All Episodes
Previous Next
May 23, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:06:50
Need to Know News (23 May 2023) with Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Brian Davidson in Houston, Texas.
Owen Stevens, who's just moved to Rochester, is unable to join us today.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
We begin with a dangerous depleted uranium cloud Moving into Poland.
This is very serious.
After an ammo dump that contained depleted uranium warheads was destroyed by the Russians, Dr. Christopher Busby, renowned British nuclear expert, confirmed that a cloud load with depleted uranium is moving west following the bombing of an ammo depot based on this nuclear material that took place on the 13th of May.
The analysis of the physicist, former consultant of the Ministry of Defense of the United Kingdom, follows.
Busby also, chemical physicist, scientific secretary of the European Committee on Radiation, confirmed what was announced by the secretary of the Russian Security Council.
But he did so on the basis of data from a radioactivity monitoring station located in Poland, after Warsaw authorities had denied that there was a problem.
It was suggested that an arms depot that had been hit contained the depleted uranium weapons, anti-tank weapons, sent by the UK to Ukraine.
Since I'm a scientific authority on uranium and its health effects, but have also examined its dispersion and behavior in the environment, I will comment on what I believe happened and why it is important.
This is Busby, of course.
I was a member of the UK Department of Ministry of Defense Depleted Uranium Oversight Board, 2000-2005.
The UK Government Committee Examining Radiation Risk, 2000-2004.
I'm Scientific Secretary of the European Committee on Radiation Risk, which is an independent non-government organization providing on risk from ionizing radiation.
Uranium is far more harmful as a respirable poison than it is powerful alpha rays over a short range than as a diffuser of long range with very weak gamma rays, even if perfectly detectable by instruments.
There is, of course, a health problem if the post-impact particles are inhaled and passed into the body, through the lungs, into the infantic system, or directly into the digestive.
But essentially, DU is harmless.
He undermines how much this fact, much censored, makes his airborne dispersal, to say the least, worrying for everyone's future health.
Whether more or powerful, there are no bodyguards to protect the lungs from radiotoxic and non-radiotoxic nanoparticles.
I'm a yachtsman.
Examination of the UK meteorological weather pressure map tells us at the time and days thereafter there was an anti-cyclone to the north of the explosion site.
Winds were weak but from the southeast blowing northwesterly around the high-pressure area.
So the plume would move toward Poland.
If the winds were about five kilometers an hour, they'd reach Poland detectors 250 miles away on the 15th.
The arrival of the depleted cloud was witnessed by a very unusual increase in radioactivity in the area found in Lublin on May 15th, precisely in conjunction with the transit of the gigantic and heavy cloud as black as uranium produced during the explosion.
Luckily, there are some location maps.
Some had been already downloaded before the system stopped working.
What we see is a massive explosion.
Thought to be DU.
Reports of a spike in gamma radiation near the site.
Uranium oxide is black.
The black blue moves northwest slowly.
Weather pattern stable.
The wind blows into Poland.
The polls measured the increase at the Madame Curie Institute in Lublin, but their map was a more sophisticated one and needed some expert interpretation.
Other detectors all across Poland also showed an increase.
Here you see the radioactivity increase spiking on the right side of the graph, of course.
The scientists refuted the hasty but soothing interpretation of a natural origin of this radioactive upsurge.
Not without knowing that it's customary to turn off the detectors whenever it becomes politically incorrect.
To alert the public of a radiological danger only Geiger counters can perceive.
Busby finally remarks the European Radioactivity Signaling Service was malfunctioning.
After Chernobyl, the EU set up a Euro-wide gamma radiation detector system that used to give gamma readings in real time.
I went to look, but astonishingly, all the data was blocked.
The web-based system administered from Germany would not provide the detector maps that are normally available.
Once again now, service has been restored.
The previously published data appears to have been modified on purpose as if there were something to hide.
Taking Busbee's warning lightly and branding it as pure propaganda instead of urging authorities to transparency of data could prove to be a dramatic term, including for the censors.
We can exclude the explosion was generated by an atomic detonation because any explosion of that type carries a blue more than 8 kilometers.
With one kilometer to infinitely small power, 1,000 billion curies are generated, starting from an excess dose found in Lublin, but also on the site in Chemensky.
In a jargon of 30 NSV, everyone can deduce, according to physical law, that in theory about 170 milligrams of depleted uranium per cubic meter ...would have passed through them with a radioactivity associated with 6,700 Bq per meter squared.
It is the imperative amount to induce this mysterious dosage.
Starting from the excess, even if they do not cross the alert threshold and are officially considered up to the standard, they'd be resolutely abnormal concentrations.
Well, in fact, completely compatible with the geographical proximity of the explosion is a powder magazine certainly seasoned with tons of depleted ammunition.
Several tons of pulverized depleted uranium could therefore be airborne over our lands and also abundantly precipitated with recent rain, recounting on ARPA to demonstrate the opposite, which Transparency Survey made available to citizens, but of course that will be impossible to do.
Brian, what do you make of this?
Well, As far as I can tell, the story's legit.
There's a lot of information out there about it with some independent researchers trying to do their own verifications and it looks like some of the maps are still working in spite of how much time and energy they put into Preventing them from working.
In essence, what has happened here is exactly what Vladimir Putin had warned about two months ago, that the introduction of these depleted uranium munitions that are designed to be fired off by the Leopard and Abraham tanks, he would see it as basically introducing a dirty bomb into the war.
And apparently, It was two months ago, The Guardian ran an article basically saying that Putin would respond if those supplies were brought in to Ukraine and into the war.
Well, now it looks like for whatever reason, whether it's because Russia hit this munition supply or Ukraine hit it or somebody hit it, Now we've got two square kilometers of highly radioactive area, plus a large plume of radioactivity that's passing over Poland as we speak, apparently.
Long-term effects, birth defects, massive hits to the food supplies, death and deformation, cancers, the type of stuff that that would This is why we don't go to war and kill people.
When I saw Donald Trump the other day talking about how his goal in Russia on the CNN interview was to stop the killing, he was right.
He didn't say he was going to take one side or the other.
He just said, my goal is to try to stop the killing.
For whatever reason, this situation is much worse than can be imagined.
You've got Robert F. Kennedy out there tweeting about it, that Britain has confirmed, this was 20 days ago, Britain has confirmed delivery of depleted uranium munitions to Ukraine.
They partially vaporize on impact, poisoning the environment with uranium dust, causing cancer and horrific birth defects.
So, war is hell.
And somebody set this thing off.
Whether it was Russia, whether it was a part of the war, whether it was an inside job, I don't know.
But there's certainly plenty of censors that are picking it up across Europe right now.
I have a friend with good intel contacts who tells me the Russians have been wargaming what's going on in Ukraine, and every scenario leads to a nuclear exchange with the West.
I think we're going to have to hold our breath and see how this plays out, but none of it is good, and I think Britain was colossally stupid to introduce the depleted uranium into the scenario.
Meanwhile, Putin faces possible overthrow by angry patriots who feel he's not doing enough, not being sufficiently aggressive.
Russian nationalist Igor Gorkin played a significant role in the conflict in Ukraine Donbass in 2014.
He's been outspoken in criticizing Putin and his commanders for their handling of the war.
According to the Institute for the Study of War, social movements are by the military blogger intended to put further pressure on Putin and the Russian defense establishment.
They're worried that unless Moscow steps out its effort, Russia might lose in Ukraine, which would lead, or could, to a pro-Western coup and a civil war in Russia.
Sunday, the group announced plans to establish regional chapters across Russia, inviting government officials, public figures, and business leaders to join.
It also plans a news conference in Moscow in June to address how Russia can win the war in Ukraine.
With Pavel Gubarev, a significant player in Russian politics, and Vladimir Kucherenko, a political activist better known by his alias Maxim Kalishnikov, he established the Club of Angry Patriots in April.
Wagner Group chief Yevgeny Prigozhin, an outspoken opponent of Putin's military strategy, Allegedly offered to divulge Russian Army whereabouts in exchange for a pullback of Ukrainian forces from the area surrounding Bakhmut.
Wagner's founder made the offer because of casualties rising among his mercenaries.
Two unnamed Ukrainian officials said he offered to work for the Ukrainian intelligence directorate several times but was turned down.
Khrushchev and Gorkin have been feuding despite their shared opposition to Russia's war strategy under Putin.
Gorkin claimed the Wagner leader was putting his psychopathic political goals ahead of his company's needs.
He's also inquired as to his whereabouts.
He's called for a frontline ceasefire since his incarceration by Russian officials.
Meanwhile, Obama's among 500 who have been banned from Russia in retaliation for sanctions imposed by the United States.
Russia's foreign ministry has said former President Barack Obama is among 500 banned in response to the latest round of sanctions.
The ministry said Russia had refused the latest U.S.
request for consular aspect access to the detained Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Bershkovich, who was arrested in March.
The move was triggered by U.S.
refusal to give visas to media traveling with Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov to the United States.
Washington should have learned a long time ago, not a single hostile attack on Russia will go unpunished.
Earlier, the U.S.
and Putin have measured against more than 300 targets aiming to punish Russia for the invasion of Ukraine and intensifying one of the harshest sanctions efforts ever implemented.
Today's action will further tighten the vice on Putin's ability to wage his barbaric invasion and will advance our goal ever to cut off Russian attempt to evade sanctions, said Secretary of the Treasury Yellen.
The Department of Treasury said it imposed sanctions on 22 people, 104 entities, in over 20 countries or jurisdictions, including companies that import, ship, or manufacture electronic components, semiconductors, and microelectronics from Russia.
Secretary of State Blinken said the action targeted an international network That procures components for the Russia-based entity responsible for the manufacture of the Orlan drone, which Russian forces and their proxies are using in Ukraine.
Among the targets?
Russian intelligence service procurement networks and agents, including Liechtenstein and the Netherlands.
The Foreign Intelligence Service of the Russian Federation was also hit with sanctions.
Okay, so there's trouble brewing internally.
That's not surprising in Russia.
Russia's energy educational research institutions in a bit to limit Russia's future extractive capabilities?
Brian.
Okay, so there's trouble brewing internally.
That's not surprising in Russia.
You've got, in essence, Putin's mercenary army leader gaining some political aspirations, and that may or may not be an influence of Western money and power. and that may or may not be an influence of You've got some other things coming up here very quickly that are causing a lot of concern.
One of them is called the U.S.
NATO Exercise Air Defender 23, which there's some very credible Harvard University researchers and journalists that are based in Moscow Which are saying that Air Defender 23 is cover for an attack on Russia in the next two to three weeks.
And so you've got a lot of problems developing in that area.
And I've spent some time going over looking over old Paul Craig Roberts articles to try to see if he had any of the tracks here.
And you know what he was always saying is this thing could have been over in 15 minutes had Putin unleashed it.
And now here we are 15 months later.
And Putin's not ending it.
There's other speculation that this thing is designed and meant to go on forever, just like Afghanistan or some of the other wars that we fought to keep the economies and the money flowing.
That may or may not be true.
I don't know.
I can tell you this, and I've said it before, it's very difficult to trust the leader of a mercenary army When money is what rules the machine.
Now, I get it that this guy has been fighting for Russia, and he's been running the mercenary army.
It's filled with prisoners, and it seems to have been working up to this point, but tides can change very, very quickly when you're not fighting for something.
And, you know, I don't know if a mercenary army is capable of fighting for love of the motherland, or if they're fighting for The riches that will be gained at the end of the war.
As for keeping people out, some move anybody would make.
We don't want spies.
We don't want these people around.
We don't want them influencing people.
Think about it.
If Obama goes over to Russia with all that clout, who is he going in to buy off?
Who is he going to pay off?
Maybe that's why they want to keep him out.
You make a great point about mercenary army.
I do believe, however, the sanctions and so forth that have been imposed by the West have backfired colossally.
This is taking out the North Stream pipeline is calamitous for Europe.
And I think that it's really altered the standing of the United States that we no longer can count on dollar hegemony.
The BRICS is growing.
Other nations are joining.
I think the consequences for the United States ultimately are going to be calamitous because The dollar is losing its role as the international currency for transactions involving oil, which has been all that has prompted up since Nixon took us off the gold standard.
So I foresee nothing but negative outcomes from this whole involvement.
Well, it appears to me we're the dog being wagged by the Israeli tail because Israel wants to make Ukraine the new Israel and is willing to fight a war to accomplish that goal to the last American soldier.
Meanwhile, Karl Rove predicts a poor performance from Joe Biden.
That's a no-brainer.
Former White House adviser Karl Rove described Biden's re-election bid as a basement double-dip, noting it was largely a dot.
In addition to an attempt to respond to his announcement, the Biden campaign launched a website ridiculed mainly for its meme potential.
Another questionable choice was Biden's announcement being made by a video.
Given the biggest criticism of Biden as he hid in his basement during his last campaign, lack of intimacy with a filmed announcement is not what his campaign needed.
But maybe the campaign has noticed the more Biden speaks live, the more his popularity diminishes.
Karl Rove also noticed the announcement did nothing to alleviate concerns about his age.
Biden at 80 is the oldest president in history, would be 86 year old by the time his second term, if it were to take place, were complete.
Many doubt Biden can last through another term.
Frankly, I don't think he can extend through this.
If he were reelected in certain four years, he'd be 86 older, but all than seven previous presidents have lived.
A better strategy would have been to assuage public concerns of frailty and cognitive decline by showing him in person energetic and sharp as a tack, per Impossible.
Instead, they showed a video.
In Rove's opinion, the video was a missed opportunity because the president decided to appeal to his Democrat base rather than to independents.
The winner of the upcoming election, given the polarization of the left and the right, We'll be the one that can't capture the middle.
The infamous Biden underground presidency is about to embark on another underground campaign.
Part of Biden's political genius might be that he knows he's not a genius.
As William Shakespeare once observed, better to remain in the basement and be thought the fool than emerge from the shadows and remove all doubt.
Meanwhile, the FBI suddenly dropped more investigation into Hillary and Bill Clinton ahead of the 2016 election.
The Durham Report has explained.
Special Counsel Durham's report concluded the FBI had no verified intel when it opened the Crossfire Hurricane investigation into Trump in 2016.
He blasted Hillary for her plan to stir up a scandal against presidential candidate Trump by tying him to Putin and the Russian hacking of the DNC, which we know was done by an insider who worked for the DNC and was upset at the way in which Bernie Sanders had deprived the nomination by transferring 13 primaries—Bernie had won—to Hillary's call-up.
The FBI was investigating claims that the Clinton Foundation was a hub of criminal activity, but they were all for show.
According to Durham, they never even got wiretap warrants for their well-placed informant who had penetrated the Clintons' inner circle.
None of the Clintons ever taken any money from the Clinton Foundation.
According to the Clinton Foundation, in fact, the Clintons themselves are major donors.
All four investigations were dropped by FBI officials.
The New York Post reported.
Notice this is the Post, not the Times.
A Little Rock and New York offices were investigating a claim that an outside commercial industry likely engaged a federal public official in a flow-of-benefit scheme, namely, large monetary contribution made to a non-profit Both under both direct and indirect control of the federal public official in exchange for favorable government action and or influence.
And of course, that would be Hillary as Secretary of State and the Clinton Foundation as the nonprofit.
The DC Investigator is based on allegations that Clinton has accepted millions from foreign governments, as well as massive Russian corporations, in an attempt to influence U.S.
foreign policy, dating back to Hillary's days as Secretary of State, as outlined by Peter Schweitzer in his book, Clinton Cash.
A fourth investigation looked into allegations by a well-placed source that Hillary continued accepting those illegal donations throughout her presidential campaign.
The FBI eventually told the informant to walk away and cut ties.
Meanwhile, the feds were busy wiretapping Trump and illegally spying on his campaign.
And, of course, the Clinton Foundation has denied any wrongdoing.
Beginning late 2014, before Hillary formally declared a presidential candidacy, the FBI learned from a well-placed source that a foreign government was planning to send an individual to contribute to Hillary's anticipated campaign as a way to gain influence with her should she win the presidency.
A foreign individual reportedly made a $2,700 contribution—modest as these go—ahead of a campaign event, which led to another of a significant sum of money, no doubt many times more.
All four probes were dropped ahead of the 2016 election, several at the direction of senior FBI officials who had close ties to the Clintons.
Here's the post tweeting, FBI dropped more probes into Hillary family non-profit ahead of 2016 election.
Durham report concludes.
Brian.
Stunning and brave is Karl Rove's analysis that Joe Biden is not going to run strong.
Ooh, stunning, stunning, stunning stuff from Rove there.
Surprise, surprise.
It's going to look a lot worse than it looked in 2020, with a very ugly war going on over in Ukraine, a pullout from Afghanistan, Joe Biden's ice cream-eating, dementia-walking, puppet-mask-wearing machine.
And I think of Joe Biden, obviously, I'm just thinking of the puppet masters that are behind him.
And I'm thinking that the same puppet masters are behind the Clinton Foundation.
Doesn't surprise me that the FBI hasn't gotten involved in anything.
And, you know, we just had this wonderful Durham report come out talking about the FBI and Donald Trump and Russiagate.
It didn't have any teeth, did it?
Was there a single indictment?
A single prosecution?
Reports, reports, reports.
That's all we get.
We don't get any justice.
We don't get any perp walks.
We don't get anything at all.
So, don't expect any of the Clinton Foundation's misgivings to be put under a spotlight or under, you know, the The justice system.
Don't expect anything related to Biden to ever be looked at or Hunter Biden to be looked at in terms of justice.
It's simply not going to happen.
The entire machine is wasted.
It's just a matter of time.
Right now, I'm a lot more worried about what's going on in the economy than I am worried about Judgment Day coming for the Clintons or the Bidens.
I just don't think it's going to happen as long as we're on this side of the grave, but Things are different, unless they die, which for some reason doesn't seem to happen very often among these rich ruling elites.
I don't know, maybe it's the adrenochrome or something, whatever they're drinking, but they don't die.
They just keep going and going and going, or their brand is continually recycled, so.
Or organs from freshly sacrificed children, Brian.
I would put nothing past them.
I think you're spot on.
Meanwhile, here's a anti-gun propaganda directed against Governor Abbott.
We already elope.
Permitted lists.
Concealed carry.
Now I'll raise you paying teachers to arm themselves and one pardon for a convicted killer, all to own the libs.
Republican governors, Jim Crow, USA poker champions.
On the one-year anniversary of Uvalde Elementary School shooting.
Let's remember all those who worked tirelessly to ensure that these massacres can continue in the U.S.
Brian, I gotta say, given the work you and I have done on Uvalde, Nashville, Buffalo, Sandy Hook, and more, this is pretty insulting.
It just begs the question, by assuming they're all legit and real, I find it rather astonishing, but then that's the whole idea.
Fortunately, the public response to the shooting is to go out and buy more weapons and ammo, so I don't think it's succeeding.
It's certainly not playing out the way they would have liked.
Well, I think it is playing out the way they would have liked.
I don't think that the goal is gun control because what happens after every one of these events?
Gun sales skyrocket, ammo sales skyrocket, everything right now in our community and in our society for anybody that's halfway awake is Going for gun sales.
It's just a matter of what type of weapon and how much ammunition do you have.
So, look, there's a long history of these false flag events.
I don't think, in my opinion, that that's the ultimate goal.
I think it's about security contracts.
I think fundamentally what's happening is that they are using the false flags to march through the halls of their Congress, pushing for different security laws and security bills, Just like the Patriot Act came after 9-11, each state has different agendas, and what they're doing is they're beefing up the security apparatus, which is that large wall between the people who are going to get screwed when this thing crashes.
When the debts grow faster than the economy can pay the debts, the crash is going to take place, and as a result of the false flags, The security apparatus, the wall of separation is going to be in place to prevent us from getting to these elite, global elites that are setting all this stuff up and managing this.
I think that all the spending is about creating a separation, building new schools, more metal detectors, more privileges to go here or to go there.
It's all about social credit scores.
It's all about identifying the bad guys, you know, the guys that would go to something like a January 6th or would go to something like that.
And then being able to weed us out in the long haul and render us ineffective when the day comes and we crash.
And again, that day, think about it.
When the debts grow faster than the economy, there's going to be a crash.
It's just the way it's going to be.
And it looks like it's right around the corner to tell the truth.
All the signs point in that direction.
Meanwhile... CyOp Climate Change, the Absurd CO2 Scan.
This is the second smartest guy in the world reviewing some data.
Well, Joe Olson and I have done a rather extensive series, actually 10 parts, about climate change, revealing the whole thing as a scam.
What he is reporting here is that the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere has been steadily dropping.
It cannot be the case that temperature is varying with CO2 or the Earth would be getting colder.
They're claiming it's getting warmer.
But in fact, all the data shows are completely independent, that the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere has nothing to do with the temperature of Earth.
And indeed, it turns out, CO2 actually cools the Earth in three or four different ways.
It contributes to the production of water and air, both of which are indispensable to life.
The current atmospheric CO2 level is about 420 parts per billion, which is critically too low.
We actually need more CO2, not less.
Big Oil has been pushing for all the green energy scams out there, and directly profiting from the climate change agenda, ironically.
Rainwash leftist Michael Moore.
Back to the great documentary exposing the involvement of big oil and climate change in his film, Planet of the Humans.
Vehicles like Tesla consume far more fossil fuel energy and resources over their lifespan and generate far more pollution.
The only advantage to driving such clean vehicles is that they are backstopped by taxpayers via ZEV credits, grants, and other theft transfers, but they will indirectly generate more CO2 over time, ironically.
The green energy scam is a program to impoverish the planet, accelerate depopulation via hyperinflation, Poverty, supply chain shortages, and famine.
It's really that simple and in plain sight.
Climate change is a psychological indoctrination program whereby humans grow to despise themselves as the main cause of planetary destruction.
Consider the human race a scourge upon the world.
This is a critical early phase of death cult normalization that allows for ritualistic suicidal behavior in, say, the uptake of slow-kill bioweapon injections, the VACs.
PSYOP-19 thus flows perfectly into PSYOP climate change for numerous reasons, as will the upcoming limited nuclear strikes in PSYOP World War III, which in turn will be justification for even more urgent climate change policies.
Remember, all these PSYOPs flow into and out of each other.
Meanwhile, If you look back at history, we see 50 years of failed eco-apocalyptic predictions.
Modern doomsayers have been predicting climate and environmental disaster since the 1960s and continue to do so today.
None of their apocalyptic predictions, with due dates, have come true.
What follows is a collection of notably wild predictions from notable people in government and science.
More than merely spotlighting the failed predictions, this collection shows the makers of failed apocalyptic predictions are often individuals holding respected positions in government and science.
While they have been and continue to be enthusiastically reported by a media eager for sensationalistic headlines, the failures are typically never revisited.
For example, 1967, dire famine by 1975.
George Getz, Los Angeles Times writer.
It's already too late.
For the world to avoid a long period of famine, a Stanford biologist said Thursday, Paul Ehrlich said the time of famine is upon us and will be at its worst and most disastrous by 1975.
He said the population of the U.S.
is already too big.
That birth control may have to be accomplished by making it involuntary, by putting sterilizing agents into stable food and drinking water, and that the Roman Catholic Church should be pressured into going along with routine measures of population control. 1969!
Everyone will disappear in a cloud of blue steam by 1989, New York Times.
Robert Reinald writes, The trouble with almost all environmental problems, says Paul Ehrlich, the population biologist, is that by the time we have enough evidence to convince people, you're dead.
Well, Dr. Ehrlich is gathering that evidence in his laboratory at Stanford.
He's wasting no time trying to convince people that drastic action is needed to add up what he foresees as a catastrophic explosion fueled by runaway population growth, a limited world food supply, and contamination of the planet by man.
We must realize that unless we are extremely lucky, everybody will disappear in a cloud of blue steam in 20 years.
Well, I guess we're extremely lucky.
Then in 1970, Ice Age by 2000 from the Boston Globe.
Air pollution may obliterate the sun and cause a new ice age in the first third of the next century.
If population continues to grow and the Earth's resources are consumed at the present rate, a pollution expert predicted yesterday.
James P. Lodge Jr.
also warned that if the current rate of increase in electric power generation continues, The demands for cooling water will boil dry the entire flow of the rivers and streams of the continental United States by the year 2000.
Well, thank goodness that hasn't happened either.
1970.
America is subject to water rationing by 1974.
Food rationing by 1980.
Here we have Dr. Ehrlich again.
by 1980.
Here we have Dr. Ehrlich again.
This must be a lunatic.
Giving aspirin to character fixer is what Dr. Paul Ehrlich thinks the current proposal for pollution control.
No real action has been taken to save the environment he maintains, and it does need saving.
Ehrlich predicts that the ocean will be as dead as Lake Erie in less than a decade.
The DDT in our fatty tissues has reached levels high enough to cause brain damage and cirrhosis of the liver.
America will be subject to water rationing by 1974 and food rationing by 1980, another of his fantastic predictions that has bitten the dust.
1971, new ice age coming from the Washington Post.
The world could be as little as 50 or 60 years away from a disastrous new ice age, a leading atmospheric scientist predicts.
Dr. S. I. Rassel of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and Columbia University says, in the next 50 years, The fine dust man constantly puts into the atmosphere by fossil fuel burning could screen out so much sunlight that the average temperature could drop by six degrees.
If sustained over several years, five to ten, he estimated, such a temperature decrease could be sufficient to trigger an ice age.
Gee, I thought the problem was global warming.
Not only that, Other perils from the ozone labor are predicted to grow worse and worse and worse.
And yet, while the ozone hole remains, no great peril to life has been observed.
More recently, ten years ago, Al Gore predicted the North Polar Ice Cap would be gone.
Inconveniently, it's still there.
On December 14, 2008, former presidential candidate Al Gore predicted the North Pole ice cap would be completely ice-free in five years.
Gore made a prediction to German TV at the COP15 climate conference, as was reported on December 16, 2018.
I'll warn the entire North polarized capitalists have appeared in five years.
Fortunately, once again, it has not come to pass.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, let's just create a fake problem so that we can produce all the solutions that we need and funnel the money to the right people to control them.
How do you think the university study departments get all their funding?
They tell these people what they want to hear and they continue to give them money.
Which is why some guy named Ehrlich back in the 70s had all these articles and said all these different things.
Obviously, there was something in it for him because he would have been seen as crazy among his peers at the time.
The data from the chart that was shown at the front of that article covers 600 million years of history.
Exactly what scientific discipline does that originate from?
Because we've got different ages of the Earth, and different timelines, and every different scientific discipline.
There is no consensus among Each of the disciplines as to what the age of the earth is and so how are we going to study something for 600 million years on this chart and not on that chart written history according to our schools only goes back.
10 to 30,000 years, biblical history anywhere from 6 to 10,000 years, and then you've got science now all of a sudden can know what the atmosphere looked like 600 million years ago, when pretty much all of the actual history that we have written indicates that there was indeed an antediluvian period, who knows how long that lasted, but a great flood seems, it appears to be a real thing that happened at a real time.
Of course, if you just think about it, the second law of thermodynamics kind of blows all this stuff out of water.
If things move from a state of order to a state of disorder, and the wind, and the waves, and the sun, and the moon, and the stars, and everything is breaking things down, why are the Rocky Mountains so fresh and so new?
So, we've had to have catastrophic changes in this We've got ancient civilizations buried under the sea, all sorts of things we don't understand, but yet somebody's going to say that 600 million years ago this is what it looked like?
Man, for once I'd like to find something that actually has some independently verifiable truth as to what exactly is the age of the Earth How exactly did it get here?
Because the only thing I can lean on that's got any credibility whatsoever is theology.
I see nothing else out there that even makes an explanation for how something came out of nothing.
So, at this point in time, I'm going to say I'm leaning toward the Bible.
Yeah, that's wonderful, Brian.
I think the age of Earth is around four and a half million.
And Joe is more expert than I by far, but we talk about this sort of thing in the very first of our anti-global warming series, which I encourage everyone to check out on my BitChute channel, Jim Fetzer.
Search for Joe Olson and they'll pop up.
A great subject for further discussion.
Meanwhile... Exposed!
FBI World Worried About Revealing Capitol Undercover Agents.
FBI Officials Are Concerned Footage From Inside The Capitol On January 6th Would Show Undercover Agents Inconfidential Informants.
No Doubt In Abundant Number.
A Whistleblower Said In Testimony Revealed On May 18th.
Because Of Course We Know Today That The FBI Was Deeply Involved In Running The Op.
George Hill, A retired supervisory intelligence analyst who worked out of the FBI's Boston field office recounted that the Washington field office pressured officials in Boston to open an investigation on 138 who attended the rally on January 6, even though there were no indications they had violated the law.
Boston official pushed back, saying they need evidence such as footage of individuals inside the Capitol to open those investigations.
Have we to do it?
Show us where they were inside the Capitol and we'll look into it.
We can't show you those videos unless you can tell us the exact time and place they were inside the Capitol.
The officials responded.
Hill said Boston officials questioned why they couldn't get access to the tranche of some 11,000 hours of footage from inside the Capitol.
Because there may be, maybe, you see undercover officers or confidential human sources on those videos whose identity we need to protect.
Washington-based officials responded.
And we know damn well it's because so many were there.
Michael Schellenberg tweeted, Why the FBI Democrats are attacking whistleblowers.
FBI says it won't release January 6th surveillance video because it would show too many undercover government agents and informants.
Musk!
FBI says it won't release January 6th surveillance video because it would show too many undercover government agents and informants.
This is insane!
How many were there?
I mean, just approximately.
He'll recounted the discussion during testimony to the U.S.
House Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of Federal Government.
A clip from the testimony was played during a hearing on May 18, detailed in a report the panel released based on whistleblower disclosures.
The FBI's national headquarters and the WFO didn't respond to requests for a comment.
Marcus Allen and other FBI employees also become a whistleblower.
Alleged that he was retaliated against because he shared an email with other FBI workers questioning whether FBI Director Wray was truthful while testifying to Congress.
You believe that Christopher Wray indicated there were no confidential informants, no FBI agents, assets present at the Capitol on January 6th that were part of the violent riot?
Isn't that right?
Representative Gatz asked Allen.
Yes, sir, Allen said.
They appear to be referring to testimony given behind closed doors.
After playing the clip, Hill's comments get said.
You got retaliated against for saying the very thing that the Washington field office was telling Boston.
to one congressional panel in a public hearing in late 2022.
He wouldn't say whether the Bureau had confidential sources embedded among the January 6th protesters.
I would add, not because he didn't know, but because their numbers were so large, it was mind-boggling.
Brian.
Yeah, they're overplaying their hand on this one.
I think back to all the Trump rallies I've seen, and I even go back in terms of understanding the conservative crowd to the old Tea Party movement crowds that were developing.
And those guys would leave the public park and clean up after themselves, leaving nothing but nice piles of trash bags loaded at the curb, ready for garbage pickup.
And then you watch the Trump crowds, they're all peaceful, they're all happy, everything's good.
Everything's good.
Well, okay, now we have November 6, 2020, an election that was obviously and clearly modified and stolen in 25,000 different ways.
Joe Biden getting more votes than Barack Obama.
In theory, one of the most unpopular candidates ever to run with Kamala Harris.
I mean, it's just absurd that they expect us to believe these things.
And so, yeah, I'm sure there was a lot of Right wing people that were very upset, but for the feds to go on and implant within the crowd people like Ray Epps and others who many many questions have been asked about to try to rabble rouse the crowd into doing things that you had massive crowds sitting around the Capitol grounds.
Crying out, fed, fed, fed, fed, pointing at the guys that were starting to raise the rabble.
Then they staged this ridiculous Ashley Babbitt shooting, which is just about the dumbest thing I've ever seen in my life, in terms of, oh, she's gonna climb up and go through this window, and this guy's just gonna pull out his gun, and he's just gonna pump her full of bullets, and she's gonna fall down on the ground, and there's no blood.
Oh, wait, we do have a blood packet that we're gonna go ahead and add into this.
We've got cameramen all over the place, controlled crowd, somebody up there saying, do this, do that.
It's ridiculous.
It's a ridiculous false flag.
The whole thing is ridiculous.
And oh, surprise, surprise, the FBI won't admit it under questioning.
So none of this surprises me.
It's just we're covering what we already know.
It's nice to see that some developments are continuing.
But again, until I see a perp walk, I really don't care.
Yeah, I think you got it exactly right, Brian.
Exactly right.
Meanwhile, Texas House passes law banning child sex change.
One Democrat breaks ranks to vote with the GOP.
Friday, the House in Texas voted 91-49 to support SB 14, moving the state closer to prohibiting puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and gender-affirming surgeries in children.
Democrat Sean Terry was the lone Democrat to vote for the bill.
I applaud Sean.
After the House made a technical change to SB 14, it was sent back to the Senate for a final vote.
The bill has a good chance of passing through the Senate and Governor Greg Abbott's desk.
The bill has been derided as an oppressive piece of legislation by trans and LGBTQ supporters.
Certain transition-related services would be denied to transgender people under 18.
According to the measure, any young person already receiving treatment must be weaned off their medication in a medically appropriate fashion.
The measure forbids any surgery to modify a child's body to reflect the gender they feel they are in defiance of their chromosome, DNA, biology, and sexual reproductive organs.
Absolutely right.
A frequent criticism by the left is that surgeries are not performed on children.
Therefore, the right is being idiotic in these measures.
The counter-argument is, if you never plan to perform surgeries on children, what's the harm in passing a law prohibiting them?
The left protestations often reveal their plans.
Also prohibited are prescribing, providing, dispensing, administering prescription drugs that induce infertility, Including puberty blockers on minors.
There's an exception in the case of precocious puberty or medical ailments.
Feeling like you're a girl or a boy, however, will not be considered a physical ailment.
To paraphrase one politician, after hearing from constituents, listening to stakeholders, and studying scientific data from the United States and throughout the world, this stance is grounded in evidence-based policy that promotes children's health development and general well-being.
Meanwhile, Target faces backlash for selling products from Transgender Designer promoting violence, drug use, and Satanism.
Target is already facing boycotts for selling tuck-friendly bathing suits and LGBTQ onesies for babies.
Now revealed that Target is selling LGBTQ pride products from a designer who appears to promote violence, drug use, and Satanism.
Target sells three items by the brand April Allen, a We Belong Everywhere messenger bag, a Too Queer for Here messenger bag, and Cure Transphobia, not Trans People's Shirt.
The LGBTQ items are available on the Target website and in its stores.
Target describes the products.
All items are designed for all bodies, regardless of gender identity and presentation.
We added design features to help make the fit customizable for you.
Our hope is for all guests to find clothing that makes them feel comfortable and affirmed in their identity.
We understand that fit is incredibly important.
And we'll continue to evolve and improve on fit needs for the LGBTQIA plus community.
Abraham Lin promotes drug use with a Popper's Open Your Third Eye pen.
Popper's, of course, is slying for drugs known as amyl nitrates, popular for use during sex.
Scarlett Johnson tweets, Trans witches for abortion!
Join our gay cult!
Definitely not trying to use designs and art to groom manipulating control kids.
Again, done with Target.
Satan is hope, compassion, equity, and love.
So naturally, Satan respects pronouns.
He loves all LGBTQIA plus people.
I went with a variation of Baphomet for this design, a deity who itself is a mixture of genders, means, ideas, and existences.
They reject They also sell products that promote Satanism, including a tear chute that reads, Satan Respects Pronouns.
Ryan, talk about a softball.
Wow.
I saw this Target thing starting to get some traction after the Bud Light thing started to get a lot of traction as well.
And I knew that that one was going to I was going to come back around.
I'm deeply concerned about some of those brands and ideas.
I'm surprised Target doesn't carry Balenciaga.
Apparently that's more of a higher-end brand.
But the idea that these guys are out here grooming these children with this trans LGBTQ thing.
You know, I'm wondering when the actual gay community is going to rise up against these trans sons of bitches.
You know, because there's a big difference between a guy who you don't even notice rolling down the street and he turns out to have a boyfriend at home or a guy or whatever.
But you can't really tell the difference because he fits into culture.
He's probably a normal thinking guy with some gay proclivities, but that is completely different than these trans folks that are out there pouncing around like some sort of distorted view of what a woman ought to look like with their man equipment Flouncing around and all their glitter bombs and big hair and big makeup that's a distortion of humankind.
As I've always said, this is a behavior that goes way, way back to the ancient fertility cults, the ancient Greeks, the old Romans, the old entertainment style.
Back before music was prolific or back before they had anything but plays.
The plays, obviously, you'd only be allowed to be a man to be in a play.
So the men played the women.
And so you had this culture of hypocrites, which is the right word for it.
They're actors who would dress up in woman's clothing and then continue with that with that play.
Of course, kids were not allowed to see that stuff even back then in those cultures.
The Romans then began with all their whole man-boy love thing, breaking through those barriers because they had the licentiousness and the law behind them that allowed them to do it.
But again, I'm going to say that what's underneath all of these things is an ancient fertility cult.
And these are ancient fertility rituals, and these are ancient death cults.
You can tie this stuff all over if you read about satanic ritual abuse, pedigree, and what happens in these ancient cults, including what happens in some of these quote-unquote temples and synagogues.
And I'm not going to exclude anything that may or may not happen behind closed doors inside Catholic churches related to priests.
What we as Christians do is we perform our acts of service out in the light of day.
We're not ashamed of what we do or who we are, but these people have something very, very dark that they worship and very dark that they're ritualizing to give it power and bring it around.
And they're trying to recruit your kids into the game.
I won't have it.
Texas won't have it.
I can't believe that the Democrats even supported it.
It must be that they're in on some stock someplace that they know, and that's why they ought to do it.
It doesn't make any sense to me, and it's reprehensible that we would allow these people to exist in our society without kicking back against the goads on this LGBTQ trans insanity related to children.
Well, well said, Brian.
Very well said.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
The setback in the West of the Rothschilds and other members of the globalist empire are mere flash wounds.
What may ultimately do them in is the ongoing economic suicide in Europe and the U.S.
resulting from the Russo-Ukrainian War and the Western sanctions.
There will have to be major uprising across Europe and eventually a populist march underground below the major banks of London and New York Where allegedly football fields have stolen gold bullion, the heart of the globalist empire is stored.
It all depends on whether Xi and Putin are willing to go all in for the kill.
A comment on Joaquin Hagopian's latest Epstein revelations exposed the crumbling Rothschild-Kazarian mafia Beto Empire, which you can find on my blog at jameshfetzer.org.
Final thoughts, Brian, yours.
What would happen to your family when the debts grow faster than what you can economically develop for your family?
You do what?
You go into bankruptcy and all those things that you have saved up and all those things that you have built up Banks are under threat of being gone to the creditors.
That's what happens on a very micro scale inside every American home every single day.
Now step that up.
What happens when banks begin to fail and everything they own starts going to the creditors?
Step that up.
What happens when our major bank, the Fed, begins to fail and everything it owns starts going to its creditors?
What happens?
When the bonds are cashed in, when the interest rates begin to exceed the production of the economy, what happens when our economy slows down?
We get a pay cut.
That's the equivalent to it.
And we can no longer afford our electric bills.
And now instead of 30,000 people supporting Our electrical entity, we've got 10,000 people supporting our electric, electrical entity.
So you have a 30% rate increase that you have to jam into the 10,000 that are still paying.
Now those people can't afford it.
This is a downward spiral and I believe we're seeing this begin.
to play out inside of America right now today.
We need to put a stop to it.
We need to stop the spending, yet we're still dumping all this money into Ukraine.
We need to stop the spending on both a federal law level and a state level, but at the same time we also need to cut the ties.
We need to stop taking the funds that corrupt our character and our witnesses.
Why does my county still have a mask regulation out here in Well, thanks to Brian for the excellence of his commentaries.
It's always a joy to share this platform with him.
me a break.
Somebody's getting paid to push these agendas down onto us and keep us under control.
Well, thanks to Brian for the excellence of his commentaries.
It's always a joy to share this platform with him.
I'm terribly concerned about what's happening to the United States.
Paul Craig Roberts has written an essay suggesting the American elites are responsible for the destruction of America.
I think that's close to right.
May not have it exactly, but I think there is no doubt Wayne Allyn Root has it right, that Obama has been the power behind the throne, that Obama has been manipulating the actor
Playing the role of Joe Biden that Obama has been calling the shots and has a great deal of responsibility here, but he's supported and developed by George Soros, the Rothschilds, others who want to see America brought to an end.
They especially fear America because of our Second Amendment, because Americans are the most armed nation in the world.
A recent event in Brazil was instrumental, where the new President Bolsonaro allowed guns galore, and possession went up 600%.
Stunningly, murders dropped dramatically.
The president who succeeded him, Lula, confiscated guns.
And now there are those of us willing to make a wager with anyone who thinks that confiscating the guns is going to help the murder rate if they want to make a bet.
So far, no one's been stepping up to the plate because they can foresee what's going to happen worldwide.
Gun ownership and homicide rates are inversely related.
The more guns, the fewer homicides.
You can manipulate the data all you want.
That's the most basic fact about gun control.
It's a colossal blunder.
And as I frequently observe, Americans use guns to defend themselves millions of times every year, saving an estimated 200,000 lives.
Since the number of those that are taken by guns absent suicide is on the order of 35,000.
Just imagine how many more deaths would occur if you took guns away from Americans and they could no longer defend themselves and it would only get worse and worse, spiraling out of control.
Think about it and be glad you live in America.
If only we can keep our republic.
Spend as much time as you can with your family, friends, and people you care about and love.
We don't know how all this is going to play out.
▲
Export Selection