All Episodes
Previous Next
May 6, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
55:53
Need to Know (5 May 2023) with Chris Weinert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer, Mass.
Wisconsin, joined today by Chris Weinert in Fort Myers, Florida.
We're anticipating Carl Herman may be able to join us from San Ramon, California, but he's in the midst of a move, and we don't know for sure.
We begin with the U.S.
elites have a plan to split up Russia.
They want to exploit its natural resources.
The Secretary of Moscow's Security Council has reported the U.S.
and its allies are seeking to preserve their power by dismantling Russia.
In an interview published by Izvesta, Nikolai Petrushchev said the West was attempting to influence the global order through the destruction of Russia or its weakening the level of a third-rate country under foreign management.
That's true of the United States, sad to say, but it will not be true of Russia.
He cited a book entitled Failed State Guide to Russia's Rapture as an example of the way that might be achieved.
The purported plan is to support instability in nations neighboring Russia, to conduct information warfare, to fan internal separatism.
The book was written by one Janusz Ugawski, a senior fellow at the Jamestown Foundation, a conservative think tank.
He made the case for dissolving Russia, claiming it had failed to become a nation-state, a civic state, or a stable imperial state, which is complete nonsense.
He cited a range of factors at work against Russia.
Lack of economic growth, inequality, distrust in government institutions, alienation of the population from the ruling elites, and disbelief in official propaganda.
All of that, however, is true of the United States.
We have a lack of economic growth, inequality, distrust in government institution, alienation of population from the ruling elites, and disbelief in official propaganda.
I suppose, therefore, he'd conclude the United States is equally a failure.
Baruch said the West is seeking to weaken Russia to gain access and exploit its vast natural resources.
Moscow's adversaries, however, underestimate the strength of our nation and the will of the Russian people to be independent.
I have no doubt he is right.
Meanwhile, John Bolton, who's kind of a loose cannon—someone, in my opinion, who ought not to be taken seriously—is throwing a plan involving increased arms, spying, nuclear tests, and a global NATO to defend Taiwan, which is a hopeless enterprise.
Taiwan is thousands of miles away across the Pacific.
The logistics are preposterous.
Bolton, who, sad to say, served in the administration of President Trump, described his grand strategy approach to geopolitics in a Wall Street Journal column.
The U.S.
should have a contemporary reincarnation of NSC-6080, argue referred to in a document under Harry Truman that laid the foundation for militarizing in preparation of a confrontation with the Soviet Union.
He claimed in a new Cold War, U.S.
and allied would be pitted against a Chinese-Russian access, accompanied by rogue state outriders like Iran and North Korea.
That being the case, I would submit it's impossible to defeat them.
Bolton named key points—increase in military spending.
He asserted Western Asia got back on social spending because the obese welfare state and massive income redistribution do not protect us from foreign adversaries.
He also insists the U.S.
should upgrade its nuclear stockpile.
He wants to improve and expand military alliances, make NATO a global organization.
But the fact is, NATO is falling apart.
It's really silly stuff, in my opinion.
Bolton urges Washington to prepare for what happens after Ukraine wins its war with Russia, suggesting how much he's diluted there's no chance of Ukraine winning a war against Russia.
Moscow alleges, of course, that the conflict with Ukraine is part of a U.S.
proxy war against Russia, and that Washington's goal is partition of the country.
They've got it right.
John Bolton has it wrong.
Briz, your thoughts.
Sorry if I said that on mute there. - Thank you.
But yeah, I saw recently that it seems like not only Zelensky, but a lot of the CFR NSC neocons have been going to Finland to try to hire the Finns now to try to go to war with the Russians.
And I guess in the failure of Poland not following Ukraine's footsteps, I think maybe they got to start looking at other places to try to attack them from satellite countries around the Russian state.
And also if you think about a lot of the Baltic states and how the subversion and control and corporate interests have infiltrated these areas, Poland, as I mentioned, as well, all this stuff used to be part of Russia.
Most of it did, at least, you know, back in the old days.
So this is kind of a An interesting situation, it'd be like the United States losing its landmass over the course of a few hundred years and then having no sentimental claim to these lands because, you know, a peace treaty as a result of a major world war or something, you know, dictated these terms rather than actual, you know, history, I guess.
So yeah, it's like, it'd be like China annexing California in terms of us going over to Ukraine and our business being over there.
And speaking of Russia, I'd also like to point out that a lot of these NSC officials are kinfolk and relatives of many of the Red Army officials that led the Holodomor in the Ukraine back 100 years ago.
I talked about Kagan and Kaganovich, it's short for that.
He was basically, I think, in charge of a lot of materials and supplies for this very population tactic in the thirties.
So, uh, and now it's what his grandson is married to Newland, who's running the coup in Ukraine now as well.
So, um, interesting stuff, small world, six degrees of separation or Kevin Bacon, whatever you call it.
But it's almost like they're trying to create this strategy of tension, this cold war, uh, every generation, whether it's the same name or not, but it's, it's, uh, it's the way they play labor forces against each other allies, uh, into adversaries, uh, If you keep the people under duress and constant fear and threat, you can not only create the need for military forces on both sides, You can create the demand for stock markets, separate money exchanges, race to the prize in terms of innovation and technology.
And really, the 1% billionaires and central bankers are probably running both of these nations from within and racing the citizens under this pretense into some sort of a situation like we saw at the end of World War II and even leading into these world wars too.
And I think that we're not done with them if you really look at what they're trying to do here.
Very, very good.
Very good, Chris.
Meanwhile, how will Vladimir Putin respond to the assassination attempt in Moscow?
A clear and present danger for more than a year now, nearly a decade since occupying and annexing Crimea, which was in accordance with international law in fact, is what Russia has been for neighboring Ukraine.
But a rash of increasingly bold incident kept by the apparent attack of two drones on the Kremlin in Moscow.
Reports show the script being dangerously flipped An unmanned aerial vehicle crashing into the cupola of the Kremlin, home to President Putin's executive office, were not deadly, but they were among the boldest and most symbolic strikes against the seat of Russian political power since the invasion began.
Russian forces officials say Putin was not present, that there were no other casualties, video appeared to show part of the building's roof on fire, Kremlin press secretary referred to the incident as a planned terrorist attack and an assassination attempt targeting the president.
Russia reserves the right to take countermeasures wherever and whenever it deems appropriate.
In other words, the attack risks ushering in a new and unpredictable stage in the deadly conflict.
Moscow says Ukraine is behind the attack, though an advisor to Zelensky denied the country's military or intelligence services were responsible.
Secretary of State Blinken struck a skeptical note as well.
I see the reports.
I can't in any way validate them.
We simply don't know.
Liar, liar, pants on fire.
Second, I would take anything coming out of the Kremlin with a very large shaker of salt, so let's see.
Maria Bobov, an associate professor specializing in post-Soviet politics at McGill, said she saw no upside for Ukraine to conducting such a spectacular attack.
It would only galvanize the Russians.
That's completely counterproductive for Ukraine.
Why would the Ukrainians want that?
Leaked Pentagon documents, however, revealed the U.S.
encouraged Ukrainian intelligence against carrying out attacks on Moscow last February on the one-year anniversary Russia said Ukrainian drones were used to strike a field depot last week in Sevastopol.
Last month, Ukraine's head of military intel boasted that Ukrainian drones were capable of reaching Moscow in the absence of its own supplies of messy firepower, agility, stealth, and surprise attacks that become a trademark of the Ukrainian forces.
But Povhova suggests a Kremlin drone attack could have been a provocation, a false flag planned by Russia's security to justify an eventually heavy-handed response.
Any number of hawkish Russian factions could have been interested in escalating the war, said Lasha Taturzy, a professor of international affairs at Norwich in Vermont.
If they did, the main reason would have to be to provoke Putin to do something more than the Russian state has done so far.
Meanwhile, Larry Johnson, former CIA officer, said the decision to drone attack Kremlin was made by the United States.
Former CIA and DELA officer Larry Johnson said the decision to launch a drone attack was made by the U.S.
The attack, seen to have been targeting Russian President Putin, was stopped by electronic warfare systems that disabled the drones before they could reach their target.
According to Johnson, the attack must have been spearheaded by the Biden admin in a U.S.
military-industrial complex because decisions on such attacks are not made in Kiev, but in Washington.
Washington should understand clearly that we know this.
Although the attack, which Ukraine denied it was involved in and failed to accomplish its goal, is still highly symbolic.
Here we have the Spectator Index tweeting, Kremlin drone attack.
Russia says two Ukrainian drones attacked Kremlin overnight.
Drone down with no victims or material damage to the Kremlin.
Moscow said it was a terrorist attack, an attempt on Putin's life.
Russia said it reserves the right to respond when and how it finds appropriate.
It didn't cause significant damage, Johnson continues.
The psychological impact, though, while there are people who may disagree, is going to galvanize Russia and not create fear or division.
There are others who believe by doing this is going to portray Russia as weak and create internal problems.
I simply note that the reaction of former President Medved, as well as members of the Duma, they are livid.
They are outraged.
They are calling for escalatory retaliation against Ukraine.
So I think in many respects this backfired.
He added the attack smacked of desperation was an attempt to provoke Russia into a major escalation to get the U.S.
more deeply involved.
At the same time, I think, Washington correctly notes they try to discourage this escalation because they recognize it's one out of control, and the U.S.
is in no position militarily to confront Russia and survive that confrontation.
Democrat presidential candidate R.F.K.
Jr.
denounced the attempted attack as a dangerous escalation.
Imagine how we'd respond if Russian backfires launched a drone strike on the Capitol.
We would stop these deranged attempts to escalate the war.
After successfully defusing the Cuban Missile Crisis, President John F. Kennedy went against ever again forcing Russia to choose between national humiliation and nuclear war.
We should heed his advice.
Meanwhile, Ukraine continued drone bombardment targeting an oil refinery in the Penosna region in southern Russia Friday morning.
A fire broke out but was quickly extinguished and no one was hurt.
Chris, your thoughts?
Well, I think in the past six months, I've seen not only foreign policy advisors, but intelligence directors in the mainstream media from time to time.
And I try not to watch the mainstream media, but just in the small instances of me looking, where they've actually been calling for and predicting the assassination of Vladimir Putin.
Given the track record of these organizations, which they represent, and think about how many people in the last decade have been removed from office by these forces, whether it's their failure to yield to the petrodollar in terms of oil or whether it's the COVID compliance or anything like that.
Qaddafi, Hussein, you know, a lot of guys in Africa seem to have mysteriously disappeared or had illnesses, possibly even the prime minister of Mexico at this point in time.
Interesting stuff.
So these guys are prone to really this type of lead pipe diplomacy, we'll say.
So as far as these type of situations, it's almost like an act of war, not only attacking the Kremlin, but many of these threats without a formal declaration of it.
So, you know, I don't know if it's theater, if it's to try to extort the citizenry or to bring us into this polarization or this inner tension or this war frame of mind.
Like I said, under duress, most people, they don't make good, sound decisions.
They react limbically.
And I think that that's part of why they're trying to put this type of strategy attention on us with this unnecessary type of aggression and this thing that's going on here.
Also, I remember MH17, they said Putin's plane was near that, and that could have been a possible assassination attempt there.
There's another time with his limo.
There's a few times poisoning.
So there's people that have maybe tried to do away with this guy, and I'm really glad that they didn't because he seems to be one of the few leaders that has some sense of duty, some honor and discipline and really some common sense.
So, you know, as far as our leaders go, I think that he just towers above them.
And it's sad that we're stuck with the bottom of the barrel.
And that's the best of our offerings in public office.
So, yeah, that's kind of where I'm at with this.
What are your thoughts?
Well, I like those observations, Chris.
I'm wondering if the Biden people, I don't mean Biden himself is just a puppet.
We know it's an actor wearing a mask.
I mean, literally, not figuratively, literally, are unaware that three presidents signed executive orders prohibiting the assassination of the leader of a foreign nation.
That came into play when we took out Saddam Hussein.
That's why the mission accomplished thing on the USS Lincoln was a fiasco.
We had actually bombed him.
We killed him in a restaurant in Baghdad, his two sons and 50 members of his general staff.
But Donald Rumsfeld, I think, realized that Carter, Reagan, and Ford had all signed executive orders prohibiting the assassination of the leader of a foreign nation, and therefore he couldn't admit it without conceding to have violated the law.
So I think the Biden people are so reckless.
They just don't give a damn.
They don't care.
They don't bother to check.
They're just utterly reckless.
What do you foresee is the outcome of this now?
I mean, it will be known that this was a U.S.-inspired move.
Your thoughts?
Well, you know, I can almost say a war, as it seems to be leading to words, that turnabout could be fair play.
Maybe they'll expose Joe Biden as being the puppet that he is.
Maybe they'll give us something in terms of strengthening our outrageous claims as far as this goes.
And maybe they'll even be the ones to provide some sort of evidence about Dominion and its origins, if they truly are a white hat organization looking out for the best interest of humanity.
However, if they're being used by the same group of central bankers in the Masonic Order, it could be, you know, just a part of the show and just them toying with our hope.
And I don't know.
I guess time will tell and I can't wait to see what comes next.
Good to stop, Chris.
Good to stop.
Meanwhile...
Marjorie Taylor Greene suggests that Joe Biden can impeach because of their documents that establish, apparently conclusively, criminal scheme between Biden and a foreign national while serving as vice president.
Chuck Grassley has described a whistleblower whose comport is credible.
Homer, the head of the House Oversight Committee, has subpoenaed the forms that describe the criminal scheme involving then-President Biden and a foreign national.
They claim the DOJ has the documents.
Homer's subpoena demands it within a week.
Marjorie posted a breaking news video, along with a copy of the joint letter from Grassley and Comer, that she now has evidence to prove Biden's alleged criminal scheme.
While the committee has not procured the document yet, she insists they will continue to investigate his potential pay-for-play scheme with foreign nationals.
Here's an Oversight Committee tweet Representatives James Comey and Chuck Grassley revealed the existence of an FBI record alleging that VP Biden engaged in a bribery scheme with a foreign national.
Point of whistleblower.
An arrangement involved the exchange of money for policy decisions.
Green claims that material contained proof and information that he interacted with a foreign national made a deal in exchange for money.
In a subsequent interview on Steve Bannon's broadcast, she suggests impeachment might finally be on the table.
Now, the Oversight Committee, we have real subpoena power.
We have the power to investigate.
The form shows the proof Biden took a money payment from a foreign national for policy decisions while he was vice president.
That means Joe Biden will be impeached.
Will the FBI produce the doc?
Grassley in an interview with Sandra Smith on Fox reiterated the whistleblower is credible.
So the DOJ and the FBI need to come clean.
What have they done with the document?
We know the document exists from a very credible whistleblower.
We do know what steps the DOJ take and the FBI to investigate.
If they saw the name Biden and view it as evidence of a criminal scheme, those steps most likely involve burying it as deep as humanly possible, as Betty Johnson tweeted.
Chuck Grassley discusses letter sent to FBI after whistleblower revealed existence of FBI record alleging then-VP Biden engaged in a criminal bribery scheme with a foreign national.
If DOJ and FBI have any hope of redeeming their once-trusted position with the American people, Garland and Ramos, answer the subpoena.
Tell us what they've done with this information.
We think very credible based on what whistleblowers are telling us, said Grassley.
The Iowa congressmen have been at the forefront of investigating the Biden family.
Grassley has in the past accused the FBI of hiding potential criminal contact by the Biden family, suggesting to me that they will have hidden this one too.
A statement from the White House, while not expressly denying the accusations, blows off the whistleblower cams as more of the same from Republicans.
That they've been lobbying unfounded politically motivated attacks against Biden without offering evidence sounds like what they've done with Donald Trump.
Republican presidential candidate Trump suggests the allegations involving the big guy are so bravely transferring the nickname Crooked from Hillary to Crooked Joe.
Homer's been indicating a press conference may come early where we'll discuss the committee's findings.
Chris, your thoughts?
Well, I think if anything, they'll maybe hang someone out at a low level and make a big sensation of it and really never go after the people that they should be investigating for the full nature of their crimes.
It'll be like Cuomo's sex scandal or one of those things where they're looking into him for something that is, you know, certainly questionable or illegal or whatever, but...
Certainly dismissing the charges of larger allegations.
You know, obviously his Vax thing and the Ukraine thing and just a lot of stuff.
J6, a lot of the stuff that he's perpetuating has been very detrimental to the fabric of this nation and the global harmony as well.
Yes, yes, yes, yes.
I think that's completely right.
enough you could get this guy on.
It's just prioritizing which one would be the best way of doing it.
But it doesn't really seem to be anybody that's interested in doing so.
It's more like they are just hanging it out on a limited basis or distracting or diverting and certainly covering up more than they're investigating.
Yes, yes, yes, yes.
I think that's completely right.
Meanwhile, breaking news.
Former Proud Boy leader, Ricky Terrio, whom I've been involved with, was working for the FBI, and three other members of the far-right extremist group, the Proud Boys.
I don't know that they are a far-right extremist group.
I'm a plot to attack the U.S. Constitution.
Capitol and a desperate bid to keep Donald Trump in power.
This is total bullshit for January 6th propaganda.
Gate-funded edible food coating gets a green light from regulators.
This is disturbing.
Edi-peel, marketed as A-peel, is described as a colorless, odorless, tasteless coating for fruit and vegetables composed entirely of a mixture of food-grade glyceroleptides derived from edible plant oils that, we're assured, is entirely safe to eat.
There's a new kid on the block garnering a huge amount of attention detailing the toxic nature of its new product to extend the lifespan of fruit and vegetables, which has gone viral.
The data sheet, which is for a chemical cleaner, let us look further into what EdAppeal is and what it means for consumers.
Appeal Science is a U.S.-based company partnered with the Gates Foundation to develop a new product It appeal an edible coating for fruit and vegetables to solve the supposed food waste crisis.
According to a 2019 report from the Food and Agriculture Organization, around 14% of all fruit and veg produced for human consumption is lost or wasted between the field and the supermarket.
But is it really all down to the shelf life?
One of the biggest issues is supermarkets exacting standards, seeing masses of vegetables and fruit left to rot before they even leave the field because it's not pretty enough or straight enough, giving massive sums of money pumped into developing the coating.
There's an enormous amount of positive press.
Huge excitement over the potential to do away with a lot of plastic packaging.
UK supermarket chains Tesco announced already trailing the product, along with avocado producers, to extend the shelf life of their fresh produce.
Frially.
The great majority of concerns thus far center around the safety of the product itself.
Perhaps more concerning is a potential lack of choice for consumers who may not want to consume a product coded in app appeal as supermarket chains in order to get sucked into the hype.
The coating has also been approved for use on organic produce in the U.S., further reducing consumer options because it cannot be removed once it's been applied.
It's not known whether any elements of the coating can be absorbed by the vegetable and fruit.
Should food last forever?
Neil's Twitter account asks, what if instead of going bad, food went good, lasting longer, create less waste, plant-based protection, longer-lasting produce?
Perhaps the question should be, how far should we go to extend the lifespan of fruits and vegetables?
Should we be trying to cheat nature's sell-by dates?
Oedipal is described as an odorless, colorless, tasteless coating for fruit and vegetables composed entirely of a mixture of food-grade glycerolipides derived from edible plant oil.
We're assured are entirely safe to eat.
Hmm, ring any bells?
The coating slows down water loss and oxidation, keeping the fruit and vegetable fresher for up to two times longer.
Images used in a bill submission to the Australian Food Standards Agency showed lemons 60 days old looking almost as fresh as the day they were picked.
Read marketing hype, you'll be forgiven for thinking edible is made from plant-derived materials such as peels, seeds, pulp, and stems from fruits and vegetables that have already been processed or left over after harvest.
The reality is somewhat different.
Ed Appeal utilizes an emulsifier known as E471 composed of purified monoglycerides and diglycerides, widely used in highly processed baked goods, ice cream, infant formulas to stop oil and water from separating and extend the shelf life of products.
Is it safe?
An extremely good question.
According to one of Apeel's submissions, we're generally recognized as safe.
The primary compounds of enterpeel are 2,3-dihydroxypolean-palamate-PA1-GN1,3-dioxypropine-2YL-palamate-PA2G.
Epeel is relying on existing science for approval.
and I think that's what I'm In fact, it's considered so safe by regulators, no acceptable daily intake is considered necessary.
According to Abiel's application, individuals who eat large quantities of vegetables and fruit in theory could assume up to 218 Megabytes a person per day.
Milligrams a person per day.
Even more if they include a lot of potatoes.
Reliance on existing scientific studies and a regulatory approval means no new science has been required to evaluate the product or test produce coated with a product to see if it not only keeps it fresh on the outside but also protects the nutritional integrity of treated products.
Mono- and diglycerides are produced from plant oils which have already gone through an extraction process using a procedure involving high temperatures and chemicals.
Residues of ethyl acetate, heptane, palladium, arsenic, lead, calmium, and mercury from the production process are to be found in the mono- and diglycerides used in the product.
Remarkably, There appears to be no public research investigating the effects of the emulsifiers used on our gut microbiota, and researchers are going for further into potential adverse effects.
Given the amount of ultra-processed food people already consume, laden with a range of emulsifiers, E471 being among the most commonly used, It's application as a coding for fruit and vegetables only increases the potential for health issues to arise in order to apply the coding.
Fruit and veggies must be sprayed or dipped in a solution.
This could potentially result in some items having very little coating, while others end up with heavier as production processes are not uniform.
As with so many things in small amounts, an appeal may not cause an issue.
It doesn't exist to show yet one way or the other.
Nutrient poor ultra processed foods, however, could lead to a tipping point into the metabolic disease and gut dysfunction.
It's not just the science isn't clear.
It doesn't exist to show yet one way or the other.
At the end of the day, an appeal is gonna be ruled out whether we like it or not.
The bottom line is that yes, it will undoubtedly extend the life of food and veggies, but what overall cost of people's health?
Whatever regulatory authorities say regarding the safety of mono and diglycerides in our food, they're a long way from the original plant compounds they're derived from.
As far as our bodies are concerned, these are new-to-nature compounds, even if widely consumed already with the inherent risks that come from them.
The arrival of labial on the marketplace reminds us of many reasons to prioritize our purchase and consumption of local, traditionally produced organic Biodynamic and chemical-free foods whenever possible.
Chris, your thoughts?
Well, I can almost hear Bill Gates right now in a TED Talk.
If we can get an efficient edible food covering, we could eliminate 15% of the population with that.
Now, I have to say, I doubt this thing would be safe and effective, even if they keep reassuring it over and over again that it's safe and effective.
You've seen how that worked last time.
I'd also have to say that this preservative is most likely toxic, which it could be.
It could be anything like embalming fluid, something of the sort like that.
A high weapon grade preservative that'll cause cancer or internal issues of the consumers without question.
So yeah, Bill Gates has always been kind of these frankenfood stuff that he wants your kids to eat but wouldn't dare feed his own children.
I doubt that he had his kids vaccinated.
I doubt he gives them GMO foods.
I doubt they're eating Impossible Burgers over at Bill Gates' house.
And I sure as hell doubt that they're going to eat any food with this stuff on it.
Well, you know, I mean, it might be actually a kind of a miracle product.
It might be good, but anything associated with Bill Gates, I got to say, you have to view with suspicion.
There's a tremendous resumption.
It's going to be harmful, potentially even fatal.
Sad to say.
Meanwhile, Fox Fights attempt to uncover documents.
Fox News is opposing a renewed effort by three news organizations to unseal docs related to its defamation lawsuit, do nothing but gratify private spider and promote public scandal.
The AP, New York Times, and NPR have asked a Delaware judge to reveal mostly private text messages and conversations between Fox employees shortly after the 2020 presidential election that were covered during the Dominion voting system lawsuit.
Fox lawyer Katherine Mallory, in a letter sent to Delaware Superior Court Judge Eric Davis, said much of the material its competitors sought was not relevant to issues of the lawsuit.
She said the media has no right to access those records.
Many of the already uncovered conversations have proven newsworthy, showing Foxhouse and executives didn't believe the false allegations about Dominion's voting equipment, but still continue to air them.
Of course, I think that's really quite ridiculous.
The allegations of Dominion stealing the election using its equipment were absolutely sound.
Another batch of messages revealed former host Tucker scorned for former President Trump, including texts where he declared, I hate him passionately.
There's some question of whether that was sent out deliberately to track down a leaking source.
They've not been shy about sharing communication with the most potential grab headlines, Mallory wrote.
One of the reasons Fox agreed to settle was to buy peace and bring an end to the media speculation.
The news organizations and the docs, most of which Fox said it had redacted because of proprietary information, were still relevant.
Fox agreed to pay $7.87 mil to end the case.
Dominion accused the network of repeatedly airing bogus claims that voguing equipment rigged the 2020 election against Trump, despite knowing those claims were false.
But the amount of evidence substantiating that they're true is simply overwhelming.
Meanwhile, RFK Jr., when on CN, blasted the idea of allowing biological males to participate in women's sports.
Even though he's far from conservative, he opposes the radical left on a number of issues, including blasting the idea of allowing biological males to participate in women's sports.
In recent years, he exposed Fauci as a longtime liar and fraud who participated in an historic coup d'etat against Western democracy by means of his best-selling book, The Real Anthony Fauci.
He's also an environmental lawyer, made a law name for himself taking on Big Pharma.
A bull after Joe Biden's announcement found 35% of Democrats want someone other than he as their candidate.
Kennedy took 21% already.
In recent interviews revealed another item on Biden's agenda he vehemently opposes.
Biden is a strong supporter of allowing biological men to participate in women's strokes, which is absurd.
Biden's education department wants to block schools that prevent male from competing from females by taking away their federal funding.
RFK Jr.
made it clear he opposes that move.
I am against people participating in women's sports who are biologically male.
I think women who have worked so hard to develop women's sports over the past 30 years, I watch it happen.
I don't think that's fair.
Not his only area of disagreement with Biden He also ripped the left's cancel culture after his wife, actress Cheryl Hines, allegedly lost jobs for supporting his candidacy.
Biden's a far-left Democrat on a socialist agenda, or actually a fake impersonation of Biden, but he's certainly running on a socialist, even communist agenda.
Even though he supports many of the left policies, like the Green New Deal.
Bobby Jr.
offers Democrats fed up with Biden an alternative.
It'll certainly be a headache for Democrats in the primary.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, I think Kennedy would definitely force them to at least come toward some sort of recognition of reality and maybe Certainly give Biden quite a run for his money in his own ticket, let alone in the national election.
So yeah, I think they'll do the same thing they did at Bernie Sanders to RFK if he does run.
Or maybe even worse, I hate to even say it, but yeah, I don't know.
We'll see.
What are your thoughts?
Well, they've even declared they're not even going to allow debates during the primary.
So the whole thing is totally rigged.
But I don't think Biden is going to make it to the ballot box.
He's going to be taken out.
He's too unpopular.
It is.
They need a plausible premise.
It doesn't have to be true.
It has to be.
Biden is not a plausible candidate.
To run the elections and maintain they were legit when they're all rigged requires a certain aura that they can use to confound those who are skeptic.
So I think they got to get rid of Biden, Chris.
They have some basis in reality for perception management's sake, at least, like you're saying, without question.
And, you know, as far as with the RFK thing, I agree.
They won't even let him really get into serious discussions if they do even let him run.
And they'll do, like I said, what they did to Bernie Sanders or worse.
You know, Biden didn't even campaign in 2020, and somehow this guy got the most votes in U.S.
history.
It's an absolute absurdity.
Right.
I couldn't agree more.
Yes, completely right.
Meanwhile, The Navy confirms using a drag queen influencer.
Where are they coming up with this word influencer?
As a digital ambassador to attract recruits.
It's going to turn off anybody who wants to join the Navy.
They aren't going to want to join a Navy that's represented by a drag queen.
The Navy confirmed to Breitbart he was a drag queen.
Influencer is one of its digital ambassadors to recruit a wide range of potential candidates.
I don't think so.
The Influencer's active-duty Navy yeoman, second-class Joshua Kelly, whose stage name is Harvey Daniels.
Kelly served as part of the Navy Pilot Ambassador Program from October 2022 to March 2023, has openly performed as a drag queen, garnered broader public attention after a video of him circulated on social media.
He announced in November 2022 in a video that the Navy asked him to be their first Navy Digital Ambassador.
From joining in 2016 to being able to share my drag experience on my off time with my fellow sailors has been a blessing.
The experience has brought me so much strength, courage, and ambition to continue being an acolyte in representation of queer sailors.
He added, Thank you, Navy, for giving me the opportunity.
I don't speak for the Navy, but simply sharing my experience in the Navy.
Hoo-yah!
Let's go, Slick!
Kelly said he first performed drag for fellow sailors during lip-sync shows on a deployment in 2017 and 2018, and that video from the second show was released on international platforms.
Tuesday he responded to criticism from conservative broadcaster Graham Allen.
Here you go for my rebuttal.
Queer people were oppressed in the military for years until 2011, in Trent since 2021.
You only want to support the military when it benefits you and doesn't involve queer people.
Yet the military is the largest diverse and adaptable organization in the U.S., meaning USA, I think.
A Navy spokeswoman said, The Navy Digital Ambassador was a pilot initiative designed to explore the digital environment to reach a wide range of potential candidates as the Navy navigates the most challenging recruiting environment to face since the start of the all-volunteer force, meaning they can't get anyone to sign up, and I guarantee you this ain't gonna help.
The pilot has concluded we're evaluating the program and how it will exist in the future.
A Navy spokesman told Fox the service did not pay Kelly or any others for being Navy digital ambassadors.
Meanwhile, middle school student stands up to school board after allegedly sending him home for wearing a shirt that said, two genders.
A middle schooler in Massachusetts was called out after he wore a t-shirt saying there are only two genders.
Liam Morrison, a 12-year-old boy, attending John T. Nichols Junior Middle School, brought his case before the board on April 13th.
The young man claims his father came to the school to pick him up after he refused to change his shirt as requested by school officials.
Why did they make the request?
Because some students were complaining it made them feel unsafe and that the words in question were disrupting education.
Can you believe?
Morrison explained he was called out at gym over offending.
They were offending their Only Two Genders t-shirt and asked to remove it.
Yes, words on a shirt made people feel unsafe.
They told me I wasn't in trouble, but it sure felt like I was.
I was told I'd need to remove my shirt before I got returned to class.
When I nicely told them I didn't want to do that, they called my father.
Thankfully, my dad, supportive of my decisions, came to pick me up.
What did my shirt say?
Five simple words.
There are only two genders.
Nothing harmful, nothing threatening.
Just a statement I believe to be a fact.
Unfortunately, you live in an era when you're not allowed to debate facts.
That is especially so in the very institution that once encouraged debate in learning schools.
Why would this school have dared to ask a student to remove a shirt?
Would this school have dared to ask a student to remove a shirt featuring an LGBT flag or a trans flag?
This kid is both brave and brilliant.
John Stemberger.
Morrison wasn't simply content to recall the events leading up and resulting in his dismissal.
He cemented his status as a legend by calling out the school board to their faces.
He was told their only two-genders teacher was targeting a protected class and was a disruption to learning.
Who is this protected class?
Are their feelings more important than my rights?
He wondered.
I don't complain when I see pride flags and diversity posters hung throughout the school.
You know why?
Because others have right there the beliefs just as I do and just like that.
A little child shall lead them.
Morris was suggesting there were no real complaints about his t-shirt.
It was actually School of Issues that made it an issue.
I was told the shirt was a disruption to learning, but no one got up or stormed out of class.
No one burst into tears.
I'm sure I would have noticed had it happened.
He said the school board, he has rights.
Perhaps something he learned at his school, but likely came from teaching at home.
I have my own political opinions.
I have the right to express those opinions even at school.
This is called the First Amendment of the Constitution.
Those rights should be recognized, especially at school, unfortunately.
It takes a 12-year-old like Liam to remind adults about the right to free speech and the science behind what is a man or a woman.
I experience disruptions in my learning every day.
Kids acting out in class are a disruption.
Nothing is done.
Why do the rules apply to one, yet not another?
Meanwhile, Mary McCarthy tweets, what an outstanding young man.
Schools would be ashamed that a 12-year-old makes more sense than adults.
Chris, your thoughts about both?
Well, sometimes the simplicity in terms of biology and even the social situation that's being constructed and subverting it.
It leads to pretty simple conclusions and stuff that nature concluded a long time ago, that there are only two genders.
However, there's a group that's really trying to play both genders against each other.
And maybe by splitting that demographic and dividing and conquering into these subcategories, they can find ways to play even more people against one another and talk about these meaningful distractions that they put in front of our face.
To really divert us away from the big issues that they're getting away with.
And we talk about that all the time.
So, yeah, I think it's absurd.
But it's even more absurd that they're targeting these kids at these ages where they are vulnerable.
And certainly not only just in terms of the situation.
this gender thing, but just the propaganda, everything else that's involved with it, social media, social influencing, the sensationalizing it, putting on it every television show.
It's not an accident that this is really being shoved onto our kids in such an aggressive manner.
And the Navy recruiting using a drag queen, Chris?
Well, I tell you, it's scared to hell out of any Russian army that They come in, they see those guys come strolling in, they go running for their lives, I bet.
Nothing to do with it.
I don't know.
I don't know what the idea is with that, but it's absurd.
And it seems to be an old Masonic, Judeo-Masonic thing where they have two different groups, you know, the feminist type and the, it seems like the pedos and the homos.
I hate to sound like, you know, crude, but it really is what it is.
And I think that they're trying to push this on just about every civilization that they're in towards especially the unwinding of the stages of empire as you get to the later stages.
You really try to see these people push this stuff on on the younger kids because they understand it takes out the fighting age male population.
It takes out the self-elected reproduction.
They understand these things completely, and certainly what they're doing here is an absurdity to our military and our soldiers.
And even the people that they're doing this with, they don't realize they're being, you know, weaponized into idiots.
As a former Marine Corps officer, I guarantee it's going to have a negative, an adversary.
They're going to lose more recruits than they gain from this stupid stunt.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con.
Pro or con to live need to know at gmail.com.
Live need to know at gmail.com.
It's amazing how these people refer to a Donald Trump or some other right-wing demigod who is going to try to undermine American democracy or take away a woman's right to choose or not address the gun crisis and gun violence or racism, sexism, or homophobia, when the man in jode is an absolute illegitimate despotic dictator who unquestionably destroyed democracy in America using racism and gun violence and a rigged election as the lever.
I believe it was a Supreme Court who turned abortion over to a decision of individual states.
This is a prime example of how a Democrat utilizes a vehicle for their destructive agenda.
Show me a single valid election audit that proves Domenico's legitimacy.
Black box computer tallying of unverified mail-in ballots with secret proprietary software that cannot be verified does not represent election integrity in any sense of the concept.
Why was Ray Epps so intent on encouraging peaceful protesters of the very obviously rigged 2020 presidential election to enter the U.S.
Capitol?
Was he an agent provocateur working directly under the control of the dishonest dirty dams?
81 votes is not 81 million votes just because Domenico is a multiple zero.
Domenico has been 81 million times worse than Donald Trump.
Meanwhile, Willard Duke, Transgender inmates whose sexually abused own daughter has moved to women's prison.
But notice, only the way it could be published is for the author to make sure her is used.
The UK has lost, of course.
We're doing the same here.
Whatever country it's become, it's certainly not what America used to be.
Teresita Mighty.
Sick, sick, sick.
A transgender female pedophile who filmed her seven-year-old daughter being sexually abused for horrific porn videos is being housed in a New Jersey women's prison despite still having a penis, according to the London Daily Mail.
Meanwhile, final thoughts.
Chris, yours.
Well, you're seeing the full spectrum assault on every sense of culture and tradition that we have by these groups.
And I don't think it's an accident that they're trying to disrupt our focus on our life, liberty, pursuit of happiness.
They're taking every right that we can have.
And the reason that they're doing this is because we're, quote unquote, allowing them to do this.
But the reason we're, quote unquote, allowing them to do this is because we have probably 20 different crises.
All being thrown at us at the same time in our daily lives, whether it's not earning livable wages, whether it's debt, whether it's the political scene, or whether it's, you know, a lot of stuff with family issues, you know, caused on by the COVID lockdowns or the vaccine status or the, you know, all this stuff that they're trying to do.
Even the attacking of the kids and their sanity with this biological confusion that they're putting on with the LGBTQ stuff and And of course, many of the other things on top of that.
I mean, the list is almost so long, you know, take up the whole show talking about this.
But really, in terms of prioritizing your obligations or your concerns, you know, you almost got to pick and choose which ones are the ones you're going to set as priorities.
And it's very difficult to do that when these guys just keep launching new crisis type capitalism endeavors at you every day, whether it's a war with Russia or war with Ukraine or just war on the poor or whatever else it is.
So, you know, I think it's a war of attrition and it's all waged against us by the group that supposedly are our public servants and elected officials and the people that put them out and send them out to do what they do.
So we really are going to have to start concentrating our efforts to avoiding fueling the system that is really waging war on us.
And find out ways to really get outside that system and start to take back our communities, our rights, our land, our economic freedom, our privacy.
You know, these are our major things.
Excellent, Chris.
Yes, excellent.
Wonderful comments throughout today.
I'm very glad we had such a wonderful, clear connection.
Yeah, I didn't want to say anything for the first one in a while.
It's wonderful.
It's wonderful.
Sundance and the conservative treehouse recently observed that the Biden admin—this is a disposable presidency.
They're just using him, and he literally is an actor wearing a mask, to promote the most extreme left-wing causes possible.
Basically open borders, basically no crime, no law enforcement, basically deteriorating education for our little kids, exposing them to all kinds of sexual issues that are inappropriate to their age.
Pushing for a queer navy, a queer military?
These are ways to destroy America.
They're doing a great job of it, by the way, if you haven't noticed.
It's happening at a breakneck speed.
Stand by for the next catastrophe to befall the nation.
And if the U.S.
was indeed behind the drone attack on the Kremlin, don't be surprised if there's reciprocation in one form or another.
Let us hope, if it comes in a form such as Chris has suggested, of exposing the theft of our elections or that we have pathetic phonies masquerading around as presidents.
So be it.
The sooner the better.
We need help.
Stand by to spend as much time as you can with your friends, your loved ones, the people you love and care about.
We still do not know how much time we have left.
Have a great weekend.
▲
Export Selection