All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 5, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:00:39
Sasha Latypova: Global Criminal Collusion of Pharma, Gov, Military Deploying Covid Weapons
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And I was invited.
I was invited to speak in Norway, the spring of this year.
And so I talked about the weaponized weaponization of health care by the global crime cartel.
And we know we know who those are.
It's a private crime cartel and private individuals, just like all mafias.
They're private people and families that have Because of the resources that they control, they have captured, you know, this happens everywhere in local, state level, and these guys have captured international governments.
And so they're using and especially using the US military power to enforce There will everywhere and to guide this really evil population control agenda.
I will write more about population control, but suffice to say that population control is an explicit U.S.
government policy, has been in place since the 70s.
It has been presented as an international policy.
The US was running around the world and telling foreign governments to control their population size.
But in fact, the same policy was implemented domestically and vaccinations in general.
All vaccines, including traditional vaccines, are systematic poisoning to ensure that the population remains under certain numbers.
So, you know, this is not a conspiracy theory.
It's a conspiracy, but it's not a theory.
And we should all understand that this is what's going on.
The governments of the world are driving population control agenda because they must.
And the people who are telling them that they must are the private owners.
So, what has happened in the U.S.
and globally is this COVID, you know, as far as the COVID goes, they had all these population control strategies in place, but someone was not satisfied.
So, COVID was implemented as a much higher gear of this agenda, and it became visible because of that.
It became very visible because of that.
So, this is a global military operation, and Catherine Watt, my friend, calls it Killbox.
Killbox is a military term, and it means it's a three-dimensional area reference that enables attacks.
So, the military will set it up using GPS coordinates, using whatever satellite, you know, whatever technology they have, they designate an area as a killbox, and then the military operation happens here.
Well, in this case, the entire world is the kill box.
And what is happening, the strategy of this is first, they, of course, manufacture fear.
They pre-manufacture it a long time before this happens.
So through media, entertainment, especially games, movies, Hollywood shows, everything, they predictably program people to recognize certain keywords as fear, such as viruses.
And if you noticed, you know, if you think back several years before this happened, how many shows and movies and entertainment and games and so forth was about pandemics, specifically because they were predictably programming you.
To when these news come on TV and on media everywhere, everyone reacts with fear because everyone has been programmed to do so.
Then, of course, they implemented all these intentionally bad policies under guise of public health in lockstep.
All governments of the world.
That should have clued everyone in right away.
So how do you do that?
Who controls that?
Definitely those were not sovereign nations acting in the interest of their population and public health.
Then, of course, weaponization of health care and the main weapon as these so-called vaccines, they're really bioweapons.
I mean, and the word bioweapon, also people misunderstand, it's just a chemical poison of a certain kind.
That's being injected.
And then, of course, gaslighting of the injured and continuous cycles of this fear, mongering and propaganda.
And that just continues.
And this is what the kill box is.
And you have to learn what this is to be able to get out of it.
Now, if we, you know, I started my investigation from the batch analysis.
I've talked about it extensively.
I published on it.
I early on collaborated with Craig Perry Cooper on his website, How Bad Is Your Batch?
And I contributed a lot of my materials to that website.
Craig is a wonderful person.
He's a great analyst.
He's very diligent.
He's built an amazing website.
If you don't know about it, you should visit it.
But over time, it became one of the best red pilling tool for everyone.
And the first analysis that I did is this one.
This was, you know, me looking at the batches.
At that time, this is current, the data is current as of end of 2021.
So just the first year of rollout of these shots, I was looking at adverse events and deaths.
And here I'm only plotting the serious ones.
The non-serious ones were multiple thousands of that.
And here I'm only plotting serious adverse events and deaths for each batch of the vaccine product for all manufacturers that were distributed in the U.S.
against their lot numbers.
So the lot numbers are on the x-axis, alphanumeric sort.
And as you can see, the variability was ginormous.
I compared them to flu, traditional flu vaccines.
And while, you know, I don't recommend any vaccines to anyone, at least at the time, it looked like flu vaccines were manufactured according to good manufacturing practices, more or less.
And so the variability was, as expected, very low and close to zero.
And it was Very consistently the same, despite that being, you know, numerous manufacturers and different load sizes and everything.
So the flu vaccine here, you can't even put them on the same graph.
So I'm just putting a visual reference and saying that, you know, all flu vaccine data is under that red line across the bottom.
And here we have these COVID shots compared.
And as you can see, the variability is 1000% lot to lot, much, much higher than the flu vaccine, much higher than expected from a good manufacturing practice compliant product.
And also exceeds any, well, there are statistical process control analysis that can be applied here, but that would be a joke.
And somebody actually did, but you don't need to.
You can visually see that there is no statistical process control happening, meaning that, you know, this manufacturing is uncontrolled at all.
And at that time I knew the answer already in 2021 that these products were not good manufacturing practice compliant.
And so that to me was a huge red flag because at that time I was still thinking that FDA and global regulators are sort of doing their work and how can they not notice this because there are so many numerous systems that exist.
How did manufacturers not notice this?
So At that time, I was still naive.
I didn't recognize that all of this was intentional.
But that was the outcome.
And you can, as I said, visit the howbad.info website.
If you're not familiar, you will see a huge amount of information there.
Also, Craig found later that it wasn't just random variability.
Like that would be bad enough.
The uncontrolled manufacturing process is bad enough.
But the variability was not random.
So he found the clusterings by alphabet.
So here's Moderna.
Moderna toxicity of the batch was predictable based on the letter that was in the middle of the batch number.
So here we're showing 041L20A and you can look up L.
And you can see what kind of toxicity you can expect from that batch.
So that's hugely bad.
Okay, so this is non-random variability, meaning, again, intentional.
The same result was more recently published by the Danish colleague Max Schmeling.
Both Craig and I know him.
We talked to him, you know, even then and back in 2021-22.
Him and his colleagues.
So he was able to obtain data from the Danish government.
Looking at Pfizer, again adverse events and deaths, and based on the vaccine lots that were distributed in Denmark.
And then he also adjusted them based on the lot size in doses, yes.
So on the x-axis you can see doses per batch, and that's the batch size.
Each dot is a batch.
Uh, and as you also, as you can see here, so this was published actually in peer reviewed journal.
Uh, and, uh, as you can see here, there are three distinct toxicity groups.
Again, there is huge variability batch to batch as far as the adverse events and deaths, but the variability is not random.
And that's also, you know, that's, that's the, you know, the confirmation are so going on two hours from Denmark.
You can see that there are batches of a smaller size, they're hugely toxic, those are the blue ones.
And then there are the green ones that are, you know, medium, small to large size, but they're sort of medium toxicity.
And then there are, again, a variety of batch sizes, the yellow dots that look Sort of benign, but they are not placebo.
So people took this paper and started saying one third of the batches was placebo.
That's not true.
These are not placebos because they show up in adverse events and deaths.
These yellow batches, I checked them myself.
I have the same data from Denmark.
They include deaths, they include serious adverse events, and they alarmingly include a lot of children's reports.
So my interpretation of these yellow batches is not that they are placebo, they're not.
They're just large, late-produced batches that were deployed to pediatrics.
A lot of them are deployed to pediatrics, and Denmark stopped using these vaccines for children very early on.
So they're just unused batches.
They went into trash, mostly, where they belong.
So those are the bullets sitting on the shelf, and they don't hurt anyone.
Um, and also I wrote another sub stack about overall the, you know, the idea of whether placebo was distributed or not.
And, uh, that's my latest article that came out, uh, recently in my sub stack.
So you can visit and read more about that.
So these are three different toxicity profiles that were determined.
And again, as you can see, there's huge blank space between.
They're cleanly separated, meaning that this is not a random variability.
Whatever it is, it shows intent.
And even if this was somehow unintentional and is based on some other factors, just by having this out there for three years or two and a half years, and the manufacturer pretending it's not happening, It's intentional because they're covering up.
They know this is happening, but they're covering up and denying.
So that's what makes it intentional.
Now the testing, so in addition to these sort of analysis, looking just at how data looks for adverse events and deaths, there were a lot of analysis looking at the vials directly.
And I'm just summarizing, I've been in touch with many groups who have done this.
There have been papers published on it, a huge review paper by David Hughes, I'm referencing here, summarizing findings.
And these findings are, well, they're all, they're all the same in the sense that nobody has found a vial that corresponds to what the label says.
Still, you have yet to see one.
Okay.
So the manufacturers align, the regulators align, and this is just so obvious and blatant that there's no doubt that this is completely intentional.
Now, sometimes RNA is found, or nucleic acids are found, RNA and DNA, in these vials.
What's most commonly found is toxic metals.
That's the most common finding.
And they're unexplainable why they're there.
Very concerning, very toxic.
Of course, they can have the sense since whatever is in the vial in the presence of the lipid nanoparticle will be encapsulated.
and potentially delivered through the cellular membrane into the cell and potentially can pass things like blood-brain barriers.
So these metals can end up in the brain causing neurological injury, all sorts of issues.
We find, so more recently, Kevin McKernan found DNA and plasmid contamination.
Whenever we find RNA, it's not conforming to anything that manufacturers said about it.
So the chain, the Sequence itself, as far as its length, never matches what the manufacturer has declared.
The substance itself, as you can see this kind of a glowy, bubbly appearance, that's hydrogel.
So the substrate of it is hydrogel and what's called DARPA or DARPA hydrogel, and there's a lot of publications on that.
I am somewhat familiar with hydrogels and I think the reason they're using it in these vials and shots is because it's kind of a way to protect the nucleic acid chains, which are very fragile.
And so this substrate enables it to circulate longer in the body, reach other, you know, more organs and get distributed more widely in the body.
And then there are a lot of different contaminants I found, like such as from my friend David Nixon here.
You know, these sorts of structures, nobody has been able to explain what they are.
There, you know, some of it may be crystallization, but these are not salt crystals for sure.
And also those strings on the upper image, these worms or ribbons or whatever you call them.
I mean, they're not live.
It's another type of a hydrogel assembly.
That we frequently, very frequently find both in the vials and in the blood of vaccinated people.
The Kevin McKernan findings are extremely important.
They have been recently replicated by several labs with a chain of custody with fresh vials.
So all of his findings are correct.
And what he found is very disturbing.
And we also used it in Idaho.
Testimony was very successful.
The contamination with plasmid DNA is hugely problematic because plasmids, so this is essentially coming from the first step of manufacturing of these shots, and it could be also intentional.
The plasmid DNA is used to encode whatever your final product is going to be, the mRNA, and then grow that DNA in E. coli cells, in the vats.
Now, it's supposed to be removed completely when RNA is made, but it's not removed.
And Kevin found up to 30% of the vial contaminated with it.
And this is a huge, huge amount.
And what happens is when somebody gets this injected into them, these plasmids can find their way into the gut and can infect the E. coli cells that live in our gut.
And essentially that person now becomes that VAT, because the E. coli pick up these plasmids, the circular plasmids, and replicate them very quickly.
So that person becomes that VAT that generates these E. coli, the plasmid DNA is an E. coli.
The plasmid DNA itself is coded for antibiotic resistance.
That's why we have sepsis all over the place.
People's just even like minor cuts and wounds are not healing and infecting.
I had several friends and colleagues who had raging sepsis from 0 to 60 in a nanosecond and no explanation what occurred other than they got injected with this.
And another problem he found, SV40 promoter gene, which is part of the tumor genesis mechanism that can happen here.
All sorts of bad things can can happen and people also shed because it goes into the gut.
People shed this into the environment, into To the household, into the office, and that's how other people get, you know, even unvaccinated, get injured in the presence of vaccinated people if they're exposed for a long time.
I had an incident after going to a dentist for dental cleaning because the technician was waxed with like five shots.
And I had an infection, a raging infection after dental cleaning.
And so again, this is what happens.
These people shed these products, these contaminated DNA and plasmids from their gut.
Then, you know, okay, let me skip that.
So what happens is, you know, why am I calling these shots bioweapons?
Well, because I'm not the first person to call them that.
This is one of the reports that I have.
This is a public report from the US Air Force, but this is also found in a variety of places, including textbooks published by NIH and other types of military reports.
The gene therapy was always considered a class of a biological weapon, a potential class of a biological weapon.
So since 1997, this Jason Group, which is some kind of a science cabal advisory group to the President of the United States, decided that these are the classifications of the biological weapons.
And as you can see, actually, they're all kind of related to each other.
But gene therapy as a weapon was identified.
And the way you weaponize gene therapy is, wait for this, is you put stealth components into it.
Well, what I just described to you is a variety of stealth components.
A stealth component is something secret, right?
That the manufacturer doesn't disclose.
Well, we have a huge variety of stealth components found already in these shots.
And yeah, up until 2020, these mRNA products were classified as gene therapies.
In fact, Moderna still in 2020 and 2021, in their SEC reports, stated that FDA considers their product a gene therapy.
So we have gene therapies being manufactured, and being weaponized with stealth ingredients, and then injected in everyone.
And, you know, being forced injected into everyone, including children.
So now, like, why is this all possible?
This was discussed, or rather, I was educated on this by my friend Catherine Watt, who writes a Bailiwick News Substack, and I highly recommend everyone read it.
Especially her pinned post, I think it's called American Domestic Bioterrorism Program, that explains this whole structure.
I've reduced it here.
So she talks about many US laws, about six key congressional statutes that enabled all of this, you know, that I've described to be on paper legal.
So while people are saying, well, it's fraud, and we can prosecute them for fraud.
Actually, no.
The only thing you can prosecute them for technically, I mean, until we find an honest judge or honest group of Congress people who can undo this, you know, a judge could.
So until we find an honest judge who says, you know, this is all nonsense.
What we have on paper right now is what I'm describing here.
It absolves them from fraud.
Fraud is legal.
The government ordered them to deliver fraud.
What you can only prosecute them for is willful misconduct, which is very, very difficult to do.
Otherwise, they're protected with PREP Act.
So here we have the structure that's being utilized is emergency use authorization.
Which is a law from 1997, which gets rid of any standards for safety and efficacy regulations under emergency The key here is that it needs to be some sort of an emergency and no available treatments.
So that's why they demonized hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin so much, and also other vitamins and other available treatments, just to pretend that this was the scenario so that they could pull this emergency use authorization thing.
Then in combination with that, they're using military purchasing, other transactions authority, and they order all these shorts and Remdesivir and a bunch of pretty much everything that is ordered for COVID, including the masks and swabs and tests and kits and services and propaganda.
And censorship.
It's all paid for through these Department of Defense contracts that are structured under Other Transaction Authority.
And Other Transaction Authority is a mechanism of contracting for Department of Defense or federal government with otherwise regulated private manufacturers without following any regulations.
That's why they're producing non-GMP compliant poison, calling it safe and effective vaccine.
And this is legal because that's exactly what the contracts actually through this other transaction authority state.
And then, of course, as I said, they're thoroughly protected themselves with this PrEP Act liability shield that as long as they follow the orders from the government, the private manufacturers or healthcare providers that are injecting people or killing them with the the private manufacturers or healthcare providers that are injecting people or killing them As long as they follow the orders, they're all protected with PrEP Act.
And the only way this can be pierced is if you prove willful misconduct, which is very hard to prove if they're all following the same protocol dictated by CDC and HHS.
That's why also they know it because HHS issued numerous legal advisory memos to health care providers explaining in great detail how to follow the orders properly and how to make sure that you don't step out of this PREP Act liability protection.
That's why even when you confront them, With the deaths of the relatives in hospitals with remdesivir.
And when people specifically request not to be given remdesivir, they're still given it.
When they fight it, they're still given it.
They try to give their loved ones ivermectin, they're denied.
So that's why the hospitals go to such extent To because of this, because of the PrEP Act, if they don't, if they let you, you know, say no and decline remdesivir, they might be found in willful, you know, the willful misconduct and, uh, the, the CDC and, you know, HHS or HHS will come down on them.
Okay.
Or, or HHS rather will throw them under the bus, uh, and they may be found liable for killing somebody.
But as long as they follow the orders from HHS, they are protected.
And so, importantly, all of this is, all of these products, all of the COVID products, including vaccines and therapeutics and diagnostics, are not proper pharmaceutical or medical devices.
Legally, they are military prototype countermeasures.
Again, this is not disclosed to anyone.
We had to find it, myself and Catherine, and once we found it, it became much more clear what's going on here.
So this whole thing of, and I also wrote a lot about it on my sub stack, this whole thing of military prototype countermeasures, it's the government created an extrajudicial space for themselves, this black hole, Which is called countermeasures, medical countermeasures, where no rules, no regulations apply, no good manufacturing practices, no bioethics, no pharmacy distribution rules.
It's just federal government created this massive block of space where they create biological, chemical, radiological and nuclear weapons and call them medicinal products.
And so that's, and that's, again, enabled by this other transaction authority regulations, and everything else that they're utilizing here.
And the key thing in the US law is this 21 USC 360 BBB, which says that the use of EUA covered medical countermeasures is not a clinical investigation.
Under public health emergencies.
So, when they declare a public health emergency, when the emergency uses arise a countermeasure and start using it, it's not a clinical investigation.
As I said, it's an extrajudicial space where, you know, these are weapons and they call them medicines and it's all made legal on paper.
Because none of the FDA regulations actually apply to these and FDA does not regulate these products.
The entity that regulates these products is BARDA, Biological Advanced Research and Development Authority in the US, that has no legal mandate to regulate pharmaceuticals.
And in fact, they don't even regulate them, they just basically kind of facilitate and distribute funding, and then they receive them from pharmaceutical companies and store them in a strategic national stockpile outside of the pharmacy distribution chain.
So but that's, that's what happens.
FDA pretends to regulate them.
FDA goes on TV and media and says we reviewed and approved.
But those are just nouns and adjectives.
They have no legal meaning.
Absolutely.
FDA is simply lying about that.
The FDA is lying about them having a legal authority over these products, and then having, you know, actually enacted that legal authority.
They don't.
And the people who are actually launching these products or these weapons onto public are these two guys so far.
Alex Azar under Trump and Javier Becerra under Biden.
And they're doing exactly the same thing.
That will tell you something.
So we should be all united, Republicans and Democrats, because we have the common enemy and this is the government.
It doesn't matter who is in charge, Republicans or Democrats, who is in the Oval Office.
It makes no difference because these are the dictators and these are the people who are launching the weapons on public and continue to do so under both administrations.
So under the current law, it's the sole authority of the HHS Secretary, whoever that happens to be at the time, To deploy these countermeasures onto public based on the only criteria that applies is if he thinks that it may be effective.
That's all.
Nothing else.
You don't need clinical trial.
They don't apply.
You can do it.
You know, you can pretend that there was a clinical trial.
They can consult with whoever they want to consult, but ultimately there's no hard requirement.
The only requirement is that this person thinks that this may be effective.
Now, you know, I talked about it quite a lot, this military operation.
And, you know, just to emphasize, this came from Operation Warp Speed.
documents that were released publicly.
This is their own org chart.
You can clearly see that the Department of Defense was the chief operating officer.
In fact, the person in charge at the time was General Perna, who was the chief operating officer of Operation World Speed, Two thirds of this organization was military.
Most of them had no healthcare experience at all.
And as you can see, the HHS was only chief science advisor, no sort of executive role.
All the executive function under the Department of Defense was government, US government.
Here, they're all in charge, BARDA, National Security Council, DOD.
And the pharma companies and medical device companies are not in charge, but getting tremendous amounts of money to shut up and follow the orders and to produce poison and ship it to the government.
So not even into the pharmacy distribution chain, but to the federal government into the strategic national stockpile from which it would get distributed to the vaccination centers.
And then the federal government owns that product until it is injected into the person.
So let me skip this.
And OK, so let me get to the the final thing is, you know, we've we became aware of all of this structure largely thanks to Brooke Jackson.
The whistleblower who worked on Pfizer so-called clinical trial and witnessed a lot of fraud at the clinical site and was complaining about it and was fired for it.
And then, you know, since then she has been suing under False Claims Act.
She's been suing Pfizer, Icon and Ventavia under False Claims Act.
And so these contracts were produced by Pfizer first as in their motion to dismiss the lawsuit.
And that's at the time we became aware that the US government actually ordered a demonstration from Pfizer.
So Pfizer's motion to dismiss was, you know, boiled down to the claim that we were not defrauding the government, we were delivering what the government ordered, which is fraud, which is a demonstration.
By definition, it's a fake.
So here the contract specified that it's a large scale vaccine manufacturing demonstration.
And that it also that's a it's a prototype product.
And so so that's what that was Pfizer's claim.
And in fact, In late March of this year, Judge Strunkale agreed with Pfizer that that was the case and dismissed the lawsuit.
Well, so Brooke and her team are appealing.
We will see how this progresses, but that just tells you something, right?
So that's exactly what I said, that the US government made it legal on paper and Pfizer is using it in their defense.
And actually these I can skip.
So I think at this point, it's probably a good place to stop and let you guys ask questions.
Hi, Sasha.
I was just gonna say thank you Sasha, great presentation.
I'm going to open it up to any questions anybody has.
I have one.
Wasn't the SV40 promoter left off the plasmid map that was given to the CDC or the FDA?
Yeah, exactly.
So they didn't even include that.
So that's like a stealth ingredient of a stealth ingredient.
So they're clearly lying about their manufacturing.
They, in fact, never even demonstrated that they're making the spike protein, that the cells, when transfected with this, actually make spike protein that they declared originally, you know, that Wuhan spike protein, for which there is a model on the computer, but nobody has actually demonstrated to the regulators that this is what happens in the cells.
They just submitted fake Western blots, and all regulators surprisingly, you know, accepted them as, you know, didn't see that they were clearly fakes.
It seems like to me, if you have a SB40 promoter in there that doesn't need to be there, and it was intentionally left off the plasma map given to the regulatory agencies, that's pretty clear willful misconduct right there.
I mean, that does cause cancer.
Again, it's a question to the courts.
So far, courts said that no, because the government never ordered anything that is regulated like a medicine.
So if you read all those contracts, you go through all these hoops.
You see that there's nothing to actually get them on because there was no requirement to produce a pharmaceutical product the way the pharmaceutical products are supposed to be produced.
Hmm.
So that's what I'm saying.
That's why, like, we need to find an honest judge who can say, this is garbage and nonsense and not go like Troncale, just like roll over and agree with Pfizer's motion to dismiss.
Yeah.
Great.
I see a hand raised.
Yes, I have a question.
Thank you, Sasha.
That was excellent.
Could you clarify for me when you showed the chart that came out of, I believe it was Denmark, with the batches and the yellow line at the bottom?
I think you said that that's not placebo, and I'm confused on that, because what I've read was saying it was.
That was a sensational piece of headlines that everybody picked up.
I don't know who put it out, because certainly Max Schmeling never made that statement, and we never said this was placebo.
But somebody designed that headline, put it out, everybody picked it up, foolishly.
It's not placebo.
These batches have death reports, children and babies, severe adverse events.
So I'm saying these are probably just underused, they're later manufactured, specifically for Denmark.
Because Denmark was one of the countries that stopped the use of children and younger people early on.
And so I am just saying these are Potentially underused batches that were later delivered and nobody wanted them and they went into garbage.
And so, but they did generate some, some adverse events.
Thank you for clarifying that.
I see Philomena has her has her hand up.
Hi, thank you.
I, I so enjoyed your presentation, you know.
Nothing is shocking anymore, but I really actually wanted to ask how you're doing because it always seems like people in the front line get attacked.
And so I was just wondering if you have.
Presented or have gotten any retaliation of such.
No, so far they prefer to ignore me.
me.
More, you know, yeah, that's, I don't know.
No, I didn't get any particular prosecution or anything other than being banned on social media, which I don't care.
Okay.
Well, thanks for sharing.
Rock on!
And I have a question.
How does all the information that you just shared, how does that fit into the UN, the WHO pandemic treaty that they want to have?
Because that's something that, you know, I don't know how many people are paying attention to it here.
But I know there are people in the UK that are really out there and trying to get their governments to not sign on to this treaty, which basically will give the UN, the WHO, complete authority over all pandemic policies going forward.
So how does that align with what you're saying With all of this information that is really being directed and from the US government, which I learned so many, I mean, your presentation was shocking and America has to hear this because, you know, I think pharma is the one getting all the, you know, the slack, but it's really, I mean, yes, pharma, but it's actually way deeper than that.
Yeah, absolutely.
I keep telling people this is genocide.
OK, so again, it's a conspiracy, but not a theory.
We see it.
It's genocide.
And genocides are always done by the government.
No private companies don't do genocides.
OK, because they can't.
The only way you can do a genocide is when you have sovereign liability protection of a government, of a large government.
And also the odds are always very much on the side of the criminals, as far as what happens with persecution.
So that's what people need to realize.
And that's how it fits into the global agenda, because they already did all this.
So whatever the IHRs of WHO are saying, all of that was already implemented through this COVID protocol globally.
They just want to now make it a law.
But they already do it in practice.
And actually, as you can see, they're not really constrained by laws.
They just want to now finalize it and put it in place as if it's an international law and democratically elected governments.
representative agreed to this and signed off on this.
So that's that's the only theater is going on right now.
But I think it's, it's very, very important for all of us to be vocal and to say no and to let our politicians know, you know, everyone everywhere is just just say no, no, no compliance, make sure even Submit an affidavit or statement to your local sheriff and say, if you're gonna try to do this, I'm not gonna be complying.
Yeah, that's good.
And some people have done it successfully.
Yeah, that's so that is really so even it's just smoke and mirrors and giving it like a final, you know, because it's already happening.
But I think that's good.
I think we all need to fight it and I know people are fighting but how does Congress like this is Congress like are you able to get this information to our representatives or how are they kind of in bed with all of this too?
I mean, how many people actually know this and they're a part of this?
Well, so our Congress is all part of this because they've voted on these statutes over time.
And you know, the way they do it is because they have to vote on the 4,000 page bill, you know, in a few hours.
Of course, nobody reads any of it, but this is how all these amendments get put in.
And so now, who's aware in Congress?
I can tell you, me and Catherine, we talked extensively with Senator Johnson.
We gave him all this evidence he has.
Actually, he requested it from us.
We gave it to him.
He has it.
He hasn't really done anything about it.
I don't know if he will or won't.
I know other Congress people also know it.
You know, we've interacted, Brooke, Talk to a few of them.
So people in Congress are aware of it.
A few of those who still have conscience.
Now, whether they can do anything about it or not, under the current structure, Congress has no power.
So that structure that I've been discussing also is part of those statutes that were enacted.
Congress gave up their congressional power, which the power they don't have.
They don't have the power to give up that power, but they did.
And so on paper, again, and the same with judiciary.
So that's why not a single court has yet admitted into discovery any of this or anything even close.
All the cases get dismissed, or if they can't dismiss them, They will, sometimes they will, you know, we have, we had a few cases that were sort of won, but they make sure absolutely not to admit any of this into discovery.
So they will, you know, 95% of the time they'll dismiss it somehow, 5% of the time when they can't, they'll maybe side with the plaintiff, but then they will make sure that it's in such a way that no evidence ever gets presented.
And I should tell you something, because the courts tell you the truth.
You just have to listen.
Yeah.
Wow.
Thanks.
Let's see if we got Cece, and then we have Meredith.
Okay, so we got past the PrEP Act, and we're in discovery in one of our cases concerning remdesivir.
And he's not filing MedMal or what remdesivir did to the patient, but fraud that the fiduciary or the doctor did not disclose to the person.
What exactly they were kidding or give them a choice.
So I'm I know that Miss branding.
I think it's you 21 US code 352.
I think that's right.
Is the statutes on misbranding drugs or mislabeling?
I'm wondering if the PrEP Act doesn't include like false advertisement of a drug or misbranding or mislabeling of one.
If that would be a way around.
John might know that that might be a way around the PrEP Act for these mislabeled and misbranded so-called Japs.
So what I know from Peter Marx's declaration Peter Marks is head of the Biologics Division of FDA.
One of the main criminals, in my opinion.
So he made a declaration in a case that was, I think it was actually recently dismissed also.
So this was suing for vaccine mandates in the military.
And I read his declaration and the way they weasel around this is he's saying, so for example, the service members were saying, well, this is an EUA product that they're distributing, but claiming that this is FDA approved.
So that's like mislabeling and misbranding.
Well, in addition to just lying about the status of the product.
And the FDA's position on this is, oh, you know, we We determined that Pfizer manufactures, so we approved Comirnaty, we determined that Pfizer manufactures this sort of branded approved Comirnaty somewhere, it's in some locations.
And so, therefore, this EUA product that comes from also from those locations should be considered, you know, as if it's approved product.
I mean that that just that part is like I was like well if they make laws apparently that's their you know that's their argument uh and uh and therefore also because that happens because we've determined that this can happen uh the vaccinators uh whoever administers these products does not have does not have to tell people does not have to provide informed consent To the subject.
And I think they will use the same argument with Remdesivir.
So, I mean, I wrote about this also in my subset.
You can read it and can see that I linked the declaration itself.
And that may give you some ideas of, well, at least how to preempt that type.
I mean, it's nonsense what he's saying, but at least how to preempt this kind of argumentation, because FDA does not make laws.
FDA cannot say Oh, in my opinion, I overruled this CFR, you know, the for the federal regulation part that governs this EUA versus a fully approved and said, well, you know, it comes from the same factory, therefore, it should be okay.
That's not okay.
Look at this.
Wow.
Oh, let's see.
We've got Meredith.
And it looks like you're muted.
Oh, okay.
Great.
Thanks.
Hi, Sasha.
Thank you so much.
That was an excellent presentation.
I really appreciate it.
And I follow your substack, and I just want to say your artwork is absolutely phenomenal.
Thank you.
I wanted to ask, you had commented about the indicator in the Moderna badges.
Is there anything comparable in the Pfizer batches?
Which one is Moderna?
You had mentioned that the Moderna, the letter in the middle of the batch number, that was kind of an indicator.
Is there something similar with regards to Pfizer?
Yeah, Pfizer is even simpler.
Pfizer batches are labeled like two letters and four numbers, and letters are in ascending alphabet.
They start with like EE, EJ, and you know starts from E. So the earlier ones are Much more toxic than the later ones.
So they all, like, align with the alphabet that way.
Dates of manufacture and the earlier, like, the ones that were manufactured up until April of 2021 are the most toxic ones so far.
And then the later ones tend to be less.
Okay.
Thank you very much.
I appreciate that.
Looks like we have John with his hand up.
Hey, Sasha, how are you?
Hi, how are you?
Good.
It's been a long time.
It's I mean, I'd like to have a quick discussion with you.
I don't know if it's going to be a question.
It's really in the marketplace or in the industry of legal.
We have an adversarial system and.
People are stuck in a market of lawyers.
And the market has been cornered by corporations.
So the normal litigators that would be accessible to the people have all been told, don't take these cases, or we're going to fire you as, you know, a corporate counsel, counsel to our corporation.
That leaves us with, and I don't want to knock the lawyers that are taking the cases, I very much appreciate them, but there are a few, and they're very small firms.
Sorry about my dog.
So, when you mention the PrEP Act, nobody's challenging the fact that the Congress can't just make a law that abridges your rights, and that's what they did.
Somebody needs to challenge the PrEP Act constitutionally.
It takes time, you know, and it's been there a long time.
It's not just COVID, but that needs to be challenged constitutionally.
That act should not exist.
They can't contract Our rights away and say, well, your constitutional rights are at a higher level than any law that the legislature passes.
So they can't just make a lot to say, oh, you don't have any rights to sue anymore.
We're just going to take those.
That's one thing.
The other, I'm not familiar with 352.
When it comes to the, I'm going to kill my dog after I get off this.
Sorry.
Cooper, come here!
Come here, buddy!
Sorry about that.
There are three kind of torts.
I don't know if the lawyers have gone over this with you.
You know, there's manufacturing defect, design defect, and poor or Defective instructions or warnings that go with it.
So you mentioned the mislabeling and stuff.
That that could be poor instructions, warnings.
It also could be a sort of manufacturing defect.
What Kevin found.
Would would be under defect fact that they use the spike protein would be a design defect.
Each 1 of these things has.
Different levels of proof that needs to come forth.
It takes time.
I guess I'm saying the whole market is screwed up.
This is all criminal.
I want to go criminal.
There's somebody in Arizona I'm talking to.
I also want to bring something in.
I'm looking for A county grand jury in Atlanta.
If anybody knows any prosecutors there that are amenable to our cause, you know, maybe we can get a prosecutor to bring it, put us in front of a grand jury.
I'm on the grand jury team for Dr. Ely.
Uh, out of the federal case in Oregon, if we can win one single case in any county in the United States, and not even win a case, but bring forward information such that the county grand jury has subpoena power, they can haul Fauci's ass down to any county in the United States or anybody from any U.S.
agency because they can subpoena witnesses and evidence.
If we can get that going, Every civil case that follows will just have to rubber stamp that evidence.
It'll be very easy to win cases after that.
To try to win cases with trying to get to discovery and trying to get standing and all that, it's really hard.
So, I don't know.
Sasha, I love your work.
I didn't mean to just talk like this, but, you know, when it comes to the law, we have it on our side, but they're not following it.
We need the citizens to step forward.
And when I say citizens, I mean 23 members of a grand jury that all we need is 12 out of the 23.
That's all you really need for probable cause to indict.
So, that's where I'm going with this, and I'll be calling you for help, Sasha.
If I ever get there, I'll be calling you to get the evidence.
Thank you.
So, that's a really good point about the PREP Act.
There is one case that's challenging the constitutionality of it.
I wrote about it.
This is the case that's brought by a CHD lawyer, Ray Flores, and this is the case against the Department of Defense.
And in the wrongful death of a student, a civilian, George Watts, and he was 24 year old, died by the COVID shot.
There's even autopsy proving that he was killed by the COVID shot.
And that case is brought by, funded by CHD.
Don't know where it's going to go, but it has been filed.
It's a great case, like it's written, Brilliantly.
Names the correct defendants.
Challenges the constitutionality of PREP Act, so all the right things.
I just don't know what's going to happen with it, but we're hoping.
And the problem is that the only place you can sue them for this is in DC.
It's in this one court in DC, right?
So, okay, so they also protected themselves this way.
Now, I am in contact, so yeah, reach out to me afterwards.
I have a contact with one county judge.
Who wants to bring grand jury.
But the problem is the and he gets all of this.
But the problem is that once, you know, even once they do it, then they need to have cover from the state AG.
So the state AG needs to bless it somehow to proceed.
Otherwise, the counties don't have the resources to do the investigation or, you know, they're stuck immediately.
And so this needs to be kind of.
Shepherded with the blessing from the state AG.
Can you say what state?
Let's talk afterwards, yeah?
Yeah, all right.
Thank you.
Great.
Well, I noticed that it's a little past three, and so I don't know how much, you know, more time it has.
Yeah, I have to jump off real soon.
Yeah, so that's why I wanted to just, you know, close out by saying thank you.
You're super informative.
And I know there's a lot of comments.
I don't know if you saw the comments or have been following some of the comments in the chat, but, you know, everybody's saying thank you for an eye-opening presentation.
May I interrupt before she goes?
Yep!
Sasha, Jay Findley is on the call.
He has some information about Pfizer blood codes that I think you would like to know about.
I posted a message.
In the chat, there's a particular mysterious response from Pfizer's lot lookup that we found out about recently, where it says lot is in multiple materials, if I remember right, and I wonder if you and you and him could talk about that just a bit before you go?
Sure, I mean I'm not aware of what this is.
Jay, are you there?
Oh, he's on a work call.
Okay, so we are, all right, I'll just come out with it.
We're scraping Pfizer lot codes right now and the responses are, let me look in the spreadsheet here, expired, not expired, lot is not relevant,
Unable to get the expiry date and then there's this other one that says lot is in multiple materials and I thought Yeah, the drawbridge is about to go up.
I thought you might have an insight on what that could be Oh, yeah, so the especially for Pfizer Pfizer depending on which this when this lot is it's like more recent or early one the Pfizer went to continuous manufacturing Sometime in 2022, which is also not, I mean, this is just total BS, but they are doing it.
Continuous manufacturing, meaning, so they label them as LODs, and LOD is supposed to be a single production run, so that, and also completely traceable all the way to the raw materials and suppliers of those.
But they label them as such, but this is a continuous production.
And they're making these giant lots.
And now, you know, and I think the reason they want to do it so that we cannot do this analysis anymore.
And, you know, just to hide all their BS even better.
So they're just basically mixing multiple So the way that it's produced first the active substance is made and then it's mixed into the LNPs and they're mixing multiple active substance batches into multiple LNP batches and it's just this way it's all like completely untraceable.
So that's what they're doing most likely with this.
Okay and I want to make sure that it's on your radar my collection of expert Expiration dates, it's the largest collection in the world, over 3300 known lot codes, known good, and most of them with their expiration dates, the latest available.
You are aware of it, you remember an email from me, Yeah, I appreciate it.
I just don't do this analysis anymore because we know what we know.
And as I said, because they switched to continuous production, it's becoming more and more meaningless.
It would be great if Aaron Seery updated his FOIA that he received the shipment data from Pfizer about a year ago, but it hasn't been updated since.
Yeah, he only has 158 block codes that they sent to him.
It's like they said, okay, well, let's give him something, but not now.
Right, so he needs to, you know, it would be great if he could, like, get everything out of them and update it, and this would be more, you know, visible, and we could do something about it.
But, I mean, I don't know if he's planning to do that or not.
And do the same for Moderna.
Although he said that, you know, they're going to FOIA some.
I think the clinical trial materials are going to come out from Moderna over the next year or so.
Yeah, we're still waiting.
So anyways, I want to just interrupt because I know, Sasha, you were trying to... Yeah, I got it.
So yeah, so I wanted to say thank you.
And otherwise, I know we could keep talking about it.
And I'm going to keep the chat open for our group.
And so if we have any other comments and ideas, we can go back and forth.
So thank you.
I also have to run and I see Eagle has joined.
Good luck, guys.
Bye.
Bye.
Thank you, Sasha.
We really appreciate it.
Thank you very much, everybody.
All right.
Bye-bye.
And for everybody else, if anybody wants to stay and just kind of chat ideas back and forth, I'm going to leave the group going.
Thanks, guys.
Bye.
Bye, John.
Bye-bye.
Hey, Albert.
Yep, doing good.
How are you doing?
▲
Export Selection