All Episodes
Previous Next
April 13, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
54:53
Need to Know News (12 April 2023) with Chris Weinert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Chris Weinert in Fort Myer, Florida.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
We begin with top secret documents showing that the corporate media is lying about Russia and Ukraine.
Surprise, surprise.
Top Secret Docs have been leaked to the public showing that the corporate media are blatantly lying about the level of death and casualties experienced by Russia and their special op in Ukraine, and that the U.S.
is using artificially low numbers provided by Ukrainian government to cover up Ukraine's death toll, which is massive.
The leak represents the largest U.S.
failure since a decade ago when Edward Snowden proved to the world the government was spying on its own citizen under the guise of national security.
Now, the leak of intel talks pertaining to the Ukraine war proves the U.S.
government, in concert with the corporate media, is lying again to drag out the war and pump up artificial support at home.
Well, countless media reports in the wider world claim Russia has lost a wobbling 200,000.
The U.S.
Intel actually puts a figure closer to 43.
While dispelling the outlandish media reports on the Russian casualties, it still parrots Ukrainian military death tolls, claiming they've only lost 17,500.
Those figures, sad to say, are far from reality.
They gotta be 10, 20 or more.
Ukrainian soldiers and observers have reported multiple times that the Ukrainians have been ordered not to retrieve bodies so the fallen men won't be officially reported, to keep the figures artificially low.
Thousands are thought to have been buried in mass graves, according to estimates from the Donetsk People's Republic.
The battle for Bakhmut alone.
Ukrainians have lost more than 17,500.
In fact, they've lost over 20,000 in Bakhmut alone.
It's been so deadly.
Ukrainian military commissars are kidnapping and scripting young men in broad daylight.
Meanwhile, get this.
U.S.
Then, when they reach Bakhmuk, they have a life expectancy of four hours.
Meanwhile, get this.
U.S. considering helping Israel against Iran for Ukraine lethal ad.
A defense intelligence agency doc has surfaced suggesting U.S. will be believes it can pressure Israel to provide lethal aid to Ukraine.
The top-secret document is entitled Israel Pathways to Providing Lethal Aid to Ukraine, dated February 28.
2023.
That's only a couple of weeks ago.
AndyWar.com couldn't verify the authenticity of the photo about it.
Here it is.
But it certainly appears to be legit.
The first and most plausible scenario was to adopt the Turkish model.
Which would mean selling Ukraine labyrinths through third parties, but openly advocating for peace talks to end the war.
The second is if Russia were to supply Iran with more advanced equipment or expand support, then Israel would respond by providing lethal aid to Kiev.
The third, if Israel requests expanded U.S.
support for counter-Iran activities in response to Russia allowing advanced Conventional Iranian weapons through Syria, Israel would provide lethal aid.
The background for the third suggests Israel has already requested U.S.
support for its operation against Iran, which of course continue unabated.
A fourth scenario, at least plausible, is if Russia incurs casualties from Israeli airstrikes in Syria and begins firing on Israeli aircraft, Israel would change its calculus on providing lethal aid to Ukraine.
Meanwhile, Israel has dramatically dropped off its airstrikes in Syria, including one that killed two members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
There's no indication, however, Israel has planned to move forward by providing aid to Ukraine.
The DIA document mentioned three Israeli weapon systems the U.S.
would like to see sent to Kiev, including the Barricade Surface-to-Air Missile, the Spyder Air Defense, and Spike ATGM, the Israeli equivalent to Javelin and Anti-Tank Missile Systems.
Chris, your thoughts?
Well, I think what's going on in the Ukraine is the way they've designed it.
It is meant to depopulate or to run at least 50% or more of the population into a refugee status.
It's a land grab.
It is a key state for the East versus West showdown that they're trying to bring in with the Cold War 2.0.
And of course, the people at the head of both the two financial systems that are competing with each other are the very same people that you mentioned in the next segment talking about Taking over more lands in Palestine in the Middle East and Iran, certainly.
I think it's one of the last and the last nation on the Wesley Clark Memo, if I'm correct, and seemingly everything after the War of Terror has been about facilitating further aggression and control in the Middle East for Israel over the Arab states.
And it seems like every war that we go into, whether it's World War I, World War II, the War of Terror, these guys are the benefactors of these conflicts.
And of course, they continue to advance their occupation of these regions in a way that I think they've run for a long time as far as serving Israel and Jerusalem as the epicenter of commerce and currency exchanges.
I think they're trying to push the same thing now with the One Belt, One Road or the New Silk Road.
And I think Iran is very much a keystone state as well, unless you want to travel over the Himalayan mountains and go around another 2,000 miles of landmass.
So, yeah, it's a very crucial place.
And I think the people that are trying to run the world's banking system, and of course, with that price controls and labor valuations, are certainly trying to impose control over Iran, the last bastion that they have in terms of conquest there.
Yeah, very good.
Indeed.
I think any scenario that leads to the U.S.
helping Israel against Iran is going to be the most likely to bring about their assistance against Ukraine.
Meanwhile, Kevin McCarthy, the Speaker of Brahmos, no blank check on Ukraine appears to have reversed itself, claiming we have to win.
That's rather pathetic because there's no way we're going to win.
Russia is already prevailing decisively.
McCarthy's comments came last week when he spoke to reporters after a meeting with the President of Taiwan in Reservist when Chuck Todd played them during an interview with House Foreign Affairs Chairman Mike McCaul.
What Russia?
Has done is wrong.
In a phrase that I use, a blank check, I use that for anything.
I look at every dollar and taxpayer we'd use, but one thing I know, that in Ukraine, we have to win.
Because it would also save Taiwan at the same time.
That's just nutty!
What in the hell?
That's just ridiculous!
Meanwhile, Michael Tracy tweets, anyone who voted for Republicans in the midterm on the assumption they bring some sort of non-interventionist policy shift in Ukraine was either deluding themselves or got scammed by Kevin McCarthy.
Chuck Todd questioned McCaul about the comments, wondering if McCarthy had reassured Zelensky that House Republicans are not going to stand in the way of more aid to Ukraine.
McCaul replied, his new comments are always how he's felt on the matter.
He's always believed it's felt this way the Texas Reps had.
What's happening in the integrated will determine what happens in Taiwan and the Pacific, he added.
Which, in my opinion, is ridiculous.
Michael Tracy.
Notice McCall says McCarthy always had this position in spite of his media outbursts over his meaningless blank check comment last year.
And in spite of the comment, wish-casting by some GOP-aligned pundits, that his comment indicated opposition to Ukraine policy.
Todd characterized the comments as a shift in the perception of where McCarthy is.
Not the fact, but the perception.
I think what's happening in Ukraine is an atrocity.
I think Ukraine—not just Ukraine, the world—has to win there, McCarthy said.
It hasn't always been what McCarthy believed, at least not according to his own words.
Political Insider Word Readers back in January that McCarthy's comments about no blank check to Ukraine were a ruse and evidence they may not be worthy of getting the role of Speaker.
McCarthy announced prior to the midterm that when the GOP takes control of the House, Ukraine no longer would be the benefactor of a blank check from the U.S.
government.
I think we're going to be sitting in a recession and they're not going to write a blank check to Ukraine.
McCarthy said they just won't do it.
It's not a free blank check.
Or so led CNN tweeting.
Sources tell CNN Republican Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy has been working behind the scenes to smooth over his comments about no blank check to Ukraine.
Republican lawmakers at the time backpedaled and McCarthy didn't step in and say, no, I meant what I said.
Political insider declared evidence McCarthy was talking out both sides of his mouth and perhaps unfit for the speakership when Grunewald blasted McCarthy over his recalibrated stance, which he described as pledging his full sales support for Biden war policy in Ukraine.
Prior to the 2022 midterm, McCarthy saw polling data showing Americans were increasingly reluctant to fund the proxy war in Ukraine, so he sent signals that he agreed, opposing a blank check.
Now he's basically saying on that, no, it meant nothing.
GOP Speaker McCarthy pledges his full-scale support for Biden's war policy in Ukraine, saying we must win there.
Coming from Glenn Greenwald, Public opinion suggests the American people are growing weary of financing the war.
A recent poll showed only 37% want to send more dollars.
38% are opposed.
23% no position.
Republican support for America having a rose drop from 35% to 17%.
Mitch McConnell responded saying he's sorry public opinion is sliding because our continued support for Ukraine is enormously important.
There's another guy who needs to go.
How important?
The single most important event going on in the world right now, says Mitch McConnell.
Kevin McCarthy is echoing those same sentiments, saying we have to win.
Does he sound closer to McConnell in his thinking, or the staunch anti-war America vs. Conservative he sold you on while seeking to earn the Speaker's gavel?
Gritz, your thoughts?
Got to make sure I wasn't on mute.
Yeah, these guys all of a sudden talking about avoiding a big blank check.
Well, I think that if you look at the War of Terror and the things that the bipartisan Congress could agree upon during the War of Terror in the course of 20 years, they've amassed over $30 trillion in debt between that and the COVID scam.
All this stuff has been put on the national debt through a private banking institution That can create public debt to facilitate these resource oligarchies.
And of course, the ones that are trying to push the CBDC on us and create this, in my opinion, this technocratic feudalism.
If you think about it, if they get the CBDC and they bring this thing in, think about how it would be used to facilitate debt collection in terms of the average American taxpayer at $31 trillion is $248,000 a taxpayer in debt.
Paying for this blank check that McCarthy so eloquently speaks of, all to aggrandize and to accumulate resources for this small group that has gaslit us into compliance and collaboration, and is seeking to do so even furthermore with these hoaxes and Gollum enterprises.
You've seen what they did with small business in terms of ritual sacrifice and these absurdities, what they've done with censorship, what they've done with sanctions, what they've done with all these things, the people that don't play along.
So this to me seems to be the ultimate grab in terms of the private sector working with and through authoritarian governments in collusion.
And these private corporations that will be the benefactors from this debt are going to take over the world and turn out the labor force and certainly colonialize 7 billion debt slaves via this instrumentation.
So I think we got a big problem here, and I think McCarthy is just kind of putting Band-Aids on some severe lacerations in terms of our hemorrhaging credibility and our hemorrhaging amount of debt.
I think it's embarrassing that he has just lied to us again.
Meanwhile, a dear friend of mine, Nick Kohlestrom, interviewed by another dear friend, Kevin Barrett, Russia's fighting a just war in Ukraine.
I've interviewed him on this very subject myself.
Nick Polarstrom's Ukraine, the just war begins.
All my life I've opposed wars, campaigned against war, even published books about how they were wrong.
And so how strange it is at last to come across a just war, one that needed to be fought.
It needed to be fought because the diplomats could not resolve it.
At last, and how strangely, I am agreeing with EU Chief Joseph Borrelli in March.
This war must be won on the battlefield.
Unlike Morelli and the entire Western media and elite establishment, however, Collins argues the war in Ukraine is a just war from the viewpoint of Russia, not from that of Zelensky and his Western backers.
Ukraine, the just war, systematically demolishes mainstream media cartoonist depictions of the war and its causes.
Exposes a long list of Western deceptions and publicity stops, and finishes by extensively citing Sergei Gassiev's The Last World War and Vladimir Putin's Empire of Lies speech, two essential documents that need to be read by anyone interested in a fair and accurate assessment of what the Ukraine war is really about.
Nick Ollerstrom is the author of many books, including Terror on the Tube, On the 7-7 London False Flag, Breaking the Spell, and How Brenton Initiated Both World Wars, Questioning World War II Myths, The Great British Capital Hoax, The Novichok Chronicles, A Tale of Two Hoaxes, and False Flags Over Europe.
Meanwhile, Nancy Pelosi applauds a meeting between Kevin McCarthy and the Taiwan leader, Former Speaker Pelosi, no stranger to calling out Republicans for what she perceives as their wrongs, sending praise their way is not something that happens often from her.
Yep, that's exactly what she's done with House Speaker McCarthy after he met with the president of Taiwan.
Wednesday, McCarthy ignoring implied threats from China—this is on April 5—met with President Tsai.
The two, along with lawmakers from both sides, held meetings at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library.
following the event he released a statement saying the meeting between sai and mccarthy is to be commended here's news mac tweeting today's meeting between president sai and taiwan as weaker mccarthy is to be commended for its leadership its bipartisan participation and its distinguished and historic venue Pelosi herself made waves in August of 2022 by flying to Taiwan to meet with Tsai.
She did so even though lawmakers, including Joe Biden, cautioned against it.
Her visit to the island nation set off a firestorm with Beijing, which responded by hosting military exercises around the tiny island nation, sending off missiles in the airspace, perpetrating an increased number of cyber attacks.
Hillary McCarthy made a statement following where he recognized America's support for the people of Taiwan will remain resolute.
He insisted there was no reason for China to retaliate, which it threatened to do in an email to the White House.
Calling the meeting a blatant provocation in direct violation of the one-China principle.
Representative Ashley Hinson posted the email on Twitter.
Here you can see the Chinese embassy complaining.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries also met with the Taiwanese president earlier in New York and said they had a very productive conversation.
While the U.S.
doesn't officially recognize Taiwan's sovereignty, lawmakers have repeatedly expressed support for the island nation and the importance of maintaining peace.
This meeting was another significant affirmation of the relationship between the two countries.
Chris, your thoughts?
Well, yeah.
If anybody looks into the history of both the rise of the socialist and communist powers in China, you'll find that they pretty much were funded and pretty much orchestrated by a group of Judeo-Masonic US-UK quote-unquote patriots and central bankers and robber barons playing Chang versus Mao.
In other words, the the nationalist, Chang, and the socialist, communist, Mao, against one another.
And more importantly, enveloping the entire Chinese population into this binary kabuki theater, as you'd call it, or as I'd call it.
And these are colonialization tactics that they've used for a long, long time.
I guess you can look into World War II and find the same situation with some of the Axis powers rising up as well, in terms of being proxy enterprises of the same group.
And Jay Gold, one of the robber barons in the 1870s or 80s said that he basically has enough money to hire one half of the world simply to kill the other half.
I think these bankers and these central bankers have that kind of money and they pretty much need to create this type of situation for the sake of quote-unquote herd management and population management.
Keeping the fighting age male populations at a very, very low number and certainly keeping the rest of the population buying into the offerings and the Galaam enterprises that are presented to them in the terms of peace.
So as far as a just war is concerned, I think that Russia has the historic and geographical background, as well as the history of treaties, whether you're talking like Pazdam, Yalta, or going back to the early 40s at the end of World War II with the United States.
So basically, I think it would be almost a similar situation to say that if China were to start colonializing the West Coast of the United States or occupying that type of an area, it would be a similar type of foul.
And trust me, if that ever happened, it would be called so.
Yeah, maybe it's happening now and maybe that's part of what's going on and we don't even really hear that yet.
But I think that Russia is correct in terms of defending its territory.
And I think that really the United States has been proven to be in the wrong place multiple times.
And I think it's part of the takedown and the controlled demolition of this country is to overstep politically and certainly financially and in many other ways.
ethically against them.
And the hand-handed efforts seem to be obvious in that regard, being that they're so reckless and so obvious and apparent that, you know, public support is going to fall on the side of Russia with this as it rightly should.
Meanwhile, check this out.
A message I sent to the American Teachers Federation headquarters.
Do you do any research before you take stands like grabbing our guns?
Do you know 200,000 lives are saved annually by the defensive use of guns versus around 35,000 lost to gun violence?
Do you look at school shootings to see if they're real or fake?
Notice how walking in the shooter was wearing one type of sneaker, black and white, and when taken out was wearing a different type of sneaker.
Very bad stuff.
Meanwhile, surprise, surprise, the COVID vaccines were never tested for safety.
There were 31% higher deaths in the VAX group in the gold standard phase 3 clinical trials.
How do we know that none of those deaths were caused by the vaccine?
Because Pfizer didn't think so, really.
Because Pfizer wouldn't tell us.
Unbelievable.
31.2% higher deaths in the gold size of Pfizer phase 3 clinical trials.
Only one way to know whether or not the vax caused any of those deaths in the 21 who died.
Proper histopathology.
Pfizer never did it.
The FDA never asked for it.
This was the biggest mistake, except I would add it wasn't a mistake, it was deliberate, in the pandemic.
And nobody has acknowledged or lifted a finger to correct it.
Had they done the proper testing on the 21 deaths, the vaccine would never have been approved.
So, of course, that's why they suppressed it.
In lieu of proper tests, there were assurances from Pfizer that nobody died from the vax.
That's absurd.
We need the tests, not assurances.
The tests are cheap and dispositive.
We can fix this in a New York minute.
But nobody wants to know the answer.
Today, only Ryan Cole is doing the proper histopathology, and in 100% of the cases he's been asked to look at, he can attribute the deaths to the vaccine.
Someday, I hope we'll have leadership at the CDC that is not corrupt, and that will ask medical examiners to do the proper tests, except the CDC is completely bought and paid for.
This can literally happen instantly.
For example, the CDC says tomorrow every medical examiner should do histopathology looking for the vaccine as cause of death on the next person who dies.
This is no big extra burden for a medical examiner.
Just a few extra steps.
Or they can ask a few medical examiners in highly vaccinated regions to run the extra tests on everyone who has an autopsy for the next 30 days, and to make sure that everyone who dies suddenly gets an autopsy done.
The bottom line is this.
We can almost instantly have proof of whether the vaccine is safe and effective or not, and the cost in time and money is de minimis.
The CDC is simply not interested in finding out the truth about the vaccine, even though their job is to protect America from health threats.
CDC.
Mission Roland Blatch.
CDC works 24-7 to protect Americans from health, safety, and security threats, both foreign and in the U.S.
Perhaps it's time to rewrite the mission statement to be more accurate.
Here's my suggestion.
CDC works 24-7 to protect the vaccine manufacturers so that nobody in America ever finds out just how deadly the vaccines really are.
What do you think?
It's an improvement, right?
It's certainly more accurate.
Here we have more.
Did Pfizer trials show the vaccine increases heart disease deaths?
Today, over a year later, the article mentioned here has a grand total of nine likes and seven comments, so it didn't get a lot of attention.
Too bad, because it's an important article.
With a 31.2% higher rate of death for those in the treatment group, because the difference was not statistically significant, we have to look at the autopsy results of all 21 who died to see if there's a problem.
If the autopsy results showed none of them died from the vaccine, which is highly unlikely in light of the Schwab study, then the vaccine might be reasonably safe.
It would kill fewer than one in 21,759 on the average.
That's not super comforting, is it?
The standard for a safe vaccine is that it kills less than one person per million vaccinated.
So essentially, the FDA made a serious error by not demanding to see definitive proof that the vaccine didn't cause any of the deaths in the trial.
As a result, The COVID vax was safety tested on the American public.
We have this very poor monitoring system of yours, which is woefully underreported, and we have a CDC supposed to monitor deaths in of yours and let us know if there are safety signals.
If they don't do that, the death safety signal triggered shortly after the rollout, and the CDC was asleep by the wheel and has still not altered or alerted the American public to the risk.
Thus, The FDA blew it by not requiring proof the vaccine didn't cause any of the deaths in the vaccine trials.
Today, CDC could easily make up for the error by doing autopsies in a high-vaccination region on every vaccinated person who dies within 30 days of the vaccine.
After just 10, it would be very obvious what's going on.
It is astonishing nobody in the country wants to do this, right?
The closest we have is a Schwab study.
They just examined five bodies with distal pathology slides, and guess what?
Yep, 100% of the cases they examined, they could determine the vaccine killed the patient.
Can you imagine what would have happened if they looked at more?
This is why no world government will dare do this.
None of the people in the power want the public to know how many they've killed with these vaccines.
That's a bottom line.
I dare anyone to prove that I'm wrong.
Chris?
Well, this to me seems to be more indicative of the cover-up being more malice of forethought than certainly is being led on.
The mens rea of the people involved with this and the extent to which they've gone through in terms of the whole thing, the whole rollout itself, to me it seems like another one of their bargaining tactics.
In this case, I would say they normally would take what they have no business taking, but in this case they're imposing things they have no business imposing.
Putting mandates on people for a vaccine, creating emergency authorizations for this.
If you think about it, the CDC's track record and margin of error here versus risk and reward is grossly being understated and manipulated in terms of statistics and actual damage.
And I think it's really difficult for them and much harder now with the statistics coming out for them to continue to uphold the notion of this being simply a hustle file and something that's not entirely far more sinister.
So as I say, you know, the rollout of this whole thing under the emergency circumstances, the risk reward, even the PCR test as a mechanism of diagnoses was a complete and total inaccurate failure.
The propaganda behind the Safe and Effective, the gaslighting campaign against the resistance, the censorship of the victims, the collusion of the conspirators, the money and the profit margins, Not to mention the actual technicals and the data and the research that has come out, the combination or recombinance of mRNA recombinance, graphene or adjuvants, like I say, the risk versus reward for pro and con, the medical murder incentives that have been funded by the Federal Reserve and put on our tax debt.
This, to me, like I say, all seems indicative of a massive cover-up and certainly something indicative of malice of forethought and certainly not an accident or hustle-file or just a simple mistake.
I couldn't agree more, Chris.
You got it exactly right.
100% spot on.
Meanwhile, Clearview AI scraped 30 billion images from Facebook and other social media and gave it to cops.
It puts everyone into a perpetual police lineup.
Hone Tok Tat, CEO of Clearview AI, demonstrates the company's facial recognition software using a photo of himself in New York on Tuesday, February 22, 2022.
In a Monday, May 9, 2022, legal filing, the company agreed to restrict the use of its massive collection of face images to settle allegations it collected people's photos without their consent.
That's from an AP report.
Fairview AI scraped 30 billion photos from social media to build its facial recognition database.
U.S.
police have used the database nearly a million times, the company's CEO told the BBC.
One digital right advocate told Insider the company is a total affront to people's right, full stop.
A controversial facial recognition database used by police departments across the nation was built in part with 30 billion photos the company scraped from Facebook and other social media without their permission.
The company's CEO recently acknowledged creating what critics call a perpetual police lineup even for those who haven't done anything wrong.
The company, Clearview AI, boasts of its potential for identifying rioters at the January 6th attack on the Capitol, saving children being abused or exploited, helping exonerate people wrongfully accused of crimes.
...but privacy violations and wrongful arrests fueled by faulty identifications made by facial recognition, including cases in Detroit and New Orleans, as cause for concern over the technology.
Clearview took photos without users' knowledge, CEO Hone Ton That acknowledged last month.
Doing so allowed for the rapid expansion of the company's massive database, which is marketed on its website to law enforcement as a tool to bring justice to victims.
That told the BBC, Clearview's AI facial recognition database.
Clearview took photos without its users' knowledge, according to its CEO, as he acknowledged.
It has been accessed by U.S.
police nearly a million times since the company's founding in 2017, though the relationship between law enforcement and Clearview remains murky.
The number could not be confirmed.
In a statement, he mailed Insider, which is making this report, that Clearview's AI database of publicly available images is lawfully collected, just like any other search engine on Google.
The company's CEO added, Clearview's AI database is used for after the crime investigation by law enforcement, is not available to the general public.
Every photo in the data set is a potential clue that could save a life, provide justice to an innocent victim, prevent a wrongful identification, or exonerate an innocent person.
The technology has long drawn criticism for its intrusiveness from privacy advocates and digital platforms alike, with major social media companies, including Facebook, sending cease and desist letters to Clearview in 2020 for violating their users' privacy.
Clearly, Clearview AI's actions invade people's privacy, which is why we banned their founder from our service and sent them a legal demand to stop accessing any data photos or videos from us, amid a spokesperson said in an email referencing a statement made by their company in April 2020, after it was first revealed the company was scraping user photos and working with law enforcement.
Since then, the spokesperson told Insider, Met has made significant investments in technology and devotes substantial team resource to combating unauthorized scraping on Facebook products.
When an authorized scraping is detected, the company may take action such as sending cease and desist letters, disabling accounts, filing lawsuits, or requesting assistance from hosting providers to protect user data.
However, despite these policies, once a photo has been scraped, biometric face prints are made and cross-referenced in the database, tying the individual to their social media profile and other identifying information forever.
And those in the photos have little recourse to remove themselves.
Residents of Illinois can opt out of the technology by providing another photo.
Clearview claims it will be used only to identify which stored photos to remove.
Though, of course, they might simply add it to the set after the ACLU sued the company under a statewide privacy law and succeeded in banning the sale of Clearview AI technology nationwide to private businesses.
Residents of other states, however, do not have the same option.
The company is still permitted to partner with law enforcement.
Chris, your thoughts?
Well, where to begin?
This to me all seems to be a lockstep of a despot's wet dream as far as putting things on.
And if you go back to like before 9-11 or shortly thereafter, you can see the locksteps they put in place.
You remember the PROMIS software was supposedly going to be a law enforcement criminal database, similar to what the COINTELPROGRAM files had under the FBI.
And this was supposedly going to integrate NSA Dragnet surveillance.
And basically start storing our databases and our dossiers in a place called Pine Bluff, Utah, and go next level in terms of using the NDAA and the War of Terror legislations passed under emergencies so that citizens will have to prove that their income and their revenue and their actions are legit.
To a cabal, a group of managers and systems managers that are using the private sector and the national security state to put this asymmetric surveillance over the citizens and the 7 billion worldwide debt slaves.
So we are all being placed on a digital plantation by this and the straw bosses under the realm of national security and the private sector Are given a selective exemption from this overwhelming surveillance and certainly prosecution from it for participating with the collusion to enslave us.
Those that do kind of go out against it, you see they get thrown, the full weight of the national security complex is thrown at them.
Snowden, Assange, go on and on, right?
Any of the whistleblowers probably pay with their lives even.
So yeah, like I said, they give you the notion of conditional privacy for your collaboration with this overreach.
And in my opinion, they create an environment of despair and fear to really see their tyranny thrive.
And it's all about, in my opinion, controlling people not only through this, but also through the use of social media and perception management To make it look like it's an organic, natural thing, or the consensus of the will of the people, but in actuality, everybody is really not happy with this, but they have no alternative.
I think you got that right again, Chris, yes.
What can we do to protect ourselves from these intrusions?
Got that right.
Meanwhile, Whoopi wears an anti-Christian message on her shirt.
Spikes were down, but tempers were up after the shooting in Nashville, which, by the way, was completely fake.
A woman, a man, transgender, we were told, killed three children and three adults.
3 plus 3 equals 33 at Covenant School, a Christian school.
According to reports, the nine-year-old child of the school's senior pastor, Chad Scruggs, was among those killed in the, we're supposed to believe, horrific incident.
Scruggs' comments to the media reflected a Christian perspective.
He stated he believed she was in the embrace of Christ, who had lifted her to life again.
The ringleader of The View, Whoopi Goldberg, faced a little time joining a mob that's aggressively sought to denigrate the spiritual strength of Christian prayer rather than lament the deaths of innocent people.
Whoopi was seen on set after the assault wearing a sweatshirt where the words thoughts and prayers had been crossed out and policy and change had been written in.
The nihilistic message represents a rising trend to abandon religious faith in favor of government protection.
Anti-gun activist group People's Action has singled out Republicans for responsibility, even though shooters have been mentally troubled and in most cases already been under the FBI's observation.
Police have named Audrey Hale as the gunman who murdered at least six, including three children.
According to local reports, Hale is a trained commercial illustrator and graphic designer who had attended Covenant School in her youth.
Just before 11 a.m., police arrived at the primary school and fatally shot Hale.
In the wake of the tragic massacre, the Biden admin advocated for stricter gun control, including a prohibition on assault weapons.
Hale is born female, but is always identified as a man.
Thus, she refers to herself with male pronouns.
Meanwhile, however, we've done a study here.
A brilliant chiropractor has observed that this is quite fraudulent.
We're talking about two different individuals.
Here's Hale on the left, who's supposed to be the transgender, and there's the shooter on the right.
Notice Hale has a long neck.
The transgender does not.
Not only that, but he's got a different body type, and he moves like a male, unlike Hale.
We see the long neck again on the right, but what about on the left?
There's nothing long about that neck.
What about the lips?
Look how prominent the lower lip is on the left, which we don't see on the right.
She had been pouting on the left, but even if so, I don't know that that alone could account for it.
Some people have a lot of disparity in the size of their lips, and it looks like the upper lip was tampered with on the ride.
It looks like someone took a Sharpie to it.
It does not have an anatomical contour.
It's too straight.
So I think I figured it out.
These two are the same person, and he is a boy.
Round face, pug nose, short neck.
It's the same kid.
I'd call it as a boy's expression, too.
Girls, even at a young age, tend to be more camera savvy.
They're quick to pose nicely for the camera.
They want to look good in photos.
It was certainly true of Audrey.
And on the right, he's nowhere 28.
It's a wonder if he's even 18.
And if you told me he was 16, I wouldn't question it.
Meanwhile, remember, wow, our trans-Nashville shooter changed his or her sneakers during his or her assault on a Christian school.
How dumb are we supposed to be?
Glad to see many are pointing out the absurdities of these stage events, which the Democrats use to promote their agenda.
Chris, your thoughts?
Wow, I have a few.
Well, Whoopi Goldberg, in my opinion, is another one of these Hollywood quadroon trifectas that is loyal to a certain race or religion that certainly is not one she publicly represents but uses for her advantage.
And of course, she goes out there and manipulates the other race that she does publicly represent in terms of becoming a social engineering straw boss and whipping her own kind in many cases.
You know, basically steering the Janissary culture into its own defenselessness while encouraging the same demographic to continue to rebel and clash with a different group of people that they are seeking to disarm and dispossess amidst this systematically imposed dispossession tactic.
So yeah, as far as I'm concerned, I think that really it is a Hollywood operation and it's trying to gaslight and mindfuck people.
And you know, as far as that dude with the The shooting woman, whatever it is, or even the dude with the Bud Light commercial.
I think that they all need a GMO-laden Bud Light, just like everyone else does.
And, you know, why should we, in terms of a basis of reality, interfere with their sense of delusion?
I think, really, you're seeing this alternative reality being branded as something That would imply some normalcy.
And then the resistance to it is actually being branded as some sort of a mental health issue.
So you're really seeing American psychiatric and the media going to work on the resistance and the even the cultural loathing for this operation as a mental health thing instead of really seeing the lunatics as the mental health issue and the people that are trying to destroy culture and tradition and certainly destroying their own futures in terms of repopulation and things of the sort.
It's really the master of inversion ceremonies, and they're using great emotion and selective half-truths to motivate people into disarming themselves against resistance to this enslavement.
It's the same as it always is.
I know.
It's just appalling how often now they're pulling out these shootings.
I just can't believe how well it's working, Fats.
I mean, I can't believe that people fall for this shit and let alone dive in after it.
Chris, yeah, no, I agree.
I got you back here.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
I mean, how stupid, how dumb are we supposed to be?
Really?
Here we go.
Ila Graines threatens legal action against a trans right activist who attacked her.
On Friday, Ila gained a former University of Kentucky swimmer Where I had my first appointment as a assistant professor of philosophy, was assaulted by an angry mob in San Francisco.
I appeared on Fox Channel Tucker Carlson to discuss the incident.
She said she was attacked by a mob of demonstrators, and she spoke about the inclusion of trans athletes in women's sports during an event organized by Turning Point USA at San Francisco State.
A video shared by Gaines shows security escorting her out of a classroom and into a hallway as protesters pursue her.
Meanwhile, she tweeted, The prisoners are running the asylum at SFSU.
I was ambushed and physically hit twice by a man.
This is proof that women need sex-protected spaces.
Still, only further assures me I'm doing something right.
When they want you silent, speak louder.
Further footage shared depicts social security media blocking Gaines from a throng of protesters before she was led to a secure room where she claims to have been barricaded for three hours.
Gaines has been vocal about her opposition to transgender females participating in and dominating female sports.
During her appearance on Tucker, Gaines revealed she plans to take action against those who allegedly assaulted her in San Francisco.
She vowed her attacker would face repercussions for their actions.
She said, you know, I am worried about my safety.
I have to be now.
When we have people who are willing to do this—and we know why they're willing to do this—it is because they don't have reason, they don't have logic, they don't have science, they don't have common sense on their side.
That's meaning they are all on my side.
And so they protrude by violence, whether it's physical or verbal.
She continued, What this means for me does not deter me.
This assures me I'm doing the right thing.
This will not silence me.
When they want me to be silenced, it just means I need to speak louder.
Carlson asks, Really quick, did anyone in the state of California authority and any political figure, for example, defend you?
No.
Not the Dean of Students, not the campus police.
I will say, City of San Francisco police stepped in.
They did a phenomenal job in escorting me three hours later.
But I will be pursuing legal action.
I will ensure the people who physically assaulted me, those who put me in that position, will face repercussions.
Chris, your thoughts?
Wow.
You know, I think that there's really The injection of these cultural engineering efforts that are so outrageous by design, and I think that is the part of the tactic, not only to distract, but to just draw people into this one way or another.
It's hard to not have a strong opinion, whether you're an expert or not, on the subject.
So I think you're seeing also a pinpointed propaganda campaign that's being run to the left and to the right that are being divided over this issue as well.
Tucker Carlson would state, and I think very righteously, his discontent with this, while you have the bleeding hearts on the other side, like the Joy Reads and the racial madcows that are going to certainly be provoking these sexual deviants in some sort of a half-truth emotional propaganda campaign to outrage them.
Furthermore, to feel a sense of repression or a reduction of their freedom or a threat from people resisting this, when they are truly being put out as threats to really do what they're doing, what they just did here.
Yeah, I can understand also why people are outraged.
Where I left off at?
Okay.
Well, what I was saying is this is so outrageous by design.
I think it's intended to almost be a distraction or something that grabs the attention of people that shouldn't be talking about this.
People not only will be polarized by this, but form a strong opinion, whether they're experts or not, and fall into this.
If they don't fall for it, they'll dive in after it.
And it's like I said, something that is intended to be that way, to pull people in.
In my opinion, also, there's a pinpointed propaganda campaign being used in conjunction with this.
Tucker Carlson stating his righteous outrage, as I mentioned, as he should.
But also on the other side, with the bleeding hearts like Joy Reads and Rachel Madcowes, they're going to provoke and trigger a lot of these sexual deviants into thinking that their freedoms are being restricted or that they're being targeted or under threat.
In reality, they're being used as threats to go after and destabilize the cultures in the way that they are with this.
So, you know, I don't understand how it's even a thing, you know, these sexual deviants, you know, crossing their biological genders to join the opposite sexes competitive sports programs.
How it's a thing, like I said, I don't even know.
It shouldn't even be a conversation, let alone a headline like it is.
So, yeah, I think it's part of the design and it's not only a suitable distraction from what's really going on in the world, but it's something that creates an emotional limbic reaction and response.
It's intended to do and people will pick a side one way or another on this and really lose track of some of the bigger issues that maybe would be a little higher in priority.
Yeah, it is bizarre.
I think it is an aspect of cultural Marxism trying to disrupt a culture, change its values, distract everyone, massive perversion.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Live need to know at gmail.com.
Jim, these CCC dupes have no idea of the actual scum of the American secret space war weapons which they are on parity or exceed the RF.
That would be the Russian Federation.
If the CCB, China, tries to go to war with America, our plasmatized space system will literally eat their icy The CCP will then be eliminated in an hour or less, as American secret satellite system featuring scalar EMF will be unleashed on these naive dupes.
Pelosi and the DNC want a war with the RF and CCP China to protect themselves from being tried for sedition and treason, convicted and hung by the neck until dead, With all personal assets clawed back.
This was from someone I know personally with a lot of intel background and sources.
Chris, your final thoughts?
Well, as we see, there is obviously a very orchestrated operation going against our culture, our way of life, the American way, the middle class, the Constitution.
And of course, a lot of the things that are being thrust into the forefront are things that are maybe, like I say, service distractions or things that I'm not saying are irrelevant, but they are certainly an emotional misdirection.
And I think that really you got to keep your wits about Yeah, I was saying before I got interrupted there by the technical difficulties.
Yeah, you really got to keep your wits about you.
They're trying to create a limbic reaction, something that you respond to emotionally.
It's certainly not rationally.
A lot of these things are exactly inversion tactics and gaslighting tactics by design.
Because in place of rational thought and common sense and thinking and data analysis, you'll jump into a reaction and forge an opinion or forge an allegiance or alliance with a certain group one way or the other.
Instead of really looking at the core issues and how the rhetoric is being delivered to you and certainly how we're being all manipulated by, like I say, pinpointed propaganda on both sides of this.
And they're trying to steer us into a civil war.
So we do their dirty work for them and take each other out.
So, uh, I think really we got to see through justice in terms of all these, these, um, lockstep programs that are intended to enslave us and really, you know, see through the forest and the trees on this.
Very good, Chris.
It's such a joy to do these shows with you.
You're among the very best commentators I've ever known.
I just say how the hypocrisy just reeks from every part of the Democrats.
They have nothing in truth or justice to commend, so they do nothing but lie and commit atrocities.
It's outrageous.
The American people have to have the intelligence enough to understand and perceive what's going on, but yet, and I do believe they exercise that wisdom at the polls in 2020 and in 2022, but because of Dominion voting machines, which change the way you vote, as in from Republican to Democrat, We're still bereft.
We're still settled with.
We're still besottened by a corrupt regime that doesn't represent the American people and is doing great destruction, not only to the Constitution, but to our standing in the eyes of the world.
America has become a joke.
We must find a way to end this, and end it soon, or it will be our own undoing.
Spend as much time as you can with family, friends, people you care about and love.
We do not know how this is going to play out or how much time we have left.
Thanks for being here.
More of the no's you need to know tomorrow.
▲
Export Selection