All Episodes
Previous Next
April 30, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:04:55
Real Deal Climate Change #10 (28 April 2023)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer welcoming you to Real Deal Special Report with Joe Olson, who's a longtime collaborator, a researcher extraordinaire.
It's been looking into global warming for some time and has an update for us that I think is going to be highly revealing about how professional societies have concealed the facts about one of the largest scams of all time.
Joe, pleasure to have you here.
Yes, a little bit of background.
Jim and I did our first interview, Zoom call in March of 2015.
It was unequivocal 9-1-1 nukes, which I ended up writing a full article about, which is posted at Veterans Today.
And then we ended up doing about two dozen YouTube videos over the next couple of years.
And then we met at the JFK ...conspiracy convention in Dallas, November of 2018, and we had lunch and our dinner together every day of the three-day-long conference.
So, we've had, you know, personal contact, and we've done 350 interviews on BitChute.
If you want more information on global warming, you can go to BitChute.
In their search, you can put Joe Olson, O-L-S-O-N, climate change.
We've done a nine-part series with our one-hour long tutorials, and if you don't understand some of the stuff that we're talking about today, we go into a little bit more depth of that, and this is just going to be adding on.
This will end up probably being AGW number 10.
But this is, if you don't understand it, this is aimed at STEM students that are GT in high school, college students that are being force-fed garbage by professors, professionals that need credit.
We're going to be discussing atmospheric radiation physics, and we're going to be discussing the part that the professional societies have played in two major scam cover-ups.
One of them is the American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Ventilating Engineers, who are covering up for the global warming green energy scam, and the other is the American Society of Civil Engineers, which are covering up for the 9-1-1 scam.
Oh, excellent, Joe.
Here we go, my friend.
This is your latest article on my blog.
Joe Olson, the ASHRAE cargo cult.
Can you see it, Joe?
Yes, you can go ahead and read the first paragraph, and then we'll read a paragraph at a time, and I'll comment on it as we go along.
You got it.
In his recent YouTube video, Anthropologists, Robert Seppler describes the reaction of ignorant tribal societies when confronted by foreign advanced technologies, while most pronounced in the tribes of Micronesia, by the arrival of Allied forces, then overtaken by Japanese forces and finally recaptured by Allies, and then abandoned.
Confused, the tribal societies then asserted their creation of these advanced technologies, claimed that they had created these products of civilization, and that foreigners had stolen these gifts from their gods.
The modern parallels are striking.
Yes, they certainly are.
If you look at what they've done to our culture in the last several decades, they've removed all of our monuments, they've removed any trace that white people created the society, and said that actually, it was created by the people that were out picking cotton, and we stole it from them.
And so therefore, we can't have any of our leaders, we can't have any of our history, and we have no place in our future, because we're not diversive, inclusive, and environmentally.
So that's the problem that they've got.
They've constructed this whole false paradigm, and then they've turned around and turned us into a tribal society.
And that's just absolutely apparent every day that you look.
And this 20-minute long video by Robert Zephyr does a really good job of explaining how this tribalized mindset is able to accept an alternative false history.
And so let's just go ahead and read the next paragraph.
Sure.
A full-spectrum assault on civilization is being conducted by foreigner, inhuman forces that have stolen our technology, dumbed us down to tribal-level ignorance, and are directing us to destroy our heritage.
Modern luddites attack every branch of science, all positive aspects of history and mold current culture into a self-hating, divisive force for feudalism.
I, Joe Olson, have written extensively on the wide range of this planned extinction event, and now every center of knowledge has been compromised.
Okay, yeah.
We will skip reading the rest of the article because at this point I'm ready to spring off into what the actual science fraud that's involved.
The American Society of Heating and Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers.
I've got a complete history of this on an article that I wrote at Canada Free Press August 7, 2010.
It's called Airmen of ASHRAE Enter the Fray.
And that particular article was really popular at Canada Free Press.
I emailed copies of it to 30 of the 50 chapters of ASHRAE, and then I called, at the time that it still charts you for long-distance calls, I called a dozen of the largest chapters in the United States and explained to them what was in my article.
And to a man, every one of the presidents of those local chapters said that they agreed, but that wasn't the national policy.
Well, one of the other people I mailed it to is what we will call a ZIM, because we're going to use the proper pronouns.
I don't want to dox anybody.
This is not about the individuals that are involved in this cover-up.
This is about the institutionalized cover-up of climate science By people who have every obligation to tell the truth about what really happens in the atmosphere, and this is the primary group.
These are the people that write the energy codes, that are also involved in all of the load calculations and all of the green energy requirements.
Every bit of this global warming, green energy, And Pete Oil is all based on scientific fraud, which is absolutely provable that Jim and I have covered in nine different lecture series so far.
And those are, you can go to BitChute, put in Joe Olson, climate change.
It'll bring up 30 different entries.
A lot of those are reposts by other web content providers at BitChute that have picked up my material and Jim's material and reposted it on their site.
But if you go through, it's AGW1, which started, I think, in January of 2021.
And then there was like one every couple of weeks for nine series total.
And this will end up being number 10.
But I want to go through, I did air conditioning load calculations.
This is a carrier design manual that I got when I was a draftsman back in the 70s.
This is based on 1960 copyright.
At the time this, and this is like the 8th edition, So, the original printing was back in the 50s, and this is what ASHRAE used to do all of their load calculations and come up with what their ASHRAE load analysis is currently.
Now, this is a really complicated thing.
It goes through absolutely everything.
This is every city in the United States, their latitude, longitude, altitude, number of degree days.
And then it has calculations for how to determine the amount of heat gain based on your solar azimuth angles, which is a function of your latitude.
And then the amount of heat that is involved, more of this solar heat gain through ordinary glass.
To do air conditioning calculations for an interior space is more complicated than it is to do the Energy absorption from the sun for exterior.
So, if you're doing interior design for an air conditioning system, you have more factors involved than if you were doing the calculations for what is happening in the general climate outside.
Now, one of the things that affects the temperature that you have to control inside the space is relative humidity.
And to do that, you use a thing that, uh, at the time was really complicated math.
It's like, uh, Stefan-Boltzmann equations, and those involve fourth-degree polynomials.
So what engineers did is they made what's called nomographs.
This nomograph is called a psychometric chart.
This is how you calculate the amount of Moisture that's in the air that's going through an air conditioning unit that has to be removed by latent heat of condensation.
And latent heat of condensation we'll discuss a little bit further when we're getting into the actual global warming aspects of it.
But just to make sure that everybody knows, if you're doing air conditioning calculations inside a space, you're doing something far more complicated than any climatologist has ever done.
And in order to be an engineer, I had to have two semesters of thermodynamics.
Prerequisites for that was four semesters of chemistry, two semesters of physics, three semesters of calculus, and then a calculus that was required only for engineers, and that calculus course was called numerical methods, and then two semesters of Thermodynamics.
So I've understood this stuff for the last 50 years.
I was invited, after that article ran in September of 2010, to be co-author of a book called Slaying the Sky Dragon, in which we explain all of the amount of transfer by radiant conductive and convective heat currents.
One of the co-authors of this book is Dr. Klaus Johnson, who is a PhD Applied Mathematician, who was employed at the Stockholm Institute in Sweden, and they are one of the ones that award the Nobel Prizes.
And when our book came out, His department ordered him to not teach the formulas that had been taught for thermodynamics for engineers since 1870 because it violated the global warming hypothesis.
This was physically impossible, Joe, from the beginning.
I mean, this is outrageous.
The laws of science, including thermodynamics, cannot be violated and cannot be changed.
And if you're being given a story that contravenes them, you know for sure that story is false.
Yes, well let's bring up four known ways that carbon dioxide cools the Earth.
If we can bring that article up.
And we don't have to read that article because it's pretty in-depth.
What we just need to do is go down and bullet point the four different methods that Dr. Pierre Latour, PhD, chemical engineering, explains in his article.
He's one of my colleagues.
And I met him several times for lunch here in Houston.
We attended the Dr. Fred Singer presentations twice out at University of Houston, and then he went out to the conference in Las Vegas.
The Heartland lukewarmest love fest is what I call it.
We were in a room with 600 claimed climate skeptics that said carbon dioxide only warms a little, and there weren't a half dozen of us in the whole room that ever taken thermodynamics, and we're trying to explain to them, no, it doesn't warm at all.
So, but we'll get to that in just a second.
Yes, I have it here, Joe, and I'm trying to find it.
Let me see here.
Do you have a link in this to it?
In the article?
I probably have it on my email that I sent you earlier, but Joe, I had it lined up.
Hang on a second.
I'm going to pause while we track this down.
Joe, we're there.
Go right ahead, my friend.
Okay, yeah.
Just scroll down.
We'll do the bullet points.
One of the paragraphs is carbon CO2 affects several temperatures in different ways.
And then one of the ways that he mentions is the Stefan Boltzmann law of radiation.
Yeah, let me just read that paragraph, Joe.
Here we developed the physics, chemistry, and biology to quantify the effect of atmospheric carbon dioxide on Earth's temperature.
There are five mechanisms and three different temperatures involved.
Four show a small cooling effect with one warm surface and cools upper atmosphere with no net bulk.
A fact.
I am unaware of a rigorous mathematical description of the greenhouse gas theory that purports to do this and show a warming effect.
After decades of research attempt, promoters cannot reduce greenhouse gas theory to mathematics of science and engineering.
Yours.
Yes, okay.
Well, one of the first ones he mentions is Stethemann-Boltzmann Law of Radiation, and then he goes into technical detail.
This is a fourth-degree polynomial that is one of the reasons why we have to use nomographs, because back in the age of slide rules, fourth-degree polynomials were pretty difficult, but now they've got plug-and-play programs where engineers can graduate with having no concept at all of how these radiation laws work.
Okay, and then the conservation of energy and atmosphere, I will discuss that in a little less technical detail.
Radiant energy transfer, I will also discuss that in a little bit less detail, because, you know, you can't really, you have to sit there and read these numbers, and this is going to, you know, glaze over the eyeballs of anybody that's not a serious science student.
And then the next one is lapse rate.
We will discuss lapse rate.
We also discuss conservation of energy on Earth.
And then, he doesn't list this as one of the four known, but he mentions photosynthesis.
And we know for a fact, plants remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
In the process, they create chemical compounds, which are sugars, starches, and cellulose, which are vital for life on the planet.
And if we didn't have plants, and we didn't have CO2, we wouldn't have life on this planet.
So, to claim that that's some kind of a pollutant is absolutely absurd.
And like they mentioned, It's the carbon dioxide is only 0.04% of the atmosphere and we will get into a little bit more detail on that but what Dr. Latour doesn't mention are two additional factors and one of those is the Phase change for water vapor.
And water vapor molecules in the driest place on Earth, which would be the Acoma Desert in Chile and Antarctica, is 1% relative humidity.
And at that point, water molecules in the atmosphere outnumber carbon dioxide molecules by 2,000 to 1.
The general relative humidity worldwide is a lot higher than that, and water vapor ends up being about 4% of the atmosphere.
And water vapor absorbs in 37,000 spectral lines.
And we'll get to that in a little bit more detail.
Now, as I mentioned, I went to the Heartland Convention out in Las Vegas.
If we can do a screen share of this.
Hang on.
Okay.
This shows the cyclic temperature chart.
And basically, you've had warming and cooling periods, and in order to make the global warming hypothesis happen, they had to eliminate one of the largest cooling periods we've had in the last 4,500 years, which is the Little Ice Age, where the Thames froze over solid, and they had elephant rides.
You could ride on the six-foot-thick ice in the middle of London.
And that occurred all the way up until the mid-1820s.
And so, bottom line is, They had to make that disappear, and they did that with some magic tree rings, and we discussed that in other ones of the series, so people are just invited to look at that.
Now, this is another one of the charts that I took out to Las Vegas.
This shows the Planck's Curve, which is one of the other laws involved in radiation physics, and it's based on temperature.
You're going to have a certain electromagnetic output, okay?
And I also took this to the Heritage Foundation Summit in Houston, which was in September of 2014, and I took it to the ASHRAE conference that they had, national conference, three day long in Houston in 2018.
And so I took these three charts, one of them is this goopy Kiel Trenberth chart.
T-I-E-H-L dash T-R-E-N-B-E-R-T-A.
And this shows incoming top of atmosphere solar radiation as being 340 watts per square meter.
And then it shows 161 watts per square meter reaching the surface of the Earth.
But then if you look over here, it says that The Earth gets 330 watts per square meter of back radiation from magic gas in the atmosphere.
And this is just absolutely 100% completely absurd.
Because this is what's actually happening in the atmosphere.
Again, we have this solid line, which indicates the Planck's curve, and Planck's curve is a function of your temperature.
We'll get to a little bit more of that in just a second.
And then, it shows the absorption by spectral lengths inside this Planck curve, and then it shows outgoing long-wave radiation.
But, if you look at this, it says spectral intensity on the vertical axis, And then if you look at the horizontal axis, this is a logarithmic axis.
So what you actually have is you have this giant hump of incoming energy from the Sun and then way over here, which has been shortened by the logarithmic scale and then amplified by the non-scaled Intensity, but they give you a clue.
They tell you its temperature.
Well, this temperature is 5500 degrees Kelvin, and this temperature is 200 degrees Kelvin.
So, what they've done is they've amplified the outgoing radiation from the Earth by 20 times in order to Maybe make it clarified, or maybe they're just trying to lie to you that the Earth is producing an equal amount of energy at the Sun, it's just in a different wavelength.
Well, that's completely, absolutely, 100% absurd.
Now, I've gone into detail about this before in other lectures in the 1 through 9 series so far.
This is water vapor absorption.
And as I mentioned before, water vapor absorbs in 37,000 spectral lines.
I give you the frequencies, and I give you the temperatures.
Carbon dioxide absorbs in 3 spectral lines.
I give you the temperatures, and I give you the spectral lines.
Carbon dioxide only absorbs in outgoing Earth temperatures and that temperature happens to be minus 80 degrees, which occurs in the Very high parts of the atmosphere, which is why CO2 with a specific gravity of 1.5 stays in the upper atmosphere because it's being heated by the sun during the day.
It gets really excited.
It gives you what's called the thermosphere, which apparently the temperature is really hot up there.
But the problem is a mechanical thermometer.
It's measuring kinetic energy.
And it can't tell the difference between one molecule moving 1,000 feet per second or 1,000 molecules moving at 1 feet per second.
And what's happening in the upper atmosphere, if you jump outside of a space suit, you're going to flash freeze your whole entire body in a millisecond.
So it's not hot up there, but a thermometer is going to say, oh man, these molecules are really excited.
Yeah, they're excited because they're being hit by the sun and they're being activated.
Okay.
Now the next one, and as we mentioned before, carbon dioxide is only 0.4% of the atmosphere.
The next one is methane.
Methane is CH4.
It's a five molecule atom.
I mean, a five-atom molecule.
And it only absorbs in two spectral lines.
And those, there again, can only absorb incoming radiation.
And then the final one is nitrous oxide, which is their new boogie bear, which is the one that... Methane is 1.7 parts per million in the atmosphere.
Nitrous oxide is 0.33 parts per million in the atmosphere and that's what gives fertilizer to plants and now they're trying to remove anesthesia because they're saying the doctors are using too much nitrous oxide on their patients and it's warming the planet.
Well, we're going to get to another really important fact that every one of these people has been lying about since the creation of climatology, and actually since Cervantes Arrhenius, who we cover in previous 1-9 series.
And this is the Stokes Shift.
What is the Stokes Shift?
The Stokes shift is Irish physicist George Gabriel Stokes discovered this spectral shift from a lower energy between incident light and scattered and emitted light.
He presented this to the Royal Society in 1852, and here is the Stokes shift.
Anything that absorbs, in the case of gases, in a billionth of a second emits a longer wavelength, lower energy photon.
And so, bottom line is, you, this is wavelength where you're getting less and less energy and lower, longer wavelength.
And what happens is, uh, say, any body with a temperature over zero degrees Kelvin emits electromagnetic radiation.
A human being at 98.6 emits in the 10 micron range, which is why you're visible on infrared cameras at night.
But you cannot take your own electromagnetic radiation and reflect it back on your body and raise your own temperature, because temperature transfer is a vector.
It only goes from a higher temperature to a lower temperature, and it's a violation of the second law of thermodynamics for it to go the opposite direction.
But, any mass that you place between an emitting body and a heat sink is going to delay that particular heat transfer.
And that's what happens in the atmosphere.
So, they claim that water vapor is a warming gas, when in fact what happens is, when the sun hits the ocean, or lakes, Or the solar side facing of a cloud, it causes evaporation.
That evaporation is called the latent heat of vaporization, and changing a liquid into a gas removes 2,274 kilojoules per kilogram of heat.
That heat travels up in the atmosphere and getting back to the lapse rate, the lapse rate is 3 degrees Kelvin, 4 degrees Fahrenheit for every thousand foot of altitude that you rise up as you're going higher and higher in altitude.
And so it rises up to a point where it has latent heat of condensation.
It condenses.
At that point, it releases that 2274, and it continues as a convective wave until it reaches more and more, and it goes completely outside of the atmosphere.
So none of that energy is being focused back on the Earth.
Actual proof of that?
When was the last time a cloud got between you and the Sun, and you got hotter?
Not a warming gas.
When was the last time a cloud got over you and dropped hot rain, hot sleet, hot hail, and hot snow?
Not a warming gas.
We use water as condensing for electrical generation plants.
We use it for cooling cars, for air conditioning plants.
If you're hot, you can spray yourself with water.
You can feel the water removing the heat away from your body.
It's absolutely 100% provable science, known since 1852 and ignored by everyone since then that's trying to push this green agenda.
And it has nothing to do with saving the climate, has nothing to do other than to completely control and dominate humanity because thermal energy is a force multiplier.
If you had to go out and mow your lawn every week with a pair of scissors, you would do nothing but mow your lawn all year long.
So, bottom line is, what happened is, I started notifying these people at ASHRAE, and like I said, I took these same three plates to their national convention.
Every day.
I got there at 7 a.m.
I stayed there till 9 p.m.
They had hors d'oeuvres and a lot of vendors had free drinks, although I don't drink, but I do eat hors d'oeuvres once in a while, and so I would stay there every day.
It was here in Houston.
I stayed there every day, and one of the really telling events that they had, and I mentioned this in my article, was one, I think it was seminar number 50, 55, where they talked about Sustainable microgrids and how incompatible the green energy systems are, because windmills don't operate at constant rotational speed, so they can't generate alternating current that's transmissible.
Solar cells work by electrical Molecular erosion, stripping electrons off of boron atoms.
I've got a great article at that, Principia Scientific, called Green Prince of Darkness Exposed.
It goes through all of the different factors involved in this green energy fraud, which is another one, but that article was originally posted at Canada Free Press back in 2010.
I updated it and reposted it at Principia Scientific, but turns out about The same time that article was being updated, Michael Moore was approached by some people that said, look, we've studied this green energy thing, and it's an absolute 100% fraud.
Every one of these green energies is a net energy loser.
And so you cannot make biofuels without using more energy than you get out of the biofuels themselves.
And that certainly includes methanol, which they're using for gasoline additive.
Or ethanol, excuse me.
And it also includes diesel fuels.
It includes these solar cells.
And they do a great example of where does the silicon come from that you use to make the crystalline silicon grid to make the base material for a solar cell?
Well, they're blasting out the largest quartz mountain known in the world, and that's over in South Carolina.
They ship it by rail over to the port.
They ship it over to China.
They grind it up, they bake it in an oven at 1500 degrees Celsius under a vacuum in order to get the crystalline cubic structure that it takes to make the strata, and then they embed that with boron and phosphorus.
Well, you can't dig and refine boron and phosphorus without using an enormous amount of energy, and what you get out of a solar cell is one and a half watts per square foot one and a half volts direct current for about six hours a day at the most and there's no way of improving that because it's just basically electron molecular stripping of the boron atoms
and when you get finished with the solar cell you've got nothing but refined toxic junk that has to be recycled and there's no way of recycling it and an electrical photo cell will never reproduce 10 percent of the investment energy it takes to to create that particular scan so bottom line is let's switch back over to the article that we had on the four on the car joe
let me just let me just emphasize let me just pick up on one of the key points you made in passing here all All of these green energy proposals entail net energy loss.
They're inefficient, they consume more energy than they produce.
It seems to me that's devastating.
It means a whole green energy scheme is a monster fraud from scratch.
And ASHRAE is 100% supporting that fraud.
And like I didn't finish mentioning, Michael Moore was approached by these people that they needed a producer to be able to put this movie out.
The movie is a 90-minute documentary called Planet of the Humans.
And you really need to visit that particular documentary and start showing it to all of your friends because it blows away the whole green energy fraud.
You're telling me that Michael Moore, liberal par excellence, has actually repudiated the Al Gore AOC liberal agenda, the green energy agenda.
Michael Moore has done this in spades in this brilliant documentary, Planet of the Humans.
Yes, and it'd be nice if the humans took over the planet, and it looks like that's going to be happening really soon.
I'm resuming my need-to-know thing, and this next Wednesday I'll be on.
I'm only going to be doing one a week because it was getting too time-consuming, but this Wednesday we'll be discussing the reasons why Fox fired Tucker, and the reasons why Fox did a settlement the day after
TrueTheVote disclosed three terabytes of incriminating evidence against Koenig, who just happens to be one of the subsidiaries of Dominion, who just happened to be suing Fox News, who just also happens to be suing Michael Lindell and Sidney Powell and TrueTheVote, and they've got enough evidence now that the voter fraud is just 100%.
So, bottom line is, all of these Fake news medias are collapsing absolutely rapidly.
Turns out today that I'm trying to remember the name of it.
And I just had it, an article from them.
You want me to pause?
But anyhow, let's pull up.
Well, no, I don't.
We don't need to do that.
It's not important.
Let's go ahead and pull up my article on the cargo cult because I want to cover a little bit more.
Back to the Cargo Cult?
Yes, sir.
Let's do some more on Cargo Cult.
okay car we go cold Why is it not coming up?
Let me try again, Joe.
Mm-hmm.
Did you want to do any more with The Four Ways, Joe?
Are we done with that?
We're done with that.
Oh, okay.
People can look that up on their own.
I don't know why I'm having trouble getting to it, Joe.
I shouldn't be.
I've got it up here multiple times.
Huh.
I may.
I may have to pause while I get it fixed.
Jesus.
is.
Joe, I'm really...
Joe, I think we're going to...
We're going to need to look again if I could.
I'm looking under my seat.
Here, Joe.
Here we go, Joe.
Just go ahead.
I got it.
I got it, Joe.
All right.
Well, let's go down and do the next article.
You mean paragraphs?
This is downloading as a file.
Okay.
You want me to read some paragraphs?
Yeah, read the next paragraph.
Well, they'll explain the capture of government, academia, and professional societies in the planned new reality, where your tribal boundaries will be increasingly limited, ending in an orchestrated mass extinction event.
I will be speaking to a wide range of organizations.
My personal contact with individuals in these organizations, the purpose of it is not to dox these placeholders, but to point out the extreme prejudice against open discussion and proven scientific and historical facts.
In keeping with, of course, non-binary pronoun assignment, I will refer to all parties as susceme.
I will refer to all PhD individuals as Doc, in keeping with my article, Hockey Stickery Doc, at Canadian Pre-Bras.
I'm going to skip footnotes.
The titles and quotation marks are by this author, and I don't feel obligated to spoon-feed those who are not intellectually curious.
I've titled this article on the role of the American Society of Refrigeration Air Conditioning Engineers, a group responsible for accurately explaining thermal force and structures and efficient use of energy.
ASHRAE is a neutered, non-binary organization, henceforth referred to as ZIM-A.
I work my way through night school and civil engineering, doing mechanical, electrical, and survey drafting.
I did air conditioning load analysis on hundreds of projects and was dismayed that there was no pushback from ASHRAE on the obvious fraud of global warming.
In September 2010, I wrote Airmen of ASHRAE into the frame and sent it to 30 of Lloyd and Zim A chapters on the board of directors.
I followed phone calls to a dozen of the largest chapter presidents.
All agreed global warming was a fraud, but said they could not oppose the national position.
One time I received my email as a board member.
A professor at a northeastern university, Zim Ed, told me that the Department of Energy provided major funding that required obedience to the carbon climate forcing call.
My engineering degree... Okay, let's stop right there.
Yeah, that particular Zim came to the Houston Chapter about two years ago, and he made a presentation, and after the presentation, I went up and started showing him a few things about what was actually happening in the atmosphere, and he said, directly to my face, that, yes, I told you, we get enormous amount of funding from the Department of Energy, created by Jimmy Carter, And we cannot go against what they tell us to do.
So we're not even going to discuss the physics that is involved that proves every bit of this is false.
We're going to do what we're being paid to do.
So, you know, pretty much like Pfizer told the court in their documents that they didn't commit fraud on the government.
They delivered the government that the fraud that the government had ordered them to deliver.
And then about two or three months ago, they had another Zim Ed from a Midwest university show up here in Houston to do a local presentation.
And she had a PhD in architectural engineering.
And apparently, they either don't teach thermodynamics anymore, or certain engineering degrees no longer require thermodynamics.
And I know that's a fact in several engineering fields, but I don't want to really go into that.
And they offer advanced degrees to people that never got an undergraduate degree in thermodynamics, in engineering, and so they never took thermodynamics.
So the whole engineering profession has been bastardized by people that have no loyalty to what engineers are supposed to do, which I'm licensed by the state of Texas to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Texas using correct applied science, and that's what I've tried to do for the last 50 years of my life, and that's why it offends me so much that these people don't do that.
So anyhow, this lady showed up, or this Zim, excuse me, it wasn't a lady, it was a Zim, This Zim showed up, and she had an hour and a half long presentation, and one of the first slides she put up was that there was no equity, diversity, and inclusion unless you had at least 30% of the minority parties involved.
And so she said there's no future for white men in engineering because we have to have 30% women, we have to have 30% minorities, and then we have to have 30% transgender, so there is no place for white men in engineering.
And this is exactly the same kind of go woke, go broke.
I pray that ASHRAE gets an enormous reduction in their membership.
I pray that ASHRAE is forced to someday provide me with a forum to debate any expert they can put forward in the whole country on the facts that I've presented as far as radiation physics and about global warming and about the enormous lies that have been systematically told throughout our entire system.
And we're not going to raise a stem a generation of future leaders if what we teach them is chicken little science and Jack and the Beanstalk energy solution by Pied Piper professors.
And then there was an ASHRAE article that came out recently.
And another Zim at a Midwest university was explaining how important it was for ASHRAE to support the global warming thing because it was the end of the world if we don't.
And I actually sent a couple of emails to this Zim.
I talked to this Zim on the phone, and this Zim sent me an email saying, well, I've been researching this for 40 years, and if you don't If you don't subscribe to what NASA says, then you are uninformed and don't send me any more articles because they're poorly referenced and they don't do the actual science.
Well, you know for an absolute fact that part of the way they got the global warming curve to happen was that they eliminated the Depression-era warming and Dust Bowl in the United States.
NASA went back and adjusted all of the temperature records from every warming period so that they could make it look like there was an increase that matched the carbon dioxide increase, which is complete hoax.
And then NASA, to give you a little further example of what duplicitous dirtbags they are, in July of 2001, they held a half-day seminar, and a guy had over a hundred PowerPoint slides, and the presentation was named NASA's Future Wars 2025.
And they said in order for there to be a continuation of government, the population had to have a mass traumatic event.
And so that's what they had planned.
And then months later, we had the 9-1-1 mass traumatic event.
And that's how they were able to push through the Patriot Act, which Joe Biden said he wrote and put in a drawer in 1996, and that that's what they were planning on doing, but they just needed the right event to make it happen.
And then we had the PNAC group that was in charge of the project for the New American Century, said that the United States need to overthrow seven Middle Eastern countries, but in order to do that, we need to have a new Pearl Harbor.
That was released in September of 2000, which brings up another one of the little friendly bunches that I have an issue with, and that's the American Society of Civil Engineers.
Now, when I was back still being a cub engineer here in Houston, we were having a local debate over a transportation system, and they were trying to put in an illegal, no-bid, design-build contract with the Disney Corporation, and it was going to connect real estate properties
that were owned by two individuals in Houston, Gerald Hines and Kenneth Schnitzer, which was downtown real estate to the Greenway Plaza real estate to the Galleria shopping mall.
And it made absolutely no sense at all.
I had traveled the country.
I'd ridden on functional rail systems in Chicago, Washington, D.C., Boston, San Francisco.
And then I knew how a good system should operate.
And so I went down and presented a proposal connecting Intercontinental Downtown Seven University campuses and Medical Center and Hobby Airports with a 27.5-mile high-speed heavy rail.
I go into a lot of detail about this in a separate channel post, which is bit.ly/J-O-E-O-L-S-O-N and then the number 2.
And this is one of the articles that was written about my rail system.
This was in the Houston Press.
In the process of doing this, I was on local TV news, and I had a three-minute segment on our NBC affiliate, which has got about almost half a million viewers.
And it was nightcast December 13, 1989, and they said, "Here's an ordinary engineer, an ordinary guy doing extraordinary ideas," five years before Rush Limbaugh supposedly coined that phrase.
And then they gave me three minutes of time on nightcasts.
I ended up meeting with everybody who was influential in Houston area.
One of those was my state, my national representative Bill Archer, District 7 U.S.
Congress, and he was chairman of the Ways and Means Committee.
He was in Congress for, I don't know, 30 or 40 years.
I had a scheduled 15-minute meeting with him, and in that 15-minute meeting, I asked him why, and he asked me why they were Why I needed to do this automobile design, which is also one of the ones that's covered in that Joe Olson 2 at Bitshoot.
I had a 200 mile per gallon carbon fiber hybrid gas electric automobile that I designed and presented to the senior class at St.
John Devines High School.
Anyhow, I said, He said, well, I'm really intrigued by this.
He said, why do we have to build this particular car?
And I said, Congressman, this is, bear again, this was on Texas Independence Day, March 2nd, 1990.
I said, if we do not build this car, in 20 years, General Motors will be bankrupt and half of U.S.
Treasury will be in Saudi Arabia.
And he said, well, that's not going to happen.
Oh, I was wrong.
It only took 19 years for General Motors to be bankrupt.
So bottom line is, all of this stuff is very observable if you understand what they're lying to you about, and I've understood my whole entire life.
And the next item that I had on that particular rail proposal was I went and met with the fired chairman of Metro.
Bob Lanier, in his private office, and I said, look, this is a violation of state competitive bidding law, Vernon's Code 664-4.
It was in my engineering newsletter just last month.
And Lanier, who was an attorney, said, yeah, I know.
He said one of our local contractors, and he gave them the name, but that's not important at this point, said that if they didn't have to bid against anybody, they got $200 million in excess profit in that billion-dollar rail project, we'll all get rich on it.
Well, one of the other groups I approached at that particular time was the American Society of Civil Engineers, and you would think that civil engineers would want to do what was best for the city of Houston, and so I went to one of their luncheons.
I had several friends of mine that had been Students with me at University of Houston and so I sat with them and I said look I need to talk to the people that are in charge of this the program director and the president I went up with my copies of the real proposal that actually work and they said well We've already decided who's getting those contracts for the monorail system, so we don't need to discuss anything else So that was number one issue on me as far as ASCE but then we get to the point of what happened on 9-1-1 and
What happened on 9-1-1, two days after the collapse of the buildings, somebody that was an administrator with the American Society of Civil Engineers said, well, this looks like a fire-damaged, sudden collapse.
And it's just like all of the sudden deaths that were experienced from all of these jabs.
And I went, my God, how, with the stuff still smoldering and not the least bit of forensic evidence, the American Society of Civil Engineers puts out a position paper that says it looks like spontaneous collapse just because once one of the dominoes starts falling, then the whole thing starts falling.
It was absolutely absurd.
But then they supported The FEMA document, which was released in January of 2002, which did the same exact scenario, and they stopped doing their analysis at the point where the building collapsed starts.
They go, well, we don't want to explain how it kept collapsing.
We just want to say this is how it started to collapse.
Which is completely absurd.
They kept getting more and more pushback, so then they had the 9-1-1 Commission.
Nobody liked what the 9-1-1 Commission said, so then in order to put a fig leaf over that, they did the National Institute of Standards and Technology analysis, and they said, yes, everything that FEMA said is absolutely 100% correct.
So, as Jim and I had discussed in March of 2015, after reading two dozen articles at Veterans Today on the nuclear vaporization of the Trade Center buildings, I ended up writing another article.
And this was posted at Veterans Today.
Unequivocal 9-1-1 nukes.
I used the FEMA 403 chapter material, which describes the exact construction of those buildings, but it has a lot of errors in it.
But this is what I use for reference.
And after I published this article at Veterans Today, one of my readers contacted me and said, you need to read the Palmer Report.
And this was produced by four Ph.D.
physicists in Europe.
One from France, one from Belgium, and two from Germany.
It was printed and published in German, and one of the people that I know here in America translated it.
It has 45 PowerPoint slides.
It has three 90-minute videos that explain the exact sequence of operation.
And this is exactly what happened.
These red arrows indicate 110-story tall buildings that collapsed in 14 seconds each, following a 12-second delay from a 2.2 Richter scale explosion which happened in the basement.
Now, you didn't do that with jet fuel.
That happened hours after the planes hit the buildings, but it happened 12 seconds prior to the videotape collapse of the buildings, and both buildings collapsed in 14 seconds.
And then, five hours later, you had the collapse of World Trade Center 7.
I'll go into extensive detail about this.
They also go into extensive detail, but because they were physicists and they hadn't bothered to study nuclear radiation, they missed some of the other factors that were involved in this.
And that is that building materials.
This is again from the FEMA drawings.
This is the Connection to the bar joists, to the spandrel sections on the exterior of the building, the horizontal bands on the World Trade Center buildings, what's called spandrel sections, those were 52-inch high, 2-inch thick plate steel.
They were welded top and bottom to bar joists on 4-foot centers.
They had shear ties that would loop through the top of the bar joists and weld it through there, and then they had 6 inches of poured concrete.
Absolutely absurd, any scenario that they come up with for how those buildings fell naturally.
And so, I hadn't had much contact with the American Society of Civil Engineers, but I did contact one of their board members about, it's been about a month ago now, and I said, I'm going to forward you some articles I want you to review those.
Contact me if you have any questions, and I'll get back to you within a month.
And he said, well, everything that you've explained makes perfect sense.
He goes, what we've been saying about the World Trade Center buildings does not make sense.
So what I'm hoping to do with today's presentation is to put the alarm bells out for the ASHRAE That your organization is duplicitous and a crime against humanity, which has nothing to do with saving the environment, and everything to do with 15-minute cities and eating bugs and owning nothing, and it's nothing but a socialist takeover, and it's even worse than that.
It's a demonic Communistic overtaking of the society.
And then also for the civil engineers out there to contact ASCE and say you've reviewed the material that we discussed in today's program and that you feel that it is mandatory that ASCE have a public hearing and we allow every side to be heard as far as what really happened.
And I attended four events so far with Richard Gage, architects and engineers for 9-1-1 Truth, The first in Austin with Alex Jones in 2009, then twice in Houston, and then about a month ago, actually on April 2nd in Austin for a four-hour-long meeting in Austin.
And he did his two-hour presentation, which I've seen repeatedly, and he repeats the same things that are false parameters.
And then he allowed me to talk to the small group of people that was there for about over an hour discussing the actual material that we just mentioned.
So these are things that it is obligatory to the engineering profession.
If you have any integrity at all, you need to say, this man is presenting
Important confirmation of scientific fraud being perpetrated across the board, and these things need to be investigated on a serious basis, and we need to have national debates that include everything that this man has talked about, because I've spent my entire life studying reality, and we're living in the worst false reality dystopic nightmare imaginable.
Joe, let me pick up on a few of the really important points you're making here.
It seems to me if you wanted to destroy civilization or bring down humanity, that attacking the sources of energy that make civilization possible would be a crucial element.
I'm talking about the use of coal, gasoline, oil, nuclear.
If you could undermine those by suggesting that they have adverse effects that threaten the planet, that you might be able to motivate a gullible society or political conspirators to promote the idea that we need green energy even though wind and solar and wave and so forth sources are
Energy inefficient and consume more energy than they produce, which means you're putting the planet on a downward spiral in terms of the energy available to sustain civilization.
It seems to me that might be a crucial element of an agenda that's basically overall intended to destroy modern civilization, replace it with a feudal, with a dramatically reduced population that's manageable,
In a new version of a feudal society, where the few are ensconced in their castles, surrounded by moats—today we call them gated communities—and the remnants, let's say, just to offer a hypothetical figure, 500 million, are toiling as serfs and slaves in a field.
Joe, it seems to me, The green energy agenda, the global warming myth would be an indispensable element there if that is your objective.
Would you agree?
Oh yes, and it's been planned for decades.
I mean, this goes back to the creation of the fake science climatology back in the mid-70s, when there was no degree in climatology, there was no demand for somebody to be a climatologist outside of the government, and it was very well covered by meteorologists and paleogeologists.
So there was, they created out of whole cloth a complete separate industry, and then we funded that to the extent of over 100 billion dollars of Carbon endangerment funding science research, where you can come up with any grant proposal possible, as long as you said carbon dioxide was bad, you were going to get a million or two million dollar grant in order to prove it.
And that's why you end up with all of these ridiculous anecdotal evidence things, which is the same thing that the Zim at the Midwest University that's on the ASHRAE board told me, that That I needed to conform to what NASA and the Department of Energy was telling me.
It's like, no I don't because these are captured agencies.
We have captured sciences.
We have captured state regulatory boards.
I'm going to start a discussion with my state licensing board.
I contacted them two weeks ago because I wanted to get this subject in front of them to see if we could get something going on a state level here in Texas.
But now that this has been recorded.
We'll put this up on Twitter and we'll put it up on BitChute.
We need you to share this with everyone possible.
Make this thing go viral and then I will contact the state licensing board and say, as engineers, do we have an obligation to teach correct science to the students and do we have the obligation to use correct science in determining the course of our future?
Now, Joe, the other thoughts I wanted to add are related to 9-11, but also really to climate change insofar as you have established that, because of the defendants of the professional organization on funding from the federal government, they are not following science.
They have become subservient to sources of funding, such as a DOE, so that if the DOE dictates that climate change is real or that the government is real, These buildings on 9-11 collapsed in a cascade, even though it's physically impossible.
For example, Charles Baldwin, a retired high school math, physics, chemistry teacher, calculated that with regard to, for example, the North Tower, every single unit of downward force from that top set of floors ...was opposed by 199 units of upward force.
It wasn't even possible for the buildings to collapse, which reveals a deception and deceit involved in only talking about the initiation of the collapse, because the initiation of the collapse would have been virtually the totality of the collapse that took place by virtue of the design of the buildings with their massive upward resistance.
And well, they're simply begging the question, taking for granted the answer about a fire-induced collapse, because the government wants that answer, and the government is controlling the purse streams, and these individuals are bought, sold, and paid for.
They are government shills, because they're not representing the laws of science.
They're not representing science at all.
They've turned into salesmen, used car salesmen, for pseudoscience and propaganda being generated and funded by the American government.
Joe, this is a disgrace!
Yes, and watch the 20-minute long Robert Zephyr video on CargoCult, because And now I'm getting my low battery.
Watch that because it really does tie into exactly what what they're doing to us.
And then in a future episode, Jim and I are going to do a deep dive into how rotten Franklin Delano Roosevelt was and how penetrated his office administration was with
NKVD agents from Soviets and how we've been lied to about every bit of the history of the 20th century and we'll take it all the way up to the 9-1-1 events because we've been lied, let's just put it, for over a hundred years because Woody Wilson lied us into World War I, FDR lied us into World War II, LBJ lied us into Vietnam.
LBJ tried to lie us into nuking Cairo in a big war in the Middle East.
That was the USS Liberty.
We were definitely lied into Bosnia and Serbia by Clinton.
We were lied to by Baby Bush into the Iraq War.
His dad lied us into the first Iraq War.
With the, you know, the babies being thrown out of the incubators and we don't mind if you're doing slant drilling over there.
You've got perfect right to come over and take Kuwait's oil fields because they're slant drilling and here's exactly how they're stealing your oil and we don't care if you do that.
Every bit of this stuff is 100% manufactured lies because wars are profitable.
The people that are ruling our planet because orphans and crippled veterans do not and widows do not rise up against tyrants.
And that's what we've got.
We've got the most ruthless tyrants in the history of the planet.
And every bit of this stuff has been 100% programmed and it includes the bastardization of families and And gender and all the other stuff that's going on all of this quote social equity crap has been forced as part of it as a total agenda.
And these people are very conscious of what they're doing.
They just don't want the public to become conscious of it.
And that's what Jim and I are doing is we're trying to make you conscious of a totally different reality that is Far better and far more productive for human life on this planet.
And as far as that goes, all life on this planet.
Because these people are anti-life, anti-God, anti-human.
And we need to remove their power control.
And it looks like the news media is fixing to collapse on that.
More we'll discuss on this coming Wednesday.
So Jim, it's been delightful.
I got low battery alarm, so I know exactly how far I can push a program, and we will be in touch soon.
Let me know when you got this posted.
Thanks.
Joe, you've done a sensational job here today, and we're peeling back the political illusion for the scientific reality, understanding which is indispensable to the continuity of life on Earth and the survival of civilized society.
I can't thank you enough, Joe, for this real deal special report.
We shall persevere.
Thank you, my friend.
I look forward to our next discussion of these vital topics.
Everyone should check out the article.
JamesHFetzer.org.
Joe Wilson.
It's there.
You'll appreciate what he's doing.
▲
Export Selection