All Episodes
Previous Next
July 31, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:32:54
Truth vs. NEW$ Inc. Part 2 (30 July 2023) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett, and Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome back, folks.
This is Truth Vs. News Incorporated.
This is July the 30th, that hot month, and the hottest news of the year.
More is coming here from Jim Fetcher.
Let's just jump into it, Jim.
Well, Scott's comment on the last couple of stories.
Go for it, Scott.
Well, I have a lot of stuff I agree with Rand Paul about, but on this particular issue, I disagree with him completely.
When he's advocating for a non-impeachment of Joe Biden, I believe that's a betrayal to the oath that you take as a member of government, and as Congress, and as a military member.
You swear an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
And any acts of abuse and corruption, fraud, waste, treason, things like that, you have a duty to stand up and expose and stop.
Not expose and stop when it's convenient.
Not, you know, do I want to?
Is it more advantageous to engage in political theater and drama?
You know, blah, blah, blah.
What are they going to do?
What would we do?
Then what would we do in response?
And what would they do in response?
Suddenly it takes on a circus manifestation.
And with regards to Joe Biden and Hunter Biden, if I was laying out the impeachment case, which I think absolutely has to happen, it would be very all-encompassing and it would essentially say, ladies and gentlemen of the United States of America, and this is open to every American, Joe Biden has committed treason, he's committed corruption, he's committed extortion, he's committed bribery from the following cases.
He's been in cahoots in contact with the Chinese Communist Party, with his son, to filter and launder money to him directly as the big guy.
I personally know that Joe Biden and Barack Obama were part of a shell game to finance terrorism through 19,000 Swiss bank accounts that Eric Holder, taking orders from Barack Obama and Joe Biden,
Through whistleblowers who were Swiss bankers into jail to cover this up, and through a military officer, myself, when I was filing the Shell Game report, exposing this, as was my duty.
I didn't report it because I wanted drama.
I reported it because of my duty and oath as an officer.
And I hold Rand Paul and every member of Congress to that echelon, too.
Now, Joe Biden and Hunter Biden, you could even say, have been involved with sex crimes with underage girls.
And I'm sure we'll see civil suits against them for that.
But this has to happen.
The impeachment has to happen or laws mean nothing and the Constitution means nothing.
We're in a big puppet show of political gamesmanship.
If we don't expose every element of these crimes, that's what the American people want to know.
What's been happening?
Who did it?
When?
What did they do?
Where are the records?
Where are the receipts?
We want it all thrown in front, not a bunch of testimony from Ukrainian embassy deep state puppets like Ambassador Taylor and Vindman and all the rest of them were, you know, talking about Trump.
But we want to know the real crimes that have endangered the national security of the United States, because look at what he's doing.
Joe Biden, or the people behind him, have sent America into this war with Russia.
You've got rhinos doing it too.
But all of the crimes of Biden, we have a constitutional duty to stop and expose.
And Rand Paul seems to have forgotten that in the rhetoric of a flatulent conversation that his father Conveniently bumbles around with as well.
Now I'm going to read you a letter I got from Rand Paul when I was an army officer, a military whistleblowing report, and I filed to Rand Paul's office, to the Judiciary Committee, the shell game report as a military officer exposing Joe Biden, Barack Obama, and Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation's shell game of Swiss banks
being used at a specific cover up of $104 million payoff by the CIA to Swiss bank whistleblower Brad Birkenfeld on September 11, 2012.
And this is the report that I got.
I don't know if you can see it.
This is from the Shell Game book.
Okay, there you go.
There's Rand Paul's signature.
And this is the letter that he wrote me on April 8, 2013, after I wrote to him as a military officer, illegally imprisoned for reporting the Shell Game of terrorist financing that occurred in Libya and elsewhere.
Mr. Scott Bennett, dear Mr. Bennett, thank you for taking the time to contact me regarding the recent attacks on the U.S.
Embassy in Egypt and the U.S.
Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.
Like you, I am appalled at these attacks.
Following the overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi and Hosni Mubarak as the respective leaders of Libya and Egypt, the United States looked forward to an era of peace and cooperation with each nation.
On the evening of September 11, 2012, attacks occurred at both the U.S.
Embassy in Egypt and the U.S.
Consulate in Libya.
The attack in Libya left Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other members dead.
Other attacks and protests occurred in other countries in the region in the following days.
These despicable acts were unprovoked by the United States government, and an attack on our embassies and consulates is considered an attack on American soil.
I believe there was negligence by the Obama administration to protect our diplomatic staff in Libya.
While testifying before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, of which I am a member, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton admitted to not reading State Department cables from the consulate in Benghazi asking for increased security.
Neglecting these messages is a failure of leadership of not only Secretary Clinton, but also reflects on the failures of the Obama administration.
As I continue to serve as a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, I will continue to exercise my oversight abilities on issues surrounding the United States foreign policy.
Again, thank you for contacting my office.
It is an honor and a privilege to represent the Commonwealth of Kentucky in the United States.
Please continue to inform me Well, you know what, Rand?
I wasn't writing you as a constituent.
I was writing you as a military officer who did this for a living, who had a top-secret SCI clearance, and was reporting you terrorist financing documents, terrorist financing bank accounts, and you did nothing!
So Rand Paul and his weak effeminate cowardice did absolutely nothing when I brought to him the fact that on September 11, 2012, CIA made $104 million payoff to a Swiss banker that had 19,000 bank accounts that Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Joe Biden took 4,000 and investigated and 15,000 went mysteriously missing, probably to fund a whole bunch of operations that we see in Libya and Syria and Ukraine.
That's what I gave him.
That's what he failed to do.
And I don't like seeing him with this game of, let's just take the easy way.
You serve government, you take the hard way, or you get the hell out.
Well, Scott, listening to that, I mean, that's pretty much boilerplate that went out to a whole lot of constituents.
I was disturbed by him implying that the death of Gaddafi was a good thing.
I mean, he ought to have been outraged by that.
Of course.
Of course.
Brian, your thoughts?
OK, so the House Ways and Means Committee is theoretically the committee that oversees taxes and tax regulation.
Among other things, within the House of Representatives, it's only one committee among many, many, many committees, although a very, very important one impeachment would be a Legal status that would allow them to continue to investigate the situation.
The more they investigate, the more they will undoubtedly uncover related to bribery and other schemes.
And with the official level of an impeachment inquiry, the more witnesses they'd be able to bring and the more witnesses they'd be able to turn.
In theory, An impeachment proceeding could uncover all or many of the dark and nefarious acts that take place within the government.
Now, let's look back through the corridors of history and you can take a look at all the scandals that have developed over the years.
How many of these politicians have taken seriously their job of uncovering corruption Within the government over all these years, it's rare, it's few and far between.
So the question you have to ask is, is this just a power play for more power for the Republicans?
Or is this an actual trend to try to root out corruption within government?
And you can go back to Kennedy, you can go back to the Teapot Dome scandal, you can go back, you can go back as far as you want.
And there's been Corruption after corruption after corruption that hasn't necessarily been dealt with.
And then we impeached Bill Clinton over Monica Lewinsky, a lie.
I mean, that, Ken Starr, that was a joke.
That was a joke of all the things that Clintons have been involved with.
Impeachment simply gave the official special prosecutor that was working in the impeachment scandal the ability to collect the records and put it together.
The question comes down to whether or not that special prosecutor or that impeachment proceeding is going to have the will to clean this thing up.
I doubt it, because I have a feeling that 60-70% of these politicians in D.C.
would go down, along with however many officials are in D.C., would go down.
It would absolutely devastate the entire core of the American republic democracy concept that exists.
May simply be trying to keep the status quo at a status quo level with just simply allowing the pendulum to swing a little bit farther over by ignoring an impeachment proceeding.
That's really all I have to say about that.
It just.
If do we really want, of course, we as citizens do.
But we'd like to see prosecution.
Well, I think you both have valuable points.
I think it's very likely he's going to take the pardon and excuse himself route at this point in time.
Meanwhile, it's egregious.
School board members battle Governor Newsom, personal attacks, threats of Biden's legal action.
This is the guy that Democrats really want to run, in my opinion, with Michelle.
Following pressure from Newsom, including the threat of 1.5 million fine and legal repercussions, a Southern California school district reversed course to adopt a state-approved curriculum.
The school board initially rejected.
The three newly elected board members for Temecula Valley Unified, Joseph Komrosky, Jen Wiersma, and Danny Gonzalez, have been repeatedly personally targeted by Newsom since they voted to delay the deployment of a curriculum for elementary school students that was backed by the governor.
He has likened them to demagogues who whitewash history, censor books, and perpetuate prejudice, bragged about a civil rights investigation launched by the state's AG back in June as to why they rejected the curriculum, and vowed to send the district a bill for 1.6 mil, along with a 1.5 mil fine, for initially refusing the tax.
This is grandstanding!
The governor's statements are outrageous.
It's been a surreal thing for me to live through this, with the amount of threats and intimidation and bullying going on.
Whether it's monetarily through a fine or a lawsuit and the name-calling, it's egregious.
Rizma told the Daily Wire there's no other way around it.
A school board in Temecula decided to reject a textbook because it mentioned Harvey Milk.
California's stepping in.
We're gonna purchase a book for these students, the same ones that hundreds of thousands of kids are already using.
If these extremist school board won't do what they're supposed to do, threatens GNU's son.
The board voted 3-2 to delay the deployment of the curriculum, largely due to parents complaining some of the content was too sexualized for elementary school students specifically.
Some parents took issue with lessons about Harvey Milk, The first openly gay man elected to public office in California, notably.
Milk had a series of sexual relations with young boys when he was in his 30s and was even accused of rape.
Other LGBT content parents felt was age-inappropriate, including the mention of the Gay Liberation Front, which parents connected to NAMBLA, a pedophile advocacy group Meltzer found some content ideological and politically biased, no doubt.
One temeculate parent, who is also a U.S.
Marine veteran, voiced outrage at Newsom during the contentious nine-hour-long board meeting last week.
I was once willing to dine on foreign land, or what I believe this country to be.
Now that the government has brought this social war to my front door, you couldn't begin to comprehend how hard I will dig in my heels and fight for what I know to be right.
Another parent expresses dissatisfaction with Newsom.
Boys cannot be girls.
Girls cannot be boys.
Men cannot get pregnant.
You're justifying the sexual perversion of young children.
Governor Gavin Newsom, Pharaoh of California, wants to spend $1.6 million on textbooks and Temecula to facilitate the deviant sexual behavior of Harvey Milk.
Why?
Because children must learn gay pride.
That's not the responsibility of the woke Pharaoh of California.
Parole rights come from God, not man.
But due to mounting legal pressure, an emergency board meeting was called on short notice.
Four out of the five board members were able to attend the meeting and voted unanimously to approve the curriculum for the coming school year.
Notably, The most controversial material, a chapter for fourth graders on Harvey Milk and other LGBT-related content, has been pushed to the end of the school year and likely will be completely removed and replaced.
Numerous board members have said they needed to quickly greenlight the state books or the district would be open to legal action.
They worried they'd be in violation of California's Williams Act, which mandates students have equal access to instructional materials and quality teachers.
Komorowski, the Temecula School Board President, talked about pressure from the state when discussing the recent curriculum.
Newsom Attorney General Bob Monta, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurman, are salivating for the board to make a mistake, adding he acted to avoid litigation.
The story is we did a 180-degree flip, and that's not the case.
What we decided to do is take, then, the curriculum and rewrite a fourth-grade module, and we'll include LGBT people, because if you need to, it's per the FAIR Act.
It'll be moved into a realm that's less controversial.
We're going to work the best we can to ask for modifications, work to provide the community with a standard that we're more comfortable with.
Newsom continued to attack the three, despite the righty vote.
Charging this latest exposed their true motives, that the battle is never about parental right, but extremist desire to control information and censor materials used to teach our children.
The Democrat also claimed, because of board member antics, Temecula has a civil rights investigation to answer.
RISMA said legally this curriculum can evolve.
She will continue to make sure parents' voices are heard and reflected in the content their children are exposed to.
This is a call to parents to keep moving, keep getting involved, get on committees, write letters to your school board, keep showing up, because you will make a difference even though people like Governor Newsom may want to shut you up.
As for Newsom, There is much that the American people should take a second look at his actions.
If you're looking at someone who wants to run for president of the United States, people better step back and question this, because local authority is the way our founders set up this country.
Individual communities should be able to speak into things without a governor tossing out the power of his office and applying this kind of pressure to moms and dads and people who step up to run the school board and to do it, I would add, properly, morally, in an age-appropriate fashion.
Scott?
Don, I'd like to show a slide, so give me screen share capability.
You can edit this out, but this slide is very, very key.
It's me, Scott.
I've got it.
Let's see.
Your screen.
I'm making your host temporarily Go ahead.
Yeah.
All right.
Here we go.
I want to show you this.
So that is a poster that I designed for Ellen Zhao, who we had running for mayor of San Francisco, and it so infuriated Gavin Newsom, Scott Wiener, London Breed, and the San Francisco Ethics Commission.
They tore them down from all over San Francisco.
We put them up various places, As you see, this is London Breed smoking a joint, dangling her shoe, counting money because of all the homeless people that are being channeled and marketed.
And here was Gavin Newsom taking money for a little girl that he was stealing for sex slavery.
That caught the eye of Gavin Newsom and all of these people, and they were so infuriated Well, I don't see anything that's homophobic.
I don't see anything racist here, except you've got London Breed, and here's Gavin Newsom stealing a child.
So it's significant because Gavin Newsom's agenda, which manifests in the stealing of the child here for sex slavery, as The Sound of Freedom has recently depicted, He hasn't changed his spots.
He is still about forcing curriculums into schools that begin to introduce the idea of man-boy love associations, sexual pedophilia, and other things.
These do evolve.
And this is the agenda of Newsom and the Democrats, is to normalize pedophilia.
And this is why you have parents standing up and roaring in a way that we've never seen since the founding of the country.
I don't think we've seen this since certain tax collectors and government officials were tarred and feathered in the 1700s by committees of safety and stuff.
And I think the same thing needs to happen now.
Scott Wiener and the rest of these people who are trying to push this homosexuality onto your children need to be tarred and feathered.
Perhaps not physically, although that would be my recommendation.
But certainly lambasted rhetorically and citizens need to be rising up and not asking, not simply writing letters, but demanding and making legal threats against school board members that are trying to introduce child manipulation, child sex slavery, child pedophilia and other forms of perversion and corruption.
These people Besides not deserving to live, they certainly don't deserve to be on any official government board, school board, or any government functioning entity.
Jim?
Brian?
A weak citizenry can't fight back, and strength comes through character and discipline.
Character and discipline are learned and practiced.
Families Proper families produce character and discipline with a good bow.
Amen.
I've always believed that the homosexual agenda was all about breaking down the strength and character of a society, breaking down its ability to reproduce, part of the depopulation agenda, part of the weakness agenda.
Because strong men and strong women producing strong families can fight back against the machine that really wants them weakened In and out.
So a school adopting this LGBTQ gay junk is all about weakening the character of the children.
To make them believe that they have to have no discipline, that they're simply sexual machines.
Mammals out there doing whatever feels best and feels right.
And when a population begins to feel like that, they're depraved, they have no character, they're Simple and empty and broken.
And I know that in the conspiracy community, we deal with a lot of gray areas, but I happen to find this particular agenda to be along the more gray area of purely satanic.
As an approach to break down our society's strength and character and to produce people that are so weak that they can be controlled, that they can be manipulated, that they can be modified, and then once they're manipulated enough, they can be placed into positions within the government where they'll be effective as tools for the dark side that's out there trying to weaken our community.
Just how I feel about the entire issue, and whether or not you agree with the whole religious aspect of it, I find it to be a core component of what they're pushing out there.
And obviously, I totally disagree with it, but I don't think people ought to be in public schools anywhere.
I think men and women ought to be staying together as families, raising their children as families, and creating a strength of character and discipline within them, so that they have self-control, and that they have understanding, so that they know what a family is.
Excellent, excellent, excellent.
And your political cartoon was too much on the mark, Scott.
They couldn't tolerate it.
Meanwhile, liberals furious over Joe Rogan's latest pro-Trump comments.
On a recent edition of his Spotify podcast, The Joe Rogan Experience, a stand-up comedian in addition to UFC analyst Joe Rogan applauded Donald Trump's anti-war views.
In contrast to the unified front of the Warren Uniparty elite, Rogan thinks Trump's attitude on Russian Ukraine is admirable and a breath of fresh air.
They are all in agreement that this should go on.
Dems used to be known as always anti, we're always Rogan or Mark, adding there is no one, whether they are Republican or Democrats.
This is the very first occasion the Democrats are wholeheartedly embracing the narrative.
And we must put an end to Putin.
We must assist Ukraine.
How many Democrats and peacemakers who previously had syringes in their Twitter bios now have a flag of Ukraine?
During a CNN town hall meeting in May, Rogin said Trump had the perfect response when asked about the crisis between Russia and Ukraine.
He advocated for a diplomatic resolution, saying, if I'm elected president, I will get that war resolved in a single day, 24 hours.
I want everyone to stop dying.
They are dying, Ukrainians and Russians.
I want their deaths to cease, and I'll finish it in a day.
I'll finish that.
I'll take care of it.
To do that, you must have presidential authority.
Duncan Trussell, comedian and Rogan's guest, agreed Trump is making sense in terms of foreign policy.
I always believed that was kind of a general agreement, like between people who are saying it's a bad idea for us to blow each other up.
He continued, any endeavor to, like, halt a conflict without a World War III or bloodshed or anything is fantastic.
Even if it were unsuccessful, even if it turned out to make you appear like a weak, pitiful piece of shit in the long run, you're still gonna look wonderful if you're remembered as a peacemaker in the eyes of the world.
Even though Rogan has previously taken moderate or liberal positions on specific topics, he now seems to be leaning toward voting Republican in an effort to counter the woke lunacy of the left.
In a podcast interview last year with Aaron Rodgers, Rogan stated, no one living today has ever faced a true pandemic.
But now that everything is finished, I'm hopeful people would, you know, realize some big mistakes were made and not make them again.
The best you can hope for is that.
What do you say to those folks then, Rogers inquired?
Select Republicans.
Over a million individuals switched from the Democrat to the Republican parties, I believe, in 2021 alone.
The opinions of Rogan, host of the most well-known podcast in the world, are encouraging for Trump's prospect of winning the presidency again.
Let me add now, here's a New York Times, actually the anti-New York Times, addressing Trump facing seven upcoming trials.
New York Times.
Trump's legal woes mount as trial dates and campaign calendar collide.
The Republican frontrunner is facing a growing tangle of criminal and civil trials that will overlap with next year's presidential primaries.
The stage has been set for a made-for-TV multi-ring circus to begin unfolding later this year and blowing into the next, just as Normiedom will be getting interested in the next QFS quadrennial freak show of the presidential election season.
This article gives us a sneak preview of coming blockbusters.
As former president, Donald J. Trump campaigns for the White House while multiple criminal prosecutions against him play out.
At least one thing is clear.
He cannot be in two places at once.
Generally, criminal defendants must be present in the courtroom during their trials.
Not only will that force Mr. Trump to step away from the campaign trail, possibly for weeks at a time, but the judges overseeing his trials must also jostle for position in sequencing dates.
The Collusion Course is writing extraordinary and unprecedented questions about the logistic, legal, and political challenges of various trials unfolding against the backdrop of a presidential campaign.
Here's what's coming.
Civil Cases October 2023 A fraud trial over lying to lenders in New York, January 2024.
Defamation trial on whether he defamed E. Jean Carroll, January 2024.
Fraud trial accusing the Trump family of enticing people to invest in scams.
Because these cases are civil, Trump could choose not to attend them.
Criminal cases.
March, 2024.
Charged with falsifying records related to paying off Stormy Daniels in New York.
Late 2023, early 2024.
The sensitive documents case, Florida.
2024 expected.
The January 6th insurrection trial, federal.
2024 expected.
Efforts to reverse Trump's election loss in Georgia.
Poor persecuted Trump.
How can he ever survive such a barrage?
Rolling eyes.
Relax, boys and girls.
As the editorial board of the Anti-New York Times have been saying since early weeks of the Mueller investigation of 2017, months before Q even came on the scene, and never once wavering since, Trump was never in any legal danger then, and is not in any legal danger now, and will not be in any legal danger in the future.
The movie, Sobhabhra, and its many actors are following the cue script written by the White House, and the coming courtroom election season blowback climax will be epic.
The whiny backseat, are we there yet, chorus?
Needs to understand that there are important legal and social reasons for all the delays, complicated scripting, and endless head-spinning scenes involved in the movie.
Why the farcical courtroom trials?
How well will the coming cases benefit Trump and ruin the deep state?
It was all spelled out in my original 2018 pamphlet amended in 2020.
QAnon.
The Storm.
Banned by Amazon.
Excerpted from pages 87 to 91.
The NSA has all the evidence needed to take down the cabal.
The evidence needs to be cleared, and is slowly introduced under the cover of other investigations, so it's no longer unactionable evidence.
The coup is a slow-motion process, not an overnight event.
Many federal judges need to be appointed.
FBI and DOJ criminals slowly purged and replaced with patriots.
Plants, such as General Mike Flynn and former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort, were placed under fake investigation so some of the evidence could be laundered and placed into play.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions only pretended to be weak and incompetent.
This has allowed him to clean out traitors in the FBI and DOJ and conduct his own investigation into Democrat voter fraud, the Clinton Foundation, child sex trafficking, and other crimes in peace and quiet, deep state operatives in government and media, We'll initiate attempts to unleash and remove Trump from office, but they will not succeed.
Everything must be done slowly, methodically, and legally so as not to shock the dormant and brainwashed American public all at once.
They must see it for themselves.
How exactly does one wash the fruit of the poison tree, or as Q rhetorically asked, on at least three occasions, how do you introduce evidence legally?
Answer.
Through struts such as all of those raids on the homes of Trump and his allies, and soon trials.
But a bewildered boobs in the overlapping tyrannical kingdom cults of Normiedan and Libtardia would never accept as legitimate coming from a Trump post A video ad or a Tucker Carlson exposé, they would have to accept if it were revealed in a courtroom and admitted by the demigod in the black robe.
That, as Trump himself is now telling us, is what's coming.
Have a look at his recent Truth Social post.
Donald is clearly having fun with this.
We'll have fun on the stand with all these people that say presidential election wasn't rigged and stolen, a trial of the century.
So they impeach me over a perfect phone call, and they don't impeach Biden for being the most corrupt president in the history of the United States.
Trump is clearly telling us he is indeed Q+, and that the White Hats are about to finish off the deep state globalists.
The frequent Andrew Jackson symbolism, the constant threats of retribution and annihilation that both he and his right-hand man Dan Scavino have been posting are the stuff of straight-up gangster, but in a righteous way.
If I had a shackle for every time President Trump—and he is still the president—said that our elections are rigged, I could buy and sell the stinking Rothschilds.
Trump and the White House have it all and caught them all in the coming series of both civil and criminal free publicity trials, which will make him a sympathetic paraguer in the eyes of all but all most extreme Marxists and far-right black wheel addicts.
We'll present his lawyers with the opportunity to introduce evidence in a manner which none can dismiss as politically motivated, as Q said, soon after the disappointing election theft of 2020.
It had to be this way.
And indeed it all did.
The feigned powerlessness, the pretended chumminess with enemies, the COVID lockdown, the election sting January 6, the staged debacle that is the fake presidency of an imposter Joe Biden, the raids, the stock market crash, and whatever other unavoidable hardship, scares, and surprises the white hat scriptwriters of our secret military government have in store for us in 2024.
We are, after all, in a war.
We close with a 35-second video linked to the image below in which Trump virtually confirms the fact that his three-term presidency has only been paused.
Have a quick listen to what he says about the pause and why it was absolutely necessary, then come back for closing commentary by the Boobus Brothers, St.
Sugar, and myself.
His move is America's one.
I read the New York Times today that Trump is facing as many as six trials in the coming year, three of them criminal.
Bubba Samaritan is two, and yet, for some odd reasons, his enemy can never get anything to stick to him, St.
Sugar.
The boss is under the guidance and protection of the most formidable earthly power that ever existed, Boobus, the frickin' U.S.
military, with all its special forces and intel assets.
Editor, as Q said from the very beginning in 2017, the only way is the military.
Scott, thoughts?
I mean, I wish this all added up.
Your thoughts?
Well, you know, Jim, we served.
We swore an oath.
We went through training.
We went through combat situations.
We know how to lead.
We're officers.
We don't follow.
We go into the sound of the guns and we command men how to act and bear themselves and we know the nature of combat.
We know the nature of the enemy and we know how to kill and we do it unflinchingly.
I don't care if you're 19 or 90 years old.
Personally, I put more stock in older veterans over the age of 60 than I do anybody under the age of 60, you know, present company excluded, because they are real men, real Americans.
What's been produced after 1990 are a bunch of cowardly, effeminate, testosterone-drained simpletons.
But we're entering a time where the fanatics, the left-wing rhinos and the Democrats and the atheists and the climate-worshiping, Greta von Sundberg, bug-eating, homosexuals and transgender lunatics are all desperate to try and shed their homosexuals and transgender lunatics are all desperate to try and shed their sin and their discomfort and their alienation
By embarking on this religion, philosophy, political identity of madness, and forcing everyone else to do it too, thinking that they can hide in the mob of wickedness, as if it's Sodom and Gomorrah.
And the patriotic traditional family values Americans are saying, no, we're not going that way.
And there's going to be a mighty clash, Hunter.
I mean, Tucker Carlson said it, too.
He said there will be a clash between Christianity and the transgender homosexual ideology.
It is irreconcilable.
And one will be crushed and the other won't.
So we're entering this, you know, this eventual contact.
It's like two trains running on the same track, and I for one, knowing the veteran community, the patriots, the conservatives, the republicans, the blue-collar workers, we are all on the side of work, property, family, God, America, Our heritage that we inherited and the heritage we want to hand down to our children.
That's why we don't tear down statues.
That's why we're not racist.
That's why we're not anything that the left tries to accuse us of.
It's an information war.
The media are behind a lot of this narrative, you know, branding.
But we have to conduct ourselves and look at a great conflict is coming upon us, and all the other countries know this too.
So I think we just have to be prepared to advance, advance, advance, march forward, and not be stopped, or turn aside, or waste time, or get In any tar pits or quicksand of Democrat debate, we have to go with bayonets raised and go marching right through them when it comes to the rhetorical, political, poetic discussions.
And we have righteousness and truth on our side, and they have the devil, madness, and lies on theirs, and truth always prevails.
Jim?
Ryan, we can't see, but hopefully we can hear you, your thoughts.
Ryan?
Well, I want to talk about waking up. - Yeah.
Can't hear me anymore?
Okay, just a second.
We can hear you.
My background, can you guys hear me now?
Go ahead.
I have a, I have a, okay.
In the context of this article from the anti-New York Times, I only want to bring up one idea, one concept.
And let me give you an illustration of it.
There is a woman who is a commentator for the Young Turks that goes by the name of Anna Kasparian.
Now, the Young Turks is a notorious left-wing woke network of people that simply spew the latest garbage coming from the woke side of the agenda.
They've been milking about their wokeness for a long, long time.
Let me tell you something.
This young woman is growing up and she's beginning to see it and she's talking about it on air.
She's saying things that add up in terms of she's finally getting old enough and wise enough to wake up.
Now if Anna Katherian can wake up, anybody can wake up.
The process that I wanted to talk about in the context of this is that People believe that they're generally well-educated and generally well-informed, until they see something that doesn't agree with their worldview.
And when they can't put the pieces together, they begin to dig, if they're curious and motivated.
Enough!
The deeper you dig, the more likely you're going to find an entirely different worldview.
This is what's happening to Anna Kasparian.
And if it's what's happening to her, it's probably happening to millions of other young Americans who are beginning to see that something is awry.
Something doesn't make sense.
It doesn't add up.
What's on the other side of the dark veil?
Who is the wizard?
Pulling back the screen.
Folks, this is why we're here.
Waking people up one day at a time.
Now I'm not saying that Q is the be-all end-all or the anti-New York Times has all the answers, but I can tell you something.
The pieces are starting to make sense if you look at them through the lens of what Q was really standing for.
I don't know if it's true or not.
And I'm glad that I don't know that if it's true or not, because that means our opposition doesn't know.
But I'm telling you this, if you want to put the pieces together and you want to understand Las Vegas and COVID, and you want to understand the darkness that is coming over our media and over the people of the United States, you have to begin to see that people have to wake up on their own.
Fascinating the whole thing, Scott.
Yeah.
I would just add one opportunity we have that no Democrat has, is we show love to people.
We honestly love the confused, hurting, transgender, gay person that has been broken up, broken families, doesn't have a mother or father, has been traumatized, been on lithium or God knows what kind of drugs as a kid, and are so confused and hurting.
We want to love them.
That's murder.
them and heal them and nourish them as good Samaritans.
Well, the Democrats want to cut off their penises, create artificial ones for girls, cut holes in boys.
That's not love.
That's murder.
That's murdering their identity for population control and insanity.
That's the opportunity that strong emotional men, especially men, can share with these poor broken people is honest love and acceptance before they self mutilate and give them hope.
That's all these people need, these young people, is that love and connection And they will not destroy themselves.
It's because they don't have it that they destroy themselves to get a sense of uniqueness and attention and love.
It's extraordinarily sad.
But that's where we differ from Democrats.
We are people of love while the Democrats are people of fear and anger and resentment.
And we win in the end, Jim.
Let us hope.
Meanwhile, Israel's Parliament has passed a law weakening the Supreme Court, limiting their ability to challenge parliamentary decisions, in other words, to find them unconstitutional, This sounds like something the Democrats would like as long as they're in control of Congress.
It includes a provision preventing judges from striking down government decisions on the ground that they're extremely unreasonable.
Means the Supreme Court will be unable to review decisions such as the termination of officials on grounds of being unreasonable.
The law, part of a plan backed by Bibi Netanyahu that would change a judiciary, was passed in a 64-0 vote after opponents walked out rather than voting against it.
The first procedural vote was a 64-56.
Justice Minister Yara Levin, architect of the plan, said Parliament had taken the first step in an important historic process to overhaul the judiciary.
Other parts include a bill that would let a majority of Parliament overturn Supreme Court decisions, and a law that would enable Parliament to select judges.
The movement for a quality government which opposes the law quickly asked the country's highest court to act against the law over it allegedly being unconstitutional.
The government of destruction has raised its malicious hand against the State of Israel, and they are threatening to destroy everything we have built here in the last 75 years.
Elad Shaga, the movement chairman, asserted.
Mr. Netanyahu, 73, and his allies say the changes are needed to curb the power of undelected judges and restore the balance of the three branches of government.
But clearly, clearly, it puts the legislative branch in a position to manipulate the outcome of judicial decisions.
Critics say they're unnecessary, fueled by personal and political grievances of Netanyahu, who is on trial for corruption charges and his partners.
Demonstrators have protested, including blocking the road leading to Parliament.
Some companies, including gas stations, closed in protest ahead of the vote.
Thousands of military reservists have declared their refusal to serve.
We are headed for disaster, Jared Labhead, leader of the opposition in Parliament, said before the law was approved.
It's a complete breaking of the rules of the game," Levitt added, as the Times of Israel reported.
The government and coalition can choose what direction a state goes in, but it can't decide the character of the state.
Netanyahu's supporters, meanwhile, thronged central Tel Aviv to show support for the planned changes to the judiciary, while Netanyahu decried the military trying to force the government's hand.
Here's Jerry Rosenberg writing for RSN, a liberal left venue.
Israel has already lost.
In March, unprecedented outcry compelled Israel's government to pause its attempted overhaul of the government's country's judiciary, but the reprieve was only temporary.
While right ministers Adhemar Ben-Griv and Ben-Sally Smotrich assured supporters the reforms would pass by late July, it did not happen.
Instead, on Monday, The final week of the Israeli parliament summer session, the ruling coalition passed the least significant component of its proposed legislation, curtailing the Supreme Court's ability to use a reasonableness standard when reviewing government's decisions.
Contrary to the far-right's pledge, the government did not enact its plan to subordinate the appointment of Supreme Court judges to politicians, nor did it grant The coalition, the ability to override judicial decisions.
In other words, Israel's democracy, flawed as it is, remains intact for now.
Far from incapacitated, the country's High Court is already rushing to convene an unprecedented session to rule on the legality of this week's effort to curb its powers.
Whether or not Israel erodes its Democratic guardrails in the months ahead, however, its people have already lost something similarly essential—basic social trust.
Israel's warring camp are ostensibly fighting over the reasonableness doctrine, a technical tool inherited from British common law, allowing the High Court to overrule certain government decisions, though not legislation.
But fundamentally, the debate is not about the law itself, which few Israelis could easily explain, but about whose judgment is trusted to safeguard the country's democracy.
Put crudely, the reasonableness doctrine is a subjective standard that has allowed Israel's justices to substitute their own considerations for the legislature's when assessing the merits of certain government actions and civil service appointments.
Given the members of Israel's Supreme Court are appointed by a panel composed mostly of other judges and lawyers, a credible case exists for restraining this capacity, which lacks Democrat accountability.
But this week's reform did not take place in a vacuum.
It took place in the context of a power grab by the most hard-right government in Israeli history, one that received only 48.4% of the vote in the last election.
If Israel's judges no longer get to decide which administrative decisions are reasonable, That means that politicians in power do, even if they, too, lack a mandate.
And today, those politicians include homophobes, convicted criminals, aspiring theocrats, and proud nationalist chauvinists.
Polls consistently show two-thirds of Israel's citizens oppose the ruling coalition's unilateral overhaul of the judiciary.
Put another way, most Israelis simply do not trust the intentions of their own government.
They do not believe that Bibi, let alone the extremist allies he depends upon to maintain his power, will be more reasonable than the unelected Supreme Court.
They do not believe that the coalition will stop with a small salvo against a judiciary when it has already announced its intention to deconstruct the entire edifice.
Israeli opposition has lost faith in its country meant to act in the best interests of the entire nation, which is why its leaders now openly accuse the government of seeking to destroy democracy.
Its rancor extends well beyond the usual partisan politics and runs both ways.
Rather than attempting to calm the waters and re-establish civic trust, Netanyahu's far-right ministers have rubbed a recent victory in the opposition face and promised more of the same.
The salad bar is open, crowd Ben Griff on Saturday morning, framing the impending reasonableness reform as merely an appetizer for a much more forbidding buffet.
A cannier or responsible politician would mount platitudes about, this is a difficult time for Israel, but we are all patriots.
We want the best for one another in the country.
Ben Giver does not believe that.
And rarely feels compelled to pretend that he does.
Instead, he and his allies have cast the hundreds of thousands of anti-overhaul street protesters as privileged anarchists and foreign-funded enemies, rather than fellow citizens expressing genuine concern.
Something has gone terribly wrong in a country where this is how leaders speak about those they are supposed to shepherd.
Such an utter collapse of shared solidarity is unprecedented in Israeli history, which is why what happens next is so uncertain.
In the days ahead, Israel's Supreme Court may overturn this first strike against its authority, something it has never done before to a quasi-constitutional basic law of this kind.
Justices may let the legislation stand, but interpret it into irrelevance, coming up with new legal ways to get to the same results that the reasonableness doctrine previously provided.
Or, The court may entirely decide it lacks the power to overrule such a parliamentary prerogative.
If the court does undo this decision, it may stall the overhaul, throwing the coalition into chaos and recrimination.
Or, the reversal may galvanize a far-right's effort to pass its entire anti-judicial package by affirming its belief that small-scale changes will never be enough to change The Court's jurisprudence.
There is a reason, after all.
The Right's original plan included many more components than what has been passed.
Removing reasonableness from the judicial toolbox still leaves the rest of the tools, not to mention those who wield them.
In the long run, the current coalition may use further legislation to cement its power, quash the courts, and marginalize the opposition, or Netanyahu's government, which is already polling poorly, may be crushed by the consequences of its own body blows to Israel's economy, security, and internal cohesion,
Much as the ill-fated economic overhaul of British Prime Minister Liz Truss precipitated her exit, the fall of the reasonableness doctrine is a pebble that begins the avalanche.
And the thing about avalanches is they cannot be controlled.
Still, though the ultimate outcome of the week's events remains in limbo, one thing is certain.
Regardless of whether Israel loses its independent judiciary, it has already lost a core component of any functioning democracy, the sense of collective concern among citizens.
And that is something that cannot be fixed by any legislation or court order.
Scott.
Well, I could see them starting a war with Lebanon or Iran or both as a distraction operation to try and disassemble this protest that's been growing for a long time.
The people are very agitated.
I think it's The sign of things to come.
I think Israel is going through all sorts of political upheavals and things like that.
That's not even to mention the COVID-19 vaccine, where you have Netanyahu being accused of experimenting on the Israeli people.
Giving them this vaccine and doing it for experimental purposes, saying, yeah, we wanted to see what it would do with a person with diabetes, what the vaccine would do with the person with high blood pressure, what it would do to a person with AIDS, what it would do to a person.
So just experimentation was there.
If it's accurate that 90% of the population got the vax, then I think you're going to witness the end and the disintegration of Israel itself eventually, Jim.
Brian?
I'm going to go ahead and stop my video here to try to preserve bandwidth, and I'm sorry about this, folks, but I have a father-in-law that's in hospice, and I have to be close to him, which is why I'm up here at the Lake House.
I don't understand Israel's politics as much as I ought to, but I can see a trend.
People are beginning to rise up against the propaganda.
This appears to be what's happening in Israel, as again, people are waking up to the fact that our wars are generally very silly pissing matches between oligarchs and power players.
In very prestigious situations and the people are being generally ignored.
I imagine that this is also hitting the streets of Israel, just like it's hitting America.
And I would hope to see an outcome that's going to be similar to something that the patriots might bring about.
And that would result theoretically in Yeah, it's really kind of fascinating, very complex and controversial.
amounts of evidence against certain amounts of people who are treasonous or acting treasonously towards the country.
That's all I can really analyze from this.
This is a very sophisticated situation that I frankly don't understand.
Yeah, it's really kind of fascinating, very complex and controversial.
Meanwhile, Obama's scandal explodes at his estate buried.
He's got a lot of splaining to do.
What's happening?
Despite all that's happening, the liberal media still consider Barack Obama to be some kind of messiah.
In fact, the Obamas continue to pull strings in our society.
They sit on the board of the largest streaming service, Netflix.
They work with Hollywood producer TV networks and speak at universities.
And many of Obama's former lackeys are calling the shots at the Biden White House.
It's safe to say the Obamas cherish their image, and now they can manipulate the country.
So we have to wonder what they are thinking right now, as scandal hits their million-dollar home on Martha's Vineyard.
A body washed up on the shores of their home, but this was no stranger from the post-millennium.
A 43-year-old man, actually 45, who drowned while paddleboarding off the Edgartown course of Martha's Vineyard on Sunday, has been identified as a personal chef to Barack and Michelle Obama.
Divers recovered his body just before 10 a.m.
Monday from Edgartown Great Pond Well, what you have blown the family's 12 million to answer lies.
A social media post showed the chef swimming and seemingly doing so decently, even though he'd been reported to be unable to swim.
This is really striking.
He could swim.
There is a video.
I've included it elsewhere.
This is pretty alarming.
Tafari Campbell served as a White House chef during Obama's administration.
He left the post to work for the Obamas as their private chef.
He presumably worked or lived at their $12 million home on Martha's Vineyard.
But his body was found on the shores of the Edgartown Great Pond on which their house is built.
According to reports, Campbell was paddleboarding when the worst happened.
Some users pointed out comments a man previously made online suggesting he couldn't swim.
That contradicted by the video he posted on Instagram showing him swimming in a pool.
He could swim, so the idea of drowning while paddleboarding—by the way, in eight feet of water—is hard to swallow.
Please state the Obamas were not at the residence at the time of Campbell's passing, but he was there visiting.
Why was he visiting the Obamas when the Obamas were not present?
What's really going on?
How did an adult man drown while paddleboarding when it had been documented that he couldn't swim?
Was there an accident or something far worse happened to him?
This man worked closely with the Obamas.
He would have been by their side at important meals in advance.
Perhaps a serious investigation needs to be launched.
Let me add some key points not included here.
It was a phone call, an anonymous phone call, reported that he had disappeared under the water when he was paddleboarding and that he was dressed all in black.
They have not identified the person who made that call, other than saying it was a woman in addition.
It was someone paddleboarding with him.
He has also not been identified.
Barack Obama loved to paddle.
Here we have key takeaways.
Obama's private chef was found dead near their home on Martha's Vineyard.
Taffari Campbell previously served as a White House chef.
Before learning to see the Obama, social media suggests he was a capable swimmer.
Now, turns out, just now, Obama has been spotted golfing with bandaged fingers and a possible wounded eye days after Chef's death.
This is from the Daily Mail.
Images have appeared online of Barack Obama golfing that have people raising their eyes.
He wears bandages on his left dominant hand, may or may not have a small wound under his left eye, depending on who you ask.
Here's a post from Twitter.
The images, which came from an article on Daily Mail, clearly show the bandages have people speculating about the dark spot that appears to be on his face.
The latter is questionable.
Certainly, he either wouldn't come out in public or would wear makeup if they're trying to hide something suspicious, but who knows?
All this comes days after his sous-chef, Tariq Campbell, is found dead, according to the Gateway Pondet.
Dressed in a green polo shirt and white shorts, Barack Obama was seen engaged in a round of golf at the exclusive Vineyard Golf Club.
The former president noticeably bearing bandaged fingers, which causes speculations online.
Citizen journalist Travis of Flint, Michigan wrote, just days after his personal chef and friend died in a very mysterious paddleboarding accident, Barack Obama appears to have injured fingers and a black eye.
We still don't know who the other person was, and Obama loves paddleboarding.
I think we can all guess what happened at this point.
The Obamas aren't the Clintons who racked up a huge list of people close to them who have died mysteriously then again.
Perhaps the Obamas are just much better at covering their tracks.
Get this.
In the section where the cops were supposed to write the reason for the call, it was left blank.
But every other call that night was properly filled out.
But the logs also state that the call came from an address two miles away from the Obama home.
But when this story first broke, we were told it came from the Obama's property.
We're also finding out the 9-1-1 call was made by a woman.
What's up, guys?
It's your boy, Benny.
It is our obligation to go to you with all of the new evidence and information that we get on a story that we have covered, and we have been covering this death at Obama's mansion.
Every single TikTok of this event seems incredibly, incredibly strange to us, and we will tell you straight up that skepticism can never be wrong.
We were skeptic about this entire story the moment it broke, and hot damn it, we've been proven right now.
Check this out.
The police are covering up For the Obamas, check it out.
Tafari Campbell is the name of the private chef for Barack Obama.
Paddleboarding death riddle.
Cops left call log reporting blank and said it came from two miles away as they refused to reveal who was with him in the water.
What the hell is this about?
Ladies and gentlemen, the police officers did not write down what was inside.
Okay, let's read the article.
Exclusive.
Tafari Campbell, this is the chef, paddleboarding death.
The cops left the report blank.
The call came from the Edgartown Police Department at 746, but the logs show the reason is blank.
Tafari drowned while paddleboarding with another person.
Who was that person?
You can see here, in the article.
Everything here is the publicly available Police Department logs.
This is from the Edgartown Police.
This is a check of the property.
This is a minor motor vehicle movement.
Vehicle accident.
Medical emergency.
Blank!
At Obama's address.
Blank!
Huh?
And why can't we get the 9-1-1 number?
We can't get it.
They won't release it.
Why won't they release who called 9-1-1?
The story continues to change, which makes you think that these people are lying to us.
We're not saying there was foul play.
We're simply saying that if you don't tell us the truth, if you don't give us the information, then there has to be an assumption of foul play.
Remember Paul Pelosi with the hammer.
So, this man, Barack Obama's private chef, He died, even though he was a proficient swimmer.
We've covered that.
He was able to hold his own in water.
You can see the videos of him swimming back and forth in the swimming pool.
So, this man died in eight feet of water for some reason.
Couldn't grab onto his paddleboard for some reason.
Like, if you fell off, at least just hold onto your board.
It'll absolutely keep you afloat.
And there was a second person with him?
None of it makes any sense.
None of it makes any sense.
The Edgartown Police Chief Bruce Nemi told the Daily Mail that the call log is generated by the Dukes County Sheriff He could only speculate as to the reason why it's left blank, saying there may be because the caller from Obama's property didn't dial 911, which automatically generates location data, and instead maybe made a direct call to a business line.
Okay, I mean, you'd have to assume that the President would have that.
That's not outside of the realm of possibility.
He also said the address was listed as Wilson's Landing because that was the public launch used as the command post.
At the time the call came in, authorities didn't know where the drowning occurred, so they used a staging site for incident's location.
It took them 12 hours to find the body.
They went door-to-door asking neighbors about it.
Why would you go door-to-door looking for a drowned person?
Another strange thing.
The property boasts a private beach from which the paddleboarders can easily launch.
At the time of the drowning, Brock and Michelle were out of the house.
Were they?
Because that story's changed.
They first said, these people are off the island.
They're nowhere near the island.
Don't worry about it.
Barack and Michelle weren't around.
It's just a private chef who travels with them everywhere he goes around.
Then that story changed.
They were off the island, along with their two girls, who left the island immediately afterwards.
Malia and Sasha Obama are pictured leaving Martha's Vineyard after death of Chef.
So, they sent their family away.
they're starting to send, they sent their family away.
See ya.
Walking off. .
See ya!
Get out of here.
I don't know.
I don't know why they sent him away.
Here's a, uh, photo of the location, but what you really need to see is a photo of the Obama's private beach, because there is a private beach at Obama's house that is absolutely and unequivocally, uh, accessible by the Secret Service.
They have cameras there.
They have monitors there.
Did any member of the Secret Service go into the water to try and help this person?
Did anybody from the Secret Service have any footage of this person drowning?
Why would a person who's competent at swimming drown?
That doesn't make any sense.
Let me say, add a few details.
He goes on for another 15 minutes.
Number one, it appears Tariff was writing a book about the Obamas.
Number two, I have the report that there were bruises on his body.
Number three and four, my speculation, I believe the phone call was made by Michelle.
I believe the party was on the other paddleboat was Barack.
And that's why he now has these defensive injuries.
They're not professional killers.
This was an original amateur hour, but I believe this is going to blow up in their face.
The question becomes, does the Edgartown Police Department have the wherewithal to conduct a proper investigation?
It's already obvious they do not, by not identifying who was with him on the paddleboard, especially because it was Barack Obama.
Or who made the call and leaving the line blank because it was Michelle?
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, it's either foul play or it's an honest death.
He's died from maybe the vaccine and he rolled off, as we've seen people get afflicted with the vaccine and they just die and drown.
And that's certainly easy to prove, or it's something else.
And by all the cover-up and all the dissimulation and all the funny business, it seems to be inclining as something else.
What is that something else?
Barack Obama probably is having a sodomite relationship with him.
There certainly is an element of a possible book, you know, expose.
There certainly is room for some sort of an assassination.
It's pretty easy to triangulate these things.
Congressional announcements can demand Secret Service report where exactly they were.
Uh, during this full 24 hours of where Obama was.
He is always under the scrutiny and the observation of the Secret Service.
Always.
Except when he's in his bedroom, you know, with Michael LeVon Robinson.
But this is something that can be examined and trailed.
But if they start really trying to cover it up as a Chapaquiddick, Oh, just a few words on this one.
same effects of Chappaquiddick, and you'll find all sorts of nefarious activity with, you know, Michelle Obama right at the center.
We'll see what happens, Jim.
Brian.
Oh, just a few words on this one.
Jeffrey Epstein, Anton Scalia, everybody associated with the Clintons, everybody associated with the Franklin scandal, Damar Hamlin, all the latest deaths related to COVID.
David.
I mean, do we ever get to the bottom of any of these things?
I think I could go on for probably two hours just naming names of suspicious deaths associated with powerful people.
Kennedy's, Ted Kennedy, I mean, Garborough, In a controlled situation, when it's a controlled investigation, it's all going to get buried.
Don't expect this one to be any different than anything else that's out there.
Whether conspiracy exists or doesn't, they're never going to give us the truth straight and factually, straight from the beginning.
So it's left to us conspiracy theorists to try to figure out what's going on.
And we can only figure out what's going on with witness statements.
Who was this guy?
Who were his neighbors?
Who was he living with?
Who knew what about where?
And I guarantee you that everybody is scared of talking like that.
So, let's see if journalists can add color.
Let's see if the police are willing to come clean.
But I seriously doubt it.
Too much tax money involved.
Too much personal pride involved.
And this one's going to probably get relegated to the books as suspicious but unproven, just like the rest of it.
Yes, I think your points are well taken.
Meanwhile, let me say I have a final kind of a bonus.
This is a video of a young man who created his own amateur rocket and got it up 56 miles.
Now, it's 50 miles higher than commercial planes fly, and gave him a perspective on Earth.
Which had become controversial because of the Flat Earth Movement.
So I want to share parts of this video with you, not necessarily all, but let's take a look.
Five, four, three, two, one.
Five, four, three, three, two, one.
one.
1404, 1405, I'll take it. 1504, 1405,
Four, four, four, four, four, five.
1405, I'll take it.
I'll take it. 1504, 1405, I'll take it.
I'll take it. 1504, 1405, I'll take it.
I'll take it.
you Thank
you.
Thank you.
Just like it's it Looks like an REI commercial.
Like, like, a wilderness commercial.
Not a freaking launch commercial, dude.
This is f***ing nuts. This is f***ing
nuts. This is f***ing
nuts.
Okay.
One, two, three.
Slowly guys.
Okay.
One, two, three.
Slowly guys.
Nice and slow.
Five, four, three, two, one.
Five, four, three, two, one. Five, four, three, two, one.
Come on.
Woo!
Five, four, three, two, one. Five, four, three, two, one. Four, three, two, one.
Sixteen.
Twenty.
Twenty-five.
Thirty.
Twenty.
Twenty.
30.
35.
Standard ignition.
Event.
Yeah!
Yeah!
Standard ignition.
Yeah!
Let's go!
Squirreling.
Mifty.
I was just falling right on you.
We were doing a whole dominant trial.
Or is it the wind that is a little squirrel?
Something's happened.
Walk out.
We were doing a little while we were doing a little while we were doing a little while.
So, let's go. let's go.
So, let's go.
Well, there's more, of course. there's more, of course. of course.
None of us is ever likely to be 56 miles above Earth.
I wanted to share it with you because I'm besieged by individuals who believe Earth is flat.
I'm actually going to be doing a debate on the Rod Deal, my show, on Wednesday.
It's going to be broadcast live on YouTube with one of the most prominent proponents of planet Earth, a fellow named David Wise.
And it's going to be a question-answer format, so I've been working out a series of questions.
I want to be non-contentious, you know, because I just want to ask questions and let him answer and not resist.
But I think I have a series of questions that are going to, you know, lay a platform for revealing how extraordinary is this idea of denying that Earth is a globe Which, of course, has emerged from 2,000 years of scientific research.
I mean, it's just astounding to me.
Flat Earth requires rejecting modern physics and astronomy.
Now, from a logical point of view, it's perfectly possible to maintain a fixed, rigid belief if you're willing to Alter all your other beliefs.
It's like the relative motion of a train.
If you're on the train moving in relation to Earth, you can maintain it's immobile, but that means everything else, Earth is just flashing by like, I mean, it just becomes incredibly complicated.
It was already, you know, Copernicus who recognized that we have a simpler model of how the planets, the stars, Earth, Moon are related to one another.
We assume Not that the Sun, the Moon, and the stars are going around an immobile Earth, but if Earth is in motion traveling around the Sun, where it would turn out to be one foci of an elliptical orbit where Isaac Newton nailed it all down.
I just want to share this because this would be one of the final proofs I offered.
I mean, if you can actually go up 50 miles beyond commercial carriers elevation at around 35,000 feet and actually discern.
But I already had a reply from a friend of mine whom I admire greatly telling me, oh, they're using This curvature lens that makes things that are flat appear to be curved.
Scott, I just invite you and Brian to comment on this because... Well, I would say anything's possible.
I stay humble in all of these things.
I keep my mind open to the science and the revelation of the material observations that I think, you know, we've been in a world of such deception, such corruption, propaganda, and manipulation, That we really can't hold rigidly to too many ideas, no matter how old they are.
And I think the science well done, and mathematics well done, and all of these things being used synchronistically to define and determine the elements of reality will Ultimately show is the earth flat or is it curved?
I don't hold on anything too stringently.
There are some compelling cases and materials, you know, and I haven't exhaustively examined them, but the astrological configuration of the stars, how they don't change.
I mean, we're spinning on the same The universe, you could say, is spinning around us.
There is some telescopic lenses that can shoot like 10 miles out, and there's no curvature of the ships going over the sea and things like that.
I think there's, I would look forward to hearing the scientific analysis.
It's not a subject I've jumped into, but I certainly wouldn't be opposed, and I don't hold any prejudicial views.
I just want to know the truth, and I think it would be quite a revelation to pull all these things together.
And that, you know, these rockets going up there is pretty significant.
I'll stop there.
Go ahead.
Brian.
Well, when I was in college, I started out studying physical anthropology and cultural anthropology at Central Washington University.
After a while, I decided I wanted to go into theology.
So, obviously, I had the traditional globalist perspective, a globe perspective, and when I went to theology school, I went off to Moody Bible Institute in Chicago, which promotes the globe theory as well.
But I remember about my junior year, I got into a class that was taught by Dr. McMath, who was a Globe guy.
And we were learning through Genesis.
And I remember very clearly sort of the crisis moment that I had to deal with in college that caused me to really break my brain for the first time.
Now, I didn't solve that issue until close to 30 years.
But what he did was he stood at the podium.
In Genesis class, and he stands to the right, and he says, when I stand to the right, I'm going to argue for the world.
And when I stand to the left, I'm going to argue for the Bible.
And let's lay them both out, because here we are in Bible college, and we need to figure out, do we believe this Bible or not?
And so he stands on the right, and he says, okay, third rock from the sun, whipping through outer space, everything's moving.
Evolution, primordial ooze, Okay.
Trillions of years.
And then he stands on the left, and God separated the waters, created the firmament, placed the stars, the lights, in the heavens for calendars and such, and he lays this out.
And he basically looks at the kids, and you can imagine from a kid's perspective, you know, here you've got a 21-year-old kid that doesn't know a damn thing other than what he's been indoctrinated with since the very beginning, and you're stuck with a real problem.
Do I believe the Bible?
Or do I believe the world?
Or can I synchronize the two?
And I didn't.
I didn't figure it out.
For years, for years, it caused basically a shipwreck.
Well, do I believe the Bible?
I do.
I don't.
I do.
I don't.
I do.
But you can't reconcile them and you can't synchronize.
It's like it's just like that debate that we had with Scorpio, where they're trying to synchronize the idea of really killing people with false flags.
And it just doesn't doesn't fit.
So for me personally, I didn't really start figuring things out until I started taking a close look at false flags and of course, or even flat earth, because I was challenged by a friend in the conspiracy community to take a look at it.
Of course, the very first thing I did was dismiss it out of hand.
It's preposterous and ludicrous.
It's terrible.
But the more time I spent on the water, especially with telescope With 60mm optical zoom and more, the more I realized we just simply see too far.
And the more it became clear to me that this water does not curve.
I mean, the world's longest photograph is over 700 miles.
It's shot from Finland to the Swedish Alps.
It's 700 miles.
And that's... If the true calculation is 8 inches per mile squared, then we have a problem.
Because we simply see too far.
In the end, what's my position?
My position is I don't know.
But I lean towards the Bible, and the Bible seems to describe something different than what the world describes.
This I think I know for a fact.
Water doesn't curve at ages per mile squared.
Now how the hell do you explain that?
I don't have all the answers.
The Bible says there's a firmament separating the waters.
I don't have all the answers.
I look up.
I feel stationary.
I know about the Michelson-Morley experiments.
I know about the response to the Michelson-Morley experiments, which were Einstein.
The Michelson-Morley experiments were pretty conclusive proofs that we're not in motion.
And Einstein came up with the theory of relativity in response to the Michelson-Morley.
I don't trust Einstein as much as I trust Copernicus or any of the other Jesuits.
Gentlemen, I will be sure to share with you the results of my exchange this coming Wednesday.
Don, take us out.
Okay, I will take us out.
First, about the earth.
it along.
Now the question is, do you believe the Bible?
I do.
Gentlemen, I will be sure to share with you the results of my exchange this coming Wednesday.
Don, take us out.
Okay, I will take us out.
First of all, the Earth, was that second submarine, I think that was two miles down going for the Titanic, and And that's two miles of deep water.
And also, there's also volcanoes with very hot stuff.
How deep is the earth?
I mean, it's got to be about two, four miles down and flat.
And what is it sitting on?
How is it, where is it resting?
How are we out there?
And those are questions that I can't answer, but so anyway.
We'll see that for another time.
Anyway, thanks so much for watching Food vs. News Incorporated.
I guess we're out of this world today.
We're just really having a fantastic time, and hopefully you're going to be able to watch this and share it.
But thank you very much, because it looks like America is a target, and it's going to be a hot week coming up here, and we'll see what happens, but we look to see you next week.
▲
Export Selection