All Episodes
Previous Next
March 18, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:06:45
Need to Know News (17 March 2023) with Chris Weinert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
As said, Jim Fetzer, Mass.
in Wisconsin, joined together today by Chris Weinert in Fort Myers, Florida.
Carl Herman's in the process of moving.
We're very glad to have Chris here to discuss the latest developments, including China announcing naval drills with Russia and Iran.
The U.S.
has finally done it, brought together what is going to be the most powerful Collaboration of nations in the world for the enduring future, I would say, for the next 100 years.
Russia, China, and Iran are holding five-day maritime exercises.
Security bond 2023 war games in the Gulf of Oman run from March 17th to 19th, today being the 17th.
The exercise will help deepen practical cooperation between the navies of the participating countries, further demonstrating the willingness and ability to jointly maintain maritime security, said the Chinese ministry.
its guided missile destroyer nanny will take place.
In late 2019, similar three nation exercises that took place in the Indian Ocean and the Arabian Sea, the goal then being to deal with counterterrorism and privacy in 2020.
In 2022, the security bond maneuvers encompassed the northern part of the Indian Ocean, involved the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Earlier, Russian Defense Minister Sergei Sojou said cooperation between Moscow and Beijing had reached a whole new level.
Partnership serving as one of the main deterrents to the aggressive activities of the United States and its henchmen in the Asia-Pacific region.
Yes, this has been the result of calamitous decision by the U.S.
and NATO to bring China and Russia into alignments against us.
In late February, China conducted another drill with Russia and South Africa.
While Pretoria called it a means of increasing coordination, Western media branded the move controversial because of the Ukrainian conflict, which is, of course, silly, meaning Meanwhile, China declares that the U.S., Britain, and Australia are going down a dangerous path with IOTCA's military pact after the three nations unveiled a nuclear-powered submarine plan.
The latest joint statement issued by the US, the UK, and Australia shows that they, for their own geopolitical interests, have totally disregarded concerns of the international community and gone further down a wrong and dangerous path, said the Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin.
He suggested the deal could violate the Non-Proliferation Treaty, but there's a mated loophole there with regard to submarines.
U.S.
nuclear-powered subs use highly enriched weapons-grade uranium, but under the Non-Proliferation Treaty loophole, naval reactors are not subject to inspection by the International Atomic Energy Agency.
It's the first time the loophole will have been used to transfer visible material nuclear technology to a non-nuclear weapon state.
While not technically a violation, Aukners does test some articles of the treaty that non-nuclear weapons should use nuclear energy for peaceful purposes.
Nuclear sub-cooperation between the U.S., Ukraine, and Australia involves the transfer of a large amount of weapon-grade, highly enriched uranium from nuclear weapon state to non-nuclear weapon state, which poses a serious proliferation risk.
Australian officials expect to spend up to $245 billion on the subs.
The Navy envisioned Australia becoming a full-service sub-hub for underwater craft activity in the Asia-Pacific, cementing Canberra's role as a U.S.
ally in a potential future conflict with China.
Although under plans, they won't be completed for decades.
Chris, your thoughts?
Oh yeah.
I think that really, I've seen this a lot, and this is kind of maybe a little more of an in-depth explanation of what I might be meaning by this, is they are definitely creating the theatrics necessary to justify furthering onto conflict, and certainly I think there's a lot more going on than just the narrative that is given to the citizens.
A lot of black market operations, a lot of economic struggles, let's say, between the BRICS and the IMF World Bank system are going on in trade deals, energy deals, things like this.
And I think it's essential to have the propaganda for the military and the law enforcement agents because they need to think it's real and follow the script, the Kabuki theater.
You know, basically because I think that the people that run the world use them in such a manner of limited basis and as pawns.
And this serves as like a loyalty test for some of these people in terms of following orders, chains of command, things like this.
So I think that there's a lot of levels, 5D chess, as you might call it, something else.
I don't know, you know, sinister or whatever.
But there's a group that has departmentalized the world's labor force and its resource extraction and is certainly escalating these different forces into conflict.
Okay.
I'll try to continue where I left off before.
We were so rudely interrupted by technical difficulties as usual.
I was talking about the Kabuki theater that is created to pull different layers of the intel services into this type of struggle and warfare type of pretense and basically talking about how the world has been departmentalized not only through trade but through each nation and its military industrial complex and its medical industrial complexes and things like this.
All by the same group of bankers and the same group of organizers.
And, you know, they did the same thing in the Cold War where, you know, Avril Harriman or Armie Hammer or Rockefeller could fly into Moscow or Beijing.
At any time, you know, completely red carpet rollout and go talk to any one of these despots at any time, whether it was Chiang or Mao or Stalin or Khrushchev, on and on.
I heard that even Rockefeller is one of the guys that fired Khrushchev back in the 60s.
So, you know, it's pretty crazy stuff to hear, you know, after the Cold War, these guys celebrating this type of thing.
And then now that they're starting a second Cold War, going back to the pretenses of national security and China and Russia are the threats and certainly not talking about the elephant in the room or the elephant at the trough.
And more importantly, trying to get the common man invested into these theatrics.
And I think they're going to pay with the poor man's blood as usual.
And that's how these these people are going to get involved with this conflict and what's picking a side in this narrative.
I don't doubt you got it right, Chris.
Meanwhile, they lied about everything.
96-page D.C.
police report uncovered showing the government knew MAGA was coming on January 6th and used it to entrap them.
The Metropolitan Police released a report on the D.C.
protests, according to Attorney Joe McBride, who discovered it.
The government knew MEGA was coming, so they entrapped them.
It was all a setup.
Here's McBride tweeting, they lied about everything.
He's got a whole lot in the report about exactly what was going on here.
And he's going to share it.
It's out there on the Internet.
The number of individuals and groups.
This is an overview from the report.
A number of individuals and groups are calling for their supporters to travel to Washington, D.C.
on or before January 6 to show support for POTUS and for overturning the election results.
The protest rallies are expected to be similar to the previous Million Mega March rallies on November and December of 2020, which drew tens of thousands of participants.
It's also expected members of Proud Boys, who intend to wear plainclothes, not their traditional yellow and black clothing, white supremacist groups Antifa and other extremist groups, will rally on January 6.
Multiple arrests were made as a result of clashes between pro-Trump and opposing groups during each of the November-December rallies.
Charges included assault with a dangerous weapon, assault on police, simple assault, weapon violation, riotous acts, and destruction of property, disorderly conduct, resisting arrest, engrossing a police line.
A number of law enforcement officers were injured in the skirmishes.
Many of the confrontation occurred after the rallies ended.
Here's more from McBride.
They knew Antifa was coming.
Expected protest.
Overview.
Julie Kelly discussed this on The War Room with Steve Bannon.
She said the report had been designated highly sensitive government information, just like all the surveillance videos.
But again, it's more evidence that undercuts the idea law enforcement was unprepared and had no idea what was going to happen that day.
There are at least two anti-Trump rallies in Washington the same day, by the way, including an Antifa rally scheduled about the same time the joint session was to convene.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, man, I've been a little bit all over the world just thinking about some of these notions and what it really means in terms of human history and where we're at now at this crucial point in time.
I think that law enforcement agencies, in addition to private sector entities like the ADL, have utilized things like the FBI and the CIA and many other institutions, NGOs even as well, to entrap any citizens who seek to exercise their rights or even duties in terms of the Declaration of Independence or Constitution.
You can go down the list of every amendment and see how it's being violated, if not by law enforcement directly, the government itself, and even the private sector's use of a proxy by said government in a very incestuous revolving door relationship.
So I think also another reason why the government uses the third party private sector the way that they do is to optimize their yield on humanity and to certainly departmentalize the rake.
Let's really optimize the yield, like I'm saying.
So and to obfuscate liability, most importantly.
So I think you're seeing a lot of stuff that maybe the government was working on in the past and using educational institutions like Stanford Research or some of these other things that they used in MKUltra to really bring out a whole new level of psychological warfare against the global population as well as its own citizens in such a way that really they use social media and many of these other Nice, Barry.
with AI and such that it is truly overwhelming the amount of bullshit that they can put out and the amount of propaganda they can spew and how they can precisely target the people that might be susceptible to these exact direct pieces of propaganda. - Nice, Barry, yes.
Yes.
And what we're learning about January 6th is stunning stuff. - We've been saying it all along, Betts.
I mean, you and I have had it since day one, basically.
We were like, is this a trap?
Is this a setup?
I'm like, yeah, that's what I feel, too.
You got it, Chris.
In spite of it all, we got a judge in our request from January 6th to pen it to cross-examine an FBI agent about leaked messages.
Defendants in the ongoing Capitol Breach trial suffered a defeat Monday, as the court ordered them may not cross-examine an FBI agent for most of the defense attorney's allegations spawned from internal FBI messages inadvertently leaked in court.
John Timothy Kelly, who turns out to be a Trump-appointed judge, addressed the allegation made by attorneys for the defendants about leaked internal FBI messages revealed in court when Nick Smith, an attorney representing Ethan Nordin, cross-examined FBI Special Agent Nicole Miller Thursday of last week.
He denied all but one of the defendant's arguments about the leaked messages.
They emerged when Smith showed in court hidden rows of an Excel spreadsheet provided to him by the DOJ containing thousands of line of correspondence among FBI agents, mostly addressed to Agent Miller.
They'd been hidden because of a filter function in Excel.
The messages include a directive from FBI personnel to Miller to destroy 338 pieces of evidence, and another to edit out an FBI agent from a confidential human source informant report.
Since last Thursday, they have been the focus of the defense attorneys who claim they showed DOJ altered evidence, violated due process, and intruded on the defendant's right to counsel.
Based on the allegation, they made a range of requests to the court.
Cross-examination, of course, would involve, after the plaintiff questioned the witnesses, it's usually limited to that touched on the line of questioning by the plaintiff.
In this case, they asked to go further to make cross-examination about the destroyed 338 items of evidence and also the suppression of the name.
The DOJ, however, sought to stop all further questioning and pushed defense attorneys back to the DOJ's original line of questioning.
The judge, in fact, sided with the DOJ, allowed only one request from the defendants, which was to cross-examine regarding the editing of the name of the person out of the CHS informant report.
D.O.J.
said the editing request was sent by another who's trying to remove his name from correspondence with a confidential course with whom he was no longer in contact.
The defense said the D.O.J.
words could not be assumed to be true and required further investigation, which was very, very appropriate.
Kelly did agree with Nordean with the defendant.
The cross-examination on the message about the CHS would be appropriate.
Nordean's cross-attorney is pursuing it.
As of Monday, the judge hasn't found the witness contradicted.
Another allegation, when it's word heated exchanges, was that the DOJ had monitored attorney-client communication.
It turned out the communication they're talking about had taken place during a jail cell conversation, where it was known the conversation was being monitored, and therefore they'd waived the right to attorney-client privilege.
The government has not obtained any privileged communication between Defendant Real and Mosley, the government wrote.
Kelly, rule in favor of the government, affirm to the extent, because the messages were made in the prison communication system, therefore, they can't cross-examine.
However, he also ruled they can't cross-examine on the destroyed 338 pieces of evidence that the defense had not shown sufficient evidence to connect it to the case.
There's nothing in the record that suggests the agent was involved.
With this case, sir, the destruction was related to evidence in this case, he said.
Furthermore, because the defendants have provided substantial backing to connect it, their probating for evidential value would be marginal and largely outweighed by the risk of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, and misleading the jury.
Interesting.
Your thoughts, Chris?
Yeah, you know, I'm thinking about how many times that the FBI has been involved, in my recollection, in the past 40-some years that I've been alive that I can think of.
And just in the past few years, I'm almost taking up an entire page just off the top of my head, running down names on the list of times where the FBI has either been directly responsible for some very treasonous or espionage type of... Go ahead.
Well, I was trying to say, in my 47 years, I'm thinking of the amount of times the FBI has been involved in some nefarious activities in terms of investigations and certainly involved with cover-ups and even misdirecting investigations and accusations and certainly involved with some treasonous, if not Very questionable behaviors like entrapping citizens from exercising their constitutional rights or human rights, things like this.
think about in recent history, the stroke, the Ray, the Comey, Mueller, 9-11, WMD, JTTF, too big to jail, Fast and Furious, BLM, Antiqua, Comax, Forex, the CDS thing, the mortgage-backed securities things, the Steele, the Skripal, the Browder, the Magnitsky, the mortgage-backed securities things, the Steele, the Skripal, the Browder, the Magnitsky, all this stuff that's
Even going into the Clinton administration, you can go even further and get down a rabbit hole and see how they set up this stuff for this, in fact, generation to be completely turned out by the legislation that they positioned 20, 30 years in advance back then.
And the patriots back then were going nuts, and they had the PACON conspiracy with the ADL and the alphabet agencies to go around and trap those people, round them up, and deem them threats to national security.
I guess the people that they dispossess and they understand righteous recourse might be coming from them, they try to dehumanize them and put them on eggshells preemptively, and certainly make what's understood not be discussed in terms of them even thinking to stand up for themselves.
Yep.
Yep.
If so, to stressing that the FBI turns out to be so not incompetent, really corrupt.
No, they're efficient.
This is like the Cheka or something.
You know what I mean?
This is next level stuff.
And the way that the media is working in conjunction with these guys, you can trace it back to Walter Winchell in World War II and Pierce and all these guys.
Uh, Just coming out of that and covering that up in itself and making the next generations what they were and, you know, flooding the kids with new media and sources of information and targeting the youth in the Janissary business model.
It's amazing to see how these guys do it.
And, you know, with the benefit of time, you can kind of have more appreciation for these things as they put them on each generation and wage war on us.
Excellent.
Excellent addendum, Chris.
Just excellent.
Meanwhile, Biden lies by omission forgetting to tell us that we're bailing out China's venture capital business with a Silicon Valley rescue.
Biden left out a very important point about the bailouts.
Biden lies through admission.
He sought to reassure the nation about the banking segment of the economy as his admin announced that it was bailing out two banks, Signature Bank and Silicon Valley.
Biden looked horrible as he slurred words and mumbled through his short talk.
While he was speaking, Western Alliance Bank dropped in value.
As of Sunday afternoon, topics related to the class of the bank, including SVB bankruptcy has spread to multiple countries, and SVB bankruptcy affects Chinese interpreters, were trending on Chinese micro-blogging site Weibo, with most of hundreds of millions of views.
Is a 2008 financial crisis happening again?
Said a Weibo user.
Mr. Biden reiterated in his remarks that no losses will be borne by the taxpayers, but will instead come from fees that banks pay into the Deposit Insurance Fund.
But where does he think the money that banks pay into the Deposit Insurance Fund come from?
Does he think that's coming out of the bankers' pockets or their customers?
What Biden didn't share is the U.S.
government bailing out Chinese venture capitalists.
Who had significant deposits in SVB.
South China Morning Post, for example, noted the bridge between SVB and China.
The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank has created a sense of panic within China's tech startup and venture capital sector as a lender served as a bridge between U.S.
capital and Chinese tech entrepreneurs.
China is the second largest venture capital market.
SVB was right in the middle.
According to TechCrunch, China, the world's second largest venture capital market, across social media platforms, investors and startups are rushing to share news on the fiasco and thoughts on how to prevent such a catastrophic moment.
For some, however, the impact is tangible.
When China was still new to venture capital in the late 1990s, SVB was among the first financial institutions to serve the country's startups, while traditional risk-aversie banks avoided them.
Over time, the bank has become a popular option for China-based startups fundraising in U.S.
dollars, as well as some China-focused U.S.
dollar venture capital firms.
What Biden left out is U.S.
government for his Chinese Communist Party buddies and their venture capital business seeking U.S.
dollars.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, you know, I'm thinking back in the 90s when Wall Street and Goldman Sachs and many of the other financial behemoths started talking about China and having the 30 to 40% savings rate amongst their citizens and them needing to tap into that demographic in terms of for venture capital.
And this is around time of the dot-com bubble and the WTO in 1999 around there and before 9-11 as well.
There was a lot of talk about integrating the Chinese labor center into American marketplaces and using that as a means to enhance profitability.
And certainly most of the capital ventures that have been built in China were from American taxpayer dollars and investment from Fed money, some way, shape or form or other.
Whether it's black market money or not, or whether it's legitimate or not, that's where we get into the murky waters.
And that's where you get into a certain group that is the mark of the beast in terms of legitimizing any sort of wealth that will come through into their economic systems has to go through them.
And I think that's what really a part of control and a part of this takeover of the world is really all about.
And I think that, you know, if you look at history, things like 9-11, putting them into positions like where they can gather everybody's data and everybody's information.
And use it in terms of financial analysis.
It's kind of a lockstep position for them to even take the next level thing with the COVID and the lockdowns and everything like that.
And if you see where they're going with this, you know, you can go by like Trudeau's orders and flip a switch.
And institutions like PayPal or Patreon or these banks, the small banks that are forced to close and consolidate with the large banks are no longer going to be able to make exceptions to these things as they selectively wish.
And they will be forced to comply with greater and more stringent measures.
Most of these nations that complied with this were forced to buy IMF loans and World Health Organization orders and UN charters and things like this.
So I think this is kind of like the blueprint, the formula that they have for all of humanity around the world and by any means necessary, by any agents necessary it seems.
I think you're going to see a lot of interesting stuff come out of this and I think you're going to see the big corporations get the bailout money.
The culprits that were behind this mess in the first place will be the ones that get bailed out.
They might give the citizens a very small check and then say it's their fault for getting a stimulus check of $800 and that's why we don't have You know, people ready to work or whatever they want to blame on the people that they're taking advantage of in the media, that's what they will do.
And actually, people will start to parrot that amongst themselves and accept this as the reality, which is kind of the goal in the first place as well.
So, yeah, like I say, flip a switch, you'll see the Lockstep Formation come on, the Vax Passports, you know, even if you think about the COVID with the masks, the lockdown, the Vax things, they ran out of small businesses, they ran basically the supplies chains into the monolith supercenters, And China was a crucial aspect to take over the labor force there and utilize that slave labor to market this in the United States for the last 30 years and make a massive amount of money while outsourcing American labor to do so.
Yes, yes, excellent.
And of course, all consists with John Perkins' confessions of an economic hitman.
Certainly.
Meanwhile, we have the head of the Russian Duma making observations about what's going on here.
Mine's insanity led to a crisis in the U.S.
financial system.
President Joe Biden's heading into another election race with a set of economic problems disappear because of his senile course, said State Duma Speaker Vassilov Bolodin.
The American leader is guilty of the fact that the security system in the world is completely destroyed.
The U.S.
had been building it up for many years to avoid the threat of another world war.
However, in three years, actually two, Biden was able to nullify all efforts.
There is a risk a global financial crisis.
Washington tried to overcome its problem in a proven way by continuing to print fiat dollars, which led to record inflation in 40 years.
However, Biden continued to raise the key rate.
As a result, banks were unable to service loans.
The crisis of the American financial system must most affect those who are guided by it, he stressed.
We're talking about Sweden, Norway, and South Korea.
Pensioners will be especially affected, risking the collapse of pension funds.
According to him, the U.S.
will not return the money but will continue to survive at the expense of other countries.
The only way to be safe from this bondage is to abandon the dollar.
Chris, your thoughts about the speaker of the Russian Duma?
Thoughts about it?
Yeah, I think that they're right about the petrodollar being an instrument that has been used to force subjectivity around the world in such a way.
And I think it's really not to the knowledge of the average American taxpayer or the American citizen.
I think it's been an instrument that's been put on by people that are actually created the empire and have looted this empire and have now exited into the next empires.
And are going to turn these empires against us in the near future.
And they're really trying to with this abhorrent puppeteer Democratic Party and its diplomacy, I'd have to say.
Think about how the adversarial situation has developed amongst the United States versus Russia or even China unnecessarily and really at the behest of a group of insiders that seem to be in a position to make immense profit playing both sides against the other in this war model.
So I was gonna say earlier that they put together the East India Company 2.0, and now this Cain's the crypto business model is really... Take it away.
Where'd we lose it at?
In fact, just so you know, the modem is right there.
I'm literally sitting underneath the modem so that I don't have to worry about there not being a signal, but sorry about all this.
Okay, fair enough.
Where'd we leave off at?
Well, you were talking about the Russian, what he was observing about U.S.
financial, and let me think specifically.
Okay, yeah, I didn't get in that far yet.
I was going off for a while.
I didn't know where it cut out at, so that's cool.
All right, I have to start over then, basically.
No problem.
What I was saying is, basically, this privateer group has used the Federal Reserve and the financial institutions of the Military Industrial Complex and Wall Street to create the East India Company 2.0, and it's really bent on controlling the world through the CBDCs and the cryptocurrency offering.
And I think this last bubble is designed to consolidate crypto and the small banking institutions, like I was saying in the last segment.
There we go.
Yeah, this thing's terrible.
Sorry, Feds.
I know, past 2.0.
Yeah, go ahead.
Yeah, yeah, okay.
East India Company 2.0, Keynes to Crypto model.
Yeah, you're seeing a lot of inflation in their line about the numbers.
You're seeing the money supply has gone up 40% in the last two and a half years compared to the entire hundred and some odd years that the Fed's been around.
So yeah, they're printing money like crazy.
More importantly, they've been bailing out these banks from the inside with credit default swaps and QE and many other programs that are not mentioned in the media at all.
And certainly the banks now with this help and stimulus and all this injection of cash still somehow come hand in hand to the Fed and get additional bailouts.
To me, this seems like a massive asset stripping operation.
And they're giving it to the people that have mismanaged our pensions, our retirements, our savings in the first place and turned us into secondary creditors by surreptitious laws and through their politicians.
That's a good word, huh?
Puppet politicians in doing so.
Yeah, tongue twister there.
I'm ahead of my brain.
But, yeah, that's interesting to see how they put this whole thing together and have been doing this.
And it is now coming to fruition in terms of, you know, the bills being paid and the debts being dupes.
So yeah, I think that's a lot to do with what's going on in Russia, too, and these people making plans in terms of plundering other people and pushing on their economic systems by force.
And more importantly, I think forcing Russia into this whole alternative that is part of the design in the first place, the Goldman Sachs BRICS agenda.
Do you mean that in relation to the geopolitical alignment of Russia and China together?
Yes, sir.
Everything.
China, Russia, the whole thing.
How does that benefit the Great Reset?
Well, I don't know necessarily about the Great Reset, but it turns three large civilian populations, you know, not necessarily against each other, but it plays them as like frenemies, the way they did, you know, in the Cold War, after World War II.
Same thing, you know, they played, you know, backdoor with China, backdoor with Russia, and played them against each other, trying to get them to turn on each other, and certainly You know, they do the same in Europe, you know, for the last few hundred years before that.
It's triangulation and certainly it's a tactic that many people may not understand on the micro, but when you see the macro and look at the whole of history and see these little steps working towards this, it really seems like this is like a script and they're trying to deliver us, gift wrap this for us, you know?
Fascinating, fascinating indeed.
Meanwhile, As death rates surge for kids and teens, researchers blame drugs, guns, and cars for everything except the Vax.
The mortality rate for children gains surge to the highest level between 2019 and 2021.
Researchers at the Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the University of Washington reported all-cause mortality increased by 10.7% for those aged 1 to 19, between 2019 and 20, and an additional 8.3 between 2020 and 21.
to 19 between 2019 and 20, and an additional 8.3 between 2020 and 21.
The excess deaths were not caused by COVID, but by injuries, including firearms, drugs, car accidents.
I find this very peculiar.
Medicine and public health have made remarkable progress in lowering pediatric mortality rates, but the lives they've saved are now endangered by man-made pathogens?
I'd say yes, but it's the facts!
Bullet drugs and automobiles are now causing youth death tolls sufficient to elevate all-cause mortality rates?
I don't believe it.
They argue the increase is a trend predating the pandemic, pointing to the nadirs of rising suicide rates in 2017, homicide rates in 2013, and increased access to opioids.
The pandemic did not initiate these trends, but may have poured fuel on the fire.
Not everyone agreed.
Dinesh Rancourt, Ph.D., all-cause mortality researcher and former physics professor at the University of Ottawa in Canada, whom I know, told the defender that JAMA, the article published there, spins the findings to make it look as if the all-cause mortality is part of a larger trend linked to broad social dynamics rather than to the draconian lockdown policies that disproportionately affected spins the findings to make it look as if the all-cause mortality is part
I think he's got it right.
The piece is what I would call spin.
Right up there with the best spin a politician could make, but it's by three MD scientists.
The spin is disgusting, shameful, and misleading.
The Supreme Court said the paper is peer-reviewed.
Well, I think peer-reviewed just means ensuring the establishment doctrine is communicated with little regard to the actual data.
Excellent!
He said the data actually show a large stepwise increase in mortality rates in 20 and 21.
That should be the basis for trying to interpret the data.
In other words, the data clearly show you something dramatic happened that caused mortality to increase in the age group in 2020 that was maintained in 2021.
That's unambiguous.
Something dramatic happened, okay?
So that should be the focus.
But what these authors do is couch it as though a part of an increase in an historical trend.
In other words, they're clearly obfuscating the role of the Vags.
They worded it as though this were just, you know, there could be a contribution from whatever happened during the COVID period.
This is embarrassingly bad.
What they left out, he emphasized, was that the all-cause child mortality increase in 2021 happened alongside a much greater rise in all-cause mortality in other age groups.
Among those 25 to 44, there was a 40% increase.
For 45 to 64, it was a 25% increase.
For 65 to 74, about a 30% increase.
For 75 to 84, just under 25.
They're talking about the youngest age group, where it happens to be the smallest in percentage increase.
But those numbers can't be understood in isolation from the entirety of the all-cause mortality table.
The heads also didn't address the fact that The rule occurred halfway through the study period and had no positive impact.
Perhaps the most important rule mentioned the fact that excess mortality is highly correlated in the U.S.
to poverty.
He added, the Pearson correlation coefficient with poverty for excess mortality is plus 0.86, a very significant correlation coefficient.
It's an absolutely strong correlation with poverty.
Poverty is a mean associated social factor, which determines whether or not you're going to be part of this cohort.
The JAMA paper comments on gender, race, and ethnicity, but not economic status.
It found the increase in injury-related deaths in 2020 mostly occurred in males.
Non-Hispanic blacks made up about two-thirds of the homicide deaths, while suicides among North American Indians and Alaska Native youth ages 10 to 19 were twice as high as those among non-Hispanic whites.
Based on those statistics, the authors end the paper saying, research and policy to underdrive, address the underlying causes of depression, suicidal, opioid use, systemic racism, widening inequity, social conflict are urgently needed.
Brandecourt said, when they point to those, they're just talking from a script.
They're not actually showing data to support what they say.
Here's the of course.
You know, in our point of view, it's known there's structural racism in the U.S., and therefore, that must be part of the cause.
In other words, they're conveying points of a dominant ideology.
They're not conveying results from empirical measurement of what's going on.
And that's another disturbing aspect of a paper like this.
It's a political paper rather than being a scientist limiting themselves to what you can reasonably conclude from hard data.
Clearly spinning!
Blame bullets, drugs, and automobiles for increasing death rates.
Current efforts to understand gun violence overcome political gridlock and enact sensible firearm policies are not progressing with the speeds that pediatric suicides and homicide require.
Clearly spinning.
That's really embarrassingly bad.
Those are the vectors that cause death, not the underlying causes.
It's not firearms that are causing the death, but rather government's assault on people and families and institutions during the COVID period.
Canadian researcher and SubSec writer Jessica Rose Also agreed, guns aren't the cause.
It's not gun violence that needs to be understood.
It's the kids themselves.
There are likely sensible firearm policies enacted.
But if you're in a certain destructive mindset and on available drugs, then no amount of sensible anything is going to matter.
I think, once again, highly misleading.
Getting off the point.
Really?
Instead of recommending further research on key questions, the only thing they recommend is we eliminate bullets, drugs, and automobiles.
I mean, come on!
What kind of crazy recommendation is that?
He had it.
You cannot address underlying causes without looking at the granularity of the human condition.
The specific people who are dying are mostly at risk because of their circumstance.
If you're not doing that, you're not doing medicine, you're not doing the science, you're not addressing the problems.
You have to talk about homogenized statistics.
If you have to talk about homogenized statistics, then never use the term underlying causes.
If you cannot go in and learn what's actually happening, if you don't have a plan to study that and a recommendation, then you should not be allowed to use the term underlying causes.
Chris, I even got to fault my friend here because he's not talking about the facts.
I mean, there's no question this is all to obscure the effects of the facts.
I have no doubt about it whatsoever.
not least doubt your thoughts.
Without question. - Okay.
A lot of obfuscation on vaccine injuries, the amount of data, the VAERS system is very antiquated by design.
There's a very selective accounting that's been administered to this whole process, whether it's the COVID fatalities, the risks of COVID, the demographics at risk, the vaccine safe and effective rates, things like that.
Even a vaccine status, you know, you got to wait two weeks until the vaccine gets hold of you for two weeks before you're actually vaccinated.
So you got a two-week window there where most of these people that are having the adverse reactions are technically unvaccinated and of course they're really obfuscating the control group and certainly the narrative behind it.
So yeah, if you think about it, COVID was a perfect fear-based gray area that saw not only incentivized medical euthanasia through remdesivir and ventilators, but also saw the witch hunt against HCQ and ivermectin while pushing this very highly toxic vax, rushing it through an emergency status.
Safe and effective, as they say.
Biden put $100 billion down in a couple of omnibus bills and a few other legislations, you know, $2 billion a state to really push this narrative on every major airways that it's safe and effective.
Well, they have no damn idea.
And we are the science that they're actually using and testing this and mandating it in federal contractors, things like this military, law enforcement, hospitals.
So, yeah, they're certainly going after the last line of defense and the first line of rescue and taking that out completely with this toxic cocktail.
And I think these control groups have been targeted specifically by, by design.
And, uh, I, I think that, you know, the data behind it is certainly never going to be given to the citizens and we'll never be able to really tell what's going on.
And it's hard to really get any honest investigations when you don't have all the facts or you get selective accounting like we've seen here.
Uh, you know, another thing reminds me of like the, the 1700 that die of heart disease or heart attacks a day, number one killer in America, they don't put any sort Yeah, sure.
Wow, fifth time.
Yeah, so he's talking about the number one killer in America, heart disease, 1,700 a day, died of that, but yet they're sensationalizing the risk and the fear of COVID, putting people into this basically mania state and trying to push these new legislations and social norms, social distancing, social contact tracing, things like this.
And really over something that is not as big a risk as many other factors that are certainly far more more dangerous.
You can even say that the Biden administration is more of a liability or risk than COVID, you know, starting a nuclear exchange with a major country the way that they've handed every bit of democracy and any sort of protocols with that, too.
I guess you can look at all this stuff and really see that it's all part of the same misery index, where they keep the people in a constant state of fear, a strategy of pension.
And they use things like selective accounting and the stuff to really contradict the word on the street in terms of using the official narrative with louder, louder volume and rumor and echo.
So, yeah, all the media forces were behind this.
All the banks were behind this.
All the corporations were behind this.
You can see who was with it and who was against it.
And I think at situations like this, at crucial times, that's probably the best indication of who's who and what's what when you see which way people go in the face of something like this.
Very nice.
Very nice.
Yeah.
Meanwhile, teacher courses Promoting critical race theory has been funded by Pandemic Relief.
I don't think that was their purpose.
Michigan Governor Whitmer used Federal Pandemic Relief Fund to create virtual courses for teachers about anti-racism and social justice, encouraging them to engage with sources espousing critical race theory.
The CARES Act in 2020 included funds for governors to award to education-related entities via the Governor's Emergency Education Relief Fund.
Whitmer and State have issued a lot at 1.4 mil to Michigan State College of University, the University of Michigan School of Education, and Michigan Virtual to create professional learning modules for kindergarten through twelfth grade teachers.
According to an email from MSU office, the educators were able to take newly relaunched courses developed in partnership with MSU's education school for free, where Republican lawmakers have introduced legislation that would ban the teaching of critical race theory in the classrooms.
Other states have passed law prohibiting it.
The way the program was funded has come under scrutiny from federal oversight.
The DOE's Office of Inspector General said the state could not support the process it used to select them to develop the modules.
The purpose of the program was to train teachers on how to implement teacher professional learning standards developed by the Governor's Education Advisory Council.
The Governor's Education Advisory Council was created by Whitmer, the executive order in 2019.
She handpicked all 15 members who served.
She signed on granting the money to Michigan Virtual MSU and UM.
To develop the learning program and other entities.
The courses included Anti-Racism in Social Justice Teaching and Leadership, in Anti-Racist Trauma, Informed Practice in Pre-K to 12 Education, Social Emotive Learning Equity Elaborations, Social Emotional Learning Assessment Mechanisms, and 11 others.
They sought to teach educators how to see racism and privilege and how it bled in school and society, analyze theoretical frameworks for anti-racist and social justice teaching, recognize systemic oppression and advise strategies to dismantle it, and examine how to connect with staff and communities.
The material asks teachers how they could respond to classroom situations in the most anti-racist way possible.
It included a video of Bettina Love explaining spirit murdering and its explicit origin in critical race theory.
I really wanted to put language and take it out of critical race theory and put it in education and say, this is what's happening to our school, Love said, and the video educators were told to view.
Another source cited the key principle of critical judgment.
I will take responsibility for what I don't directly control—structural racism, systemic oppression, and all forms of bias—and attempt to influence transformative change within seemingly entrenched systems.
The second module was to heighten educators' awareness of trauma and oppression, to individually and collectively imagine ways to disrupt sources of oppression and harm in order to transform classrooms and schools.
One of the required readings was an article by healing justice trainer Candace Valenzuela, which argued educators need to look at unresolved historical trauma.
Trauma-informed training cannot be facilitated by anyone who hasn't faced the generational historical trauma of racism, white supremacy, heteropatriarchy, ableism, and capitalism within their own bodies, communications, and practices.
We must not only hyper-focus on the trauma of youth of color, but also research up into the traumatic implication of white-dominant societies, historical narcissism, historical amnesia, and colonialist perpetuation of violence.
Wow!
Other resources included modules on less contentious views of how educators and administrators can evaluate their practice to help students who have suffered traumatic experience or approach marginalized communities with empathy while continuing conversation about race and racism.
For example, in one of the module scenarios, respondents were encouraged to find ways to handle an incident in a classroom or talk to a student wearing a Confederate flag t-shirt with the goal of helping a student understand racism is not acceptable and their actions affect those around them.
Regardless, the federal watchdog was critical of how the state had allocated the money.
Governor Whitmer made the decision to award funds without using selection criteria, or including the names of all the entities evaluated, did not document the evaluation of 14 external requests as required.
The state never made data about the other entities who applied available to the agency.
Michigan did not maintain sufficient documentation to award the funds and not award funds.
The Center Square in 2021 reported federal taxpayers paid millions for a critical race theory program for future educators called RISE, which awarded funds in 2016.
It gave teaching students a $5,000 stipend.
Encouraged participants used critical race theory as a way to evaluate teacher quality.
Chris, I don't know, this just drives me up the wall.
That's kind of funny how the same legacy families that once ran the slave trade and run the economic debt slavery trade to this day flip and fund these type of ideological fulcrums that are political leverage points where they can basically mobilize groups by half-truths and historic I guess misinterpretations by race or even faith, gender, politics, anything like that, really, if you think about it.
And it's funny how they always focus on racism and certainly not poverty.
They talk about equity inclusion, which would probably be putting everybody on a social credit score seat.
Yeah, well, I kind of got lost a little bit on there, but yeah.
Powerful, of course.
I guess way to keep me on track.
Yeah, I was talking about the social credit score and how these people are trying to put the new technocratic feudalism down.
Basically, I was saying they focus on racism and certainly not poverty.
You know, they go through the fight for 15, but they certainly don't want to provide anybody with a livable wage.
And they've run the labor markets across every nation against each other with these trade deals and with the banking systems and certainly by many other organized forces and supply side economics.
So, you know, this group has always been labor's most prolific champion while remaining its most lethal adversary in terms of, you know, being surreptitious, telling them one thing and delivering another.
I think that really their goal is never to serve the people.
It's only to serve them, like I said, mobilizing rhetoric to nudge trigger points to maybe steer them towards an agenda and less of an actual functional family or home or traditional family, I should say.
They're the ones that are always going against that, too.
I talked about how they use these trigger points in terms of dividing people by gender, race, politics, even generations against generations in terms of sexual identities and things like that.
You know, you see these guys Zoom in on anywhere there's confusion, uncertainty, or even overwhelming certainty, and try to position themselves on one side and the other of that and control them both.
They usually put operatives in to infiltrate and contaminate these type of ideological movements on both sides, and there's a lot of NGO money that goes behind this, so it may come off and appear as a grassroots thing, it may start as that, but I guarantee once anybody takes hold of an idea, it'll be infiltrated, you'll be thrown out, elbowed out, nudged out by these guys that are the pros that are there I think he got it exactly right, Chris.
control the conversation so that it doesn't go anywhere promising.
It's amazing to see it on anything, everything.
I think you got it exactly right, Chris.
Meanwhile, Mike King, who runs the anti-New York Times, has picked up on absurdities of the official story of 9-11, but not for the unexpected 2016 rise of Donald Trump and the White Hats.
The nearly two-decade-long post-9-11 horror show known as the War on Terror would still be raging now in the Middle East and Central Asia, from Afghanistan to Pakistan to Iraq to Libya to Syria to Sudan to Somalia and beyond.
Out of the ruinous reign of Bush II and Mr. and Mr. Obongo, the never-ending wars and ISIS proxy wars, which surely have spread throughout Asia, North Africa, and Eastern Europe by now, have the likes of Soros and Killary and McStain and Satinianu not been stopped.
No 9-11 equals no war on terror.
This is why a proper understanding of who really orchestrated the attacks on 9/11/2001 remains relevant to this day.
When unpacking the mountain of deep state CIA and Mossad lies, propping up the official story, most conspiracy theorists correctly focus for simplicity's sake on the impossibility of the following absurdities.
Skyscrapers disintegrating into instant powder and dust at refall speed.
A third skyscraper not struck by an airplane collapsing at zero resistance speed later that afternoon.
A commercial airliner supposedly penetrating the Pentagon without leaving a trace of debris.
Of course, there are scores of other smaller, though still gaping, holes in the 9-11 story which have filled up entire books, but for reasons of sheer obviousness and for purpose of ease, nor me friendly explanation, The above points would have to be considered in the top rank, the top three on the BS scale, with which any healthy-minded newbie on the subject can be persuaded to at least scratch his head and ask for more information.
Here you see, number one, the mighty towers explode into instant powder and aerosol.
The forgotten 600-foot-tall WTC-7, not hit by anything, yet collapse at free-fall speed in a perfect controlled demolition.
Third, where is the bloody commercial airliner at the Pentagon?
As for this 9-11 expert, there's a fourth nail in the chasm of the Deep State Pable, which should rank with the aforementioned three items when it comes to in-your-face obviousness.
Specifically, the manifest impossibility of proof to Poor to mediocre small-plane flight students performing top-gun maneuvers with massive commercial airliners.
Though many a pilot has gone on record to confirm the impossibility of what these flying phantoms are said to have accomplished, it doesn't take an aviation expert to figure this one out.
Far from the fact there were no suicide hijackers, and that FBI chief in closet White House Robert Mueller had even confirmed that stolen identities of Arabs were used for the attacks, three of the characters said to be piloting planes received their training at a small plane school in Florida called Hoffman Aviation.
Fourth, was he only to attend a commercial plane flight school with simulators, the Pan Am International Flight Academy in Arizona.
But according to his instructors, his flying skills were extremely poor.
Here's a breakdown of where the Flying Circus clowns with stolen identities went to flight school and where they crashed.
Pan Am Academy, Arizona.
Honey Honjor.
Pentagon Plane.
Very weak flying skills.
Hoffman Aviation Flora, Small Plains.
Muhammad Atta, World Trade Center, North Tower, perfect strike.
Manwar al-Shihi, World Trade Center, South Tower, perfect strike.
Zia Zahra crashed into a Pennsylvania field after heroic passengers struggled with the hijackers.
The only reason these Muslims, Israelis posing as Muslims, enrolled in a flight school was to establish a record of having done so in advance of the big event and the official fable that was to follow.
The small plane novices absolutely did not and could not execute such maneuvers with lumbering commercial airliners.
Aside from that, no traces of planes were visible at the Pentagon or in Pennsylvania, and hollow aluminum tubes cannot cleanly penetrate through massive solid steel walls as if they were made in paper.
But I digress.
Come on, normies.
Think!
No way, just no way, you go from flying a little 25-foot Cessna to a 150-foot Boeing.
The planning of the attack was technically and organizationally a master achievement to hijack four huge airplanes within a few minutes and within one hour to drive them to their targets with complicated flight maneuvers.
This is unthinkable without years of support from state intelligence services.
Andreas von Bulow, former head of the Parliamentary Commission overseeing Germany's secret services, and among the very first members to join Scholars for 9-11 Truth when I founded it in December of 2005.
Wow!
These A-Rab kids sure were some quick learners.
Sing it, Kenny, sing it!
Right into the danger zone!
Highway to the danger zone!
Gonna take it right into the danger zone!
Meanwhile, I was invited to participate in a debate with Michael Shermer, who is defending the official account in I, A Critic for the 10th Annual 9-11 Scientist Debate.
We're fairly evenly matched in terms of background.
Shermer has a PhD in the history of science, I in the philosophy of science.
His from Claremont, mine from Indiana.
He's a professor at Claremont University.
I, Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota.
He has a Bachelor of Science from Pepperdine.
My Bachelor of Arts from Princeton.
He's a founder and editor of Skeptic Magazine.
I'm the founder of Scholars for 9-11 Truth.
He had at the time 6,199 citations and a Hirsch index of 29.
citations and a Hirsch index of 29, I4,202, and a Hirsch index of 34, where the Hirsch index indicates how many papers you have with that many citations.
That says 29 papers with at least 29 citations.
I34 papers with at least 34 citations.
Now, Rick Shattuck organized.
Shermer, for reasons only he can address, declined to show, so we created a debate by an interview he gave on C-SPAN, and to which I respond to his comments.
You will find it at eneta.org slash debate 2023 or at Mimeo at that number.
It will be complete and available tomorrow.
So, please, Chris, your thoughts.
Well, it's hard to believe it's been 22 years and people are still even uncertain about this.
And it's, I guess, for the benefit of hindsight, looking at the Cui Bono and the suspects that were involved with that and the companies that were behind these suspects.
And I'm not talking about the 19 hijackers.
I'm talking about if you really look into this and see who was standing down and who was putting orders on.
This is something that would involve very much the intelligence services.
And I have to say, if you think about von Bülow and who he is, I believe he's probably related to Klaus von Bülow, the guy from Lufthansa that was trying to investigate in the 70s the Boeing uninterruptible autopilot system that he suspected was being used by Israeli intelligence services to provide the illusion of hijackings and then to subsequently thwart them in mid-hijack in the 70s.
You know, and Tebby and all this other stuff, too.
If you look into those, how many hijackings were there in the 70s, you know, that the Mossad was all over and, you know, bringing them onto the ground safely and all this stuff.
So, I think that there's a there there, because that was another thing that popped up in the investigations of 9-11.
Whether you believe it to it or not, doesn't matter.
It's one of the potential suspects that is involved with that narrative, as well, using the uninterruptible autopilot system.
So, it'd be interesting to see Von Bulow, who was the That's great stuff.
Great stuff, Chris.
I love that edition.
Interesting, huh?
You know, I mean, I think you can tie this together in so many ways.
was framed for the murder of his wife.
And I think the lawyer that was trying to defend him was Alan Dershowitz.
And Jim Cramer from CNBC fame was the head researcher on the case.
That's great stuff.
Great stuff, Chris.
I love that addition.
Interesting, huh?
You know, I mean, I think you can tie this together in so many ways.
I mean, that's just one of many.
No, that's really fascinating.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, bro.
Got it live.
Need to know at gmail.com.
Live.
Need to know at gmail.com.
Huge!
Are the dominoes starting to tumble?
They lied about everything.
96-page DC police report uncovered.
Shows government knew MAGA was coming on January 6th and entrapped them all.
Metropolitan Police released their report recently on the D.C.
protests on January 6th of 2021.
Well, here come the punches.
You know, I often think that maybe Trump had a suspect idea that this might be a setup or an entrapment, and maybe it was even a long-term loyalty test as far as who does what in the position of this, knowing that There was certainly the full documentation of this entire narrative that was being, I guess, dictated and rendered, but certainly not publicly, I guess, sensationalized on all the media sources, we'll say, as far as what really happened.
The official narrative took hold and that was the story.
And there was certainly information, I think, that was presented to Fox that would contradict much of what was in the official narratives of many of the other media organizations.
And at some point in time, I think that maybe they were held mum in terms of revealing this while it's going on.
And I think it was more or less to wait for the political weather vane to stop spinning around and to see which way they were going and they could go with this.
And I think it really the nation is seeing, you know, what was behind this and this whole setup and how the elaborate, duplicitous nature of this This group that has couped and usurped our country and many countries around the world has actually overtaken democracy and overtaken the entire process of it.
So I think it's amazing to see that this is starting to unwrap and to present itself for what it is.
is the truth is finally going to set a lot of us free that have been calling this out yeah sorry about that Well, Okay, back after more technical difficulties.
Yeah, I was talking about how I think this was something that was part of the setup in the first place to see who would fall for it, who would step back from this, who would step up or who would fold.
And really, I think it's kind of the finger on the pulse of the Patriot movement and to see how much they'll take in the face of an overreaching government and certainly an unjust and I guess, manipulated election.
And really, if you think about the debt that's incurred from this, that too, and the looting of the country and the forcing into this World War III adversarial situation that we're seeing, I think it's all part of it to see what these guys can get away with.
And it's going to be the way that they sneak out the back door until they've looted us blind and taken everything from us, pensions, property, on forth to the currency, and even to the political spectrum of the United States and the Constitution and everything else.
So, yeah, I think it's been an asset stripping operation from day one.
And I think that a lot of the things that we talk about, the conspiracies are added up and they're working towards this crescendo.
And this is the apex of the orchestration.
Wonderful, Chris.
Great comments today, in spite of the technical glitches.
I'm just delighted with everything you have to say.
I've already mentioned this debate with Michael Schirmer.
That should be posted and up tomorrow.
I'll be putting it up on my Bitu channel.
It'll go on Rumble.
It'll also be on my Twitter account.
I think that's one you don't want to miss.
But in addition, yesterday I did an interview with David Zublik, which I do once a week, and I was talking about January 6th and all the evidence we have now that the insurrection was contrived in order to deliberately disrupt not the counting of the electoral votes, but the discussion of evidence that there were improprieties during the election.
Now, It was timed to exactly preclude motions to that effect to get into the official record.
Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Mitch McConnell, Mike Pence were all deeply involved.
It was affecting a coup against the United States Because when they reconvened, it was under emergency circumstances.
Those motions were lost forever, and it made it impossible to have a legal footing for the Supreme Court to review what happened here.
It was a brilliantly executed coup.
And it may be, here in my conversation with David Zublik, it's laid out more clearly than you'll find anywhere else.
Some have written to me to say as much, and I want to share it with you again.
It'll be on my Bitu channel, it'll be on Rumble, and it's going to be on my Twitter account this weekend.
Something you don't want to miss.
Meanwhile, spend as much time as you can with your family, your friends, and people you love and care about.
We do not know how much time we have left.
▲
Export Selection