All Episodes
April 18, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:16:22
Need to Know News (18 April 2023) with Owen Stevens
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer, Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Owen Stevens in Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Brian Davidson is on the road and unable to be here today, but we have a lot to cover.
Very serious stuff.
The Ukraine president issued a warning about retreat from Bakhmut, but he's also acknowledging it may be a necessity.
Indeed, the Russians are tightening the noose.
Ukrainian President Zelensky has issued a warning about retreating his troops from Bakhmut in anticipation of being encumbered, really surrounded, by Russian forces.
The announcement follows an earlier update where Ukraine was looking to strategically pull back, but the fact is they're being defeated, so I regard these as public relations advisories.
Alexander Buransky, an advisor, reportedly said the cost of staying to fight might outweigh the benefits, meaning they're going to be slaughtered, so it's not worth losing the lives of the troops.
Zelensky reiterated the importance of not losing more soldiers, which are, frankly, being decimated, concluding that the correct decision would be made by the generals.
But He added that while they're considering retreat as an option, it's not yet time as Ukrainian troops are warding off numerous Russian attacks.
I think any delay is a huge mistake.
But then again, really, this whole involvement has been a blunder where the NATO and the United States thought they could defeat Russia.
The General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine has stated that their troops are successfully defending the city, which I guarantee you is false.
The Russians are reportedly making advances.
They are.
They are losing five soldiers for every Ukrainian.
That is false.
It's more like eight Ukrainians to every Russian.
What was once a tourist destination is now allegedly in ruins after a year of fighting.
Ukraine may strategically pull out of the city, but it remains of strategic importance for the Russians who already control about half of the Donetsk region.
Now, Tucker, it seemed to me, has been very, very good in dealing about the Laker.
Check this out.
Good evening and welcome to Tucker Carlson Tonight.
For the past 14 months, you have heard two main things about the war in Ukraine.
The first is that the war in Ukraine is a war of national sovereignty.
It is not a proxy battle between superpowers.
Russia invaded Ukraine.
That was immoral.
The United States supports Ukraine because the United States supports democracy.
But the United States itself is not at war with Russia.
This is Ukraine's war to fight.
The second thing we have heard over and over again is that Ukraine is winning that war.
Ukrainian troops are brave and noble.
Russian troops are evil and incompetent.
The Ukrainians are beating the Russians.
In the end, their victory is inevitable.
Now you're very familiar with these points because you have heard them every day since last February.
You've heard them repeated by every power center in the United States, the Pentagon, the White House, the leaders of both parties in Congress, CEOs, and celebrities.
And most insistently of all, you've heard them from virtually every single outlet along the entire spectrum of our national news media.
These are the two essential themes of the war in Ukraine.
And both of them are lies.
We know that they're lies because late last week leaked intelligence about the war in Ukraine began to appear on social media.
Briefing slides prepared by the U.S.
government began to show up, among other places, on Twitter.
And the slides show that this is in fact not Ukraine's war.
It's our war.
The United States is a direct combatant in a war against Russia.
As we speak, American soldiers are fighting Russian soldiers.
So this is not a regional conflict in Eastern Europe.
This is a hot war between the two primary nuclear superpowers on Earth.
And yet this war has never been formally declared.
It has not been authorized by Congress.
And for that reason, this war is a violation of American law.
It is a crime.
The second thing we learn from these slides is that despite direct U.S.
involvement, Ukraine is in fact losing the war.
Seven Ukrainians are being killed for every Russian.
Ukrainian air defenses have been utterly degraded.
Ukraine is losing.
The Biden administration is perfectly aware of this.
They're panicked about it.
But they have lied about this fact to the public.
Just two weeks ago, for example, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin told the U.S.
Senate that Russian military power is, quote, waning.
In other words, Russia is losing the war.
That was a lie.
He knew it was when he said it, but he repeated it in congressional testimony.
That is a crime.
But Lloyd Austin has not been arrested for committing that crime.
Instead, the only man who has been taken into custody, or likely ever will be, is a 21-year-old Massachusetts Air National Guardsman who leaked the slides that showed that Lloyd Austin was lying.
He revealed the crimes, therefore he's the criminal.
That's how Washington works.
Telling the truth is the only real sin.
Now our news media exist and have constitutional protection precisely in order to push back against this grotesque standard.
Their only job is to tell the truth.
And yet tonight the news media are celebrating the capture of the kid who told Americans what's actually happening in Ukraine.
They are treating him like Osama Bin Laden.
Maybe a little worse, actually.
Because unlike al-Qaeda, apparently this kid is a racist.
Here's CNN.
The Washington Post, as you know, reviewed video of this suspect yelling racial and anti-semitic slurs.
Is this a dangerous person?
This air guardsman who's now been taken into custody had talked about being a gun enthusiast, had been at gun ranges.
He's obviously a member of the military.
And he's the big guy in the scene.
Somehow he has access to this kind of information and that makes him even larger.
So this 21-year-old Air National Guardsman from Massachusetts is not a whistleblower, CNN explains, with the help of the many intelligence agency figures it has now hired as analysts.
an enthusiast, feels like in some of these descriptions, somebody who's maybe hungry for power.
So this 21 year old Air National Guardsman from Massachusetts is not a whistleblower, CNN explains with the help of the many intelligence agency figures that is now hired as analysts.
No, he's not a whistleblower.
He's a criminal.
Because he is, unlike the people who run our government, quote, hungry for power.
And because this 21-year-old was so hungry for power, federal law enforcement had to swing into action with unfamiliar speed and efficiency and apprehend him.
He was that threatening.
Now keep in mind, as of tonight, we still don't know where Jeffrey Epstein got hundreds of millions of dollars.
We have no idea.
Nor do we know what he did for a living.
We don't know who left pipe bombs on Capitol Hill on January 6th.
Two of them.
We don't know who leaked the Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade.
We can't even say for certain who killed the President of the United States.
Because after 60 years, the Biden administration is still hiding thousands of pages of classified documents from the Kennedy assassination.
Just as they are hiding more than a billion other classified documents.
Wow.
But tonight, we can say for dead certain who embarrassed Toria Nuland and Joe Biden.
And that kid is going to jail for a long, long time.
That's the standard.
The media are fine with that standard.
Watch this remarkable exchange on Monday of this week between the White House Press Corps and Biden flack John Kirby.
Without confirming the validity of the documents, this is information that has no business in the public domain.
It has no business, if you don't mind me saying, on the front pages of newspapers or on television.
It is not intended for public consumption, and it should not be out there.
So the fact that US soldiers are fighting Russian soldiers in a war in Ukraine has no business in the public domain.
The fact that the country we are backing and fighting alongside is losing, not winning, Has no business in the public domain.
You have no right to know what your government is doing in your name with your tax dollars and with the future of your children and grandchildren.
You have no right to know.
Shut up and stop asking relevant questions.
OK, said the media.
And if you want to get really sick to your stomach, go pull a transcript from the Pentagon briefing today where news reporters Asked Flax from the Pentagon, what are we going to do to keep information like this secret in the future?
Not one question about the substance of the information.
We're fighting a war against Russia directly?
Really?
Don't they have the largest nuclear arsenal in the world?
Not one question.
How can we help you keep it secret?
Those were the questions.
And not only are the media, not only are the media covering up the substance of the story, which is not who leaked it, but what he leaked, They're covering up the crimes committed to get you this information.
The administration apparently used illegal surveillance techniques to identify this kid, apparently with the help of the Washington Post and the New York Times, who are its accomplices.
They're not holding government accountable.
They're helping government keep you from knowing what government is doing.
Today, the Washington Post reported it had exclusively obtained some of the classified documents this leaker possessed.
QUOTE, "THE POST ALSO REVIEWED APPROXIMATELY 300 PHOTOS OF CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS, MOST OF WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN MADE PUBLIC. SOME OF THE TEXT DOCUMENTS THE LEAKER IS SAID TO HAVE WRITTEN OUT." SO WE'VE GOT TWO PROBLEMS HERE.
If it's illegal to see these documents, if you don't have a security clearance, how is the Washington Post doing this legally?
They don't have a security clearance.
Well, obviously they were given them by the U.S.
intel agencies and are working alongside them.
But the bigger problem is this is information that's relevant to the public in a so-called democracy.
You can't lie about things that jeopardize our collective future and get away with it.
And you certainly shouldn't be doing that with the assistance of the news media.
The news media whose job it is to inform you of what your government is doing, but instead they are working actively late into the night to lie to you on behalf of their masters in permanent Washington.
By the way, just last week the plan was to lie in an even more grotesque way and blame Russia for this, and we're quoting.
Russia or pro-Russian elements are likely behind the leak of several classified U.S.
military documents posted on social media that offer a partial month-old snapshot of the war in Ukraine, three U.S.
officials told Reuters on Friday.
Really?
Who are these officials who lied to Reuters?
Then Reuters just, of course, obediently reprinted their lies, as they always do.
News agencies print what they are told to print by the intel agencies no matter how ridiculous it is.
No matter how much dignity and self-respect they exchange in return for doing it.
So what's happening to the Sleeker now is what happens to anyone who contradicts the national security state and their obedient servants in the media.
You go to prison!
So the media can continue to tell you lies.
Here's MSNBC, for example, assuring its viewers that everything's just fine.
What the Russians didn't understand was that they were going into the lion's den.
That kind of what we would say in the military, this force multiplier, made the Ukrainian army quite literally unbeatable.
They are winning.
Russia is going to lose this war.
Every last person has said exactly what Malcolm just said.
They're going to win this war.
It's not a matter of if, but when.
14 months in, they are simultaneously telling you that Ukraine's victory is inevitable, mostly because of the moral power they possess, but at the same time, you need to send tens or hundreds of billions of dollars more in advanced weapons systems to Ukraine to keep them from losing.
What will they say now that we know the truth and that we know that they lied to us?
Not just the U.S.
government, but the U.S.
news media.
Subscribe to the Fox News YouTube channel to catch our Oh, and I think that's Tucker Carlson at his very best.
That was amazing.
Better than anyone else on television.
It's just so much.
It's so much fun.
I, you know, listening to MSNBC and CNN, I just get, it's so maddening.
The lies right in our face.
If you ever, I never listen, but if you ever turn it on and you're awake to this kind of stuff, you realize the plight of a lot of other Americans who actually still believe this stuff.
And tune in for real information.
And that's a serious problem.
A lot of Americans are getting completely faulty information that's ideologically driven.
There's a lot of things happening right now that I was looking into that relate to this.
The Inspector General for the Pentagon right now, he's probing the Ukrainian government for corruption related to the massive amounts of aid the country has received since it was invaded by Russia last year.
One of the things is that there's 20 audits that they're planning Close to 100 people engaged in oversight right now related to Ukraine with partnerships with the State Department and the USAID.
And this is really being driven by Republicans who are growing increasingly critical of the Biden administration's aid to Ukraine.
We've sent like $400 billion plus dollars to Ukraine right now.
That's our tax dollars.
That's our money.
Since January 2022, the U.S.
has committed over $78 billion to Ukraine in military, humanitarian and economic aid.
That's just since that date, so just a ton of money, and we are getting information right now, as you know, due to this leak and due to several things coming out right now, that this money was not being spent in the way that we wanted it to be spent.
It's not being spent for military, for instance.
It's not being spent for those things, but rather it's going to feed this corruption even more.
It's in the pockets of people like Zelensky and the other cronies that he's got up in there in Ukraine.
The other people, like maybe even Hunter Biden, the other people that are on boards of these oil companies.
I don't even know how corrupt this really gets, but that's one of the things I would look into.
Then lastly, I'd also mention one other aspect of this.
I know Tucker mentioned the media.
He mentioned the government, the Justice Department, the national security state, but he didn't mention social media.
One of the roles I think that played a huge part in this, especially in our inability to adequately understand what was going on in Ukraine was social media.
That's how a lot of information is spread right now.
And YouTube's content moderators, it emerged on Tuesday.
It shows that the Google-owned platform has labeled a number of critical positions on the conflict in Ukraine as hateful or extreme.
And if they can label something as hateful or extreme, they can then censor or demonetize creators on those grounds.
So any creator or any YouTube person that wants to expose the truth, that wants to expose what's going on, They're gonna have an incredibly difficult time doing it because YouTube's gonna label them as hateful and extreme and remove their content.
So we have social media working in tandem with the news media to censor the truth as well.
You absolutely are correct in why Elon Musk turning Twitter into something more like a commons is so significant.
Meanwhile, Marjorie Taylor Greene has been among the few voices speaking out in behalf of the leaker who indeed is a whistleblower.
Marjorie Taylor Greene defended the 21-year-old Air National Guardsman arrested for leaking classified docs in a series of tweets.
She highlighted Tech Sierra's qualities as white, male, Christian, and anti-war, suggesting those very traits made him a target for the Biden administration, no doubt.
Marjorie Greene tweeting, Jake Teix says white male Christian and anti-war, that makes it an enemy to the Biden regime.
And he told the truth about troops being on the ground in Ukraine and a lot more.
Ask yourself, who is the real enemy?
A young, low-level National Guardsman or the implied President of the United States?
Carter Green, his action to expose the truth about U.S.
troops in Ukraine and other key information, which the current admin is denying.
In addition, she questioned who is the real enemy, pointing out the administration is involved in a conflict with a non-NATO nation, namely Ukraine, against nuclear-armed Russia, but without war powers, meaning without the permission of government.
She acknowledged the seriousness of leaking classified material, but emphasized he's being hailed as a hero, appropriately, for uncovering the truth about the Biden administration.
She also raised questions about whether the government can be trusted with sensitive information that has national security implications, the government itself.
His arrest follows a leak of hundreds of pages of classified material linked to the war in U.S.
intel ops in various countries.
Glenn Greenwald, independent journalist, criticized the mainstream's reaction, especially their attacks upon the leaker.
The New York Times and Washington Post especially, which he claimed were instrumental in identifying him.
Glenn Greenwald, look what's going on here.
First, the New York Times jointly with CI Front Mailing Cat and W Post hunted down, exposed, and insured the arrest of the 21-year-old leaker.
Now they're having a party with the docs, publishing one exclusive after the next as if they bravely obtained them.
Greenwald questioned why any journalist would want to see a leaker exposed and punished while demanding the government maintain secrecy.
He highlighted the role of the media in upholding the truth, noted their failure to do so in this case.
His comments were met with opposition from establishment Republican and Democrat lawmakers, including former Representative Liz Cheney, of course, and Representative Eric Swalwell, needless to add.
Cheney claimed Greene's remarks demonstrate her inability to be trusted.
At the same time, Swalwell accused her of siding with one of the biggest traitors America's seen.
I dare say Liz Cheney and Eric Swalwell deserve titles like that.
Fox News host Tucker Carlson expressed concern about the official narrative, stating the leaked site revealed two critical falsehoods.
The war is not only Ukraine's fight but also involves direct U.S.
involvement and, despite claims to the contrary, Ukraine is losing.
He argued the Biden admin knows the reality but chooses to deceive the public.
In light of these revelations, with the debate surrounding the actions in handling and classified information in the war in Ukraine will undoubtedly continue as the nation grapples with questions of transparency and trust, for all whistleblowers and the media and safeguarding the truth remains critical but is being abdicated by the mainstream.
Owen, your thoughts?
Yeah, I'll just be really quick on this.
I wanted to really think about the leak and what the leak does.
What does this do?
What's the effect going to be of this leak?
Obviously, I want to shout out that 21-year-old hero that exposed this and ruined his life.
He will be in jail forever.
He will not see the light of day, provided we do something about it and actually help the kid.
It's sad to see a young kid like that who maybe didn't think about what he was actually doing, maybe didn't have the perspective, didn't understand what he was up against.
That's sad to see, but he did the right thing.
He did something that is incredibly courageous.
Maybe he didn't know the fallout.
Maybe he wouldn't have done it if he realized what was actually going to happen to him.
But we still have to see more.
I think there's more out there about this kid.
I think there's going to be a really, really interesting few developments about this kid's case and about what happens to him eventually and about how strong people are going to push for his release and his freedom.
I hope to be one of those people.
But the real winners of the recent U.S.
classified documents, it might very well be pro-war politicians.
So people that want the American taxpayers and the Pentagon to spend more on the Russian-Ukraine war, I think that that's actually what might end up happening.
With this lie being exposed that Ukraine is actually losing, don't you think that they're just going to use this as an impetus to up the amount of dollars that we spend?
Clearly, if Ukraine is losing this war, then we must not be doing enough.
We must not be doing enough.
And this might eventually end up in accelerating the amount of boots on the ground or the amount of weapons or whatever we send over there.
I think that this actually works in the favor of people that want this war.
That's something that I've been pondering.
I don't know if this leak, you know, this leak is good for public for the public knowing what's actually going on and and to further reveal how corrupt the Biden administration is and the lies that are being told to us every single day on on a repeat loop.
One of the things that was interesting when we were watching the CNN and MSNBC to go back to them.
That was just how they say the same exact thing.
You know, these people are actors that read from a script.
That's what they do.
And the script is written by people that are far above, far above these news companies, the owners of these news companies, people in BlackRock and Vanguard and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Open Societies Foundation.
These are the people that are writing these scripts.
It's the narrative that they want to advance in the media.
And so I'm really interested to see what these documents do, what the leaks do.
James, do you have any thoughts on that?
Well, I mean, other than exposing the hypocrisy and deceit of the Biden admin, I think they may be, as Larry Johnson has suggested and as Ray McGovern has also proposed be a way to cushion the american people for the reality to come to wit that ukraine is losing the war yeah and and you know to make it easier to convey that information of planting the seed of what is to come so yeah
and even if they do that they also be at work yeah even if they do that the thing that that's going to be interesting is to see how the biden administration responds Because now they're ousted, and since they're ousted, how are they going to respond?
Are they going to apologize?
They're not going to apologize.
They're going to say, well, clearly these things, either they're going to discredit these leaks as, what do we always see?
Disinformation.
We're going to see a bunch of people either saying, this is just disinformation.
It's not true.
Well, if that's the case, then why is this kid going to jail?
Why is this kid in trouble?
Why is this, if it's just disinformation?
And so I think that this is going to be used by pro-war politicians and big think tanks to increase efforts to supply Ukraine with weapons, money.
I think we're not done giving.
I don't think we're done giving at all.
I mean, $400 billion already donated to Ukraine, and that's our money, guys.
That's our taxpayer dollars going to this, going into the pockets of these Ukrainian corrupt cronies that are, you know,
By the way, Joaquin A. Gopian, who's a brilliant commentator, has a piece published on my blog, jameshfetzer.org, where he suggests the deep state is going to use this as a reason to improve Suppression, censorship, especially on social media.
You know, just as Taka was saying, they're worried about how they're going to stop it in the future.
That may be one of the driving forces here, that they'll impose more massive forms of censorship and restraint so it doesn't happen again.
In other words, this is giving them an excuse for doing something they've wanted to do all along.
So I think we got multiple motives at work here, Owen.
Good comments.
Meanwhile.
Oh, Jim, you're muted.
Hey, Jim, I think you're muted. .
Thank you.
Yeah, I think you're muted real quick.
All right.
There we go.
We got you back.
Little technical glitch there.
Good catch.
Thanks.
All right.
Go back to the beginning.
Yeah, yeah.
Go back to the beginning.
Okay, perfect.
Here we have John Fetterman, who has been absent most of his career, is now returning to chair a Senate subcommittee on food stamps.
Fetterman, who is receiving treatment for depression severe enough he had to be hospitalized for six weeks, will be coming back to work.
I mean, here's what he claims.
The news is out.
I'm very excited to chair my first subcommittee hearing next week.
He tweeted Wednesday, we're talking about protecting SNAP, fighting for Pennsylvania farmers in the Farm Bill, and much more.
I hope you'll tune in.
I guarantee 100% Fetterman did not write this.
This is phony, this is fake, and the guy they're bringing back is not.
John Fetterman.
Meanwhile, Richard Bonnell tweets, Did you feel this way about Fetterman?
When Ro Khanna writes, It's time for Senator Feinstein to resign.
We need to put the country ahead of personal loyalty.
Well, she has had a lifetime of public service.
It's obvious she can no longer fulfill her duties.
Not speaking out undermines our credibility as elected representatives of the people.
This act is getting old.
Letterman's been gone since Feb.
15, served less than a month before taking a six-week leave.
Left-leaning site like Politico is sought to paint it as something that often happens, citing Minority Leader McConnell and Dianne Feinstein as examples.
What no one can deny, however, which even Politico has had to admit to a degree, is Federman is not a usual case.
His health has been under scrutiny since he was running for Senate last year in his face-off against Republican candidate Dr. Muhammad Oz, and we know how they stole the election.
Adam Jemelson tweets, Reductive morning with Senator Federman at Walter Reed, discussing the rail safety legislation.
Farm bill, another Senate business.
John is well on his way to recovery and wanted me to say how grateful he is for all the well wishes.
He's laser focused on Pennsylvania.
We'll be back soon.
Yes, we will see.
Betterman suffered a severe stroke last May.
He's shown trouble with language, needing full-time staff caregivers, not just able to help him with his work but day-to-day activities.
Since being sworn in, Betterment has used transcription technology to help him talk to colleagues and conduct Santa's business political mansion.
During his stay in Walter Reed, he signed onto a bipartisan rail safety bill, causing many to ask whether he made the decision or members of his staff.
I guarantee you, he did not.
Here's Brianna Morella tweeting, Democrats are calling on Senator Dianne Feinstein to resign over health concerns.
Why aren't those same Democrats calling for Joe Biden or John Foderman's resignation?
Federman got to Washington in January.
Within a month, suffered a mental breakdown so severe he wound up in the psych ward where he remains tonight, Tucker has said.
He's not appeared to the public since, and we're supposed to think that's not a big deal.
We're not even supposed to think about it and show how completely normal it is for newly elected U.S.
Senators to have mental breakdowns and disappear from public view.
He also brought attention to the authenticity of the rail bill, saying, so here you have a guy who's getting round-the-clock psychiatric care deciding how to prevent train derailment.
There's so many questions here.
The most obvious is the logistic.
How is John Fetterman doing this if he's in the psych ward?
And we don't know, because no one will say.
Well, the real Wizard of Oz, will you stand up?
In March, when Fetterman was shown as having co-sponsored the rail bill, he faced massive criticism from conservatives as to whether he was truly working and Crick was among them.
Now we're going to finally see how reality looks with him leading this new subcommittee.
Let us have your thoughts.
Look, Bridget Gabriel tweets, I'm not one to push conspiracy theories, but John Fetterman's face looks totally different.
Catch her tweeting.
He's got really great doctors.
In only 10 weeks, he's had a complete head transplant.
Look at this.
You got the real John Fetterman on the left, and you got a fake John Fetterman on the right.
And look at this now.
Here's a guy getting out of the cab that's supposed to be Fetterman, and guess what?
It ain't the real one.
It's the fake.
How are you feeling, Senator?
How are they supposed to get away with this horseshit, Owen?
So you think that's a double?
Yeah, that's the fake.
It's the fake Fetterman.
The real guy has a big, massive face.
He never smiles.
He looks like an oaf.
This guy, slight smile, smaller head, doesn't look quite as oafish.
He's acting in a way he's trying to distract attention, but I guarantee you that's a Fetterman body double.
That is not John Fetterman.
Well, they found they did.
They did a good job.
They did a good job with whatever double.
And that's the thing I've been saying about Biden for a long time.
It's one of the things I'm also wondering about Mitch McConnell.
You know, one of the things that I'm but I'm also wondering, you know, if that's the case, then why is Dianne Feinstein not not back yet?
But I think that this is just it's just a humorous story.
I think it's a shame to see The people of Pennsylvania be represented by that.
But at the same time, I don't think it matters too much.
I think that at the end of the day, the representation that we are supposed to have in the House and in the Senate has been a lie for a very, very long time.
And so I think that ever since 1871, it's been a lie.
I think that truthfully, most of the politicians in the Senate Don't care too much about representing people's voices.
I don't think that the congressman in the house either care very much about representing what you want.
I mean, the problem is, is that the government does not fear the people as much as the people fear the government, which is the backwards way.
It was never supposed to be like that.
It's completely backwards.
Since the government doesn't fear the people, they can do whatever they want.
And that's exactly what they've done.
I mean, we just we see the spending bills.
We see everything that we're doing with the Ukraine right now.
And that just proves that this is just I think this is just humorous watching him walk around like an ape.
Good to be back before walking in the building, voting on critical bills, voting on bills that are really, really important.
It's just, it's very interesting to see.
I'm sure that Oz is really, he's really, he's got to be irritated to see that this is the guy that beat him.
It's a sad day for Republicans if we can't even, you know, if we can't beat this guy, if we can't win, you know, if we can't beat this kind of dude, then it's a really sad day.
And it also shows me that There's not much that can be done about fraud and election manipulation, and that's really what we're dealing with right now.
That's an incredibly difficult topic and thing to fix at this point.
We're going to see it happen in basically every major election.
We saw it happen in Georgia.
We saw election integrity right now, one of those big issues that we really need to be pressuring our politicians to address, that we really need to be pressuring people to address and asking questions and not letting this go because it's just going to be repeated again in the future.
Yeah, it's because they control the election apparatus that they can act in such an arrogant and irresponsible fashion with impunity.
You mentioned 1971.
Why do you regard that date as pivotal?
1871.
Yes, it was a long time ago, and this is when a very crucial thing happened.
In 1871, the language of our Constitution was changed, and the Constitution language was changed from the Constitution for the United States of America to the Constitution of the United States of America.
So, when it was the Constitution for the United States of America, okay, it made that possession of the people.
But when they labeled it a constitution of the United States, it was labeling it a possession of the United States.
And what that was able to do and what we were essentially did, and that's really the start of our involvement in this globalist empire.
That's really the start in 1871 when we decided, because we were bankrupt after the Civil War, to take money from international global bankers, including the Rothschilds and the banks of England to take money from them and to join in this globalist power structure.
And that has been the case for a very, very long time.
It's why the District of Columbia is not a state.
It's a district.
It's not even part of America.
Really, the laws are different there.
The There's no taxes there.
For instance, it's a very different place, governed completely different than any other state is, not controlled at all by the people.
That's because it's a foreign entity controlled and owned by the United States Corporation.
That's a whole different rabbit hole to go into, and I don't want to get into that, but that's one of the most pivotal dates, the most pivotal years, because it's when America abandoned Very, very, very nice points, Owen.
Very nice.
Republican took in the money of the big bankers and became a slave to the globalists.
Very, very, very nice point, Owen.
Very nice.
Meanwhile, even Democrats now are calling for Dianne Feinstein to resign.
Her indefinite absence has sparked calls from her own party for her resignation and a request from the senator herself for the majority leader to temporarily fill her seat on a key panel, the judiciary.
area.
Feinstein 89 has been home recovering from shingles for more than a month.
I've had shingles.
It's very nasty.
Causing her to miss dozen of floor votes and hold up approval of Joe Biden pending judicial nominees.
They must pass through the Senate Judiciary Committee of which she is the head.
Currently split evenly between Republicans and Democrats while she is away.
Fellow California Republican Rohana was the first congressional Democrat to call for her to step down, saying it's obvious she can no longer fulfill her duties.
Dean Phillips of Minnesota, another Democrat, chimed in his agreement with Kahana.
Senator Feinstein's a remarkable American whose contributions to our country are immeasurable, Phillips wrote.
But I believe it's now a dereliction of duty to remain in the Senate.
A dereliction of duty for those who agree to remain quiet.
The congressman's comments came after pressure had been building over the last several days, including by the chairman Dick Durban, who told CNN that he could not consider judicial nominees in these circumstances because a tie vote is a losing point in committee, thereby correcting my impression that Feinstein had been the chair.
Pod Save America host John Leavitt, a former speechwriter for President Obama, Then called for Feinstein to leave her position during an episode of his show because she's not in the Judiciary Committee.
Durbin has said it's made it basically impossible to move a lot of these lower court nominees to the Senate for a vote.
Observing, Feinstein is now preventing us from being able to confirm judges.
As sad as it is to see someone who's had an incredibly storied and important career Dianne Feinstein should no longer be in the Senate.
She should resign.
He condemned those around her for being part of the farce of having a lack of a senator in such an important job as really wrong, saying she should resign and more people should be calling on her to resign.
Feinstein responds she'd been experiencing complication, but she planned to return as soon as possible once her doctors gave the okay.
She said meantime she asked Schumer to temporarily sub for her on the committee.
Feinstein's full statement.
I understand my absence could delay the important work of the Judiciary, so I've asked Leader Schumer to ask the Senate to allow another Democrat Senator to temporarily serve until I'm able to resume my committee work, which will be never.
A spokesperson for Schumer said he's agreed to the request.
Per Senator Feinstein's wishes, Majority Leader Schumer will ask the Senate next week to allow another Democrat Senator to temporarily serve on the Judiciary.
Schumer, however, will need Republican support, likely through either a unanimous consent or a typical sitting vote approval, but it's unclear that GOP will provide it while judicial nominees are on the line.
Owen, your thoughts?
Yeah, with Dianne Feinstein there was this really, you know, I don't have much to say on this but there's a there's a hilarious meme that I saw and it was this picture of Dianne Feinstein when she's young and in her 20s and a picture of her now and about how, you know, this is how long that this person has been a career politician.
It's shocking, like her entire life.
We're talking 60 plus years of this stuff.
And it's just, it is really, really bad when you get a person like, I mean, we had the same thing with Ruth Bader Ginsburg, so old and at this point, there comes a point where you are that old, where you cannot put up with the rigors of being a congresswoman where you cannot put up with the rigors of being a congresswoman or being, you know, in It's a tremendously stressful job.
It leads people to have gray hair.
They get gray hair early because of how stressful the job is.
It's a very, very stressful job.
But, of course, Diane is protected by the media, always will be protected by the media, so I'm sure she's had a very, very easy go of it.
But overall, I think that I wouldn't be opposed to laws that limit or at least put an age cap on how old some of our leaders can actually be, because I just don't think that...
I don't think that it's a good idea to have, for instance, Joe Biden being 80 something years old.
Trump is in the same thing.
He's a bit younger though, but I think that mental fitness is an incredibly important thing, especially when you're leading a country.
And if you if you're not mentally fit, if you don't have that level of mental fitness, then you shouldn't be in that position.
And I just think that's the case with Dianne Feinstein.
I think it's time that she leave.
I think it's time that we just move on from this, move on from her.
She's been in there forever.
And, you know, I don't wish that she that she, you know, get hurt by shakras.
Meanwhile, D.C.
I mean, that's a horrible, horrible disease to be suffering from.
That's one of the things that my parents have had that not fun, like you said.
But I don't wish that she'd come back at all anytime soon.
So not much to say about that other than just we need age and age cap.
She won't be back on the Senate, I guarantee you.
Meanwhile, D.C. Drano observes,
He has broken the law and committed an impeachable offense.
To say nothing of what this does to instigate World War III.
Bad situation we are in.
Meanwhile, prosecutor admits cops instigated violence on the January 6th protests.
The Kangaroo Court trial of Proud Boys hit a snag when it was discovered a Biden secret police—sorry, FBI—had infiltrated the defense team.
The defense team!
We're not talking about FBI at the Capitol.
We're talking about infiltrating the defense team with a spook.
The trial's now revealed there were twice as many FBI informants in the Proud Boys on January 6th as there were actual Proud Boys, and it's not an exaggeration.
That's literally true.
In a separate trial, the prosecutor's admitted in court filings he wants to keep surveillance videos secret from the public and the defense because the videos prove undercover D.C.
Metro cops were instigating violence at the protests.
It looks like everyone was instigating violence at the peaceful Trump protests except for the actual Trump supporters.
A Trump guy named William Poe has represented himself very ably, may I add, against charges that he briefly entered the Capitol on January 6th.
He filed a motion in February calling for video footage shot by three undercover Metro cops to be unsealed.
Last Friday, the prosecutor filed a counter motion claiming they should be kept secret, but government's reasoning has stated in writing his pope wants to try the case in the media by releasing the videos of cops instigating violence.
That's their argument?
Yes.
When the government filed its counter-motion, someone leaked video from three undercover mental cops of the Department's Electronic Surveillance Unit, both immediately pointed out in court and to The Epoch Times.
This is exactly why all the videos need to be released both publicly and to defense teams in the January 6th Communist Show trials.
The officer clearly incited that area, and we still don't have video from all other undercover MPDs at POBE.
And as the numerous informants in the Proud Boy trial demonstrates, we're only just beginning to scratch the surface of FBI involvement.
The leaked video showed two of the undercover cops walking steps behind Ashley Babbitt.
One of them states she's going to get shot.
A few minutes later, Ashley Babbitt would be viciously, savagely, brutally murdered by one of Nancy Pelosi's cops.
May I add, I believe this was a stage shooting and she was not in fact killed, but she was been presented as having been killed.
She was shot dead by a dirty cop, despite being fine with nothing and posing a threat to absolutely no one.
She was peaceful, unarmed, and an Air Force veteran.
Here are some quotes from the undercover cops shouting to members of the crowd while the cops are dressed up in pro-Trump costumes.
Come on, man!
Let's go!
Come on!
Go, go, go!
Keep going!
Keep going!
Come on!
In a prior case filing, Pope wrote, this video evinces undercover law enforcement urging the crowd to advance under Sharon's scaffolding toward the Capitol on January 6.
The government may claim incidents like this did not happen, but the facts show they did.
Prosecutors argue that if the identities of the undercover cops who were inciting are revealed.
Their lives will be put in danger, and some of those dangerous white supremacist insurrectionist Trump-supporting Nazi fascists will hunt them down and kill them.
Count me skeptical.
The government expects the court to take their word on it that January 6th happened just like they say it happened, and no, you can't see the videos.
And oh, by the way, speaking of the Brown Boys trial, it's on a hiatus while the judge tries to figure out what's even happening.
There are five proud boys on trial, including the group's leader, Enrique Terrio.
Mr. Terrio turns out to be an FBI informant himself.
And at least 10 additional FBI informants have been found to have been swirling around the five defendants.
10 FBI agents for five defendants?
And that's just the ones who have been revealed at trial.
One of those undercover informants have been having conversation with the defendants and their lawyers in clear and legal violation of attorney-client privilege.
Oh!
And the trial has also revealed the FBI tried to get one of the Proud Boys to make Molotov cocktails and bring them to the protest.
Owen, your thoughts?
Yeah, there's a lot of things going on with the FBI right now.
You know, one of the things that we know is that they not only um instigated this but evidence that suggests that they instigated this was destroyed the fbi was caught red-handed destroying evidence um destroying a lot of evidence actually uh that relates to january 6th um there's a lot of things going on with the fbi right now that i think are very interesting most notably is you know a lot of attacks on catholics it's a weird really weird thing that's going on right now where they're they're they're subpoenaing these pre these priests
There was a memo that was released against Catholic churches, against Catholic priests.
I mean, this is really a secret police arm.
That's what this is.
It's Joe Biden's secret police.
That's exactly how they operate.
Coming in and you know breaking down doors of Christians who are pro-life and putting them in the back of the car Arresting them in front of their kids pointing guns at their families.
That's that's our government everybody That's the government that we have if you ever wondered why owning a gun was important This is the reason that owning a gun is important because this kind of stuff is gonna happen more Okay, if you're if you're if you're a person for instance who's caught online denying the election if you're a person who's caught online You know calling January 6th, you know, or telling the truth about January 6th.
You're a target.
They know who you are, okay?
If you have a cell phone, if you have a computer, they know who you are.
They're watching you, okay?
And that's the fact.
And so we have to be really careful.
You know, we can't allow ourselves to, you know, To to be to be to to not be cautious right now, especially when we have dangerous people who have a lot of power who are who are interested in shown that they will use that power to silence you.
And so I don't think we're going to see for a very long time anything happen to the FBI about this.
I don't think we're going to see any real accountability about January 6th.
We haven't yet, and it's been years.
So I don't think we're going to see it anytime soon.
But it'd be something that's interesting to just keep up on it and always mention that just to not forget this colossal lie, this colossal attack on our identity as Americans.
That's really what this was.
It's an anti-American assault, a complete gaslighting of the American people, and it's really grotesque.
And to agree, a controversy disrupting attempts to put motions on the floor to dispute the election.
Submitted electors' votes so that they wouldn't be a legal basis to go to the Supreme Court.
It was all very cleverly contrived.
That's a great point.
Meanwhile, Biden makes an eye-opening gap in Ireland, manages to insult an entire country with a phrase, black and tans.
Failed President Biden, eager to escape the ire of America, perhaps, left to Ireland this week.
Not sure why he was there.
All the pub appearances in the world aren't going to save this sinking ship.
But Ireland's long been our ally, so there's no fear a buffoon like Biden could mess that up, right?
He did tick off France to the point where they no longer respect us, but this is Joe's ancestral land.
There's just no way to do something—oh wait, he just did.
From Fox.
Friend Biden mixed up a New Zealand rugby team in an historic British occupying force on Wednesday during a speech at the Windsor Bar in Dundalk.
This was given me by one of these guys right here, he said Wednesday.
He was a hell of a rugby peter.
He made the hell out of the black and tans.
The Black and Tans became known for particular brutality toward dissent and Irish citizens.
The Black and Tans remains a common cultural symbol of the occupation years.
No, no, no.
It's not every day Joe managed to remind an entire nation of how they were oppressed and mistreated by the British.
He mentioned his tie given to him by a distant relative who recently defeated the New Zealand All Blacks in rugby.
But instead, Biden called the team the Black and Tans, which happened to be a British police force brutally mistreating an Irish citizen who disagreed with the British government.
The term remains a symbol of the years when Britain oppressed Ireland.
Good job, Joe.
Normally, we can overlook this kind of misstep.
Hey, everyone mixes up the name of a sports team with a brutal fascist group, right?
But this is Joe Biden, the man who's supposed to be our president.
President can't afford to make insulting gaffes like this.
But we know Joe is far too old for the job.
Many wonder if he's suffering from mental decline.
So we can just assume the gaffe was the result of the aging man's inability to put thoughts together.
His handlers must be working overtime to control every aspect of his image.
But even they can't control him 24-7.
The world needs to see that Joe is too old and ill to do the job.
I mean, For the president to insult an ally like Ireland is pretty low.
Biden made an insulting gaffe, called the New Zealand team all blacks, the black and tans, where the black and tans were the brutal British force that oppressed the Irish in the 1920s.
But get this.
We also discovered this is an imposter.
Let me play that again just for emphasis.
Oh my gosh, that's a mask.
Holy cow.
Let me play that again, just for emphasis.
This is a latex mask.
The fake Biden is wearing.
Oh my gosh, that's a mask.
Holy cow.
Owen, your thoughts?
Well, I mean, yeah, that's a mask.
We've known this for a while.
The other thing that I want to also mention is that if that is a mask, then we have to assume that the person behind that mask is intentionally making these gaffes on purpose.
If it's not actually... I don't think so.
I don't think so.
He's just old and he had an itch and he scratched it.
He had no idea.
I think this guy is...
No, no, I think, well, yeah, no, Joe Biden's pathetic.
Yeah.
But if this, if the real, the real Joe, by the way, oh, and I'm convinced died in 2017.
I've done a huge amount on this.
Right.
Biden, but go ahead.
I've heard that too.
But what I'm what I'm saying is that all of these gaffes, since Biden has been president in 2020, right, if we're to assume that, you know, the person that is playing Biden in a role is wearing a mask, then what about all of these gaffes?
I don't think it's an accident.
I think these gaffes are on purpose.
It's the same thing that happened when Obama was the president and Obama went around the world apologizing for America.
And what this does is it damages our country's reputation.
It happened in France, like you just said, when we irritated France about sabotaging ties and relationships between our country with other countries.
We're doing the same thing with Ireland.
There's a bunch of other gaffes that he's made that are really, you know, a lot of them are funny, but it's a joke.
It's a complete joke.
It's you know For the office of the president.
He says we hold these truths.
This is in 2020 we hold these truths to be self-evident that all men and women were created by the God or you know the You know the thing that's what he said.
That was a quote that all men and women are created But but he didn't say the part He didn't say the fundamental part about that quote in front of the entire country and that's on purpose That's on purpose.
I don't think that this is a mistake.
I do not think at all for a second that if this is really not Joe Biden, this is really a person behind a mask, that these gaffes are on accident.
I think they're on purpose to sabotage our reputation as a country and to gaslight the American people into thinking that their politicians can be excused if they are this old or this blatantly stupid.
I think this is to convince Americans and to almost normalize this kind of thing.
We're seeing it with Fetterman as well.
Federman getting in there and dealing with everything that he dealt with mentally, collapsing into depression and losing his mind in office, only convinces the American people further that politicians that act this way should be put up with, that we should tolerate this kind of stuff, and to remove ourselves from any semblance of responsibility to do something about it.
Well, that's all very interesting.
Bear in mind now, They're both fake.
The guy that's running is Federman is not Federman.
The guy that's running is Biden is not Biden.
I mean, the monstrosity of the deception.
And get this, when you mention Barack Obama, We have more, a late development here from his brother.
This is really great stuff.
Barack Obama's family, specifically his brother, admits he's not American, and Michelle is not what he seems.
Check out that photograph.
Fascinating.
Fascinating.
This is another story I've been all over for many, many years, probably a decade at least.
From Baxter Dimitri News, rumors concerning the legitimacy of Obama's U.S.
birth certificate have refused to go away.
In 2017, a five-year study revealed forensic researchers claiming there were 10 features that proved a Hawaiian document was a forgery.
I had one of them on a radio show I did, and we spent two hours, found 20 proofs that the Hawaiian birth certificate was a fake.
Now Malik Obama, his brother, is dropping truth bombs and documents proving his younger brother, Barack, was born in Nairobi, Kenya, and thus was a fake and illegitimate president.
Malik says everyone in the Obama family calls Barack fake-ass and has a major truth bomb to drop about Michelle.
His revelations come at the same time Columbia University graduates, who are supposed to be in the same class as Barack Obama, admit they have no memory of him at all.
At this point, we have to ask, is there anything real about America's first black president, or is he a total fraud?
Are Barack and Michelle Obama the biggest con jobs in history?
The answer to which is yes, but they've got a lot of competition.
Even the new Biden and the new Fetterman.
Before we dive in, Malek Obama has a history of dropping truth bombs about his family on Twitter Tuesday.
He boasts a few highly incriminating documents from his brother's Kenyan history, proving that what we have been told about Obama is a total lie.
These docs were taken from the Obama family home in Kenya that the CIA agents who carefully crafted his identity are desperate that you not see.
Malik, who announced his support for Donald Trump during the 2016 election, is estranged from his younger brother, complaining that he distanced himself from his family during his second term in office.
Since Malik has used Twitter to support Trump and release embarrassing information about his younger brother, however, the publication of Barack's alleged Kenyan birth certificate is by far the most damaging to date.
The birth certificate!
Issued by the British Protectorate of Kenya states that Barack Hussein Obama II was born on 4 August 1961 in the Coast Province General Hospital in Mombas, Kenya.
But it gets even worse Melech is also determined to really reveal the truth about his sister-in-law, the Democrat darling Michelle Obama, whom Melech claims is not really his sister-in-law at all.
According to Melech, Michelle is a man, and she has political ambitions he determined to blow up by revealing the truth about her.
Melech tweets, I, Melech Obama, will campaign against Michelle Obama when she runs for President.
He, she.
Mentioning pronouns.
Melech's claims are supported by official government documents.
Former First Lady was registered to vote as a man from 1994 until 2008, according to official docs obtained from the Illinois State Board of Elections.
The official docs also reveal Michelle officially changed her sex to female in 2008, the same year her husband was running for president.
We made a whole video of these damning records, obtained by FOIA request.
The official docs were obtained from the state of Illinois by documentary filmmaker Joel Gilbert, who explained he decided to take a serious approach to learning about Michelle's background because the mainstream refuses to touch the topic.
While he didn't expect to find proof she registered to vote as a man for 14 years.
Gilbert was stunned when he received her official voter registration cards from 1994 and 2008, describing the process of unraveling Michelle's changing sexual identity, he writes, having recently obtained official documents from the state of Illinois.
Here's what I can say with assurance.
I found proof and official documents that Michelle Obama registered a vote as a man in 1994.
I also have official proof that, after 14 years of voting as a man, Michelle Obama changed her sex in 2008 from male to female.
This is not more social media silliness.
This is fact.
I obtained the documents from the Illinois State Board of Education only last week.
Here is Michelle Obama's official voter registration card from 1994 when she registered to vote as a man.
The letter M is circled under sex.
Notice right there in the middle on the third line.
Sex M. Then on July 14, 2008, With her husband about to be nominated by Democrats for the presidency, she changed her sex from male to female.
He's got that, too.
Since the early days, citizens have studied videos and photos of Michelle and said she is a man.
In 2014, comedian Joan Rivers fueled both rumors, responding to a TMZ reporter who innocently asked her whether the U.S.
would ever elect a gay president.
We already have it with Obama, so let's just calm down, said Rivers, before adding, you know Michelle is a tranny.
When asked to clarify remarks, she articulates Louis a transgender, we all know.
Rivers' comments fueled social media posting of photos suggesting Michelle is really a man, and close-up videos of her dancing on the Ellen DeGeneres Show, purporting to show something lurking in her pants.
Less than two months later, Rivers died as a result of what was supposed to be a minor throat procedure.
So who is Barack Obama?
His birth certificate and the real nature of her marriage aren't the only controversies threatening to blow up in the former president's face and expose a lifetime of lies.
Classmates of his Columbia 83 political science graduating class are now admitting the former president did not attend the university.
Despite Obama's official backstory, they earned his degree at the prestigious school.
Wayne Allen Root, a Columbia grad from that class, said he asked classmates if they have any memory of Barack, and none of them have a single memory of the future president during their four years at Columbia.
I asked every classmate I met at our 30th reunion, many political science majors, if they ever met, saw, or heard of Obama.
The answer was a resounding no from every one of them.
I asked if they found this strange or worried how this was possible.
They all answered, yes.
I asked if they thought it was possible to be a political science major and never meet a fellow major in our small classes.
They all gave me a very strange-looking answer, no.
So I asked, could this be possible?
Can you explain this?
No one had an answer.
Wayne describes himself as a Democrat, Who voted for the former president both times.
As did I, by the way.
He doesn't have an axe to grind, and neither do his classmates, as he explains.
Keep in mind, these people I spoke to are all two of man and woman, dedicated liberal Democrats who voted for Obama.
I'm guessing 90% are major Democrat contributors.
My Columbia classmates are the cream of the crop of American society—lawyers, doctors, billionaire hedge fund members, stars of the media.
They adore Obama.
But they all admit they never met him in their four years at Columbia.
No one ever met him.
Even worse, no one even remembers seeing that unique, memorable face.
Think about this for a minute.
Our classmate is President of the United States.
Shouldn't someone remember him?
Or at least claim to remember him?
Yeah, that's weird.
One of my early videos—this is from August of 2020—Fake News Issues of Identity.
Short takes on Lee Oswald, Noah Bauser, Paul McCarthy, Hillary Clinton, Michelle Obama, and even Kamala Harris.
Here's one of the photographs I've uncovered.
Here's Barack Obama with his lover at the time called Michael LaVaughn Robinson.
Notice, in particular, the lack of any breasts.
You cannot be a woman and not have breasts, although there are flat-chested women.
This is clearly not someone among them.
That is a man!
Columbia professors also have their doubts about Obama's claim to have attended the institution.
One classmate told me he was present when one of the most honored professors at Columbia gave a speech to alumni a couple of years ago, followed by Q&A.
He was asked about Obama at Columbia and said, I have my doubts about the story.
The crowd was stunned.
He immediately went on to the next question and never elaborated.
So who is Barack Obama?
His older brother claims the president has been lying about everything, including where he was born.
His supposed former classmate claimed he didn't attend Columbia.
The man is a carefully constructed fake designed to inflict maximum damage on America and the free world.
And according to Barack Obama's own family, his wife, Michelle, is actually a man.
Where does the deception end?
For years we've been reporting on the gender blurring agenda based on the assertion that genders are social constructs.
That same agenda claims toddlers can make life-altering decisions switching genders while promoting the use of extreme drugs such as hormone blockers.
The same agenda is creeping into elementary school curricula because they know that indoctrination must happen at a young age to permanently affect the psyche.
You're at the people's voice.
We're determined to continue exposing the agenda of the globalist elite.
And here they're doing a great job of it.
Owen, your thoughts?
Yeah, that's a whole rabbit hole of information.
I have not had a chance.
Now, listen, it's so funny because my mom is one of the people that first came to me with this.
And she said, you know that this is interesting.
And she showed me this.
And my mom is convinced And I asked, I was like, that's so weird.
I've never heard anything about Michelle Obama being a man.
It's some internet thing that I looked up a while ago and saw some pictures of Michelle wearing one of those dresses with what appeared to be a bulge in her pants.
I didn't know what to think of it.
I actually still don't know what to think of it.
I have not done any kind of research into this issue, so I won't comment any further about it.
I don't really know that much about it.
It's definitely weird.
As far as the gender, you know, the agenda, this transgender agenda, it's not only that they want to indoctrinate these students, they also want to separate this new generation from the values and traditions of their parents.
One of the things that this transgender agenda does, especially having these kids keep a lot of this stuff from parents, which is a large part of what these LGBTQ classes, You know, projects are doing in school is trying to make kids feeling to, you know, to feel comfortable enough to not tell their parents and to hide this from their parents and to instead only do this at school, only reveal this kinds of things to teachers who are government agents.
They work for the government.
This is one of the ways that they're trying to separate these kids from the old generation by convincing them that their gender is different.
And then, you know, their parents being confused about that.
And then that that basically says, Oh, man, they just don't understand me.
They don't understand what I'm about.
So that kid is further separated from his parents from the values that his parents believe in and the religion that his parents have.
So this is one of those Marxist tactics meant, you know, to sever the connection between children and their parents and the This new generation, this transhumanist generation that feeds the profiteering motives of a lot of these doctors and a lot of these social workers as well as big bankers who are behind the LGBTQ movement.
So I'm not at all surprised to see the Obamas linked in here somewhere along the line when it comes to that agenda.
Well, Owen, you tell your mom she got it right.
Jim Fetzer's done a huge amount of research on this, and she's spot on.
And if she wants to check out this story, have her go to my blog, jameshfetzer.org, and she'll find that video embedded.
And I think she'll be fascinated by other cases where we've been deceived by our own government based upon false claims of identity, which extend out of Fetterman And of course, to Joe Biden himself.
So you want to have her watch our show today.
Oh, and I'm sure your mom's a smart gal.
She got it.
She she's the one.
Yeah, she's the reason I do this kind of stuff.
So it's it's great.
It's great to look to.
That's excellent.
That's simply excellent.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail.
Broadcom to live.
Need to know at Gmail dot com live.
Need to know at Gmail dot com.
Here are a couple of comments from my blog.
Before any of this was known, I found it strange the way Barry was lotting over Michael Michelle at the inaugural ball.
I didn't think it was normal for a husband to act that way toward his wife.
It was as if Barry was indicating that Michelle looked great as a woman.
Not that as a woman, she looked great in the gown she was wearing.
Of course, at the time, I had no idea that Michelle was actually a biological male.
Barry's birth certificate was always suspect.
I was able to get a replacement birth certificate for my passport application in about 20 minutes at the Colorado Bureau of Records.
It certainly seems odd that the governor of the state of Hawaii would have to intervene to help Barry with his birth certificate problem.
In it, the governor knew enough people in the state he was able to provide Gary with an actual birth certificate that could be used for the forgery.
My belief is that Frank Marshall Davis is Barry's biological father, and that Barack Obama, the alleged Kenyan father, was tricked into believing he was the father.
Even Barry's mother may not have known at the time, as in all probability, she was having sex with both men.
During that time period, she became pregnant.
I think Davis was smart enough to ditch himself out of the relationship, or maybe Barry's mother simply preferred the Kenyan.
What we do know is the facial resemblance of Obama the President to that of Davis is most remarkable, whereas Obama the President bears no resemblance whatsoever to the canyon.
Final thoughts.
Owen, yours.
I'll just mention real quick one of the stories that I've been really, really interested in.
in the not only are they you know, I noticed around 2020 2019 2020 when the when the first COVID vaccines were being released when when all this was coming in the pipeline, how badly they wanted us to take it, how badly you know, how how how much it was pushed in the media.
What they're doing right now, everybody, this is really important to understand, is now they're injecting food, so animals, meat, with mRNA vaccines.
They're going to be doing this to pigs.
They've been doing that since 2018.
They're doing it to cows.
They're doing it to chickens.
They're doing it to all the meat that we're going to be basically buying in The supermarkets, you know, and it doesn't, even if it's organic, even if it's labeled as organic, this is one of the things that's really, really troubling because it might end up vaccinating you just by eating this meat which has that mRNA spike protein inside of it.
So it's really, really important to make sure that if you're eating meat, eating food, that you're sourcing it from local places.
If you can, if you can source meat from local places, from local ranchers, from companies that have committed to not use MRNA technology, like Good Ranchers is one of the places that you can go to make sure that you do not ingest any kind of MRNA that you don't know.
And it's just a really important thing.
Our food supply is being attacked more than ever before.
And so it's really important to know what you're putting in your body, where you're getting it from.
Make sure that you know that your food is safe and clean and doesn't contain a toxic mRNA spike protein that could be detrimental to your health.
So everybody, I would just end on that note.
Thank you for a wonderful show, James.
It was great.
This was one of the craziest shows about Michelle Obama and all that kind of stuff.
That is just such a weird These are these people.
This is a demonic agenda.
This is one of the things that I've always said about this.
You know, these people, whether it be Joe Biden, Barack Obama, something was never right.
I remember hearing Rush Limbaugh talk about Barack Obama and the birth certificate thing.
So this has been an issue for a very, very long time.
I'm not surprised in the slightest to see that he was completely fraudulent, that his identity was conjured up as this construct in order to be able to be moved and pushed as a pawn by the globalist elite.
That's who I think Barack Obama was.
He was a pawn that was completely pulled by strings, very similarly to how Joe Biden is pulled by these strings, which is exactly why they wanted him in there.
So great show.
James, thanks a lot.
Oh, and I can't tell you how happy I am with everything you had to say today.
Just wonderful.
And I want you to tell your mom.
I think she had a great influence in raising a super kid.
I'm just delighted with all your comments.
There's so much more, but it's such a positive occasion.
I'm gonna call it here and just thank you so much for today's show.
This is Juan.
Everyone ought to share with their friends and family, because it truly exposes a Democrat agenda.
It's a sham.
It's all built on lies, deceit, deception.
Whether you go back to Barack and Michelle Obama, or you go to Joe Biden and now John Fetterman, it's all a sham.
And it's detrimental to America and the Constitution of the United States.
Don't let yourself be played share with everyone.
Meanwhile, Spend as much time as you can with your fam, your friendly, just as Owen has been warning.
We really don't know how much time we have left.
It could be nuclear, but it could even be in the food we eat.
Sad to say.
Back tomorrow with more of the news you need to know.
Export Selection