All Episodes
Previous Next
March 11, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:01:29
Need to Know News (10 March 2023) with Chris Weinert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Said Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Chris Weinert in Fort Myer, Florida.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
Carl Herman unable to join us today.
We begin with a report out of Ukraine.
That Russian hypersonic missiles have wiped out a U.S.-NATO secret command post in Kiev.
Dozens of top U.S.
and NATO officers have been vaporized.
This is a translation.
It's a little crude, but we'll get the idea across.
According to sources familiar with the politics behind the scenes, the blow fell on the bunker control and planning centers, as well as on air defense and radar.
Insider reported heavy losses among the officers, including American.
It seems a shadow general staff of the proxy NATO-Ukraine force was hit hard.
Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine has announced data from the night of March 8th and 9th.
According to him, 81 missiles were fired at Ukrainian targets by the Russian side.
Allegedly, independent anti-aircraft gunners shot down 34.
Eight did not reach their target.
But it's very unclear this is anything except propaganda.
It appears the Independent Air Force was able to chalk up only Dummy and Girani missiles.
Neither Zelensky, the head of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, or Zelensky, the President of Ukraine, will provide details.
But real dependency, real despondency reigns in Ukraine as a consequence.
The Speaker of the Praetorian Forces of Ukraine, Ignat, said this was the first time that six Kinzhai missiles had been fired at Ukraine, also known as Daggers.
They are far more dangerous than other Russian missiles, capable of flying at hypersonic speeds, ten times the speed of sound, and of maneuvering in flight.
It's virtually impossible for an air defense system to shoot them down, since a missile rises up 20 kilometers and dies at great speed on the target.
Adding that in his memory, there has never been such a dangerous arrival, meaning all-out assault.
Even Zelensky admitted he'd had a hard day's night.
The audience noted he looked like a beaten dog, that there were no words about interceptions in his speech.
In addition, it became known that hits on the IRIS-R and NARSAMS air defense system, which were worked out on dummy missiles and destroyed by the Xs flying behind, indicates that this was blocked by independent Mustafa.
As many as 25 public fell under the distribution.
The head of the Ministry of Energy was forced to admit a missile attack damaged at least three thermal power plants.
It must be assumed he lied in this small direction.
In other words, that the damage was actually far greater.
Public Kerkov told about at least 15 explosions and attacks on ZHP-3 and ZHP-5, where damage is still unknown.
A local resident wrote about power and water outages.
Separately, the assumption is being voiced that the secret barracks of the Armed Forces of Ukraine were destroyed in the Zaporozhye region by missiles immediately at a critical infrastructure facility.
The Armed Forces are soon going to receive Seimer, Arbogast, and Russian hackers preparing to run operations against Ukraine.
In the Voigle region, residents heard strongest explosions in Lutsk and Dvorsky.
The blow was so powerful the ceiling fell in a number of holes.
According to preliminated data, the substation and the military airfield were damaged.
Odessa prayer, another blogger, ...reported a destruction of energy facilities in the region.
Most likely the substation was smashed into trash in Odesta.
More stringent schedules for stabilization shutdowns have already been published, meaning it's very, very difficult to conceal the damage.
Thus, the Russian Federation forces continue to turn off the switch to Ukraine.
And with the use of these powerful missiles for Bandera and their star-striped puppeteers, it has begun to dawn there's no place in Nanko where one can hide.
If the Kremlin considers it's time to twist Zelensky, then it will be so.
Chris, your thoughts?
Well, I was just kind of compiling them on paper and trying to not get too far ahead of myself.
I have to say that this is obviously very indicative of things getting very real in terms of the warfare and the casualties that are being rendered from it.
And certainly the truth being another casualty of this war.
You're seeing them really try to acclimate the population to the onset of war and to condition them, the public, in terms of accepting the causes for war and to unite for the causes which they're fighting for, so to speak.
So, yeah, I think really public support is the most crucial thing needed in terms of warfare in the past, being that human labor has been such a massive part of infantry.
Well, now with these automation devices and, you know, weaponry that they have now, drones and whatnot, automation's taken over.
AI can pretty much run this gambit.
You don't even need public support anymore as long as you have the capital to impose this type of assault.
So, you know, thinking about what's going on in terms of like really creating like a background for this, think of all the things that they've done to try to impose or force some sort of misdeeds upon Russia.
Think of Biden's whole presidency and like how he's imposed these foolish terms that sanction Russia, take their assets, accuse them of doing what they just did to them, and then fulfill them towards this Goldman Sachs-Briks initiative that was orchestrated, in my opinion, by some of the financial and then fulfill them towards this Goldman Sachs-Briks initiative that was orchestrated, in my opinion, by some of the financial forces to But I think it's really something that's falling into place.
And I think there's really put a background up for this, whether it's trying to put the 2016 election and Hillary Clinton's failure at her term onto Russian hacking, which was proven to be State Department sanctioned operatives in Russia, masking as Russian operatives.
So go figure there.
They go think of MH17, where 82 of the top 100 virologists were taken out on the way to fighting against the Ebola outbreak in Africa.
They're shot down if they blame it on Russia.
And then three months later, they find out that it was actually the Ukrainian rebel forces in the United States.
Nord Stream, another perfect example.
Think of, like I said, the swift sanctions and them really forcing them out of the T2 and T1 settlement systems and forcing them to create their own settlement system with the Shanghai Corporation.
If you think about it, this is really A big deal thinking about, you know, probably three quarters of the population is going to be behind this and three quarters of the world's GDP will be behind this.
This is kind of a big, big deal.
And these wars, I think, are certainly them trying out their toys on the public and really forcing people to abandon their property.
And then they come in and take it for pennies on the dollar with them in a domain and things like that.
So there's a lot of stuff going on both sides of this conflict that are fulfilling the agendas of both sides of the war.
Oh, Chris, I think you got a real fix on it.
something that is being sanctioned, orchestrated, and full-out executed in terms of kabuki theater by these puppets on the public.
And I know it may sound a little hard to follow, but when you start thinking about this and maybe pay attention to what I'm saying, you'll see exactly what I'm talking about.
Oh, Chris, I think you got a real fix on it.
Meanwhile, Russia reacts to the new claims about the Nord Stream blaming it on Ukraine.
Western media reports exonerating NATO from involvement, rupturing the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines have the hallmark of synchronized misinformation, according to the Kremlin. - Right.
Secretary Dmitry Peskov said it looked like an attempt to deflect attention from the real culprits, with which I agree 100%.
The anonymously sourced reports emerged just a few days after German Chancellor Schultz visited Washington and met with Joe Biden.
The New York Times reported Tuesday that a pro-Ukrainian group may have been behind the September attacks, where the pipelines connected Russia and Germany beneath the Baltic Sea.
Outlet-unnamed sources also claim no American or British national were involved, which is ridiculous beyond belief.
The same day, German state broadcaster ARD, SWR and DZI claimed German investigators had found that a yacht reportedly used in the attack belonged to a Polish-based company owned by two Ukrainians.
This is bullshit.
Last month, veteran journalist Seymour Hersh published a report laying the blame on Washington for orchestrating the attacks.
The White House has denied responsibility, calling the allegations utterly false and complete fiction.
Speaking to RIA Novosti, Peskop say was surprised by the fact the officials quoted could make guesses about the blast without conducting any investigation.
Obviously, those who have masterminded the Nord Stream attack want to divert attention.
Obviously, this is a coordinated media hoax campaign.
The Kremlin spokesman also noted Russia had not been invited to participate in the investigations.
This is not just strange.
It smells like a monstrous crime.
At least, the shareholder countries' pipelines in the U.N.
should demand an urgent transparent investigation, which would involve all parties that could shed light on what happened.
Russia's embassy to the U.S.
also commented on the Times article with Minister Counselor Andrei Lednev saying Moscow perceived the anonymous leaks as nothing more than an attempt to confuse those who are sincerely trying to get to the bottom of things in this egregious crime.
You know, the New York Times story instantly got a greed lie in the local information field.
The diplomat said the development was especially noteworthy, given attempt by local officials and journalists to blatantly silence a bombshell report of Hirsch.
Meanwhile, in This is Curious, a jet company that produces inflatable imitation weapons, including fake HIMARS rocket systems and Abram tanks used as decoys in Ukraine, announced its production orders have dramatically increased.
Its business has soared by 30% over the last year.
The company's chief executive said he expects growth to continue rising by double digits For at least another three to five years.
His name, Wojtek Pressler, refused to comment on whether the decoys were being used in Ukraine.
He said, however, I can imagine.
If we want to support a partner country that is in trouble, we would send them inflatable decoys.
Or, if it already has them, if not, it will have them for sure.
Infratech uses light materials such as artificial silk.
to produce the decoys.
A vape tank, for example, might weigh 100 kilograms.
Reportedly, it takes four to operate a decoy.
Ten minutes to unwrap it and inflate it.
According to the company, the vape tanks, armored vehicles, and jet fighters are used to fool the enemy on the battlefield.
So they target the decoys instead of real weaponry.
If I force the enemy to destroy a thing of mine by using something that is four times what in reality could be 20 times more expensive, then I'm the winner economically.
Inflatech currently manufactures up to 50 decoys a month, reportedly sold to a number of countries.
The U.S.
Department of Defense announced it would send a new military aid package worth $400 million to Ukraine, including MR's rocket and artillery shells.
The package, the 33rd draughts of military aid doled out to Ukraine since August of 2021.
Since the beginning, Washington has reportedly provided Kyiv with more than $32 billion worth in arms.
Russia has long condemned the supply, arguing it only prolongs the fighting without changing the outcome, where I have no doubt they've got it right.
Chris, your thoughts?
Well, I have a bunch.
Where to begin?
I think really in terms of property theft, a war zone is a perfect place for something like this.
And I think it's also a perfect situation to cover up any potential formal and legitimate investigations.
Into bioengineering or genetic engineering and warfare, biowarfare labs that have been going on in Ukraine and even in other places, China as well.
Some of the child trafficking, money laundering, drug smuggling, adrenochrome producing, natural gas oligarchy type of situations.
I think that if they really looked into some of the people that have been really plundering out of this war and have really covered up a lot of stuff with this war, you'll find pretty much what's going on with that.
And I think you look at who's also contracted to rebuild it, like BlackRock and many other companies that are taking contracts for reconstruction afterwards.
It's kind of interesting how they run these gambits and really cause these problems and then sell them the solution at the end and really profit every step of the way over mounds and mounds of innocent blood and bodies.
So you think they also settle their debts related to these war crimes by IMF and BS loans, too.
So that's another sinister topic on itself.
But this is happening and this is really being done under the guise of nation states by the oligarchies in all countries, just murdering the middle class out and taking their property.
And calling it a war or an ideal ideology type of struggle.
But really it's nothing more than just grand larceny and you know war criminals behind it who are doing what they've always done.
Think about this, what if they have like a Potemkin infantry and they're just playing us like some sort of thing to just drive people off their land and they just got mercs and just automated weapons just blasting the shit out of this area driving over 50% of the population out of their properties like they did already and just taking this rich rich land not only in terms of wheat production but geography.
Good point, good point.
pipeline and delivering to Europe and many other things, resources beneath the ground.
So yeah, they're running these people out of town.
This is a bigger scandal, in my opinion, and a bigger land grab than maybe what they did in the '90s with the Harvard Trust and the gas problem, you those things. - Good points, good points.
Meanwhile, as Buchmut falls, the US may turn from Ukraine, starting with a pipeline story.
A nice commentary here by Joe Lauria.
On its face, a New York Times article suggesting pro-Ukraine groups had sabotaged a pipeline.
I got to pause.
You're muted. - Good.
On its face, the New York Times article of yesterday suggesting pro-Ukrainian group sabotage of pipeline appears intended to exonerate both the U.S.
and Ukrainian governments from involvement in the destruction of the Nord Stream gas pipeline.
The thrust is that Ukrainians unaffiliated with the Kiev government were those who were responsible, citing unnamed U.S.
officials.
A closer examination, however, reveals layers of nuance that do not dismiss Ukrainian government may have had something to do with it after all.
The story quotes anonymous European officials claiming a state had to be involved in the sophisticated underwater operation.
The Time goes out of its way to say more than once that it was not the United States, but that appears to be obvious bullshit.
While the second paragraph says categorically the state was not Ukraine either, the article leaves open the door for possible Ukrainian involvement.
U.S.
official declined to disclose the nature of the intel, how it was obtained, or any details of the strength of the evidence.
What that means is, this is just bullshit.
This is just extraction.
This is just propaganda.
The Times make it clear what the consequences would be for a pro-Ukrainian coalition Washington built in the Combined West if there were Ukrainian government involvement.
A visual said there were still enormous gaps in what US-wide agencies and the European partners knew about what transpired.
But a visual said it might constitute the first significant lead to emerge from several closely guarded investigations, the conclusion to which could have profound implications for a coalition supporting Ukraine.
Any suggestion of Ukrainian involvement Whether direct or indirect could upset the delicate relationship between Ukraine and Germany, souring support among a German public that has swallowed high energy prices in the name of solidarity.
The Times further developed the theme that involvement by the Ukrainian government could destroy international support for Kiev, as well as the immense public backing for Kiev that U.S.-led propaganda has developed.
The Washington Post ran a similar story yesterday, reporting the Ukrainian government denied any involvement.
Ukraine absolutely did not participate in the attack on Nord Stream 2, said Mikhail Polyak, a top advisor, said Zelensky.
Questioning why his country would conduct an operation that destabilizes the region and diverts attention from the war, which is categorically not beneficial to us.
The newspaper here is allowing U.S.
officials to begin distancing the U.S.
from Ukraine, claiming Washington has limited influence on Kyiv, despite years of evidence to the contrary.
The piece appears to be preparing the Western public for an abrupt about-face in Ukraine because of a litany of Ukrainian operations the U.S.
says it opposes.
It's worth quoting The Times.
Any finding that puts blame on Kiev or Ukrainian proxies could prompt a backlash in Europe and make it harder for the West to maintain a unified front in support of Ukraine.
U.S.
officials and intel agencies acknowledge they have limited visibility into Ukrainian decision-making.
Despite Ukraine's deep dependence on the U.S.
for military, intel, and diplomatic support, Ukrainian officials are not always transparent with their American counterparts about their military operations, especially against Russian targets behind enemy lines.
Those frustrated U.S.
officials who believe they have not measurably improved Ukraine's position on the battlefield But I've risked alienating European allies and widening the war.
The operations that have unnerved the U.S.
include a strike in early August on Russia's Saki Air Base on the western coast of Crimea, A truck bombing in October that destroyed part of the Kerr Strait Bridge linking Russia to Crimea, and drone strikes in December aimed at Russian military bases in Kazan and Ingalls, about 300 miles beyond the Ukrainian border.
But there have been other acts of sabotage and violence of a more ambiguous provenance that U.S.
intel agencies have had a harder time attributing to Ukraine.
One was a car bomb near Moscow in August that killed Daria Dugina, the daughter of a prominent Russian nationalist.
Kiev denied any involvement.
U.S.
intel agencies eventually came to believe the killing was authorized by what officials called elements of the Ukrainian government.
In response to the finding, the Biden admin privately rebuked the Ukrainians and warned them against taking similar action.
The explosions that ruptured the Nord Stream took place five weeks after Ms.
Dugina's killing.
After the Nord Stream Mob, there was hush speculation and worry in Washington that parts of the Ukrainian government might have been involved in that operation as well.
This is not to say the U.S.
did not conduct the Nord Stream sabotage, just as Seymour Hersh has reported, and yet still cynically blames Ukraine.
Hersh himself ridiculed the Times story in an email to Consortium News.
In directing attention toward the Ukrainian government's possible culpability, U.S.
intel gets a two-fer.
It deflects blame from the U.S.
and prepares the public for the U.S.
to justify abandoning Ukraine after all the U.S.
has invested in its venture to weaken Russia and topple its government through an economic information proxy war, all of which have failed.
A consensus is forming among Western leaders that the war against Russia and Ukraine is lost.
Thus, Washington would have to save face to pull off such a reversal of policy, insinuating that Ukraine blew up the pipeline of its ally Germany, could help the U.S.
climb down from its strike position in support of Ukraine.
The same day of the New York Times story, a joint investigation by a major German paper, De Zeit, and the ARD broadcast network reported the pipeline attack was linked to Ukraine.
De Zeit reported, according to a machine translation, The German investigative authorities have apparently made a breakthrough in solving the attack on Nord Stream 1 and 2 after joint research by the ARD Capital Studio, the IED Political Magazine, Contrast, SWR, and ZEIT.
It was possible to largely reconstruct how and when the explosive attack was repaired in the course of the investigation.
Accordingly, traces lead in the direction of Ukraine.
Just as the Times reported, the Zeit pedges its reporting, saying investigators have not yet found any evidence as to who ordered the destruction.
It might not be credible to immediately blame Ukraine.
The sources for these articles may be employing a tactic to gradually prepare the public for more definitive blame later.
The Zeit doesn't provide a level of detail missing from the Times to wit that They managed to identify the boat allegedly used for the secret operation, a yacht rented from a country based in Poland, apparently owned by two Ukrainians.
According to the investigation, the secret operation at sea was carried out by a team of six people, said to have been five men and one woman.
Accordingly, the group consisted of a captain, two divers, two diving assistants, and a doctor, who was said to have transported the explosives to the crime scene and placed them there.
The nationality of the perpetrators is apparently unclear.
The culprits used professionally forged passports, which are said to have been used, among other things, to rent the boat.
I can't believe this is such nonsense, such obvious, blatant propaganda.
Both articles appeared on the same day, and major U.S.
and German publications might indicate a degree of coordination between U.S.
and German intelligence.
Friday, just four days before the article appeared, German Chancellor Schultz made an unusual trip to Washington, where he went to the White House for a meeting with Biden.
No aides were present with the two men.
The meeting lasted over just an hour.
There was no press conference afterwards.
Shultz did not allow press on his plane.
He returned to the airport after the meeting to fly back to Berlin.
Clearly, the two did not want to discuss a sensitive matter over the phone or in a video link.
The Times was fed this piece from U.S.
Intel as stories continue to be leaked showing Western leaders do not believe Ukraine can win the war despite their public pronouncements and that Kiev must cut its losses and seek a settlement with Russia.
The Wall Street Journal reported 11 days ago
Public rhetoric has deepening private doubts among politicians in the UK, France, and Germany that Ukraine will be able to expel the Russians from eastern Ukraine and Crimea, which Russia has controlled since 2014, and a belief the West can only help sustain the war effort for so long, especially if the conflict settles into a stalemate, officials from all three countries say.
We keep repeating that Russia mustn't win, but what does that mean?
If the war goes on long enough with this intensity, Ukraine's losses will become unbearable, a senior French official said, and no one believes they will be able to retrieve Crimea.
President Macron and German Chancellor Schultz told Zelensky at a palace dinner last month he must consider peace talks with Moscow.
According to the source, the paper quoted Macron as telling Zelensky Even mortal enemies like France and Germany had to make peace following World War II.
Macron told Zelensky he had been a great war leader, but that he would eventually have to shift into a political statesman and make difficult decisions.
A major turning point that would force a large decision may come if Russia can complete its military takeover of Bakhmut, which is proceeding as we speak.
The battle for the city in Donbass has been waging since last summer and has intensified in the past weeks.
Russia has nearly encircled the entire city, trapped in an estimated 10,000 Ukrainian troops.
Ukraine had repeatedly played down the importance of Bakhmut, but nevertheless continually sent in droves of soldiers to their death.
Bakhmut is an important HUD in Ukraine's defense of Donbass.
In an interview with CNN, Zelensky admitted Bakhmut's vital importance to Ukraine.
We understand that after Bakhmut they could go further.
They could to Kremantorsk.
They could go to Silvansk.
It would be an open road for the Russians after Bakhmut to other towns in Ukraine in the Donetsk direction, he told Wolf Blitzer.
That's why our guys are standing there.
The fall of Bakhmut to Russia would be a major humiliation for Zelensky in Ukraine, as well as for the United States in Europe.
The U.S.
would have a major choice to make.
Continue to escalate the war with a danger it could lead to a U.S.-Russia confrontation that could go nuclear, or press Ukraine to absorb its losses and seek a settlement.
Russia, however, would then be in a position to dictate turns.
Possibly recognition for four Eastern Ukrainian oblasts as part of Russia, after referenda there voted to join the Russian Federation, Ukraine agreeing to be a neutral nation that will not join NATO, demilitarization of Ukraine, and disbanding of neo-Nazi units.
Portraying Ukraine as an unworthy partner that blew up German pipelines might help minimize the humiliation to the West if this were to happen.
Then again, neoconservatives in Washington and in European capitals might win out in the battle with realists and continue pressing the war, though the realists at this stage seem to have the upper hand.
Chris, your thoughts.
I was muted.
Yeah.
I'm thinking about the way that this type of background is created in the similar ways to was in the 30s with Russia and Germany starting to forge treaties and agreements and accords, things like that.
The Molotov on Ribbentrop Treaty, as you remember.
A lot of these things happened as pretenses to wars.
Really, I think some of the absurdity in terms of diplomatic failure has really led to a lot of these wars and accelerated these conditions unnecessarily, we'll just say.
And I think whenever you see these terms being thrust upon the public with such little cause and such confusion behind the actual facts and verification of what's going on, I think that it's no accident.
I think that it's very much part of trying to draw people into wars.
And when you create such a A lot of casualties, real victims, you know, that you're actually going to create political polarities in the wake of such devastation and destruction.
And as I say, I think they're really using this to usher in a new economic system, and they're using political means to do so in some cases, I guess, and using nation states and religion and whatever else they can.
But I think the real thing needs to go on talking about I think how around the world, anybody that's in the middle class that has any sort of savings or value or wages are being absolutely assaulted, not only by inflation, which is theft, and many other means, you know, nickel and diamond is to death, so to speak.
And I don't think it's an accident that they're trying to take property ownership away from people and using war and economic warfare and many other things to do so.
So it's a war happening around the world everywhere, not only just in the Ukraine.
It's going on everywhere.
And people don't even realize it's been waged against them or waged upon them in such a way.
And even going through the struggling through all the hardships, too.
It's like they still don't realize it somehow.
So it's kind of baffling to me.
It makes me think about a quote by Jay Gold in the 1870s or so.
He said that he's wealthy enough to hire one half of the world simply to kill the other half.
And I think really you're seeing that type of situation maybe manifesting itself at this point and serving a purpose in terms of a long term agenda for this group that seems to be behind it.
So whenever you see the truth expose a lie, all the liars must now expose this newfound truth to even more of their convenient lies.
And that is really, I think, what they're trying to do.
And I think really in terms of misdirecting people and misdirecting the focus of the people and really trying to condemn the people that are getting out in the streets under certain things or not, maybe Atlanta and some of these other places that are seeing all these things out in the streets, are people that are really facing the conflict, the real war that's going on at home, are people that are really facing the conflict, the real war that's going on at home, whether it's debt to income ratio So you're seeing entire generations being completely economically sanctioned from property ownership in the United States.
And it's by design, and it's been a result of the stuff that these guys in power now did in the 90s with NAFTA and things like that.
Permit normalization trade with China, and many other things.
Deregulating financial industries, creating derivatives, many things like that.
So I think you're really seeing this all coming home to roost, and I think we're going to get held, we're going to be caught holding the bag on this.
And I think it's really the looting and dismantling of the United States and more importantly, the Federal Reserve that's going on here.
And it's just playing this out in terms of, I guess, theater, for lack of a better word.
We have Tucker doing a brilliant job of reporting what's going on here with the January 6th.
Here's a summary of reactions to what he's been reporting.
A small group of people, which include the leaders of the Democratic Party and their allies in the media, had a complete monopoly on what you were allowed to know about what happened, what actually happened, in the Capitol on January 6th.
And they defended that monopoly with great ferocity, as monopolists tend to do.
So the moment we broke that monopoly simply by getting access to the footage, it's not hard.
That's what you're supposed to do when you work in the news business.
Other media outlets went crazy.
They all did.
And we just couldn't resist not to be self-referential, but it's too hilarious.
So we assembled a montage.
Here it is.
What we saw tonight, Allison, from Tucker, is nothing new.
He has been trying to sanitize the very real violence that we all saw unfold at the U.S.
Capitol.
41,000 hours of footage from an attempted coup is federal evidence.
How on earth is Kevin McCarthy trying to justify the fellow members of Congress giving 41,000 hours of federal investigative evidence and material to Fox News?
This is the danger of Not fairness.
Unfairness.
You should give it to every news organization at the same time.
What's next?
Is the Speaker of the House going to turn over the daily schedules of the Capitol Police?
Are they going to give them the codes to the locked doors?
Nobody that believes any of that garbage Tucker was spewing, none of their kids will ever believe that garbage.
It feels like a Soviet system.
Or, you know, the way the Nazis would build a Potemkin village.
Tucker Carlson's doing the same thing with the footage from 1-6.
Footage.
We're both Soviet and Nazi!
What you're hearing, of course, is panic.
It's fear.
A hurt dog barks!
But it's still pretty funny.
Well, Tucker's doing a great job, in my opinion.
Here we have more of what's taking place here.
Tucker releases a supercut of corrupt media panicking over the released January 6th footage.
The media is in an absolute panic, scrambling to find excuses and distraction.
Monday, Tucker released footage proving they lied about the alleged insurrection.
In one fell swoop, he destroyed the entire narrative.
Needless to say, politicians and the media did not react well.
Chuck Schumer had a fit over the footage.
It wasn't just the Democrats, though.
RINOs like Adam Ginsinger and Mitch McConnell openly criticized Tucker for releasing the footage.
Tucker continued the story Tuesday, but not before releasing a cut of the media meltdown.
Here we have Kennekoa Substack tweeting, Tucker laughs at a montage of the media panicking about his January 6th coverage.
The leaders of the Democrat Party and their allies in the media had a complete monopoly on what you were allowed to know on what actually happened on the Capitol on January 6th.
So the moment additional footage was released, The media weren't the only ones upset.
Mitch McConnell wasn't happy either.
Charlie Kirk tweeted, breaking, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell calls it a mistake for Tucker and Fox News to release a never-before-seen January 6 footage.
Adam Kinzinger seemed worried.
Daily Caller tweeted, Adam Kinzinger panic-stricken over Tucker releasing J6 footage.
Kinzinger, we set history straight on the committee.
Of course, nothing can top Chuck Schumer's reaction.
The Columbia Bugle tweeted, They're freaking out big time.
Senator Schumer went down to the Senate floor this morning to condemn Tucker Carlson's January 6th tape segment last night, to call for Fox and Rupert Murdoch to stop Tucker from releasing another report.
They fear the truth.
They especially fear her when we the people know it.
Tracy being sweet.
They are very, very scared.
Their narrative is collapsing.
Very scared.
And honestly, all of the senators demanding Tucker not air his show tonight created a ridiculous Streisand effect.
I think everyone will be watching Tucker.
Candace Owens.
Tucker must air more footage tonight.
The entire swamp is losing its collective mind.
They never thought a public would learn the truth.
Unreal that people still don't see the DOJ played a sinister hand in this.
We don't know who dropped off the pipeline.
They continue to insist.
Charlie Kirk, The left wing is pelting down, claiming Tucker cherry-picked J6 footage.
But all of this is new video the public hasn't seen before.
So who's guilty of cherry-picking?
Tucker?
Or the people who refuse to show us all 45,000 hours of footage?
Cat turd!
Tucker Carlson is a truth teller.
That's why he whizzes off all the hysterical liars on the left.
Kanekoa Substack.
Tucker Carlson.
A small group of people, which includes the leaders of the Democrat Party and their allies in the media.
Had a complete monopoly on what you were allowed to know about what happened in the Capitol on January 6th.
The corporate media in the voice?
Releasing the January 6th footage is dangerous to our democracy.
And a Pazano belt is dwelting down.
Pazano tweets.
Here's a problem that shivers down the back of both Democrats and Republicans.
The J6 operation involved both parties.
Look at the panic by Chuckles the Clown and Cocaine Mitch McConnell, exactly the same.
They were complicit.
Chris, your thoughts?
Two years too late, in my opinion, I wish that he was a little bit more on top of this when it was going on and people like us in the independent media were saying this is absolutely what's happening.
And it turns out, you know, I have to say we're right again.
It's not that I told you so, but It seems to take the independent media to start repeating the truth over and over again before these guys would even acknowledge it and even consider it a possibility.
So I think that there's really levels of information that are being catered to in terms of this Tucker thing.
And I can understand that he's doing something, but the bar is low.
We need your voice a little stronger, Chris.
I really hope that the sentiment will change as well as the motivation and people will finally start to take back, you know, what's theirs.
You know, we need your voice a little stronger, Chris.
Meanwhile, Tucker told Glenn Beck the January 6th committee didn't merely distort facts, but fabricated full falsehoods and that it blew my mind.
Tucker joined nationally syndicated radio host and co-founder of Blaze Media Glenn Beck Wednesday to discuss the uncut and narrative destabilizing footage of the January 6th protest, which a Fox News host has been playing on his show.
The Blade previously noted much of the footage that Kevin McCarthy granted Tucker access appears to contradict key claims made by members of the January 6th Committee and dutifully circulated by the liberal media.
Tucker noticed that extra to distortions, such as the deceptive attitudes to smear Senator Josh Hawley as a coward, or the addition of screaming sounds to video originally recorded without audio, the January 6th Committee advanced lies wholly severed from the reality of what actually happened at the Capitol in order to shape a politically expedient narrative.
Here's the Blaze tweeting, New footage debunks a previously released Josh Hawley tape by the J6 committee.
The surveillance footage we reviewed showed that famous clip was a sham edited deceptively by the January 6th committee.
The clip was propaganda, not evidence.
The actual videotape You call the January 6th committee members liars, said Beck, referencing Tucker's comments on Monday and committee members' promotion of the claim that Capitol Police Officer Brian Sitnik had been killed as a result of injuries sustained that day.
Do you make the case that they're liars?
They didn't just, you know, fib a bit and eat around the corners?
That these are full-fledged liars, asked Beck?
Tucker replied, Well, that was a stunning part to me.
I've been in Washington my whole life, and my dad worked for the government, so I had a kind of root-level trust in government.
My default setting is they're not lying about anything.
I never assumed that.
I was so shocked to learn they were lying intentionally.
We have a very specific way of knowing that.
January 6th, committee researchers looked at video.
They bookmarked it.
They left an electronic mark on the video they watch.
So we know what they watched, and then we watched it.
Tucker noted there's a video of Jacob Chansley, of Ray Epps, of Brian Sicknick, that we know they watched, not included in the report that was never mentioned in the hearings.
A year and a half, a thousand witnesses, 850-page report in this video, which overturns the story they were telling, proves it was a lie.
For Jacob Chansley, the so-called QAnon shaman, this lie proved life-changing.
Chansley's former lawyer recently claimed he had not seen the newly released footage, which could have aided his client against federal charges.
Whereas his former client had been depicted as a deranged leader of a violent mob, the footage played on Tucker's show revealed he was escorted around the Capitol by police without incident.
Chandler was ultimately charged with knowingly entering or remaining in any restricted building or ground without lawful authority and with violent entry and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds and sentenced to four years.
There was evidently no saving Tucker's childhood presumption of government official forthrightness in the wake of reviewing the tapes of Chansley and others.
We know that they lie.
And that just blew my mind, he said.
While Tucker had no trouble believing Adam Schiff would deal in lies, Noting that he is a force of darkness, the cable hosts found it troubling that former representative Liz Cheney, whom he's known for decades, was also a purveyor of falsehoods.
I always assume she disagrees on the issues with me.
No, it turns out Liz Cheney is actually affirmatively a liar, said Tucker.
She knew information.
She withheld it because it challenged the lie that she was telling to the public.
Here's Glenn Beck tweeting, Tucker explained the evidence he uncovered that led him to call the January 6th committee members liars.
This video, which overturns a story they were telling they saw but hid, that just blew my mind.
Senator Chuck Schumer recently borrowed a phrase coined by Adolf Hitler to condemn Tucker and McCarthy by extension for showing narrative challenging January 6 footage, suggesting it enabled the big lie, which is supposed to be the theft of the 2020 election, which of course was stolen, and has further eroded our precious democracy.
Tucker suggested Beckness's mere projection that the Grand Deception was played by those now apoplectic about his showcase of previously omitted or altered footage.
This?
This is an event that was a complex event with many facets, and they simplified it immediately into a good versus evil tale, as they do with everything.
Partly because they lack nuanced imagination, but partly because this was a tool they were using for a purpose.
It was a cudgel they were using to beat down their opponents and grab more power for themselves.
In effect, what it did was change the definition of terrorism, said Tucker, from something that exists in other countries and is aimed at us, to Republican voters, populist voters, Bernie Sanders voters, Trump voters.
Anybody who questions the legitimacy of the current power holders is now redefined Not as a political opponent, but as a terrorist.
The Blaze recently reported that prior to Tucker's initial exhibition of footage calling into question the claims and intentions of those on the January 6th committee, leftist journalist Chris Hedges penned an article condemning the Democrat establishment for polarizing the country and shredding civil liberties.
Hedges appeared to agree with Tucker, stating the judicial lynching against many of those who participated in the January 6th events, a lynching that is mandating years in retrial detention and prison for misdemeanors, is part of a broader statist effort, corroding democratic institutions and bringing the U.S.
closer toward tyranny.
Tucker suggested the false narrative constructed around January 6 and the corresponding redefinition of terrorism have excused the weaponization of the FBI, the CIA, and other government agencies against their political opponents of the Washington establishment.
Our own government has been harnessed as a political tool.
It's like the one thing you can't allow, said Tucker.
Chris, your thoughts?
Oh yeah, think about all the people that they're dispossessing and squandering and mismanaging their pensions and using their pension funds to enslave us with this COVID hoax and many other things.
Think about all these people that have lost their property ownership due to like inflation or even you know many of the other things that are going on as part of the economic assault on the middle class.
The preppers that have resulted from seeing many PAC-KON conspiracies and many of these sanctioned terror events against citizens go on in their own countries around the world are now all of a sudden the targets of these very big states and governments for trying to be self-sufficient or trying to have some sort of a Nessie.
That seems to be they're trying to set up the dynamic where you are immediately directly dependent upon your government for the sole survival and sustenance and everything else.
And of course, it's all going to be stuff like GMO foods or vaccines or stuff that you wouldn't want to take in the first place, poison apple offerings.
But let's just say, you know, the people minded that are not capable enough to get outside of this gauntlet and survive.
Sorry, my mouth's ahead of my brain here.
You know, you got to think about all these people are the target group now.
These are the preppers, the patriots, everyone that like, you know, they were talking about even Bernie Sanders people, Trump people that have been disaffected by the system.
You know, they're creating a lot of adversaries.
And that, of course, trying to assure that through orchestrated acts of violence, usually stuff that's engineered, in my opinion, to try to destroy unity or the potential I think that the grassroots thing is going to start to come of this and I think that really it's going to happen around the world.
will of an NGO or this political machinery that is out there that can harness that momentum and use it for its own misdeeds.
So yeah, I think that the grassroots thing is going to start to come of this.
And I think that really it's going to happen around the world.
I think it's already happening.
And I think that these people are freaking out because there's really another story that has not only been told from the get-go, but now it's proven to be right once.
And once again, these guys are in some hot water as far as credibility and things like that.
And obviously, their track record behind these type of things, too.
So, yeah, I can see why they're really trying to misdirect our focus and create some sort of turmoil amongst themselves to really keep us from uniting against them and doing the right thing with our resources.
So my two cents there.
What do you think, Betts?
Very good.
Very good, Chris.
Meanwhile, Elon Musk has accused the January 6th committee of misleading the public.
Twitter CEO Elon Musk has accused a former January 6th Select Committee dominated by House Democrats of misleading the American public about the so-called riot at the Capitol.
Musk's accusation came in reaction to the airing of previously unseen January 6th footage by Fox, which showed what happened inside the Capitol seemed much more orderly than it was resented to the public.
The footage was aired on Tucker Carlson Tonight after the new Republican Speaker of the House, Kevin McCarthy, gave the show hosts access to more than 40,000 hours of January 6th videos.
Billionaire Musk comments on the new footage came in response to a tweet criticizing the former January 6th committee members for lying.
The Twitter owner directed his tweet to some of the select committee members, Democrat U.S.
Representative Adam Schiff, for example, and former U.S.
Representatives Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger.
Cheney and Kinzinger were the only two Republicans on Pelosi's committee, but took an anti-Trump stance, leading the former president to label them rhinos, Republicans in name only.
Besides misleading the public, they withheld evidence for partisan political reasons that sent people to prison for far more serious crimes than they committed, Elon Musk wrote regarding the January 6th committee.
This is deeply wrong, legally and morally.
The footage the new House Speaker released at the Capitol appears to contrast the narrative presented by former Speaker Pelosi's Select Committee that investigated the events on that day.
The report stressed the new video showed that QAnon shaman Jacob Chansley was escorted by at least nine police officers inside the Capitol.
Fox host Tucker said in his commentary, They may be taking an indication of officers' complicity in the breach.
House Speaker McCarthy released the footage after Democrats insisted it should be kept from the American people over security concerns.
I was asked in the press about these tapes, and I said they do belong to the American public, McCarthy told the Times on February 22nd.
I think Sunshine lets everybody make their own judgment.
The final report of the January 6th Committee, which included seven Democrats and the two anti-Trump Republicans, concluded that President Trump participated in a multi-part conspiracy to overturn the result of the 2020 presidential election illegally.
It also claimed Trump failed to prevent his supporters from storming the U.S.
Capitol.
Here's another from NBC tweet.
Tucker Carlson with newly released video provided by Speaker McCarthy falsely portrays a January 6th riot as a peaceful gathering.
Clandestine tweets.
The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears.
It was their final, most essential command.
Chris, your thoughts?
You know, this reminds me of like when they were passing the Fed and everybody was at uproars back in the 1910s.
They were going after Morgan and Rockefeller and they kept blowing up their own maids with these bombs, you know, and forced them to really create the FBI and all these other, you know, agencies, you know, to help these poor victims who've established themselves in the public eye as victims when they're clearly perpetrators and Malevolent forces.
So, interesting to see how they can do this with perception and clout, and I think really people are seeing through this now, and maybe they're seeing it a little bit more evident today.
Maybe they have another rung of proxies between themselves and the actual theater now, but I don't think Rockefeller's personally out there like he used to be.
But, you know, similar type of thing.
You know, a puppet or two once removed, and it's the same concept.
Anyways, where I'm going with this, Matt, is by putting this type of situation preemptively on eggshells, so to speak, you really can Discourage anybody from taking a similar course of action, whether that course of action has been taken or not.
Think of the Whitmer kidnapping or things like that.
You know, where actually these people that are scoundrels, that are actually war criminals, actually face some sort of orchestrated retaliation against them from the outraged public.
And in theory, it's just an FBI ruse, and they're entrapping anybody with their political spectrum into targeting radicals in the first place.
They create them from their and being caught doing what they're doing, manipulating the technology by which they have to do it and the speed and efficiency by which they can do so.
Now we have with AI and many other quantum programs, computers and things like that.
So, yeah, I think it's really gone crazy.
And I think people have to have some respect because we couldn't quite pitch.
Even the same with the smallpox, that's what I was going to say, in the 1920s, similar to what they do in the 2020s with COVID.
Good, good, good, good.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, bro or con, to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Our colleague Carl Herman has shared the following three facts, proved by Tucker's January 6th film evidence, Demsurrectionists must ignore.
Number one, The Viking-horned Jacob Chansley, who was charged with violent entry to the Capitol and who was later depicted as having fought his way through the building to storm the Senate chambers, in fact, walked the hall calmly in the company of police officers who didn't try to stop him and who, in fact, sought to open doors for him, too.
Senator Josh Hawley, who was depicted by the January 6th Committee as a coward and who ran alone from the mob, In fact, followed police erections and left an area with many other legislators.
Third, Officer Brian Sicknick, who has repeatedly been depicted as an officer murdered by violent insurrectionists in the Capitol on January 6th, can be seen walking around unharmed in the Capitol after he's supposed to have been killed.
Meanwhile, final thoughts, Chris, yours.
Yeah, you made me think of like 9-11 when John Kerry was taking the George Costanza exit out of Congress that day.
That was pretty interesting.
I guess the footage was very entertaining.
I guess it was knocking over people trying to get Get to the escape hatch, but interesting there.
Anyways, yeah, we're facing some interesting times.
I think history is repeating itself and the technocracy by which they're trying to enslave us has increased, but really it's that the formula is the same, the culprits are the same.
And really we need to come together to not fall into their traps.
And we're not rendered so helpless under their control mechanisms and their schemes and everything like that.
I don't think there's anywhere you can go on earth to escape this group.
And I think the only thing left to do is to really stand and fight and make sure that, you know, they are punished sufficiently enough that this doesn't happen again.
Chris, I want to thank you for your excellent comments.
We had a little technical interference here and there, but we understood virtually all that you had to say today, for which I'm very grateful.
Let me just add that all the understanding of all the malevolent practices of the Democrats won't do any good if we can't get rid of the electronic voting machines they're using to steal election after election after election.
It happened in 2020.
It happened in 2022, and it's going to happen in 2024 if we do not return to paper ballots and hand counts.
Trump endorsing photo IDs to vote.
That's absolutely right.
He's on the right path, and every American who cares about the future of this country should join in those efforts.
Get rid of electronic voting machines, absolutely.
Get back to paper ballots and hand counts and photo IDs to vote.
The future of the nation hangs in the ballots.
Meanwhile, spend as much time as you can with your friend, your family, the people you love and care about this weekend.
We do not know how much time we have left.
▲
Export Selection