Need to Know News (13 April 2023) with Carl Herman
|
Time
Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Carl Herman in his new home in Mission Viejo, California.
Ryan Davidson is on the road and will be unable to join us.
We have much to review.
The Pentagon leaks have exposed NATO's special forces have been in Ukraine virtually from the beginning.
At least.
One of the classified docs leaked showed the presence of 97 NATO special ops in Ukraine as of March 1, 2023, of which 50 were British.
The Guardian reported it had two files that include 14 special U.S.
operatives and 50 British.
Documents were labeled secret, prepared for senior U.S.
defense officials, according to the outlet.
It contained information about NATO military ops, logistics, weapon delivery, and training of Ukrainian troops.
Another U.K.
outlet declassified Know that 14 U.S.
Special Ops were among the 29 Pentagon personnel present in Ukraine, including the Marine Security Detachment at the U.S.
Embassy in Kiev.
Another 71 State Department personnel were listed in the country as well, amounting to a total of 100 Americans.
Declassified said the slide was marked not releasable to foreign nationals.
While the U.S.
Special Operators came from the Navy SEALs and Army Delta Force, the British definition extends beyond the Special Air Service to paratroopers, marines, and other units.
A PM is not obligated to brief Parliament on their deployment by virtue of their special status.
Dozens of classified U.S.
military docs have been discovered online in the past week, attracting considerable media attention.
The U.S.
hasn't confirmed their authenticity, but they're doing everything they can to suppress it.
While Washington and London have never officially confirmed their special forces in Ukraine, multiple media outlets have reported it over the past year.
For example, in April last, Le Figaro claimed SAS and Teleport Sombreros have been present since the beginning of Russia's military operation, waging a secret war on behalf of Ukraine.
The British Daily Mirror reported dozens of retired SAS operators had gone to Ukraine to contribute their expertise, including teaching KF soldiers how to operate British-made anti-tank rockets.
The outlet Greyzone reported British special ops had been working through a private company called Prevail Partners to train Ukrainian saboteurs targeting Crimea.
In December, a British military admitted up to 300 Royal Marines had been deployed to Ukraine for discrete operations.
Meanwhile, the leaker has been identified a young gun enthusiast who worked at a military base.
The man appears to have been identified.
The Washington Post interviewed a teenage member of a group, internet chat group, who described the source, referred to by the initials OJ, as having shared photographs and videos.
He holds a series of racial and anti-Islamic swears into the camera, then fires several rounds at a target, the report said.
Notice, this could be simply an effort to try to discredit him in killing the messenger instead of addressing the message.
The late talks have laid bare secrets about Ukraine prep for a swing counter-offensive, U.S.
spying on allies such as Ukraine, South Korea, and Israel, and tensions between Washington and allied capitals over arming Kiev.
Increasing evidence that it was not a military op by a state actor to discredit the U.S., but a consequence of Pentagon granting top-secret clearances to large numbers of service members, civilians, and contractors, as many as 1.25 mil.
OG, the source, appears to have acted as a leader on a server originally set up in 2020 on the Discord messaging platform by a small group of gun enthusiasts and gamers.
They went by several names, often known as the Thug Shaker Central.
O.G.
appears to have begun posting talks last year, using on the server he named Bear v. Pig, a reference to the Ukraine war, but also a viral video showing pigs fighting off a black bear.
According to the teenage member of the group, O.G.
has a dark view of the government, especially law enforcement and intel agencies as they repress reports and rants about government overreach.
Both said details were confirmed anonymously by other members of the group, and that they had viewed a total of 300 photographs at classified docs.
The origins of Leak was first reported Sunday by the Bellingcat Investigative Journalism Group.
The Washington Post said the team member had yet to be interviewed by any federal law enforcement by the time of publication Wednesday night.
Even Defense Secretary Lloyd Ross has vowed to turn over every rock to find the leaker.
O.G.' 's whereabouts are unknown.
He seemed very confused, lost about what to do, fully aware of what's happening and the consequences.
He's just not sure how to solve it and is rather distraught.
In his final message, O.G.
told his fellow members to keep low and delete information that could possibly relate to him, including copies of classified docs.
Russia's offered only a muted response.
Deputy Foreign Minister suggested leak might be U.S.
disinformation.
Ukraine government is assessing a possible damage from the disclosures.
It gave details that 12 newly formed brigades equipped with Western battle tanks and armored vehicles likely to lead the assault against dug-in Russian position.
For sure, people are not happy.
Ukraine was criticized for not being a trustworthy partner at the beginning of the invasion.
We weren't provided with weapons because of a lack of trust.
We lost a lot of territory and people as a result.
This perception was wrong.
Now this leak comes from the U.S.
All right.
Surely to say whether it's going to affect planning for the Ukrainian counteroffensive, widely expected to take place in the south of the country, possibly in the east as well.
The goal being to break the land corridor connecting Crimea with Donetsk and evict Russians from the occupied city of Mariupol and the port of Berdansk.
It's not going to be successful.
And obviously, this is going to create a major problem, because identifying the resources they're putting together for the counteroffensive.
But I would think, Carl, satellite imagery and the like, the Russians would have already known.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, I don't think there's going to be a counter offensive, of course, with the first part of the story.
And again, unknowingly, there's going to be an echo in this mostly empty home.
So the US and the UK and NATO have personnel on the ground in Ukraine, of course, because the Ukrainian war is a US-UK-NATO operation.
So of course, they're going to have people in there.
The name of the game for NATO is to surround Russia, to isolate them.
And then you'd have to eventually decapitate the political leadership of Putin.
You'd have to buy a replacement so that you get a controlled puppet at the top, similar to what you have for Zelensky, Macron, Trudeau, Biden, Harris, the Clintons, Bush.
Those are all controlled assets.
Obama.
And When we have this news in the current, present day of more apparent crime du jour, I want to assure our audience that you don't have to worry too much about the uncertainty of what's going on in the present when you have the history, and I'll put the link to the essay of US Illegal to demonstrate that we really had about 200 plus years of the US demonstrating that they routinely
We'll tell lies that are objectively demonstrated as false and known to be false as they're told for these Orwellian Treaty violating wars of aggression.
Therefore, we don't have to worry about this particular crime du jour too much.
Of course, knock yourself out by the facts of what's going on in the present, but when the history is so established, then and by established, I mean that we can quantify that in similar You got it.
Very good.
illegal wars of aggression.
The U.S. has war-murdered more than 30 million people since World War II.
So what's a prudent person to do except to withdraw consent and demand arrest as I get this contractor on the door?
You got it.
Very good.
Meanwhile, White House logs revealed George "That sort of son has made at least 14 questions.
If you want to know who's running the government, it ain't this guy Joe Biden, a pig.
Soros has proven himself instrumental in funding leftist causes for years, but at the age of 92, He sought after a new champion.
His 37-year-old son, Alexander, appears to carry on his father's legacy of propping up radicals and technocrats alike.
Recently updated White House logs have revealed Alexander had the ear of prominent officials and staffers inside the Biden admin, having visited the White House at least 14 times since Biden took office.
Soros the Younger, chaired as father of the Open Society Foundation, sits on the board of the European Council on Foreign Relations.
The Democrat fundraiser and University of California, Berkeley grad routinely takes selfies with liberal elites and leftist politicians like Emmanuel Macron, Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Cory Booker, Chuck Schumer, and others across the globe.
It was he, by the way, who announced that Kamala Harris would be the Democrat Party nominee for vice president.
On March 30th, the White House revealed just how often he's haunted the building.
He attended a luxurious state dinner hosted by Biden and First Lady on December 1st, having met with a chief of staff advisor near Cervista earlier in the day.
The next, he met with both advisor to the counselor and to the president, Mariana Adam, and Deputy National Security Advisor Jonathan Feiner.
These are people who are actually carrying things out, so he's making connections with the key people.
No doubt they receiving their marching orders from him.
Soros had, on other occasions, met with a National Security Advisor staffer and others in the presence or close to inner circle.
Matt Palumbo, author of an essay as to his review of the Soros Empire, told Fox & Friends it was notable most of Soros' visits were to individuals involved in national security.
Ukraine is a country where the Soros family has unfortunately boasted a lot of influence.
There are tens if not hundreds of billions being thrown around there.
I think it will be something worth circling back on in the coming months or years.
Mike Howell, director of the Oversight Project at the Heritage Foundation, suggests that Soros' repeat visits are concerning, since his family has already done tremendous damage to our country.
And bear in mind, it is George Soros' dream, his ambition, lifelong, to destroy America before his death.
The Soros agenda is one of death and destruction in the name of open borders and ending Western civilizations at hell.
The Biden admin and rogue prosecutor movement may be its most damaging purchase in America to date.
Waze reported Soros' elder had funneled $21 billion into leftist politics to influence global policy since 2000.
Contrary to Elon Musk's suggestion, the younger Soros is de facto in charge.
Tom Hilton of Judicial Watch said not to be distracted by Alex's name in the log.
It's actually a George Soros rep they're looking to meet with at the Biden White House.
He's still calling the shots.
It's his money, his foundation.
Fitton underscores that Soros' aggressive environmental agenda, open border initiatives, and other destructive vet causes are still at play and have significant influence with Biden.
The Washington Examiner reported Alexander to pump $5.7 million into leftist political action committees and Democrat campaigns since 2018, directing $2 million in 2018 to Senate Majority PAC, linked to Majority Leader Chuck Schumer.
He also contributed $130,000 to Pelosi's campaign.
Alexander had poised to lead his family's multi-billion political and philanthropic network, said Scott Walter, president of Capital Research Center, a conservative outlet like his father.
He closes up to White House and congressional leaders willing to do the family's bidding on issues like crime, immigration, election policy, and more, as he exploits every type of giving—money to parties, independent expenditure groups, and so-called charities.
This is a significant story right there.
Carl, your thoughts.
George Soros, Jen Gates, the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, Elon Musk.
These are just puppets and they're used to purchase what is necessary for an empire.
They're relatively high level puppets, but they're order takers.
So you need to have, you need to purchase your political control.
You need to purchase your financial system to enrich yourselves and pay off your minions.
You need to purchase media.
For Gates, you need to be a philanthropist and somebody who is just represented as some smart guy wanting to give back to the public, and that goes back historically to the robber barons cleaning up their public image.
So you get Gates purchasing and investing in the use of these bioweapon so-called vaccines, wanting to purchase farmland and talking about putting vaccines in our food, And then you get the GMO and the fake meat that is with Gates.
You have Musk with the Neuralink.
That would be an important step to create your robots and human beings.
You have Rockefellers making purchases in education and research and grants.
And then the Rothschilds, they're probably a higher up puppet with historically being some of the leaders to control the banking movement.
But, you know, then you've got to go back into who's really in control, and you get mythology of 13 families, and then further mythologies back that, that there are forces controlling those 13 families that would explain how they've been able to dominate an entire planet, is because there's a high-key, intelligent, invasive other species with It is a fascinating speculation, Carl.
I might count myself a tad skeptical, but it is always another hypothesis for our consideration.
their money, and they are purchasing what is necessary for an empire.
It is a fascinating speculation, Carl.
I might get myself a tad skeptical, but it is always another hypothesis for our consideration.
Meanwhile, we have Carrie Lake responding to a reporter's inquiry, and some would suggest getting quite the better.
Carrie Lake just leveled this mainstream reporter.
Arizona Republican gubernatorial candidate Carrie Late recently made headlines after asked by a reporter what she thought about the Trump proceedings in New York during an event at the former president's Mar-a-Lago estate.
Carrie responded to the report with a bold and confident answer, I don't know if I can say it, it's just a shitshow.
This response had been met with both praise and criticism from conservatives and liberals alike.
Kerry Lake destroys mainstream reporter in epic defense of Trump.
Watch.
When asked if she believed the corporacy could hurt Trump in 2024, Kerry told the reporter, no, not at all.
Are you kidding?
The guy's raising millions of dollars from people who have never donated a penny to politics.
They understand it.
They recognize bullying when they see it.
Kerry's response is a testament to his belief that President Trump is a victim of political bullying, and his supporters will stand by him no matter what.
Tuesday, Trump pled guilty to 34 charges related to allegations he falsified business records pertaining to former porn star Stormy Daniels.
The case is another example of the extreme length evidence they are willing to go to take down Trump.
The charges against him are politically motivated and have nothing to do with justice or the law.
House Speaker McCarthy and Majority Leader Scalise have both voiced their outrage.
McCarthy vowing to hold the Soros-founded Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg accountable.
Scalise calling the indictment outrageous.
Josh Hawley, Senator of Mississippi, also weighed in, saying tonight's indictment isn't about the law.
It's about power.
Raw power.
It's a Democrat party telling the nation to stop at nothing to control the outcome of the next presidential election.
It's an assault on our democracy, pure and simple.
Kerry's response is a perfect example of why conservatives need to stand up for President Trump and fight back against politically motivated attacks from Democrats.
It's clear they'll do anything in their power to take down Trump, even if it means weaponizing the federal justice process.
Republicans must come together and fight back against this blatant attack on our democracy and our freedom.
Carrie is a shining example of what it means to be a conservative leader and a true patriot.
Here we have her speaking out.
What organization are you in?
NBC News.
Oh, jeez.
Are you a communist newspaper?
Get away.
I don't want to talk to NBC.
Excuse me.
Carrie.
What did you make of today's proceedings in New York?
I don't know what you can say.
It's just a shit shot.
Are you worried at all that this could vote President Trump in the general election?
Are you kidding?
The guy is raising millions of dollars from people who have never donated one penny to politics.
They understand and they recognize bullying when they see it.
A lot of these are mama guys.
They're the people who are with me at the mama guys.
And they recognize bullying.
Some of their kids have been voting.
President Trump has been bullying every day, every day, since he dared to stand up for Wow!
Wow, Carl!
She even dismissed him because he was with NBC.
Appropriately, by the way.
I think she's just fantastic.
Oh, jeez.
Are you a communist news reporter?
Get away.
I don't want to talk to NBC.
Excuse me.
Here.
What organization are you?
NBC.
Oh.
Wow.
Wow, Carl.
She even dismissed him because he was with NBC appropriately, by the way.
I think she's just fantastic.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, that absolutely is true.
And I'll put a link to one published paper that I have, which is in part a demonstration that the war, formerly known as On Terror, was started by lies known to be false, as they were told by corporate media.
And I love that attitude that Carrie Lake has, and it's totally appropriate for NBC, if you take a look at the factless Russiagate, the primeless impeachment, the ridiculous raid of Ma-a-Lago and the election fraud.
And for that reporter, you know, I've seen that a few times now.
You just look at the reporter's face.
You know, there's no response at all to the idea, the concept that the American public are the ones who are being lied to and deceived by corporate media.
Right.
What we're seeing is the flip that will come where the people will see, because the premise of that NBC reporter is, you know, I'm with corporate media, the most reliable voice to tell you what you need to know.
And the United States federal government and the government of New York.
Well, okay, we are very close to where that anybody associated with corporate media is going to be seen as a serial criminal liar.
And anybody associated with leaderships of the government of the federal, the federal U.S.
and the state of New York are going to be assumed as being criminal and with COVID crimes against a criminal against humanity as well.
No doubt, no doubt.
What a terrific person, Gary.
Meanwhile...
Jean-Pierre grilled about why Biden doesn't hold press conferences.
Is the admin trying to protect the president from our questions?
Oh, no, of course not!
During a Monday briefing, White House Press Secretary Corinne Jean-Pierre was asked why President Biden had not held many formal press conferences during his time in office.
He has an upcoming trip to the UK and Ireland, but no formal press conferences are scheduled.
Jean-Pierre claimed the president often directly answered the media's question.
I mean, the president takes shouted questions.
I understand, John.
I understand.
I understand.
I've dealt with this question about three times already.
I understand that it is a job of you all to ask this question to me.
Totally get that.
The second question has to do with the lack of a press conference during the President's upcoming trip, and the lack of a press conference we see in general from this White House reporter, Sandor Herr.
I represent a news organization with 113 TV stations, a question I'm often asked and don't know the answer to, so I'll ask.
Is the admin trying to protect the President from our questions?
Absolutely not, Gene B. Erdreich.
Absolutely not.
They're more than question.
So why the lack of any interaction in a formal setting to have a press conference?
And that's not a problem at all, but certainly the president many times has stood in front of all of you taking questions on his own because he wanted to see what was on your mind, wanted to see what the questions you were going to ask him, and he wanted to answer them all.
She continued.
This has happened multiple times, many times during this admin, and that will certainly continue to be.
When it comes to a formal press conference, I don't have anything to share with you at the time.
The reporter continued to press her, stating members do not have the opportunity to ask the president questions in quite some time.
Jean-Pierre called it unprecedented for a president to answer as many shouted questions as Biden has during his time in office.
Reporters then grumbled in disagreement.
Well, we'll certainly get the data and share that with all of you.
I hear you.
I hear you on the press conference, on a formal press conference.
We get this probably every couple of months when you guys ask us about a formal press conference.
I don't have anything to share with all of you at this time, and I'll just leave it there.
She concluded before moving on.
Since taking office, 2021 through January 2023 Biden has held 21 press conferences according to data collected by UC Santa Barbara.
Former President Trump had 88 during his four years in office, Obama 163 during his eight.
163 during his age.
Reporter.
Is the admin trying to protect a president from a question?
White House, West Side Reporter, absolutely not!
Reporter, then why the lack of any interaction in a formal setting at the White House?
The President takes shouted questions.
Meanwhile, check this out.
It may explain why he's unavailable.
Oh my gosh, that's a mask!
Oh my gosh, that's a mask.
Holy cow.
I'm going to play that again.
This is extremely revealing.
The guy is supposed to be President Biden and he's wearing a latex mask.
Carl, lots of material there, my friend.
- It's a mask.
- African-American.
- Holy cow.
- We always act right.
- Well, the key to success.
- Carl, lots of material there, my friend.
Go for it.
- Yeah, well, the first one was propaganda, Pierre and the press corps.
See, the weakness of that question, are you trying to shield President Biden?
Get your list of questions.
Make a request.
She is the press secretary.
Her job is to serve the press, which is the job to serve the people.
So, just keep asking.
Request a live press conference.
Submit the fucking questions that you have, and make sure they are razor sharp.
So, the media, you don't get into.
The White House press conference, unless you're going to be some sort of a lapdog, but the idea that a media could do it and I'll model, I'll put a link to what I did with Hayward Unified School District is you get the sharpest questions and then you keep the documentation about how many times they have refused to answer it.
Or if they do, you just remind them of the ridiculous answers that they have given.
Four, as we have documented for three years, is that these actors, they are a brand.
See, they don't care about our opponents, don't care about anybody.
They don't care about the truth.
They care about pushing a controlling narrative.
So all they need are not leaders, somebody who would look and be innovative and synergetic with that.
And it have advances that are unpredictable and unimaginable.
Do you want a controlled puppet?
So, just anybody, it could be Dianne Feinstein, it could be Fetterman, it could be John McCain, Obama, whatever.
They're all just puppets.
Now, for our audience members, and as always, I don't have much power other than the factual accuracy of the message.
And all we really have at our control is what we think and what we say and what we do.
But certainly, that is sufficient evidence to withdraw all support from that political leadership, because this is just another avenue of fraud.
Yes, yes, yes.
How outrageous.
They're perpetrating this fraud on the American people.
the banks diluting and the corporate media lying, withdraw consent from this shitty clown show.
Yes, yes, yes.
How outrageous.
They're perpetrating this fraud on the American people.
Disgusting, truly.
Meanwhile, we have a report here, very serious, Project Icebreaker, the beginning of a one-world digital currency system by Brandon Smith via alt-market U.S.
There's been extensive discussion within alternative media about the dangers of central bank digital currencies, CBDCs, very similar to blockchain-based products, but directly controlled by central bankers.
The Orwellian nature of CBDCs cannot be overstated.
In a casual society, most people would be dependent on digital products for exchanging goods and labor, and this would, of course, mean the end of all privacy and trade.
Everything you buy or sell or work for in your life would be recorded, and this lack of anonymity could be used to stifle your freedom in the future.
For example, say you like to eat steak regularly, but the increasingly authoritarian government decides to list red meat as a health risk and a climate change risk due to carbon emission from cows.
All fraudulent, of course, but nevertheless, they have the power.
They determined by your purchase history, to which they have full access, you've contributed more carbon pollution than most by eating red meat.
Often, they declare you must pay a retroactive carbon tax on your past purchases of red meat.
Not only that, but your insurance company sends you a letter stating you're a medical risk and cut off your health coverage.
Products you consume, services you use, can be tracked to create a psychological profile.
Then a factor in determining your social credit score, just as the Chinese Communist Party's do in China today.
Perhaps you refuse an annual mRNA booster shot.
The tracking algorithm makes notes.
Now you're under suspicion for being anti-vax.
Your social credit score plummets, cutting you off from public venues.
Maybe you're even fired from your job.
In the worst-case scenario, economic access is the greatest oppression tool.
With CBDCs in place and no physical cash in existence, your savings will never be truly yours.
You'll never be able to hold your purchasing power in your hands.
The means of exchange would be bottle-decked by the banks, and governments would have the option to freeze your ability to transact.
In one day you get angry about a particular policy and openly call the system corrupt?
They can simply shut your option to transfer your digital money to others until you submit or die.
CBDCs give establishment officials leverage to starve their political opponents with algorithmic precision.
It would be a new world in technocratic oppression.
It's important to understand central bankers are moving at breakneck speed to develop and introduce digital currencies.
It's happening now.
It's not a matter of experimentation.
They already have these systems ready to implement.
The Fed's inset transfer program, FedNow, is set to debut in July.
Not CBDC, but an intermediary step toward instituting CBDC in the near.
In my investigation of these programs and how quickly they're progressing, I came across one called Project Icebreaker, run by the Bank for International Settlements, or IBS.
For those unaware, IBS is a globalist institution with a clandestine past known as the Central Bank of Central Banks.
It's a policymaking hub for most of the central banks of the world.
If you ever wondered how it was possible for so many national central banks to operate in tandem with each other instead of acting in the interest of the countries in which they reside, The BIS is the answer.
In other words, organizations like the Fed are not necessarily loyal to Americans or America.
They're loyal to the dictates of the BIS.
The BIS is at the forefront of the movement to adopt CBDCs.
They've been funding a vast array of projects that test and refine the technology and, as of this year, estimate that at least 81 central banks are in the midst of introducing digital currency systems.
Project Icebreaker grabbed my attention for a number of reasons.
The BIS described the project as a foreign exchange clearinghouse for retail CBDCs, which are currencies used by regular public and businesses to buy products retail, enabling the currency to be traded from country to country quickly and efficiently.
This is accomplished using the Icebreaker Hub, a BIS control mechanism which facilitates data transfers for an array of transactions while connecting banks to other banks.
Investigating further, I realize Icebreaker in theory functions almost exactly like the Swift payment system.
More than 10,000 financial institutions in 212 different countries use a SWIFT to transfer funds overseas, an incredible centralization bottleneck that gives its shareholders considerable power.
As a point of reference, after the special military operation began in Ukraine, Russia was expelled from SWIFT, used as a weapon they thought would crash the Russian economy.
Russia, in fact, found ways around it because their trade relationship with major economies like China and India enabled them to thrive and survive.
But some damage has still been done.
Consider this, however.
What if all monetary transactions were centralized through CBDCs and BIS controlled the hub, where they're all exchanged globally?
This is what Icebreaker is.
Now imagine you operate a business relying on overseas transactions.
You need to pay someone in Vietnam, Taiwan to produce your products.
With CBDCs in place, you'll most likely be completely dependent on a system similar to Icebreaker to move your digital money to Vietnamese banks or to accounts of your manufacturers.
Say officially that BIS, for whatever reason, don't like you.
Initiate Russian-style sanctions.
Your business is now dead.
What if you had to meet certain standards to be allowed to use the hub, and the BIS dictates those standards?
What if BIS decides your company needs to meet woke ESG-related categories before you can get permission for icebreaker transactions?
Now BIS has the ability to manipulate social and cultural trends using your business and millions of others as force messengers.
For the average consumer, doing most of it might not sound like a big deal.
But for the business world, a swift light up for retail CBDC could be used to dominate all international trade.
Running any kind of large organization or company would mean bowing to the whims of the BIS.
It gets worse, though.
Part of the process of the spoken-wheel exchange method used by Icebreaker includes the exploitation of a bridge currency to fill gaps in exchange rates and liquidity.
On the surface, it seems like a clever way to speed up transactions.
That said, think about the long-term path this kind of bridging sets in motion.
Say there's a global-scale economic crisis causing many currencies to fluctuate wildly.
Say the U.S.
dollar loses its World Reserve status and petrodollar and sends FX foreign exchange markets into a panic.
This, of course, is happening right now.
Price inflation becomes rampant and breaking institutions falter under liquidity pressures.
Let's say central bankers introduce CBDCs as a solution to the problem, and Abyss Icebreaker as the intermediary for international trade.
The population is so frightened by the economic crash they then embrace a digital framework.
Now say the BIS claims they still can't find a currency they consider stable enough to act as means to bridge most global transactions.
What happens then?
Well, luckily, they've been all been working on their own global CBDC.
In the case of the International Monetary Fund, this one-world currency would be based around a special drawing-right basket system they've been using for decades to broker currency transfer between national governments.
The BIS then uses the One World Currency as a bridge and icebreaker going forward.
Eventually, the BIS, IMF, and various central banks will ask the public the inevitable question, why are we bothering with these national currency exchanges when we have a perfectly good bridge currency in the form of this One World CBDC?
Why don't we just get rid of all those superfluous national CBDCs and have one currency for all?
Thus, total global financial centralization would be achieved.
Once we have a one-world currency, a completely centralized and micromanaged global economy, and the most vital trade systems in the world controlled by a tiny handful of faceless, unelected bureaucrats, why then have nations at all?
Global government would be the next and final step.
I see the nightmare play out when I look at projects like Icebreaker, They seem innocuous, but they act as a DNA by which economic tyranny is given birth.
Here, society going clashes.
Already there.
Please help.
Carl, your thoughts.
Zara!
Got a plumber doing the work in the kitchen there.
So great article, great catch and pass, Jim.
So the idea of the central currencies, of course that's what they want.
Of course it is.
And they want to have a social credit filter as well.
So the Pentagon Papers that Daniel Ellsberg and Anthony Russo Russo became friends with one of the Rockefellers, and Russo had a documentary from over 20 years ago where he quoted the Rockefeller for this exact plan, and that they do want everybody chipped into this cashless system, and then if you have any dissidents, you just turn their chip off, and they won't be able to access anything.
They won't be able to ask, they won't be able to pay for anything.
That also is what we were looking at for the Canadian truckers under Trudeau.
So, of course our opponents would want this central control, and then if you have a dissident, then they can also, as well, just issue a little notification through the Department of Homeland Security for a DVE alert, a domestic violent extremist, and they would come up with some narrative to justify excluding somebody from society.
So, the central issue, though, of giving more authority back to the central banks?
No, no.
Now, I'll put documentation in the show notes, but these people centrally in the central banks, this is fraud.
So, everybody is aware that we have this exponential debt curve, where we have this growth of debt that is by mathematical and mechanical design.
That is how they built the system.
It is designed to collapse in a tragic comedy when the interest payment Becomes to honor us in the history of this goes all the way back to the Bible for a Jubilee to forgive debts to prevent this type of tragic comic system, but the people at the top, they just want more power.
And that's the only direction that they go now.
For this, you just have to recognize the Orwellian nature of this so-called monetary system.
It's a debt system.
That's why we have the exponential growth curve of debt.
So, you know, of course, we shouldn't give them any more power.
We should remove the power that they have, and we can quantify the damages, literally, into the hundreds of trillions of dollars that these monsters have looted.
And then, to put one final note, you have President Kennedy issuing an executive order that allowed the Treasury Department to print notes that are backed by silver outside of the Federal Reserve System.
That monetary reform of creating what is used for money as a direct payment into the infrastructure system couldn't be allowed, and that was a big reason why President Kennedy had to be assassinated.
Again, totally anything that these monsters propose, we have sufficient factual documentation for people to withdraw consent and demand their arrest and not allow them any more of their schemes.
Very nice.
Very nice, Carl.
Excellent.
Meanwhile, Mike King of the Anti-New York Times is focused on the Shroud of Turin myth or miracle.
I've long been inclined to believe the Shroud of Turin is authentic.
Now, it appears to be scientifically inexplicable.
This would have been perfect for Easter, so let's say we're playing catch-up.
Listen.
Real History's channel mission consists of teaching true history, reporting real news, and providing fact-based and logical conspiracy analysis.
Notwithstanding our staunch opposition to atheism and Darwin's delusion, and an unshakable belief in a self-evident manifestation of the laws of nature and nature's God, we are not here to proselytize, evangelize, or promote one religion over another, or any religion at all.
And of course I'm an agnostic and I have published on evolutionary theory multiple places and defend evolution as the only theory that makes sense of biological phenomena, but we're setting that aside here and now.
It's only due to the historical element of the subject that this app of R.H.C., that's Mike and the swearing of R.H.C.
co-founder St.
Sugar, the conspiracy cat, Upon being asked for a reader for an assessment of the mysterious Shroud of Turin, Director Dark Critically acclaimed research capabilities to an objective and in-depth study of the debate over this historical artifact, which has always intrigued us, as it has me.
The Last Days of Jesus Christ I always mostly remember preaching some 2,000 years ago about love, peace, mercy, charity, kindness, forgiveness, more.
Many Christians forget Jesus was very aggressive and lion-hearted when publicly confronting the mighty Jewish elders of His day, the Pharisees.
It was not the warm and fuzzy stuff that caused the problem, but rather The confrontational holy hatred that led to his crucifixion.
I'm your host, Joyce Marcels, from the New Testament, Jesus to the Pharisees.
You are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do.
He was a murderer from the beginning and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him.
When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own.
For he is a liar, the father of it, because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.
John 8, 44-45.
Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees and hypocrites!
For you travel land and sea to make a single convert to Judaism, and when he is won, you make him twice as much of a son of hell as yourselves.
Matthew 23, 15.
Tell it, Jesus, tell it!
The last straw for the Pharisees and the money men came when Jesus fashioned hand-made a whip of cords indicating premeditated controlled anger.
And literally attack the money changers who were doing business in the temple.
And Jesus went into the temple of God and cast out all of them who sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the money changers, and the seats of them that sold doves, and said unto them, It is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer, but ye have made it a den of thieves.
Matthew 21, 12-13.
Tell it, Jesus, tell it!
This physical attack on the Rothschilds of his day sealed his fate.
To appeal to Jewish leaders of the unruly and perpetually rebellious province of Judea, the Roman governor Pontius Pilate reluctantly signed off on the ultimate penalty of crucifixion, symbolically washing his hands of the degree which the Jewish elders and their mob of zealots demanded.
Jesus was brutally flogged, crowned with thorns, and nailed to the cross on Good Friday.
His body was placed in a cave tomb and enveloped in a burial shroud.
The faithful believe that he rose on Sunday Easter.
Doubters suggest that his disciple removed the body of their beloved teacher and then created the legend of a resurrection and event, said to be confirmed by the mysterious image left on the burial shroud.
Some images.
He boldly insulted and humiliated the Pharisees in their faces in front of everybody.
Jesus goes full Nazi, physically attacking the traders and moneylenders of Jerusalem.
The lobby had his thugs arrest Jesus and then brought before the Roman governor for a Nuremberg-style show trial.
Here, pressured by a move of Jewish fanatics known as the Zealot Pilot, reluctantly signs off on crucifixion.
Fogged viciously and then crowned with thorns, the usual suspects got him.
What follows is a summary of the history and hard data points established by secular scientists to our satisfaction, nothing more.
Please limit critical responses only to these points and I have no interest in debating theology here.
Backstory of the Shroud The iconic shroud at Turin is a 14-foot linen cloth bearing front and back images of a severely beaten and crucified man who stood 5'10", tall for that era, believed by the faithful to be the actual burial shroud of Jesus Christ.
In the West, it was first presented to a local church during the 1350s by a French knight.
There's no record of where the Shroud was during the 1300 years since Christ's burial outside of Jerusalem, though the best theory, based on forensic analysis of pollen particles from the Shroud, would be that it was kept in Constantinople until the Catholic Army's 4th Crusade sack of the Eastern Orthodox City, and before that, located in Jerusalem.
Worried the Shroud could turn out to be fake, the official position of Pope Clement VII in the Catholic Church at the time was to declare it to be an artistic relic, but not a holy icon—a fact that debunkers often cite, but fails to take into account the fact that no one then nor to this day has been able to explain how the haunting image and bloodstains got into the fabric.
In 1532, a fire broke out, or was set, in the chapel where the shroud had been moved.
It melted part of the silver in the container housing the shroud, dripping molten metal on the sides of the cloth.
Some of the damaged area was replaced and stitched together by nuns, but the burn marks and extinguishing water stain remain visible on the shroud today.
In 1578, the Shroud was again moved to the Cathedral of St.
John the Baptist in the city of Turin, which later became part of Italy.
It has remained there ever since, with the exception of World War II, when it was relocated to protect it from American bombardment.
There was another fire in 1997 which required the Shroud to be saved.
Satanic arson, I bet!
Going on seven centuries now, the debate about its authenticity continues, especially since an accidental discovery in 1898.
That year, an Italian photographer was shocked to discover that the negative image of the shroud yielded a much clearer positive, possibly indicating that the original image itself is the photographic negative.
Ever since, both deniers and believers have sought to bolster their argument with intensive scientific studies, utilizing forensic technologies not available in centuries gone by.
With total objectivity and with Catholic upbringing and personal wishes set aside, we present some interesting, frankly mind-boggling, elemental facts previously not known to us, which have been uncovered and agreed upon by scientists of varying faiths of no faith at all.
Drop whatever conclusions that your hearts and minds lead to.
We are only presenting raw data here.
You decide.
Here's a portrait of the unfolded shroud from 1578 when it was first brought to Turin.
Cautious Clement wasn't quite buying it.
In fact, the Catholic Church has always taken a surprisingly objective and non-dogmatic position regarding the question of authenticity.
Oddly, the first image on the shroud is better seen and appreciated in 3D than the negative.
3-in-4 attorney and amateur photographer Secondo Pia was stunned when he developed his photo in 1898.
Subsequent photos some 30 years later again confirm the image is much more detailed and revealing in the negative.
An honest summary of objective observations.
Why?
There are neither paint nor oil nor scorch marks anywhere on the shroud.
The source of the image, which only affects the tippy-top microns of the fibers, remains of unknown and inexplicable origin.
2.
All attempts at replication, even with modern technologies and even on a small scale, have failed.
3.
The blood on the shroud is real, type AB with the DNA of a male human. 4.
The pattern of the bloodstains is consistent with those of a man who is crowned with thorns and clogged mercilessly by two men with spiked webs, one taller than the other.
5.
Some of the blood that stained the shroud had previously bled out onto the body from a still-living man, and some of the blood oozed out after death.
6.
The properties of blood samples reveal the presence of a trauma-induced chemical released from the liver indicative of someone who had been tortured and terrorized. 7.
There are dirt remnants in the face area, consistent with a man falling down face first, perhaps while carrying the heavy cross to his place of execution.
8.
In 2019, it required a lawsuit and a court order for a team of secular Oxford scientists to finally access the original 1988 data compiled by an earlier team of scientists whose work led to the publication of a much-publicized debunking article in the journal Nature.
After the British Museum was forced to release the data, the Oxford team scientifically ruled out the 1988 finding debunking.
Lying!
The carbon dating debunk of 1988 turned out to be hasty, if not rigged, based on contaminated and repaired from the 1592 fire samples of the cloth.
We have learned of many cases of erroneous carbon dating, such as a known thousand-year-old Viking artifact dating back only to the 1980s.
It was actually a thousand years old.
Ten!
In 2013, a more advanced procedure known as spectroscopic dating confirmed that parts of the shroud could indeed be dated back to the days of Christ.
Here are more images.
In 1978, the Shroud of Turin Research Project, STIRB, assembled a dream team of non-religious forensic experts to intensively study the burial cloth.
Without drawing conclusions as to whether the resurrection occurred or not, the team concluded the photographic image of the ancient shroud is indeed that of a man who had been tortured and crucified.
How it got there, they could not answer.
Based on the 1980 carbon dating studies, it's proven to have been wrong.
The paper of record and the rest of the anti-cross media wasted no time in front-paging the Shroud as a fake.
New Test Data Date Shrouded Turin to Irena Christ Study of Data from 1988 Shrouded Turin Testing Suggests Mistakes The Smug Atheist Scientist of 1988 Had Declared, With Grand Media Fair Affair, That the Shroud Was Woven During the Middle Ages Note!
The Exclamation Points in 2016-1390 Thirty years ago, and a lawsuit later, their biased and manipulative work was discredited by a team of Oxford researchers, as even elements of both the mainstream and scientific media have since reported.
After a faulty carbon-14 dating debunk was itself debunked, recent debunkers have shifted to an analysis of the pattern of the bleeding, which they say suggests that the crowd is probably or likely a fake.
But even this minor unproven point has been countered by other forensic experts.
Forensic research, once again, suggests the Shroud of Turin is fake.
Shroud of Turin is fake, Woodstain suggests.
Woodstains on Shroud of Turin are probably fake, say forensic experts.
Ancient Shroud of Turin is likely fake, Woodstown Analysis finds.
Eleven!
A bloodstain of fabric first.
The superficial image of a tortured man happened afterward.
This is known because there are no lines of imagery beneath the bloodstains.
Why would and could an alleged artist create real bloodstains before creating the image of a body?
Twelve.
The image was not drawn by strokes nor by dotted art techniques.
13.
The image is extremely superficial, yet, when photographed, the negative comes into full focus with much more detailed realism.
An artist would have had to anticipate the invention of photography many centuries later for viewers to fully appreciate the artwork. 14.
Embedding of this image, one theory posits, could be consistent with a burst of intensely bright UV light.
A divine Polaroid picture?
The location of the tomb was measured to have unusual levels of electromagnetic activity.
Fifteen.
The image, when photographed, has three-dimensional properties.
Sixteen.
Pollen samples.
Pollen gets into everything.
Removal of the fabric by tape.
Indicate that the shroud contained pollen types indigenous to Europe, Turkey, Constantinople, and Jerusalem.
Seventeen.
Advanced technology used to analyze negative images revealed the presence of ancient Roman coins used to weigh down the body's eyelids.
This particular point is disputed.
18.
A particular weave of the shroud is consistent with a weaving pattern popular in Egypt and Judea 2,000 years ago, but not known in Europe.
19.
Experts on the debunk side of the case, as well as the media, clearly manifest an emotional bias and hostility toward the hypothesis that the shroud could be the result of something supernatural.
The negativity is so strong it has driven them to manipulate and then hide data.
What Satanists have not been able to accomplish by arson, the debunkers have sought to achieve by fake science instead.
Why?
20.
The scientifically based believers, many of them non-religious, some Jewish, as well as the still undecideds, on the other hand, do not reveal any such dogmatic prejudice or cognitive bias.
21.
Every single claim of debunk or duplication to date After wearing a predictable media hype, has later been exposed by scientists, not the church, as shoddy science, or at least been credibly challenged by other experts and rendered inconclusive.
22.
In April 2022, the film producer David Roth publicly offered the British Museum a million-dollar reward if they can successfully fake this iconic artifact, both They said it was created by a medieval fraudster, and I tell them, well, if he could do it, he should be able to do it, too.
And if he can't, I have a million-dollar reward for you.
I encourage them to repeat this thing by creating something similar today.
Because of all the evidence that I have seen, if it is a fake, it is the most ingenious fake in history.
So far, no takers for the reward.
The bottom line.
After much intense analysis, no forensic expert or scientist has been able to honestly explain away these mysteries, nor figure out by what unusual means the bloodstained image of a terrorized man was embedded upon and within the shroud, not even close.
Indeed, to this day, the entirety of the debunked case amounts only to a continuing appeal to incredulity fallacy.
Nothing more.
Meaning it's impossible for them to believe it could be true.
Now, that in and of itself does not prove that the Shroud is a product of a miracle.
Of course, it simply means that contrary to breathless media reports, The well-funded and well-equipped teams at PRAC Forensic Scientists who have studied the Shroud have never been able to debunk it, and this sets up a logical either-or.
The Shroud is either the most cleverly sophisticated artistic and technological host in human history, with the artists having had the foresight and forensic knowledge to use the real human blood of a terrorist-stricken live and then dead volunteer, Perpetrated 1800 years before the most basic photographic technology was even invented, or it is a supernatural forensic sign of God's handiwork.
There are no in-between scenarios here, and that's all we care to say about the matter.
A couple more images?
In addition to the 1352 fire which damaged a shroud, there was another horrible five-hour fire which, were it not for the heroic efforts of an Italian firefighter, would have destroyed the cloth in 1997.
Antichrist, Satanists, and the usual suspects have been known to torch churches and cathedrals.
Carl, your thoughts?
There we are, I keep forgetting.
As a social studies teacher, I would teach about this, and students would be curious because this was on the news all the way back into the 80s.
And the principal points that I would make as an educator is that science is always going to run the show, and what you want is objective and independently verifiable data.
And in this case, you do have an image that is created on cloth, and the cloth has the pollen samples and the weave samples that would be consistent with an authentic Artifact of the time, you have a mysterious way that the image appears and that the image is anatomically correct.
No artist is able to draw something anatomically correct.
And as the paper points out, the blood happened before this image is created.
So, as a professional academic, this goes in the category of a mystery.
And there isn't anything wrong with that.
inside of the body outwardly, which if you think of a story of some sort of resurrection, yeah, sure, it could be.
So as a professional academic, this goes into the category of a mystery.
And there isn't anything wrong with that.
It seems that there isn't any good argument for how this was created.
And it certainly could have been done by something that we would call supernatural.
We just don't know.
I do like what Mike King said about Jesus being a rebel, because imagine if you were hanging out with Jesus, and he goes to the big city for the first time, goes into the temple, and starts a fight.
With a whip to throw the money changers out of the temple.
Now, as well, in history, this is just about 30 years before the great Jewish revolt, which would end up in the destruction of the temple in what we're told in the history is 70 by the Roman troops.
But, you know, if you're a disciple, you're with Jesus, this person of love and miracles, and he starts a fight, you're going to be talking among each other.
So, what do we do?
Do we throw down with Jesus?
Do we pull him off?
What do we do here?
I have a similar situation of applying science to another controversial topic.
In 1990, I was on a television show, public television, to promote the 1990 World Summit for Children, which would be the largest UN summit, largest meeting of heads of state in world history at that point for ending poverty.
And in the green room, I was with a professor from Cal Poly Pomona, who was going to talk about crop circles.
And I talked with him, and this was a PhD, and he said, okay, here's the science for these authentic crop circles, is that these crops are bent at 90 degrees about an inch from the ground, which, with a grain stalk, you can't do without snapping it.
The grain will continue to grow horizontally.
There's a measurable electromagnetic field.
The geometric patterns in the crop circles are Perfectly accurate, not off by one degree.
There are no footprints going in, going out.
These things occur overnight.
They can be hundreds of yards.
And they too, there have been a group of researchers for crop circles that have offered a million dollar reward if they can replicate these things.
And what they have to replicate is they have to bend the crop over without breaking it so that it'll continue to grow.
No footprints, geometrically perfect.
Oh, the electromagnetic signature that dissipates after a couple of weeks And also the top few millimeters of the soil has evidence of a brief burst of heat, as by the microscopic examination of the top levels of the soil, having the iron particles be attracted together as spheres.
So that also is a good case.
And if people would only be Now, the broader picture to our audience members and the value of the story is just let the science that we can verify lead the discussion and then we'll be out of all of the trouble with other important controversial topics as COVID and the wars and the banks are looting.
Well, of course, there are always inexplicable phenomena in any year of science that are subsequently explained by future developments.
My opinion, setting crop circles to the side, The Shroud of Turin is authentic.
It actually is the image of Jesus Christ, and it was created not by a miracle, but by an unusual set of circumstances.
Notice they mention the cave had a high degree of radioactivity.
They just happen to have, I think, just the right set of circumstances between the body, the shroud, and the Electromagnetic properties that crave to create this image, and it ought to be possible to replicate in principle if they could duplicate those circumstances, but it may or may not be possible to do in any case.
I believe the shroud is authentic, and it is the image of Christ, but that was not created by a miracle, but by a highly extraordinary, even unique set of circumstances that made it come out as a fascinating case.
So there's actually A third alternative.
It's not either a fake or a miracle.
It's possible it's naturally produced and it is authentic, but it was by a non-miraculous process, my submission as to the explanation for the shroud.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, Broercon, to live-need-to-know at gmail.com.
Live-need-to-know at gmail.com.
Meanwhile, Bud Light has just destroyed itself.
Its stock has been dropping dramatically by introducing this tranny, Dylan McIlvainy, and there's a rather fascinating piece by JB about Bud Light's sales prevention strategy.
Look at this.
DC Drano tweeted, On March 31st, Anheuser-Busch had a $132,038 billion market cap.
at $132,038 billion market cap.
As of today, it's now at $128.4 billion.
You know what that means?
The Woke Bud Light campaign has already shaved off nearly $4 billion in company value.
But don't let Dems' idea of conservative boycotts work.
Here to present what's going on graphically, its stock is dropping precipitously.
The reaction has been very powerful and, in my opinion, completely appropriate.
Paul, your final thoughts?
I was trying to look up a joke from that Budweiser thing that I had posted, but I didn't get it, and I didn't remember.
There are a lot of nice jokes out there.
It is crazy, and it is a crazy, upside-down world.
And I like the idea of, with the Jesus thing, A lot of my students, when I would present the facts that we have four Gospels, and they occur in the historical record over a period of time from about 60 to 120 AD, and as the story evolves, historians tend to think that the closest, just as Barney Davidson said,
The information we can get closest to the event typically is going to be the most reliable, and the story of Jesus evolves to the last book of John, where instead of this Jewish guy predicting the coming of the Jewish Savior, the Son of Man, that in the last story he becomes the Savior himself.
So, The facts are always going to give you a better grasp on the reality, and then, you know, we just want to be empowered by the facts, and then people can interpret those however they want.
The facts are going to answer who did what, when, where, but the subjective question of why, I mean, that's up to the individual to come up with a why.
Now, I would suggest to our audience members that we are so close to the breakthrough I keep on saying it over and over again, but we are, and this thing could break any time.
It could break with the financial collapse.
It could break with something in the Ukraine.
It could break with some miraculous type of situation.
We shall see.
Well, Carl, thank you for all your excellent comments today.
Not believing in miracles, I'm not awaiting any miraculous event, but I will say this, based upon my assessment of the situation, while the shroud is frequently debunked as fake, it appeared to me to be authentic.
And, well, Joe Biden is frequently assumed to be real.
He is obviously a fake.
Let that sink in.
All of Washington, D.C.
has to know this is a fraud, and no doubt most of the media.
Very few, however, have the courage and direct Competence and integrity like Carrie Lake, to call it like it is.
She's an inspiring figure.
We need more of her, and we need less of the Jean-Pierre's and a phony Biden and the lying Democrats who are doing so much disservice and damage to America under the influence of George Soros.
Who wants to see his dream come true?
For American to be destroyed before he dies?
And let me say, he's right on schedule.
It's happening before our very eyes.
Meanwhile, spend as much time with family, friends, and people you love and care about.