All Episodes
July 27, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:15:06
Need to Know News (27 July 2023) with Carl Herman
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Carl Herman in Mission Viejo, California.
Brian Davidson is on assignment.
We begin with U.S.
and allies.
Preparing to support an open-ended conflict in Ukraine.
This is not good.
The U.S.
and allies are worried Ukraine's stalled counteroffensive means the war between Russian and Ukrainian forces will be open-ended and ongoing.
The report said the U.S.
was hoping Ukraine would regain some territory to pave the way for a negotiated settlement But it's not happening.
Without significant Ukrainian gains, the West is preparing to support the proxy war for years to come.
The only real response is an industrial mobilization that will give the Ukrainians and the Russians a clear message that Ukrainians will always have plenty of what they need, an unnamed Western diplomat told the Wall Street Journal.
The diplomat said the U.S.
may have to accept the war won't end any time soon.
Biden and other officials have repeatedly said they're in for as long as it takes, but it's unclear If the U.S.
and its NATO allies can sustain support for Ukraine, warning that Western military stockpiles are running low, especially in relation to howitzer ammunition.
Time is also on Russia's side, and potential political changes in the U.S.
could impact the level of support for Ukraine.
The Journal said a stalemate could bolster the argument of those inside who oppose supporting Ukraine, though opposition to the policy of pouring tens of billions of dollars in weapons into Ukraine is still relatively small in Congress.
A U.S.
official told the Journal, it's still too early to assess the Ukrainian counteroffensive since Kiev hasn't committed all of its combat brigades that have been trained by NATO.
If they commit their reserves and the reserves are not successful, then we will have to determine the way ahead.
The Journal reported that Western officials knew Ukrainian forces did not have enough training or equipment to dislodge Russian, but hoped the counteroffensive would be successful anyway.
In other words, wishful thinking.
Leading up to the counteroffensive, the Discord leaks and media reports revealed the U.S.
did not believe Ukraine could regain much territory from Russia, if any at all.
A European official quoted That is, government does not believe Ukraine can regain all the territory Russia has captured, but the government in Kyiv maintains that recapturing all the territory is its goal, including Crimea, which Russia has controlled since 2014, demonstrating the war will drag on as long as the U.S.
and NATO keep backing Ukraine—unless, of course, Russia simply demolishes Ukraine, which appears to be taking place.
Meanwhile, uber-Russia hot Victoria Nuland rises to acting Deputy Secretary of State so she can do even more damage.
She's done as much as anyone to sour U.S.-Russia ties.
Now she has become one of Washington's top diplomats.
This is awful.
In a slightly noticed move, the Biden admin announced Monday Victoria Nuland will take over as acting second-in-command at the State Department, replacing Wendy Sherman, who plans to retire at the end of the week.
Nuland's appointment will be a boon for Russia hawks who want to turn up the heat on the Kremlin, but For those who favor a negotiated end, a promotion for the notoriously undiplomatic diplomat will be a bitter pill.
Here she is, monster, Russophobe extraordinaire, who engineered the coup of 2014 that set all of this in motion.
A few quick reminders are in order.
When Newland served in the Obama admin, She had an infamously call with the U.S.
ambassador to Ukraine as a maiden uprising roiled the country.
The pair of diplomats discussed conversation with opposition leaders, and Nuland expressed support for putting Arseniy Yatsenko into power.
Yatsenko would become prime minister later that month, after Russia-friendly former President Viktor Yukhanovich fled the country.
At one memorable point during the call, Nuland said, fuck the EU in response to Europe's softer stance on the protest.
The controversy surrounding the call and larger implications of U.S.
involvement in the ouster of Yankovych kicked up tensions with Russia and contributed to President Putin's decision to seize Crimea and support an insurgency in eastern Ukraine.
Handing out food to demonstrators on the ground in Kiev probably didn't help either.
Nuland, along with State Department Sanction Czar Daniel Freed, then led the effort to punish Putin through sanctions, which of course has massively backfired.
Another official at State reportedly asked Freed if the Russians realize that the two hardest-line people in the entire U.S.
government are now in a position to go after that.
Nuland's hawkish inclination continued after she left the Obama admin back in 2020.
She penned a foreign affairs essay pinning down Putin in what she called for a permanent expansion of NATO bases in the alliance's eastern flank, a move that would be certain to ratchet up tensions between the U.S.
and Russia, as I have previously noted.
Nuland also opposed the idea of a free rollover of New START, the only remaining agreement that limits Washington and Moscow's nuclear weapons stockpiles, when it was set to expire in 2021.
Since returning to state under Biden, she has shown little interest in a dovish turn.
In interviews earlier this year, Nuland called Putin a 19th century autocrat justifying Ukrainian attacks in Crimea, which Russia has called a red line.
If we don't defeat Putin, Every other autocrat on this planet is going to go looking to bite off pieces of countries and destabilize the order that has largely kept us safe and prosperous for decades and decades, she argued, just giving a straw man exaggerated version of a position to make it easier to attack.
To recap, Nuland first was allegedly involved in a conspiracy to overthrow Ukraine's president, second was definitely behind a strict sanctions regime on Russian officials, and third has never softened her uber-hockey stances since.
With U.S.-Russia tensions at their highest point in decades, I'd say 50 years easily.
There should be little doubt as to how her appointment would be received in Moscow.
There is, of course, some reason for hope.
In the statement announcing Sherman's retirement, the Biden admin did not give a clear indication whether Nuland would be nominated to formally take over as Deputy Secretary of State.
Biden has asked Victoria Nuland to serve as Acting Deputy Secretary until her next Deputy Secretary is confirmed.
This leaves reason to believe there's internal opposition to her nomination, or that the admin has someone else in mind, which I find highly unlikely.
For now, we can only wait and see as Kiev struggles to retake territory through its grinding counteroffensive in the East.
In one month, we have only advanced a kilometer and a half, a Ukrainian medic told Kyiv Post.
We move forward by inches, but I don't think it's worth all the human resources and material that we have spent.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, so another forever lie started for Willie and illegal Yeah, it looks like it's going to go on forever, at least that's what we're shown.
require Vietnam-style protests in order to end.
And the Wall Street Journal, they say that the opposition in Congress is relatively small.
Okie doke.
Yeah, it looks like it's gonna go on forever, at least that's what we're shown.
And for the second story, Victoria Nuland.
Wow, so the number two position of Secretary of State.
Jim, I like that move.
I hope that she's there when the narrative completely collapses.
I want her to be in the responsible position, the best person to serve with Blinken in the Secretary of State office.
And for her to say that Putin is the 19th century autocrat, that's just more typical.
So everything out of these people's mouths is the projection of what they're doing.
It is the U.S.
who is taking bites out of pieces of countries.
That's all that they ever do.
So this dichotomy, this polarization, it stretches more and more and more, and we're going to keep talking about it until it breaks.
Yes.
Yes, indeed.
Indeed, Garl.
Quite right.
Meanwhile, Hunter, Biden's attorneys face sanctions over misrepresentations of the court.
Hunter Biden's attorneys face potential sanctions over misrepresentations of the court after his legal team allegedly lied to the clerk in his criminal case.
The Bretton Sons set painter a plea agreement on Wednesday after his legal team secured a sweetheart deal agreement on Biden's charge by federal authorities of illegally possessing a handgun and failing to pay two years worth of federal taxes.
On Tuesday, House Way and Mean Committee Chairman Jason Smith submitted a brief to U.S.
District Court Judge Mary Ellen Noriega arguing she should reconsider Biden-Wley agreement in light of an IRS whistleblower's recent claim that the DOJ stifled their IRS investigation into Biden.
A defendant appears to have benefited from political interference, which calls into question the propriety of the investigation of the U.S.
Attorney's Office.
Smith's attorney, Theodore Hitler wrote in a court filing, it is critical that the court consider the whistleblower material before determining whether to accept a plea agreement.
However, Biden attorneys face possible sanctions after a member of the legal team misrepresented her identity to improperly convince the clerk to remove Smith's brief from the docket.
That, however, is only the beginning of the problems for Hunter.
Judge slapped Hunter with unprecedented release rules.
He's furious.
Hunter Biden's release condition was just announced.
Judge Mary Ellen Noriaka approved the terms, which severely restrict Biden's way of life and carry the threat of instant imprisonment should any of them be broken.
When Judge Noriaka rejected Biden's plea agreement earlier this morning, the course of his legal tale took a dramatic turn.
And Hunter ultimately pled not guilty.
This is when Biden's restrictions were announced.
The strict regulation reflects the seriousness of the accusation Biden is facing, as well as the difficulties he will encounter in court.
The court order has extensive and specific conditions.
The criteria requirements are as follows.
No possession of firearms.
This provision, though a standard requirement in many legal situations, further underscores the severity of Biden's case.
Prohibition on using or possessing any controlled substances.
Ouch!
This includes substances such as marijuana, unless prescribed by a doctor.
This mandate reflects the court's concern about substance abuse issues involving Hunter.
Full federal supervision.
Hunter will be under the watchful eye of federal authorities, marking an unprecedented level of scrutiny for the son of a sitting president.
Total abstinence from alcohol.
This absolute ban on alcohol use appears to address concerns about Biden's previous struggles with substance addiction.
Seek active employment.
This provision, while somewhat unusual, signifies the court's insistence that Hunter lead a constructive, law-abiding life.
Not likely.
Regular testing for prohibited substances.
This condition provides a mechanism for the court to enforce a substance use restriction.
Participation in substance abuse therapy.
This requirement, while addressing hunters past issues with addiction, could also serve as a therapeutic route for recovery.
These restrictions aren't just suggestions, though.
Any violation will result in our sanctions and maybe immediate repercussions.
They consist of immediate issues of arrest warrant.
This immediate consequence would place Hunter back in custody, a stark turnaround for the son of the president.
REVOCATION OF RELEASE.
VIOLATION OF ANY CONDITION COULD RESULT IN BIDEN'S RELEASE BEING REVOKED, SIGNIFYING A RETURN TO DETENTION.
Poor Fitzgerald Bond.
It violated.
Biden risks losing any bond posted.
Reflecting the financial repercussions of non-compliance.
Prosecution for contempt of court.
This additional legal trouble could further complicate Hunter's already intricate legal saga.
Here's Nikki Sorter tweeting.
Breaking.
The new conditions of release for Hunter Biden have hit the docket, signed by Judge Mary Ellen Noriega, who shelved Hunter's plea deal today.
If Hunter does not comply with any part of the order, he could be immediately requested.
He's required to all of the above.
Carl, your thoughts on this remarkable development?
It's getting better and better.
So people appreciate this, the severity of this.
This is a game ender.
Hunter Biden's legal team called up this U.S.
District Judge Noriega's court, pretending to be from the House Ways and Means Committee, saying that the amicus brief filed by the House Ways and Means Committee detailing, basically saying, you know, That, uh, two IRS whistleblowers and that form of $10 million from Burisma to the Hunters.
Huh.
You should reconsider all of that plea deal and have Hunter go to court over this.
So what did Biden's legal team do?
They had one of their people call the court, pretend to be from the Ways and Means Committee, and say, oh, yeah, you got to pull that amicus brief because it has tax information on it that can't be shared.
And they were busted.
And then the judge did blow up.
So this, the idea that this would go public.
The fact that we have an honest judge on this case, at least it appears so far, this is extraordinarily good news.
Let's see, what else?
Oh, and the judge's orders.
Wow, that does smack, like a judge who is totally pissed off.
I don't know For the legality, and this may be extraordinary orders by the court for Hunter to remain free and at large, but I want to point out that the judge did make egregious errors saying that Hunter needs to seek active employment.
Hunter Biden is a renowned international energy expert, making a million dollars a year for Years at Burisma and an international art expert selling his art for more, probably ten times more, than the judge makes.
And I understand those buying his art are prominent Democrat Party donors, Carl.
I mean, this is wonderful.
And who would know art better than them?
This is sensational development.
We have an honest jurist.
Minutes after Trump bombshell explodes, Republicans come sprinting to the rescue.
What's happening?
If you really think the last attacks by the left against Trump have anything to do with what they're saying, you need to take another look.
All the polls show Trump winning the GOP nomination and even beating Biden in 2024.
Biden is crumbling.
His mental health is getting worse by the minute.
Democrats have no real backup.
And Trump has a record.
They can ride right back into the White House.
So, Democrats have been churning up the most intense, insane attacks we've ever seen.
They've already indicted him twice over questionable charges, but guess what they just did?
From a post-millennial.
Trump released a statement Monday saying he's notified Sunday that Biden's DOJ considers him to be a target of the January 6th grand jury.
This, Trump said, almost always means an arrest and an indictment.
Are you kidding me?
Are Democrats really this stupid?
Democrats in New York indicted Trump over weak accusations regarding his business.
Then Biden's DOJ indicted Trump over wild claims-related documents he kept at his home.
If that were not enough.
Biden's rabid dog, Jeff Smith, just sent Trump a letter that essentially means they're going to indict him again, this time over already debunked accusation about January 6th.
How can anyone not think the left is trying to rig our democracy?
You might not believe they stole that 2020 election, but give me a break.
They're indicting Trump three times?
Do you really believe this has anything to do with the actual charges?
Democrats are panicking.
They know if Trump returns to the White House, they are all doomed.
So they are throwing every baseless and idiotic charge they can cook up to take him down.
This is very troubling.
It shows us that Democrats don't want a free country, but a kind of dictatorship where they persecute their political enemies to the death.
And if you thought Republicans were taking this lying down, you're dreaming from Breitbart.
Republican official blasted the Justice Department January 6 probe and told the reportedly imminent indictment of former President Donald J. Trump expressing support for Trump in the face of the weaponization of the justice system against President Joe Biden's opponents.
Republican leaders are condemning the left's weaponization of the justice system against Trump, Biden's top political rival.
Kevin McCarthy said this is not equal justice and that it's wrong.
Jim Jordan said Americans are tired of the double standards.
Steve Scalise Echoed the sentiment that Biden and the Democrats are weaponizing our DOJ against our enemy.
So did Elise Stefanik, Ted Cruz, Byron Donalds, and other top Republicans.
It's clear that Republicans are no longer standing for this nonsense.
It took three indictments, but the party is finally taking Trump's side.
If Democrats really think they can get away with this insanity, they are sorely mistaken.
Key takeaways?
Trump revealed that Biden-DOJ was preparing to indict him again.
Biden's laptop, Jack Smith, appears to be indicting Trump over J6 claims.
Republican leaders condemn Democrats, accusing them of weaponizing the justice system, as they have been doing so grossly.
Meanwhile, get this.
Biden may not plan to send alternative electors if needed in 2020.
Now they're suing Republicans for doing the same.
Trump prosecutor Jack Smith has been investigating the process of saying alternative electors for possible prosecution.
This week, far-left Democrat Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel charged 16 of the 2020 Trump electors with eight felonies each.
Many of the Michigan Trump electors are retirees in their 70s and 80s.
The charges against the Michigan electors include forgery, election law forgery, utterance conspiracy.
The media has engaged in systemic journalistic malpractice by endlessly referring to the alternate electors as fake electors in order to make them seem guilty of innocent conduct.
Now Mike Pence, executive director of the Foundation for Freedom Online, laid out evidence on Twitter that the Biden team had planned to send their own slates of alternative electors in case they lost.
A central bank stockpile.
The Biden plans were written and overseen by John Podesta, of course.
Podesta had a plan to ensure Biden won by sending an alternate set of electors, like Ben's tweets.
John Podesta role-playing Joe Biden in Transition Integrity Project Summer 2020 simulation to ensure a Biden presidency, even if Trump won the election, openly plotted sending a separate elector slate.
The same thing DOJ just indicted Trump electors for considering doing.
Here's the source file.
More on the above.
Carl, your thoughts?
So the optics are getting just better and better.
For the truth, you have Tucker Carlson destroying the Republican candidates other than Trump as war criminals in Ukraine and COVID criminals against humanity.
You have RFK2 destroying the Democrats who are attempting to censor him, talking about official censorship.
Led by one of my favorites, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who cooperated with the criminals in Bower County, Florida, to destroy the ballots in the 2016 and 2018 primary elections against my colleague, Tim Canova.
And Tim won that case in court.
The findings of the court were, oh yeah, it's clear in the rules that you don't destroy the ballots, but we're not going to do anything about it.
That's why Debbie Wasserman Schultz was there.
And you have, as you said, the destruction of Biden and the optics get poorer and poorer for him.
So what do our opponents do about that?
They go back to the well.
Third time.
Just try to arrest Trump again.
The alternative electors.
This was also done in 1960.
Hawaii was declared won by Nixon and the Republicans, and they set up their electors, all three of them.
And the Democrats with Kennedy, they set up an alternative slate of electors as well.
And it turned out that, you know, who knows what nonsense happened in that election.
But it was the same thing.
The Democrats set up an alternative electors and they ended up being used for those three votes.
And then you have Podesta and the Democrats planning it out and gaming it out for 2020.
Now, I like that insight to see that that was in the summer of 2020.
And the our opponents have taken over the world because of their ability to plan ahead.
And that was a contingency plan for the case of a clear win.
So, we'll see what develops further with this, but I'm liking the trend of how much is being exposed.
So am I, Carl.
So am I. Very encouraging.
Meanwhile, get this.
Russia outlaws sex change operations and legally identifying as another sex.
Bans transgenders from adopting children.
We should be doing the same.
I praise Russia.
I admire Vladimir Putin.
He is standing up for morality, normalcy, families.
and regular forms of life rather than perversions which are being embraced here in the United States.
Meanwhile, dancing COVID nurses that supported draconian mandates have switched to climate change.
This is bizarre.
Perhaps one of the most unsettling narrative relationships during the COVID pandemic lockdown was the assertion by various government think tanks and media pundits that the mandates weren't just good for stopping the spread, they were also good for saving the environment for what they claim will be inevitable apocalyptic climate change.
Well, the COVID agenda has all but disappeared thanks to millions of people.
And if the states are rejecting the restrictions, climate hysteria is still alive and well.
One of the most obnoxious trends in COVID propaganda was the constant TikTok dance videos.
Dancing politicians, dancing talk show hosts, dancing nurses, all telling us to comply while frolicking around like maniacs.
Well, it's not over.
Because the dancing COVID nurses are back.
And now they're here to tell us that accepting carbon controls is just as important as accepting the mandates.
Unbelievable.
Here it is.
Check it out.
The world is a world's greatest risk.
Fire's front and extreme heat, but more than just our dancing thieves.
So come on new fossil fuels, save bloody with renewables.
Come on kids, pay the price, ignoring scientists' advice.
Nor ain't scientists advice.
It should be undisputed by the planet, so we stay alive, stay alive.
Leaders should be understaffed by the planet so we stay alive, stay alive.
Come on, come on, just stop, go by the stop, so we stay alive, stay alive.
I'm gonna come to stop, I'm gonna stop you, so we stay alive, stay alive.
We all want to stay alive, stay alive.
We all want to stay alive, stay alive.
We all want to stay alive.
We all want to stay alive.
We all want to stay alive.
We all want to stay alive.
Such unadulterated bullshit.
Beyond the numerous question of how nurses managed to have time to make so many TikToks if the hospital were overrun with patients dying of COVID, as the media asserted the first year of the pandemic, we must also ask, if they lied about the effectiveness of the mandates, why should we listen to them about climate change?
Not one draconian policy enforced by governments made any difference whatsoever in the transmission of the COVID virus.
The lockdowns were pointless.
The masks were pointless.
Social distancing was pointless.
And the official median infection fatality rate of COVID is a mere 0.23%, which means 99.8% of people were never under any threat from the disease anyway.
These facts were well known by medical professionals by early 2021, yet many of them continue to push the mandates.
Invariably, as the summer heats up, so does hype surrounding climate controls, which would do little or nothing to shift the existing state of Earth's temperature.
Record temps are often touted, but these records are limited a short time from around 140 years of official data since the 1880s.
But what about before then?
When we look at the real history of the Earth's climate, the temps today are incredibly mild.
Not only that, but the global warming events of the past all occurred without human involvement.
Here's a wonderful chart.
Estimated global temperature over the last 550 million years.
One has to wonder, if this is the case, why are no carbon control proponents or climate scientists talking about it?
Is the situation much like COVID, where they tell you to believe the science, except that the science contradicts their claims?
And let's not forget, The same people have been telling us Earth is on the verge of burning, of going out of existence for a very long time.
People stopped idolizing nurses after the pandemic scare.
Dancing for the climate feels more like a desperate act to regain relevance rather than legitimate activism.
Look at this.
June 29, 1989.
UN predicts disaster if global warming not checked.
A senior UN environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000.
Huh!
I wonder if that came true.
Meanwhile, over a thousand top scientists conclude there's no climate emergency, there's only the PsyOp climate change depopulation scam from the second smartest guy in the world.
Over a thousand top scientists from around the world, including Nobel Prize winners, signed the World Climate Declaration, a state there is no climate emergency.
It is a con to consolidate resources and ultimately achieve mass depopulation.
Readers of this Substack appreciate that in 1968, the One World Government created the Club of Role.
This technocratic node, along with the WFUN, CFR, Rockefeller Crime Syndicate, and various captured governments, would promote the Climate Fear Project, In order to convince humanity that they are responsible for all things weather.
By duping the population into believing such anti-science nonsense, society would live in a perpetual state of self-loathing and fear.
This would allow for all those who trust the PSYOP to be far more easily controlled.
Think pandemic, death bags, child sex reassignment surgery, etc., and have a far greater propensity to not reproduce.
Here, in fact, it turns out we're in a CO2 famine.
Notice, 160 million years ago, The parts per million for CO2 was around 270, 50.
When primates developed, it already dropped to around 1,000 parts per million.
Today, it's around 250.
We're actually in a dire state, because if it drops below around 150, life is no longer sustainable.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, the first story for Russia stepping up and stopping the fantasy that somebody can change gender is good for them.
I like that.
The data of the people who go through that mutilation surgery is horrific with incontinence.
I think the suicide rate, those who attempt suicide who have gone through that procedure is close to 50%.
So the idea of stopping it so that the physicians can actually honor their oath to do no harm would be a good thing.
And then, just to stop the pretense of the illusion, the fantasy, that there, you can have, you can change your genders.
The Dancing Nurses!
I like their comeback, just like I like Victoria Newland's comeback, to just put it in their faces.
And you're right, it is bullshit.
Those little signs that they put on the sheeted bodies, like, oh, food shortage!
Oh, if you care about that?
There are an abundance of solutions.
Our political leaders don't do that.
And other signs of social unrest, like the 2020 Summer of Love paid for or brought to you by the people who paid Antifa to engage in that.
And the I don't know what I wrote for that note there.
I will.
Oh, so we're in 2023 now.
We can definitively demonstrate, in part by essays from the second smartest guy in the room, the data that COVID is a crime against humanity, and here on BitTube I'll put my essay from 2021, and it was clear by 2021 that this was a joke, and I'll provide documentation for people who want to be able to point to at least one paper.
for climate change.
So they started talking about global warming, but global warming stopped almost 20 years ago.
Oh, they had to get their focus groups and come up with a new label and climate change got the most favorable impression.
So that's what they've gone with the idea that you have 1000 scientists stepping up for leadership.
That's great.
And they'll have an abundance of opportunities to to fight and to lead.
And by the way, peeps, leadership, the idea of leadership, the definition of it, one of the first definitions just means that being a leader is you're going first.
You see something, you're going to stand up and you're going to put your body and your voice out there first.
And whatever attacks may come, you'll say, I'll take them.
This is similar to, so we have 3,000 professional architects and engineers with Richard Gage who put their license number on the line to say that the story of what happened on 9-11 is physically impossible.
But that goes back to 2001.
I hope that our climate scientists can engineer and that life will provide us some sort of a breakthrough before another 20 years goes by, because we're not going to make it that long.
Excellent.
Excellent, Carl.
Excellent.
Meanwhile... New details emerge after Obama's personal chef is found dead near the ex-president's Martha Vineyard home.
This case is getting stranger and stranger.
The world was shocked when Barack and Michelle Obama's personal chef, Tafari Campbell, was found dead nearing their 12 1⁄2 mil estate on Martha's Vineyard.
New details have now come to light.
Daily Mail reported the body found near the Obamas' estate has been identified as 45-year-old Tavari Campbell, a former White House sous-chef who has been the Obama family personal chef for the past few years.
Campbell reportedly went missing Sunday after paddleboarding on Edgerton Great Pond with someone whose name has not been identified at this time.
Campbell was reportedly seen falling overboard and quickly becoming submerged under eight feet of water.
Let me know right off the bat.
He was paddle boarding with someone whose name has not been identified at this time.
Well, who the hell was that?
And why the hell didn't they save him?
And why aren't we hearing his story of what happened?
Something is terribly wrong.
Here's Daily Loud tweeting, breaking.
Barack Obama's personal chef, Tafari Campbell, found dead after drowning near the former president's Martha Vineyard home.
Tafari was a beloved part of our family, Barack and Michelle said in a statement after his body was found.
When we first met him, he was a talented sous-chef at the White House, creative and passionate about food and its ability to bring people together.
In the years that followed, we got to know him as a warm, fun, extraordinarily kind person who made all of our lives a little brighter.
That's why, when we were getting ready to leave the White House, we asked Afari to stay with us, and he generously agreed.
He's been part of our lives ever since, and our hearts are broken that he's gone.
They concluded by offering support to Campbell's wife and twin sons.
But does that look like a statement you get?
If you just learned that your chef had died, this is much too thoughtful.
This was prepared in advance.
They knew what was going on.
They knew his body would be found.
Today, we join everyone who knew and loved Tafari, especially his wife Cherise and their twin boys Xavier and Sabin, in grieving the loss of a truly wonderful man.
The Mall reported the Obamas initially said they were not home at the time he went missing.
However, their office amended this by claiming that the Obamas actually were on Martha's Vineyard, just not at their own residence when Campbell drowned.
Well, where the hell were they?
At Edgerton Great Pond, perhaps?
The New York Post reported a 911 call came in from the Obama's 30-acre estate at 79 Turkey Land Cove Road on Sunday night with the unidentified caller saying that Campbell was wearing all black and did not have a life jacket on.
A massive search was immediately launched that involved divers, Coast Guard helicopters, resources from multiple agencies.
But it was not until 10 a.m.
Monday Campbell's body was found using sonar scanners deployed from a boat.
Well, How come the caller's unidentified?
And how did the caller know he was wearing all black and didn't have a life jacket on unless the caller was observing the event as it took place?
Another huge red flag.
Something is wrong.
Then Amira King tweets.
Taffari Campbell is a former White House chef who cooked for the Obama family.
Walter Schreiber is another former chef for the White House and cooked for the Clinton family.
Both of these men drowned.
Here's a piece by Victor Thorne prior to Obama's elevation to the presidency reflecting on some issues that are rather unsettling.
Investigator closed the case, believes there's more to the brutal murders than mainstream press is letting on.
Is a Barack Obama bombshell lurking in the shadows, waiting to derail one of the biggest Cinderella stories in recent history?
Well, most political prognosticators in the mainstream press presume that Obama is a presumptive Democrat nominee for president.
They still wonder aloud if Hillary or some other entity has something up their sleeve.
The bombshell may involve the murder of Donald Young, a 47-year-old choir master at former Reverend Jeremiah Wright's Trinity United Church of Christ, the same congregation that Obama's attended for the past 20 years, or so we have been led to believe.
Two other young black men who attended the same church, Larry Bland and Nate Spencer, were also murdered, execution style, with bullets to the backs of their heads, all within 40 days of each other, beginning in November of 2007.
All three, notably, were openly homosexual.
What links this story to Barack is that according to an acquaintance of Obama, Larry Sinclair, Obama's a closet bisexual with whom he had sexual and drug-related encounters in November of 1999.
Honestly, I'm not even convinced he's bisexual.
I think he's 100% homo.
Further, Sinclair claims Obama was friendly with at least two of the deceased parishioners, and that choir director Donald had contacted him shortly before being murdered from multiple gunshot wounds on December 23, 2007.
These killings are receiving a number of different reactions.
Mike Parker, reporting for CBS Chicago, wrote, activists fear gay African Americans are being targeted for murder.
While Mark Lovelace of the Coalition for Justice and Reflect queries, are we under attack?
Is this a serial killer?
I think not.
An even more sinister aspect is being investigated according to Sinclair in an affidavit to the Chicago PD.
Donald Young had informed him he and Barack were intimate with each other.
Sinclair, it should be noted, declared on a January 18, 2008 YouTube video, and on two separate occasions in November of 1999, he engaged in sex act with Obama, and that Obama smoked crap cocaine, once in a limousine, the other at a hotel in Gurney, Illinois.
Sinclair has also asked, why would Young, whom he had never met, initiate these calls by contacting him on cell phone numbers known only to the Obama camp?
Further, a private investigator connected to the Chicago PD told the Globe Donald Young was silenced because of something he knew about Obama.
Donald was in a position where he heard a lot of things and saw a lot of things concerning Barack.
Another questionable Obama associate is openly homosexual.
That would be Stanford Law professor Lawrence Lessing, who was listed during the 2008 campaign as being part of Obama's technology initiative.
In April, Lessig showed a video at a Google seminar entitled Jesus Christ the Musical, where Jesus Christ lip-syncs Gloria Gaynor's 1970 disco hit, I Will Survive, during which he strips down to just a diaper, effeminately struts along a city street, and finally gets run over by a speeding bus.
This is the individual playing the role of Jesus Christ!
Are three murders within the span of 40 days among members of America's most-discussed church—one run by the controversial Reverend Jeremiah Wright—enough to rouse the suspicions of Chicago law enforcement and members of the national media?
Not a chance.
Or, as Sinclair wrote in a May 18th email, was a murder of Young made look similar to other recent murders to make it look as if it were a hate crime because he'd become a political liability?
One can only hope this isn't the beginning of another body count eerily reminiscent of that associated with Bill and Hillary Clinton.
Carl, let me add, the only serial murders involved here are of persons who had direct homosexual sex with a Barack Obama, whereas he's about to become the nominee for president.
He does not want the public to know.
Your thoughts?
Exactly right.
So, two drowned chefs.
What a coincidence.
So this dude and you raise great questions with that Jimmy's paddle boarding so that's lying on a board and sometimes you got a paddle and you're going to be just chillin who was that dude and what type of water were they in was it just calm waters where they're just.
You know, just chillin' in the water?
And for the report to say that he fell overboard!
He's on a paddleboard!
I guess you could say that he did that, he fell over his board.
But, you know, if this isn't body surfing or surfing, then this is just still water.
Was this a vax event?
Like the 20 plus reporters and journalists who collapsed on air?
That's a possibility.
Or is that just going to be the cover story for other facts that this person would know being with the Obamas?
Let's see what else we got.
So, Big Mike and Obama, they're crisis actors.
They're pretending to be political leaders when they're actually just puppetitions.
They don't make any policy decisions.
They're just
And then I did like when Victor Thorne, who I appreciated when he was alive, and I'll get to his death in just a moment, they got the good twofer that Victor pointed out to be able to push to silence, permanently silence, silence Obama's gay lovers while at the same time being able to push both the anti-gay narrative, maybe they want reparations for them, I don't know,
And as well, the hate crime narrative that we've seen lately.
Now, Victor Thorne, he did end up with the official report that he suicided.
That is suspicious.
Another gunshot wound to the head.
And Victor Thorne, according to his brother, was tremendously happy.
He had never been more successful.
His career was going up and up and up with the excellent work that he was doing to expose the deep state.
So, you know, it would be a good move by the opponents to stop that presentation by Victor Thorne.
Especially look what he's doing.
He's talking about these deaths that involve young men who either had had, or very probably had had, sexual relation with Obama that he wanted to silence.
He cannot have been enthusiastic about Victor Thorne reporting all this in the American free press.
Meanwhile, Candace Owens, Refuses to watch Barbie movie, here's why.
Mainstream media is fawning over the Barbie movie, but there are plenty of reviewers who are less than enthusiastic about their extreme feminist messaging.
Daily Wire host Candace Owens had her opinion on watching the fantasy comedy which debuted July 21st.
Candace explained why she had no interest in seeing the movie, despite extreme marketing efforts meant to convince her otherwise.
Obviously.
If you're listening to this podcast, you know one of the things I really hate is that we're living in a world increasingly anti-man.
While we pretend that women are suffering under the foot of the patriarchy, what's actually happening is that toxic feminism has risen to the top and is actually oppressing men with movements that make entirely no sense.
Owens went on to give a few examples of celebrities embodying this toxic femininity, including actor Jonah Hill's ex-girlfriend, who accused him of emotional abuse and posted private text messages, and singer Bebe Rexha, who reacted badly to her ex admitting she gained weight.
The product host said women are frequently vicious toward men, and this behavior is typically applauded in the mainstream as some kind of feminist victory.
Owen said she based her decision not to see the film on a review Sarah Vine wrote for the Daily Mail, which explains some of the issue with Barbie, quote, I knew I could take her words at face value, Owen said.
The commentator goes on to quote from the review, which says, My main objection is that Barbie is not really a film about Barbie at all.
It's one hour and 54 minutes of extended misandry dressed up with a few fun dance routines and one or two granted fairly decent jokes.
It's a deeply anti-man movie, an extension of all that TikTok feminism that paints any form of masculinity other than the most endine, meaning the most feminine version, the weakest, the most feeble, as toxic and predatory, and frames women's liberation, not as a movement based on achieving equality between the sexes,
But as a cultural revenge vehicle designed to write men out of the story altogether.
Every male character is either an idiot, a bigot, or a sad, rather pathetic loser.
If the roles were reversed, and a male director made a film about how all women were hysterical, neurotic, gold-digging witches, it would be denounced, quite rightly, as deeply offensive and sexist.
Owen said this synopsis was enough to turn her off from seeing the movie.
If that's what she's trying to convey, that means they're either idiots or bigots or sad, and when they demonstrate any form of masculinity, they must be put back in their boxes by women.
I'm just not interested.
I like Candace Owens.
I think she's wonderful.
I would have thought she'd want to see the film to confirm the review for herself, but that was her choice.
Carl?
Yeah, I don't know if I'm going to end up seeing that movie or not, and I'll explain why in just a moment.
So for corporate media, for them to pimp anything, they're taking orders because they're not reporters either.
They're taking orders as well, and they're just And on the surface that was a brilliant analysis is that this is a sexist movie and the motivation of it is that you're going to have to destroy men like us, Jim, and men like our audience members.
You have to call any type of leadership is toxic masculinity.
You have to just have order followers and minions.
That's what our slaves, that's what our masters want.
Now, I did look up in Rotten Tomatoes, that is the key review site, or one of the key review sites.
And for Barbie, it got a 90% approval rating by the critics, which are gonna be the paid pimps of the prostitutes, and an 86% among the audience.
So the audience apparently liked it if those polls are accurate.
Compared with the Sound of Freedom, Sound of Freedom got a 70% rating by the critics and a 99% rating by the audience.
Now, the Barbie movie, you know, I did read an extensive review by a patriot who just detailed all of the ridiculous agenda items that went through the movie, and part of it was in that article.
But the beginning of the movie is just these little girls destroying their dolls, so just a Part of destruction and that's what our our opponents have to do.
They have to destroy everything in a previous culture in order to replace it.
And that's part of the theory of destroying a culture and having a revolution now for the Barbie movies.
Our daughter.
Who is soon to be 22.
She grew up with Barbie movies, and they were like 20 of them.
They were animated.
And these stories, I actually enjoyed watching those movies because the Barbie character was not ridiculously proportioned and engaged in adventures where she had to be creative.
She had to be kind.
She had to be courageous in order to take on the challenges.
And there were many catchphrases that I liked.
And one that I remember is that, you know, Barbie facing a challenge.
And like any type of a movie, it's...
Life or death, and it's a ridiculously hazardous challenge.
And the question comes down to, Barbie, are you ready?
And you can tell that Barbie is not ready, but she rallies and says, I'm as ready as I'll ever be.
And that was a constant theme.
But that is a far cry from what we're seeing here.
My daughter might force me to watch that movie, and if so, I'll be able to provide you with that critique, Jim, that you wanted from Candace.
Oh, that was just a wonderful commentary.
I really profoundly appreciate all of that.
Excellent.
Well done.
Meanwhile, speaking of Sound of Freedom, rumors—media swipe at Sound of Freedom backfires bigly.
Look closer at the two headlines.
ABC decries Sound of Freedom as propaganda.
ABC reporter goes down for rape slavery.
ABC News, July 19, 2023.
Trump screams Sound of Freedom, seeking to rally evangelists around fear of child trafficking.
Here's the other.
Former ABC reporter pleads guilty to possessing child pornography.
Our buddy the Texan has made an interesting observation.
The regime media is trying to spin the success of Sound of Freedom, a movie about the sexual exploitation and trafficking of children, as an example of the right, specifically those nutty mega-deplorables, embracing a QAnon conspiracy theory.
Meanwhile, someone who is breathing the same rarefied air over at ABC News was caught in possession of child porn.
Talk about an awkward pair of articles.
The ABC News article begins predictably slamming former President Trump.
Former President Donald Trump on Wednesday night hosted a screening of the film Scum Sound of Freedom at his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey.
One day after the revelation, special counsel Jack Smith has informed Trump he's a target of a federal investigation into his efforts to overturn the 2020 election.
Sound of Freedom is a faith-based film, and evangelicals are one of its main audiences.
An advisor at Trump told ABC that the screening was going to include a large faith-based element.
The movie is loosely based on Tim Ballard, who founded the anti-trafficking organization Operation Underground Railroad.
The fictional story, starring actor Jim Caviezel as Ballard, follows his mission through the Colombian jail to save a girl from child traffickers.
Sound of Freedom is a faith-based film, and Evangelicals are one of its main audiences.
An advisor to Trump told ABC News this screening was going to include a large faith-based LMI.
The ABC News framing of the story is that the movie is stoking the fear of child sex trafficking, and it's a gullible idiot Trump-supporting evangelicals who believe that kind of QAnon conspiracy bunk, and that Trump is simply exploiting them.
Of course, while doing that, it also attempts to discredit the star of the film, Jim Caviezel, and the real-life hero he portrays, Tim Ballard, because of Trump.
Between late 2019 and 2020, Ballard served on an anti-trafficking White House advisory council while Trump was president.
He and his Operation Underground Railway's work has been closely scrutinized in an investigation published by Vice News that reported Ballard and the organization had at times seemingly exaggerated some elements of their work.
The ABC News article does include that Ballard Angel Studios and Operation Underground Railway have all pushed back on claims that they're promoting a QAnon conspiracy.
I can't explain it, and neither can they.
They just like to throw the word out.
QAnon.
Ballard.
The anti-trafficking advocates set on Fox.
They make zero connection to the actual story.
The CEO of Angel Studios, which is distributing Sound of Freedom, has likewise pushed back on this claim, saying everyone who's seen the film knows it has nothing to do with politics or conspiracy, and it's just a great true story well told.
Operation Underground Railway Websites say they don't condone conspiracy theories and are not affiliated with any conspiracy groups in any way, shape, or form.
Accurate information about child exploitation and human trafficking is imperative to effectively confront these issues.
Source, ABC News.
It's sad that the state of media is so awful, and including comments by the people they're trying to smear is worthy of kudos, but here we are, just two days after publication of that article.
The Epoch Times reports that a former NBC News journalist has pled guilty to possession of child porn.
From the Epoch Times.
James Gordon Meek, 53.
Pleaded guilty to using an online messaging platform to send and receive child porn, according to a plea agreement made public on July 21st.
Mr. Meek acknowledged knowingly violating 18 U.S.
Code 2252, which bars transporting child porn, ...is in any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce, or in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer or mail, annoyingly possessing or accessing child porn with intent to view Mr. Meek is slated to be sentenced on September 29.
He faces at least five years in prison and up to 40 behind bars.
He could also be ordered to pay a fine of up to $500,000.
A lawyer for Mr. Meek did not respond to a request for comment.
An ABC spokeswoman did not return an inquiry.
Weird that ABC didn't want to comment, eh?
But it wasn't just oops.
I downloaded the wrong porn.
He was seeking it out and traveling other states to communicate with others to share child porn.
He even contacted a minor over Snapchat and pressured her for sexually explicit pictures.
While in or around South Carolina, he used his phone to engage in messages with two different people, Mr. Meek admitted in the plea deal.
The conversation included the exchange of child porn, including at least one infant.
According to an earlier filing, Mr. Meek also had similar discussions over Snapchat and conversed with at least one minor.
Law enforcement officials identified the young girl, who told them Mr. Meek and other men contacted her on Snapchat and pressured her to provide sexually explicit pictures.
Mr. Meek's computer, an external hard drive, and three other phones were also discovered to contain multiple depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct.
Mr. Meek acknowledged.
According to an earlier filing, a defendant knew that his electronic devices contained such depictions that the individuals depicted were minors and that at least some of the individuals depicted were prepubescent and minors.
Under the age of 12, prosecutors said in a statement with which Mr. Meek agreed in entering the guilty plea.
Source?
The Atlantic Times.
To be fair, it isn't just ABC News melting down over Sound of Freedom.
It's pretty much every news agency.
Sagart and Jetty exposing some of the earlier regime media freakout, which has only become more shrill as Sound of Freedom has been a shock blockbuster hit for the summer.
Is it just a weird coincidence that ABC is downplaying the sexual exploitation of children, right?
Probably not.
Remember, It was ABC that spiked the Jeffrey Epstein child trafficking theory three years before it hit the mainstream.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, the trend that we're seeing is so many stories, it's hard to keep up.
So I really like that trend as well.
My understanding of that ABC reporter was the same one who claimed to debunk Pizzagate.
And I wonder if that individual wasn't also a criminal participant in sexual crimes against trafficked children.
The connection that our corporate media is making for the Sound of Freedom and Q, I want to address that a little bit.
So, as a professional historian, I read all of the Q source material and found it to be among the hardest-hitting sources for truth that I could find, and one of the major themes was the trafficked children.
And we also know that whatever Q Is or was, was a White House insider because of the coordination of the language between what Trump would tweet and what Q would post, both in the timing of those posts and in the specific language.
All right, spy op.
Another one.
All right, that doesn't mean anything.
And even with the power of the truth that were at the Q post, that isn't enough to do anything if And only if the Dark Hats are still in charge.
That'll be no different from people pointing to the Warren Commission report 60 years ago, or people talking about the Federal Reserve 100 years ago.
It's just not going to be enough if the Black Hats are in charge.
But I do want to point out, look where we are now with what Q promised of drip, drip, flood.
I am very encouraged.
I like the trend.
And as I've said for months, none of this is going to matter until we have a breakthrough.
We're not in any position to be excited about anything.
But if the breakthrough does happen, all of us who have been participants in this World War Three AMREV 2.0 will be able to be perfectly positioned and spread out enough to be able to help our Oh, I do agree.
There are some positive developments, especially in what we're reporting today.
I like that.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Now they want to interview Melania Beverly Wright.
See story below.
The usual restitute claptrap, trying to find something negative to say about Trump.
Melania declined a New York Times interview.
Good for her.
For four years, the mainstream press, including the women's and fashion magazines, ignored her.
Why should she give them the time of day now?
They will only do a hatchet piece.
A very private live with Melania Trump from Yahoo News.
Let me say, I found it outrageous at the time.
You had this gorgeous, wonderful person in the White House, where in the past every single year, virtually every single issue of the women's magazine would feature The First Lady, and they had none about Melania.
And most of those First Ladies, frankly, were very uninteresting, even boring, maudlin, ordinary.
Melania is completely different in that category.
Carl, your final thoughts.
And Jim, that particular point is excellent because you would think that corporate media and our masters would want to promote Melania.
If Trump was a usual stooge and a player, Melania would be great to be able to have people look up to America and to feel good about their country.
They could have done a lot.
But if Trump was not with the agenda, then of course they would have to attack everything.
And that's exactly what we've seen.
And all that said, I have no other words of wisdom of my final thoughts to myself or to anybody else, other than just to stick with the truth, notice the trends, and when governments collapse historically, when these empires go down, as I've said over the years now, it happens in an instant.
And that's what I think that we'll see, and we have all these narratives coming together, all of which are game-ending.
The pay to play.
That was a breakthrough this week for the FBI forums to be able to demonstrate that the FBI documented $10 million going to the Biden family from Burisma.
And now you have a federal judge saying that, yeah, Hunter's going to have to go to trial over this.
So this is very interesting developments, along with all the other trends coming in.
Biden's destruction, the COVID crimes against humanity, the war in Ukraine.
So much is coming together, and it would be poetic justice if all of these narratives blew at once.
That would give the maximum exposure.
Now, this is just Wishful thinking at this point.
I am at 95% certainty that the White Hats are in charge.
And here at BitChute, I'll go ahead and put the documentation to inform my personal conclusion with that.
But we're just chatting on this side of the breakthrough, which, as we've talked about today, we'll continue to do until something does break.
Excellent comments, Carl.
Much appreciated.
Think of the first ladies since JFK.
Lady Bird Johnson.
Betty Ford.
Pat Nixon.
Rosalind Carter.
Laura Bush.
Give me a break.
These were uninteresting women.
Some of them were, frankly, the opposite of beautiful.
Melania Trump has to be the most beautiful, glamorous, stylish First Lady since Jacqueline Kennedy.
Remember when Jack reported, after returning from France, that he was the man who escorted Jacqueline Kennedy to Paris, where she received rave reviews.
Melania was deserving of equal praise.
But as you correctly observed, Carl, That would benefit Trump, and because he's an archenemy of the deep state of the vested interests of the military-industrial complex, they could not even give Melania the time of day.
She has, in the meanwhile, handled herself wonderfully.
I recall with great affection how beautiful she looked, how stunning it was for her and Donald to walk down Pennsylvania Avenue after the inauguration.
It truly was inspiring and brought back memories of Jack and Jackie.
The country deserved to benefit from what we had done in electing him president, but the deep state has not viewed this as an act of kindness, but as a political atrocity, disaster of the highest order of magnitude.
They must do something to repair.
And now we have, after You know, the initial onslaughts against Trump, Russiagate, the two impeachments.
Now we're working on, what, the third or even the fourth indictment?
None of it has any basis in law or in fact.
We have to recognize what this means.
There can be no more sincere sign that a man of high office is working to benefit the American people than that he's opposed by the mainstream media, the deep state, and the political establishment.
That man is Donald Trump.
I believe he has much more to give this nation.
We must do everything we can in our power to support him and to defeat his enemies, who are ours in turn.
Meanwhile, spend as much time with your friend, family, the people you love and care about.
We still do not know how much time we have left.
Export Selection