All Episodes
Previous Next
March 31, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
50:19
Covid Shots' DEVASTATING Birth Statistics - Dr. Jim Thorp on the Merritt Medical Hour
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thank you.
Thank you.
I'm Dr. Lee Merritt, once an orthopedic surgeon, now your professional medical rebel, and tonight we have Dr. Jim Thorpe here.
Dr. Thorpe's an OBGYN doctor.
He's been in practice almost as long as I have, 40-some years as an OBGYN doctor.
He's recently published a paper on COVID-19 vaccines, the impact on pregnancy outcomes and menstrual function, but it's more.
We're going to talk about stillbirth and all sorts of stuff.
And I just want to point out, People like Dr. Thorpe are few and far between, but my colleagues in medicine, I'm just going to say, we need a new word.
We need the word, I'm coining this new term, it's called eitrogenics, as opposed to, you know, erythrocyte, as opposed to Patricide or fratricide or genocide.
Eatricide is when doctors actually purposely kill you and that's where we are in.
So we'll be back here in about a couple minutes and we'll take on this challenge and talk to Dr. Thorpe about what we can do and what's going on.
Thank you.
At the Brighteon Store, we offer a variety of colloidal silver solutions that we make in Texas using Texas rainwater and specialized circuitry that I personally designed to produce silver ions in purified rainwater.
We have a colloidal silver extra strength spray, a silver-based first aid gel, as well as a colloidal silver herbal mouthwash solution that people just rave about.
Each one of these is subjected to our rigorous laboratory testing for metals, glyphosate, and microbiology in order to ensure product purity and safety for your health.
We manufacture our own silver products right in the heart of Texas and deliver them to you using our own warehousing and fulfillment infrastructure that we built to serve real America.
All of us here at Brighteon thank you for your support.
Shop our silver products at brighteonstore.com.
We're back, and welcome Dr. Thorpe.
Thanks for joining us tonight.
Now, I know it's amazing to me, and I'm sure you're as frustrated as I am, that of all our colleagues out there that are pushing these, still pushing these vaccines, still saying it's safe and effective.
They said it was safe and effective in pregnant women, and it had never been tested on pregnant women.
How do we ever wrap our minds around People we know doing this kind of thing.
What is going on and what did you conclude when you studied this extensively?
I know a lot, by the way, I know one of the things we're going to talk about is shedding and all that sort of stuff and the impact on pregnancy because I get that question all the time.
So lots to talk about.
Yeah, it's very interesting from my perspective.
And by the way, Dr. Merritt, thank you so much for inviting me on your illustrious platform.
I've been looking forward and have admired you for a long time.
And I really appreciate your bravery and your leadership in this area of medical freedom.
So I think that the most concerning part to me is the timeline And the acid fast timeline that the most egregious violation in the history of medical ethics is pushing a novel experimental gene treatment in pregnant women globally.
And to be certain, this was planned from the very start.
This was a fata complete.
And I have proof of that, you know, going through the timeline.
And the really remarkable dates are, of course, December 1, 2020 was when the official rollout to the general population.
And then next comes along as February 28, 2021, which is 12 weeks later, about 90 days, and we have the post-marketing rollout of the Pfizer internal documents.
Now, I had those documents two years ago.
They were given to me by a whistleblower, and they were trying to suppress those for 75 years, as you know.
And so, Your viewers should know that your government, the Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, and the FDA, along with all the medical boards, they had the information that this is the most lethal medical treatment that has ever been unleashed on the world.
And this is not by Jim Thorpe's reckoning or Dr. Lee Merritt's reckoning.
This is according to Pfizer's internal documents that they tried to suppress.
This is a hundred dead people per week, more than a hundred, for the first 90 days of the rollout.
And you can't argue with that data.
So to look at that data, the most lethal drug and or vaccine in the history of medicine, and to charade that you're actually doing studies that show safety is a complete fallacy.
And at the same time, That's on page seven of that document.
Just Google Pfizer 5.3.6 PHMPT.
It'll bring you right to that document.
30 page document.
And that is the document that's still being suppressed, but it's irrefutable.
It's not my data.
And on page 12 is horrible obstetrical outcomes.
Uh, just unbelievably horrible in 270 pregnant women.
Well, and if I remember that right, I got privy to that early on too, because it was available if you could get at it.
Like, you know, like so many other things.
They hide it on the internet, but if you don't know the exact place to search, like you just gave us, you can't find it.
But out of that 270 women, my understanding is they could only prove one live birth.
Lost a bunch to follow up.
It never should have.
That had data that was not worth it.
But it's not just about the fact that it was, that was for people getting pregnant or getting the shot during pregnancy.
But it's damaging women at all, in all ways, right?
Even after they've had their shots and now they're trying to get pregnant.
Can you talk about that a little bit?
Yeah, sure.
In my clinical experience, and I'm a busy, very, very busy clinician, I'm seeing, you know, 200 patients a week, high-risk OB patients a week.
So I can tell you that the problems in pregnancy did not start in 2020 with a pandemic.
It started with the vaccine rollout in early 2021.
And I have data that can prove that.
So it is really irrefutable.
If you go on that timeline now, we're up to February 28, 2021.
Now what happened immediately or concurrent with that was the Department of Health and Human Services Granted 13 plus billion dollars of your tax money and mine and your viewers tax money to launch the most aggressive
Unparalleled propaganda campaign in the history of the world to eliminate vaccine hesitancy and to drum in safe, effective, and necessary to every person in the world.
And that money was given to over 270 sectors of our society, including all the medical boards, all the medical organizations, athletes, Hollywood stars, all the churches, Go on and on and on.
So this is fifth generation warfare of pushing, misinforming people to push them into taking a deadly drug.
And that's what happened.
And Dr. Merritt, who do you think was one of the founding members of this Department of Health and Human Services COVID-19 Coalition Corps, CCC.
It was the American College of OBGYN.
They took a massive amount of money, a non-returnable, non-payback loan, as it's called, and they have to sign certain agreements.
And we're trying to get a hold of that through FOIA requests.
My wife and I, she's an attorney, and we're overdue on it.
But there's no doubt in my mind That this is all directed through this CCC, 13 billion dollars, bribing all the medical establishment and pushing this.
Now, then in June of 2021, the fraudulent New England Journal of Medicine article by the fraudulent editor-in-chief, Eric Rubin, and you all know this guy because this is the infamous person that voted In the FDA to push the drugs in children fully acknowledging that he had no data and the only way to find it was to just roll it up.
Well he rolled it out already and he voted for it but that's the most exemplary piece of antithesis of science that I've ever seen in my life and this is the editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine.
Now, he pushed the Shimabukuro article, which is just as bad as the Pfizer 5.3.6 document.
The Shimabukuro article was fraudulent, it was completely manipulated, and it put the New England Journal of Medicine seal of approval on this pushing it in pregnancy, safe, effective, and necessary in pregnancy.
This is in July.
One month later, all of the medical organizations and all the boards, including the American Board of OBGYN, American College of OBGYN, Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine, said it's mandatory.
You need to push this in pregnancy.
And if you spread any misinformation that is a narrative contrary to ours, we will destroy you professionally.
And that happened officially in every, all the 200 medical boards and medical organizations, every single physician and nurse got a copy in the mail, threatening them to destroy them professionally if they countermanded that narrative. threatening them to destroy them professionally if they countermanded that narrative. - Oh yeah, I have a personal, my personal experience with that, that I said, my only point was I made to the military was in 2020, they only lost four people in all the services to
And we've already lost more than that to the vaccine.
This is a national security nightmare.
Don't mandate it for the military.
And in spite of the fact that, and I had almost a year and a half investigation against my license for saying that.
Not because I treated someone badly, it's just for speech.
You know, and by the way, it was still going on when the governor of Iowa was saying to Biden to stop the mandates.
You so money is the only thing you know, that's your what you unearthed.
There is unbelievable and that's that is a key bit of evidence here.
I hope that that's going to be taken on board the legal guys because that it has to be money.
Now.
I don't that doesn't it doesn't exempt our the guys way down the pyramid.
See what I get.
I get that point that the top people were bribed and the organizations were bribed.
But when you were a young doctor, I was a young doctor first in practice.
We didn't have any relationship with those people.
We were just out earn our money, but now they all work for hospitals.
So what happens is they have all this debt and then they get fired from the narrative.
That's the draw for them.
They don't get the money, but they're being threatened by the people who did get the money. - That's absolutely right. - That's what I think.
I think you're absolutely correct.
The way the board is treating me is exactly consistent with that.
I've been fighting with the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology now for over two years and I'm pretty harsh on them and I've been in communication with them formal and written them formal letters.
No response.
I put that data in front of them.
I put this study that we'll talk about in front of them.
All they do is threaten me.
And they're threatening, just to be clear for the non-physicians out there, so this is your specialty board they're threatening you with.
Which is, to be honest, that's one level.
The next level is, and what I was threatened with, is they take your complete license.
So you can't even, you know, take temperatures in the hospital anymore.
I mean, it's not just about delivering babies.
So it starts there, but then it goes down to your licensing level.
So that's interesting.
And they're trying to hit me on that front as well.
Yeah.
So I'm getting it from all fronts.
And then, of course, because of my work, I'm slandered and accused of being a misfit and a misinformation spreader and a grifter.
Oh, yeah, I love that word.
I'm a grifter, too.
So... Like we have anything to gain?
You know, it's interesting that the people that are gaining on this and making millions, like the people at the American Board of OBGYN or the American College of OBGYN or the Society of Maternal Field Medicine that have taken massive bribe monies and are pushing this, they're the ones that are pushing the misinformation that is deadly all over the world.
Yeah.
Unprecedented.
Tell about, you know, on a clinical note, tell about what you're finding with, I know you had a whole series of placenta photographs that you showed one time at a meeting that I watched.
Can you talk about that a little bit?
Because I tell you that in the second half, we're going to have to tell these women who have taken the vaccine, how we can, what to expect and what to do, because people are waking up to realize this is an infertility, long-term infertility problem, not just a short-term issue, but For right now, just tell them what you're seeing clinically in the whole thing.
Right.
Clinically, what I'm seeing, and we'll go through the study in the second run here, the second half, but basically, clinically, what I'm seeing is a massive increase in infertility, a massive increase in menstrual abnormalities and abnormal bleeding,
Abnormal significant increases in miscarriage, fetal malformations, fetal death, fetal chromosomal abnormalities, fetal cardiac arrhythmia, severe placental abnormalities, placental thrombosis,
Severe growth problems in the fetus, what we call fetal growth restriction due to abnormal placentas, abnormal fetal testing studies, abnormal organ perfusion in the fetus as deemed by our ultrasound and color Doppler flow, oligohydramnios, severe decreased fluid, severe preeclampsia,
Pre-term premature rupture of membranes, premature delivery and premature premature delivery resulting in afterwards a newborn death.
I've seen all that.
That's what the government data that we'll review next segment.
How about your pediatric colleagues?
Now, I know you guys work very closely with the pediatricians, but I don't, you know, other than Larry Pilevsky, I don't hear too many pediatricians speaking out against this.
And it, and I have to say that they've been kind of deeper into the vaccine dollars than the rest of us.
I didn't, I mean, in my whole life in medicine, I never got paid a cent to give anybody a vaccine, but that's not true in pediatrics.
So, is that why they're quiet?
Have they really all been bought off?
And are they not seeing Early baby death?
I mean post, you know, the death that's occurring.
I've heard that there's an increased death like several months after birth.
I can't speak to that, but maybe you know.
There is, and I can tell you the most hush and the most controlled group of physicians, I believe, in all of America are pediatricians.
And maybe next after that would be the OBGYNs, but specifically the subspecialties of OBGYN, maternal fetal medicine, which I am, but also the, you know, who's raking in the dollars right now, and they'll just shut up and they know what's going on as a reproductive infertility doc, They are taking in tons and tons of money.
Because the infertility rate's gone way sky high.
So they're making money hands over fist.
And then the OB oncologists are also making money too.
And they're very hush hush.
So I'm the only maternal fetal medicine doc, and to my knowledge, the only practicing, at first, two years ago, the only practicing OBGYN doc, to my knowledge, that has come out of all 50,000 of us in the country that have come out swinging at the American board of OBGYN for this obvious egregious violation.
We've never broken the golden rule of pregnancy for six millennia, Dr. Merritt.
No, I know it.
You know, I remember Christiane Northrup, you know, our other OBGYN doctor friend, saying that in her whole career, you know, she'd never seen more than two or three stillbirths.
And she says, she sees them all the time now.
And there was that There's a doctor in Vancouver that I think tried to report, was it 21 in a month?
He said the nurses are traumatized.
It's horrible.
And what happened to him?
They threatened him with jail time, I think, or psychiatric incarceration, i.e.
jail by psychiatrist.
That's right.
There's five whistleblowers, and I've written this up, and I have a slide on it.
Unfortunately, I can't show it, but you're speaking of Dr. Daniel Nagas and Dr. Mel Bruchet.
in Lionsgate Hospital in Vancouver, British Columbia, and they had 13 dead babies in one 24-hour period.
Oh my gosh!
21 in a month, I believe.
And you know, until you look at the statistics of that, you won't believe it.
You're looking at 160 Fetal death or stillbirth per thousand deliveries.
That is unbelievable.
The baseline is about six.
It's less than six per thousand deliveries.
And so a standard deviation is 0.5 fetal deaths, one sigma, per thousand.
So do the math.
You know, this is up to 160 per thousand.
It's almost a 16.
That's a 16 percent stillbirth rate.
This is 300 sigma surge and that is unheard of.
Right.
That's unheard of.
And there's five whistleblowers that have swarmed affidavits on that, two of the doctors and then three other doulas, and they've had protests in front of the hospital, shown the signs, and they get, you're right, they get put in jail, threatened to put in psychiatric facilities, and I mean literally shut down.
It's horrible.
Yeah, we're in a medical dictatorship.
It really is, it's just, it's hard to wrap your mind around what our profession has become that we allow this, because we could stop it.
You know, I said one time to somebody, I said, I remember when we had a problem in the hospital about something, and it was a quality thing that we felt strongly about.
And we realized there were six of us that were the kind of the big surgeons that were bringing in a vast amount of money to that hospital.
The OR, as you know, is one of the biggest, if not the biggest money inflow into the hospital.
And if everybody had just said, no, we're not gonna go along with this, it would have stopped like that.
So the fact that people are not doing that is just mind boggling to me.
You can't deny, what you've just said is 160 times normal.
It's like the all cause mortality that's being reported up to over 100% up.
It was 42% the Indiana actuary, and I have a friend who runs, he's with an insurance company, and he says it's 142% or something like that.
It's over 100% in recent data.
It usually varies 0.1% year-to-year, the all-cause mortality.
Again, you can't, all the smart people, you know, what my dad somewhat derogatorily used to call the university boys, where are they?
All the smart people in the universities are supposed to be studying this academically, you know, where are they other than you?
I mean, thank God for you, but this is an unbelievable That's why I'm saying, that's why I think iatrocide is our new term.
It's death by doctor because if we didn't, we might not have all caused it, but we could stop it now if everybody just said no.
If passive resistance, they said no, they shut down the hospitals, they said there's no point in having a hospital, it's a death, it's just a death factory.
Let's think about this.
This is beyond belief and to our children, our precious children.
And that's exactly right, and I know you, and this is why you're doing it.
You're doing it while we're doing it, both of us and many others.
We're doing it for not only our patients and our younger colleagues, but we're also doing it for our children and our grandchildren and the future, because this, we cannot go on like this.
This is a Horrible, failed system.
This is a corrupted military-medical-industrial complex gone awry very, very badly.
And it needs to stop.
It needs to stop now.
You know, I have to say, military-medical-industrial complex, one of the things that's going around as well, Pfizer didn't do it, it was really the military, but I tell people, don't buy into that.
You know in the back rooms, okay, and I shouldn't just pick on Pfizer, Pfizer, Moderna, you know, you name them, all of the AstraZeneca, you name them.
They're all the same with DARPA.
So, they all got together in the back smoking rooms, and they said, I know, we'll say the military did it, because then we'll be, we can't be held responsible.
We were just following orders.
Yeah, that didn't work in 1947.
It ain't gonna work this time either, guys.
So, well, when we come back, we're going to talk more about, you know, what women need to know, and also about your paper specifically.
So, thanks very much for joining us, and everybody else, we We remember to support the show.
If you like these shows, please go to the Brighton store and use the code REBEL and we'll be back in just a couple minutes.
The Brighteon Store understands the importance of getting all the nutrients you need to support the healthy functions of your body.
Our nutrient-dense superfoods and supplements can help nourish your body and promote your optimal health and well-being.
100% customer satisfaction guarantee on all purchases.
You deserve the best.
BrighteonStore.com support this amazing platform and amazing patriots for humanity.
Use promo code REBEL at checkout for additional savings.
The boosters are killing millions.
A vaccine holocaust has begun.
We are seeing right now the highest death rates we have ever seen in the history of this business.
The vaccinated have chronic COVID.
Hey folks, guess you heard this morning I tested positive for COVID.
I've been double vaccinated, double boosted.
They're drowning in bioweapons sludge.
The generational patriots are standing back and standing by.
Christopher Key is leading the revolution.
That's why they're poisonous with the water, the food, the supplements.
Confronting corrupt corporations through peaceful protest and righteous resistance.
Visit vaccine-police.com to stay informed on pure blood survival and products to keep your loved ones safe.
Vaccine-police.com Nearly all the vitamin C sold at retail today comes from China, and it's made from genetically modified corn.
Even though vitamin C is a critical part of immune support, it's also critical to know where your vitamin C comes from.
I'm Mike Adams, the founder of Brighteon and BrighteonStore.com.
And we only sell non-China, non-GMO vitamin C.
We then subject it to rigorous laboratory testing in our own food science lab, checking for heavy metals, glyphosate, as well as microbiological contamination.
Only after it passes our tests do we encapsulate it and package it for our audience.
You can find it at BryteonStore.com.
It's not the cheapest vitamin C on the market, but it is by far the most rigorously tested and honestly sourced vitamin C available anywhere in the world.
Support your health and this free speech platform by shopping at brighteonstore.com.
All righty.
And we're back with the brave Dr. James Thorpe, one of the very few OBGYN doctors to speak out.
He and Christiane Northrup and a few others.
but.
So tell us about the paper and what you discovered by running the, it wasn't just the VAERS, but tell us what you discovered.
So thank you, Dr. Merritt.
So what we did was use governmental data and totally unmanipulated, fresh from the government data, CDC and the FDA.
We looked to the FDA and the CDC, their website, and ascertained exactly how they recommended that this data be used.
And it's interesting, Dr. Merritt, they recommend that you're only allowed to compare a novel vaccine to another safe vaccine.
So you know right away that that gives them a huge favor and advantage for, because their safe vaccine is not safe, it's associated with death and risk.
So for those purposes, we actually used influenza vaccine because in 1997, after, get this, 60 years of use in the general population, 60 years.
It was finally approved specifically for the use in pregnancy in 1997.
So our study began January 1st, 1998 and continued until June 30th, 2022, just last year.
So there were 282 months of influenza vaccine and pregnancy data.
And then we used at that time, it was only 18 months of the COVID-19 vaccine in pregnancy.
And we took the adverse events.
Now the CDC and the FDA, what they say, Lee, is that if you have a twofold risk ratio, then that breaches their danger signal, twofold.
So what we did was we did exactly their methodology, except the only problem is we didn't see it twofold.
I had to convert the x-axis from linear to logarithmic.
Oh my gosh!
Because that's how bad it was.
We're looking at five, ten, fifty, a hundred, a thousand fold, okay?
So this is very serious.
Like, for example, Now we analyze this.
We have a Ph.D.
in mathematical modeling.
I do statistics as well.
I've done them for all my clinical studies.
So all seven of us work together and we did three separate models, completely separate.
We did adverse event per time per month.
We did adverse event per shot And then we did adverse event per person vaccinated.
Three completely separate ratios.
We analyzed them all.
No matter how we analyzed it, there was a massive increase.
Let's just take, for example, abnormal menstrual menstruation with the COVID-19 vaccine compared with the influenza vaccine.
It was almost 1,200-fold.
There was a 1,200 fold, 1,192, almost 1,200 fold increase.
1,192.
There was a 57 fold increase in miscarriage.
There was a 38 fold increase in fetal death. - 1,500%.
1500%?
What was the miscarriage?
I'm sorry.
Miscarriage is increased 5,700%, a 57-fold increase.
Oh my gosh!
That's relative to the COVID-19 vaccine, relative to the influenza vaccine, a 5,700-fold increase.
a 5700 fold increase, a 5700% increase, 57 fold increase.
And the same with all the other 15 obstetrical complications that I listed off in the first segment, those all drastically breached the safety signal for the FDA and the CDC.
Oh my gosh!
Keep in mind that one of the authors on this is Albert Benavidez, and Albert Benavidez is one of the experts on VAERS Of course, he says, you're not catching all the problems, Dr. Thorpe.
They've manipulated all the data, and I have proof of it.
That's fine, Albert.
We're not going to change any of their data.
I know you have proof.
We're going to take the data that we know is manipulated, we know that it's being throttled, and we're going to let them use their own rope to hang themselves.
And that's what we did.
So yeah, so even though, let's say that they said there were, and I'm just making up a number, they said there were 100 stillbursts, there might have been really 200 or 300.
And they've kept their thumb, just like the gold market, they keep their thumb on the various numbers.
And then the other side of that equation is, The most dangerous vaccine, it seems to me, in my general awareness that's come on, not pediatric necessarily, but in general for adults, has been this increased damage that we're seeing with flu.
You know, as a spine surgeon, I studied neurology in the Queen's Square Institute in London, and I never saw a case of Guillain-Barre.
I heard Only started hearing about cases of Guillain-Barre when the flu started and that is the number one payout of the federal compensation board for vaccines.
So you're not talking about a safe vaccine there either.
You know, just to make everybody needs it.
So this number is skewed down, which should help them, the vaccination makers.
This, this, the flu is skewed up, which should help the vaccination makers.
And it's still grossly abnormal.
There's no just, there's no way this could be, it's even worse than what you're telling us.
It is.
And if that weren't bad enough, you know, would people immediately just pounce on us and say, well, you know, that's McCullough's data or that's Thorpe's data?
You know, no.
This is government data.
Okay, this is not our data.
And if you want to trash the study, then How do you, what do you do?
I can produce 34 other completely independent data sources globally that verify or if not are worse than the CDC and the FDA.
Like for example, let's take the equivalent of the CDC and FDA, the UK yellow card, it's worse.
Let's take the European Medicines Agency, Let's even use the World Health Organization.
DigiAccess.
It's worse.
And then, you know, if they want to throw out all that data, you know, you look at Edward Dowd and, you know, you talked about, you know, financial grooves in the economic sector.
As you know, he was a BlackRock leverage, very famous, very, very brilliant moneymaker on Wall Street.
And, you know, he's written a book and, you know, Ed, and you probably have him on your show.
The numbers that he produces are just They're irrefutable.
I mean he's looking at not only all-cause mortality but a temporal relationship but also the disabled workforce and the ratio of the disabled to the working population of the working population is horrific and so there's so many of us in so many different industries They come to the exact same conclusion.
It's irrefutable.
And then if that's not enough, and they still don't believe it, then you go to the Pfizer 5.3.6.
90, you know, first 90 day rollout.
And it's deadly in the pregnant and non-pregnant.
And it's very harmful.
The morbidity and mortality is unbelievable.
46% of those pregnant women And that Pfizer 5.3.6 had reactions, significant reactions to the vaccine.
And I want to say the live birth rate, the miscarriage rate, was way north of 80 percent, just like the Shimabukuro study.
So this is all consistent.
And the only thing they can do is publish more and more fraudulent studies in the mainstream military medical industrial complex of journals like JAMA or Lancet or pediatrics or New England Journal of Medicine.
That's all they can do. - Just to put this in perspective, when the hydroxychloroquine controversy blew up and JAMA, it was not JAMA, it was the New England Journal and- - Lancet.
And they not only published, you know, they're so, I say this because they're so worried about the data came from Jim Thorpe or the data came from Peter McCullough, but they took data that didn't even exist.
Those false papers that said you couldn't, that hydroxychloroquine didn't, I've never seen anything like this in my life.
We all knew papers that got fudged a little bit, but they're, For people that don't know, they took data sets from this company called Surgicil that claimed that they had all this data that showed that hydroxychloroquine didn't exist or didn't work.
And finally, somebody on the other side said, could you please show us the data?
And they had to admit that not only had they they hadn't skewed the data, they had no data.
And the data collectors were a sci-fi writer and a former porn star.
I mean, you can't make this up.
It was a completely false front organization, storefront thing that didn't even exist.
That is just beyond... And I don't want to get you in trouble here, Lee, but I want to call the personnel.
Okay, it was a cardiologist at Harvard.
His name is Manny, Mandeep Mehra, and he was a lead author.
And you're absolutely right.
Anybody with one neuron in their brain, including my seven-year-old grandson, could have told you that article was fake.
Because if the pandemic was only five months old, how in the world can you do a multiple continental study with 80,000 patients in it, which was randomized That doesn't happen.
It's impossible.
You've published studies before.
You can't do that.
It's physically impossible.
So we knew it was hogwash.
But yet, where is the penalty?
Mandy Mira should have had his license removed.
He should be in jail.
How many people, Lee, have died around the world from COVID-19?
How many people?
7 million?
8 million?
Somewhere in that?
Okay, the effective They are responsible.
Dr. Mandeep Mehra is responsible for killing 7 million people and same with the Lancet, 7 million people.
And the same with Chimmy Shimabukuro and the editor-in-chief of the New England Journal.
They killed people and my patients globally by putting out this false data and saying it's safe, effective, and necessary.
They've killed people.
Where's the justice?
And governments, you know, in February of 2020, no, sorry, February of 2021, when the rollout of the vaccine started, I stumbled across some of the review of the Israeli data.
Because, you know, Israel sacrificed their people.
I don't, you know, that's another whole story to be investigated why that's going on.
But anyway, they, Netanyahu wants them to be the test case for all the Pfizer people.
So they had a complete Pfizer takeover of Israel.
They pushed the jab on everybody and After by February, by the middle of February, they had 12.5% of the population vaccinated, but they had 50% of the COVID deaths.
This is death of the disease they're trying to vaccinate because 50% were in vaccinated people, 52%.
So that tells you What's going on?
And when they looked at it, that if you were over the age of 65 and you took the vaccine, you had 40 times more chance of dying of COVID than if you hadn't taken the vaccine.
And yet they covered it up.
Now that was done because Herb Seligman, who has an Israeli citizenship, but he's an epidemiologist in Israel, he basically blew the whistle and put that out on the internet and didn't wait.
He couldn't have gotten it published.
That's the other point to be made here, that what you're saying about how the fraud That guy from Harvard was able to get his paper published toot-sweet like that.
I couldn't get my paper published on the bleeding and thrombotic episodes that I tried to get published in March of 2021.
It took six months to get it published in a journal that would take it, like APS, because they're not afraid to publish non-narrative stuff.
But the people that publish the narrative stuff can get their stuff out like this.
And to your point, and I love this, you know, some knucklehead and his handler, you know, I give him a little bit of grace, but I will call him, he attacked me voraciously and mocked me and criticized me.
He goes, oh that's a, you know, that journalist really puts out propaganda.
And I said, oh, is that right?
And I said, because the American Journal of the American Journal, the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, that is, you know, I publish a lot.
I've published well over 220 articles and peer-reviewed.
I've been a reviewer for all the major journals.
That is the most comprehensive review of any publication I've ever had, the two reviewers from this, on this paper we just talked about.
I was so, it was the first time publishing that journal, I can't tell you how many hours and hours of reviewers Uh, and, and even the editorial staff that put into, you know, nitpicking and making sure that, um, that all the, uh, eyes were dotted and everything was appropriate and they understood all the analytics.
But when I came back and his name, this guy's, uh, handle, And he hasn't come back since.
You know, he's a podcaster, Joe Sixpack podcast.
He says, well, you know, he mocked out the journal and said, oh yeah, you're right.
I guess I should have published in the really fraudulent journals that you ascribe to, like the New England Journal of Medicine.
And I talked to him about the Shimabukuro article, and I talked to him about the Lancet article.
I haven't seen him back since.
But people just are stunned.
They can't believe it because, you know, like I was 15 years ago or 20 years ago, you know, I was a moron.
I completely believed everything and everything I read in the journal, everything they taught me in a medical school.
I'm not an anti-vaxxer.
I'm military.
I've pushed vaccines in pregnancy.
I made a mistake.
I'm a human being.
I publicly repented and apologized.
I probably hurt some patients.
I'm sure I did, but I thought I was doing the right thing because I believed in the literature, and what a fool I was.
Yeah, now we're not going to make that mistake again, and unfortunately, you know, to some degree, this is going to be a self-correcting situation because, to me, one of the big tragedies here is that they forced this vaccine on our entire medical system, except those of us who stood up and said no.
You know, that walked away, or just like the pilots that walked away.
We've got a huge system collapse about to happen on all fronts.
But on that note, how about the women now that have taken the vaccine?
Do you see anything that they can do positive to help there?
I mean, if we're seeing this, and the other question I get from all these women that are not vaccinated is, am I at risk around vaccinated people for infertility?
What say you on those things?
Really important questions.
We published our first paper from mycyclestory.com, and that was published a year ago.
And I am privileged to work with a group, a brilliant group of RFK's group, CHD, and Brian Hooker, Tiffany Parato, who is a founder of My Cycle Story.
You know, she was deplatformed off of Facebook with tens of thousands of women that were vaccine injured with severe menstrual abnormalities.
They completely wiped all of her database, just took it down because it wasn't supportive of the federal government's narrative.
So what she did was she started my cycle story we started a permanent database it can't be tampered with.
We published our first study last year and and what we found there's a the most extreme form of menstrual abnormality can be looked at is called a decidual cast.
And when you deliver a decidual cast, you know it.
You've never heard of it, probably.
Most OBs have never seen it, but there were only about less than 50 published in the medical literature in 110 years.
In the first, in seven months of 2021, there were 290 plus cases that were reported in this study.
So that tells you, I won't go into, the decidual cast is the actual in internal lining of the uterus and it's shaped like a triangle, the exact shape of the inside of the womb.
And it's shed intact, it's delivered intact like a baby.
It's very scary, it's very painful, and it's very bloody.
So that was novel.
Now what we've done, we're about ready to publish another paper within the next month that is a sequel to that.
And what we've demonstrated is that a large proportion of these women were not vaccinated, but with three to five days before their massive episode of abnormal vaginal bleeding, they came in close contact with a recently vaccinated individual.
So it pretty much proves, we believe this will pretty much provide very strong circumstantial evidence that there is something being shed.
And that shouldn't, I know it doesn't surprise you because you're on top of the data and you know that before the vaccine was ever released, when there were clinical studies, they told their vaccinated not to, you know, sleep or come close.
Right.
They told the researchers, we're getting bad results from this stuff on other uninvolved people.
Don't be around pregnant women.
Don't have your patients around pregnant women that took the RNA technology.
And this was from 2015.
So this is not like... When they roll it out, did they warn the public?
No, no, no, no.
This is a war against humanity.
This study is, I think, going to, and it brings up a lot of really concerning issues.
Dr. Peter McCullough, earlier this week, Monday, let out a substat where he said, in essence, he believes, with the data now available, that there is actually exosomal shedding of intact pseudo-uridinated man-made mRNA And that it is released from every gland in the body.
For example, in breast milk, we have several reports now, it's intact exosomal man-made mRNA that then goes into breastfeed and probably causes vaccination, if you will, of the newborn.
And we're seeing the exact same thing if that happens from the A ductal cell making breast milk, it can happen to the sweat glands, the salivary glands, it can come out your breath.
So he believes that we're infecting or we're vaccinating the unvaxxed by this shedding phenomenon.
We don't know exactly and we can't quantitate it, but we're pressing on in studies to do that.
Well, and by the way, there's an article that I quoted on a podcast in April of 2021.
Dr. Malone was on that podcast, and it was a veterinary study from 2017 or 2018 in Australia, and it was self-disseminating vaccines in emerging infectious diseases.
And that was exactly the point, that you sterilized a large group of mice by starting sterilizing a small group and then letting them go out in the wild, or getting out against other mice that weren't vaccinated, which shed on them, sterilize them, and then go to the next He told me at that time I didn't understand the literature.
Uh-huh.
Well, anyway.
They knew about this, I'm just saying.
They knew about this and they've tried to hide it.
So listen, we're gonna have to have you, I'm gonna have to have you back again and we're gonna have to go on treatment and all sorts of stuff.
We just ran out of time, but unbelievable.
I mean, so I think that, I guess the summary is, if you're a woman that has taken the vaccine or if you think you've been really exposed to a lot of like your husband's vaccinated or something, you need to look for data.
You need to look at advice and it's out there.
There are many people, including myself, we've tried to come up with things as we know them, and I'm sure you have some too.
We just have to have you back.
So, how can people find information from you?
I don't have a website, but I do have, I'm very active on Twitter.
Okay.
I haven't been put in Twitter jail yet.
Well, you will be, but you can come on our show again.
So, thank you guys, very nice being here, and we'll see you guys next week.
Thanks.
▲
Export Selection