe they had in the last century.
	Fascinating.
	Meanwhile, Jen Psaki, a former press secretary, says any discussion of Biden corruption while Trump is being indicted is a Putin-like tactic.
	Can you believe?
	Former press secretary Jen Psaki, suggested it was traitorous to talk about Biden corruption when Trump is under indictment.
	Do you understand what she's saying here?
	Pointing out corruption and potential criminality in the White House is something dictators like Russian President Putin engage in not, you know, relentlessly pursuing, indicting, or jailing political opponents, as Biden is doing.
	I'm not sure what the color of the sky in Misaki's world has to be a brilliant shade of non-blue.
	Misaki, currently a host on left-wing MSNBC, summarized her thoughts, expressing disgust that the Biden family scandal is even in discussion at this point.
	There's no evidence of that, meaning Biden corruption.
	But they're going to keep trying because that's the argument.
	They want to fuzzy the water, muddy the water, not fuzzy muddy the water.
	By the way, that's a tactic Vladimir Putin and other authoritarian dictators use.
	But that's their strategic objective, to make it all seem the same.
	Up is down, left is right, that's Fisaki's world.
	No, exposing Biden family corruption is not Putin-like.
	If you'll give the moment to put on my Ushanka, I'd like to update you a bit on that corruption.
	Devin Archer, former associate of Hunter, testified in Congress that Joe Biden was put on speakerphone or met in person with some business associate 20 times.
	As a mean to sell the brand in secure, lucrative ventures.
	Archer's testimony also confirmed that VP Biden met in 2014 with Russian billionaire Alina Maturina, widow of the former mayor of Moscow, at a Georgetown cafe.
	Coincidentally, Maturina was left off of Biden's Russia sanctions list last year.
	Hunter, according to the New York Post, has received over $100 million in investment banking from Baterina.
	Contrary to Psaki's claim, there are volumes of evidence in the form of email documents, whistleblower textbooks, that demonstrate ethnic levels of corruption by the Biden crime family.
	But you can't discuss any of that because, my, my God, you're just like Putin!
	Here's Benny Johnson tweeting, Representative Daniel Goldman just confirmed Joe Biden coordinated with Hunter's business partners regularly.
	What were they talking about?
	According to a sweaty, visibly shaken Goldman, just the weather, guys.
	Just the weather.
	Misaki was among the first purveyors of misinformation regarding Hunter's laptop when she tried projecting with the suggestion the whole thing was Russian disinformation.
	She claimed the laptop, known by the FBI to be real from the outset, was actually a Russian plot.
	Here you have Misaki tweeting, Hunter Biden's story is Russian disinfo, doesn't a former intel official say?
	Do you know what might put a smile on the face of Vladimir Putin?
	Jailing political opponents as a means to interfere in an election or dishing out propaganda that people like Psaki does or telling people to ignore criminals because of their party affiliation.
	Those all sound infinitely more Putin-esque.
	Psaki's tweet was a reference to the letter published by 51 former Intel officials we now know as simply a means to keep the spotlight off their chosen candidate.
	It worked.
	The story was suppressed by the media and big tech, keeping American voters in the dark, propelling Biden to victory.
	It's enough to make Putin blush.
	Psaki also spread lies about parental rights and education law in Florida.
	That makes her completely crazy because it's hurting kids.
	The legislation restricts teachers and school districts from giving classroom instruction on sexual orientation or gender identity in kindergarten through third grade.
	It protects kids.
	But this was Psaki's reaction.
	And then there was a time she helped spread fake news about migrants being whipped at the border, something she called obviously horrific.
	Investigation found the Border Patrol agent never whipped a migrant.
	Her career is marked by several instances of her trying to muddy the water.
	Guess that makes her Putin's papa.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	Well, psychopath pistachio.
	I'm so glad she spoke up.
	I did not want anybody to forget that woman for what she has said and what she has represented as the former White House press secretary.
	So she also lies in omission about the FBI's own form showing that Biden's took in $10 million from Burisma alone.
	So the prima facie evidence for that witch is that either she is criminally complicit or If she wants to talk about Russia, huh?
	Okay, well then, the phrase associated with Lenin, then she's a useful idiot.
	But I bet that if we really dug into Jen Psaki with her greatest hits regarding election fraud and COVID and Ukraine and crimes against children, I'm glad she brought that up too.
	She's for the sexualization of children from kindergarten to third grade.
	We want them to be confused about everything, but certain about transgenderism, huh?
	So, Jen is a psychopath, and what that means, and I don't say that to insult her as a professional scholar.
	I'm trying to be as precise and concise as possible.
	The psychopath has a veneer of socially acceptable behavior, and Jen certainly does.
	She's well-educated, well-spoken, but this veneer of socially acceptable behavior Nice, Chris.
	covers viciously destructive policies and actions.
	So, Jen Pisaki, we'll remember you after the victory and people that are rolled up for complicity with all these crimes centered in war, money, and against our children.
	Nice.
	Chris?
	Yeah, a lot of what she does is pretty much out of the page book of propaganda, if you really read into that, that's a good book to look at.
	And a few other ones about the subject, if you really dive into it.
	They've pretty much taken pages out of that formula, you know, and everything they do, whether it's emotional inversion, selective accounting, hyper-focus, or completely non-focus.
	You remember they said that the Clinton Foundation, all those unsubstantiated claims, the vast right-wing conspiracy, I could go down the whole slang bullet point type of words they used to basically talk that off.
	A nothing burger, you know, gaslighting you into feeling like an asshole for suggesting, you know, the malevolence that was really going on with that organization itself.
	And when that exhausted its credibility, then they thrust in the Biden machine without a beat, missing a beat, and ran them to the top.
	This is, like Joe Biden said, the most vast and comprehensive voter fraud network in human history.
	So, I think he was telling the truth there.
	I think that that was absolutely correct, and I think that the biggest mistake people make is underestimating the danger of the situation that has presented itself here today.
	Oh, I couldn't agree more.
	Meanwhile, Trump says it would be sort of foolish to go to the Republican debates.
	Former President Trump questioned why he'd want to take part in the party's first primary debate, saying it could be foolish given his sizable lead in the polls over the other whole foals.
	In an interview with Breitbart, he said he had decided whether to join or not, which will be held on August 23rd in Milwaukee.
	I haven't totally made a decision.
	I like debates.
	I might be here because of debates.
	I might have won against Hillary with the debates, and I might have gotten the nomination because of the debates.
	Oh, and you're leading by 50 and 60 points above these people, and you have people at 0, 1, and 2 percent.
	They're going to be asking hostile questions, probably won't have much of an audience if I'm not there.
	If I'm not the debates and they're not going to have a very big audience, it seems like it would be foolish to do them.
	According to the latest poll, which surveyed 3,716 registered voters, 58% of the respondents said they would support Trump.
	DeSantis said this in second with 15% support.
	Vivek Goswami was third with nine, followed by former VP Pence with seven.
	None of the remaining picked up more than three percent.
	Trump noted he wouldn't be the first to skip a debate since former President Ronald Reagan did not participate in 1980.
	Moreover, taking part would mean putting himself up against a hostile network.
	I feel it's sort of foolish to be doing that.
	I think it could be stupid.
	It could be a stupid thing to do.
	But I've not made a decision.
	At a campaign rally near Pennsylvania, Trump asked his supporters whether he should take part.
	Should I go there with 10 or 12 hostile people in a hostile network and be abused with terrible questions?
	Trump asked.
	Should I do the debate?
	The crowd responded with a chorus of no's.
	Two days after the rally, Trump took to his true socials, suggesting a debate could be a contest to see who should be his running mate.
	Let them debate so I can see who I might consider for VP.
	The Santas, widely seen as Trump's biggest challenger, said he will join the debate regardless of Trump's decision.
	Nobody's entitled to be nominated.
	You gotta earn it, he said, encouraging Trump to participate.
	I think he should show up and make his case and answer questions like the rest of us.
	Last month, Rona McDaniel, chairwoman of the Republican National Committee, said it would be a mistake for Mr. Trump to skip the debate, saying not getting on the debate stage is just more of an opportunity for Joe Biden to continue to get his message out.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	Well, for Trump, I like that position.
	I would say, if it were me, he should just continue to go ahead and roast Fox for being the hostile network that the article describes.
	In general, you want to have three talking points that you want to have.
	So if you make the point that, yeah, I'm not going to show up to Fox's debate, and you Take the three strongest points and Tucker tried to tell the truth and he got fired.
	You could bring up some clips of what they did to support the fraudulent 2020 election and then you could come up with whatever else that you wanted to do for a third talking point to make sure that people understand that Fox is just part of the problem.
	And for, oh, DeSantis.
	I wanted to say something about DeSantis.
	So for DeSantis to say that Trump needs to make his case and earn something, huh?
	Yeah, OK.
	That's on you, DeSantis.
	It's up to you to make your case that you can earn an audience talking with Trump.
	Yes, Chris.
	Oh, man.
	Yeah, there's, like I said in the last segment, a lot of selective accounting as far as, you know, what people do and what gets reported and what gets focused on and what gets ignored.
	This is the full weight of the media doing this and Fox is very much a part of this and I think that the whole two-party system is designed to, like I said, lower our expectations and certainly the things that are delivered from our government in terms of service.
	And to really acclimate us to lesser and lesser qualities of life as we go along, and certainly poorer and poorer foreign and domestic policies.
	These psychopaths that Carl was talking about are, you know, making up the CFR and they're funded by AIPAC.
	And these guys are the ones that decide our domestic and foreign policies.
	And they have obviously proven to be complete and total psychopaths.
	So my question is, why do we continue to put the fate of ourselves and our children into the hands of these complete and total lunatics?
	Baffles me, but I don't know.
	I just live here, I guess.
	Dershowitz. - Yes.
	Jack Smith could be indicted for fraud for omitting Trump's peaceful statement.
	A very nice point.
	The indictment charges Trump with war counts, including conspiracy to defraud the United States.
	In the portion recounting Trump's speech at the Stop the Steal rally, Smith reveals the errors of the House Democrats.
	He focuses on Trump's use of the phrase, fight like hell, omits a sentence highlighted by Trump's defense team.
	I know that everyone here will soon be marching over the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard, Donald Trump.
	Gershwin told Megyn Kelly that by his own standards, Smith could be charged with fraud because of his omission of Trump's peaceful rhetoric.
	Under the indictment itself, Jack Smith could be indicted.
	He told a direct lie here.
	He reported to describe the speech President Trump made on January 6th, and he left out the key words when President Trump said, I want you to demonstrate peacefully and patriotically, you know.
	Lie by omission under the law can be as serious as a law by commission.
	The fact that Smith repeated the error of the House impeachment managers would appear to be deliberate, because these phrases were the crux of Trump's Senate trial.
	His lawyers even played footage of Democrats using similar fight rhetoric to show its common usage.
	Really unbelievable.
	Trump's team returned again and again to the fact that he told his supporters to rally peacefully at the Capitol, which was ultimately a major reason he was able to defeat the House impeachment charge of incitement.
	Notably, Smith did not charge Trump with incitement, but in a statement to the press, he claimed Trump's lies about the election caused a riot, all but making the claim of incitement.
	Meanwhile, Mike Pence tries bold new strategy of alienating the 80 million people who voted for Trump.
	U.S.
	In a bold new attempt to win the 2024 election against Biden, candidate Pence has decided to alienate all 80 million voters who supported Donald Trump.
	It's about time someone had the courage to say it, since today I will trump his bat, Pence said to a raucous crowd of 12 seniors in the activity center of Shady Oak's retirement home.
	If that hurts my chances with the tens of millions of people who voted for him, so be it.
	I am a stalwart man of integrity.
	Just look at my kind eyes and serious face.
	Pence then looked directly into the camera with a look of integrity.
	Sources within the Pence campaign confirmed Pence plans to make up the loss in support by courting Biden voters and convincing them he's not a bigoted Nazi fascist homophile.
	We have faith in the virtuous Americans who voted for Biden, said a campaign spokesman.
	They will certainly see things our way.
	What Pence has had the chance to talk to them in his comforting evangelical dad voice and make them seem reason.
	Pence also expressed confidence he'd be able to make inroads with 150 million who didn't vote in the previous elections, such as babies, illegal immigrants and Chinese spies posing as university professors.
	Trump is an existential threat to democracy and an evil person, continued Pence.
	I know this from my four years of loyally and unquestionably serving him.
	Vote for me.
	At publishing time, approximately 100% of Biden voters polled still thought Pence was a bigoted Nazi fascist homophile.
	Carl, For Jack Smith, you know, what he's doing could get him disbarred, but our opponents have no choice.
	They can't back up.
	They can't ever stop what they're doing because what they did was engaged in war centered in war money or crime centered war money and crimes against humanity with COVID.
	So for this thing that Jack Smith is saying, he's claiming that Trump engaged in fraud.
	All right.
	Well, the case of fraud means is that you knew something to be true, but you did something else for your personal gain.
	Okay?
	So, and what this article is pointing out is that Jack Smith intentionally, willfully ignored exculpatory evidence against Trump to say that, because Trump said, you know, just demonstrate peacefully and patriotically in his last Two tweets confirm that.
	So that is a lie of omission.
	And then for this case to even be brought up, that it is possible to make a case of fraud for 2020 election fraud, when You have all those states, I believe five of the states, and it might be more than that with their last moment, those states that shut down the vote counting and then came back with mathematically impossible numbers.
	As we keep on saying, and I'll put the in the show notes here at Bitshoot, the evidence for this in the documentation, the state of Pennsylvania had a legislative hearing and they demonstrated that when they resumed counting the votes, they had one vote batch of 600,000 for Biden, 3,000 for Trump, but 201 odds Yeah, Jack, see, it's more likely that you would win two super lotteries in a row.
	to 60 zeros after it.
	For Jack Smith to say there's no evidence for that and it's fraud to say otherwise, yeah, Jack, it's more likely that you would win two super lotteries in a row.
	That's more probable than it is for Biden to have won that election.
	And part of me, again, you have to be absolutely passionate and frustrated about the lies.
	But at the same time, when you step back and see the position that these psychopaths are in, it's like, oh, come on, baby.
	What else do you want to say?
	Tell us everything.
	And then when we get this breakthrough, the Hammer of Paul and all those people will be done forever.
	One could not ask for a better example of the corruption of the DOJ than these indictments.
	Chris?
	Yeah, this lawfare has certainly been versed in Shakespearean irony, but kind of maybe infantilized for the average onlooker and people that might participate in the two-party system and fall into these emotional traps.
	You know, this is all, in my opinion, theatrics that are brought forth from the London Theatre Company and the Jewish Hollywood media.
	And I think that, you know, the DC thing is kind of the same thing.
	It's a controlled opposition thing.
	It's polarized.
	It's atomized.
	It's meant to provoke you emotionally, to play on your needs or your fears, and to certainly not deliver in the rhetoric that they really gin everybody up with.
	So I almost think that, you know, another thing I'd like to point out is most of this lawfare that's been brought forth by the DNC and Jack Smith and many of these other guys bragging and everyone else, Clinton especially, come to find out all the stuff they're putting on Donald Trump.
	It turns out that these guys are fabricating all this shit, making it up all along, lying on their ass, paying for the intel and these private ghouls to really make this stuff up, literally.
	And then nothing ever happens to them for this.
	So it's amazing to me to really watch this and not, like, you know, lose my mind.
	I guess that's kind of why I have to emotionally divorce myself from this thing.
	Maybe that's part of why I rationalize it as Kabuki theater.
	But yeah, it's certainly... I think time is gonna be the avenger with most of this here.
	Nice.
	Very.
	Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
	Carl invited my attention to a nice graph.
	COVID deaths by vaccine status in England, April 2021 to December 2022.
	It's absolutely staggering that the unvaccinated are suffering a very low mortality rate, but the vaccinated, my God, double, triple, quadruple, Look at that graph.
	All those red lines are signs of death induced by medical malpractice, and a deadly vaccine promoted as safe and effective.
	Serious, serious stuff.
	Carl, would you like to comment?
	Yeah, this is the official data from the UK, and according to their data, unreliable as it is from our point, but from the public point, okay, so they're admitting to this.
	And if we count up the data that is in the article, 92% of all deaths in the UK described from COVID, now that's problematic with testing, I'll put in the show notes in here and bit you some documentation that everybody should withdraw consent of any reliability of anything that is tested by the psychopaths, but 92% of UK deaths of covid are now coming.
	from the vaccinated, and I believe it's the triple vaccinated that is most problematic.
	And when it comes from official data, that empowers everybody to be able to point, withdraw consent, and then if they demand anything, anything, anything, anything, other than to point at the data and to acknowledge it, then to demand their removal.
	from office as either being, again, the same thing for Jen Pisacchi, as being laughably incompetent and a useful idiot, or more likely being criminally complicit.
	Chris, your thoughts?
	Yeah, no doubt.
	I agree.
	I think that they've given up the hustle foul and the accident and the incorrect and wrong and whatever.
	No, I think this is malice of forethought.
	I think that the more and more these guys act, cover up, and do these type of propaganda campaigns, doubling down on the duplicity, so to speak, you know, the more evident it becomes to me and many others that maybe haven't really given this a second thought.
	How complicit they are in this and how dirty this whole thing is and how nasty it has been intended to be all along.
	So yeah, I guess you really gotta, it's hard for most people, normal people, to think like these psychopaths or even fathom the amount of lunacy that these people really put out and put a lot of money behind on a daily basis.
	So yeah, I could see why they really kind of I guess maybe project their own innocence onto these people and really they're underprepared to assess what they're dealing with, in my opinion, given because they don't know the true nature of this quote-unquote enemy.
	It's not like a foreign nation that's coming in here by boat.
	These guys are coming in by limousine and saying something that's certainly not true and playing this whole propaganda game the way that they are.
	So, yeah, I think time will be the avenger, like I said in the last segment.
	Yes.
	Indeed.
	Meanwhile, despite 12 deaths during clinical trials, the CDC signs off on RSV shots for newborns.
	This is outrageous.
	CDC and Prevention, Disease Control and Prevention recommend the first ever monoclonal antibody marketed as a defense for all newborns against respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV.
	Efortis, also known as Nercevimib, is produced by pharma giants Sanofi and AstraZeneca.
	In a press release, the CDC referred to the drug as a powerful tool and a new immunization.
	The AC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices voted to include Nurse Evimab in the Vaccine for Children program, which provides recommended vaccines and immunization at no cost to about half the nation's children.
	This is terrible.
	CDC is currently working to make it available through the Vaccine for Children program.
	Healthcare providers will be a key partner in their outreach.
	According to the AP, the drug will be offered as a one-time shot for infants born just before or during the RSV season, and for those less than 8 months old before the season starts, and some high-risk 8- to 19-month-old infants.
	Infants, of course, are a high-risk group.
	Infants in the high-risk group include immunocompromised children and those with chronic lung disease, as well as Native American and Alaska Native children who have RSV hospitalization rates between 4 and 10 times that of the general population.
	The CDC's ACIP approved in a unanimous 10-0 vote.
	Though not bound by the vote, CDC Director Mandy Cohen signed off on the recommendation Thursday.
	The drug will be broadly available for all inputs regardless of whether they have a health condition right.
	We can't miss out on big profits for pharma giving shots at kids whether they need it or not.
	Some medical experts criticize the recommendation point infant tests that occur during their clinical trials.
	Cardiologist Peter McCullough, for example, observed, while monoclonal antibodies are reasonably safe and effective, they are not clinically indicated nor medically necessary in all newborns.
	This new preventative strategy should be considered in rare cases with baseline lung disease, such as severe asthma or cystic fibrosis.
	Injecting all newborns should be off the table and rejected by parents who want to avoid unnecessary drugs and potential harm.
	Brian Hooker, Ph.D., P.E., Senior Director of Science and Research for Children's Health Defense, cited a significant number of infant deaths during the clinical trials.
	This is really too bad.
	Seem to be part of the Department of Health and Human Services' scare tactics recently regarding RSV, which is generally a mild infection finding its origin during the development of the polio vaccine.
	The efficacy of the antibodies in the clinical trials is woefully low, and the circulating half-life of such a therapeutic may be as low as two weeks.
	In other words, it hardly, if it even protects, it does so only ever so briefly.
	I'm worried about allergic reaction in newborns, especially given the high dose of antibodies, given that 12 infants died in the experimental arm of the clinical trial.
	Children's Health Defense posted, according to a published CDC paper from 2025, 25 babies under one year of age die from RSV yearly in the U.S.
	Twelve innocent babies died during the Resemimab trial, the so-called powerful tool to protect children against RSV.
	Dr. Meryl Ness, an internist, biological warfare epidemiologist, how appropriate is that, member of the CHG Scientific Advisory Committee, cited a study indicating RSV is low risk for babies.
	She also cited the lack of demonstrated long-term efficacy for such monoclonal antibodies, writing, There's already resistance in RSV strains to this product, so as it gets used, the resistance strain will outperform the susceptible ones, and the RSV ecology is likely to change.
	I mean, its use will likely not last very long.
	Talking about the evolutionary development, which is also true of coronaviruses, that they adapt so rapidly, developing a vaccine is a bad idea, because as soon as you get it out there, they've already adapted and gone beyond it.
	That was ignored, of course, during the pandemic and promotion of the Kill Vax, because it was still designed to kill.
	It didn't have anything to do with a virus.
	ACIB recommended adding it to the childhood vaccine schedule, which would provide manufacturers a waiver of liability even if it kills kids, but also recommended coding it as a drug for insurance purposes and leaving it out of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.
	ACIB member and CDC epidemiologist Jefferson Jones said during Thursday's meeting, the group felt that RSV-associated disease in infants born during or entering the first RSV season is of public health importance.
	Also, clinical data regarding the effectiveness of Mayfortis was presented, indicating it was up to 75% effective at preventing lower respiratory tract infections that require medical attention among infants, 78% effective at preventing hospitalization.
	I guarantee you those figures are just made up.
	Jones acknowledged that a primary limitation was RSV testing may be more common for children with risk conditions inflating RSV-specific hospitalization rates.
	Overall, the evidence range was very low certainty.
	And this was downgraded because of indirectness, because the use of the pharmacokinetic energy as a surrogate for efficacy.
	A population did not include children to match a proposed indication outside of chronic lung disease, congenital heart disease, the study was small in size, and get this, no placebo group was included for comparison.
	Several infant deaths, 12 in all, were reported during the clinical trial, which they claimed were unrelated to the antibody.
	CNBC reported in June that of the 12 incidents, 4 died from cardiac, 2 died from gastroenteritis, 2 from unknown causes, but were likely cases of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, the name you give when you don't know why they died, 1 from a tumor, 1 from COVID, 1 from a skull fracture, and 1 from pneumonia.
	In the Stat News report in June, no data are available about whether giving Nusimabab to a baby whose mother was vaccinated against RSV during pregnancy would give the infant more protection or be it a waste of the product or possibly bring about their death.
	Carl, this is horrific.
	It is horrific, and I acknowledge Michael, the MD, for putting that together.
	He could have been a little bit stronger in the math, just to throw a little criticism in there.
	When you're saying that 12 of these kids died in the studies, out of how many?
	And if you're saying that 25 nationally die every year, it's out of how many?
	And then for making that point, so to say that there was no placebo group in the test, okay, then that means that they didn't have a study.
	They didn't have one.
	You don't have a placebo placebo group, then you fail the definition of a study.
	And that would be similar to saying that.
	Okay.
	So, if you didn't have any guns and you didn't have any plans on January 6, and that means you didn't have any insurrection because you failed to meet the definition for it.
	So, for the CDC.
	You know, if people get a little bit confused about every new PSYOP, every crime du jour coming their way, part of my contribution as a historian is to say, well, you know, do the best you can if you're interested to understand the crime du jour, but you don't really don't have to.
	You just have to rest upon the history, and that is sufficient.
	Uh, to demand arrest and withdraw consent.
	For example, the CDC, so for them, they, as the CDC admits, they have no sample of COVID.
	And that's 100 plus other health organizations.
	None of them can produce any evidence that COVID exists with a sample of the virus.
	Plus, because they never had one, they had to create a COVID test with generic flu.
	And then they overcycled that test, and this is all in the documentation that I'll provide with the essay, My Best Shot.
	They overcycled this test, and then when they rolled that out, then they officially said with a straight face, oh yeah, the flu took a vacation this year.
	That's why it went down 99%.
	And those COVID cases actually aren't flu, they're COVID because the flu disappeared.
	So it's just crazy, tragic, comic.
	But I'm not done yet!
	Wait, there's more!
	Any adverse event from being vaxxed that occurs within 14 days, that is counted as an adverse COVID event to somebody unvaccinated.
	How cruel and evil.
	And then anybody who dies, they're counted as a COVID death, no matter what killed the person, if they get one of those fraudulent tests to show a false positive result.
	So, you know, people don't have to play this game and any way that they get to the position of withdrawing consent and demanding arrests of such.
	such leaders, that's where I think that people need to be at.
	Nice.
	Chris.
	Yeah, I agree with Carl.
	I don't think they did any tests.
	And this has absolutely been a whole en masse experiment on the entire world population with this mRNA recombinant and this, I don't even want to call it a vaccine.
	This is something else.
	I mean, this is beyond the Nuremberg Code and beyond anything what the Nazis could have ever dreamt of doing.
	And this is going on and there hasn't even been a shout or even a whimper.
	So this is amazing to see the amount of carnage that's going on.
	For that testing, the thing you were talking about, the respiratory disease, whatever that is, I know one person, it was a baby that had the shot and within two weeks the baby was in a hospital on a ventilator and almost dead.
	Just got out of the hospital two nights ago.
	So uh yeah that's uh and strangely enough she was legally and medically not uh vaccinated because I guess it's within two weeks right?
	So uh wow that's that's something.
	So I wonder how those stats will weigh in as far as this science and these type of experimental tests.
	Are being considered by the marketplace and by Big Pharma, who has not only vested interest in the success of these products, but certainly extensive complicity in the failure or the maiming of patients from these products.
	So, wow, as I say, it's like they're doubling down, tripling down because they're waist deep in the blood of the innocent.
	And this whole thing should have never been.
	And the fact that it is and nobody's ever done anything about it, to me, is still a mystery.
	And a lot of them own stock, and these companies are making money out of the debt that they are bringing about by promoting the products.
	These doctors think they're doing you a favor, Fats.
	You know what I mean?
	Like, these people seriously think they're trying to help you with this shit, and it is a poison apple at best.
	So yeah, I'm sorry to cut in on you.
	I just had to add that point.
	Welcome.
	Absolutely.
	Anytime.
	Joker actor Mark Marion calls right-wing men criticizing Barbie.
	A bunch of effing insecure babies.
	I might agree with him.
	I have seen the film.
	Joker actor!
	Mark Maron, who also fancies himself a comedian, shared his thought on Greta Gerwig's Barbie, calling Ming Chrisine a film for his promotion of woke ideology.
	And frankly, I didn't see it promoting woke ideology.
	It's certainly not promoting transgenderism at all.
	It's encouraging girls and women to be accepting of themselves as girls of women.
	A bunch of effing insecure men!
	Babies!
	Marian Levy's phrase on a film where it's progressive and feminist message.
	I don't see it all that progressive, but I mean, I was watching it with care.
	He said on TikTok, I saw Barbie.
	I thought it was an effing masterpiece, and I don't throw that word around lightly, but Jesus Christ, right?
	He continued, I didn't know what to expect.
	I wasn't even excited about going.
	It's like it does a fairly amazing thing to create a sort of broad-based entertainment product that applies to the entire spectrum, primarily of women, I think, and thus seep it in progressive politics and basic feminism in a way that's funny and formative and well-executed in a context that is engaging and zapping monumental.
	It shouldn't be.
	It's pretty radical, he said.
	It's intentionally, thoroughly explaining feminist ideas in a way that's funny.
	I've just never seen anything like it, and I guess that's, you know, the world is having the same experience on different levels.
	He then returned to his praise of the film.
	The performers were all great, but really that script man had that same experience right from the get-go, like watching a musical, and they cast Will Ferrell to be Will Ferrell Fonny, which is always a treat.
	He lambooned Ben Crisside in the film.
	And the comedy about men is inspired.
	And the fact that certain men took offense to the point where they tried to build a grift around it in terms of their narrative as right-wing is so embarrassing for them.
	I mean, so embarrassing.
	Any dude who can't take the hits in the movie, they gotta take a look in their pants and decide what they're made of.
	I mean, what a buck of effing insecure babies.
	Marion then returned to praise.
	The performance was all great, but it's really the script.
	It's what I thought of it.
	It made me proud somehow.
	Numerous right-wing critics have described the film as woke.
	Novelist and comic book reader Jean D. Arnaud stated in his review, Barbie opens up in a scene that's actually a little girl playing with a baby doll.
	In an allegory for abortion and trained women to abort their babies to be happy, she destroys a little baby doll and looks up at Margot Robbie, who has this beautiful, wonderful, thin physique, and she wants that out of her life.
	She's become a career woman who doesn't care about such things.
	It's a beautiful, beautiful thing, according to these people, so it's a pro-baby-killing movie immediately out the gate.
	He concluded his review stating, man-hating film, pro-trans film, pro-homosexual film, pro-abortion film.
	This is exactly what we got out of their kid's property, which should just have been a fun movie.
	And I tell you, having watched the film with my daughter, I didn't get that reaction at all.
	I thought it was a celebration of being a girl and womanhood and confronting leaving Barbie-dom to go to the real world and having to adjust.
	I thought it was inspiring and even profound.
	Carl?
	Wow, wow, wow.
	My daughter hasn't pressed me enough to see it, and I haven't been excited to promote it, so I haven't seen it and I don't know it, but I'm glad to hear that report from you, Jim.
	So, In general.
	Human beings, we want to maximize the virtue in everybody's experience and expression to make the strongest team possible, to lift everyone up, to be of the strongest character.
	And that is the, that is exactly what our opponents don't want.
	What they want is this false narrative and fear and this, this straw man argument that it's really that argument that that guy is making is a sexist baiting.
	Yeah, I was prepared to be entertained, but it actually had depth to it, which surprised me.
	I liked it.
	has something to say and could be something worthwhile.
	So if my daughter brings it up again, I'll be more curious to accept her invitation to see it. - Yeah, I was prepared to be entertained, but it actually had depth to it, which surprised me.
	I liked it.
	Chris. - Oh man, I could see myself getting roped into that one by the little one pretty soon.
	She's just about at that age in, you know, the Sally commercial a few times.
	So yeah, I haven't seen the movie.
	I couldn't really comment on what it's about or anything like that.
	But as far as all the stuff that's getting pumped through Hollywood in terms of social engineering, yeah, I could see how somebody could make a case.
	Maybe not necessarily on that movie, but on many others.
	So yeah, I guess that's really all I have to say.
	Until I see it, I can't really I guarantee it's not pro-abortion, and it's certainly not pro-transgender, nothing like that.
	Meanwhile, we're getting many modes of deception out of our government.
	Before the Parkland school shooting gets reenacted with live gunfire, lawmakers took the tour site where seven people were massacred, or so we were told.
	I guarantee it, nobody died at Parkland.
	At least 140 live rounds will be fired inside of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School Friday in a reenactment of the 2018 mass shooting, part of a lawsuit against a former sheriff deputy who stayed outside during the massacre.
	The bullets will be fired into a ballistic trap inside the school's three-story building where the violence unfolded in Parkland.
	The reenactment, which will take several hours, Well, mimic the killer's movements on the day that left 17 people dead, 17 others injured, in what remains the deadliest high school shooting.
	It should be easy to reenact.
	All they have to do is follow the script.
	Scott Peterson, former Broward County Sheriff Deputy, was found not guilty and due to criminal charges after prosecutors accused him of ignoring his training and failing to confront the shooter, instead taking cover outside the building as the victims were gunned down.
	Peterson argued he didn't enter the building because he couldn't tell where the gunshots were coming from due to XOs on the campus.
	The civil action was brought by several victim families and a survivor.
	They want to reenact the shooting to prove the former deputy heard numbers of 70 shots and knew where they were coming from.
	In addition, using the same model of semi-automatic rifle and caliber of cartridge.
	Real talk, the judge of reenactment would sound the fire alarm at the same time as the day of the shooting.
	He expected it would take probably two hours.
	The school will be closed for the day.
	No students will be on campus during the reenactment.
	A bipartisan congressional delegation will tour the site of the massacre ahead of the reenactment, said Florida Democrat Representative Jared Moskowitz, a graduate of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.
	He sent a letter inviting all members to attend.
	It's important for folks in Congress, my colleagues, to see what happens when a school shooting comes to your neighborhood.
	It's going to be a very emotional day.
	Several victim families will join the nine congressional lawmakers for the tour.
	For many, it'll be the second time they visit the untouched site.
	Last month, families and surviving victims were allowed to visit for the first time since the tragedy on February 4, 2018.
	By the way, that was Valentine's Day.
	In accordance with their common practice, they sent all the students home at 1 p.m., all 3,500.
	Only a few dozen stayed behind to serve as student crisis actors.
	Max Schachter, his 14-year-old son, Alex, who was killed in his English class on the first floor of the 1200 building, attended a private tour and saw where his child took his last breath.
	Or so we are told.
	I've wanted to bring members of Congress to this building for years.
	After I walked through it myself and I saw the horror.
	I saw Alex's blood all over the floor, all over his desk, and all the other victims.
	I walked out of that building and I was just so angry.
	It was worse than I ever imagined.
	The grieving father decided to channel his agony into action.
	Here's a weapon in AR-15, which of course is a .223 Remington round, just slightly larger than a .22 bullet, but fired at high velocity.
	The New York Times reported the kinds of wounds inflicted when these military-style weapons, damaging bone, ripping up muscles, very horrific.
	Perhaps no one knows the devastating wounds inflicted by assault-style rifles better than the trauma surgeons who struggle to repair them.
	The doctors say they are haunted by the experiences, complying injuries so dire, they struggle to find words to describe them.
	Well, remarkably, we didn't have those wounds at Parkland.
	Here we have Maddie Wilford.
	Dr. Nika Pachinko said wounds on Ms.
	Wilford's chest and abdomen had already healed.
	This is like 10 days after the shooting.
	Young people have a tendency to heal very fast.
	A bullet wound on her upper arm, which had injured two tendons, would take more time.
	She's very, very lucky, Dr. Narabuchenko said.
	We're talking about large-caliber bullets penetrating through the chest and abdomen.
	Those are serious injuries.
	Well, the bullets aren't large-caliber, but they are high-velocity.
	And you're a shot in the chest or abdomen, and you wouldn't be walking around with a bandage on your wrist.
	You'd be dead or seriously incapacitated.
	Dr. Nichaprinko, and I gotta guarantee you, this has to be an actor-doctor phony fraud, say, believe Ms.
	Wilford would be physically ready to return to school next week and would probably make a full recovery.
	I'm so grateful to be here, Ms.
	Wilbert said, and it wouldn't be possible without those officers and first responders, and those amazing doctors, and especially all the love that everyone has sent.
	Here's another.
	Samantha Hugh Hantings, released from the hospital and walking and being interviewed by reporters after only one week.
	And her two legs now require only band-aids for the AR-15 wounds.
	And she apparently had to wait 30 minutes in her classroom before SWAT officers arrived.
	Lucky for her, she didn't bleed out and die.
	She's all over the news with her statement regarding Trump's phone call.
	Just Google her name.
	For New York Times' anti-Trump Samantha Fuentes, see, check it out.
	They're actually using Simunition, which is made out of laundry detergent and bead wax.
	It'll create a welt on the skin, but it will not even penetrate the skin.
	Recall that according to the official timeline, two minutes and 33 seconds after he had been dropped off by Uber, Nicholas Cruz walked to the building and began shooting.
	We have seen by teacher Stacy Limble is dressed in full metal garb, helmet, face mask, bulletproof armor.
	She saw someone dressed in full metal garb.
	How could she possibly know it was Nicholas Cruz?
	She could not.
	So we're to believe in the space of two minutes and 33 seconds.
	Nicholas Cruz managed to walk from the curb where the Uber driver had dropped him to the east stairwell, put on a full metal garb of helmet, face mask, bulletproof armor, and begin shooting?
	If you believe that, you must also believe in the Easter Bunny.
	Meanwhile, here's from an inside classroom at Parkland Hospital, where you're gonna see you use a training dummy with no arms and no head and a pool of fake blood to pretend to be a decedent of the shooting.
	This is how it was done.
	Listen up.
	crying
	oh oh
	i'm gonna play it again i'm I want to point out these students are doing their best to act as though they're scared, but you'll notice if you watch carefully.
	One girl is worried about her bottled water.
	Another's on her iPad.
	A kid is pulling his putts.
	These aren't things you'd do if you were terrified because a shooting had just taken place in front of your very eyes.
	Well, you see, individuals in police uniform going in and out, you must think, wow, those Parkland cops are really Johnny on the spot.
	They aren't Parkland cops.
	Parkland gave up its police force five years earlier.
	Those are actors pretending to be cops.
	crying Sings Sings
	You're so comfortable.
	Plus, as I suggested, it ought to be easy to do the reenactment All they'd have to do is follow the script.
	Carl?
	This is an official lie of omission again, and they're denying any of the facts that would refute the official narrative, such as the few that we pointed out.
	Here.
	And so, because it's another official lie, or so it's faced, and especially so because the official lie does not engage with any questions that might destroy the credibility of that official narrative.
	In that article, so you had a dad, huh?
	Four and a half years later, he's touring the classroom, and they said it was the first time.
	And yet, he's saying that Alex's blood was still on the desk and on the Explore!
	They haven't cleaned that up in four and a half years, huh?
	And then that x-ray.
	So the actual damage done by a high-velocity gunshot is going to be very different from a Band-Aid.
	And exactly as Jim pointed out, what you would expect is, you know, a lot of the kids play paintball.
	I've played paintball.
	It's a rush.
	And you do get a welt.
	But a Band-Aid, and walking around, that's physically impossible, or at least You would have to conclude, and the burden of proof for what people can stand with ethically and morally is that prima facie, on its face, this seems like another lie.
	And because of the whole history and background of a lying, looting, illegal rogue state empire, again, you just withdraw consent and you have to find both the courage and get your eyes and hands on the facts enough so that you're no longer Chris, your thoughts?
	Yeah, the, um, this was the David Hogg one, right?
	Yeah.
	Okay, just wanted to make sure I had the right one.
	I mean, there are so damn many of these things they put out like once a week.
	You got that right.
	I kind of lose track of them, but I pretty much get the gist and understand the formula.
	Well I guess it's a fair question to ask which David Hogg because wasn't he involved with the 2014 Huntington Beach shooting too?
	Where he was a witness of that across the country you know in California.
	Interesting stuff and then of course you got that Alexa Mietnik who's been in like four that was her fourth one you know I think she was in the Boston bombing and a couple others.
	These are crisis actors that are doing this stuff and these kids are being brought in and then I think they're even using some kids from the school too.
	I don't know what's going on with this whole theater and this whole circus but apparently the FBI seems to be involved and seems to be endorsing this and sponsoring it so I don't know all bets are off.
	I figured that those fake FBI agents from like Sandy Hook would have been detained for impersonating an FBI officer.
	There's no way a trained officer would carry their automatic weapon in the way these people are doing it.
	So I don't know man.
	I just this whole thing stinks to high heaven.
	People that are paying attention are freaking out and the people that don't give a shit or don't really have time to care.
	They're looking at us like we're a little bit crazy but I think maybe now we're starting to get a little bit more street cred.
	From how many times we've been right versus wrong, and how long we've been saying this for, and, you know, track record to track record, I think the conspiracy theorists are pretty much coming out to look like the modern news daycasters.
	You know, the Cassandra curse I was talking about the other day, but I'll get into that later on, but I have thoughts.
	Well, here's some more proof in how they're trying to take advantage of these stage events.
	They forgot to put up the obituaries.
	It occurred on the 14th of February.
	And yet, weeks later, by March 7th, there was only one death reported for February 14th, Alice Levinson, who was like an 84-year-old woman who was not a student at Marjory Stoneman Douglas.
	Here we had Kelsey Flint, a student who survived the massacre, reporting that it was like a movie.
	It looked so real, but it felt so fake.
	And there's David Hawk, who, by the way, appears to have graduated from Laguna Shoals High School and was taken out to Parkland to be the voice of the students.
	In other words, he was cast in this role where his father—surprise, surprise—works for the FBI.
	Meanwhile, Democrats demand a 1,000% tax on assault weapons, which they define as any semi-automatic with 10 rounds or more.
	Democrats announced that Representative Pressuring Speaker McCarthy told a vote on legislation would place an excise tax What they consider assault weapons that increase gun prices by a thousand percent.
	More than two dozen Democrats, including Representative Don Beyer of Virginia, penned a letter to the House Speaker to bring the legislation to the floor as soon as possible.
	The members of the Gun Violence Prevention Task Force put forward the same suggestion proposed in 2022 when 38 Democrats wanted the incredible tax increase.
	An excise tax, which places a duty on the product at the moment of manufacturing, would increase the price of a $1,000 firearm to $10,000 before it even gets to a retailer.
	As there was no new published version, it's unclear whether the legislation differs from the 2022 tax, which also came from Bayer.
	In the previous iteration, the tax was imposed on any magazine or related device that accept more than 10 rounds of ammo.
	A provided definition for a semi-automatic assault weapon was a semi-automatic rifle or pistol with a fixed magazine of 10 rounds or more, or that has other various features.
	Any gun fitting the definition would have the excise tax apply.
	the group provides statistics about gun violence including that 1686 children were killed and another 4485 injured by gun violence in 2022 and continue to call violence preventable carnage and said the republican controlled house has yet to vote on even one guy gun violent prevention bill a
	According to Breitbart, however, California has had an assault weapon ban while having the most firearms-related homicide in a single state in 2021.
	The outlet also claims 17% of annual firearm murders in the country were in California that year.
	Surprise, surprise.
	And everyone knows that the Democrat-controlled cities that have the most stringent gun control laws have the highest rate of gun violence.
	Chicago being an exemplar, these laws do not work.
	But the Democrats are trying to pull the wool over the eyes of the American people, Carl.
	And again, my response is, any other ideas?
	How about a hundred thousand percent increase?
	You may as well go for it.
	It's just so people are going to make a choice and they're either going to support the Democratic Party leadership for all of their crimes and lies that we've discussed today and for the past weeks and the past years, and that that party also non-coincidentally wants Americans to be unarmed to do anything About it.
	Okay, that's one choice.
	And the other choice is to reject those psychopaths and to demand what we already have, which is the United States Constitution, where we have the Bill of Rights, the rights in the Constitution, the ideals of the Declaration of Independence and all standing.
	That inalienable rights are above all of those.
	And my observation as a retired AP U.S.
	government teacher is that the corporate media lies have just drained any of the patriotism, any of the association with history from Americans.
	They think that they can go ahead and skate like they're in a Barbie film instead of in the real world.
	It is this this wasted type of a stand that is divorced from our history and divorced from reality. - Chris, your thoughts. - Yeah, I was gonna go back to the David Hogg thing I was going to add a little more to that.
	That operation seemed like it took place right in Wolfgang Halbig's backyard.
	And I think he had a lot of good research and you did too about the Sandy Hook thing.
	And man, it really opened my eyes to a lot of stuff.
	So, you know, I think people should go back and look at some of you guys' old stuff.
	And have you ever at all heard from him?
	I know you guys are facing a lot of similar challenges.
	I wasn't sure.
	Oh yeah, we're in contact, yes.
	Okay, cool, cool, good.
	I always wondered how that guy was doing.
	Hopefully he's doing all right.
	He is.
	All right, excellent.
	Well, yeah.
	No, that's good stuff, man.
	That'd be a good show if you guys ever want to sit down and talk, man.
	I'd hate to volunteer for that one, but I know the audience would probably love to hear that one.
	No doubt about it.
	Absolutely.
	Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
	Send fan mail, BROERCON, to LIVE.
	Need to know it?
	Gmail.com.
	LIVE.
	Need to know at gmail.com.
	Nice comment here, Andrew Bridget.
	It's really strange times at the moment.
	Cocaine was found at Biden's house.
	A dead body was found at Obama's house.
	A male prostitute was found at Pelosi's house.
	An illegal server was found at Clinton's house.
	And the FBI raided Trump's house.
	Yes.
	They had to distract from the reality of what's going on, the criminality of the Biden crime family and the Democrats galore.
	Final thoughts, Carl.
	I have shared over the months that moving to Mission Viejo, I've had opportunity to talk to many contractors and have found that all of them, that when the conversations shift to current events, they all have a strong recognition of the criminality and the lies and the disgust That this is really unprecedented in my experience.
	And then yesterday, we're going to upgrade one of our cars.
	And I was at a car dealer.
	And the car salesman that I was talking to is a guy named Scott, who's from Afghanistan.
	And we started talking a little bit.
	And he was absolutely livid.
	He said, when I told him of the criminality of the US government, he in a soft voice, he said, people have no idea how evil The United States is, in my country, in Afghanistan.
	They lied.
	They invaded.
	They killed.
	And they looted the whole treasury when they were done.
	And people have no idea.
	And we chatted a little bit more.
	Actually, in his office, we chatted for like 20 minutes on current events.
	And it wasn't me driving the show.
	This guy was curious.
	And he said, so do you think that I should leave the country?
	And I said, no, brother.
	What you're seeing is the last gas.
	This is all going to blow up.
	And then we need strong people who have experiences like you do and can be able to demonstrate this illegality.
	Because when this thing does break, people are going to be looking for comfort to people who have experienced it and have gone beyond it.
	So for our audience members, that's you, patriots.
	Ladies and gentlemen, brothers and sisters, when we do get the breakthrough and the normies are shook, Yeah, all this is going out, and you're going to have opportunity to step up and be a leader and bring them back.
	And the most exciting thing is that with release of the technologies that have been suppressed, this planet, this place, Earth, can be turned into a paradise.
	We're not there yet.
	But we're close enough with the tragic comedy of these stories to be able to see it could be any time.
	Griff, your final thoughts?
	Yeah, you know, I think about that too, Carl.
	That's, I think, what has to happen.
	But whether it will happen that easily without everyone really putting down their dark old weapons and getting out on the street and doing the right thing.
	propagandists kind of stir up, maybe focusing on the bigger picture and realize maybe what I said earlier about these enemies, they don't come in on boats or planes, they come in in limousines.
	So think about that and who your real enemy is.
	Really, a lot of this script is played out almost, like I said, like a wrestling script with a baby and heels and baby faces and all that stuff that's playing to the audience, people's emotions.
	And of course, when you incorporate duress and great financial loss and personal loss as well, really, the human emotions are very prone towards manipulation.
	And these people understand that, too.
	And I just kind of fear the way that they put it up.
	One time, it's going to come back and get them like a karmic boomer.
	Very nice comments from Chris and Carl, as always.
	The Democrats ignore the fact that by taking guns away from law-abiding citizens, they're giving criminals free fire zones where they can act on, inhibit, and kill as many as they want.
	With impunity!
	Ignore the fact that Americans use guns for defensive purposes to defend themselves millions of times every year, saving an estimated 200,000 lives per annum.
	200,000!
	That compares with 70,000 to 75,000 who die from gun violence, over half of whom are from suicides.
	So you're quadrupling the number of deaths if you take guns away and people are no longer able to defend themselves.
	Think about it.
	How is America better off if we take guns away from law-abiding citizens and let our criminals run rampant and shoot anyone they want?
	Which could be your mother, your sister, your brother, your daughter, your son.
	This is just disgusting beyond belief.
	And they're all adding to it by staging these phony events like Charlottesville, like Sandy Hook, like Parkland, like Orlando and Dallas, like Las Vegas.
	Like Uvalde, like Buffalo, like Nashville.
	Believe me, I have studied them all.
	I've been pioneering collaborative research and bringing together the best experts to sort these things out.
	Every one of those was fake.
	The only one who died was perhaps the body of Steven Paddock in the suite in the Mandalay on the 32nd floor, where the shell casing were on top of the blood.
	If that had been real, they had to be under the blood, because he stopped shooting after he's dead.
	I think we'd all agree to that.
	And Scott Bennett, a PsyOps officer in the Army in Intel, perceived some of the shell casings were from CO2 cartridges for gas-fueled pellet guns, others were from blanks.
	It's all phony.
	It's all fake.
	Hollywood has come to Washington, D.C., and they're working their best to deceive us all to promote a political agenda that would be very damaging to the nation.
	The Second Amendment is indispensable to preserve our rights.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	And spend as much time as you can with family, friends, and people you love and care about.
	We do not know how much time we have left.

▲