Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 19, 2023 - Jim Fetzer

01:02:56

Kaeperernicked? Babylon Bee Awards, Dolly Weird, Pipeline Plan, Occupied America?

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Welcome to the 27th edition of Gary King's Inconvenient Truth, where Gary presents clips, stories that I don't know they're coming, so I can get my spontaneous and unrehearsed reaction.
	Gary, you've been doing a fantastic job.
	You've been blowing me and the audience away, so let's see what you got for us today.
	Yeah, we got really hardcore on y'all's butts last time, so we're gonna try to Well, I'm not going to tell you what we're going to do.
	You're just going to have to sit back and watch.
	You've got a great car here.
	You've got a really good system.
	I would say, though, there's a 99.9% chance that, you know, the car will be fine.
	But what I do recommend is servicing your engine with this new experimental oil technology here.
	It could ruin your engine.
	No, no, no.
	I'm alright still.
	You sure?
	0.1% is looking a bit scary, don't you think?
	We've had a lot of cars come into the shop this month.
	Problems.
	Well, you know, if you don't look after your car, it breaks down, that's life, innit?
	Come on, it'll be fine.
	Okay, so if the engine gets ruined, You're liable, right?
	Umm... No.
	You know what, the risk to reward ratio ain't sounding too good, so I'm gonna pass on this one.
	But thanks for your offer, though.
	You want a donut?
	Huh?
	What?
	Come on, every free oil shot, you get a free donut.
	What do you want?
	You want a burger?
	Fries?
	Huh?
	You want it?
	I got it.
	What you want, a lotto ticket?
	Wheat?
	Come on, just take it.
	Come on, pick this stuff.
	No, man!
	What are you, anti-oil?
	Anti-oil?
	By the information you just gave me, I'm choosing not to have it.
	How about it sounds to you?
	I don't need it?
	Listen, you goddamn maggot.
	If you don't take this oil, I'll make sure you never drive again.
	You understand me?
	The choice is yours.
	That ain't a choice.
	That's coercion.
	You can't run from it, Daryl!
	Huh?
	Everybody's going to have to take the oil if you want to drive.
	You understand me?
	The camera!
	The camera!
	All right.
	Gary, I like that a lot because it shows what they've done with the Vax.
	It's all totally coercive.
	It's got no merits whatsoever.
	There's no liability for the vaccine company.
	Big Pharma is running a mass murder, a genocide, not just against Americans, but against the whole world population.
	And Gary, sad to say, has been succeeding massively.
	Infertility, sterility is all a part of this, and the world population has been dropping, which is what the globalists want.
	Hopefully, however, enough have become aware enough that they're not going to buy it.
	Women, spontaneous abortions and so forth have just skyrocketed since the VAX was introduced and they're going way out of their way to try to explain, no, no, it's global warming or it's, you know, breathing air or what have you, Gary.
	It's become the point of absurdity.
	Everyone needs to take the message very well presented in terms of what's going on here with the VAX.
	All right.
	And let's not forget the people who helped us get here.
	Put to full screen.
	Well, hey, it's me.
	I'm finally going to get my vaccine.
	I'm so excited.
	I've been waiting a while.
	I'm old enough to get it and I'm smart enough to get it.
	So I'm very happy that I'm going to get my Moderna shot today.
	And I wanted to tell everybody, I think you should get out there.
	And do it too.
	I even changed one of my songs to fit the occasion.
	It goes, Vaccine, vaccine, vaccine, vaccine.
	I'm begging of you, please don't hesitate.
	Vaccine, vaccine, vaccine, vaccine.
	Cause once you're dead, then that's a bit too late.
	I know I'm trying to be funny now, but I'm dead serious about the vaccine.
	I think we all want to get back to normal, whatever that is.
	And that would be a great shot in the arm, wouldn't it?
	If we could get back to that.
	But anyhow, I just wanted to encourage everybody, because the sooner we get to feeling better, the sooner we are going to get back to being normal.
	So I just want to say to all you cowards out there, Don't be such a chicken squat.
	Get out there and get shot.
	Anyway, that's my message to you.
	So I am going to call on my friend, Dr. Najia Boomrod, that's worked in research here at Vanderbilt.
	That's where I am today.
	And he's going to pop me in my arm.
	And so I'm going to call him in.
	I'm going to mask up first, though, because I have a pretty good distance from me and the camera.
	So I'm going to put this on.
	OK, here I go.
	Here I go, all right.
	Think you got it?
	I got it.
	Okay.
	That didn't hurt.
	Just stung a little bit, but that was from the alcohol pad, I think.
	Yeah.
	Right?
	Okay.
	All right.
	Should we put a... A bandaid?
	No, mess up my beauty mark.
	Okay.
	I'm joking.
	You do what you gotta do.
	I don't want blood on my clothes.
	Hey, I did it!
	I did it!
	Ooh, Vanderbilt.
	It's just disgusting that an institution like Vanderbilt would cooperate in a scam like this.
	Dolly Parton's a brainless twit, so you know.
	When she talks about death, what she may have done is just terminate her own, because as Stu Peters had been showing The astronomical number of those who are dying suddenly.
	Just look at your obituaries.
	Go online.
	I have a correspondent who sends me a regular update about the sports figures who are dying.
	And every week she's sending me 10 or 12.
	I mean, these are fairly prominent people who have dropped dead suddenly.
	Is it despicable?
	What Dolly didn't mention is she was paid a hundred grand or more to make that little brief segment.
	So, you know, that was 10 minutes long, and I think it was actually less.
	She was getting big bucks for doing all of that, Gary.
	Embarrassing and bad.
	Just, just think about it.
	If Dolly drops dead, you're gonna know the reason why.
	Well, at least we know the role of our stars.
	Okay, talking about sports figures, here we go.
	Hello my friends and welcome to the Weekly Roundup, where we discuss just a fraction of the insanity that takes place in the world each week.
	Our top story today, Colin Kaepernick has accused his white adoptive parents of being racist.
	The former NFL star told CBS Chicago he struggled growing up in a problematic household.
	A through line he detailed in his upcoming graphic novel titled Change the Game.
	I mean, accusing the race most likely to take in the children of other races of racism is definitely changing the game.
	I'll give him that.
	According to Colin, his mother Teresa Kaepernick once told him, This became a space where it's like, how do I navigate the situation now?
	But it's also informed me why I have my long hair today.
	Wow Colin, thanks for owning your blackness by growing out your hair.
	A special skill reserved for black people apparently.
	Of course, there was no mention of his biological parents in the book, because anti-racism means you can dump your black newborn in the dumpster behind Denny's as long as you compliment his natural hair before leaving him to die.
	No, but seriously, it seems that this is just another stunt to warm the youths up to dirty commie behavior.
	Kaepernick has taken a page right out of Mal's Little Red Handbook by encouraging children to turn on their parents and pledge their allegiance to the state.
	Say the line, Bart!
	My white parents who fed, sheltered, and clothed a black child are racist white supremacists.
	All right, that's it.
	Well, very revealing, Colin.
	Kaepernick has shown himself to be a self-indulgent narcissist who cares only about himself.
	He had these wonderful parents who adopted him.
	They had no obligation to do that.
	And then he trashes them when they're doing their best to have him grow up.
	And to become a success, I find that shameful.
	And of course, our commentator is brilliant.
	She picks it all out.
	She says it all so clearly.
	I love her little videos, Gary, and I'm so glad you continue to play them.
	Yeah.
	Can't go wrong with what's-her-face.
	I keep saying that, but it's the truth.
	I'm Brooke Alvarez.
	Let's get right to our top story tonight.
	Congress today reauthorized funding for Facebook, the massive online surveillance program run by the CIA.
	According to Department of Homeland Security reports, Facebook has replaced almost every other CIA information gathering program since it was launched in 2004.
	After years of secretly monitoring the public, we were astounded so many people would willingly publicize where they live, their religious and political views, an alphabetized list of all their friends, personal email addresses, phone numbers, hundreds of photos of themselves, and even status updates about what they were doing moment to moment.
	It is truly a dream come true for the CIA.
	Much of the credit belongs to CIA agent Mark Zuckerberg, who runs the day-to-day Facebook operation for the agency.
	The decorated agent, codenamed the Overlord, was recently awarded the prestigious Medal of Intelligence Commendation for his work with the Facebook program, which he has called, quote, the single most powerful tool for population control ever created.
	Among the biggest successes of the Facebook program is Operation Farmville, which the CIA credits with pacifying as many as 85 million people after unemployment rates rose dramatically.
	Other features, such as the suggested friends window, have been instrumental in allowing government agents to infiltrate deeper into the friend networks of suspected dissidents.
	For some expert analysis now on the story, let's check in with the Fact Zone's first responders.
	Jason, you have written extensively about the Facebook program.
	Why is it so effective?
	Well, one of the key reasons is that the CIA has been so thorough in convincing the nation that constantly sharing information about everything that you're doing is somehow desirable instead of deeply unsettling.
	Yeah.
	You know, the critics are saying that with the national debt being so high, is this really the time to be spending even more money on spy programs?
	Well, actually, the Facebook program saves the CIA money.
	That's right.
	Like the Maps application, where you list every place that you've been, whether it's the state or a country.
	Oh, right.
	With the little pins, they show where you visited.
	Yeah, I like that.
	That kind of information would have taken the CIA months of going through hotel receipts and plane tickets to figure it all out.
	The manpower that Facebook saves is huge.
	Absolutely.
	Absolutely, absolutely.
	And the calendar feature even lets the CIA know where you're going to be in advance.
	Right, so now if they want to pick you up for questioning, all they have to do is see which events you RSVP'd yes to and then send their agents to be waiting for you.
	That's how they got my brother.
	So effective.
	But guys, with all the focus on the Facebook program, is it taking away from some of the other CIA programs like the Twitter initiative?
	The funding for that should be cut entirely.
	Right, 400 billion tweets and not one useful bit of data was ever transmitted.
	Now is this trend of social network information gathering dangerous?
	I mean just last week the New York Times revealed that Al-Qaeda has designed Foursquare to identify popular locations for bombings.
	Actually, Brooke, that's been discredited as any kind of real threat.
	The people that use that site are people that no one would mind seeing bombed anyway.
	Really, the only thing the CIA has to be concerned about is people losing interest in Facebook and moving on to a new social network site, like the Chinese site Wanbi.
	I love Wanbi!
	Are you guys on Wanbi?
	Oh my God, it's so much more fun than Facebook.
	It is great.
	I love that one.
	I love that you can earn friend points the more state secrets that you post.
	You know, I've got a lot of contacts in the State Department.
	You know, I think I could really rack them up.
	I'll post them up.
	I should.
	All right, first responders, thank you so much as always.
	You know, I'm, of course, a big fan of any social networking site.
	It allows me to interact with my fans without having to see, hear, or smell them.
	I love parody.
	Well, Gary, I was going to say, you know, I mean, that's marvelous satire, but so far as I know, everything that was being said there is true.
	Facebook began as a CIA project.
	It was called LifeLog.
	And it was when they finally revealed it and made Mark Zuckerberg their face guy that they changed the name.
	So, I mean, what they're saying is actually 100% true.
	In fact, I was listening for anything I could detect that was actually false.
	And honestly, Gary, I didn't find anything there that was obviously false, so far as I can tell.
	Everything they were reporting is actually true.
	It saves the CIFS some money.
	Americans, you know, are friendly, outgoing people.
	They tend to trust their government.
	It's only now, under anguishing circumstances, that we're losing that confidence and recognizing that At least regard to the President's administration.
	They're not upholding the Constitution.
	They're sabotaging the Constitution, and they're not protecting us.
	They're defeating us, driving us into the ground.
	They're flooding the country with illegals.
	They made us Yeah, we're cooked.
	independent.
	They're creating massive inflation.
	Basically, they're going about destroying the American way of life.
	And we don't catch on to this in time.
	We are done for.
	Yeah, we're good.
	Okay, on to the next thing.
	Something about Russian reporters, Dr. Fischer.
	Talk.
	That's the message from Seymour Hersh, the journalist behind a bombshell Nord Stream blast investigation, which ended up concluding that the U.S.
	was behind the explosions in September.
	Discussing his findings during a radio broadcast, he said he wouldn't reveal his sources despite media pressure.
	I think what the newspapers, particularly the German newspapers, are very nasty to me.
	And the New York Times and the Washington Post just ignore me.
	I think what they think I should do is use his name and get him put in jail.
	It's amazing to me how they fall in line, my colleagues.
	They didn't do it when I was in the New York Times.
	They didn't do that.
	The one thing the government's good at is tracking down people who talk.
	For more on this, I'm joined by Marina Kosorova in the studio.
	You can give me all of the details.
	What do we know more about this from his podcast?
	Well, Seymour Hersh reiterated once again that this was all about the United States trying to hold on to their power in Europe.
	And what they wanted to do was to make sure that Russia and Germany don't become even closer.
	Because we've seen, for example, with Nord Stream 2, the supplies from Russia to Germany of cheap gas, that amount was supposed to double.
	So the ties, if you will, would become even closer.
	And Germany's would be unable, the way the US saw it, would be unable to stand up to Russia if it wanted to follow America's lead, for example.
	So they wanted to eliminate that dependency due to the gas supplies.
	So the option was to get rid of them.
	And again, Seymour Hersh reminded us once again that Joe Biden and Victoria Nuland were talking about these plans quite openly.
	And from his article from that source that he quotes, with direct knowledge to the operational planning, He did say that those involved in the planning were shocked at how open and frank top U.S.
	officials were about getting rid of those pipelines.
	And again, as you mentioned, the source.
	That's the key element.
	Everyone wants to know who Seymour Hersh's source is.
	And he says that the reason why he doesn't reveal it is because, of course, he would be endangering them.
	Let's take a listen.
	It's not even a hard story to understand.
	The president of the United States and the undersecretary of state both said they were going to do it.
	And he did it!
	There's something called the pipeline industry.
	It's an industry that makes American companies involved.
	They build pipelines around the world.
	Are you listening to me?
	Yes, yes, yes.
	They know what happened.
	So it seems he's not revealing the source, but it seems to be someone from the pipeline industry.
	That's the cue that he's given us this time.
	Marina, if we take a step back, the story behind Hersh's report has not really been widely covered by mainstream media.
	Why do you think that is?
	I'll let you answer that.
	Why do you think that is?
	Well, I like Marina, and I love RT.
	It's one of the most reliable sources for news in the world today, far exceeding the mainstream in this country by a country mile.
	I mean, it's ridiculous how much propaganda we get from NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, and the like, not to mention the New York Times or the Washington Post.
	And yes, absolutely, 100%.
	It was to destroy Burgeoning relations between Russia and Germany that were going to turn the European Union into an industrial powerhouse by virtue of the vast natural resources provided by Russia, but it was also going to demonstrate that NATO was antiquated and obsolete, that there was no necessity to continue to buy expensive military equipment from the United States.
	The U.S.
	was going to be left on the outside looking in, And he's correct.
	Biden, Victoria Nuland, Secretary of State Blinken, they all declared that the Nord Stream would not go forward if Russia were to intrude into Ukraine, and they saw that it would come to pass.
	Now, an interesting and unsubtle aspect of all this, Gary, is we're told, and we're hearing all this business about global warming and Carbon dioxide and all that.
	Now, it's a myth.
	It's complete and utter nonsense.
	But just to demonstrate here that it's not a sincere belief by any of the parties involved, this pipeline thing was the greatest—if you assume the global warming theory were true—this Nord Stream pipeline was the greatest environmental disaster in world history.
	I've not heard a single peep about it.
	No one has talked about this vast release of gas into the atmosphere, methane and all that, which ought to have been a cause for, you know, Talking about calamities, blah, blah, blah, blah.
	But of course, the U.S.
	did it.
	The U.S.
	is part of the whole propaganda campaign.
	The U.S.
	said is to say the elites who are running the shop are all in on all this garbage.
	So they don't say a word.
	It's very revealing, therefore, by the silence over that aspect of the case, which is deafening.
	Boy, that girl had a good command of the English language, even though you could tell she was Russian.
	The Fed cannot raise interest rates high enough to bring down inflation because inflation is mostly supply side.
	They can't do anything about that.
	So they're trying to take inflation down by raising interest rates.
	In other words, crushing demand alone.
	Right.
	But when they raise it up a certain level between five and six, I've been predicting you're going to start getting financial instability.
	And we see that already now with the Silicon Valley Bank, because the tech sector is the most exposed right now.
	And You know, there's like 250 companies that have their money in Silicon Valley banks, a lot of them startups.
	And if that bank goes belly up and they lose that money, well, a whole bunch of startups are going to crash, right?
	That's where the government, I think, is going to really jump in and bail it out.
	There's already signs they're doing it.
	But we don't know the contagion Between Silicon Valley Bank and other tech financial funders and other commercial banks that fund these tech banks.
	You know, the tentacles of contagion are very widespread and we don't really know it because they're these tentacles.
	These tentacles are always very opaque.
	You know, we saw that back with the housing sector crash and we're going to find out over the weekend.
	Or start to find out what are the contagion potential here for the collapse of this bank, a very important bank.
	And it'd be interesting to see what happens on Monday, both in the financial markets, stock and bond markets, and also all next week, because we're beginning to see it will leak out.
	Step by step, I think, on what the contagion is.
	And it may shut down the funding of startups in the tech industry for a while.
	So, you know, it's all traceable to the Fed interest rate policy and Biden's policy of attacking tech, Chinese technology, and trying to get businesses to come back to the U.S., which is part of the geopolitical.
	The problem with Biden is that it's all geopolitics, and what happens to the economy be damned, really, as the U.S.
	tries to ring-fence Russia and China and the other countries who may align with them.
	The U.S.
	is bifurcating slowly the global economy, the global capitalist economy, but it's all because of geopolitical objectives, I believe.
	And it's it's going to be a big price to pay.
	I think eventually by a couple years from now, I think it's too early much too early to say that and unlike in 2008 boy, the government is jumping on this thing ensuring bailouts and so forth already within 24 hours, you know, they learned their lesson of not dragging their feet back then.
	I think one of the consequences if there is contagion is the feds going to stop raising rates.
	Because they're going to take care of the financial sector first.
	And that means inflation is going to stay high 3 4 5 percent.
	It's not going to come down.
	So they're between a rock and a hard place.
	You know, do they try to keep bringing inflation down by raising rates or by raising rates?
	Do they cause a fruit of financial stress?
	The Fed doesn't work very well.
	The policy doesn't work very well anymore in the 21st century where you got a globalized financialized world economy.
	Here you go, Dr. Fetzer.
	Several points to make here.
	This guy is obviously sincere and qualified in doing his best to give an honest account, unlike, say, our Secretary of the Treasury, Janet Yellen, who is a massive liar on every count.
	Now, the Silicon Valley thing, has a potential for a domino effect that could bring down banking across the United States.
	That raises the specter of the solution being worse than the problem by the government proposing a central federal bank and moving to digital currency.
	Frankly, Once we go to digital currency, we're all slaves.
	Our lives are effectively over as far as exercising our own freedom, our own judgment, acting on our own preferences, because we'll be boxed in.
	If we want to gas our car but they want us driving electric, our credit card won't work when we go to the pump.
	Electric vehicles are a catastrophe.
	They involve ripping up the earth to get all the elements.
	Airheads like AOC or Kamala Harris have no comprehension whatsoever what's involved in any of these issues.
	And so when you have these blithering idiots out there in public extolling the virtues of electric vehicles, for example, you gotta understand, you're being led by the dumbest of the dumb.
	What else is at stake here now with the Silicon Valley bankers?
	I'm getting a report today!
	Within an hour of coming on with you here today, Gary, there's a lot of cartel drug money involved here.
	This Silicon Valley bank was a very corrupt enterprise, and there are vast ramifications that are going to be exposed now because of it.
	And I can only say it's just symptomatic.
	Any way you look at it, it's symptomatic of the degree of corruption and incompetence By the administration, because they're incompetent to solve any problem facing the country.
	In fact, it's very clear.
	They're not trying to remedy.
	They're only trying to make matters worse.
	And at that, they are very, very good and are succeeding beyond their wildest imagination.
	Yeah.
	All right.
	Here we go, Dr. Peser.
	All right.
	So now when you go to economics, you got to admit that's kind of boring stuff.
	So we're going to try to pick it up a little bit.
	-Nothing more boring than economics class.
	Ten minutes.
	Get back.
	It's now that time.
	This is hopefully the first of many award ceremonies where we will acknowledge those people in our country that have made an impact.
	Those people that have forged ahead towards the future.
	And left an impression on us all.
	The dreamers.
	The achievers.
	The ones who made us stand up and say, that was totes bussin' yo.
	It's the first ever Babylon Bee Awards.
	Now our first award of the night goes for Best Dramatic Actor.
	The award goes to Dr. Anthony Fauci.
	For his performance in "Pandemic." Great job, doctor.
	Well-deserved.
	Shame about those puppies.
	Our second award of the night goes to Best President of the Year, and this one should be obvious since there's only one person who's, you know, technically, you know, president right now.
	But the award goes to Donald J. Trump.
	Excellent performance as the one true president this year.
	Of course, many of you guys know the Balambi for our Christian references.
	This is for the best Christian actor who got his start in Growing Pains and whose first name rhymes with Dirk.
	It's a fiercely competitive category.
	But this year, The award goes to... Kirk Cameron!
	What?!
	Now, is Kirk Cameron actually here tonight?
	Because you could give a speech right now.
	Alright, he did not come.
	He didn't grace us.
	I'm sorry.
	Okay.
	Alright, so this next one should be a shoe-in.
	It's the award for the best satire site in the world.
	Kyle, you should probably get ready for this one.
	I'm just saying.
	Alright.
	The award for the best satire site goes to... MJ?
	-Jay? -CNN.
	Great job, guys.
	Great job.
	Hey!
	Get my name out of your mouth!
	Hey!
	Kyle!
	Kyle!
	It's just a joke, man!
	It's just a... David!
	David!
	He looked at me, he looked at me.
	What?
	Wah!
	So sorry for that outburst.
	Moving on to the next award.
	Speaking of moving, this award is for the U-Haul Salesman of the Year.
	And the award goes to, and you should not be surprised, goes to the King of Greece himself, Gavin himself!
	Thank you.
	Now Newsom would be nothing without the little people.
	The ones who supported him.
	The ones that helped him shut down his state.
	And of course all the people who are living in red states where the Californians moved to.
	So this next award is for best state for Californians to move to so long as they leave their politics behind.
	Nominees.
	There's nominees.
	The nominees include Florida, Texas, Montana, Idaho, and North Korea.
	With the award goes to... Texas! Texas! Texas! Texas! Texas! Texas! Texas! Texas! Texas!
	We actually had to pick Texas because we knew some of you were carrying guns.
	We didn't want to risk it.
	Speaking of Texas, this next one is a really big one.
	The award for best person who's either going to save free speech and all of humanity or destroy us all with mind-controlled monkeys goes to... I'll let's see.
	It is Elon Musk.
	Elon Ma!
	Elon Ma!
	I did not see that coming.
	I had my money on Tony Stark, actually.
	We'd be remiss If we did not reward those who innovate, those who invest in our future with bold new inventions that catapult us into the world of tomorrow.
	Thus the Babylon Bees Award for best new virus goes to Pfizer for COVID-23.
	We're very excited about COVID-23.
	It just dropped, along with Pfizer's vaccine for COVID-23.
	I, myself, am very proudly vaccinated with a lot of boosters.
	This last award is the most anticipated award of the year.
	And I am proud.
	I already know who won this one.
	I am proud to announce to you for the second year in a row, the defending champion, the Babylon Bees Man of the Year, Rachel Levine!
	If you are not nominated, then just try being better next year for Pete's sake.
	All right.
	Bye.
	Well, I'm a big fan of the Babylon Bee, and God knows the awards for Anthony Fauci and for Pfizer were well-deserved.
	Gavin Grusome Newsome is just despicable.
	He certainly would be the U-Haul Salesman of the Year, getting everyone out of California, Texas, Florida, very deserving destinations.
	Rachel Levine, Man of the Year, of course.
	What could be a more obvious choice?
	The insanity of a Biden administration and all this gender mixing as though you can pick and choose your sex in promotion of gender surgery, hormone therapy, and all that is as despicable as it gets, and it's destroying a lot of lives of young people.
	Who may be going through a period of transition.
	I mean, virtually every young person passing through puberty isn't quite sure what's going on with their own bodies, but that's an idiotic basis for having sex-rendering surgery, mammectomies, penile removal, and the like.
	Gary, it is as disgusting as it gets.
	And I think ultimately we can track it back to Barack and Michelle Obama, where to this day, maybe most Americans don't realize that Michelle was born Michael LaVaughn Robinson and is not a man who underwent a sex change, but a man with breast implants and a huge shaving bill who wants to be president of the United States, or at least run as vice with gruesome newsome, which I anticipate is going to be
	Among the worst tickets after Biden and Harris, needless to add, which are going to go down in history as the most incompetent and despicable administration in American history, bar none.
	All right, Dr. Fetzer, on to the next thing.
	Yeah, that was fun.
	You're working to build an interface to the brain.
	Yeah.
	Electrode to neuron interface at a micro-level.
	Okay, what is that?
	Like, I'm gonna have, like, a plug in my head that's gonna fit into a hard drive?
	Like, how does that work?
	Yeah, yeah.
	A chip and a bunch of tiny wires.
	This would be implanted surgically.
	And it would do what?
	Could you input?
	Could you download Jim?
	Mm-hmm.
	Yes.
	You all will have implants and we measure your brainwaves and I can immediately tell you how the people react to your answers.
	You all have to do it.
	It's a sensor.
	This tiny green thing in there?
	That tiny green thing in there.
	You put it underneath your skin and what that tells you is that there are chemical reactions going on inside the body and that signal means you're going to have symptoms tomorrow.
	Wow.
	There's an actual transmitter in that?
	Yeah, it's like a check engine light.
	When you enhance the brain, when you make the human body full of sensors, these sensors are capable of collecting data.
	Data, right?
	It's what we're mining, it's what we're creating, it's what we're finding new insights around.
	That's the goldmine that's being used by data scientists and AI.
	Big Tech collects your contact information, your location, ads that you click on, websites you visit, and your search queries.
	But what do they do with that information?
	You are the product.
	You are the people that Facebook wants to show ads to.
	Their customers are the ad companies, the companies that want to put really relevant ads in front of your eyes so that you're more likely to click on them.
	To do this, it primes the pump by feeding you new articles tailored to reinforce your body image issues.
	Then, when it observes a decrease in your self-confidence, it pushes targeted advertising at you to grab you while you're at a low end.
	The social networking site gets its advertising revenue, its client sells lots of diet products, and you end up feeling bad about yourself.
	Think about this.
	If I know what makes you tick as an individual, and I'm then able to generate patterns of how you as an individual relate to, are similar to, or different from other individuals, I may be able to then generate information that allows me to interact with you on ways that are more meaningful to our level of interaction.
	In other words, the more I know about what makes you tick, the more my interactions can be geared with you to make you tick the way I want you to.
	The way I want you to.
	It's a project first dreamed up by the military to get information from the battlefield.
	They call it SmartDust, and the new technology may soon make it possible to keep track of anything, anywhere, including you.
	SmartDust originated with DARPA back in the 90s.
	This powder-sized chip is something called the MU chip from Hitachi.
	It's the smallest commercially available RFID system in the world.
	You can literally scatter this stuff like dust, or embed it into a sheet of paper.
	It doesn't require a battery.
	Flecks of computing power settling on your skin, ingested, monitoring you inside and out.
	The nanoparticles are designed to go under the radar of the immune system and so they are undetected in the body.
	We have computing everywhere, we have connectivity everywhere, we have infrastructure that can compute those with new capabilities like AI.
	If you have enough data, and you have enough computing power, you can understand people better than they understand themselves, and then you can manipulate them in ways which were previously impossible.
	Transhumanism is a growing movement that aims to use technology to modify our bodies, sometimes in radical ways to make them stronger, faster, and better.
	Ooh, not some easy clips there.
	Well, there's a lot going on there, Gary.
	I mean, Klaus Schwab, after all, is not a neuroscientist.
	He's a megalomaniac.
	His objective is to control what remains of the human population after they've wiped out 95%.
	They want to reduce, well, the population from roughly 8 billion to a half a billion, 500 million.
	And the key part is control, management.
	Look, think about it.
	They're talking about creating an artificial device that is more and more like a human being.
	Well, nothing is more like a human being than a human being, and yet they want to get rid of them.
	Most of the world's population of human beings to have these artificial facsimiles remaining, and then roughly a handful around to what take care of them, frankly, it's because this is a grotesquely anti-human agenda, because they do not want human beings to be able to exercise their free will of acting in accordance with their own preferences, their own desires,
	And their own wants, not to mention their own ethics.
	They want to be controllers.
	They're just trying to create an army that can be serfs and slaves in the field to attend them, their masters.
	Do you think Klaus Schwab is going to allow electrodes to be put in his brain?
	Obviously not.
	This is unbelievable, but it's their vision.
	This is what we get from the Bill Gates.
	And the Henry Kissingers and the Klaus Schwabs and the Jacob Rothschilds, their vision of a future that is a form of despotism for such remnants of humanity as remain after they finish their genocidal operation, which is well advanced already here and now on planet Earth.
	Now I tend to believe that anyone can be part of the truth movement and this woman here is actually explaining it in her own way about Sandy Hook and I think it's very interesting.
	Okay so real quick I had a little bit of a revelation the other night.
	You know when it comes to all these um People saying that you can't say anything about Sandy Hook or, you know, how dare you, you know, uh, try to ask somebody for proof.
	Um, you know, with all the weird shit that, um, surrounded the whole Sandy Hook thing, I think it's pretty ridiculous to tell somebody that they're not allowed to ask questions, okay?
	Actually, I think it's pretty reasonable to ask questions.
	And, here's where my revelation came in.
	So, about thirteen and a half years ago, my husband passed away.
	Now, when I had to deal with Social Security.
	Um, even when I had to deal with the courts, because believe it or not, he actually had to do work project that, you know, he didn't get a chance to finish or even start.
	But, um, when they were calling me up and jamming me up about, you know, um, how come he's not started his work project yet?
	Or, um, when I was trying to sign up for survivor's benefits, Guess what I had to do?
	I had to prove it.
	I had to provide a death certificate.
	Now, did I say, how dare you not believe me and take my word for it?
	I'm a widow.
	My husband just died.
	I'm grief stricken.
	How dare you?
	I shouldn't have to prove it.
	No, I didn't.
	And anybody would be a moron to expect somebody to have a reaction like that.
	Okay?
	They don't know me.
	It's like we don't know them.
	So yeah, I don't think it is too out of line to ask for proof.
	Show me a death certificate.
	But I think it was pretty convenient or inconvenient, however you want to look at it.
	How about this?
	Pretty suspicious that when it came to the AJ trial, there was no trial.
	So normally in a defamation case, You know, you have to prove that somebody's lying.
	Well, they didn't have to prove shit because they didn't have to do a trial.
	They just went straight to the penalty phase.
	How are more people not finding this suspicious?
	Now, whether you think AJ is a shill, or if you think he's controlled opposition, if you think it's a psyop, or if you think he's the real deal, I'm not trying to argue that.
	All I'm saying is, something is rotten in the state of Denmark, okay?
	Something does not smell right.
	More people should be suspicious.
	And um, so yeah, that's my thoughts on Sandy Hook.
	I know Sandy Hook is old news, but just in case anyone was curious about where I stood on the whole subject.
	There you have it.
	Now, do I think all mass shootings are fake and that there's no deaths in any of them?
	I'm not saying that at all.
	I'm just saying it's good to be skeptical of everything you hear.
	All right, the Pretty Kitty from 153 News.
	Well, all the mass shootings that I've investigated, bringing together groups of experts, have turned out to be phony and fraudulent.
	I've published books about most of them, including, of course, not only Sandy Hook.
	I threw in the Boston bombing for good measure, Orlando and Dallas, Charlottesville, Parkland, Uh, Las Vegas, all of those were fraudulent.
	You can find my work all over the place.
	Go to jameshfetzer.org, for example, and check out jimtheconspiracyguy.com.
	There's 65 shows, and you'll find lots of choices.
	If you just check out how to spot a falsified part one and how to spot a falsified part two, you'll find a mass of evidence broken into small chunks.
	For about 10 of these events, and you'll understand how much they are fraudulent.
	Now, her point about the Alex Jones trials is impeccable.
	She said they just went directly to the penalty phase.
	She's absolutely correct.
	Why?
	Because they never reached a question of the merits.
	There was never any determination whether when Alex Jones opined that it had been a fraud.
	And by the way, it was a matter he took back subsequently and acknowledged that he'd been wrong, which illustrates that a man's later opinions can be less well-founded than their earlier, because when he claimed it was fake, he had it right, and when he claimed it was real, he had it wrong.
	But the fact is these trials did not involve a stage of presenting evidence to a jury to reach a determination on the facts.
	They were all decided on procedural grounds.
	They were decided on the basis of stipulation or presupposition.
	Actually, Alex Jones on the basis of a default.
	He was alleged not to have provided sufficient discovery.
	No one, no one.
	Robert Barnes, for example, who's a very sophisticated guy, was following the first trial very closely.
	He said he was kind of dumbfounded that he was in the courtroom.
	It was unlike any courtroom he'd ever been in before, that there were three different cameras in the courtroom, one directly focused on the jury, that it looked to him like a made-for-TV movie, And no one, even a reporter for the New York Times, knew what it was that Alex Jones purportedly had not provided by way of discovery, where they had thousands of pages and every video where he'd ever commented on it in public.
	So she's really right.
	I mean, this is a woman who's not overly cerebral, but she's thought it through.
	Sufficiently to recognize that something's inside out, something's upside down, something doesn't add up.
	And may I say, my own case was one where a jury was never allowed to review the evidence that I had to present, where I was being sued for declaring that a death certificate, which was incomplete, it had no file number, Talent certification, no state certification.
	Or by Connecticut law, not even parents are allowed to have an incomplete test certificate.
	I was supposed to be held in fault for describing that as fake.
	Now, I'm not allowed to reiterate that.
	I'm under a court order that I can't reaffirm.
	I'm just explaining I was sued over this.
	And they used in the complaint a complete death certificate that had a file number, town and state certification, and said there was no material differences between the two, which is absurd on its face.
	I went forward because I thought I had an opportunity here to present the massive evidence that I gathered with 12 other experts, six of us PhDs, that the school had been closed by 2008, that there were no students there, and that it was a FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control, and I'll tell you, today I know, many of those who participated in the drill have read the book.
	They like the book, because it's accurate.
	And a lot of them, you know, feel trapped having to live the rest of their lives as a lie, and they don't like it.
	And I'll just tell you, I'm hopeful that there's going to be a breakthrough here, where the American people are going to come to understand the extent to which they've been so massively played, not just by Sandy Hook, but by a whole string of these artificial events which are contrived by the government when they want to have a newsworthy event.
	And because the media is in on it, they give the massive publicity to promote a political agenda that the public is going to have a hard time buying otherwise, such as Giving up our guns.
	Remember, the Founding Fathers had good reasons for the Second Amendment.
	They wanted every American to be a citizen soldier who could come to the aid of the nation in times of a foreign invasion or to overthrow a tyrannical government.
	Well, We're undergoing a foreign invasion by the massive influx from the border, and it's a major threat to national security, but the Biden administration wants it to happen, and therefore they're not raising any concerns.
	But I think they also want to take guns away because they're fearful that if you read the Declaration of Independence, if you understand what the Founding Fathers had in mind, when they are so massively
	Subverting the Constitution and imposing a form of tyranny on the American people that we are entitled, in accordance with nature's law and human rights, to rise up in opposition and to overthrow a tyrannical government and replace it with one that is
	More to our liking, more in accordance with the principles with respect to which all men should live in relation to other men, which involve mutual respect for one another and adherence to something approximating equal justice under law.
	Gary, we're in a terrible situation.
	I found it interesting that she had reasoned through To a well-founded conclusion, and notice this too.
	Her husband died 13 years ago.
	This is 2023.
	13 years ago would be 2010.
	Sandy Hook occurred in 2012.
	So she already knew the processes involved in dealing with a death in a family.
	And it's absolutely true.
	The reason why this one death certificate was a subject of commentary in the book is because we couldn't get a hold of the death certificates.
	And in fact, the clerk of Newtown went out of her way—she entered into a secret negotiation with the state legislature to avoid having to issue death certificates because she knew issuing a false death certificate is a violation of the law.
	And I'll just tell you, there's a whole lot more to this story, and I'm only hoping that It will come out in a spectacular way and that everyone is going to understand the extent to which we have been playing.
	Yeah, you have to admit she has pretty eyes telling the story, no doubt about that.
	I think this is going to wrap it up for us.
	We've got a couple of screenshots, and I think we'll be out for the number 27.
	I mean, to this day, the United States has something called the Strategic Oil Reserve Agreement with Israel.
	Under which it will guarantee to supply Israel with oil in the event of a crisis, even to the extent of denying oil to its own people.
	The United States has been humiliated, abused, disgraced, internationally and domestically, as it moves to support Israel in whatever it does.
	And it is impossible to think that this is being done willingly.
	That the United States is the same country that existed in the 1960s and 70s.
	The only possible thing that we can conclude is that the United States has been under Israeli occupation.
	To all intents and purposes, the United States, slowly and quite clearly, allowed itself to be occupied and humiliated by a lobby that had, at its primary interest, the interests of another government.
	Because a lot of people will argue that, well, the United States is the strongest country in the world.
	Nobody can push the United States around.
	Well, if you look at the people who run the United States, the military-industrial complex is a very good example.
	The interplay between them and the Israel lobby is very, very close.
	And it makes no sense for the United States to murder Arabs en masse.
	It makes no sense for the United States to repudiate its own principles and declare war on its own citizens.
	The only way we can make sense of this is that the people in Washington are serving another government, that we have essentially a treasonous government.
	We have to look at the sort of Gangsterism that we most commonly associate with the Mafia or some other sort of organized crime.
	There is no other way to explain the United States from a rational point of view.
	It cannot be done.
	There is no rational explanation for the United States behavior.
	We must assume an irrational frame of reference.
	We must assume that the United States we see, and the United States that really exists, are quite two separate things.
	And if we do that, and we look at the events of September the 11th and how that happened, and the people who were responsible for it, we end up with conclusions that the United States has been dominated by interest groups that put the interests of America behind that of Israel.
	I can't disagree with you.
	That's a wonderful clip.
	Greg Felton's a brilliant guy with great courage and integrity.
	He was a speaker at my Vancouver hearings held in June of 2010.
	Yeah, I'm a huge fan of Great Felton.
	And of course, he got it exactly right.
	Congress is Israeli-occupied territory.
	It was Cynthia McKinney who revealed the pledge that every new member is asked to make with the interests of Israel ahead of even that of the United States.
	And if they decline to sign the pledge, then their finances just dry up, or they find next time around their district's been redrawn.
	Cynthia was able to survive and serve six or eight terms in the House, but even as notable a figure as Dennis Kucinich, whom I regarded at the time as the most
	Intelligent member of Congress, had his district redrawn, and none other than my dear friend you, Gary King, asked me not so long ago, did I know how many members of the then-current Congress had refused to sign the pledge, and when I acknowledged I did not, you held up one finger of one hand, because I'm one member of the Congress!
	Who had refused to sign a pledge.
	And when you put that political domination of the Congress together with a media where the Rothschild banking empire owns both Reuters and the Associated Press, and where 95% of the news printed in American newspapers comes from Reuters or the Associated Press, and we're having
	A panel of 100 executives from CNN, every one of whom is a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen, another panel of 100 executives from NBC, every one of whom is a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen, another panel of 100 executives from The New York Times, every one of whom is a dual U.S.
	Israeli citizen, you begin to appreciate that America is Israeli-occupied territory.
	I mean, the average American has no idea this is the case, but the Congress is completely dominated, and they act to use America as a resource to benefit them, and yes, yes, yes, 9-11 was an Israeli op to draw the United States into the Middle East, to use American forces to take out the modern Arab states that served as a counterbalance to Israel's domination of the entire region.
	So if you want more confirmation, another of my collaborative books is American Newton 9-11 Complements of the CIA, the neocons, the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
	Where Bibi Netanyahu and Ehud Umert were the brain trust behind it all, with complicity from many American Zionists right here in the USA.
	It's quite a story, Gary.
	Quite a story, and Americans are only gradually beginning to dimly appreciate what happened to us on that tragic and fateful day.
	All right, we're going to go ahead and close out the show.
	This is two screenshots from a commenter, a very powerful one, and pretty much everything you're just talking about.
	All of these Treasury Secretary, Secretary of State, Chief of Staff, Attorney General, on and on and on.
	This is the most updated thing that we have, and if you look to the right, we've got vaccine approval, the people involved there, Um, it seems to be it's the same thing, um, and and I don't think it's going to change anytime soon, Dr. Fetzer.
	Okay, that's very powerful and I, I, you know, I, I, I so appreciate you up.
	Yeah, I saw appreciate what you're doing here and with this program, which, which, uh.
	I think it's making a difference, frankly.
	I really like it, Gary, and I can't thank you enough for persevering.
	Yeah, I really use a lot of, at this point, it's almost entertainment.
	And it amazes me how easy it is to find clips that, almost all of these clips, they're basically stepping on their own toes and admitting it.
	You know, if you're just aware enough, you can see them.
	Everything that they're doing there and to tell you the truth.
	I've been doing so many horse racing shows that I forgot it was Saturday.
	So we and then I was so busy.
	I put this show together in about.
	No, let's say 30-40 minutes to find all these clips, put them up and ready to go.
	I did it in 30 minutes.
	They're just so available out there.
	You're doing a great job, Gary.
	Keep it up.
	You got it.
	All right.
	Inconvenient Truth number 27.
	We'll see you next time.
	Appreciate it, Dr. Fetzer.
	See you then.

▲