Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 8, 2023 - Jim Fetzer

01:27:50

Need to Know News (7 June 2023) with Joe Olson and Chris Weinert

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Joe Olson in Houston, Texas, and Chris Weinert in Fort Myer, Florida.
	We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
	We begin with a dam in Ukraine providing water to Crimea being destroyed.
	The Ukrainians are claiming the Russians did it, which is frankly about as absurd as it gets.
	The dam was built by the USSR in the 50s.
	It's nearly 100 feet tall, over 10,000 feet wide.
	The dam was constructed as a hydroelectric power plant and created the Kakavoka Reservoir over 2,000 square kilometers, Europe's largest nuclear power plant, the Zabrizhaya.
	And the Crimean Peninsula received water from the reservoir, so obviously the Russians would want to destroy it.
	An explosion ripped through the dam Tuesday morning, causing flooding to begin downstream.
	They say it's unclear if the attack was intentional, but that's absurd.
	Of course it was intentional.
	The most immediate impact was flooding the surrounding area, displacing at least 16,000.
	A Ukrainian official said eight towns had been partially or completely flooded.
	It's expected to be worse in areas controlled by Russia.
	There'll be, of course, environmental damage.
	Another concern is the power plant.
	The IAEA, the UN nuclear watchdog group, says it's closely monitoring the situation, but there's no imminent nuclear safety risk.
	Kiev immediately blamed Moscow, calling it a terrorist attack and a war crime.
	Ukraine's defense minister suggested Russia destroyed the dam as a tactical defense of the region.
	The landscape claimed it was impossible for Ukrainians to have carried out the dam's destruction.
	This is unreal.
	Russia has been calling a dam in the entire area for more than a year.
	It's physically impossible to blow it up somehow from the outside by shelling.
	It was mined by the Russian occupiers and they blew it up.
	Last year, however, Ukrainian Major General Andrei Povlachok told the Washington Post he considered attacking the dam during Ukraine's counter-offensive last year.
	Povlachok considered flooding the river.
	Ukrainians, he said, even conducted a test strike with HIMARS launcher on one of the floodgates, making three holes in the metal to see if the Danube water would be raised enough to stymie Russian crossings, but not flood nearby villages.
	The test was a success.
	Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Ukrainian forces were behind the destruction of the dam.
	Oppressor received reports through the Defense Ministry and other services on what's happening.
	We can say unequivocally there's a deliberate sabotage by the Ukrainian side.
	The attack will impact a core Russian concern.
	Through the 250-mile-long northern Crimean Canal, the reservoir feeds water to the peninsula.
	Before the invasion, the Kremlin regularly issued demands that irrigation systems supply water to Crimea remain open.
	Peshkov said part of Kiev's motivation was depriving Crimea of water.
	The water level in the reservoir is dropping.
	Hence, the water supply to the Northern Crimean Canal is drastically reduced.
	Apparently, the sabotage is also due to the fact that having launched large-scale offensive operations two days ago, Ukrainian armored forces have been unable to achieve their aims.
	Their operations have stalled.
	Meanwhile, Tucker released episode one of Tucker on Twitter on the explosion of the Kharkov dam in Ukraine.
	On Tuesday, Tucker took on the Ukrainian dam blown up on Tuesday.
	Likely a Ukrainian attack, he explained.
	He began his program as follows.
	This morning, it looks like someone blew up the Kakovo Dam in southern Ukraine.
	The rushing wall of water wiped out entire villages, destroyed a critical hydropower plant, and as of tonight, puts the largest nuclear reactor in Europe in danger of melting down.
	So if this was intentional, it was not a military tactic.
	It was an act of terrorism.
	The question then is, who did it?
	Well, let's see.
	The Kharkov Dam was effectively Russian.
	It was built by the Russian government.
	It sits in Russian-controlled territory.
	The dam's reserves supply water to Crimea, which has been for the last 240 years home of the Russian Black Sea Fleet.
	Blowing up the dam may be bad for Ukraine, but it hurts Russia more.
	And for precisely that reason, the Ukrainian government has considered destroying it.
	In December, the Washington Post quoted a Ukrainian general saying his men had fired American-made rockets at the dam's floodgate as a test strike.
	So really, once the facts start coming in, it becomes much less of a mystery what might have happened to the dam.
	Any fair person would conclude the Ukrainians probably blew it up, just as you would assume they blew up Nord Stream, the Russian natural gas pipeline, last fall.
	Astonishingly, Tucker on Twitter has had 60 million viewers.
	60 million viewers.
	That's a 20-volt increase from the 3 million average on Fox.
	Joe, your thoughts?
	Yes, and that was an unannounced 10-minute long Twitter blast.
	So, yeah, he's going to clean their... There's no way they're going to be able to keep him bound to this.
	do not compete clause of his contract even if he has to forego all the money there's nothing they can do to stop him so good godspeed to that guy yeah what really happened was that the two days prior to the missile attacks on this uh kakaro dam the uh ukrainians launched uh attacks across several different fronts they lost
	They lost 3,700 troops, 52 tanks, 207 armed vehicles, 5 airplanes, 2 helicopters, and 48 artillery pieces.
	So to divert from their losses in the field, their offensive that ended up being Very unoffensive to the Russians.
	They decided they would sabotage this and that way by flooding the downstream portion of the river, they were able to relocate the troops that they had stationed up to go back and re-attack Russia with another one of their failed spring offensives.
	So that's exactly what's going on.
	And to make it more insidious, the dam was hit by two missiles.
	It has six water-powered turbines.
	It hit one of the center turbines, which knocked out the electrical production coming out of that particular portion of the dam.
	And then they also hit one of the floodgates.
	And when you look at the damage, it's obvious from the start of the flooding situation that it was hit in two separate locations.
	Then, as a result of the water pouring through, it was able to wash down portions of the dam while going further down.
	But it gets more insidious than that, because north of this particular dam,
	It is another dam, which is D-N-E-P-R-O-P-T-R-O-V-S-K, which is in control of the Ukrainians, and it creates the Dnepr Reservoir, and they opened the floodgates there several weeks ago so that they could flood this particular lake prior to blowing it, and then that way they're reducing not only the water supply for the nuclear power plant,
	Excellent comments, Chris.
	Yeah, absolutely right.
	Ukraine's a very large producer of wheat, too, so that's going to hurt them and impact them pretty big.
	the whole entire eastern Ukraine in order to continue fighting the war that NATO's ordered them to fight.
	It's absolutely insane.
	Excellent comments, Chris.
	Yeah, absolutely right.
	Ukraine is a very large producer of wheat, too, so that's going to hurt them and impact them pretty big.
	That's one of their larger exports.
	I'd also like to say that this is a war in everything except for declaration.
	And the amount of money that's been dedicated through debt to finance this type of adversarial position will absolutely yield sufficient carnage, I'm sure, given the amount of commitment they've made to this.
	So this to me it seems like the people behind this better win this because if not they're going to be probably they're going to be the ones that are being in trouble for war crimes and things of the sort.
	And this is not just about what's going on with Ukraine and sending mercenaries in.
	I'm talking about the adrenochrome, the sex trafficking, the whole thing.
	Even energy deals, on and on.
	So this is a big deal.
	And the RNA recombinant development too, the gain-of-function labs.
	So there's a lot of dark stuff going on in this place.
	It needs to come to light.
	Now, hopefully Tucker Carlson will be a guy to help with this, but I still think he's got a lot to prove as far as him being a controlled opposition insider.
	There's much more about this.
	Meanwhile, Ukraine had a plan to bomb the Nakhon Govind Dam as a last resort, conducted a test strike last year, and blamed Russia.
	Surprise, surprise.
	Garrison Counteroffensive Major Andrei Kolychuk told the Washington Post in December of 2022 that Ukraine had plans to bomb the dam as a last resort, and even conducted a test strike on the dam with American Hymhars, which they falsely blamed on the Russians.
	So there's nothing new here.
	Two bridges, the Post said reported, were targeted with U.S.-supplied HIMARS launchers, which have a range of 50 miles and quickly rendered impassable.
	There were moments when we turned off their supply lines completely, and they still managed to build crossings, Kovachek said.
	They managed to replenish ammunition.
	It was very difficult.
	Cover considered flooding the river.
	The Ukrainians, he said, even conducted a test strike with a Hummer's launcher on one of the floodgates at the Kharkov Dam, making three holes in the mantle to see if the Danube's water could be raised enough to stymie Russian crossings.
	From Andrew Koibert via Zero Hedge, Kiev's long-term plans to blow up the Kokoslova Dam.
	The partial destruction of the dam Tuesday morning saw Kiev and Moscow exchange accusation as the Hood of Dwine.
	But a report from the Washington Post in late December extends credence to the Kremlin's version of events, titled Inside the Ukrainian counteroffensive that shocked Putin and reshaped the war, its journalist quoted former commander of Novosibirsk counteroffensive, Major General Kalachuk, who shockingly admitted to planning this war crime.
	Chugach considered flooding the river.
	Ukrainians, he said, even conducted a test, which was a success.
	His remarks about the step remained a last resort is pertinent to recall at present considering the first phase of Kiev's NATO-backed counteroffensive completely failed Monday, according to the Russian Ministry of Defense.
	Just as Ukraine launched its proxy invasion of Russia in late May to distract from its loss in the Battle of Artemikovs, so too it might seem to have gone through with Polkachev's planned war crime to distract from this most recent embarrassment as well, just as Joe suggested.
	The above-mentioned explanation isn't a far fetched.
	Some might think, after all.
	One of complexity theory's precepts is that initial conditions at the onset of non-linear processes can disproportionately shape the outcome.
	In this context, the first failed phase of Kiev's counteroffensive risks ruining the entire campaign, which could have prompted its planner to employ Kolkachuk's last resort to introduce an unexpected variable into the equation that might improve their odds.
	Ukraine struck the dam in November 2022 but blamed Russia for the attack.
	As you can see in this tweet, falsely blaming Russia, three holes have been described.
	Here's footage of the explosion that damaged the Kolkatav hydroelectric dam.
	Here's another.
	It doesn't seem the hydroelectric dam was damaged by the Russians in their retreat.
	It does seem that the hydroelectric dam was damaged by the Russians in their retreat.
	A massive question is how significant the damage actually is.
	Today, Ukraine is once again blaming Russia for the dam's destruction.
	Benjamin Bennett tweets, new planet satellites show the unimaginable damage to the Novogorsk Shogunate.
	Russian terrorists.
	The destruction of the hydroelectric power plant only confirms to the whole world they must be expelled from every corner of Ukraine.
	Zelensky said not a single meter should be left to them because they use every meter for terror.
	It's only Ukraine's victory.
	Excuse me.
	That will return security, and this victory will come.
	The terrorists will not be able to stop Ukraine with water missiles or anything else.
	All services are working.
	I have convened a National Security and Defense Council.
	Free, beneficial, and verified information only.
	Here you can actually see the dam, the flooding, just massive.
	I mean, massive.
	Cubious quantities of water!
	I mean, this is humongous!
	Meanwhile, California Representative Ted Lieu, without evidence, declared Russia guilty of another war crime, called for them to be designated as a state sponsor of terrorism.
	Eel Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, without evidence, also declared Russia guilty of war crimes.
	Ursula von der Leyen tweets, Russia will have to pay for the war crimes committed in Ukraine.
	The destruction of the dam, an outrageous attack on civilian infrastructure, puts at risk thousands of people in the Kherson region.
	Europe is mobilizing support through a civil protection mechanism.
	She got the part about an outrageous attack on civilian infrastructure right, but the party responsible wrong.
	Meanwhile, the White House said they cannot conclusively say what happened at this point.
	I'm reminded of the incident last year where Ukraine struck Poland with a missile for Zelensky to come out and falsely accuse Russia of being behind the attack.
	As Christopher Miller tweeted, Zelensky, terror is not limited to our national borders.
	Russian missile hit Poland to fire missiles at NATO territory.
	This is a Russian missile attack on collective security.
	This is a very significant escalation we must act.
	While NATO holds Russia responsible for the misfire, initial investigations suggest the missile that hit Poland was Ukrainian in origin.
	Since giving this speech, various officials from Ukraine have walked back accusations the missiles were Russian.
	Zelensky tried to use a false flag to con NATO into war, but the White House wouldn't go along with his lies then.
	Biden came out and said it's highly unlikely Russia was behind the strike, while other anonymous officials think the president of Ukraine was most likely to blame.
	Joe, your thoughts?
	Yes, well, we have a pattern going on here.
	About a year ago, Russia took control of the Zafariya nuclear power plant, and they were repeatedly hit by artillery shells from the Ukrainians.
	And every time one would hit, the Ukrainians would say, Russia's occupied the nuclear power plant, and they're trying to blow it up and blame it on us.
	It's like, no, we know exactly where it's coming from.
	We're blowing up the artillery units that you're using to shoot us.
	Then we had the Nord Stream gas pipeline, where obviously Russia's going to blow up its own gas line and hurt its own gas production in order to further the cause of Ukraine.
	Absolute insane.
	Yeah, this whole thing is stupid.
	But the thing is that they knew that the Zaporozhye power plant was vulnerable.
	So in September, right after the Nord Stream Pipeline bombing, Russia decided to put So basically they need very little amount of circulating water to be able to keep the rods from being able to decompose and melt down.
	So the plant at this point is safe and they've got enough in their detention pond around the plant To be able to continue that level of cooling and back up diesel generators to power whatever pumps are necessary.
	So the plant is safe, short of being struck with another HIMAR, which you know, we're shipping more and more weapons every minute.
	It's absolutely insane.
	And something that really happened, and it's wonderful, there's a great 20-minute long interview with Max Blumenthal and Alex Rosenstein on Greystone.
	They had made comments about the National Endowment for Democracy being a CIA front organization, and apparently it got one of the little sock puppets over there's niggers in a twist, and so she called him up and she says, we have nothing to do Yeah, I don't know why you guys would say that.
	And they went, oh, really?
	Well, do you know when your organization started?
	Yes, William Casey said that they'd already been caught in too many coups and they needed to set up a fringe organization.
	cut out to do global overthrows and not have it blamed on the CIA.
	So they created the National Endowment for Democracy, and it was signed by Ronnie Reagan, who never saw a government program that he didn't think was freaking wonderful.
	That dirtbag.
	And so bottom line is, here we are now with a multiple, and they were heavily involved, they're the ones that funded through Victoria Nuland, the 2004 color revolution in Ukraine and the 2014 Maidan revolution.
	These people are sick bastards, 100 percent, and you've got to watch this thing because this lady knows nothing about the history of the organization that she represents, and they're just nothing but a bunch of choir boys.
	Get over yourself, lady.
	You're either willfully ignorant or you're just unavoidably ignorant.
	Nice points, Joe.
	Chris?
	Yeah, another thing I'd like to add to Joe's list of acts of terror that they've committed against civilian populations under the guise of the Ukrainian front or whatever.
	The MH-17, the Buc-3 missile thing, for three months they raved on about this was, you know, Russia, Russia, Russia, you know, like almost Jan Brady-ish.
	And at some point in time, You know, I think at like midnight, they finally admitted three months later that, you know, Wolf Blitzer and all these guys, oh, they had to retract the whole three months that they've been running around the town criers convicting Russia of this in the Court of Public Opinions, and find out that it was actually our Ukrainian-backed rebels that had done this, and this is after an international investigation.
	So there's a lot of money that's going into this through NGOs and through these type of fronts and, you know, you guys were just talking about there and Blumenthal and them guys.
	Uh, you know, but really when you look at it, I think it's a lot bigger picture than most people can follow.
	And I think you're even seeing, you know, some of these Intel agencies and their operatives turning on other Intel agencies and their operatives.
	I think it's to mock chaos to some extent.
	I would say that those two gentlemen that Joe mentioned are probably dual Israeli citizens.
	I'm just throwing that out there too.
	So take that with whatever grain you like.
	But, you know, we have a bigger problem and I think that this is the whole parlor trick the gambit between the Judeo Masonic Cabal is that they have these insiders that just sit there and point fingers at each other knowing nothing will ever happen knowing that it's just a get everybody all riled up and, you know, condition helplessness, and I think that
	You know, people may need to see the forest through the trees and some of this stuff and maybe there's no forest or trees here, but I'm just saying, you know, I have to look into this a little more and I would take caution from anything that Blumenthal or Lowenstein or anybody with names like that have to say.
	Yeah, in this case, however, it appears that we're speaking the truth, amazingly enough.
	Yeah, it's a little broken clock, you know, could be.
	I know.
	Meanwhile, YouTube finally do allow evidence concessing the fraudulent 2020 election.
	In a stunning reversal of a policy been in place since November 4th of 2020, the day after the last presidential election, YouTube Google has announced that it will now allow videos questioning whether the 2020 election was stolen.
	Amazing!
	We should not trust this announcement any further than anyone could throw 2024 presidential contender Chris Christie.
	However, at least for the midterm, content creators are suddenly allowed to put as much video evidence as they would like to contest the stolen 2020 election.
	There are two main takeaways we can read of this abrupt policy change.
	Here's what YouTube told Axios before we get to those.
	In a reversal of its election integrity policy, YouTube will leave up content that says fraud, errors, or glitches occurred in the 2020 presidential election and other U.S.
	elections.
	YouTube continued.
	Two years, tens of thousands of video removals, and one election cycle later, we recognized it was time to reevaluate the effects of this policy in today's changed landscape.
	Changed landscape.
	By its own admission, YouTube has removed tens of thousands of videos asserting that fraud, errors, and glitches plagued the 2020 election.
	A sheer volume in terms of gigabytes of evidence YouTube has withheld from the public.
	Since the election suggests all those allegations about said election are true.
	We crowdsourced the 2020 election.
	Everyone who noticed anything, from housewives to data analysts who work for intel agencies, was posting evidence of election fraud online.
	There were some spectacular fakes, like Sidney Powell, and here I must disagree.
	I never regard Sidney as a fake.
	I personally attacked Tucker for ribbing into her.
	But at the end of the day, Tucker was correct.
	Sidney was a fraud who had no real evidence of election fraud.
	Sorry, Tucker.
	When's that Twitter show coming online anyway?
	We all miss you.
	And of course it has, with a vengeance, 60 million views.
	But a lot of the evidence was real.
	It was substantial, authoritative, and impossible to explain aside from fraud.
	Even videos of lawfully appointed authorities.
	Like the special counsel appointed to investigate Wisconsin's dirty election were censored from YouTube at a certain point.
	The lady does protest too much.
	The YouTube policy chain tells us two things.
	First, they don't care if anybody finds out now.
	Even if there were a best case scenario thing to happen right now and the 2020 election were overturned and Trump reinstated, Trump could only serve a year and a half before being term limited out.
	Therefore, YouTube doesn't care if everyone finds out the suspected pedophile who got, laugh out loud, 81 million votes is actually a fake unelected leader.
	Second, Donald Trump is an unstoppable juggernaut in 2024, and the deep state wants to be able to legitimately question election results again after Trump wins.
	Remember, The Deep State, which includes the fake news media, the permanent bureaucratic state in Washington, the intelligence agencies, and almost all of Congress, complained for four years straight the 2016 election was stolen by Trump colluding with Putin.
	There was nothing wrong with protesting the 2016 election.
	It wasn't an insurrection, treason, or a reason to lock anyone in a gulag or censor their YouTube channel if someone complained the 2016 election was stolen.
	It was also perfectly legitimate, right up until late 2019, to question the integrity of our hackable voting machines.
	A lot of leading Democrat Senators and Representatives, up to and including the fake Vice President, not Mrs. Willie Brown, Voting machines are hooked up to the internet and vulnerable to hacking and vote manipulation.
	They said this in a freaking documentary.
	HBO has since taken off the air.
	It only became treason and insurrection to question election results after a dementia potato who never even campaigned somehow got more votes than any other figure in any election throughout human history.
	Anyway, YouTube is going to once again allow videos questioning the fake 2020 election.
	As I've said repeatedly, they cannot cheat using the same methods in 2024, which increases Donald Trump's chances.
	We're going to be watching them like hawks, therefore.
	It's pretty clear you do want us to make it legal to question election results again after the 2024 landslide, that is.
	Fingers crossed, coming.
	What other possible reason could there be for YouTube to suddenly change its policy and allow creators to once again question the 2020 election results?
	Why is it suddenly not disinformation to question the results of that election?
	Joe, your thoughts?
	Yeah, well, first of all, he's got the 22nd Amendment wrong, because if you serve less than two years of a term, then you're allowed to serve two terms.
	So that's a bunch of crap.
	That's the same reason why LBJ, this was the amendment that was passed in 1951.
	LBJ waited until the Kennedy administration had finished two and a half years before they snuffed him because that allowed LBJ to run twice and he was elected in 64 and he could have run again in 68 but then he went ahead and shot MLK and RFK and he had the Gulf of Tonkin he had the USS Liberty.
	So he had so many warts, he knew that he couldn't and couldn't possibly dodge all the bullets.
	So that sack of shit had to leave.
	Now, we've gotten back to the January 6th shit.
	The committee that was hearing that, including the two rhinos and the rest of the Democrats, took recorded congressional tapes, which had no audio, selectively edited the portions they wanted and added audio because they selectively edited the portions they wanted and added audio because they had plenty of audio because Nancy Pelosi's son and daughter, son-in-law and daughter, were recording all over the Capitol and make this into a grand
	So we have that little problem.
	And then we have the U.S.
	Postal Service, after two and a half years of investigation, said, well, yes, actually, one of our postal carriers did pick up 300,000 ballots in New York and did drive them to Pennsylvania.
	So, yes, that particular Conspiracy theory is 100% true.
	And then we have the bribery, we have the hidden laptop for over three years, and we have the FBI witness that says that he has proof that FJB got a $5 million bribe, but the FBI won't release the information on that because it's an ongoing investigation.
	How long does it have to be going on when you have a witness that's been a confidential source for the FBI?
	For over 10 years and he'd paid over six figures and you know he's credible and there's no way you can discredit him and you know what JB did is absolutely criminal.
	And then just one more little tidbit, we have the Koenig.
	Um, voter registration roles that were being altered and and captured by the Chinese over 300 terabytes of information true.
	The vote was able to get information from their website.
	of three terabytes worth of evidence.
	And so they said that it looks like Konek is actually a front for the Chinese and that they're manipulating our elections every way possible.
	And so Konek decided that they would sue through the vote.
	And they managed to get a crooked brawny ray gun apported judge here in Houston to send them to jail for 10 days because they refuted to divulge who their witness was.
	And their witness was also an approved FBI witness and was under protection of the FBI.
	They said, if you want to know, just ask the FBI.
	They can tell you who that guy is, but we're not going to disclose our witness.
	Well, Konek managed...
	They continue to threaten them and so when they got out of jail.
	Fascinating.
	said, here's the three terabytes of data that we have, and the very next day, Konek dropped their lawsuit.
	So now, True the Vote can go against them for false claims, and they're going to be able to go through discovery, and they're going to be able to prove just exactly how rotten our whole entire election system has been for the last 30 years, kids.
	Fascinating.
	Chris?
	I'll just say that if there's anybody that's truly interfering with the electoral process in the United States, it is people that are the dual citizens at CFR and APAC, ADL folk.
	And I'd have to say that the Chinese might be a contingent scapegoat, and they probably did have some sort of meddling or interference going on, just like in 2016 the quote-unquote Russians did.
	That election in 2016 was stolen too, but it was done in the Democratic primary, of course.
	But I mean, nobody talks about that except for the liberals.
	They whip up about that and the Bernie Sanders thing.
	And on the other side, you know, you got the Donald Trump thing and you got these two disenfranchised heroes that are, you know, totally opposite in terms of political offerings and rhetoric and everything, demeanor and character, that are supposedly, you know, I think the sheepdogs for the base.
	I don't know.
	I think Trump is the fallback plan in terms of this group at the top is hemorrhaging credibility.
	The PR firms know it.
	The analytics companies know it.
	The military knows it.
	They know the sentiment of the people.
	They're getting pissed off.
	They're finding out the truth, and they're certainly not impressed with this.
	Very interesting.
	two-party system.
	I think there's going to be a lot of stuff that's going to have to change.
	And I think that's why they're bringing in DeSantis and RFK and Trump and all these people that will definitely cause a lot of divide and conquer go on.
	Very interesting.
	Meanwhile, speaking of Junior, speaking of Junior, over the week, he said that he agrees with the children at Parkland that the NRA is a terrorist organization and that it needs to be removed and people do he said that he agrees with the children at Parkland that the NRA is a So there's your wonderful savior of democracy.
	That guy's an absolute bad along with his global warming stuff.
	And he still won't say that vaccines are bad.
	That one is bad.
	Crazy.
	RFK said the NRA is a terrorist organization?
	Yeah, the Parkland and the David Hogg thing.
	You remember Fight for Your Life thing?
	I know, but I mean, RFK Jr.
	was supporting David Hogg and the Parkland swindle?
	No, I think it was on Twitter he said it.
	He said it on Twitter.
	RFK Jr.
	said this on Twitter.
	Outrageous.
	Just stunning.
	Meanwhile, just to show how ridiculous distorted science can become, this is from the Wisconsin State Journal, an article claiming that Racial bias is built into common medical tests for lung function, likely leading to fewer black patients getting care for breathing problems.
	This is just about as absurd as it gets.
	As many as 40% more black male patients in the study might have been diagnosed with breathing problems if current diagnosis-assisting reader software was changed.
	Doctors have long discussed the potential problems caused by race-based assumptions that are built into diagnostic software.
	This study, published in JAMA—that's the Journal of the AMA Network—opened Offers one of the first real-world examples of how the issue may affect diagnosis and care for long patients.
	The results are exciting to see published, but it's also what we'd expect from setting aside race-based calculation, said Dr. Darsh Ali Vivas, a pulmonary care doctor at Mass General.
	He was the author of an influential 2020 New England Journal of Medicine article cataloging examples of how race-based assumptions are used in making doctor decisions about patient care.
	For centuries, some doctors and mothers have held beliefs that there are natural racial differences in health, including one that black people's lungs were innately worse than those of white people.
	That assumption ended up in modern guidelines and algorithms for assessing risk and deciding on further care.
	Test results were adjusted to account for or correct for a patient's race or ethnicity.
	Frankly, I find this absurd.
	Blacks are, if anything, more athletic than whites.
	Look at the predominance of blacks in the NFL and the NBA.
	I think this is just more nonsense that's supposed to make us think of blacks as victims and give them all of our money and massive reparations and the like.
	Joe, your thoughts?
	Yes, we're all familiar with the DEI program.
	I found a different set of anagrams for that.
	It's Dictatorship, Enabling, and Indoctrination, because that's all this crap is.
	Yeah, they want you to completely feel sorry that every problem that the blacks have is related to the white race, you know?
	And it's like... It's incredible!
	Incredible job!
	Red race, you know, they're no problem at all.
	If we just didn't have any white people, and we've got the head of this, the one of the ladies that's high up in the CDC is a woman from here in Houston.
	I think her last name is Brown, and she said that because the highest hesitancy in vaccines is white people, we just need to exterminate all the white people.
	Yeah, she works at one of the big medical colleges here in Houston, and She's Jewish, so, you know, she knows exactly what the problem is.
	And Jewish people aren't white, kids.
	They're Khazarians, and they're the friends and saviors of all humanity because they're the Chosen People.
	Screw them!
	I think you got it right, Joe.
	Sad to say.
	Chris?
	100% Joe, I agree.
	Yeah, I think that whole diversity, equality and inclusion thing is a carrot and stick.
	It's a moving goalpost.
	It's something that they can just provoke them in terms of imagination and certainly rhetoric.
	Kind of like hope and change.
	Uh you know that's any kind of a of a similar uh type situation where they will fill the blanks with their own imagination.
	They will definitely fill their own history with their own imagination and certainly with the the history that is being pumped in by these these some of these Ivy League schools and these think tanks that are they're really trying to create a a another racial civil war.
	And I think this has been going on for a while, and for a while it didn't make sense in the media, but then when you see it so consistently and happening in such a manufactured way, even BLM and Antifa and the whole thing, and the St.
	Louis stuff 10 years ago, and on and on.
	I mean, it was definitely where they had a selective reporting, a selective accounting, and they definitely had an emotionally charged perspective on each side of that.
	And it was being just funneled in for sensationalism in the media and certainly turned into a social engineering program en masse.
	So, you know, this is all, I guess, the culmination of these things that have been going on for a long time.
	And they seem to do this like every decade or two under a different ethos, pathos, or logos, but it's the same formula.
	It is bizarre in the extreme.
	Meanwhile… It's a top-down dictatorship, because not only did they poison Budweiser, but then they turned around and poisoned Target, and then they poisoned Cole, and then they poisoned Chick-fil-A, and it turns out that If you use any of the credit card systems or you need to use banking for anything in order to expand your businesses, these people will block you if you don't have a high DEI score.
	And so bottom line is, The current head whose parents were wonderful Christians and formed Chick-fil-A and created a debt-free franchise system that's not franchised.
	They own all of their stores and they did an absolute fabulous job of promoting Chick-fil-A, but now they're Second generation has taken over, and they've decided, well, we're going to have to jump through all the hoops that the DEI folks thought, and so now they're going to be facing another boycott, just like the successful boycotts that are going on against Target and Budd.
	Same with climate change and global initiatives.
	You know, that's the same damn thing, Joe.
	It's a shakedown.
	It's another extortion tactic on corporations.
	It's another hidden threat.
	It's a control mechanism.
	Same with the Vax mandate and all that, too.
	Yeah, think about that.
	Oh, yeah.
	Yeah, they wiped out the small business with the pandemic and the lockdown.
	Now they're going after larger businesses.
	I mean, who's going to remain?
	Amazon.com, period?
	The mark of the beast.
	Thanks.
	It's unbelievable.
	Meanwhile, most U.S.
	adults are rejecting the COVID booster shots.
	Thank God.
	A new study has found most American adults are refusing to take any more COVID boosters, and the CDC reports significant differences between the health protection capabilities of those who haven't had the vax versus those who have.
	According to Fox, CDC's latest report examined over 85,000 cases of hospitalization, where patients displayed COVID-like illness across different states.
	Dr. Shanna Johnson, a physician in Scottsdale, Arizona, reviewed the findings and claimed that, while the bivalent mRNA vaccine did ultimately protect against the most harmful outcome, including hospitalization and death, the durability of the protection did not last long.
	Frankly, We've long known that coronavirus can't be treated with a vaccine because it mutates too rapidly.
	The whole thing was a scam from the beginning.
	For adults, the vaccine efficacy dropped from 62% at two months after vax to 24% at four to six months.
	Durability was better for preventing critical disease at 50% four to six months after.
	The study showed the vax was more effective in people with stronger immune systems than in those who are immune-compromised.
	But the vax, you know, is to make you immune-compromised.
	That's the whole purpose of the vax.
	Although CDC admits natural immunity is a strong source of protection, the agency still insists that Vax provides the most protection, which is categorically false.
	The authors note, in fact, it's not offering you any protection at all.
	It's doing you massive harm.
	Author's note, since a large portion of the pop has experienced COVID, they have some level of protection from natural immunity.
	But the vax provides additional benefits, said Johnson.
	Natural immunity confers a benefit, but the vax provides broader coverage protecting against more variants.
	I guarantee you 100% that's bullshit.
	The data support updated recommendation allowing additional optimal COVID doses for high-risk populations.
	All eligible persons should stay up to date with recommended facts, says the CDC, which of course is a PR operation for the big pharma.
	As of May 2023, however, only about 20% of adults who took the vax originally got a booster.
	Most of that 20% received their last vax dose over a year ago.
	Uptake has been quite low, said Dr. Mark Siegel, a professor of medicine at New York University Medical Center and a Fox contributor.
	It makes complete sense for adults, especially those in the high-risk groups, including the elderly and those with chronic disease, to have a bivalent shot if they already haven't had one, unless they understand that it's going to bring about their death.
	It's just a terrible, terrible thing.
	I cannot stand this kind of pseudoscientific bullshit, Joe.
	Yes, well there's a great interview with Greg Hunter, who has Watchdog USA site, hour-long, with Karen Kingston, who's one of the real experts on this particular stuff.
	And she goes into the complete history of this bioweapons shit, the same thing that David Martin did in his 20-minute dissertation to the European Union.
	Absolutely fabulous material.
	And then let's see...
	Quick to the next subject with Chris, because I had something else that I was going to mention and I've lost my notes.
	Chris has lost contact temporarily, but we'll move forward.
	Washington Post article accuses bigoted right-wing extremists of inciting anti-democracy target boycott.
	How can a boycott be anti-democratic?
	That's just voting with your pocketbook.
	The Washington Post is receiving pushback for publishing an article painting conservatives who support the Target boycott as extremists and opponents of democracy.
	The article they published, Target Gets Caught in Cultural Crossfire Over Pride Month Items, about supposed right-wing extremism stemming from a retail boycott, begins with an account of a female customer allegedly upset because Target was carrying Pride Month merchandise.
	The woman reported using her own scissors to cut her Target credit card in front of the guest services in South Florida.
	Informed employees, I'm never shopping here again.
	Good for her.
	The manager said there were tense encounters with workers who reported over LGBTQ plus items, ticked off customers, allegedly accused target of shoving your woke agenda down our throats, and employees were reportedly called child groomers.
	The article touched on bomb threats targeting several Target stores in multiple states.
	However, local news said the bomb threats were made by a person who claimed to be angry Target was cowardly for turning its back on the LGBTQ community and decided to cater to the homophobic right-wing redneck bigots who protested and vandalized their store.
	The article, written by a retail reporter and business reporter, noted Target decided to pull some items because of the backlash.
	Queer and transgender designers blame domestic terrorists for Target taking their controversial products off the shelf.
	The article painted the Target boycott with a broad brush that conservatives were upset that the national retail chain was selling LGBTQ merchandise.
	However, the article did not mention the boycott really took off after it was revealed the big box chain was selling tuck-friendly bathing suits, LGBTQ onesies for babies, and products From a transgender designer promoting Satanism, violence, and drug use.
	Though Pride Month and other inclusivity initiatives have been around for years, they've increasingly become litmus tests for consumers, forcing companies to fully commit on social issues or yield to critics.
	Target, one of the largest American general merchandise retailers, said it has offered products celebrating Pride Month for more than a decade.
	The article cited experts on extremism—those are just Democrat talking heads and propaganda promoters being designated as experts on extremism—to point the finger at right-wing influencers for inciting an anti-democracy movement.
	Lindsey Schreiber, who studies violent movements for the anti-extreme watchdog Western State Center, told the Washington Post, It's not like any of this is all that unpredictable.
	We don't always know exactly where the sort of anti-democracy actors are going to point next with the increase in threats and harassment.
	from anti-democracy movements in the U.S.
	has become so frequent that it's something that absolutely needs to be planned for.
	He claimed bigoted and anti-democracy groups will attempt various boycott tactics to see what will stick, but I think that's a gross misdescription of the situation.
	Sarah Kate Ellis, president and chief executive of the LGBTQ media advocacy group GLAAD, said as soon as you cede ground to extremists, you give them more permission.
	Ellis claimed Republican lawmakers like Marjorie Taylor Greene demonize the LGBTQ community.
	The WaPo article stated, according to experts on extremism, the boycotts, the threats, and harassment are part of a diffuse but focused campaign that's been played by influential conservatives exploiting TikTok and wide-ring media, all of which is just ridiculous.
	It's parents, ordinary Americans, who don't like having this gay shit stuffed down their throat.
	The article named conservative commentator Matt Walsh as an anti-LGBTQ rabble rouser who stirs up boycotts against woke companies, which is just silly in the extreme.
	A sizable number of Twitter reactions to the post article left out the accusation that the boycott was based on extremism of any kind.
	The person explained, Today in the narrative, if you stop shopping at places that endorse child sex change, you're an extremist.
	One Twitter user said, Parents not worrying their children being exposed to a satanic sex cult while they're shopping at Target is not an example of extremism.
	Real extremism offering LGBTQ themed onesies for daisies.
	Another stated, You're calling a normal and fairly muted response to a corporate sponsored upheaval in our social norms extremism.
	Target has lost billions in market value since the boycott began.
	The retailer's stock is down 14%.
	Joe, your thoughts?
	Yes, well, you reap what you sow.
	When you don't have any idea what your customer base is and you decide that you can dictate social mores to the entire nation, regardless of what the social mores have been for the last 200 years and the vast majority of the people feel, then you are going to reap the whirlwind and you deserve it.
	And the horrible thing for these people is they've gotten in the Uncle Rima's and Burr Rabbit's situation of fighting the Tar Baby, because not only did they piss off the 99% of the people that are straight and family-oriented, but they also pissed off the 3% or 2%, whatever it is, or the LBGTQXYZ folks, because now they've caved, and so now those people are boycotting them.
	So they're in a lose-lose situation, and for them to turn around and Cleed that they're being picked on by these terrible groups of terrorists nationwide kind of reminds me of the Mendeza Mendeza brothers out in Los Angeles in August of 1989.
	Lyle and Eric had lived with mommy and daddy their whole lives and they'd gone to college and mommy and daddy said well look it's time for you guys to leave the nest and we're gonna you know give you a multi-million dollar settlement when mom and I finish traveling and retire.
	And the kids said, well, we don't want to have to go to work, and we're afraid that you're going to cut us out of the will.
	So they got out their 12-gauge shotgun.
	They shot Daddy six times.
	They shot Mommy ten times.
	And then when they were tried, they pled to the jury, have mercy on us because we're orphans.
	It's just so absurd, Joe.
	It's just so absurd.
	This whole thing is stupid bullshit, and anybody that puts up with it is irredeemable.
	It's time that people stood up, and I'm so glad that—I wish there was more people standing in front of Target with signs protesting them.
	But it's nice that there's people that are protesting with their feet and going the other direction.
	But we could be more democratic than, you know.
	They're politicizing retail.
	I mean, how pathetic is that?
	Why should they do that?
	We've had this intrusion in sports.
	We're sick of politics.
	We're sick of this, all this sex change business.
	It's ridiculous.
	Nobody has done more to explain what's going on than the daily Wires!
	Controversial!
	What is a woman documentary?
	I cannot praise this film highly enough.
	In a whirlwind 24-hour period.
	The Daily Wire faced unexpected challenges and triumphs surrounding its documentary, What Is A Woman, on Twitter.
	Initially, some in the platform attempted to sabotage the film's visibility, leaving a restriction being placed due to alleged misgendering.
	However, thanks to the intervention of Elon Musk, who has a significant following and, of course, is the owner, the film received a tremendous boost and garnered attention from millions.
	Co-CEO Jeremy Boren expressed gratitude to those who support the cause of free speech during this tumultuous period.
	He acknowledged both Elon Musk and Twitter, rectifying the situation, allowing the documentary to continue being available on the platform for the weekend.
	Boring even humorously references Streisand effect, where attempts to suppress information inadvertently lead to its wider dissemination.
	The groundbreaking documentary featuring Matt Walsh explores the radical transgender craze and seeks to foster a meaningful conversation on the topic.
	It succeeds beyond your wildest imagination.
	By posting it on Twitter for free, The Wire aimed to mark the one-year anniversary of its release and engage in an open dialogue.
	However, the platform initially labeled it as hateful contact due to alleged instances of misgendering.
	Fortunately, Twitter removed the tag and restored the film's visibility.
	Enabling users to like, retweet, and engage with it freely.
	Elon Musk, a prominent figure on Twitter, to put it mildly, became a significant advocate.
	He not only acknowledged the mistake of Twitter, but has encouraged a substantial following to watch the film, highlighting its relevance to every parent.
	His endorsement exponentially amplified the reach and impact, turning it into a viral sensation.
	The Daily Wire tweet featuring the film garnered an astonishing 65 million views in less than 24 hours.
	It's over 200 million views at this point in time.
	This episode serves as a testament to the power of free speech and the unintended consequences that can arise when attempts are made to suppress certain viewpoints.
	Despite initial obstacles, the film makes it transcend its limitation and spark important conversation about gender and identity.
	It is a reminder of the critical role that platforms like Twitter play in facilitating diverse perspectives and allowing open dialogue on complex issues.
	By embracing a conservative perspective that champions free speech and exchange of ideas, we can continue to foster meaningful conversation and drive our society forward.
	Meanwhile, the Babylon Bee Damning leak reveals Matt Walsh knew what a woman was this whole time.
	Nashville.
	A damning leak from the hacked emails that conservative commentator Matt Walsh has revealed that in spite of the question posed by his documentary, What Is A Woman?, he has actually known what a woman was this entire time.
	Stunning.
	Disgusting.
	Rank apostrophe, said rank transgender former journalist Brian Stelter.
	We all knew Walsh wasn't who he claimed to be, but now we have proof.
	Daily Wire CEO Jeremy Boring also expressed disappointment at the news.
	I dumped millions into Matt's documentary to discover the answer to this question.
	And it turned out he knew the answer this whole time!
	I feel betrayed!
	On top of that, I also found out he's still subscribed to Harry's Razors.
	I feel like I don't even know him.
	Authorities say they're still searching for the alleged hacker and warning people not to share the leaked emails as it could radicalize whoever reads them against gender ideology.
	At publishing time, Things have gotten worse for Walsh after someone posted the entirety of his Cowboy Bebop fanfic online.
	Here we have, by the way, just a bit of it.
	I mean, this is just so wonderful, I can't begin to tell you how much I like it.
	It may be hard to play, but, by God, it's wonderful.
	Here's a warning.
	The program contained discussion of transgenderism, gender dysphoria, and gender reassignment surgery.
	Some viewers may find the content and imagery disturbing.
	Your discretion is advised.
	It's just wonderful.
	Joe, your thoughts?
	Yeah, so I didn't... When he started off, we talked to that I don't know.
	I'm just pretending to be a woman.
	and kept asking questions about what was a woman.
	And finally, the transgender therapist said, well, I don't know.
	I'm just pretending to be a woman.
	I actually have a Winky.
	So it was like, at that point, it was like, I don't need to watch any more of this.
	But it's interesting that you can live in a society where you have most likely a mother, two grandmothers, several aunts, female cousins, nieces, nephews, Daughters, wives, sisters, and you're not able to tell that there's a difference between one gender and the other.
	How screwed up of a human being do you have to be to be in that kind of condition?
	That's item number one.
	Item number two, over the weekend I had a great time.
	I went to Austin to the Long Center, which is a 2,500-seat concert hall right across the river from City Hall and the Bat Bridge on Lake Travis, which used to be called Town Lake.
	Now they call it Lady Bird, but I refuse to use that term because I despise the whole LBJ cult.
	But anyhow, they had the Great Awakening And it was about two hour, almost two hour long movie, and it did a whole lot of discovery on the
	It's pervasive nature of communism and how we're being taken over by communists and that the COVID thing, which was done by the same producer, Mickey Willis, the same particular group, he did a pandemic movie one and two, but as he was filming this one, he goes, we've got a more fundamental problem than just the vaccine issue.
	We've got something that is going to absolutely kill all of society if we don't stop it.
	He managed to focus on the worldwide communism and what they're doing to our country and the rest of the world.
	So, very interesting movie.
	Joe, you really deprived yourself of a treat.
	This is so balanced, it's so even-handed, and it's so devastating to the transgender movement.
	You really need to watch the whole thing.
	I cannot encourage anyone strongly enough.
	I would even encourage you to watch it twice.
	It is sensational.
	Incredible.
	Matt Walsh's What Is A Woman hits 165.4 million views on Twitter, as I say.
	million views on Twitter, as I say, it's over 200 million today.
	After a chaotic day and a half of suppression and pre-sweech victories, the groundbreaking What Is A Woman documentary has reached over 165 million views as of Sunday at 7:00 PM.
	Numbers will continue to rise as Daily Wire is left of him free to view in the platform.
	Matt Walsh, Daily Wire podcaster and star of the film, shared on Saturday that in addition to 110 million views, the movie had 120,000 retweets, figures he described as incredible.
	I am among them.
	It's a movie they really don't want you to see.
	What is a woman?
	Watch the explosive documentary starring Matt Walsh blog, free on Twitter.
	Earliest morning, the Nashville-based Daily Wire announced a movie they really don't want you to see had officially hit 100 million views.
	The milestone came hours after their Friday night update shared that the film had amassed over 78 million within 24 hours.
	With this number, they decide to leave it up.
	The rapid spread followed Walsh's cinematic expose of gender ideology being suppressed by Twitter executives, a decision which, according to owner Elon Musk, was a mistake.
	The temporary censorship occurred after the Daily Wire reached an agreement with a platform to stream the film for free in honor of its one-year anniversary.
	Twitter reported backing out of the deal to certain scenes which featured characters misgendering others.
	But it's all part of the give and take of the film.
	Explain what the hell is going on.
	It's essential to the theme.
	Musk later resolved the issue and promoted the film on his own Twitter page, criticizing child mutilation, saying every parent should watch a documentary.
	It's now a pinned tweet on his account.
	Absolutely every parent should watch.
	Joe, since you haven't seen it, let me go ahead and add, though, one additional story I think we have today to wit.
	Megan Kelly tears up, vows to no longer use preferred pronouns.
	In a recent segment on her podcast, Megyn Kelly explained why she's changed her mind about the trans agenda and will no longer use preferred pronouns.
	She explained how she used to feel about the issue and didn't think it was a big deal.
	Now, we've moved beyond the slippery slope in many ways and Kelly is rejecting it.
	She talks about how important it is for girls and women to have their own space.
	Megyn Kelly.
	I, for one, will not be celebrating this dishonesty.
	In fact, I'm in a very different place when it comes to this entire issue.
	And that's the subject of today's opening—why I'm done with preferred pronouns.
	I was an early proponent of using preferred pronouns as far back as the early 2000s, saying she when I knew the truth was he.
	It seemed harmless.
	I had no wish to cause offense.
	Trans people were tortured enough, it seemed to me, by nature of their dysphoria and society's disdain for them in general.
	So I comply.
	I went along with it.
	I didn't see the harm.
	By 2016, we're debating bills to stop trans access to certain bathrooms, which I covered from the news desk, siding with the trans community.
	How does it affect our lives as women if, here or there, a trans person uses a stall in our bathroom?
	These people aren't bothering anyone.
	Why wouldn't we accommodate them?
	I didn't see the harm.
	In 2018, while at NBC, I hosted shows on trans people, one of which had a segment on trans kids.
	I led the audience in cheering for them, encouraging them to own who they are.
	I use approved terms like gender-affirming care or medicinal gender manipulation.
	Cis refer to naturally born women and men, assigned male at birth instead of born male.
	I smiled and listened politely as a guest told me, gender is just a social construct.
	At one point in her monologue, Megham teared up as she spoke about the pain women feel this society pushes this ideology on them.
	Watch the video.
	Check it out.
	It is June 2nd, and that means it is officially Pride Month, where we will be subjected to non-stop celebrations of a group, gays and lesbians, that has had equal rights and political power in the United States for quite some time now.
	Okay?
	As author and gay rights activist Bruce Bauer writes in Thursday's New York Post, quote, "We've won equality.
	Why should gays continue to be singled out, even for the purpose of being celebrated?
	Being gay is an attribute, not an accomplishment." Nonetheless, American corporations must show the citizenry how progressive they are and so taste the rainbow.
	We also have a month of this kind of imagery coming our way, boldly celebrating the TQ portion of the LGBTQ crowd.
	Look at this.
	Look at this.
	A pregnant woman who purports to call herself a man, complete with facial hair, on the cover of Glamour UK.
	She says giving birth made her very dysphoric.
	That will happen when you're calling yourself a man by giving birth to a baby, to the point where she demanded a c-section.
	I for one will not be celebrating this dishonesty.
	In fact, I'm in a very different place when it comes to this entire issue.
	And that is the subject of today's opening.
	Why I'm done with preferred pronouns.
	I was an early proponent of using preferred pronouns as far back as the early 2000s.
	Of saying she when I knew the truth was he.
	It seemed harmless and I had no wish to cause offense.
	Trans people were tortured enough, it seemed to me, by nature of their dysphoria and society's disdain for them in general.
	So I complied.
	I went along with it.
	I didn't see the harm.
	By 2016, we were debating bills to stop trans access to certain bathrooms, which I covered from the news desk, siding with the trans community.
	How does it affect our lives as women if here or there a trans person uses a stall in our bathroom?
	These people aren't bothering anyone.
	Why wouldn't we accommodate them?
	I didn't see the harm.
	In 2018, while at NBC, I hosted shows on trans people, one of which had a segment on trans kids.
	I led the audience in cheering for them, encouraging them to own who they are.
	I used approved terms like gender-affirming care for medicinal gender manipulations, cis to refer to natural-born women and men, assigned male at birth instead of born male.
	I smiled and listened politely as a guest told me, gender is just a social construct.
	I wanted to be supportive of those who were suffering.
	I would use this more evolved language.
	I didn't see the harm.
	By the time we began the Megyn Kelly Show podcast in September 2020, the warning signs were everywhere.
	Abigail Schreier had written her beautiful and immensely important book, Irreversible Damage, documenting the social contagion sweeping teenage and adolescent girls, a group that traditionally had very few members claiming gender dysphoria, but was quickly on its way to having more than any other.
	Teenage girls in Connecticut were losing on the track to males.
	Runners who had raced as boys the year before then simply declared themselves female and dominated their new competitors.
	I had the female runners on the show, along with a trans medical physicist who was also a former athlete, to explain the advantages to trans athletes, especially post-puberty.
	When I slipped and said the trans girls were biological males, this person told me that was offensive.
	I explained that it was an attempt at clarity, but began to rethink the language policing.
	Why did I have to deny reality in order to be polite?
	What I said was true and not offered to offend, but I wanted to be respectful.
	Was there any harm?
	The Connecticut girls sued and went on to lose their case.
	It's now on appeal.
	And girl after girl across this country soon faced the same problem.
	Competing against boys who claimed they were trans was dejecting and often near impossible.
	They were too strong, too big, too fast, too agile.
	From wingspan, to femur length, to lung capacity, heart size, and musculature, they had serious advantages, even with testosterone adjustment, which few competitions required in the first place.
	American schools, including our own in New York City, began pushing the idea on children that gender is as malleable as a dinner menu order.
	Our son and his third grade classmates were regularly asked if they were sure they were still boys.
	Later, this and other schools moved away from the terms boys and girls altogether.
	Now parents pick up their students at day's end, not their sons or daughters.
	Kids telling teachers they were uncomfortable in their bodies were immediately affirmed as trans, despite the fact that upwards of 90% of kids will grow out of these feelings if only they are allowed to do so.
	Schools worked to facilitate children's transition in the classroom, complete with name and wardrobe changes, while implementing policies to keep it secret from the parents.
	The children had to be protected from those who loved them most.
	We pulled our children out, fleeing the woke ideology on gender and race that seemed closer to abuse than academics.
	We moved to Connecticut in 2021, and that was the year the floodgates really opened.
	Hardly a day went by over the next two years without another story in the news of the trans madness sweeping the nation.
	Female inmates being raped by male sex offenders who had conveniently declared themselves trans right before heading to prison.
	Female cyclists losing titles to grown men who declared themselves trans and absconded with the prize money.
	Professional psychiatric associations adopting gender-confirming care as the only acceptable option for children suffering any hint of gender confusion.
	A boy in a dress sexually assaulting a girl in a Virginia school bathroom while administrators covered it up.
	A teenage volleyball player severely injured by a trans player who spiked the ball so hard, the girl suffered permanent damage.
	Hospitals bragging about how much cash they were making on cross-gender procedures, including on teenagers.
	Pictures online of young women's gutted forearms, where flesh was harvested to build a grotesque, phony phallus that no one would ever mistake for an actual male sex organ.
	High schoolers celebrating top surgery, in which their breasts were amputated before their 16th birthday, forever eliminating their ability to breastfeed.
	Kids pumped full of puberty blockers and then cross-sex hormones rendered sterile and incapable of ever reaching sexual climax.
	All while their parents and doctors maintained this was all by informed consent.
	One by one we met the detransitioners.
	Those brave enough to admit their gender changes had been a mistake.
	Kids who were just unhappy, anxious, or perhaps on the autism spectrum had been rushed to transition by a system that seemed more about a political agenda than about addressing the patient's mental health.
	These voices were promptly ignored or shamed by the very same community that had love-bombed them to begin with, earlier touting surgery, hormones, and the trans lifestyle as a kind of panacea.
	And then came Leah Thomas.
	An obvious male, towering over his female competitors, crushing them in the pool by several body lengths.
	The spectacle of this swimmer, ranked in the mid-500s as a male, annihilating women in race after race, heading to the NCAA Finals, where he emerged a champion, was for many of us, the last straw.
	The University of Pennsylvania female teammates, who quietly objected, were told they should seek therapy.
	Forced to share a locker room with an intact male whose social media posts, according to the Daily Wire, suggest he becomes sexually aroused by dressing like a woman, a common fetish among male-to-female trans people, the female swimmers were told, deal with it.
	Every instinctual alarm that went off about the dangers of sharing this vulnerable space with a man was stifled and rejected as bigoted by administrators who would never have to face these circumstances themselves.
	A few of the co-eds spoke anonymously in the press, revealing their distress over these events, but saying they feared losing future employment if they failed to keep their mouths shut.
	Riley Gaines stayed silent, too, at first.
	Gaines, who like all female swimmers, had a lifetime of training as a girl.
	The swims when your breasts are developing and changing the way your arms and torso move.
	Your hips are expanding and affecting your balance and speed.
	Your first period is coming but you don't know when and you worry about an embarrassing moment in the pool.
	The moments when you're so bloated you look and feel 10 pounds heavier in your lower abdomen and dealing with menstrual cramps that no medication can assuage.
	But you dive in anyway and give it a go.
	Gaines undoubtedly had all of those moments.
	While the 6'1", Leah Thomas, who one year earlier was swimming as Will, had none, having lived his 20 years as a man.
	Now that man was a women's team champion, regularly in the press bragging about how much it meant to him to crush his female competitors.
	When Gaines tied Thomas for fifth place at the NCAA Championships, she said nothing publicly.
	When officials wanted Thomas, not Gaines, to hold the trophy for the picture, Gaines smiled for the cameras.
	But something was shifting under the pool that afternoon because Riley Gaines would not stay silent for long.
	A few weeks later, she found her voice, speaking out respectfully about the unfairness of it all.
	And when she did, she was attacked.
	Physically assaulted by a trans activist on a college campus.
	Threatened and shouted down.
	Mocked for her tears and forced by an angry mob into a back room after speaking to students.
	Security too intimidated by the vicious mob to stand up to them.
	And she was not the only one.
	Kelly J. Keene, a five-foot-one English mother of four and devoted advocate for women's rights, who came on this show recently and spoke truth so plainly, it moved me profoundly, has been repeatedly targeted.
	In March, she was doused in tomato juice as a mob moved in, yelling, F-U, you C-word, prepared to cause her physical harm rather than let her speak in New Zealand.
	Had she not been rushed out by police, she clearly would have been brutalized.
	And there I was, along with millions of others, watching and learning and finally seeing it.
	There is the harm.
	There's the harm.
	There's the harm.
	It is beyond time to stand up to the trans lobby that means to deprive women of their spaces and rights.
	To the men who pose as trans women to gain access to places like sorority houses only to exploit the women who'd been strong-armed into welcoming them.
	To the men who grow their hair long, throw on a dress, pop on their TikTok filter, and then threaten to kill us if we object to them coming into our private spaces.
	To the mutilation of our children by money-driven doctors, and the rape of our imprisoned sisters, and the theft of our medals and opportunities to win?
	How can we stand up to any of this if we are complicit?
	How can we fight for facts if we participate in this fiction that a man can become a woman?
	That transitioning is possible?
	And then we try to say, no, she cannot come into our locker rooms or bathrooms or swimming lanes or sororities.
	We tried to say, no, Target, she can buy her bathing suit with the extra fabric to hide her penis in some other store.
	It doesn't make sense.
	Because it isn't true.
	And we know it's not true.
	And to pretend that it is true is to foster a lie that is hurting too many people, almost all of them girls.
	Women and girls.
	They say pronouns are a gateway drug.
	They open the door to these lies that lead to real harm to real females.
	They are a clever rhetorical trick that forces you to cede the argument about women's spaces before you've ever even spoken one word of substance.
	People with genuine gender dysphoria can lobby to create their own spaces.
	I will support them.
	To create open categories in sport.
	I will support them.
	The answer in the interim is not, women lose.
	Girls get hurt.
	Females learn to turn off their innate sense of danger, of fairness, of the joy of spending time with only women.
	Kids, too, can grow to adulthood and do what they want with their bodies.
	I will have empathy for them.
	I would never bully them.
	But children should not be subjected to these dangerous interventions in school or at the hands of so-called medical professionals.
	The facilities that allow it must be stopped or shut down.
	For these reasons, I have resolved to base my conversations around gender on the same tenets that already govern my life, truth and reality.
	I will not use preferred pronouns, a decision motivated by a growing alarm over women's rights and the safety of children.
	I will speak to a trans person kindly and with empathy.
	In their presence, I will likely try to avoid pronouns altogether, as I have no wish to intentionally provoke or upset anyone.
	But I will not take this gateway drug anymore.
	Because I have a daughter.
	Because I am a woman.
	An adult human female.
	Because for far too long, I failed to see the harm and therefore helped cause it.
	To the women and men who helped open my eyes, thank you.
	And I will single out one in particular.
	Ireland's Bran Dove, who at 14 years old wrote the poem, I Am Not a Dress, which perfectly captures what so many of us are feeling.
	I am not a dress to be worn on a whim.
	A man in a dress is nonetheless a him.
	Women are not simply what we wear.
	If this offends you, I do not care.
	I am not an idea in any man's mind.
	And my purpose in life is not to be kind.
	So while my rights are trampled every day of the week, I will not stand by being docile and meek.
	We are women.
	We are warriors of steel.
	Woman is something no man will ever feel.
	Woman is not a skill that any man can hone.
	Woman is our word, and it is ours alone.
	I gotta tell you, Joe, that has to be Megyn Kelly's finest moment.
	Look, she's not a rocket scientist, she's not fantastic in any way, but she has thought it through, and I think this is a marvelous statement.
	I never watched it before.
	The more she said, the more I liked sharing it with the rest of the world.
	I know.
	You've already thought this issue through.
	But I wanted for our audience to have that opportunity to hear her words about this, which strike me as so true.
	Your thoughts?
	Yeah, really good rebuttal.
	No man is going to ever ovulate, menstruate, gestate, or lactate.
	Get over it.
	It's a complete, biologically different system, and you have no right to Appropriated.
	You know, we complain about appropriating cultures.
	Well, this is the biggest part of culture you can appropriate.
	Half the human population, you're going to take their gender away from.
	Absolutely insane.
	And getting back to what would be the motives for this crap, well, here's a study that's at the John Hopkins Public Health EDU site.
	Study, paying for transgender health care is cost effective.
	Yeah, in determining cost-effective medical services, policymakers, yeah, we love those people, consider something cost-effective if it's below $100,000 per year.
	In the first five years, researchers found that providing health care For transgender people, it costs between $34,000 and $43,000 per year for quality of life.
	After 10 years, that cost dropped to $7,000 to $10,000 per year.
	So you wonder why the medical establishment is promoting this?
	It's just another money grip for them.
	Absolutely insane.
	And if you think paying $43,000 a year In medical costs, to pretend that you're something you're never going to be is cost justifiable?
	You're as insane as anybody on the planet.
	Those are great points.
	Yes, there's a financial motive behind all of these programs and agendas, just as there was behind the VACs.
	The hospitals got big bucks for classifying patients as COVID.
	They got more money putting them on ventilators.
	They got max if they had patients who died and attributed it to the VACs.
	This is outrageous.
	If they want to introduce three categories of sports, men's sports, women's sports, and trans sports, that's okay with me.
	And you watch how the enthusiasm for going tranny just diminishes stunningly, dropping like a rock.
	Meanwhile...
	We want to hear from you.
	Send fan mail, broercon, to live-need-to-know-at-gmail.com.
	Live-need-to-know-at-gmail.com.
	How sad is it when your own government declares war on its citizenry?
	How sad and tragic is our own U.S.
	government has been hijacked by the RKM-COL money changers That's the Kazarian Moth Child, Rothschild Kazarian Moth Child, is now activating operations to destroy America's small business, the economy, and disable or mass murder many, if not all, of us?
	It began with the stage wars going back to World War I and the perpetual wars since.
	The exportation of U.S.
	industry to communist-controlled China and other nations continue with the deployment of the pentagram-controlled CV, and the jabs, and the staged serious action by the U.S.
	government to destroy small business, the U.S.
	economy, trucking, farming, and every major formerly successful U.S.
	industry.
	Yes!
	The U.S.
	government is secretly deploying a war against its citizen and seem to be doing everything it can to destroy America, disable us, and mass murder many.
	Final thoughts.
	Joe, yours.
	Yes.
	Well, one of the guys I follow religiously on BitChute is Max Egan, whose website on BitChute is CrowHouse.
	And he's originally from Australia.
	He was a musician.
	He's been outside the norm in thinking and behavior for his whole life.
	And he had to flee Australia because they were trying to frame him for a gun crime.
	And so he's been living for the last two years in Acapulco with limited travel capabilities because he refused to get jabbed.
	So anyhow, he announced on his website that he was going to be in Houston for an event this weekend.
	And I went, Oh my God, I finally get to shake hands with the man.
	He's at an event called the Antiquitech cycles of destruction.
	And it's an eight hour long program.
	One of the presenters is a guy named Martin Ludeke, who I think is from England.
	And he's one of the ones that's the English Flat Earth Society.
	I got no use for flat earthers at all.
	The other guy is a guy named Jason Brashears, uh, who has a website that's called Archie, Archie A-R-C-H-A-I-X, Archie X, and he's with the, uh, Ancient civilization stuff, which I followed quite a bit with Graham Hancock.
	I haven't been able to research enough of his stuff to find out if he's genuine or not, but chance to see Max Egan in person, $80, and see two other guys that I might not want to see that much of.
	You know, I'm okay with it.
	You don't get to meet people that you really enjoy listening to and researching with on a regular basis.
	And who knows, there's a potential that Max and I could actually strike up a good conversation sometime in the future.
	So, that's what I've got for my weekend plan.
	Last weekend in Austin was absolutely fabulous.
	Once again, I want to highly recommend The Great Awakening movie, and it's a fabulous movie.
	Well, Joe, I can't thank you enough.
	Chris, too, of course, for his comments.
	I'm hoping he didn't have an automobile accident while he was on the air.
	I shall verify as soon as we conclude our program today.
	I want to reiterate, you've got to watch What Is A Woman all the way through.
	Even watch it twice.
	It is so well done.
	It's a masterpiece, in my opinion.
	What is a woman is just as important to American culture today as Stanley Kubrick's Dr. Strangelove is to the world in terms of its history with regard to the threat of nuclear war.
	And because of the Ukrainian Because of the fight over Ukraine, which is a massive titanic battle between good and evil, Russia must prevail.
	Russia is winning, but the United States and NATO may turn it into a nuclear event, which is going to lead to 100 million dead in the first hour, ultimately at least 200 million, possibly vastly more.
	For that reason, I encourage you, again, spend as much time as you can with your family, your friends, the people you love and care about.
	Literally, we do not know how much time we have left.

▲