All Episodes
Previous Next
March 22, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:06:49
Need to Know News (21 March 2023) with Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer, Mazin, Wisconsin, joined today by Brian Davidson in Houston, Texas.
Owen Stevens in Michigan, Alaska, is unable to join us today, but he'll be back next week.
Russia is preparing for total war with NATO.
They're putting S-400 systems all over the place.
International Criminal Court, as we've previously reported, has put out a warrant for his arrest.
After all, he's a great Russian nationalist, just as we have The attempt to arrest Donald Trump is a great American rationalist.
Any attempt at reconciliation ends with the ICC issuing the warrant against Vladimir Putin.
American Westerners have made a decision of no return.
They want to arrest the nuclear superpower president to instigate his overthrow from within.
The total rupture is now a fact, and the downing of the Reaper will only be the beginning.
NATO and the West have officially declared war on Russia.
The head of the Commission for the UN said that they had found no evidence of genocide, but they claimed that he was taking children out of Ukraine to Russia, which I believe was done to protect them, but that this was a war crime.
The situations it examined were regarding the transportation and displacement of children.
Within Ukraine and the Russian Federation, respectively.
According to Kiev, 16,221 children were deported to Russia by the end of February.
The Commission was unable to verify those figures.
Russian officials have taken legal and political measures regarding their transfer.
Putin did sign a decree in May of 2022 to make it easier to grant Russian citizenship to some children.
The Commission also found waves of attack carried out by Russia starting in October 10th of 2022 against Ukrainian energy infrastructure and the use of torture by the Russian authorities would constitute crimes against humanity.
This baffles me.
I have no doubt the Azov battalion was committing war crimes, but I am very doubtful Russia was doing so.
The Commission, however, claimed to have established a pattern of widespread illegal detention targeting many, including women and children.
One former prisoner claims to have been beaten as punishment for speaking Ukrainian and not remember the lyrics of the Russian Federation anthem.
That sounds ridiculous to me.
A source told Reuters the ICC prosecutor has got the arrest warrant against other Russians, too.
The commission sought to verify whether the shelling and siege of Mariupol could constitute a crime against humanity.
They do not have evidence to reach such a conclusion.
This is the first time investigators have published a written report pointing out last September to the media it was then too early to talk about crimes against humanity.
On the other hand, they had already accused Russian forces of committing a significant number of war crimes in four Ukrainian provinces.
Many of these constitute war crime, deliberate killing, attacks on civilians, illegal detention, torture, rape, forcible transportation and deportation of children.
Why are we hearing none of this about the Ukrainian Armed Forces and especially the Azov Battalion?
Remember, Biden, the American president, or pretender thereto, has directly accused his Russian counterpart of being responsible for crimes in Ukraine, calling Putin a war criminal and a thug who's gone ahead with an immoral war.
Secretary of State Blinken has also stated crimes are being committed in Ukraine.
Targeting civilians is a war crime.
Disclosing American experts are in the process of documenting and evaluating possible war crimes in Ukraine, no doubt like the experts are documenting the crimes committed by Donald Trump.
Here we have AZ tweeting, international criminal court issues arrest warrant against Putin over war crimes.
There was nothing from the ICC about Clinton, Bush, Obama, more, more.
Meanwhile, Russia is preparing for total war with NATO.
Multiple areas are showing the positioning of S-400 anti-aircraft systems in the vicinity of the Moscow Academy of Agricultural Economy and other local authorities in the protected part Losinyi Ostrov.
A third area, Timurov's Academy, again, This is a 1,000-acre area in front of the protected Polomenskoye Museum site.
We're all shocked, and you do nothing.
The builders will get in a month to cover everything with asphalt.
Anti-aircraft defense systems will be installed here next to the Church of the Ascension.
Don't you understand where these decisions are made, a police officer told a resident?
By such decision was meant the destruction of a forest zone with an area of about 100 acres between the river and the fence.
The forest began being destroyed.
This was apparently for the sake of protecting Moscow.
This is to protect Moscow!
Granting access across these fields and so forth.
Here's another great drone video of an S-400 air defense site in Moscow.
Here's another.
Here's another.
Interestingly, the article suggests two additional S-400, possibly a new Pantsir S-1 location and more.
Here's the location of the first S-400 More.
Brian, your thoughts.
What are we to make of this?
Well, I can tell you one thing for certain.
This isn't about children.
I think what's fundamentally happening behind the scenes here is that Putin's running his own version of Murder, Inc.
using the KGB and other secret police forces, and we're running our version of Murder, Inc.
From originating from the CIA and Zionists and many Israeli forces and others.
And at this point in time, Putin's been purging Russia of over 39 mysterious deaths have happened in the last two years and a couple within the last 10 to 15 days.
It was covered by the Sun Magazine in an article called the U.S.
version of the Sun.
An article called Murder Inc.
Bloodthirsty Mafia Boss Putin Killing Russian Russian Elite to Cling to Power as 39 Oligarchs and Officials Mysteriously Die.
And so what this article does is it basically just takes the time to archive all of the people of all of the oligarchs and all of the high level scientists and all of the high level players that have been That have died mysteriously via contract over the last two years with an uptick most recently.
I think that's fundamentally what's going on is that as Putin purges from the inside so that he's not assassinated or removed, it's up to the international community to try to figure out how to take him out from the inside.
I think that their attempts are going to fail and Putin is going to remain strong and he's going to be able to continue On the path that he's been on.
And I think the international community is just getting very frustrated with his position that he's dug in and fighting these guys off.
It's good for Putin.
He's defending himself, defending himself war.
And NATO obviously is nothing more than American and Zionist puppets.
The U.S.
and NATO are very unhappy that they're losing this war in Ukraine, so they've got to figure out something to do about it, which I think is not going to pan out.
Meanwhile, Steve Bannon observed the banks are insolvent and will be nationalized.
Many of us are worried about something like that coming.
There's simply no other option at this time for the Fed.
I'll be forced to provide liquidity, mean, pick your pocket while shoveling money into large banking institutions that have made one poor decision after another to protect the system from collapse.
It's like a safe and effective.
But for the world of international finance and banking, ultimately it will lead to ownership of the banks by the governments, which is called nationalization.
Credit swifts might effectively become a subsidiary of the European Central Bank, for example.
Strangely enough, terminology doesn't exist for the transition of a Bank in a sovereign country directly to a supranational entity.
We'll call it internationalizing the bank in that case.
This is an entirely and utterly fully manufactured crisis being conducted by the Fed alongside their incestuous partners, risking taking C-suite executives and board members asleep at the wheel at banks, who have now run their respective systems and businesses into the ground.
It's been a long time coming.
Being conducted right under everyone's nose.
CBDCs, that is to say digital currency, may not be ready for prime time just yet.
Remember, these people can barely tie their shoes in the morning, but they might be soon.
Here's their timeline, suggesting October 2023 is a projected date to decide whether or not to continue development of the digital euro.
Perhaps they could force us into use by a crisis, but it would still be months, if not years, before the window of opportunity opens.
In simpler, more direct terms, these people are stupid.
Given the confines of the system, the most fast and easy but not good way to fix the current set of dogpiling crises is simply continue to print money, thereby causing further currency debasement and using the systems in place, as they have been.
The people managing this crisis are not innovators.
Janet Yellen is a dog king, not an innovator, where a definition could be Something you may never have come across before is the concept of a dog hang.
In the before times, a ruler who conquered a new territory would often install a symbolic leader who is specifically nothing more than a bit of a puppet.
There are hundreds of other banks that just to get through the rest of the quarter and next are going to need intervention.
In other words, also on the verge of collapse.
The banking system here is about to undergo a rabid, complete meltdown, and those entrusted to manage the crisis are only going to make it worse.
Here we have some scary headlines.
Banks are running scared as the Fed is about to make things worse.
Federal Reserve lent $300 billion in emergency funds this past week.
What on earth is happening with the $80 trillion of hidden FX swap debt?
While central bankers may not be ready to roll out the CVDCs yet, their partners, often found mulling around sullenly at large meetings like the one below, might actually be able to develop and deploy as part of some public-private partnership.
You know, because they're good people.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, I think it's an interesting time to revisit the question of who was Satoshi Nakamoto, the supposed person who invented Bitcoin back in 2009.
I've been watching this digital currency program roll on out, and it seems to me it was more of a litmus test or a testing ground to see how digital currencies would play out.
It did pretty well for a while and is still doing pretty well, but remember, at the end of the day, Uh was the Rothschild banking dynasty that said give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes its laws.
At the end of the day the quantitative easing that's been going on for the last 13 or 14 years has to come to an end.
Inflation right now is making the rich richer and making the poor poorer and it's doing nothing but but Widening the gap between the middle class and the lower class and the upper crust that's out there.
And I also think that in the end of the day, they do not want to see us in a cash-based society.
They want to Bubble it up, boil it over, and let that bubble burst so that they can institute a draconian solution run by a government agency to put us all back into shape with some sort of digital-based income and digital-based spending plan.
So it feels to me like time is short for the Fed.
And it feels to me like the fact that no politician has ever bothered to audit it or put it back into position.
And I also remember what happened to the Tea Party way back in the day.
They were out there talking about monetary responsibility and fiscal responsibility.
And of course they were infiltrated, divided, shut down and destroyed by the media.
And I believe that all happened so that today could come up the way exactly that it has.
I think they've got two years to do it.
I don't think they're going to wait for the next president.
I wouldn't want to be the next president to oversee it.
That's for certain.
But I think it's coming.
Although the American economy is strong, there are always weak points.
And this strength is only as strong as our weakest link in the chain.
As soon as the dominoes begin to fall, The crash will come and it will come hard.
I'm not necessarily predicting it, but everybody who's got a mind knows it's only a matter of time before all the money printing catches up to us and ends up destroying the entire system.
Brian, I actually think it's going to happen this year.
I don't see any way it can be circumvented.
Meanwhile, Trilateral Commission 2023 is the year of a new global order.
The Trilateral Commission's 50th anniversary marks the culmination of its self-proclaimed new international economic order.
On March 12, it held its plenary meeting in New Delhi, India, to discuss issues related to globalization.
Trilateral co-founder Zbigniew Brzezinski's Technocratic Area has apparently officially arrived.
Amid the new world alliances forming as India and China seek to normalize relations and as China brokered a relationship between Saudi Arabia and Iran, the globalist narrative has opened a new and possibly final chapter.
During the Nikkei Asia, one unnamed trilateral member addressed the plenary meeting and stated, Three decades of globalization, defined as integrated, free-market-based, and deflationary, has been replaced by what will be a multi-decade period of globalization defined as fragmented, not free-market-based, but industrial policy-based and structurally inflationary.
This year, 2023, is year one of this new global order.
This reflects Brzezinski's early strategy to transform the world, as he wrote in Between Two Ages, America's role in the tech-necronic era.
The nation-state as a fundamental unit of man's organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force.
International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation-state.
Welcome to the new global order.
The trilateral gives a signal to the WF.
Al Schwab, of course, famously observed The pandemic represents a fair but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world to the benefit of the bankers.
Bob Schwab made that statement in 2020.
This fall, in my analysis, the so-called pandemic was technocracy's coup d'etat, building over 45 years at the hands of the Trilateral Commission.
I argue consistently the Commission's original new international economic order was nothing more than technocracy warmed over from the 30s.
It was Brzezinski's technectronic era.
It was the U.S.
sustainable development.
It was Biden's Green New Deal, all one and the same, all strategized by members of the Trilateral Commission beginning in 1973.
The W.E.F.
is thoroughly intertwined with the U.N.
and vigorously promotes its Sustainable Development Goals.
Its own website states, the COVID pandemic has presented its fair share of challenges but also offered opportunities.
The W.E.F.
has assembled physical events for over 50 years, but we now have a unique opportunity to take the experience online.
As part of the Sustainable Development Impact Summit 2020, The WF is experimenting with a 3D environment that allows spatial exploration of the Sustainable Development Goals, SDG-specific content discovery, and experiencing the ambience of a physical event from your computer.
When Schwab says the WEF is reimagining the future, he is flatly misleading.
The future was already reimagined by early members of the Trilateral Commission, such as Ziebig, David Rockefeller, Richard Gardner, and, of course, Henry Kissinger.
On June 3rd of 2020, Schwab wrote, To achieve a better outcome, the world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions.
Every country, from the United States to China, must participate.
And every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed.
In short, we need a great reset of capitalism.
Now the Trilateral Commission, acting as quarterback, has relayed the call to the WEF that this year, 2023, is year one of the new global order.
In other words, pull out all the stops.
The Great Reset has arrived.
Execute a battle plan to terminate capitalism and free market economics and, by the way, the nation state.
What does this mean for 2023?
We're already experiencing a polycrisis, a doom, where multiple crises are descending upon us at the same time.
There's a man-made energy crisis, warring against coal, oil, and natural gas.
A man-made food crisis, warring against all traditional food systems.
A man-made financial crisis, threatening total collapse of existing financial systems.
And a man-made military conflict between Russia and Ukraine, threatening World War III.
Any one could be seen as a scorched earth policy where total destruction is possible down to the ground level.
If all four are unleashed at the same time, it would be the equivalent of atomic warfare resulting in a literal dark winter.
Such a collapsed world would then be ripe for total capture and rebuilding into technocracy's dystopia.
It's unfortunate that hardly anyone has given any credence to the Trilateral Commission over the years.
I will say pointedly, the first to bust them was the late scholar and professor Anthony Sutton, with whom I co-authored Trilaterals Over Washington.
Between 1978 and 81, few paid attention back then, just as few pay attention today.
We were mercilessly censored, just as I am censored today.
Nevertheless, our work has stood the test of time, and now the endgame is at hand.
If you feel you're in the dark, it's a time to start reading and studying.
Their volumes are available here and here.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, they've been telegraphing this move for a long, long time.
Hopefully our listeners are at least brushed up on how they're going to institute the New World Order.
I've used as one of my volumes to research it, The New World Order by Ralph Epperson, which was written in 1989, which I find to be an absolute playbook in terms of The different things that are happening in society and when you ask yourself the question, why does the media push this or why is this agenda being pushed through from the academics?
I always go back to this because it seems that in here there's at least some chapter somewhere that deals with things that don't make sense.
So, let me just pull a quote from it.
This is out of Dostoevsky.
I'm just going to read a few of the quotes from the introduction, just to show you how far back this goes.
Brave New World Revisited.
The Grand Inquisitor from Dostoevsky's parables says, In the end, they, the people, will lay their freedom at our controllers' feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us.
1958, Aldous Huxley.
The 21st century will be the era of world controllers.
President George W. Bush, May 12, 1989, commencement address, Texas A&M.
Ultimately, our objective is to welcome the Soviet Union back into the new world order.
Perhaps the new world order of the future will truly be a family of nations.
1968, Nelson Rockefeller.
As president, he would work toward an international creation of a new world order.
January 30, 1976, a document called the Declaration of Interdependence was introduced, signed by 32 senators and 92 representatives, and it read in part, two centuries ago, our forefathers brought forth a new nation.
Now we must join with the others to bring forth a new world order.
And I can tell you that this book, each chapter, is like a playbook on the insanity that's happening out there.
Normal Americans, we don't think about this.
We don't understand this.
But there's been a great deception played on us because they don't believe that we're capable of ruling ourselves and managing our own society.
They think that they need to do it for us because otherwise we would just descend into total chaos and rebellion.
I disagree wholeheartedly, and if they would allow us to elect our own representatives, I'm sure that we could go back to 1776 and how this is meant to be.
But as long as they control our elections, we really find ourselves in a position where we must accept the puppet that they're putting in front of us, and the puppeteer will continue to parrot all of the plays that run from the New World's Order playbook.
I feel, unfortunately, that time rolls closer and closer every day toward the New World Order, and I'm feeling like it's more and more a real possibility in the next two years now than I ever have felt before.
I worry, worry, too, Brian.
I think you got it exactly right.
Meanwhile, this is most interesting.
Here's someone who actually is acknowledging that he was paid to participate.
Can I get this to play?
Maybe not.
This is a guy who admitted to being paid to protest at the Capitol building on January 6th.
He had bangs of conscience.
You can find it on Twitter.
This is a guy, a participant, right there, telling us he was there, he was paid, and he regrets it.
Meanwhile, Fauci responds to most calls for prosecution.
Fauci, the recently retired director of NAID, who recently reported racking up to $100,000 per speech, in addition to undisclosed royalty payments for Big Pharma, appeared on CNN.
He played the world's smallest violin for himself.
Prosecute me for what?
What are they talking about?
I wish I could figure out what the hell they were talking about.
I think they're just going off the deep end.
Of course, it's going to have a difficult effect and a deleterious one on my family.
They don't like to have me getting death threats all the time.
Every time someone gets up and spouts some nonsense and misinformation, disinformation, and outright lies, somebody somewhere decides they want to do harm to me and or my family.
A poor, maligned grifter?
If Fauci would feign confusion about why he would be the target of an investigation into his conduct in office, he could probably clear things up quickly by appearing before Congress.
A figure like Jim Jordan or Rand Paul would likely be willing to explain things to him.
The context of the interview was Zedlin Musk's tweet from December, where he declared his bro-downs were prosecute and fauci, which triggered a meltdown among the corporate media due to Musk's enormous reach and cultural influence, and the recent Senate legislation to declassify all intelligence related to the origins of COVID.
It's unclear.
Biden, who many speculate is compromised by the Chinese communist power structure, will sign the bill into law.
These developments, paired with former CDC Director Robert Redfield's testimony before Congress regarding COVID's likely lab origin, indicates the dam may be breaking.
It was slow coming over three years in the making, but the truth, as the saying goes, always comes out in the end.
I recently speculated whether Fauci could be prosecuted for negligent homicide vis-a-vis the estimated 1.13 million Americans, and that's a tiny, tiny number in relation to what I take to be the true one, died from COVID.
The circumstantial evidence he funded the creation in a poorly run Chinese lab is incredibly strong.
All a successful prosecution would take is a talented state attorney and an open-minded jury willing to consider the evidence.
Brian.
Well, the first story about an agent provocateur on January 6th.
I don't think there's really much to see there anymore, except that we've got somebody admitting it.
We've already seen lots of Ray Epps's deposition information, especially where he said he organized it.
All the Trump supporters that are in the know about false flags knew going back to January 6th.
And so it was just a question of whether the evidence would come out.
I think they allowed the evidence to come out because they believe that It's too little too late for any of us to do anything about it and at this point in time they know that their war is won so it really all comes down to can they get us to divide ourselves against ourselves so that we can't fight back while they implement their new world order.
As for Fauci, I see him as nothing more than a puppet on the strings of the of the of the medical industry machine, the pharmaceutical companies being one of them.
I'm not a big fan of some of the large hospital systems out there, but I don't see that medicine side of Fauci having ever played a role at all.
I think he's a fraud from the very beginning.
I tend to believe Judy Mikovits.
I think maybe he's got a lot of education, but he's certainly, in my mind, controlled by the powers that mean to control them.
So I would refer you to, if you really want to have a big long journey into understanding the state of medicine today, try David Whitehead's, I think it's an eight-part series called The Cult of the Medics, which takes us all the way back to the serpent on the staff in terms of looking at the history of medicine in America.
Now Fauci, he's just Pretending to be the face of science, and it's frankly a joke for all of us that really understand what science is.
But Fauci is a fraud from the very beginning, and should he be prosecuted?
I would much rather see him get shaken down to tell us who was pulling the strings the whole time.
That, to me, is a lot more important, because I see Fauci as nothing more than the public face of the player of the game, not a leader in any sense.
He flip-flopped on too many issues.
He didn't do anything that made any sense.
Excellent point.
I mean, he was just a PR guy for Big Pharma, and he had a manner, a disposition, and made him look like a kindly person.
And you want to associate someone who seemed to be a grandfatherly figure with mass murder, but in fact there he is, the representative.
Well, I remember he and Susan Birx on the very first press conference, and that was October of Yep.
I completely agree, Brian.
or 2020 when COVID supposedly broke out, their very first press conference, he and Burks flashed Masonic hand signals and Fauci dropped the old hidden hand.
So he's part of the crew.
Yep.
I completely agree, Brian.
Meanwhile, Wall Street Journal calls that Biden for blaming Trump, of course.
Who else are we going to blame?
For Silicon Valley bank collapse.
Following the footsteps of Barack Obama, who famously blamed W for every economic problem during his tenure, Biden, who's been in office also for over two years, pointed a finger at Trump.
First, the President declared his quick action to stabilize the banking industry following the collapse of multiple banks and that we can now breathe easier.
Then he took aim at his predecessor.
During the Obama-Biden admin, we put in place tough requirements on banks like Silicon Valley and Signature, including the Dodd-Frank law, to make sure the crisis we saw in 2008 would not happen again.
Unfortunately, the last administration rolled back some of these requirements.
Here's TownHall.com tweeting, reporting exactly that point.
It should be noted the rollback was signed into law by then-President Trump, but the legislation was passed with bipartisan support.
It was designed to lift burdens unnecessarily put on small and medium-sized lenders.
The Silicon Valley Bank, however, represents the second largest bank collapse in U.S.
history.
The Wall Street Journal decided to analyze Biden's overall claims, and they weren't buying it.
The president offers assurances that markets don't believe, they wrote, suggesting investors aren't buying what Biden is selling.
And the editorial board also addressed the accusations against Trump.
As he so often does.
The president also blamed the bank panic on the Trump administration, in this case for modifying some 2010 Dodd-Frank rules.
But not even Barney Frank, the Dodd-Frank co-author believes, that is to blame.
Tom Phitton, Marcus, don't believe Biden's assurances about safety of banking system or White House's first instinct, even in financial panic.
Is this been reality and not for political scapegoats?
None of this will restore confidence.
The Wall Street Journal was the only entity to strike back.
E.J.
Antoni, Research Fellow in Regional Economics with the Heritage Foundation, told Fox the SVB collapse had nothing to do with Trump or Dodd-Fank.
Glenn Greenwald noted if the bank regulation rollbacks were so devastating, Biden had two years of a majority in the Senate, albeit slim, in control of the House to do something about it.
Glenn Greenwald tweets, Biden's been president for more than two years.
His employees control all regulatory agencies until two months ago.
Democrats control both houses.
So whose fault is this week's collapse of the Silicon Valley Bank?
Obviously Trump's.
Probably Putin's, too.
Trump's campaign spokesman Stephen Chung also fired back and made telling points.
Brian, your thoughts?
This is going to collapse.
And I think what's interesting about studying this particular article is that it is becoming more clear to me that in order to initiate their new world order, they're going to need to somehow blame Trump and conservatives as patsies for the collapse of the everything bubble.
Now, I had to go, I was looking for a very old article from 2017 or 2018 that has been eliminated from Google, so I had to go use a Russian search engine named Yandex to find this, but it's called a, the Fed is a suicide bomber with a deeper agenda.
And the article, let me quote it, the Fed deliberately created the everything bubble so that it would, so that it could be deliberately imploded At the proper time.
In other words, the crash we have been witnessing so far during the final quarter of 2018 and continuing into 2019 is a controlled demolition of the economy.
Jerome Powell is not some rebel going against the easy money dictates of the Fed.
Jerome Powell is playing the role that has been given to him.
Ben Bernanke and Janet Yellen's job was to inflate the bubble.
Jerome Powell's job is to crash the bubble.
The author was wrong about the timing, and I'm not sure why he was wrong or if somehow Trump got in the way, but the bubble is clearly at this point in time with the quantitative easing being artificially inflated.
Now, let me just throw this out there.
They may not want to burst the bubble while Joe Biden is in office.
They may be waiting for Trump to come on in so that they can blame us Or blame conservatives or blame Trump-style policies for the total collapse and the institution of the New World Order.
I don't believe they're going to wait for Trump, but let me just say that we make a great Patsy.
Joe Biden can say, well, everything was under control while I was in there.
Now, let me ask you a question.
Would you want to come in and take over after Joe Biden?
After this last run?
I mean, just look at the damage that's been done in the last two years.
Is it even thinkable that a four-year presidency or a one-term presidency could even possibly reverse the damage?
To me, it feels like a large-style controlled demolition, a distraction, and it's basically just setting up for the central banks and the globalists to ultimately avoid the blame for the very painful consequences that are coming our way.
Great observation.
They may want to bring Trump in in order to blame him for every disaster they create.
Meanwhile, it was a setup.
Feds knew of registered Trump protests outside the Capitol on January 6.
Later, they had trapped thousands of Trump supporters in a restricted area where protesters had permits to rally.
The FBI testified on October 13, 2022.
They were using geo-tracking data to identify Trump supporters who gathered near the U.S.
Capitol on January 6.
A bombshell report by the EFF, Electronic Freedom Foundation, revealed the vast secret of partnership between private companies and the federal government to survey and track the movement of millions of Americans, which, by the way, is a clear violation of First Amendment, which says the government may not interfere with petitioning the right of the people to petition their government over grievances such as stolen elections.
According to the EFF, the Intel Alphabet agencies, including ICE, FBI, Secret Service, Homeland Security, DoD, as well as state and local law enforcement, are being funneled hordes of private cell phone location data by private brokers who harvest the information.
The government later said it was a restricted zone—you can see it defined here by the red line—a restricted area where Trump supporters were gathering because they had permits to hold rallies in this area.
We know of no markers, flags, fencing, or other indication this area was off-limits.
Indeed, if they had permits to be there, this clearly would be a bait-and-switch.
This is the same tactic Greg Phillips, Catherine Engelbrecht, and Truth or Vote used to investigate the mail-in ballot dropbox fraud of the 2020 election.
The cell phone data collected by the group was used to identify the network of Democrat operatives who committed mass election fraud, as seen in the documentary 2,000 Mules.
The FBI was alleged to have used this data to identify a patriotic protester to travel to D.C.
on January 6 to support Trump and the Constitution.
Tens of thousands of nearly a million later walked the Capitol following Trump's speech.
We now have evidence the government in D.C.
believes New Thousand would assemble in this area because they had permits for their rallies.
The Trump supporters had flyers of different scheduled events on the 5th and the 6th.
How is it legal that Trump supporters today are still having their homes raided and are sent to prison for staying outside the Capitol on January 6th or walking through the Capitol without committing any violence?
Thousands of Trump supporters gathered at the Capitol following his speech because it was on the schedule and they had permits.
And while they were waiting for a protest or looking for the stage, they were shot in the face by police.
Here's one of the mega rally maps and guides.
I mean, this is incredible.
The police knew it all.
It was permitted.
And yet they claim there was these designated areas where they're not permitted, where they'd already issued permits.
It's absolutely outrageous, Brian.
Well, they're just running 2.0 right now with this Manhattan District Attorney who supposedly has some charges he's going to put Trump on.
Supposedly, since we first reported this on Sunday, that Manhattan DA has backed off and it's not going to be out there.
But even today, there was masked Trump supporters in front of the Trump Tower in New York pretending to be MAGA.
Now when was the last time you saw MAGA put a mask on to do some protesting?
Give me a break.
So they're setting up a planned rebellion which they can use to blame Trump supporters for a crisis so that they can continue their talking points.
And just, if you don't know how much this mainstream media depends upon Trump, just go ahead and go to MSNBC's website and take a look at what percentage of the articles are based around Trump.
He's the best moneymaker they've got, and he's everything they've got to deflect interest away from Joe Biden.
So the fact that January 6th was staged doesn't surprise me.
All it does is show us the playbook that they're going to continue to use to blame Trump supporters and set us all up as patsies for whatever nefarious agenda that they're getting ready to roll out.
Not having seen the reports, you make such a telling point that Trump supporters don't wear masks.
So if you've seen a mask It's a fraud.
It's a phony.
It's an op.
It's a scam.
I think that's a really telling point, Brian.
Excellent.
Excellent.
Meanwhile, as the banking world is ripped apart so the globalists can bring in a tyrannical new world order, the Biden Cabal's new gun-grabbing executive order tells us to be ready for shit to hit the fan.
Guns and ammo are far greater than cash.
One C.S.
really hits the fan.
Teaching and conveying information are among the most important aspects of writing, often like a college professor trying to teach undergraduates the important fundamentals of political science on the basis of governmental power.
Fortunately, the Left has been providing an increasing number of examples of its inherent authoritarianism to illustrate these dynamics.
Most would agree these totalitarian tendencies would cause most people to shy away from the tyrannical 10%.
Unfortunately, there are still true believers in the fascism of the far left.
We've proven the far left is fascist, along with many others who have done the same.
We've shown the National Socialist German Workers' Party was a National Socialist German Workers' Party, and we've proven that gun confiscation is a central part of the left's socialist national agenda.
This means those on the far left living in denial can dispense with trying to pretend something is false simply because it's not explicitly proven every five minutes.
We on the pro-freedom right wonder why leftists persist in staying on the wrong side of history, not to mention being tardy with their lessons in comparison to the rest of the class.
They're holding everyone else black, while we need to talk about the fact that far left can't let go of its control obsession and face mask fetish.
You would think that the Cochrane study would have been the last nail in the face for face masks, given for almost three years.
We haven't seen a straight comparison that would conclusively prove they work.
Parenthetically, Speaking, we do know if they did work, the left would have been able to cite a plethora of studies showing that, and we would have been inundated with this news 24-7.
Well, everyone knows the opposite happened.
Dennis Wager put it all in perspective with his essay, Why the Left is Pro-Mask.
He condemned the mask mandate as all you need to know of the authoritarian left.
We can't do it justice here, but here is the money quote.
And notice, by the way, the only reason why the government would want to disarm you after 247 years is because they intend to do something that you would shoot them for.
Exactly!
A fourth reason the left insists on forcing us to wear masks is controlling other lives is the left's raison d'etre.
Controlling others is what leftism is all about.
That's why the left seeks ever-expanding government.
There's no such thing as increasing the size of government, but not increasing the amount of government control over our lives, by definition.
More government means more control over people's lives.
There's no example of the left gaining power anywhere in the world, and at any time since they took over Russia in 1917, and not restricting the freedom of its citizens.
This is the main object lesson we need to understand about the mask issue, and why we paraphrase the famous quote.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever, or more wells, to a mask stamping on a human face.
As an engineer, it's vitally important to distill any seemingly complex circuit mechanism or motion down to its basic mathematical laws to understand what's going on.
Then you can quantify its operation and see how the object is actually working.
In this case, Prager is providing an object lesson on the left side of the political spectrum.
He's telling us what motivates leftists and why moving further to the left always seems to involve less individual liberty and more government control.
In this case, control over your breathing and what you're wearing on your face.
You also notice authoritarians will always have a convenient saving-the-planet excuse for depriving you of your rights.
It was a misinformation during the COVID crisis to excuse, to justify censorship along with saving the children.
For freedom of expression suppression on YouTube, with the right of self-defense.
Then, of course, they trot out a sob story to rationalize unconstitutional red flag gun confiscation and attack a basic human right.
Their latest brilliant idea is to start rationing for no reason because, you guess it, saving the planet.
It could point the way to a fairer future.
Rationing today is seen as a sign things have gone very wrong.
In JHBO's The Last of Us, where humanity has been decimated by a fungal infection that turns people into violent meat sacks, Quarantine zone residents swap ration cards for shoelaces and trade them in the black market for drugs.
In the real world, produce has been rationed in the UK amid a whopping 17% rise in prices for groceries, seen by many as a failure of government planning.
Sometimes you just have to laugh at the sheer absurdity of leftist logic.
What's our solution to the failure of government planning?
More government planning, of course!
But it's even worse for the crisis of global whatever-the-weather-is-doing-this-week, as usual.
A serious crisis situation suddenly requires the fascist far left to expand its control over the public.
Funny how that always works out when there's a crisis created by, you guessed it, a fascist far left.
It's almost as though leftists do this to gain power over the people.
Duh.
Compare the anti-liberty left side of the spectrum measuring government power with the pro-freedom side that favors liberty and limited government.
The only models that make sense on the far right, with zero levels of government power, proceed ever higher as you move left.
We're seeing increased aggressiveness on the part of the fascists far left, taking control and destroying common sense civil rights, everything from censorship and gun control to the destruction of the right to privacy, all to address a crisis that results in their gaining more control.
It's hard to believe anyone would want to be on that side of history these days.
It's hard to believe anyone would want to be on the side of the anti-liberty left.
But that's how it is.
Brian.
They will attack religion, real religion.
They have no problem with fake religions as long as it's nationalistic.
Because religion keeps us separate and gives us something that isn't, that does not consume our time that is related to them.
They will attack the family because the family unit is the strong unit at the end of the day that can fight with them, against them.
They will attack our right to association.
They'll attack our education systems.
They'll attack our property.
Say that we'll have nothing and we'll be happy?
They'll attack nationalism.
They'll attack our identification with our country as nationalists.
And they've already called us white nationalists and this and that.
They are after our identity as individuals.
The face mask is a sign of their victory over the individual.
The crowds that they put together for their protests, the individualism is removed or displaced purely with evil, nefarious intentions.
Their biggest fear is that from the people will rise up a leader who will speak to the hearts and minds of the American people and who will speak truth in power.
Where that person is at and how that person will rise, I do not know at this point in time.
But I imagine that it's going to be a nationalistic, religious leader who is an iconoclast, who's calling it like he sees it and calling it out for what it actually is.
This person will have to have character of such a high level that they're not able to be purchased or swayed Corrupted by money, but will simply have supporters that support them 100% whichever direction that they go.
So it's going to have to be a very charismatic and a very powerful type of person that's going to have to rise to lead.
And if we don't as patriots put a leader in place, they will.
The best way to control the opposition is to lead it.
So expect that there's going to be people that infiltrate whatever movement does come around to resist this, as they've done with other things such as the Tea Party and other conservative groups that they couldn't control.
And expect that there will be people that pretend to be a part of it, that are really there for nothing but to destroy it.
So it's going to be very, very difficult to see what we need to lead us out of this situation.
And I don't know when or how that person will rise, but it's going to have to be the type of person that can get the attention of the mainstream media while doing right and doing good and taking us in a better direction.
He's going to have to be very wise and very elegant in the way that he answers questions and very straightforward in who he calls out and what he calls out as the enemy to the people.
Very, very nice.
Meanwhile, as though we needed a further illustration of the far-left's desire to control our lives, they even want to control what we eat, even the candy we consume.
Skittles, Campbell's Soup, Hostess Donut, Jelly Beans.
More could be banned under a proposed bill, of course.
And where's it going to originate?
A California lawmaker.
Introduce a bill banning additives using Skittle, Jelly Bean, Campbell's Soup, some bread bans, and more.
Californians shouldn't have to worry that the food they buy in their neighborhood grocery store might be full of dangerous additives or toxic chemicals, said California Assemblymember Jesse Gabriel, a Democrat, of course, who's also the chair of the Assembly Committee on Privacy and Consumer Protection.
This bill will correct a concerning lack of federal oversight and help protect our kids, public health, and the safety of our food supply.
The lawmakers have Assembly Bill 418.
If enacted, beloved candies, soups, and breads would become illegal to manufacture or sell in the state.
Foods on the chopping block include Skittles, Sour Patch Kids, Jelly Beans, Trident Sugar-Free Gum, Kaz, Hostess Desserts, Campbell's Soup, Old El Paso Queso Sauce, Certain Brands of Bread, and more.
The bill would be the first in the U.S.
to ban the use of the named additives in processed foods.
Gabriel notes processed foods and candies contain the substances are marketed to children, low-income consumers, and communities of color.
As if white people didn't like Campbell's soup or Skittles.
Gabriel's Bill prohibits manufacturing, selling, delivering, distributing, holding, or offering for sale food containing any of five substances, brominated vegetable oil, potassium bromate, propylparaben, red dithrium, titanium oxide.
The targeted substances are already banned in the EU over public health concern, according to Gabriel.
Those health risks include an increased cancer risk, behavioral issues for children, reproductive harm, and damage to the immune system.
I've heard similar claims made, by the way, for sugar.
Why are these toxic chemicals in our foods?
Said Susan Little, the Environmental Working Group's Government Affairs Senior Advocate for California.
We know they are harmful and that children are likely eating more of these chemicals than adults.
It makes no sense that the same products food manufacturers sell in California are sold in the EU but without these toxic chemicals.
We thank Assemblymember Gabriel's efforts to remove these toxic additives from California's food supply.
Directors from companies including the National Confectioners Association, California Grocers Association, and American Chemistry Council oppose the bill and it premature and the targeted substances are safe.
All five of these additives have been thoroughly reviewed by the federal and state system and many international scientific bodies and continue to be deemed safe.
The confectionery industry creates $7.7 billion in economic impact in California.
The industry provides over 100,000 direct and indirect jobs in the Golden State.
Brian, your thoughts?
I love candy.
I don't see any reason why anybody would go after candy.
It's the most foolish thing you've ever had.
additional American jobs through the sourcing of our raw materials and distribution and sale of any product, the organization said.
Brian, your thoughts?
I love candy.
I don't see any reason why anybody would go after candy.
It's the most foolish thing you've ever had.
I've ever heard in my life that they'd go after candy.
Give me a break.
I I don't really know what to think of the story as to why they would go after it, except that there's always an economic motive behind whatever move that they make.
And it probably, to me, would be to suppress the industry so they can purchase it for pennies on the dollar.
That's the only thing I can think of.
And California in this regard would have a role like Texas regarding school books.
Publishers don't want to make a separate edition, so if in Texas they won't accept a school book text, the publishers conform to Texas in order to have it uniform, not having to publish separate editions for different states.
And it would be similar if California were to pass.
It would have an effect throughout the nation, not only in the once golden state.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, broercon, to live-need-to-know-at-gmail.com.
Live-need-to-know-at-gmail.com.
As the banking system goes billy-up, this is a comment from my blog, the selected U.S.
dictator with no brain gives away billions to the asshole known as Ukraine.
It would be more aptly named Biden's land.
For the record, Crimea is officially now Russian, but it's always been associated with Russia since the time of Catherine the Great, the reigning empress, from 1762 to 1796.
Now Russia is liberating more of the Russian-speaking regions trapped in the Biden's asshole by aggressive NATO expansionism.
The Russian-speaking regions have recently voted to rejoin Russia.
People observing this conflict need to keep in mind the illegitimate American dictatorship doesn't honor the true outcome of elections in the U.S.
or Russia.
U.S.
elections are not audited.
Instead, people are told to accept the outcome on blind faith.
However, the American Dictatorship simply doesn't honor the outcome of any Russian election.
Now American borders are wide open, so citizenship actually means nothing.
Peaceful demonstrators have languished in gulags for years now for crimes such as carrying and playing a tambourine inside the Capitol building on January 6th after being invited in by the police.
Right choice voting is the next big scam claiming to improve democracy.
The true purpose is to add more confusion with a ballot counting scheme so that no one will be able to understand her question.
But as America self-destructs under the Uniparty's iron heel, We can all rest assured, 10% will continue to go to the big guy, and he or she will never be prosecuted for any of their long list of suspected financial and education crimes.
However, there is one bit of good news.
Russian pilots skillfully brought down a cowardly unmanned American spy drone operating over Russian territory.
It was only a $440 million loss for the taxpayers and a big psychological win for Russia.
I don't quite understand the number.
I mean, the drone, I think, was only maybe $40,000 or something like that.
So the number is fantastic.
Meanwhile, The Association for 9-11 Truth Awareness sponsors debates annually this year the 10th.
It was between Michael Shermer, the editor of Skeptic, and Jim Fetzer, founder of Scholars for 9-11 Truth.
He, Shermer, chose not to show, so Anita created an Irsatz version where We took an interview we'd done on C-SPAN, answering a lot of questions, and I commented on his answers.
You can find it at anita.org slash debate slash 2023 or on my Twitter account at Jim Fetzer.
I think anyone who's been on the fence about what happened on 9-11 will find this highly illuminating.
Meanwhile, Final thoughts.
Yours, Brian.
Just because America seems to be careening towards the globalist New World Order, and some European nations seem to be careening toward the New World Order, doesn't mean the whole rest of the world is as well.
Just for instance, over the last month or so, we've seen some astonishing developments on the geopolitical front in the Middle East.
And let's just start out with China came out with their U.S.
hegemony.
They lambasted our U.S.
hegemony position and launched a global security initiative.
And then they came out and offered a peace plan for Ukraine.
That's from China.
On March 10th, China mediated an agreement which restored relations between Saudi Arabia And Iran?
Well, that used to be our territory.
On March 15th, Moscow rolled out the red carpet for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
Yesterday, al-Assad and his wife, Asma, arrived in the United Arab Emirates for talks with Sheikh Mohammed.
Iran and Iraq signed a security cooperation agreement that will stop the CIA-sponsored Kurdish activities against Iran.
King Salman of Saudi Arabia invited the President of Iran to visit in Riyadh and China's President Xi arrived in Moscow a couple days ago for three days of talks with Russian President Putin and an article by Putin was published in the People's Daily while Russian media published and signed an article by President Xi.
So the world is changing.
And there are groups out there and there are nations out there that are pushing back against the new world order.
While at the other time, if you take a look at what's going on in France, Macron's using the Olympics in 2024 as an excuse to set up a Chinese-style surveillance state.
And the people are out in Paris and they're angry there.
They're protesting it.
They're very upset.
So there are some positive developments globally that might delay this New World Order, but are we strong enough, and do we have a strong enough leader to stand up and go against them?
I just don't know.
I have a feeling it's going to have to originate Well, I so appreciate Brian Davidson's intellectually acute, precise delineation of the issues here and his comments thereupon.
that would lead the charge.
So it'll be interesting to see how it's going to change.
Well, I so appreciate Brian Davidson's intellectually acute, precise delineation of the issues here and his comments thereupon.
I think he's got it right that there's tremendous resistance to a new world order internationally.
Jacob Rothschild, no less, has declared Vladimir Putin to be an enemy of the new world order.
And that the new world order cannot proceed, cannot move forward without Ukraine.
Well, they're not going to have Ukraine.
Putin is surviving and thriving Russia.
And China are merging.
The other developments he mentioned are creating a multipolar world which is adverse to the United States and its own interests.
We're seeing the disappearance of the petrodollar.
The quality of life in the United States is diminishing because of multiple factors involved here, the bank collapses being only the most superficial indication.
I say It appears to me the world globally is going to thrive, but whether or not the United States can survive becomes the issue.
If this corrupt prosecutor in New York has backed off on arresting Donald Trump, that's a good sign.
But remember, we cannot maintain democracy without eternal vigilance.
And we've been pretty bad at showing that in the past.
This is going to take some resolve.
It ain't going to be easy, but our future lives and that of our nation are dependent upon it.
Thanks for joining us.
▲
Export Selection