Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 12, 2023 - Jim Fetzer

01:45:26

Need to Know (11 April 2023) with Owen Stevens and Brian Davidson

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is it, Jim Fetzer, Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Owen Stevens in Grand Rapids, Michigan, and Brian Davidson in Houston, Texas.
	We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
	The U.S.
	appears to be pushing back on a plan that would give Ukraine the status of NATO.
	I think that the situation is deteriorating so badly.
	That would be embarrassing.
	The Financial Times said the U.S., Germany, and Hungary, all three, are pushing back against the efforts.
	NATO members are expected to be locked into the negotiations until a summit is held of the NATO countries.
	The Ukrainian President, of course, has warned he'd only attend if Kyiv were presented with steps toward membership.
	NATO first promised in 2008 Ukraine could join the alliance, despite warnings from William Burns, U.S.
	Ambassador to Russia at the time, who now serves as CIA Director.
	That Ukrainian entry into NATO is the brightest of all red lines for the Russian elite, not just Putin.
	But no one paid any attention.
	NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg said Ukraine must win the war and become more interoperable with the alliance to become a member.
	Sources told Financial Times, all NATO members agree offering Ukraine full membership is not a short-term option given its engagement in war with Russia.
	Which, after all, would mean since there's a war on one NATO member, a war on all would bring them all into the war with Russia.
	That would be rather much.
	Any sort of new guarantee would be highly provocative toward Russia.
	Meanwhile, former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev says Ukraine is simply going to disappear because nobody needs it.
	The EU doesn't need Ukraine because supporting the country amid the conflict on the order of the Russian mentor has plunged Europeans into real financial and political hell.
	Kiev's prime backer, the U.S., doesn't need Ukraine either, because most ordinary Americans have no idea even where it's located geographically.
	Consider it some abstract part of Russia.
	Africa and Latin America reject Ukraine because the billions the U.S.
	has been wasting on senseless battles would have been enough to fund many social developmental programs.
	Asian countries don't need Ukraine because, through the example of the conflict between Moscow and Kyiv, they see how the technologies of color revolutions are being developed.
	To eliminate the largest competing powers, Russia doesn't need Ukraine, because the country was a mistake created by the collapse of the Soviet Union.
	And, get this, even Ukraine, with its Nazi elite at the helm, is not needed by its own citizens, which is why out of 45 million, fewer, a little more than 20 million, remain there now.
	Bad, bad, bad.
	Your thoughts, Owen?
	Yeah, I think right away, one of my first thoughts, it's not relating to this specifically, but there was, this is recent and I don't know if you've heard of this, but this is coming out right now about the leaked documents that were just out in regards to Ukraine.
	There's these leaked documents, whether it's a leak or a hack or information, disinformation, a coup for Russia, a ploy by us.
	But these documents are really, really telling right now.
	They were leaked by online gamers in regards to Ukraine, and they're telling us that Biden's promise not to put boots on the ground in Ukraine was a total lie, according to leaked documents from the Pentagon right now.
	These leaked documents, there's special forces and they're showing special forces in Ukraine right now.
	And.
	And I'm following this story as it's developing.
	This is in the last hour about all these leaked documents, what they mean.
	And I honestly think that this is over as a conflict.
	I mean, it's been over for a long time at this point.
	It's just, you know, what we're seeing in the media, at least, Yeah, so that's what these documents show.
	There's U.S.
	military forces right now, special forces in Ukraine on the ground right now.
	That's what these documents are showing.
	Was Biden committing U.S. military forces to Ukraine?
	Yes.
	So that's what these documents show.
	There's U.S. military forces right now, special forces in Ukraine on the ground right now.
	That's what these documents are showing.
	If you guys want to see these documents, all you have to do is look at them.
	I know it's important.
	Yeah.
	It's the New York Times.
	They just did a report on it right now.
	The Times just an hour ago put a report out.
	And then there's also fears that Ukraine could fall well short in spring camp.
	counter-offensive.
	These leaks reveal that the counter-offensive that Ukraine is supposedly undertaking, what these leaks say is that it's going to fall short completely.
	And so that's other big news coming right now out of Ukraine.
	Yes, I believe that 100%.
	Brian?
	Well, first of all, this is obviously one of the biggest money pits I've ever seen in terms of what's going on in Ukraine.
	The The leaked documents seem to indicate that they're going to run out of their ability to maintain any air defenses by May 23rd, which would leave Putin in a position to fly over there with fighter jets and just take out anything he wants to take out and leave what he wants to leave.
	Dropping bombs from the air is obviously one of the most effective ways to Put this thing to an end and write fast.
	However, as the article states, who wants it?
	I mean, is BlackRock and Vanguard really going to go in there and rebuild the whole setup?
	Are we really going to drop all this money on these people that want to go back to Russia, this culture, these people?
	I don't know the answer, but what is clearly developing is some sort of I'm assuming that it's the mineral rights to whatever's in Ukraine and who's going to be able to harvest what's left of that country.
	Economically, when it's all said and done.
	I don't know the answer to that.
	I don't know who's going to sell off what.
	I don't know if Russia wants to go in there and do this or if it's going to be like it's Afghanistan where it's basically sold off to Afghanistan.
	I don't know if there's going to be anything left when it's all said and done.
	So who would invest in rebuilding it if Russia wins?
	I don't think Russia will be in a position to want to rebuild it.
	I don't know if Russia is going to be in a position to want to take care of that culture and those people.
	I think if those people, of course, those people will be clamoring to go back and join the motherland in the event that Russia wins.
	But how much will Russia's political theater allow for Ukraine?
	The big question at the end of the day is, I know that BRICS is a financial organization.
	And I know that NATO is a military organization.
	And NATO, obviously America, has been supporting NATO and supporting all the financial investment that we've been making in Ukraine.
	But don't you get the feeling that Ukraine is really just a front to try to get rid of Putin and try to break up the old Soviet Empire?
	You know, I don't know how it's all going to go.
	I haven't been able to study it with all these shootings going on lately, and I'm really not Up to date on everything that's happening over there, but I can tell you that based on what I've seen about these Pentagon leaked documents they do appear legit.
	On a lot of different levels they were taken with a cell phone camera of documents inside of a file.
	Apparently Pentagon's trying to scramble to get them and figure out where the leak happened and whose cell phone it was.
	Obviously the cell phone users was probably wise enough to at least erase the metadata before it was probably through a series of different channels posted on 4chan.
	They indicate of course that the Minsk agreements were a big Ruse to buy time by Western nations and that it was all a lie, which means that we can't be trusted whatsoever.
	And they, they indicate that if they're legit, that Ukrainian air defenses are going to run out of money by May 23rd.
	And of course, if that happens, that's, that's going to be the end and right fast.
	But all suggest Mendeleev has it right that Ukraine is not going to continue to exist as a nation.
	Meanwhile, the latest package includes cash to buy 23 million rounds of ammunition.
	Added is another $2.1 billion U.S.
	taxpayer dollars earmarked to buy equipment and services on the commercial market.
	This is not from the military-industrial complex, but on the commercial market.
	Among the items are more than 23 million rounds of small arms ammo that could dry up supplies of some common types on the consumer market.
	This is over and above the 150 rounds already allocated to U.S.
	supplies and purchase for Ukrainian forces.
	As the news reported, that $2.1 billion of our taxpayer money is earmarked to buy that from the commercial market.
	It's going to include the same ammo makers you and I buy from.
	Another ammo shortage in the making.
	If you don't have enough ammo now, stock up.
	Before this shortage, drive prices of ammo up.
	Meanwhile, the U.S.
	tells Europe, send us more business or go to hell.
	Very disturbing.
	The country blew up the Nord Stream pipeline to supply cheap Russian energy to Europe, which is now threatening Europe to be sanctioned by America unless they cut off business with Russia—everything the government tells them to cut off.
	Under the headline, America has a message for countries and companies still doing business with Russia.
	You're with us or against us.
	Top officials from the Treasury plan international trips to pressure firms and countries doing business with Russia to cut them off.
	The message is continue to provide Moscow with material support or keep doing business with countries that represent 50% of the global economy.
	Those are the choices to be laid out.
	I think they're rapidly changing because more and more countries are joining BRICS, are siding with Russia.
	I think the U.S.
	is running out of allies.
	If it's manufactured goods that are involved, America is demanding buy them from us or countries of which we approve, or we'll cut you off and do what we in Norway did to Nord Stream—cut off your sources of supply by force that you won't cut off on your own voluntarily.
	This is the new free world of American vassal nations, and if you are not with us and doing what we demand, you are supporting authoritarian regimes, and we are against those, and we'll be at war with them, never at peace with them, and we won't be at peace with you or with any other enemy.
	So, you're either with us or you're against us Jews.
	We'll then know whether to sell you our weapons or use them against you.
	We will not relax in support of the free world, and neither will you or else.
	This is the same America as when, at least since W first announced to the world, either you're with us or you're against us.
	Being an ally of America now means being a slave to America, and anyone who is not that, a slave, is America's enemy.
	That's a basic message of today's president, Joe Biden.
	Forcher adds, Treasury officials Rosenberg and Brian Nelson, specialists in sanctions and terrorist financing, will travel to Europe to meet with leaders of financial institutions in Switzerland, Italy, and Germany.
	They plan to share intel on potential sanctions to warn of the potential penalties Rosenberg will also make a stop in the former Soviet Republic of Kazakhstan.
	Turns their private business is not to do business with Russia.
	Kazakhstan has the largest border of any nation with Russia, 7,599 kilometers, 4,721 miles.
	1,599 kilometers, 4,721 miles.
	Unlike other existing NATO nations to Russia's west, it is to Russia's south.
	China has a second longest, 4,209 kilometers, 2,650 miles, and Biden admin is now preparing to go to war against China too, increasingly putting pressure on Europe to trade less with that soon-to-be-officially-designated increasingly putting pressure on Europe to trade less with that soon-to-be-officially-designated foreign adversary of the United
	It's not enough to strangle Russia from the West, they want to do it from the South, and soon Europeans will be required to participate as well.
	America wants the entire world to strangle Russia, and then China too.
	So the question is, which side are you on?
	Are you against Russia and ultimately China, or are you instead against America's government, which, by the way, doesn't represent the American people?
	I think the situation is America is getting more and more desperate and having fewer and fewer friends.
	Your thoughts on that?
	Yeah, I think this really mirrors what's going on with the CBDCs right now.
	That's the Central Bank Digital Currencies.
	This is exactly what the Biden administration is trying to do.
	It's an Orwellian thing.
	Really, what they want is a cashless society.
	So most people are going to be dependent on digital products for exchanging goods and labor.
	So like a Bitcoin that they can program and turn on and off depending on how obedient you are to the government.
	Right.
	And this is exactly what they've done to Russia when they moved Russia from SWIFT and from the SWIFT network.
	And what we're seeing right now is economic access being used as a really important oppressive tool.
	So that's that's This is kind of the worst case scenario where economic access is the greatest oppressive tool.
	With CBDC, central bank digital currencies being able to remove Russia from SWIFT, with all these things in place and then no physical cash, like that's exactly what they want, our savings are never going to be truly ours.
	We're never going to be able to hold purchasing power.
	And the means of exchange would be bottlenecked by the banks, which is exactly why they want Russia to remove it from SWIFT and to make it basically bottlenecked by the banks.
	That's exactly what they're trying to do.
	And that's what they're going to be trying to do with us and with citizens in this country.
	So I think it's an interesting parallel between CBDCs and what they're trying to do with Project Icebreaker, which is something that's basically allowing them to interconnect these banks.
	We know that there's a FedNow service that's coming out.
	All of this happening in conjunction is a very scary thing, and we really need to be keeping our eye on what's happening with the central banks, what's happening with the Federal Reserve, and how they're going to be using CBDCs, programmable Bitcoin across the world, not only to oppress American citizens, but to oppress people around the world. not only to oppress American citizens, but to oppress people And it seems as if America has taken this big bully stance.
	I mean, once upon a time, I would have liked to say that our job was to be the world police policing freedom.
	Well, it's just not the case.
	I don't think it has been the case for a very, very long time if it ever was the case.
	I think that that, you know, that dream of America being this bastion for freedom, the shield, you know, to guard people in oppression.
	You know, it's just it's just not true when you consider what we're actually doing, you know, and what we've actually done and what our government actually is, you know.
	We're not people, and we're not run or ruled by people who care about freedom primarily.
	They care about power primarily.
	It's no different than any Soviet, you know, or no different than any communist government, okay?
	It's the only difference is that we call ourselves a democracy.
	We call ourselves free, but in reality, it's a complete delusion.
	Well said, Owen.
	Brian?
	Well, Owen, I think you're Right on about the CBDCs, and I think that China was the perfect test pattern for how the social credit score system controls the population and controls the journalists.
	What they basically do is give you a credit score just like your normal credit score based on how well you conform to the narrative.
	Good citizens are given a good credit score and they get to be happy and they can go get loans and they can travel and they can withdraw their money and bad citizens are considered to be bad citizens and they've got problems and they can't get loans and they can't travel and they Their social credit score is advertised in the world as a bad citizen.
	It's a control mechanism, very Orwellian, sort of 1984-ish.
	I think the CBDCs are absolutely on their way here in America.
	I think they've been telegraphing it.
	They're telling us outright that it's going to be here coming July, at least the test patterns at a lot of the large national banks.
	Now, Signature Bank was Obviously, a setback for them in the fact that that thing was looted over and over and over, and they were set up to be one of the major influencers related to the CBDCs.
	But that's just a control mechanism that's built into population control.
	What is happening over in Europe as a different issue, really, Owen's right when he says Team America, World Police, and we're doing this because obviously at this point in time, the Fed is overextended.
	Everybody can feel it.
	I'm printing billions and billions and billions here and billions there.
	You know, I've got a little theory that I'm developing and I'm working on.
	I've actually got to do a lot more research on it.
	But I, like I said in the last show, I think that these false flags are little money explosions designed to beef up the security apparatus.
	And get more cops, get more security apparatus, and at the end of the day, as we beef up that security apparatus in the middle, just like the 9-11 resulted in the Patriot Act, what they're trying to do is create a buffer between the citizenry And the elite and the people that are involved in these false flags are being promised that they're going to end up at the top of the food chain rather than they're at the bottom of the food chain.
	And of course, you've got the secret handshake organizations like the Freemasons and others that are obviously involved in getting these government contracts.
	So I think what's happening right now is a real example of a great divide taking place between The bourgeoisie and the proletariat.
	American style.
	And at the end of the day, the right path.
	That was sensational, Brian.
	Just simply excellent.
	shut down our borders, shut down the CIA, shut down the FBI, get clean elections and get the hell out of all these other places.
	But we can't because it's our currency that controls the rest of the world that we hand out like butter to all the compliant nations that play along with our international social credit system.
	That was sensational, Brian.
	Just simply excellent.
	Excellent.
	Meanwhile, Alstead legislators want their jobs back.
	These are two black Tennessee legislators who actually used bullhorns on the floor of the House, bringing a protest right into the House, which was why they were given the boot, not because they're Wanting to grab our guns.
	That just shows they suffer from cognitive deficits that are very common in the Democrat Party, especially.
	Nashville's Metro Council is likely to reappoint Justin Jones.
	They're also likely to reappoint Justin Pearson, who's from Memphis.
	Meanwhile, around 400 in Well, how many are missing, not having representation in the meanwhile, but it appears to be a very brief duration?
	They have some prominent supporters, but look at the quality of the supporters.
	Joe Biden on the one hand, Kamala Harris on the other.
	That's rather pathetic.
	Meanwhile, it's 140,000 voters in primarily black districts in Nashville and Memphis who have no representation, but only temporarily.
	A third Democrat, Gloria Johnson in Knoxville, was spared expulsion by a one-vote margin.
	She is white, while they are black.
	Spurring an outcry at the differing outcomes, Bach, she had a lesser role, didn't use a make-up on, as I mentioned, also had an attorney present, which they did not.
	Even Johnson, however, has suggested skin color may have made a difference, while the Republican House Speaker Cameron Saxon denied that, asserting it was a false narrative.
	I'm with him.
	Meanwhile, just remember what was going here at Nashville.
	Our trans Nashville shooter changed his or her sneakers during his or her assault on a Christian school.
	How dumb are we supposed to be?
	Glad to see many are pointing out absurdities of these staged events, which the Democrats use to promote their agenda.
	Owen, your thoughts?
	In regards to the Nashville shooting, I did some homework and, um, I wanted to find out, now my whole, you know, we talked a few shows back about school shootings, specifically Sandy Hook, and about how it was, you know, the very secretive and sketchy nature of Sandy Hook, I'll say, you know, to not end up like Alex Jones.
	The what I was trying to find with Nashville was verifiable proof about, you know, what actually happened.
	So I actually tracked down.
	I have a I have a contact who knows the family that that had that that knew that knows or that knows the family who's who lost a daughter.
	And they also know the the principal who was shot and the several other adults who were shot.
	So to these people, you know, it's very real.
	And that's what I was wondering.
	I was, you know, these people Either this lie is, you know, involving the family either the families are in on it either people that know that people are in on it because what I'm starting to worry is that with us, you know, with the shootings being fake maybe the motive for the shooter is not You know, just to kill a bunch of kids.
	Maybe it's a political motive.
	Maybe we're giving the Democrats, maybe we're giving leftists too much credit to think that they wouldn't organize killing of the killing of children to advance this agenda.
	And I think they absolutely would.
	What I mean by this is that maybe it's not as if this shooting was didn't happen.
	Maybe the video is fake.
	I think that that's certainly true.
	The video to me doesn't it doesn't look real.
	But the dead children, the dead adults, you know, we don't we don't we haven't seen anything to suggest that they aren't that they haven't been killed for the Nashville shooting.
	And so I think that that being said, I'm starting to think, starting to wonder if these school shootings are going to happen more frequently and continue to happen more frequently.
	We know that they've just increased every single decade.
	It seems like they double the amount of mass shootings that we have, especially in schools, double.
	What I'm starting to really worry about is that the government or very very bad actors high up are paying certain individuals or have something on certain individuals or organizing planned hits on these kids in schools and then faking the videos and leaking those to the press because it looks to me from checking with the source that I have that these children were killed and that these parents were killed whether it was by
	A school shooter or somebody who was paid by these actors to go in there and kill the kids.
	I'm not sure, and I think that's something that we need to be investigating from here on out.
	And what was your source again, Owen?
	So, what I did is tracking down, I know the worship leader who leads worship at that covenant school for those kids, who knows the families, knows The headmaster was employed at that school.
	And that worship leader went and said that the school was, you know, one of the things that was happening was that the after the shooting, the Nashville School, the Covenant School did not know whether or not they were going to tell kids what had happened.
	But a lot of the kids had witnessed it.
	A lot of the kids had seen this and they decided.
	That what they were going to do was let the kids know what had happened.
	Um, and that worship leader was the person who led, um, who led that with the students and that story, um, led me to that contact.
	And she, it's verified.
	She verifies that these kids were killed.
	She verifies that the headmaster was killed as well as I believe it was the assistant or the teacher.
	And then the daughter of the, uh, head priest of that, or the head pastor of that, of the covenant church, who was, who was killed.
	And so, The fact that these kids were killed, the fact that people died, you know, at least that's the information we have for now.
	And that's the information I'm going off of based on what I've seen and heard from the people that were living in Nashville and in that school, is that this was very real and that it was a targeted killing.
	And in all honesty, You know, whether the video is fake or not, the video to me looks fake.
	The shoe thing, the head, you know, the way that it looked, it did not look real.
	But I'm wondering if they organized a plan hit on these kids and are staging this.
	I mean, that's still a fake thing in some way, but but kids still died.
	And that makes it even worse.
	It's one thing if you fake it, no kid actually dies.
	It's an entirely different thing if you fake it and actually kill the children.
	Oh, and I've done eight or ten.
	Brian's done quite a few now, including this.
	Nobody died at any of these, I'm telling you.
	So your worship leader is simply in on it.
	They're paying big bucks.
	They were given $310,000 for the crisis actors in Nashville.
	You can get a lot of sincerity out of people for that kind of money.
	Brian.
	It's possible.
	Well, the story was about the Three busketeers or whatever inside the Nashville, was it, is the Nashville legislature.
	Oh yeah.
	We've got a, we've got, Jim and I are going to be conducting an interview with a couple of rappers that were involved in a, that were involved in a conspiracy back in around 2000.
	We're going to be conducting those interviews here in a couple of days.
	But the reason that I went after these guys and started having conversations with them is that they were early on in the stages of rap, they were approached by an organization that built prisons.
	It was a security apparatus vendor, basically, or a group of vendors that basically had approached their community in sort of a super secret handshake sort of meeting and said, look, we want you to change your tune.
	In terms of how the content that you're delivering to the black community because we've got all these contracts and if you do that we're going to let you in on the contracts and you're going to be a part of the crew and you're going to be a part of the big apparatus.
	So we're going to interview those guys about what happened back then and the reason that I went and found these guys Is because I believe them.
	It was one of those little stories that seemed like urban legend, but it just had so many pieces that clicked in my mind.
	Here you've got normal citizens that have become heavy influencers in a particular area that aren't necessarily members of the secret club, but are invited to a meeting where they get the opportunity to become a member of the secret club.
	They're offered massive amounts of money.
	Stock options, all sorts of things in order to get to play along with the apparatus and be involved in it.
	And the downside is, hey, all they got to do is sell out the black people.
	Now, if the story is true and we're going to find out when we interview them, then I think it was a small slice of what they're doing now on a much larger scale.
	In terms of, okay, we're going to approach all these people in this community.
	We're going to say, you're going to be on the top.
	You're going to get paid all this money.
	We're going to have new schools.
	We're going to have new money.
	We're going to have new jobs.
	You're going to be given this.
	You're going to be given that.
	You're going to be given all this.
	And as long as you play along, you're not going to have to worry about your mortgage payments.
	You're always going to have peace and security.
	And the problem is, that is bait.
	And they take the bait, but what they get caught up into is a lie.
	A lie that will haunt them the rest of their lives.
	And that's what we're seeing right now, is we're seeing people that have said, hey, I got caught up in the lie.
	Promise this, promise that, I was young and idealistic and I thought the money would help with gun control or whatever it happens to be.
	But at the end of the day, What they became were pawns singing, I want gun control.
	I'm gonna let it shine inside the state Capitol pushing for a bloated, for a security apparatus to get their bills through that pay the contractors that are operated by the bad guys so that they can create again, like I said, a security apparatus buffer between us, the people, and them, The special big minds and big identities.
	So Jim and I are going to be exploring this with a couple of guys that were involved in this very early on that came clean about it.
	And they're, I would consider them to be in a sense whistleblowers, although they might not know everything that happened.
	But I think it makes perfect sense, because like I said, every one of these false flags, and there was there was This clicked in my brain when I saw that in Nashville, the SWAT team had showed up at the shooter's house within a couple of hours and three explosions went off.
	And I said, What's that all about?
	Oh, it dawns on me.
	They need more robots for bomb control, so they're going to write this into the script and then play it in so that when they walk the halls with their lobbyists, they can say, by the way, we need this line item inside the new bill, the new spending bill that we're going to pass, that's going to give us more bomb-sniffing robots.
	The manifesto.
	Now they can walk the halls and say, look, we've got seven different school shooters.
	All have a manifesto.
	It all said that they would do it again.
	It all said that they would go out and kill more.
	We need more money.
	We need more protection.
	We need more of this and more of that.
	Oh, and I'm telling you that these things are not the result of a demon hidden under a rock.
	Mysteriously coming out and influencing all these people's minds.
	What is driving this machine is money, pure and simple, and a whole lot of... Oh, and I think it was good you sought to go further, but...
	It's a community project, and they're paid big bucks, and they have contracts and nondisclosure agreements, and they can't violate them.
	Just to give you an idea of the magnitude of the amounts we're talking about, when Eric Holder came down to Newtown, it turns out it was in 2006, He gave the community $140 million to participate in the Sandy Hook Hoax, and families there didn't want to be part of it.
	They moved out of Newtown.
	I mean, this was six years in the planning and big bucks involved, and two of the participants have explained To me, that some of the crisis actors in Nashville are trained in Connecticut, and that while Vicky Soto reprised her role in Uvalde for $210,000, they've jacked it up another $100,000, so now they're getting $310,000?
	Just to be a crisis actor, I mean, it's staggering.
	Right, that's perfectly, you know, I can understand that, absolutely, but the point is, You know, just because there are crisis actors, just because the video might have been faked, just because there are going to be fake elements to this, and most assuredly there are, to advance an agenda, that doesn't mean that kids aren't killed.
	And that's the thing that I think, I think that, you know, what we could be dealing with, you know, is our targeted attacks where kids are killed, but they're killed, you know, controlled,
	And this is this is this is performed on purpose and then staged the after the after effect was staged because, you know, for at least the people that I talked to, it seemed as if that they were, you know, and I've known these people and, you know, I do not think that they were paid off in some way to, you know, to to lie about what they're what they're saying.
	You know, these aren't these aren't You know, these are people that I've that I've known, you know, having connections in Nashville.
	It's one of the places I used to live.
	And so although that might be the case, you know, I just I would need to see more information, you know, and we can't and I don't and I would be hesitant to use Sandy Hook and what happened in Sandy Hook.
	And, you know, and some of the other examples that we've seen that are fake and that that that were manipulated completely and then assume that that's the case with Nashville.
	Just by default, you know, I think we need to see more come out in terms of the story and be reported on this story and then some really good journalism and due diligence be done before we make any conclusion about whether or not children actually died.
	For me, at least, it seems as if they did for now.
	And, you know, that's something that could change in the future if we actually have verified proof, but that's something that I would need in order to change my view on that.
	Yeah, well, you might want to look at a.
	Show Brian and I did with Giuseppe Vavangulo, it's on my BitchU channel, where Brian went frame by frame on the body cam, and there wasn't even any recoil from the rivals, no bullets were being fired, no ricochet, no blood on the body.
	Well, that's the video.
	They didn't even change their sneakers, I'm telling you.
	Sure, but what I'm saying is that's the video.
	They're going to release, and this is what would make sense, is the video, when you're staging a video like that, if a video is staged, you're not going to get it right.
	You're not going to get it.
	You know, and that's why, you know, I don't think that that video, right, is was was the was the actual video or the actual thing.
	So, you know, it's possible that these kids could have been killed and then the video put up there and then really and then leaked to the media, you know, about what happened.
	That's that's the other thing, you know, that I don't know if that was the actual video showing that we don't have any video showing the killing of kids.
	You know, we don't have any video showing showing that.
	And so that's one of the things that I would call into question.
	Well, we don't have any bodies.
	We don't.
	I mean, three on three.
	Oh, look, I appreciate your sincerity.
	I 100% do.
	100%.
	Meanwhile, there's appeals that are being raised by courts of appeal about the January 6th prosecution, because there's an element in the offense that has yet to be addressed whether they had corrupt intent.
	This is very significant.
	The corrupt intent standard doesn't apply to those who are also charged with assaulting police, since if you committed an assault on the police, you satisfy the condition.
	But those who are only charged with obstruction, the question becomes, makes a difference to whether they spent 20 years in prison or not.
	How to measure whether January 6th riders acted with corrupt intent.
	The judges noted the requirement was meant to avoid inadvertently criminalizing traditional protests or lobbying activities that have been a feature of civic engagement throughout American history.
	Any decision on the meaning of corrupt intent would have to separate those legitimate activities from potential criminal conduct.
	And of course, it's enshrined in the First Amendment.
	The right to peaceably petition our government over grievances such as stolen elections.
	Judge Florent Penn, who wrote a majority opinion, said it was not theirs to decide because the three defendants before them were charged with assaulting police and there they didn't have an issue.
	But they do believe that this is a crucial issue.
	Prior cases have defined corrupt intent in multiple ways.
	The Supreme Court, acting crudely, is doing something wrongful, immoral, depraved, or evil.
	The late Justice Antonin Scalia described corrupt acts as those done to bring about either an unlawful result or a lawful result by some unlawful method, with the hope or expectation of either financial gain or other benefit to oneself or a benefit of another person.
	I don't think any of those satisfy the January 6th, at least the naive participants.
	I do think the provocateurs are in trouble.
	Here's a problem with the Justice Department's own making.
	They wanted to use the obstruction charge as a sword hanging over the head of January 6th rioters to get them to bleed down.
	Facing 20 years, most took their deal.
	If hundreds are freed, however, DOJ and the Biden admin will be facing a nearly unprecedented backlash, as they say in politics, very bad optics.
	Meanwhile, James Wood blasts the Democrats for the dangerous game they're playing with a Trump hit witch hunt.
	He sacrificed his acting career to speak his mind.
	Democrats and their media allies have escalated their obsession with Trump.
	Alvin Bragg brought pathetic charges related to the Stormy Daniels saga.
	Meanwhile, Biden's calamitous foreign policy has driven Russia into the arms of Communist China.
	James Withers called out the farce that is the current political moment.
	No public trial for a presidential candidate, so even the information stream will be strangled and thus controlled by one political party, meaning that Trump's hearings are not going to be televised.
	The most grievous attack on checks and balance inherent in our Constitution will play right out of the gate.
	He later tweeted an article about a Chinese nuclear threat.
	Russian China colluding to carve up the world is what the puppet masters blowing the strings of the White House should be concerned with.
	Instead, they're ghost hosting a dog and pony show in New York while our president naps.
	China maintains a fleet of six nuclear-capable subs, Fox has reported.
	While Democrats in the entire legacy apparatus have mobilized to advance the Trump witch-hunt, freedom's biggest enemies are making strategic moves.
	We're going to want to have our nuclear power to attack subs to tail them, so the extra demands on our assets are clear," said Christopher Twomey.
	But the point is, the information, the near-continuous patrols have changed so rapidly, we don't know what else has changed.
	After seven years of one bombshell after another, Democrats have pinned their hopes on an indictment so flimsy, even CNN has called it underwhelming.
	Owen, your thoughts?
	It's amazing what, you know, the length that these people are going to go to to keep this silent, to try to keep this as controlled as possible.
	I mean, Alvin Bragg just sued Jim Jordan in a move to block the interference in the Trump case from from Republicans in the House.
	It was a 50 page suit.
	It was filed in federal court.
	It accused Mr. Jordan of a brazen and unconstitutional attack on the prosecution of Mr. Trump in a transparent campaign to intimidate and attack the district attorney.
	So poor me, poor me.
	Mr. Mr. Bragg last week unveiled 34 felony charges, obviously against Trump.
	And I think that the fact that not only are there these felony charges against Trump, which if these felony charges were true, if these things were real, and if And if everything that they had against Trump was really incriminating and was really, really serious to prosecute and it was actually genuine, then it wouldn't really matter much if Republicans wanted to peer into that or investigate that or question that because you would have viable grounds to sue him then it wouldn't really matter much if Republicans wanted to peer into that or
	You'd have viable felonies in the first place.
	But the fact of the matter is, and we all know this, they don't.
	They don't have anything.
	They have absolutely nothing.
	It's a complete political hit job as far as I'm concerned.
	And that's why it's so important to silence people who would otherwise want this to stop or investigate these allegations further and actually investigate what's going on.
	It was so funny.
	One of the things that I saw on social media the other day, a group of protesters was outside.
	They – not pro-Trump protesters but anti-Trump protesters.
	I guess they were celebrating.
	And they were celebrating Trump's indictment.
	They were celebrating what he was getting indicted for and the fact that Trump is done.
	They were holding these Trump is done signs.
	All of people that are my peers, 23 years old, Gen Z, not very proud to be in that generation – But they were holding all these signs and a reporter went up and asked them, he just simply asked them, do you know what Trump is on trial for?
	Do you know what he's do you know what, you know, these felony charges are?
	Do you know what he did wrong?
	Can you name one thing?
	Not a single one of those, you know, people celebrating could name anything.
	And that just speaks to, you know, what it says to me is that this is a political hit job.
	It's a political hit job.
	Nobody knows what Trump actually did.
	And when you ask people that are anti-Trump, they don't know.
	So often the fact that when you're talking to people in your life that hate Donald Trump and you ask why, they have no answer.
	There's really no good answer.
	Oh, it's because the media said so.
	That's literally all they have.
	And so it's sad to see people in my generation.
	It's sad to see all of these people that are buying this narrative, just buying it.
	Not even, you know, they don't they don't care about personal research.
	They don't care about reality or facts.
	And they're buying it because it's easy.
	It's a distraction.
	It gets them up in arms about something.
	It links them to a group.
	It gives them an identity.
	You can be angry about something and feel like you're accomplishing something for the good of the world to get this evil Trump guy out of office who's basically, to them, the second coming of Hitler.
	They even said this, comparing him to Adolf Hitler.
	This is the kind of America that I'm worried about.
	This is the kind of America we live in.
	We don't live in a free country where people are judged by their actions or character.
	They're judged by their politics and then judged in accordance to how obedient they are with this overarching globalist agenda.
	And if they're not obedient, they're going to be judged as guilty.
	Well, your concerns are well-founded, Brian.
	So the two articles there, obviously we don't have the January 6th and we had the Trump issue with Alvin Bragg.
	Okay, so let's talk about the elements of a crime and just lay out the foundation real fast.
	This person, on this day, knowingly, intentionally did this in this county, which establishes jurisdiction, That act that they did is a violation of this statute in this state, okay?
	So, the January 6th guys knowingly and intentionally committed an insurrection in this Washington DC building on this day at this time.
	Donald Trump knowingly and intentionally modified business records so that he could avoid Election law, which is a violation of this statute in New York and this borough.
	This area, so it establishes the venue.
	It establishes the charge.
	It establishes the statute.
	It establishes the time period in which the crime took place.
	Okay.
	The concept that's there, what is variable and what the jury.
	Looks at, or the judges look at, is that idea of knowingly and intentionally, which is mens rea.
	And if you go back and watch Legally Blonde, that really good little movie with Reese Witherspoon, you'll see that she's in her freshman level, you know, legal course, and she says, mens rea!
	Well, that's what's going on.
	That's fundamentally what's at the heart of a criminal charge.
	And so the penal code recognizes fundamentally four different levels of mens rea, which is your knowingly And intentionally and then you've got your recklessness and then you've got your negligence.
	Okay, so.
	At the end of the day, you have to ask yourself the question about the January 6th people.
	Would a jury come back and say they knowingly and intentionally violated this?
	What about the people that were protesting outside the Supreme Court Justice's home?
	Did they knowingly and intentionally violate this law?
	What about the guy that's driving 36 in a 35?
	Did he knowingly and intentionally?
	Well, yeah!
	Yeah, because he knew the speed limit, or at least was required to know the speed limit.
	So, at the end of the day, the jury comes down to that issue of intent.
	And the jury is the one that decides if you had the intent.
	Not the judge, not the prosecutor, not the defense.
	The jury, in theory, is what's going to decide if you had the intent.
	So, I guess what I'm saying is, at the very end of the day, sometimes it's best to go back to a little basic primer about what constitutes Yep, good stuff, good stuff, good stuff, really good stuff.
	Could Alvin Bragg get a conviction if a judge issues the judge's orders that asked the jury, did he knowingly and intentionally do this at this time?
	And this is the same with the January 6th guys.
	Yep.
	Good stuff.
	Really good stuff.
	Meanwhile, we'll take one more look here.
	I sent this to the American Federation of Teachers headquarters because they're going for the guns.
	Do you do any research before you take stands like grabbing our guns?
	Do you know 200,000 lives are saved annually by the defensive use of guns versus around 35,000 lost to gun violence?
	Do you look at school shootings to see if they're real or fake?
	I don't expect to hear back from them, but I wouldn't mind if somebody took a second look.
	Meanwhile, the U.S.
	Attorney in Utah has given the anti-vax movement the greatest gift ever.
	They have George Kirk Moore a doctor with a crime.
	He is a loud discovery.
	He will have access to VSD, Medicare, NDI, state death and vaccination records.
	Whoops!
	Here's the guy.
	U.S.
	Attorney has given Dr. Kirk Moore the right to request state and federal public health records.
	Now the truth will finally be exposed.
	Let us hope.
	He can single-handedly do something no one else has been able to do.
	Expose the corruption and end the COVID vaccination in the U.S.
	and worldwide.
	U.S.
	Attorney issued a criminal indictment against him for running a COVID-19 vax scheme to defraud the government and CDC.
	He was actually opposing the vax.
	What if Dr. Moore was saving lives and is actually a hero?
	Since this is a criminal proceeding in a federal court, he cannot be denied discovery to show the vaccines are deadly.
	This is relevant due to the opportunity for jury nullification, where a jury has a right to issue a not guilty verdict if they believe a law or a prosecution is unjust.
	If the judge denied more discovery, he can appeal because there's no country in the world that has correlated the death vax data and released the records for public analysis.
	They keep it hidden behind closed doors.
	All attempts have been rebuffed.
	They try to seal it up for 75 years because that's the average lifespan of an American, so no one Would be alive when they would finally release the data, would have lived through the event itself.
	A federal court has jurisdiction over all 50 states, can order the CDC and all of them to turn over COVID vax records and death records.
	You know, the records that the states and the CDC don't want to be made public.
	So Dr. Moore is now empowered to do something nobody else in the world can do—access the secret public health records of every state in the United States that will show the entire world what everyone in power wants to hide from the public—the truth.
	The judge can allow them to be made public if they are in the public interest, which they will be.
	It's a job of the courts to find the truth, or so we have been led to believe.
	Thanks to the U.S.
	Attorney in Utah, we're finally going to have the opportunity to discover it.
	Let us hope.
	Meanwhile, Owen, your thoughts.
	I mean, I know the truth and I've already discovered it.
	And I think one of the things that we, you know, yeah, this is good for people to see what's really going on.
	But I mean, as far as I'm concerned, we know what's going on right now.
	You know, there's verifiable proof, you know, frontline doctors doing an incredible job.
	There's people out there with these sources already that are speaking about these sources.
	These are things that you can get.
	They're readily available to people that want to see what's going on with with the vaccine, you know, and even knowing people that have received the vaccine.
	Like this is not some crazy, never before seen, you know, discovery.
	This is already discovered.
	We already know what's going on.
	There's a deep agenda that we've put our finger on us in terms of this vaccine for a long time.
	And so really what we need people to do is separate themselves from this trust of media, from this trust of these institutions that have not ever done anything in their best interest and probably won't do anything in their best interest.
	One of the things that I want to start doing is removing trust and stop trusting people that keep failing us every single time.
	And then once and then when there's good news, finally, you know, we're supposed to get something that we want, we trust them again, even though they failed us a million You know, this, it brings me back to challenging the election fraud, challenging the 2020 election when they said that Trump and those lawyers were going to challenge the election and everybody got really excited because it meant Trump was going to finally challenge the stolen election, but nothing ever happened and never got done.
	You know, this is the kind of thing, it's like they almost silence us by giving us a little bit here and there, giving us what we want.
	The information is already there.
	The information is out there.
	If you want to see what's going on, you can easily look it up.
	You can discover it easily.
	It's not something that's just hidden.
	Plenty of doctors have lost their jobs.
	Plenty of doctors won't ever be hired again.
	There's plenty of people that are really at risk.
	Their lives are at risk because of what they are revealing.
	Even on popular podcasts like Joe Rogan, they're talking about vaccine injury.
	They're talking about how this was never a vaccine in the first place and about how people are dealing with severe complications.
	That's the most popular podcast in the entire world.
	It regularly gets 10 million views per episode.
	So I think the idea that we need to trust some judge to give us the permission to learn about what's happening, I resent that completely.
	I don't need anybody's permission to know what's happened or to research it for myself.
	I'm glad that this is being done because people that don't have these resources or don't know this and are trusting, You know, of the news and of the legacy media will maybe be able to get, you know, some information.
	But honestly, who cares about information if you've already taken the vaccine?
	If you've already taken the vaccine, which we know that over 250 million Americans have already taken the vaccine, there's only about 80 million Americans that are unvaccinated.
	And so the harm has been done.
	The damage has been done.
	There's no going back from it just because we can suddenly reveal information to people now.
	No, they've already taken the vaccine.
	They're already eligible for all of the risks associated.
	So honestly, it doesn't do a thing.
	Brian.
	There is something in this world that psychologists have generally called cognitive dissonance.
	Okay.
	And here's where fundamentally the break takes place.
	Oh, and this is to try to help you understand something, okay?
	Before I watched the Orlando Pulse nightclub shooting develop between my eyes, I thought, right before my eyes, I thought I had a pretty good take on the world.
	I was watching Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly and I was entertained at night and then Megyn Kelly would come on and I thought, okay, I got a pretty good feel.
	I got a decent job.
	I've got a decent education.
	I'm getting some money coming in.
	I got a good feel for things.
	I'm a pretty smart guy.
	I was thinking some people tell me I'm pretty smart guy.
	Okay, it's all good.
	And what happened was That I watched the Pulse nightclub shooting unfold before my eyes, and I saw this guy named Norman Cassiano come on the television, sitting in the passenger seat of a gold, what looked to be like a Honda Civic.
	And he was performing an interview on Fox News, and he lifted up his shirt and he said, look, I was shot four times or six times, depending on which story, in the abdomen.
	And he had a piece of white gauze taped onto his gut.
	And I looked at that, and I saw that, and I said, this is less than 48 hours after this guy was shot with a high-powered rifle.
	I shot four hogs last weekend.
	I know what they do.
	I'm not an idiot.
	I said, I'm getting to the bottom of this.
	And the problem was that I had to go down a rabbit hole that forced me into a particular situation.
	Where it really forced me was that the more I looked at the evidence, the more I explored the facts, the more I explored the provable nature of what I could gather about the Orlando Pulse nightclub, the more I realized that I had been deceived.
	And I had to admit that.
	I had been deceived by the news.
	I had been deceived by the world.
	And I had to admit that.
	And that was very difficult for a guy who thought pretty highly of himself.
	You mean this whole time I was fooled?
	I thought I was so smart.
	I'd go to work and I'd talk with my co-workers sitting in their office.
	I'd tell them what was happening on Fox News.
	I thought I was so smart.
	The problem that they run into is that the older a person gets or the more developed their mind becomes, this is like the movie The Matrix, where we don't wake them up.
	We don't pull them out of the matrix once they've reached a certain age because they just can't handle it.
	Okay?
	The fundamental fact is, anybody who puts their mind and their instincts to work on these shootings will come out on the other side having one choice.
	Everything I thought I believed was a lie.
	And if I'm being intellectually honest, right down to my core, You have to rethink the whole thing.
	The whole thing.
	And that's what I did.
	I said, I thought I knew something.
	I didn't know it.
	I got to rethink the entire And I went back and I started looking at this conspiracy and that conspiracy and this and that, looking at them all, throwing these ones out and these ones out.
	But I had to rebuild my mind to allow my instincts and my mentality to rule the day like an umpire and act as an umpire.
	Strike!
	Out!
	Strike!
	Ball!
	And once I got to that point, that's where I began to realize, finally, for the first time in my life, I was thinking and I was proud of that.
	Very nice.
	Turns out that the permit for the Bulse Club expired three years before an event took place.
	That's when they repainted it from white to black.
	I thought COVID-19 throttling was bad, but it's child's play to the aviators and CDC.
	They know how to fake us out.
	They know how to suppress information.
	It's been going on for years, and we haven't been able to figure it out.
	Let's skip dinner and move and get right down to the foreplay and the fraud.
	Click the image to launch the official mental alert of Bartz.
	It's true and legitimate.
	The reason I'm here is to show the world how to expose this sinly, veiled carnival trick they have been doing for quite a while, apparently.
	Props to all the PhDs and computational biologists, math wizards out there.
	You're all doing a great job keeping them.
	If anyone's interested in my master files of every Aviaris IDE published date, let me know and I'll extend a professional courtesy.
	Otherwise, I'll make the files available to my paid subscribers shortly.
	You don't ask a shark to climb a tree.
	You ask a monkey.
	I'm the monkey, the number one aviator's auditor in the world.
	Since I no longer want to run a large medical billing op for hospitals or labs participating in the fraud, I'm trying to carve out an existence as an aviator's watchdog.
	So you can throw a hundred dog a bone?
	That would be wonderful.
	If someone can come in and do better, please do and relieve me of my post.
	And until then, I feel obligated to humanity until the world has NAVIR's interactive dashboard, like the executive officers at Moderna and Pfizer are using.
	So unless you've been fully downloading the Avera's Wonder files every week and identifying the new reports, along with the deleted ones, you will have an impossible challenge finding throttled reports.
	The downloadable files have no time-state data of when the reports were published.
	You can't query them using simple web searches from any website except mine.
	MedAlerts and MyAvera's Aware are the only place to go to see when these reports were published.
	Mayberry's Aware is the only site where you can do any analysis on the various time lags between the various data, like Vax Date, Onset Date, Death Date, Received Date, Published Date, and Exploration Date were applicable, and in every combination.
	I recently took the time to scrape down every aviator's ID number from the MedAlert Wayback machine.
	The Wayback does offer a list of IDs from every reporting cycle, technically, but it's only a list of ID numbers.
	I had to bake a serious cake and massage it into usable data, especially for all-dates pre-COVID jab.
	I put together a snippet collage of the summary details for every published cycle take.
	You can find the complete PDF collage here.
	And he goes on to explain exactly what's going on here.
	I'm working on my magnum opus now, having the whole 33-year Avers dashboard with a functionality of my COVID-19-only dashboard.
	The rats are running out of places to hide.
	And let me tell you, my initial teaser, ID number 50793, I open with is not rare or an outlier.
	There are tons of stuff.
	I really can't believe a prod like this has been going on for this long.
	What the heck was everybody doing?
	More to be revealed.
	God bless.
	The nation's food supply could be manipulated, by the way, by public health agencies to influence population outcomes.
	A great example is the fortification of cereal grains with folic acid, the synthetic form of folate, which successfully reduces the incidence of neural tube defects, vinyl bifida.
	Now, an oral route of administration being considered specifically for COVID-19 vaccine by using mRNA in cow's milk.
	Zhang and colleagues have demonstrated that a shortened mRNA code of 675 base pairs could be loaded into the phospholipide packets called exomes derived from milk, and then use the same milk and feed it to mice.
	The mice gastrointestinal tract absorbed the exomes, and the mRNA must have made it into the bloodstream and lymphatic issue, because antibodies were produced in fed mice, yet so was SPARC protein.
	The German pandemic ends as scheduled.
	Nothing will ever be the same.
	The German pandemic is not ending because a virus is suddenly safer, or the vaccine has saved us, or we finally mass our way into a world free of respiratory pathogens.
	No.
	It's ending according to a timeline established last fall, which idiotically synced virus restriction to winter tire rules.
	In this way, Our rulers finally abandoned all pretense that their measure were anything more than public health theater performed to soothe the feelings of terrified aging urbanites.
	Even that schedule proved hard to maintain.
	Most visible and obnoxious restrictions had to be withdrawn months ago.
	All political energy was finally drained from the force.
	Remain our vestigial mass mandates for our care homes and clinics.
	After tomorrow, those institutions will be permitted to set their own rules too.
	In a muted retrospective attempt to declare victory, Mayor Reicher Runfunk cannot refrain from the tiresome lectures which are the want of publicly funded state media outlets everywhere.
	Yes, Germany is saying goodbye to its last measures later than some other European countries.
	But all those who speculated just a few months ago that politicians would never again allow complete freedom in Germany, as known before Corona, have now learned better.
	Holy Saturday of 2023, just passed, will usher in a return to complete normality.
	The massive encroachments on fundamental rights were the exception in the pandemic, said federal justice minister Marco Bushman, telling the Willamson tag freedom is now the rule again.
	Owen, your thoughts?
	Yeah, back to the vaccine.
	This is I'm so fascinated about all of this.
	You know, this is such a fascinating thing, such a it's definitely a rabbit hole.
	But, you know, I think I really do think that vaccination and This vaccine issue is going to be one of the the foundational issues going forward.
	And in terms of, you know, this globalist plan, as well as getting our republic back, what we have to do is really, really understand.
	We have to have knowledge about what's inside of these vaccines.
	I want to tell everybody no vaccine is safe.
	No vaccine is safe.
	There's not a single one that's safe.
	Every single one of them is putting aluminum inside of your body, heavy metals inside of your body, formaldehyde inside of your body, aborted fetal tissues inside of your body, cancer cells inside of your body.
	That's how they replicate these things.
	No vaccine is safe, and it never was.
	And especially with this with this COVID vaccine, what we really have to do is go to in terms of the reporting.
	This is really important.
	VAERS reports about 1% of the cases right now.
	What we what we know is there's about a million, you know, 88,000 reports in terms of just the COVID vaccine and about a million nine hundred in terms of all vaccines.
	So the COVID vaccine makes up an overwhelming majority.
	That's about 1% reporting.
	And what we have to really talk about is if you go to Pfizer, if you go to Moderna, these are things that they've published.
	Before any medicine is released, You know, if you watch those ads on TV where they tell you about medicine, like, you know, Xanax or something, they legally they have to give you, you know, what could happen, the side effects that could happen as a result of taking this drug.
	And that's the same with the vaccines.
	It's not something that they're going to show you in person.
	And actually, one of the funny things is that if you go get the vaccine in person and ask for the ingredients, they're not going to give it to you.
	There's a blank Slate is a blank sheet, but there are adverse effects and adverse events.
	All of these adverse events and effects are listed by Pfizer.
	All of them are listed.
	You can go to page 30 of this report that I'm on right now.
	You can find it at time to free America dot com.
	You can go and what they've done is Pfizer.
	You know, they they they did the reporting about what the vaccine did all in double spaced so you can read it.
	Everything's, you know, readable.
	Everything's Organized in a good way, pleasing to the eye, so it's easy to understand, easy to take in what the vaccine does, the science behind the vaccine.
	This is the real journal aspect.
	This is what they're putting in academia.
	This is what they're putting up there.
	This is the real document that shows the science behind what they're actually doing.
	And then when they get to the adverse events section on page 30,
	Instead of double spacing it like they did or up you know up top they single space everything so it's like right next to each other so you can't even read it and they put it close together there's not a single space there's no spaces in between these adverse events and adverse effects nobody is going to read through them because it's on it's that's the way that they've written them they didn't write them out in a way that you could you know read them or take it in they had to do it legally and they put it all single spaced with no spaces in between and if you go down and you read there's
	Five, six, seven, eight pages of single-spaced adverse effects.
	Thousands of adverse effects that you can have as a result of taking this vaccine.
	And then, you know, what we have to start doing is going to these... This information is available, okay?
	But you have to take time out of your day to research it.
	You have to take time out of your day to really go above and beyond to find out what's going on.
	And if you have a family member who's suffering from a weird, indescribable, indescribable illness that they've never dealt with before, you should really check this list out and see if what they're suffering from is listed on this adverse effect reporting system.
	Because, you know, although it probably won't get reported, it'll give you some closure.
	And I think that's what people are going to need right now.
	I really do think that people are waking up in terms of this vaccine.
	You know, we're seeing this on the news, how people are now being, you know, these blood clots that people are dying with and these clots that are in people's bloodstreams are being pulled out of dead bodies right now.
	It was just on the news the other night.
	So this is stuff that's coming out right now.
	Keep your eyes out.
	Yeah, they're not even made of blood, they're fibrous material that was artificially created by elements of the vex.
	Exactly.
	Big picture, science has been hijacked and replaced with groupthink, psychology, and propaganda.
	Okay, there was a time when all the great disciplines of science would go out and observe what was true.
	They would start out with something fundamentally observable.
	In nature and then they would roll with it.
	So you've got your oceanography.
	You've got your you know, just name the science and you can take each discipline and go down the list and take a look at the founders and what they all started out with was something that was observable and testable and provable in nature.
	The problem is along the way our academic institutions have been hijacked by special interests.
	And money has been injected into the system to corrupt the truth and instead promote an idea or an agenda or a concept that sells more and creates more money.
	Folks, money is truly at the root of all different kinds of evils.
	Out there.
	And I wish that people would, that we would go back to a culture of character and integrity where we would actually observe and document the reality of what's taking place.
	Going to the Vaxxers database or Google or anything else.
	We can all feel it.
	That information has been controlled and hijacked and modified and the truths have been hidden.
	So that the agendas can rise so that the people in control of the grants for the institutions or in control of the program at this college or whatever can build the agenda to continue to sell and promote and push more products and more evil.
	Yes, yes.
	Very good.
	Meanwhile, House Republicans are saying they're hearing on the Manhattan-Alvin Bragg pro-crime policies.
	The hearing is titled Victims of Violent Crime in Manhattan.
	Rags under fire, principally from conservatives, for what the critics say are soft on crime policies.
	The hearing will examine how the district attorney's pro-crime, anti-victim policies have led to an increase in violent crime in a dangerous community for New York City residents.
	Shortly before taking office, he issued a member to staffers stating that they will not prosecute marijuana misdemeanors, public transportation fare evasion, most trespassing violations, arresting resists, and prostitution.
	He also announced downgrading certain offenses, including possession of a non-firearm weapon, both residential and commercial burglaries, that's a good one, and drug cases.
	The House Judiciary Committee announced on April 10th it will hold these hearings.
	Republicans have pointed out the incongruence of Bregg's leniency on these crimes versus his prosecution of Trump.
	By the way, both Stormy and Trump have acknowledged they did not have sex.
	to which he pled not guilty of his alleged role in the payment of hush money to adult filmmaker Stormy Daniels.
	By the way, both Stormy and Trump have acknowledged they did not have sex.
	It may be that Michael Cohen had sex with Stormy, and it appears it was Michael Cohen who paid the hush money and then sought to have Trump reimburse him.
	The people in the state of New York alleged Donald Trump repeatedly and fraudulently falsified New York business records to conceal crimes and damaging information from the voting public, Bragg said.
	Manhattan is home to the country's most significant business market.
	We cannot allow New York businesses to manipulate their records to cover up criminal conduct.
	That can't mean, of course, that the offenses alleged there were only misdemeanors unless they're being advanced to cover up a more serious crime, the nature of which has never been specified.
	Alvin Bragg has irreparably damaged our country in an attempt to interfere with a presidential election.
	As he routinely frees violent criminals to terrorize the public, he weaponized our sacred system of justice against President Donald Trump.
	The American people will not tolerate this injustice, and the House will hold Alvin Bragg and his unprecedented abuse of power to account," said Speaker McCarthy.
	Bragg's office fired back over two letters to him regarding his investigation.
	The March 20th and March 25th letters to Bragg were written by the House Judiciary Chair, House Oversight Chair, and House Administration Chair.
	I think, Owen, you were mentioning a retaliation by Bragg earlier today.
	Go for it.
	Yeah.
	I mean, you know, what we know at least is that the district attorney, Alvin Bragg, what he's done already is sue Jim Jordan over this.
	It's in a 50 page lawsuit accusing Jordan of obstruction and interference, seeking to block congressional subpoenas linked to his inquiry.
	Now, what we don't understand about this is, you know, What this is doing, you know, blocking interference from a congressman who is there to represent people, represent his district, represent the interests of the American people.
	You know, really what this is, is Alvin Bragg blocking the American people trying to peer into what is going on right now.
	Um, I don't know how this is really going to turn out.
	I've heard some people say that this is really, really good for Trump.
	Some people say that this is not necessarily a good thing for Trump.
	I tend to think that it is a good thing.
	I know that Trump is going to be appearing in New York soon for this insane $250 million lawsuit one week after his arrest.
	There was another probe of his business dealings by a Democrat prosecutor who vowed to get him proceeds.
	So this is really, really, this is bad stuff.
	It's not just Alvin Bragg.
	There's a bunch of other people that are jumping down his throat right now.
	And there's no surprise at all.
	This is exactly what happened.
	their playbook is going to be.
	But what I don't think they understand is that this is also Trump's playbook.
	Trump wrote this in his book.
	I don't know if you guys have read The Art of the Deal or anything, but this is one of my favorite books ever.
	And what he talks about is that there's no bad press.
	There's no such thing as bad press.
	And one thing that we know is that Trump has been talked about on a nonstop loop by the legacy media.
	He's been talked about nonstop, even though they're talking about his suit, they're talking about that.
	He's getting news time.
	And who's not getting news time?
	DeSantis really isn't getting that much news time.
	Other people running aren't getting that much news time.
	Trump is dominating the news cycle.
	That's what he does.
	I think that bodes well for him, even if it's negative.
	But as far as this lawsuit goes, as far as everything goes, you know, God help these people.
	If, uh, if, if something like this happens to Trump and Trump is put away or Trump is, you know, and I don't think that's going to happen at all, but if Trump.
	You know, if this if this actually if this actually turns out to be something and they actually get and they, you know, a sham trial, like what they did with Alex Jones, for instance, where he didn't even have the freedom of speech and they sued him for over a billion dollars and it bankrupted his entire business.
	That's exactly the playbook that they have going from here on out.
	And I think they're going to try to do something similar to Trump.
	And if that is the case and it works like it did with Alex Jones, when it happened to Alex Jones, I don't think many people care that much because of how how much he'd been demonized by everybody.
	So people were generally comfortable kind of going along with it and then not offering support.
	Um, although I was not one of those people.
	It was absolutely horrendous what they did to him.
	And if they can do it to Alex Jones, they can do it to you.
	The same thing with Trump.
	They don't hate Trump.
	They hate you.
	They hate what you believe in.
	They hate your values.
	Okay.
	Trump is just standing in the way.
	Um, at least that's how he puts it.
	And so, um, if Trump is, if this is going to be something similar to the Alex Jones trial, If this is not going to be aired, if it's, you know, if it's going to be some kind of secret meeting where they, you know, where they do some, I'm not sure what's going to happen, but I can tell you that there are going to be.
	I don't, I can't even imagine.
	I was at the Million MAGA March after the election was stolen, and that – to see that many people there, you have to really see it for yourself to understand how much people love Donald Trump and how much people will go to get arms for this guy and take you have to really see it for yourself to understand how much people love Donald I don't want that to happen because I just don't think it bodes well for our cities.
	We're talking about massive riots, which I believe will happen, and I don't want that to be the case because it's just going to frame.
	It's going to frame conservatives as ultra-MAGA extremists just like they did with January 6th.
	So this situation is not good.
	It's going to continue to rise.
	even by arresting Trump, even by probing into this, is provoking conservatives.
	What they're doing is provoking conservatives, and they want us to act brashly in this moment.
	I think we have to really be careful about that.
	Well, of course, Trump has already been arraigned, and his popularity in the polls has gone up by at least 10 points.
	He's going to continue to rise.
	I doubt very much that it's even legal to bring a lawsuit against a member of the Congress for the performance of their duties.
	So I think it's going to be embarrassing to brag.
	I doubt very much that there's any legitimacy to it whatsoever.
	It's a PR stunt.
	But I believe the suit against Trump is going to backfire.
	Brian, your thoughts.
	Well, we as a Western civilization have a very well-developed sense of fair play, and one of the symbols of that sense of fair play is the Statute of Lady Justice, or Justicia, or also known as Lastitia, who was a Roman goddess.
	She's often depicted barefoot, holding scales and a sword and a blindfold, symbolizing that justice is Equal for all.
	And of course, in Western societies, we've adopted this concept that justice is equal for all.
	It's something that we give a lot of lip service to, but the symbol is completely meaningless if we're willing to violate the words of the law and the words of the Constitution in a selective manner in order to achieve it.
	Now, the balance scales, they represented sort of impartiality as an obligation of the law
	To wait out evidence as presented in court and that each legal case needs to be looked at the SOAR represented enforcement and respect that would that the justice symbols would be able to actually take action to bring the justice into play and the blindfold represented
	The significance of the judicial system tolerating abuse not tolerating abuse or ignorance related to the assets of the law that they would just again like umpire safe or out and your question is fundamentally at the heart of what's happening with Trump.
	Are they throwing that Western value out the door, that thing that's sacred to our courts, that thing that used to be considered sacred to all of us?
	Are they throwing it out the door?
	And once that happens, and that snowball begins to roll downhill, it comes down to a clannish, Look, the Chinese had a constitution.
	The Romans had a constitution.
	The constitution was completely meaningless without the actual enforcement of the words.
	It doesn't matter.
	What words are written on our Constitution if we're willing to violate the principles that those words stand for.
	So at the end of the day, I guess what the fear in Congress is, is that he with most power decides what justice looks like rather than it being impartial.
	I think fundamentally at the end of the day, that's why the Republicans are so upset And they're of course concerned that he who wields the power will wield the sword without impartiality and without the scales of justice.
	Extremely well said, Brian.
	Very, very clear.
	Meanwhile, the Biden admin proposes rules that forbid bans on transgender athletes, but allowing some limits.
	Schools and colleges would be forbidden from enacting outright bans on transgenders under a proposed release Thursday from the Biden admin.
	But teams could create some limits in certain cases.
	The proposed rule sends a counterpunch to a waiver of Republican-led states that have sought to ban trans athletes from competing in school stores.
	The proposal would become enshrined as a provision of Title IX, a landmark gender equity legislation enacted in 1972 that virtually all of us applauded because it gave recognition of women's sports.
	Must undergo a lengthy approval process, almost certain to face challenges.
	The proposal comes on the same day a Supreme Court said a 12-year-old transgender girl in West Virginia can continue competing on her middle track while legal battles over the state transgender law continue.
	The law bans transgenders from female teams because, of course, as is recognized by all doctors, surgeons, physicians, athletes, men have a physical superiority over women that is biological and innate to the sex.
	The proposal comes, all told, at least 16 now have bands to cover high school interscholastic sports.
	Some also extend to intramural club or college sports.
	Under the new rule proposed by Biden, No school or college that received federal funding would be allowed to impose a one-size-fits-all policy that categorically bans trans from playing on sports consistent with their gender identity.
	Still, it leaves room for schools to develop teen eligibility rules that could ultimately result in restrictions around trans-athlete participation.
	That would be allowed only if it serves important educational objectives such as fairness in competition.
	What could be more obvious than allowing men to compare with women undermines fairness in competition, therefore excluding them.
	Only allowing women to compete with women promotes fairness in competition.
	Any limits would have to consider the sport, the level of competition, the age of the students.
	Every student should be able to have the full experience of attending school in America, including participating in athletics free from discrimination, said Miguel Cardona, Biden's education secretary.
	But I think we're reaching a point where, just as we might have a trans bathroom, Male, female, trans.
	We might have trans sports.
	Male sports, female sports, trans sports.
	If you want equality, that would appear the way to achieve it.
	Critics argue transgenders have an advantage over a side gender, meaning women who actually are women.
	Leah Thomas, for example, became the first transgender man pretending to be a woman to win an NCAA swimming title.
	College Sport Governing Body adopted a sport-by-sport approach to transgenders in 2022, which was to bring the organization in line with U.S.
	and international Olympic committees.
	At the same time, international sport governing bodies are instituting policies that ban all trans athletes from competing in track and field and effectively ban trans women from swimming events.
	I think that's exactly right.
	I agree with that.
	The Biden admin has made it a priority to bolster the rights of trans students.
	Last year it proposed a separate rule for the first time that would extend Title IX to LGBTQ students.
	That rule, which drew more than 240,000 comments from the public and sharp opposition from conservatives, is expected to be finalized as early as next month.
	The new proposal doesn't offer examples of limits.
	It does clarify restrictions can't be directed at trans students only.
	Schools that choose to impose limits must minimize harm to students who lose out on athletic opportunities.
	Remaining students participating on a sports team consistent with their gender identity can stigmatize and isolate them.
	This is, I think, quite bizarre.
	Stignify and isolate them.
	They should not be allowed to compete if they give an inherent biological advantage that makes it inherently unfair.
	Schools that violate Title IX can face penalties up to complete loss of federal funding.
	Olin, your thought.
	You're muted.
	Yeah.
	Yep.
	My bad.
	This is one of those age old issues for me.
	This is where I got my start was in, you know, coming against these trans sports.
	And one of the interesting things, you know, and I see this all the time now, looking at public schools and how public schools have allowed this.
	The real concern is there's a lot of stories about this that have made a lot of news attention.
	There's a lot of stories that have gone national about this Leah Thomas being obviously the main one and what a disgusting person Leah Thomas is.
	But this also affects your average, everyday public school and kids that are in that public school.
	What we're seeing now is teachers are being bullied by this transgender agenda.
	And this trans agenda, what we're also seeing is that it's impacting kids with autism, kids who are on the spectrum.
	Kids who have Asperger's, kids who are falling, you know, who are who are different than other kids who see things in black and white more than normal kids do.
	And that's exactly what the transgender movement is trying to, you know, they're basically stealing these kids.
	And, you know, it's one of these things.
	If you know somebody with autism or if you know somebody who's on the spectrum or has, you know, that deals with that, even if you move a chair out of a room and it's the wrong way, the autistic person associates that with an attack on what they seem as normal.
	And so a lot of autistic kids resort to violence and can be violent and aggressive if things are done that, you know, that that complicates their life even further because they're so black and white a lot of the time.
	And what we're seeing right now, and that's what we're seeing with these transgender uprisings.
	And we just saw Riley Gaines, a swimmer, a biological female swimmer, a biological, a biological female, a girl, a woman, an actual woman, a real woman attacked and punched for for coming against Leah Thomas, a man in sports.
	So real women are paying the price here.
	And who is attacking real women?
	Who's coming against real women?
	Who's who's, you know, assaulting people?
	And that's.
	That's this radical transgender movement.
	It's radicalizing kids and especially what we're seeing.
	There's a report out in the UK right now which is talking about how a lot of these kids are on the spectrum.
	A lot of these kids are autistic.
	And I wasn't surprised at all.
	And what we know about a lot of these kids is that they're autistic, and that because of that autism, they're more easily swayed into this cult.
	It's a total, complete cult.
	And that's a real scary thing, and people with autism, people with Asperger's, people living with this, should be up in arms about how these kids are being targeted specifically because of how they were born.
	Um, and the way that their brain works, it works differently than ours does.
	And they're looking for meaning, they're looking for identity, they're looking for a place to fit in for, and they're looking for control.
	You know, that's one of the other things is that, you know, this transgender ideology teaches you that you can control every single fundamental piece of yourself, and that everybody in the world has to conform to the way that you think.
	Everybody else in the world has to conform to the way that you identify.
	And that's exactly what a lot of autistic kids would love, for their way to be, no way but their way, and either their way or the highway.
	And that's really what the case is.
	And that's, I think, why we're seeing a lot of this aggression, not to blame it on autism, but that's really what it is for a lot of these kids.
	And that report is really fascinating.
	The other thing about testosterone, gender fluidity, it's one of these really crazy arguments because this is not just physical differences.
	Men and females don't just have physical differences.
	We have neurological differences that happen in utero when you're born.
	This is a developmental process.
	One of the things that we have to stop doing is using their language and using their fundamental assumptions.
	And this argument, we cannot Assume that what they're saying is rational or treated like it's rational or treated like it has any rational basis whatsoever and argue on their terms.
	We have to shift the argument to make sure that's on our terms, to make sure that we're arguing for reality, arguing with reality and being absolutely steadfast in reality.
	This is unbelievably insane.
	It's purely fantastical.
	And to see so many teachers, to see so many colleges, to see basically the entire world bend their knee at utter insanity, you know, speaks to how far this country has fallen and how far the human spirit has fallen and freedom has fallen and the character of our nation.
	It's very, very sad.
	This is one of those issues, you know, this is one of those issues where a lot of people think it's not that big of a deal.
	You know, the trans issue, it's not that big of a deal.
	There's bigger issues to be focused on.
	And I agree there are very, very serious issues.
	But to give up reality itself, to give up biology itself, to be bullied by people into sacrificing what we know is true, that's really what this is about.
	It's not a fight against discriminating against trans women or trans men, okay?
	It's really about fighting for truth.
	Fighting for fundamental truth.
	And that's never something that we should give up or sacrifice.
	Just to illustrate the difference between the sexes in athletic competition, Leah Thomas, who ranked number one among women, only ranked something like 527th among men.
	How grotesque is that?
	Brian, yours.
	Without government, life would be solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.
	This is like Philosophy 101.
	We have to have government, but government is for the people, of the people, by the people, and the people make decisions as to what the standards of how the government ought to be applied has been.
	Historically, the people have recognized man and woman And historically, those that are conservative in values and Western-led believe that the family unit is something that's sacred, united in the bonds of marriage and matrimony, and that as a result of that comes children.
	Now, I believe that what is happening with this dark and nefarious agenda is that they just want to create a Oh, we can't have girls' bathrooms and boys' bathrooms.
	We can't have separation.
	Think about what would happen to the human being or our culture if we just eliminated this, allowed for the massive pedophilia, allowed for transgenderism, Flamboyant, without social ramifications.
	And I'm not saying legal ramifications.
	Again, justice is blind.
	But we as a people ought to decide what is acceptable behavior in our society and what is not acceptable behavior in our society.
	And we as a people have generally been conservative, recognizing that God created them, man and woman.
	Recognizing the sanctimony of marriage, recognizing the sanctimony of the family, recognizing the righteousness and the quality of culture that that brings up amongst humanity.
	And I think that these people are iconoclasts, and what they're after, they are the worst kind of iconoclast, because what they're after is the absolute destruction of a society that looks down their nose at their dirty, rotten behavior.
	Very nice.
	Very nice.
	I'm going to add one more quick thing.
	You know, the other thing that's really important to note about this is the sterilization that's taking place, too.
	So these kids are being sterilized.
	Not only are they being sterilized, but if we really think about how devious this is, right, I think it really began, it began with gay marriage, this attack on sex, this attack on natural sex, on the sex that God intended, this gift that God gave mankind that's now been distorted, twisted, and now it's being erased.
	These kids who have their penises removed Cannot procreate.
	Not only that, but think about this.
	They cannot experience sexual pleasure for the rest of their life.
	Kids that have their penises removed, kids that have these operations, they are not only sterilized, but they won't be able to have or achieve an orgasm.
	They won't be able to have or achieve sexual pleasure in their lifetime.
	And, you know, we just had a there was a story out about a 14 year old who was operated on and then mutilated as a result of this transgender diagnosis after only two Zoom meetings.
	And, you know, then you think about how much money the doctor is making, how much money the social worker is making, how much money is involved in this.
	And who's really paying the price, the lifelong price, for this insanity, for this greed, for this agenda?
	It's children.
	It's always been children.
	It began with John Money when John Money came up with the idea of gender identity and then sexually abused two twins, both of whom committed suicide, both of whom were mutilated, both of whom could never experience sexual pleasure, ruined from birth by this agenda.
	That's where it started and that's exactly where it's going to end.
	You've made a lot of excellent points here, Owen.
	Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
	Send fan mail, pro or con, to live-need-to-know-at-gmail.com.
	Live-need-to-know-at-gmail.com.
	Again, just a reiteration about the American Teachers Federation Headquarters, do you do any research before you take stands like grabbing our guns?
	Do you know 200,000 lives are saved annually by the defensive use of guns versus around 35,000 lost to gun violence?
	Do you look at school shootings to see if they are real or fake?
	Answer, of course not.
	Their minds are already made up.
	Final thoughts, Owen, yours.
	Yeah.
	You know, my, you know, just to address the transgender shooting once more and again, you know, and, and what, you know, for me, it's really important that we are, and this is something that I've, that I'm trying to think about because there's, there's an agenda on both sides, right?
	There's narratives on both sides there.
	And I think that one of the things that I always want to do is make sure that and sometimes I find that I do this where I will start to affirm what I want it to be because it confirms the narrative that I ascribe to or the agenda that I ascribe to.
	Or it affirms my values in some way or it makes sense because of what we've already seen.
	One of the things that I really want to start doing is taking, you know, as a born again Christian, you know, one of the things that I do and will always do is just take a step back and allow the Holy Spirit to communicate that to me in time and allow, you know, allow myself to just take a step back.
	I find I need to take a step back a lot of times and pray and really just, and really just take, you know, and maybe even fast and take a moment To step back from all of this, to step back from politics, to step back from these conversations and to just search for clarity, search for, you know, and ask for that truth to be revealed.
	And I think that truth will be revealed.
	And as far as this Nashville shooting, one of the things that we have to do, we have to start doing is separating our identity from Ideology, our identity from what we believe.
	And so often liberals, that's why they get so mad when you come at them.
	If you ever wondered why, why is it that when I talk to somebody about abortion, why is it that when I mentioned this transgender issue, why is it that I mentioned electric cars with the fact that, you know, about Elon Musk or something crazy that my family members that are liberal, that my family members that are leftists, that people that I know that are leftists or Democrats are so aggressive, so violent, so up in arms.
	To me, it's because Their identity has become what they believe.
	Their identity has become that ideology.
	That's a dangerous thing.
	It's dangerous for us as well.
	You have to have a stronger root.
	Your identity has to have a stronger root.
	For me it's Jesus Christ.
	And so that's one of the things that I'll always say.
	Never stop saying that your identity can't be, you know, things of this world because At the end of the day, what I find myself doing, if that's the case, is justifying things that might not be true because they adhere to a narrative, because they are confirming the agenda or it makes sense at the end of the day.
	And it's and it's and it's confirming what I believe to be true and want to be true.
	That's not something I ever want to do.
	And so I think the more that Americans can and the thing is, is that, you know, whatever, regardless of what I think of school shootings, regardless what I think of, you know, I could be wrong.
	I could be wrong.
	I need to learn more.
	I need to research more.
	So that's the thing, you know, and Until I do that, you know, I can't come, I can't say that what, what, I can't say that my perspective is truth.
	I can't say that my perspective is exactly what happened.
	All I can do, all we should be able to do, all we should do is, uh, is give people our opinion that's based on, you know, that's based on the facts at hand until now.
	I mean, how many things that I, that's so funny, the journey that I've taken, you know, with radio and doing shows and, and, and really speaking out against this stuff is most of the things that I'm speaking out against now, A couple of years ago, I believed were all true.
	A couple of years ago, I was, you know, in this system as well.
	I was just as indoctrinated as a lot of kids were.
	And I'm realizing, you know, the extent of that is serious.
	And so what I would just want and ask everybody, just have grace for people that don't know this stuff yet, you know, because I believe that with the vaccine issue, to go to the vaccine issue, people are going to wake up.
	And when they wake up and realize what is actually going on, can you imagine how terrified They are going to be to realize that their blood is full of poison, that they are eligible for these adverse effects.
	That is going to be an incredibly scary time for a lot of Americans.
	And what I would encourage you to do as a conservative or somebody that has spoken out against this for a very long time and probably received a lot of criticism and a lot of hatred from the very people that are going to come to you terrified, is to take those people in and to say, it's okay, you didn't know.
	But now, welcome to the light.
	We cannot allow ourselves to say, I told you so, and then despise people when they finally take the blinders off.
	We have to bring them in and treat them with love, kindness, and make sure that they come on our side and receive the help that they deserve as humans.
	OK, that's one of the other things.
	And so, pleasure to be a part of the show today, everybody.
	Brian, your final thoughts.
	I just want to encourage the commentators to try to keep things constructive, instead of destructive and remember that we're running with a team of volunteers, and we all have feelings, we dedicate our time and our energy to come down here and Uh, sometimes we're speaking to people that are at our level.
	Sometimes we're speaking to people that are above our level.
	And sometimes we're speaking to people that are not quite on our level, but all the time we hope to edify and bring up and bring along.
	And that includes trying to bring on a younger generation.
	You know, our benches aren't exactly running, uh, NFL deep here.
	And so we do the best we can with the energy and the resources that we've got.
	And hopefully it's, uh, some of the older guys that can bring some of the younger guys along.
	Well, both of you, Owen and Brian, gave wonderful commentary today on a wide range of subjects, sometimes in considerable detail and depth, quite admirable.
	Just two simple observations about Nashville, one from the point of view of deductive logic, the other abductive.
	A story like Nashville can be true if and only if all of its parts are true.
	The narrative The driving up, the entering the building, the dash cam footage is not true.
	Therefore, the story cannot be true.
	Abductively.
	Competitor.
	What's the probability of the available evidence if the hypothesis were true versus that it was a real event versus that it's a fake event?
	All the points we've been making about the difference in the shoes, the empty parking lot, no one in the building, lack of recoil, no blood, They all indicate that that's only consistent with a false story, with a fabricated story.
	It's utterly inconsistent with a true story.
	If we want to find out the truth, obviously it appears on its face.
	We are being played.
	So don't let yourself be played.
	Don't be fooled.
	Don't take it in.
	Meanwhile, we want to thank you for joining us.
	I encourage you to spend as much time as you can with family, friends, people you love and care about, because we do not know how much time we have left.

▲