All Episodes
Previous Next
July 25, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:36:11
Need to Know News (24 July 2023) with Carl Herman and Chris Weinert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Carl Herman.
And why do I resist?
Mission Viejo!
Mission Viejo!
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
We're expecting, here he is, Chris Weinert to be joining us.
So here we have Chris coming in right now.
We're going to give you all the news you need to know.
We begin with an absolutely fascinating report from Benjamin Fulford relating to a peace deal reached between NATO and Russia.
Listen to this.
An agreement to end the Ukraine war was reached in principle last week following high-level negotiation between British MI6 intel and the Russian FSB.
The details will be negotiated over the coming months.
Sources in both agencies confirm.
The basic outline of the agreement is as follows.
Russia will get the entire Ukrainian Black Sea coast.
The city of Odessa will become a demilitarized free trade zone to allow Ukrainian trade to proceed smoothly.
The country of Abkhazia will be internationally recognized and also turned into a free trade zone.
Most of us may not even know where that country is located, but here it is, just north and west of Georgia on the Russian border.
Fascinating!
The war criminals in Ukraine, including Volodymyr Zelensky, will be removed from power and face justice.
A fully modernized 300,000-man NATO army will be established in Germany, strong enough to deter Russian invasion.
The Russians weren't planning any invasion, but too weak to threaten Russia—clearly symbolic.
It'd also keep a military-industrial complex in business, and do a swords-to-plowshare transition can be managed.
That's in some Neverland.
Also, a Polish-Lithuanian confederacy may take over non-Russian parts of Ukraine.
Russian President Vladimir Putin himself says plans may be in the works to use an intended Polish-Lithuanian-Ukrainian joint military unit as an occupation force in Western Ukrainian territory, and any Polish forces entering Lviv are certain to remain there.
He also says, if the Ukrainians want to relinquish or sell off something to pay their bosses, as traitors usually do, that's their business.
We will not interfere.
In other words, the Russians seem to be okay with this as long as they leave Belarus alone.
Of course, there are hotheads in both Russia and the West who are not satisfied with this arrangement.
Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko says he's starting to get tense with the Wagner Group because they want to march on Warsaw.
My prediction ain't gonna happen.
The Kazarian mafia propaganda rag The New York Times, for its part, is still clinging to the illusion that a thoroughly defeated Ukraine can still somehow win the war, if only they get more weapons and money.
This is delusional, as Putin notes.
The whole world sees that the vaunted Western supposedly invulnerable military equipment is on fire and is often even inferior to some Soviet-era made weapons in terms of technical and tactical characteristics.
the west does not have the production capacity to quickly replenish the consumption of reserves of equipment and ammunition in addition people in ukraine are asking the legitimate question more often For what?
For the sake of whose salvage interests are their relatives and friends dying?
This is why cooler heads prevail.
The alternative is all-out nuclear war, which is something only the Khazarian mafia wants.
Diplomats are expected to start working on the details of the peace agreement in Malta during the month of August, MI6 sources say.
They sent us a press release by the Anglo-Saxon military group known as the Patriots International Alliance.
It calls for an immediate ceasefire in Ukraine to prevent a potential nuclear conflict.
It also recognized the atrocities committed against ethnic Russians in Ukraine and the installation of U.S.
Department of Defense bioweapon laboratories in Ukraine as war crimes.
Since these military veterans have not accepted bribes from the Khazarian Mafia, they're looking for financial sponsors for the Peace Conference in Malta.
They can be contacted via MG Major General Pauly Valley U.S.
Army Retired Chairman, suaus1961 at gmail.com.
suaus1961 at gmail.com.
Let's face it, Ukraine was a military catastrophe, a military defeat, catastrophic defeat for the Khazarian mafia, as Colonel Douglas MacGregor has noted.
Ukrainian service personnel are surrendering at a first opportunity owing to the belief they're being treated as nothing more than cannon fodder.
Absolutely right.
And we have not even talked about the estimated 60,000 children who have disappeared coming out of Ukraine.
That's a mini-catastrophe.
The lesson learned in Ukraine is American military power consists of boutique forces designed for safari in Africa and the Middle East, not decisive combat operation against great continental powers like Russia or China.
It is time for Washington to turn its attention inward and address a decade of American societal, economic, and military decay that ensued after 1991 when the Soviet Union dissolved.
It is time to reverse the decline in American national prosperity.
I could not agree more.
Europeans are also sick and tired of supporting a dying U.S.
regime.
P3 Freemason sources say in the past two and a half years, EU countries paid $1.12 trillion for expensive U.S.
natural gas, which would have been enough for 10 years worth of Russian gas before the Ukrainian war began.
This is why the Europeans voted against the Americans and with the British at the recently ended NATO summit.
History shows whenever there's a decisive military defeat, regime change follows.
The braid of Rockefeller stooges from the fake Biden administration visiting China recently has been part of a desperate attempt by the old U.S.
regime to stay in power.
Elon Musk, Bill Gates, Anthony Blinken, Janet Yellen all went to China on begging missions, but returned empty-handed.
This led to top Rockefeller bagman, the 100-year-old Henry Kissinger himself, being sent to China.
Chinese government sources say they told Kissinger they respect him as an old friend who normalized relations between the U.S.
and China in the 70s.
However, they also told him they knew he ordered the murder of Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.
Bobby was a member of the Chinese Lai royal family.
For this and other reasons, they would not support his Rockefeller masters and their fake Biden.
Also, in a very clear sign, Taiwan does not intend to go along with any Kazarian mafia plot.
To turn that island into a new Ukraine, Tsai Ko-shen, head of Taiwan's defense, said Taiwan does not plan on reselling Hawk's surface-to-air missile systems, SAMs, to the U.S.
just so they can turn around and send them to Ukraine.
He added, Deadlines have already been set, in accordance with which the SOC SAMs will be rid of every year.
They'll be replaced with TenCoon, Skybow, TAS SAMs.
After that, they will be destroyed.
In other words, they are telling the Rockefellers, we're not going to trade used weapons for your fake dollars so that you can buy time by selling them to other countries.
Carl, what fascinating stuff.
And as Ben Fulford, he was a reporter with Forbes stationed in Japan, and he found out, what many of us find out, when he approaches government leaders with actual solutions for the people, they discover that the governments are not there for the people.
And in Japan, Fulford has documented for probably close to 20 years, and I've read him for over a decade, that he's just a stooge, just a puppet of the US.
And that for the resolution of the war in Ukraine.
My experience of reading Ben for over 10 years is that the information is valuable and interesting.
And when it comes right down to it, that last part is just testimony.
So we shall see how it plays out.
The optics certainly are of a one sided war.
And the people are paying attention for the Europeans to have to pay four times The previous price of natural gas, that is something that everybody pays attention to, of course, and the Ukrainian minions supporting the war.
So, the war is one-sided because there is very little motivation among the Ukrainians except to avoid their own deaths.
These are minions to the puppets of the US, UK, Germany, France, and NATO, and they're civilization ordered into a meat grinder.
And the Ukrainians noticed that, of course.
And the rest of the world also notices that the peace offered through the Minsk Accords and grew Russia's terms for peace, which was just to allow democracy and to have no NATO for Ukraine.
That rejection creates an environment where the people are seeing the extent of the depravity of this neocolonial empire and are rejecting it.
Thank you.
Very good.
Chris, what do you think of Benjamin Wolff's sensational report of a peace agreement, which he outlined?
Well, I just heard a little bit of what you were saying about it before my internet dropped out again, but yeah, that's definitely an interesting concept.
To me, it seems like the Kazarian Mafia is playing both ends against the middle and using this situation, this mass genocide, as a bargaining tactic to walk away with stuff that they should not have at all.
They have no business taking in the first place.
But somehow or another, after committing this massive amount of atrocity and war crimes and depopulation tactics, somehow or another, they're still getting away with it and they're still getting what they want.
I'm sure there's more to this deal than most of us will really know about.
Like you mentioned, the bio-warfare weapons and I'll even mention the child trafficking and many other things going on with the prostitution stuff that goes there.
And even the wheat deal that we talked about in another show, there's a lot of resources that are at stake here.
And this is some big, big money.
I also mentioned that this wheat was some of the only non-GMO wheat that's on the marketplace, too, so that's kind of a big deal, I think, too, in terms of supplying the elite their food supply, because they're not going to eat that Monsanto shit that they expect us to eat and that they pump into every grocery store.
Yeah, I think it's definitely something that the Gazarian Mafia has had their eye on this region for a long, long time.
It goes back a ways and throughout empires, but certainly the same group of people seems to be behind this.
And it seems like in a 100-year cycle that they go into here every 100 years and just depopulate as many people as they can get away with depopulating.
Fascinating.
Meanwhile, the D.C.
Uniparty has killed a House resolution to end U.S.
and many other things.
So, yeah, this is pretty interesting times.
And I don't know, it'll be interesting to see how accurate Fulford is on this with his report.
Fascinating.
Meanwhile, the D.C. Uniparty has killed a House resolution to end U.S. emergency powers in Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Yemen.
In a massive show of support for limitless executive power, Congress rejected legislation.
That would have terminated national emergency powers, allowing Washington to wage war across the Middle East, and to test biological weapons on U.S.
citizens.
Led by Representative Paul Gosar, a handful of Republican members launched a protest against 41 nominal national emergency declarations many decades old.
Gosar argued the National Emergency Act is tyrannical, granting 148 separate powers to the executive branch.
This July 18, the House voted down five resolutions to terminate national emergency powers dating back as far as 2003.
The countries affected by the five resolutions include Congo, Yemen, Libya, Syria, and Iraq.
Each vote saw a coalition of pro-war Democrats and Republicans join together in overwhelming number to protect the executive branch's emergency authorities.
Among the declarations still in effect is one authorizing war on Libya.
On the basis that Muammar Gaddafi posed an urgent threat to the U.S.
when enabling economic warfare on Syria on the specious grounds that Damascus sponsors international terrorism.
And another, allowing the President to support Saudi Arabia's military assault on Yemen, which has resulted in the world's worst humanitarian catastrophe.
Yet another emergency declaration provides the authority for the U.S.
government to test biological weapons on American citizens.
U.S.
Code allows the President to suspend existing law on biological and chemical warfare in the event of a declared national emergency.
It's sad that we're here for these five emergency resolutions, Representative Gosar said.
Warning, there will be 36 more coming your way.
He added, national emergencies are supposed to be rare and brief.
The passing of the National Emergencies Act by the 1976 Congress did not intend for the executive to utilize declarations for decades in order to apply sanctions.
That is something Congress can do separately from a national emergency declaration.
The resolution to relax sanctions against the Democratic Republic of Congo was introduced by Representative Lauren Boebert.
It would have terminated a 2006 emergency power authorized by executive order imposing sanctions on the property of Congolese nationals.
President Biden extended these powers on the ground that the situation interrelated to the Democrat Republic of Congo continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to U.S.
foreign policy, which is dubious in the extreme, by law.
National emergency declarations are supposed to be reviewed by Congress every six months, yet none of the five in question have ever been subject to scrutiny.
Boebert noted on the floor that in the 16 years since a national emergency related to Congo was declared, it should have been reviewed 31 times.
Gregory Meeks, the corporate-sponsored ranking Democrat member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, claimed relaxing sanctions on Congo would enable ISIS to open checking accounts at American banks.
He offered no explanation why a designated terrorist group would opt to place a war chest so far behind enemy lines.
Representative Eli Crane, an Iraq war veteran, sponsored the resolution to terminate the national emergency on Iraq, which was declared just months after the 2003 U.S.
invasion.
At the time, the U.S.
was engaged ostensibly in a quest to unearth mythological weapons of mass destruction.
The declaration has been widely criticized as a means of exerting neocolonial control over the Iraqi oil industry and offering a guarantee of immunity from prosecution for white-collar and corporate crimes that involved Iraqi oil.
The national emergency powers extended by the Biden admin this fall.
Gosar and Matt Gaetz co-sponsored the resolution seeking to put an end to emergency powers on Syria.
This declaration was authorized by a 2004 executive order introducing sanctions on the ground that Damascus was supporting terrorism and pursuing weapons of mass destruction and missile programs and undermined U.S.
and international efforts with respect to the stabilization and reconstruction of Iraq.
The Biden admin extended the Sanctions Act this May.
This time, they justified its economic assault on the basis of serious supposed chemical weapons and subordinate terrorist organizations, which pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security foreign policy economy of the U.S.
But the chemical weapon claims are all fabricated and fake and known to be so.
On the House floor, Gates characterized the five emergency declarations as dormant slush funds spending untold sums of money with no transparency as to how much is going into the Syrian emergency.
Kosar's resolution focused on declarations around Yemen and Libya heartlessly.
The extended national emergency related Yemen blocks donations of food, clothing, and medicine intended to relieve human suffering by the people of Yemen, noting an estimated 130 Yemen children die every day due to famine.
It is incomprehensible that a stated emergency be used by our country to harm the people of another country, including forcing starvation and disease, in a separate press release.
Those are noted almost hilariously.
The extended national emergency-related Libya continues to cite Muammar Gaddafi as a reason for the declaration.
Even though Gaddafi's been dead for nearly 12 years, you can't make this stuff up.
At no time since 2011, or I would add before, has Libya posed a military or economic threat to the United States.
The people of Libya deserve to live in a manner of their choosing, without the prospect of U.S.
bombing attacks or color revolutions thrust upon them by corrupt and misguided American agencies, none of whom are acting with Congressional approval.
Gosar described the 148 national emergency powers available to the president as tyrannical.
You know, there were 41 active national emergencies on the book, one dating as far back as 1979.
No president, regardless of party, should be handed a blank check and endless special powers that can be used to circumvent the normal democratic process, exceed their constitutional authority, and violate the balance of power.
Among the powers granted by the National Emergency Act is one allowing for the drafting of American citizens into active duty, another for seizure of radio stations, one for testing biological and chemical weapons on American citizens, another for freezing U.S.
citizen bank accounts, restrictions against anyone representing them as an attorney from even renting property or selling groceries to them,
In arguing against terminating the national emergency, Republican Representative Mike Lawler insisted that Reza would have to issue an executive order to invoke the emergency power to authorize testing biological weapons on American citizens and that Congress would have the chance to deny that power.
Still, he offered no justification for allowing the executive a pathway to such draconian powers.
Carl, this is extremely revealing of real Washington and what's really going on.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, great story.
I had no idea there were 41 of these things on the books.
I knew there were a few.
I know that I keep getting my crotch grabbed through TSA, through that ongoing emergency, but 41 of them.
I do have direct experience with the bullshit associated with declaring official emergencies in the state of California.
For the 2020 through the 2022 school year, I challenged my school district to explain how they could have an emergency, given the statutory language in California, similar to all states, says a couple of important things.
One, you got to terminate the emergency ASAP, and you define the emergency as beyond control local resources, hospitals.
In the case of COVID, we never got that data.
Instead, we were bait and switched with the fraudulent PCR test.
So I asked my district, hey, How can you honor this as an emergency when it violates the statutory requirement of beyond control local hospitals?
There is new data that our local hospitals are beyond control.
And they couldn't answer this.
So I got gaslit and ignored by our school district.
And finally, the superintendent, out of frustration, says, you know, you think we got it wrong.
Why don't you contact the governor's office?
I did.
And the 14 leading executive and legislative agencies in California, all of them refused to answer the question.
I reported back to that, and that's when the school district terminated my committee reporting this data for—what did they say?
Oh, they said it was insulting to other political views.
To show the truth about the situation, Carl is insulting to other views.
Outrageous.
Chris, your thoughts?
That's the old gaslighting trick, you know, how the attackers become the victims and how they play this card all the time.
You know, they question you like you're a scoundrel and you have no decency when you're suspicious of their behaviors for righteous reasons.
I mean, look at the track record we're talking about here.
You talk about emergency laws and things like that.
Think about some of the things that have been passed in under emergency law.
There's what the income tax, there's Selective Service Act, Alien Sedition Act, I believe, or Espionage Act they had in 1917.
You know, this is World War I, the war that the bankers created to have these emergencies so that they can put these type of things in.
And basically so they can squash anybody that opposed the Federal Reserve and the U.S. dollar going to fiat or basically putting this on the rest of the world, too, in terms of the League of Nations and that type of scheme that they tried to push in World War I.
Unsuccessfully, might I add, and then they had to use World War II and rename it the U.N., but it's basically the same thing.
They're colonializing us under these pretenses, under the guise of decency and civilization and law and order.
But ultimately, at the top, this is the ultimate corruption, and we're seeing it going on around the world, and we're really seeing it get exposed for what it is.
Think about this.
They talk about Gaddafi in Libya being a threat to the United States.
Why?
Because he was going to put a gold-backed dinar out and actually have a Central African currency that was gold-backed.
And this basically was shot down by many of the Wall Street guys and next you know Hillary Clinton's in there and uh you know we came we saw he died and all that you know cackle cackle so uh yeah this is uh pretty nasty stuff uh Saddam was looking at doing a similar thing if you think about that they go into his place with some person they do they take His museum work and his gold works.
So yeah, that's par for the course.
And of course, they want us accepting their IOUs, their fiat IOUs.
You know, might as well be, you know, tulips or hookah beads or company script or truck wages or anything like that.
You know, the CBDC for that matter.
And think about them now trying to put the CBDC on the entire globe.
With the capacities that it has, trying to gaslight people who have suspicions about the capabilities and what they're going to actually be used for if they are in fact put in place.
So yeah, this is some really dirty stuff.
This is a hostile takeover.
And I think that really, you know, at the end of the day, if you look at it, they want the people trading their digital crypto, CBDC, whatever you want to call it, and certainly not gold and silver.
They certainly don't want people having control of the production of goods in their own countries.
And certainly by controlling the banks and the interest rates and, you know, the everything with that, if you really think about it, They can control our wages, they can control our production of goods, our national output, even our political process.
So yeah, there's all these jargons and inversions that they put out to supposedly take the money out of politics with Citizens United or, you know, whatever.
All these other things they're trying to do.
The Dodd-Frank to protect the citizens.
You know, they're all inversions.
They're actually there to protect the bankers, to protect the politicians, and it's about time these people lived in the fear that we deal with every day.
And, you know, until that really happens, I don't think we're really doing much but spinning our own tires.
Very nice.
Carl?
Chris is right on the money.
When Iraq was accepting only U.S.
dollars for oil, no emergency.
But immediately after Saddam said that he was going to accept other currencies for oil, then it became an emergency and he was a bad man.
Same thing with Iran.
As soon as Iran began accepting other currencies for oil, then that became a requirement for regime change.
Yep, absolutely right.
Go ahead.
I was going to say the same thing.
Look at Yemen.
Since 1991, the United States State Department and CIA have had a perpetual war going along with Mossad, of course, going on in Yemen.
Basically, every change of Congress, whether Democrat or Republican, is like a change in the leader of Yemen between al-Sisi and al-Hadi.
If you really think about it, you can look at the charts, look at the books, and look at the transitions in leadership there.
So this is a stronghold for oil and geo strategy.
And I also have to say the people in the Congo, these people that are sudden threats, I bet they are tenants above land that had some pretty rich reserves in terms of the geological studies that were taking place over their property.
And now all of a sudden they are threats.
They are adversarial people to the United States government and to this basically this plague of locusts that is running our country.
Excellent.
Both.
Just terrific.
Good.
Meanwhile… Trump classified document trial now scheduled for May.
A federal judge scheduled a trial date for former President Trump about illegally retaining hundreds of classified documents, which I guarantee has no basis in law or fact.
The May 20th trial date set by U.S.
District Judge Eileen Cannon is a compromise between a request for prosecutors to set the trial this December and a bid by defense is scheduled after the 2024 election.
If the date holds, you're close on the heels of a separate New York trial on state charges for falsifying business records.
It also means the trial will not start until deep into the presidential nominating calendar, probably well after it's clear who the nominee will be, though before that person is officially nominated at the Republican National Convention.
And I guarantee you, regardless of these lawsuits, it will be Donald Trump.
Canon previously scheduled a trial for August, where prosecutors asked that it start on December 11, while Trump wanted it postponed since he joined for president in a field that includes President Biden.
The court not presides over a prosecution advanced by the administration of a sitting president against his chief political rival, himself a leading candidate for the presidency of the United States, Trump's representatives said in a brief.
Thus, a measured consideration and timeline that allows for a careful and complete review of the procedures that led to this indictment and the unprecedented legal issues presented herein best serve the interests of the defendants and the public.
Prosecutors said a delay was warranted, but only for several months.
They said it was needed because Trump's lawyers needed to obtain security clearance to review classified material that would be produced during discovery ahead of the trial.
Trump could face yet additional trials.
It was revealed this week he received a letter informing him he was a target of a separate DOJ, and that January 6th, prosecutors in Georgia plan to announce charges of attempts by Trump and his allies to subvert the vote there.
All bullshit!
Meanwhile, House Republicans reject Democrat pressure to disinvite RFK Jr.
from testifying on censorship.
R.F.K.
Jr.
is causing great tumult in the Democrat Party because a whole lot of Democrats recognize who he is and his family, and they're dumbfounded by the efforts to suppress.
But Biden can't afford to have any debate or any alternative if they're going to move forward with his candidacy.
Republicans on the subcommittee on the weaponization of federal government are moving ahead to hear testimony from RFK Jr.
after House Democrats raised accusation that he had made anti-Semitic remarks.
Not a chance.
He's actually extremely pro-Israel.
At a July 11 campaign event, he described research indicating the genetic structure of SARS-CoV-2 had differing impacts on individuals of different races and ethnicities, including a lesser impact on ethnic Chinese and Ashkenazi Jews.
He also discussed how bioweapons could potentially be designed to harm specific ethnic groups.
The New York Post published an article with a headline, Paul R. F. Kennedy Jr.
says COVID may have been ethnically targeted to spare Jews.
He's insisted he wasn't claiming SARS-CoV-2 was deliberately modified to spare Jews, as the Post did it.
And I find it despicable that the Post twisted it that way.
They usually do a fair and responsible job of reporting, but not here.
The controversy comes as he's scheduled to testify before the Weaponization Subcommittee on July 20th.
Actually, it just passed.
We'll discuss government collusion with big tech, the Congressional Integrity Project, An activist group with a goal of defending Biden and Democrats against Republican congressional investigations sent a letter to Jim Jordan accusing him and other House Republicans of an anti-Semitic pattern of behavior calling for them to disinvite Mr. Kennedy.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries also issued a statement accusing him of repeating a vile anti-Semitic trope—what the hell was that?—and calling for his remarks to be uniformly content.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Daniel Goldman also piled on.
Mr. Jordan rebuffed the Democrat pressure campaign.
The Republican lawmaker distanced himself from his remarks about COVID, but insisted the weaponization subcommittee would still like him to talk about coordinated efforts between government and social media to throttle speech.
I totally disagree with what he said, but he's a Democrat.
I disagree with other things he said, too, but we're having him because of censorship.
House Speaker McCarthy similarly distanced himself from RFK Jr.' 's remarks, but pushed back on the call to disinvite him.
I disagree with everything Kennedy said, but contended the hearing's focus is censorship.
I don't think censoring somebody is actually the answer here to a committee meeting on censorship.
What RFK Jr.
actually said With COVID-19, there's an argument that it's ethnically targeted, which is impeccable.
He's absolutely right.
COVID-19 attacks different races disproportionately, describing how different groups have differences in the structure of their ACE2 inhibitors, receptors, which are those that bind with SARS-CoV-2 and lead to COVID infections.
COVID-19 is targeted to attack Caucasians and Black people.
Those who are most immune are Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese.
We don't know whether it was deliberately targeted or not, but there are papers out there showing racial or ethnical differential in impact.
We know Chinese are spending hundreds of millions to develop ethnic bioweapons, and the U.S.
is doing the same.
In this article, RFK says COVID may have been ethnically targeted to spare Jews.
A Post wrote, Kennedy's remark echoes well-worn anti-Semitic literature blaming Jews for the emergence of the spread of coronavirus, which began circulating shortly after the pandemic broke.
Mr. Kennedy pushed back, saying that Mo's story is mistaken.
I have never, ever suggested COVID viruses targeted as spare juice.
I accurately pointed out during an off-the-record conversation The U.S.
and other governments are developing ethnically targeted bioweapons.
A 2021 study shows COVID appears to disproportionately affect certain races, since a Furin-Cleve docking site is most compatible with Black and Caucasians, least compatible with ethnic Chinese, Finns, and Ashkenazi Jews.
In that sense, it's a kind of proof of concept for ethnically targeted bioweapons.
I do not believe, and never implied, that the effect was deliberately engineered.
I'll tell you for sure it was.
Kennedy shared a link to the 2021 study he was describing, published in the National Institute of Health, While Mr. Kennedy and Mr. Biden are both running as Democrats, they've demonstrated differing views on a number of issues, including COVID-19 lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and the war in Ukraine.
Kennedy founded the non-profit Children's Health Defense, which has been critical of COVID vaccine mandates.
He and CHD filed a federal lawsuit accusing Biden admin of working with Big Tech to induce those companies to censor Kennedy's constitutionally protected speech.
A federal judge just issued a preliminary injunction against a Biden admin in a similar case, finding a number of plaintiffs were likely to succeed on the merits in establishing the government has used its power to silence the opposition.
The case brought by Republican Attorneys General Louisiana Missouri described an instance in January 2021 where a White House official flagged a tweet by Mr. Kennedy and sent an email to a Twitter official stating, hey folks wanted to flag the below tweet I'm wondering if we can get moving on the process of having it removed ASAP.
What could be more blatant proof than that?
Last week, the Biden admin won an appeal from a three-judge panel on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, staying the lower court's preliminary injunction while the lawsuit proceeds.
The two-page appeal court decision Yeah, great story.
reasoning for staying in the lower court's injunction.
The three judges were Circuit Court Carl E. Stewart, an appointee of Clinton, Circuit Judge James Earl Graves, an appointee of Barack Obama, and Andrew Stephen Oldham, an appointee of Trump.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, great story.
So first, with the Trump trial, so that's going to be lawfare, and it's the same ridiculous scenario and attempt after the crimeless and factless Russiagate that was paid for by the Clinton campaign, the crimeless impeachment, the election fraud, and the J-6 the crimeless impeachment, the election fraud, and the J-6 false flag cover-up for that.
So one of the tricks of our opponents is you take a weakness.
All right, so you have Biden with a bunch of records.
I forget how many it was there as we went.
Forty-one 41 ongoing emergencies.
Biden might have 41 storage locations of records.
And then you flip it and you accuse your opponent of what you actually did.
And as far as Trump with presidential records, there is no crime that I can recognize or imagine.
This was all vetted.
Everything was declassified.
Everything was shown.
Everything was shown at Mar-a-Lago for the security procedures.
And then they had a big Photo op, break in of the president's records.
So, for RFK Jr.
and censorship, Wasserman Schultz.
So, this was the woman who my colleague, Tim Canova, challenged in the primaries in 16 and 18.
And I'm sure that Tim won both of those, but Wasserman Schultz, along with the apparatchiks, they destroyed the ballots.
They're supposed to keep them for like 20 months, but they destroyed the ballots.
And Tim went to court and they got the court to agree saying, oh yeah, it shouldn't have destroyed those ballots, but we're not going to give you another election.
So when Wasserman Schultz went on that committee this week and accused Kennedy of being anti-Semitic, Bobby blew up, called it slander and called it a lie.
But that would have been a great opportunity.
And to the extent that people can do this and keep their cool, it would be great.
He should have invited Wasserman Schultz, tell me your conspiracy theory.
Tell me how this research is anti-Semitic in order to demonstrate the ridiculous nature of it.
But, you know, my attempts of doing that through COVID and Hayward Unified School Districts and California's orders, my attempt to have them go and tell their story didn't work out very well for me.
Speaker McCarthy, for this guy, this tool, to say he disagreed with everything that Kennedy said.
What a cartoon character.
What an elementary school sellout to any view of leadership.
Disagree with everything.
And then finally, you know, censorship.
Our opponents, they have to censor in order to have authoritarian dictatorship.
They want the people, human beings, to be sheeple who will accept orders and only voices from authority.
And how they have to do that is through censorship.
And the response of the citizens, of course, is to flip the script on them, tell them it's limited government.
And then we have all the documentation of their ongoing crimes.
And here at BitChute, I'll put enough sufficient documentation for anybody to withdraw consent and demand the leader's arrests.
Excellent, Chris.
Yeah, it's unfortunate that the Democratic Party has somehow found a way to use the disenfranchised in a manner that they have become dependents.
and they pretty much are prone to vote blue no matter who.
And oftentimes people like Kennedy or even in 2016 Bernie Sanders had an opportunity and even Tim Kanova, if you really think about it, had an opportunity to really step in and make a change in the political theater, so to speak.
And they were completely disregarded and really, I say, dismantled by their own party in many instances.
I know Sanders is an independent, but he was running under the Democratic House and through the primary and all that.
Amazing to see how this whole thug system works in terms of the political infrastructure of the Democratic Party.
And it's always been that way.
They've always had press gangs, they've always had the Boss Tweet, or the Belmont corruption, or the Wilson to FDR and everything.
And even what you're seeing with Obama and Biden.
They play on the rhetoric to provoke emotions in the demographics in which they harness, i.e.
mostly women and minorities and things like that.
But I think a lot of them are starting to really wake up, especially after this COVID swing and miss and many of these other failures.
I think that people are starting to get, you know, what's going on.
I think it's hitting them hard in the pocketbook.
And economically speaking, I think that's going to cause a lot of unrest politically And I think that they're going to have a hard time shoving Bobby Kennedy on a backburner.
He's talking about some interesting things that if he really gets through and pushes these things, like gold backing or Bitcoin backing the US dollar and revaluing gold, man, that would be something.
He could really solve a lot of problems short-term, long-term with that and really put us onto an honest system to compete with the rest of the global economy.
Or, you know, you can let Joe Biden go in there, fall down the stairs for another four years, you know, Kamala be like basically a slip and fall away from becoming the next or the first female president.
So yeah, or they're talking about Michelle Obama now.
So I guess there goes the female part, but she could be president too.
So yeah, this is a really interesting situation.
They're trying to, you know, put on the people that supposedly representing the labor and the actual workers, but they have gone astray.
They have sold out.
The people to the corporation, and I think everything that they have done has been an inversion at best.
They're going to have a hard time pulling off the election scam that they did in 2020, this one coming up, if there even is an election.
I would bet something's going to happen and Biden's going to have to do something real stupid and declare himself emperor or something.
I don't know.
We'll see.
Time will tell.
But as far as Kennedy's concerned, I think it's good that he's in there pushing the envelope, but I think that really to some extent, I don't think he's going to push it too hard.
I think that a lot of the political theater is them just using analytics, telling us what we want to hear, and they will do absolutely nothing of the sort when they get the job.
So that's my theory.
Wasserman Schultz, of course, was the head of the DNC when she switched 13 primaries.
Bernie had won to Hillary's column to guarantee that she would be the nominee.
And then they defended against a lawsuit by saying that they were a private company and they were entitled to nominate anyone they wanted, regardless of the outcomes of the primaries or the caucuses.
That's Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
And of course, because Bernie's Jewish, That might well have been construed in an unfavorable way as an act of anti-Semitism.
It was certainly an act of political corruption.
Meanwhile, get this.
We're actually in a CO2 famine.
Way back when, 160 million years ago, the parts per million in the atmosphere of CO2 were at 2,750.
By 80 million years ago, it had dropped to around 1,400, which is optimal for plants.
By the time primates developed, around 50 million years ago, down to 1,000 today, around 250.
We're actually in a CO2 famine, and if it drops further, we could actually find Life is no longer sustainable on Earth.
This, of course, shows a whole global warming.
CO2 claim is rubbish.
Complete rubbish right here in a single graph.
Carl, Chris, I'd actually welcome your comments.
Yeah, you guys have done a great job of being able to, you and Joe Alston, to demonstrate that this climate gate is a farce.
And it is.
It's in any of the areas, any of the major policy areas, if you push into the facts, all you're going to see is that they have force and fraud.
They just have talking points.
And if you push into the actual data, everything falls apart.
And this is one area where it does as well.
Chris?
Yeah.
It actually ties in with the next story.
I probably should have gone ahead, but we'll come back.
Go ahead.
You can go ahead if you want to go to the next story.
I can pass on my comments on that.
I was going to say another thing about Debbie Wasserman Schultz, though.
You remember, she was involved with a lot of stuff.
Her brother covered up a bitch.
Yeah, her IT guys were spying on Congress.
Her IT guys, yeah, these Pakistani IT guys were spying on Congress under her cover.
I mean, she is truly a despicable person.
Yeah, it's treason, but like, they play the trifecta in terms of propaganda every time so that they somehow look like the perpetrator is a victim, you know, and it's absolutely despicable when you see it.
You've got to have a game in jujitsu, really, to understand how they work this stuff because they play the woman card, the Jew card, and then, of course, the Democrat vote blue no matter who.
So, yeah, this is a pretty strong, I guess, stronghold for the political infrastructure of that party and political apparatus if you think how they can rig elections and run the voting machines every time.
So, yeah, I mean, they're up to shenanigans, and the fact that they've gotten away with it this long is a mystery to me.
I don't know how that's happened.
I don't know what's going on.
I think sometimes I wake up in a parallel universe.
I don't know.
It's crazy, Feds.
Well, even though global warming is a myth, get this.
Thirteen nations agree to engineer a global famine by destroying agriculture, saying that producing food is bad for the planet.
We're now being told that producing food is bad for the planet.
To save the planet, globalists insist, farms must be shut down across the globe.
Under the guise of reducing methane emissions, 13 nations have signed a pledge to engineer global famine by gutting agricultural production and shutting down farms, announced earlier this year by the Global Methane Hub.
Like a ball of crisis engineers who exploit public panic to destroy the world's food supply.
Those 13 nations are Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Burkina Faso, Chile, Czech Republic, Ecuador, Germany, Panama, Peru, Spain, the United States, and Uruguay.
Imagine no meat production from Australia, Brazil, or the USA.
This is the goal of the globalists.
They admit it's all part of the climate fraud, which has been thoroughly exposed as a quack science hoax.
As Luis Plana, Spain's Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food says, I'm glad to see a shared commitment by the international community To mitigate methane emission from agriculture as a means to achieve the goals we signed for the Paris Agreement on Climate.
Food systems are responsible for 60% of methane emission, warns Marcello Mina, CEO of the Global Methane Hub.
She is saying farming is destroying the planet.
Hence, their demand to shut down farms.
Without farms, you have no food.
And without food, You get what Kamala Harris called for over the weekend—reduce population.
The depopulation agenda is no longer even a secret.
They're bragging about it.
Here's their logic.
Food equals global warming.
So they attack food and are shutting it down.
Cows and chickens will be replaced by crickets and insect larvae.
Enjoy the crunchy fake meat patties and cricket mcnuggets.
Soon you'll be eating bugs because meat will be wildly unaffordable due to government shutting down farms and ranches, as journalist Leo Holman explains.
We can presume from this language that among the practices being considered are replacing a major portion of the beef and dairy cattle, pork and chicken stocks that populations rest on for protein, with insect larvae, mealworms, crickets, and more.
The UN World Economic Forum and other NGOs have been promoting meatless diets around the consumption of insect protein per year, and billionaires have invested in massive insect factories being built in the state of Illinois and Canada and in the Netherlands.
Or mealworms, crickets, and other bugs will be processed as additives to be inserted into the food supply, often without clear labels that will inform people of exactly what they are eating.
Huffman also reversed the Deagle forecast, which projects an almost 70% reduction in the U.S.
population by 2025, saying There is no more efficient way to depopulate than through war, famine, and plagues.
Isn't it interesting?
All three of these time-tested methods of murder are in play right now.
Carl, your thoughts?
They had to change their talking point of global warming to climate change because the overall total temperatures on the planet, I think for close to 20 years now, they've been Falling, not rising.
And the idea of shutting down farms, well, plants breathe in carbon dioxide.
So, the idea that methane is a problem, huh?
Well, this was kind of the final blow for the government of the Netherlands to try to Confiscate farms in the Netherlands and the Dutch people revolted and that Prime Minister has left and that was also associated with policies of illegal immigration and with the COVID.
Crimes against humanity.
But what we're seeing is everything in the show.
All of the evil, all of the extensions.
And remember, in the United States, to withdraw consent, and you know, translate this to whatever other countries that you may be concerned about, we have limited government under the Constitution and under inalienable rights.
Now, the bullshitters will say, ah, well, we just need to do everything that's necessary and proper.
OK, so this is the contest and just take your stand.
And unless you want to be eaten bugs and to be ordered into every evil, despicable, psychologically torturous, psychopathic condition that you want, command no.
Yes, Chris.
Chris?
Shutting down farms.
Is it working still?
Shutting down farms.
Okay, yep.
I gotcha.
Yep, I just want to make sure my phone is still working.
That's yep.
Yeah, as far as I'm concerned, think about what Bill Gates and many of the World Economic Forum types are doing.
They're trying to buy up all the farmlands from distressed farmers.
Think about what they've done in terms of government policy and laws and federal funding, in terms of running out the mom-and-pop farmers, even the mom-and-pop grocery stores, basically so that the Cisco Logistics infrastructure will come in, Bill Gates' APL will be the product with GMO produce and vegetables, and people will eat these poisons filled with glyphosate and be puzzled by the cancer rates and things of the sort, right?
And basically these guys can sell you chemo if you get a mortgage and afford it, you know, stuff like that.
This is the plan they have for us in terms of our longevity, of our rights to life and livelihoods.
And they've done all this with the Federal Reserve, this basically phantom money system, and run out everything that's real in terms of trade, in terms of production of goods or agriculture.
And they've replaced it with things that are entirely toxic.
And I have to say that the cow manure methane thing is absolutely part of that as well.
They want people dependent upon their manufactured fertilizers, which will leach and bleach out their own soils, and they won't reproduce natural good soils for each year.
Every year they'll have to buy more and more fertilizers.
They'll have to buy more and more Roundup.
You know, this is the whole game.
And of course, you know, they're nickel and diamond us to the grave and things of the sort.
So, I really think that we need to find a different direction with our country, with our resources, with our time, our energy, our love.
Instead of diving back into the cesspool that we call our political infrastructure, I almost think people are going to have to locally start to develop their own communities, start developing their own agriculture, their own school systems, things like this.
And I really hope that people are starting to realize that a war has been waged against us and, more importantly, our children.
And I think that we have to respond accordingly.
I think that's very telling, Chris.
Excellent.
Meanwhile, somebody mentions a Clinton body count and Anthony Weiner loses his mind.
By the way, I've been informed by highly reliable sources that Anthony Weiner is actually the offspring of Chuck Schumer.
Convicted sex offender Anthony Weiner had a veritable meltdown confronted with a conspiracy theory surrounding the Clinton body count.
The confrontation began when Patrick David, host of the PBD podcast, referenced a popular conspiracy theory about the number of supposedly mysterious and unexplained deaths related to the Clintons.
I would say it's up to around 200.
How is it that in the last 50 years, every political figure has their own reputation, but with the Clintons, the reputation is that people close to them died, David asks.
Why is that a story so many believe?
Wiener responded, anyone could throw together a list of people close to famous politicians who have died.
Are the Clintons in their 70s yet?
You don't think I can make a list of other people who are 70-something, point out this person died, that person died, he fired back?
But it didn't take long before the entire debate descended into a screaming match about Hillary being a big girl and Weiner being a big boy.
Just now, Vince Dow tweets, Hillary Clinton best friend Anthony Weiner is unhinged meltdown after being asked about the Clinton body count.
Reminder, this guy went to jail for sexting a 15-year-old girl.
Because at this point, Wiener, a one-time rising star in the Democrat Party, even a leading candidate for mayor of New York City, launched into an animated defense of the Clintons.
And why wouldn't he?
He doesn't want to end up on the list like others.
Just kidding, fact-checkers.
But David responded that such a list could surround any politician by asking a simple question.
How come they haven't done that with Bush?
He's in the same age.
How come they haven't done that with Reagan?
How come they haven't done that with Kerry?
Wiener pushed back, calling the claim bizarre, suggesting they're simply relegated to obscure websites.
You're implying something nefarious is afoot, both with a question and with a list.
Wiener then diminished their death by referring to them as obscure people.
Hillary, she's a big girl.
I'm a big boy.
You're a big boy, Heath Hume.
The people you just listed?
These are obscure people.
I mean obscure people.
Wiener was being asked to defend a conspiracy theory about the Clinton bodycat, a list that is rather expansive.
Wikipedia calls it discredited, though detailed death records, the unusually large circle of associates a president will likely have, and the fact many listed had been misidentified or were still alive.
I don't believe that for a second.
One of the more famous cases, of course, involved Vint Foster, Deputy White House Counsel for the Clintons, who was alleged to have committed suicide after a bout with depression in 1993, where his body was found in Fort Marcy Park, just miles from the White House.
I know people who know all there is to know about this, and it definitely was not suicide.
It was murder.
There's been speculation of what actually happened, most notably from Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, who called Foster's death very fishy.
More recently, Mark Middleton.
A top advisor to Bill Clinton was found hanging from a tree with an electrical cord around his neck and a shotgun blast to the chest.
Nothing to see there.
The shotgun was located 30 feet from his body and the death was ruled a suicide.
So what did he do first?
Did he hang himself and then shoot himself with a shotgun or shoot himself with a shotgun and then hang himself?
Build inside the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein into the White House on sublocations.
He also met with Epstein at least three times in the White House between 93 and 94.
Epstein allegedly committed suicide in his jail cell while awaiting trial, but I guarantee you he's probably on his own orgy island sipping Mai Tais as we speak.
Here's Carmen Sabia tweeting, This would be a nice time to remind you that Mark Middleton, a former aide to President Bill Clinton, who introduced him to Jeffrey Epstein, committed suicide with a shotgun, and the judge had sealed the records.
He omitted and hung himself with an electrical cord.
Meanwhile, here's another tweet from Nicole Fuller.
Anthony Weiner, sent to 21 months in federal prison, quickly departs courthouse with lawyer Heckler references Carlos Danger's pseudonym.
David noted conspiracy theories and bad reputation tend to follow politicians for a reason, even referencing Weiner's own sordid past.
He was sentenced to 21 months in jail and three years supervised after he sent sexually explicit messages to an underage girl, including, by the way, photographs of his own wiener.
He ended up sentenced to 18 months, was released in May of 2019, but ordered to register as a sex offender.
Everybody has a stereotype.
You have a reputation whether you like it or not, Matt David told Wiener.
Your reputation is you like to text underage girls.
You like to talk to girls.
You sex 10 pictures of your ding-a-ling.
That's your reputation.
Wiener also made news by claiming Florida Governor Santis was campaigning like a pussy.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, that is an interesting story of that interview.
Typically, if you're going to make an accusation or bring a topic up, you need to be able to defend against the strawman arguments like Wiener's.
But the guy did pretty good by offering that there's no such list for the Bushes or for the Reagans or for anybody else.
So, Wiener, we gotta point out the history of this guy.
Now, it's very interesting that he was, in fact, The top candidate picked and slotted for the mayor of New York City, and who knows where else he would have gone after that, because all you're looking for are people who can sell a good lie.
Wiener's laptop.
Life insurance folder.
Frazzledrip.
This is what he had, and what will come forward if we can still get the truth.
And I'm surprised that the The interviewer didn't have anything to say about that, if you really wanted to hit hard.
Oh, that's such a good point!
That Wiener's laptop that contains all these gross offenses, even murders involving Hillary Clinton and Hugh Abedin, was not even mentioned!
That's outrageous!
Chris?
And that's not even counting Podestas, right?
Or Hunters?
You know what I'm saying?
You've got like a pretty strong video track record of some very indecent things at high levels of power that are probably, I would say, very convictable, but the law authorities seem to not be interested in pursuing these avenues, and the ones that do end up on that list you were talking about.
So yeah, it's kind of a crazy situation I think we have here, and I think people are going to have to figure out a way to fight back against this, because this is obviously a super judicial Uh, murder incorporated type of power.
And I think they've been doing this for a long, long time with anybody that's ever had some integrity in this country.
And, uh, that's going to take the multitudes using, uh, using every one of us to, to, to smoke these guys out, you know?
I don't know what else to say.
It's a force that, I mean, Winston Churchill talked about it, J Edgar Hoover talked about it, Wilson talked about it, you know, that's so big, it's so deceptive, it's so omnipresent that you dare not mention its name or, you know, I mean, they all, Winston said, you could trip over this beast, look it in the eye and then run away, like pretend that it never happened.
So I really think that there's, There's something like this, an organized force that's in power in our government and in the world governments, that's obviously showing its hand, its face, and people need to really take note of this and start preparing accordingly, like I said.
Yeah, you can see the government's run like a crime family.
Biden is just the most obvious manifestation.
Meanwhile... What about the Clinton Foundation?
What about the Clinton Foundation?
I mean, you know how much money they have raked?
And they don't even talk about it.
It makes like Hunter and Joe's thing look small, you know?
And like, it's like nations were giving her five billion at a time.
You remember when she was running in 2016?
And then she loses to Trump, and then that money It's gone.
No one investigates it.
All the people involved with it end up hanging from a tree with a cord and a shotgun or whatever the hell it is.
And Hillary had a major role in trafficking children too, so there's more there as well.
Good point.
Did you hear about Silsby?
Did you hear about that Silsby?
She's got a new name and she's in charge of like that kids with the immigration.
Like she's pretty high up there.
Apparently she got married and has a different name now, but it's the same Laura Silsby.
I've heard that.
I don't know.
I haven't been able to follow that down.
I was just wondering if you heard anything about that or if you knew anything more.
No, I haven't, but great points all.
Meanwhile, twist everything to fit your impulsive narrative.
Jason Aldean's wife fires back at critics.
He's done something very good.
Country music star Jason Aldean's White Brittany, an outspoken opponent of the woke agenda permeating much of American society, fired back at critics of her husband's song, Try That in a Small Town, who called the lyrics racist.
Aline's song released in May was targeted only after he released a video on July 14.
Critics call it racist and pro-lynching, which is absurd.
After the backlash, country music television pulled the video.
Paul Dean's wife, Brittany, fired back at critics publishing a selfie of her with her husband captioned, Never apologize for speaking the truth.
Love it.
Media is the same song and dance she wrote on Instagram.
Twist everything you can to fit your repulsive narrative.
How about instead of creating stories, we focus on the real ones, such as child trafficking, food for thought, Aldean also vigorously defended himself.
In the past 24 hours, I've been accused of releasing a pro-lynching song, a song that's been out since May, and was subject to comparison that I, direct quote, was not too pleased with the nationwide BLM protest.
These references are not only meritless but dangerous.
There's not a single lyric in the song that references race or points to it, and there isn't a single video clip that isn't real news footage.
And while I can try and respect others to have their own interpretation of a song with music, this one goes too far.
In 2022, Brittany shared a video showing her applying makeup, captioned, I'd really like to thank my parents for not changing my gender when I went through my tomboy phase.
I love this girly life.
Her husband reacting, laughing my ass off.
I'm glad they didn't too, because you and I wouldn't have worked out.
Try that in a small town for me.
Reverse the feeling of a community I had growing up where we took care of our neighbors regardless of difference in background or belief, because they were our neighbors.
That was above any differences.
My political views have never been something I've hidden from.
And I know a lot of us in this country don't agree on how we get back to a sense of normalcy, where we go at least a day without a headline that keeps us up at night.
But the desire to do it, that's what this song is about.
Here are the lyrics.
Try that in a small town.
Sucker punch somebody on a sidewalk.
Car jack an old lady at a red light.
Pull a gun on the owner of a liquor store.
You think it's cool?
Well, act a fool if you like.
Cuss out a cop.
Spit in his face.
Stomp on the flag and light it up.
Yeah, you think you're tough.
Well, try that in a small town.
See how far you may get down the road.
Around here, we take care of our own.
You cross that line, it won't take long for you to find out.
I recommend you don't try that in a small town.
Got a gun that my granddad gave me.
They say one day they're gonna round up well.
That ship might fly in the city.
Good luck.
Try that in a small town.
See how far you make it down the road.
Around here, we take care of our own.
You cross that line, it won't take long for you to find out.
I recommend you don't.
Try that in a small town.
Well, the good old boys raise a bright if you're looking for a fight.
Try that in a small town.
Try that in a small town.
Well, the good old boys raise a bright if you're looking for a fight.
Try that in a small town.
See how far you make it down the road.
Around here, we take care of our own.
If you cross that line, it won't take long for you to find out.
I recommend you don't try that in a small town.
Try that in a small town.
Oh, oh.
Try that in a small town.
Here it is, a video version that has caused such an uproar.
Sucker punch somebody on the sidewalk.
Carjacking old lady at a red light.
hooligan on the owner of a liquor store you think it's cool Act a fool if you like Cuss out a cop spittin' his face Scope on a flag and light it up Yeah, you think you're tough Well, try that in a small town See how far you make it down We take care of our own.
You cross that line.
It won't take long for you to find out.
I recommend you don't try that in a small town.
Got a gun that my granddad gave me.
They say one day they're gonna round up.
Well, that shit might fly in the city.
Good luck.
Try that in a small town.
See how far you make it down the road.
Around here we take care of our own.
You cross that line.
It won't take long for you to find out.
I recommend you don't try that in a small town full of good old boys.
Raised up right.
If you're looking for a fight, try that in a small town.
Try that in a small town.
These farmers are dropping their own crops for the day,
A friend is in need and they've come to help.
It's what this community and a lot of our community stand for.
Somebody needs some help, you'll get it. - Karl, your thoughts? your thoughts?
Great song, great story to show that.
So the quote, twist everything to fit your repulsive narrative.
That's exactly what we have.
And then country music.
Television engages in censorship.
They're owned by CBS and Viacom.
And an alternative would be to stew them.
So the claims that this is a pro-lynching song and pro-racist, again, I think that a small town jury would enjoy hearing that story about the connection there, when actually what we're having is we're having this talking point of toxic Masculinity for anybody who supports and defends the Constitution of the United States of limited government underneath inalienable rights.
And many of us have owes to the Constitution to support and defend this limited government.
And they have to get rid of us.
They have to somehow shame us, attack us.
And that is the whole engagement.
Who will win?
These wannabe dictators who come in with these ridiculous juvenile talking points that are insulting to human beings.
That's the contest.
We'll see how this plays out.
Well, I'm just impressed.
You know, country music really revolves around what it is to be an American, and I think this just struck a chord because, in a way, especially the video, eviscerates the whole Democrat campaign, the whole equity bullshit, all the BLM riots, the arson, the looting, the whole bit.
I think it's very effective.
Hank Williams Jr., I understand, has come aboard with Jason Aldean, and I expect a whole host of other country stars are going to pick up the slogan and join in, and it can make a difference.
Chris?
You know, what if he's even talking about the corruption in D.C.
as far as that's concerned, or like a, you know, a group of financiers running people into homelessness in America, you know, middle class being completely devoured by inflation.
You could write songs about that too, I guess.
Would that be racist or anti-Semitic or anything like that?
Well, I think it's more racist or anti-Semitic in the eyes and the ears of the beholder that would claim it to be racist, even though it's clearly not.
But I guess, you know, defending your homeland, your neighborhood, your city, you know, having kinfolk, friends around.
Small town is a very intimate and interpersonal type of situation in America.
It's something that, you know, you see on the outskirts of cities.
Uh, so yeah, it's a different lifestyle.
It's a different group of people.
Oops.
Let's hope we get Chris back right away because he's obviously got a lot to say.
Here we go.
Chris, continue, continue.
Oh yeah.
Okay.
I dropped that, but making the point that, uh, it's a little bit more of an adhesive community in a small town.
So I don't think he's really saying anything racist.
I think he's telling it, you know, true.
I think that.
You know, like I was saying earlier in the previous segment, that people are going to have to start taking their local communities back and building up from there in terms of political power and, you know, community outreaches and things like that.
Because everything that's being offered by the World Economic Forum and their henchmen is clearly a Trojan horse or a poison apple at this point.
And I think people need to respond accordingly.
Yeah, I mean, he's eviscerating one of the vulnerabilities of Democrats.
They're soft on crime.
They're not just soft on crime, they're actually promoting it.
It is disgusting.
Completely undemocratic, un-American, outrageous, immoral, corrupt as can get.
Meanwhile, GOP strikes gold.
House passes groundbreaking act to protect public schools.
On July 19th, the House approved a groundbreaking bill, H.R.
3941, also known as the Schools Not Shelters Act.
Introduced by Representative Mark Molinaro of New York, it prohibits K-12 schools and higher education institutions from being used as shelters for individuals unlawfully entering the United States, a significant step toward upholding the sanctity of our educational institutions.
The bill was passed with a 222-201 vote.
Democrats joining the unanimous—with four Democrats joining the unanimous Republican support.
The legislation strictly forbids the use of public elementary and secondary schools, as well as higher education institutions, as shelters for unauthorized immigrants.
Otherwise, they can lose federal funding.
The bill does allow temporary sheltering in the event of a specified disaster, forest fire, hurricane, tornado, Other natural disaster warranting a disaster declaration by federal or state government.
It extends to schools in the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and American Samoa.
Representative Molinaro, the bill's author, expressed parents across New York ...have consistently voiced their concern about public school gymnasiums being used as shelters among the surge of unauthorized immigrants.
New York City has grappled with over 90,000 unauthorized immigrants, primarily from the southern border.
The surge has strained the city's homeless shelter system, leading to the use of emergency hotels.
Really, hotels as an emergency to accommodate the unprecedented levels of unauthorized immigrants.
And they're not going away!
In response to the crisis, some areas, such as Broome County, which has a limited housing capacity, have declared a state of emergency over the potential reallocation of immigrants from New York City.
Representative Molinaro, father of four, emphasized with a concerned appearance, will oppose housing migrants in schools.
He emphasized they should be placed for academics, athletics, community service, and vital therapy for children.
Not designed to serve as migrant shelters.
He stressed the need for a compassionate approach to the migrant crisis.
But I say, what the hell do you do with these people?
What's going on here to bring all them into the United States with no opportunity to accommodate their needs?
And of course, the answer is obvious.
It's to destroy America.
The legislator criticized transporting them from the southern border to the city and upstate.
He argued it is not compassionate to relocate individuals to unfamiliar areas of schools not equipped to serve as migrant shelters.
He insisted our children upstate New York residents and the migrants themselves deserve better.
The White House, however, vehemently opposed the bill, suggesting Biden may veto it.
Count on it.
The administration argues the legislation would undermine local control, interfere with the ability of states and municipalities to govern and make decisions.
Really, it would set up opposition to the government, keeping the spigot open, letting millions flood into America across our southern border.
Despite White House opposition, the bill's passage in the House represents a significant step toward preserving the integrity of our educational institutions.
It remains to be seen if it can pass in the Senate, where Democrats hold a slim majority.
Meanwhile, Miss Italy bans transgender contestants.
Must be a woman from birth.
Will not jump on the glittery bandwagon of transactivism.
Good for Italy.
Miss Italy Passion has banned transgender contestants from taking part.
Lately, beauty contests have been trying to make news by also using strategies I think are a bit absurd, said Miss Italy official patron Patrizia Merlagani.
Miss Italia, on the other hand, will not jump on the glittery bandwagon of trans activism.
Since it was born.
My competition is foreseen in its regulation, a clarification according to which one must be a woman from birth.
Probably because even then, it was foreseen that beauty could undergo modification, or that women could undergo modification, or that men could become women, she said during an interview.
The Miss Italy Pageant Banning Transgender contestant arrived just weeks after a Transgender Beauty Queen contestant was crowned Miss Netherlands 2023.
Rikki Valerie Coley, a 22-year-old biological male, defeated a field of nine biological women to be named Miss Universe Netherlands.
Coley will represent Netherlands at the 72nd Miss Universe Competition in El Salvador.
Coley wrote in another post, hey darlings, as you know, I proudly admit I wasn't born the woman I wanted to be, but I have developed myself into the woman I am.
Over four months ago, I had my surgery.
For me, it completed the circle and brought me happiness.
Transgender beauty contestant Angela Potts was Miss Spain in the Miss Universe contest in 2018.
Miss Universe changed its rules to allow transgender contestants to compete in 2012.
In October of 2022, transgender billionaire Andy Jacobon Jakobuta purchased Miss Universe, Miss USA, and Miss Teen USA.
Jakobuta added, I was bullied a lot in school because I was a woman trapped in the wrong body.
In 2022, the San Francisco-based 9th U.S.
Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Miss United States of America contest could not be forced to allow transgender contestants to compete.
Carl, your thoughts?
The bill for no school for illegal aliens, yeah, that's a step in the right direction, and I'm wondering here, California as I am, The California legislature won't turn around and pass something saying that, oh, yeah, of course you can use, they'll try to counter that.
Now, that said, we do have ongoing emergencies of poverty, but flooding nations, as has happened in Europe and in the United States, doing that as a claimed virtue signal solution, that's going to get your political leader a 9% approval rating or lower, like Joe Biden.
And there are Poverty solutions for that real problem, but we're not going to get any of them until these so-called leaders who are war criminals and COVID criminals against humanity, these bankster looters a la John Perkins, economic hitman, they are the ones that have to be arrested and put out of power first for the rapacious neocolonialism of all resources, natural and human.
For the Miss Universe, the ideals of being feminine.
Now, the only thing that I really liked about that article for the beauty contest, I mean, it's great that they want to limit somebody who the ideal of being feminine.
Ooh, I think that if you brought that whatever contest it is in a room of children, I don't think the children are going to be attracted to that at all.
I think that dogs would be a little bit weirded out by that mix.
Um, the ideals that we should be promoting to our children is just being healthy.
Healthy has a beauty to it.
You being able to demonstrate some skill sets.
So you put in the work and you are skilled or talented, and as well that you're an articulate leader.
Those are ideals that all of us should be shooting for.
But the idea that anybody would be attracted to the mutilation of a body for the false concept of changing your gender, the impossible goal of that, and that would have to be based upon a psychology
Call me old-fashioned, Carl, but I like the idea of a beauty pageant based on beauty for women, which men find very attractive.
I'm all for the traditional beauty pageant.
Chris, your thoughts?
Uh you know a point I'd like to make is that the uh the APA and even the medical uh industry or whatever you want to call it and all the initial agencies that follow along with it above and below uh they're going through this type of process and encouraging it.
They're finding ways to fund this.
I mean there's people that can't afford to get cancer treatment but are having to you know other people getting this paid for and stuff and Insurance is definitely probably something weird with that too.
I don't know the intricacies of that, but I'd have to say that that's more than elective surgery.
I don't know what else to call it.
But while the fact that it's being pushed and sensationalized and discussed to such measures and certainly the money behind the hyper focus on this.
It is, in my opinion, obvious of what is trying to be done and who's behind it.
But, you know, I guess some people really that fall into this lifestyle or aggrandize it or, you know, I guess adopt this.
They, I guess, won't see it in the same way that people that know it's a trap would.
I think that's got a lot to do with it.
Diminishing reproduction in the species to drop the population worldwide.
I just feel sorry for them because they won't really know what it's like to be a parent or anything like that.
And, you know, I guess they're really missing out on the circle of life.
I think that's got a lot to do with it.
Diminishing reproduction in the species to drop the population worldwide.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, bro, or gone to live need to know at gmail.com.
Live need to know at gmail.com.
Dr. Leigh Marichal Beverly writes, most recent episode see link below.
Note, Oprah's star may be crashing down soon.
Lots of chatter on YouTube about her ties to child trafficking.
Sorted tales of her attempts to procure black celebs for pervert Quincy Jones also.
That news about Jones was a shocker.
It really is Holly Weird, not Hollywood.
From Beverly.
Final thoughts.
Carl, yours.
Yeah, Holly, Holly Weird.
All of the agencies have been captured by our opponents, and if you think about the General ideal that we're seeing is the takeover of all resources, natural and human, for global domination.
Of course you'd have to take over entertainment in order to push your propaganda.
So despite everything being looking like it is an uphill battle, the truth is on our side, and all we need to do Act appropriate, moment by moment, and we'll be just fine.
And trust that we have friends in high places who have higher ideals than these psychopaths.
Nice.
Chris, your final thoughts.
Sorry, I'm trying to unmute there. - Okay.
Well, I guess we realize what's being done to us and by whom.
I think really we got to start focusing on what to do next, how to respond to this.
There's been a force that has tried to destroy every aspect of American culture, whether it's The arts or whether it's the education or whether it's commerce, you know, the destruction of restaurants and small businesses, the destruction of the currency and the commodities and everything else to the manipulation of markets.
It's widespread.
It's rampant.
It's done and blessed by the powers of high and it's really felt by the people down low and I think it's real hard for anybody to have any confidence in any sort of a reasonable investment in this environment.
And I think it's not an accident.
I think they want everybody on eggshells.
I think they want it so everybody can barely survive and they'll sell things cheaply that are dear.
Liquidity crunches, things of the sort, freezing of credit and loans.
There's a really strong push to run people off their property.
And it's an organized group that's doing this.
You can see who's accumulating much of this property.
Like I said in other shows, BlackRock owns one in five single family homes in America.
You know, it's 21%.
That's pretty shocking.
And you got to think how they're using our pensions, our retirements, to weaponize these situations against not only ourselves, but our children.
And I think really people are going to have to start to sharpen up and find ways To react to this and to really mitigate this disaster that's going to come along with much of the Ponzi schemes that are going to come crashing down.
I not only liked Carl's and Chris's comments today, but I think Carl's got a great dog there.
A wonderful family pet.
Love it.
Let me just say, nothing could have been more welcome to me than Fulford's report about a negotiated truce, a peace between Russia and Ukraine, really, between Russia and NATO.
This is a most welcome development.
Everything you reported there sounds totally plausible, very rational as a basis for having a negotiated settlement.
Russia clearly has prevailed.
NATO, through Ukraine, has proven to be no match.
The good guys appear to have won this one, and for the sake of humanity, we can all breathe a sigh of relief.
But never underestimate the Khazarian mafia.
They're going to act with desperation to last American or Ukrainian, not just soldier, but life.
Bear that in mind.
Meanwhile, it doesn't appear we've dodged a bullet.
I recently said I thought on the atomic scientist's clock of how close we are to nuclear war, we were five seconds away.
I think now we can set that back to five minutes.
Let's all breathe a sigh of relief and be very grateful for what appears to be a very significant development that's going to affect every one of us in positive ways to live another day.
Thanks for being here.
▲
Export Selection