All Episodes
Previous Next
June 10, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
51:23
Need to Know News (9 June 2023) with Chris Weinert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer, Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Chris Weinert in Fort Myer, Florida.
Florida's becoming a real popular place.
We're going to have a big trial down there soon, and I expect the defendant is going to be acquitted.
It's big news now.
Carl Hervis, finishing his move, won't be with us today.
Alan Dershowitz.
I don't see an administration in charge of a presidential candidate.
Nothing about the law or the Constitution inhibits the Biden people in the least bit.
Speaking with Sebastian Gorka, the Harvard Law School professor Alan Dershowitz explained he doesn't see how the admin can throw charges at a candidate running for president to replace them.
Unless this indictment is the strongest case since Nixon's obstruction of justice back in the 1970s, this is a disgrace.
Mark my words, this is a disgrace.
When you have the current admin going after the man who is potentially capable of inciting them, it better be the strongest case imaginable.
It better be a case that would get bipartisan support.
Not a chance.
Those are what's pointed out.
Republicans are not on board with the indictment.
The full slate reportedly includes 7 counts, actually 37 counts, including violations of the Espionage Act and conspiracy to obstruct justice.
It's just manufactured out of whole cloth.
The professor urges them to wait Tuesday at 3 for the former president's scheduled arraignment to see if they have any actual smoking guns.
If they don't have smoking guns, it's an indictment that never ever should have been brought.
If it's anything like a close case, then it looks like a close case.
He maintained that DOJ special counsel John Smith would not be able to make a case that he intended to use the documents for foreign espionage.
If President Trump believed he declassified the material that was entitled Possess Him, it can't be a crime to refuse to turn them over.
Meanwhile, Dan Bongino, the police state is here.
He's got that right.
Syndicated conservative talk show host, former Secret Service agent Dan Bongino, said the announcement of Trump's indictment was proof the police state is here.
We live in a police state, Rob.
He told Rob Schmidt.
The police state is here.
It's not coming.
Coming next week.
It's not going to be here next year.
The police state is here now.
The idea that you live in a constitutional republic, take it.
Wipe your rump with it and flush it down the toilet because it's gone.
The police state has been here.
It's been here for years.
You're just seeing manifestations right now.
Bongino, who worked in New York Police Department for four years before joining the Secret Service, said the indictment served two purposes.
This is, you know, probably Act 7 in a play of election interference by Democrats.
They just want Trump off the ballot because they know he's most likely to win.
That's the obvious one.
We've almost come to accept that acts of malfeasance are normal when Democrats interfere in elections like it's almost no big deal.
The second, he said, had to do with revelations in a document House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer had been pressing to obtain from the FBI.
It contains accusations that the head of Burisma, Ukrainian oil, paid then-VP Joe Biden five mil in his Sunderhunter, another five mil in a bribery scream.
You have to understand what's going on, Bungie, the timing here is not accidental.
Evidence came out today, hard evidence, that the President of the United States, while he was Obama's vice, was involved in the biggest political payoff in human history in a political scandal.
This is all about making Trump go away, covering up for not just Biden, but covering up for Obama.
Remember, Biden was the VP.
If he was paid a bribe for policy decisions, what policy decisions, he can't make them.
He was Obama's vice president.
Everything's about covering up for the Obama-Biden regime.
That's all this is.
The timing here is not accidental.
I would just add, Chris, there's a third reason, which is, I think, with the invasion at the southern border.
The nation desperately needs leadership.
Trump is the guy who could provide it.
They want to get him embroiled in every kind of distraction, so he can't do that.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, it seems like they're really going after him for stuff that would be more or less nothing burgers if and when the other past administrations, even current administrations, do the same thing or worse.
Nobody really seems to even notice they're given a hall pass and completely disregarded.
You know, another thing, I think if this was more than theater, they'd be going after some different things maybe that they could get Trump on, but I don't think they're really interested in doing that.
I think it's part of the theater.
I think it's part to callous the base, you know, to where people will stop paying attention, not only on the liberal side, but also on the conservative side.
It's going to really dehuman a lot of people in the opposition.
And I think it's all part of a psychological operation, if you ask me, this whole persecution, the mountains, molehills thing, and everything else with Trump, while they pretty much let everybody else slide.
You know, Hillary Clinton didn't lock her up.
That should have happened right away, and the fact that that didn't should make you question what's going on.
Yeah, I think really some heads have to roll and I think they're going to just serve up low-level accounts and maybe try to get Trump off the board, too.
So, I don't think you're going to see justice.
I think you're going to see the illusion of it.
I think they're going to try to create the perception of diligence and certainly only provide rhetoric and not deliverance in terms of actual justice and going after people that are, like you say, traitors and responsible for espionage and that are turning this country into a third-world shithole.
I don't think Floridians are going to be plagued here by this phony attack on Trump.
I do not.
Meanwhile, does anyone believe American propaganda anymore?
A new Washington Post article about Nord Stream throws Ukraine overboard and absolves the U.S., which obviously is another version of reality we'll have to strain to take seriously.
This is getting silly now.
The Kakahovka Dam just exploded in Ukraine, flooding a huge territory, causing another insane ecological disaster.
Russia and Ukraine yesterday trained the accusation while the U.S.
was leaning toward Russia as the culprit.
The synchronicity was uncanny, with the media's damn freakout coming exactly as public panic about a previous lunatic infrastructure attack came full circle.
Moving from certainty Russia blew up the Nord Stream to belated claims we knew all along Ukraine did it.
It's as if officials want the world to take American intelligence assessment more as Gilbert Gottfried routines than truth.
At 10.52 a.m.
yesterday, the Washington Post published an exclusive call.
The U.S.
had intelligence of detailed Ukrainian plan to attack Nord Stream pipeline.
The story contended the U.S.
learned from a European intel source in June Ukraine was planning a covert attack on Nord Stream Using divers reported directly to the commander-in-chief of the Ukrainian forces, General Valery Valyushny.
Apparently, U.S.
and European allies knew about the Ukrainian plan and were impotent to stop a move they worried risked a severe Russian response.
The only in the country who didn't roll their eyes or laugh at these latest anonymous contortions were reporters.
Americans were wary of intelligence warning of Ukrainian pipeline attacks, wrote the New York Times.
Rolling Stone declared, the U.S.
knew Ukraine was planning to attack Russia's Nord Stream, and so on.
My favorite was a Godfather-themed header on the side of former Mother Jones writer Kevin Trump.
Ukraine was behind the Nord Stream bombing all along.
Meanwhile, Foreign Minister warns Russia must keep in mind that F-16 can carry nuclear weapons.
The Russian diplomat made the comments warning how the U.S.
and NATO are escalating their role in Ukraine.
Anything can be expected from the leaders of U.S.
and other Western countries, he said.
They're already proving this when following long-range weapons and tanks.
They're now seriously preparing F-16s.
We must keep in mind one of the modifications of the F-16 has the capability to deliver nuclear weapons.
F-16s are capable of carrying B61 nuclear gravity bombs, which the U.S.
stores in several European countries.
Under NATO's nuclear sharing program, these bombs are deployed in Germany, Italy, Turkey, Belgium, and the Netherlands.
When Russian President Putin announced he was sending nuclear weapons to Belarus, he compared the move to NATO's nuclear sharing.
He said the deployment was in response to the UK providing Ukraine with depleted Uranium weapons.
Meanwhile, NATO may send troops to Ukraine, warms a former alliance head.
A group of NATO countries may be willing to put troops on the ground in Ukraine if member states, including the U.S., do not provide tangible security guarantees to Kiev.
Rasmussen, Anders, former NATO Secretary General, Acting as official advisor to Vladimir Zelensky on Ukraine's place in a future European security arrangement has been touring Europe and Washington.
He warned that even if a group of states did provide Ukraine with security guarantees, others would not allow the issue of future NATO membership to be kept off the agenda.
He made remarks as the current chief, Jen Stoltenberg, said the issue of security guarantees would be on the agenda in Belarus, where there is to be a conference, but added that NATO, under Article 5, can only provide full-fledged security to full members.
U.S.
Ambassador to NATO Julian Smith said, we're looking at an array of options to signal Ukraine is advancing in its relationship with NATO.
Rasmussen said, if NATO cannot agree on a clear path forward for Ukraine, there's a clear possibility some countries might take action.
We know Poland is very engaged in providing concrete assistance.
And I wouldn't exclude the possibility Poland would engage even stronger in this context on a national basis and be followed by the Baltic states, maybe including the possibility of troops on the ground.
I think the Poles would seriously consider going in and assemble a coalition of the willing If Ukraine doesn't get anything in Vilnius, we shouldn't underestimate the bullish feeling.
The Bulls felt for too long Western Europe did not listen to their warnings.
He said it would be entirely legal for Ukraine to seek such military assistance.
Rasmussen said it's important that Ukraine should receive written security guarantees, preferably before the summit, but outside of the NATO's framework.
They need to cover intelligence-sharing, joint Ukraine training, enhanced ammunition production, NATO interoperability, and a supply arm sufficient to deter Russia from further attack.
He said, After a slow start, momentum is building behind the idea, including in France.
But he warned security guarantees would not be enough.
Some NATO allies might be in favor to actually avoid a real discussion of Ukraine's membership aspiration.
They hope that by providing security guarantees they can avoid the question.
I don't think that is possible.
I think the NATO issue will be raised at the summit in Vilnius.
I spoke with several European leaders.
There's a group of hardcore Eastern-Central European allies who want a clear path for Ukraine to NATO membership.
He's had history showed.
It was dangerous to leave Ukraine in the NATO waiting room indefinitely.
Even if an invite to join is not provided at the Vilnius Summit, the possibility of extending next year could be reverenced.
NATO membership should exclude setting preconditions such as a NATO membership action plan, something neither Sweden nor Finland have required.
Anything less than that would be a disappointment to Ukraine.
He rejected the argument Ukraine could not be offered a BAT to NATO membership until the war is over, saying this would provide Putin with a veto.
Well, Putin's not just going to have a veto.
Putin's got to win.
Chris, this is so stupid because it was Ukraine membership and NATO that was the final straw for Russia.
Chris? - Isn't that right?
Sorry, that's what I know you called on me there.
I didn't hear you.
Sorry about that.
Yes, I always say this, and I don't think I'm understating it or missing the mark on this, but maybe people can disagree.
I really think that the whole concept of nation-states and the independence model are Judeo-Masonic creations and offerings, and they are provided in rhetoric to draw the blood oath under the guise of nationalism, and to certainly use these mechanisms to create a nuclear blackmail and extortion racket over their citizens.
And I think it's been the meaning of government and the whole concept of government for a long time coming, and a long time ago.
This being said, I'm watching this stuff play out in real time, and I see the horrendous diplomatic penalty failures.
I don't even want to call them miscalculations.
I call them flat-out, I think they're doing what they're doing.
I don't think this type of stupidity bears this mark of consistency, and I think that it's not an accident that it has been.
I think this is very much orchestrated, and as I said, I think Briggs was a Goldman Sachs Asset transferring mechanism provided in 2001 right before 9-11.
So do the math, watch what happened since then, follow the money, and you'll probably find the people that are betraying not only this country, but the entire global population with this blackmail extortion racket.
Basically, the governments are taking over the mafia's racket.
And then they use the NGO and the place where they used to use the mafia, you know, the underworld to enforce things out in the streets.
So, yeah, this is nothing new.
I think it's just higher stakes and higher technology playing out the same formula to try to control humanity for a long time.
And I think that Biden admin is nothing but a criminal syndicate itself right here in the United States.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah.
Meanwhile, the Ireland government plans to slaughter 200,000 farting cows to combat global warming.
All right.
Irish lawmakers are pushing a proposal to kill off 200,000 dairy cows to reach their climate change goals.
The plan is to eliminate 65,000 a year over three years to green out gas emissions on farms by 2030.
The Irish government is considering an initiative to significantly reduce the number of dairy cows to reach its climate change target.
One proposal would be by reducing the national dairyhood by 10%, the equivalent of removing 65,000 a year for three years.
Minister for Agriculture Charlie McConnell told Irish radio station RTE Morning Ireland a dairy vision group with farmer representatives looking into a range of options to reduce emissions on farms.
The Irish Department of Agriculture is downplaying the report to kill hundreds of thousands of cows, claiming it's simply a modelling document.
It was reported yesterday that cows would have to be culled at a cost of 600,000 euros to taxpayers over the next three years to meet climate emission targets.
The farming independents had got the figures from an internal doc, the Freedom of Information Request.
Though the proposal was insane on its face, governments in Europe have clearly demonstrated their willingness to go to war with farmers, destroy food and energy production, Meanwhile, Biden's climate envoy John Kerry warned last week farmers need to stop growing so much food in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
John Kerry says U.S.
farmers must radically transform food production and meet net-zero emission goals by 2030.
There's one of the great traitors to the United States walking around on the face of Earth when he belongs somewhere else.
Chris, your thoughts?
Sorry, I was muted.
Yeah, this is an asshole that has the audacity to fly around the world in his charter jet and put his finger in the chest of third world nations and third world civilians and even first world ones and lecture them about carbon and climate change and all this bullshit.
The replacement with silicone is more what they want to probably call this.
And I think what's really going on is this is another one of those shakedowns, the whole carbon thing, the whole climate change thing.
And it's used as a justification to control not only the food supply, but the population via the food supply.
And I also think that there's something going on with maybe the vaccination of livestock in terms of trying to use that as a A Trojan horse or a poison apple for the consumers of the world to really be forced into that whole experiment too.
So yeah, I think there's really something going on where guys like Bill Gates feel this strong urge to control all agricultural production and all food production and things of that sort, along with all data, all technology, all political, all medical choices.
You know, so I mean, to call it tyranny by any other name is certainly an abuse of the language.
And I think that really what's going on here is really showing itself.
And I don't think there's really a two-party system or any party in this system that's going to really be able to vote its way or bureaucratically slice its way out of this mess, whether you're talking the debt or the military-industrial complex, which makes the debt, and the debt slaves that are going to be supposedly held to be liable for this type of extravagance. and the debt slaves that are going to be supposedly And really, this whole extravagance is absolute corruption, collusion, and dispossession.
Don't make any mistake about that.
This is not going to help the American people in any way, shape, or form.
It has been done to really, I think, just take out as many people.
I think there's an agenda to bring the U.S.
population and the global population down, as they've always talked about.
And if you read things like Deagles, they're talking in 2025, and even the World Bank had a memo on this in 05, talking about the population going under 70 million in the United States.
And you can see they're damn well trying to fulfill that agenda and that initiative, too.
So, yeah, there's something else going on here than that, and I think that Oh, I think you got it exactly right, Chris.
or to not point that out, is certainly an injustice for those who know better to not warn others that don't.
Oh, I think you got it exactly right, Chris.
Meanwhile, McCarthy gets slapped with a conservative revolt in the House not seen in over two decades.
A dozen conservative lawmakers voted down a rule bringing a set of Republican-backed bills to the House floor for debate.
This is a move that hadn't been seen in the chamber in over two decades, a clear revolt against Speaker Kevin McCarthy's leadership.
Politico described the move as an extraordinary rebellion, entirely unexpected by senior Republicans, representing the beginning of a conservative drive to undercut McCarthy.
The vote pertained to passing legislation protecting gas stoves from potential government bans, something conservatives obviously support, a clear indication that this is more than a More a warning shot than anything else.
At issue is a Biden-McCarthy debt ceiling agreement that earned more votes from Democrats than Republicans, gives the president two years to continue wantonly borrowing money.
McCarthy described the deal as fabulous and its passage is one of the best nights I've ever been here.
The 12 conservative lawmakers seemingly disagree.
Their vote indicates they'd like to see the Speaker adhere to some of the promises and concessions he made during the brutal effort to earn the gavel or risk having his agenda derailed.
CNN host Jake Tapper reported on the extraordinary revolt, mentioning the first time in more than two decades the House of Representatives voted down a rule.
Well, it's really a warning shot across the bow to Kevin McCarthy.
He said, hey, Bob, we don't like what you did to us, and we can bring down legislation if you don't listen.
Matt Gaetz suggests the protest was an effort to enforce a fact they want to end the imperial speakership.
Today we took down the rule because we're frustrated the way this place is operating.
We're concerned the fundamental commitments that allowed McCarthy to assume the speakership have been violated as a consequence of the debt deal.
A political report conveys the notion.
The conservative report was truly surprising and caught Republican leaders off guard.
Good!
They need to be kept aware of the fact their retake of the House was a voting mandate to stop the liberal administration from doing more harm to the country.
When you capitulate on a debt ceiling agreement where you've got all the leverage, resulting in more Democrats voting in favor and then publicly celebrating the deal, you know you've gone against why you were put in the leadership in the first place.
The debt limit was not fabulous, as McCarthy asserts, but the revolt holding him accountable certainly is.
Here we have Matt May tweeting, the area of the imperial speakership is over.
Oh, I'm done with their failure theater.
Here's another.
The Washington Post.
Hard right Republicans still angry over debt ceiling.
Foil McCarthy on GOP vote.
And who knows?
Maybe this is just the beginning.
Earlier this week, former campaign manager Steve Bannon called on each of the 149 Republicans who voted in favor of the debt ceiling to be primaried in 2024.
That even includes significant mega-allies like Marjorie Taylor, Green Jim Jordan, and James Comer.
There need to be more conservatives in the House to fight back against Biden, as opposed to those who vote in a way that prompts him to give primetime celebrity speech, like Green, Jordan, and Comer have done.
Chris, your thoughts?
Well, I think there's definitely, like I said, a lot bigger picture than what the media is presenting.
I think there's some sort of I guess force or power in D.C.
that can make a person like McCarthy readily comply with any sort of thing, whether it's raising the roof and putting another few 4, 5, 10, 20, 30, 50 trillion on the necks of the Americans in terms of a debt millstone.
Look at him.
I think they shot him one time at a recreational softball game.
Is that correct?
St.
McCarthy, right?
Yeah, sure.
Scalise, yeah.
That was Scalise, not McCarthy, but Scalise.
Oh, I thought it was McCarthy.
Okay, well yeah, sure.
Any one of these guys, I guess they can really pretty much send that message to you.
Either go along with corruption and really push it off on the taxpayer.
Or, you know, you do the right thing and you get primaried out by AIPAC and replaced by the CFR and literally ostracized or ganged up on by the rest of Congress.
So yeah, this is a den of vipers, a pack of jackals that have taken over our, not only our legislation, but also our economic debt and issuance of debt.
So, and most of this stuff is done by a private bank, which is the Fed.
Nice.
It's even outside of Congress and gone dark with FASB 56.
So we're looking at something really, really nasty, really, really dark here that I don't think anything that's good operates under this type of clandestine manner in the way that it has and does.
And certainly doesn't have this level of greed and corruption and certainly futility in terms of doing service to the American people.
Nice.
Meanwhile, Trump vows to fix the U.S. administration.
in six months, and Sanders sits back with a brutal question.
It's no secret Trump has been mercilessly critical of DeSantis.
Long before he announced his own 2024 campaign, Trump attacked his character, his record, and his accomplishment.
To the surprise of many, DeSantis said nothing in return.
Most likely, he knew getting into a street fight with Trump was a bad idea.
But in recent days, it looks like the gloves are off.
DeSantis has become increasingly antagonistic.
Now it seems he's going on the offense.
Trump recently vowed he was going to quickly fix America.
In just six months they've elected.
DeSantis fired back.
Former President Trump and Florida Governor DeSantis trade punches over the advantages of experience in office versus the ability to serve multiple terms.
Speaking to voters in Iowa, a former president said he could reverse a Biden admin's impact on the country in six months.
A reporter brought Trump's promise to make the U.S.
the way it was in six months to DeSantis, who is campaigning about 1,200 miles away in New Hampshire.
Then why didn't he do it in his first four years, DeSantis quipped?
In previous remarks, DeSantis has said the fact Trump can only serve four more years will undermine Republican governance in the future.
Getting a president elected to the same party as the incumbent is difficult.
It has not been done since George H.W.
Bush took over from Ronald Reagan after the 1988 election.
Here we have Gabe Gutierrez tweeting, DeSantis responds to my question about former Trump saying he'd fix the U.S.
in six months after DeSantis said he'd need two terms to turn the country around.
DeSantis!
Why didn't he do it in his first four years?
Wow!
DeSantis had previously discussed Trump's second term problem.
If re-elected, he has at best only four years to get things done.
Many believe all the good things he's accomplished in his first term have been wiped out by Biden.
So Trump has only one term, if elected, to get anything done.
In contrast, DeSantis or another GOP president would have potentially eight years.
DeSantis said if Trump won, the next presidential election would surely fall to Democrats.
It appears DeSantis believes the Republicans need the next eight years to fix the economy and reverse Biden's disastrous decisions.
How will Truss respond to that?
We'll find out soon enough.
Chris, your thoughts.
Well, you know, I definitely think Trump has pointed out a lot of issues that have been swept under the rug in terms of American discourse and the political scene.
I think he's definitely has infantilized and triggered a lot of conversations and dialogues, too, really to provoke, I think, almost a middle school type mentality, Lord of the Flies situation amongst the concerned and desperate citizens around here.
So, as far as I'm concerned, if I had to pick one in terms of this AIPAC-funded, CFR-sponsored race to the bottom between Trump and DeSantis, man, I don't know.
I could see the smart play being take Trump, at least for the first and last term that he could serve, and then have DeSantis waiting as a readily available candidate.
I'd like to see either of these guys take that beanie off their head and throw it out of the ring like Rocky did with that white towel at Rocky III, because really, if this country's going to have a chance, it's got to do something like that, and it's got to really put Israel to justice.
Chris, I think you got that again exactly right.
Meanwhile, who's behind the rise in transgenderism?
Well, guess what?
It's a group of Zionists who appear to be calling the shots.
We got Transgender Equality read by Mara Keisling, founder, Jewish.
We got Margus Harshfield, a Jewish sexologist in Weimar Germany, considered a pioneer of transgenderism.
We got Gilson, headed by Eliza Isyard, another Jew.
We got TSER, by Ellie Dirk, founder, another Jew.
We got TLDEF, led by Julian Euless and Michael Silverman, founders, both Jews.
Absolutely stunning!
Meanwhile, some of the nation's largest pediatric hospitals will no longer offer child gender modification.
Thank God!
Potentially thousands of Texas kids seeking to change their gender will no longer have access to puberty blockers, sterilization, and permanently disfiguring gender transition surgeries under new laws signed by Texas Governor Greg Abbott.
He signed Senate Bill 14, making the Lone Star State the most populous state number of women sex change treatment for children.
The new law stands as a major roadblock for advocates of transgender medicine.
It'll stop the nation's largest pediatric health care provider, Texas Children's Hospital in Houston, from offering gender modification procedures to minors.
It will prohibit three more of the country's largest pediatric hospitals from offering services to children who want to change their gender.
Both Texas Children's Hospital with 973 beds and Children's Medical Center with 490 currently offer gender-altering services to youth.
The new law bans surgeries that sterilize children by removing parts of their reproductive systems.
It outlaws mastectomies for girls hoping to live more like boys.
It disallows the prescribing of drugs that induce temporary or permanent infertility, such as cross-sex hormones.
It prohibits removing any otherwise healthy or non-diseased body part.
The Lone Star State joined 17 others, now restricting gender transitioning for children.
The Texas law goes into effect on 1 September.
Almost 30,000 Texas teens, ages 13 through 17, likely have a gender identity different than their biological sex, according to the Williams Institute, part of the UCLA School of Law, and nearly one in five who identify as transgender or minors as young as 13.
Under the new law, children in Texas on hormones will have to be weaned off those drugs.
Doctors who perform gender modification on children stand to lose their medical licenses.
The bill gives the Attorney General the ability to enforce the law.
The Republican-led effort to pass a priority for Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick met stiff resistance from Democrats.
GOP advocates said cross-sex hormone puberty blockers in surgery could cause irrevocable health programs or sterility in children.
Their Democrat counterparts argued the decision to put children on hormone treatment and surgery should be left to parents or children and doctors.
Journalist Chris Ruffo, an outspoken opponent of woke gender ideology and gender modification for children, posted an undated internal email from Children's Hospital CEO Mark Wallace on Twitter in May.
Wallace announced the immensely heart-wrenching transition to modify gender-affirming care offered to children.
Action will be taken over the next few months to comply with a new law prohibiting procedures and prescription treatments for gender-transitioning, gender reassignment, and gender dysphoria.
He wrote, the hospital would work with parents and families to manage the discontinuation of hormone therapies or source appropriate care outside of Texas.
The hospital, he wrote, will continue to offer psychological support and any form of care we can within the boundaries of the law.
He said staff would navigate these steps with grace, love, and compassion.
He wants to remind everyone our mission is to create a healthier future for all children.
Being unable to serve and support these kids and families the way we have in the past is painful.
That hospital will remain dedicated to educating and amplifying the importance of safe, high-quality transgender medicine programs.
He asked for support, empathy, and care for children, families, and care teams deeply affected by the new legislation and wanted to reassure care teams who devoted their lives to gender-affirming care that they are deeply valued.
Another large hospital, Children's Medical Center of Dallas, will have to stop treating hundreds of minors with hormone therapy.
The hospital operates a gender clinic in conjunction with UT Southwestern Medical Center.
The clinic, started by Dr. Zima Lopez in 2014, is called the Gender Education and Care Interdisciplinary Support Project.
Lopez, a pediatric endocrinologist, said publicly she will close her practice in July and move to California because of the new law.
State lawmakers, including Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton, have been pushing to ban transgender medical procedures for the past two years.
Paxson has been replaced by an interim Attorney General while he awaits trial in the Texas Senate after being impeached by the Texas House.
Paxson has denounced the impeachment based on untrue allegations that are politically motivated.
Before his current problems, Paxson was part of a campaign to apply enough political pressure to hamstring GenSys in November 2021 when the clinic was closed to new patients.
It's now allowed to continue seeing existing ones.
After Lopez filed a lawsuit in March of 2022 to fully reopen the clinic, a Dallas judge issued a temporary order allowing to see new patients until the case could be settled in court.
A replacement comment was not immediately returned.
Dr. Stanley Goldfarb is chairman of the board for Do No Harm, which fights radical ideologies in medicine.
Texas new law is significant because it affects large treatment centers for transgender youth, Goldfarb told The Atomic Times.
Children who are confused about their general need mental health care instead of surgeries or hormones.
The vast, vast majority of these children bring with them a tremendous burden of psychological difficulty.
I hope the hospitals pivot to the right kind of care for these children.
Some pediatric hospitals operate on the theory that the reason children with gender dysphoria have psychological problems is because they haven't had a chance to change their gender.
Once the children are allowed to transition, advocates think the psychological problems experienced by these children will go away.
But evidence from multiple studies suggests the opposite happens.
The literature does not show their psychological problems go away.
Chris, your thoughts?
I wonder if they're ever going to admit, as far as doctors are concerned, the gender dysphoria can be caused possibly by things that are added into the food supply, you know, things like that, or even plastics or industrial externalities, things of the sort.
Well, I'd like to actually look into that possibility, too.
I think that's a strong factor that is also behind this, but they're redirecting not only the focus, but also the complicity, the guilt.
And they're really putting it on to the victim again.
And they're creating a political situation from this.
And, you know, it'd be one thing, I guess, if Obamacare would cover cancer treatment or terminal diseases or things of the sort.
Instead, Hopefully Chris can continue to complete his thoughts on this vital issue.
Meanwhile, breaking University of Pennsylvania swimmer breaks her silence, shares her story about being forced to have a biological male join her swim team.
In a recent interview, Paula Scanlon, a former teammate of transgender swimmer Leah Thomas, accused the University of Pennsylvania of manipulating the girl's swim team into silence.
Scanlon criticized her alma mater, For shutting down concerns that girls had over swimming with a biological male on their female swim team and being forced to allow him into their locker room.
She was interviewed by Matt Walsh, journalist at the Daily Wire.
She decided to finally open up and talk about the experience.
She explained that after a year of remaining quiet, only allowing herself to be interviewed anonymously, her concern to believe things were mishandled by the university have continued to bother her.
Is there something wrong with me for thinking this is wrong?
The university wanted us to be quiet.
They did it in a very effective way.
There was something going on in this athletic department, wanted to keep us silent.
It was getting scary.
She said the university didn't want any kid back, made the swimmers feel they were not allowed to have their own opinions.
She shared with Walsh that the female swimmers hid from Thomas in the restroom stalls when they needed to change clothes.
They continue to tell us our opinions were wrong.
If we had an issue about, we were the problem.
And it's frightening.
Your future job is on the line, Scanlon said.
Shelton claimed swimmers would hide in the bathroom stalls to avoid changing in front of Thomas.
Here's Matt Wallace talking.
A teammate, Aaliyah Thomas, appeared in What Is A Woman anonymously.
A few days ago, she came to us and said she's ready to come out publicly and tell her story.
I had a longer conversation with Paula where she revealed a number of details that weren't covered in the film.
Thomas Swammon successfully on the men's team for three years before the girls team was informed by his coach that he'd be moving to their team.
Scanlon said he'd been widely encouraged to tell the truth about what happened.
Something that has shocked me is the volume of international messages I've received.
The world looks to America to do the right thing, and now more than ever, as important as Americans, we stand up for the truth.
The whole world depends on our doing so.
Paul, it's important that we do this.
Scanlon thanked fellow collegiate swimmer Riley Gaines for standing up to protect the integrity of women's sports.
Matt tweets, A teammate, Aaliyah Thomas, appeared in What Is A Woman anonymously a few days ago.
She came to us and said she was ready to come out with details that weren't covered in the film.
Meanwhile, SBLC labels parental right advocates as hate and anti-government groups.
On Tuesday, a far-left Southern Poverty Law Center added several prominent parental right organizations to its list of hate and anti-government groups, creating a detailed map showing where such groups are located throughout the United States.
As reported by the New York Post, the SPLC's Year in Hate and Extremism 2022 report was a total of 1,225 hate and anti-government extremist groups throughout the country, an increase from 733 in 2021.
Many of the new additions are groups dedicated to transparency in public education and greater rights for parents to determine their own children's education.
Schools, especially, have been on the receiving end of rumped-up and coordinated hard-right attacks, frequently through the guise of parents' rights group, the group claimed.
They were in part spurred by the right-wing backlash to COVID-19 public safety measures in schools.
They have grown into an anti-student inclusion movement, targeting any inclusive curriculum that contains discussion of race, discrimination, and LGBTQ identities.
One such group targeted is Moms for Liberty, with 280 chapters across 45 states and 115,000 members nationwide.
The group focuses on holding schools accountable for seeking to promote sexually explicit or racially divisive literature to students in the name of diversity, equity and inclusion.
They can be spotted at school board meetings across the country.
Wearing shirts and carrying signs that declare, we do not co-parent with the government.
The SPLC says, describing Moms for Liberty in a report, declaring it to be an extremist group at the forefront of this mobilization.
Other groups targeted include No Left Turn in Education, Parental Rights in Education, and Parents Involved in Education.
They emerged after the mass implementation of remote learning during the coronavirus pandemic, which allowed many parents to see firsthand what their children were being taught, with many objecting to its lessons of critical race theory, transgenderism, and other highly politically topics meant to divide children along racial and gender lines.
A grassroots movement began seeing school board meetings protesting all across the country, with a number of groups waging successful campaigns to remove school board members from office and replace them with conservatives and parent-right advocates.
In 2021, The Biden admin labeled such group domestic terrorists after Merrick Garland's Department of Justice received a letter from the National School Boards Association demanding that they do so.
How outrageous was that?
Chris, your thoughts.
Yeah, it's kind of interesting to see all these right-wing national security threats and dangers to the whatever.
They're the only people that are standing up for the Constitution, human rights, liberty, free markets, free exchange of idea, free speech even.
And sadly, what's being done with that is being weaponized on the other side with the harnessing and harvesting of that particular demographic, the LGBTQ.
I think they really got these people because they make for good pageantry.
It's certainly they can be triggered and provoked and they probably have like a niche demographic where it is probably in my guesstimation somehow funded.
I don't know how or by whom NGOs would be my best guess and maybe even through the cryptocurrency markets.
In my opinion, they fund these people to be political operatives to be, you know, I think social influencers and engineers, you know, people that are what we would probably call crisis actors, fets.
I mean, you've seen enough of these hoaxes and false flags.
I doubt it's just at these mass shootings that they use these type of nudgers.
I bet it's got to be in just about every sort of political gathering or things of the sort.
So my guess is this is the rich people doing the old Jay Gould quote, you know, they're wealthy enough to pay one half of the world simply to kill the other half.
Yeah.
Good.
Nice.
Chris.
Excellent.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, Broercon, to LiveNeedToKnowAtGmail.com.
LiveNeedToKnowAtGmail.com.
Canadian fires?
Beverly writes.
Call me a conspiracy nut, but these fires in Canada sound suspicious.
Affecting things all the way down the East Coast, maybe even to Virginia?
Has such a powerful conflagration ever happened before?
I see on Yahoo home page, New York City is distributing N95 masks to import air quality from the fires.
Here we go with a mask again.
Something just doesn't pass the smell test here.
Meanwhile, final thoughts.
Chris, yours.
I'd like to point out that they've been having this issue with these fires coming out that have been accused of being directed energy weapons.
I don't think that that's an understatement.
I think that's a distinct possibility, if not a likelihood.
And I think that people need to understand that maybe this is being used.
If you've seen that spontaneous fire in Quebec or some of the stuff in California over the last 5, 7, 10 years, this is a land grab.
They're running people off their property and they're going to take their minerals and Really, like I say, through this debt mechanism, through this Leviathan compound interest, fractional reserve banking system, and then the ensuing blockchain markets, I think that they're going to try to create a whole new realm of techno-feudalism.
From there.
I was talking about these people making a whole new realm of techno-feudalism with the debt mechanism and the compound interest and fractional reserve banking systems.
It was a century-long plan, and this is the next plan for the next century.
Many of these climate initiatives, these depopulation agendas are all part of this.
It's all part of the 2030 onto the 2050 Greater Israel Project plan.
So, these groups that are being targeted as national security threats, By the national security threats, I think you're going to have to start to come together and really, when they do, you're going to see more than an ample majority, whether you're talking the GDL or the parents of teachers that want to have rights over their own children or decide their own medical rights or things of that nature.
There's so many people that could fall into these groups and really unite and take the country and the Constitution back and certainly put on an economic system that would not be what we're seeing now.
Oh, Chris, it's just wonderful to have you as a commentator.
I enjoy every single opportunity.
Let me just say, I think a lot of Americans are getting very pissed off with the Democrat Party and their corruption of the DOJ and the rule of law.
They turned America into an international laughingstock.
Going after your political opponent who's going to wipe clean your clock at the next election with a phony trumped up charge?
Just outrageous!
A lot of us think this is too much.
I think many Americans are going to regard this as the last straw.
I can't predict exactly how this is going to play out, but I can tell you for a certainty, a lot of us are fed up with this bullshit, and we hold in contempt everyone from Merrick Garland and this fake Biden and Obama and all the other who are mucking up the United States to serve their own personal agenda.
To hell with them!
Spend as much time as you can with your family, your friends, the people you care about.
We do not know how this is all going to play out.
Have a great weekend.
▲
Export Selection